HomeMy WebLinkAbout28- Planning & Building Services CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Dept: Planning & Building Services
MCC Date: January 22, 1996
Date: January 2, 1996
Synopsis of Previous Council Action: J N E;.,3f At•
None
Recommended Motion:
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council deny Development Code Amendment
No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18, based on the Findings of Fact (Exhibit 3).
&094 L,,
Al ou
Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 384-5357
Supporting data attached: Staff Report and Ordinance Ward: City-wide
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. AS
/Aako
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 95-06 AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
OWNER: C. K. Investment
1000 Quail, Suite 135
Newport Beach, CA 92660
APPLICANT: Robert H. Lee & Associates
1201 South Beach Blvd, Suite 207
La Habra, CA 90631
REQUEST/LOCATION: The applicant is requesting approval of Development Code
Amendment No. 95-06 to amend Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), to allow service stations to locate
at the corner of a major or secondary arterial with a freeway on- or off-ramp and a street
forming the boundary of the Freeway Corridor Overlay District provided the parcel is part of
a multi-tenant shopping center 10 acres or more in size. The amendment would also change
Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4), exempting service stations with convenience
stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. The
amendment would apply to properties in all commercial districts with the exception of the CN,
CG-4, and CCS-2 land use designations that are located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay
and along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp.
The applicant also requests the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 to construct an
1,872 square foot gasoline station with convenience market. The convenience .market is
proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The proposed facility
is to be located on 1.06 acres at the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway
in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. The site is an outparcel of the 11.44 acre
multi-tenant shopping center, University Town Center.
KEY POINTS: There are several key points which have been identified as follows:
Development Code Amendment No 95-06
o Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1),permits new service stations only
at the intersections of major and secondary arterials, and their intersections with
freeway off-ramps. The proposed amendment would add the provision of
allowing service stations on parcels located at the corner of a major or secondary
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 2
arterial with a freeway on- or off-ramp and a street forming the boundary of the
Freeway Corridor Overlay provided that the parcel is part of a shopping center
10 acres or more in size.
o The amendment would allow up to three stations on one of the two sides of the
freeway, provided that one of the three stations was part of a multi-tenant
shopping center 10 acres or more in size. This would result in a potential for a
maximum of 5 service stations at an intersections of a freeway and major or
secondary arterials with freeway on- or off-ramp meeting all the service station
locational criteria of this section.
o The amendment will increase the number of potential sites at the intersections of
the freeway and major or secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps by one.
Two shopping centers of 10+ acres exist adjacent to freeway intersections,
Highland Avenue Plaza (Wal-Mart Center) and University Town Center (Hughes
Market Center). Highland Avenue Plaza meets present Development Code
criteria and already has the potential of requesting and developing a service
station under a Conditional Use Permit. The University Town Center would be
the only site affected by the amendment.
o Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4)would also be amended to exempt
service stations in the Freeway Corridor Overlay with convenience stores as an
ancillary use from the 1000 foot distance criteria from other convenience stores,
providing the opportunity for a greater number of gasoline/convenience facilities
in highly travelled areas potentially reducing the number of additional trips for
minor shopping for the convenience of residents.
o Service stations or service station/convenience markets proposed under the
amendment would be subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit
allowing the City discretion in determining whether or not specific proposals are
appropriate.
o The proposed amendment conflicts with General Plan Goal 1G(m) in that it will
create an over-saturation of service stations at selected intersections by adding the
potential for a fifth station, adversely impacting a high quality of life and secure
environment for the City's residents and businesses.
o The amendment is not consistent with the original intent of the Development Code
in that it would allow service stations to be located outside of the Freeway
Corridor Overlay at locations other than the intersections of major and secondary
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 3
arterials and their intersections with freeway on- and off-ramps.
Conditional Use Permit No 95-18
O The conditional use permit cannot be approved unless Development Code
Amendment No. 95-05 is approved and implemented.
o The proposed service station is consistent with Development Code Amendment
No. 95-06 and would be compatible with the surrounding commercial
development and Scottish Rite Temple located across Varsity Avenue on the
south.
O The gasoline station/convenience store building will include the sale of beer and
wine for off-site consumption.
O The area does not have an overconcentration of licensed off-sale alcoholic
beverage outlets. According to Janice Edmonds of Alcoholic Beverage Control
(ABC) the Census Tract, 46.02, will support 11 licenses for the sale of alcohol
for off-site consumption, and currently there have only been 8 licenses issued.
A determination of public convenience or necessity (PCN) is not required.
O The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift
and is proposed for 24 hour operation.
o The Development Review Committee (DRC) had requested upgraded elevations
for greater architectural consistency with University Town Center shopping center
at the preliminary review meeting. However, based on the DRC's denial
recommendation no upgraded elevations were provided. Should the Mayor and
Council wish to consider approval of the project, it is recommended that they
review the upgraded elevations or require revisions as necessary through project
Conditions of Approval.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) STATUS
An Initial Study was prepared by staff for both the Development Code Amendment and
Conditional Use Permit. The Initial Study was presented to the Environmental Review
Committee on October 26, 1995. A Negative Declaration was proposed. The Initial Study was
made available for public review and comment from November 2, 1995 until November 22,
1995. No comments were received.
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 4
On November 30, 1995, the ERC determined that the Initial Study adequately addressed the
environmental impacts of the Development Code Amendment and Conditional Use Permit but
did not recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration and cleared the project onto Planning
commission without any recommendation. Pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines,
CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or denies.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed
both Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 at their
December 12, 1995 meeting and recommended that the Mayor and Common Council deny
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 as per staff's
recommendation. The Planning Commission vote for denial was: Ayes - Gaffney, Hamilton,
Schuiling, Stone, and Thrasher; Nays - None; Abstain - None; Absent - Brue, Cole, Gonzales,
Strimpel, and Traver.
OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL: The Mayor and
Common Council May:
1. Deny Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No.
95-18 as recommended by the Planning Commission and Staff; or
2. Adopt the proposed Negative Declaration and adopt the Ordinance (Exhibit 5)
approving Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and approve Conditional
Use Permit No. 94-18 based upon the Findings of Fact(Exhibit 6) and Conditions
of Approval and Standard Requirements (Exhibit 7).
RECON 4ENDATION: Staff recommends that the hearing be closed, and that Development
Code Amendment No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 be denied based upon the
attached Findings of Fact (Exhibit 3).
Prepared by: Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner
for Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services
Exhibit 1 Location Map
Exhibit 2 Planning Commission Staff Report
Attachment A Location Map (Included as Exhibit 1)
Attachment B Proposed Development Code Text (B-1)(Not Included),
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 Service Station
Intersection Analysis (B-2)[Revised analysis included as
Exhibit 8]
Attachment C Site Plan (C-1), Floor Plans (C-2), and Elevations (C-3)
NEMMONNONUMMUMM
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 5
Attachment D Development Code Amendment Findings of Fact(D-1)(Not
Included) and Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact(D-
2)(Not Included)
Exhibit 3 Development Code Amendment Findings of Fact for Denial (3-1)and Conditional
Use Permit Findings of Fact for denial(3-2)
Exhibit 4 Initial Study
Exhibit 5 Ordinance
Exhibit 6 Development Code Amendment Findings of Fact supporting approval (6-1)
Conditional Use Permit Finding of Fact supporting approval (6-2)
Exhibit 7 Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements
Exhibit 8 Revised Development Code Amendment Service Station Intersection Analysis
EXHIBIT 1 '
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM #
LOCATION CASE
HEARING DATE
f L r
` P
/ I •y
F r
f s
O AVL `-
Lp
S/ 1
TF �
PORTOLA
V2 I
e ,
e ® 1
G +�s
ofp -
\\ r
l ` z
Z
ST
Lye
y
v
G
EXHIBIT 2
SUND4ARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DMSION
----------------
CASE: Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 AGENDA ITEM: 5
and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 HEARING DATE: 12-12-95
WARD: 5
APPLICANT: OWNER:
ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES CK INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
1201 S. Beach Blvd., Suite 207 1000 Quail, Suite 135
La Habra, CA 90631 Newport Beach, CA 92260
REQUEST / LOCATION - A request to amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1) to
allow service station construction at specified intersections in conjunction with existing shopping centers
ten or more acres in size. The Amendment would apply Citywide.
Approval of a Conditional Use Permit to construct an 1,872 square foot service station/convenience
market to include off-sale of beer and wine on a 1.06 acre outparcel of an 11.44 acre shopping center
at the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway.
EXISTING LAND USE
PROPERTY LAND USE DESIGNATION
SUBJECT Vacant CG-1, Commercial General
NORTH Shopping Center CG-1, Commercial General
SOUTH Vacant CG-1, Commercial General
EAST Shopping Center CG-1, Commercial General
WEST Shopping Center CG-1, Commercial General
GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC YES ❑ FLOOD HAZARD YES ❑ SEWERS: YES ■
HAZARD ZONE: NO ■ ZONE: NO ■ NO ❑
HIGH FIRE HAZARD YES ❑ AIRPORT YES ❑ REDEVELOPMENT YES ❑
ZONE: NO ■ NOISE/CRASH NO ■ PROJECT AREA: NO ■
ZONE:
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
■ Not Applicable ❑ Potential Effects, ❑ APPROVAL
(Previous Mitigating Measures,
Mitigated No E.I.R. ❑ CONDITIONS
Negative
Declaration) ❑ E.I.R. w/Significant ■ DENIAL
Effects
❑ Exempt ❑ CONTINUANCE
❑ Significant Effects, TO:
❑ No Significant See Attached E.R.C.
