Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11 PoliceCITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION F• -�-n: Lee Dean, Chief of Police Subject: Amendment of Chapter 8.81 and Resolution 98 -193, Expenditure of Funds For Police ORIGINAL Automation of Alarm Ordinance Fee Collection. Date: November 19, 1998 Synopsis of Previous Council action: On July 8, 1998 the Mayor and Common Council adopted Resolution 98-19' ) amending Chapter 8.8 1, Security Alarm Systems Recommended motion: 1. Adopt resolution. 2. Authorize the Director of Finance to amend the FY 1998 -99 revenue and expenditure budget to reflect the transfer of $23,900 from the Police Evidence Impound account to purchase Records Management software for the Alarm - `rdinance program. 3. f hat said ordinance be laid over for final adoption. Contact person: Cant- Michael Billdt Supporting data attached: yes FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $23,912 Source: (Acct. No.) 001 - 220 -5604 S!Rfiature Phone: 384 -5608 Ward: City Wide (Acct. Description) Police Evidence Impound account Council Notes: Finance: Agenda I/� CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 'F REPORT Sub*ect: Amendment of Chapter 8.81 and Resolution 98 -193, Expenditure of Funds For Automation of Alarm Ordinance Fee Collection. Background: Amendment of Chapter 8.81, Security Alarm Systems: On July 8, 1998, the Mayor and Common Council adopted Resolution No. 98 -193, establishing certain fees for services furnished by the City of San Bernardino. Part IV; Section II of said resolution established permit fees for alarms in the City of San Bernardino as follows: Residential alarm system, $25 Commercial alarm System, $50 In addition, the resolution increased the number of permissible false alarms from three to four false alarms, prior to the assessment of false alarm fines The adoption of Resolution #98 -193 by the Mayor and Common Council necessitated the department's review of Municipal Code, Chapter 8.81. Through our review of the security alarm system ordinance we identified the following sections that require amendment, repeal or additional language. ab- section (L) is added to Section 8.81.020 to address multiple alarms issued within a 72 -hour period. • Section 8.81.070(B), as amended, clearly defines when a separate alarm permit is required and establishes each permit is subject to a registration fee and annual fees. • Section 8.81.090, is recommended for repeal as the police department, for some time now, has not monitored or serviced any alarms in the City of San Bernardino. • Section 8.81100, as it pertains to false alarm fees, is amended to state each permit has its own false alarm count and all structures covered under one permit use the same false alarm count. • Section 8.81.110(A), is amended to insure that every alarm user files, with the police department, a notice containing the names and telephone numbers of persons responsible for response to the scene when necessary. • Sub - sections (C) and (D) are hereby added to Section 8.8 1.110 allowing the department to assess reasonable fees incurred securing premises when alarm users either refuse or fail to respond when noticed. • Section 8.81.120 is amended to require each alarm company to include the City permit number when reporting alarm activations. • Section 3, of Resolution #98 -193 be amended identifying the 365 -day period as being the annual date of when a permit was issued; all alarm accounts will begin with no false alarm on each record. Alarm Ordinance automation upgrade: A modification to the current Tiburon alarm software program is needed to automate the additional tasks and workload associated with the revised fee schedule and proposed alarm ordinance revisions. The projected cost of t1- modifications is $23,912. revised alarm fee schedule drastically changes the workload and oversight of the alarm ordinance performed by the assigned clerk. The major changes are as follows: • An annual alarm permit renewal fee has been reinstated. The fee will be billed via letter and due on the anniversary date of the permit. • The number of forgivable false alarms has been increased from three to four. • `"ime frames for renewal fees and false alarm fees will be changed from calendar year to a 365 -day period rnmencing on the date of the alarm permit. • .:ourtesy warning letters will be generated commencing on the third and subsequent false alarm and all alarm permit revocations. • Billings for annual permit renewals will need to be prepared in addition to the current false alarm fees. These changes will increase the workload of the alarm clerk by at least 25 %. The current alarm software tracks false alarms by calendar year and does not have the capability of tracking alarm permit renewal dates. Courtesy false alarm letters and all billings are generated manually. The proposed modification of the Tiburon alarm software will automate these functions, resulting in the efficient administration of the alarm ordinance. Time saved can be applied to additional oversight of the program