Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout25- Planning and Building Services AL✓✓1 1411 ' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCII, ACTION From: Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Dept: Planning & Building Services tjmp- _ ! 7p; Date: January 5, 1996 MCC Date: January 22, 1996 o yp�G" Synopsis of Previous Council Action: �/&4 11/22/94 The Mayor and Common Council denied the project and continued the item to 12/4/95 directing staff to prepare Findings of Fact supporting denial. 12/4/95 The Mayor and Common Council continued the item until 12/18/95. 12/18/95 The Mayor and Common Council voted for reconsideration of the project and continued the item until 1/22/96 directing staff to renotice the project hearing. Recommended Motion: That the hearing be closed; the Negative Declaration be adopted, the first reading be waived and the Ordinance laid over for final adoption and that Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 be approved based on the Findings of Fact contained in the October 17, 1995, Planning Commission staff report. All g ey Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: DCA Citywide, CUP Ward 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source:(Acct. No.) (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: �/a X196 Agenda Item No. a�S CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Staff Report SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 95-05 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1996 OWNER: UNOCAL 17700 Castleton Street, Suite 500 City of Industry, CA 91748 APPLICANT: Service Station Services #3 Hutton Center Drive, Suite 711 Santa Ana, CA 92707 REQUEST/LOCATION: The applicant is requesting approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 to amend Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. The amendment would also change Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4), exempting service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. The amendment would apply to properties in all commercial districts with the exception of the CN, CG-4, and CCS-2 land use designations that are located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay and along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp. The applicant also requests the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive-through automatic car wash. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The proposed facility is to be located on 1.64 acres at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. BACKGROUND: On November 20, 1995, the Mayor and Common Council denied the project and continued the item until December 4, 1995, directing staff to prepare Findings of Fact in support of the denial. On December 4, 1995, the Mayor and Common Council continued the item until December 18, 1995 to enable the applicant to provide new information regarding the proposal. On December 18, 1995, the Mayor and Common Council voted for reconsideration of the projects and continued the item until January 22, 1996 in order to renotice the hearing. KEY POINTS: There are several key points which have been identified as follows: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 2 Development Code Amendment No. 94-05 O The applicant has expressed concern over the difference between staffs estimates and their estimates in the number of potential service stations that could result from approval of the Development Code Amendment. O The difference is primarily attributable to differences in site analysis utilized by the applicant and by staff. 1. The applicant's analysis focused on vacant sites suitable for service station development that meet the locational criteria of the proposed Development Code Amendment and did not consider any sites currently developed with other land uses. Staff's analysis included all sites meeting the service station locational criteria regardless of whether or not the site was developed, a technique that is consistent with current land use analysis planning practice. Staffs analysis results in an estimate that reflects the absolute maximum number of service stations that could be developed under the proposed amendment in the worst case scenario that every available site meeting the criteria is developed with a service station. The applicant's analysis results is a more realistic short term estimate of the number of stations that are likely to be developed under the proposed amendment. As an example of the differences in the analyses, on the southwest corner of Orange Show Road and I-215 is a large operational multi-tenant commercial center. The site meets the criteria for the development of a service station. Staff counted that site in the analysis, since there is nothing to preclude the owner of that property from submitting an application to demolish the shopping center and develop a service station. The applicant did not include that site in his analysis since it was already developed with an operating commercial center and it is not likely to be demolished to make way for development of a new service station. 2. Another difference was in the inclusion of freeway on-ramps in the analysis. The Development Code states that service stations may locate along major and secondary arterials adjacent to off-ramps. However, in practice, the Code has been interpreted to allow service stations to locate adjacent to on-ramps as well as off-ramps. The applicant's analysis included sites adjacent to on-ramps consistent with practice, but staff's analysis included only sites adjacent to off-ramps in keeping with the Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 3 literal content of the Code. Staff has since adjusted the analysis to include on-ramps consistent with current interpretation and department practices. The results of the analysis reveal that the proposed amendment would result in 2 additional service station sites for a total of 32 sites (See Exhibit 1). The increase is attributable to the provisions of the amendment which allow stations to locate at the corner of the major or secondary arterial and a street forming the boundary of the Freeway Corridor Overlay. As a result of the amendment, additional sites are created at the southwest corner of Mountain View and Coulston, and at the northwest corner of "G" Street and Mill. o The primary result of the proposed amendment is to increase the number of available sites for service station development with only minimal increase the absolute number of potential sites. The service station proposed under Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 is a clear example of how the amendment is supposed to work. Under the current Development Code, a total of 4 service stations could be potentially developed at the intersection of I-215 and University Parkway, adjacent to the freeway on and off-ramps. However, the Scottish Rite Temple occupies the site adjacent to the freeway on-ramp, precluding the development of a fourth station at the intersection. The amendment makes the southwest corner of Varsity and University Parkway, a site located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay and within close proximity to the on-ramp, to be developed with a service station. The potential number of stations at the intersection does not increase, however the number of available sites has. o The City maintains discretion over the development of additional service stations at these newly available sites through the Conditional Use Permit process. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL: The Mayor and Common Council May: 1. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 as requested by the applicant; or 2. Deny both Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. 3. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Deny Conditional Use Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 4 Permit No. 95-11. RECONEWENDATION: Staff recommends that the hearing be closed, the Negative Declaration be adopted, the first reading be waived and the ordinance be laid over for final adoption, and that Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 be approved based on the Findings of Fact contained in the October 17, 1995 Planning Commission staff report. Prepared by: Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner for Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services Exhibit 1 Revised Analysis Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Exhibit 2 December 4, 1995 Mayor and Common Council Staff Report Exhibit 3 November 20, 1995 Mayor and Common Council Staff Report EXHIBIT 1 REVISED DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 95-05 SERVICE STATION INTERSECTION ANALYSIS DCA 95-05 DCA 95-05* Number of Current Number Total Number of Number of Net Number On-ramps (Net Increase) Intersection Off-ramps Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations I-10 Mountain View 1 1 2 1 1 (1) Tippecanoe St. 2 2 2 2 0 (0) Waterman Avenue 1 1 1 0 1 (0) Hospitality Ln. 2 2 2 0 2 (0) Redlands Blvd. 1 2 2 0 2 (0) "E" Street 1 2 2 0 2 (0) I-215 Orange Show Rd. 4 4 4 3 1 (0) Inland Ctr. Dr. 4 4 4 0 4 (0) Mill St. 1 0 2 0 2 (l) "I" Street 2 2 2 0 2 (0) 2nd Street 3 3 3 1 3 (0) 5th Street 5th Street has no direct off-ramps - they both let off at 6th Street, which is not a major or secondary arterial Base Line St. Base Line Street has no direct off ramps "H" Street 2 2 2 0 2 (0) 27th Street 4 2 2 0 2 (0) University Pkwy. 4 4 4 3 1 (0) Palm Avenue 4 4 4 2 2 (0) DCA 95-05 DCA 95-05* Number of Current Number Total Number of Number of Net Number On-ramps (Net Increase) Intersection Off-ramps Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations State Route 30 Highland Ave 2 2 2 0 2 (0) (W of I-215) Highland Ave. 4 4 4 2 2 (0) (E of I-215) "E" Street 2 0 0 0 0 (0) Waterman Ave. 4 2 2 2 0 (0) Del Rosa Ave. 4 2 2 3 0 (0) Highland Ave. 3 2 2 1 1 (0) (@ Arden) Highland Ave. 2 1 1 0 1 (0) (@ Boulder) TOTALS 56 47 51 20 32 (2) , G MY OF SAN BERNA RDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit Dept: Planning & Building Services No. 95-11 Date: November 22, 1995 MCC Date: December 4, 1995 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: On November 20, 1995, the Mayor and Common Council denied the project and continued the item until December 4, 1995, and directed staff to prepare Findings of Fact in support of the denial. Recommended Motion: That the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Findings of Fact supporting the denial of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. Al Bo ' i Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: City-wide FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) N/A (Acct. Descri0on) Finance: Council Notes: Agenda Item No. EXHIBIT 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Staff Report ' SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 95-05 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 4, 1995 OWNER: Unocal 17700 Castleton Street, Suite 300 City of Industry, CA 91748 APPLICANT: Service Station Services #3 Hutton Center Drive, Suite 711 Santa Ana, CA 92407 REQUEST/LOCATION: The applicant requested approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 to amend Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. The amendment would have changed Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4), exempting service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. The amendment would have applied to properties in all commercial districts with the exception of the CN, CG-4, and CCS-2 land use designations that are located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay and along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp. The applicant also requested the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive-through automatic car wash. The convenience market proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The proposed facility would have been located on 1.64 acres at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. BACKGROUND: At their meeting of November 20, 1995, the Mayor and Common Council closed the public hearing, denied Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 and continued the item until December 4, 1995 and directed staff to prepare findings supporting denial. KEY POINTS: There are several key points which have been identified as follows: 0 At the November 20, 1995 meeting, the Mayor and Council indicated that they believed Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 4, 1995 Page 2 that Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 would result in an over-saturation of service stations. Finding of Fact No. 2 for the Development Code Amendment No. 95- 05 has been amended to reflect the Mayor and Council's finding on this point in support of denial of the project (Exhibit 1). o Without approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 is not consistent with the Development Code. Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact Nos. 1, 2, 5 and 6 have been amended to reflect the inconsistency with the Development Code for denial of the project (Exhibit 2). RECOMAEENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Findings of Fact(Exhibits 1 and 2) supporting the denial of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. Prepared by: Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner for Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services a Exhibit 1 Findings of Fact for Denial for Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Exhibit 2 Findings of Fact for Denial for Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 4, 1995 Page 3 EXHIBIT 1 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed amendment conflicts with General Plan Goal 1G(m) in that it will create an over-saturation of service stations with convenience stores within the Freeway Corridor Overlay and thus adversely impact a high quality of life and secure environment for the City's residents and businesses. 2. There are adequate sites and opportunities for the establishment of service stations under current code provisions to meet the needs of the residents of the City. The proposed amendment would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, in that the amendment will create an over-concentration of service stations on a City-wide basis contributing to blighting influences. There are a significant number of existing abandoned service stations throughout the City. 3. The proposed amendment would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, in that the amendment would create additional turning movements at the intersections of major and secondary arterials and freeway on- and off-ramps throughout the City resulting in an increase in traffic congestion, thus reducing the efficiency of the City street system. 4. The Mayor and Common Council adopts these Findings of Fact and denies Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 independent of and disregarding the Planning Commission's recommendation. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 4, 1995 Page 4 EXHIBIT 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed service station facility is not a permitted use at the location proposed and therefore is inconsistent with the Development Code. 2. The proposed use is not consistent with the General Plan, in that it is not a permitted use in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district at the proposed location. a 3. The proposed facility is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code in that and Initial Study was prepared and a Negative Declaration is proposed. 4. There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored, in that an Initial Study has been prepared for Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11, and a Negative Declaration has been proposed. 5. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are not compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the service station facility is to be established in that it is not a permitted use and would be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. 6. The subject site is not physically suitable for the type of use proposed, in that the Development Code does not permit service stations except at the intersection of major and secondary arterials or their intersection with a freeway off-ramp. The site does not meet this locational criteria. 7. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety, in that all agencies responsible for providing those services have reviewed the project and none have indicated any inability to provide the necessary services. 8. The Mayor and Common Council adopts these Findings of Fact and denies Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 independent of and disregarding the Planning Commission's recommendation. CITY OF SAN BERM, .DINO - REQUEST FC . COUNCIL ACTION From: Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit Dept: Planning & Building Services No. 95-11 Date: November 1, 1995 MCC Date: November 20, 1995 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None Recommended Motion: That the hearing be closed, the Negative Declaration be adopted, the first reading be waived and the ordinance laid over for final adoption and that Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 be approved based on the Findings of Fact contained in the October 17, 1995, Planning Commission staff report. Al Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff RepQrt and Ordinance Ward: _DCA City-wide. CUP Ward 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) N/A (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: Agenda Item No. EXHIBIT 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCEL ACTION Staff Report SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 95-05 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 REQUEST/LOCATION: The applicant is requesting approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 to amend Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. The amendment would also change Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4), exempting service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. The amendment would apply to properties in all commercial districts with the exception of the CN, CG-4, and CCS-2 land use designations that are located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay and along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp. The applicant also requests the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive-through automatic car wash. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The proposed facility is to be located on 1.64 acres at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. KEY POINTS: There are several key points which have been identified as follows: Development Code Amendment No 94-05 o Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1),permits new service stations only at the intersections of major and secondary arterials, and their intersections with freeway off-ramps. The proposed amendment would revise this section, deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off- ramps, and adding the provision that a new service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. O The amendment would allow a maximum of two service stations on each side of the freeway (total 4 per intersection of freeway and major or secondary arterial with freeway off-ramp). Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 2 o The amendment will increase the number of potential sites at the intersections of the freeway and major or secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps that may be developed with service stations. o Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4)would also be amended to exempt service stations in the Freeway Corridor Overlay with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the 1000 foot distance criteria from other convenience stores, providing the opportunity for a greater number of gasoline/convenience facilities in highly travelled areas potentially reducing the number of additional trips for minor shopping for the convenience of residents. o Service stations or service station/convenience markets proposed under the amendment would be subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit allowing the City discretion in determining whether or not specific proposals are appropriate. o Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. See Attachment B-2 of the Planning Commission Staff Report. 1. Approximately 12 freeway intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified (See Attachment B-2). 2. From the analysis, it is estimated that the proposed amendment would create the potential for 19 new service stations at these freeway intersections. 3. It is estimated that 5 of the existing service stations that currently do not meet the Development Code locational criteria would meet the locational criteria of the proposed amendment. See Attachment B-2, Service Station Intersection Analysis. o The proposed amendment is consistent with General Plan Objective 1.19, which states: "Provide for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of residents; ..." Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 3 • The proposed amendment is consistent with the original intent of the section which is to locate service stations at the intersections of major roadways and major roadways and freeways. • By allowing service stations to locate in the additional areas within the Freeway Corridor Overlay, these service station/convenience markets will, for the convenience of City residents, provide convenient fueling and minor shopping in a single stop enroute to home or work, eliminating the need for multiple trips and stops. Conditional Use Permit No 94-06 • The conditional use permit cannot be approved unless Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 is approved and implemented. • The proposed service station/convenience market (including the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption) fast food drive through restaurant and automatic drive through car wash is consistent with Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and would be compatible with the surrounding commercial development and Scottish Rite Temple adjacent to the site on the south. o Approximately 2,343 square feet of the proposed building will be allocated to the convenience market, with the remainder being allocated to the fast-food portion of the business. • The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off- site consumption, however, the applicant has indicated that beer, wine and other convenience market items will not be sold through the fast food drive-through window. • The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift and is proposed for 24 hour operation. • The area does not have an overconcentration of licensed off-sale alcoholic beverage outlets. According to Janice Edmonds of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) the Census Tract, 46.02, will support 11 licenses for the sale of alcohol for off-site consumption, and currently there have only been 8 licenses issued. A determination of public convenience or necessity (PCN) is not required. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 4 o The Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. See Police Department Interoffice Memorandum, Exhibit 3. o A traffic study was prepared for the project and was reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer. The addition of the project related traffic will not impact significantly impact the adjacent street system or intersections. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) STATUS An Initial Study was prepared by staff for both the Development Code Amendment and Conditional Use Permit. The Initial Study was presented to the Environmental Review Committee on August 10, 1995. A Negative Declaration was proposed. The Initial Study was made available for public review and comment from August 17, 1995 until September 6, 1995. No comments were received. On September 7, 1995, the ERC recommended the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration to the Mayor and Common Council for both projects. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed both Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 at their October 17, 1995 meeting and recommended that the Mayor and Common Council deny Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. The Planning Commission had concerns that the Development Code Amendment was designed for the proposed Conditional Use Permit, and that project related traffic would impact the area despite the results of the traffic study or the City Traffic Engineers conclusion. The Commission felt that there was no need for new service stations, and that the Development Code Amendment was not needed. The Planning Commission vote for denial was: Ayes - Brue, Hamilton, Stone, Strimpel and Thrasher; Nays -Gonzales and Traver; Absent -Cole and Schuiling. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL: The Mayor and Common Council May: 1. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 as requested by the applicant; or 2. Deny both Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 5 a 3. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the hearing be closed, the Negative Declaration be adopted, the first reading be waived and the ordinance be laid over for final adoption, and that Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 be approved based on the Findings of Fact contained in the October 17, 1995 Planning Commission staff report. Prepared by: Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner for Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services Exhibit 1 Location Map Exhibit 2 Planning Commission Staff Report Attachment A Location Map (Included as Exhibit 1) Attachment B Proposed Development Code Text (B-1)(Not Included), Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Service Station Intersection Analysis (B-2) Attachment C Site Plan (C-1), Floor Plans (C-2), and Elevations (C-3) Attachment D Conditional Use Permit Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table Attachment E Development Code Amendment Findings of Fact (E-1), Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact (E-2) Attachment F Conditions of Approval (Included as Exhibit 5) Attachment G Standard Requirements (Included as Exhibit 5) Attachment H Initial Study Exhibit 3 Police Department Interoffice Memorandum Exhibit 4 Ordinance Exhibit 5 Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements EXHIBIT 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM # LOCATION CASE HEARING DATE V v t L � o. A e C u o+ o ~ r o+ f i +r O AVA �f 00 A- 1 ` ` • _ t • hr 1000 •� o • 46-41 PORT V9 1 ® s/ � G � olp v ST C ___. N cm cr menvacm Puw-e.,, PAGE t OF µ 40 EXHIBIT 2 SUMMARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDL i PLANNING DMSION CASE: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and AGENDA ITEM: 2 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 HEARING DATE: 10-17-95 WARD: 5 APPLICANT: OWNER: Service Station Services Unocal #3 Hutton Centre Dr., Ste. 711 17700 Castleton St., Ste. 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 City of Industry, CA 91748 REQUEST / LOCATION - A request to amend the Development Code to allow up to two service stations to locate on each side of the freeway within the Freeway Corridor Overlay along major and secondary arterials with a freeway off-ramp and exempt service stations with convenience markets within the Freeway Corridor Overlay from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Development Code Amendment would apply City-wide. A Conditional Use Permit to construct a service station/convenience market with off-sale beer and wine, with a fast food drive-thru and drive thru car wash. Located at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway. EXISTING LAND USE PROPERTY LAND USE DESIGNATION SUBJECT Vacant CG-1, Commercial General NORTH Shopping Center CG-1, Commercial General SOUTH Scottish Rite Temple CG-1, Commercial General EAST Shopping Center under development CG-1, Commercial General WEST Scottish Rite Temple CG-1, Commercial General GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC YES ❑ FLOOD HAZARD YES ❑ SEWERS: YES ■ HAZARD ZONE: NO ■ ZONE: NO ■ NO ❑ HIGH FIRE HAZARD ' YES ❑ AIRPORT YES ❑ REDEVELOPMENT YES ❑ ZONE: NO ■ NOISE/CRASH NO ■ PROJECT AREA: NO ■ ZONE: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: ❑ Not Applicable ❑ E.I.R. w/Significant ■ APPROVAL ❑ Exempt Effects ■ No Significant ■ CONDITIONS Effects ❑ Significant Effects, ❑ Potential Effects, See Attached E.R.C. ❑ DENIAL Mitigating Minutes Measures, ❑ CONTINUANCE No E.I.R. TO: I Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 1 REQUEST Development Coyle Amendment No. 95-05 The applicant requests the approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, to amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. A maximum of two such service stations would be permitted on each side of the freeway, for a total of four along an arterial within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. The amendment would also change Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4),exempting service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 The applicant also requests the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11, to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive-thru automatic car wash. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. LOCATION Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 The Development Code Amendment would apply to properties City-wide in all commercial General Plan land use designations except CN, CG-4 and CCS-2 located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-I1 The proposed site for the service station/convenience market consists of 1.64 acres located at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) An Initial Study was prepared by staff for both the Development Code Amendment and Conditional Use Permit. The Initial Study was presented to the Environmental Review Committee on August 10, 1995. A Negative Declaration was proposed. The Initial Study was I Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 2 made available for public review and comment from August 17, 1995 until September 6, 1995. No comments were received. On September 7, 1995, the ERC recommended the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration to the Mayor and Common Council for both projects. ANALYSIS-DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT General Plan Consistency The proposed amendment is consistent with General Plan Objective 1.19, which states: "Provide for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of residents; ..." The amendment will create opportunities for service station/convenience markets to locate near freeway corridor on- and off-ramps leading to residential communities. By locating in these areas the service station/convenience markets will, for the convenience of City residents, provide convenient fueling and minor shopping in a single stop enroute to home or work, eliminating the need for multiple trips and stops. Development Code Amendment Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), permits new service stations only at the ,intersections of major and secondary arterials, and their intersections with freeway off-ramps. The proposed amendment would revise this section, deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a new service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. A maximum of two such service stations would be permitted on each side of the freeway. While the amendment will not increase the allowable number of such stations, it will increase the number of potential sites that may be developed with them. The proposal would also amend the Development Code to exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Specifically, the proposal would amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4) adding the proposed exemption with the exception that only a maximum of two such service stations be allowed to locate on each side of the freeway. Amending this section allows service stations to have convenience markets regardless of their proximity to other convenience markets, providing a greater number of gasoline/convenience facilities for the convenience of residents. See Attachment "B", Proposed Amendment Text. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 3 Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. Approximately 12 freeway intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified (See Attachment B-2). From the analysis, it is estimated that a total of 23 service stations presently exist at these intersections. Under current Development Code criteria, 18 of the 23 existing service stations meet the Development Code locational criteria. Under the criteria of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, a total of 42 service stations would be possible. Taking the existing service stations into consideration, the proposed amendment would create the potential for 19 new service stations. Additionally, all 5 of the service stations that do not meet current Development Code locational criteria would meet the locational criteria of the proposed amendment. See Attachment B-2, Service Station Intersection Analysis. Under the proposed amendment a total of 42 service stations with ancillary convenience markets would be possible. Data regarding the number of existing service stations with ancillary convenience markets was not available for analysis. ANALYSIS-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market. The gas station/convenience market building will include a fast-food drive through window, and 960 square foot drive-thru automatic car wash. .Approximately 2,343 square feet of the proposed building will be allocated to the convenience market, with the remainder being allocated to the fast-food portion of the business. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption, however, the applicant has indicated that beer, wine and other convenience market items will not be sold through the fast food drive-through window. The 960 square foot car wash will be self-service. Six gasoline pump islands are proposed with a capability of fueling 12 cars simultaneously. The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift. The facility is proposed for 24 hour operation. Permiued Use Under Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, the proposed gasoline station/convenience market would be a permitted use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 4 Site and Area C iaracteristics The 1.64 acre site is triangular in shape and is located on the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. University Parkway is identified by the General Plan as a major arterial. The are two freeway off-ramps from the I-215 freeway onto University Parkway, and the site is located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. The site is presently vacant and undeveloped, and is devoid of any vegetation. Surrounding land uses include the Scottish Rite Temple, immediately adjacent on the south, a multi-tenant shopping center with two fast food drive-through restaurants on the north, across Varsity Avenue, and a multi-tenant shopping center, restaurants, fast food drive-through restaurants, and service station, under construction on the east. The I-215 freeway is adjacent to the Scottish Rite Temple on the south. Compatibility The proposed gasoline station/convenience market with fast food drive-through window and self- service automatic car wash is compatible with the surrounding commercial development and Scottish Rite Temple adjacent to the site on the south. Development Code and General Plan Consistency The proposal is in Compliance with the Development Code and is consistent with the General Plan as shown in Attachment "D". Sales of Beer and Wine for Off-Site Consumption Staff contacted Janice Edmonds of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC)on Wednesday, September 27, 1995, with regard to the application and the existing concentration of off-sale alcoholic beverage licenses in the area. The project is located in Census Tract 46.02. According to ABC the Census Tract will support 11 licenses for the sale of alcohol for off-site consumption, and currently there have only been 8 licenses issued. Therefore, the area does not have an overconcentration of licensed off-sale alcoholic beverage outlets. Landscaping The project proposes 14,232+ square feet of landscaping or 25 percent, whereas the Development Code requires 15 percent landscaping or 8,497 square feet. Parking and Internal Circulation Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 5 The 16 standard parking spaces shown on the site plan meet the number of parking spaces required by the Development Code for the proposed development. All on-site vehicular paths are of adequate width to accommodate two-way traffic in conformance with the Development Code requirement of 24 feet. Loading All loading will take place in the drive-through lane during off hours of the drive-through restaurant. Traffic During the environmental review process, the City Traffic Engineer had determined that the additional vehicle trips resulting from the establishment of the proposed use would not cause any significant impact on the adjoining street system. However, based upon the concerns of staff and concerns raised by the Planning Commission regarding area traffic, traffic counts were taken and an analysis of traffic turning movements conducted and included in a report by KHR Associates. KHR investigated both traffic volumes and turning movements of this proposed facility, as well as a similar facility proposed, and currently in the review process for the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway. The level of service (LOS), denoted alphabetically from "A" to "F", is an evaluation of the degree of congestion, roadway design constraints, delay, accident potential, and driver discomfort experienced during a given period of time - typically during the peak hour or on a daily basis. While LOS A is the most desirable condition, LOS C is a benchmark used for planning purposes, while LOS D is considered acceptable for peak hour travel on major streets and highways. The traffic study found that the intersection of Varsity Avenue and-University Parkway operate at LOS C and that the with the addition of this proposed project at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway, and the addition of another similar facility on the northwest corner, that the intersection will continue to operate at LOS C, with at most an added 0.5 second delay at the intersection at both morning and afternoon peak hours. Therefore, the project will not cause any significant impacts on the adjoining street system as previously determined by the City Traffic Engineer during the environmental review process. COMMENTS RECEIVED CALTRANS The California Department of Transportation reviewed the proposal and indicated that although the traffic generated by the proposal does not appear to have a significant direct impact on the Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 6 State highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area. As noted above, a traffic study was prepared which found that this facility, as well as a similar facility currently in process and proposed for the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway, would not result in any significant cumulative effects on area traffic. Future development in the area will be subject to further review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Any cumulative impacts resulting to area traffic as a result of those proposals would be addressed at that time. Police Department In a telephone conversation between staff and Martha Soto of the Police Department on October 2, 1995, it was indicated that the Area Commander would not oppose the proposal, and that a memorandum would be forthcoming along with recommended Police Conditions of Approval. As of the writing of this staff report, neither the memorandum nor the conditions had been received. They will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration, once received. CONCLUSION Development Code Amendment No. 94-05 The proposed amendment will permit up to two service stations to locate on each side of the freeway within the Freeway Corridor Overlay along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The amendment will exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. The amendment is consistent with General Plan Objective 1.19, which provides for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of residents. - Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 With the approval, adoption and implementation of Development Code Amendment No. 94-05, the proposed service station/convenience market with off-sale of beer and wine, drive-through restaurant and drive-through automatic self- service car wash will meet all applicable Development Code Standards, inclusive of those that would be established by Development Code Amendment No. 94-05. An Initial Study for the proposal has been prepared and a Negative Declaration proposed. All impacts have been addressed through the Initial Study and project Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 7 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the proposed Negative Declaration; 2. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 based upon the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment E-1); and, 3. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 based on the attached Findings of Fact (E-2), and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment F) and Standard Requirements (Attachment G). Respectfully Submitted, Michael Hays Assistant Director of Planning and Building Services Mike R. Finn Associate Planner Attachment A Location Map Attachment B Proposed Development Code Text (B-1), and Development Code Amendment Service Station Intersection Analysis (B-2) Attachment C Site Plan (C-1), Floor Plans (C-2), and Elevations (C-3) Attachment D Conditional Use Permit Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table Attachment E Development Code Amendment Findings of Fact (E-1), Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact (E-2) Attachment F Conditions of Approval Attachment G Standard Requirements Attachment H Initial Study Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 10 ATTACHMENT "B-2" DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO 95-05 SERVICE STATION PiTERSE TION ANALYSIS DCA 95-05 Number of DCA 95-05 Number of Current Number Total Number of Existing Net Number Intersection Off—ramps Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations Possible Stations I-10 Mountain View 1 1 2 2 0 Waterman Ave. 2 2 4 3 1 I-215 Orange Show Rd. 2 2 4 2 2 2nd Street 2 2 4 0 4 University Pkwy. 2 2 4 3 1 Palm Avenue 2 2 4 2 2 State Route 30 Highland Ave. 2 2 4 2 2 "E" Street 1 1 4 2 2 Waterman Ave. 2 2 2 2 0 Del Rosa Ave. 2 2 4 4 0 Highland Ave. 1 1 4 1 3 (@ Arden) Highland Ave. 2 2 2 -2 (0 Boulder) TOTALS 21 42 23 19 r • ' �' I i ATTACHMENT C-1 t �E ch W W oil ,14a f d fill i 3 i C13 • fliji, at a Y } F f� A y. ' 6;n oil t'S J �IIIII �a 11111 111111 - ;� - ��•■�•••� 11111 .. � .�.,■r,...■■.� X111111111 .�- 1.► 111111 �'► `say= �':; � �i'��I{ .: s lift ATTACHMENT C-3 CID EI t� eeeseseeeem+eseeeeeao # � � ! a1 ..��.o W .jfl W li o 0 0 ! � gg e s o ' � m fills fill t a !.fill y� �R €t. }fQa6 I I I I I I 1 1 1 IJE 7s s r N 3 �IIIII 11111 - �IIIII 11111 ■ Ie ,M::: ■ ooc�:a: calm PrA -lah-k-I ........... C I I -94 ma U C� 0 0 f fill Ab 11f1t Q o m tl�jRt �r• : ■ ax � x� O �.� - , ,, I .. ,� 11111 VzPP All Al �{it `L �I i `,� I � II. ��IIIIIiII IN .. P. . .. >tii�: � .. 'i �1. II 1 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 12 ATTACHMENT "D" DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Development General Cry Proper Code Plan Permitted Use Gas Station, Convenience Permitted subject to Permitted Market, Drive-Through Conditional Use Permit' and Car Wash Height 1 Story 2 Stories 2 Stories (24 feet) (30 feet) (30 feet) Setbacks From Curb Face 25 feet' 25 feet N/A Front 10 feet 10 feet N/A Side (Street) 10 feet 10 feet N/A Drive Through Width 13 feet 11 feet N/A Width on Curved 17 feet 12 feet N/A Sections Landscaping 14,232+ square feet 8,497 square feet N/A (25+ percent) (15 percent) Lot Coverage 12 percent 40 percent N/A Parking 16' 16 N/A ' Assuming Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 is approved and implemented. ' Setback applies to parking areas, drive-through aisles and structures only. ' 2.500 square feet 0 1 space per 250 square feet plus 1 space 0 pump island => 10 + 6 or 16 spaces. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 13 ATTACHMENT "E-1" DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan in that the amendment provides for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of residents as addressed by General Plan Objective 1.19. The amendment accomplishes this by creating opportunities for service station/convenience markets to locate near freeway corridor on- and off-ramps leading to residential communities. By locating in these areas the service station/convenience markets will, for the convenience of City residents, provide convenient fueling and minor shopping in a single stop enroute to home or work, eliminating the need for multiple trips and stops. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, in that the amendment will permit up to two service stations to locate on each side of the freeway within the Freeway Corridor Overlay along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The amendment will also exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda Art Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 14 ATTACHMENT "E-2" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT Note: These Findings are made with the assumption that Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 is approved, adopted and implemented. 1. The proposed service station facility is a conditionally permitted use within, and would not impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan, in that it is a permitted use in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. 3. The proposed facility is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code in that and Initial Study was prepared and a Negative Declaration is proposed. 4. There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored, in that an Initial Study has been prepared for Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11, and a Negative Declaration has been proposed. All impacts have been properly mitigated through project Conditions of Approval. 5. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the service station facility is to be established and will not create significant noise, traffic or other conditiong or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, as addressed in the Initial Study. 6. The subject site is physically suitable the proposed facility, in that the site can accommodate the proposed use in compliance with all applicable Development Code Standards. 7. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety, in that the no all agencies responsible for providing those services have reviewed the project and none have indicated any inability to provide the necessary services. ATTACHMENT "H" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO INITIAL STUDY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT FOR Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A Development Code Amendment to allow service stations within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District on major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and to allow convenience stores as an ancillary use to service stations within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District on major and secondary arterials not subject to the 1000 foot distance restriction from other convenience stores. The project includes a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market (including the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption), fast food drive through restaurant, and a 960 square foot drive-thru automatic car wash, located at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district and within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. DATE: August 10, 1995 PREPARED FOR: Unocal 17700 Castleton Street, Suite 500 City of Industry, CA 91748 PREPARED BY: Michael R. Finn Associate Planner City of San Bernardino Planning and Building Services 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 (909) 384-5057 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Project: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Owner: Unocal Applicant: Service Station Services Introduction This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. It contains an evaluation of potential adverse impacts that can occur if Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 are approved. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared. The following components constitute the Initial Study for Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11: 1. Project Description and Location 2. Site and Area Characteristics 3. Environmental Setting 4. Summary 5. Environmental Determination 6. Environmental Impact Checklist 7. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures 8. Supporting Information/Location Map and Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevation Combined, these components constitute the complete Initial Study for Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 3 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 is a request to amend the Development Code to allow service stations along major and secondary arterials with freeway offramps, within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. Specifically the proposal would amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway offramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway offramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. A maximum of two such service stations would be permitted on each side of the freeway. See Attachment 8-1, Proposed Amendment Text. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 also includes a request to amend the Development Code to exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Specifically, the proposal would amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4) adding the proposed exemption with the exception that only a maximum of two such service stations be allowed to locate on each side of the freeway. See Attachment 8-1, Proposed Amendment Text. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 is an application to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive- thru automatic car wash. Approximately 2,343 square feet of the building is allocated to the convenience market, with the remainder of the structure allocated to the fast-food portion of the business. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The 960 square foot self-service is located along the southern border of the site and will be fully enclosed during operation. Six gasoline pump islands are proposed with a capability of fueling 12 cars simultaneously. The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift. Proposed hours of operation is 24 hours a day. 2. SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 The Development Code Amendment would apply to all properties that: 1. Are located along major or secondary arterials with a freeway offramp and located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District; 2. Meet criteria ##1 above and there are fewer than two such service stations meeting City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 4 criteria #1 already located on the side of the freeway for which the service station is proposed; 3. Meet the above criteria and do not adjoin a residential land use district. Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. Approximately 12 freeway off-ramp intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified and are shown in Attachment B-2. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 The 1.64 acre site is irregular in shape, and is located on the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. University Parkway is identified by the General Plan as a major arterial. There are two freeway offramps from the I-215 freeway onto University Parkway, and the site is located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. The site is presently vacant and undeveloped. Surrounding land uses include Scottish Rite Temple, immediately adjacent on the south, a multi- tenant shopping center with two fast food drive-throughs on the north, across Varsity Avenue, and a multi-tenant shopping center, restaurants, fast food drive-through restaurants, and service station, under construction on the east. The I-215 freeway is adjacent to the Scottish Rite Temple on the south. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 The amendment would be applicable only to those projects meeting the criteria listed under Section 2, above. The environmental setting will be dependent on the individual project location as determined by any future conditional use permit applications. Conditional use permit applications meeting the conditions established by this amendment and environmental issues are such that they will be addressed with each individual application submittal. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 The site is located in an area identified by the General Plan as being located within a High Wind Hazard Area. 4. SUNEWARY City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 5 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 would create the potential for approximately 19 new service stations, based on an analysis of available business registration data. Although business registration information regarding service stations with ancillary convenience stores were not available, it is estimated that a maximum of 42 such facilities would be possible under the proposed amendment. In those areas where potential impacts may occur, proposals under the amendment would be subject to review under CEQA and may be conditioned to reduce or eliminate impacts as necessary. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 The Conditional Use Permit would result in the establishment of a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with fast food drive-through restaurant, convenience market with sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption, and drive-through automatic car wash at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway. The project site is located within an area of potential wind erosion and high wind hazard area. The proposal includes the transport, storage and use of gasoline and petroleum products. Project conditions of approval have been included to mitigate potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 6 On the basis of this initial study, The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 1447 Name i e Signature Date City Contact Person regarding this Initial Study: Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner City of San Bernardino - Department of Planning and Building Services 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Phone: (909) 384-5057 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 7 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain "Yes" and "Maybe" answers on a separate attached sheet. "No" answers are explained on this checklist. See Attachment "A" Preliminary Environmental Description Form, where necessary. (SECTION 6) Yes No Maybe 1. Earth Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) on slopes of 15% or more based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. D.(3)? _ X _ b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15% natural grade based on review of General Plan HMOD map, which designates areas of 15% or greater slope in the City? _ X c. Development within the Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 47, of the City's General Plan? _ X d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature based on field review? X e. Development within areas defined for high potential for water or wind erosion as identified in Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 53, of the City's General Plan? X Yes No Maybe f. Modification of a channel, creek or river based on review of City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 8 USGS Topographic Map (Name) X g. Development within an area subject to landslides, mudslides, subsidence or other similar hazards as identified in Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the City's General Plan? _ X h. Development within an area subject to liquefaction as shown in Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 48, of the City's General Plan? X i. Other? _ X 2. Air Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient air quality as defined by South Coast Air Quality Management District, based on meeting the threshold for significance in the District's, "CEQA Air Quality Handbook"? . _ X b. The creation of objectionable odors based on information contained in Preliminary Description Form, No. G.(3)? _ X _ c. Development within a high wind Yes No Maybe hazard area as identified in City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 9 Section 15.0-Wind & Fire, Figure 59, of the City's General Plan? X _ 3. Water Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces that cannot be mitigated by Public Works Standard Requirements to contain and convey runoff to approved storm drain based on review of the proposed site plan? _ X _ b. Significant alteration in the course or flow of flood waters based on consultation with Public Works staff? X c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality based on requirements of Public Works to have runoff directed to approved storm drains? _ X _ d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground water? _ X _ Yes No Maybe e. Exposure of people or property City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 10 to flood hazards as identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060281 0010-B, and Section 16.0-Flooding, Figure 62, of the City's General Plan? _ X f. Other? _ X 4. Biological Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. Development within the Biological Resources Management Overlay, as identified in Section 10.0- Natural Resources, Figure 41, of the City's General Plan? _ X 1. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants or their habitat including stands of trees based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. B.(1) and verified by on-site survey/evaluation? _ X 2. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals or their habitat based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. E.(8) and verified by site survey/evaluation? _ X 3. Impacts to the wildlife Yes No Maybe disbursal or migration corridors? _ X _ City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 11 b. Removal of viable, mature trees based on site survey/evaluation and review of the proposed site plan? (6" or greater trunk diameter at 4' above the ground) _ X _ c. Other? X 5. Noise: Could the proposal result in: a. Development of housing, health care facilities, schools, libraries, religious facilities or other noise sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior as identified in Section 14.0-Noise, Figures 57 and 58 of the City's General Plan? X b. Development of new or expansion of existing industrial, commercial or other uses which generate noise levels above an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior that may affect areas containing housing, schools, health care facilities or other sensitive uses based on information in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. G.(1) and evaluation of surrounding land uses No. C., and verified by site survey/evaluation? _ X c. Other? _ X Yes No Maybe 6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the land use as City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 12 designated based on the review of the General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Districts Map? _ X — b. Development within an Airport District as identified in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Report and the Land Use Zoning District Map? _ X — c. Development within Foothill Fire Zones A & B, or C as identified on the Development Code Overlay Districts Map? _ X — d. Other? Amendment to the X _ Development Code 7. Man-Made Hazards: Based on information contained in Preliminary Environmental Description Form, No. G.(1) and G.(2) will the project: a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? X b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? _ X c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? _ X — d. Other? _ X _ 8. Housing: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing as verified by a site survey/evaluation? _ X _ Yes No Maybe b. Create a significant demand for additional housing based on the City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 13 proposed use and evaluation of project size? _ X _ c. Other? X 9. Transportation/Circulation: Could the proposal, in comparison with the Circulation Plan as identified in Section 6.0-Circulation of the City's General Plan and based on the conclusions of the City Traffic Engineer and review of the Traffic Study if one was prepared, result in: a. A significant increase in traffic volumes on the roadways or intersections or an increase that is significantly greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? X b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? X c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? _ X _ d. Alteration of.present patterns of circulation? _ X e. Impact to rail or air traffic? _ X _ f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ X g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? X h. Other? X Yes No Maybe 10. Public Services: Based on the responses of the responsible City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 14 agencies or departments, will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? _ X c. Schools (i.e., attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? _ X _ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Medical aid? _ X f. Solid Waste? X g. Other? X 11. Utilities: Will the proposal: a. Based on the responses of the responsible Agencies, Departments, or Utility Company, impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? _ X _ 2. Electricity? _ X 3. Water? _ X 4. Sewer? _ X 5. Other? _ X — b. Result in a disjointed pattern Yes No Maybe of utility extensions based on City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 15 review of existing patterns and proposed extensions. _ X — 12. Aesthetics: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any significant or important scenic view based on evaluation of the view shed verified by site survey/ evaluation? _ X b. Will the visual impact of the project create aesthetically offensive changes in the existing visual setting based on a site survey and evaluation of the proposed elevations? _ X c. Other? _ X 13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site by development within an archaeological sensitive area as identified in Section 3.0- Historical, Figure 8, of the City's General Plan? _ X b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site, structure or object as listed in the City's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? _ X c. Other? X 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance Yes No Maybe (Section 15065) City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 16 The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Based on this Initial Study: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ X _ b. Does the project have the to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) _ X _ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ X Yes No Maybe d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 17 effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ X _ B. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (SECTION 7) 1. Earth Resources Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-h. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market in areas that may require substantial earth movement, development within an Alquist-Priolo Zone, modification of a channel, creek or river, or in areas subject to wind erosion, water erosion, land slides, mudslides or other similar earth hazards. The earth resources environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the location of the specific proposal and its relation to specific environmental earth resources/hazards. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 e. The proposed project is located within an area identified in Figure 53 of the General Plan as having high potential for wind erosion. The site is relatively flat. Therefore, little or no potential exists for slope erosion. The primary source for potential impacts will be bare soil exposed to high wind during grading and site preparation, potentially generating high amounts of dust and erosion/siltation. Since the overall final development and landscaping of the site will result in minimal soil exposure, long term impacts are expected to be insignificant. However, grading, site preparation, and project construction could result in the short term exposure of large areas of bare soil to high wind. Engineering Department Standard Requirements concerning compliance Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code, and Planning Department Conditions of approval requiring cessation of construction operations and application of soil binders when wind velocities reach 20 mph or greater will reduce the short term potential impacts from grading and construction to a level of insignificance. 2. Air Resources Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-c. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market that may result in substantial air emissions or that may have an effect upon ambient air quality, create objectionable odors, or result in such development within a high wind hazard area. The air resource environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the specific proposal and its location. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. , = A . City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 18 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 C. The proposal will result in the development of a service station with a convenience market, fast food drive-through restaurant, and drive-through automatic car wash within a high wind hazard area. Building Division Standard Requirements requiring design of the roof and structure of the dwellings to be developed on the site to withstand 80 mile per hour wind load, exposure C, will reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 3. Water Resources Development Permit No. 95-05 a-e. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market that may result in substantial changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns, alteration of the course or flow of flood waters, may result in discharge into surface waters, a change in quality or quantity of ground water, or result in the exposure of people or property to flood hazards. The water resource environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the specific proposal and its specific location. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 4. Biological Resources Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market that may result in the Biological Resources Management Overlay or that could result in the removal of viable mature trees. The biological resources environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the specific proposal and its specific location. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 5. Noise Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market that may result in noise impacts to noise sensitive uses nearby. Potential noise impacts will be dependent upon the specific proposal and its location in relation to noise sensitive land uses. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 b. The proposal includes a 960 square foot drive-through automatic car wash on the south property line adjacent to the Scottish Rite Temple. The car wash will be enclosed. Per project conditions of City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 19 approval, the wash will be sound proofed to ensure that external noise levels will be at or below 65 db(A) per General Plan noise requirements. Potential impacts are insignificant. 6. Land Use Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-c. The amendment does not propose any change in land use as designated in the General Plan. The amendment could result in the development of a service station/convenience market in airport districts AD-II and AD-V. Such a proposal would be subject to the provisions contained in Chapter 19.12 of the Development Code, which addresses development within Airport Districts. The amendment will not result in development within any Foothill Fire Zone since none of the sites affected by the proposed amendment is located within the Foothill Fire Zone. Impacts as a result of development under the amendment will be project specific and dependent upon the proposed location with to land use hazards. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. d. Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. Approximately 12 freeway intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified (See Attachment B-2). From the analysis, it is estimated that a total of 23 service stations presently exist at these intersections. Under current Development Code criteria, 18 of the 23 existing service stations meet the Development Code locational criteria. Under the criteria of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, a total of 42 service stations would be possible. Taking the existing service stations into consideration, the proposed amendment would create the potential for 19 new service stations. Additionally, all 5 of the service stations that do not meet current Development Code locational criteria would meet the locational criteria of the proposed amendment. Under the proposed amendment a total of 42 service stations with ancillary convenience markets would be possible. Data regarding the number of existing service stations with ancillary convenience markets was not available for analysis. 7. Man-Made Hazards Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-c. The amendment will likely result in the use, transport, and storage of hazardous materials in the form of gasoline products. Impacts as a result of development under the amendment will be project specific and dependent upon the proposed location with to land use hazards. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 20 a. The proposal will result in the transport, use, and storage of gasoline and petroleum products. Project compliance with the following project conditions of approval will reduce potential impacts to a level of non-significance: 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans for underground storage tank systems shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be required to apply for a Hazardous Material Handler Permit, a Hazardous Material Generator Permit (if applicable), and Underground Tank permit. 3. Prior to Occupancy, the applicant shall obtain a "Business Plan" as defined in Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code. 8. Housing Development Code Amendment No 95-05 a-b. The amendment could result in the removal of existing housing. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 9. Transportation/Circulation Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-h. Individual projects proposed under Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 would be subject to review under the provisions of CEQA. The City Traffic Engineer will review all such projects on a case-by-case basis for impacts. Projects would be conditioned as necessary to prevent significant traffic impacts, once submitted. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 a-h. The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposal and has determined that the additional vehicle trips resulting from the establishment of the use will not cause any significant impact on the adjoining street system. Total traffic volume will be less than the street design capacity. 10. Public Services Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 21 a-f. Specific proposals under the amendment may impact the capability of public service providers to provide adequate levels of service. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 11. Utilities Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment may impact the capability of public utility providers to provide adequate levels of service. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 12. Aesthetics Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment could have aesthetic impacts. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 13. Cultural Resources Development Cale Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment could have potential impact on cultural resources. The potential for impacts will be dependent upon the specific proposal and its location in relation to noise sensitive land uses. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 22 8. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 8-1 Draft Development Code Amendment Text 8-2 Service Station Intersection Analysis 8-3 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Location Map 8-4 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevations T J `- _ i EXHIBIT 3 City of San Bernardino -. ,..,{ . San Bernardino Police Department Interoffice Memorandum ? :i..�. .,.•'�_.,.ham.,_... .. iii To: SGT. J. GODDARD From: CSR II M. SOTO i Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #95-11 Date: October 9, 1995 Copies : MIKE FINN, ASSOCIATE PLANNER APPLICANT: Barry Hammond BUSINESS • Unocal University Pkwy/Varsity Ave. INVESTIGATION• The business will be located within the reporting district SC405 and ABC census tract 46 . 02 . According to ABC, they will support 11 off-sale licenses and currently there are only eight . The nearest off-sale licensed premise is Hughes Market, which will be located about . 2 mi . from the business . The nearest on-sale licensed premise is Ramada Inn, which will be located about . 4 mi . from the business . The nearest school is J C Carmark Elementary located at 4777 N. State St . and will be about . 2 mi . from the business . The nearest church is First Baptist Church located at 4747 State St . and will be about . 2 mi . from the business . The nearest park is Littlefield/Shultis Memorial Park on Kendall Ave. and will be about 1 . 6 mi . from the business . The nearest residence will be an apartment complex across the street from the business . The complex is Ridgeline Park Apartments located at 1925 College Ave . and will be about 100' from the business . AREA COMMANDER COMMENTS : Sgt . Soderbloom, who is the Administrative Sergeant for the Area Commander, said they have no objection. POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS : Since the Administrative Sergeant for the area has no objection and A.B . C. will support 11 off-sale licenses and there are currently only eight, the Police Department has no objections . THE SBPD IS COMMITTED TO PROVIDING: PROGRESSIVE DUALITY POLICE SERVICE; A SAFE ENVIRONMENT TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE; A REDUCTION IN CRIME THROUGH PROBLEM RECOGNITION AND PROBLEM SOLVING POLICE CONCERNS APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A.B.C. LICENSES LOCATION: University Pkwy/Varsity Ave . Conditional Use Permit No . 95-11 Reporting District SC 405 Six Months Part I Crimes Persons Property Census Tract 46 . 02 On Sale Off Sale Allowed Allowed 11 Existing Existing 8 GENERAL VICINITY: Distance To Nearest : Distance School Carmack Elementary School 4777 N. State St . . 2 Mi . Church First Baptist Church 4747 N. State St . . 2 Mi . Park Littlefield/Shultis Mem Park Kendall Ave . 1 . 6 Mi . ABC On Sale License Premises Ramada Inn 2000 Ostrems Wy. .4 Mi . ABC Off Sale Licensed Premises Hughes Market . 2 Mi . Hallmark Shell Station . 3 Mi . Arco Am/Pm . 3 Mi . Distance of Parking Lot to Residence : Ridgeline Park Apts 1925 College 100' Page two CUP 95-11 Area Commander Comments : Sat . Soderbloom the Administrative Sergeant for the Area Commander, said they have no objections Police Department Recommendations : Since the Administrative Sergeant of the area has no objection and A.B . C. will support 11 off-sale licenses and there are currently only eight the police department has no objections EXHIBIT 5 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda ill Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 15 ATTACHMENT "F" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 1. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction on improvements shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. Project: Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Expiration Date: (Two years from the effective date of DCA No. 95-05) 2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause, grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code provisions. 3. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan(s) approved by the Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and Common Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be subject to approval by the Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if applicable. a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping; b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures; C. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme; and, d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project. 4. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 16 attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. 5. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate. The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit. 6. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air pollution; glare control; exterior lightning design and control; noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control. Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground. 7. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (five copies) to the Public Works Department with the required fee for review. The landscape plans will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services and the Planning Division for review. (Note: The issuance of a building development permit, by the Department of Planning and Building Services, does NOT waive this requirement.) No grading permit(s) will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department), and comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 19.28 (Landscaping Standards) of the Development Code effective on the date of approval of this permit. Trees are to be inspected by a representative of the Parks Department prior to planting. 8. This development shall be required to maintained a minimum of 16 standard off-street parking spaces as shown on the approved plan(s) on file. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 17 9. The car wash shall be sound proofed, as necessary, to ensure that external noise levels will be at or below 65 db(A). 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans for the underground storage tank system shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall apply for a Hazardous Material Handler Permit, a Hazardous Material Generator Permit (if applicable), and Underground Tank Permit. Contact the County Department of Environmental Health Services at (909) 387-3080. 12. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall file a "Business Plan" as defined in Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code. 13. Plans for the food facility shall be submitted to the Department of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health Services, Food Section. Call (909) 387-4608. 14. Only fast-food menu items (sodas, fries, sandwiches, etc.) may be sold through the fast food drive-through window. No beer, wine or convenince store merchandise shall be sold through the fast food drive through window. 15. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the following City Departments or Divisions: a. Public Works (Engineering) Department b. Building Services Division of the Planning and Building Services Department C. Police Department d. Water Department e. Fire Department e. Public Services (Refuse) Department f. Parks and Recreation Department ATTACHMENT "G" — STANDARD REOUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUPS» CITY ENGINEER & ,0G4 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STATION CONE HEARING DATE STORE MMOR t/E-THAL/ A O C4,4 WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WESTSIDEOFU HERS-Iry PAf,KMIY_ SOUTHS/DEOF IMHS/TYAt/ PAGE NO: • NOTE TO APPLICANT. Where separate Engineering plans are required, the applicant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. 1. Drainage and Flood Control a) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b) Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit Requirements. c) An Erosion Control Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to grading plan approval. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. 2. Grading a) if more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plottgrading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Page 1 9113195 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STATION. CON(/. HEARING DATE STORE MOR114F THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF U VERSITY PARKWAY. SOUTH SIDE OFVARSITYAY PAGE NO: b) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code. c) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04167 of the Municipal Code(See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). d) The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Site Design shall comply with all requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to handicap parking and accessibility. e) A handicap accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet . Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6 feet. f) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the Engineering Division for Checking. g) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to allow the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of owner neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property owner and shall ensure that , if the property owner or subsequent owner(s) fail to properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file appropriate liens against the property in order to accomplish the required landscape maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of $200.00 shall be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing costs. This easement and covenant shall be executed by the property owner prior to Page 2 9113/95 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS! CASE NO. CUP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & OCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: G,45STATICA CONV. HEARING DATE sTOaE wiV,giVF THRU. AND CAR WASH_ AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST S1VE OF U1V1YB9S/TY PARKWAY_ SOUTH S/DE OF VARS 7Y-AV. PAGE NO: plan approval unless otherwise allowed by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 3. Utilities a) Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses). b) This parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. c) Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. d) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required. e) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Section 19.20.030 of the Development Code. Page 3 9113195 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/(M CONE. HEARING DATE STORE Y/DR/I/E-THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WFSTS/DEOFUN/EERS/TY PARKWAY_ SOUTHS/DEOFVARS/TYAV PAGE NO: f) Existing Utilities which interfere with new constriction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030. 4. Street Improvement and Dedications a) Remove existing asphalt curb along the westerly side of University Parkway adjacent to the site and replace with 8 inch curb and gutter per City Standard No. 200, Type "B". Curb face shall be set at 53 feet from the centerline of University Parkway. A transition shall be constructed at the southerly boundary to provide for traffic safety and drainage. b) A side opening catch basin shall be installed in the curb to replace the existing drainage inlet located in the street right-of-way of University Parkway near the southeasterly corner of the site. c) A handicap ramp conforming to City Standard No. 205 shall be constructed at the southwesterly comer of University Parkway and Varsity Avenue. Sufficient right-of-way shall be dedicated, if necessary, to accommodate the ramp. d) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb). e) Construct Handicap Ramps in accordance with City Standard No. 205 at all curb returns within and adjacent to the project site. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way at the corner to accommodate the ramp. Page 4 9113195 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & OCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/ON. CO/Vt/. HEARING DATE STORE W/DA/YE-THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WESTS/DE CFUU_W/EAS/TY PARKWAY. SOUTH S/DE OF PARS/TYA V. PAGE NO: f) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type II, including Handicap by-pass. Remove existing driveway approaches that are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter and sidewalk. g) Install one Street Light on each adjacent street in accordance with City Standard Nos. SL-1 and SL-2. 5. Required Engineering Permits a) Grading permit(If applicable.). b) On-site improvements construction permit(except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), including landscaping. C) Off-site improvements construction permit. 6. Applicable Engineering Fees' a) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 4% and 4%, respectively, of the estimated construction cose of the off-site improvements. b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements(except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 2% and 3%, respectively, of the 'AM Fees are subject to change without notice. 'Estimated Construction Cost for Off-Site Improvements is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with the Department of Public Works/City Engineer. Rage 5 91I M5 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95_11 CITY ENGINEER & OCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/ON. CONI% HEARING DATE -5TORE WIDRIVE-THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION:_ WESTS/DE0FUN/1/ERS 17Y PARKWAY. SOUTHS/DEOF kARS/TYAY PAGE NO: estimated construction costa of the on-site improvements, including landscaping. C) Plan check and inspection fees for grading Of permit required) - Fee Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter. d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount of 6 262 . Based on 56.652 Square Feet @ $ 0.379 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area (75% of the net lot area according to plan), then $ 0.130 per square foot of remaining impervious lot area or fraction thereof. e) Developer shall reimburse City in the amount $125,000 for this projects fair share of the cost of Comprehensive Storm Drain Project No. 7-E25 which was previously installed at the City's expense in University Parkway adjacent to the site. f) Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of $17,441 . Based on 1,155 trips per day c@ $ 15.10 per new trip generated by the project. Exact amount shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of application for Building Permit. g) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount of 214 . Based on 2,343 Square Feet of Bldg Area @ $ 214.30 per 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof. h) Sewer inspection fee in the amount of $18.07 . Based on 1 connection 18.07 per connection. 'Estimated Construction Cost for On-Site Improvements is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with the Department of Public Worics/City Engineer. Page 6 9113195 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/O/V_ MY11- HEARING DATE STORE WIDR/►/E-THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WESTS/DE OF U/V/YEI9S/TY PARKWAY. SOUTH S/DE OF VA HSI TYAV PAGE NO: 1) Street or easement dedication processing fee in the amount of 200.00 per document. Page 7 911345 Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 1 of 2 BUILDING DIVISION STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 1. Submit plans prepared by a Registered Building Architect or Civil or Structural Engineer. 2. Submit a complete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a Registered Civil or Structural Engineer or Architect. 3. Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Forms for non-residential buildings including a signed compliance statement. 4. Submit calculations a structural drawings, prepared by a Registered Civil Structural Engineer or Architect. 5. Submit five (5) complete sets of construction plans including: (a) Copy of conditions (3) (b) Soils report (3) (c) Energy Calculations (3) (d) Structural Calculations (3) 6. Submit a single line drawing of the electrical service. Show all equipment, conduit and wire sizes and types. Show the service ground size and grounding electrode. 7. Submit panel schedule(s) and electrical plans. 8. Submit a plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning system. (Clearly identify the location and rating of the equipment and the sizes and material of all ducts, registers and the location of all fire dampers). Show means of providing mechanical ventilation as required by the 1991 Uniform Building Code. 9. Submit gas pipe loads, sizing calculations and isometrics. 10. Provide a plot plan showing the location of the proposed sewer system. 11. Submit isometric plans of cold and hot water and drain waste and vent systems. 12. Show compliance with Title 24 for the physically handicapped in the following: Path of travel to building, restrooms. and all exits. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 2 of 2 13. Submit plans approved by the County Health Department. 14. For structures located within high wind areas: a. Design structure, including roof covering, using 80 mph wind load, Exposure "C". 15. City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's Compensation Insurance. 16. Assessor's Parcel Number. 266-591-01 17. Contractor's City license. 18. Contractor's State license. 19. Sewer capacity rights from Water Department, 384-5093, Neil Thomsen. 20. School fees from Unified School District, 381-1179. 21. Other: Plan Check time is approximately 5 to 6 weeks Expeditious Plan Check time is approximately 10 working days Contact Development Services for possible expeditious review at 384-5071 22. Deposit: $910.92 23. Provide waste water approval. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD BUILDING REQUIREMENTS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1994 DEVELOPMENTAL/ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CASE ) e C-Y7 --\ I DATE -I- \ -" COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS The following special provisions shall apply to all new commercial or industrial buildings or those with 50% improvement or alteration: Garage-type doors A. Garage type doors which are either rolling overhead, solid overhead, swinging, sliding, or accordion style doors shall conform to the following standards: 1. Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of five- sixteen}hs (5/16) inch in thickness with t1* locking hardware being attached to the suppor framing. 2 . Aluminum doors shall be a minimum thickness of . 0215 inches and riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18) inches on center along the outside seams. There shall be a full width horizontal beam attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot or pedestrian access door framing within three (3) inches or the strike area of the Pilot or pedestrian access door. 3 . Fiberglass doors shall have panels a minimum of six (6) ounces per square foot from the bottom of the door to a height of seven (7) feet. Panels above seven (7) feet and panels in residential structures . have a density of not less than five (5) ounces per square foot. B. Where sliding or accordion doors are used, they shall be equipped with guide tracks which shall be designed so that the door cannot be removed from the track when in the closed and locked position. C. Doors that exceed sixteen (16) feet in width shall have two (2) lock receiving points, one located on each side of the door. Doors not exceeding sixteen (16) feet shall have one lock receiving point placed on either side of the door. A single bolt may be used in the center of the Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 2 door with the locking point located either in the floor or door frame header. D. All overhead or swinging doors shall be equipped with slidebolts which shall be capable of using padlocks with a minimum nine-thirty-seconds 99/32) inch shackle. 1. The entire slidebolt assembly shall be constructed of case-hardened steel and shall have a frame a minimum of . 120 inches in thickness, and a bolt diameter a minimum of one-half (1/2) inch, and shall protrude at least one and one-half (1 1/2) inches into the receiving guide. 2 . Slide bolt assemblies shall be attached to the door with bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior. Rivets shall not be used to attach such assemblies. E. Padlocks used with exterior mounted slide bolts shall have a hardened steel shackle a minimum of nine-thirty! seconds (9/32) inch in diameter with heel and toe locking and a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation. The key shall be nonremovable when in an unlocked position. F. Doors using a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the bolt or locking bar extending into the receiving guide a minimum of one (1) inch. G. Pedestrian access 4c.-rs contained in garage type doors shall comply to the standards set forth in the below section. Windows/Locks/Doors (Including Sliding Glass) : The following requirements must be met for windows, locks, doors (including sliding glass) : A. All movable windows and sliding glass doors shall be constructed and/or equipped so as to prevent them from being lifted out of their tracks when in the closed position. B. Louvered windows shall not be used when any portion of the window is less than twelve (12) feet vertically or six (5) feet horizontally from an accessible surface or any adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread, platform, or similar structure. Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 3 C. Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, solid wood or metal doors, shall be = constructed or protected as follows: 1. Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and three-fourths (1 3/4) inches. Hollow metal doors shall be constructed of a minimum equivalent to sixteen (16) U.S. gauge steel and have sufficient reinforcement to maintain the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is installed; such reinforcement being able to restrict collapsing of the door around the locking device. 2 . Except when double cylinder deadbolts are used or safety glazing is required by Chapter 54 of the Uniform Building Code, any glazing installed within forty (40) inches of any door locking mechanisms shall be constructed or protected as follows: - a. Fully tempered glass or rated burglar resistant glazing, or b. Iron or steel grills of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch mesh secured with nonremovable bolts on the inside of the glazing may be used; and framing for iron or steel grills shall be by one (1) inch by one-fourth (1/4) inch flat metal secured by nonremovable bolts, or C. The glazing shall be covered with iron or steel bars of at least one-half (1/2) inch round or one inch by on-fourth (1 x 1/4) inch flat metal, spaced not more than five (5) inches apart and secured with nonremovable bolts. d. Items b and c above shall not interfere with the operation of opening windows if such windows are required to be openable by the Uniform Building Code. D. All swinging exterior doors with the exception of aluminum frame swinging doors shall be equipped as follows: 1 . A single or double door shall be equipped with a double or single cylinder deadbolt. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of one inch and be Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 4 constructed so as to repeal cutting tool attack. The deadbolt shall have an embedment of at least three-fourths (3/4) inch into the door jamb/strike. The cylinder shall have a cylinder guard, a minimum of five (5) pin tumblers, and shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock b y connecting screws of at least one-fourth (1/4) inch in diameter. All deadbolts will be equipped wic:L a locked indicator. Exposed installation screws on double cylinder deadbolts shall be nonremovable. The provisions of this subsection do not apply where ( 1) panic hardware is required, or (2) an equivalent device is approved by the enforcing authority. Locking devices shall be mounted at a height of not less than thirty (30) nor more than fort-four (44) inches above the finished floor. 2 . Hinges for outswinging doors shall be equipped wi nonremovable hinge pins or a mechanical interloc to- preclude removal of the door from the exterio by removing the hinge pins. 3 . Whenever a mail slot is located within forty (40) inches of the primary locking device on any exterior door it shall be covered by an interior hood which will discourage manipulation of the primary locking device. 4 . Strikeplates shall be constructed of minimum sixteen (16) U.S. gauge steel, bronze or brass, a minimum of three and one-half (3 1/2) inches in length and secured to the jamb with screws a minimum of two and one-half (2 1/2) inches in length. E. All exterior double doors shall be equipped as follows: 1. The inactive leaf of double doors shall be equipped with automatic releasing metal _' u_;tbolts having a f minimum embedment of five-eighths (5/8) inch into the header and threshold of the door frame or by panic hardware which contains a minimum of !2) 1 -cking points, one located at the header, the other at the threshold of each door. 2 . Double doors shall have a full-length astragal, constructed of steel a minimum of . 125 inch thick which will cover the opening between the doors . The astragal shall be a minimum of two (2) inches wide, and extend a minimum of one inch beyond the Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 5 edge of the door to which it is attached. The astragal shall be attached to the outside of the active door by means of welding or with nonremovable bolts spaced apart on not more than ten (10) inch centers. F. Aluminum frame swinging doors shall conform to the following: 1 . The jamb on all aluminum frame swinging doors shall be so constructed or protected to withstand one thousand six hundred (1, 600) pounds of pressure in both a vertical distance of three (3) inches and a horizontal distance of one (1) inch each side of the strike so as to prevent violation of the strike. 2 . Aluminum frame swinging doors shall be equipped AF with a two-point lnckirg mechanism 'consisting at ' dead-bolt having a minimum bolt projection of onk and one-half (1 1/2) inches, or a hook shaped or similar bolt that engages the strike sufficiently to prevent spreading and a metal automatic releasing threshold bolt having a minimum embedment of five-eighths (5/8) inch into the floor. The deadbolt lock shall have a minimum of five (5) pin tumblers and a cylinder guard and shall be equipped with a locked indicator. G. Panic hardware, whenever required by the Uniform Building Code or Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, shall be equipped and installed as follows: 1 . Panic hardware shall contain a minimum of two (2) locking points on each door, one located at the head, the other at the threshold of the door, or 2 . On single doors, panic hardware may have one locking point which is not to be located at either the top or bottom rails of the door frame. The door shall have an astragal constructed of steel . 125 i- -`1;s thick which shall be attached with nonremovable bolts or welded to the outside of the door. The astragal shall extend a minimum of six (6) inches vertically above and below the latch of the panic hardware. The astragal shall be a minimum of two (2) inches wide and extend a minimum of one (1) inch beyond the edge of the door. 3 . Double doors containing panic hardware shall have a Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 6 full length steel astragal attached to the doors at their meeting point which will close the opening between them but not interfere with the operation of either door. H. Installation and construction of frames and jambs for exterior swinging doors shall be as follows: 1. Door jambs shall be installed with solid backing in such a manner that no voids exist between the strike side of the jamb and the frame opening for a vertical distance of six (6) inches each side of the strike. Finger joints are prohibited. 2 . In wood framing, horizontal blocking shall be placed between studs at door lock height for three (3) stud spaces each side of the door openings. - Trimmers shall be full length from the heads to thq floor with solid backing against sole plates. I . In multiple occupancy office buildings all entrance doors to individual office suites shall meet the construction and locking requirements for exterior doors. J. In multiple occupancy buildings, interior walls dividing the individual suites shall not end at the false ceiling but shall continue to the real roof. K. Exterior transoms or windows shall be deemed accessible if less than twelve (12) feet above ground or adjacent to any pedestrian walkway. Accear4_._-: e windows and transoms having a pane or opening exceeding ninety-six (96) square inches, with the smallest dimension exceeding six . (6) inches, 'and not visible from a public or private thoroughfare shall be protected in the following manner: 1. Fully tempered glass or burglary resistant glazing, or - 2 . The following window barriers may be used but shall be secured with bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior: a. Interior or exterior steel or iron bars of at least one-half (1/2) inch round or one by one- quarter (1 x 1/4) inch flat metal spaced not more than five (5) inches apart and security fastened, or b. Interior or exterior iron or steel grills of Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 7 at least one-eighth (1/8) inch metal with not more than a two (2) inch mesh and securely fastened. 3 . The protective bars or grills shall not interfere with the operation of opening windows if such windows are required to be openable by the Uniform Building Code. L. Roof openings shall be equipped as follows : 1. All skylights on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be provided with: a. Rated burglary resistant glazing, or i b. Iron or steel bars of at least one-half (1/2 inch round or one by one-fourth (1 x 1/4) inc flat metal spaced not more than five (5 inches on center to cross the narrowest dimension of the opening being covered. If the narrowest dimension of that- opening exceeds eighteen (18) inches, cross members shall be welded into place, not more than eighteen (18) inches apart beginning with a cross member at the center of the opening. Cross members shall be welded to each and every bar it crosses. The entire bar assembly shall be mounted inside the skylight and shall be attach to the building structure by means of machine bolts spaced not more than sixteen (16) inches apart or attached by means of an equivalent method approved by the enforcing authority, or C. A steel or iron grill of at least one-eighth (1/B) inch metal with a maximum two (2) inch mesh mounted inside the skylight and secured j by bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior. d. These requirements do not apply on any structure with a height of thirty-five (35) feet or more where there is no readily available roof access as determined by the enforcing authority. 2 . All hatchway openings on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 8 secured as follows: a. If the hatchway is of wooden material, it shall be covered on the inside with at least sixteen (16) U.S . gauge sheet steel or its equivalent, attached with screws. b. The hatchway shall be secured from the inside with a slide bar or slide bolts which are attached by nonremovable bolts. C. Outside hinges on all hatchway opening shall be provided with nonremovable pins when using pin type hinges. 3 . All air duct or air vent openings exceeding ninety- six (96) square inches on the roof or exterior walls of any commercial building shall be secured by covering same with either of the following: a. Iron or steel bars of at least one-half (1/21 inch round or one by one-fourth (1 x 1/4) inch flat metal spaced no more than five (5) inches apart and securely fastened, or b. Iron or steel grills of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch metal with a maximum two (2) inch mesh and securely fastened, or c. If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be sP�cured with bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior. d. The above must not interfere with venting requirements, creating potentially hazardous conditions to health and safety, or conflict with the provisions of the Uniform Building Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code. M. Permanently affixed ladders leading to roofs shall be fully enclosed with sheet metal to a height of ten (10) feet. This covering shall be locked against the ladder with a case hardened hasp, secured with nonremovable screws or bolts and a padlock with a minimum three-eighth (3/8) inch hardened steel shackle, locking at both heel and toe, and a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation with nonremovable key when in an unlocked position. Hinges on the cover will be provided with nonremovable pins when using pin-type hinges. Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 9 N. A building located within eight (s) feet of utility poles, trees, cr similar structures which allow access to the building's roof, windows, or other openings shall have such access area barricaded or fenced with materials to deter human climbing. O. The following standards for lighting and address markings shall apply to commercial buildings: 1. The address number of every commercial building'" shall be located and displayed so that it shall be easily visible from the street. The numerals in these numbers shall be no less than six (6) inches in _height and be of a color contrasting to the background. In addition, any business which affords vehicular access to the rear through any driveway, alleyway, or parking lot shall also display the same numbers on the rear of the building. I 2 . Roof top address numbers shall be provided. The ► shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in length and two (2) feet in width and of contrasting- color to the background. Numbers shall be placed parallel to the street address as assigned. Each building within a commercial complex shall have its own address/assigned number affixed to roof. 3 . All exterior doors shall be equipped with a lighting device which shall provide a minimum maintained one (1) footcandle of light at ground level during hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by vandal resistant covers. 4 . All parking lots and access thereto shall be provided with a minimum maintained one (1) footcandle of light on the parking surface from dusk until dawn. 5. /; Exterior lighting shall not shine away from subject property. 