Effects Minutes
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #5
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 1
REQUEST
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
The applicant requests the approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-06, to amend
Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), to allow service stations to locate along major
or secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps,within the.Freeway Corridor Overlay District.
The amendment would allow a maximum of 2 service stations on each side of the freeway along
a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay.
A parcel located arthe corner of a major or secondary arterial and a street forming the boundary
of the Freeway Corridor Overlay district could also be developed with a service station provided
that the parcel was part of a multi-tenant shopping center 10 acres or more in size. The
amendment would allow up to 3 stations on one of the two freeway sides only if one of the three
stations was part of a multi-tenant shopping center 10 acres or more in size.
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
The applicant also requests the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18, to construct a
1,872 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, to include the off-sale of beer and
wine on at out-parcel of an 11.44 acre multi-tenant shopping center (Hughes Market- University
Town Center) at the corner of a major arterial and boundary street of the Freeway Corridor
Overlay.
LOCATION
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
The Development Code Amendment would apply to properties City-wide in all commercial
General Plan land use designations except CN, CG-4 and CCS-2 located within the Freeway
Corridor Overlay District.
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
The proposed site for the service station/convenience market consists of 1.06 acres located at
the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial
General land use district. Varsity Avenue forms the boundary of the Freeway Corridor Overlay.
BACKGROUND
On October 17, 1995, the Planning Commission heard Development Code Amendment 95-05,
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda ##5
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 2
a similar request for a Development Code Amendment to allow service stations along a major
or secondary arterial with freeway access within the Freeway Corridor Overlay district. The
Planning Commission recommended to the Mayor and Common Council that they deny the
amendment. The Commission indicated that there was already an ample number of existing sites
suitable for development with service stations and that e additional sites created by the
amendment were not needed. The votes for recommending denial were as follows:
Commissioners Brue, Hamilton, Strimpel and Thrasher voting,aye; Commissioners Gonzales and
Traver voting nay; and Commissioners Cole and Schuiling were absent.
The request for the convenience market was reliant upon a approval of Development Code
Amendment No. 95-05, which would have amended Development Code Section
19.06.030(2)(F)(4) to allow service stations within the Freeway Corridor Overlay with
convenience stores with an ancillary use to be exempted hom the 1000 foot distance criteria
from other convenience stores. The Mayor and Common ouncil denied Development Code
Amendment No. 95-05 on November 20, 1995 directing staff to prepare findings supporting
denial for the December 4, 1995 Mayor and Common Council meeting.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA)
An Initial Study was prepared by staff for both the De elopment Code Amendment and
Conditional Use Permit. The Initial Study was presen to the Environmental Review
Committee on October 26, 1995. A Negative Declaration w s proposed. The Initial Study was
made available for public review and comment from November 2, 1995 until November 22,
1995. No comments were received.
The Initial Study was again reviewed at the end of the public comment period by the ERC at
their meeting of November 30, 1995. The ERC determined that the Initial Study adequately
addressed the environmental impacts of the Development Code Amendment and Conditional Use
Permit but did not recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration and cleared the project onto
Planning commission without any recommendation. Pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA
Guidelines, CEQA does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or denies.
ANALYSIS-DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
General Plan Consistency
The proposed amendment would implement General Plan Objective 1.19, which states:
"Provide for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal
service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #5
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 3
intersections to serve the needs of residents; ..."
The amendment would create additional opportunities for service stations by allowing stations
to locate in high traffic areas.
However, the proposed amendment conflicts with General Plan Goal 1G(m) in that it will create
an over-saturation of service stations near the Freeway Corridor Overlay. There are adequate
sites and opportunities for the establishment of service stations under current Development Code
provisions to meet the needs of the residents of the City. The amendment would create
additional turning movements near the intersections of major and secondary arterials and freeway
on- and off-ramps throughout the City resulting in an increase in traffic congestion and reducing
the efficiency of the City street system. The amendment would thus adversely impact a high
quality of life and secure environment for the City's residents and businesses in conflict with this
General Plan Goal.
Development Code Amendment
Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), permits new service stations only at the
intersections of major and secondary arterials, and their intersections with freeway off-ramps.
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 was dependent upon the approval of Development
Permit No. 95-05, referenced in the Background section of this staff report and denied by the
Mayor and Common Council. Development Code Amendment No. 95-06, therefore contains
the provisions of Development Code No. 95-05.
The proposed amendment would revise Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1),allowing
service stations to locate within the Freeway Corridor Overlay, up to two per side of the
freeway. The amendment would also permit a service station to be constructed on a parcel
located at the corner of a major or secondary arterial and a street forming the boundary of the
Freeway Corridor Overlay district provided that the parcel was part of a multi-tenant shopping
center 10 acres or more in size. The amendment would allow up to 3 stations on one of the two
freeway sides only if one of the three stations was part of a multi-tenant shopping center 10
acres or more in size. See Attachment "B", Proposed Amendment Text.
Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's
Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff for Development Code
Amendment No. 95-05 and is applicable to Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 as well.
Additionally, on November 16, 1995, staff conducted a physical survey of service stations and
potential service station sites within and adjacent to the Freeway Corridor Overlay District for
Development Code Amendment No. 95-05. Approximately 23 freeway intersections with major
or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #5
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 4
and analyzed (See Attachment B-2). From the analysis, it is estimated that a total of 20 service
stations presently exist at these intersections. Under current Development Code Criteria,
approximately 16 sites meet the criteria necessary for the development of service stations within
the Freeway Corridor Overlay. Under the criteria of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05,
an additional 17 sites would meet the criteria for the development of service stations within the
Freeway Corridor Overlay, for a combined total of 33 potential service station sites within the
City under Development Code Amendment No. 95-05. Development Code Amendment No. 95-
06, would have added one more potential service station site at the Hughes Market shopping
center, for a total` of 34 potential sites. See Attachment B-2, Service Station Intersection
Analysis.
Since without the amendment there are approximately 16 sites meeting the criteria for the
creation on service stations near the intersections of major and secondary arterials and freeway
on- and off-ramps, it can be concluded that there are adequate sites and opportunities for the
establishment of service stations under current code provisions to meet the needs of the residents
of the City.
Previous Action by the Mayor and Common Council
On November 20, 1995, the Mayor and Common Council heard Development Code Amendment
No. 95-05. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 would have allowed service stations to
locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp either adjacent to an on- or
off-ramp or at the corner of the arterial and a street forming the boundary of the Freeway
Corridor Overlay. A maximum of two such stations on each side of the freeway would have
been allowed. The amendment included provisions for exempting service stations with
convenience stores as an ancillary use from the 1,000 foot distance criteria from other
convenience stores.
The Mayor and Common Council denied the amendment in concept, indicating that the
amendment would result in an over-concentration of service stations within the Freeway Corridor
Overlay. The Council noted the large number of abandoned stations within the City and the
blight that they create, and were concerned that the additional sites could contribute to blighting
influences.
ANALYSIS-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Proposal
The applicant proposes to construct a 1,872 square foot gasoline station with convenience
market. The gas station/convenience market building will include the sale of beer and wine for
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #5
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 5
off-site consumption. Six gasoline pump islands are proposed with a capability of fueling 12
cars simultaneously.
The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift. The facility is
proposed for 24 hour operation.
Site and Area Characteristics
The 1.06 acre siteis irregular in shape, and is located at the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue
and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. University Parkway
is identified by the General Plan as a major arterial. There are two freeway off-ramps from the
I-215 freeway onto University Parkway, The site is not located within the Freeway Corridor
Overlay but abuts Varsity Avenue which forms the northern boundary of the Overlay. The site
is a vacant outparcel of an 11.44 acre multi-tenant shopping center located on the west side of
University Parkway between Varsity Avenue and College Avenue.
Surrounding land uses include a vacant parcel across Varsity Avenue on the south, to the west
and north a multi-tenant shopping center with two fast food drive through restaurants on the
north, and a multi-tenant shopping center, restaurants, fast food drive through restaurant and
service station under construction, across University Parkway, on the east. The I-215 freeway
is adjacent to the Scottish Rite Temple, across the vacant lot on the south.
Permitted Use
Without Development Code Amendment No. 95-06, the proposed gasoline station is not a
permitted use at the location proposed. The intersection does not meet the criteria'under the
current Development Code for the establishment of a service station. The proposal also includes
a convenience market and is located less than 1,000 feet from another convenience market to
be located in the proposed Chevron station across University Parkway on the east.
Unless Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 is approved, the Conditional Use Permit
cannot be approved.
CONCLUSION
Development Code Amendment No. 94-06
The amendment would result in an over-concentration of service stations, possibly contributing
to the blighting influence of abandoned service stations within the City. Without the
amendment, there are 16 sites located near major and secondary arterials and their intersections
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #5
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 6
with freeway on- and off-ramps that could be developed with service stations, providing ample
opportunity for the construction of new stations without amending the Development Code.
Conditional Use Permit No. 94-18
Without approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 the proposed service
station/convenience store is not a permitted use in the location proposed.
RECONEVMgDA'YTON
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Common
Council deny Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
based upon the attached Findings of Fact (Attachments D-1 and D-2).