and increased interaction with persons possessing alarm permits. Problem locations will be readily identifiable and referred to appropriate area commands for problem solving efforts. Revenue will be enhanced through the automated billing process. Financial impact: Staff proposes funding the computer automation with a one -time expenditure of $23,912 from the Police Evidence Impound account. $23,900 will be moved into the general fund as revenue and then budgeted as an expenditure in the police budget for MIS internal service charges. The MIS budget will also be adjusted accordingly. olice Evidence Impound account has been collecting funds for many years. Currently, there is approximately 5,_,o,000 in this account with additional funds being deposited sporadically. A recent audit reveals that this account is overfunded and thus monies are available for general fund purposes. The department estimates that approximately half or $175,000 of the money in this account is available for general fund use. This current Request for Council Action proposes the expenditure of $23,912 from that account. A separate Request for Council Action, generated by Management Information Services, and agreed to by the police department, will request the expenditure of $71,910 from that account for an additional Public Safety Programmer. If both of these requests are approved, approximately $80,000 will remain for additional general fund purposes. The department is not recommending that these funds be immediately encumbered. Rather, the department suggests that these funds may be used in the following ways to be specified in a subsequent staff report. • To supplement the police departments overtime account. • To pay for third year funding for the additional Public Safety Programmer as requested by Management Information Services. • To provide funding for a possible computer software upgrade to automate the collection of fees associated with the towing ordinance. • To upgrade Evidence Storage Facility in the `B" building. As required by Government Code Section 50050 and consistent with direction from the City Attorney's Office, the police department will publish the transfer of monies to the general fund. In the event that any claims are filed with the police department, sufficient funds are available to reimburse legitimate claims of three years or less. Recommendations: Staff recommends the Mayor and Common Council adopt resolution amending sections 8.81.070(B), 8.81.100, 8.81.110(A), and 8.81.120; adding subsection (C) and (D) to section 8.81.110; sub - section (L) is added to Section 8.81,.020 tQ address multiple alarms issued within a 72 -hour period; and repealing section 8.81.090 relating to City security Alarm Systems. Adoption will assist the police department in accurately tracking alarm users and identifying those alarm users who are not complying with the ordinance. In addition, the City will be able to recover cost a- -fated with securing properties when the alarm user fails to respond in a reasonable time. S,-,, recommends the Mayor and Common Council approves the expenditure of funds from the Police Evidence Impound account to automate the collection of fees associated with the Alarm Ordinance. Failure to approve expenditure will impact the police department's ability to generate projected revenue. City of San Bernardino MIS Department, Public Safety Systems False Alarm Module Proposed Design Document Purpose: The City of San Bernardino regulates the use of private and commercial alarm systems. This project seeks to enhance the present billing module to reduce the amount of time necessary to process false alarm transactions. Regulatory Issues: The City Council, by resolution and conversation, has set the following standards for false alarm events: 1. All alarm users must have a permit. 2. False Alarm Count A. Users get a total of 4 free responses in each category of alarm (burglary and robbery) during the 12 -month period, which starts with the date that the permit was issued. The response counter, for each category is reset to zero on the anniversary date that the permit was issued. B. A new data file that contains free days will need to be created. A free day occurs when the city experiences a day of abnormal weather or nature conditions. Events that occur on these dates are globally "forgiven" and are not charges against any account. (Ex. DAYFILE -> 07/14/1998 -WIND, 12/01/98 -RAIN) 3. Courtesy Notices, Warning Notices and Invoices A. A courtesy letter is generated for the third false alarm event in each category. (The courtesy letter will be in the form of a postcard) B. A warning letter is generated for the fourth false alarm event in each category. (The warning letter will be in the form of a postcard) C. The fifth and sixth responses in each category are charged a specific fine. These invoices will be sent on mailer- invoices. Once the user begins receiving billable invoices, multiple incidents can be sent on one invoice. D. The seventh through ninth responses in each category are charged the fee previously