6 . A' ? exterior lighting devices are to be "s:.ske" proof and inaccessible to common reach or climbing and shall be placed at a height which will fully illuminate an average adult. 7 . All parking spaces must be visible from at least one point from the interior of the building. Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 10 P. Interior night lighting shall be maintained in those areas that are visible from the street (ground floors only) . Q. All exterior block wall fencing shall have intervals providing visibility corridors which will allow visibility of the interior from outside the wall, and these visibility corridors shall be placed at regular intervals. This applies only to block walls visible from the street. R. Passenger elevators, the interiors of which are not completely visible when the car door(s) is open, shall have mirrors so placed as to make visible the whole of the elevator interior to prospective passengers outside the elevator. S . When access to or within a commercial complex is undulf difficult because of secured openings or where immedia access is necessary for life saving or fire fighting purposes, a key override is to be installed in an accessible location. The key override shall be mastered to both the fire department and police department keys. T. Any structure four (4) stories in height or greater will have a repeater installed in its roof. SEE PAGE 10 Standard Requirements •' Commercial/Industrial Page 10 Additional Conditions: —� L S �.t t •--• LPL / 1 — v l >..�� i ► ►r— 5 LJ E t-r-r-ED 7- r 3-95 SAN B1 lARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPAi_MENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Review of Plans: VCA 95--o5 Cup 9r7, - 11 Date Compiled: 7- 1 -9S Owner/Developer: QtJOCA Compiled By: T.--1 , ILF-rf>0t J Type of Project: GAS 51-A-1 10 M A2T Number of Units: Location: 'SW Q"67, WATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING: Contact 'PAVL- l�-V50t, Phone: _3�34- Z5 391 Fax: 384 - 553 _ Note: All Water Services are Subject to the Rules & Regulations of the Water Department. N ❑ Size of Main Adjacent the Project: JtJ VAd:?5 l7'`r ❑ Approximate Water Pressure: 11 0 P51 Elevation of Water Storage: I M'i f�-r Hydrant Flow® 20 psi: > 11._G o (a te ❑ Type, Size, Location, and Distance to Nearest Fire Hydrant: 2 % to" D*JE WAY W/57eAM GV_ rJ OZ.z FI RE W(PZ6►315 (:)0 \/A251 T Y rJCV'rH aF Si-re • Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. • Off-site Water Facilities Required. ❑ Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department. ❑ Comments: IJCTf✓ DATE OFF r gc FLovJ TZ~ST 4/9,3) WATER QUALITY CONTROL: Contact: (�G,1„J /lFrvn/f�� Phone: Fax: ��/-ss3 Z _ AR.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. XDouble Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.(1AA-14Aric,�,/� ❑ Air Gap Required at Service Connection. ❑ No Backflow Device Required at This Time. ENVIRONMENTAL COVIROLfINDUSTRIAL WASTE: Contact: I I" Phone: �04 5C707 Fax: 3 G 8�� - /�S -Note: No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed. ❑ Industrial Waste Permit Required. )4Grease Trap Required. i O GiAt, "5AiJ� / t ' 1 t 02 -� 13 Pre-treatment Required. p SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: T(9�� Contact: N&( 7_�a ze✓) Phone: c3gq-Sbq-3 Fax: .3 9q-Sa IS Note: Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building& Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit. ❑ No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. 9_15ewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the Water Department for 117 Gallons Per Day, Equivalent Dwelling Units: . '12- srtubject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: C eQAVeo►en&- M?Y4wt - a3y3 i9- G-' .OS = /1'7 galleu 3� vtd c1uip,�.d- sPces. gNd expcctko( disGlu.yc `� drlc.�,.athc. disc�a,�,.c -� -� CA Wash . 9MKEQut2.FRM(4/94) CITY OF SP BERNARDINO FIRE DEF RTMENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: 'C-Off Date: 7-1-3 `,2tL Reviewed By: C GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Provide one additional set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check. ❑ Contact the City of San Bernardino Fire Department at (909) 384-5388 for specific detailed requirements. ❑ The developer shall provide for adequate fire flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Minimum fire flow requirements shall be based on square footage, construction features, and exposure information supplied by the developer and must be available Drior to placing combustible materials on site. WATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION: ❑ The fire protection water service for the area of this project is provided by: ❑ San Bernardino Municipal Water Department- Engineering (909) 384-5391 ❑ East Valley Water District - Engineering (909) 888-8986 Phone: ❑ Other Water Purveyor: PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES: ❑ Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 feet for commercial and multi-residential areas and at intervals not to exceed 500 feet for residential areas. ❑ Fire hydrant minimum flow rates of 1,500 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for commercial and multi residential areas. Minimum fire hydrant flow rates of 1,000 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for residential areas. ❑ Fire flow requirements may be met from the combined flow of two adjacent fire hydrants. Fire flow requirements may be adjusted, as deemed appropriate by the Fire Department, based on individual site specific conditions and available mitigations. ❑ Fire hydrant type and specific location shall be jointly determined by the City of San Bernardino Fire Department in conjunction with the water purveyor. Fire hydrant materials and installation shall conform to the standards and specifications of the water purveyor. ❑ Public fire hydrants, fire services, and public water facilities necessary to meet Fire Department requirements are the developer's financial responsibility and shall be installed by the water purveyor or by the developer at the water purveyor's discretion. Contact the water purveyor indicated above for additional information. ACCESS: ❑ Provide two separate, dedicated routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, all weather. ❑ Provide an access road to each building for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width. ❑ Extend roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of all single story buildings. ❑ , Extend roadway to within 50 feet of the exterior wall of all multiple-story buildings. Provide "NO PARKING' signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE-NO PARKING -M.C. Sec 15.16". 0 Dead-end streets shall n exceed feet in length minimum radius approval. turnaround. ❑ The names of any newstreets (p bliicorprivate) hall be submitted to the Fire Department SITE: ❑ All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction. ❑ Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than 150 feet from the curb line. No fire hydrants should be within 40 feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Barret type, with one T/2 inch and 4 inch outlet, and approved by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants shall be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by painting an 8 inch wide, red stripe for 15 feet in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles. Bl)JLDINGS: Address numerals shall be installed on the building at the front or other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage street. Commercial and multi family address numerals shall be 6 inches tall, single family address numerals shall be 4 inches tall. The color of the numerals shall contrast with the color of the background. ❑ Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit it serves. Fire Extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 106/C. Minimum distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75 feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher. • Apartment houses with 16 or more units, hotels(motels) with 20 or more units,or apartments or hotels(motels)three stories or more in height shall be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers designed to NFPA standards. • All buildings, other than residential, over 5,000 square feet, shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA standards. This includes existing buildings vacant over 180 days. • Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction of the system. • Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of construction. ❑ Provide fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of installation. ❑ Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shall be required at Fire Department approved location. Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changesre Department requirements. i ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: � ���� ©� Q a zz�e-l� FPO 170(11-941 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REFUSE DIVISION DRC/ERC REQUIREMENTS TRANSMITTAL TO: PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES Project Planner _��°�� f .`��% DATE: Project No. 6k,e-7 T ,,,lP o�a !;7- 5 BY: A r D C, ✓ f,0 ,kI _(se °z r.. .f ti's , 45.11 oENERJlL' - The City of San Bernardino Public Services Department is responsible for proper collection, disposal, and recycling of solid waste and by-products generated within the city. Developments are therefore required to plan for the service arrangements marked below, and establish a refuse account with the Refuse Division by calling (909) 384-5335 prior to the commencement of construction, remodelling, oa occupation of this project. Other city-provided containers are available to the applicant's contractor(*) for construction debris as well. Shared containers for multiple commercial or residential occupants must be paid for by a single account. Ultimate responsibility for payment rests on the property owner. Service fees will be charged according to those in effect at the time of service. RESIDENTIAL - Refuse and/or recyclable collection will be made at the curb. Development must have ample room for storage of all containers out of street view. O Residents to supply their own 32 gallon maximum containers (limit 3 per unit) . O City to supply one 90 gallon refuse container and possibly one 90 gallon recycling container per detached dwelling unit or pair of multiple units. CoMMERCIAL - Refuse and/or recyclable collection will be made from either City-owned or customer-owned containers services by City crews. Container(s) must be kept in enclosure(s) accessible to city trucks an shown on the approved site plan. Container access shall not conflict with loading zones. Enclosure gates may not swing into or directly behind any parking space. Enclosure(s) shall have a minimum of 6 feet wide by 12 feet long paved, level (less than 2% grade) area in front of gate(s) for container(a) to be serviced from. Overhead wires, signs, and obstructions shall not be located over container service area(s) . Driveway chains must be marked by reflective material. Customer may lock the enclosure(@) or driveway gate(s) but must either unlock by 5:00am on service day(s) or provide a key or gate card. No electronic transmitters will be accepted. Bins may be locked only with standard padlock numbers assigned at start of service account. The following requirements apply if checked: El �Truck access not safe or sufficient. Please rearrange as shown on site plan. Ea'Truck access sufficient as shown on site plan. E3"Construct I enclosure(!) per drawing 508 for commercial/industrial application. Enclosure eze O Construct enclosure(s) per st ndard drawing 508 with rear pedestrian access added. Pedestrian access to be 6" higher than pavement on which container rests. Enclosure size plus pedestrian access. Additional Comments City Of San Bernardino Refuse Service Guide tt is our goal to provide you with the best and safest refuse service. To do so,we need your cooperation in placing your refuse for collection. If our crews find your refuse container unserviceable when they arrive to service it,they will leave a red tag like the one pictured here to irdorm you of the situation. Please review J4 016 the explanation of items 1 through 10 to become familiar with proper service o.+re�@ conditions. We cannot deduct from your bill for pickups missed due to 91 10�..• 1 unserviceable conditions since ourtruck and crew time is spent going to and from your location.If refuse pickup is missed,and no tag is left,please report �„�,•f s,A,,� d the same day or after 7:30 a.m.the next working day. - tee•+• 1. Vehicles blocking our truck or your container,or parked too dose "84a.PJu-11.We for safety,will prevent servicing. Type"Lw_No.of V* d•In Way 2. Debris on ground in front of or under the wheels of your container YOUR BIN WAS will preve a rvirinn NOT EMPTIED BECAUSE OF: 3. Bins with broken wheels,rods,orother parts will be exchanged upon 1 — Vehicle In way your request. 2 — Debris on ground 3 — Bin needs repair. 4. Bins not placed outside as needed will prevent servicing. 4 — Bin not out. 5 — Pavement under construction. 5. Our trucks may not drive on pavement under construction. 6 — Bin loaded above rim. 7 — Bin overweight. 6 & 7. ��9 p Containers with u above rim oroverweighted 8 — Gate locked. 9 — Bin locked. with dirt, concrete, etc.will not be serviced. 10 — Potential hazardous material,tires, or other unacceptable material. 8 " 9. Containers locked up or locked in win not be serviced unless Please call for information. I prior arrangements are made through our office. HELP KEEP OUR CITY CLEAN Public S+rvietrs Dell�rtrrwnt 10. Please refer to our Hazardous Material Policy to help protect the trp REFUSE DIVISION ! environment. We cannot accept hazardous material in refuse CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO i containers. Please be aware that we cant accept whole tires or Telephone:384•5335 pieces of wood more than four feet in length.Metal rigs appliances must be kept separate from refuse. To insure that you receive your scheduled pickups we ask that 32 gal.or 90 gat. automated container(s)be at the curb by 6:00 a.m. If your container is not at the curb when your route is serviced, it does not result in a reduction of the charges. Temporary or special bins and drop bodies will be charged for rental and service of the container,prorated for the period Of time you have the container,with one (1)week minimum charge. Containers shall be kept in the locations prescribed by a Feld Supervisor.This be an approved enclosure,concrete slab,or area with parking bumpers.A service fee wig be assessed when we are unable to service said container for reasons on the tag. 1) 20 yard containers must not be loaded more than 1/3 full (capacity) with rocks, dirt, asphalt, roofing material, or concrete. 2) 30 and 40 yard containers must not be loaded with rocks and concrete,only regular refuse or lightweight construction materials. 3) When your rolloff container exceeds the prescribed weight limit,you will be charged for the direct overweight charge we are assessed by the county landfill. 10 Yard n 2 tons 20 Yard 5 tons 35 Yard a 7.5 tons 15 Yard • 4 tons 30 Yard - 7 tons 40 Yard - 8 tons 4) Unscheduled service must be requested by 4:00 p.m. on the business day prior to desired service day. It is the responsibility for the customer to notify the Public Services Department in writing when cancelling oroommencing service. Your account will be charged until this office is notified. Notification must be made by property owner or authorized agent. Compaction units must be approved by the Superintendent of Refuse before installation. Accounts are billed on a monthly basis. The big is due and payable upon presentation.You have 60 days to dispute any current month charges on your bill. If your account becomes delinquent,you service is subject to being discontinued and your account wilt be turned over to our collection agency. You will not be able to restart service until an fees have been collected. Unpaid closed accounts are tumed over for collection after 60 days. All deposits (except non-refundable) will be applied to your closing bill. tT ��• i�OUTEA�L$CELLS SO�IO MIN. pIMENSIOHS eIN slzc W L 3 CY. 6'.g�I a1_804 4 CY e�•O,� 8,_Sol W0.6VIOPER •/ v2 A.e. 2-3 CY. 6:8" 151-0" L - 2- 4 CY. g�-0" 151-0„ �x�N�r6 = 2• NO . B►FS dV A /��� " NO. 4 rAR —A v _ of 24-C C. 1'•6'x0. BV1IPEa , FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT •/V2*A.$. 41 4 1• MQ. A 0A1t 32 O.C. I at R -0' L4 I • (COUftEasUNK) • SEE OETAILIAI 12'LT[Et fLECvES � Auld i IN CONCRETE TO C'CONC. SLAB•/S&i CkFd SECURE SATES t to/lo vr.w.►. AKK o F (CONCRETE CLASS FIK.GRADE dd $20•C•2500) I 12 STEEL SLEEYt IN j^j $'a 12'0 CONCRETE 90.4 BAR COWL A FCCTING TO SECvgc SATES ITYPj � . 3' PLAN VIEW • Axs &A _ SECTION A-A CHAMt�GaTE FRAY$ :�11Q QaT ES $AR CNANNEL t%1'a Iti/16o f CROSS $RACING • 1 ' N MOLES 12O.C. • 6. 4F • STEEL 3'a 3'a .197 POST a V ELO CAP • GRINO SMOOTH Vas* N.O. WNiE BY STANLEY 1 11 3 PER CAT E, HELD T7K •'!R METAL DECK j 11� Z'CL ��. l I I I TO POSTS • GATE FRAME t0 VENC PRIMER COATCO (� J... By VERCO MiG. CC. TACK lc—WELD AT TOP B BOTTOM TO 1/2' 0 CALV. STEEL 3 V2'CALK STEEL C:KANNtL of 12'O.C. CANE $OLTI STANLEY N.O. MASPq STANLE NO. CO 1009 t 2 ItEQJ M0. SP. 917 NOTES -DETAIL L 'A' FRONT ELEVATION L ALL WORK SHALL 6E DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION , LATEST EDITION. 2. LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS. 3. WITHIN S' OF C041BUSTIOLE CCNSTRUCTION, INSTALL A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER APPROVED BY FIRE DEPT. �G 4. CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS TO 8E COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR. It S. SPECIFIED MANUFACTURERIS SHOWN OR APPROVED EOUAL. ITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUSLIC 1VORNS DEPT APPROVED STANDAf a tCt�itte hjl� �� c ci ut�, 4,wo o!v . 3 OP¢n�� px. 3, 10 D w, ��7ffitr Ti' %� co..c..*c cu�iof�a6 Ar j7v. l �,►e,s c4ft.:•'Lf rt i v�c� 45/' 7�K{u rt oit✓e �.�e.c CITY OF SAN BERNARD'.NO PARRS, RECREATION COMMIINITY .SERVICES DEPARTMENT STANDARD, RBQIIIREIK8NT8 Case: Date: Reviewed,MBy: I ` 1 •�.i[�J�a Gffi18RAL R$QIIIREKEN'rS: ,;� [V] Commercial Industrial and Multi-Unit ( ] Assessment District [ ] Residential [ ] Purpose Guidelines and submittal procedure [ ] Irrigation and Landscaping Plans. Contact the City of San Bernardino Parks,Recreation and Community Services Department at (909) 384-5217 or 384-5314 for specific detailed requirements. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: .- �•a;r ( ] Maintenance _of .landscape ar4as, - # [� ] Planter Areas ,,'-Y» , '� [ ] Interior Planter Areas [ ] Irrigation Systems [ ] Setback Areas [ ] Slope Areas ['A] Ground Cover and Bedding Material [ ] Erosion Control ['(] Heed Control PLANT NATERIALS EXI Plant list and climatic conditions [�] Street Trees [ ] Plant Material Size Requirements and Ratios INSPECTION AMID OTHER REQUIREMENTS [�(] Irrigation System [ ] Landscaping I ] Hardscape Items ( ] Street tree Specifications [ ] Arborist Report I ] Removal or destruction of trees ( ] Screening Requirement (City, Dev.Code) Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services requirements. Additional information 5 v G - '•� max••: ' �:�� ;:;.gin-��� -x:�t Ms;JJ - x. . 71482577 P. 01 r' ewon RECEIVE Chevron k December 27, 199 '96 JAN 17 P12 :16 George T.(Tom)Prewitt Orange Show Dealer Chevron Service Ptrone 909 285 0249 1198 So.T st. Fax 909 825 6377 San Bernardino.CA 91408.1915 City of San Bernardino Council and Mayors Office Subject: Amendment to Development Code No. 95-05 and Conditional Use )Permit No. 95-1 1. 1. i Code Section 19.06.030 (2) (0) (1) to allow service stations to locate within the "Freeway Corridor Overlay District" along wafOr and secondary arteriole's with direct freeway access, and to change Code Section 19.06.030 2 F 4 t g o exempt P service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. f am against this code change for the following reasons: • This will be a massive change to the econorinic environment of viable stations and convenience stores and is similar, as far as impact, to adding several more shopping centers downtown. The over-saturation and future investments in this city are at stake and must be looked at closer. • This proposed General Plan. change effecting redevelopment of secondary locations and existing secondary locations has not been analyzed thoroughly as to the economic impact on the city. flow many locations will be abandoned, forced out of business or not re-opened because of this change? As a prominent business owner with a considerable investment under the existing codes, .l.request that each of the council nreurbers vote to deny this code change. Sincerely, l I'l 61n RECF1VF1--U-( 1..�. ►' January 12,1996 .96 JAN 17 P12 :16 City of San Bernardino Council and Mayors Office Subject: Amendment to Development Code No. 95-05 and Code No. 95-06. Code Section 19.06.030 (2) (0) (1) to allow service stations to locate within the "Freeway Corridor Overlay District"along major and secondary arteriole's with direct freeway access, and to change Code Section 19.06.030 (2) (F) (4) to exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. • These Code changes will effect the economic environment of viable Gas Stations and Convenience stores, and will set a precedence that is not in the best interests of the City. No further conveniences to the citizens of San Bernardino would result from these proposed Code changes. As far as impact, it could be compared to developing several more shopping centers downtown. The over-saturation and future investments in this city are at stake and must be looked at closer. • These proposed Code changes will effect redevelopment of secondary locations. Existing secondary locations would also be at risk. The economic impact of over saturation on the entire City should be considered. How many locations will be abandoned,forced out of business or not re-opened because of these changes? As a prominent business owner with a considerable investment under the existing codes, I request that each of the council members vote to deny these Code changes. Sincerely, 7-ELEVEN STORE #'2693413 3211 KENDALL DR. SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92407 1� RECEIVED--C11 Y CILEf:r January 12,1996 '96 JAN 17 P12- :16 City of San Bernardino Council and Mayors Office Subject. Amendment to Development Code No. 95-05 and Code No. 95-06. Code Section 19.06030 (2) (0) (1) to allow service stations to locate within the "Freeway Corridor Overlay District"along major and secondary arteriole's with direct freeway access, and to change Code Section 19.06.030 (2) (F) (4) to exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. • These Code changes will effect the economic environment of viable Gas Stations and Convenience stores, and will set a precedence that is not in the best interests of the City. No further conveniences to the citizens of San Bernardino would result from these proposed Code changes. As far as impact, it could be compared to developing several more shopping centers downtown. The over-saturation and future investments in this city are at stake and must be looked at closer. • These proposed Code changes will effect redevelopment of secondary locations. Existing secondary locations would also be at risk. The economic impact of over saturation on the entire City should be considered. How many locations will be abandoned,forced out of business or not re-opened because of these changes? As a prominent business owner with a considerable investment under the existing codes, I request that each of the council members vote to deny these Code changes. Sincerely, ROBERT J. CIRRITO �� 336 W. Chestnut Ave Bus. (818) 359-2213 Monrovia, CA 91016 Res. (714) 596-5443 RECEIVV January 12,1996 '96 JAM 17 P12 :16 City of San Bernardino Council and Mayors Office Subject. Amendment to Development Code No. 95-05 and Code No. 95-06. Code Section 19.06.030 (2) (0) (1) to allow service stations to locate within the "Freeway Corridor Overlay District"along major and secondary arteriole's with direct freeway access, and to change Code Section 19.06.030 (2) (F) (4) to exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. • These Code changes will effect the economic environment of viable Gas Stations and Convenience stores, and will set a precedence that is not in the best interests of the City. No further conveniences to the citizens of San Bernardino would result from these proposed Code changes. As far as impact, it could be compared to developing several more shopping centers downtown. The over-saturation and future investments in this city are at stake and must be looked at closer. • These proposed Code changes will effect redevelopment of secondary locations. Existing secondary locations would also be at risk. The economic impact of over saturation on the entire City should be considered. How many locations will be abandoned,forced out of business or not re-opened because of these changes? As a prominent business owner with a considerable investment under the existing codes, I request that each of the council members vote to deny these Code changes. Sincerel OPEN 24 HOURS SERVICE DEPT. L4— 8 A.M.-7 P.M. 7 DAYS A WEEK, HIGHLAND SHELL Ax� COMPLETE AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE BRAKES-TUNE-UPS-AUTO AIR&TIRES BAT.&ACC. SMOG CHECK 1108 W.HIGHLAND sent acwueanun nn opens mno aa�-anaa Now t RECEIVE=ra.. 'r ,LEFw January 12,1996 .96 JAN 17 P12 :16 City of San Bernardino Council and Mayors Office Subject. Amendment to Development Code No. 95-05 and Code No. 95-06. Code Section 19.06.030 (2) (0) (1) to allow service stations to locate within the "Freeway Corridor Overlay District"along major and secondary arteriole's with direct freeway access, and to change Code Section 19.06.030(2) (F) (4) to exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. • These Code changes will effect the economic environment of viable Gas Stations and Convenience stores, and will set a precedence that is not in the best interests of the City. No further conveniences to the citizens of San Bernardino would result from these proposed Code changes. As far as impact, it could be compared to developing several more shopping centers downtown. The over-saturation and future investments in this city are at stake and must be looked at closer. • These proposed Code changes will effect redevelopment of secondary locations. Existing secondary locations would also be at risk. The economic impact of over saturation on the entire City should be considered. How many locations will be abandoned,forced out of business or not re-opened because of these changes? As a prominent business owner with a considerable investment under the existing codes, I request that each of the council members vote to deny these Code changes. Sincerely, BRUCE MAYHEW gagmak, GENERAL MANAGER BOSTON MARKET �� 4694 N. UNIVERSITY SAN BERNARDINO, • CALIF. 92407 11 /� 96 BOSTON WEST LLC (909)880-9788 PHONE /�C(, A BOSTON CHICKEN FRANCHISFF 1-1--- r.- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit Dept: Planning & Building Services No. 95-11 Date: November 22, 1995 MCC Date: December 4, 1995 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: On November 20, 1995, the Mayor and Common Council denied the project and continued the item until December 4, 1995, and directed staff to prepare Findings of Fact in support of the denial. Recommended Motion: That the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Findings of Fact supporting the denial of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. A Bo Contact person: Al Boug_hey Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: City-wide FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) N/A (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: I.Vyl9s Agenda Item No.--/6 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Staff Report SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 95-05 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 4, 1995 OWNER: Unocal 17700 Castleton Street, Suite 300 City of Industry, CA 91748 APPLICANT: Service Station Services #3 Hutton Center Drive, Suite 711 Santa Ana, CA 92407 REQUEST/LOCATION: The applicant requested approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 to amend Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. The amendment would have changed Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4),exempting service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. The amendment would have applied to properties in all commercial districts with the exception of the CN, CG-4, and CCS-2 land use designations that are located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay and along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp. The applicant also requested the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive-through automatic car wash. The convenience market proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The proposed facility would have been located on 1.64 acres at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. BACKGROUND: At their meeting of November 20, 1995, the Mayor and Common Council closed the public hearing, denied Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 and continued the item until December 4, 1995 and directed staff to prepare findings supporting denial. KEY POINTS: There are several key points which have been identified as follows: 0 At the November 20, 1995 meeting, the Mayor and Council indicated that they believed Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 4, 1995 Page 2 that Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 would result in an over-saturation of service stations. Finding of Fact No. 2 for the Development Code Amendment No. 95- 05 has been amended to reflect the Mayor and Council's finding on this point in support of denial of the project (Exhibit 1). o Without approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 is not consistent with the Development Code. Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact Nos. 1, 2, 5 and 6 have been amended to reflect the inconsistency with the Development Code for denial of the project (Exhibit 2). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Findings of Fact(Exhibits 1 and 2) supporting the denial of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. Prepared by: Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner for Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services Exhibit 1 Findings of Fact for Denial for Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Exhibit 2 Findings of Fact for Denial for Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 4, 1995 Page 3 EXHIBIT 1 DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed amendment conflicts with General Plan Goal 1G(m) in that it will create an over-saturation of service stations with convenience stores within the Freeway Corridor Overlay and thus adversely impact a high quality of life and secure environment for the City's residents and businesses. 2. There are adequate sites and opportunities for the establishment of service stations under current code provisions to meet the needs of the residents of the City. The proposed amendment would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, in that the amendment will create an over-concentration of service stations on a City-wide basis contributing to blighting influences. There are a significant number of existing abandoned service stations throughout the City. 3. The proposed amendment would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, in that the amendment would create additional turning movements at the intersections of major and secondary arterials and freeway on- and off-ramps throughout the City resulting in an increase in traffic congestion, thus reducing the efficiency of the City street system. 4. The Mayor and Common Council adopts these Findings of Fact and denies Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 independent of and disregarding the Planning Commission's recommendation. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 4, 1995 Page 4 EXHIBIT 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed service station facility is not a permitted use at the location proposed and therefore is inconsistent with the Development Code. 2. The proposed use is not consistent with the General Plan, in that it is not a permitted use in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district at the proposed location. 3. The proposed facility is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code in that and Initial Study was prepared and a Negative Declaration is proposed. 4. There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored, in that an Initial Study has been prepared for Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11, and a Negative Declaration has been proposed. 5. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are not compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the service station facility is to be established in that it is not a permitted use and would be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. 6. The subject site is not physically suitable for the type of use proposed, in that the Development Code does not permit service stations except at the intersection of major and secondary arterials or their intersection with a freeway off-ramp. The site does not meet this locational criteria. 7. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety, in that all agencies responsible for providing those services have reviewed the project and none have indicated any inability to provide the necessary services. 8. The Mayor and Common Council adopts these Findings of Fact and denies Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 independent of and disregarding the Planning Commission's recommendation. p� CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit Dept: Planning & Building Services No. 95-11 Date: November 1, 1995 MCC Date: November 20, 1995 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None Recommended Motion: That the hearing be closed, the Negative Declaration be adopted, the first reading be waived and the ordinance laid over for final adoption and that Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 be approved based on the Findings of Fact contained in the October 17, 1995, Planning Commission staff report. 0;&, i�' Al Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report and Ordinance Ward: DCA City-wide, CUP Ward 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) N/A (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: Agenda Item No. 39,4 o A CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Staff Report SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 95-05 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 REQUEST/LOCATION: The applicant is requesting approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 to amend Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. The amendment would also change Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4), exempting service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. The amendment would apply to properties in all commercial districts with the exception of the CN, CG-4, and CCS-2 land use designations that are located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay and along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp. The applicant also requests the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive-through automatic car wash. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The proposed facility is to be located on 1.64 acres at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. KEY POINTS: There are several key points which have been identified as follows: Development Code Amendment No 94-05 • Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1),permits new service stations only at the intersections of major and secondary arterials, and their intersections with freeway off-ramps. The proposed amendment would revise this section, deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off- ramps, and adding the provision that a new service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. • The amendment would allow a maximum of two service stations on each side of the freeway (total 4 per intersection of freeway and major or secondary arterial with freeway off-ramp). Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 2 • The amendment will increase the number of potential sites at the intersections of the freeway and major or secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps that may be developed with service stations. • Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4)would also be amended to exempt service stations in the Freeway Corridor Overlay with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the 1000 foot distance criteria from other convenience stores, providing the opportunity for a greater number of gasoline/convenience facilities in highly travelled areas potentially reducing the number of additional trips for minor shopping for the convenience of residents. • Service stations or service station/convenience markets proposed under the amendment would be subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit allowing the City discretion in determining whether or not specific proposals are appropriate. • Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. See Attachment B-2 of the Planning Commission Staff Report. 1. Approximately 12 freeway intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified (See Attachment B-2). 2. From the analysis, it is estimated that the proposed amendment would create the potential for 19 new service stations at these freeway intersections. 3. It is estimated that 5 of the existing service stations that currently do not meet the Development Code locational criteria would meet the locational criteria of the proposed amendment. See Attachment B-2, Service Station Intersection Analysis. • The proposed amendment is consistent with General Plan Objective 1.19, which states: "Provide for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of residents; ..." Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 3 o The proposed amendment is consistent with the original intent of the section which is to locate service stations at the intersections of major roadways and major roadways and freeways. o By allowing service stations to locate in the additional areas within the Freeway Corridor Overlay, these service station/convenience markets will, for the convenience of City residents, provide convenient fueling and minor shopping in a single stop enroute to home or work, eliminating the need for multiple trips and stops. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 o The conditional use permit cannot be approved unless Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 is approved and implemented. o The proposed service station/convenience market (including the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption) fast food drive through restaurant and automatic drive through car wash is consistent with Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and would be compatible with the surrounding commercial development and Scottish Rite Temple adjacent to the site on the south. o Approximately 2,343 square feet of the proposed building will be allocated to the convenience market, with the remainder being allocated to the fast-food portion of the business. o The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off- site consumption, however, the applicant has indicated that beer, wine and other convenience market items will not be sold through the fast food drive-through window. o The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift and is proposed for 24 hour operation. o The area does not have an overconcentration of licensed off-sale alcoholic beverage outlets. According to Janice Edmonds of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) the Census Tract, 46.02, will support 11 licenses for the sale of alcohol for off-site consumption, and currently there have only been 8 licenses issued. A determination of public convenience or necessity (PCN) is not required. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 4 o The Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has no objections. See Police Department Interoffice Memorandum, Exhibit 3. o A traffic study was prepared for the project and was reviewed by the City Traffic Engineer. The addition of the project related traffic will not impact significantly impact the adjacent street system or intersections. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) STATUS An Initial Study was prepared by staff for both the Development Code Amendment and Conditional Use Permit. The Initial Study was presented to the Environmental Review Committee on August 10, 1995. A Negative Declaration was proposed. The Initial Study was made available for public review and comment from August 17, 1995 until September 6, 1995. No comments were received. On September 7, 1995, the ERC recommended the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration to the Mayor and Common Council for both projects. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission reviewed both Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 at their October 17, 1995 meeting and recommended that the Mayor and Common Council deny Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. The Planning Commission had concerns that the Development Code Amendment was designed for the proposed Conditional Use Permit, and that project related traffic would impact the area despite the results of the traffic study or the City Traffic Engineers conclusion. The Commission felt that there was no need for new service stations, and that the Development Code Amendment was not needed. The Planning Commission vote for denial was: Ayes - Brue, Hamilton, Stone, Strimpel and Thrasher; Nays -Gonzales and Traver; Absent -Cole and Schuiling. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL: The Mayor and Common Council May: 1. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 as requested by the applicant; or 2. Deny both Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Mayor and Common Council Meeting November 20, 1995 Page 5 3. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Deny Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the hearing be closed, the Negative Declaration be adopted, the first reading be waived and the ordinance be laid over for final adoption, and that Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 be approved based on the Findings of Fact contained in the October 17, 1995 Planning Commission staff report. Prepared by: Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner for Al Boughey, Director of Planning and Building Services Exhibit 1 Location Map Exhibit 2 Planning Commission Staff Report Attachment A Location Map (Included as Exhibit 1) Attachment B Proposed Development Code Text (B-1)(Not Included), Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Service Station Intersection Analysis (B-2) Attachment C Site Plan (C-1), Floor Plans (C-2), and Elevations (C-3) Attachment D Conditional Use Permit Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table Attachment E Development Code Amendment Findings of Fact (E-1), Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact (E-2) Attachment F Conditions of Approval (Included as Exhibit 5) Attachment G Standard Requirements (Included as Exhibit 5) Attachment H Initial Study Exhibit 3 Police Department Interoffice Memorandum Exhibit 4 Ordinance Exhibit 5 Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements EXHIBIT 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM # CASE LOCATION HEARING DATE l op t : O � AVt r+ 1 � is `p 1 G � ® s/ � G � .f ofp too.- G v ST � N c�cr sm A v EXHIBIT 2 S " i CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DMSION CASE: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and AGENDA ITEM: 2 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 HEARING DATE: 10-17-95 WARD: 5 APPLICANT: OWNER: Service Station Services Unocal #3 Hutton Centre Dr., Ste. 711 17700 Castleton St., Ste. 300 Santa Ana, CA 92707 City of Industry, CA 91748 REQUEST / LOCATION - A request to amend the Development Code to allow up to two service stations to locate on each side of the freeway within the Freeway Corridor Overlay along major and secondary arterials with a freeway off-ramp and exempt service stations with convenience markets within the Freeway Corridor Overlay from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Development Code Amendment would apply City-wide. A Conditional Use Permit to construct a service station/convenience market with off-sale beer and wine, with a fast food drive-thru and drive thru car wash. Located at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway. -------------- -- ------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------------- EnSTING LAND USE PROPERTY LAND USE DESIGNATION SUBJECT Vacant CG-1, Commercial General NORTH Shopping Center CG-1, Commercial General SOUTH Scottish Rite Temple CG-1, Commercial General EAST Shopping Center under development CG-1, Commercial General WEST Scottish Rite Temple CG-1, Commercial General GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC YES ❑ FLOOD HAZARD YES ❑ SEWERS: YES ■ HAZARD ZONE: NO ■ ZONE: NO ■ NO ❑ HIGH FIRE HAZARD ' YES o AIRPORT YES ❑ REDEVELOPMENT YES ❑ ZONE: NO ■ NOISE/CRASH NO ■ PROJECT AREA: NO ■ ZONE: ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: • Not Applicable ❑ E.I.R. w/Significant ■ APPROVAL • Exempt Effects • No Significant ■ CONDITIONS Effects ❑ Significant Effects, • Potential Effects, See Attached E.R.C. ❑ DENIAL Mitigating Minutes Measures, ❑ CONTINUANCE No E.I.R. TO: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 1 REQUEST Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 The applicant requests the approval of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, to amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. A maximum of two such service stations would be permitted on each side of the freeway, for a total of four along an arterial within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. The amendment would also change Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4),exempting service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-I1 The applicant also requests the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11, to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive-thru automatic car wash. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. LOCATION Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 The Development Code Amendment would apply to properties City-wide in all commercial General Plan land use designations except CN, CG-4 and CCS-2 located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 The proposed site for the service station/convenience market consists of 1.64 acres located at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) An Initial Study was prepared by staff for both the Development Code Amendment and Conditional Use Permit. The Initial Study was presented to the Environmental Review Committee on August 10, 1995. A Negative Declaration was proposed. The Initial Study was Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 2 made available for public review and comment from August 17, 1995 until September 6, 1995. No comments were received. On September 7, 1995, the ERC recommended the Planning Commission recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration to the Mayor and Common Council for both projects. ANALYSIS-DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT General Plan Consistency The proposed amendment is consistent with General Plan Objective 1.19, which states: "Provide for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of residents; ..." The amendment will create opportunities for service station/convenience markets to locate near freeway corridor on- and off-ramps leading to residential communities. By locating in these areas the service station/convenience markets will, for the convenience of City residents, provide convenient fueling and minor shopping in a single stop enroute to home or work, eliminating the need for multiple trips and stops. Development Code Amendment Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), permits new service stations only at the intersections of major and secondary arterials, and their intersections with freeway off-ramps. The proposed amendment would revise this section, deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and adding the provision that a new service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. A maximum of two such service stations would be permitted on each side of the freeway. While the amendment will not increase the allowable number of such stations, it will increase the number of potential sites that may be developed with them. The proposal would also amend the Development Code to exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Specifically, the proposal would amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4) adding the proposed exemption with the exception that only a maximum of two such service stations be allowed to locate on each side of the freeway. Amending this section allows service stations to have convenience markets regardless of their proximity to other convenience markets, providing a greater number of gasoline/convenience facilities for the convenience of residents. See Attachment "B", Proposed Amendment Text. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 3 Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. Approximately 12 freeway intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified (See Attachment B-2). From the analysis, it is estimated that a total of 23 service stations presently exist at these intersections. Under current Development Code criteria, 18 of the 23 existing service stations meet the Development Code locational criteria. Under the criteria of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, a total of 42 service stations would be possible. Taking the existing service stations into consideration, the proposed amendment would create the potential for 19 new service stations. Additionally, all 5 of the service stations that do not meet current Development Code locational criteria would meet the locational criteria of the proposed amendment. See Attachment B-2, Service Station Intersection Analysis. Under the proposed amendment a total of 42 service stations with ancillary convenience markets would be possible. Data regarding the number of existing service stations with ancillary convenience markets was not available for analysis. ANALYSIS-CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Proposal The applicant proposes to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market. The gas station/convenience market building will include a fast-food drive through window, and 960 square foot drive-thru automatic car wash. Approximately 2,343 square feet of the proposed building will be allocated to the convenience market, with the remainder being allocated to the fast-food portion of the business. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption, however, the applicant has indicated that beer, wine and other convenience market items will not be sold through the fast food drive-through window. The 960 square foot car wash will be self-service. Six gasoline pump islands are proposed with a capability of fueling 12 cars simultaneously. The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift. The facility is proposed for 24 hour operation. Permitted Use Under Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, the proposed gasoline station/convenience market would be a permitted use, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 4 Site and Area Characteristics The 1.64 acre site is triangular in shape and is located on the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. University Parkway is identified by the General Plan as a major arterial. The are two freeway off-ramps from the I-215 freeway onto University Parkway, and the site is located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. The site is presently vacant and undeveloped, and is devoid of any vegetation. Surrounding land uses include the Scottish Rite Temple, immediately adjacent on the south, a multi-tenant shopping center with two fast food drive-through restaurants on the north, across Varsity Avenue, and a multi-tenant shopping center, restaurants, fast food drive-through restaurants, and service station, under construction on the east. The I-215 freeway is adjacent to the Scottish Rite Temple on the south. Compatibility The proposed gasoline station/convenience market with fast food drive-through window and self- service automatic car wash is compatible with the surrounding commercial development and Scottish Rite Temple adjacent to the site on the south. Development Code and General Plan Consistency The proposal is in Compliance with the Development Code and is consistent with the General Plan as shown in Attachment "D". Sales of Beer and Wine for Off-Site Consumption Staff contacted Janice Edmonds of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC)on Wednesday, September 27, 1995, with regard to the application and the existing concentration of off-sale alcoholic beverage licenses in the area. The project is located in Census Tract 46.02. According to ABC the Census Tract will support 11 licenses for the sale of alcohol for off-site consumption, and currently there have only been 8 licenses issued. Therefore, the area does not have an overconcentration of licensed off-sale alcoholic beverage outlets. Landscaping The project proposes 14,232+ square feet of landscaping or 25 percent, whereas the Development Code requires 15 percent landscaping or 8,497 square feet. Parking and Internal Circulation Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 5 The 16 standard parking spaces shown on the site plan meet the number of parking spaces required by the Development Code for the proposed development. All on-site vehicular paths are of adequate width to accommodate two-way traffic in conformance with the Development Code requirement of 24 feet. Loading All loading will take place in the drive-through lane during off hours of the drive-through restaurant. Traffic During the environmental review process, the City Traffic Engineer had determined that the additional vehicle trips resulting from the establishment of the proposed use would not cause any significant impact on the adjoining street system. However, based upon the concerns of staff and concerns raised by the Planning Commission regarding area traffic, traffic counts were taken and an analysis of traffic turning movements conducted and included in a report by KHR Associates. KHR investigated both traffic volumes and turning movements of this proposed facility, as well as a similar facility proposed, and currently in the review process for the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway. The level of service (LOS), denoted alphabetically from "A" to "F", is an evaluation of the degree of congestion, roadway design constraints, delay, accident potential, and driver discomfort experienced during a given period of time - typically during the peak hour or on a daily basis. While LOS A is the most desirable condition, LOS C is a benchmark used for planning purposes, while LOS D is considered acceptable for peak hour travel on major streets and highways. The traffic study found that the intersection of Varsity Avenue and-University Parkway operate at LOS C and that the with the addition of this proposed project at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway, and the addition of another similar facility on the northwest corner, that the intersection will continue to operate at LOS C, with at most an added 0.5 second delay at the intersection at both morning and afternoon peak hours. Therefore, the project will not cause any significant impacts on the adjoining street system as previously determined by the City Traffic Engineer during the environmental review process. COMMENTS RECEIVED CALTRANS The California Department of Transportation reviewed the proposal and indicated that although the traffic generated by the proposal does not appear to have a significant direct impact on the Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 6 State highway system, consideration must be given to the cumulative effect of continued development in this area. As noted above, a traffic study was prepared which found that this facility, as well as a similar facility currently in process and proposed for the northwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway, would not result in any significant cumulative effects on area traffic. Future development in the area will be subject to further review under the California Environmental Quality Act. Any cumulative impacts resulting to area traffic as a result of those proposals would be addressed at that time. Police Department In a telephone conversation between staff and Martha Soto of the Police Department on October 2, 1995, it was indicated that the Area Commander would not oppose the proposal, and that a memorandum would be forthcoming along with recommended Police Conditions of Approval. As of the writing of this staff report, neither the memorandum nor the conditions had been received. They will be forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration, once received. CONCLUSION Development Code Amendment No. 94-05 The proposed amendment will permit up to two service stations to locate on each side of the freeway within the Freeway Corridor Overlay along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The amendment will exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. The amendment is consistent with General Plan Objective 1.19, which provides for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of residents. - Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 With the approval, adoption and implementation of Development Code Amendment No. 94-05, the proposed service station/convenience market with off-sale of beer and wine, drive-through restaurant and drive-through automatic self- service car wash will meet all applicable Development Code Standards, inclusive of those that would be established by Development Code Amendment No. 94-05. An Initial Study for the proposal has been prepared and a Negative Declaration proposed. All impacts have been addressed through the Initial Study and project Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda H2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 7 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the proposed Negative Declaration; 2. Approve Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 based upon the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment E-1); and, 3. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 based on the attached Findings of Fact(E-2), and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment F) and Standard Requirements (Attachment G). Respectfully Submitted, v Michael Hays 7� Assistant Director of Planning and Building Services ( J � Mike R. Finn Associate Planner Attachment A Location Map Attachment B Proposed Development Code Text (B-1), and Development Code Amendment Service Station Intersection Analysis (B-2) Attachment C Site Plan (C-1), Floor Plans (C-2), and Elevations (C-3) Attachment D Conditional Use Permit Development Code and General Plan Consistency Table Attachment E Development Code Amendment Findings of Fact (E-1), Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact (E-2) Attachment F Conditions of Approval Attachment G Standard Requirements Attachment H Initial Study Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 10 ATTACHMENT "B-2" DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT NO. 95-05 SERVICE STATION INTERSECTION ANALYSIS DCA 95-05 Number of DCA 95-05 Number of Current Number Total Number of Existing Net Number Intersection f0 framps Stations Possible Stations Possibl Stations Possible Stations I-10 Mountain View 1 1 2 2 0 Waterman Ave. 2 2 4 3 1 I-215 Orange Show Rd. 2 2 4 2 2 2nd Street 2 2 4 0 4 University Pkwy. 2 2 4 3 1 Palm Avenue 2 2 4 2 2 State Route 30 Highland Ave. 2 2 4 2 2 "E" Street 1 1 4 2 2 Waterman Ave. 2 2 2 2 0 Del Rosa Ave. 2 2 4 4 0 Highland Ave. 1 1 4 1 3 (@ Arden) Highland Ave. 2 2 2 0 2 (@ Boulder) TOTALS 21 42 23 19 Q i r' ATTACHMENT C-1 r La O � $� r••�30 � � � n r • � ��� qtr g ` d D ; a W • W rap 11 H J l k � o #--...._ •w.., - - , '• ti r ,� 1 �•0 0 �a$s ATTACHMENT C-2 loll LO 0 CL i e ®eee®m W W as Tg 1 0 i a U r iE E �d 11. 1 ATTACHMENT C-3 +j W t., f O D , , v 1 U ' 1 1 � e 1 � e 1 ' 1 1 , 1 , 1 1 It 1 m ' m , 1 K 1 � e � • I A i - �illll 11111 - IIIIII - �11111 o o c• --< c ,-c � ■•'•■■■■■■■ ���- 111111111 ..... ........::: mycm aa�::: OR ` ::: Entnow mom ! 4 1 v r< i ■ Age a �••••••• �'::1111111 ip- Does c r Z ~"� 4 U V W +l 1 O D I � If ! v U Q Q CD �aa rrsi Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 12 ATTACHMENT "D" DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Development General Category Propgsal Code Plan Permitted Use Gas Station, Convenience Permitted subject to Permitted Market, Drive-Through Conditional Use Permit' and Car Wash Height 1 Story 2 Stories 2 Stories (24 feet) (30 feet) (30 feet) Setbacks From Curb Face 25 feee 25 feet N/A Front 10 feet 10 feet N/A Side (Street) 10 feet 10 feet N/A Drive Through Width 13 feet 11 feet N/A Width on Curved 17 feet 12 feet N/A Sections Landscaping 14,232+ square feet 8,497 square feet N/A (25+ percent) (15 percent) Lot Coverage 12 percent 40 percent N/A Parking 163 16 N/A ' Assuming Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 is approved and implemented. z Setback applies to parking areas, drive-through aisles and structures only. s 2,500 square feet 0 1 space per 250 square feet plus 1 space 0 pump island => 10 + 6 or 16 spaces. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 13 ATTACHMENT "E-1" DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan in that the amendment provides for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of residents as addressed by General Plan Objective 1.19. The amendment accomplishes this by creating opportunities for service station/convenience markets to locate near freeway corridor on- and off-ramps leading to residential communities. By locating in these areas the service station/convenience markets will, for the convenience of City residents, provide convenient fueling and minor shopping in a single stop enroute to home or work, eliminating the need for multiple trips and stops. 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, in that the amendment will permit up to two service stations to locate on each side of the freeway within the Freeway Corridor Overlay along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway off-ramp, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The amendment will also exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 14 ATTACHMENT "E-2" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS OF FACT Note: These Findings are made with the assumption that Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 is approved, adopted and implemented. 1. The proposed service station facility is a conditionally permitted use within, and would not impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan, in that it is a permitted use in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. 3. The proposed facility is in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code in that and Initial Study was prepared and a Negative Declaration is proposed. 4. There will be no potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored, in that an Initial Study has been prepared for Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11, and a Negative Declaration has been proposed. All impacts have been properly mitigated through project Conditions of Approval. 5. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use are compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the service station facility is to be established and will not create significant noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, as addressed in the Initial Study. 6. The subject site is physically suitable the proposed facility, in that the site can accommodate the proposed use in compliance with all applicable Development Code Standards. 7. There are adequate provisions for public access, water, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety, in that the no all agencies responsible for providing those services have reviewed the project and none have indicated any inability to provide the necessary services. ATTACHMENT "H" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO INITIAL STUDY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IlVIPACT FOR Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION: A Development Code Amendment to allow service stations within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District on major and secondary arterials with freeway off-ramps, and to allow convenience stores as an ancillary use to service stations within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District on major and secondary arterials not subject to the 1000 foot distance restriction from other convenience stores. The project includes a Conditional Use Permit to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market (including the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption), fast food drive through restaurant, and a 960 square foot drive-thru automatic car wash, located at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district and within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. DATE: August 10, 1995 PREPARED FOR: Unocal 17700 Castleton Street, Suite 500 City of Industry, CA 91748 PREPARED BY: Michael R. Finn Associate Planner City of San Bernardino Planning and Building Services 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 (909) 384-5057 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Project: Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Owner: Unocal Applicant: Service Station Services Introduction This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. It contains an evaluation of potential adverse impacts that can occur if Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 are approved. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared. The following components constitute the Initial Study for Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11: 1. Project Description and Location 2. Site and Area Characteristics 3. Environmental Setting 4. Summary 5. Environmental Determination 6. Environmental Impact Checklist 7. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures 8. Supporting Information/Location Map and Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevation Combined, these components constitute the complete Initial Study for Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 3 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 is a request to amend the Development Code to allow service stations along major and secondary arterials with freeway offramps, within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. Specifically the proposal would amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(0)(1), deleting the reference to intersections of major and secondary arterials with freeway offramps, and adding the provision that a service station may locate along a major or secondary arterial with a freeway offramp within the Freeway Corridor Overlay. A maximum of two such service stations would be permitted on each side of the freeway. See Attachment 8-1, Proposed Amendment Text. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 also includes a request to amend the Development Code to exempt service stations with convenience stores as an ancillary use from the distance criteria from other convenience stores. Specifically, the proposal would amend Development Code Section 19.06.030(2)(F)(4) adding the proposed exemption with the exception that only a maximum of two such service stations be allowed to locate on each side of the freeway. See Attachment 8-1, Proposed Amendment Text. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 is an application to construct a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with convenience market, fast-food drive through restaurant, and 960 square foot drive- thru automatic car wash. Approximately 2,343 square feet of the building is allocated to the convenience market, with the remainder of the structure allocated to the fast-food portion of the business. The convenience market is proposed to include the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The 960 square foot self-service is located along the southern border of the site and will be fully enclosed during operation. Six gasoline pump islands are proposed with a capability of fueling 12 cars simultaneously. The facility is proposed to employ a total of 10 with a maximum of 4 per shift. Proposed hours of operation is 24 hours a day. 2. SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 The Development Code Amendment would apply to all properties that: 1. Are located along major or secondary arterials with a freeway offramp and located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District; 2. Meet criteria #1 above and there are fewer than two such service stations meeting City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 4 criteria #1 already located on the side of the freeway for which the service station is proposed; 3. Meet the above criteria and do not adjoin a residential land use district. Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. Approximately 12 freeway off-ramp intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified and are shown in Attachment B-2. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-I1 The 1.64 acre site is irregular in shape, and is located on the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway in the CG-1, Commercial General land use district. University Parkway is identified by the General Plan as a major arterial. There are two freeway offramps from the I-215 freeway onto University Parkway, and the site is located within the Freeway Corridor Overlay District. The site is presently vacant and undeveloped. Surrounding land uses include Scottish Rite Temple, immediately adjacent on the south, a multi- tenant shopping center with two fast food drive-throughs on the north, across Varsity Avenue, and a multi-tenant shopping center, restaurants, fast food drive-through restaurants, and service station, under construction on the east. The I-215 freeway is adjacent to the Scottish Rite Temple on the south. 3. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 The amendment would be applicable only to those projects meeting the criteria listed under Section 2, above. The environmental setting will be dependent on the individual project location as determined by any future conditional use permit applications. Conditional use permit applications meeting the conditions established by this amendment and environmental issues are such that they will be addressed with each individual application submittal. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-I1 The site is located in an area identified by the General Plan as being located within a High Wind Hazard Area. 4. SUMMARY City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 5 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 would create the potential for approximately 19 new service stations, based on an analysis of available business registration data. Although business registration information regarding service stations with ancillary convenience stores were not available, it is estimated that a maximum of 42 such facilities would be possible under the proposed amendment. In those areas where potential impacts may occur, proposals under the amendment would be subject to review under CEQA and may be conditioned to reduce or eliminate impacts as necessary. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 The Conditional Use Permit would result in the establishment of a 2,500 square foot gasoline station with fast food drive-through restaurant, convenience market with sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption, and drive-through automatic car wash at the southwest corner of Varsity Avenue and University Parkway. The project site is located within an area of potential wind erosion and high wind hazard area. The proposal includes the transport, storage and use of gasoline and petroleum products. Project conditions of approval have been included to mitigate potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 6 On the basis of this initial study, X The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. _ The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA Ale4el Name e Signature Al::?- l�J Date City Contact Person regarding this Initial Study: Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner City of San Bernardino - Department of Planning and Building Services 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Phone: (909) 384-5057 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 7 A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain "Yes" and "Maybe" answers on a separate attached sheet. "No" answers are explained on this checklist. See Attachment "A" Preliminary Environmental Description Form, where necessary. (SECTION 6) Yes No Maybe 1. Earth Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) on slopes of 15% or more based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. D.(3)? _ X _ b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15% natural grade based on review of General Plan HMOD map, which designates areas of 15% or greater slope in the City? _ X c. Development within the Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 47, of the City's General Plan? _ X _ d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature based on field review? X e. Development within areas defined for high potential for water or wind erosion as identified in Section 12.,0-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 53, of the City's General Plan? X Yes No Maybe f. Modification of a channel, creek or river based on review of City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 8 USGS Topographic Map (Name) X g. Development within an area subject to landslides, mudslides, subsidence or other similar hazards as identified in Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the City's General Plan? _ X h. Development within an area subject to liquefaction as shown in Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 48, of the City's General Plan? _ X _ i. Other? X 2. Air Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient air quality as defined by South Coast Air Quality Management District, based on meeting the threshold for significance in the District's, "CEQA Air Quality Handbook"?. X b. The creation of objectionable odors based on information contained in Preliminary Description Form, No. G.(3)? _ X _ Yes No Maybe c. Development within a high wind hazard area as identified in City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 9 Section 15.0-Wind & Fire, Figure 59, of the City's General Plan? X 3. Water Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces that cannot be mitigated by Public Works Standard Requirements to contain and convey runoff to approved storm drain based on review of the proposed site plan? _ X _ b. Significant alteration in the course or flow of flood waters based on consultation with Public Works staff? X c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality based on requirements of Public Works to have runoff directed to approved storm drains? _ X _ d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground water? _ X Yes No Maybe e. Exposure of people or property City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 10 to flood hazards as identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060281 0010-B, and Section 16.0-Flooding, Figure 62, of the City's General Plan? X f. Other? X 4. Biological Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. Development within the Biological Resources Management Overlay, as identified in Section 10.0- Natural Resources, Figure 41, of the City's General Plan? _ X _ 1. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants or their habitat including stands of trees based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. B.(l) and verified by on-site survey/evaluation? _ X 2. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals or their habitat based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. E.(8) and verified by site survey/evaluation? _ X _ Yes No Maybe 3. Impacts to the wildlife disbursal or migration corridors? _ X _ City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 11 b. Removal of viable, mature trees based on site survey/evaluation and review of the proposed site plan? (6" or greater trunk diameter at 4' above the ground) _ X c. Other? X 5. Noise: Could the proposal result in: a. Development of housing, health care facilities, schools, libraries, religious facilities or other noise sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior as identified in Section 14.0-Noise, Figures 57 and 58 of the City's General Plan? X b. Development of new or expansion of existing industrial, commercial or other uses which generate noise levels above an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior that may affect areas containing housing, schools, health care facilities or other sensitive uses based on information in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. G.(1) and evaluation of surrounding land uses No. C., and verified by site survey/evaluation? _ X c. Other? X Yes No Maybe 6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the land use as City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 12 designated based on the review of the General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Districts Map? _ X _ b. Development within an Airport District as identified in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Report and the Land Use Zoning District Map? _ X _ c. Development within Foothill Fire Zones A & B, or C as identified on the Development Code Overlay Districts Map? _ X d. Other? Amendment to the X Development Code 7. Man-Made Hazards: Based on information contained in Preliminary Environmental Description Form, No. G.(1) and G.(2) will the project: a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? X b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? X c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? _ X _ d. Other? X 8. Housing: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing as verified by a site survey/evaluation? _ X _ Yes No Maybe b. Create a significant demand for additional housing based on the City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 13 proposed use and evaluation of project size? _ X c. Other? X 9. Transportation/Circulation: Could the proposal, in comparison with the Circulation Plan as identified in Section 6.0-Circulation of the City's General Plan and based on the conclusions of the City Traffic Engineer and review of the Traffic Study if one was prepared, result in: a. A significant increase in traffic volumes on the roadways or intersections or an increase that is significantly greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? X b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? X c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? _ X _ d. Alteration of.present patterns of circulation? X e. Impact to rail or air traffic? _ X _ f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? _ X _ g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? _ X h. Other? X Yes No Maybe 10. Public Services: Based on the responses of the responsible City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 14 agencies or departments, will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? _ X b. Police protection? _ X _ c. Schools (i.e., attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? _ X _ d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Medical aid? X f. Solid Waste? X g. Other? _ X _ 11. Utilities: Will the proposal: a. Based on the responses of the responsible Agencies, Departments, or Utility Company, impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? _ X 2. Electricity? _ X 3. Water? X 4. Sewer? X 5. Other? X Yes No Maybe b. Result in a disjointed pattern of utility extensions based on City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 15 review of existing patterns and proposed extensions. _ X 12. Aesthetics: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any significant or important scenic view based on evaluation of the view shed verified by site survey/ evaluation? X b. Will the visual impact of the project create aesthetically offensive changes in the existing visual setting based on a site survey and evaluation of the proposed elevations? X c. Other? X 13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site by development within an archaeological sensitive area as identified in Section 3.0- Historical, Figure 8, of the City's General Plan? _ X _ b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site, structure or object as listed in the City's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? _ X _ c. Other? X Yes No Maybe 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 16 The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Based on this Initial Study: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? _ X b. Does the project have the to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) _ X _ c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) _ X Yes No Maybe d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 17 effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? _ X _ B. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (SECTION 7) 1. Earth Resources Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-h. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market in areas that may require substantial earth movement, development within an Alquist-Priolo Zone, modification of a channel, creek or river, or in areas subject to wind erosion, water erosion, land slides, mudslides or other similar earth hazards. The earth resources environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the location of the specific proposal and its relation to specific environmental earth resources/hazards. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 e. The proposed project is located within an area identified in Figure 53 of the General Plan as having high potential for wind erosion. The site is relatively flat. Therefore, little or no potential exists for slope erosion. The primary source for potential impacts will be bare soil exposed to high wind during grading and site preparation, potentially generating high amounts of dust and erosion/siltation. Since the overall final development and landscaping of the site will result in minimal soil exposure, long term impacts are expected to be insignificant. However, grading, site preparation, and project construction could result in the short term exposure of large areas of bare soil to high wind. Engineering Department Standard Requirements concerning compliance Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code, and Planning Department Conditions of approval requiring cessation of construction operations an d application of soil binders when wind velocities reach 20 mph or greater will reduce the short term potential impacts from grading and construction to a level of insignificance. 2. Air Resources Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-c. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market that may result in substantial air emissions or that may have an effect upon ambient air quality, create objectionable odors, or result in such development within a high wind hazard area. The air resource environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the specific proposal and its location. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 18 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 C. The proposal will result in the development of a service station with a convenience market, fast food drive-through restaurant, and drive-through automatic car wash within a high wind hazard area. Building Division Standard Requirements requiring design of the roof and structure of the dwellings to be developed on the site to withstand 80 mile per hour wind load, exposure C, will reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 3. Water Resources Development Permit No. 95-05 a-e. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market that may result in substantial changes in absorption rates and drainage patterns, alteration of the course or flow of flood waters, may result in discharge into surface waters, a change in quality or quantity of ground water, or result in the exposure of people or property to flood hazards. The water resource environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the specific proposal and its specific location. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 4. Biological Resources Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market that may result in the Biological Resources Management Overlay or that could result in the removal of viable mature trees. The biological resources environmental constraints and concerns will be site specific and dependent upon the specific proposal and its specific location. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 5. Noise Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. The amendment may result in the development of a service station/convenience market that may result in noise impacts to noise sensitive uses nearby. Potential noise impacts will be dependent upon the specific proposal and its location in relation to noise sensitive land uses. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-I1 b. The proposal includes a 960 square foot drive-through automatic car wash on the south property line adjacent to the Scottish Rite Temple. The car wash will be enclosed. Per project conditions of City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 19 approval, the wash will be sound proofed to ensure that external noise levels will be at or below 65 db(A) per General Plan noise requirements. Potential impacts are insignificant. 6. Land Use Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-c. The amendment does not propose any change in land use as designated in the General Plan. The amendment could result in the development of a service station/convenience market in airport districts AD-II and AD-V. Such a proposal would be subject to the provisions contained in Chapter 19.12 of the Development Code, which addresses development within Airport Districts. The amendment will not result in development within any Foothill Fire Zone since none of the sites affected by the proposed amendment is located within the Foothill Fire Zone. Impacts as a result of development under the amendment will be project specific and dependent upon the proposed location with to land use hazards. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. d. Available business registration data for service stations within the City was mapped by the City's Management Information Services Department and analyzed by staff. Approximately 12 freeway intersections with major or secondary arterials affected by the proposed Development Code Amendment were identified (See Attachment B-2). From the analysis, it is estimated that a total of 23 service stations presently exist at these intersections. Under current Development Code criteria, 18 of the 23 existing service stations meet the Development Code locational criteria. Under the criteria of Development Code Amendment No. 95-05, a total of 42 service stations would be possible. Taking the existing service stations into consideration, the proposed amendment would create the potential for 19 new service stations. Additionally, all 5 of the service stations that do not meet current Development Code locational criteria would meet the locational criteria of the proposed amendment. Under the proposed amendment a total of 42 service stations with ancillary convenience markets would be possible. Data regarding the number of existing service stations with ancillary convenience markets was not available for analysis. 7. Man-Made Hazards Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-c. The amendment will likely result in the use, transport, and storage of hazardous materials in the form of gasoline products. Impacts as a result of development under the amendment will be project specific and dependent upon the proposed location with to land use hazards. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 20 a. The proposal will result in the transport, use, and storage of gasoline and petroleum products. Project compliance with the following project conditions of approval will reduce potential impacts to a level of non-significance: 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans for underground storage tank systems shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services. 2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall be required to apply for a Hazardous Material Handler Permit, a Hazardous Material Generator Permit (if applicable), and Underground Tank permit. 3. Prior to Occupancy, the applicant shall obtain a "Business Plan" as defined in Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code. 8. Housing Development Code Amendment No 95-05 a-b. The amendment could result in the removal of existing housing. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 9. Transportation/Circulation Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-h. Individual projects proposed under Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 would be subject to review under the provisions of CEQA. The City Traffic Engineer will review all such projects on a case-by-case basis for impacts. Projects would be conditioned as necessary to prevent significant traffic impacts, once submitted. Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 a-h. The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the proposal and has determined that the additional vehicle trips resulting from the establishment of the use will not cause any significant impact on the adjoining street system. Total traffic volume will be less than the street design capacity. 10. Public Services Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 21 a-f. Specific proposals under the amendment may impact the capability of public service providers to provide adequate levels of service. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 11. Utilities Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment may impact the capability of public utility providers to provide adequate levels of service. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 12. Aesthetics Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment could have aesthetic impacts. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. 13. Cultural Resources Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 a-b. Specific proposals under the amendment could have potential impact on cultural resources. The potential for impacts will be dependent upon the specific proposal and its location in relation to noise sensitive land uses. Such issues will be addressed within the context of specific development applications prior to their approval pursuant to the provisions of the CEQA. Potential impacts are not significant. City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist Page 22 8. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 8-1 Draft Development Code Amendment Text 8-2 Service Station Intersection Analysis 8-3 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Location Map 8-4 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevations D. Ulu T EXHIBIT 3 City of San Bernardino c�iTY San Bernardino Police Department Interoffice Memorandum To: SGT. J. GODDARD From: CSR II M. SOTO i Subject: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #95-11 Date: October 9, 1995 Copies : MIKE FINN, ASSOCIATE PLANNER APPLICANT: Barry Hammond BUSINESS• Unocal University Pkwy/Varsity Ave . INVESTIGATION• The business will be located within the reporting district SC405 and ABC census tract 46 . 02 . According to ABC, they will support 11 off-sale licenses and currently there are only eight . The nearest off-sale licensed premise is Hughes Market, which will be located about .2 mi . from the business. The nearest on-sale licensed premise is Ramada Inn, which will be located about .4 mi. from the business . The nearest school is J C Carmark Elementary located at 4777 N. State St . and will be about .2 mi . from the business . The nearest church is First Baptist Church located at 4747 State St . and will be about . 2 mi . from the business. The nearest park is Littlefield/Shultis Memorial Park on Kendall Ave. and will be about 1 . 6 mi . from the business . The nearest residence will be an apartment complex across the street from the business . The complex is Ridgeline Park Apartments located at 1925 College Ave. and will be about 100' from the business . AREA COMMANDER COMMENTS: Sgt . Soderbloom, who is the Administrative Sergeant for the Area Commander, said they have no objection. POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDATIONS: Since the Administrative Sergeant for the area has no objection and A.B .C. will support 11 off-sale licenses and there are currently only eight, the Police Department has no objections . THE SBPD IS COMMITTED TO PROVIDING: PROGRESSIVE QUALITY POLICE SERVICE; A SAFE ENVIRONMENT TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE; A REDUCTION IN CRIME THROUGH PROBLEM RECOGNITION AND PROBLEM SOLVING POLICE CONCERNS APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR A.B . C. LICENSES LOCATION: University Pkwy/Varsity Ave . Conditional Use Permit No . 95-11 Reporting District SC 405 Six Months Part I Crimes Persons Property Census Tract 46 . 02 On Sale Off Sale Allowed Allowed 11 Existing Existing 8 GENERAL VICINITY: Distance To Nearest : Distance School Carmack Elementary School 4777 N. State St . . 2 Mi . Church First Baptist Church 4747 N. State St . . 2 Mi . Park Littlefield/Shultis Mem. Park Kendall Ave . 1 . 6 Mi . ABC On Sale License Premises Ramada Inn 2000 Ostrems Wy. . 4 Mi . ABC Off Sale Licensed Premises Hughes Market . 2 Mi . Hallmark Shell Station . 3 Mi . Arco Am/Pm . 3 Mi . Distance of Parking Lot to Residence : Ridgeline Park Apts 1925 College 100' Page two CUP 95-11 Area Commander Comments:_ Sqt . Soderbloom the Administrative Sergeant for the Area Commander, said they have no objections Police Department Recommendations: Since the Administrative Sergeant of the area has no objection and A.B.C. will support 11 off-sale licenses and there are currentl only eight, the loolice department has no objections EXHIBIT 5 Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 15 ATTACHMENT "F" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 1. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction on improvements shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. Project: Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Expiration Date: (Two years from the effective date of DCA No. 95-05) 2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause, grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code provisions. 3. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan(s) approved by the Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and Common Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be subject to approval by the Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if applicable. a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping; b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures; C. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme; and, d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project. 4. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 16 attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. 5. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate. The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit. 6. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air pollution; glare control; exterior lightning design and control; noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control. Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground. 7. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (five copies) to the Public Works Department with the required fee for review. The landscape plans will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services and the Planning Division for review. (Note: The issuance of a building development permit, by the Department of Planning and Building Services, does NOT waive this requirement.) No grading permit(s) will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department), and comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter 19.28 (Landscaping Standards) of the Development Code effective on the date of approval of this permit. Trees are to be inspected by a representative of the Parks Department prior to planting. 8. This development shall be required to maintained a minimum of 16 standard off-street parking spaces as shown on the approved plan(s) on file. Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 17 9. The car wash shall be sound proofed, as necessary, to ensure that external noise levels will be at or below 65 db(A). 10. Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans for the underground storage tank system shall be reviewed and approved by the San Bernardino County Department of Environmental Health Services. 11. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall apply for a Hazardous Material Handler Permit, a Hazardous Material Generator Permit (if applicable), and Underground Tank Permit. Contact the County Department of Environmental Health Services at (909) 387-3080. 12. Prior to occupancy, the applicant shall file a "Business Plan" as defined in Chapter 6.95 of the Health and Safety Code. 13. Plans for the food facility shall be submitted to the Department of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health Services, Food Section. Call (909) 387-4608. 14. Only fast-food menu items (sodas, fries, sandwiches, etc.) may be sold through the fast food drive-through window. No beer, wine or convenince store merchandise shall be sold through the fast food drive through window. 15. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the following City Departments or Divisions: a. Public Works (Engineering) Department b. Building Services Division of the Planning and Building Services Department C. Police Department d. Water Department e. Fire Department e. Public Services (Refuse) Department f. Parks and Recreation Department ATTACHMENT "G" STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STATION, CONt/. HEARING DATE .STORE MORIt/E-THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST S/OE OF UN/YERS/TY PARKWAY_ SOUTH S IDE OF VARS/TYA I/ PAGE NO: • NOTE TO APPLICANT. Where separate Engineering plans are required, the applicant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. 1. Drainage and Flood Control a) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b) Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit Requirements. c) An Erosion Control Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to grading plan approval. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. 2. Grading a) If more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Page 1 91931195 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKSI CASE NO. CLIP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-45 DESCRIPTION: GAS STATION. MY V_ HEARING DATE STORE W09RIVE-THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST SIDE OF UffYERSITY PARKWAY. SOUTHSIDEOFVARSITYAI/. PAGE NO: b) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code. c) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code(See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). d) The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. Site Design shall comply with all requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to handicap parking and accessibility. e) A handicap accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet . Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6 feet. f) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the Engineering Division for Checking. g) An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to allow the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of owner neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property owner and shall ensure that , if the property owner or subsequent owner(s) fail to properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file appropriate liens against the property in order to accomplish the required landscape maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of $200.00 shall be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing costs. This easement and covenant shall be executed by the property owner prior to Page 2 9/13/95 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP 9511 CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GASSTAT/ON. CONV. HEARING DATE STORE J4W-&VE-THRL/. AND CAA WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST S/DE OF UN VERS/TY P.4AKNrAY. SOUTHS/DE OF!/ARS/TYAt/. PAGE NO: plan approval unless otherwise allowed by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. 3. Utilities a) Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses). b) This parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. c) Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. d) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required. e) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Section 19.20.030 of the Development Code. Page 3 9113195 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95- CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/O/V. CO/VV. HEARING DATE STORE W/DM1/E-THRU_ AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST S/DE OF UN/MERS/TY PARKWAY. SOUTH SIDE OF MARS/TYAM. PAGE NO: f) Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030. 4. Street Improvement and Dedications a) Remove existing asphalt curb along the westerly side of University Parkway adjacent to the site and replace with 8 inch curb and gutter per City Standard No. 200, Type "B". Curb face shall be set at 53 feet from the centerline of University Parkway. A transition shall be constructed at the southerly boundary to provide for traffic safety and drainage. b) A side opening catch basin shall be installed in the curb to replace the existing drainage inlet located in the street right-of-way of University Parkway near the southeasterly corner of the site. c) A handicap ramp conforming to City Standard No. 205 shall be constructed at the southwesterly corner of University Parkway and Varsity Avenue. Sufficient right-of-way shall be dedicated, if necessary, to accommodate the ramp. d) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb). e) Construct Handicap Ramps in accordance with City Standard No. 205 at all curb returns within and adjacent to the project site. Dedicate sufficient right-of-way at the corner to accommodate the ramp. Page 4 9113195 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/ON. CON V. HEARING DATE STORE W/DRlVE-THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WESTS/DEOFUN/I/EHS/TY PARKWAY. SOUTH S/DE OF VARS/TYAV.. PAGE NO: f) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type 11, including Handicap by-pass. Remove existing driveway approaches that are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter and sidewalk. g) Install one Street Light on each adjacent street in accordance with City Standard Nos. SL-1 and SL-2. 5. Required Engineering Permits a) Grading permit(If applicable.). b) On-site improvements construction permit(except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), including landscaping. c) Off-site improvements construction permit. 6. AwAicable Engineering Fees' a) Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 4% and 4%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost2 of the off-site improvements. b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements(except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 2% and 3%, respectively, of the 'All Fees are subject to change without notice. 2Estimated Construction Cost for Off-Site Improvements is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with the Department of Public Works/City Engineer. Page 5 9113195 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CUP95-11 CITY ENGINEER & OCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/ON. CONY. HEARING DATE STOf7EW107/14FMI I- ANO CAI? WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST S/DE OF UAYVERS/TY PARKWA Y. SOUTH S/DE OF V4RS/TYA(1. PAGE N O: estimated construction costa of the on-site improvements, including landscaping. C) Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required) - Fee Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter. d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount of fi 262 . Based on 56,652 Square Feet @ $ 0.379 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area (75% of the net lot area according to plan), then $ 0.130 per square foot of remaining impervious lot area or fraction thereof. e) Developer shall reimburse City in the amount $125,000 for this project's fair share of the cost of Comprehensive Storm Drain Project No. 7-E25 which was previously installed at the City's expense in University Parkway adjacent to the site. f) Traffic system fee in the estimated amount of $17,441 . Based on 1,155 trips per day @ $ 15.10 per new trip generated by the project. Exact amount shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of application for Building Permit. g) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount of 214 . Based on 2,343 Square Feet of Bldg Area @ $ 214.30 per 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof. h) Sewer inspection fee in the amount of $18.07 Based on 1 connection @ 18.07 per connection. 'Estimated Construction Cost for On-Site improvements is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with the Department of Public Works/City Engineer. Page 6 9/13/95 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CLIP 95- CITY ENGINEER & DCA 95-05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/ON CONY. HEARING DATE STORE WIDRIVF-THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST S/DE OF UN/YEAS/TY PARKWAY_ SOUTH S/DE OF VARS/TYAt/_ PAGE NO: 1) Street or easement dedication processing fee in the amount of 200.00 per document. Page 7 9/13/95 Conditional Use Permit No. 94-06 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 1 of 2 BUILDING DIVISION STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 1. Submit plans prepared by a Registered Building Architect or Civil or Structural Engineer. 2. Submit a complete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a Registered Civil or Structural Engineer or Architect. 3. Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Forms for non-residential buildings including a signed compliance statement. 4. Submit calculations a structural drawings, prepared by a Registered Civil Structural Engineer or Architect. 5. Submit five (5) complete sets of construction plans including: (a) Copy of conditions (3) (b) Soils report (3) (c) Energy Calculations (3) (d) Structural Calculations (3) 6. Submit a single line drawing of the electrical service. Show all equipment, conduit and wire sizes and types. Show the service ground size and grounding electrode. 7. Submit panel schedule(s) and electrical plans. 8. Submit a plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning system. (Clearly identify the location and rating of the equipment and the sizes and material of all ducts, registers and the location of all fire dampers). Show means of providing mechanical ventilation as required by the 1991 Uniform Building Code. 9. Submit gas pipe loads, sizing calculations and isometrics. 