Respectfully ubmitted,
Michael Hays
Assistant D' or of Planning and Building Services
Michael R. Fi
Associate Planner
Attachment A Location Map
Attachment B Proposed Development Code Text (B-1), and Development Code
Amendment Service Station Intersection Analysis (B-2)
Attachment C Site Plan (C-1), Floor Plans (C-2), and Elevations (C-3)
Attachment D Development Code Amendment Findings of Fact (D-1) and Conditional
Use Permit Findings of Fact (D-2)
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #5
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 8
ATTACHMENT B-1
Proposed Language for Development Code Amendment No 95-06
Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1)
1. New service stations shall be permitted only at the intersections of major and secondary
arterials, and along major or secondary
arterials wtth freeway off ramps within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. A
maximum of 2 service stations shall be permitted at each intersection, or on each side
of the freeway along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off ramp within the
Freeway Corridor Overlay District. A parcel that is located at the corner of a major or
secondary arterial and a street forming the boundary of the Freeway Corridor Overlay
District may be developed with a service station provided that the parcel is pan of a
mufti-tenant shopping center 10 or more acres in size. A third service station may be
permitted on one of the sides of the freeway only if one of the three stations is located
on the outparcel of a multi-tenant shopping center as outlined in this section. The use
shall not adjoin a residential land use district.
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #5
Hearing Date:.12-12-95
Page 9
ATTACHMENT B-2
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO, 95-05
SERVICE STATION INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
DCA 95-05*
DCA 95-05 Number of Net Number
Number of Current Number Total Number of Existing (Net Increase)
Intersection OfC-=ps Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations
I-10
Mountain View 1 1 2 1 1 (1)
Tippecanoe St. 1 1 2 2 0 (0)
Waterman Avenue 0 0 1 0 1 (1)
Hospitality Ln. 1 2 2 0 2 (0)
Redlands Blvd. 1 2 2 0 2 (0)
"E" Street 0 0 2 0 2 (2)
I-215
Orange Show Rd. 2 2 4 3 1 (0)
Inland Ctr. Dr. 2 2 4 0 4 (2)
Mill St. 0 0 2 0 2 (2)
"I" Street 1 2 2 0 2 (0)
2nd Street 1 1 4 1 3 (2)
5th Street 5th Street has no direct off-ramps - they both let off at 6th Street, which is not a major
or secondary arterial
Base Line St. Base Line Street has no direct off ramps
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #5
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 10
DCA 95-05*
DCA 95-05 Number of Net Number
Number of Current Number Total Number of Existing (Net Increase)
Intersection f0 f-ramps Stations Possible Stations Possibl Stations Possible Stations
"H" Street 1 2 2 0 2 (0)
27th Street 1 1 2 0 2 (l)
University Pkwy. 2 2 4 3 1 (1)
Palm Avenue 2 2 4 2 2 (2)
State Route 30
Highland Ave 1 2 2 0 2 (0)
(W of I-215)
Highland Ave. 2 2 4 2 2 (2)
(E of I-215)
"E" Street 1 0 0 0 0 (0)
Waterman Ave. 1 1 2 2 0 (0)
Del Rosa Ave. 2 1 2 3 0 (0)
Highland Ave. 1 1 2 1 1 (1)
(@ Arden)
Highland Ave. 1 1 1 1 (0)
(Q Boulder)
TOTALS 25 28 52 20 33(17)
* DCA 95-06 would add 1 additional potential station site to the DCA 95-05 total. The Hughes Market
Shopping Center and Wal-Mart Shopping Center are the only centers that meet the criteria of DCA 95-06 and
the Wal Mart Center meets current code criteria to construct a service station.
ATTACHMENT C-1
_ 7
�s
v
b 4W
f. a - .
• - _.y. :ice:- I ,_ \ I
Coto
d a
::::i
nip ■, ��
UuIr�
l
.�
�Il�i�
A TT
ACHNENT C-3
....
..::....4 ,,i J
IN
LO
....
' mil
r
w
�w
� j
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 6
EXHIBIT 3-1
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposed amendment conflicts with General Plan Goal 1G(m) in that it will create
an over-saturation of service stations in certain location by allowing a third service
station on one of the two sides of the freeway adversely impacting a high quality of life
and secure environment for the City's residents and businesses.
2. There are adequate sites and opportunities for the establishment of service stations under
current code provisions to meet the needs of the residents of the City. The proposed
amendment would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or
welfare of the City, in that the amendment will create an over-concentration of service
stations at selected intersections within the City.
3. The proposed amendment would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City, in that the amendment would create additional
turning movements at the selected intersections of major and secondary arterials and
freeway on- and off-ramps throughout the City resulting in an increase in traffic
congestion, thus reducing the efficiency of the City street system.
4. The amendment is not consistent with the original intent of the Development Code in that
it would allow service stations to be located outside of the Freeway Corridor Overlay at
locations other than the intersections of major and secondary arterials I and their
intersections with freeway on- and off-ramps.
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 7
ATTACHMENT 3-2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposed service station facility is not a permitted use at the location proposed and
is inconsistent with the Development Code.
2. The proposed use is not consistent with the General Plan, in that it is not a permitted use
in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district at the proposed location.
3. The proposed facility is in compliance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality in that pursuant to Section 15270 of the CEQA Guidelines, CEQA
does not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or denies.
4. There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and
natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored, in that CEQA does
not apply to projects which a public agency rejects or denies.
5. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are not
compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the
service station facility is to be established in that it is not a permitted use and would be
objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the
public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City.
6. The subject site is not physically suitable for the type of use proposed, in that the
Development Code does not permit service stations except at the intersection of major
and secondary arterials or their intersection with a freeway off-ramp. The site does not
meet this locational criteria.
7. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, water, sanitation, and public
utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public
health and safety, in that the no all agencies responsible for providing those services have
reviewed the project and none have indicated any inability to provide the necessary
services.
EXIIBIT 4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
INITIAL STUDY FOR ENVIRONA JEN 'AL IMPACT
FOR Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A Development Code Amendment to allow
up to three gasoline service stations to locate on one side of the freeway along a major
or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp, within the freeway corridor overlay,
provided that one of the three service stations is located on an outparcel that is part of
a shopping center 10 acres or more in size. For the purposes of Development Code
Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), the amendment expands the Freeway Corridor Overlay to
include parcels that would normally be excluded from the Overlay but are located at the
corner of a major (or secondary) arterial and a street forming the boundary of the
Freeway Corridor Overlay District. The project includes a Conditional Use Permit to
construct a 1,872 square foot gasoline station/convenience market, to include the off-sale
of beer and wine. The site is located on a 1.06 acre parcel located at the northwest
corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway, within a 11.44 acre multi-tenant
shopping center in the CG-1, Commercial General Land Use Designation and the
Freeway Corridor Overlay District.
DATE: October 13, 1995
PREPARED FOR:
C K Investment Properties
1000 Quail, Suite 135
Newport Beach, CA 92660
PREPARED BY:
Michael R. Finn
Associate Planner
City of San Bernardino
Planning and Building Services
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
(909) 384-5057
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES
DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
Project: Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Owner: C K Investment Properties
Applicant: Robert H. Lee & Associates
Introduction
This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for Development Code Amendment
No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18. It contains an evaluation of potential adverse
impacts that can occur if Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit
No. 95-18 are approved.
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study
when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not
exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal,
not exempt from CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared.
The following components constitute the Initial Study for Development Code Amendment No.
95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18:
1. Project Description and Location
2. Site and Area Characteristics
3. Environmental Setting
4. Summary
5. Environmental Determination
6. Environmental Impact Checklist
7. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures
8. Supporting Information/Location Map and Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevation
Combined, these components constitute the complete Initial Study for Development Code
Amendment No. 95-06 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18.
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 3
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 is a request to amend the Development Code to allow
a third service station to locate on one of the two sides of the freeway, along a major or
secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp as long as the third station is to be located on an
outparcel of a shopping center that is 10 acres or more is size. Specifically the proposal.would
amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), adding language that allows parcels
located at the corner of major and secondary arterials and a street forming the boundary of the
Freeway Corridor.Overlay District to be considered part of the district for the purposes of that
section, and adding language that allows a third service station to be permitted on one of the two
sides of the freeway only if it is an outparcel that is part of a shopping center of 10 acres or
more. See Attachment 8-1, Proposed Amendment Text.
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 is an application to construct a 1,872 square foot service
station/convenience market, with the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption. Six
gasoline pump islands are proposed with a capability of fueling 12 cars simultaneously.
The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift. Proposed hours
of operation are 24 hours a day.
2. SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
The Development Code Amendment would apply to all properties that:
1. Are located along major or secondary arterials with a freeway off-ramp that
would not normally be considered part of the Freeway Corridor Overlay district,
but are located at the corner of the major or secondary arterial and a street
forming the boundary of the Freeway Corridor Overlay; or
2. Meet criteria #1 above and there are fewer than two such service stations meeting
criteria #1 already located on the side of the freeway for which the service station
is proposed; or
3. Are located along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp and are
part of a multi-tenant shopping center 10 acres or more in size and:
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 4
a. are located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay; or
b. meet criteria #1 above; or
4. meet the above criteria and do not adjoin a residential land use district.
Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's
Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. Approximately 12 freeway
intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code
Amendment were identified and are shown in Attachment B-2.
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
The 1.06 acre site is irregular in shape, and is located at the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue
and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. University Parkway
is identified by the General Plan as a major arterial. The are two freeway off-ramps from the
1-215 freeway onto University Parkway. The site is not located within the Freeway Corridor
Overlay but abuts Varsity Avenue which forms the northern boundary of the overlay. The site
is an outparcel of an 11.44 multi-tenant shopping center located on the west side of University
Parkway between Varsity Avenue and College Avenue and is presently vacant and undeveloped.
Surrounding land uses include a vacant parcel across Varsity Avenue on the south upon which
a service station/convenience store with fast food drive-through and drive-through car wash and
the Scottish Rite Temple, to the west and north a multi-tenant shopping center with two fast food
drive-throughs on the north, and a multi-tenant shopping center, restaurants, fast food drive-
through restaurant, and a service station, under construction on the east. The I-215 freeway is
adjacent to the Scottish Rite Temple on the south.
