Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06.A- Community Development 6.A ORDINANCE (ID # 4535) DOC ID: 4535 C CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO — REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Public Hearing From: Mark Persico M/CC Meeting Date: 07/18/2016 Prepared by: Oliver Mujica, Dept: Community Development Ward(s): 3 Subject: Ordinance of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, California Approving General Plan Amendment 16-03 to Change the General Plan Land Use Designation of 11.02 Acres from Residential Urban to Residential Medium and Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01 to Change the Zoning District from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM) in Order to Allow the Development, Establishment of Operation of Mary's Village Located on the North Side of Walnut Street Between Pico Avenue and San Marcos Street (FIRST READING); And Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, California Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Approving Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 to Allow Development, Establishment and Operation of Mary's Village on a Parcel Containing Approximately 11.02 Acres Located on the North Side of Walnut Street Between Pico Avenue and San Marcos Street. (#4535) Current Business Registration Certificate: Financial Impact: The proposed Mary's Village project will result in increased property tax of an undetermined amount to accrue to the City. Mayor to open the hearing. . . Motion: 1) Close the hearing; 2) Lay over Ordinance (see Attachment 1) for final adoption; and 3) Adopt the Resolution (see Attachment 2) adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, approving Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09, based upon the recommended Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for construction and operation of a residential care facility for men. Applicant/Property Owner: Mary's Mercy Center PO Box 7563 San Bernardino, CA 92411 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: Updated: 7/12/2016 by Georgeann 'Gigi" Hanna C Packet Pg.480 n C/) > 0 MEL O c 3 QQL (D < > co �0 QL- 0- O N 0 `n30 � Z v o 3 M C0 Cn c� cp > cDO o3 � N 0- CD n CD CD 3. > cL 3 3 CD CD 0 CD 0L CD � � � n ono o o GJ 0 N C (D o zs : Z rt tz�CD :3 C7 r rt rt < 3 0- o (n cn Cl) > CD 0- � � O x CD CD ° (D FT a — — Q =3 7C3 � = � =37 m o � a n D (D 9 . . V CD ° Cn cn C v D N CD 0 9 Q U m CD d CD C7 Ll n CD m o Z cn rn V e Y, , .gas ' " r r , e B r o j oTM ca OR 4 F D CD rMIL C s z O ti �u } 1 r o 0 o v o r O rMIL r • • AWNW tk. SIC•..� �i.. ,.. r� , b �s r o } o cn 0 w - � .c YV I ak i�: trf� 4 �n �X �•ly� t. PROW r 0 0 c� c� 4nwx xd F _ cc MONr [ v �X I i xl n .k nr n ° CD CD CD CD W N O =0 0 CD N N C: W CD � N 0 0 0 N Cl) :3 O _0 Q � Co O -0 Co m . cn -1 � :3 N_0 C � C � CD CD CD cn � (n cn T CD cn — + E5' '{ (n r� —. CD O O CD CD �, CD CD CC 0 0 0 COD N � (n COD O � LM r-+• W O � ^ (n � 3 -0 u) � �' CL 0 n 3 0-. -0 CD CD — CO — CD rr O = — _= cn ■ ■' . CD `C O to � �" ,-+, d CD nO �< o CO ( O 3 a' < `< CD o 3 �. CL CD a- CL :3 C: N 3 = <' ^ ll< cn � Q �. � � rr cn w 0 cn CD rt (n O CL ago o :3 Q <" cn rt W (n 3 cn n O ' m � O0 O o ^* C7• Q Cn 3 3 mo m0 � � � C rn o _ I- CD 3 m � � (D (D 3 <• ° O CD cn m p O COD C. v -1 cn n < cn �- o O v CD — 3 m cn m �• Z ,--t- c � Cc CD CC cn O O CD �+ � �.CD CD cn _ _ p 0 m `< CD <, . O o o O O <• - C cn N• m cv N 70 O ,--� _ O CD m cn 3 7 :3 �. d � c� CD CD EL I � � m c� �A1 A ,s yin r -a��' � ,•���,�� ��„ r a y" 9 r E3zr 9irn ll Fn D D n r < rn , m4 a r Z - - - - , J, ( - ,- Ci) j-ARTPSIA ;-� STREET rn Fn v rn U) 0 z o U) w .. m � A tP o G� • -stn DC� = � 2m -11 = F -1 X35 vh � � �n rn corn Z �t a ;, N) O S I rn } i I I O �7 I I � { � I I I I ✓, 1 1 v ........... ... Cl) cn r 1 { A { I 3f. I C7 - C� � � v 0 X 0 CD rn c' = cn cn cn cn =3 o 3 o w iv o rn 0 0 0 0 �? r 0 0 0 .. D � CD -0 < < = = = = < (D E o o o z -� z 0 0 0 0 zCD 0 0 0 0 z C.P ` 3333 � Q O in =2. Z -� - - rt CD CD CD CD 0� i Q rn o ZT �' w CD CD CD in cn U) rt Cn m O r Z rt C/) rt CD W o rn ,« nw _. N CD 0- o m= 3 03 cn CD f-q- < Z CD 3o � 3 -0 C =r CD0 Q CD 0 M CD CD CD CD � � M CD o CL o Q M C)C- CAD O o Q �• � � CD Q Qo Z -n On 3 3 Z ° w < � _ Q ° < oz � n QLn. � CD 0 �- 3 O C7 N oo � � N CD 0 w c O =3 C?. O — (n N �' �D CD CD .-. CQ p d p N CD 3 70 CD � CD rt 4535 None Background: On April 20, 2016, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2016-014 (please see Attachment 3)forwarding a recommendation that the Mayor and Common Council: 1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and 2) Approve General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09, based upon the recommended Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval for construction and operation of a residential care facility for men. Project Description: Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.50 (General Plan Amendments), Chapter 19.42 (Development Code Amendments), Chapter 19.74 (Zoning Map Amendments), §19.04.010(2)(T) (Residential Zones Specific Standards - Social Services Use/ Centers), §19.36.020 (Conditional Use Permit Applications) and §19.66.020 (Subdivision Map Applications) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the applicant is requesting the approval of General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and the Zoning District of a site containing approximately 11.02 acres from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); the subdivision consolidating the existing parcels into four (4) separate parcels; and,. 1) The subdivision consolidating the existing parcels containing a total of 11.02 into four(4) parcels; 2) The change of the General Plan Land Use Designation from Residential Urban to Residential Medium and change the Zoning District from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); and, 3) The development, establishment and operation of Mary's Village as a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services, along with the construction of the required on-site and off-site improvements. Updated: 7/12/2016 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna C Packet Pg.481 6.A 4535 Analysis: Project Development - The proposed Mary's Village has been designed to comply with development standards of the City of San Bernardino Development Code. The multi-phased project ultimately envisions a village-type campus that will provide support to its residents to facilitate their full inclusion in the broader community. Phase I will encompass approximately 2.92 acres of the project and includes the construction of four (4) single-story residential buildings containing approximately 7,000 square feet each that will accommodate up to eighty-five (85) residents. These buildings will include common kitchen, dining and living areas, training rooms, and administrative offices. Phase 2 will encompass approximately 2.91 acres of the project and includes the development of approximately 17,000 square feet of medical, administrative, and educational space in up to three (3) buildings. Phase 3 will encompass approximately 3.05 acres of the project and envisions the construction of up to fifteen (15) rent-subsidized housing units for graduates of Mary's Village programs. Finally, Phase 4 will encompass approximately 2.14 acres of the project for the future construction of two (2) buildings containing up to a combined total of approximately 20,000 square feet to house support/community services and a chapel. Land Use - The project consists of the development of a men's residential complex that will provide comprehensive on-site medical, behavioral health, training and support services that offer a healthy alternative to substance abuse, mental illness or homelessness. The goal and objective of Mary's Village necessitates an extensive and comprehensive program that affords each man a sense of growth and development leading to integration of the man into a new life and society. The development of the proposed project and the implementation of the on-site programs seek to improve the lives of its resident population, and by extension, create a positive change in the broader community. Mary's Village seeks to address the wide range of needs of each individual client with a goal of increasing community safety and stimulating economic vitality. Since 1994, Mary's Mercy Center has provided similar services for women and children at its existing San Bernardino facility. Mary's Village proposes to provide long-term residential opportunities for men in an environment that promotes holistic healing, allowing each resident to integrate into society with a renewed sense of his own worth and dignity. Operations - The residents will live on-site 24 hours per day seven (7) days per week, and a typical resident is at the facility for a period of 12 to 18 months. When completed, Mary's Village will approximately 39 staff members and up to 115 residents. Site Design/Access/Traffic - The proposed development will be accessed from Walnut Street by Artesian Avenue and Pico Street, and from Congress Street. San Marcos Avenue will be improved to serve as an emergency access road. The internal site circulation has been designed to adequately accommodate on-site vehicular circulation and access to the parking areas. Designated "paths of travel" have also been provided to ensure pedestrian safety. The City's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and accepted the Focused Traffic Analysis prepared for the proposed development, and the appropriate traffic related mitigation measures/Conditions of Approval have been included. Architecture - The single-story "contemporary Mediterranean" architectural design comprised of stuccoed walls and tile roofs is intended to create a village setting that is compatible to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Updated: 7/12/2016 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna C Packet Pg.482 4535 General Plan Goals and Policies - The City of San Bernardino General Plan includes goals and policies to guide future development within the City, including the following: • Enhance the aesthetic quality of land uses and structures in San Bernardino. • Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in San Bernardino by strategic infill of new development and revitalization of existing development. • Control development and the use of land to minimize adverse impacts. With respect to the proposal, the applicant will be revitalizing the subject property in a manner that will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subject property thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. Through this proposal, the existing property will be transformed from a vacant underutilized site into a development that meets the City's special housing needs, while satisfying the Development Code requirements and will be adequately regulated through the Conditions of Approval in order to minimize potential impacts. Public Comments -Although there were no public comments submitted on the project prior to or during the public hearing by the Planning Commission, staff has received several letters in support prior to this meeting by the Mayor and Common Council (please see Attachment 7). California Environmental Quality Act: In accordance with §15063 (Initial Study) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant submitted and the Planning Division accepted an Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared in connection with General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 for the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and the Zoning District of a site containing approximately 11.02 acres from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); the subdivision consolidating the existing parcels into four(4) separate parcels; and, the development, establishment and operation of Mary's Village as a men's residential complex. Accordingly, pursuant to §15072 of CEQA, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 was posted on December 18, 2015 for the CEQA-mandated thirty (30) day public review and comment period, and there were no public written comments received or verbal comments presented. On January 14, 2016, the Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application and Environmental Determination of the Planning Division, and moved the Mitigated Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 to the Planning Commission for consideration. Conclusion: On April 20, 2016, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City of San Bernardino General Plan and Development Code, and that the application satisfies all Findings of Fact required for approval of General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09. Updated: 7/12/2016 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna C Packet Pg.483 6.A 4535 City Attorney Review: This staff report and supporting documentation has bee n reviewed by the Deputy City Attorney, and accepted as to form. Supporting Documents: Attachment 1: Ordinance Attachment 2: Resolution Attachment 3: Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-014 Attachment 4: Planning Commission Staff Report, dated April 20, 2016 Attachment 5: Planning Commission Minutes, dated April 20, 2016 Attachment 6: Display Ad Attachment 7: Support Letters City Attorney Review: Supporting Documents: Attachment 1 - Ordinance (DOC) Attachment 2 - Resolution (DOC) Attachment 2 - Resolution - Exhibit A - MMRP (PDF) Attachment 2 - Resolution - Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval - Exhibit A (PDF) Attachment 2 - Resolution - Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval (PDF) Attachment 3 - PC Resolution 2016-014 (PDF) Attachment 4 - PC Staff Report 4.20.16 (PDF) Attachment 5 - PC Minutes 4.20.16 (PDF) Attachment 6 - Display Ad (PDF) Attachment 7 - Support Letters (PDF) Updated: 7/12/2016 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna C Packet Pg.484 I ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-03 3 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF 11.02 ACRES o FROM RESIDENTIAL URBAN TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM AND 4 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT) 15-01 TO 5 CHANGE THE ZONING DISTRICT FROM RESIDENTIAL URBAN (RU) TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM) IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT, C 6 ESTABLISHMENT OF OPERATION OF MARY'S VILLAGE LOCATED ON THE c 7 NORTH SIDE OF WALNUT STREET BETWEEN PICO AVENUE AND SAN MARCOS STREET. 8 WHEREAS, the current City of San Bernardino Development Code was initially o L 9 P implemented in 1991; and < 10 N WHEREAS, the current City of San Bernardino General Plan was initially a 11 implemented in 2005; and 0 12 WHEREAS, on April 20, 2016, the Planning Commission of the City of San 13 Bernardino held a noticed public hearing to consider public testimony and the staff report, and a 0 14 adopted Resolution 2016-014 recommending the adoption of the Mitigated Negative m 15 Declaration and the approval of General Plan Amendment 16-01, Development Code 16 Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 to the Mayor and Common Council; and 1 WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing for the Mayor and Common Council's M 18 consideration of the proposed Ordinance was published in The Sun newspaper on July 8, 19 2016. 20 NOW THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE 0 O 21 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: w c 22 E 23 SECTION 1. The Mayor and Common Council find that the above-stated Recitals 24 are true and hereby adopt and incorporate them herein. a C m 25 SECTION 2. Findings of Fact—General Plan Amendment 16-03. 26 a 27 Finding No. 1: The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan. 28 1 Packet Pg.485 6.A.a 1 Finding of Fact: General Plan Housing Goal 3.1 states: "Facilitate the development of a 2 variety of types of housing to meet the needs of all income levels in the 3 City of San Bernardino." The proposed development, establishment o u_ T 4 and operation a men's residential complex providing comprehensive v 5 on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training 6 N O 7 and support services will provide additional housing opportunities in LO m 8 the southwestern area of the City, consistent with the General Plan goal Cnn 0 9 and policy cited above. Additionally, the proposed project is permitted a 10 within the proposed Residential Medium (RM) zone, subject to the a 11 v approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions vi 12 of Approval and CEQA determination, and the proposed Residential 13 a Medium (RM) zone is consistent with the Residential land use 14 , 15 designation set forth by the General Plan Land Use Map. > P 16 Finding No. 2: The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public ? 1 interest,health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. M 18 Finding of Fact: The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, d 19 c 20 health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that amendment = 0 21 from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM) will w c 22 facilitate the development, establishment and operation of a men's 23 residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional ca Q 24 housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services a 25 with the on-site and off-site improvements consistent with the City's 26 a 27 Development Code. The project site has direct access from both Walnut 28 Street and Congress Street, will be fully served by utility providers,will 2 Packet Pg.486 I be constructed in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations, 2 and will not result in the need for the excessive provision of services. 3 Finding No. 3 The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of o LO r 4 land uses within the City. D U 5 Finding of Fact: The proposed amendment from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential 6 N 0 Medium (RM) maintains an appropriate balance of land uses by r 7 m 8 providing for the revitalization of an existing under-utilized site. Thus, v=i 0 9 the proposed amendment will not change the balance of land uses in the T Q 10 City. N Q 11 U Finding No. 4 The subject parcels are physically suitable (including but not limited to, 0 12 0 access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, a 13 a 14 and adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the 15 requested land use designation and the anticipated land use 16 development 17 Finding of Fact: The vacant 11.02-acre site is which is currently vacant and under- M 18 LO utilized will provide for the accommodation of the development, 19 20 establishment and operation of a men's residential complex with the on- 0 21 site and off-site improvements consistent with the City's Development Y 22 Code, and there are no physical constraints on the site, such as steep 23 slopes or watercourses. f° Q 24 y SECTION 3. Findings of Fact — Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map 25 L 26 Amendment) 15-01. Y Q 27 Finding No. 1: The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan. 28 3 Packet Pg. 487 I Finding of Fact: The proposed development, establishment and operation a men's 2 residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional 3 housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services o Ln 4 will provide additional housing opportunities in the southwestern area a. v 5 of the City, consistent with the General Plan goal and policy cited C 6 0 above. Additionally, the proposed project is permitted within the LO rM m 8 proposed Residential Medium (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a CO VZ 9 Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions of Approval LO a 10 and CEQA determination, and the proposed Residential Medium (RM) a 11 � zone is consistent with the Residential land use designation set forth by 12 0 the General Plan Land Use Map and with the City's Development `r° 13 a 14 Code. m 15 Finding No. 2: The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public N 16 interest,health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. 1 Finding of Fact: The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, M 18 : v health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that amendment m 19 C 20 from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM) will = a 21 facilitate the development, establishment and operation of a men's C 22 residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional E 23 housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services Q 24 u with the on-site and off-site improvements consistent with the City's 25 s Development Code. The project site has direct access from both Walnut a 26 a 27 Street and Congress Street,will be fully served by utility providers,will 28 4 Packet Pg.488 1 be constructed in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations, 2 and will not result in the need for the excessive provision of services. 3 Finding No. 3 The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of o r 4 land uses within the City. D U 5 Finding of Fact: The proposed amendment from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential 6 `V O Medium (RM) maintains an appropriate balance of land uses by r 7 m 8 providing for the revitalization of an existing under-utilized site. Thus, Cn O 9 the proposed amendment will not change the balance of land uses in the Ln Q 10 City. N Q 11 U Finding No. 4 The subject parcels are physically suitable (including but not limited to, o cli 12 access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, 13 a 14 and adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the U 15 requested land use designation and the anticipated land use 16 development a 17 Finding of Fact: The vacant 11.02-acre site is which is currently vacant and under- M LO 18 utilized will provide for the accommodation of the development, d 19 20 establishment and operation of a men's residential complex with the on- S L 0 21 site and off-site improvements consistent with the City's Development w 22 Code, and there are no physical constraints on the site, such as steep 23 slopes or watercourses. f0 Q 24 SECTION 4. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality 25 1. The Mayor and Common Council has independently reviewed, analyzed and exercised w 26 a 27 judgment in finding that General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment 28 (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and 5 Packet Pg.489 6.A.a 1 Conditional Use Permit 15-09 will have no significant adverse effect on the environment with %Nor 2 incorporation of the Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures; and determining that 3 the Mitigated Negative Declaration, as accepted by the Planning Commission as to the effects o T 4 of this proposed project, is hereby adopted. 5 SECTION 5.—General Plan Amendment 16-03, changing the General Plan Land Use 6 N 0 7 Designation from Residential Urban to Residential Medium for the properties known as m 8 Assessor Parcel Numbers 0137-051-07, 32 and 33; 0137-101-05 and 06; 0274-011-05, 14 and 0 0 9 28; 0274-022-01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and 06; 0274-023-08, 09. 10 and 11; 0274-023-12 through Lh 10 222; 0274-023-26 through 38; 0274-023-40, 41 and 43; 0274-024-06 through 13; and, 0274- a 11 v 024-21,is hereby approved. ° 12 0 SECTION 6. — Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-03, a 13 a 14 changing the Zoning District from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM) for 15 the properties known as Assessor Parcel Numbers 0137-051-07, 32 and 33; 0137-101-05 and Vi 16 06; 0274-011-05, 14 and 28; 0274-022-01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and 06; 0274-023-08, 09. 10 and 11; 17 0274-023-12 through 222; 0274-023-26 through 38; 0274-023-40, 41 and 43; 0274-024-06 M 18 through 13; and, 0274-024-21, is hereby approved. m 19 20 SECTION 7. — Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use = 0 21 Permit 15-09, as approved by Resolution, is incorporated herein by reference. T c 22 SECTION 8. - Notice of Determination: The Planning Division of the Community 23 Development Department is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County r Q 24 w Clerk of the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's compliance with California 25 26 Environmental Quality Act in adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration. a 27 SECTION 9. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or 28 clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be 6 Packet Pg.490 6.A.a 1 unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision 2 shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any 3 part thereof. The Mayor and Common Council hereby declares that it would have adopted o Ln 4 each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, U 5 clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. 6 N O LO 7 m 8 Cn 9 /// Ln T Q 10 N Q 12 M /// (0 a 13 CL 14 , 15 Y) 16 17 /// Ln M LO 18 /// �- d 19 C 20 /// 0 21 22 E L 23 w a 24 25 /// 26 a /// 27 28 7 Packet Pg.491 1 ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,CALIFORNIA APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-03 2 TO CHANGE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION OF 11.02 ACRES FROM RESIDENTIAL URBAN TO RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM AND 3 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT) 15-01 TO o CHANGE THE ZONING DISTRICT FROM RESIDENTIAL URBAN (RU) TO r 4 RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM (RM) IN ORDER TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT, 5 ESTABLISHMENT OF OPERATION OF MARY'S VILLAGE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WALNUT STREET BETWEEN PICO AVENUE AND SAN 6 MARCOS STREET. o LO 7 m I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor 8 v, and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 0 9 day of , 2016,by the following vote to wit: r a 10 N 11 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT a U O MARQUEZ 12 M BARRIOS 13 VALDIVIA Q a c� 14 SHORETT 15 NICKEL RICHARD y 16 MULVIHILL 17 ,n M to 18 : Georgeann Hanna, City Clerk aD 19 c �a c 20 The foregoing Ordinance is hereby adopted this day of 12016. O 21 c 22 R. CAREY DAVIS, Mayor = 23 Approved as to form: City of San Bernardino 24 Gary D. Saenz, City Attorney Q c 25 E By: 26 a 27 28 8 Packet Pg.492 p I RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE 3 DECLARATION AND APPROVING SUBDIVISION 15-02 (TENTATIVE PARCEL o MAP 19648) AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-09 TO ALLOW THE 4 DEVELOPMENT, ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF MARY'S VILLAGE ON 5 A PARCEL CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 11.02 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WALNUT STREET BETWEEN PICO AVENUE AND SAN MARCOS 6 STREET. o LO 7 WHEREAS, on June 11, 2015, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.50 co 8 (General Plan Amendments), Chapter 19.42 (Development Code Amendments), Chapter (n 0 9 19.74 (Zoning Map Amendments), §19.04.010(2)(T) (Residential Zones Specific Standards - 10 Social Services Uses/Centers), §19.36.020 (Conditional Use Permit Applications) and N §19.66.020 (Subdivision Map Applications) of the City of San Bernardino Development v 11 a 12 Code, an application for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment o (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and a 13 Conditional Use Permit 15-09 was duly submitted by: 14 15 Property Owner: Mary's Mercy Center > 16 4740 Green River Road, Suite 118 L Glendora, CA 91740 17 ,t, Project Applicant: Mary's Mercy Center LO 18 4740 Green River Road, Suite 118 19 Glendora, CA 91740 0 r 20 Parcel Address: North Side of Walnut Street, Between Pico Avenue and San Marcos Street 21 APN'S: 0137-051-07, 32 and 33; 0137-101-05 and 06; 0274-011-05, 14 N 22 and 28; 0274-022-01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and 06; 0274-023-08, 09. 