10. Provide a plot plan showing the location of the proposed sewer system. 11. Submit isometric plans of cold and hot water and drain waste and vent systems. 12. Show compliance with Title 24 for the physically handicapped in the following: Path of travel to building restrooms and all exits. Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 Agenda #2 Hearing Date: 10-17-95 Page 2 of 2 13. Submit plans approved by the County Health Department. 14. For structures located within high wind areas: a. Design structure, including roof covering, using 80 mph wind load, Exposure "C". 15. City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's Compensation Insurance. 16. Assessor's Parcel Number. 266-591-01 17. Contractor's City license. 18. Contractor's State license. 19. Sewer capacity rights from Water Department, 384-5093, Neil Thomsen. 20. School fees from Unified School District, 381-1179. 21. Other: Plan Check time is a p..proximately 5 to 6 weeks Expeditious Plan Check time is approximately 10 working days. Contact Development Services for possible expeditious review at 384-5071. 22. Deposit: $910.92 23. Provide waste water approval. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD BUILDING REQUIREMENTS POLICE DEPARTMENT 1994 DEVELOPMENTAL/ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CASE #��L' --� ` DATE COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS The following special provisions shall apply to all new commercial or industrial buildings or those with 50% improvement or alteration: Garage-type doors A. Garage type doors which are either rolling overhead, solid overhead, swinging, sliding, or accordion style doors shall conform to the following standards: 1. Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of five- sixteen}hs (5/16) inch in thickness with thA locking hardware being attached to the suppori framing. 2 . Aluminum doors shall be a minimum thickness of .0215 inches and riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18) inches on center along the outside seams. There shall be a full width horizontal beam attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot or pedestrian access door framing within three (3) inches or the strike area of the pilot or pedestrian access door. 3 . Fiberglass doors shall have panels a minimum of six (6) ounces per square foot from the bottom of the door to a height of seven (7) feet. Panels above seven (7) feet and panels in residential structures have a density of not less than five (5) ounces per square foot. B. Where sliding or accordion doors are used, they shall be equipped with guide tracks which shall be designed so th-at the door cannot be removed from the track when in the closed and locked position. C. Doors that exceed sixteen (16) feet in width shall have two (2) lock receiving points, one located on each side of the door. Doors not exceeding sixteen (16) feet shall have one lock receiving point placed on either side of the door. A single bolt may be used in the center of the Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 2 door with the locking point located either in the floor or door frame header. D. All overhead or swinging doors shall be equipped with slidebolts which shall be capable of using padlocks with a minimum nine-thirty-seconds 99/32) inch shackle. 1. The entire slidebolt assembly shall be constructed of case-hardened steel and shall have a frame a. minimum of . 120 inches in thickness, and a bolt diameter a minimum of one-half (1/2) inch, and shall protrude at least one and one-half (1 1/2) inches into the receiving guide. 2 . Slide bolt assemblies shall be attached to the door with bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior. Rivets shall not be used to attach such assemblies. E. Padlocks used with exterior mounted slide bolts shall have a hardened steel shackle a minimum of nine-thirty= seconds (9/32) inch in diameter with heel and toe locking and a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation. The key shall be nonremovable when in an unlocked position. F. Doors using a cylinder lock shall have a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation with the bolt or locking bar extending into the receiving guide a minimum of one (1) inch. G. Pedestrian access ,^ -rs contained in garage type doors shall comply to the standards set forth in the below section. Windows/Locks/Doors (Including Sliding Glass) : The following requirements must be met for windows, locks, doors (including sliding glass) : A. All., movable windows and sliding glass doors shall be constructed and/or equipped so as to prevent them from being lifted out of their tracks when in the closed position. B. Louvered windows shall not be used when any portion of the window is less than twelve (12) feet vertically or six (5) feet horizontally from an accessible surface or any adjoining roof, balcony, landing, stair tread, platform, or similar structure. Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 3 C. Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, solid wood or metal doors, shall be constructed or protected as follows: 1. Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of one and three-fourths (1 3/4) inches. Hollow metal doors shall be constructed of a minimum equivalent to sixteen (16) U.S. gauge steel and have sufficient reinforcement to maintain the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is installed; such reinforcement being able to restrict collapsing of the door around the locking device. 2 . Except when double cylinder deadbolts are used or safety glazing is required by Chapter 54 of the Uniform Building Code, any glazing installed within forty (40) inches of any door locking mechanisms shall be constructed or protected as follows: a. Fully tempered glass or rated burglar resistant glazing, or b. Iron or steel grills of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch mesh secured with nonremovable bolts on the inside of the glazing may be used; and framing for iron or steel grills shall be by one (1) inch by one-fourth (1/4) inch flat metal secured by nonremovable bolts, or C. The glazing shall be covered with iron or steel bars of at least one-half (1/2) inch round or one inch by on-fourth (1 x 1/4) inch flat metal, spaced not more than five (5) inches apart and secured with nonremovable bolts. d. Items b and c above shall not interfere with the operation of opening windows if such windows are required to be openable by the Uniform Building Code. D. All swinging exterior doors with the exception of aluminum frame swinging doors shall be equipped as follows: 1 . A single or double door shall be equipped with a double or single cylinder deadbolt. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of one inch and be Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 4 constructed so as to repeal cutting tool attack. The deadbolt shall have an embedment of at least three-fourths (3/4) inch into the door jamb/strike. The cylinder shall have a cylinder guard, a minimum of five (5) pin tumblers, and shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock b y connecting screws of at least one-fourth (1/4) inch in diameter. All deadbolts will be equipped wit:. a locked indicator. Exposed installation screws on double cylinder deadbolts shall be nonremovable. The provisions of this subsection do not apply where (1) panic hardware is required, or (2) an equivalent device is approved by the enforcing authority. Locking devices shall be mounted at a height of not less than thirty (30) nor more than fort-four (44) inches above the finished floor. 2 . Hinges for outswinging doors shall be equipped wi nonremovable hinge pins or a mechanical interloc ° to- preclude removal of the door from the exterio by removing the hinge pins. 3 . Whenever a mail slot is located within forty (40) inches of the primary locking device on any exterior door it shall be covered by an interior hood which will discourage manipulation of the primary locking device. 4 . Strikeplates shall be constructed of minimum sixteen (16) U.S. gauge steel, bronze or brass, a minimum of three and one-half (3 1/2) inches in length and secured to the jamb with screws a minimum of two and one-half (2 1/2) inches in length. E. All exterior double doors shall be equipped as follows: 1. The inactive leaf of double doors shall be equipped with automatic releasing metal 1�;~5olts having a minimum embedment of five-eighths (5/8) inch into the header and threshold of the door frame or by panic hardware which contains a minimum of !2) 1 -cking points, one located at the header, the other at the threshold of each door. 2 . Double doors shall have a full-length astragal, constructed of steel a minimum of . 125 inch thick which will cover the opening between the doors. The astragal shall be a minimum of two (2) inches wide, and extend a minimum of one inch beyond the I Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 5 edge of the door to which it is attached. The astragal shall be attached to the outside of the active door by means of welding or with nonremovable bolts spaced apart on not more than ten (10) inch centers. F. Aluminum frame swinging doors shall conform to the following: 1 . The jamb on all aluminum frame swinging doors shall be so constructed or protected to withstand one thousand six hundred (1, 600) pounds of pressure in both a vertical distance of three (3) inches and a horizontal distance of one (1) inch each side of the strike so as to prevent violation of the strike. 2 . Aluminum frame swinging doors shall be equipped with a two-point lncckirg mechanism -consisting of deadbolt having a minimum bolt projection of 04 and one-half (1 1/2) inches, or a hook shaped or similar bolt that engages the strike sufficiently to prevent spreading and a metal automatic releasing threshold bolt having a minimum embedment of five-eighths (5/8) inch into the floor. The deadbolt lock shall have a minimum of five (5) pin tumblers and a cylinder guard and shall be equipped with a locked indicator. G. Panic hardware, whenever required by the Uniform Building Code or Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, shall be equipped and installed as follows: 1. Panic hardware shall contain a minimum of two (2) locking points on each door, one located at the head, the other at the threshold of the door, or 2 . On single doors, panic hardware may have one locking point which is not to be located at either the top or bottom rails of the door frame. The door shall have an astragal constructed of steel . 125 i`ii s thick which shall be attached with nonremovable bolts or welded to the outside of the door. The astragal shall extend a minimum of six (6) inches vertically above and below the latch of the panic hardware. The astragal shall be a minimum of two (2) inches wide and extend a minimum of one (1) inch beyond the edge of the door. 3 . Double doors containing panic hardware shall have a Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 6 full length steel astragal attached to the doors at their meeting point which will close the opening between them but not interfere with the operation of either door. H. Installation and construction of frames and jambs for exterior swinging doors shall be as follows: 1. Door jambs shall be installed with solid backing in such a manner that no voids exist between the strike side of the jamb and the frame opening for a vertical distance of six (6) inches each side of the strike. Finger joints are prohibited. 2 . In wood framing, horizontal blocking shall be placed between studs at door lock height for three (3) stud spaces each side of the door openings. Trimmers shall be full length from the heads to thq floor with solid backing against sole plates. I - F I. In multiple occupancy office buildings all entrance doors to individual office suites shall meet the construction and locking requirements for exterior doors. J. In multiple occupancy buildings, interior walls dividing the individual suites shall not end at the false ceiling but shall continue to the real roof. K. Exterior transoms or windows shall be deemed accessible if less than twelve (12) feet above ground or adjacent to any pedestrian walkway. Accea--;.::: e windows and transoms having a pane or opening exceeding ninety-six (96) square inches, with the smallest dimension exceeding six (6) inches, -and not visible from a public or private thoroughfare shall be protected in the following manner: 1. Fully tempered glass or burglary resistant glazing, or - 2 . .- The following window barriers may be used but shall be secured with bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior: a. Interior or exterior steel or iron bars of at least one-half (1/2) inch round or one by one- quarter (1 x 1/4) inch flat metal spaced not more than five (5) inches apart and security fastened, or b. Interior or exterior iron or steel grills of standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 7 at least one-eighth (1/8) inch metal with not more than a two (2) inch mesh and securely fastened. 3 . The protective bars or grills shall not interfere with the operation of opening windows if such windows are required to be openable by the Uniform Building Code. L. Roof openings shall be equipped as follows: 1. All skylights on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be provided with: a. Rated burglary resistant glazing, or b. Iron or steel bars of at least one-half (1/2 inch round or one by one-fourth (1 x 1/4) inc flat metal spaced not more than five (5 inches on center to cross the narrowest dimension of the opening being covered. If the narrowest dimension of that- opening exceeds eighteen (18) inches, cross members shall be welded into place, not more than eighteen (18) inches apart beginning with a cross member at the center of the opening. Cross members shall be welded to each and every bar it crosses. The entire bar assembly shall be mounted inside the skylight and shall be attach to the building structure by means of machine bolts spaced not more than sixteen (16) inches apart or attached by means of an equivalent method approved by the enforcing authority, or C. A steel or iron grill of at least one-eighth (1/S) inch metal with a maximum two (2) inch mesh mounted inside the skylight and secured j by bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior. d. These requirements do not apply on any structure with a height of thirty-five (35) feet or more where there is no readily available roof access as determined by the enforcing authority. 2 . All hatchway openings on the roof of any building or premises used for business purposes shall be Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 8 secured as follows: a. If the hatchway is of wooden material, it shall be covered on the inside with at least sixteen (16) U.S. gauge sheet steel or its equivalent, attached with screws. b. The hatchway shall be secured from the inside with a slide bar or slide bolts which are attached by nonremovable bolts. C. Outside hinges on all hatchway opening shall be provided with nonremovable pins when using pin type hinges. 3 . All air duct or air vent openings exceeding ninety- six (96) square inches on the roof or exterior walls of any commercial building shall be secured by covering same with either of the following: ° a. Iron or steel bars of at least one-half (1/21 inch round or one by one-fourth (1 x 1/4) inch flat metal spaced no more than five (5) inches apart and securely fastened, or b. Iron or steel grills of at least one-eighth (1/8) inch metal with a maximum two (2) inch mesh and securely fastened, or C. If the barrier is on the outside, it shall be sPCUred with bolts which are nonremovable from the exterior. d. The above must not interfere with venting requirements, creating potentially hazardous conditions to health and safety, or conflict with the provisions of the Uniform Building Code or Title 19, California Administrative Code. M. Permanently affixed ladders leading to roofs shall be fully enclosed with sheet metal to a height of ten (10) feet. This covering shall be locked against the ladder with a case hardened hasp, secured with nonremovable screws or bolts and a padlock with a minimum three-eighth (3/8) inch hardened steel shackle, locking at both heel and toe, and a minimum five (5) pin tumbler operation with nonremovable key when in an unlocked position. Hinges on the cover will be provided with nonremovable pins when using pin-type hinges. Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 9 N. A building located within eight (8) feet of utility poles, trees, or similar structures which allow access to the building's roof, windows, or other openings shall have such access area barricaded or fenced with materials to deter human climbing. O. The following standards for lighting and address markings shall apply to commercial buildings: 1. The address number of every commercial building shall be located and displayed so that it shall be easily visible from the street. The numerals in these numbers shall be no less than six (6) inches in -height and be of a color contrasting to the background. In addition, any business which affords vehicular access to the rear through any driveway, alleyway, or parking lot shall also display the same numbers on the rear of the building. I - 2 . Roof top address numbers shall be provided. The ► shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in length and two (2) feet in width and of contrasting color to the background. Numbers shall be placed parallel to the street address as assigned. Each building within a commercial complex shall have its own address/assigned number affixed to roof. 3 . All exterior doors shall be equipped with a lighting device which shall provide a minimum maintained one (1) footcandle of light at ground level during hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by vandal resistant covers. 4 . All parking lots and access thereto shall be provided with a minimum maintained one (1) footcandle of light on the parking surface from dusk until dawn. 5. Exterior lighting shall not shine away from subject property. 6 . A' '_ exterior lighting devices are to be "s:. �ke" proof and inaccessible to common reach or climbing and shall be placed at a height which will fully illuminate an average adult. 7 . All parking spaces must be visible from at least one point from the interior of the building. e Standard Requirements - Police Commercial/Industrial Page 10 P. Interior night lighting shall be maintained in those areas that are visible from the street (ground floors only) . Q. All exterior block wall fencing shall have intervals providing visibility corridors which will allow visibility of the interior from outside the wall, and these visibility corridors shall be placed at regular intervals. This applies only to block walls visible from the street. R. Passenger elevators, the interiors of which are not completely visible when the car door(s) is open, shall have mirrors so placed as to make visible the whole of the elevator interior to prospective passengers outside the elevator. S . When access to or within a commercial complex is undul difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for life saving or fire fightini purposes, a key override is to be installed in an accessible location. The key override shall be mastered to both the fire department and police department keys. T. Any structure four (4) stories in height or greater will have a repeater installed in its roof. SEE PAGE 10 t, Standard Requirements Commercial/Industrial Page 10 Additional Conditions: P 5 ER wAw --� 4 c . SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT U STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Review of Plans: VC.A 95--85 4� cup 9c, Date Compiled: -7- 12 -9 Owner/Developer: t-)tJ OCR L_ Compiled By: T,J , Type of Project: GAS S;7\ I o,,,J M A Number of Units: Location: _'SW CO"6:;C2 CF- )/A 05ITY It 0,,J 1 V E"-S fTY WATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING: Contact: VAVL IeT!5,otj Phone: - 5391 Fax: _3B4 Note: All Water Services are Subject to the Rules & Regulations of the Water Department. ❑ Size of Main Adjacent the Project: f G 1 P 114 VACS J T y � G 13 Approximate Water Pressure: 11 O P51 Elevation of Water Storage: 17�) Hydrant Flow @ 20 psi: y 15 U • Type, Size, Location, and Distance to Nearest Fire Hydrant: 2 % l.a" C, Je WAY W/ 65v— NoZZc� El RC W(VPa,-1z' 00 VAf,51 T Y ticV 'la cr- s i-re _ • Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. • Off-site Water Facilities Required. • Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department. • Comments: IJ CITE DA i 15- oF F-1 WATER QUALIT Y CONTROL: Contact: /�� ,f�Jl4 yryft Phone: 3l-�!Dyr.L� Fax: +/- AR.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection.(14A,�ar����r� ❑ Air Gap Required at Service Connection. J ❑ No Backflow Device Required at This Time. ENVIRONMENTAL CO ROL/INDUS IAL WASTE: 2r Contact: I M �`50., �e - Phone: J W4, 5r7 Fax: 8� �G-_JS /^ Note: No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed. ❑ Industrial Waste Permit Required. )4Grease Trap Required. 12-0- C, c4A(, ��,J�`�/ I ,J 1 i O I� Jct� ❑ Pre-treatment Required. ! �7�,L J 1 A l 1^1A 50ti SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION• 1--19 Contact: N e a T40m3t el Phone: 5D4-3 Fax: Sa►S _ Note: Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building& Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit. ❑ No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. Q-ge-wer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the Water Department for 17 Gallons Per Day, Equivalent Dwelling Units: , '11- J SKubject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. /Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: C 6,nyew'V19c. MqY-k-& - - 0,3q3 T9.4 @ .OS = //7 ml S CS. 4-1 2 x >4d drsCl..,ac `a'o cilrlcr,nn,_ �-- CAr WesJ.. SCDREQUI2.FRM(4194) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: C oi' Date: ;�-- 1-3 Reviewed By: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Provide one additional set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check. ❑ Contact the City of San Bernardino Fire Department at (909) 384-5388 for specific detailed requirements. ❑ The developer shall provide for adequate fire flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Minimum fire flow requirements shall be based on square footage, construction features, and exposure information supplied by the developer and must be available prior to placing combustible materials on site. WATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION: ❑ The fire protection water service for the area of this project is provided by: ❑ San Bernardino Municipal Water Department - Engineering (909) 384-5391 ❑ East Valley Water District- Engineering (909) 888-8986 ❑ Other Water Purveyor: Phone: PUBLIC FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES: • Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 feet for commercial and multi-residential areas and at intervals not to exceed 500 feet for residential areas. • Fire hydrant minimum flow rates of 1,500 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for commercial and multi-residential areas. Minimum fire hydrant flow rates of 1,000 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for residential areas. • Fire flow requirements may be met from the combined flow of two adjacent fire hydrants. Fire flow requirements may be adjusted, as deemed appropriate by the Fire Department, based on individual site specific conditions and available mitigations. • Fire hydrant type and specific location shall be jointly determined by the City of San Bernardino Fire Department in conjunction with the water purveyor. Fire hydrant materials and installation shall conform to the standards and specifications of the water purveyor. • Public fire hydrants, fire services, and public water facilities necessary to meet Fire Department requirements are the developer's financial responsibility and shall be installed by the water purveyor or by the developer at the water purveyor's discretion. Contact the water purveyor indicated above for additional information. ACCESS: ❑ Provide two separate, dedicated routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, all weather. ❑ Provide an access road to each building for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width. ❑ Extend roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of all single story buildings. ❑ . Extend roadway to within 50 feet of the exterior wall of all multiple-story buildings. IX Provide "NO PARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE-NO PARKING -M.C. Sec 15.16". ❑ Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500 feet in length and shall have a minimum 40 foot radius turnaround. ❑ The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. SITE: ❑ All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction. ❑ Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than 150 feet from the curb line. No fire hydrants should be within 40 feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Barrel type, with one 2'/2 inch and 4 inch outlet, and approved by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants shall be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by painting an 8 inch wide, red stripe for 15 feet in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles. B LDINGS: Address numerals shall be installed on the building at the front or other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage street. Commercial and multi family address numerals shall be 6 inches tall, single family address numerals shall be 4 inches tall. The color of the numerals shall contrast with t_he color of the background. ❑ Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit it serves. Fire Extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 10B/C. Minimum distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75 feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher. • Apartment houses with 16 or more units, hotels (motels) with 20 or more units, or apartments or hotels(motels) three stories or more in height shall be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers designed to NFPA standards. • All buildings, other than residential, over 5,000 square feet, shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA standards. This includes existing buildings vacant over 180 days. • Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction of the system. • Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of construction. • Provide fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of installation. • Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shall be required at Fire Department approved location. Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to Fire Department requirements. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: -� 0C C FPB 170(11-94) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REFUSE DIVISION DRC/ERC REQUIREMENTS TRANSMITTAL TO: PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES Project Planner DATE: Project No. BY: Ark GENERAL' - The City of San Bernardino Public Services Department is `responsible for proper collection, disposal, and recycling of solid waste and by-products generated within the city. Developments are therefore required to plan for the service arrangements marked below, and establish a refuse account with the Refuse Division by calling (909) 384-5335 prior to the commencement of construction, remodelling, oL occupation of this project. Other city-provided containers are available to the applicant's contractor(s) for construction debris as well. Shared containers for multiple commercial or residential occupants must be paid for by a single account. Ultimate responsibility for payment rests on the property owner. Service fees will be charged according to those in effect at the time of service. RESIDENTIAL - Refuse and/or recyclable collection will be made at the curb. Development must have ample room for storage of all containers out of street view. O Residents to supply their own 32 gallon maximum containers (limit 3 per unit) . O City to supply one 90 gallon refuse container and possibly one 90 gallon recycling container per detached dwelling unit or pair of multiple units. COMMERCIAL - Refuse and/or recyclable collection will be made from either City-owned or customer-owned containers services by City crews. Container(s) must be kept in enclosure(s) accessible to city trucks as shown on the approved site plan. Container access shall not conflict with loading zones. Enclosure gates may not swing into or directly behind any parking space. Enclosure(s) shall have a minimum of 6 feet wide by 12 feet long paved, level (less than 2% grade) area in front of gate(s) for container(a) to be serviced from. Overhead wires, signs, and obstructions shall not be located over container service area(s) . Driveway chains must be marked by reflective material. Customer may lock the enclosure(s) or driveway gate(s) but must either unlock by 5:00am on service day(*) or provide a key or gate card. No electronic transmitters will be accepted. Bins may be locked only with standard padlock numbers assigned at start of service account. The following requirements apply if checked: O Truck access not safe or sufficient. Please rearrange as shown on site plan. 0� Y Truck access sufficient as shown on site plan. 9"Construct I enclosure(!) per tandard drawing 508 for commercial/industrial application. Enclosure sze O Construct enclosure(s) per at ndard drawing 508 with rear pedestrian access added. Pedestrian access to be 60 higher than pavement on which container rests. Enclosure size plus pedestrian access. Additional Consents City of San Bernardino Refuse Service Guide It is our goal to provide you with the best and safest refuse service. To do so,we need your cooperation in placing your refuse for collection. If our crews find your refuse container unserviceable when they arrive to service it,they will leave a red tag like the one pictured here to inform you of the situation. Please review J11,014 the explanation of items 1 through 10 to become familiar with proper service Sara conditions. We cannot deduct from your till for pickups missed due to unserviceable conditions since our truck and crew time is spent going to and from your location.If refuse pickup is missed,and no tag is left,please report AC�/Ef1.,ly,� 4 the same day or after 7:30 a.m.the next working day. Ham♦of tw:rw - Deana. 1. Vehicles blocking our tnx*or your container,or parked too close "'64 fdcr- for safety,will prevent servicing. Type"lx-No.of Vatido In War . 2. Debris on ground in front of or under the wheels of your container YOUR BIN WAS will preve^I ­rvir•ir�m NOT EMPTIED BECAUSE OF: 3. Bins with broken wheels,lids,or other parts will be exchanged upon 1 — Vehicle In way your request. 2 — Debris on ground 3 — Bin needs repair. 4. Bins not placed outside as needed will prevent servicing. 4 — Bin not out. 5 — Pavement under construction. 5. Our trucks may not drive on pavement under construction. 6 — Bin loaded above rim. 7 — Bin overweight. 6 & 7. Containers withmaterialstick' u above rim oroverweighted 8 — Gate locked. �9 p 9 — Bin locked. with dut,concrete, etc. will not be serviced. 10 — Potential hazardous material,tires, or other unacceptable material. 814 9. Containers locked up or locked in will not be serviced unless Please call for information. I prior arrangements are made through our office. HELP KEEP OUR CITY CLEAN Public services Oop artrywnt 10. Please refer to our Hazardous Material Policy to help protect the �p � REFUSE DIVISION ; environment. We cannot accept hazardous material in refuse CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ; containers. Please be aware that we cant accept whole tires or Telephone:384.5335 I pieces of wood more than fourfeet in length.Metal appliances must be kept separate from refuse. To insure that you receive your scheduled pickups we ask that 32 gal. or 90 gal. automated container(s)be at the curb by 6:00 a.m. If your container is not at the curb when your route is serviced, d does not result in a reduction of the charges. Temporary or special bins and drop bodies will be charged for rental and service of the container,prorated for the period of time you have the container,with one (1)week minimum charge.Containers shall be kept in the locations prescribed by a Feld Supervisor.This be an approved enclosure,concrete slab,or area with parking bumpers.A service fee will be assessed when we are unable to service said container for reasons on the tag. 1) 20 yard containers must not be loaded more than 1/3 full (capacity) with rocks, dirt, asphalt, roofing material, or concrete. 2) 30 and 40 yard containers must not be loaded with rocks and concrete,only regular refuse or lightweight construction materials. 3) When your rolloff container exceeds the prescribed weight limit,you will be charged for the direct overweight charge we are assessed by the county landfill. 10 Yard = 2 tons 20 Yard 5 tons 35 Yard 7.5 tons 15 Yard 4 tons 30 Yard = 7 tons 40 Yard = 8 torts 4) Unscheduled service must be requested by 4:00 p.m. on the business day prior to desired service day. It is the responsibility for the customer to notify the Public Services Department in writing when cancelling orcommencing service. Your account will be charged until this office is notified. Notification must be made by property owner or authorized agent. Cornpaction units must be approved by the Superintendent of Refuse before installation. Accounts are billed on a monthly basis. The bill is due and payable upon presentation.You have 60 days to dispute any Current month charges on your bill. If your account becomes delinquent,you service is subject to being discontinued and your account will be turned over to our collection agency. You will not be able to restart service until all fees have been collected. Unpaid closed accounts are turned over for collection after 60 days. All deposits (except nn-refundable) will be applied to your closing bill. '' B` ♦W AllI(I�( /1 ritt : 7Y� •• CONCRETE BLOCK MAILS, M $ROUT ALL CELLS SOLID IN. OIMENSIOt`IS ;- - lot 81N SIZC W L 3 CY. 4 CY. 6--al WO.SVWPER ./ vz A.6. 2-3 CY. 6=g" IS'_o., 2. 1:0 a BARS A 0I`}` NO. 1 6AR --� dt 24'O.C. 4'i 6'w0. BuMPEa , BLUSH WITH PAVEMENT V2'A.111• R1 • 1• N0 a tAlt 32'O.C. I Of a'.O' It f (C0LKTER3UNKJ • O • � SEE DETAIL A 12 STEEL SLEMS A if 6 IN CONCRETE TO SECURE SATES !'CJNC. SLAB U/6 i Gk�b 10/10 W.W.F. / / �X /V�r (CONCRETE CLASS ilA.GRADE a/a /F $20•C•2500) I '4t roc % x ..�s. 12'fTEEI fLEEYE tN /1L!/Qflt $%12'0 CONCRETE NO.a BAR CONT. rOCTIA$ TO SECURE 3' SATES tTYPj 16' PLAN V1 EW SECTION A-A :�.i1� r,�►TC6 3'a S' C GATE FRAME Cw►tivf L SAR CHANNEL 2'a 1'i y16' f CR0SS SRACtN$ _ 1 ' N HOLES 12'0.C. • STEEL S'a lot .1075 _ POST, WELD CAP CRJKO SMOOTH I 1 v s S-M.D. f LI" Wt:iE Br iTAtYLEY TYPE 8-24 METAL DECK j t If Tat..a. � 1 t 3 PER GATE, *EL.D 120 GAVSE, PRIMER COATED L–V1..._ ._ _ ... _ NU I TO POSTS i BATE FRAME tY VERCO L1F6. CC. TACK "' "' -' – L-�- VELD AT TOP 6 BOTTOM TO 1/2' C iALV. STEEL 3112'SALV. STEEL CHANNEL of 12*0.C. CANE BOLT, STANLEY N.O. HASP, STANLE DETAIL 'A' NOTES ND co IFRONT� ELEVAT 10Nf17 I. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONSTRUCTION , LATEST EDITION. 2. LOCATION SUBJECT TO THE APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS. 3. WITHIN 5' OF C0161SUSTIEILE CCNSTRUCTION, INSTALL A AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER I j APPROVED BY FIRE DEPT. L ♦ 4. CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR. it 5. SPECIFIED MANUFACTURER'S SHOWN OR APPROVED EQUAL. II�'S CITY !2F --SAN EIERNARDINO PUBLIC-WORKS DEPT APPROVED - STANDAf Qi �usei� tic QQ 4'evly� / or /A PtAf c0.4c.0 fc cu f o" IF.