mentioned plus a penalty assessment. E. A warning letter of revocation is issued on the tenth false alarm event in each category. This notice also serves as an invoice. The alarm license will be flagged for revocation on the eleventh response. This notice also serves as an invoice. F. There should be a field in this module that automatically gets flagged at the 11"th response. The Police Department can reset this flag once a permit holder has resolved the problem with their alarm. Once the field is cleared, the next false alarm event would flag the field again and the alarm permit would again be considered for revocation. G. There should be a report and the Police Department can run that will identify all accounts that are in the revocation mode. The report should use this new field to identify these accounts. H. Invoicing continues after the eleventh incident. If the new "revocation field" is flagged, there is a new warning message asking the user to immediately contact the Police Department. Otherwise, a notice of revocation message is generated on the invoice and the "revocation flag" is set again. I. This cycle continues until the end of the annual period. 4. Renewals - All alarm users must pay an annual renewal fee. There are separates fee for residential alarms and commercial alarms. Private citizens can request a senior citizen discount. There must be a means to flag such discount accounts. Government agencies are exempt from the renewal fees. There must be a means to exclude them from the renewal billing cycle. A. Fees are invoiced for renewal annually on the anniversary of the first day of the month before the date that the permit was issued. As an example, if the user's permit expires on 07- 10 -98, the user would get a renewal notice with the 06 -01 -98 batch of renewal notices. B. Renewal invoices use the same mailer format that false alarm events also use. S. Aged Invoices /Renewals The same process should be used for aged invoices and aged renewal notices. We would like a process similar to the following: A. Renewals /Invoices that are not paid within 30 days from the date of the original invoice have a penalty assessment added to them. An invoice cycle should generate late notice invoices on mailer - invoices. B. Renewals /Invoices that are 60 days past due will generate a second warning message. Like the 30 day late notices, an invoice cycle should generate these late notices on mailer- invoices. C. Renewals /Invoices that are past due after 90 days will generate a final collection invoice. These invoices will also be sent on mailer- invoices. In addition to the mailer, a summary report needs to be created that can be sent to the City Finance Department. D. A new field should be created that reflects that fact that a 90- day late notice was sent. This field will be used to produce reports of aged collection accounts. 6. Automated Incident Processing The volume of false alarm incidents drains our staff. To help reduce the volume of work and to be more time effective, we wish to automate much of the incident processing procedure. The following is a concept that we would like to employ: False Alarm events are queued in the BROW transaction. An operator would active a process and the following procedures would happen: A. Incident /Permit Matching The process uses the MLI of the queue BROW record to search for a valid permit. Since permits have an MLI attached to them, a positive match can be made at this level. B. Rain /Wind Day Check Once a positive match is made, the process checks the date of the event again the dates in the Rain /Wind Day File. If the date of the event match a date in this file, the type of day (Rain or Wind) is passed to the Disposition Field. If the event date is not in this file, the FAL disposition is automatically passed to the Disposition Field. With the incident matched to a permit and a disposition code (provided by the Rain /Wind check or the default of FAL, the AADD record can be automatically added to the False Alarm System. No further RMS user interaction is necessary. C. "No Permit Found" Processing If a permit can not be located using the incident /permit matching process listed above, the event must be processed as an "unlicensed" event. We would like to see a procedure similar to the following: The basic location information from the false alarm incident should be transferred to a blank ALOC screen. The clerks processing the record will add /edit some basic ALOC information after double checking that the location data is valid. Once the required information has been entered, the ALOC screen will be transmitted to RMS. RMS will assign the next available permit number. It will also automatically set the RESPONSE field (discussed in Section 6 below) to "U" to flag the location as an unlicensed permit. The new FEES DUE field (also discussed below) will be set to "Y" to indicate that fees are due. The TYPE field should be filled in with the correct alarm type based on the following data: NATCALL = ALARMB TYPE -B = Y NATCALL = ALARMR TYPE -R = Y Instead of a first response courtesy card, RMS will generate a warning letter and an alarm permit application on blank white paper. The basic location information and some of the ALOC information (like alarm permit number and MLI) should automatically be filled in on the application. The new PAPERWORK field (discussed below) should be set to "Y" to indicate that an alarm permit application needs to be completed for this permit number. This will start the false alarm counter for this permit. Alarm events at this location will be recorded and processed like a permitted alarm. 