3. ENVIRONNWNTAL SETTING
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
The amendment would be applicable only to those projects meeting the criteria listed under
Section 2, above. The environmental setting will be dependent on the individual project location
as determined by any future conditional use permit applications. The environmental setting of
Conditional use Permit applications meeting the conditions established by this amendment will
be project specific and will be addressed during review and processing of each individual
application submittal.
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 5
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
The site is located in an area identified by the General Plan as being located within a High Wind
Hazard Area.
4. SUNEM ARY
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
Based on -an analysis of available business registration data, Development Code
Amendment No. 95-06 would create the potential for 1 new service station after
accounting for the number of stations that would be allowed under DCA 95-05. In those
areas where potential impacts may occur, proposals under the amendment would be
subject to review under CEQA and may be conditioned to reduce or eliminate impacts
as necessary.
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
The Conditional Use Permit would result in the establishment of a 1,872 square foot
gasoline station with a convenience market including the sales of beer and wine for off-
site consumption at the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway.
The project site is located within an area of potential wind erosion and high wind hazard
area. The proposal includes the transport, storage and use of gasoline and petroleum
products. Project conditions of approval and standard requirements will reduce any
potential impacts to a level of insignificance.
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 6
5. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial study,
X The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although
there will not be significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures
described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
M tckE,t�-i, �}qyS C�kA�RXY�M.1NV��o►�Ntifil� ��V�EivJ G6Ynf1ti�TT�iC�
Name an itle
Signature L
Da
City Contact Person regarding this Initial Study:
Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner
City of San Bernardino
Department of Planning and Building Services
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Phone: (909) 384-5057
Fax: (909) 384-5155
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 7
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain "Yes" and "Maybe" answers on a separate attached sheet.
"No" answers are explained on this checklist. See Attachment "A" Preliminary Environmental
Description Form, where necessary. (SECTION 6)
Yes No Maybe
1. Earth Resources: Will the proposal
result in:
a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill)
on slopes of 15% or more based on
information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental
Description Form No. D.(3)? X
b. Development and/or grading on a
slope greater than 15% natural
grade based on review of General
Plan HMOD map, which designates
areas of 15% or greater slope in
the City?
c. Development within the Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Zone as
defined in Section 12.0-Geologic
& Seismic, Figure 47, of the
City's General Plan? _ X
d. Modification of any unique geologic
or physical feature based on field
review? _ X
e. Development within areas defined
for high potential for water or
wind erosion as identified in
Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic,
Figure 53, of the City's General
Plan? X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 8
Yes No Maybe
L Modification of a channel, creek
or river based on review of
USGS Topographic Map (Name)
X
g. Development within an area
subject to landslides, mudslides,
subsidence or other similar
hazards 3s identified in Section
12.0-Geologic & Seismic,
Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the
City's General Plan? i X _
h. Development within an area
subject to liquefaction as shown
in Section 12.0-Geologic &
Seismic, Figure 48, of the
City's General Plan? X _
i. Other? X
2. Air Resources: Will the proposal
result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or an
effect upon ambient air quality
as defined by South Coast Air Quality
Management District, based on
meeting the threshold for significance
in the District's, "CEQA Air Quality
Handbook"? X
b. The creation of objectionable
odors based on information
contained in Preliminary
Description Form, No. G.(3)? _ X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 9
Yes No Maybe
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area as identified in
Section 15.0-Wind & Fire, Figure
59, of the City's General Plan? X
3. Water Resources: Will the proposal
result in:
a. Changes-in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces
that cannot be mitigated by
Public Works Standard
Requirements to contain and
convey runoff to approved
storm drain based on review
of the proposed site plan? _ X _
b. Significant alteration in the
course or flow of flood waters
based on consultation with
Public Works staff? _ X
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality based on
requirements.of Public Works
to have runoff directed to
approved storm drains? _ X
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground water? _ X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 10
Yes No Maybe
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards as identified
in the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's Flood
Insurance Rate Map, Community
Panel Number 0602810010-
and Section 16.0-Flooding,
Figure 62, of the City's General
Plan? - _ X
f. Other? _ X
4. Biological Resources: Could the
proposal result in:
a. Development within the Biological
Resources Management Overlay, as
identified in Section 10.0-
Natural Resources, Figure 41,
of the City's General Plan? _ X
1. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants or their
habitat including stands of
trees based on information
contained in the Preliminary
Environmental Description
Form No. B.(1) and verified
by on-site survey/evaluation? _ X
2. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals or their
habitat based on information
contained in the Preliminary
Environmental Description
Form No. E.(8) and verified
by site survey/evaluation? _ X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 11
I Impacts to the wildlife Yes No Maybe
disbursal or migration corridors? _ X _
b. Removal of viable, mature trees
based on site survey/evaluation
and review of the proposed site
plan? (6" or greater trunk
diameter at 4' above the ground) _ X
c. Other? _ X
5. Noise: Could the proposal result in:
a. Development of housing, health
care facilities, schools,
libraries, religious facilities
or other noise sensitive uses
in areas where existing or
future noise levels exceed an
Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior and an
Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior as
identified in Section 14.0-Noise,
Figures 57 and 58 of the City's
General Plan? _ X
b. Development of new or expansion
of existing industrial,
commercial or other uses which
generate noise levels above an Ldn
of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn of
45 dB(A) interior that may affect
areas containing housing, schools,
health care facilities or other
sensitive uses based on
information in the Preliminary
Environmental Description Form
No. G.(1) and evaluation of
surrounding land uses No. C., and
verified by site survey/evaluation? _ X
c. Other? _ X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 12
Yes No Maybe
6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in:
a. A change in the land use as
designated based on the review
of the General Plan Land Use
Plan/Zoning Districts Map? _ X
b. Development within an Airport
District as identified in the
Air Installation Compatible Use
Zone (AICUZ) Report and the Land
Use Zoning District Map? _ X —
c. Development within Foothill Fire
Zones A & B, or C as identified
on the Development Code Overlay
Districts Map? _ X
d. Other? Amendment to the X
Development Code
7. Man-Made Hazards: Based on
information contained in Preliminary
Environmental Description Form,
No. G.(1) and G.(2) will the project:
a. Use, store, transport or dispose
of hazardous.or toxic materials
(including but not limited to
oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)? X
b. Involve the release of
hazardous substances? _ X _
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards? _ X
d. Other? _ X
8. Housing: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing as verified
by a site survev/evaluation? x
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 13
Yes No Maybe
b. Create a significant demand for
additional housing based on the
proposed use and evaluation of
project size? _ X
c. Other? _ X
9. Transportation/Circulation: Could
the proposal, in comparison with the
Circulation Plan as identified in
Section 6.0-Circulation of the City's
General Plan and based on the
conclusions of the City Traffic
Engineer and review of the Traffic
Study if one was prepared, result in:
a. A significant increase in traffic
volumes on the roadways or
intersections or an increase that
is significantly greater than the
land use designated on the
General Plan? _ X
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures? _ X
c. Impact upon,existing public
transportation systems? _ X _
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation? _ X
e. Impact to rail or air traffic? X
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? X
g. A disjointed pattern of roadway
improvements? _ X
h. Other? _ X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 14
Yes No Maybe
10. Public Services: Based on the
responses of the responsible
agencies or departments, will the
proposal impact the following
beyond the capability to provide
adequate levels of service?
a. Fire protection? _ X
b. Police protection? _ X
c. Schools (i.e., attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)? _ X _
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? _ X
e. Medical aid? _ X _
f. Solid Waste? _ X
g. Other? X
11. Utilities: Will the proposal:
a. Based on the responses of the
responsible Agencies,
Departments, or Utility Company,
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service or require the
construction of new facilities?
1. Natural gas? _ X
2. Electricity? _ X
3. Water? _ X
4. Sewer? _ X
5. Other? X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 15
Yes No Maybe
b. Result in a disjointed pattern
of utility extensions based on
review of existing patterns
and proposed extensions. _ X
12. Aesthetics:
a. Could the proposal result in the
obstruction of any significant or
important scenic view based on
evaluation of the view shed
verified by site survey/
evaluation? X
b. Will the visual impact of the
project create aesthetically
offensive changes in the
existing visual setting
based on a site survey and
evaluation of the proposed
elevations? X
c. Other? X
13. Cultural Resources: Could the
proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site by
development within an
archaeological sensitive area
as identified in Section 3.0-
Historical, Figure 8, of the
City's General Plan? _ X
b. Alteration or destruction of
a historical site, structure
or object as listed in the
City's Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey? _ X _
c. Other? X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 16
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance Yes No Maybe
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered
yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an
Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Based on this Initial Study:
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory? _ X
b. Does the project have the
to the disadvantage of long-
term, environmental goals? (A
short-term impact on the
environment.is one which
occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) _ X
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where
the impact on each resource is
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is
significant.) _ X
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 17
Yes No Maybe
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly? _ X _
B. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(SECTION 7)
1. Earth Resources
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-h. The amendment may result in the development of a service station in areas that may require substantial
earth movement, development within an Alquist-Priolo Zone, modification of a channel, creek or river,
or in areas subject to wind erosion, water erosion, land slides, mudslides or other similar earth hazards.
The earth resources environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the
location of the specific proposal and its relation to specific environmental earth resources/hazards. Such
issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval
pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant.
Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06
e. The proposed project is located within an area identified in Figure 53 of the General Plan as having high
potential for wind erosion. The site is relatively flat. Therefore, little or no potential exists for slope
erosion. The primary source for potential impacts will be bare soil exposed to high wind during grading
and site preparation, potentially generating high amounts of dust and erosion/siltation.
Since the overall final development and landscaping of the site will result in minimal soil exposure, long
term impacts are expected to be insignificant. However, grading, site preparation, and project
construction could result in the short term exposure of large areas of bare soil to high wind.
Engineering Department Standard Requirements concerning compliance Section 7012(c) of the Uniform
Building Code, and Planning Department Conditions of approval requiring cessation of construction
operations and application of soil binders when wind velocities reach 20 mph or greater will reduce the
short term potential impacts from grading and construction to a level of insignificance.
2. Air Resources
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-c. The amendment may result in the development of a service station that may result in substantial air
emissions or that may have an effect upon ambient air duality. create obiectionable odors_ or result in
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 18
concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the specific proposal and its location. Such issues
will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant
to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant.
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
C. The proposal will result in the development of a service station with a convenience market within a high
wind hazard area. Building Division Standard Requirements requiring design of the roof and structure
of the dwellings to be developed on the site to withstand 80 mile per hour wind load, exposure C, will
reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance.
3. Water Resources
Development Permit No. 95-06
a-e. The amendment may result in the development of a service station that may result in substantial changes
in absorption rates and drainage patterns, alteration of the course or flow of flood waters, may result
in discharge into surface waters, a change in quality or quantity of ground water, or result in the
exposure of people or property to flood hazards. The water resource environmental constraints and
concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the specific proposal and its specific location. Such
issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval
pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant.
4. Biological Resources
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-b. The amendment may result in the development of a service station that may result in the Biological
Resources Management Overlay or that could result in the removal of viable mature trees. The
biological resources environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon
the specific proposal and its specific location. Such issues will be addressed within the context of
specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA.
Potential impacts are not significant.
5. Noise
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-b. The amendment may result in the development of a service station that may result in noise impacts to
noise sensitive uses nearby. Potential noise impacts will be dependent upon the specific proposal and
its location in relation to noise sensitive land uses. Such issues will be addressed within the context of
specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA.
Potential impacts are not significant.
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 19
6. Land Use
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-c. The amendment does not propose any change in land use as designated in the General Plan. The
amendment could result in the development of a service station in airport districts AD-H and AD-V.
Such a proposal would be subject to the provisions contained in Chapter 19.12 of the Development
Code, which addresses development within Airport Districts. The amendment will not result in
development within any Foothill Fire Zone since none of the sites affected by the proposed amendment
is located within the Foothill Fire Zone. Impacts as a result of development under the amendment will
be project specific and dependent upon the proposed location with to land use hazards. Such issues will
be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant
to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant.
d. Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's
Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. The analysis was conducted using
the assumption that Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 had been approved or implemented to
analyze the net effects of this amendment. Approximately 12 freeway intersections with major or
secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified (See
Attachment B-2). From the analysis, it is estimated that one additional service station would be possible
from the number allowed under Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 (see footnote Attachment
B-2). This is because there are only two shopping centers of 10+ acres along a major or secondary
arterial with a freeway off-ramp either within or near the Freeway Corridor Overlay. These shopping
centers are the Wal-Mart shopping center at the northwest corner of Highland Avenue and State
Highway 330, and the Hughes shopping center at University Parkway between Varsity Avenue and
College Avenue near Interstate 215. The Wal-Mart Center has an outparcel within the Freeway
Corridor Overlay adjacent to the freeway off-ramp and already meets the locational criteria for having
a service station. Hence the Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 only creates the potential for
the Hughes shopping center to have a station since it would not be allowed a station under either the
current Development Code or Development Code Amendment No. 95-05.
7. Man-Made Hazards
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-c. The amendment will likely result in the use, transport, and storage of hazardous materials in the form
of gasoline products. Impacts as a result of development under the amendment will be project specific
and dependent upon the proposed location with to land use hazards. Such issues will be addressed
within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions
of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant.
Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06
a. The proposal will result in the transport, use, and storage of gasoline and petroleum products. Project
r.mmnlinnrP_ with the fnllnui;no ,not nnnflit;nno e.F.,......... 1 .,.:11 _o.a...,_ .... a:_t •___— - t____t _t
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 20
1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans for underground storage tank systems shall be
reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health
Services.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be required to apply for a
Hazardous Material Handler Permit, a Hazardous Material Generator Permit (if applicable), and
Underground Tank permit.
3. Prior to Occupancy, the applicant shall obtain a "Business Plan" as defined in Chapter 6.95 of
the Health and Safety Code.
8. Housing
Development Code Amendment No 95-06
a-b. The amendment could result in the removal of existing housing. Such issues will be addressed within
the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the
CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant.
9. Transportation/Circulation
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-h. Individual projects proposed under Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 would be subject to
review under the provisions of CEQA. The City Traffic Engineer will review all such projects on a
case-by-case basis for impacts. Projects would be conditioned as necessary to prevent significant traffic
impacts, once submitted.
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-06
a-h. The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposal and has determined that the additional vehicle trips
resulting from the establishment of the use will not cause any significant impact on the adjoining street
system. Total traffic volume will be less than the street design capacity.
10. Public Services
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-f. Specific proposals under the amendment may impact the capability of public service providers to provide
adequate levels of service. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development
applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not
significant.
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 21
11. Utilities
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment may impact the capability of public utility providers to provide
adequate levels of service. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development
applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not
significant.
12. Aesthetics
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment could have aesthetic impacts. Such issues will be addressed
within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions
of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant.
13. Cultural Resources
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06
a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment could have potential impact on cultural resources. The
potential for impacts will be dependent upon the specific proposal and its location in relation to noise
sensitive land uses. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development
applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not
significant.
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 22
8. SUPPORTING INFORMATION
8-1 Draft Development Code Amendment Text
8-2 Service Station Intersection Analysis
8-3 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 Location Map
8-4 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18 Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevations
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 23
Attachment B-1
Draft Development Code Amendment Text
Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1)
1. New service stations shall be permitted only at the intersections of major and secondary arterials,
and along major or secondary arterials with freeway
o ramps within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. A maximum of 2 service stations shall
be permitte, at each intersection, or on each side of the freeway along a major or secondary
arterial with a freeway o ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. For the purposes
of this section, a parcel that is located at the corner of a major or secondary arterial and a
street forming the boundary of the Freeway Corridor Overlay District may be considered part
of the overlay for the purposes of developing a service station. A third service station may be
pennined on one of the sides of the freeway only if it is developed on an outparvel that is pan
of a multi-tenant shopping center of greater than 10 acres. The use shall not adjoin a residential
land use district.
City of San Bernardino
Environmental Impact Checklist
Page 24
Attachment B-2
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO, 95-06
SERVICE STATION INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
DCA 95-06 DCA 95-06*
Number of Current Number Total Number of Net Number
Intersection Offramps Stations Possible' Stations Possible Possible Statione
I-10
Mountain View 1 2 2 0
Waterman Ave. 2 4 4 0
I-215
Orange Show Rd. 2 4 4 0
2nd Street 2 4 4 0
University Pkwy. 2 4 5 1
Palm Avenue 2 4 4 0
State Route 30
Highland Ave. 2 4 4 0
"E" Street 1 4 4 0
Waterman Ave. 2 2 2 0
Del Rosa Ave. 2 4 4 0
Highland Ave. 1 4 4 0
(Qa Arden)
Highland Ave. 2 2 2 0
((g? Boulder) TOTALS 42 43 1
' Assumes Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 has been approved and implemented.
z Ignores number of existing stations and only considers the potential for new stations created by this
amendment.
rw
1 ORDINANCE NO.
2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SECTION
19 . 06. 030 (2) (0) (1) OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE
3 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO ALLOW SERVICE STATIONS AT CORNERS OF MAJOR
AND SECONDARY ARTERIALS WITH A FREEWAY ON- OR OFF-RAMP AND A STREET
4 FORMING THE BOUNDARY OF THE FREEWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY, AND AMENDING
SECTION 19. 06. 030 (2) (F) (4) TO EXEMPT SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE
5 STORES FROM THE 1000 FOOT DISTANCE CRITERIA FROM AN EXISTING OR
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED CONVENIENCE STORE.
6 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO
7 ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
8 Section 1. Page II-114, Section 19. 06. 030 (2) (0) (1) of the San
9 Bernardino Municipal Code (Development Code) , is amended to read as
10 follows: 111. New service stations shall be permitted only at the
11 intersections of major and secondary arterials, and their
12 intersections with freeway off-ramps. A maximum of 2 service
13 stations shall be permitted at each intersection. A parcel that is
14 located at the corner of a major or secondary arterial with a
15 freeway on- or off-ramp and a street forming the boundary of the
16 Freeway Corridor Overlay District may be developed with a service
17 station provided that the parcel is part of a multi-tenant shopping
18 center 10 or more acres in size. A third service station may be
19 permitted on one of the two sides of the freeway only if one of the
20 three stations is part of a multi-tenant shopping center as
21 outlined in this section. The use shall not adjoin a residential
22 land use district. " [See Exhibit 1, (Page II-114 of the Development
23 Code) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference] .
24 Section 2 . Page II-98, Section 19 . 06. 030 (2) (F) (4) , is amended
25 by adding at the end of the section the sentence, "Service stations
26 located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay pursuant to the
27 provisions of Section 19 . 06. 030 (2) (0) (1) of this Chapter, that
28 include a convenience store as an ancillary use, are not subject to
1
1 the 1000 foot distance restriction from other convenience stores. "
2 [See Exhibit 2 , (Page II-98 of the Development Code) attached
3 hereto and incorporated herein by, reference] .
