Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS5- Police CITY*OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION . , From: Lee Dean, Chief of Police Subject: Resolution of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the Mayor to file a local Dept: Police law enforcement block grant application IGINAL with the U.S. Department of Justice, Date: July 23, 1996 Bureau of Justice Administration (BJA) on behalf of the Police Department for the acquisition of replacement of Synopsis of Previous Council action: Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Records Management System (WS) computer systems. None Recommended motion: Adopt Resolution. Signature Contact person: Captain Robert Curtis Phone: 384-5606 Supporting data attached: Yes Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $123,805 ($78,300 from CDBG and $45,505 from MIS) Source: (Acct. No.) Acct. Description) Finance`° Council Notes: 75-0262 Agenda Item No. r/ -CITY 'OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT The Omnibus FY 1996 Appropriations Act, Public Law 104-134, provided $503 million for Local Law Enforcement Block Grants for local governments to underwrite projects to reduce crime and improve public safety. Funding is distributed nationally to states by a formula based, in part, by their percentage of Part I violent crime reported during the past three years. Funding for local government is also based, in part, on their percentage of state Part I violent crime. The City of San Bernardino is eligible to apply for federal funding in the amount of $1,114,251 to finance projects qualifying for one or more of the seven approved Program Purpose Areas. The grant has a ten percent cash match requirement of $123,805 that will not be waived, resulting in a total project amount of $1,238,056. The deadline for submission of applications is August 9, 1996. All complete applications will be approved by September 30, 1996. The Police Department has identified the replacement of the existing Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Records Management System (RMS) computer systems as our most urgent automation need in the next five years. The cost of replacing both systems is estimated at $1.3 million. The current RMS software is outdated, resulting in slowdowns and obstacles to accurate data retrieval that jeopardize crime analysis, investigative, and records efforts. Although the year 2000 is still on the horizon, it is rapidly becoming another obstacle to automated record keeping. The vendor has advised us RMS will not recognize the year 2000 without upgrading this system. Operationally, CAD hardware and software have exceeded system life expectancy. Hardware and software management is labor intensive because of the age and obsolescence of the entire system. The CAD software language is so outmoded that the vendor is unable to locate or hire trained programmers to support our system. Public and officer safety is jeopardized by the system interruptions which leave dispatchers unable to determine officer status or call activity. Several problems contribute to, or cause these frequent system failures. A primary factor is the fact that CAD and RMS represent two different software vendors which oftentimes results in "fingerpointing" when software problems occur. The Police, Fire and MIS departments have conducted extensive research, surveys, site visits and demonstrations of potential replacement CAD and RMS systems. We have identified a single integrated replacement system that meets our needs and resolves all of the issues and obstacles enumerated above. A replacement RMS system will ensure that the Police Department has a functional 75.0264 records management system on January 1, 2000. The new software is expected to be more user-friendly in data entry and retrieval functions, eliminate the need for shutdown to perform routine backup, improve the CLETS interface, allow report generation without slowdown of other system operations, and provide reliable data from all systems. The replacement CAD system will solve the assorted list of problems associated with our aging system. System management needs will be reduced and crime analysis will be able to develop and run reports without system restrictions or interference with real-time operations. More importantly, the new CAD system will provide a reliable communications link between the 911 Dispatch Center and field personnel, accurate and timely calls for service data for optimal deployment of field resources and a means of interfacing the new 911-PSAP (public safety answering point) system with CAD. The far-flung connections of gangs throughout the city, state and country and their impact on local violent crime has placed increased focus on technology as a weapon in the fight against crime and improvement of public safety. The replacement of our RMS and CAD systems will be the foundation that subsequent technology acquisitions are built upon. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPLICATION FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM City of San Bernardino Profile The City of San Bernardino currently has an estimated official population of 184,397, with the numbers exceeding 250,000 during daytime hours. The city has roughly 60 square miles and serves as the county seat, with the San Bernardino Police Department as its municipal law enforcement agency. In the last three decades San Bernardino has experienced significant demographic and economic changes. The once family oriented community composed of mostly middle- class working people now has nearly 40% of its population receiving government assistance. Its reputation for agricultural and industrial contributions has changed to that of the "murder capital" of the nation or, as recently stated in a Newsweek article, "187 Champions". (187 is the California penal code section for murder.) In 