$ r' � . • /�4� ax 6 Q l • l�en Spa! Gw�ri �y'.al. • r ON. m Ire.,ed ool ZP rt opt✓e p Wax CITY OF SAN BERNARD:NO PARRS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERV-ICCE+S/^�DEPARTMENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 4�f'T "t "�� Case• C—O P 6i5l l Date: U s0ox; Reviewed By: GENERAL REQUIRE11ENTS: [ ] Commercial Industrial and multi-Unit [ ] Assessment District ( ] Residential [)(] Purpose, Guidelines and submittal procedure [ ] Irrigation and Landscaping Plans. r)(] Contact the City of San Bernardino Parks,Recreation and Community Services Department at (909) 384-5217 or 384-5314 for specific detailed requirements. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS: [V1 Maintenance of landscape areas { [�l Planter Areas [ ] Interior Planter Areas [ ] Irrigation Systems [ (] Setback Areas [ ] Slope Areas [ ] Ground Cover and Bedding Material [ ] Erosion Control [5(1 Weed Control PLANT MATERIALS [X) Plant list and climatic conditions [ ] Street Trees [ ] Plant Material Size Requirements and Ratios INSPECTION AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS [ ] Irrigation System ( ] Landscaping [ ] Hardscape Items [ ] Street tree Specifications [ ] Arborist Report [ ] Removal or destruction of trees [ ] Screening Requirement (City, Dev.Code) Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services requirements. Additional information On pc)o I SC:to xS;ii O •� I1�;" --� W .. r •� IIII � II �' � ` X111111111 M11,11 all l I�� ��IIIIIII O �I II :�. � 'lIIIIIIIIIIIII � IiI ;}� n� Ililllllilllll �� � HIT in .- II���� \ CL '6 PRODUCTS COMPANY Date: November 2, 1995 Memorandum To: Mike Finn Associate Planner City of San Bernardino 300 North 'D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 Re: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION# 7339 University Parkway &Varsity Avenue San Bernardino, CA The enclosed material is transmitted for your use: Qtx DD* Descri 'on 9 11-2-95 Project handbooks re: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION # 7339 SAN BERNARDINO Please distribute these handbooks to the Council members prior to our hearing. If you need any additional information, you can reach me at (818) 854-7074. Truly yours, 04 Ray Benboali Project Manager FORM 3-OF14(REV.1-95)PRINTED IN U.S.A. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Common Council FROM: Henry Empeno, Jr., Deputy City Attorney DATE: March 4, 1996 RE: Agenda Item #31, Unocal Service Station, Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 REVISED FORM MOTION: That the hearing be closed; that the negative declaration be adopted; that said ordinance be laid over for final adoption; and that Conditional Use Permit No. 95- llbe approved based on the findings of fact and subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in Exhibit 2, Attachment E, F and G in the October 17, 1995 Planning Commission Staff Report,with Standard Requirement #6(e) [storm drain fee] as amended and agreed to, by the Applicant. (Added portion underlined) Entered into Retard It CounciI1Cmy0evCms Mtg: n�e by HENRY EMPENO, JR., re Agenda Item Deputy City Attorney City ClerkICOC Secy City of San Bernardino HE\ao\(mem261 # 31 -::?— C-/— GC STANDARD REQUIREMENTS QEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS/ CASE NO. CV-P-195-11 'TY ENGINEER A DC4 95.05 DESCRIPTION: GAS STAT/ON. CON V. HEARING DATE STORE W/DRIVE--THRU. AND CAR WASH AGENDA ITEM LOCATION: WEST S/DE OF U (1VERS/TY PARKWAY. SOUTHS/DEOFVARSITYAV. PAGE NO: estimated construction costa of the on-site improvements, including landscaping. C) Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required) - Fee Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter. d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount of $6,262 . Based on 56.652 Square Feet @ $ 0.379 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area (75% of the net lot area according to plan), then $ 0.130 per square foot of remaining impervious lot area or fraction thereof. $q 0 00 p e) Developer shall reimburse City in the amount $ 6,99@-for this project's fair share of the cost of Comprehensive Storm Drain Project No. 7-E25 which was previously installed at the City's expense in University Parkway adjacent to the site 52r'd P al c6oPa of - S'1 oaa 6�tI f) Traffic system fee in the estima ed amount of $17,441 . Based on 1.155 trips per day @ $ 15.10 per new trip generated by the project. Exact amount shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of application for Building Permit g) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount of 214 . Based on 2,343 Square Feet of Bldg Area @ $ 214.30 per 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof. h) Sewer inspection fee in the amount of $18.07 . Based on 1 connection 18.07 per connection. 'Estimated Construction Cost for on-Site improvements is based on a list of st2ndard unit prices on file with the Department of Public WorkmCity Engineer. Page 6 9/13195 3 �. " January 19, 1996 RE: Dev. Code Ammen. 95.05 R 95-06 Cond. Use Permits 9541 8:,_95-lP Rc�� , r Dear Council Member; '96 FEB -1 r 07 I have appeared before the council twice , speaking against any change in the development -code 95-05, issuance of conditional use permits and issuance of exemptions to permits for the sale of liquor. Unfortunatly I cannot attend the Council Meeting scheduled for January 22nd and hope you will accept this letter in lieu of my attendance. I represent my neighbors on Grossmont and Melbourne and , -again, we most yianrniiclir protest the reconsideration and granting of any conditional use permits for the follow- ing reasons: 1 . There will shortly be 3 gas stations ( 2 existing and 1 being constructed) within a radius of 300 feet on University Parkway. These are more than adequate to handle existing and foreseeable traffic flow. Putting it bluntly, we do not need the eye- sore of more gas stations . 2. With regard to liquor sales , there will be 3 con- venience stores and Hughes Market all selling beer and wine; all open 24 hours a day. Do we really need more in a space of less than 800 feet? I respectfully request that you, please , do not turn University Parkway into an ugly "Gasoline Alley" . We do not need it. We beg of you please vote against these Development Code changes and any Conditional Use Permits . Thank you, Clarence Burstein Entered into Record at � '% 1683 Grossmont Road CouncillCmyDevCms Mtg: San Bernardino 92407 by re Agenda Item -' WMM City ClerkICOC Secy J? City of San Bernardino 3/y/9� Entered into Record at I� CouncillcmyoevCms Mtg: March 4, 1996 by I n Agenda Item Prepared statement by: Carol Baker CIOMCDC S6cy Read by. Administrative Assistant,Ms. Terri Lynn Ramirez ti"of San Bernardino Due to illness, I am unable to attend the Council Meeting in behalf of Franchise World Headquarters i.e. Subway Restaurants, Inc. and Union 76 Products. However, I would like to have the following statement read to the Council Members. I am the Development Agent for Subway representing the counties of Riverside, San Bernardino,and Imperial. My responsibilities involve franchise sales, site approval, lease negotiations, and the maintenance and inspection of franchised stores. Subway units are independently owned and operated by franchisees which leads us to the discussion of Store#2486 owned by Jim Siriani. As of February 20, 1996,Mr. Siriani chose to close his store and cease operating at this location. As of this writing,my understanding is that Mr. Siriani plans to file for Bankruptcy. Please take under advisement that Subway does not choose to cause any of their franchisees financial hardship nor to enter into a situation of encroachment. With this in mind, franchisees are notified by Certified Mail of any locations that have been presented to the Development Office for approval. They are given ten days to register a site dispute and Mr. Siriani did just that. A Site Survey is conducted following the guidelines of Headquarters and once completed is sent to the Site Review Committee in Milford, CT. The contents of this package are survey responses,detailed map of demographic area including significant boundaries,points of interest,and location of fast food establishments and a video is included which follows the most direct route from the existing store to the proposed location. The franchisee is advised of the dates of the surveys and invited to participate. The Site Review Committee concluded that the development of the Unocal location would have no impact on Mr. Siriani's store and the site was therefore approved for development. Mr. Siriani's woes have not come from a location that does not even exist but from an indebtedness that was brought about by buying his former partner out of the franchise. I personally completed a breakeven analysis which details his fixed expenses and determines what sales volume is necessary in order to maintain a healthy business. Mr. Siriam informed me that the store was responsible for paying three notes,bank, City,and partner. This is an impossible scenario. All owners are counselled on the adverse affect of debt loads that become the burdon of the store and eventually cause its closing because the bills cannot be paid. On a number of occasions,Mr. Siriani asked for our assistance in working with his Landlord, Mr. Clayton Wright,because he felt that the condition of the property i.e. graffiti, lack of maintenance, low tenancy,and unsightly appearance was causing a negative impact to his store. In closing, I would once again remind the Council that we have been prudent in our decision to develop a Subway within the Unocal station and hope that we will be able to proceed with this location. Unfortunately,Mr. Siriani has been burdoned by a financial situation that has primarily evolved from over-extending himself through loans. I am at a loss to understand the nature of the City's loan to Mr. Siriani especially if it is a result of a loan pursued under the guise of Subway. At$32,353.90,the store could be rebuilt in it's entirety. Once again,thank you for your consideration of this matter. 3-q-9� CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO -Planning and Building Services Department Interoffice Memorandum ON 3 1 TO: Mayor Minor FROM: Valerie C. Ross, Principal Planner for Al Boughey, Director &I ?, SUBJECT: MCC Meeting of 3/4/96 DATE: March 1, 1996 COPIES: Shauna Clark, City Administrator; Rachel Clark, City Clerk As per your request, we contacted the applicants for DCA 95-05/CUP95-11 (Unocal), Agenda item No. 31 and GPA 95-05/CUP 95-24 (Lorton OJ), Agenda item No. 33 regarding a continuance to March 18th. Harold Lorton agreed to a continuance of his item. Ray Benboali of Unocal prefers not to continue his item and requested that it be heard on Monday. He and the people associated with the project will be at the meeting. 4 I `J � t January 19, 1996 RE: Dev. Code Ammen. 95--05 & 95-06 q� 1 o Cond. Use Permits 9541 & ,_95-1R Dear Council Member; '96 FEB -1 P'5 :07 I have appeared before the council twice , speaking against any change in the development -code 95-05, issuance of conditional use permits and issuance of exemptions to permits for the sale of liquor. Unfortunatly I cannot attend the Council Meeting scheduled for January 22nd and hope you will accept this letter in lieu of my attendance. I represent my neighbors on Grossmont and Melbourne and , -again, we rr1net •li anrn,icl�r j^rn t°S t the rer,ny�,gi ricrati nil and granting of any conditional use permits for the follow- ing reasons: 1 . There will shortly be 3 gas stations ( 2 existing and 1 being constructed) within a radius of 300 feet on University Parkway. These are more than adequate to handle existing and foreseeable traffic flow. Putting it bluntly, we do not need the eye- sore of more gas stations. 2. With regard to liquor sales , there will be 3 con- venience stores and Hughes Market all selling beer and wine; all open 24 hours a day. Do we really need more in a space of less than 800 feet? I respectfully request that you, please , do not turn University Parkway into an ugly "Gasoline Alley" . We do not need it. We beg of you please vote against these Development Code changes and any Conditional Use Permits. Thank you, Clarence Burstein 1683 Grossmont Road San Bernardino 92407 _t _3/ylf(o r BURSTEIN 1 -. 1683 Grossmont Rd. San Bernardino,CA 92407 Councilman Jerry Devlin 300 North D St. San Bernardino, C . 92418 Please read before Council Meeting Jan. 22 7 February 1996 page 1 of 2 Honorable Councilman Jerry M. Devlin, Ward 5 Mayor and Common Council Members 300 N. "D" Street 95 -7 PI? ;27 San Bernardino, CA 92418 Re: Proposed Unocal Service Station Development/ Request for Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11. Dear Councilman Devlin, Mayor Minor, and Common Council Members: Regarding Development Code Amendment No. 95-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 95-11 continued Item No. 25 from Council meeting 1/22/96 wherein Applicant Unocal requests an ordinance/variance and approval to construct a 2 , 500 square foot gasoline station with a convenience market, a drive-through Subway Sandwiches & Salads restaurant, and a 960 square foot drive-through car wash, it is imperative that a vote be recorded to deny Unocal this action! The ramifications of such an ordinance/variance would set a precedence that would establish extreme jurisprudential and financial liability to the city. Moreover, fiscal and environmental impact of this developed "Service Station" would be extremely detrimental to the city' s 5th Ward for years to come. To allow Unocal alterations in the Development Code Sections 19 . 06 . 030 (2) (0) (1) and 19. 06. 030 (2) (F) (4) via a city ordinance amending the Code, or in a variance amending the Code would render the Development Code impotent (in respect to these sections) and virtually meaningless to future planning issues. To construct this service station, drive-through Subway, and car wash and to locate at the intersection of University Parkway and Varsity Avenues, within the 1000 foot criteria from an existing or previously approved convenience store/service station, and along the Freeway Corridor (that runs from the I-215 to Cal State, south to north, with on/off Freeway access) would breach the city' s own preestablished Development Code protecting San Bernardino from possible litigation, economic distress, and environmental blight! Notwithstanding the financial and legal liability- due to the added congestion at said intersection with the construction of this enigmatic proposal, it would also pose considerable financial and legal liability to the city in the form of precedence setting. *What about future requests from builders/developers for amendment or variance changes from these Code sections or other sections involving future planning matters? *Consider a wrongful death suit involving the city brought by a deceased motorist's family citing Code amendments (by an ordinance or variance to the aforementioned sections) along this Corridor as substantial contributing factors as a cause in fact of death via a "sine qua non" ruling. page 2 of 2 Liability of litigation and settlement costs from builders_ citywide citizens or students traversing this Freeway Corridor with such heavy traffic congestion would be SUBSTANTIAL! ! ! The city must be in a better position to be postured to embrace such financial risks (see enclosures) . In addition, this proposed site which would include a Subway restaurant is approximately 2 . 3 miles away from my Subway restaurant and would virtually ensure financial disaster for my business and other eateries located within "Kendall Square" down the Kendall and 40th Street Corridor. With the build-out of University Parkway many "drive-through" and "fast food" restaurants already make it increasingly difficult to compete for the consumer and Cal State student/personnel dollar since consumers have such a wide choice of food to select from on University Parkway. An additional Subway with a "drive-through" no less would give consumers little reason to travel across Kendall to 40th Street to visit my establishment. MY BUSINESS RELIES HEAVILY ON CAL STATE CONSUMERS TO SURVIVE! If Unocal is allowed to continue this financial onslaught it would very seriously cause me to consider filing Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Inasmuch, as my additional business closure would cause added blight to the city, it would also severely impact my ability to repay Agency loan No, 2037 with an outstanding balance of $32, 353 . 90! THEREFORE, TO AVOID DETRIMENTAL PRECEDENCE SETTING FOR THE CITY AND BOTH FINANCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL CATASTROPHE WITHIN THE FIFTH WARD FOR BOTH THE CITY AND MYSELF I STRONGLY URGE YOU TO DENY THE APPROVAL TO UNOCAL TO CONSTRUCT THIS SERVICE STATION PROPOSED AT THE INTERSECTION OF UNIVERSITY PARKWAY AND VARSITY AVENUES. enclosures: cc. Mayor Tom Minor Common Council Members Shauna Clark, City Administrator Timothy C. Steinhaus, Agency Administrator Mike Finn, Associate Planner Sincerely, / e,, C u James C. Siriani, Owner/Operator Subway Sandwiches & Salads #2486 1050 W. Kendall Drive, Ste. B San Bernardino, CA 92407 (909) 886-3343 FAX (909) 886-1155 01'LUIRL rtr.r un i. J✓1JtA UUIN r tik'j 1 KA Y Y Debts, clo' ud fut,, ure of . agency + I�t MOW II�IA�C S x� '� 0 The EDA has s' y z committed$189 million to big projects nr bevel$ `rile t" ell' Board ,u g P 1 LS in San 1 `+�' 9 "a+� i. P4. Bernardino.Is it money f s seven councI ors shown s. r, �+ wasted or well spent? s to i dmg pFrojects tlia�at �y ffts aboutt4tl eiff�l Wei and First In a series P ayroll o 2,millon '., ... ;- By MICHAEL DIAMOND t o�rV� d �,.y' Sun Business Writer `t1 SAN BERNARDINO - t (toping that what he had ar i heard wasn't true,Mike Trout, of the Economic Development + jt4 Agency,drove quickly to Stan- �{ dard Mortgage Co.offices on D Street. Peering through a window, ' + r rDwARD,V +' ''t DAVD'1 's .' "icy;. he saw a moving dolly among { neoRErt?_,, r� the furniture.His heart sank. +t i r� •r 4. rYa+r'"°t' krt Trout raced to another TMfw da d Standard Mortgage office, on DECISIONS f Seventh Street. 'there, two ., !, � a7rfywR ,^K+ '� t 4'�4 signs confirmed his worst efts r �* w , fears."Liquidation sale,"said '. .m Y� 1�. d , Y ', fit¢ one."We are closed,"said the ' other. tvi�ewswith .3'iA tu;,; ,, `.. � - r•y " Ep' c , cxsaatffin � The Standard Mortgage 8++wr+aayyrco closing last April meant the m b S.A7F_ t EDA would I repay a 1.7 m' hlig}i X for npnny 11 mon U r. The EDA now sends W a month to Riverside i} E EDA'S TOP 20 �r p p F,; National Bank to pay off the PROJECTS Ala' t' loan-money intended to re- Amount vitalize San Bernardino and I A FAILED rd Money that city officials now Project funded + forciN the EDA to pay baclt a$1M7 r�nillk�t admit probably won't be re- ,a �,,s 1? + +.. covered from Standard Mort- guaraiijeLd foF the 1.Superblock $52 million t•; p�?, ;; r gage or its former owner. 2.Mobilehome r „. r 1R r� I�M; t!ifid 4 `r_ . + y►pr* i The EDA's decision to pro- conversion program $35 million r f` ± .°"y{ vide public funds for Standard 3.Santa Fe Depot District $15 million ;.' ortfage is among a series of ons made by the agenc 4.Multi screen cinerna ov complex 315 million es- 5.Central Police Station $14 million 3t5 tions about whether the agen- cy is sufficiently focused on its 6.San Bernardino two main goals of fighting stadium $13 million blight and creating jobs. 7.Harris'department £ tS Manv observers feel the t PR18 .''.L, +r agency has strayed too far store renovation $ii mltllonj"� 4 i rtl A.}rRa.O. , from these goals-goals that 8.San Bernardino °q AAA Qa � ' 0 address two of the city's big- Community Hospital S11 million LOWaRRrJOB ' a �� ? gest problems. c.��an Anro AMmM' 9.New Pine Housing e station "The redevelopment agen- cy I rv(Ce ar�� anaverage cy for too many years has Development Ss mltllon {' $7 an hour hhtha IAon gta�antoo J + J; r been subject way too much to 10.Freeway Home Center $2.4 million t people's political gnals," said 11.Inland Plaza $2.3 million s, San Bernardino economist John fi - {` using. As a copse 12.Gas Co.building $1.8 million r -,- quence, he added, investment 13.Mt Vernon storm money that "could be used to drain $1.8 million l repair the economy and re= a ,, I, �:• pair the housing, has largely 14.Standard Mortgage $1.7 million been squandered." 15.California Theatre r j .Indeed,a three-month stu- renovation $1.5 million ? dy by The Sun shows that 16.Redlands Nissan $1.5 million s` among the agency's current 17.Ruba Enterprises s -� a top 20 projects, set to con- Arco AM/PM d sume as much as$189 million 51.4 million d ;t REDUINdS N18$AN x-r t� r.n K >� in public funds,area$1.8 mil- 18.Center Chevrolet s1-2 million ' 1.5 MI�UON lion storm drain along Mount 19•Law library ��A �JUNeMoved�La'Isuiv/S�uiuld;`. Vernon Avenue, $L5 million ry $1 million �-r dealership and 20 jobs fo Sad Bernardino with$1.5'= for interior renovation at the 20.Postal center $1 mltllon ;+d• 'mrillidd financial incentive package.' See EDA/AS EDA ■ Is the agency financially SUN STAFF healthy?Story/A8. -Y 2 8 2 V u C O O y 5 � H n e _b a �•}1)^ y and dO„ C .�• C6R�0 LCNZ�y c..yCO� 3 °vim L 9.. oE Vv tto b Ems � ��t� EDA deal y�y v gym n° vUQcENDy E ti E°y�nvoc^ocv vE� vo vy�"OOi°� 'ir•( F o y�F tea-E`•c�YQ cuts debt, L C° al as °00 7 C a_3 >� nn E°oa! v`oE�3�y oGa�.c•oao c ate' ' ° - ° L�`CCa yti� ^_� carries risk C y y °• ,�.JC Jp 00 alth al-'-"77t-- E.j3>.aW ocC: L-v c _ 5' ■ Pact Involving old Gas �� y E sL,:,v g SAN BERNARDINO T _ y=y ^; Company building absolves -0 M - ' San Bernardino of$1.3 itself,"says a report to the coun- ca0 r EJ'c'+_os-�� r-il. — _c million loan guarantee,but W>- >E,°❑c E E'�E c o•n opens city o nuisance Specitle as: �y bring named y on the title as a art owner, the 3 o-5 , v lawsuits. EDA will assume some legal liabi- y dt s :fit E lities- including the possibility �11 By RICHARD BROOKS of being sued by anyone involved -- h e t v v Sun Staff Writer in a slip-and-fall arcident. The good news is, as a part H mr�a oor._ oo e° SAN RFRNARDINO -- De- owner the EDA is entitled to 50 e my u �° -o^-J c E veloper At Steward won final city percent of the project's cash now vycY rte.= ar v±E > approval AtonrI for an E o'c_d --oc z• - :-I Y and 50 percent of the proceeds pL L.� �. =n - O�D L agreement designed to help him when the building is sold, said ° v °�'� OC ryJ Qt pL refinance the old Cas Company FDA attorney Tim Sabo. °m c o ' of e E building- but thatmay make the maEo> ouo- e� °p cityatargr tofnuisarlcelawsillts. Let metrnderstandthis v v° v L o �oi.-L now,'' said Councilman .Terry •tW �„o L a v o ,�.° "They're the big fish. I'm the Devlin."Ifwe vote in f.•tvor of this, EY little fish, if there's an accident," that means we're going o he re- �� Steward lnlrl the City Council lieved ofa$1.3 million(loan gear• L, y ac r c n c shortly hefnrr the 7.0 vole. antee)obligation. • °/E E o° n ' e [-c v a' "The only problem 1 can fore- "And if we don't do it, what n E m.5 3 0 I v�.°2 0 see is you may have to sign on the happens?" -- new loan. And that was some-^ thing you didn't want to do." Steward wouldn't get his rre- ° 6 E c c= c c E nanring anti the EDA would re- m As a result of the vote,the city rnain on the hook for the$1.3 mil- t 3�._� �L Economic Development Commis- lion loan guarantee, Sabo • • c o m c v C n :°o`,p Sion will become a named co-own- replied. Nor would the EDA be Sac E c- er of the building - but will be entitled to any additional rove-released from its previous $1.3 nue,the lawyer said. O o a v v ,_ ,,_E million loan guarantee for Stew- "So there is more incentive to v m gip''>� yr ;•,p�-' ard'spmjrct' us financially, which is a reward u o'- - o ;` E E` - c°_ Steward and the EDA teamed for being involved in those nui• • 3a 0 a o u c c u c-? up ir. 1993 to buy and remodel the since lawsuits, should the oc- o°H c3l ' J old An(drforaaboittwo),ciSr.s rur„Butagain,tilebi y MMy E=,ti ma L,e _ L_ biggest (to v--c._ , :S c v Steward has been trying to refs• the FDA)that we see eliminating O E E.-m°;: .4 , U nance the Project. here is the$1.3 million loan guar- L�e=c- r o v a e But the bank wants all FDA arllee.” "�E =- ,c -- deeds of trust removed. One of And as Steward pointed out, Vl _ ' the trust deeds secures a$1136,000 the FDA-as a named cn-owner agency loan. --may be asked to co-sign any re- So in return for relinquishing financing package. O `v e that trust deed,the EDA will tic- All of that sounds like a dam- o I come a named partner-and will ned ifymr do,damned ifyou don't • d to `m share in any sales proceeds. situation,Devlin said. vL v �r L E c 1> v I "Going unsecured is inherent- Not exactly,Sabo replied. ai "._ = o•nL - C:c ly risky, but becoming an owner "I think we're less damned • Ot c= N>o m e y c c of property carries certain risks thisway." v J ■ ° y Q O ,[O 1 p CC,to 7. -1 E C m c7 L..?oaC F•� y_ o7,a Fcy> 3 v :E W Y 7 / L Ma CL cc i d C L L O U Z v c co a q 0 a., CQca < v 7_ a tu �3�`� a �— �° r ° y= L U Q O o v C co n c ESL 3 a9i m,� °_Y ;11 G.Et > •rte 'p +' U'-p O^t7 a) c., 5, G t,. cd ,� c CL a~i ro � r C 0. t. Q) � �� G U a) Q) o a o aa))•= c bL O }' C U ro 'y•cc cc m ro tp �cu C G G c C bL. ^r - > C - 0.^ U C u ro C ?'D cd 0 C)•'p .� C u, G C .ice i 0. p Jo Ifj � . E .� O p ro... —U,. O c0 rA cu"'. .X _ .'.' C'C7 'Q ro C G b0°B O C ._. ^• p i C d' y C G C •'-''U i., a) C1D Q) Z G :. � U ^ a) �. L ' 0.t: ✓" C .^, C uj c..5 O.: LO t. (n O t... U,� a) L y {:. M O U O'D.0 •-� C 0.,f.'.O,c Gl'+ O ro v O C a0i C p ro C o • C) C C,..- c' �+ .D c> c..v c) c bbL u... o ro� - o %U "�. g r p x u C ro C ! y co r a C C C M C C 0 r-�x W C C' ~ C O V O•C G C6 m O p�' y U .:: .I] •.�G _ ^ 0.�". 'C C UJ,� a >' C E�^. C ro ro F. C _ p_ cu r ^'�." bDr a) u� C, ��cz � y'CL U) a. ® O m .0 C• C"'' 0. a o C C..'' O C a)� s. �w y u) rCj. a) 0. ro a ' O^ O ^ n m �.` U s- u) ro - 0. rn > p C ro u; s c9 V, i.. O a'....,"� '') � �. m Ul'p Uj C C a) 7�••� R'' >'c:C y rd C r C u� 1 ^aa� � rQ� ro� ° > o E .� G+ .O ru � � ro C C Z O U ryn ® � a lU y ca i ro p C u C, c C. i c^ ,C d U CG ro R «C^.� C G Co O O G U Cs.C- yr cbA rC: o .n cEa °� as r � o �-oC: bD a � ro a� m ro ao' o ° u ♦.� C W.. p c) �_ C Ul C O .�.••C, a V., 0. 'O 0. O u• It C U� _ �� •d•G 0.0 ro u ro>� ro �'- ro O ,� yy., C r �+-' C C•=^C 00 y w C a) C - U . Q) ? u a °� C N u ° °per C, ma ocep �`- �c rd �.? p n r-y . � cF �? n > Mc ° aU•C tiu �muroca °p^ csc � CD O r c u. C� c.. U u 0_ ...0 �-0 C2 C'y- CV CJ.0. Z: CU tQ y�p a1 N �bf", ro ro Cj C.u. h rn o CO r�i o ' �, c a r C U) p - r Cl r Un u bL - (� c rn cM iv a3 4-- C Ov U) U C LO m ■�� { cn m .�. ^ ^' U; u C. ..- Q) ) = u; �. ^ u, CJ +a••'xr'•� •C. v' T U- 0. C t4 T 7 T ^ G Vi G �. r C• U)d U fS C`_ a G a .O d bl, r, tL, 0. a o m v; �- y axe G' U a. v C y c0 G C) C Cu.; ^• u bf C^C a CJ u: C C p� C'�c. .C � C ~ C o ro U tC ,*.+ m c L.. C v u Cq ro.v 2 u.� o— s u,EZ .�. °� r N °o,7 L� '� 'u; ,•' a)Q C m p C..L Q U o C a, C) o U C >,T 4 c u m < < m '1 <(.J w = .� ~n. 0.v y 4 O) u, C C IC u. U C U.^_ 'r J ..N c/j o cn O N m O.-+N ro '['V u O bD o R. CI- C' o•C E o _ qE co5a 7aaC U0) `�'� bc°.aacc qU C co o I UNOCALIS PROJECT HANDBOOK 7339 University Parkway Varsity Avenue San Bernardino , CA RETAIL FORMAT PROGRAM UNOCAUD SITE: UNOCAL SERVICE STATION # 7339 University Parkway & Varsity Avenue San Bernardino, CA UNOCAL'S PROJECT PROPOSAL Build ground-up a state of the art fueling facility including: a FASTBREAK food mart with Fast-Food Drive-Through, and a PROWASH EXPRESS SERVICE car wash. PROJECT MANAGER: RAY BENBOALI UNOCAL CORPORATION 17700 Castleton St. Suite 500 City of Industry, CA 91748 (818) 854-7074 (818) 965-7430 FAX ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES: BARRY F MMOND SERVICE STATION SERVICES 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 711 Santa Ana, CA 92707 (714) 546-1227 (714) 546-0812 FAX UNOCAL19 Unocal's new design reflects a commitment to better serve the community through improved products, services and convenience delivered by the comer "service station." The distinctive architecture serves to identify a safer, more pleasant buying experience and enhances our positive image in the community. The improvements will also benefit the community through increases to the local tax base. The specific design elements are: FUEL FACILITY The mechanical dispensers will be replaced with electronic, multi-product dispensers. They will feature a credit card reader system installed to allow for payment at the pump. In addition, the use of lightweight hoses and nozzles allows for easier customer use. These dispensers will be set further apart to provide additional maneuverability and service will be available 24 hours a day. FASTBREAK FOOD MART FASTBREAK is an ancillary food mart business operating on the site in conjunction with the primary business of gasoline sales. FASTBREAK will contain a 2,343 square feet area. The food mart will offer food, beverages, tobacco, grocery and other name brand quality items all pre-approved by Unocal. Video arcade games and the sale of adult magazines will not be permitted. Two restrooms, open to our customers, will be located inside for safety and convenience. Their only access, from indoors, helps improve safety by deterring any misappropriate use likely to attract undesirable activities to our site. Twenty-four hours of operation will provide the goods and services needed by the community. QUICK SERVICE DRIVE-THROUGH RESTAURANT A quick service restaurant is located inside the FASTBREAK food mart and incorporates an inside walk up counter and a drive-thru pickup window. It is a take- out only restaurant with no seating provided. .kY UNOCALID OFF PREMISE BEER AND WINE PERMIT Unocal, through a comprehensive development program, trains its dealer organization to take alcohol merchandising seriously. Unocal voluntarily grees to limit the parameters of our operation as follows • Alcoholic beverage sales shall be limited to beer and wine with no hard liquor sold; • The hours of sale of beer and wine shall be limited so no sales occur after 1:00a.m. • Applicant shall post signage at food mart precluding consumption of alcoholic beverages on site and precluding loitering; ► Applicant shall post signs at the food mart in compliance with any and all municipal codes notifying the public in both in English and predominant second language in the area with regard to open containers; ► Exterior advertising shall comply with all local sign ordinances and there will be no advertising indications of the availability of alcoholic beverages; ► There will be no beer and wine advertisement located on the motor fuel island; ► No fortified wines shall be sold; ► No ice in quantities of less than 2 pounds shall be sold, furnished or given away; ► No beer and wine will be displayed within five feet of the cash register or the front door, unless, of course, it is in a permanently affixed cooler; • No beer or wine display will be made from an ice tub; • No single can, 40 ounce or Magnum bottle sales of beer will be permitted; • No sale of beer and wine will be made from a drive - in window, UNOCAUD ............. lv' ► No self illuminating advertising for beer and wine shall be located on the building or windows; ► Employees on duty between 10:00 p.m. and 1:00 a.m. who sell beer and wine shall be at least 21 years of age; • No coin operated amusement devices or video games on the premises; • Applicant will secure the premises with appropriate security lighting and employee scrutiny of the adjacent areas under which applicant has control to preclude trash, graffiti or littering and any lighting under the control of applicant shall be directed in such a manner so as not to unreasonably interfere with the quiet enjoyment of nearby residences. Applicant shall further provide adequate lighting above the entrance to the premises sufficient in strength to make visible the identify and actions of all persons entering or exiting the premises; ► The applicant shall maintain free of litter all areas of the premises under which applicant has control; ► Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises shall be removed or painted over within 72 hours of the discovery thereof; ► A sign will be posted in the window to identify that the cash register contains $50.00 or less in cash and the drop safe is not accessible to employees; ► The Food mart is equipped with a security camera that is capable of receiving an image on film or tape that can be made a permanent record and that can be enlarged through projection or other means. Cameras will be maintained in proper working order at all times and shall be subject to periodic inspection by the local police department. UNOCAL19 PROWASH EXPRESS SERVICE CAR WASH PROWASH EXPRESS SERVICE features a state-of-the-art soft cloth car wash with exterior only cleaning. An attendant guides customers into the car wash tunnel. Customers will remain in their car as it travels through the tunnel on an automatic conveyor. A second attendent will quickly towel dry the car once it leaves the conveyor. The wash will take 2-3 minutes from start to finish. A full line of car protection upgrade packages will be offered (i.e. waxes). Video technology via payment at the pump system installed within the gasoline dispensers will also provide additional customer convenience. The facility windows are automatically washed every 18 minutes to maintain facility appearance. 80% of the water used to wash and rinse the car is reclaimed. All the water used to wash and rinse the car is captured in the conveyor trench. From the trench, the water is drained to clarifier tanks where suspended solids settle to the bottom of the tanks as the water flows through them. Clear water is then transferred from the clarifier tanks, through filters, for reuse. Compared to the 75 gallons typically used in a driveway washing, only 13 gallons of fresh water is needed to wash each car. This facility will help minimize residential driveway washing and chemical inflow to the storm drain system. Most of the noise generated from car wash operations stems from the air dryer. However, the decibel level attenuates to ambient noise levels at approximately 30 feet. To help minimize noise concerns, Unocal has placed the dryer as far back as possible from the exit end of the tunnel. OTHER DESIGN ELEMENTS: EXTERIOR UGFMNG This project includes fixtures with state-of-the-art metal halide light fixtures which provide high intensity, energy efficient, down lighting. This design will have a minimum effect on adjacent properties and public right-of-ways but will provide a safer, more secure environment on site. :: :` UNOCAUD ...... LANDSCAPING Planter space will be divided into bright blooms, ground cover and shrubbery. Bright blooms will be positioned for maximum visibility and will be rotated in April and September. Ground cover and shrubbery will provide a striking accent to the flowering plants. Multi-colored and ever blooming Gazanias will serve as a general ground cover. Shrubbery will include elegant evergreens such as Nandena, New Zealand flax, and Pittisporum Wheeled. After the initial installation, a maintenance service will visit the site at least twice a month to keep the planters looking fresh and inviting. They will clean, weed, fertilize and handle pest problems. They will also remove faded blooms and replace damaged plants. LOITERING DETERRENCE PROGRAM Loitering is a hindrance to a successful business operation; the site operator and his employees will be trained to be aware of all customers both in the store and on the property. Public telephones will be placed in well lighted areas on the property and installed with a call out feature only. FACILITY MAINTENANCE & UTTER CONTROL PROGRAM Unocal believes a clean, attractive facility is necessary for a successful operation. The site operator and his employees will be required to attend training programs that include both daily and periodic litter control and maintenance duties. Unocal's litter control program includes a schedule for keeping the premises and surrounding area free from litter (street frontage and abutting sidewalks). There will be refuse receptacles at each gasoline island and one adjacent to the FASTBREAK food mart. Furthemnore, in addition to regular operational staff visits, all Unocal facilities are inspected three times a year by top management according to our Company's Five Star Program. Every site is required to meet minimum scores, otherwise written defaults may lead to lease temp nations.