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ON
1 ORDINANCE. .AMENDING SECTION 19 . 06. 030 (2) (0) (1) . . .TO ALLOW
SERVICE STATIONS AT CORNERS OF MAJOR AND SECONDARY ARTERIALS WITH
2 A FREEWAY ON- OR OFF-RAMP AND A STREET FORMING THE BOUNDARY OF THE
FREEWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY, AND AMENDING SECTION 19. 06. 030 (2) (F) (4)
3 TO EXEMPT SERVICE STATION/CONVENIENCE STORES FROM THE 1000 FOOT
DISTANCE CRITERIA FROM AN EXISTING OR PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
4 CONVENIENCE STORE.
5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by
6 the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
7 meeting thereof, held on the day of
8 1996, by the following vote, to wit:
9 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
10 NEGRETE
11 CURLIN
12 HERNANDEZ
13 OBERHELMAN
14 DEVLIN
15 POPE-LUDLAM
16 MILLER
17
18 Rachel Clark, City Clerk
19 The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this day
20 of 1996.
21 Tom Minor, Mayor
22 City of San Bernardino
23 Approved as to form
and legal content:
24 JAMES F. PENMAN,
25 City ,Attorney
26 By: �-
27
28
3
. EDIT 1
COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS-19.06
13) Donation areas shall be kept free of litter and any
other undesirable material. The containers shall be
clearly marked to identify the type of material that
may be deposited. The facility shall display a notice
stating that no material shall be left outside the recy-
cling containers;
14) Signs shall be installed pursuant to Chapter 19.22
(Sign Standards). Additionally,the facility shall be
clearly marked with the name and phone number of
the facility operator and the hours of operation;
15) No dust,fumes,smoke,vibration or odor above
ambient level shall be detectable from adjacent
residentially designated parcels; and
16) The facility shall maintain adequate on-site refuse
containers for the disposal of non-hazardous waste.
N. SENIOR CITIZEN/CONGREGATE CARE HOUSING STANDARDS
Refer to Section 19.04.030 (2)(Q).
O. SERVICE STATION (GASOLINE) STANDARDS
Service stations are subject to a Conditional Use Permit and shall comply
with the following standards:
1. New service stations shall be permitted only at the intersections
of major and secondary arterials, and their intersections with
freeway offramps. A maximum of 2 service stations shall be
permitted at each intersection. A parcel that is located at the
corner of a major or secondary arterial with a freeway on- or off-
ramp and a street forming the boundary of the Freeway Corridor
Overlay District may be developed with a service station provided
that the parcel is a part of a multi-tenant shopping center 10 or
more acres in size. A third service station may be permitted on
one of the two sides of the freeway only if one of the three stations
is part of a multi-tenant shopping center as outlined in this section.
The use shall not adjoin a residential land use district.
2. The minimum parcel size shall be 15,000 square feet,with a
minimum street footage of 100 feet on each street.
3. All activities and operations shall be conducted entirely within an
enclosed structure,except as follows:
a. The dispensing of petroleum products,water and air from
pump islands.
b. The provision of emergency service of a minor nature.
EXMIT 2
COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS_19.06
E. BONUS HEIGHT
Proposed structures within the CR-2 land use district shall have a maxi-
mum height limit of 100 feet. This section provides a special incentive to
increase the maximum allowable height limit up to 150 feet through a pro-
gram which encourages such additional amenities as deemed desirable by
the Commission. These amenities may include, but not limited to, the fol-
lowing:
1. Mixed Use Developments (i.e., residential above commercial
office and retail uses, restaurants, theaters, etc.);
2. Enhanced pedestrian activities;
3. Improved signage and additional landscaping;
4. ,. Additional parldng;
5. Ground level and second floor plazas;
6. Outdoor cafes;
7. Artistic Sculptures and aquatic amenities; and
8. Day care facilities.
F. CONVENIENCE STORES
The retail sale of groceries, staples, sudry items and/or alcoholic
beverages where the gross floor area is less than 5000 square feet is subject
to Conditional Use Permit review, and shall be constructed and operated
in the following manner:
1. The minimum site area shall be 10,000 square feet.
2. The site shall have direct frontage along a major or secondary
street. The site shall not have direct access on a local residential
street.
3. One access drive may be permitted for each street frontage.
The design and location of the access drive(s) shall be subject to the
approval of the DRC.
4. No convenience store shall be located less than 1000 feet from an
existing or previously approved convenience store, or an existing
elementary, junior high school, or high school, as measured from
1 property line to another. Service stations located within the
Freeway Corridor Overlay pursuant to the provisions of Section
19.06.030(2)(0)(1) of this Chapter, that include a convenience
store as an ancillary use, are not subject to the 1000 foot distance
restriction from other convenience stares
17 M
EXHIBIT N0. 6
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 8
ATTACHMENT 6-1
DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FINDINGS OF FACT SUPPORTING APPROVAL
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan in that the amendment
provides for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal
service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and
intersections to serve the needs of residents as addressed by General Plan Objective 1.19.
The amendment accomplishes this by creating opportunities for service
station/convenience markets to locate near freeway corridor on- and off-ramps leading
to residential communities. By locating in these areas the service station/convenience
markets will, for the convenience of City residents, provide convenient fueling and minor
shopping in a single stop enroute to home or work, eliminating the need for multiple trips
and stops.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City, in that the amendment will permit up to two service
stations to locate on each side of the freeway within the Freeway Corridor Overlay along
a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp, subject to the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit.
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 9
ATTACHMENT 6-2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT SUPPORTING APPROVAL
1. The proposed service station facility is a conditionally permitted use within, and would
not impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and complies with
all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code.
2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan, in that it is a permitted use in the
CG-1, Commercial General land use district.
3. The proposed facility is in compliance with the requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code in that
and Initial Study was prepared and a Negative Declaration is proposed.
4. There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and
natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored, in that an Initial
Study has been prepared for Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18, and a Negative
Declaration has been proposed. All impacts have been properly mitigated through
project Conditions of Approval.
5. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are
compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the
service station facility is to be established and will not create significant noise, traffic or
other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted
uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or
welfare of the City, as addressed in the Initial Study.
6. The subject site is physically suitable the proposed facility, in that the site can
accommodate the proposed use in compliance with all applicable Development Code
Standards.
7. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, water, sanitation, and public
utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public
health and safety, in that the no all agencies responsible for providing those services have
reviewed the project and none have indicated any inability to provide the necessary
services.
EXHIBIT 7
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 10
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
1. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction on
improvements shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void.
In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of.
one year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void.
Project: Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Expiration Date: (Two years from the effective date of DCA No. 95-06)
2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration
date and for good cause, grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review
authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code
provisions.
3. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan(s) approved by the
Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and
Common Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be subject to approval by the
Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds
10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the
refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing
review authority if applicable.
a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping;
b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures;
C. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification
of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved
theme; and,
d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project.
4. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter.
Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its
officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of
San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and
attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 11
action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this
condition.
5. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied
or no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business
commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued
by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the
Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed
with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate. The
deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terms,
conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit.
6. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development
Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property
Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and
grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air
pollution; glare control; exterior lightning design and control; noise control; odor control;
screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control.
Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied
with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or meter
cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending with the
building design and include landscaping when on the ground.
7. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (five copies)
to the Public Works Department with the required fee for review. The landscape plans
will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services and the Planning
Division for review. (Note: The issuance of a building development permit, by the
Department of Planning and Building Services, does NOT waive this requirement.) No
grading permit(s) will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The landscape and
irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape and
Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department), and comply with all applicable
provisions of Chapter 19.28 (Landscaping Standards) of the Development Code effective
on the date of approval of this permit. Trees are to be inspected by a representative of
the Parks Department prior to planting.
8. This development shall be required to maintained a minimum of 19 standard off-street
parking spaces as shown on the approved plan(s) on file.
9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans for the underground storage tank system
Development Code Amendment No. 95-06 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996
Page 12
shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Department of
Environmental Health Services.
10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall apply for a Hazardous
Material Handler Permit, a Hazardous Material Generator Permit (if applicable), and
Underground Tank Permit. Contact the County Department of Environmental Health
Services at (909) 387-3080.
11. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall file a "Business Plan" as defined in Chapter 6.95
of the Health and Safety Code.
12. Plans for the food facility shall be submitted to the Department of Public Health,
Division of Environmental Health Services, Food Section. Call (909) 387-4608.
13. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the
following City Departments or Divisions:
a. Public Works (Engineering) Department
b. Building Services Division of the Planning and Building Services Department
C. Water Department
d. Fire Department
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. /6
CITY ENGINEER & DC4 95-06
DESCRIPTION: MOB/L GAS STATION HEARING DATE
AND CON( FE YCESTOFIE" AGENDA ITEM
LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF UWY,EAS/TY
PA/WWAY. NORTH SIDE YAASITYAI/E PAGE NO:
♦ NOTE TO APPLICANT.- Where separate Engineering plans are required, the applicant is
responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They
may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans.
1. Drainage and Flood Control
a) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public
drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
b) Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to
maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit
Requirements. A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the State Water
Quality Control Board for construction disturbing 5 acres of more of land.
c) An Erosion Control Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to
grading plan approval. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due
to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of
construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be
immediately built upon.