10 and 11; 0274-023-12 through 222; 0274-023-26 through 38; E 23 0274-023-40, 41 and 43; 0274-024-06 through 13; and, 0274- 024-21 a 24 Lot Area: 11.02 acres CD 25 26 WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment 16-03 is a request to allow the change of the r a 27 General Plan Land Use Designation of the subject 11.02 acre site from Residential Urban to 28 Residential Medium; and 1 Packet,Pg.493 6.A.b, 1 WHEREAS, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01 is a 2 request to allow the change of the Zoning District of the subject 11.02 acre site from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); and 3 0 WHEREAS, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) is a request to ' 4 consolidate the existing vacant parcels containing approximately 11.02 acres into four (4) U 5 separate parcels; and c� 6 WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit 15-09 is a request to allow the development, o Ln 7 establishment and operation of Mary's Village as a men's residential complex providing m 8 comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and ai 9 support services; and LO WHEREAS, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department has 10 N reviewed General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map a 11 Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use r> 12 Permit 15-09 for consistency with the City of San Bernardino General Plan and compliance T 13 with the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and a. 14 WHEREAS, pursuant to requirements of §15063 of the California Environmental 6 15 Quality Act, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department accepted the > 16 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration submitted by the applicant for General Plan , Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, 17 Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09; and LO 18 : WHEREAS, on December 18, 2015, pursuant to §15072 of the California = 19 2 Environmental Quality Act, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was _M 20 ° posted for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map 0 21 Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use 1� w C 22 Permit 15-09 for the CEQA-mandated thirty (30) day public review and comment period, and E s 23 there were no public written comments received or verbal comments presented; and 24 WHEREAS, on January 14, 2016, pursuant to the requirements of §19.36.040, Q r c 25 §19.42.020, §19.50.020, §19.66.150 and §19.74.020 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the r 26 a application and moved the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16-03, 27 Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 28 2 Packet Pg.494 EMIL- 1 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 to the Planning Commission for consideration; and 2 WHEREAS, on April 20, 2016, pursuant to the requirements of §19.52.040 of the 3 9 City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission held the duly noticed LO 4 public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or CL U 5 opposition to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and R 6 Reporting Program submitted by the applicant for General Plan Amendment 16-03, c 7 Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 m 8 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09, and at which meeting the Cn Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2016-014 recommending to the Mayor and LO 9 r Common Council the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the approval of 10 N General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) a 11 U 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09; ° ri 12 and 13 WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapters 19.36, 19.42, 19.50, 19.66 and CL 14 19.74 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Mayor and Common Council has 15 the authority to take action on the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 , (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use 15-09; and 17 LO WHEREAS, notice of the July 18, 2016 public hearing for the Mayor and Common � 18 Council's consideration of the proposed Resolution was published in The Sun newspaper on = ° 19 July 8 2016, and was mailed to property owners within a 500 foot radius of the project site in .2 20 0 accordance with Development Code Chapter 19.52. d W 21 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON N c 22 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: E 23 SECTION 1. The Mayor and Common Council find that the above-stated Recitals CU 24 are true and hereby adopt and incorporate them herein. a 25 SECTION 2. Findings of Fact—Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648). E Finding No. 1: The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan. 26 a Finding of Fact: The proposed Tentative Parcel Map to accommodate the development, 27 establishment and operation of a men's residential complex providing 28 3 Packet Pg.495 6.A.b 1 comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off-site 2 improvements will provide additional housing opportunities with the 3 9 City, the proposed project is permitted within the proposed Residential 4 Medium (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a General Plan U 5 Amendment, Development Code Amendment/Zoning Code �a 6 Amendment and Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate o Lh 7 Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination, and the proposed m 8 Residential Medium (RM) zone is consistent with the proposed 9 Residential land use designation set forth by the General Plan Land Use Map. 10 N Finding No. 2: The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent Q U 11 with the General Plan. ° M 12 Finding of Fact: General Plan Land Use Goal 2.2 states: Promote development that T 13 integrates with surrounding land uses." The proposed Tentative Parcel D_ 14 Map will be consistent with the pattern of development within the 6 15 existing surrounding neighborhood. 16 General Plan Land Use policy 2.7.5 states: "Require that developments conform to the availability of public infrastructure to accommodate its 17 ,t; demands and mitigate its impacts." The proposed Tentative Parcel Map M 18 will connect to existing water and sewer services, roads, storm drains, o 19 and private utilities. 20 Finding No. 3 The site is physically suitable for the type of development. 21 Finding of Fact: The proposed project is permitted within the proposed Residential w 22 Medium (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a General Plan E 23 Amendment, Development Code Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment 24 and Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions of a 25 Approval and CEQA determination. The subject site as a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional U 26 a housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services 27 with the on-site and off-site improvements is sufficient in size to 28 4 Packet Pg 496 6.A.b 1 accommodate the proposal under General Plan Amendment 16-03, 2 Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use 3 Permit 15-09 as required by the City of San Bernardino Development 4 Code. Therefore, the subject site is physically suitable for the proposal. v 5 Finding No. 4 The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. _ is 6 Finding of Fact: The development, establishment and operation of a men's residential o W 7 complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and m 8 medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on- C4 VZ site and off-site improvements is permitted within the proposed 9 9 Residential Medium (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a General .4 10 N Plan Amendment, Development Code Amendment/Zoning Map a 11 V Amendment and Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate ri 12 Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination. The subject site as a T 13 men's residential complex is sufficient in size to accommodate the CL 14 proposal under Development Conditional Use Permit 15-09 as required a� ea 15 by the City of San Bernardino Development Code. Therefore, the 16 subject site is physically suitable for the proposal. 17 Finding No. 5: The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not LO cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably u 18 injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. c 19 Finding of Fact: The design of the subdivision will not have any significant negative 20 impacts to wildlife or their habitat. The project site is an existing 0 21 developed site and surrounded by urban development. No significant N c 22 negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result from re- 23 use of the existing site already developed with commercial uses. 24 Finding No. 6: The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause a 25 serious public health problems. Finding of Fact: The design of the proposed subdivision meets all of the applicable r 26 a Development Code requirements and will not result in any serious 27 public health problems. The proposed parcels will have access to 28 5 6.A.b existing public streets. Existing utilities and public services are 1 2 available to serve the project site and ensure the maintenance of public health and safety. 3 9 Finding No. 7 The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not Ln 4 conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access a. U 5 through or use of,property within the proposed subdivision. _ 6 Finding of Fact: The design of the subdivision will not conflict with any public or c Lh 7 private easements. All documentation relating to easements and m 8 dedications will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior T 9 to recordation of the Final Map. Existing easements will be reserved in place or relocated, as necessary. 10 N SECTION 3. Findings of Fact—Conditional Use Permit 15-09. a 11 � Finding No. 1: The proposed use is conditionally permitted within, and would not ri 12 impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and o 13 complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Development a. 14 Code. , 15 Finding of Fact: The proposed project is a conditionally permitted use, pursuant to 16 Development Code §19.04.010(2)(T)(C). The project site will be located within the Residential Medium (RM) zone as proposed by 17 Q General Plan Amendment 16-03 and Development Code Amendment 18 v (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, and is substantially surrounded by = 19 2 existing residential uses. The proposed development will comply with _ 20 ° all applicable Development Code standards, such as parking 0 21 landscaping, building setbacks and height, etc. Further, the N c 22 development of the subject property will enhance the appearance of the 23 vacant and under-utilized property. Therefore, the project would not 24 impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district or be a 25 detrimental to surrounding properties. d Finding No. 2: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. r 26 Q Finding of Fact: The General Plan Housing Goal 3.1 states: "Facilitate the development 27 of a variety of types of housing to meet the needs of all income levels in 28 6 Packet Pg. 498 1 the City of San Bernardino." The proposed development, establishment 2 and operation a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training 3 9 and support services will provide additional housing opportunities in LO 4 the southwestern area of the City, consistent with the General Plan goal U 5 and policy cited above. Additionally, the proposed project is permitted 6 within the proposed Residential Medium (RM) zone, subject to the c LO 7 approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions m 8 of Approval and CEQA determination, and the proposed Residential u°i 9 Medium (RM) zone is consistent with the Residential land use LO t designation set forth by the General Plan Land Use Map. Therefore the 10 N proposed project would be compatible with surrounding land uses and a U 11 consistent with the General Plan. ° crs 12 Finding No. 3 Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use is in CD 13 compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental D_ 14 Quality Act(CEQA) and §19.20.030(6) of the Development Code. 15 Finding of Fact: In accordance with §15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act 16 (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared L in connection with General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code 17 LO Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 M 18 `" (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 for the C 19 2 development, establishment and operation of a men's residential 20 ° complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and 0 21 medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on- 1: C 22 site and off-site improvements. In accordance with §15097 of CEQA, a E 23 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared in 24 order to ensure that the mitigation measures are implemented to prevent Q 25 potential environmental impacts. Approval of the proposed project would not result in any impacts on the environment. 26 a 27 28 7 Packet Pg.499 1 Finding No. 4 There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly 2 mitigated and monitored. 3 ° Finding of Fact: The project site is an in-fill lot and the surrounding area is urbanized. LO 4 Therefore, no significant negative impacts on the environment are a. U 5 anticipated to result from the proposed men's residential complex. 6 Finding No. 5: The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed c 7 use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the m 8 general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will not Cn 9 create significant noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may LO be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or 10 N adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of N U 11 the City. ° M 12 Finding of Fact: The proposed design is in compliance with the Development Code 13 requirements that are applicable to location, height and setbacks for the 0- 14 proposed men's residential complex. All access to the subject property 6 15 will be through points of access from Walnut Street and Congress Street. Therefore, the design of the project will ensure that the project , 16 will not create any significant noise, traffic, or other conditions that 17 LO would be detrimental or objectionable to other uses in the vicinity or M 18 : adverse to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. _ 19 ° Finding No. 6: The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity 20 of use being proposed. 21 Finding of Fact: The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the 1• C 22 project being proposed as evidenced by project compliance with all E 23 applicable Development Code Standards. The size of the project site is 24 adequate to accommodate the proposed improvements, in compliance a c with the requirements of the Development Code. 25 26 Finding No. 7 There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not a 27 be detrimental to public health and safety. 28 8 Packet Pg. 500 6.A.b 1 Finding of Fact: The site has direct access off of Walnut Street and Congress Street. All 2 agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation and other public services to the site have had the opportunity 3 to review the proposal, and none indicated inability to serve the project .n 4 site. Establishment of the proposed men's residential complex, subject U 5 to Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to public services or 6 public health and safety. o LA 7 SECTION 4. Compliance with the California Environmental Quality m 8 1. The Mayor and Common Council has independently reviewed, analyzed and exercised (n T 9 judgment in finding that General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment LO r (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and 10 N Conditional Use 15-09 will have no significant adverse effect on the environment with Q 11 incorporation of the Conditions of Approval and mitigation measures; and determining that ° M 12 the Mitigated Negative Declaration, as accepted by the Planning Commission as to the effects 13 of this proposed project, is hereby adopted. a. 14 2. Mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been a� 15 compiled in a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for General Plan Amendment > 16 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 L (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09. The Mayor and Common 17 ,t; Council hereby approve the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program attached as Exhibit M 18 A, and incorporated herein by reference. o 19 SECTION 5. — General Plan Amendment 16-03, as approved by Ordinance, is 0 20 incorporated herein by reference. y a� 21 SECTION 6. — Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, as N C 22 approved by Ordinance, is incorporated herein by reference. E 23 SECTION 7. — Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use c� w 24 Permit 15-09, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit B and Q c 25 incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved. 26 SECTION 8. - Notice of Determination: The Planning Division of the Community r Development Department is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Q 27 28 9 Packet'Pg.501 6.A.b 1 Clerk of the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's compliance with California 2 Environmental Quality Act in adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration. SECTION 9. Severability: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, or 3 9 clause or phrase in this Resolution or any part thereof is for any reason held to be Ln 4 unconstitutional, invalid or ineffective by any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision U 5 shall not affect the validity or effectiveness of the remaining portions of this Resolution or any 6 part thereof. The Mayor and Common Council hereby declares that it would have adopted c Ln 7 each section irrespective of the fact that any one or more subsections, subdivisions, sentences, m 8 clauses, or phrases be declared unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective. N T LO 9 r 10 N vi U 12 /// T- .4 13 HI a. 14 /// 6 15 HI 16 /// 17 Ln Lo 18 HI o 19 0 20 21 HI c 22 /// E 23 24 25 E 26 /// Y a 27 HI 28 10 Packet Pg.502 6.A.b 1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE 2 DECLARATION AND APPROVING SUBDIVISION 15-02 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648) AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-09 TO ALLOW THE 3 DEVELOPMENT, ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF MARY'S VILLAGE ON c LO A PARCEL CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 11.02 ACRES LOCATED ON THE 4 NORTH SIDE OF WALNUT STREET BETWEEN PICO AVENUE AND SAN MARCOS 0. 5 STREET. _ 6 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor o 7 and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on the m day of , 2016,by the following vote to wit: 8 T O LO 9 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT r a 10 MARQUEZ N 'a 11 BARRIOS M 12 VALDIVIA T 13 SHORETT d c� 14 NICKEL a� 15 RICHARD 16 MULVIHILL 17 LO M Ln 18 Georgeann Hanna, City Clerk 19 20 The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this day of , 2016. y as 21 N C 22 R. CAREY DAVIS, Mayor E 23 Approved as to form: City of San Bernardino Y Q 24 Gary D. Saenz, ., City Attorney 25 U 26 By: a 27 28 11 Packet Pg. 503 now 6.A.a Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration a> 0 LO a MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM c N This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for use in implementing 9 mitigation for the: m Mary's Village Project N r O The program has been prepared in compliance with State law and the Mitigated Negative Declaration LO (MND) prepared for the project by the City of San Bernardino(City.) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring N Q program for those measures placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the o environment(Public Resource Code Section 21081.6). The law states that the reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. o T The monitoring program contains the following elements: Q a 0 1) The mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure ai CD compliance. In some instances, one action may be used to verify implementation of several mitigation measures. j 2) A procedure for compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported. 3) The program has been designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to compliance M procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the v program. As changes are made, new monitoring compliance procedures and records will be o. developed and incorporated into the program. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program includes mitigation identified in the MND. Q MITIGATION MONITORING AND RESPONSIBILITIES x W As the Lead Agency, the City is responsible for ensuring full compliance with the mitigation measures adopted for the proposed project. The City will monitor and report on all mitigation activities. o Mitigation measures will be implemented at different stages of development throughout the project area. In this regard, the responsibilities for implementation have been assigned to the Applicant, y Contractor, or a combination thereof. If during the course of project implementation, any of the mitigation measures identified herein cannot be successfully implemented, the City shall be immediately informed, and the City will then inform any affected responsible agencies. The City, in N conjunction with any affected responsible agencies, will then determine if modification to the project is required and/or whether alternative mitigation is appropriate. E w Q c m E s Q Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1 Packet Pg.504 s.A.� Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration N Q U 0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CHECKLIST o 9 Project Name: Mary's Village Project Applicant: Mary's Mercy Center, a Inc. c� Date: March 8,2016 , Sanctions > R N Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Responsible for Timing of Method of Verified D. for L Action Monitoring Verification Verification Initials Compliance AIR QUALITY LO M AIR-1 The project shall comply with the City Planner or Prior to the Evidence the Withhold v requirements of SCAQMD Rules 402 and Designee issuance of stated measures grading 403, Fugitive Dust, which require the grading an have been permit or stop implementation of Reasonable Available permits,and/or incorporated into work order Control Measures(RACM)for all fugitive dust during grading construction sources, and the AQMP, which identifies activities documents Q Best Available Control Measures (BACM) and/or site visit and Best Available Control Technologies during grading x (BACT) for area sources and point sources, w respectively. This would include but would not be limited to the following actions: 0 .? 1. The project proponent shall ensure that o construction equipment is properly maintained and serviced to minimize exhaust emissions. w 2. The project proponent shall ensure that v existing power sources are utilized where E feasible via temporary power lines to U avoid on-site power generation. Q 3. The project proponent shall ensure that C construction employees be informed of m ride-sharing and transit opportunities. s U l0 a Packet Pg.505 Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration N Sanctions Mitigation Measure No. Implementing a U O ri 0 Responsible D. m Action Monitoring Verification Verification Initials Compliance Q CL 4. The project proponent shall ensure that any portion of the site to be graded shall rn be prewatered to a depth of three feet `_° prior to the onset of grading activities. > N _ 5. The project proponent shall ensure that L, twice daily watering of the site or other `° soil stabilization methods shall be employed on an ongoing basis after the M initiation of any on-site grading activity. a Portions of the site that are actively being a graded shall be watered regularly to ensure that a crust is formed on the ground surface, and shall be watered at the end of each workday. a 6. The project proponent shall ensure that n x all disturbed areas are treated to prevent W erosion until the site is constructed. c 7. To reduce the potential for wind erosion, o the project proponent shall ensure that landscaped areas, if any, are installed as ° soon as possible. 8. The project proponent shall ensure that SCAQMD Rule 403 is adhered to, ensuring the cleanup of construction- E related dirt on approach routes to the U project site. 9. The project proponent shall ensure that Q all grading activities are suspended m during first and second stage ozone L episodes or when wind speeds exceed v R a Packet Pg.506 Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration Sanctions Mitigation Measure No. Implementing N Q U D M Responsible for Timing of Method of Verif . for 9 0 Action Monitoring Verification Verification Initials Compliance a IL 25 miles per hour. ci 10. Cover all trucks hauling dirt,sand,soil,or R other loose materials,or maintain at least 0.6 m(2 feet)of freeboard(vertical space H between the top of the load and top of the trailer) in accordance with the m requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC)Section 23114. M 11. Limit all on-site traffic speeds to 15 mph v or less. a o: GREENHOUSE GAS M GHG-1 To ensure that the proposed project City Planner Prior to the Evidence of Withhold Q complies with and would not conflict with or and/or City issuance of incorporation of building impede the implementation of reduction goals Building Official building permits applicable and permits r identified in Assembly Bill (AB)32, the (or designees) appropriate x w Governor's Executive Order (EO)S-3-05, features and and other strategies to help reduce practices into 0 greenhouse gases (GHGs) to the level project design proposed by the Governor, the project will y implement a variety of measures that will reduce its GHG emissions. To the extent feasible,and to the satisfaction of the City of N San Bernardino(City), the following measures will be incorporated into the design E E and construction of the project (including s specific building projects): =° Q Construction and Building Materials. c Use locally produced and/or manufactured £ building materials for at least 10 percent of m a Packet Pg.507 Omn- 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration < Sanctions N_ Q U 0 Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Responsible for Timing of Method of Verified Date/ for Non- Verification Q a the construction materials used for the 0 project. - Recycle/reuse at least 50 percent of the demolished and/or grubbed construction _v, materials (including, but not limited to, soil, vegetation, concrete, lumber, metal, and cardboard)if feasible. Ln - Use "Green Building Materials," such as a those materials that are resource-efficient and are recycled and manufactured in an environmentally friendly way, for at least 10 percent of the project. Energy Efficiency Measures. - Design all project buildings to meet or ° s exceed the California Building Code's (CBC) x W Title 24 energy standard, including, but not limited to,any combination of the following: 0 Increase insulation such that heat transfer and thermal bridging is minimized; Limit air leakage through the structure or within the heating and cooling distribution N system to minimize energy consumption;and Incorporate ENERGY STAR or better L rated windows, space heating and cooling equipment,light fixtures,appliances,or other Q applicable electrical equipment. c - Install efficient lighting and lighting control systems. Use daylight as an integral part of E U Q Packet Pg.508 Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration N 'a U 0 Sanctions Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Responsible for Timing of Method of Verified Date/ for Non- Action Monitoring Verification Verification Initials Compliance ri 0 Q CL the lighting systems in buildings. 0 ci Install"cool'roofs and cool pavements. 0 Install energy-efficient heating and > cooling systems, appliances and equipment, and control systems. � Install solar lights or light-emitting diodes (LEDs)for outdoor lighting or outdoor lighting M that meets the San Bernardino City Code. v Water Conservation and Efficiency a. Measures. 