7. ALOC changes A. Rename DATE field to Permit issued field. B. Change TYPE field to be three separate type files (TYPE -B and TYPE -R). These will be yes /no fields. C. Use RESPONSE field as our revoked field. The field can contain codes (A- active, C- cancel, R- revoked, U- unlicensed, V- vacation). D. ALOC will need space for 3 responsible parties (RP). The data will include name, address, work phone number, home phone number. E. ALOC will need a SENIOR CITIZEN yes /no field. F. ALOC will need a GOVERNMENT ENTITY yes /no field. G. ALOC will need a FEES DUE yes /r.o field. H. ALOC will need a PAPERWORK yes /no box. 8. AADD changes A. Expand TYPE field to TYPE -B, TYPE -R and TYPE -F fields. These will be yes /no fields. B. TYPE field should be automatically inputted from BROW based on CALL -TYPE. (Ex. An ALARMB code in BROW will put a "Y" in the TYPE -B field) November 13, 1998 Mr. Michael Eckley Project Manager City of San Bernardino MIS Division 710 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 Dear Mr. Eckley: P643- Q980029 In response to the City provided document, City of San Bernardino MIS Department, Public Safety Systems, False Alarm Module, Proposed Design Document, Tiburon is pleased to provide this quotation for modifications to the Tiburon Software required to the meet the functionality described within the document. This quotation is for Tiburon Services only, no hardware is proposed. Included in the Services to be provided under this quotation are: Design and Specification Review • Software Implementation Services. • Project Management Services The quotation being provided is based on the functionality requirements described in the City provided document. Tiburon will provide the following modifications: RMS Modifications: Due to the detailed nature of the City's False Alarm standards described in the document, Tiburon recommends a Design and Specification Review to ensure that all modifications that need to be made are agreed to by Tiburon and the City. Folllowing the Specification Review, Tiburon will implement the changes identified in the Specification Review phase. Tiburon will provide the functionality for a firm fixed price of $23,912. This price includes a credit of ten (10) days of software services carried over from the Upgrade Project. This quotation is based on the following assumptions and general comments: City to be Invoiced as follows: 1. Upon Acceptance of Quotation - 50% $11,956.00 2. Upon Production Use of RMS Modifications - 50% $11,956.00 P643- 0980029 November 13, 1998 Page 2 Payment terms are net thirty (30) days upon receipt of invoice. Terms and Condition of the existing Contract between the City and Tiburon apply. This quotation is valid for ninety (90) days from date of submittal. Please sign below indicating your acceptance of this Quotation and return this letter along with a City Purchase Order to my attention. Upon receipt of your Purchase Order, Tiburon will contact the City to schedule Design and Specification Review meetings. As always, if you have any questions, please call me at 1- 714 -712 -2925. Sincerely, Don Miller Manager - Southern California Office Western Operations Tiburon, Inc. cc: File P643 By this signature, the City of San Bernardino acknowledges and accepts the terms of this quotation. Mr. Michael Eckley Date COPY I ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS 8.81.070(B), 8.81.100,8.81.110(A) AND 8.81.120; ADDING SUBSECTION (L) TO SECTION 8.81.020 AND SUBSECTIONS (C), (D) AND (E) TO SECTION 8.81.110; AND REPEALING SECTION 8.81.090 RELATING TO CITY 4 SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS. 5 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO 6 ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 7 SECTION 1. Subsection L is hereby added to Section 8.81.020 of the San Bernardino 8 Municipal Code to read as follows: 9 "L. Common Cause. A common technical difficulty or malfunction which causes 10 an alarm system to generate a series of false alarms, all of which occur within 1 I a 72 hour period. The series of false alarms shall be counted as one false 12 alarm only if the cause of the series of false alarms is repaired before it 13 Generates additional false alarms beyond the 72 hour period, documentation 14 of the repair is provided to the Police Chief, and during the 30 -day period 15 following the repair, the alarm system generates no additional false alarms 16 from the documented cause." 