HomeMy WebLinkAbout05.I- Police 5.1
RESOLUTION (ID # 3776) DOC ID: 3776 E
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO — REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Purchase Order
From: Jarrod Burguan M/CC Meeting Date: 05/04/2015
Prepared by: Mike Eckley,
Dept: Police Ward(s): All
Subject:
Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino Authorizing
the Purchase of a CDBG Grant Funded Park Safety Camera Expansion for the San
Bernardino Police Department. (#3776)
Current Business Registration Certificate: Yes
Financial Impact:
Account Budgeted Amount: $300,000.00 Account No. 119-210-0001-5702
Account Description: CDBG FY 2014/2015
Balance as of: 04/28/2015 - $300,000.00
Balance after approval of this item: $0.00
Account Budgeted Amount: $75,000.00 Account No. 119-380-0077-5502
Account Description: CDBG FY 2014/2015
Balance as of: 04/28/2015 - $75,000.00
Balance after approval of this item: $0.00
Motion: Adopt the Resolution.
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
Resolution 2012-0073 - 05-07-2012, Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council
authorizing the execution of a Vender Services Agreement with CelPlan Technologies
for the purchase of a Downtown Camera Protection Zone System with additional
cameras for the San Manuel Area Camera Protection Zone.
Resolution 2014-3583 - 12-01-2014, Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council
authorizing the execution of a Vendor Services Agreement with CelPlan Technologies
for the purchase of a five camera expansion to the Downtown Camera Protection Zone
System (covering the Mt Vernon corridor).
Resolution 2014-0420 - 12-16-2014, Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council
authorizing an increase in the Fiscal Year 2014/2015 budget by $725,000 using
undesignated AB109 funds.
Resolution 2014-3732 - 04-06-2014, Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council
authorizing Substantial Amendment#5 to the 2014-2015 Action Plan for the Federal
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) allocating funding totaling $923,00 to
41 various eligible projects .
Updated: 4/30/2015 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna E Packet Pg. 134
5.1
3776
Background:
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) designated the City of San Bernardino as
a high-threat urban area. In 2008, the City of San Bernardino became a member of the
Riverside Area UASI in cooperation with the cities of Riverside and Ontario. The intent
of the UASI program is to enhance regional preparedness and expand collaboration
efforts.
On January 31, 2011, the City of Riverside Office of Emergency Management notified
the City of San Bernardino that the final modifications for the 2010 UASI grant funding
cycle were approved and expenditures against the grant were authorized. The 2010
UASI grant provided funding in the amount of$440,000 to the Police Department to
purchase the first phase of a Downtown Camera Protection project that builds off the
Police Department's existing Crime Camera project.
In 2010, the US DOJ COPS Office authorized an amendment to the Police
Department's 2007 COPS Technology Grant that allowed the Police Department to
purchase a single "Crime Camera" to test the technology and it's suitability within our
community. The City of Redlands has a large "Crime Camera" project which allows
dispatchers to view about 60 cameras in parks, at schools, and on streets around the
city of Redlands. Their system served as a model for the City of San Bernardino.
Utilizing the same vendor as the City of Redlands, the City of San Bernardino would
have been able to purchase a total of 11 cameras for the Downtown Protection Zone
given the funding secured under the UASI 2010 grant.
After a competitive open public bid process, the City awarded CeIPIan Technologies
with the contract for crime cameras. CeIPIan was able to provide service at a
significantly reduced rate which enabled the purchase of 21 cameras for the Downtown
Camera Protection Zone (which included two cameras funded by the San Manuel Band
of Mission Indians to form the San Manuel Camera Protection Zone). The system
platform was developed and the cameras were activated and brought on line as
installation occurred throughout 2012.
CeIPIan Technologies, who has offices in Reston Virginia and San Diego, California is
the designer of the existing Camera Protection Zone system (both for Downtown and
the San Manuel area). CeIPIan Technologies is also the current maintenance provider
for the City's Camera Protection Zone (both at the camera sites as well as at the Police
Dispatch Center). Having had success with the single camera trial system and the
larger City system, the Police Department began investigating funding opportunities for
further expansion.
In the last quarter of 2014, several new camera locations were identified by the Police
Department. CeIPIan Technologies provided a quote to integrate the top five new
camera locations into the existing system and cover all maintenance issues for the new
sites until the current maintenance contract expires on 06-30-2015. City Council
approved this purchase at the regular 12-01-2014 Common City Council meeting.
Updated: 4/30/2015 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna E I Packet Pg. 135
5.1
3776
Installation of these new cameras is almost complete (all five cameras have been
installed and three have already been activated).
In February 2015, at the direction of the Chief of Police, the Police Department
contacted CelPlan Technologies to develop a plan to deploy crime cameras into the
Hospitality Lane area. Testing revealed some communications difficulties in the area.
Three of the five cameras were designed to use the existing private radio network to
deliver camera video to the Police Dispatch Center. The other two cameras were
configured to utilize cellular data services to communicate with the Dispatch Center in
order to overcome some of the signal connectivity concerns. Funds for this expansion
project are to be provided by the Police Department's AB109 budget.
The Police Department recommends placement of 5 cameras at:
Hospitality Lane/Hunts Lane 1 Camera
Hospitality Lane/Diners Court 1 Camera
Hospitality Lane/Waterman Avenue 1 Camera
Hospitality Lane/Tippecanoe Avenue 1 Camera
Harriman Ave/Tippecanoe Avenue 1 Camera
Recently, the Police Department and the Parks Department met to discuss how the
camera system might be deployed at some of our City park locations as safety cameras
to help promote safety and reduce the chance of vandalism as well as other crimes that
occur within our parks. Key issues for the Parks Department are portability of the
cameras as well as the ability to readily send the signal back to the Police Department
for monitoring. The Parks Department seeks a solution that will allow us movement of
the cameras within the parks (or to completely new park locations) easily. To do this,
CelPlan Technologies worked with the Police and Parks Departments to provide a
solution that incorporates safety cameras which use cellular telephone connections to
send data to the Police Dispatch Center. This allows for a more simplified relocation
process than cameras that use a microwave path to return data to our dispatch center.
The Parks Department and the Police Department identified seven parks that are
located within qualifying CDBG Census tracks. A total of 15 cameras are to be
deployed at the following locations:
Perris Hill Park 5 Cameras
Seccombe Lake Park 3 Cameras
Nunez Park 3 Cameras
Lytle Creek Park 1 Camera
La Plaza Park 1 Camera
Ann Sherrill's Park 1 Camera
Delman Heights Park 1 Camera
Most cameras will use cellular technology for connectivity. However cameras
suggested for Ann Sherrill's Park and La Plaza Park are close to existing microwave
networking infrastructure for the City's existing camera network. The project hopes to
Updated: 4/30/2015 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna E Packet Pg. 136
5.1
3776
forego recurring monthly cellular costs at these two locations by connecting to the
existing camera system microwave network.