5- Devise a comprehensive water conservation strategy appropriate for the Q project and its location. The strategy may a include the following, plus other innovative X measures that may be appropriate: W Create water-efficient landscapes within 0 the development. Install water-efficient irrigation systems ° 0 and devices, such as soil moisture-based irrigation controls. a Use reclaimed water, if available, for landscape irrigation within the project. Install E the infrastructure to deliver and use reclaimed water,if available. c m Q Design buildings to be water-efficient. Install water-efficient fixtures and appliances, m including low-flow faucets and waterless E U A Q Packet Pg.509 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration < Sanctions N_ Q U O 0 Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Responsible for Timing of Method of D. Non- Action Monitoring Verification Verification Initials m Compliance Q a U urinals. ci Restrict watering methods (e.g., prohibit R systems that apply water to nonvegetated surfaces)and control runoff. N T Solid Waste Measures. `m - To facilitate and encourage recycling to reduce landfill-associated emissions, among others, the project will provide trash v enclosures that include additional enclosed CL area(s)for collection of recyclable materials. The recycling collection area(s) will be located within,near,or adjacent to each trash and rubbish disposal area. The recycling Q collection area will be a minimum of 50 percent of the area provided for the trash/ r rubbish enclosure(s) or as approved by the t+ waste management department of the City of c San Bernardino. - Provide employee education on waste o reduction and available recycling services. N Transportation Measures. N - To facilitate and encourage nonmotorized m transportation, bicycle racks shall be E provided in convenient locations to facilitate r U bicycle access to the project area. The bicycle racks shall be shown on project Q landscaping and improvement plans c submitted for Planning Department approval and shall be installed in accordance with £ U m Q Packet Pg.510 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration Sanctions N a U 0 Implementing Mitigation Measure No. , Datel for Non- Action m Verification • Q CL those plans. O ai - Provide pedestrian walkway and R connectivity requirements. a BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES BIO-1 A pre-construction burrowing owl City Planner or Prior to the Submittal of Withhold survey shall be conducted within 3 days prior Designee issuance of burrowing owl grading to beginning of site grading. This survey grading permits survey report to permits LO maybe conducted simultaneously with the the City and,as v nesting bird survey in Mitigation Measure appropriate: (. BIO-2. Surveys and relocation, if applicable, shall be conducted between September 1 1)Evidence and January 31. It is anticipated that the appropriate survey protocols will, at a minimum, reflect buffers and Q the standards of the CDFW Staff Report on protection-in- a Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If burrowing owls place measures s are not located on site, no further mitigation have been w u is required. If burrowing owls are on the site established = the following requirements shall apply: OR If burrowing owls are found on site during the y pre-construction surveys, they will be 2)Submittal of a protected in place through the use of buffer Burrowing owl zones, visual screens, or other measures, Relocation Plan while construction activities are occurring.The and relocation of m CDFW Staff Report on Burrowing Mitigation owls. £ includes appropriate buffer zones based on the timing of construction that will be implemented, if needed. If occupied burrows Q are too close to proposed construction areas to allow for appropriate protection in place, a qualified biologist will discuss additional m Q Packet Pg.511 6'rA.a Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration N Q U Sanctions M 0 Action Mitigation Measure • Monitoring Verification Verification Initials Compliance Q a avoidance options with CDFW. ui - If needed, owls will be relocated by a R qualified biologist from any occupied burrows j that cannot be avoided by project activities w into adjacent suitable habitat. Suitable habitat is undeveloped land that can meet the m burrowing owl's life cycle requirements (for both foraging and breeding) and is not M intended for development. Suitable habitat must be adjacent or near the disturbance site a. or artificial burrows will need to be provided nearby. Once the biologist has confirmed that 2 the owls have left the burrow, burrows should be excavated using hand tools and refilled to Q prevent reoccupation. L - Owls shall be excluded from burrows using x w passive relocation techniques within the approved limits of disturbance and an c 0 appropriate buffer zone. This will be ._ conducted by a qualified biologist by installing o one-way doors in burrow entrances. The qualified biologist will also determine whether creation of artificial burrows is necessary as a part of the relocation effort. A Burrowing Owl Relocation Plan B (Relocation Plan) prepared by a qualified A biologist shall be submitted to the CDFW for Q review and approval prior to relocation of owls. The Relocation Plan shall describe proposed a m relocation and monitoring plans and shall £ include the number and location(s) of m Q Packet Pg.512 Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration Sanctions Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Responsible for Timing of Method of Verified Date/ for Non- Action Monitoring Verification Verification Initials Compliance N_ Q U D M 0 a occupied burrow sites and details on adjacent O or nearby suitable habitat available to owls for rn relocation. If no suitable habitat is available 2 nearby for relocation, details regarding the > creation of artificial burrows (numbers, locations, and type of burrows) shall be included in the plan.The Relocation Plan shall 2 also describe proposed mitigation to M compensate for impacts to burrowing owls/ .n occupied burrows within the project site. a BIO-2 If project activities are planned during City Planner or Prior to the Submittal of a Withhold the avian nesting season (approximately Designee issuance of Nesting Bird grading �l February 1 through August 31), nesting bird grading permit Survey and,as permit surveys shall be conducted within three days appropriate: Q prior to disturbance to ensure birds protected :° under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) 1)Evidence K are not disturbed by construction-related appropriate W activities such as noise and increased human buffers have o presence. Any active nests detected in the been established area shall be flagged and an appropriate 0 buffer around the nest location will be 0 w established, as determined by the CDFW. The buffer area is to be avoided until the N nesting cycle is complete or it is determined by the biologist that the nest has failed. E r CULTURAL RESOURCES m CULA If cultural resources (archaeologic) City Planner or Prior to the Evidence the Withhold a are discovered during construction activities, City Building and issuance of construction grading a qualified archaeologist and/or historian Safety grading permits documents permit and/or 0) shall be retained to assess the nature and Department(or and during include issuance of a E -. .....------ ........ ....... _ __ m Q Packet Pg.513 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration Sanctions N_ Q U ri 0 Monitoring Mitigation Measure No. Implementing Action co • • Q a. significance of the find,diverting construction designees) construction instructions in stop work 0 if necessary. The archaeologist and/or the event such a order rn historian shall have the authority to redirect resources is m ground-disturbing activities in the vicinity of detected,and as the find until the nature and extent of the find applicable, can be evaluated. Any such resource ` R uncovered shall be recorded and/or removed 1)Evidence per applicable guidelines, in consultation and appropriate cooperation with San Bernardino County buffer areas `O Museum staff, appropriate Native American have been �! tribal representatives, and/or the County established Historical Society. AND 2) Completion of a required a evaluation by a w qualified archeologist(s). o CUL-2 If paleontological resources are City Planner or Prior to the Evidence the Withhold ._ discovered during grading, a qualified City Building and issuance of construction grading N paleontologist will be retained to evaluate the Safety grading permits documents permit and/or resource and then monitor the remaining Department(or and during include issuance of a ground-disturbing activities. The qualified designees) construction instructions in stop work a paleontologist shall have the authority to the event such a order redirect ground-disturbing activities in the resources is E vicinity of the find until the nature and extent detected,and as r U of the find can be evaluated. Any such applicable, =° resource uncovered during the course of Q project-related construction shall be recorded 1) Completion of and/or removed per applicable guidelines, in required E consultation and cooperation with San evaluation by a ........ ...... -- Q Packet Pg.514 � 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration N 4 U O Sanctions M 0 Mitigation Measure No. Implementing r Monitoring• • Q CL Bernardino County Museum staff. Any qualified 0 recovery activity shall be consistent with paleontologist(s) applicable City and/or State regulations. m GEOLOGY AND SOILS ) a GEO-1 Prior to issuance of the grading City Engineer or Prior to the Submittal of Withhold m permits,the developer shall provide evidence designee issuance of plans to the City grading to the City for review and approval that the grading and/or that incorporate and/or M location and design of all proposed buildings building permits design and building and facilities incorporate the building permits recommendations identified in the project- requirements a specific geotechnical study. This measure cited in the site- 2 shall be implemented to the satisfaction of specific the City Engineer. geotechnical Q investigation. ., HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY x HYD-1 Prior to the issuance of a grading City Engineer or Prior to the Submittal of Withhold W permit, the project applicant shall file and designee issuance of evidence to the grading c obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the grading permit City that NPDES permit °- Regional Water Quality Control Board in filing ' order to be in compliance with the State requirement(s) NPDES General Construction Storm Water have been Permit for discharge of surface runoff satisfied. a associated with construction activities. c Evidence that this has been obtained (i.e., a d copy of the Waste Discharger's Identification Number) shall be submitted to the City for R coverage under the NPDES General Q Construction Permit. The NOI shall address • the potential for an extended and discontinuous construction period based on E R Packet-Pg.515 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration N_ Q V 0 Sanctions M O Mitigation Non- Action• • - Responsible• • • Date/ • f0 Verification Q IL funding availability. c) ui rn HYD-2 Prior to the issuance of grading, the City Engineer or Prior to the Submittal of Withhold R project applicant shall submit to and receive designee issuance of evidence to the grading j approval from the City of San Bernardino a grading permit City that the permit Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan project-specific R (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall include a SWPPP has surface water control plan and erosion been approved control plan citing specific measures to by the RWQCB. ,M control on-site and off-site erosion during the a entire grading and construction period. In 0- addition, the SWPPP shall emphasize structural and nonstructural Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control sediment and non-visible discharges from the Q site. The SWPPP will include inspection B forms for routine monitoring of the site during w construction phase to ensure NPDES compliance and additional BMPs and erosion o control measures will be documented in the SWPPP and utilized if necessary. The 2 0 SWPPP shall address the potential for an w extended and discontinuous construction period based on funding availability. The N SWPPP will be kept on site for the entire duration of project construction and will be available to the local RWQCB for inspection at any time. Some the BMPs to be implemented may include the following: Q - Sediment discharges from the site may be controlled by the following: sandbags, silt E fences, straw wattles and temporary basins U A Q Packet Pg 516 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration Sanctions N Q U O 0 Non- Action Mitigation Measure Method • '• �. • f0 • Responsible •• • Q a. (if deemed necessary), and other discharge control devices. The construction and rn condition of the BMPs will be periodically —° inspected during construction and repairs will be made when necessary as required by the SWPPP. `m - Materials that have the potential to contribute to non-visible pollutants to storm water must not be placed in drainage ways v and must be contained,elevated,and placed a in temporary storage containment areas. All loose piles of soil,silt,clay,sand,debris, and other earthen material shall be protected Q in a reasonable manner to eliminate any discharge from the site. Stockpiles will be ° s surrounded by silt fences and covered with w plastic tarps. c In addition,the construction contractor shall 3 be responsible for performing and 5 documenting the application of BMPs N identified in the SWPPP. Weekly inspections shall be performed on sandbag barriers and other sediment control measures called for in r the SWPPP. Monthly reports and inspection logs shall be maintained by the Contractor E and reviewed by the City of San Bernardino m and the representatives of the State Water Resources Control Board. In the event that it Q is not feasible to implement specific BMPs, v the City of San Bernardino can make a E determination that other BMPs will provide U R Q Packet Pg.517 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration ¢< Sanctions Mitigation Measure No. Implementing N_ Q U ri 0 Responsible Monitoring Action a equivalent or superior treatment either on or O off site. a> R HYD-3 Prior to the issuance of grading City Engineer or Prior to the Approval of plans Withhold 2 permits, the Project Applicant shall submit a designee issuance of to the City that building final Water Quality Management Plan building incorporate permit (WQMP) to the City of San Bernardino, for project-specific review and approval. The project shall WQMP features. implement site design BMPs, source control M BMPs, and treatment control BMPs as identified in the Water Quality Management `.a. Plan. This measure shall be implemented to the satisfaction of the City Public Works Department and Planning Division as appropriate. s NOISE NOW Prior to issuance of grading and City Planner or Prior to the Submittal of Withhold w building permits for each phase of the designee issuance of Construction grading = project, the developer shall prepare a grading and/or Noise Control and/or o Construction Noise Control Plan(CNCP)and building permits Plan building will submit the plan the City for review and permit approval. The plan shall include but will not be limited to the following: N - During all site excavation and grading, the m project contractors shall equip all E construction equipment,fixed or mobile, with = properly operating and maintained mufflers U m consistent with manufacturers'standards. Q - The project contractor shall place all m stationary construction equipment so that E emitted noise is directed away from sensitive Q Packet Pg.518, 6.A.c Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration N Q U 13 Sanctions 0 Mitigation .. Implementing Responsible for Timing of Method of . co Monitoring Q IL receptors nearest the project site. O ai - The construction contractor shall locate °1 m equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction- H related noise sources and noise-sensitive receptors nearest to the project site during all m project construction. LO M !f) 'Q N0I-2 Prior to issuance of an occupancy City Building Prior to the Submittal of Withhold " permit, building fagade upgrades such as Official or issuance of plans to the City building W double-paned windows at a minimum STC- designee building permit showing the permit 2 32 rating shall be installed in the proposed required features chapel (Phase 4) to the satisfaction of the have been Q City Planning Department. incorporated into :a the project r design. X LU N0I-3 Prior to issuance of an occupancy City Building Prior to the Submittal of Withhold C permit, on-site buildings directly exposed to Official or issuance of evidence that occupancy 2 the railroad noise shall be provided with a designee occupancy required permit mechanical ventilation system such as air permit mechanical conditioning to ensure that windows can ventilation has remain closed for prolonged periods of time. been provided N C d >_ L U R Q C N l: s U R Q Packet PSI.519 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648 FUTURE TRANSITIONAL HOUSING-TYPICAL PHA5ING LEGEND PHASE I - FUTURE MEDICAL BUILDING 6 SECOND Residential Care C .A'✓E I — —' — STORY ADMINISTRATION facility, 82 beds OFFICES 1 y PHASE 2 - FUTURE EDUCATIONAL Medical and BUILDING with ENCLOSED Education Building � COURT YARD i FUTURE ANNEX s PHA5E 3 -Transition STORAGE Hou5m6j and 9 ncnES Community Garden FUTURE Areas '.0,11011111i k X.: FU E CHAPEL " EMERGENCY veHICLE Access � •?�� � � �r � PHASE 4 - ROAD I _. e, Community Care ff - � � Faclhtles `. 3 14 ACRE$ W NORTH — _— � _— — SCALE.1 =50 -- __ VTACNTSTREET — (4—)S NGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES APPROX.7,000 5F OF LIVING AREA EACH MARYS MERCY CENTER- SOUTH CAMPU5 SITE PLAN - January 19,2015 APRIL 2015 ..^m•„1e TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP .�...w 4LOTS nAr APN 0274-022-01,ET AL . 1102 ACRES(GROSSINET) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648 w g IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 6168,84-92,105117,126133,AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 100,102-104,134-135 OF ASSESSORS MAP NO.14,AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 1 OF MAPS,PAGE 24,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BER14ARDINO COUNTY,AND _ gacmwya..: . 5 PORTIONS OF BLOCK"H"A D T'OF MURRAY AND PAYNES SUBDIVISION OF THE METCALF TRACT,IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS,PAGE 27,RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. "N.ppyRµjY-[ ”/ cMPxlc scut voR ra h ia uEx! BOUNN.41 I .. VICINITY MAP �S Zpy V 13.05 ACRES - ,,,,,°44 °® .0°•, w mux¢wr .wmowu°«o.u.�. NB'* ,.,,o.,.a.o, ,a.c.....a.a... P Po0.9E - � ..en e,renaxrecn..ex em.. .e,.ccuuc.ww BWx�Wr •xmm .na - ......m..u.rron.m _ ca°.naw Z x � 2 ACR ems°,eenunnow.0.c.u...,eun®°m, Z 2.91 m - ES .. cm�.,.eem..o.�w„c„,.,.,en em...,° U 01 MB 924 /��ry .n ,....,. ...c..�.e.m.,..,, }m5§ J ASSESSORS I.V.tfnr�"EOro. ....�� o n ..ssrn .m NOW a.:». .. dig MAP NO.14 / LLII n S eouwwrc - O - SHEET INDEX � m s ... ♦ / oaxeraivu�AmE nm'n w. ¢Za , m BWxMm (n N W72 um�°o aonauxs } P MB MURRAtl P m,v / rnrcErvuanwoxoa a Q. -= 8 AYPoE ° -- SUBDIVISION .,4 a a. _ z xW 2.92 ACRES MB 124 ASSESSOR'S I R MAP NO.14 i a 2.14 ACRES / ,/ __ y.. .� f )1.I Lu a I < . , w x MB 124 __ -- > sourq+xr�ss ASSESSORS oa MAP Po0..94 // _s na F PS®124 1 .. / Z Z ASSESSOR'S � Lu MAR NO.14 I J L -- II — — L — _ -- -- _ _ i �� �� _ f w -' -- _ aw. a.. - SHEET OF 10 APRIL 2015 m..TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP ran 4LOTS APN 0274-022-01,ET AL 11.02 ACRES(GROSSMET) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648 W g ff IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 81 E8,80.92,105-117,12&133,AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 100,102-104,134-135 OF ASSESSORS MAP NO.14,AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 1 OF MAPS,PAGE 24,IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,AND S PORTIONS OF BLOCK 9f'AND"I"OF MURRAY AND PAYNES SUBDIVISION OF THE METCALF TRACT,IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS,PAGE 27,RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. -c �I =axn ra,.ixmeu,=ew..e caxn,ecuu,a awcm,n Vs eei.o.enuneeuurvmex.a.uxeume.eae uec,meo Q V'g F N�n O �u r� �Sx rE�® Z .wo...rt.,...o,a.,a...o.,o,moa...",......, E.�x.nx. nw......u....e�.a..o.,m,..��.,..,,,.ow...,.,.,..,�..,.".....e,.ro. %mw Z WgUS Q a y � f LU cr W SECTION A-A LU Z Z SECTION B-B O SHEET OF -� 24 SECTION C-C - APRIL 2015 .� ..WEXISTING CONDITIONS MAP ,., - •4 LOTS Ar APN 0274-022-01,ET AL 11 02 ACRES(GROSSINET) TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648 g IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDMSION OF LOTS 61 b8,W92,105-117.126-133.AND PORTIONS OF LOTS 100,102-100,134-135 OF ASSESSORS MAP NO.14,AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 1 OF MAPS•PAGE 24.IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,AND p PORTIONS OF BLOCK'H-AND"I"OF MURRAY AND PAYNES SUBDIVISION OF THE METCALF TRACT,IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS,PAGE 27,RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. cMPHim SINE I I � O moi 30 3l k` ---------- a A� JTiv x ./61____) I+I 100 101 j�,� 140 O _ - _ 1 - T ( '62 y 99 i'• \ tOd�\ 1 j_:.; .139 j n! sa 5s 6 i, 9s a, 03 3e v� Z I I � 64 x I~ 97 Z04 \ T � 1 @7 _ - �LLI r 105 Y�c 65 W �..0 rc v.! 66 �� �.,, >9s wyI ms i 1ST 'tay g of } ! I I,' I� 4 .IA 6j i i 94 107 k 134 •'44 .4 / o Lu 68-- I 93 I x.198 I'� l33 o I 92 1 nO/c I... X132 F i 7p 1 I _ 6 1 7 1 � '110 / 1 w:. I 13071- 1 90 111 _ _J L _ _-I_ L 1 T L J L J L \ 89 129 ` A� 69 ,M: u3 -..I....._ 12e �...If '�)? / d Z 87 '....I - 114.... 1 •W.."._ _127 -..,` r 7 7'`� 9 _cl.. �__ ,-1_ -I t 1--_ `•ti r>" _r4�.,_ [ 8' C .115 1 I 126 S ! G%ti'"I 4 y. 13 J.- O 116 l i ' 12-,5/ { ! I / 1 ) ,Jy 1..1,.1 f "l. l fi... I } - Z�r f rte' 1 84 .e.:, ( � L ...�- 1. L J_l jJ _ I T LIJ t I ! T / Y' 'I. U '90 1, I ��1 82 81 11lP19(f1i301 1 / I Y� I ri R a I y I I Y $y /I 1 J /I r RSI N HISTOR 1 f 1 I� i,:�s4} y L 1 _- L� J L _-s �.° _. ... ,,,, SHEET _ _ _L _ 3 4 - - - APRIL 2015 „^CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 4LOTS APN 0274-022-01,ET AL TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648 11.02 ACRES(GROSSINET) e IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO.STATE OF CALIFORNIA BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOTS 61-68,M-92,105-117,126-1 NS 33,AND PORTIOOF LOTS 100,102-106,134-135 OF ASSESSORS MAP NO.14,AS SHOWN BY PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 1 OF MAPS,PAGE 2 OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,AND 5 PORTIONS OF BLOCK"H"AND T'OF MURRAY AND PAYNES SUBDIVISION OF THE METCALF TRACT,IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 4 OF MAPS,PAGE 27,RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY. I Z W _ Cf12" lOS-.. , ol 4 �• T r "N °? C) o V go I9 .'2.91 ORES LLI �' Q z � o 3 - a CD a I Q 4 1 � a EL LLI .k ~ w z i ff .. m .— - SHEET mart z - - -- 44 MEL--- IJH F7 I u clo of EE .....------ ... ........... . ............ ............... I I�1� i El: ........... 3D A103 ,u cm w ED CO3 7:J Ji 4, EU th 77.1 3 A104 - 7 �2 •• rev y Y S Y i aim 13 d f 4 .. ...r .w.....�.�...... a ,...»_�.._, A105 �FRONT EXTERIOR EIEV�TNIN i a` ------------- =RFARpORER1OR—AVON L[FT"R1OREI AVON •S' i =m ob �R16NT lXlll11OR EIlVRTON i e � � 3 . �m x �FRONT EXTERIOR EIEV>nON -- - 11 TI Ll I li Ll 0 - i IL IiiIII: A, =REAR EXTERNIR ELEVAnoN ry a LL �LEFr F]RERIOR ELEVATON �' I o" Rloxr EXTERIOR aevAnoN '�h_2 9 s Ll Ll FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION O-r"— — 2 REAR[Rfa1W 6EVATON i I . I t �E r. ire DEFTWERNIRIMAMON l t I J pil" u � _ z v q ?z RNINTEXfERNMELEVATNIN =R: A w•,v ,R rf _wx 6.A.e c EXHIBIT "B" `4 N O CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL r SUBDIVISION 15-02 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648) D AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-09 LO 1. This approval is to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and N Zoning District of the subject 11.02 acre site from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Q Medium (RM); the consolidation of the existing vacant parcels into four (4) separate o parcels; and, the development, establishment and operation of a men's residential o complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off-site improvements. The a project site is located on the north side of Walnut Street between Pico Avenue and San Marcos Street 2. The project site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the plans stamped N July 18, 2016 (EXHIBIT "A"), approved by the Mayor and Common Council on file in cu the Planning Division; the Conditions of Approval contained herein; and, the City's Municipal Code regulations. LO co LO 3. The project shall be subject to all of the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, dated July 18, 2016, approved by the Mayor and Common Council, and incorporated herein by reference as Conditions of Approval. °CL L Q 4. Within two (2) years of the Conditional Use Permit approval, commencement of o construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one .2 Y (1) year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. However, approval of the Conditional Use Permit does not authorize commencement of construction. All necessary permits must be obtained prior to commencement of specified construction activities m included in the Conditions of Approval. '= X EXPIRATION DATE: July 18, 2018 w 5. The review authority may grant a time extension, for good cause, not to exceed twelve (12) months. The applicant must file an application, the processing fees, and all required o submittal items, thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all Development Code provisions in effect at the N time of the requested extension. c CD E 6. In the event this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense of this Q matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Y City of San Bernardino (City), any departments, agencies, divisions, boards or commission of the City as well as predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, E U Y Y Q Packet Pg. 532 6.A.e elected officials, officers, employees, representatives and attorneys of the City from any a claim, action or proceeding against any of the foregoing persons or entities. The applicant o LO further agrees to reimburse the City for any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. The costs, salaries, and �? expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office shall be considered as o LO "Attorney's fees" for the purpose of this condition. As part of the consideration for issuing this Development Permit, this condition shall remain in effect if the Development Permit is rescinded or revoked,whether or not at the request of applicant. N a U 0 Planning Division ri 0 c4 7. The applicant, facility operator, and/or property owner shall submit Operational, Q Management and Security Plans for the men's residential complex to the Planning 0- Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. 8. Within two (2) years of the final Mayor and Common Council approval, construction of Phase 1 shall commence. Construction of Phase 2 shall commence within three (3) years of the Mayor and Common Council approval. Construction of Phase 3 shall commence � within four (4) years of the Mayor and Common Council approval. Construction of Phase 4 shall commence within five (5) years of the Mayor and Common Council M approval. Failure to meet the construction commencement requirements shall make the 7 approval of the remaining Phases null and void. 0 9. Phase 1 shall have a maximum of 85 residents, and the overall project shall have a Q maximum of 115 residents. o y 10. A six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along all exterior o property lines. 0 U 11. The applicant shall post a bond in an amount equivalent to the cost of landscaping, . including landscape installation and one year of maintenance service. The purpose of the 0° bond is to ensure that all landscaping survives the planting process and lasts for a period ° of at least one year. The bond will be released no sooner than one year after issuance of w the Final Certificate of Occupancy an d only after such time as the survival of the landscaping has been verified by City staff. ° 0 12. If the colors of the buildings or other exterior finish materials are to be modified beyond the current proposal and improvement requirements, the revised color scheme and/or finish materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to y commencement of work. _ a� E 13. Minor modification to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director through the w Minor Modification Permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the Q allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refilling of the original application. E U f4 w Q Packet Pg. 533 6.A.e 14. The facility operator and property owner shall be responsible for regular maintenance of a the project site. The site shall be maintained in a clean condition and free of litter and any o LO other undesirable material(s). Vandalism, graffiti, trash and other debris shall be removed and cleaned up within 24 hours of being reported. 0° 15. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each phase, o LO for a period of two (2) years, the Planning Division shall conduct an inspection of the business operations and property to ensure compliance with the Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. In the event that an N unresolved issue continues to exist, the applicant shall submit an application, and o appropriate application fee, for reconsideration by the Planning Commission. 0 16. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the City of San Bernardino a Community Development Department, Land Development and Building & Safety a. Divisions, Fire Department, Police Department, Municipal Water Department, Public Works Department, and the City Clerk's Office/Business Registration Division. _ Land Development Division 17. Drainage and Flood Control Phase 1, 2, 3 and 4 LO M a. All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the Building Official, which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino County Department of Flood Control. o The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and Q flood control. Q 0 b. A permit will be required from the San Bernardino County Department of = Transportation and Flood Control, if any work is required within the Flood 0 Control District's right-of-way. o c. The development is located within Zone X of the Federal Insurance Rate Maps on booklet#06071C8677 H with year 08/28/08. m Y d. All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public s drainage facility. If not feasible,proper drainage facilities and easements shall be w provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. o e. If site drainage is to be outletted into the public street, the drainage shall be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with City y Standard No. 400. Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway approaches W will not be permitted. N Y aD E U Y Y Q a.+ N E t U t6 Y Y Q Packet Pg. 534 6.A.e f. A Full Categorical Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and a Storm Water c Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this project. The applicant is o LO directed to the County of San Bernardino Flood Control web page for the WQMP Technical Guidance Document and template. The Building Official, prior to D issuance of any permit, shall approve the WQMP and the SWPPP. A CD copy of En the approved WQMP and SWPPP are required prior to Occupancy. The bearings o LO for the project site shall be noted on the WQMP. The proposed infiltration trench shall be constructed to ensure stabilization of the slopes. 5; N g. Emergency overflow from the site shall not discharged into Lytle Creek Channel without written authorization from the San Bernardino County Department of 0 Flood Control. cl 0 h. A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the State Water Quality Control Q Board for construction disturbing 1 acre or more of land. a a i. The Building Official, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded > y areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. � 18. Grading and Landscaping co LO Phase 1, 2, 3 and 4 7 Ar 0 a. The grading and on-site improvement plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be Q prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" Q and the City's "Standard Drawings", the WDID number shall be placed on the Grading plans unless otherwise approved by the Building Official. o b. If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the Development Code shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development - Planning o0 Division prior to issuance of any grading or site development permits. c. If more than 50 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets then a special w hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer. Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls, bonding, covering of loads, street o cleaning, etc. may be required by the City Engineer. 2 0 d. A liquefaction evaluation is required for the site. This evaluation must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction evaluation shall be incorporated in the grading plan. U f0 a+ Q C N E U l4 Q Packet Pg. 535 6.A.e e. Wheel stops are not permitted by the Development Code, except at designated cc accessible parking spaces. Therefore, continuous 6" high curb shall be used o LO around planter areas and areas where head in parking is adjacent to walkways. ca The parking spaces may be 16.5' deep and may overhang the landscaping or walkway by 2.5'. Overhang into the setback area or into an ADA path of travel (minimum 4' wide)is not permitted. q LO f. Continuous concrete curbing at least 6 inches high and 6 inches wide shall be Q provided at least 3 feet from any wall, fence, property line, walkway, or structure r- N where parking and/or drive aisles are located adjacent thereto. Curbing may be left out at structure access points. The space between the curb and wall, fence, o property line,walkway or structure shall be landscaped. o g. The refuse enclosure(s) must be constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 508. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15 feet, unless the Public Services Department, Refuse Division, approves a smaller size, in writing. Where a refuse enclosure is proposed to be constructed adjacent to spaces for parking passenger vehicles, a 3' wide by 6 " high concrete planter shall be provided to separate the enclosure from the adjacent parking. The N placement of the enclosure and design of the planter shall preclude the enclosure doors from opening into drive aisles or impacting against adjacent parked cars. The number and placement of refuse enclosures shall conform to the location and M number shown on the site plan as approved by the Development Review Committee. � h. Retaining walls,block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and detailed Q on the on-site improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the Building permit C issued by the Building Official. All masonry walls shall be constructed of o decorative block and articulated every 100 feet with architectural features acceptable to the City Planner. i. The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting, including o light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design with structural calculations, 00 • Photometric plot shall be provided which show that the proposed on-site lighting design will provide: W • 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly distributed over the surface of the o parking lot during hours of operation, and 0 j. The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to accessible parking and , accessibility, including retrofitting of existing building access points for accessibility. E s U r w Q C N E s U .i Y Q Packet Pg. 536 6.A.e a k. An accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building a entrance. All pathways shall be concrete paved and shall provide a minimum o clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved r width shall be 6.5 feet. � Cn 1. Where an accessible path of travel crosses drive aisles, it shall be delineated by 0 textured/colored concrete pavement. M m. The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Q Official prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the Land N Development Division for Checking. o n. Prior to occupancy of any building, the developer shall post a bond to guarantee o the maintenance and survival of project landscaping for a period of one year. Q 19. Utilities a a. Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City 6 Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone,water, and sewer. N b. This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of San @ Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City M Standard Drawings. 7 c. Phases 1, 3 and 4 - All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street on Congress Street, Artesia Street, and Pico Street shall o be placed underground in accordance with Section 19.20.030. Q d. Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the o Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer as stated in Development o Code Section 19.20.030. a 20. Mapping 0 U Phase 1 m a. A Final Map based upon field survey will be required. b. Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building w setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be submitted to the City Engineer for plan check. 21. Improvement Completion Phase 1 N a. Street, and sewer improvement plans for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer,prior to the Map recordation. E s b. If the construction/installation of required improvements is not completed prior to Map recordation, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer and the City will be required. E s Q Packet Pg. 537 6.A.e 22. Street Improvement and Dedications a. For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) to LO provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the m curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: 0 LO Street Name Right of Way Curb Line N 'a U Artesian Street 50 feet 18 feet M 0 W Congress Avenue 50 feet 18 feet a� Pico Street 50 feet 18 feet N S� CU 2 b. Phase 4 -Pico Street shall be rehabilitated and the structural street section shall be LO designed on the "R" value of the subgrade as determined by soils testing and the in traffic Index. The minimum AC thickness shall be 4 inches with an AB thickness �- of 6 inches. The offset cul-de-sac shall be constructed according to the City of San Bernardino standard. ° a Q c. Phase 1 and 4 - The full width pavement on Artesia Street and Congress Street Q w adjoining the site shall be rehabilitated full width and the structural street section shall be designed on the "R" value of the subgrade as determined by soils testing o and the traffic Index. The minimum AC thickness shall be 4 inches with an AB La thickness of 6 inches. o U d. Phase 1, 3 and 4 - Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200 adjacent to the site on Congress Street, Artesian Street and Pico Street. Widen CO pavement adjacent to the site to match new curb and gutter. Construct approach and departure transitions for traffic safety and drainage as approved by the City w Engineer. o e. Phase 1, 3 and 4 - Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site on Congress Street, Artesian Street and Pico Street in accordance with City Standard No. 202; Case U) "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb). f. All Phases - Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type II, Y including an accessible by-pass around the top of the drive approach. Remove existing driveway approaches that are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb &gutter and sidewalk. g. Phase 1, 3 and 4 - Construct all cul-de-sac's and knuckles in accordance with City Q Standard Drawing No. 101. 0 E U RS a. Q Packet Pg. 538 6.A.e v h. All Phases - A Street cut permit, issued by the City Engineer, will be required for utility cuts into existing streets. The required method shall include a slurry coat o along the frontage of the project site to center line. If trenching crosses both sides r of the street,both sides shall have a slurry coat and stripping along the frontage of °_° the project site. (n i. Phase 1, 3 and 4 - Install Street Lights adjacent to the site on Congress Street, ' Artesia Street and Pico Street in accordance with City Standard Nos. SL-1 and a SL-2. Also, a separate light plan shall be submitted in accordance with the City N of San Bernardino Street Lighting Design Policies. 23. Phasing o a. If the project is to be developed in phases, each individual phase shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, convenience for public service vehicles, and a proper traffic circulation. b. Improvement plans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond the phase boundary to verify the feasibility of the design shall be complete to the > satisfaction of the City Engineer and/or Building Official. L c. Dead-end streets shall be provided with a minimum 32 foot radius paved turn cc around. LO d. A properly designed water system shall be constructed, which is capable of Ln providing required fire flow, perhaps looping or extending beyond the phase boundaries. > 0 24. Required Engineering Plans a a. A complete submittal for plan checking shall consist of: o ■ street improvement plans (may include street lights or street lighting may be o separate plan), _ ■ sewer plans (Private sewers may be shown on on-site improvement plan; public sewers must be on a separate plan with profile), m ■ storm drain plans (Private storm drains may be shown on on-site improvement plans; public storm drains must be on a separate plan with profile), w ■ signing and striping plan (may be on sheets included in street improvement plan), 0 ■ lighting (on-site lighting may be included in on-site improvement plan or may be on a separate stand-alone plan), ■ grading(may be incorporated with on-site improvement plan), w ■ on-site landscaping and irrigation, E ■ Other plans as required. Piecemeal submittal of various types of plans for the o w same project will not be allowed. Q w _ E t U Q Packet Pg. 539 6.A.e ■ All required supporting calculations, studies and reports must be included in v the initial submittal (including but not limited to drainage studies, soils o reports, structural calculations) L' m b. All off-site improvement plans submitted for plan check shall be prepared on the N City's standard 24" x 36" sheets. A signature block satisfactory to the City Engineer or his designee shall be provided. LO c. After completion of plan checking, final Mylar drawings, stamped and signed by a the Registered Civil Engineer in charge, shall be submitted to the City Engineer N and/or Building Official for approval. o d. Copies of the City's design policies and procedures and standard drawings are o available at the Public Works Counter for the cost of reproduction. They are also �o available at no charge at the Public Works Web Site at http://www.sbcity.or a 25. Required Engineering Permits a� a. Grading permit. f° b. On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Development y Services-Building Division), including landscaping. c. Off-site improvement construction permit. 26. Applicable Engineering Fees co 7 a. All plan check, permit, inspection, and impact fees are outlined on the Public R Works Fee Schedule. A deposit in the amount of 100% of the estimated o checking fee for each set of plans will be required at time of application for plan a check. The amount of the fee is subject to adjustment if the construction cost Q estimate varies more than 10% from the estimate submitted with the application y for plan checking. o b. The current fee schedule is available at the Public Works Counter and at c http://www.sbcity.org U 27. Traffic Requirements 00 Y a. All Traffic Study mitigation measures shall be implemented. w 0 0 N d N Y C d E t U t0 Y Y Q C N E s U Y Y Q Packet Pg. 540 6.A.f RESOLUTION NO. 2016-014-PC A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA RECOMMENDING TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL THE ADOPTION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE ' DECLARATION AND APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-03, a. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT) 15-01, SUBDIVISION 15-02 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648) AND CONDITIONAL $ USE PERMIT 15-09 TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT, ESTABLISHMENT AND co OPERATION OF MARY'S VILLAGE ON A PARCEL CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 11.02 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WALNUT STREET BETWEEN PICO AVENUE AND SAN MARCOS STREET (APN: 0137- 051-07, 32 AND 33; 0137-101-05 AND 06; 0274-011-05, 14 AND 28; 0274-022-01, 02, 03, 04, 05 AND 06; 0274-023-08, 09. 10 AND 11; 0274-023-12 THROUGH 222; 0274- 9 LO 023-26 THROUGH 38; 0274-02340, 41 AND 43; 0274-024-06 THROUGH 13; AND, 0274-024-21)WITHIN THE RESIDENTIAL URBAN (RU) ZONE. N a WHEREAS, on June 11, 2015, pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.50 (General o Plan Amendments), Chapter 19.42 (Development Code Amendments), Chapter 19.74 (Zoning c.; Map Amendments), §19.04.010(2)(T) (Residential Zones Specific Standards - Social Services 9 Uses/Centers), §19.36.020 (Conditional Use Permit Applications) and §19.66.020 (Subdivision a Map Applications) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, an application for General 0 Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, a� Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 was duly submitted by: N L Property Owner: Mary's Mercy Center 510 W. Citrus Edge Street Glendora, CA 91740 LO Project Applicant: Mary's Mercy Center o 510 W. Citrus Edge Street Glendora, CA 91740 N 0 Parcel Address: North Side of Walnut Street, Between Pico Avenue and San Marcos Street 0 APN: 0137-051-07, 32 and 33; 0137-101-05 and 06; 0274-011-05, 14 and 28; 0274-022-01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and 06; 0274-023-08, 09. 10 and 11; 0274-023-12 through 222; 0274-023-26 through 38; 0274- 023-40,41 and 43; 0274-024-06 through 13; and, 0274-024-21 Lot Area: 11.02 acres E s U WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment 16-03 and Development Code Amendment y (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01 is a request to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Q Designation and Zoning District of the subject 11.02 acre site from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium(RM); and U .r . a 1 Packet Pg. 541 6.A.f WHEREAS, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) is a request to consolidate the existing vacant parcels containing approximately 11.02 acres into four (4) separate parcels; and WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit 15-09 is a request to allow the development, C LO establishment and operation of Mary's Village as a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services;and WHEREAS, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department has o reviewed General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map r Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use CO Permit 15-09 for consistency with the City of San Bernardino General Plan and compliance with the City of San Bernardino Development Code; and o LO T WHEREAS, pursuant to requirements of §15063 of the California Environmental d Quality Act, the Planning Division of the Community Development Department accepted the N Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration submitted by the applicant for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, ° Subdivision 15-02(Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09; and o a WHEREAS, pursuant to §15072 of the California Environmental Quality Act, a Notice a. 0 of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 was posted on December 18, 2015 for the > CEQA-mandated thirty (30) day public review and comment period, and there were no public �n written comments received or verbal comments presented; and CO WHEREAS, on January 14, 2016, pursuant to the requirements of §19.36.040, CO §19.42.020, §19.50.020, §19.66.150 and §19.74.020 of the City of San Bernardino Development 7T_ Code, the Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application and moved the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment(Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) o and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 to the Planning Commission for consideration; and 0 WHEREAS, on March 4, 2016, pursuant to the requirements §19.52.020 of the City of o tn San Bernardino Development Code, the City gave public notice by advertising in the San Bernardino Sun, a newspaper of general circulation within the City of San Bernardino, and by mailing notices to the property owners within 500 feet of the subject property of the holding of a a public hearing at which the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16-03, Y Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648)and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 would be considered; and WHEREAS, on March 16, 2016, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan a Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 was E continued to the Planning Commission meeting on April 20, 2016, and since this item was continued to a date specific no new public notification was required; and Q 2 Packet Pg. 542 6.A.f WHEREAS, on April 20, 2016, pursuant to the requirements of§19.52.040 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission held the duly noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code 0) Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) LO and Conditional Use Permit 15-09, and at which meeting the Planning Commission considered a the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) -� and Conditional Use Permit 15-09; and N O WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Chapters 19.36, 19.42, 19.50, 19.66 and r 19.74 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the Planning Commission has the authority to take action of its recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council on the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code o Lh Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09. Q N NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino does o hereby resolve, determine, find, and order as follows: M 0 SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: a a. ca In accordance with §15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant submitted and the Planning Division of the City of San Bernardino accepted an Initial Study/ Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared in connection with General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 for: 1) the subdivision to consolidate the existing vacant parcels containing approximately 11.02 acres into four(4) separate parcels; 2)the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning District from Residential Urban co (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); and, 3) the development, establishment and operation of Mary's Village. Accordingly, pursuant to §15072 of CEQA, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code 9 Amendment(Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) N and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 was posted on December 18, 2015 for the CEQA-mandated o thirty (30) day public review and comment period. In accordance with §15074 of CEQA, on 2 April 20,2016,during a duly advertised public hearing,the Planning Commission considered the o Mitigated Negative Declaration including a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council for the adoption of the Mitigated a Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code co Amendment(Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09. U SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-03: w a Section 19.50.050 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that General Plan Amendment applications meet certain findings prior to the approval by the Mayor and Common E Council. Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the recommendation by the Planning Commission for the approval of General Plan Amendment 16-03: Q 3 Packet Pg. 543 6.A.f Finding No. 1: The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan. Finding of Fact: General Plan Housing Goal 3.1 states: "Facilitate the development of a variety of types of housing to meet the needs of all income levels in the City of San Bernardino." The proposed development, establishment and to operation a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site a transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support M services will provide additional housing opportunities in the southwestern area of the City, consistent with the General Plan goal and policy cited above. Additionally, the proposed project is permitted within the proposed o LO Residential Medium (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination, and the proposed Residential Medium (RM) zone is consistent with the Residential land use designation set forth by the o General Plan Land Use Map. r a Finding No.2: The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, N health, safety,convenience, or welfare of the City. o M Finding of Fact: The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that amendment from Q Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM) will facilitate the 0. development, establishment and operation of a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off- site improvements consistent with the City's Development Code. The project site has direct access from both Walnut Street and Congress Street, will be fully served by utility providers, will be constructed in accordance with all applicable codes and regulations, and will not result in the need CO for the excessive provision of services. v Finding No.3 The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. N c Finding of Fact: The proposed amendment from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM) maintains an appropriate balance of land uses by providing o for the revitalization of an existing under-utilized site. Thus, the proposed amendment will not change the balance of land uses in the City. a Finding No. 4 The subject parcels are physically suitable (including but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development Finding of Fact: The vacant 11.02-acre site is which is currently vacant and under-utilized will provide for the accommodation of the development, establishment E and operation of a men's residential complex with the on-site and off-site improvements consistent with the City's Development Code, and there are Q no physical constraints on the site, such as steep slopes or watercourses. 4 Packet Pg. 544 F 6.A.f SECTION 3. FINDINGS FOR DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT (ZONING MAP AMENDMENT) 15-0 1: Sections 19.42.050 and 19.74.050 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code require that LO Development Code Amendment and Zoning Map Amendment, respectively, applications meet a certain findings prior to the approval by the Mayor and Common Council. Accordingly, the D U following findings are provided in support of the recommendation by the Planning Commission = for the approval of Development Code Amendment(Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01: N O LO Finding No. 1: The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan. m D Finding of Fact: The proposed development, establishment and operation a men's u) residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, 9 and medical, behavioral health, training and support services will provide additional housing opportunities in the southwestern area of the City, consistent with the General Plan goal and policy cited above. Additionally, N the proposed project is permitted within the proposed Residential Medium o (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the M appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination, and the proposed Residential Medium (RM) zone is consistent with the a Residential land use designation set forth by the General Plan Land Use 0 Map and with the City's Development Code. 6 Finding No. 2: The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. ;, L c� G Finding of Fact: The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that amendment from M Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM) will facilitate the development, establishment and operation of a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off- N site improvements consistent with the City's Development Code. The o project site has direct access from both Walnut Street and Congress Street, will be fully served by utility providers, will be constructed in accordance o with all applicable codes and regulations, and will not result in the need W for the excessive provision of services. a Finding No. 3 The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. U Finding of Fact: The proposed amendment from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM) maintains an appropriate balance of land uses by providing a for the revitalization of an existing under-utilized site. Thus, the proposed C amendment will not change the balance of land uses in the City. E U 10 f4 Q 5 Packet Pg. 545 6.A.f Finding No.4 The subject parcels are physically suitable (including but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested land use designation and the anticipated land use development 0 M Finding of Fact: The vacant 11.02-acre site is which is currently vacant and under-utilized r will provide for the accommodation of the development, establishment D and operation of a men's residential complex with the on-site and off-site improvements consistent with the City's Development Code, and there are no physical constraints on the site, such as steep slopes or watercourses. o LO SECTION 4. FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-09: Section 19.36.050 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Conditional o LO Use Permit applications meet certain findings prior to the approval by the Mayor and Common Council. Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the recommendation by the Planning Commission for the approval of Conditional Use Permit 15-09: N a U Finding No. 1: The proposed use is conditionally permitted within, and would not impair cli the integrity and character of the subject land use district and complies 9 with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. Q a. Finding of Fact: The proposed project is a conditionally permitted use, pursuant to Development Code §19.04.010(2)(T)(C). The project site will be located within the Residential Medium (RM) zone as proposed by General Plan Amendment 16-03 and Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map , Amendment) 15-01, and is substantially surrounded by existing residential uses. The proposed development will comply with all applicable Development Code standards, such as parking landscaping, building M setbacks and height, etc. Further, the development of the subject property 7t will enhance the appearance of the vacant and under-utilized property. Therefore, the project would not impair the integrity and character of the 9 subject land use district or be detrimental to surrounding properties. N Finding No.2: The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. 2 0 Finding of Fact: The General Plan Housing Goal 3.1 states: "Facilitate the development of a variety of types of housing to meet the needs of all income levels in the City of San Bernardino." The proposed development, establishment and operation a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site y transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services will provide additional housing opportunities in the southwestern area of the City, consistent with the General Plan goal and policy cited 2 above. Additionally, the proposed project is permitted within the proposed Q Residential Medium (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA s determination, and the proposed Residential Medium (RM) zone is U consistent with the Residential land use designation set forth by the Q General Plan Land Use Map. Therefore the proposed project would be 6 Packet Pg. 546 6.A.f compatible with surrounding land uses and consistent with the General Plan. Finding No. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use is in g . pP rn compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality LO Act(CEQA) and §19.20.030(6)of the Development Code. r o. D Finding of Fact: In accordance with §15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in CU connection with General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code o Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 LO (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 for the development, establishment and operation of a men's residential complex U) providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, o behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off- site improvements. In accordance with §15097 of CEQA, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared in order to ensure N that the mitigation measures are implemented to prevent potential o environmental impacts. Approval of the proposed project would not result cli in any impacts on the environment. 9 a Finding No.4 There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon CL environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored. Finding of Fact: The project site is an in-fill lot and the surrounding area is urbanized. Therefore, no significant negative impacts on the environment are CU anticipated to result from the proposed men's residential complex. LO CO LO Finding No. 5: The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed 71� use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will not create significant noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be o objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or = adverse to the public interest, health, safety,convenience, or welfare of the City. 0 aD a: Finding of Fact: The proposed design is in compliance with the Development Code requirements that are applicable to location, height and setbacks for the proposed men's residential complex. All access to the subject property w will be through points of access from Walnut Street and Congress Street. Therefore, the design of the project will ensure that the project will not create any significant noise, traffic, or other conditions that would be E detrimental or objectionable to other uses in the vicinity or adverse to the a public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. C E Finding No. 6: The subject site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed. a 7 Packet Pg. 547 ,...... 