1970, there were 8 murders, in 1995 68 - a 750% increase. Industrial flight by major employers such as Santa Fe Railroad, May Company, Circle K, and the closure of Norton AFB, have contributed to the general decline and transformation of vibrant business corridors and well-kept residential areas into a "ghost town" atmosphere with at least one vacant and boarded up business or house on every block, and numerous "For Sale" signs posted. VIOLENT CRIME PROBLEM The resident population of San Bernardino includes approximately 13,000 known probationers, 3,000 parolees, and 1,500 sex and narcotics registrants. Combined, this accounts for roughly 10% of the total population of the city. Statistics identify San Bernardino as having a serious violent crime problem. Between 1992 and 1994, the three most recent years for which local, state, and nationwide crime statistics are available at this time, San Bernardino's population remained at .6% of California's population while its violent crimes made up 1.54% of California's violent crime index. A more long term view of the problem shows a 64% population increase between 1970 and 1994, but a six-fold increase in violent crime. Besides the already mentioned murder statistics, the most significant changes are in aggravated assaults, which are almost 9 times higher, a 700% increase in rapes and a quadrupling of robberies. Among the 47 California cities with populations of more than 100,000 listed in the FBI's 1994 Uniform Crime Report, which contains the most recent official crime data, San Bernardino ranks 17th in population, but 11th in raw Part I crime numbers. SAN BERNARDINO RANKS NUMBER ONE IN VIOLENT CRIME PER CAPITA, to include California's largest cities. Violent crimes are increasingly being committed by gang members or their associates, and the severity and brutality of crimes has escalated at an alarming rate. It is estimated that a minimum of 2,100 individuals belong to 10 of the major gangs with 90 subsets within the city. A comparison of 1994 and 1995 homicides revealed that gang-related killings have increased 150% (25 cases in 1995 versus 10 cases in 1994). A recent example of the severity of the gang problem is the case of five family members including parents and three children brutally tortured and murdered in a home invasion robbery. The suspects, later determined to be members of a local Asian gang, are linked to at least 4 other murders and numerous crimes throughout the state and the country. Proposed Program Purpose Area The far-flung connections of gangs throughout the city, state and country and their impact on local violent crimes has placed increased focus on technology as a weapon in the fight against crime and improvement of public safety. It is our goal to provide police officers and support personnel with the technological tools and data to do their jobs in the safest and most efficient manner given today's criminal activities. The San Bernardino Police Department has therefore targeted the replacement of its major automated systems, CAD and RMS, as its program purpose area. 1. Technology Investment - Historical Records Management System: In 1984, the Police Department utilized $390,000 obtained as part of a CCAP grant to purchase its first automated Records Management System (RMS). This mini-computer allowed the Police Department to begin to automate the collection and analysis of crime data. The system was enhanced in 1991, using $100,000 from the City General Fund Budget to upgrade the RMS software and add several terminals in various department units. The Department has since then outgrown even the updated version and is experiencing significant problems in dealing with growth issues and day-to-day operations. Slowdowns are common, a complete shut-down of 12 hours a month is routine, and obstacles to accurate data retrieval jeopardize crime analysis, investigative, and records efforts. Part of these problems are due to the vendor's stated difficulty in maintaining an outdated system. Although the year 2000 is still on the horizon, it is rapidly becoming another obstacle to automated record keeping. The vendor has advised us RMS will not recognize the year 2000 without upgrading this system. Even today, important data cannot be entered into RMS because of this limitation. Computer Aided Dispatch System: In 1986, a new Computer Aided Dispatch System (CAD) was coupled with the RMS System to automate the public safety dispatch center located at SBPD. The new CAD system, including hardware and software, was purchased with $320,000 from the City's General Fund. Based on 1994 and 1995 statistics, police calls for service account for over 94% of all entries. One major upgrade to CAD was made in 1993, when a software module and 153 Mobile Data Terminals were added to the system. They were placed in all police vehicles to enable dispatching via MDT, which eased the overcrowding on voice radio frequencies, and provided officers a direct link to make remote inquiries into criminal databases and the RMS System. Funding for this $1 million upgrade came from a street lighting and sweeping assessment district that freed up general fund revenue for additional police services. Operationally CAD hardware and software have exceeded system life expectancy. Hardware and software management is labor intensive because of the age and obsolescence of the entire system. The CAD software program language is so outmoded the vendor cannot continue to support our system. They are no longer able to locate or hire staff programmers who are familiar with the software language. Additionally, Crime Analysis cannot run custom reports to establish crime "hot spots" or areas with specific or unusually high criminal activity. Functionally, public and officer safety is jeopardized by the system interruptions which often leave dispatchers unable to determine officer status or call