As the camera system grows, we have identified the following "back-end" expansion
items that are required to host a platform that can provide quality performance to both
the Police Department and the Parks Department as additional cameras come online.
CelPlan Technologies was asked to provide a project plan to prepare the server "back-
end" for our planned growth and the near term future. Their quote will provide the
following items:
Rackable Dell R520 server for camera management 1 Server
Retask the existing serve for mobile user viewing access (retask existing)
Add mobile viewing licenses 5 User Licenses
Installation services and one fiscal year of maintenance Professional Svcs
Overall Project Costs:
1. Hospitality Lane - 5 Cameras $ 121,605.28
2. Park Safety Project - 15 Cameras $ 323,578.79
3. Server Back-end Upgrades $ 18,345.83
Total CelPlan Proposal Costs $ 463,529.90
4. IT Data Circuit and Firewall Costs (external*) $ 36,470.10
The external IT data circuit and firewall costs are associated with a direct public Internet
connection that must be added in the Police Department's Dispatch Center to isolate
the large volume of incoming cellular video data from the remote project cameras. The
firewall was selected by the City IT Department to insure that it matches existing
security/virus protection equipment managed by our IT Department networking team.
The circuit costs for Fiscal Year 2015/2016 are covered in this project budget; however,
approximately $12,000 in monthly cellular service charges will have to be budgeted by
the Police and Parks Departments for Fiscal Year 2015/2016.
Overall Project Funding Sources:
1. Hospitality Lane - AB109 FY 14/15 Budget $ 125,000.00
2. Park Safety - PD FY 14/15 CDBG Amendment 5 $ 300,000.00
3. Park Safety - Parks FY 14/15 CDBG Amendment 5 $ 75,000.00
Total Proposal Funding $ 500,000.00
To assist the City, CelPlan Technologies offered a one-time discount of approximate
20% to allow all 20 of the cameras being added to this system to match the rough
overall cost of our previously purchased cameras (approximate average of $22,300.00
per camera). External to the monthly cellular service costs for Fiscal Year 2015/2016, all
twenty cameras are being added to the existing system without the use of any City
Updated: 4/30/2015 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna E I Packet Pg. 137
5.1
3776
General Fund monies.
This Request for Council Action seeks permission to move forward with the purchase
and installation of five new camera sites in the Hospitality Lane area (as outlined in the
Statement of Work provided by CelPlan Technologies, of Reston, Virginia which is
dated March 26, 2015, and numbered as Quote #SAN150326), seeks permission to
move forward with the purchase and installation of fifteen new Park Safety camera sites
(as outlined in the Statement of Work provided by CelPlan Technologies, of Reston,
Virginia which is dated April 5, 2015, and numbered as Quote #SAN150405), and seeks
permission to move forward with the upgrade of the projects back-end servers (as
outlined in the Statement of Work provided by CelPlan Technologies, of Reston, Virginia
which is dated April 8, 2015, and numbered as Quote #SAN150408),.
CelPlan Technologies was awarded the contract for our first phase camera project
based on an open competitive bid and that they are our current contracted maintenance
provider for the entire camera system. In addition, they are offering an approximate
20% discount off their regular pricing for this expansion project. It is therefore
recommended pursuant to San Bernardino Municipal Code 3.04.010(b)(3), that the
Mayor and Common Council approve a selected source justification for the purchase of
this combined group of expansion projects for our Downtown Camera Protection Zone
project from CelPlan Technologies, of Reston, Virginia.
Financial Impact:
The Police Department was awarded $125,000.00 for the Hospitality Lane camera
expansion program as part of the Fiscal year 2014/2015 AB109 budget plan.
Additionally, the Police Department was awarded $300,000.00 for the Park Safety
camera expansion project and the server upgrade as part of Amendment 5 for the
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) action plan for FY2014/2015. The Parks
Department was awarded $75,000.00 for the Park Safety camera expansion project as
part of Amendment 5 for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) action plan
for FY2014/2015.
City Attorney Review:
Supporting Documents:
Reso CelPlan Expansion 20150504 (DOC)
agrmt 3776 (PDF)
CelPlan Proposal SAN150326 (Hospitality Lane) (PDF)
CelPlan Proposal SAN 150405 (Park Safety Cameras)(PDF)
CelPlan Proposal SAN 150408 (Server Upgrades) (PDF)
VSA_Agreement_Cel (DOCX)
Updated: 4/30/2015 by Georgeann "Gigi" Hanna E Packet Pg. 138
1 RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A CDBG GRANT
3 FUNDED PARK SAFETY CAMERA EXPANSION FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO
4 POLICE DEPARTMENT a
5 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON .2
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
6 x
W
7
SECTION 1. After a review of official responses to City public bid F-12-10, CelPlan E
�o
8 Technologies Incorporated, of Reston, Virginia was found to be the lowest compliance bidder r
9
for the Downtown Camera Protection Zone system as described in City public bid F-12-10. U)
10 L
Considering that CelPlan Technologies is the current contracted maintenance provider for the
11
12 existing Downtown Camera Protection Zone and considering that CelPlan has presented a
13 Statement of Work for a five camera expansion of the project, pursuant to San Bernardino
14
Municipal Code 3.04.010(b)(3), the Mayor and Common Council hereby approve a selected o
15
source justification for the purchase of this expansion project for our Downtown Camera �?
16 M
17 Protection Zone project for CelPlan Technologies, of Reston, Virginia
0
18 SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute a Vendor
0
N
19 Service Agreement (attached and labeled as Exhibit A) between CelPlan Technologies o
.N
20 =
Incorporated and the City of San Bernardino. x
21 W
SECTION 3. The authorization to sign the Vendor Service Agreement referenced in 2
22
Section 2 of this resolution is rescinded if the Vendor Service Agreement is not signed by v
23 N
24
both parties within sixty (60) days of the passage of this resolution.
25 /// E
s
26
a
27
28
1
Packet Pg. 139
1 SECTION 4. The Finance Department is hereby authorized to issue a purchase order
2 to CelPlan Technologies Incorporated, of Reston, Virginia, for the purchase of a twenty
3 camera expansion of the Downtown Camera Protection Zone system for the San Bernardino
0
4 Police Department in an amount not to exceed $463,529.90. The purchase order shall read .
5 N
"Twenty Camera Expansion of the Downtown Camera Protection Zone System".