6.A.f Finding of Fact: The site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being proposed as evidenced by project compliance with all applicable Development Code Standards. The size of the project site is adequate to accommodate the proposed improvements, in compliance with the requirements of the Development Code. ,° Finding No.7 There are adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and D public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety. N O LO Finding of Fact: The site has direct access off of Walnut Street and Congress Street. All agencies responsible for reviewing access and providing water, sanitation D and other public services to the site have had the opportunity to review the co proposal, and none indicated inability to serve the project site. o Establishment of the proposed men's residential complex, subject to LO Conditions of Approval, will not be detrimental to public services or public health and safety. N Q U SECTION 6. FINDINGS FOR SUBDIVISION 15-02 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648): 9 T a Section 19.66.150 of the City of San Bernardino Development Code requires that Subdivision applications meet certain findings prior to the approval by the Mayor and Common Council. Accordingly, the following findings are provided in support of the recommendation by the Planning Commission for the approval of Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648): N A Finding No. 1: The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan. Finding of Fact: The proposed Tentative Parcel Map to accommodate the development, co establishment and operation of a men's residential complex providing d; comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off-site improvements will provide additional housing opportunities with the City, o the proposed project is permitted within the proposed Residential Medium o (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a General Plan Amendment, Development Code Amendment/Zoning Code Amendment and N Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination, and the proposed Residential Medium (RM) zone is consistent with the proposed Residential land use designation set forth by the General Plan Land Use Map. a� Finding No. 2: The design and improvements of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan. r Q Finding of Fact: General Plan Land Use Goal 2.2 states: Promote development that integrates with surrounding land uses." The proposed Tentative Parcel E Map will be consistent with the pattern of development within the existing r surrounding neighborhood. Q 8 Packet Pg. 548 6.A.f General Plan Land Use policy 2.7.5 states: "Require that developments conform to the availability of public infrastructure to accommodate its demands and mitigate its impacts." The proposed Tentative Parcel Map will connect to existing water and sewer services, roads, storm drains, and �3 private utilities. LO T a. Finding No.3 The site is physically suitable for the type of development. :3 U Finding of Fact: The proposed project is permitted within the proposed Residential CU Medium (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a General Plan o Amendment, Development Code Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment CO and Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination. The subject site as a men's residential complex in providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, o LO behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off- site improvements is sufficient in size to accommodate the proposal under General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning a Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) o and Conditional Use Pen-nit 15-09 as required by the City of San ; Bernardino Development Code. Therefore, the subject site is physically 9 suitable for the proposal. Q a 0 Finding No.4 The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Finding of Fact: The development, establishment and operation of a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and -; medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off-site improvements is permitted within the proposed Residential Medium (RM) zone, subject to the approval of a General Plan M Amendment, Development Code Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment and Conditional Use Permit with the appropriate Conditions of Approval and CEQA determination. The subject site as a men's residential complex 9 is sufficient in size to accommodate the proposal under Development N Conditional Use Permit 15-09 as required by the City of San Bernardino 0 Development Code. Therefore, the subject site is physically suitable for the proposal. 0 Finding No. 5: The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not a cause substantial environmental damage or substantially or avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. Finding of Fact: The design of the subdivision will not have any significant negative impacts to wildlife or their habitat. The project site is an existing developed site and surrounded by urban development. No significant Q negative impacts on the environment are anticipated to result from re-use CD of the existing site already developed with commercial uses. E U R Finding No. 6: The design of the subdivision or type of improvements will not cause a serious public health problems. 9 Packet Pg. 549 6.A.f Finding of Fact: The design of the proposed subdivision meets all of the applicable Development Code requirements and will not result in any serious public health problems. The proposed parcels will have access to existing public streets. Existing utilities and public services are available to serve the project site and ensure the maintenance of public health and safety. Finding No.7 The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not D conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. N O Finding of Fact: The design of the subdivision will not conflict with any public or private r ca easements. All documentation relating to easements and dedications will be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to recordation of the Final Map. Existing easements will be reserved in place or relocated, as o Ln necessary. Q SECTION 7. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: a U The recommendation of approval to the Mayor and Common Council of General Plan o Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 shall be a subject to the following Conditions of Approval: 1. This approval is to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and Zoning District of the subject 11.02 acre site from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); the consolidation of the existing vacant parcels into four (4) separate , parcels; and, the development, establishment and operation of a men's residential M complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, behavioral health, training and support services with the on-site and off-site improvements. The M project site is located on the north side of Walnut Street between Pico Avenue and San Marcos Street 0 2. The project site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the plans stamped N April 20, 2016 (EXHIBIT "A"), recommended for approval by the Planning o Commission, which includes a site plan, on file in the Planning Division; the Conditions of Approval contained herein; and,the City's Municipal Code regulations. o a� 3. The project shall be subject to all of the mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, dated April 20,2016 (EXHIBIT"B"), recommended for approval by the Planning Commission, and incorporated herein by reference as Conditions of Approval. 4. Within two (2) years of the Conditional Use Permit approval, commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In a addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one (1) year, then the pen-nit/approval shall become null and void. However, approval of the E Conditional Use Permit does not authorize commencement of construction. All necessary ' permits must be obtained prior to commencement of specified construction activities a included in the Conditions of Approval. 10 Packet Pg. 550 6.A.f EXPIRATION DATE: April 20,2018 5. The review authority may grant a time extension, for good cause, not to exceed twelve co (12) months. The applicant must file an application, the processing fees, and all required LO submittal items, thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date. The review authority shall a ensure that the project complies with all Development Code provisions in effect at the D U time of the requested extension. 6. In the event this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the 9 LO applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and will cooperate fully in the defense of this matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the D City of San Bernardino (City), any departments, agencies, divisions, boards or commission of the City as well as predecessors, successors, assigns, agents, directors, 9 elected officials, officers, employees, representatives and attorneys of the City from any claim, action or proceeding against any of the foregoing persons or entities. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City for any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may a be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not o relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. The costs, salaries, and M expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office shall be considered as "Attorney's fees" for the purpose of this condition. As part of the consideration for a issuing this Development Permit, this condition shall remain in effect if the Development 0 Permit is rescinded or revoked,whether or not at the request of applicant. a� Planning Division 7. The applicant, facility operator, and/or property owner shall submit Operational, M Management and Security Plans for the men's residential complex to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. M 8. Within two (2) years of the final Mayor and Common Council approval, construction of Phase 1 shall commence. Construction of Phase 2 shall commence within three (3) years of the Mayor and Common Council approval. Construction of Phase 3 shall commence N within four (4) years of the Mayor and Common Council approval. Construction of o Phase 4 shall commence within five (5) years of the Mayor and Common Council approval. Failure to meet the construction commencement requirements shall make the o approval of the remaining Phases null and void. U 9. Phase 1 shall have a maximum of 85 residents, and the overall project shall have a a maximum of 115 residents. _ 10. A six (6) foot high decorative masonry wall shall be constructed along all exterior property lines. .2 E U f4 w a 11 Packet Pg. 551 6.A.f 11. The applicant shall post a bond in an amount equivalent to the cost of landscaping, including landscape installation and one year of maintenance service. The purpose of the bond is to ensure that all landscaping survives the planting process and lasts for a period of at least one year. The bond will be released no sooner than one year after issuance of the Final Certificate of Occupancy and only after such time as the survival of the tn landscaping has been verified by City staff. a. D 12. If the colors of the buildings or other exterior finish materials are to be modified beyond the current proposal and improvement requirements, the revised color scheme and/or finish materials shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to 0 LO commencement of work. m 13. Minor modification to the plans shall be subject to approval by the Director through the `n Minor Modification Permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the 9 allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refilling of the original r Q application. N 14. The facility operator and property owner shall be responsible for regular maintenance of o the project site. The site shall be maintained in a clean condition and free of litter and any M other undesirable material(s). Vandalism, graffiti, trash and other debris shall be removed 9 and cleaned up within 24 hours of being reported. Q a 0 15. Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each phase, for a period of two (2) years, the Planning Division shall conduct an inspection of the 2 business operations and property to ensure compliance with the Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. In the event that an unresolved issue continues to exist, the applicant shall submit an application, and appropriate application fee, for reconsideration by the Planning Commission. LO M LO 16. The project shall comply with all applicable requirements of the City of San Bernardino Community Development Department, Land Development and Building & Safety Divisions, Fire Department, Police Department, Municipal Water Department, Public Works Department, and the City Clerk's Office/Business Registration Division. N 0 Land Development Division 0 17. Drainage and Flood Control U Phase 1, 2, 3 and 4 a M a. All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the Building Official, which may be based in part on the E recommendations of the San Bernardino County Department of Flood Control. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and Q flood control. b. A permit will be required from the San Bernardino County Department of E Transportation and Flood Control, if any work is required within the Flood Control District's right-of-way. Q 12 Packet Pg. 552 6.A.f c. The development is located within Zone X of the Federal Insurance Rate Maps on booklet 406071 C8677 H with year 08/28/08. d. All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be o provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. to T e. If site drainage is to be outletted into the public street, the drainage shall be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with City c Standard No. 400. Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway approaches CU will not be permitted. o N f. A Full Categorical Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and a Storm Water m Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for this project. The applicant is N directed to the County of San Bernardino Flood Control web page for the WQMP Technical Guidance Document and template. The Building Official, prior to LO issuance of any permit, shall approve the WQMP and the SWPPP. A CD copy of a the approved WQMP and SWPPP are required prior to Occupancy. The bearings N for the project site shall be noted on the WQMP. The proposed infiltration trench Q shall be constructed to ensure stabilization of the slopes. 0 g. Emergency overflow from the site shall not discharged into Lytle Creek Channel o to without written authorization from the San Bernardino County Department of Flood Control. a. a h. A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the State Water Quality Control Board for construction disturbing 1 acre or more of land. f° i. The Building Official, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an Erosion y Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. M LO 18. Grading and Landscaping O Phase 1, 2, 3 and 4 0 N a. The grading and on-site improvement plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil o Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" y and the City's "Standard Drawings", the WDID number shall be placed on the Grading plans unless otherwise approved by the Building Official. a b. If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit M conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the Development Code shall be obtained from the Department of Community Development - Planning E Division prior to issuance of any grading or site development permits. y c. If more than 50 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets then a special Q Y hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer. Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls, bonding, covering of loads, street E cleaning, etc. may be required by the City Engineer. a 13 Packet Pg. 553 6.A.f d. A liquefaction evaluation is required for the site. This evaluation must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading AF A requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction evaluation shall be incorporated in the grading plan. 0 e. Wheel stops are not permitted by the Development Code, except at designated r accessible parking spaces. Therefore, continuous 6" high curb shall be used a. around planter areas and areas where head in parking is adjacent to walkways. V The parking spaces may be 16.5' deep and may overhang the landscaping or walkway by 2.5'. Overhang into the setback area or into an ADA path of travel N (minimum 4' wide) is not permitted. q LO f. Continuous concrete curbing at least 6 inches high and 6 inches wide shall be provided at least 3 feet from any wall, fence, property line, walkway, or structure where parking and/or drive aisles are located adjacent thereto. Curbing may be o LO left out at structure access points. The space between the curb and wall, fence, property line, walkway or structure shall be landscaped. Q g. The refuse enclosure(s) must be constructed in accordance with City Standard Q Drawing No. 508. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15 0 feet, unless the Public Services Department, Refuse Division, approves a smaller o size, in writing. Where a refuse enclosure is proposed to be constructed adjacent to spaces for parking passenger vehicles, a 3' wide by 6 " high concrete planter a shall be provided to separate the enclosure from the adjacent parking. The placement of the enclosure and design of the planter shall preclude the enclosure , doors from opening into drive aisles or impacting against adjacent parked cars. _° The number and placement of refuse enclosures shall conform to the location and number shown on the site plan as approved by the Development Review �. Committee. h. Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and detailed M LO on the on-site improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the Building permit issued by the Building Official. All masonry walls shall be constructed of decorative block and articulated every 100 feet with architectural features acceptable to the City Planner. o N L The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting, including o light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design with structural calculations, Cn a) • Photometric plot shall be provided which show that the proposed on-site lighting design will provide: a. • 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation, and E j. The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all requirements of ro The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to accessible parking and Q accessibility, including retrofitting of existing building access points for accessibility. U ca Z 10 a 14 Packet Pg. 554 6.A.f k. An accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be concrete paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6.5 feet. w 0 1. Where an accessible path of travel crosses drive aisles, it shall be delineated by ' r textured/colored concrete pavement. a m. The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Building Official prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the Land ca Development Division for Checking. o U) n. Prior to occupancy of any building, the developer shall post a bond to guarantee m the maintenance and survival of project landscaping for a period of one year. D 19. Utilities o LO a. Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, 5. electric,telephone, water,and sewer. a U b. This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of San o Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be designed and o constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. c. Phases 1, 3 and 4 - All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street on Congress Street, Artesia Street, and Pico Street shall be placed underground in accordance with Section 19.20.030. > d. Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer as stated in Development Code Section 19.20.030. M LO 20. Mapping Phase 1 0 a. A Final Map based upon field survey will be required. o N b. Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building o setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be submitted to the City Engineer for plan check. N a� 21. Improvement Completion U a Phase 1 M a. Street, and sewer improvement plans for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the Map recordation. _ b. If the construction/installation of required improvements is not completed prior to 2 Map recordation, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement Q executed by the developer and the City will be required. E U t6 Q 15 Packet Pg. 555 6.A.f 22. Street Improvement and Dedications .00p"%,. a. For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: o Ln a D U Street Name Right of Way Curb Line CU N O Artesian Street 50 feet 18 feet r m Congress Avenue 50 feet 18 feet o a Pico Street 50 feet 18 feet N N a U D rS b. Phase 4 - Pico Street shall be rehabilitated and the structural street section shall be o designed on the "R" value of the subgrade as determined by soils testing and the a traffic Index. The minimum AC thickness shall be 4 inches with an AB thickness of 6 inches. The offset cul-de-sac shall be constructed according to the City of San Bernardino standard. _° c. Phase 1 and 4 - The full width pavement on Artesia Street and Congress Street adjoining the site shall be rehabilitated full width and the structural street section shall be designed on the "R" value of the subgrade as determined by soils testing and the traffic Index. The minimum AC thickness shall be 4 inches with an AB M thickness of 6 inches. v d. Phase 1, 3 and 4 - Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200 It adjacent to the site on Congress Street, Artesian Street and Pico Street. Widen o pavement adjacent to the site to match new curb and gutter. Construct approach N and departure transitions for traffic safety and drainage as approved by the City o Engineer. e. Phase 1, 3 and 4 - Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site on Congress Street, CD 0 Artesian Street and Pico Street in accordance with City Standard No. 202; Case Q: "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb). a f. All Phases - Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type II, including an accessible by-pass around the top of the drive approach. Remove existing driveway approaches that are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter and sidewalk. I° Q g. Phase 1, 3 and 4 -Construct all cul-de-sac's and knuckles in accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 101. o w a 16 Packet Pg. 556 6.A.f h. All Phases - A Street cut permit, issued by the City Engineer, will be required for utility cuts into existing streets. The required method shall include a slurry coat along the frontage of the project site to center line. If trenching crosses both sides of the street, both sides shall have a slurry coat and stripping along the frontage of the project site. LO i. Phase 1, 3 and 4 - Install Street Lights adjacent to the site on Congress Street, _ Artesia Street and Pico Street in accordance with City Standard Nos. SLA and SL-2. Also, a separate light plan shall be submitted in accordance with the City of San Bernardino Street Lighting Design Policies. o 23. Phasing r ca a. If the project is to be developed in phases, each individual phase shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, convenience for public service vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. b. Improvement plans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond the phase boundary to verify the feasibility of the design shall be complete to the N satisfaction of the City Engineer and/or Building Official. 0 c. Dead-end streets shall be provided with a minimum 32 foot radius paved turn M 0 around. T d. A properly designed water system shall be constructed, which is capable of a providing required fire flow, perhaps looping or extending beyond the phase boundaries. 24. Required Engineering Plans a. A complete submittal for plan checking shall consist of. CU • street improvement plans (may include street lights or street lighting may be separate plan), M M In ■ sewer plans (Private sewers may be shown on on-site improvement plan; public sewers must be on a separate plan with profile), o ■ storm drain plans(Private storm drains may be shown on on-site improvement o plans; public storm drains must be on a separate plan with profile), 0 ■ signing and striping plan (may be on sheets included in street improvement plan), d ■ lighting (on-site lighting may be included in on-site improvement plan or may U be on a separate stand-alone plan), a • M grading (may be incorporated with on-site improvement plan), a� • on-site landscaping and irrigation, E • Other plans as required. Piecemeal submittal of various types of plans for the w same project will not be allowed. a r • All required supporting calculations, studies and reports must be included in the initial submittal (including but not limited to drainage studies, soils reports, structural calculations) a 17 Packet Pg. 557 b. All off-site improvement plans submitted for plan check shall be prepared on the City's standard 24" x 36" sheets. A signature block satisfactory to the City Engineer or his designee shall be provided. c. After completion of plan checking, final Mylar drawings, stamped and signed by o the Registered Civil Engineer in charge, shall be submitted to the City Engineer LO and/or Building Official for approval. a d. Copies of the City's design policies and procedures and standard drawings are available at the Public Works Counter for the cost of reproduction. They are also available at no charge at the Public Works Web Site at http://www.sbcity.org o Lh 25. Required Engineering Permits m a. Grading permit. N b. On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Development LO Services-Building Division), including landscaping. Q c. Off-site improvement construction permit. N a 26. Applicable Engineering Fees o a. All plan check, permit, inspection, and impact fees are outlined on the Public o Works Fee Schedule. A deposit in the amount of 100% of the estimated checking fee for each set of plans will be required at time of application for plan a check. The amount of the fee is subject to adjustment if the construction cost estimate varies more than 10% from the estimate submitted with the application for plan checking. b. The current fee schedule is available at the Public Works Counter and at http://www.sbcily.or g 27. Traffic Requirements M LO a. All Traffic Study mitigation measures shall be implemented. 11 0 11 11 N 11 0 11 = 11 � 11 � Il a 11 M Il Il E 11 � U f� 11 Q 11 11 � E AF 11 � 11 y 11 18 Packet Pg. 558 t \\ SECTION 7. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: 0 The Planning Commission hereby takes the following action: a D 1. Adoption of Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-014 forwarding a recommendation that the Mayor and Common Council: N O a. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment(Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09, in accordance with (n §15074 (Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration) of the California o Lh Environmental Quality Act, and direct the Community Development Director to prepare and file with the Clerk of the County of San Bernardino a Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code §21152(c) and CEQA N Guidelines §15075; and a 0 ri b. Approve General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning 9 Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Q Conditional Use Permit 15-09 based on the Findings of pact and subject to the CL recommended Conditions of Approval. �a PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 20`h day of April 2016. N LO M d' T O t—Carr"y sley, Chairman N San Bernardino Planning Commission o 0 N ATTEST: a M C N E U f6 w r Mark Persico, Planning Commission Secretary Q u City of San Bernardino, California E U Q 19 Packet'Pg.559 CERTIFICATION• . I, Stephanie Sanchez, Recording Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, No. 2016-014, was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, at a regular 9 meeting thereof held on the 2 01h day of April 2016, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Heasley, Machen, Lopez, Paxton, Earp NOES: Eble, Durr ABSENT: Barnhardt, Dailey co D Cn 17 ABSTAIN: None 9 LO N Stepha e Sa)hoz, Recordi M fig ecretary City of tan B nardino,Cal o a. ui ar LO M 9 N O 0 a. E M U .2 E U .2 20 I Packet Pg. 560 6.A.f ® c, 0 Lo a _ U c ca N O to EXHIBIT "A" APPROVED PLANS O Lo T Q N a U O C- 0 co Q a c� m a� �o c� M d' r O to r O N C O i+ O N Q Q: U n. M Y C d E V Rf Y Y Q Y C d E V Y a 21 Packet Pg. 561 6.AJ dVW �30HVd 3AUVIN31 a r tuw�� o„ yy ttt►iE v-3.0aawNa38 MIS k , @ i i]r7e nag C89S ML XO@'O'd W ."'""°""�"""°' 'ONI 'U3lN93,k3H3W S,AUVVI w i '�NI'S3IYIOOSSV SStldYtOON3 13h96L dtdW 13�bv 3/�t1V1N3 L a3eorrin3° O � � � t �4EE4t8Raaie��t9�63�EE @� u, { �d� f s ,=1 IIIIIIII= 1_ p . 7 ! A ' �➢fi it191 49��`11 7i 9 C � �� � 1 F Fy 5 iIilgp� a . - al - s o 1 D ' rnn r k I- � '� I o O ' G In 4 °x r o �. �• E c b �. °?