2. Grading
a) If more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and
drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading
permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict
accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the
City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
Page 1 10/2/95
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP951 18
CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-46
DESCRIPTION: Afa&L GAS STAT/ON HEARING DATE
AND CONt/EN/ENCESTORE AGENDA ITEM
LOCATION: WEST S/DE OF UNIVERSITY
PARKWAY. NOWTHS/DE VAi4517*YAVE PAGE NO:
b) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible,
this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to
all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code(See "Grading
Policies and Procedures").
c) The fueling area surface and the parking areas adjacent to the building
shall be constructed of PCC concrete pavement.
d) The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Site
Design shall comply with all requirements of The California Building Code,
Title 24, relating to handicap parking and accessibility, including retro-
fitting of existing building access points for handicap accessibility, if
applicable.
e) A handicap accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way
to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a
minimum clear width of 4 feet . Where parking overhangs the pathway, the
minimum paved width shall be 6 feet.
f) A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if
reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is proposed to cross lot
lines.
g) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the
Engineering Division for Checking.
h) Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided for the existing
Landscape Maintenance District, if modifications to the District's
landscaping is necessary.
Page 2 10/2495
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP 95-18
CITY ENGINEER & OCA 95-05
DESCRIPTION: MOBIL GAS STATION HEARING DATE
AND CON I/ENIENCESTORE AGENDA ITEM
LOCATION: WESTSIDEOFUNIVERSITY
PASKWA Y_ NORTH SIDE VARSITYAVE PAGE NO:
i) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to allow
the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of owner
neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property owner
and shall ensure that , if the property owner or subsequent owner(s) fail to
properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file appropriate
liens against the property in order to accomplish the required landscape
maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of $200.00 shall
be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing costs. This
easement and covenant shall be executed by the property owner prior to
plan approval unless otherwise allowed by the Director of Public
Works/City Engineer.
3. Utilities
a) Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with
City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including
gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV optional for
commercial, industrial, or institutional uses).
b) Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so it
can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the
area.
c) Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be constructed at
the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures"
and City Standard Drawings.
d) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as
required.
Page 3 1012195
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CV-R95-16
CITY ENGINEER & ,CCA 95-06
DESCRIPTION: MO8/L GAS STATION HEARING DATE
AND CONi/ENIENCESTORE AGENDA ITEM
LOCATION: WEST S/DE OF LMLIERS/TY
PARKWAY. NORTHS/DE VARS/TYAVE PAGE NO:
e) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side
of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Section 19.20.030
of the Development Code.
f) Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at
the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except overhead
lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be
undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030.
g) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb), if missing.
h) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type II,
including Handicap by-pass. Remove existing driveway approaches that
are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter
and sidewalk.
i) Install Street Lights adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
Nos. SL-1 and SL-2, if missing.
4. Required Engineering Permits
a) Grading permit(If applicable.).
b) On-site improvements construction permit(except buildings - see Planning
and Building Services), including landscaping.
c) Off-site improvements construction permit.
Page 4 10/2/95
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUPS,->8
CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-06
DESCRIPTION: MOBIL GASSTAT/ON HEARING DATE
AND 00A(VE 61 FACE S70RE AGENDA ITEM
LOCATION: WESTSIDEOFUN/t/ERSITY
PARKWAY. NORTH SIDE VARSITYA!/E PAGE NO:
5. Applicable Engineering Fees'
a) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 4% and 4%,
respectively, of the estimated construction cost2 of the off-site
improvements.
b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements(except buildings -
See Planning and Building Services) - 2% and 3%, respectively, of the
estimated construction costa of the on-site improvements, including
landscaping.
c) Plan check and inspection fees for grading Of permit required) - Fee
Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter.
d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount of $5,124 . Based on 46,374
Square Feet @ $ 0.379 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of
impervious lot area (estimated as 46,374-12,662=33,712 SF per Site
Plan), then $ 0.130 per square foot of remaining impervious lot area or
fraction thereof.
e) Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of $17,456 . Based on 1 ,156
trips per day c@ $ 15.10 per new trip generated by the project. Exact
amount shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of
application for Building Permit.
'All Fees are subject to change without notice.
2Estimated Construction Cost for Off-Site Improvements is based on a list of standard unit prices on file
with the Department of Public Works/City Engineer.
'Estimated Construction Cost for On-Site Improvements is based on a list of standard unit prices on file
with the Department of Public Works/City Engineer.
Page 5 10/2/95
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP 9�>8
CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-06
DESCRIPTION: AfOB/L GAS STATION HEARING DATE
AND CON YEA YENCESTORE AGENDA ITEM
LOCATION: WEST S/DE OF UNIVERSITY
PARKWAY. NORTH S/DE t/ARS/TYA f/E PAGE NO:
f) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount of 214 Based on
1 ,872 Square Feet of Bldg Area @ $ 214.30 per 3,000 square feet or
fraction thereof.
g) Sewer inspection fee in the amount of 18 . Based on 1 connections
18.07 per connection.
h) Street or easement dedication processing fee in the amount of 200.00
per document (if dedication by separate document is required).
Page 6 10121195
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #
Hearing Date: 12-12-95
Page 1 of 2
BUILDING DIVISION STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
1. Submit plans prepared by a Registered Building Architect or Civil or Structural Engineer.
2. Submit a complete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a Registered Civil or
Structural Engineer or Architect.
3. Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Forms for non-residential
buildings including a signed compliance statement.
4. Submit calculations a structural drawings, prepared by a Registered Civil Structural
Engineer or Architect.
5. Submit five (5) complete sets of construction plans including:
(a) Copy of conditions (3)
(b) Soils report and/or liquefaction report (3)
(c) Energy Calculations (3)
(d) Structural Calculations (3)
6. Submit a preliminary soils report prepared by a person licensed to do so.
7. Submit a single line drawing of the electrical service. Show all equipment, conduit and
wire sizes and types. Show the service ground size and grounding electrode.
8. Submit panel schedule(s) and electrical plans.
9. Submit a plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning system. (Clearly identify the
location and rating of the equipment and the sizes and material of all ducts, registers and
the location of all fire dampers). Show means of providing mechanical ventilation as
required by the 1991 Uniform Building Code.
10. Submit gas pipe loads, sizing calculations and isometrics.
11. Provide a plot plan showing the location of the proposed sewer system.
12. Submit isometric plans of cold and hot water and drain waste and vent systems.
Conditional Use Permit No. 95-18
Agenda #
Hearing Date: 10-17-95
Page 2 of 2
13. Show compliance with Title 24 for the physically handicapped in the following: Path of
travel to building. restrooms, and all exits.
14. Submit plans approved by the County Health Department.
15. For structures located within high wind areas:
a. Design structure, including roof covering, using 80 mph wind load, Exposure
"C".
16. City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's Compensation
Insurance.
17. Assessor's Parcel Number. 266-591-18
18. Contractor's City license.
19. Contractor's State license.
20. Sewer capacity rights from Water Department, 384-5093, Neil Thomsen.
21. School fees from Unified School District, 381-1179.
22. Other: Plan Check time is approximately 5 to 6 weeks Expeditious Plan Check time
is approximately 10 working days. Contact Development Services for possible
exMitious review at 384-5071.
23. Deposit: $700.92
24. Provide waste water approval.
AAJ 2L,&-r29I - tg
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Review of Plans: V C-A 95• 06�;, cUr Date Compiled: 1 95
Owner/Developer: G, K, Compiled By: P,J, I..ET 50„/
Type of Project: 67A5 5-/-xT7c^/ C'ynl✓6JlE,1,/L'G 57D,e6 Number of Units:
Location: Coe' ✓A2S,7Y AyCAIL)C A,JD LWi'/GE5i7Y PA��klA
WATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING:
Contact: PAUL- L6-150"i Phone:
'3 fit- `7 35 I Fax: 3 8,1 !!5,�5 Z__
Note: All Water Services are Subject to the Rules& Regulations of the Water Department.
❑ Size of Main Adjacent the Project: 17 1? 1.19 I,j VAZS,2- AV640 E
o A-t,e46 zcrr t
❑ Approximate Water Pressure: (O Elevation of Water Storage: OZo FT Hydrant Flow @ 20 psi: (1(N4
❑ Type, Size, Location, and Distance to Nearest Fire Hydrant: U " 4AIG WAY' W/5'71bA'"6e Oti1 V.425/7-Y ,Ad6.JVt—:;
AOJA C.,JT Td Si 72<
❑ Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter.
❑ Off-site Water Facilities Required.
❑ Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department.
❑ Comments:
WATER QUALITY CONTROL:
Contact: �L_L:'y\ �v-y-L-e— Phone: -3 1 00 (P Fax:
61 6 P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.
❑ Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.
❑ Air Gap Required at Service Connection.
❑ No Backflow Device Required at This Time.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL/INDUSTRIAL WASTE:
Contact: Phone: Fax:
Note: No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed.
❑ Industrial Waste Permit Required.
• Grease Trap Required.
• Pre-treatment Required.
SEWER CAPA TTY INFORMATION:
Contact Phone: _.5:f4 093 Fax:
Note: Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building& Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit.
❑ No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time.
0-11ewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the Water Department for Gallons Per Day, Equivalent Dwelling Units: , 33
❑ Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit.
Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: _ &Aywima JAr-)f`ju SMM h 1,07d S l L C5 - 94
STDREQU12.FRM(4/94)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: CSC/►'
Date: /D S= `jyS
Reviewed By:
A/0 l L /�-1/rtJ/-�-/,9 � v�t,�i v�,rzs i�-Y—h�vG l-� �1�.� 7 ��-, ��F-
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
Provide one additional set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check.