6 x
7 4)
E
8
r
9
M
10
a
"D
11 a
c
12 UL
13
14 �
m
0
15
16
17 Ln
0
LO
18
C%4
19 r-
.0
20 c
a
X
21
c
�a
22
U
23
24
a)
25 s
26
27
28
2
Packet Pg. 140
1 RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF A CDBG GRANT
2 FUNDED PARK SAFETY CAMERA EXPANSION FOR THE SAN BERNARDINO
POLICE DEPARTMENT
3
4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and a
c
5 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting .°
c
6 thereof, held on the day of , 2015,by the following vote, to wit: w
7 COUNCILMEMBERS: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT d
8 v
MARQUEZ
9 BARRIOS
W
10 VALDIVIA a
a.
11 SHORETT w
12 NICKEL
LL
13 JOHNSON
L
14
MULVIHILL
m
0
15
16 Georgeann Hanna, City Clerk ti
17 The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this of v
CD
LO
2015. 0
18
0
N
19 0
R. Carey Davis, Mayor •N
20 City of San Bernardino a
Approved as to form: w
21 Gary D. Saenz, City Attorney
22
U
23 By: o
24
25 E
U
26 r
a
27
28
3
Packet Pg. 141
VENDOR SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO AND CELPLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
This Vendor Services Agreement is entered into this day of
by and between CelPlan Technologies Incorporated, of Reston, Virginia ("VENDOR") and
the City of San Bernardino, California ("CITY" or"San Bernardino").
WITNESSETH:
a�
0
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council has determined that it is advantageous and a.
in the best interest of the CITY to contract for the installation,configuration,and activation of five o
new expansion cameras for the CITY'S existing Crime Camera System operated by the San
Bernardino Police Department;NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows-
CL
X
ua
1. SCOPE OF SERVICES.
For the remuneration stipulated,CITY hereby engages the services of VENDOR to provide E
those products and services as set forth in CelPlan Technologies' proposed Statement of Work U
Reference Number SAN141108 (dated November 8, 2014) as Exhibit "A," attached hereto and
incorporated herein. Cn n
L
2. COMPENSATION AND EXPENSES. a
a. For the services delineated above,the VENDOR,shall retain deliver,install,configure,
0
activate and provide the training outlined in the VENDOR'S Technologies' proposed
Statement of Work Reference Number SAN150326 (dated March 15, 2015), their U-
proposed Statement of Work Reference Number SAN 150405 (dated April 5,2015)and
their proposed Statement of Work Reference Number SAN150408 (dated April 8,
2015)as Exhibit"A." m
b. No other expenditures made by VENDOR shall be reimbursed by CITY. v
to
3. TERM. ti
The initial term of this Agreement shall be for a period of six months. The VENDOR must M
complete all work with 120 days of receipt of a City Purchase Order. ;°
ti
M
The CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving thirty (30) days written notice to
Vendor. CITY shall pay all that is payable under this Agreement to Vendor until the date of
termination.
c
a�
E
Effect of Termination. If this Agreement is terminated as provided herein, CITY may require �
Vendor to provide all finished or unfinished documents and data and other information of any w
kind prepared by Vendor in connection with the performance of services under this Agreement. Q
Vendor shall be required to provide such documents and other information within fifteen(15)days
of the request.
1
Packet Pg. 142
4. INDEMNITY.
Vendor agrees to and shall indemnify and hold the City, its elected officials, employees,
agents or representatives,free and harmless from all claims,actions, damages and liabilities of any
kind and nature arising from bodily injury, including death, or property damage,based or asserted
upon any actual or alleged act or omission of Vendor, its employees, agents, or subcontractors,
relating to or in any way connected with the accomplishment of the work or performance of
services under this Agreement, unless the bodily injury or property damage was actually caused o
by the sole negligence of the City, its elected officials, employees, agents or representatives. As a`
part of the foregoing indemnity,Vendor agrees to protect and defend at its own expense,including o
attorney's fees, the City, its elected officials, employees, agents or representatives from any and =
all legal actions based upon such actual or alleged acts or omissions. Vendor hereby waives any x
and all rights to any types of express or implied indemnity against the City, its elected officials, w
employees,agents or representatives,with respect to third party claims against the Vendor relating
to or in any way connected with the accomplishment of the work or performance of services under U
this Agreement.
d
5. INSURANCE. `19
While not restricting or limiting the foregoing, during the term of this Agreement, L-
VENDOR shall maintain in effect policies of comprehensive public, general and automobile a
liability insurance, in the amount of$1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and statutory worker's .�
compensation coverage, and shall file copies of said policies with the CITY's Risk Manager prior 3
to undertaking any work under this Agreement. CITY shall be set forth as an additional named Y
insured in each policy of insurance provided hereunder. The Certificate of Insurance furnished to L
the CITY shall require the insurer to notify CITY at least 30 days prior to any change in or
termination of the policy.
0
U
6. NON-DISCRIMINATION. ti
In the performance of this Agreement and in the hiring and recruitment of employees,
VENDOR shall not engage in, nor permit its officers, employees or agents to engage in,
discrimination in employment of persons because of their race, religion, color, national origin,
ancestry, age, mental or physical disability, medical condition, marital status, sexual gender or
sexual orientation,or any other status protected by law.
7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
VENDOR shall perform work tasks provided by this Agreement, but for all intents and E
purposes,VENDOR shall be an independent contractor and not an agent or employee of the CITY.
VENDOR shall secure, at its expense,and be responsible for any and all payment of Income Tax, a
Social Security, State Disability Insurance Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, and
other payroll deductions for VENDOR and its officers, agents, and employees, and all business
license,if any are required,in connection with the services to be performed hereunder.
8. BUSINESS REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS.
VENDOR warrants that it possesses or shall obtain, and maintain a business registration
certificate pursuant to Chapter 5 of the Municipal Code, and any other licenses, permits,
2
Packet Pg. 143
qualifications, insurance, and approval of whatever nature that are legally required of VENDOR
to practice its business or profession.
9. NOTICES.
Any notices to be given pursuant to this Agreement shall be deposited with the United
States Postal Service,postage prepaid and addressed as follows:
TO THE CITY: TO THE VENDOR:
0
Michael Madden,Police Lieutenant Mr. Jasper Bruinzeel n.