°� I t 1 1 N ID co 1lit's 9 t � °° I . • 1 0 6118 2` --- 0)$ U I t 1 1 � W 1y 2 o q I I r(t � t Cl) LO Z >_ � - t - Z e ... .. I i . i. .. ... 1 _� _ . . I .. dig y' ' BBBB I ga ' w Packet Pg. 562 ddW 130NVd 3AI1`d1N31 _ 6 6.A.f �! atu� ooMx+va i°°fFa te6i V avN1139 NiB � � h nvidsasno�Days st XO e'0'd r sm�+oacinno�wrtsr�o� ^' -4 �NI'a31N33 AOM3W SAWN 91rM dVW 1302Nd 3AIlVIN31 H ` `� 'ONI'331V10ONV SSVdnOON3 y3dO13A30 s yl � td Jill, 0 IM . _ . . D a. U c co N ., O N LO o a g y I Yaa( i 6r • C m a �+ 11 illq U) n! §�a°�S � a0ye9$ :�S@ a O 117 g 3 :°�:e j.,1l11 ji1F{�i�gAs �aa4 i�;'� � 1 � U tj,s l 3 Y�°tf sj M ; 1HIBi 1 11 111. Q Yiilr i;iC 1313 iEi !§ f Yj e� S7i O to i M Col i I � to $ ytyyty eY i �ie al�s�iY 'e e:j°re n�a,RAli�i � I ! a 0 Q II O > �y gg U H 6 d Q aY� 67 e U) Q W b ; F g1E�EeEjl4 iggFi .4pinr ig `pE ° ig far $I9 LO Z —'~ e� s .?e9i!{ tiY � irl� YebQ�� ifrPYi��g O Q � m Z$ li��j.Bi i$- `{ �4f < N MR I ei .+ Y a i igg t ES z C9 s z O a ' H O a+ 8 z o 1< 88((� p 4: Y:Eatl�Rf i� a{!ES eelp° et�oe y 2 N iY9] ab r9p '°6a ; t14 rw �� �� ' ���[�a����t�(�i°�i� �9•ri ��� p'R9 ������ 9 �fffft � � 4 °adY�=$[�`aa9�g Bi i 1r9 Yid It lit I i �a.pa @ Sij c 6iliy ets ! edl6iTi ¢ t'°� $a � Trrfle $I;$F Y gg F g I !l1ee�Ye @f Y`33�a4�er 2§ �4a� M1111 l ll i MIR tai aG �.■ 4 �a'$ iygd ea; 6�kz ti1e° S�i I iY �`�S �i�Yr�� 3�3�Tr �l:e���ryi� `:•�{�$ 1 � � Lr i L) a--- 0 , : 66ii� $ a° nlH �r�Iiii�Yor $Y I t S{ i S° isey{ i�'��a dIe_e ,�s asp tss�rfp s— T ,,r r iri ra 3r�� 9r.a rs rii lr�rY�! Packet Pg. 563 I dVW SNOwaNOO ONUSIX3 0 6.A.f t [ctlsh�n1B0i a//�eire tttlittv7',.08Y�O'd a k � [. 37vw slasno'a eats M,l%68 ONI UMN3O J DUNIII S.AZJVW M6L dVW-130MVd 3ALLVIN31 - � "7NI'331tl1�033V 5StldWO�N3 tl3d0��30 O O LO T- I 1 1 i f3 m I l j m a. , LID I { t _ �. �� �� !'r� I i�,r .. `I ---i.0 �4 y� �N $ I ' U cli a err - - �P -�-� I ' •I'' mz I _ _ 2 1 a 6$`4 (D d CL F- W m'o F �F o ----------- a f.. � r 1 l i 1 I I i• p ..� I I 1. 1 - D ' lC O CY °` o z I r ' I ' ' �°/' n'=/ i �� ' n �°�, 'i ;hN i i 'y I' i� In ..\..W i I 2 I _ I V j i �.] 1 f.^ , , t ` u _ `6j� .a 1 I ° ZnZ w-W ; -/� -' .. i, r'� 1 1 t f. [ o -^- ;v 1 I ;( In uFjW$=nww i- �"��-�_��� --'S R-r--r--4- CA- Q36 �n �' 1 -�1 li •.I I I I I 1 Il I II 1• e„\\\� yl I�� Z 6^z z /f/ �,✓� I 1 f. • I { N X040 � I I i i � i ' i i I i i i.i 5 , Q I --, I •I. � P I mi.l it N I o{I n l 1 1 I Pil O YJ 1- / P I P I P .1 1 I P I P I P P l l m •1 0 1 1 m l �• I m l 1s I , 1. to tj si ac,Aj .nom ~m� _ 1 , I eq 55$ , it 1• I I I-. 1 11 I� 1 1 1 I �`�a I I Mme -�- --�-- --'- 1--�-- --�--1- 1--J - L`'-L d I I a o i F - --- < zo ' -•It ,A-� _r-,T` -- -1 .-'- r I • I 4 I I 1. 1 1 I 1 SL I III d E 1 I 1 .II•1�.D .o I .D 1 .D y .o .v I n f n I n 1 n 1' I � _ _i ;�.1, 1 I 1 I I' 1 i 1 1 I , it I , M,• II ; L J Q \r ' , I. g , I Q Packet Pg. 564 t NV-1d ONIG"O IVnid3ONOO 0 6.A.f t tomt *=MOW v� - uewh oa,]Kro 111►La Y7'oH10tlV►1N3e [1K'X°8"O'd 4 W R W " �� :' 1N33�7 LAiO?`at YlfMR7 Q '3N1'N31N30,k3U3W S.AUVV4 9*6t dVVi 133HVd 3AIlVIN31 H _ ��NI'831VIJOSSY SSYdMi07N3 y3d°13A3O Q1 O N V- 1 1 � 1 t N O IA I ' ' I CD IQs � ` �i•i % ` _� \�_ �,�� 1 to tl r $ — �i- J 1. .� ► �L '1 N r i i t o �-.l O I ' - ( I Co salt ,' ; ,,� �, ,;,; ; a. Zw1�}y� �/� HIE _ _ ' I� t II LO / R 1 I t l rfl bl� i . c Z q JI I 1 1 N f � Q of �/ �/i i ^O 1• :' 1 I� 0 .n� ~S2� '/ /''/ F i. � + �• a —© `:`� i j �� R4 �$� i� F � i• i 1 I I ;I U M t 1 LU . 4 1 1 —IQI IIL j }4,,1_tt 1 •1' :9 i 1 II Q taf I 1. I n �``� �O\ �������� i• [I I I VI Ilt fj? I LJ I I V s 9 I 'I I fC } �„�� � � 1 i• i• � � 11 Q Packet Pg. 565 r 6.A.f — o i N M C %n O O is ��c m 1p Q rn m � Mm ~ Z, E = lm -. °LO CLO LLJ y U�� V E y C C a _ Q uQ1 a 4j V41 E U fA U cto J A- oCtL a- � u..l C UQ aU � a. N LO OJ Co Z Q Cn U U 0 Co LO N � Zoat \\ \ -� Q to tu d lu Joy w Q J — O¢ Z�W °-mO t \ ` 1 I III w W Cu tL. 0 1 r ) to W , LU �— III, I , CC � ----------`i II CQ bZ N _�- i Q li G O y w s O U d t , III, , M I1� U _ IIo 0 I�i OC�Q c d z� IIIIo� tu tLI�Vp I I,�UU' ++ QQ , Z O I 10 - ? Q W 0 II I I,z iL I Packet Pg. 566 6.A.f JL T.T.CNIOling Md if r kzilj�u. 0 IE 0 LO as D CIO CD Lh C? ... U_ 0 N JLT. III I IA C) NS 0 cl� Li CD b C7 7 LL,IL, CO S CO LO Is< in o ° X Y X /I . t UW IN 2 Packet Pg. 567 6.A.f 0 0 CL cu (D E N 0- 9 LO co co to E 9 LO o N 49 7,J El t CL CD As WT-* r'.1 U') LO 10 0.00% jer h U /> CN O 0 CD E lC i. E V < IMulqnS"40 ld W� Packet Pg. 568 w�.�:•ra 6.A.f LO .a oKiatma•tm+a r Q 0 0 to �> �® w ! a IE ® ... o .. - •,r o to _ cfl � T v 1 � , f ® Y U) lie 0 i m 0 O w c ` O rY U a M C d E L U t4 w a Y U f6 a Packet Pg. 569 6.A.f ►m+ T rn 0 T.77 7.77 c_° LO �5 D Lc h D c o o u> MT W cn T O Lr LO T 7RT CQ G N � 0 cli a, o co T a a a� cu M to a, 7 r rf O to CD T t� N c O r O y d U 0. M N E L V r Q G d E S V Rf r w a RN%K-S Packet;Pg.570 .IL T.r.OKI owournina aminno wa a�s »+w9 AaAn A. 0 c �a rn o LO LO Ln ° .. I i O (m , I ( I _ N co AF A Ln _ I M 0 ;�- - 7 r O � N C O 'r _3 O LmlI � � , 1 - i 1 1 I aswWa�s r�v��wn d Packet Pg. 571 6.A.f •cnournrn cKCOicno do INN p rn c $ C �o c r 0. sb I m � I � 1 1 1 I � � cy LO LO o 1 0 rx o j M to IL CD 1 !ICI LO M Lo I c `-y—� (V L C O MI r 7 - 1 { a 1 1 . III j ih I.�w�s��•�� �1..� Packet Pg. 572 A.Ml 6 A.f CNOUrmi flNI011nY li0nl .J.rrVJ MRI• � �� 31 O C Q LO I � ! Was �Q O N 1 0 ' LO 1 r 1 N LO it it , Q ! a I o 1 to I im Y) IIT � 1 CO M LO EM �l o I � ' U Ift �[ + Cl) i f - :t• � 1 = I 1 1 O I • [�IJ ' 1 II +Y+ 1 I I Iew"ft Ma 40 ww luij Packet Pg. 573 6.A.f rn O Lo r U c cv N O EXHIBIT "B" MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM O Ln r a N Q U C� O to r a n. t9 ai c� Lo M Lo r O co r O N C O O y d U a M C N E L U t0 a E a 22 Packet Pg. 574 6.A.f Mary's Village Project City of San Bernardino Mitigated Negative Declaration O LO MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM U C This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for use in Implementing N mitigation for the: ° Mary's Village Project The program has been prepared in compliance with State law and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND)prepared for the project by the City of San Bernardino(City.) LO r The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires adoption of a reporting or monitoring program for those measures placed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the N environment(Public Resource Code Section 21 081.6).The law states that the reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. o vi The monitoring program contains the following elements: ° T 1) The mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to ensure Qa compliance. In some instances, one action may be used to verify implementation of several 0 mitigation measures. 2) A procedure for compliance and verification has been outlined for each action necessary. This procedure designates who will take action, what action will be taken and when, and to whom and > when compliance will be reported. 3) The program has been designed to be flexible.As monitoring progresses,changes to compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those responsible for the LO program. As changes are made, new monitoring compliance procedures and records will be developed and Incorporated Into the program. This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Includes mitigation Identified in the WIND. o to MITIGATION MONITORING AND RESPONSIBILITIES N 0 As the Lead Agency,the City is responsible for ensuring full compliance with the mitigation measures adopted for the proposed project. The City will monitor and report on all mitigation aces. o Mitigation measures will be Implemented at different stages of development throughout the project area In this regard, the responsibilities for implementation have been assigned to the Applicant, Contractor, or a combination thereof. If during the course of project implementation, any of the a. mitigation measures Identified herein cannot be successfully Implemented, the City shall be M immediately Informed, and the City will then inform any affected responsible agencies. The City, in conjunction with any affected responsible agencies,will then determine if modification to the project Is E required and/or whether alternative mitigation is appropriate. U R r-. Q C d E s U B CIA < Q Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1 Packet Pg. 575 L d C ♦0� c� C ° V ` O Lh •Q ` ', • • o '2 r a =c ° a ti QI Q V • » E t31 m Qy m 0 U ar ar N 0 3 c ro -M C6 m o a) Lh Ca or Cn C Ln 2 T ° Q CL © o C c N » V E (} u Or N Or U Car' CL E Q Cm CD �} w o .C . U (7 ro i T Y IL W cs - S :s Q) m m 0 L 0 T � ._N 'C N 4'r •t3 CL.N m 0 m O 0.. • ° M 0 ,Z C O • (a _ L2.. C n r >-N © 00 CL o W N cs W -0 0 Q) N N �;•_v EL' Qy c C C .� w w m r ° ,y m tD -0 4 U cxr ` O � � _C N � ++ 0 d �_ a� cd ° -, 3 Noc m3ar Warms; � '_ 0. 0 > W ED 0 0 c Ear o Q 7 ` 'RS t N 1] N C C N 0 0 C N qr �. ar 0 i- O N- _ '} O ,Z _ E m .E N i� -p Lr n. m ,13 .O Cl- d Ca 1L ° U C O N o V QS vi U N (D � N ° Ln Q ° � � M 2 C m.0 C - N W -- Cr 2 N C7 v �; ° � n ¢r O ar tts `gym `ZQca � O ° CL o- C Q, ° E3 CL E uvcL ° ,a ° ° arC .° ° � v ° ° Ec ar L7 (n U m N v_, w `a. m N CL °' 0. ro m C1 p 0 fll m C C 3 m a! C RS w " roCroQ �,ar 'rrvC �+ 'o� ro E- Z r aCr ;o w ro 'm 0 ar.- CL_ ' CL c ° o c .F+ Q C > N"� > E N G_ ro N i N �3 E 6L m N m .-.« � C ' .0 QS .N N 0 .0 C C 41 ,. L ` CS ) 1- v E (U }- Cr .°' ro f- u•C s Q Packet Pg. 576 6.A:# c a c a ' Q L • T L r • a. CD C 0 ' • • m m 0 CJ > m - N p N N tm p O 0 uj tB 2 r• T U � m 4+ m fA 2 O T Q N 0 M O to TI. CL N R 4 LO Cl) LO • T O 1 T (V tfS �} Q7 ma) .�. �C C � �@ w C: ca o C a 'o6 O a) O Q7 0 i� c w o O 4s c = O M 0 o X o , !!3 {p "••' M A iS3 a Q) CL.p tl5 '" N ..�.. a- O o 9 d �:. O (B 9J SD vs QI 4n sn 63 sn chi to o N N C ... �' C fD N N .?� 0 ''S �. � U. � C C C: a'ocao av, � m'o � a� ar � 3 °� � vao a+ �ucini ioa rn nsmaoD ao �` Mom mm m o to a ss� c c .- s a rn y " - m e o = o c c m -o in o 0l-y (nn ecn M '- to 7 (n o N 7 c� m c ty ' Y tictf a) ._ v a � C O E a c0 t0 y v-4 W c N C N C: 0 a O cu c'3 ,Y c N t° o a .� a a � ' � � a s N .0 a�ci c ' a `T ro CL a > N C aci 0 - o c' Q c >,'v, n u � X- p m m o. d Q, ua ° c o CL E c 3 w o CLµ- vo a t° m `° cco j mom " a c`n a) cz ".- CL o o CL f° ca o ' o 3 c � ro a) -0 w N w .- cn vc � o U7`sa000 =v, tv ua) �, o v r- a UaM0 w 0) 0 M a. a � o maw � o n. oa 16 a u, Q 0 3 o ca co o c a o o o c � o�v, 'o a) in 'p ro to • o kr a �2� V' o•a- a a�i c c ° in 4 no b u m CL( c o o a �rn' c a o ma. ° o a�.22' = Q � � oa �' � o `' oho o '< voim •o a ` y }- Ri .0 CL F— C N O.� CL � � 01� f- m N � � � UO7 f— 0 V f6 .d: lfj Cfl t^- W t37 Q Packet Pg. 577 +^ O C " U C O o O 'Q `i • 'D Cr)ur r LO a c = a %- U * c _ E D v � N! to N 0 + O w LO ro Z +n 0 CO U W rn � o L6 • C c v 0 Q e31 -6 .0- 0 � C C 'Sfr • - ro f '0 U u 0 .0 v Cl c � CLa, Q2mo c v ro W .E c°o to a CL � CL • E vc ° 0- o� o rn ro 0 :3 L ro is to fJ N M 4} LO • v C Z:0 d _ C � • L- c N • oar c co m Ca a 0 N L N - � a � CJ CL ar a ar m - u v v ? N df Co Jr,-, p � c M ro .. O zscc c3 � a te ' O o vc % a c a i (a It ro c u) n m W ql N o CC vrcyov> b Q. O � Q ° vim ° © vcaUi m .. mom v oU � '. ` ;nE- cam E ° Cm m v o .. .. = v ro o ' o om -m ou v E n E E o E mvroA U- p U „ c • .N vw UUT y Off% L7 R30 7 a uNt'M CL U ro N Rs v O ro W c E •> 'a, 0 >,r= in 0 - v � a E Y S4° -°• O C v v E n m W� C v Q � ° ° -0 'a V w U N0 v '.o CO � C ca C O N v • to tU O .N.r N,@ S U) - 'rT N v N JJ u) C 11r 3 3 = - ro ro C � 0 � ( � v5-? E W r arvEo °cu°�iEn� !� � � ° E vU W t7a � ' v c00u (n N v t cu N U oo � .. J a } v a- v w C ro U c N U Cu CL°U E aC7 Q1 a`- E E w v ? va ,- Q Packet Pg. 578 6.A.f °C o 0 m (n ° is in m N O tv to @ ,z � U �as m ». D m � O M Q . N a ' U ° ai O to Q CL (7 �i A N @ LO M w to • v t r O to o i r O N CO =C C N O (J O `�N O p C Q7 q1 O O CO � — NOt4 C 1� O O @ 7 O 2 p - O � .. 0 - - .- � � G V � V t2 in Cu N Ltro EN 'O v_30 ` rnio N p N O N N ` v `' O O N D C 0 � m �Cr, C7) f C • @C }� i- 4 .0 .0 t7Y U 0 E m M @ C Q.Y G O 7 ' 'C3 O 7 Q1 } .0 @ Q rn r • @ t31 t75 @ 'O .d U t0 CO m N w C N ill .:T C @ N S} C C C tll U _ @ a C C .� @ C Q' t3 �.. IV .0 E _ � @. fU flro mtUO g U •C .CC — O rn m m W m � Cn = @ Q r- ra N 3 l7 Q V O 4 to E @- m C N L!1 0 —. v �, Cu @ ZT C ro N C ` ` ;v +`-� C '0 r N d to a O m 6C} m N@ ` N E Q -6 N tll = C C N O'L2 @ ` E Ql W C � p m E C ,.0 N d a � }.gym � m E � C � ` �-D 'q 20 03Em ivE E � •a E rn o a o ° G� U N c C J = C tSQ o @ 0 v m C C C7 x E �• m Packet Pg. 579 6.Af O G O O 0 ' r CL ro ro - a ro co v �0 C)LO LO mZ cn o LO Q . N V O aS 0 Q 0. LO M LO • O 0 Ir- O N � G > O A a) M aI > O O N O G u o ai cr 3 � � c � 0 0 0 >. � o — _ m O a) rn rn7 O C C sn N QY 9 C N c aU "' a: c qx y m d m '- Q3 y O W a> a; M,- n c � . a) m > iv -� �_ ? c : �- iii o .N > o m .a -0 ' tti CL C a C q c . m E m n } y d a) m a) O G O O O O Q C m = 0 .__ C O Us C O C tSi N `ta C O t0 = w lU V+ �n M 'D u c u a� 2 `n n r n. w w C � O 7 a) .� C C m °° c � @ c m O X c ' tM o � O o � o �m .� cv'ts � ' `c YcO E O >-m E �- c @ O '} m a) Vl III O C•C? Q fV6 a; uO a7 N «. ` o U) N O O C C+`) N O E m }, o C >, mem c =° c may c m C: m Q rn — QV v .> mm� m cv � _ > c a.� c .9) 3: CD c Z m m as us E �� i; a) 53 �' as v Q ° (D E m = o m war m a c m m � a u c co .o cwta � 4i cova) Ua) rsrn ca) u � cnU m c0cco �. S � va.EE ro co cC Q Packet Pg. 580 6.A.f �• © c p o 0 0 LO N , r ro a CO • ' U — � c m o (te) cn Z w r in LO Q • U ce) 0 co Q CL m • ai w � N m� G ♦ LO M LO s � • O O N 7a p tT G p Uj a)t O a3 aMf V a) 0 a) U t9 L c w Q N tMA M tN0 '� N '_ ?� N N@ F=" O ."�i O 4) Q cm i E 0) c V p , '4 y c tD C O 47 C rnC a) n > ia a) ,y O a) • O � O N O M O Ma` o c w 2 o c c N v c o U • c as uN) n..a m N G F' E o n». o cn N o . Q C coi a c c vY Fo > o v = im 0 c9 C) > N E p vi N v o N CL a) c M � o oa3ma) 00m � may �, o p ' ». m u o) o M M o o a)E o c • ui cRS vou � —_ m ° cu cuc -cp-sa °gym a) 3 as m . M mom _'u a) � N p >,a) _ � — E ` U V c N — c crnao 0 c voi'o c a @ c o. m p n aci o Mc c o C [].c M M N y» U N N a) �- > > N M c w 0a v a) coCL— a) c — caZ5Ep o- M c M cm CL +. CU c n+ M p OJ V _ M 075 M CM0 .= c U V 0) 0 .0 ++ v ~ M � m a �'3i' c c aa) m C -0 c o 'U = -o m aria o N ?� coo � ,. � v ° a) .c E '> .o o. ;o o a) a) �, Mw E N � EEi a ov ' Q `� ) ua) 0a; m o � cn v°i ° � %) tun s Nt h � c c c Oa ° M M a H M ° .v u c c M a uTiN ctiOWMF- � to Packet h , asys�SONM Q Packet Pg. 581 6.A.f o c rn C o 0 E �m 0 MCL 0 co LO w 0 T o O O � ai 0? (u � � � ° � o a ro prom cm 0a) wc»o0 U a ' E o m aw vE a ° U o y 2 c) -0 0 p o ri U) m to m T Co .m max- ow L7 tv m Er m O T Q E O a) CL r. .° C c N CU y ti. . °) L 4 � M LO c W r co 4? • . Q. nc.R TO .� tD fQ U p N �- }+O W r (D Z c to c 4) 0 w `- 0 c c 0 to N m c c O .Q fU C c . = 0 ° � O .t � m � p�j .c O O .O �: M C O m CL N m N `O = O m cS M O . m 'O N U N m U .O m 4 x:07) C Q? N — f9 :� > � m 3 E « CL C `_'" - C° c 'n 3 s� c C,z� O v._ = 30 ° m O m m 3 .o m m n ECC ? E c n -O E � � � _ a = c m aD _ o �y� Npwcu E ° at ° a fUa0 0cn cun2Cy � m G a m n .5 amt m Rs � _ � c ° CE a �, ° C) O U d 3 U) c c:cn O O "U E = 2 N � O C O � O N c p O • C y (�) O 'O ro 0 3 cco O LL C C O in C V)� O � m W U +`'° -0 - rr p3 j O 0 = 3+ c • td c v U E G iU .cn m U•°- ai c' 0 ° O a c = „_� d 0 Q = d T. CD 2 a m N �`- _ = cu as'v>'3' E air c ' ° � ca °nca E vaEi tU) cc 'V) mc � 3 coS- a1In vt"v °' ° mo 'c ° ° Q�f U r O to Q7 c c a. 0 .9 � nu �. �' ° UyN ° n' o °_ 'ocacsi 3cNN0 (Ua,,,", — o CL Ua._ o)*vo ° O2P"2oli 0) �� roa n � vm0 Y m o ff ' v M o m � a v c c c ,� cn o `o - c m O Q o c � CL C: a ° ° cc ° � N o 3c E cn �N 0. Y N a N cmn O c c 2 O U vi V E O O .0 c a �,a sva � i �' nY � � �' � a °1 v c O O ° m v Ott w ° EcooWMV) mm !'_' aa� 3 ° � � iv ° or Q Packet Pg.582 "-' o C rn � C .0 O o a) O . r Cl �o • d m o • • U� O a) c m cn i:+ r O r Q . N_ Q • U D ri 0 co a a p N LO Cl) LO • 71 d' . r O to � r O Mtn u) aJ '' 'O ' O O cn a) C a) c1 a) ` N C'o O C 3 tU tV :C p �ro a} ro @ a) a) �@ 0 b EL C a) c c c O ,c c — vi 'S N : Q Q ° C O R� -0 d y O- U ¢) 0 O U C Ci @ ° Ul U M �? ro ro 1 C Q C a) v) iSS @ a) 0 a t@i O j � C - N O O cG .� .G iA E C 0 >.w V'C C a U �j ( U {3— 'O N 0 ro 'c3) a1 a) t12 ti) O a —°@ t0lf Q d 0 CL.O 0 N C ` C m ��.. 'p 'p .0 N C .0 O a a � _ m .0 @ C • U = @m V� EcU = _O� �p � � a°i � @ � �' fUEcLnB O .- Ill C p w 'C C O 4= .a _ .s'a a) CL O S7' C C .0 • N ..�.. Q S3 ' O O V).a m X C N = C 3 KO p .-.N ro CO a O V 3y@ ° aC)) uG o »U. .@_ C•S) roL] . , @ a ,O� a).Ec@ V a) a c G S Q w`�:c m V° a) Cp 0 ° ° N teN � ° " ro 3p cm a) rnc ro ° o o 0 ° � a 5 ` -� } 0 - -_ _ a . .a © o @ v m @ ro a) o CL °� ° aa) w m4t 'a a n; '0 acC cs c > a Ma g `) roo a) ro a) C O -0 Lo ° _ 0 X O O Q O O Q a) @ Q O m C u) C3 C di @ ro 0 > > > Q n. CTC C� O C d C@ @ _ @ C? U . d Packet Pg. 583 6,A.f .+ 0 c @� ¢f v o to U 1 tC Co 0 > Cl) Q..N it @ p� N O "V 9 Z• Ci m m N r o LO ro • . @ @ ( @ N U � > DoE a Co ro.c ax. m CL u as c .:3 °! O aw � � '5 2 ,2- -0 Nj �: Cl �a 0 o > 0 CL C : CD U) zto Co r- @ss .0 a E c� a?p (D a}O a) Cn Q) � asn wvClC � C7 U CA q U C 3 @ w C o =3 o � 'p LL .N CD Cl C7?@ @ ° q @ °i to i 0) LO C G C C t?} FL Qt CL Cif .�. {gyp T- 9 UC} UUU) a m 0 _ _ N N q Cn >,'O N - C <U 0 Q) a) 'o uj C v N fl@ N C@ `' 4?Q tl1 Cu G@ A 47 U a) ro C CO @ .0 C .w .C] @ V F' i E " ,C C_ CM•-'C fa iia > c m o rn X ,S o�,1 c o s� U � v y CD Co ° ro NCL @ c a) o y a� o 0 m aD s @ � ro N I m- C .2)O C ro r 70 - In Q " N ro @O g q o o m � c �a 0 @u00— q C C CL(D Im d • TJ 0 .CZ (Y N .N.. w d ro CM U C 'o M C@ a? C .C� � C � U 0) y i = ro.=.n ° .0 C3 U .S '7 (n Z1 O m .o Vf aY @ C ° a.... � a) �Q @{ a) � �a c m E- o c c � E ° o, E C) @ . q tj 4*t Q Ck ct M- o 0 �'-0 ° rn @_ iu to @ N 'ro m roc uc aNN ° romac@. tO!) = a u }` q UO @ Q. ` '} N N o t9 @ T ,Q N v ,� .' .�. '0 2 C +�+ . � U j " 2a yO @ n ' c * 4 j y C • Z7 >,.C1 o "� c - -D ti C > N y p O tU n '!' ° 4S r N m 10 E t]. m U z ° O-0 a � fV @ Ja � o 8 C > N @ �- yl N N� � J � 07 @ u q o c u ._._ ._ ro u o t- c n Packet Pg. 584' o G o rn C _a O o Q ; « X C a)x to L. N m a O C71 N a r Q. CL « Czaa c E � CL a) o o v, 072 V5 o c 0 c > ;> (n N CM o d Lh N },Z T U 0 " m D � O LO T- o N W o E Q cu c u o 0 >. v a) � u v 0 >.y N • .� G CT to .° n y .G G 'A to'w tC: •°3 a CN _ N u MCa) T G •d, o G - C G N 2 N L C2. O a) C O ° aiv � ca -F rL .6 Qm'row 0 a +� ia3 � a' m aa�iN a) I .. n Wa > aNN � Gv � � oy a cr@ o w of N aI CL Q N in Z O > O > O a c C C Cf CL N > 0aN ruo 0 <t c�t � ar0- N uJQ -aaC r � o co r y a « G E c a o a) m ui u a u 2 C: Gam : OO � a `� i c U G 0 CL In Cn m u Co . C L I `0 N O LO _ � • eE G us « � G ?' E Cu m nr 0 m rn ro c g UUt/7G7vo m 0 N c ••C g C' «. N C C N (U ay G G 4a=3 C X t N L a aa t a) ' O 0 0.a - i > N G O C a O N E !v 0 2 E O U N L) � tG o N '+O N 4> a � d 0 o d+ a N in '- 4) :s (u V N N O COO a) .�.� to Cl} U v Z C O V1 r C 0)N (a CL > 0 M.0 C@ 0 0 '0 C N N }" t>l7 DIG a O G ? O G N C C N D C fu a N 7 - >y 0 S? C N O CAN -? 0)4 - O N O C Q « U V1 to CA C '0 U a (1 C O O w- tC a) O C N N C v C1 E a) U ay u �" a u »! N a) + U U N -OD m 0 Cl 10 C <V > C T] c t? N .. 7 j E C O �.°- O N CL tin t0 -J O O C w O O V Ucs ` >rn 0) 0- - A aro Q Packet Pg. 585 6.A.f �c�i � O ° ' r c� (3 r m . c ov E b IL � v Ct m m p S' 0) (v .n CL 0) 0. v C tqf N to M 0 0 CD L6 Z r Co t0 � p1 c Lo r a) W n U ay c w 00.. IV a O NL o o m G Q G o C G C �ccu-� v rn G v � ccU `= ° c ' °_)TS a u W ' r n > ens W (a i tTm U) o. o n v y �.E v) a) C)L;= L c N Q w O. 0 W o G v O C7 y c) Cn O 7 O � �! w t0.... .a 17 V N Cn.n 0-0 R o a ,n v • c C Q) a) C C C V- W rn Cl U `o 0 N 7. Cn O 0 N N +. W " CA to () C a) `- w 0 uj R) C d � C Q `O CN6 O m > ? ? U C tai c 6 rn> G ' C`LC 7- rn o n) .o " `- UC? t"v -o O E a) 0 .0 a) a) Co v a) a) m J m a ro = U7 c � m <n cn E 'a o rn � 'Er w `t oz0 0 .; (b C G cazs " W V) 2 o o rn o n 0c ~ v G v) .otr )n o0 x c V CL 0 V C O i.. 0 tU Q. � o o a °v � a= w c m cU a) U p C Cn ZZ a M O U "o _ C 40- .V y C O vj a) M . N C p .. • Co mnm N d 2: myr Gfl E � c Qf C 0D � a3 ro d N � � o u� oC73 G L in C t N a: C , d) .n 7 O } Q O U` O O +c�+ C LL �+ Q �- w U a3 O o_.- a) C O • oc tip .. mw ani rnt] a ti � U ° u o c a�i 'ono O �jUC Evn ?` O cpU)—mcoam QC E • E o U o o � s 4 o iU p p � °�arw E O a QE C u ' v v a W W tU a C 0 W M 0 } ?- O p di -0 Q. tJ <n > o O O O 9 .�. m E ca C9 t9 a ° ° co T In an « Z a. oC� _0ZCL m u v0 .. o Q Packet Pg. 586 0 r a 0 CL to 0 CL tm 0) C. > > N 0 as 9 LO 63 Z M U) 9 LO a) 0 'o CO N C) N > C3 o 2 CL U EL CL M Cli (U O 9 U) a>) CL U) D -a • 0 w a) CL 0 cn 0 :3 12 a. cm L to o LO M a) LO (U • C cn UJ (M CD C14 N cu cc c co a o o c a) r- cm(n c a) w a a to a) c: Q) a) C > m 0 N J-- 0 C W 0 A-- M 0 C .- .0 0 .0 -0 0 • 0 - -a ui EL (D 0 u (n Cn-a M o E o c w 0 C; 2 w c a u 0 CL - — 0 :3 (D,- C 5 w - CL z lu -0 — , -IL 3� CL E cm :3 21 t� V) Cn Co 0 r E o s w c Z - M �o CL - 0 - (o C tn 0 jo C 'intro a)c° vii C: " = , -0 a. m C (D C 12 0 U 2 0 0 m E .0- or- - M CD C) CD u 0 L2 = Cu C 0 > :3 n "M 'D E E 0) =M- C M 0 u u cL n cn a. :3 0 0 Cn > 0 Co E a) 2 2 92 w -�!- a) 0 0 u 0 a- 0 E U) 0 2 a Cn w :3 Cn E a - 0. 0 a) (� a -*a C: r 2 Q O.S -0 Cl) • EL a) 0) 3: C (n a. 0 — C 0- u a) A (D 4 ch E om-0 Ln E C: 0)0 -0 -6,5 (L 0 Zn -0 3: L mo - u 0 V) W COL (n O .c -a c .0 2 1 CL E -0 -0 C -.4 Z o 0 V C M to 'D 0 -Cu - m C CL 00. o a) w u 3: 0 a - a) m "0 0- =a) E C Cx- Vi c = M .0 Lo 0 E = .s r u) :3 E �o a 0 C: m M =0 w 0 0 CL - I M (u 0 - - m 0- 0 M -0 - ° o um 0 • > - ma E - Cu " = 0 E a) (n w Co CL -@ q- 0 =,2 0 r- a. CL w CL a a) E 0) Cp N > 0- 0) CD Q) ..�tLa- "o �o cL 0 ,0 r- E 0 fin. 6 0 - E (L CL C .0 Q. 0 :t:., L) a ,- E 0 e c CD 0 0 m CO 0 r 15- -0 2 (6 E r- o o 3: 3: —x ED 'S > C .a CL CL E 0 ,2 D. MwSo ou ou w 70M O .�in-w O ou u u in o CL -5 Cu Packet Pg. 587 C o 0 O , • V- a. r m a m r U > C— >St .� cG4 N a ami ,n (Q ',Z w r W O T" T" Q . N • U O .� cei O Q a. U LO • r @ to @ r .. M dLO' O w t V- Cl N Q3 CS >•= N O to Z7 C} ]. Ql — O N to O C C �- O `) = @ QI C A 43 Q) C D C d C C ' O O G IJ O LM `o ro v @ __ m ° @ o u mt— ro ma o y r .0 •p v .L7 Co to y Q. tfi 'Oi.f" tar'� 'O {SJJ v � � @ � �M N � C O .0 L] C t0 C Q) 'Q Q C to `m U � N G O w ¢' W= a d O.. p .N. C @ @ C Q} CS > m - > t a`> �� 0 — v@i � E 'a � c E -> -o v W CU) 0 � 3 � C a) C m �- 10 c — 0 x o o C � cn 0 m w@ � as ° Q a O C D m 4l O N N U L7 V C O tU @ . (� C � en q G N .0 C@ E @ 02 C C N . m M O VS >.— _ _C ' a V '� .� @ O q N — U � ` � � � q U � C@ In O n O � ill 'O m M C a = (F3 N O ` �-. r • W N ' @ > @ C O C 'N '�" C V �.. .Q' y E N (fS N Ql C N C +`'' �: C'y G .`�-. O CL C C U y 4 p, d Cu 2 c aC cu .Q m � C cL o 0 c c 'som Em 0 U aim° o M 0 r v '= o y = o c a) o ' w m o w ` ° n oa a o ccc E a ° Q c � ti E a a o Co a'c a v aci cu � s > Qa �m >, c E 4w o 0 @a. @� q m � v �a E n 'n w c 0 U E s � a- m E m v@ @ w o o -+'O @ E N � C d N to r- 0 U O O N � O@ G ¢ C to � Ql O d L N O!G C N @ tU .@+ A CO U '} m .� M .0 b us CL i .0 17 Q to O @@ LL N o Q Packet Pg. 588 uoi .a O o LO CL o '6 E a mmaar � � mm 'a > m m %- M o a a z LO �` Uar m cr o LO ( G U U} Q • C �= u w c o N � wtu n .0 a v >U o p = _ 0 C . Q m e .voi c ri L 0 . ❑. o = OOm o Q c CL N U 2 a. cc Q ° E 0 • o CaC vi m CU (D yr occ' aca',cr =Cu L o gy m `CJ -ca > o :3� © m"_ t O to aor 4r M • LO • U.) C: O ,�VJ ' U a) U Q) Co O *- rnmc '- - -pW 0we0 oarm •o 'oo ar — c �n — roar � O G SEf m w m c G c c m . w O E y o Cu m m m — 3 O m CL 0 O N + pr ; N Al N CCr 3 C r V n Cu C O C O Q i1 - ^'� G Cl E � tq a� — ua m m um � U '� an d 3 m t n � o yr O O S to } ? - N CL U - "fl ° C C E ar me a) no � aaC3 rnM � � rn E c m cu o cmi Ca g •E CL c—coo C — o N Na. >, a) C d>1 Cn o c 0 m a � � U) � ' � U a1 cr `j' �U5 Co Nc�-E is n°r co M U Ca O • .��. N C1. — . Co — d m ar N c a) � C a) � C `ro a j U "O C a ca C aCr 4: tJ=ii CL 3 m O .G — > C G M p � N p > Or _ to 0 U N m G 'm Q)Q .c UCzarm ? aC? T� N 0>) Ln mO arU .LGm OUMC7 C1 � O di'O G Cm O �_ T7 O 0 N ro N N a) C ar.0 E Z ar w C 0 2 � � O Q • > . .. m e � y � O 0 O U G >G CO Oro C C a m m T v a' � > Co a(U w W � � ( 0 a N CX, v r.r o CLc�- m .'o_oa.w0 m Z Z "a Qau 3 m . CL n. (1 in nr Q Packet Pg. 589 6.A.f E o o -a U m 4 s a V- m Q- c ` c .c .= o a = a w U cn v rom c > _ > to tv Ut 4. CD CV v Z" O G Z r N tat N O tft T- Ll (D C7 • 0 v Sa O w C} v U '� f%1 C > O C N .D O G C X0 N p CL 0 U p '= > ti. '� cry f n .0 C tJ3 4>1 E E yam) w _ Q CL _ E _ a s0 a) tat CL p U m U fa O D. O :3 a .n O a r to 0) Cl) * C C U') p 00 v p O v v a - � - et -� .a O U0 -a UO m O v G j ro U ro U tall v O co . ro a N = :- � cro F- � � p C U Gi O U C-C a-�C1 Q O C1 N•$ N to ' � a) a as O aO C v Q1 O N �_ O O O W a LS tl1 d _ O 0 a1 u _G o U O N G -p C y, � y .O 16 M N `o c v ro E c • c> `n E _ v CL yr v v •o o a ro .o to ° a1 rnn A 'o ' v E W M n v o M m m O Q � r • a p ro n v, v c � v1 '9 � amt otm c o a�i N U c v j to 3 c O E M C o h o E :3 U o 'C u1 v pot p ° a v_1 `acv a u1 '3 a1 .{_° aot ° �U C m v u1 , � 'a1NinZn � 0013 a o > 0v 10 ca mzs ` a — v v 01 v • tJ7 .O G � Q .5 C C O N R? to C_l to Q U a) to N cO1 Q C1 � Ll c d O O x3 V d C _@ C O O . v � � CL ro cOi F- � alrocvio O0oc� f°c � Oa) 0 a) :S CL Z 0.-o o't U U Z Q.E E SO Q Packet Pg.590 AGENDA ITEM #8 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 0 LO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION a U CASE: General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment/ Zoning Map Amendment 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 and N Conditional Use Permit 15-09 Ln HEARING DATE: April 20, 2016 m WARD: 3 D OWNER/APPLICANT: Vz Mary's Mercy Center LO 510 W. Citrus Edge Street Q Glendora, CA 91740 N Q REQUEST & LOCATION: 0 A request to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and the Zoning o District of a site containing approximately 11.02 acres from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); the subdivision consolidating the existing parcels into four (4) a separate parcels; and, the development, establishment and operation of Mary's Village as a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, , behavioral health, training and support services. The project site is located on the north side of _° A Walnut Street between Pico Avenue and San Marcos Street. N APN: 0137-051-07, 32 and 33; 0137-101-05 and 06; 0274-011-05, 14 and 28; 0274- 022-01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and 06; 0274-023-08, 09. 10 and 11; 0274-023-12 Ln through 222; 0274-023-26 through 38; 0274-023-40, 41 and 43; 0274-024-06 to through 13; and, 0274-024-21 ZONE: Residential Urban(RU) 7 0 N STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division of the Community Development Department recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-014 forwarding a recommendation that the Mayor and Common Council (please see Attachment A): U 1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 16-03, a Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09, in accordance with §15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act; and E U fC r.+ 2. Approve General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Q Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended E Conditions of Approval. 