Contact the City of San Bernardino Fire Department at (909) 384-5388 for specific detailed requirements--SEC XJO 7-G�7
❑ The developer shall provide for adequate fire flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Minimum fire flow requirements shall be based
on square footage, construction features, and exposure information supplied by the developer and must be available prior to placing combustible
materials on site.
WATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION:
❑ The fire protection water service for the area of this project is provided by:
❑ San Bernardino Municipal Water Department- Engineering (909) 384-5391
❑ East Valley Water District- Engineering (909) 888-8986
❑ Other Water Purveyor: Phone:
PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES:
❑ Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 feet for commercial and multi-residential areas and at intervals not
to exceed 500 feet for residential areas.
❑ Fire hydrant minimum flow rates of 1,500 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for commercial and multi-residential areas.
Minimum fire hydrant flow rates of 1,000 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for residential areas.
❑ Fire flow requirements may be met from the combined flow of two adjacent fire hydrants. Fire flow requirements may be adjusted, as deemed
appropriate by the Fire Department, based on individual site specific conditions and available mitigations.
❑ Fire hydrant type and specific location shall be jointly determined by the City of San Bernardino Fire Department in conjunction with the water
purveyor. Fire hydrant materials and installation shall conform to the standards and specifications of the water purveyor.
❑ Public fire hydrants, fire services, and public water facilities necessary to meet Fire Department requirements are the developer's financial
responsibility and shall be installed by the water purveyor or by the developer at the water purveyor's discretion. Contact the water purveyor
indicated above for additional information.
ACCESS:
❑ Provide two separate, dedicated routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, all weather.
❑ Provide an access road to each building for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 20 feet
of unobstructed width.
❑ Extend roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of all single story buildings.
❑ Extend roadway to within 50 feet of the exterior wall of all multiple-story buildings.
❑ Provide "NO PARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less than the required
width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE-NO PARKING -M.C. Sec 15.16".
❑ Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500 feet in length and shall have a minimum 40 foot radius turnaround.
❑ The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval.
SITE:
❑ All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction.
❑ Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than 150 feet from the curb line. No fire hydrants should be within
40 feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Barrel type, with one 2'/2 inch and 4 inch outlet, and approved by the Fire Department.
Fire hydrants shall be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by painting an 8 inch wide, red stripe for 15 feet in each direction in front of the
hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles.
BUILDINGS:
Address numerals shall be installed on the building at the front or other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage
street. Commercial and multi family address numerals shall be 6 inches tall, single family address numerals shall be 4 Inches tall. The color
of the numerals shall contrast with the color of the background.
❑ Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit it serves.
Fire Extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 10B/C. Minimum
distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75 feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher.
❑ Apartment houses with 16 or more units, hotels (motels) with 20 or more units, or apartments or hotels(motels) three stories or more in height
shall be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers designed to NFPA standards.
❑ All buildings, other than residential, over 5,000 square feet, shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA
standards. This includes existing buildings vacant over 180 days.
❑ Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction of the system.
❑ Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of construction.
❑ Provide fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of installation.
❑ Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shall be required at Fire Department approved location.
Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to Fire Department requirements.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: S�ST/9L(AT�0,1_1 DF UST
A ,-k vlel,�:) PC'7.u1 �-
FPB 170(11-94)
EXHIBIT 8
REVISED DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO 95-05
SERVICE STATION INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
DCA 95-05 DCA 95-05*
Number of Current Number Total Number of Number of Net Number
On-ramps (Net Increase)
Intersection Off-ramps Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations
I-10
Mountain View 1 1 2 1 1 (1)
Tippecanoe St. 2 2 2 2 0 (0)
Waterman Avenue 1 1 1 0 1 (0)
Hospitality Ln. 2 2 2 0 2 (0)
Redlands Blvd. 1 2 2 0 2 (0)
"E" Street 1 2 2 0 2 (0)
I-215
Orange Show Rd. 4 4 4 3 1 (0)
Inland Ctr. Dr. 4 4 4 0 4 (0)
Mill St. 1 0 2 0 2 (1)
"I" Street 2 2 2 0 2 (0)
2nd Street 3 3 3 1 3 (0)
5th Street 5th Street has no direct off-ramps - they both let off at 6th Street, which is not a major
or secondary arterial
Base Line St. Base Line Street has no direct off ramps
"H" Street 2 2 2 0 2 (0)
27th Street 4 2 2 0 2 (0)
University Pkwy. 4 4 4 3 1 (0)
Palm Avenue 4 4 4 2 2 (0)
DCA 95-05 DCA 95-05*
Number of Current Number Total Number of Number of Net Number
On-ramps (Net Increase)
Intersection Off-ramps Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations
State Route 30
Highland Ave 2 2 2 0 2 (0)
(W of I-215)
Highland Ave. 4 4 4 2 2 (0)
(E of I-215)
"E" Street 2 0 0 0 0 (0)
Waterman Ave. 4 2 2 2 0 (0)
Del Rosa Ave. 4 2 2 3 0 (0)
Highland Ave. 3 2 2 1 1 (0)
(@ Arden)
Highland Ave. 2 1 1 0 1 (Ol
(Q Boulder)
TOTALS 56 47 51 20 32 (2)
* DCA 95-06 would add 1 additional potential station site to the DCA 95-05 total. The Hughes Market
Shopping Center and Wal-Mart Shopping Center are the only centers that meet the criteria of DCA 95-06 and
the Wal-Mart Center meets current code criteria to construct a service station.
JAN-16-1996 08 51 R.H. LEE - LA HABRA 310 902 8026 P.01
' AN ESOP COMPANY
ROBERT H, LEE & ASSOCIATES,
ARCMTECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONA�ENT1 SERVICES
1201 SOUTH BEACH BOULEVARD, Sv1TS 207 HABRA, CA 90631 PHONE 310-902-8023 FAx 310-902-8026
BRUCE J.GREENFIRLD
Architcct
s0-ftial Office Manger
A9a0ciate January 12, 1996 �� sin
tT '
rn_
JOHN W.JOHNSON
Architect
Ca-President J
City of San Bernardino
BRLiN F.Z"A Planning Dept.
Architect
CaPregldpp 300 N. 'D' St. �.
JOHN B.HICiLR
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Architect
Vice President �
ATTN: Mike Finn
CECIL R.SPENCER
Architect
Vice President RE: INCA No. 95-06 and CUP No. 95-18
JAMES H.RAY Proposed Mobil Convenience Store
Civil 8140neer
6Mobil Service Station #18-EPD
How""°G•'m"''rt"
AaaOCluc University 0I-215
GARY M 38ML1NG San Bernardino, CA
.
Architect
Associate
BLYTHE R.WUSON Dear Mr, Finn,
Architect
A"Odate
On behalf of Mobil Oil Corporation, we, Robert H. Lee& Associates, respectfully request
that our application for the above-referenced approvals be withdrawn.
It has been a pleasure working with the city of San Bernardino and we look forward to
working with you again in the future.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at (310) 902-8023.
Sincerely,
ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES
Eduardo Potter
Job Captain
cc: Jim Huntsberry, Mobil Oil / ah&
Jerry Kittrell, C.K. Properties
Greg Van't Hul, Brinderson r,(
Alan Shimabukuro, RHL
-� JAN 1 6 1990
CITY OF $AN FK�riNA.iDAO
DEPARTMENT OF PLAN%MNQ &
ILI) 1MATu=A. GA SACRAMENTO, CA BELLEVUE, WA PL'iALUMA• CA
��
Jk '-16-1996 08:51 R.H. LEE - LA HABRA 310 902 9026 P.01
AN ESOP COMPANY
ROBERT H. LEE & AssOCIATES, INC.
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
1201 SOUTH BEACH BOULEVAHn, Sum 207 LA HABRA, CA 90631 PHONE 310-902-8023 FAx 310-902-8026
BRUCE J.GREENRIK1,0
AYChitc�t -
nm Scut Office Manger January 12 1996
ABEOCiate r
JOHN W,JOHNSON
Architect
Co-presiWtat City of San Bernardino
BRIAN F.ZMA Planning Dept.
Architect
C041res1dolt 30a N. 'D' St.
JOHN B.HICX13 San Bernardino, CA 92418
Architect
Vim President
ATN: Mike Finn
CECIL R.9PEYCER "T
Architcct
Vice Prnidenl RE: DCA No. 95-06 and CUP No. 95-18
JAMES H.RAY Proposed Mobil Convenience Store
Civil En6 nm
OMobil Service Station #18-EPD
HUN'ARU G.,cntn.,R..
Aewgatc University (aI-215
GARY M.38MLING San Bernardino, CA
Architect
Anwialc
RLYTHE R,WHSON Dear Mr. Firm,
Architect
AJeocistc
i
On behalf of Mobil Oil Corporation, we, Robert H. Lee &Associates, respectfully request
that our application for the above-referenced approvals be withdrawn.
It has been a pleasure working with the city of San Bernardino and we look forwatd to
working with you again in the future.
If you have any questions, please give me a call at (310) 9028023.
Sincerely, Entered into Record at
CouncillCmyDevCms Mtg: /2-.)-A C",
ROBERT H. LEE & ASSOCIATES
by C ,
re Agenda Item
Eduardo Potter
Job Captain
cc: Jim Huntsberry, Mobil Oil City CIerkICDC Secy
Jerry Kittrell, C.K. Properties City of San Bernardino
Greg Van't Hui, Brinderson
Alan Shimabukuro, RHL
_�- JAN 1 6 1196 11
CITY OF $AN � HNr:,,DAO
DEPARTMENT OF?LAN-,J;iJCi &
ILI) MARwTTA, GA SACRAMENTO, CA BELLEVUE, WA PETALUMA, CA