San Bernardino Police Department CelPlan Technologies Inc. o
710 North"D" Street 1920 Association Dr., 4tl' Floor C
San.Bernardino,CA 92401 Reston,VA 20191 x
Telephone: (909) 384-5742 Telephone: (760)274-4214 w
v
10. ATTORNEYS' FEES
In the event that litigation is brought by any party in connection with this Agreement,the
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the opposing party all costs and expenses, 4
including reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by the prevailing party in the exercise of any of its in
rights or remedies hereunder or the enforcement of any of the terms, conditions or provisions
hereof. The costs,salary, and expenses of the City Attorney and members of his office in enforcing °-
� "` this Agreement on behalf of the CITY shall be considered as "attorneys' fees" for the purposes of
this paragraph. LL
w
C
11. ASSIGNMENT. 1°
VENDOR shall not voluntarily or by operation of law assign,transfer, sublet or encumber
all or any part of the VENDOR's interest in this Agreement without CITY's prior written consent. o
Any attempted assignment, transfer, subletting or encumbrance shall be void and shall constitute v
a breach of this Agreement and cause for the termination of this Agreement. Regardless of CITY's to
consent,no subletting or assignment shall release VENDOR of VENDOR's obligation to perform M
all other obligations to be performed by VENDOR hereunder for the term of this Agreement.
ti
ti
M
12. VENUE.
The parties hereto agree that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this ai
Agreement shall be tried and litigated either in the State courts located in the County of San
Bernardino, State of California or the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California,
Riverside Division. The aforementioned choice of venue is intended by the parties to be mandatory E
and not permissive in nature.
r
Q
13, GOVERNING LAW.
This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.
14, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS.
This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties to this Agreement
and their respective heirs,representatives,successors,and assigns.
3
Packet Pg. 144
15. HEADINGS.
The subject headings of the sections of this Agreement are included for the purposes of
convenience only and shall not affect the construction or the interpretation of any of its provisions.
16. SEVERABILITY.
If any provision of this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such determination shall not affect the validity or
enforceability of the remaining terms and provisions hereof or of the offending provision in any o
other circumstance,and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and a
effect. o
N
G
17. REMEDIES; WAIVER.
All remedies available to either party for one or more breaches by the other party are and w
shall be deemed cumulative and may be exercised separately or concurrently without waiver of
any other remedies. The failure of either party to act in the event of a breach of this Agreement E
by the other shall not be deemed a waiver of such breach or a waiver of future breaches, unless v
such waiver shall be in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought.
Cn
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; MODIFICATION. L
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and the understanding between the a
parties, and supersedes any prior agreements and understandings relating to the subject matter of
this Agreement. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written instrument
executed by all parties to this Agreement. U-
,L^
V
U
IlI co
ti
ti
h
ti
E
L
0)
w
C
d
E
V
t0
1H
ffl
4
Packet Pg. 145
DVENDOR SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO AND CELPLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day
and date set forth below.
w
Dated: , 2415 CelPlan Technologies Inc. a
0
L
a
By: _
Leonhard Korowajczuk,CEO
M
Q
X
w
Dated ,2015 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
E
U
By:
Allen J. Parker,City Manager N
L
Approved as to Form: a
Gary D. Saenz,City Attorney d
U.
By: _c r"
c�
m
0
U
co
ti
ti
M
CO
ti
M
a+
E
L
Y
E
U
f�
w
Q
5
Packet Pg. l46
5.Lc
�Wi reless Global Technologies
d
0
L-
a.
r-
0
c
a
x
w
CELPLAN PHASE 4 EXPANSION
E
"HOSPITALITY" SOW
a
,fD
FOR cn
L
DOWNTOWN SURVEILLANCE CAMERA SYSTEM
FOR Y
L
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
0
U
ti
ti
M
G
fa
J
A
.Q
y
O
N
M
O
r
Z
Q
U)
R
Vt
O
CL
O
L
a
c
a
d
U
c
v
E
MARCH 26,2015
RESTON,VIRGINIA/SAN DIEGO,CA Q
Ref.No.:SAN150326
Packet Pg. 147
S.Lc
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
0
L
a
c
0
LISTOF FIGURES...............................................................................................................iv two
X
W
LISTOF TABLES.................................................................................................................. V ca
L
(D
E
1. STATEMENT OF WORK..........................................................................................1-0
U
1.A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................ 1-1
1.B CAMERA SECTION................................................................................................... 1-2
u�
1.B.1 Camera Site 1........................................................................................................................... 1-3 .c
L
1.B.2 Camera Site 2........................................................................................................................... 1-3
I.B.3 Camera Site 3........................................................................................................................... 1-4 �0
1.B.4 Camera Site 4........................................................................................................................... 1-4 a)
1.B.5 Camera Site 5........................................................................................................................... 1-5
C CORE NETWORKING SECTION 1-5
U.
1 +.
I.D PROJECT COST SUMMARY....................................................................................... 1-5 c�a
L
.E REFERENCE LISTING 1-6
11 MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT PLAN ....................................................................... 1-6 0�0
0
2. COMPANY AND EXPERIENCE.................................................................................2-0
2.A CELPLAN TECHNOLOGIES,INC. ..............................................................................2-1
M
2.13 CELPLAN'S W14NET DIVISION 2-2
...............................................................................
2.0 CELPLAN PARTNERS 2-3 Q
2.13 COMPANY CONTACT INFORMATION........................................................................2-3 J
2.E CELPLAN EXPERIENCE............................................................................................2-3 >'
6
r
3. TECHNICAL REFERENCE INFORMATION ..............................................................3-0 Q
N
3.A "BEST OF BREED"DESIGN APPROACH....................................................................3-1 Z
3.13 VISION OF GROWTH AND IP-BASED SCALABILITY..................................................3-1 N
3.0 WIRELESS NETWORK DESIGN.................................................................................3-2 0
LO
3.C.1 General Network Design Guidelines.......................................................................................3-3 r
Z
3.C.2 General Wireless Design Guidelines.......................................................................................3-4 Q
3.13 POLE CAMERA ENCLOSURE Cn
3.1).1 Multi-radio Features................................................................................................................3-5
3.13.2 Camera Mount Options...........................................................................................................3-6 a
0
3.E SURVEILLANCE CAMERA/ENCODING SYSTEM.......................................................3-6 a
3.E.1 PTZ Camera Options...............................................................................................................3-6 c
3.E.2 Camera Optical Zoom..............................................................................................................3-7 a
3.E.3 Video Frame Rate,Resolution and Encoding..........................................................................3-8
3.F DEPLOYMENT SERVICES 3-10 V
c
4. ORGANIZATION AND PROJECT PLAN....................................................................4-0 E
E
4.A ORGANIZATION AND KEY PERSONNEL....................................................................4-1
4.13 PROJECT MANAGEMENT .........................................................................................4-2 Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1910 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 10191 Page ii
Packet Pg. 148
Table of Contents
4.0 PROJECT TEAM AND RESUME INFORMATION ..........................................................4-2
4.C.I CelPlan Resumes.....................................................................................................................4-3
4.1) PROJECT PLAN Q
0
5. COST PROPOSAL DETAILS.....................................................................................5-0 a
a
5.A BASELINE SYSTEM 5-I O
5.13 NOTES,TERM AND CONDITIONS 5-3
.............................................................................