0 Q Packet Pg. 591 GPA 16-03,DCA/ZMA 15-01,SUB I5-02 and CUP 15-09 Planning Commission Date:4.20.2016 Page 2 BACKGROUND June 11,2015: General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning o Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map r 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 application was submitted. January 14, 2015: Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application and moved the Mitigated Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map o Ln Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 to the Planning Commission for m consideration. N March 2, 2016: A legal advertisement was sent to the San Bernardino Sun Newspaper for o LO publication on March 4, 2016. March 3, 2016: Notices were mailed to the property owners and residents within 500 feet < of the exterior boundaries of the subject property, providing the nature of N the request, location of the property, the date, time, and place of the Planning Commission meeting of March 16, 2016 for the Mitigated ° Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development o Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 Q (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09. March 16, 2016: This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 20, d 2016. PROJECT DESCRIPTION � L CO Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 19.50 (General Plan Amendments), Chapter 19.42 (Development Code Amendments), Chapter 19.74 (Zoning Map Amendments), M §19.04.010(2)(T) (Residential Zones Specific Standards — Social Services Use/Centers), v §19.36.020 (Conditional Use Permit Applications) and §19.66.020 (Subdivision Map Applications) of the City of San Bernardino Development Code, the applicant is requesting the o approval of General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use o Permit 15-09 to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and the Zoning District of a site containing approximately 11.02 acres from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); the subdivision consolidating the existing parcels into four (4) separate parcels; and, development, establishment and operation of Mary's Village as a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical, a behavioral health, training and support services, with the required on-site and off-site improvements. U f0 w w Q C d E t U R a� a Packet Pg. 592 GPA 16-03,DCAIZMA 15-01,SUB 15-02 and CUP 15-09 Planning Commission Date:4.20.2016 Page 3 SETTING& SITE CHARACTERISTICS The project site is located on the north side of Walnut Street between Pico Avenue and San o LO Marcos Street, within the Residential Urban (RU) zone (please see Attachments B and Q. The overall project site contains a total of approximately 11.02, and is accessible from both Walnut Street and Congress Street. The overall project site is currently vacant. Table 1 below provides a summary of the surrounding land use characteristics of the subject site and surrounding o N properties. o T_ TABLE 1: SITE AND SURROUNDING LAND USES m LOCATION LAND USE ZONE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION o Site Vacant Residential Urban(RU) Residential Urban ' North Lytle Creek Channel N/A N/A Q South Single Family Residential Residential Urban(RU) Commercial General a U East Santa Fe Railroad N/A N/A clS 0 West Single Family Residential Residential Urban(RU) Residential Urban c4 and CL Auto Dismantling Yard ai ANALYSIS Project Development , The proposed development has been designed to comply with development standards of the City of San Bernardino Development Code. Table 2 below provides a site design analysis that illustrates the consistency of the project with the Development Code and General Plan. co TABLE 2: DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL N CODE PLAN L Land Use Social Services Permitted Subject to Permitted Subject Q. Use/Centers the Approval of CUP to the Approval of W CUP (. Lot Size 11.02 Acres 20,000 Square Feet N/A U a Height 1 Story: 17 Feet 3 Stories; 42 Feet N/A Y Lot Coverage 6% (3,000 square feet) 50%max. N/A U fC w The multi-phased project ultimately envisions a village-type campus that will provide support to Q its residents to facilitate their full inclusion in the broader community. Phase I will encompass approximately 2.92 acres of the project and includes the construction of four (4) single-story E residential buildings containing approximately 7,000 square feet each that will accommodate up o to eighty-two (82) residents. These buildings will include common kitchen, dining and living Q areas, training rooms, and administrative offices. Phase 2 will encompass approximately 2.91 acres of the project and includes the development of approximately 17,000 square feet of Packet Pg. 593 GPA 16-03,DCA/ZMA 15-01,SUB 15-02 and CUP 15-09 Planning Commission Date:4.20.2016 Page 4 medical, administrative, and educational space in up to three (3) buildings. Phase 3 will encompass approximately 3.05 acres of the project and envisions the construction of up to fifteen (15) rent-subsidized housing units for graduates of Mary's Village programs. Finally, Phase 4 9 will encompass approximately 2.14 acres of the project for the future construction of two (2) r buildings containing up to a combined total of approximately 20,000 square feet to house support/community services and a chapel. c Land Use: o to The project consists of the development of a men's residential complex that will provide comprehensive on-site medical, behavioral health, training and support services that offer a CO M healthy alternative to substance abuse,mental illness or homelessness. The goal and objective of N Mary's Village necessitates an extensive and comprehensive program that affords each man a o in sense of growth and development leading to integration of the man into a new life and society. r. The development of the proposed project and the implementation of the on-site programs seek to improve the lives of its resident population, and by extension, create a positive change in the a broader community. Mary's Village seeks to address the wide range of needs of each individual v client with a goal of increasing community safety and stimulating economic vitality. ri 0 Since 1994, Mary's Mercy Center has provided similar services for women and children at its a existing San Bernardino facility. Mary's Village proposes to provide long-term residential opportunities for men in an environment that promotes holistic healing, allowing each resident to integrate into society with a renewed sense of his own worth and dignity. Operations: y The residents will live on-site 24 hours per day seven(7) days per week, and a typical resident is at the facility for a period of 12 to 18 months. The following table provides a summary of the projected staff. M LO Projected Staff Personnel Title Staffing Level Hours Days N Administrator 1 8:00am to 5:00pm M-F Program Director 1 8:00am to 5:00pm M-F o Drug and Alcohol Counselor 3 9:00am to 6:00pm M-F Case Manager 3 8:00am to 5:00pm M-F Program Manager 2 9:00am to 6:00pm M-F n Day Staff 2 8:00am to 4:00 m 7 Days o_ Evening Staff 5 4:00pm to 8:00pm 7 Days Transportation 2 8:00am to 5:00 m M-F Day House Staff 5 8:00am to 5:00pm 7 Days E Evening House Supervisor 2 1 1:00 m to 8:00am 7 Days U Evening House Staff 5 3:00pm to 11:00pm 7 Days Q Data Entry 2 9:00am to 6:00 pm M-F Cook 4 9:00am to 6:00pm 7 Days Maintenance 2 8:00am to 5:00pm M-F 39 y Packet Pg. 594 GPA 16-03,DCA/ZMA 15-01,SUB 15-02 and CUP 15-09 Planning Commission Date:4.20.2016 Page 5 Site Design/Access/Traffic The proposed development will be accessed from Walnut Street by Artesian Avenue and Pico Street, and from Congress Street. San Marcos Avenue will be improved to serve as an 9 emergency access road. The internal site circulation has been designed to adequately accommodate on-site vehicular circulation and access to the parking areas. Designated "paths of D travel" have also been provided to ensure pedestrian safety. The City's Traffic Engineering Division has reviewed and accepted the Focused Traffic Analysis prepared for the proposed a development, and the appropriate traffic related mitigation measures/Conditions of Approval o LO have been included. m Architecture V) The single-story "contemporary Mediterranean" architectural design comprised of stuccoed o LO walls and tile roofs is intended to create a village setting that is compatible to the surrounding residential neighborhoods. Q N General Plan Goals and Policies v The City of San Bernardino General Plan includes goals and policies to guide future ° development within the City, including the following: 9 Q ✓ Enhance the aesthetic quality of land uses and structures in San Bernardino. a ✓ Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in San Bernardino by strategic infill of a� new development and revitalization of existing development. or A ✓ Control development and the use of land to minimize adverse impacts. N With respect to the proposal, the applicant will be revitalizing the subject property in a manner that will enhance the physical and visual qualities of the subject property thereby enhancing the aesthetics of the surrounding neighborhood. Through this proposal, the existing property will be co transformed from a vacant underutilized site into a development that meets the City's special :, housing needs, while satisfying the Development Code requirements and will be adequately regulated through the Conditions of Approval in order to minimize potential impacts. N Development Considerations o The development of such men's residential complex is unique for the community. Therefore, in an effort to help ensure the success of the proposed project and as a safeguard to ensure its completion to the satisfaction of the City, the following Condition of Approvals has been included: U a ✓ The applicant, facility operator, and/or property owner shall submit Operational, Management and Security Plans for the men's residential complex to the Planning Division for review and approval prior to the issuance of any grading or building permit. (please see Condition of Approval No. 7) w w Q E 10 s U Q Packet Pg. 595 GPA 16-03,DCA/ZMA 15-01,SUB 15-02 and CUP 15-09 Planning Commission Date:4.20.2016 Page 6 ✓ Within two (2) years of the final Mayor and Common Council approval, construction of Phase 1 shall commence. Construction of Phase 2 shall commence within three (3) years of the Mayor and Common Council approval. Construction of Phase 3 shall commence o within four (4) years of the Mayor and Common Council approval. Construction of r Phase 4 shall commence within five (5) years of the Mayor and Common Council D approval. Failure to meet the construction commencement requirements shall make the approval of the remaining Phases null and void. (please see Condition of Approval No. 8) N O ✓ to Within six (6) months from the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each phase, for a period of two (2) years, the Planning Division shall conduct an inspection of the m business operations and property to ensure compliance with the Conditions of Approval N to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director. In the event that an o Ln unresolved issue continues to exist, the applicant shall submit an application, and appropriate application fee, for reconsideration by the Planning Commission. (please see a Condition of Approval No. 14) a U CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) ° M 0 In accordance with §15063 (Initial Study) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant submitted and the Planning Division accepted an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared in connection with General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 for the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and > the Zoning District of a site containing approximately 11.02 acres from Residential Urban (RU) ) to Residential Medium (RM); the subdivision consolidating the existing parcels into four (4) separate parcels; and, the development, establishment and operation of Mary's Village as a men's residential complex (please see Attachment D). M Accordingly, pursuant to §15072 of CEQA, a Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative co Declaration for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map N Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 was posted on December 18, 2015 for the CEQA-mandated thirty (30) day public o review and comment period, and there were no public written comments received or verbal comments presented as of the date of the preparation of this Staff Report. 4- On January 14, 2016, the Development and Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application and Environmental Determination of the Planning Division, and moved the Mitigated a Negative Declaration for General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09 to the Planning Commission for consideration. a Y Q w E U Q Packet Pg. 596 GPA 16-03,DCAIZMA 15-01,SUB 15-02 and CUP 15-09 Planning Commission Date:4.20.2016 Page 7 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-014 forwarding a 9 recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment D (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit 15-09, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. o LO Respectfully Submitted, m 0 LO Q N_ Q U M 0 Oliver Mujica Planning Division Manager Approved for Distribution: Y) LO M LO CD 7 O Cli Mark Persico, AICP Community Development Director o a m Attachments: A. Resolution No. 2016-014 B. Aerial Map Cn C. Location Map D. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, dated December 18, 2015 a� E U a� Q C d E 10 s U Q Packet Pg. 597 6.A.h IgIHAR Larry Heasley,Chair sp �7 Lance Durr, Vice Chair Andrew Machen CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO Amelia S.Lopez Jim Eble COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT oG��ED IN Dusan Barnhardt 300 North "D"Street, San Bernardino, California 92418 c Kent Paxton LO Casey Dailey Phone:(909)384-7272 • Fax:(909)384-5155 .- Steven Earp d U c N PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MINUTES APRIL 20,2016 m MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 17, 2016 0 in MINUTES OF MARCH 16,2016 a N EXTENSION OF TIME 16-01 a U D EXTENSION OF TIME 16-02 cr> 0 m EXTENSION OF TIME 16-03 a VARIANCE 16-01 a� DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 16-02 AND to CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 16-03 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-03, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT / In ZONING MAP AMENDMENT 15-01, SUBDIVISION 15-02, AND CONDITIONAL USE U) PERMIT 15-09 r DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TYPE—P 15-03 N GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-02 AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT / ZONING MAP AMENDMENT 14-17 U a c a U Y V Q I.d E U Q Page 1 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 598 6.A.h Chair Heasley called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioner Lopez led the flag salute. 0 Present: Commissioners: Heasley, Durr, Machen,Lopez,Eble, Paxton, and Earp. r a. Excused: None. Absent: Barnhardt and Dailey. Staff present: Mark Persico, Community Development Director; Steven Graham, Deputy City Attorney; Oliver Mujica, Planning Division Manager; Travis Martin, Assistant Planner; Chantal Power, Assistant Planner; Elizabeth Mora-Rodriguez, Assistant Planner and Stephanie Sanchez, o Planning Commission Secretary. LO MTM W ADMINISTRATION OF OATH uDi Stephanie Sanchez, Planning Commission Secretary administered the oath. LO CONSENT AGENDA: N 'a Mark Persico, Community Development Director, gave a brief presentation of the consent o agenda. M 0 co 1. Minutes of February 17,2016. Staff recommended approval of these minutes. a c� 2. Minutes of March 16,2016. Staff recommended approval of these minutes. _cc Jn 3. EXTENSION OF TIME 16-01 - A request to allow a one (1) year extension of time for Subdivision 05-40 for Tentative Tract Map 17329 involving the subdivision of a parcel containing approximately 55.76 acres into ninety-four (94) single family LO residential lots. LO Address: Meyers Road and Little League Drive 7 Zone: Residential Estate (RE) and Residential Low (RL) N Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA — pursuant to §15162 (Previous Environmental Determination) of the California Environmental Quality Act. Applicant: GFR Enterprises, Inc./SB 17329, LLC APN: 0261-031-1 and 10; 0261-062-11, 12, 13 and 14; a and, 0348-111-13 and 14 Ward: 5 E s Recommended Motion: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-019 adopting the Categorical Exemption for Extension of Time Q 16-01 of Subdivision 05-40 for Tentative Tract Map 17329 and approving Extension of Time 16-01 of Subdivision 05-40 for Tentative Tract Map 17329, subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. a Page 2 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 599 6.A.h 4. EXTENSION OF TIME 16-02 — A request to allow a one (1) year extension of time for Subdivision 04-23 for Tentative Tract Map 17170 involving the subdivision of a parcel containing approximately 16.0 acres into thirty (30) separate parcels (27 c single family residential lots and 3 open space lettered lots). LO T a Address: Northwest Corner of Foothill Boulevard and U Macy Street = Zone: Residential Medium (RM), Residential Suburban N (RS), and Commercial General-1(CG-1) LO Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA — pursuant to §15162 (Previous m Environmental Determination) of the California Environmental Quality Act. Applicant: Santiago Foothill Estates LO APN: 0142-041-04 Ward: 6 N_ Q Recommended Motion: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt U 0 Resolution No. 2016-013 adopting the Categorical Exemption for Extension of Time M 16-02 of Subdivision 04-23 for Tentative Tract Map 17170 and approving Extension of Time 16-02 of Subdivision 04-23 for Tentative Tract Map 17170, subject to the a a. recommended Conditions of Approval. a� 5. EXTENSION OF TIME 16-03 - A request to allow a one (1) year extension of 2 time for Subdivision 05-01 for Tentative Tract Map 17367 involving the subdivision of a parcel containing approximately 64.9 acres into sixty-nine (69) separate parcels , (66 single family residential lots,2 open space lettered lots, and one remainder lot). Address: North Side of Verdemont Avenue, East of Palm M LO Avenue Zone: Residential Low (RL) 7 Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA — pursuant to §15162 (Previous °ry Environmental Determination) of the California Environmental Quality Act. Applicant: Verdemont Heights, LLC E APN: 0261-011-02, 03 and 10; and, 0348-121-12 and 27 Ward: 6 a Recommended Motion: Staff recommended that this item be removed from the agenda and re-noticed to reflect the correct property location. s U cc Z Q 6. VARIANCE 16-01 - A request to allow the construction of a sixteen (16) foot high wall feature to exceed the maximum permitted height of ten(10) feet for an existing multi-tenant E industrial development. 49 Address: 184 W. Caroline Street Q Zone: Commercial Regional (CR-3) Page 3 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 600 6.A.h Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA — pursuant to §15303 (New Construction of Small Structures) of the California Environmental Quality Act. a, Applicant: Douglas Jones LO APN: 0164-321-84 a Ward: 3 v Recommended Motion: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-016 adopting the Categorical Exemption for Variance 16-01 0 and approving Variance 16-01, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the r recommended Conditions of Approval. co U) Mark Persico, Community Development Director, made a recommendation to continue Item o #5 to the next Planning Commission on May 18th to allow for updated noticing. LO Q Commissioner Paxton made a motion to approve the consent agenda. N Q Commissioner Eble seconded the motion. o M O The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Heasley, Durr, Machen, Lopez, Eble, Paxton and Earp.Nays: None. Abstain: None. Excused:None. Absent: Barnhardt and Dailey. a PUBLIC COMMENTS -ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA No comments. N PUBLIC HEARINGS 7. DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT 16-02 AND CONDITIONAL USE M LO PERMIT 16-03 — A request to amend §19.22.080 (Off-Site Signs) and allow the installation and operation of a freestanding freeway-oriented electronic message center sign, on a parcel containing approximately 3.40 acres. N v� Address: 1630 S. `B" Street w Zone: Commercial General (CG-1) Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA — pursuant to §15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental a Quality Act. r, Owner: E Street Holdings,LLC CD Applicant: Lamar Central Outdoor, LLC E APN: 0141-253-02 Ward: 3 Q Recommended Motion: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt w Resolution No. 2016-015 forwarding a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council the adoption of the Categorical Exemption and approval of Development Code Amendment 16-02 and Conditional Use Permit 16-03, based on the Findings 2 of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. Q Page 4 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 601 6.A.h Oliver Mujica, Planning Division Manager, gave a brief presentation of the project. Brian Smith, Lamar Advertising, 24541 Redlands Boulevard., made a short statement o regarding the project. V) a The commissioners had questions regarding the project. Commissioner Durr made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2016-015 forwarding a N recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council the adoption of the Categorical to Exemption and approval of Development Code Amendment 16-02 and Conditional Use m Permit 16-03, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. 0 LO Commissioner Eble seconded the motion. a N The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Durr, Machen, Lopez, Eble, Paxton and Earp. Nays: Heasley. Abstain: None. Excused: None. Absent: Barnhardt and Dailey. o M 0 to 8. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-03, DEVELOPMENT CODE a AMENDMENT/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT 15-01, SUBDIVISION 15-02 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-09 -A request to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and the Zoning District of a site containing approximately 11.02 acres from Residential Urban (RU) to Residential Medium > (RM); the subdivision consolidating the existing parcels into four (4) separate parcels; and, the development, establishment and operation of Mary's Village as a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and to medical,behavioral health, training and support services. Address: North side of Walnut Street between Pico Avenue 0 and San Marcos Street N Zone: Residential Urban(RU) Environmental Determination: Mitigated Negative Declaration -pursuant to §15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act. Applicant: Mary's Mercy Center a APN: 0274-022-01 LO Ward: 3 a� Recommended Motion: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-014 forwarding a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of General Q Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment(Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and Conditional Use Permit E 15-09, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of y Approval. Page 5 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 602 6.A.h Oliver Mujica, Planning Division Manager,gave a brief presentation of the project. Terry Kent, Mary's Mercy Center,made a short statement regarding the project. o LO Mike Hein, Mary's Mercy Center,made a short statement regarding the project. a. U The commissioners had questions regarding the project. cu N There was an added condition for the project: ,° m • Phase 1 shall have a maximum of 85 residents, and the overall project shall have a D maximum of 115 residents. 0 Ln Commissioner Paxton made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2016-014 forwarding a a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council the adoption of the Mitigated Negative N Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment 16-03, Development Code Amendment Q (Zoning Map Amendment) 15-01, Subdivision 15-02 (Tentative Parcel Map 19648) and o Conditional Use Permit 15-09, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended o Conditions of Approval. Q a Commissioner Machen seconded the motion. a� The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Heasley, Machen, Lopez, Paxton and Earp. `_° Nays: Eble and Durr. Abstain: None. Excused: None. Absent: Barnhardt and Dailey. N 9. DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TYPE-P 15-03—A request to allow the establishment LO and operation of a storage yard for trucks, trailers and fully enclosed "40-yard" r containers. 0 Address: 957 W. Reece Street Zone: Commercial Heavy(CH) a Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA — pursuant to §15301 (Existing Facilities)of the California Environmental Quality Act. Applicant: Brickley Environmental U APN: 0144-232-31; and, 0144-222-47 and 52 LO Ward: 1 a� Recommended Motion: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2016-021 adopting the Categorical Exemption for Development .2 Permit Type-P 15-03 and approving Development Permit Type-P, based on the d Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. E Chantal Power,Assistant Planner, gave a brief presentation of the project. U w Q Page 6 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 603 6.A.h AF A Edward Bonadiman, Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates, made a short statement regarding the project and made several inquiries as to the conditions on the project. Condition 15.B will required as part of the project: n T B) Due to the various types of materials that will be stored on-site a pretreatment device shall capture all mitigated storm water run —off for the two year storm v before it reaches the detention basin, if deemed necessary. The detention basin shall be designed in accordance with "Detention Basin Design Criteria for San o Bernardino County." Retention basins are not acceptable.* r m Commissioner Eble made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2016-021 adopting the Categorical T Exemption for Development Permit Type-P 15-03 and approving Development Permit Type-P, q LO based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. Q Commissioner Paxton seconded the motion. N a U 0 The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Heasley, Durr, Machen, Lopez, Eble, Paxton M and Earp.Nays: None. Abstain: None. Excused: None. Absent: Barnhardt and Dailey. T d a ai a, 10. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-02 AND DEVELOPMENT CODE !� AMENDMENT/ZONING MAP AMENDMENT 14-17 - A request to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation and the Zoning District from Residential Suburban (RS) to Residential Medium High-20 (RMH-20) for three (3) parcels containing a total of approximately 3.57 acres in order to construct fifty-one (5 1) attached residential units within the sphere of influence of the unincorporated LO area of the City of San Bernardino. T Address: 4630 N. "F" Street N Zone: Residential Suburban(RS) N Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA - pursuant to §15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental Quality Act. Applicant: Joseph E. Bonadiman&Associates, Inc. a APN: 0265-191-17, 18 and 34 LO Ward: 4 s Recommended Motion: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt w Resolution No. 2016-022 forwarding a recommendation to the Mayor and Common a Council the adoption of the Categorical Exemption and approval of General Plan Amendment 16-02 and Development Code Amendment/Zoning Map Amendment 0 14-17, based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the recommended Conditions of Approval. w 0 Q Page 7 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 604 6.A.h Oliver Mujica, Planning Division Manager, gave a brief presentation of the project. The commissioners had questions regarding the project. o tn Renee Mason, 665 W 48th Street, spoke in opposition. U Mareello DeBarros,4694 North F Street, spoke in opposition. CU N Rodney Lambert, 4532 North F Street, spoke in opposition. Ln MT W Pat Perez,4798 N F Street, spoke in opposition. W Chris Petersen, 747 W 48th Street, spoke in opposition. Q Brandy Barbee,4720 N F Street, spoke in opposition. N a Edward Bonadiman, Joseph E. Bonadiman&Associates, took the opportunity to respond to 0 the concerns of the public. o The commissioners had additional questions for staff. a c� Commissioner Durr made a motion to direct staff to prepare and return with of Resolution No 2016-022 forwaring a Resolution for the Mayor and Common Council recommending denial of = General Plan Amendment 16-02, Development Code Amendment / Zoning Map Amendment h 14-17. CU Commissioner Eble seconded the motion. M Ln The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Heasley, Durr, Machen, Lopez, Eble, and Earp. Nays: None. Abstain: Paxton Excused: None. Absent: Barnhardt and Dailey. o N N NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 3 None LO U a PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS/ANNOUNCEMENTS a� E None w c DIRECTOR'S REPORT E 1. Status Report on Development Code Update Project r 2. Major Projects List Q 3. Third Thursday Food Fest Page 8 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 605 6.A.h AdPWRL 4. Art Night 5. Introduction of Elizabeth Mora-Rodriguez as the New Assistant Planner ADJOURNMENT o LO T Commissioner Paxton made a motion which was unanimously carried, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting at 8:20 p.m. The next regular meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, May 18, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, First Floor, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. o LO m Minutes Adopted by Planning Commissioners: Heasley, Duff, Machen, Lopez, Eble, Paxton m and Earp. Date Approved: May 18, 2016 Minutes Prepared by: Stephanie Sanchez Q N Q U cri 0 Stephanie Sanchez Q Executive Assistant a c� a� a� LO M LO d' to T7 O N �1 y 7 G V d LO C N t U f0 Q N E t U 0 IE Q Page 9 of 9 04/20/2016 Packet Pg. 606 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the City of San Bernardino Mayor and Common Council will hold a public hearing on Monday, July 18, 2016 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino,California 92418,on the following items: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-03, DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT/ZONING o MAP AMENDMENT 15-01, SUBDIVISION 15-02 (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 19648) AND LO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-09 —A request to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use a Designation and the Zoning District of a site containing approximately 11 acres from Residential Urban v (RU) to Residential Medium (RM); the subdivision consolidating the existing parcels into four (4) c separate parcels; and, the development, establishment and operation of Mary's Mercy Center as a men's residential complex providing comprehensive on-site transitional housing, and medical,behavioral health, o training and support services. The project site is located on the north side of Walnut Street between Pico LO Avenue and San Marcos Street,within the Residential Urban(RU)zone. 00 Environmental Determination: Mitigated Negative Declaration, pursuant to §15074 of the o California Environmental Quality Act LO Owner/Applicant: Mary's Mercy Center Q APN: 0137-051-07, 32 and 33; 0137-101-05 and 06; 0274-011-05, 14 N and 28; 0274-022-01,02,03, 04,05 and 06; 0274-023-08,09. 10 a and 11; 0274-023-12 through 222; 0274-023-26 through 38; o 0274-023-40, 41 and 43; 0274-024-06 through 13; and, 0274- C.; 024-21 ° Q0 Q GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 16-02 AND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT/ZONING 0- MAP AMENDMENT 14-17 -A request to allow the change of the General Plan Land Use Designation 6 and the Zoning District from Residential Suburban(RS)to Residential Medium(RM)for three(3)parcels containing a total of approximately 3.57 acres in order to construct fifty-one(5 1)attached residential units > within the unincorporated area of the City of San Bernardino. The project site is located at 4630 N. "F" (n Street,within the Residential Suburban(RS)zone. I- Environmental Determination: Exempt from CEQA - pursuant to §15332 (In-Fill Development LO Project)of the California Environmental Quality Act. M Owner: Chih Hung Wang Applicant: Joseph E.Bonadiman&Associates,Inc. APN: 0265-191-17, 18 and 34 >, CL The Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino welcome your participation in evaluating o these items. The Mayor and Common Council will review the proposals and will consider the proposed environmental determinations in making its decisions. The public is welcome to speak at the public `° hearing or to submit written comments prior-to the hearing. For more information, please contact the E Community Development Department at City Hall,or by phone at(909)384-5057. U tt3 If you challenge the resultant action of the Mayor and Common Council in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Planning Division at,or prior to,the public hearing. 