17 SECTION 2. Section 8.81.070(B) is hereby amended to read as follows: 18 "B. Separate alarm permits shall be required as follows: 19 1. A single alarm system permit may be granted to any single - family residence. The 20 permit may authorize intrusion, panic and/or robbery coverage. The permit may 21 include the primary residence and any outbuildings (such as garages, sheds or hobby 22 shops) on the parcel that are not used for commercial purposes. A separate permit 23 must be issued for any buildings on the property that are used for commercial 24 purposes. If the residence and the outbuildings are on separate parcels, separate 25 permits are required for each parcel. 26 2. A single alarm system permit may be granted to any single unit of any multi - family 27 residential complex (such as an apartment, a condominium or a mobile home). The 28 permit may authorize intrusion. panic and/or robbery coverage. The permit may RLS /js [ALARNLORD] 1 4 C R 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17', i 18' 19 20' 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 include the primary residential unit and any outbuildings (such as stand -alor garages, sheds or hobby shops) used exclusively by the applicant that are not used t commercial purposes. A separate permit must be issued for any outbuildings that a, used for commercial purposes. If the residence and the outbuildings are on separe parcels, separate permits are required for each parcel. 3. A single alarm system permit may be authorized to any commercial business. T: permit may authorize intrusion, panic and/or robbery coverage. The permit m, authorize these types of coverage for any structures used by the applicant on b parcel. If a commercial business operates on more than one land parcel, the busine must have a separate permit for each parcel of land. 4. If the commercial business is a mall, strip mall or other commercial buildir complex, a single permit may be used to provide coverage for any vacant unit. unless they are on separate parcels. If located on separate parcels. separate perm: are required for each parcel. Each commercial unit rented, leased or sold to anoth, commercial business must be covered by a separate permit. 5. Each permit is subject to a registration fee and annual fees. Each permit has it's ov false alarm count. All structures covered under one permit use the same false alar- count. SECTION 3. Section 8.81.090 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby repeale. SECTION 4. Section 8.81.100 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby amende to read as follows: "The City shall charge false alarm fees at a rate set by resolution of the Mavor and Common Council. Each permit has its own false alarm count. All structures covered under one permit use the same false alarm count." SECTION 5. Section 8.81.110(A) of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is herel amended to read as follows: "A. Every alarm user shall file with the police department a notice containing the names and telephone numbers of the persons to be notified to render repairs RLS /js IALARNLORD] . .._. -. �..v:.�_. :... ��.�e..+ -Ya �u;t, e _ ..- ..rv,.w v�a:f..< �Yi�a+ 7lGtl. hX: i.. Jtrl_.. �._ �x.. �V� .:.2►.wktiM'v.JxfW..t.}j��.Y: .. R 1 2 3 4 N 5i 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2, 74 25 26 271 281 or service and secure the premises during any time the alarm is actuated. In addition, such notice may be posted. If posted, such notice shall be placed near the front door of the premises or gate if fenced, and this notice shall be posted in a position that is clearly visible. ". SECTION 6. Subsections C, D and E are hereby added to Section 8.81.110 of the S Bernardino Municipal Code to read as follows: "C. Alarm users shall pay to the City reasonable costs, as determined and assessed by the Police Chief or Fire Chief, or his/her designee, respectively, for expenses incurred in securing premises where a burglar alarm or fire alarm has been activated, whether or not the activation is a false alarm. The assessment shall be satisfied by the alarm user within fifteen days after the alarm user has been notified of the assessment and the grounds for the assessment. This section shall apply only to instances where the alarm user has failed to reasonably respond to notification that an alarm has been activated on premises owned, occupied or controlled by the alarm user. If the expenses set forth in the assessment are not paid within 15 days, the alarm user may be placed on a no response status. The alarm user will be notified by first class mail of the no response status at the address on the alarm permit. An additional amount of 10% of the amount of the expenses per month, not to exceed 100 %, shall be added to the expenses until paid. This assessment in this subsection shall be instituted to cover escalating costs incurred to pursue delinquent assessments requiring extended enforcement action." "D. Where the Police Chief or Fire Chief, or his /her designee, respectively, is required to cause the assessment of costs pursuant to the provisions of this section, he or she shall