a
ANNEX A—GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................. w
L
ANNEXB—UNITS ................................................................................................................. E
m
U
--
O
N
L
U-
0''Lnn
V/�
W
U
cc
h
h
M
Gt
C
J
a.+
E
N
O
N
M
0
r
Z
Q
Cn
N
O
Q
O
i
a
c
a
d
U
c
d
E
U
rr
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page lit
Packet Pg. 149
5.(.c
List of Figures
List of Figures
.o
L
0-
O
FIGURE 1 CELPLAN HEADQUARTERS...............................................................................2-1 c
FIGURE 2 EXAMPLE RF COVERAGE ANALYSIS WITH"CELPLANNER"TOOL....................2-2 x
FIGURE 3 W14NET'S FLEXIVIDEO SOLUTION DEPLOYED.................................................2-3 LL1
CU
FIGURE 4 MODULAR"ONE-BOX"WIRELESS CAMERA APPROACH....................................3-5 w
FIGURE 5 FV-2100 ATTACHED CAMERA MOUNT OPTIONS..............................................3-6 cEv
FIGURE 6 EXAMPLE NETWORK DESIGN PLOTS...............................................................3-11 U
FIGURE 7 ORGANIZATION CHART.....................................................................................4-1 4i
to
L
0.
U_
N
V
,,Ln
'
V
ca
Cl)
O
C
O
J
A
O
Q
N
O
tp
N
M
O
LO
T_
z
Q
tC
O
CL
O
L
a
a
a�
U
c
m
E
v
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page iv
Packet Pg. 150
List of Tables
List of Tables
L
IL
_
TABLE 1 SECURITY INDUSTRY TRANSITION.....................................................................3-1 N
TABLE 2 PROPOSED CAMERA OPTIONS COMPARISON......................................................3-7 c=v
CL
TABLE 3 OPTICAL ZOOM AND RESOLUTION.....................................................................3-7 x
W
TABLE 4 NTSC PIXEL RESOLUTION.................................................................................3-8 m-
TABLE S DATA RATES FOR UNCOMPRESSED FRAMES......................................................3-8 E
TABLE 6 DATA RATES FOR LOW MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES....................................3-9 j
TABLE 7 DATA RATES FOR HIGH MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES...................................3-9
TABLE 8 DATA RATES FOR AVERAGE MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES............................3-9 R
TABLE 9 COMPRESSION TECHNIQUE COMPARISON(AT 15 FPS) ....................................3-10 N
m
CL
a
d
c
,,L^^
'V
MV
W
0
U
ti
h
M
d
_
f�
J
Q
0
O
tG
N
M
O
LO
T
Z
V/
O
Q
O
L
CL
c
R
a
m
v
d
E
U
SCf
rr
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page v
Packet Pg. 151;
CelPlan" V ' 4 N e fi
WitvlesS Global Technologies otrtt�ta of LrtPltrt lrrnmataptes, tnt.
U
4)
O
L
a
C
_O
�N
LO
Q.
X
W
to
L
4)
E
M
U
d
ti-
Lv
N
1 . Statement of Work
a
v
d
C
U-
C
c�
''L^^
/V
V
m
0
U
Lfl
ti
ti
M
C
cu
J
r+
Q
N
O
2
to
N
M
O
LO
r
Z
Q
l4
N
O
CL
O
L
a
c
c�
a
d
U
C
m
v
Q
Ref.No.:SAN150326
Packet Pg. 152
Statement of Work
This Chapter contains the detailed information for the various sections of the "Statement
of Work" section. Additionally, Chapters 2 through 5 provide further information in
addition to this Chapter. Also, various Annexes are provided with background ai
0
information. a L.
c
O
1.A Executive Summary
(1) CelPlan's Experience: Since 2006, CelPlan has been involved with some of the w
largest citywide (wireless) surveillance projects and largest cities in the country, 2
including multiple 100+ camera systems. Our local track record includes
deployments with some of the largest local Cities, including Los Angeles and Long v
Beach, but we also have been awarded initial and expansion contracts with smaller local a
entities such as Modesto, Culver City, Oakland, UCSB and UCB. We have done work for
Cn
CalTrans also.
Y
L
0.
SC4pltly CameCaa On fddwaukee StreetCatners Help _
Catch tlgn#nals ip. �
;rvwa caar+u �I tv
JV AIL
ow ++
C
t6
L^�
Kash MYR EDY To 'NAiHM m
Security cameras aid in arrest of
man tiFittt stolen gun Downtown camera catches assault of Turlock man U
to
ti
M
Pine Ave.pipe bomb
suspect appears in court
J
Unique is our deep understanding of wireless technologies, as evidenced in two published N
books on wireless technologies, published with Wiley. We are currently in the process =
to write a book for Wiley about public safety surveillance systems design.
N
M
O
:f
Designit
Z
'i Q
00W N
Systems
N
O
sZ
O
IZ
WiMAX and LTE c
Network Design, d
Optimization and d
Performance Analysis V
WILEY
pi
d
;_
0
.c
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-1
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 153
Statement of Work
securttp Cameras on"itwaukee sheet coorws IkMP
Cattk cmaktais
eea..e.nw.. V
Q
0
L
a
c
o_
N
Kate MYKtEBY Ta VBASNMN '�""'"--
SZ
X
Security cameras aid in arrest o. Downtown camera catches assault of Turlock man LL
man with stolen gun
E
t4
U
a
Pine Ave.pipe bomb
suspect appears in court "-
cv
t!?
m
0.
(2)ProiectExpansion: This project represents an expansion of the existing system,using
the same standards, technologies,while assuring full compatibility.
c
1.B Camera Section
All camera units are based on CelPlan's field-proven,modular pole camera unit that is m
described in great detail in section 3.D of this proposal, including pictures and diagrams. L)
This unit was first introduced to the market in 2005/2006 in Long Beach, and is currently Q0
in its 5th generation. Because this unit(CelPlan's FlexiVideo FV-2100) is modular, it can M
be configured to suit the needs of a specific project. This is the only solution compatible
with the current system. The following details about the configuration, applicable to all 5
sites, are provided as follows:
• PTZ Camera: We suggest the Axis P5534-E model,with improved resolution at
IMP (720p) in order to get better details in the pictures. N
0
• Wireless: We suggest radio technology consistent with the initial project, except =
to
for two sites that are harder to reach, and are suggested at cellular modem. M
0
LO
• Edge Camera Storage: As a unique feature of our solution, we can accommodate Z
a full-scale archiving server, operating on windows platform and Genetec N
management software. We are providing a 1 TB capacity with each camera unit. N
0
CL
0
a
c
a
U
c
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-2
A11 design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 154
Statement of Work
The following map depicts the initial suggested camera locations:
m
'o
L
IL
c
0
.N
c
CL
X
U1
0
L
dE
M
U
A
m
N
Y
L
C.