activity. Citizen safety is compromised because calls in the pending and holding queues cannot be dispatched until the information can be retrieved. Officer safety is potentially compromised because computer monitors freeze or loose unit locations and activity status. Interruptions in service are particularly critical when emergency events are occurring simultaneous to a computer crash. The loss or delay in accessing data and consequent slowdown in response time always has the potential for detrimental outcomes that could have been avoided. Several problems contribute to, or cause these frequent system failures. A primary factor is the fact that CAD and RMS represent two different vendors which oftentimes results in "fingerpointing" when software problems occur. RMS processes and Crime Analysis searches are also problematic, causing slowdowns that lead to CAD failures through system overloads. Overall, CAD is a limited information source. 2. Technology -. Future Needs The most significant reason for focusing on a technology program is the fact that our aged RMS and CAD systems can no longer meet the demands of today,s law enforcement environment. Advanced technology is essential for the reliable delivery of safe and efficient law enforcement services. Records Management System Replacement RMS software will ensure the San Bernardino Police Department has a functional records management system on January 1, 2000. New software is expected to be more user-friendly in data entry and retrieval functions; eliminate the need for shutdown to perform routine backup; improve the interface with CLETS; allow report generation without slowdown of other system operations; and provide reliable data from all systems. In addition, new software and hardware will provide a needed jail management system. Our new jail facility opened January 15, 1996, minus an automated means of booking or tracking prisoners. Computer-Aided Dispatch Currently available CAD technology will solve the assorted list of problems associated with our aged system. Non-propriety software written in a user-friendly language will reduce system management needs, and allow crime analysis to develop and run reports without system restrictions or interference with real-time operations. More importantly, the new CAD system will provide (1) a reliable communications link between the 911 Dispatch Center and field personnel; (2) accurate and timely calls for service data for optimal deployment of field resources; and (3) a means of interfacing the new 911-PSAP (public safety answering point) system with CAD. Advanced technology will provide the Police Department with a tool that is essential in fighting the war on gangs and crime. The combined CAD/RMS replacement system cost is expected to be $1,300,000.00. The City of San Bernardino has committed itself to the 10% matching-fund requirement, a contribution of $123,805.00. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM ' LOCAL APPLICATION FORM 95-600772 s City / Municipality July, 1996 City of San Bernardino 300 North V Street San Bernardino CA 92401 X Mr. Tom Minor Mayor 909-384-5133 909-384-5067 s Captain Robert W. Curtis . 909-384-5606 Ms Barbara Pachon ACH HHS A. Federal B.Match $1 ,114,251 $123,805 7-18-96 7-18-96 ` 4' * '6•.a..Pi*+fie 7'�, -3- z�w""'- - •:.. `��. a MR-M-0.^ss "..rl'S^'_a j`TiL J. .x 4s}+ ,.'r •�.. n.. LSiW' .Wrr sa.HIRING b. OVERTIME c. EQUIPMENT X w.�.... $1 ,114,251 „• a �'"°'.�, , • ,.���: �£�s.,. •:'^era -4 r.�..-._,� - �• . !�- (1)SWORN (2)CIVILIAN i &4-w J'wwl mom I (1)SCHOOLS (2)OTHER ... - y ,....? .. .- •• -Ly+,�-'' .r :- .'.a r,.i-or ..:i.�'�i'^W�:x d�.�ats�a3y��.-r't 7� i '=-rty t 7�.^ Y�.._ t �,r�'..h<3�`•� (1) ESTABLISH (2)SUPPORT �•.n•. G�.ur#..,,x _..whet..—.-.3�,T�'_..vi%�`?S�C� ��'�•,�t�.n+....a.� <�, u."*. .."'r!".1- �ati .�"��,( f �+� t�-�•7(- (1)ADULTS (2)JUVENILES (1)RURAL AREA 'Se..t'w�wn.w.�. n� 'ewS.•'d_ .»�.... T ' �T '.:.' ` Yd .�',,'«i.ri.�,M.aAi- C � ��? � '. 'l,-' "c_` T _ -. SWAN= State and local government OMB APPROVAL NO.1121-0140 EXPIRES:1/31,g6 ASSURANCES The Applicant hereby assures and certifies compliance with all Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements, including OMB Circulars No.A-21,A-110, A-122,A-128,A-87;E.O.12372 and Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements-28 CFR, Part 66, Common Rule,that govern the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted project.Also the Applicant assures and certifies that: 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant:that a reso- with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of lution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or 1966 as amended(16 USC 470),Executive Order 11593,and passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body, the Archeological and Historical Preservation Act of 1966(16 authorizing the filing of the application, including all under- USC 569a-1 et seq.) by(a)consulting with the State Historic standings and assurances contained therein, and directing Preservation Officer on the conduct of investigations,as nec- and authorizing the person identified as the official repre- essay ,,to identify gg sentative of the applicant to act in connection with the appli- in the National Register Historic Places that are subject to cation and to provide such additional information as may be adverse effects (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and required. notifying the Federal grantor agency of the existence of any such properties, and by (b) complying with all requirements 2. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uni- established by the Federal grantor agency to avoid or miti- form Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions gate adverse effects upon such properties. Act of 1970 P.L. 91-646) which provides for fair and equi- table treatment of persons displaced as a result of Federal 11. It will comply, and assure the compliance of all its and federally-assisted programs. subgrantees and contractors, with the applicable provisions 3. It will comply with of Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act p y provisions of Federal law which limit ter- of 1968,as amended, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency tain political activities of employees of a State or local unit Prevention Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as appropriate; of government whose principal employment is in connection the provisions of the current edition of the Office of Justice with an activity financed in whole or in part by Federal grants. Programs Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants, (5 USC 1501, et seq.) M7100.1; and all other applicable Federal laws, orders, 4. It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours pro- circulars, or regulations. visions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act if applicable. 12. It will comply with the provisions of 28 CFR applicable to grants and cooperative agreements including Part 18,Administrative 5. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using Review Procedure; Part 20, Criminal Justice Information Sys- their positions for a purpose that is or give the appearance of tems;Part 22,Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Sta- being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or tistical Information; Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems others, particularly those with whom they have family, busi- Operating Policies; Part 30, Intergovernmental Review of De- ness, or other ties. partment of Justice Programs and Activities;Part 42, Nondis- crimination/Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Pro- 6. It will give the sponsoring agency or the Comptroller General, cedures; Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the National through any authorized representative,access to and the right Environmental Policy Act;Part 63, Floodplain Management and to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related Wetland Protection Procedures; and Federal laws or regula- to the grant. tions applicable to Federal Assistance Programs. 7. It will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal 13. It will comply, and all its contractors will comply,with the non- Sponsoring agency concerning special requirements of law, discrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control program requirements,and other administrative requirements. and Safe Streets Act of 1968,as amended,42 USC 3789(d), or Victims of Crime Act (as appropriate);Title VI of the Civil 8. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 504 of the Reha- supervision which shall be utilized in the accomplishment of bilitation Act of 1973, as amended;Subtitle A,Title II of the the project are not listed in the Environmental protection Americans With Disabilities Act(ADA) (1990);Title IX of the Agency's (EPA-list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify Education Amendments of 1972;the Age Discrimination Act the Federal grantor agency of the receipt of any communica- of 1975; Department of Justice Non-Discrimination Regula- tion from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities tions,28 CFR Part 42,Subparts C, D, E,and G;and Depart- indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under con- ment of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 sideration for listing by the EPA. CFR Part 35 and Part 39. 9. It will comply with the flood insurance purchase requirements 14. In the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State ad- of Section 102(a)of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, ministrative agency makes a finding of discrimination after a Public Law 93-234, 87 Stat. 975, approved December 31, due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, 1976. Section 102(a) requires, on and after March 2, 1975, national origin,sex,or disability against a recipient of funds, the purchase of flood insurance in communities where such the recipient will forward a copy of the finding to the Office insurance is available as a condition for the receipt of any for Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs. Federal financial assistance for construction or acquisition purposes for use in any area that had been identified by the 15. It will provide an Equal Employment Opportunity Program if Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- required to maintain one, where the application Is for ment as an area having special flood hazards. The phrase $500,000 or more. 'Federal financial assistance' includes any form of loan, grant, guaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy, disas- 16. It will comply with the provisions of the Coastal Barrier Re- ter assistance loan or grant, or any other form of direct or sources Act (P.L. 97-348) dated October 19, 1982 (16 USC indirect Federal assistance. 3501 et seq.) which prohibits the expenditure of most new Feeral funds 10. It will assist the Federal grantor agency in its compliance sou ces System.(thin the units of the Coastal Barrier Re- Signature Date OJP FORM 40003(Rev.1-93)PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE ATTACHMENT TO SF-424. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 6 , OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS; AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Applicants should refer to the regulations cited below to determine the certification to which they are required to attest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Signature of this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, 'New Restrictions on Lobbying" and 28 CFR Part 67, 'Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonpro-curement) and Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Grants)."The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Justice determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 1. LOBBYING As required by Section 1352,Title 31 of the U.S. Code,and public(Federal,State,or local)transaction or contract under a implemented at 28 CFR Part 69,for persons entering into a public transaction;violation of Federal or State antitrust grant or cooperative agreement over$100,000,as defined at statutes or l commission of embezzlement,theft, forgery, 28 CFR Part 69,the applicant certifies that: bribery, falsification destruction of records,making false statements, or receiving stolen property;. (a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be (c)Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for in- civilly charged by a govemmental entity(Federal,State,or fluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of local)with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in any agency, a Member of Congress,an officer or employee of paragraph (1)(b)of this certification;and Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in con- nection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this applica- of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, lion had one or more public transactions(Federal,State,or renewal, amendment,or modification of any Federal grant or local)terminated for cause or default;and cooperative agreement; B.Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the (b) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or at- explanation to this application. tempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress,or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS) complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, *Disclosure of Lobbying Activities;in accordance with its instructions; As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988,and (c)The undersigned shall require that the language of this cer- implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F,for grantees,as tification be included in the award documents for all subawards defined at 28 CFR Part 67 Sections 67.615 and 67.620— at all tiers(including subgrants,contracts under grants and A.The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide cooperative agreements,and subcontracts)and that all sub- a drug-free workplace by: recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. (a)Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,dispensing,possession,or 2 DEBARMENT,SUSPENSION,AND OTHER use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS employees for violation of such prohibition; (DIRECT RECIPIENT) (b) Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and inform employees about— Suspension, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, for prospec- (1)The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; tive participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at (2)The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510- (3)Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee A.The applicant certifies that it and its principals: assistance programs;and (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debar- (4)The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for ment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department (c) Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged or agency; in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the state- ment required by paragraph (a); do Have not within a three-year period preceding this again (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by the been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the _ them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connec- tion with obtaining,attempting to obtain,or performing a grant, the employee will- OJP FORM 406116(3.91)REPLACES OJP FORMS 4051/2.406113 AND 4061/4 WHICH ARE OBSOLETE { (1)Abide by the terms of the statement;and San Bernardino Police Department (2)Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a 710 North 'D' Street violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace San Bernardino CA 92401 no later than five calendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency,in writing,within 10 calendar days Check g] if there are workplaces on file that are not indentified after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2)from an here. employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such convic- Section 67,630 of the regulations provides that a grantee that tion. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, is a State may elect to make one certification in each Federal including position title,to:Department of Justice, Office of fiscal year.A copy of which should be included with each ap- Justice Programs,ATTN:Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, plication for Department of Justice funding.States and State N.W.,Washington, D.C. 20531.Notice shall include the iden- agencies may elect to use OJP Form 4061/7. tification number(s)of each affected grant; Check p if the State has elected to complete OJP Form (f)Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar 4061/7. days of receiving notice under subparagraph(d)(2),with respect to any employee who is so convicted- (1)Taking appropriate personnel action against such an DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS) employee, up to and including termination,consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,as amended;or As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988,and 2 implemented at 28 CFR Part 67,Subpart F,for grantees,as ( ) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a defined at 28 CFR Part 67;Sections 67.615 and 67.620— drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal,State, or local health, law enforce- A.As a condition of the grant, I certify that 1 will not