4) E U w Submitted: July 5,2016 Q Publish: July 8,2016(Display ad) Packet Pg. 607 Z:;�X(-AL STMT SAN BERNARD INK , REENTRY INITIATIVE _ 9 0 LO T Friday,June 10, 20316 a. U San Bernardino City Council Member Henry Nickel 300 North D Street cV San Bernardino, CA 92418 0 Ln T m Dear San Bernardino City Council Members: D 0 1 write to express my strong support for the Mary's Village project, which has been ui T proposed by Mary's Mercy Center in San Bernardino. This City is in desperate need of a services for the homeless population--particularly the homeless male population. This N project will have a major impact in addressing that need. 0 With over fifty percent of the residents of the City of on welfare,food stamps, Medi-Cal, o or a combination thereof, and thirty eight percent living at or below the poverty level, San Bernardino is the second poorest large city in the nation. It houses 10 percent of the county's population but 40 percent of its homeless population and approximately 70 percent of the homeless population is male. This underserved group represents a public health crisis and portends disastrous outcomes for our community if not addressed. While there are comprehensive programs for homeless women and homeless women N with children, there are no comprehensive housing programs for homeless men in the Ln Central San Bernardino Region. Mary's Mercy Center has been serving homeless M individuals or individuals at-risk of becoming homeless with dignity and respect since 1987. Over the years, thousands of individuals have received hot meals, clothing, r supportive services, access to showers, food, medical and dental services through o Mary's Mercy Center. d Mary's Mercy Center has done superlative work on behalf of the homeless in this L community for nearly 30 years. I trust them to do this difficult work and to do it well. 1 m earnestly request that you give all due consideration to this project and demonstrate your support of Mary's Village in west San Bernardino. Q a Sincerely, Cn 1 � a� E t Carolyn Eggleston,Ph.D. Executive Director Q w c d E U r 909.327.2983 fax:909.327.2101 Q 5500 UNIVERSITY I"'ARKWAY, SAN BEMAsRDINO CA 92407 Packet Pg. 608 San Bernardino Sexual Assault Services, Inc. L,�enuf-,Suve U)j AF It Cif I ii �i�—)`4)F�;� SM,; (4091393-94iN �4' 4ti" 9 to little 7. 2016 0- San Bernardino Sesmal Asiattlt St:r%icc.- In%:. 444 %, Arro--%hcad Avc. 'Sijitc fill CU C14 A" e", 11. 1 9 its Bernardino.CA 97-101 tp S"td of Ottv"am 1 Suit Bernardino City Council k-teniticr. V it-ginia Mar4tiv/ 100 N. D $treet CO San Bemardino.CA Vh:,o;2,0*,den) ()car Suit I-lermittlitto( it% Cotlavil klunibcUs: N rift: Ito V.Nprrss my support for Mar-Cs Village. whisk llw+6ccri projh*sed b% %ImA Mcrc% ('enter it) Q "an Bernardino. Tilt,,.City i% in dvspen,Ic need of smico I'or the hoincless population. particularN the homeless male Population.This if"jccl imould have a malor impact in aildreo-,ing that nve& cl Board Members, CD rfl I INct IIIIN pwrectil of 01 cc--ideol,*ittv r#n v.0ture. 6tod %lamps., Meth-Cal. or a J11(l llfirlk-vight 11cr4xill liN V :11 �,l IV o,% file J�)%Crty lewl, San Bernardino 1� The"."ofld poolv%l hqw 0- Artymefy Mrs brv�� it% in tilt: flat itll, 11 holises 11)licttx1it t i r tilt:county*S populatioll Willi-40 percent of*it being holnelus.-, -- and 70 pment of the honicless population is male. This undersomed group rcprcwnt,,s-,I public heulth Ex*cutw*Director cemi"i and rorvbadows disawmis klutcomes for our communim if not acidre-,,sed. f'QuArO throogh kVilile. illem- are :omprellowkc Illoyralit, 6,sr horflelct,� k-otlicil mid Isomele's V%ilb childmi, aCtt 111cf-C itiv tit, zlinillwhem-ikc holi'mug prM, for lioniclew, men tit Ott: Central 1iatj lierna"Jim, V9( t tlirfly kegion. %,far%*!, Mercy Cenler 11w; been serving hmneles,. individuals and intlividwfl. at-tfsk 1,11 I tulmr,I) U) becomina homcltn�,,� with dianit, anti repect since 1987, 08cr the years. thou."n,& of indl-6dual.s m flat e recei%ed hot clothing- supportive servictm. acoe,-s to shotkers- food. medical. and dentist scar iccN throtj2h %iar%*,; Merc*. Center. Untied Way of ",ait 14crumdut- Ilvxmil A,,�;stdl 'wr\icc, NISAS) tinder stand,, lite stilt)& Is, a11.11 .2 Ow ki.11 'S Mcrt!% ("oller(Irot lde-.to Ills,conjIlItImIN. S14SA-S aKo m,orks %%tilt indi%Omsk mitt jaiwi w, M > tiecd. %Vc prveide vri,,i,, intencmion. 110 cat-st counwling" atiweac\. .11111 ac 4:0111patillilvill fit%isiirn.tit init-, partner wi it relaies to client; f1w tm,cr- in :cxtvfl Oolence� \Ja",*,,- ?ticrc% ('enter lia'si iven a comnit 1li, pistine"-hip 113% allimcd otir ageneics to IlroN Ade \,\raparotind wr%ices so tm,urc hc�a ar practicc%alid ItlCre3w IJCVCS.Io wtviev%. 0 %IIjy'�, NICr1:N ('cities, 113s, a-lilt: Vwelit"Inal $so IlOtillf of tilt: 11.,mclvst, 1-hiplifalion tit this CL I­r ricarly 30 tram. I >inccrcly request that N4111 III thle consideration Ili tilt, proiect fit ind demoi isTrate Mitts support or mary's Village In wcsl San Berardino. T O T 1. Q E L) cand\ stalliov, E Packet Pg. 609 ` tAI S EIS PERRMANEWE. June 16,2016 ° Mayor R.Carey Davis and Council Members City of San Bernardino U 300 N.D Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 N 0 LO Dear Mayor and Council Members; m I am writing this letter to express Kaiser Permanente's strong support for Mary's Village project,which has been proposed by Mary's o Mercy Center in San Bernardino. The City is in dire need of services for the homeless population--particularly the homeless male Ln population. This project will have a major impact in addressing that need. Q With over fifty percent of the residents of the City on welfare,food stamps,Medi-Cal,or a combination thereof,and thirty eight percent a living at or below the poverty level, San Bernardino is the second poorest large city in the nation. It houses 10 percent of the county's o population but 40 percent of its homeless population and approximately 70 percent of the homeless population is male. This M underserved group represents a public health crisis and portends disastrous outcomes for our community if not addressed. T Q CL While there are comprehensive programs for homeless women and homeless women with children,there are no comprehensive housing programs for homeless men in the Central San Bernardino Region. Mary's Mercy Center has been serving homeless , individuals or individuals at-risk of becoming homeless with dignity and respect since 1987. Over the years,thousands of individuals !� have received hot meals,clothing,supportive services,access to showers,food, medical and dental services through Mary's Mercy > Center. Kaiser Permanente understands that poverty is a primary social determinant of health. Indicators of poverty include lack of education, LO unemployment, low income,housing instability,and use of public programs. Economic instability creates barriers to access health M services,healthy food,safe spaces for physical activities,and other necessities that contribute to good health status, Poverty is linked v to increased risk of chronic diseases,mental health problems(such as stress,anxiety,and depression),deprived child development, and premature death. Conversely,good health can lead to better productivity and improve one's economic status. The uniqueness of o Mary's Village is that it will bring comprehensive services to homeless men in one central location. m Kaiser Permanente recognizes the important work that Mary's Mercy Center does. Mary's Mercy Center has been actively engaged in the Hospital and Homeless Service Provider Convenings that Kaiser Permanente organized and held in 2015 to explore and better ;n respond to the needs of homeless individuals collectively. Kaiser Permanente staff&physicians have been volunteering at Mary's Mercy Center for several years. Mary's Mercy Center has done amazing work on behalf of the homeless in this community for nearly 30 years. We kindly and earnestly °a ask that you give all due consideration to this project and demonstrate your support of Mary's Village in west San Bernardino. N Sincly ` CD Jenoifer Rekh-Si vest Sr.Director,Public Affairs and Brand Communications E Kaiser Permanente San Bernardino County Area c� Q 9961 Sierra Avenue Fontana,CA 92335 Packet Pg. 610 .......................- Executive Director Ray Osborne Executive Committee 1PAdd inland Empi ' Landon Boucher 9 June 1, 2016 Todd Bourguignon CL :3 City of San Bernardino Tom Howell 300 North D Street d H haredrick San Bernardino, CA 92418 Ric 9 LO San Bernardino City Council: Randy Florence HomeAid Inland Empire(HAZE},the non-profit charity of the Baldy View and Riverside County Chris Lutz Chapters of the Southern California Building Industry Association(BIA), is providing this letter 9 stating our strong support for the 82-bed Mary's Village housing facility being proposed in the Martha Cowles City of San Bernardino by Mary's Mercy Center,one of our long-standing and most successful service provider partners. Brenda Dowdy N Since 1990, HomeAid Inland Empire has renovated or built 37 housing facilities with a total of 1,027 beds throughout San Bernardino and Riverside counties to provide a safe place for Harod Vandiver cli 9 people who are temporarily homeless to stay while they work to rebuild their lives and regain t CO self-sufficiency.Three of those quality housing facilities located in the City of San Bernardino, Lisa Riess-Mendez CL Veronica's Home of Mercy I and 11 and Casa Merced III, providing a total of 132 beds,were 0 successfully completed by HAI E in partnership Mary's Mercy Center. 6 Board of Directors .2 HomeAid Inland Empire works with more than 20 service provider partners throughout the Kad Kreutziger Inland Empire, and Mary's Mercy Center is one of the most effective partners we have encountered over the past 26 years when it comes to being able to provide housing and Evelyn Hawkins ca supportive services to people who have encountered challenges and misfortune in their lives. There is an urgent need in the City of San Bernardino for the type of housing facility that JoAnne Perez in Mary's Mercy Center is proposing to provide single men who need a place to live.According to the 2016 Point-In-Time(PIT)count, more than 70%of the 564 people in this city who don't Lisa Jones have an adequate place to stay are single men.This proposed facility would provide housing .0 for up to 20%of that population. 2 > Stephame Adams CD HomeAid Inland Empire strongly urges the San Bernardino City Council to approve the 82- bed housing facility at Mary's Village being proposed by Mary's Mercy Center. Safti Brown Cl) _j Det)orah l(Fistonto 1_1 Best Regards, 0 Renee Hunt•Moore Cn Ray Osborne Judy Hossainj Executive Director E a) HomeAid Inland Empire Kaylee Lett WK E V441W 3891 11th Street Riverside,CA 92501 T(951)686-0628 F(951)781-0509 www.homeaidie.org HomeAid Inland Empire is a 501 (c)(3)non-profit corporation Federal Tax 10#33-0681511 Packet Pg. 611 Ar , Unitid Way S Nr ,th D _:tr—t t Vficc 9,X 74,-, Hernircdin C.,l,tirrnia lOw- taF ax .ast�.9�5.409G c 4­.m.ri, ,-Unit.sIilax`.c�rg r Q D LIVE UN1TEDTm i • c N TO: San Bernardino City Council Member Virginia Marquez r 300 N. D Street m San�dino,CA 92418 Dear Council Me er Marquez: LO Q I write to express my strong support for the Mary's Village project,which has been proposed by N Mary's Mercy Center in San Bernardino. This City is in desperate need of services for the Q homeless population--particularly the homeless male population. This project will have a major o impact in addressing that need. M 0 cfl With over fifty percent of the residents of the City of on welfare,food stamps,Medi-Cal,or a a IL combination thereof,and thirty eight percent living at or below the poverty level, San Bernardino 0 is the second poorest large city in the nation. It houses 10 percent of the county's population but 4 40 percent of its homeless population and approximately 70 percent of the homeless population is male. This underserved group represents a public health crisis and portends disastrous outcomes for our community if not addressed. While there are comprehensive programs for homeless women and homeless women with children,there are no comprehensive housing programs for homeless men in the Central San co Bernardino Region. Mary's Mercy Center has been serving homeless individuals or individuals at-risk of becoming homeless with dignity and respect since 1987. Over the years,thousands of r individuals have received hot meals,clothing,supportive services,access to showers,food, o medical and dental services through Mary's Mercy Center. N As a long time partner agency of Arrowhead United Way,we understand the important work that Mary's Mercy Center does. We too work with individuals and families in need of assistance. a� Mary's Mercy Center has done superlative work on behalf of the homeless in this community for o nearly 30 years. I trust them to do this difficult work and to do it well. I earnestly request that a you give all due consideration to this project and demonstrate your support of Mary's Village in west San Bernardino. Y Sincp,sly, U Doug Row- � Q President EO C d E 0 U Y Q ?lease consider Arrowhead United I ay in your will or estate Packet Pg. 612 0 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY r a �em D Schaal of Dentisni, 1 .� M N O Ln June 7, 2016 m D San Bernardino City Council vn 300 N. D Street ° LO San Bernardino,CA 92418 Q N_ Q Dear San Bernardino City Council Members: o rS 0 I write to express my strong support for the Mary's Village project, which has been proposed by `r° Mary's Mercy Center in San Bernardino. This City is in desperate need of services for the nQ. homeless population--particularly the homeless male population. This project will have a major ci impact in addressing that need. With over fifty percent of the residents of the City on welfare, food stamps, Medi-Cal, or a P0 combination thereof, and thirty eight percent living at or below the poverty level, San Bernardino is the second poorest large city in the nation. It houses 10 percent of the county's population but 40 percent of its homeless population and approximately 70 percent of the C0 homeless population is male. This underserved group represents a public health crisis and portends disastrous outcomes for our community if not addressed. c 0 .N While there are comprehensive programs for homeless women and homeless women with children, there are no comprehensive housing programs for homeless men in the Central San Bernardino Region. Mary's Mercy Center has been serving homeless individuals or individuals at-risk of becoming homeless with dignity and respect since 1987. Over the years, thousands of J individuals have received hot meals, clothing, supportive services, access to showers, food, medical and dental services through Mary's Mercy Center. a The Loma Linda University School of Dentistry has provided free dental clinics several times per year to the homeless clientele of Mary's Mercy Center for the past five years. Our School c d provides similar care in many different settings every year, both domestically and s internationally. We have found the staff at Mary's Mercy Center to be some of the kindest and most dedicated individuals we have encountered anywhere. The homeless persons they serve Q (many of whom our staff has gotten to know over the years) live in extremely difficult circumstances and they would greatly benefit from the proposed Mary's Village project.The City E t cts A Seventh-dky Adtenikt Institution Q Packet Pg. 613 1 0 rn 0 LC7MA LINDA UNIVERSITY School of Dentistry N O of San Bernardino itself would benefit by having such a facility for homeless men that takes LO them off the streets. m Cn Mary's Mercy Center has done superlative work on behalf of the homeless in this q LO community for nearly 30 years. I trust them to do this difficult work and to do it well. I a earnestly request that you give all due consideration to this project and demonstrate N your support of Mary's Village in west San Bernardino. 0 M Sincerely, to "' a a Ronald 1. Dail , PhD , Dean 2 taw Loma Linda University School of Dentistry N LO M r C O .N O d' N L d rr J L O Q Q 0) ti I_ V w Q E .•1 4e�'ettth-c#a4 Adventist CllStltutor: Q Packet Pg. 614 6.A.j � 1 LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY LO P a D U June 7,2'016 c N O Ln P San Bernardino City Council soo N.D Street San Bernardino,CA 92418 r 0 Ln P Dear San Bernardino City Council Members: < N I write to express my strong support for the Mary's Village project, which has been proposed by Mary's Mercy U Center in San Bernardino. This City is in desperate need of services for the homeless population—particularly the � homeless male population. This project will have a major impact in addressing that need. o P With over fifty percent of the residents of the City on welfare,food stamps, Medi-Cal,or a combination thereof, Q and thirty eight percent living at or below the poverty level,San Bernardino is the second poorest large city in the tag nation. It houses 10 percent of the county's population but 40 percent of its homeless population and 4 approximately 70 percent of the homeless population is male. This underserved group represents a public health ca crisis and portends disastrous outcomes for our community if not addressed. N While there are comprehensive programs for homeless women and homeless women with children, there are no comprehensive housing programs for homeless men in the Central San.Bernardino Region. Mary's Mercy Center � has been serving homeless individuals or individuals at-risk of becoming homeless with dignity and respect since ,n 1987. Over the years, thousands of individuals have received hot meals,clothing,supportive services,and access LO to showers,food,medical and dental services through Mary's Mercy Center, The Loma Linda University School of Dentistry has provided free dental clinics several times per year to the o homeless clientele of Mary's Mercy Center for the past five years. Our School provides similar care in many N different settings every year, both domestically and internationally. We have found the staff at Mary's Mercy Center to be some of the kindest and most dedicated individuals we have encountered anywhere. The homeless persons they serve (many of whom our staff has gotten to know over the years) live in extremely difficult L circumstances and they would greatly benefit from the proposed Mary's Village project. The City of San Bernardino itself would benefit by having such a facility for homeless men that takes them off the streets. J L 0 Mary's Mercy Center has done superlative work on behalf of the homeless in this community for nearly s0 years. a I trust them to do this difficult work and to do it well. I earnestly request that you give all due consideration to cn this project and demonstrate your support of Mary's Village in west San Bernardino. w c m Sincerely, E Q Richard H.Hart,MD,DrPH c w President and CEO E U Q .{.lerrgth..s3uy-'lct�ertctst Irscituctraa OFFICE OFTHE PRESIDENT Loma Linda,California 92350 (909)558-4540 •fax(909) 558-0242 - www.liu.edu Packet Pg. 615 ''MIMMOV florlt,O M Sm)fit,two0w Dignity Health 1805 Medical Center Drive,San Bernardino.CA 92- St. Bernardine Medical Center 2101 N.Waterman Avenue,San Bernardino,CA 92, Community Hospital of San Bernardino LO a. June 20, 2016 C*4 9 LO T_ Sail Bernardino City Council Honorable Bessine Richard, Councilmember, 6'h Ward (n 300 N. D Street 9 LO San Bernardino, CA 92418 N Dear Councilmember Richard: On behalf of Dignity Health's Inland Empire hospitals, Community Hospital of San 9 Bernardino and St. Bernardine Medical Center, we are writing to urge your support of the to Mary's Village project being proposed by Mary's Mercy Center in San Bernardino. Dignity Health strongly believes that completion of this proposed 82-bed facility is a major step forward in filling a desperate need for shelter for the underserved male homeless population in our community. Jn While there are comprehensive programs for homeless women and homeless women with children in the San Bernardino region, there are virtually no comprehensive housing programs for homeless men. This is a significant problem for our city. As we are all acutely aware, Sall LO Bernardino is the second poorest large city in the nation and home to 40 percent of our Ln county's homeless population, approximately 70 percent of which is male. This represents a public health crisis and portends disastrous outcomes for our community if not addressed. 0 Dignity Health is committed to our mission of delivering compassionate, high-quality, > affordable services in the communities we serve, with preferential option to serve and advocate for the poor, vulnerable and disenfranchised. The two Inland Empire hospitals have been leaders in this community effort to improve the health and quality of life in San Bernardino since the early 1900s. We share this commitment and our united efforts with many other local not-for-profit organizations, including Mary's Mercy Center, with whom we 0 CL have worked since their inception in 1987. Mary's Mercy Center is a strong partner for St. Bernardine and Community Hospital. Through our Dignity Health Community Grants Program, we have supported their efforts financially, E providing$258,009 in grants over 17 years. We have also actively collaborated with them in providing services for the community and have been privileged to include their present and past leadership on the Comillunity Benefit Initiative Committee. The hospitals' comprehensive approach to community health improvement includes multi- E pronged initiatives directed at significant health needs. We view shelter as a fundamental building block to well-being. Although we do not provide those housing services directly, we see it as our responsibility to support trusted and experienced organizations that do. I Packet Pg. 616 10 In our view,there could be no organization better suited to develop and provide shelter for the vulnerable,homeless men of our community than Mary's Mercy Center. Over the years, c thousands of individuals have received hot meals, clothing, supportive services, and access to r showers, food,medical and dental services through their organization. They are a proven a. community resource, and we trust them to do this difficult work and do it well. We hope you, U too, will demonstrate your support of Mary's Village in west San Bernardino to bring these critical services to those in need. `° N O Sincerely, / m Cn 1 (n Darryl VandenBosch i June Collison a President +/President N St. Bernardine Medical Center Community Hospital of San Bernardino a U O cli 0 W T- 0. AF A t7 ci w a N f6 LO M LO r C O_ N N N L d W J Y O Q. Q N Q Q E U f� w Q C d E .0 Q Packet Pg.617 U1$05 Medical Center Drive.San Bentaklino,CA 924 Dignit,y Heatth dignit},Iiealth.orglsa)i-bernardipio. St. Bernardine Medical Center *1 Bkp*a"wn�',I-, " ` I 2101 N.Waterman Avenue,San Berryardino,CA 924 0 Commu 9 nity Hospital of San Bernardino dignityltealth.o),glstberittirdiiiemeelicaI U1 a. :D L) June 20, 2016 -0 to C14 9 LO San Bernardino City Council Honorable Benito Barrios, Councilmember.2nd Ward 300 N. D Street 9 San Bernardino, CA 92418 Dear Councilmernber Barrios: N On behalf of Dignity Health's Inland Empire hospitals, Community Hospital of San 9 Bernardino and St. Bernardine Medical Center, we are writing to urge your support of the Mary's Village project being proposed by Marys Mercy Center in San Bernardino. Dignity Health strongly believes that completion of this proposed 82-bed facility is a major step forward in filling a desperate need for shelter for the underserved male homeless population in our community. tWhile there are comprehensive programs for homeless women and homeless women with ) children in the San Bernardino region,there are virtually no comprehensive housing programs for homeless men. This is a significant problem for our city. As we are all acutely aware, San LO Bernardino is the second poorest large city in the nation and home to 40 percent of our LO county's homeless population, approximately 70 percent of which is male. This represents a public health crisis and portends disastrous outcomes for our community if not addressed. 0 T Dignity Health is committed to our mission of delivering compassionate,high-quality, > affordable services in the communities we serve,with preferential option to serve and advocate for the poor, vulnerable and disenfranchised. The two Inland Empire hospitals have been leaders in this community effort to improve the health and quality of life in San Bernardino since the early 1900s. We share this commitment and our united efforts with many other local not-for-profit organizations,including Mary's Mercy Center,with whom we 0 CL have worked since their inception in 1987. Mary's Mercy Center is a strong partner for St. Bernardine and Community Hospital. Through our Dignity Health Community Grants Program,we have supported their efforts financially, E providing$258,009 in grants over 17 years. We have also actively collaborated with them in U providing services for the community and have been privileged to include their present and past leadership on the Community Benefit Initiative Committee. The hospitals' comprehensive approach to community health improvement includes multi- E pronged initiatives directed at significant health needs. We view shelter as a fundamental U building block to well-being. Although we do not provide those housing services directly,we see it as our responsibility to support trusted and experienced organizations that do. IPacket Pg. 618 6.A.j In our view, there could be no organization better suited to develop and provide shelter for the vulnerable, homeless men of our community than Mary's Mercy Center. Over the years, a thousands of individuals have received hot meals, clothing, supportive services, and access to LO showers, food, medical and dental services through their organization. They are a proven a community resource, and we trust them to do this difficult work and do it well. We hope you, 0 too, will demonstrate your support of Mary's Village in west San Bernardino to bring these critical services to those in need. N O Sincerely, m i LO Darryl VandenBosch Ye llison a President President N St. Bemardine Medical Center Community Hospital of San Bernardino Q U �i 0 Q a c� d M NNW LO M to T O .N (NNV 1.i. L d J O CL 3 N ti C tv E t V t0 Q C O E CU t w Q Packet Pg. 619 6.A.j June 2, 2016 rn 0 LO City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street a San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001 L) N Dear Mayor and Common Council, LO I am writing you in strong support of the proposed project known as Mary's Village Transitional D Housing for Men located in the 3rd ward of San Bernardino. It is my understanding that this proposed project will be presented to the Community Development Staff on July 5th 2016. o LO I have been involved with numerous shelter providers over the years in some form or another. I Q have toured their facilities and seen firsthand how they operate.Quite honestly the sad truth is N that many times they aren't ran very well.The same however can not be said for the facilities a U that Mary's Mercy Center operates.They are bar-nun the most effective service provider I have ever had the privilege of knowing.Their facilities are always clean,organized and create a o sense of pride and dignity in not only the people they serve but also for the surrounding communities. a 0 I have seen the transition made in the lives of those that Mary's Mercy Center has helped through the Veronica's House of Mercy and Casa Merced facilities.Through a diligent work ethic, high personal standard and a fervent intent on keeping their integrity intact, Mary's Mercy Center and the individuals who operate their facilities,set an example that is seen and emulated by the people they help.They lead with love and operate with sound fiscal discipline to ensure the continued success of their programs and those they aim to serve. M It has been said that"in order for anyone to move forward, they first need to stand". Mary's Ln Mercy Center helps people"stand", stand tall and proud, building their confidence and guiding them toward a new and more prosperous fife. 0 I strongly urge that the City of San Bernardino approve this project for two simple reasons. o! 1.There is a need. Current PIT counts state that there are roughly 564 people living without adequate housing within the boundaries of the City of San Bernardino. 70%of those are single men. L 2. Mary's Village Transitional Housing for Men can help meet that need. c. Thank you all for your time, consideration and your committed service to the City of San Bernardino. c a� Sincerely, E U E Landon Boucher a 951-226-4355 w Landon@BoucherResources.com U t4 Q Packet Pg. 620 Stephanie Sanchez From: Mark Persico Sent: Monday,July 18, 2016 5:39 PM To: Stephanie Sanchez Subject: Fwd: Cherry Ave Hi Stephanie, Can you please print this and bring down to Council Chambers. Thank you, Mark Persico Community Development Director City of San Bernardino (909) 384-5357 Persico ma(@-sbcity.org Sent from my HTC EVO 4G LTE ----- Forwarded message ----- From: "Ed Bonadiman" <eda-bonadiman.com> To: "Mark Persico" <Persico Ma ,sbcity.org>, "Oliver Mujica" <Mujica Ola-sbcity.org> Subject: Cherry Ave Date: Mon, Jul 18, 2016 5:37 PM Oliver, Please continue the Item for Nany Wang on Cherry Street to the first meeting in September. Thanks! Edward J. Bonadiman, M.B.A., P.L.S. President Joseph E. Bonadiman &Associates, Inc. 234 North Arrowhead Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92408 ph (909) 885-3806 x132 cell (909) 771-6430 fax(909) 381-1721 th 1