CD
LL
wow
c
,Ln
VV
W
1.B.1 Camera Site 1
This site is at Hunts & Hospitality.
ti
M
As for the pricing table, the following is provided:
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 9,804.10 J
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included)
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 9,804.10 70
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 808.84 Q
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 10,612.94 0
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included) _
7. Non-taxable Maintenance(to June 30, 2015) $ 138.89 M
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 8,400.00
u�
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included) z
10. Subtotal of Items 6—9 $ 8,538.89 <
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 19,151.83
0
CL
1.B.2 Camera Site 2
a
This site is at Diners & Hospitality. 0
c�
a
As for the pricing table, the following is provided: v
c
c�c
G
V
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-3
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 155
Statement of Work
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 9,804.10
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included)
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 9,804.10
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 808.84 0
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 10,612.94 a.
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included) o
7. Non-taxable Maintenance(to June 30, 2015) $ 138.89 =
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 8,400.00 K
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included) w
10. Subtotal of Items 6-9 $ 8,538.89
m
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 19,151.83 E
ca
U
1.B.3 Camera Site 3
M
This site is at Waterman& Hospitality. N
As for the pricing table, the following is provided: a
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 9,804.10
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included)
U.
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 9,804.10
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 808.84 E
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 10,612.94
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included) m
7. Non-taxable Maintenance(to June 30, 2015) $ 138.89
U
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 8,400.00
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included) ti
ti
10. Subtotal of Items 6-9 $ 8,538.89
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 19,151.83
M
J
1.B.4 Camera Site 4
This site is at Tippecanoe & Harriman (cellular site). a
N
As for the pricing table, the following is provided: _
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 9,804.10 M
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included) ,°n
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 9,804.10 `-
z
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 808.84
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 10,612.94
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included) o
7. Non-taxable Maintenance(to June 30, 2015) $ 138.89 0
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 8,400.00 n-
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included)
10. Subtotal of Items 6-9 $ 8,538.89 a-
m
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 19,151.83 U
W
E
U
.r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-4
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 156 "'
Statement of Work
1.B.5 Camera Site 5
This site is at another pole (TBD) along Hospitality (cellular). d
0
L
As for the pricing table, the following is provided: a.
_
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 9,804.10
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included) Q
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 9,804.10 w
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 808.84
L
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 10,612.94
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included) U
7. Non-taxable Maintenance(to June 30, 2015) $ 138.89
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 8,400.00 ,a
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included) Cj
10. Subtotal of Items 6-9 $ 8,538.89
L
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 19,151.83
m
1.0 Core Networking Section
Three sites are locally connected with wireless links, through the"Hospitality &
Waterman" site to a repeater site at"Orange Show& Waterman"to the City Hall roof 0
This project requires significant core network build-out, including a new repeater site on t9
m
pole, multiple added radios, and an additional radio install at the City Hall rooftop. o
As for the pricing table, the following is provided, related to the backhaul connection �
network for the first three camera sites: M
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 9,835.00
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included)
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 9,835.00
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 811.39 75
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 10,646.39 Q
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included)
7. Non-taxable Maintenance(to June 30, 2015) $ 138.89
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 15,061.20 M
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included) °,
10. Subtotal of Items 6-9 $ 15,200.09 Z
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 25,846.48 `t
W
Ta
1.D Project Cost Summary o
L
With reference to the previous sections, the below table summarizes the project costs, a.
based on the assumptions and information contained in this proposal. a
1. Camera Section Subtotal $ 95,759.13 V
2. Core Networking Section Subtotal $ 25,846.48
3. Grand Total for Project $ 121,605.61
E
In addition, Chapter 5 contains a more detailed summary and break-down of the costs, o
terms and conditions. Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-5
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 1577
Statement of Work
1.E Reference Listing
The following specific references are provided:
0
City of Modesto (Police Dept.) `a
Contact: Fabian Zacharia o
Phone : +1 (209) 342-9128/+1 (209) 652-6137
E-mail : fzacharia(&modestogov.com w
Description: (CelPlan Reference) A 44-camera system, complete with v
monitoring center and SAN storage. Citywide downtown system, including also
building cameras at City facilities. Initial contract from December 2008, with
expansion from March 2010; still under contract for maintenance services. 19- ,N
camera expansion contract was recently ordered. (Key field staffing including cn
Paulo Leite, Gary Tarbell and Nikhil Mathur.)
a
City of Los Angeles (Police Dept.)
Contact: Sandy Russell U`
c
Phone : +1 (213) 486-7054
E-mail : G9461(&lapd.lacity.org m
0
Description: Contract implementation for wireless camera systems for multiple U
area stations within the City of LA. Initial contract award of$13M included
Mission, Topenga, West Valley and Foothill Area Stations. Expansions with M
Southwest and 77th division. CelPlan also provided wireless camera systems for
LAX perimeter protection. (Key field staffing including Paulo Leite, Gary
Tarbell,Nikhil Mathur and Leo Korowajczuk.) -'
a
.Q
1.17 Maintenance and Support Plan =
The standard maintenance plan on the main system is extended to the expansion sites, M
with coverage until the end of the main system cycle, which is at June 30.
T
Z
vJ
0
CL
0
L
a
C
a
Q
U
c
m
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-6
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 158`
5.I.c
a i
elPlcxn W 4 N e 1t'1'tilG'SSGIo6crlTechfloogleS Q+rrua� at trtPtrn rerAnatoptrs. gar, ...
U
O
L
a
C
0
N
M
CL
X
w
L
E
M
V
.M�
d
N
2. Company and Experience
d
U-
,,L^^
,V
V
m
0
U
ti
ti
M
d
C
fC
J
N
O
2
N
M
O
W)
r
Z
Q
O
O.