engage ment,or other appropriate agency; in the unlawful manufacture,distribution,dispensing, posses- (g)Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug- sion,or use of a controlled substance in conducting any free workplace through implementation of paragraphs(a),(b), activity with the grant;and (c), (d),(e),and(f). B.If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a B.The grantee may insert in the space provided below the violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity,I site(s)for the performance of work done in connection with will report the conviction, in writing,within 10 calendar days the specific grant: of the conviction,to:Department of Justice,Office of Justice Programs,ATTN:Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Place of Performance(Street address, city, county, state, zip Washington, D.C. 20531. code) As the duly authorized representative of the appliicartt, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications. 1.Grantee Name and Address: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program 95-600772 2.Application Number and/or Project Name 3.Grantee IRS/Vendor Number ,Tom Minor 4.Typed Name and Title of Authorized Representative 5. Signature 6. Date Approved by OMB DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352 NOT APPLICABLE (See reverse for public burden disclosure.) ** ** 1. Type of Federal Action: 2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type: aa. contract a. bid/offer/application ❑ a. initial filing b. grant b. initial award b. material change,,' c. cooperative agreement c. post-award d. loan For Material Change Only: e. loan guarantee year quarter f. loan insurance date of last report 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity: S. ff Reporting Entity in No.4 is Subawardee, ❑ Prime ❑ Subawardee Enter Name and Address of Prime: Tier , if/mown. Congressional District,if known: Congressional District,if(mown: 6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description; CFDA Number, if applicable. 8. Federal Action Number,if known: 9. Award Amount,if known: S 10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Entity b. Individuals Performing Services (if individual,last name,first name,MI). Cnc/uding address if different from No. 10a) (last name,first name,MI) 11. Information requested through this form is authorized by title 31 U.S.C.section 1352.This disclosure of lobbying activities is Signature: a material representation of fact upon which reliance was entered��disclosure is rK `fin' `�°f Tom Minor 1352 This information will be required pursuant b 31 U.S.C. Print Name: reported 14 the Cangness semi- annuatly and will be available for Title: Mayor who falls to file the required disclosure to $100. for of not such that$10,000 and not"'°"°than Telephone No.: 909-384-5133 Date: Auttmorized for Local Reproduction Standard Fonn—LLL INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity,whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient,at the initiation or receipt of a covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to title 31 U.S.C.section 1352.The filing of a form is required for each payment or agreement to make payment to any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Use the SF-LLL-A Continuation Sheet for additional information if the space on the form is inadequate. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change report.Refer to the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information. 1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the outcome of a covered Federal action. 2. Identify the status of the covered Federal action. 3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a followup report caused by a material change to the information previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last previously submitted report by this reporting entity for this covered Federal action. 4. Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if known. Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or subaward recipient. Identify the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the 1 st tier. Subawards include but are not limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants. 5. If the organization filing the report in item 4 checks"Subawardee,"then enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known. 6. Enter the name of the Federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level below agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard. 7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance(CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments. 8. Enter the most appropriate Federal identifying number available for the Federal action identified in item 1 (e.g., Request for Proposal (RFP) number; Invitation for Bid (IFB) number; grant announcement number, the contract, grant, or loan award number, the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Include prefixes,e.g.,"RFP-DE-90-001." 9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal amount of the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5. 10. '(a) Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the lobbying entity engaged by the reporting entity identified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action. (b) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services, and include full address if different from 10 (a). Enter Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial (MI). 11. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name, title, and telephone number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response,including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources,gathering and maintaining the data needed,and completing and reviewing the collection of information.Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project(0348-0046),Washington,D.C.20503.