keep an accounting of the costs thereof, including administrative expenses for the abatement. The term "administrative expenses" includes but is not limited to the actual expenses and costs of the City in the preparation of notices, specifications and contracts, inspection of RLS/js [ALARNI.ORD] 1 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 O rr the work, office overhead, filing fees, and the costs of printing and mailings required under this Chapter. Upon conclusion of the assessment, he or she shall submit his or her itemized statement of costs in a Report to the Hearing Officer and set the same for a hearing before the Hearing Officer. Notice of the time and place of the hearing and a copy of the Report shall be given by the respective department to the alarm permit holder to which the assessments relate, and to any other interested person requesting the same, by first -class mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the person at his or her last - known address at least five days in advance of the hearing. The hearing shall be heard before the Hearing Officer in the Council Chambers at City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California, at such date and time as provided by resolution." "E. Hearing by the Hearing Officer. At the time set for hearing, the Hearin, Officer shall hear and consider all objections or protest to the assessment and may continue the hearing from time to time. Upon the conclusion of the hearing, the Hearing Officer shall allow or overrule any or all objections. The decision of the Hearing officer is final." SECTION 7. Section 8.81.120 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code is hereby amen& to read as follows: "Every alarm business which monitors an alarm system located within the City shall maintain on file a current listing of all such alarm systems including the alarm permit number and the name, address and telephone number of the individual or individuals from whom entry to the premises may be obtained. Said information shall be available to the police department upon request of any authorized representative thereof. The alarm permit number assigned to an alarm system by the police department shall be given to the police /fire dispatcher at the time an alarm is reported to the police /tire communications center by an alarm company, a central monitoring station, a telephone answering service or any other business that monitors RLS /js 1ALARNI.0RD1 M 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19' 20 21 22 24 25 26 27 28 and reports alarms." RLSJjs [ALARIAORD] 5 E 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19, 20 21 22 23) 24 25 26 27 28 .__. _:.. :.. ___�.:.. .. ff.+ �# s�M�? dtv. a�4>. i�. w�, �. yyry. �vr+ �. M41 °.hti6��f?L�i�kc..��YNCtiti1a�.♦ .�' -.t «.. ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF S' BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTIONS 8.81.070(B), 8.81.100,8.81.110(A) AND 8.81.1: ADDING SUBSECTION (L) TO SECTION 8.81.020 AND SUBSECTIONS (c) , (D) AND ( TO SECTION 8.81.110; AND REPEALING SECTION 8.81.090 RELATING TO CI i SECURITY ALARM SYSTEMS. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor a Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held the day of , 1998, by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT ESTRADA LIEN VACANT SCHNETZ DEVLIN ANDERSON MILLER CITY CLERK The foregoing Ordinance is hereby approved this day of .1998. Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PENN/IAN City Attorney By: ( RLS,js (ALARNLORD] 0 JUDITH VALLES, Mayor City of San Bernardino 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 '? 1� 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Sr BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 98 -193 RELATING CERTAIN FEES FOR SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY c SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section Three of Resolution No. 98 -193 of the City of San Bernardino hereby amended to read as follows: "3. The 365 day period is defined as being on the annual date of when a permit was issued; all alarm accounts will begin with no false alarm on each record. This shall not excuse or waive past due fines or permit fees that may be owed and is strictly for record keeping purposes." RLS js [FEES.RES1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 hi 14 15 16 171 18 19 20 21 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SA- BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTION 3 OF RESOLUTION NO. 98 -193 RELATING T, CERTAIN FEES FOR SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor ar Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meet thereof, held on the day of , 1998, by the following vote, to v COUNCIL MEMBERS: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT ESTRADA LIEN VACANT SCHNETZ DEVLIN ANDERSON MILLER CITY CLERK The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this day of Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PENMAN, City Attorney RLS js [FEES.RES] JUDITH VALLES, Mayor City of San Bernardino . 195