O
L
CL
C
a-
4)
U
w
c
a>
E
U
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150326
Packet Pg. 159
S.Lc
Company and Experience
This chapter describes CelPlan, its qualifications, teaming partners and experience.
w
2.A CelPlan Technologies, Inc. o
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. (a Virginia company) is a privately-held wireless technology
company, established in 1995, and wholly owned subsidiary of CelPlan International, N
with 500 employees worldwide. The company is headquartered in Reston, VA, and has
two US-based satellite offices; one in the Chicago area, and one in the San Diego area. w
Furthermore, CelPlan has strong global presence through local offices in South America,
Asia and Africa. In relation to this project, CelPlan possesses the required C-7 California
State Contractors License (925007), and has technical field offices in Los Angeles and U
Long Beach.
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. can act as prime contractor and has its corporate offices at to
1920 Association Drive, 3rd Floor, Reston,VA 20191 and our federal corporate ID
number is 54-1766195. Bids are presented by the following individuals,both authorized
to execute agreements for the company:
• Mr. Leonhard Korowajczuk, CEO/CTO,phone 703-259-4022, LL
leonhard @celplan.com
L
0
• Mr. Jasper Bruinzeel,VP of Marketing& Sales,phone 760-274-4214, 0
jasper @celplan.com a
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. has the required financial capability and funding to undergo
ti
major citywide or regional projects. CelPlan Technologies, Inc. is totally debt free and M
has a good reserve to develop its projects. (Dun&Bradstreet: 87-906-1281). Already,
CelPlan has successfully implemented similar projects, including large-scale projects for
major cities, including the City of Los Angeles and Long Beach.No past or current legal _J
actions exist against CelPlan. CelPlan is not debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible w
with any federal, state or local agency. 7°
o
CO
r
Z
Q
Cn
N
O
O_
O
a
_
�a
d
U
c
m
E
s
Figure I CelPlan Headquarters U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Pugs 2-1
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 160
S.I.c
Company and Experience
CelPlan is a leading provider of advanced Radio Frequency("RP) software planning
tools for the purpose of wireless network planning. The industry-leading"CelPlanner"
suite supports multiple technologies, including the most advanced technologies such as u
DVB-H, Mobile WiMAX and the latest WiFi standards. Also,the company offers a °
a
unique family of drive-test tools ("CelSignal")for automated characterization of wireless o
networks. CelPlan features an extensive customer list, and has provided its tools and N
professional services to the world's leading carriers (incl. Verizon and Sprint), Q
communications solutions providers (incl. Ericsson and NSN) and integrators (incl. W
Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman). Based on its tools and professional services
team, CelPlan can offer the Customer unsurpassed services in this project, in terms of E
wireless network planning and configuration, to guarantee optimum performance.
w
as
°
U)
Y
t0
a
CD
c
I U_
0
r' m
0
- U
ti
ti
M
N
Figure 2 Example RF Coverage Analysis with "CelPlanner" Tool J
2.B CelPlan's Wi4Net Division r
.Q
Due to the growing demand with government and public safety agencies for IP-based
large-scale and citywide surveillance systems, CelPlan brings its Wi4Net division, co
committed to the development and deployment of integrated(IP-based) surveillance M
CD
solutions for public safety and government organization. Our group is focused on more LO
complex design problems, including issues such as bandwidth and processing of large
numbers of cameras, high-capacity fiber networking,wireless connectivity,multiple co
locations, legacy system integration, video analytics, ALPR, and gunshot detection. o
a.
Already in May 2005, CelPlan/Wi4Net introduced its fixed and wireless IP-based °
surveillance systems to Cities and public safety organizations, throughout the United c
States. Since then,many large government entities have contracted with CelPlan, a
including the Los Angeles,Las Vegas,Milwaukee,Long Beach,McAllen and others.
Generally, CelPlan has provisioned turn-key solutions for its customers, including
camera units, fiber or wireless infrastructure, fully equipped monitoring centers E
(including large-capacity(SAN) storage solutions), IP-based video management
software, vehicle-based connectivity and comprehensive maintenance plans.
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-2
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 161
S.Lc
Company and Experience
U
d
O
L
a
c
o_
N
Q
X
W
M
i
U
Figure 3 WNNet's FlexiVideo Solution Deployed v
a
2.0 CelPlan Partners ICU
CelPlan offers the Customer a turn-key solution,providing project management,network
design, installation, system commissioning and training. For this surveillance project, CL
CelPlan introduces leading companies as partners, and local subcontractor for superior
a�
installation and maintenance support. The main team partners include Axis, Radwin,
Genetec, and Dell.
c
CO
Aff • ' �.
can"UNKCATin ,s MVAW=O*! GENETEC �
ti
ti
M
tU
2.D Company Contact Information M
For follow up to this proposal, communication can be addressed to:
w
R
Jasper Bruinzeel,Vice President of Marketing& Sales N
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. X
1920 Association Dr.,4h Floor N
Reston,VA 20191 0
Main: (703) 259-4020
Cell: (760) 274-4214 a
Fax: (703)476-8964
U)
E-mail: jasper( ,celplan.com 0 CL
0
L
IL
2.E CelPlan Experience
o.
Wi4Net represents unique experience in providing turn-key large-scale surveillance v
solutions to public safety and government organizations. Wi4Net customers include the
City of Los Angeles, the City of Las Vegas, the City of Long Beach and the City of
Milwaukee. The City of Long Beach deployment is still considered one of the first and
largest wireless, citywide video surveillance systems deployed in the United States, and
generally considered a showcase of what is possible in wireless surveillance. This project a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-3
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 162
5.I.c
Company and Experience
is highlighted below, along with the Las Vegas, McAllen, Milwaukee, Reading, Modesto
and Los Angeles projects.
Some project highlights are provided below. o
a
Long Beach, CA o
N
Currently a 53-camera citywide camera system(in process to expand
to 72), all current signals are streamed wirelessly, simultaneously and w
continuously,to a monitoring command center equipped with six 40"
screens and four 17" screens. The monitoring system offers 30 days of W
storage,utilizing an 18 TB storage area network solution. Exclusively
using the 4.9 GHz band for all video streaming, all cameras connect
wirelessly to a single aggregation point. The system is live monitored
during critical times, such as Friday and Saturday nights. Cn
L
W
r
U-
,V
V
I
` M
O
C
fQ
J
J,
r
.Q
Las Vegas,NV o
Initially a 50-camera system,the Las Vegas system now includes 174 camera N
connections,with the solution supporting 7 downtown wireless PTZ pole camera system, CO
in addition fixed and temporary uses. Las Vegas police department also uses the system z
for various covert operations. Q
Cn
N
O
0-
O
L
a.
c
a
m
U
c
y
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-4
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 163
5.I.c
Company and Experience
d
O
IL
c
O
U
ca
a
a w
ca
U
A
J_
tv
Y
McAllen, TX a
V
m
With a focus on downtown sections and City Parks, the initial phase of the McAllen a
C
project includes 100+ cameras. With a strong emphasis on license plate recognition,the Li
system features a mix of PTZ and fixed megapixel cameras. Already,the system was
expanded to 150+cameras, including integration with convention center security system
and other facility cameras and systems. t9
CO
The system is based on a hybrid fiber-wireless backhaul infrastructure. v
�o
ti
ti
I J
t0
Q
0
O
Z
co
N
M
O
Ln
T
Z
Q
U)
O
Milwaukee, WI o
CL
With a 60+node wireless network design, the system provides coverage throughout the a
City's 96 square mile, and supports 7 districts and 7 district offices. The initial phase a
deployed 15 wireless cameras,with additional expansion phases adding 3, 12, 7 and 4 v
cameras for a current total of 41. The central command center,monitored 24/7, features a
server with Storage Area Network supporting 30 TB of storage capacity(for 120 days of z
storage). 24/7 monitoring staff supports the police operations, and improves efficiencies.
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-5
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 164
Company and Experience
L) _ Setur ty Cameras On Milwaukee Street Corners Help
Catch Criminats
Cfte cameras V
O
L-
0.
c
0
0
sz
X
w
o-s.IXOMM4iq�1MNMbM'^-e4 tFg4"e asce L
(U
KAY MYKLEBY T E
s�
U
a
d
4-
N
Reading, PA L
In an effort to reduce crime, and improve the City, the City of Reading and Police
Department have deployed initial phases with currently 28-cameras, with plans to expand =
to 75. The system is live monitored at times, and has provided many successes from the u0.
start. On average, 45-60 minutes of relevant footage is extracted every week.
The system features a hybrid fiber—wireless infrastructure with mobility layer for access 0
to vehicles and other purposes. m
CL
ti
s
R
_ J
r
C
0
n Ln
rn
� �II
+ 0
tZ
0
L
a
c
o.
a�
U
c
d
E
U
w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-6
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 165i
5.I.c
Company and Experience
Modesto, CA ^
In this project, CelPlan designed and implemented for the City of Modesto an IP-based
centralized surveillance solution,to reach critical locations in the down-town area,but o
also integrate with the largest local shopping mall security system, and various municipal °-
in-building security systems, such as the police department,bus yard and transit center. o
Backhaul design is a fiber-wireless hybrid solution.
sz
The system has been highly successful and assisted in solving about 20 cases within the w
first 12 months of operation, including prevention and arrest of four perpetrators in a case a
of rape and murder attempt in progress. E
U
a�
L
Q.
N
' LL
C
f0
L
Los Angeles, CA
0
CO
In this project, CelPlan was awarded an initial contract for four of LAPD's police area °
U
stations to establish local camera systems for high crime areas/hotspots in the area for
monitoring from the local area stations. The initial contract award includes systems for ti
Mission, Foothill, Topanga and West Valley, with expansions planned for Southwest
(completed) and other area stations. The goal of the contract has been to establish a
standard for citywide surveillance system throughout the City of Los Angeles. _J
Consistent(CelPlan)technology was also deployed at the perimeters of LAX airport.
- e.t. w
o
N
E M
O
Ln
P
Z
N
O
O
a.
c
a
CD
U
e
E
U
t0
d
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-7
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 166
5.I.c
*O CdPlan W i 4 --N e t
0 �Y4lecs Global Technologies 4 .-� :e=titan terArxirap3as. Inc.
V
d
O
L-
a.
O
N
R
CL
x
w
M
L
E
R
U
a
Y
O
3. Technical Reference Information
L
a
m
.a
w
Y
L
C9
m
OON
0
U
cQ
r-
M
d
C
J
Y
Q
N
O
2
CD
N
M
O
LO
V-
Z
Q
t0
N
O
Q
O
L
a
c
a
m
U
Y
_
d
E
U
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150326
Packet Pg. 167
S.I.c
Technical Reference Information
In addition to Chapter 1 (Statement of Work),this Chapter provides further technical
background information in critical areas, such as system, cameras,wireless and
management solution. d
'o
Further to this chapter, find technical documentation(equipment datasheets) and relevant °-
white papers included in Annex C and D, respectively. o
•N
3.A "Best of Breed" Design Approach ,X
The security industry has gone through significant transformations in recent years. Video
streams are now processed as "digital" signals,rather than"analog". With recognized M
encoding standards (such as MPEG-4 and H.264), communications standards (such as U
a
Ethernet/IP),wireless standards (Wi-Fi, WiMAX, etc.) and hardware standards (such as Q
Windows-based operating systems), it is now truly possible to recommend "best-of- in
breed"components for each part of the solution.
ca
a.
Our proposal is based on this"best-of-breed"open-standards based approach in the
various aspects of the design. Particularly in the video management section,we would
compare some of the open architecture solutions (such as Genetec, Milestone and OnSSI) U_
to closed systems (such as IndigoVision,Avigilon,DVTel,Verint and Pelco).
c�
Table I Security Industry Transition
0
Closed System Open Architecture
Proprietary Solution Standards Based ti
5i-
Analog IP / Digital
Single Vendor Trap Best of Breed Selection
w
3.B Vision of Growth and IP-Based Scalability Q
N
Although initially a smaller project for just surveillance, this system should be able to i
migrate and integrate other surveillance system,within one state-of-the-art IP-based N
surveillance environment. It should allow for citywide surveillance, tying together CD
in
multiple locations (City facilities, schools,university, airport, 3rd parties, etc.) and z
multiple applications(surveillance, access control, ALPR, etc.). a
Genetec, Milestone and OnSSI are considered the leading video management solutions in o
the industry, and we are certified with all three companies. For us, the proposed Genetec o
solution is by far the most professional, most scalable and most advanced surveillance a.
solution in the industry, and the clear choice for citywide surveillance applications. This _a
is evidenced by the fact that Genetec has already been selected by the Top-3 cities in the a
United States (i.e. New York, Los Angeles and Chicago). v
Specifically on New York and Chicago (see picture below), these systems feature the CD
largest city government video systems in the country,with over 10,000 cameras already,
including integration with other entities, such as transport, schools and others. In case of Y
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Pa wt -1
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 168
Technical Reference Information
New York, under certain conditions (like hitting of panic button), the police will gain
access to third party commercial systems in the City (like GAP and JC Penny).
a�
0
L
a
c
a 0
N
C
M
Q
X
W
R
L
dC
y 3ra v
V
M
Cn
a.� a
m
c
U.
The below diagram indicates the overall vision for citywide security with City =
government, pulling together multiple locations and multiple applications into a single
security platform. We can explain more about the many options available with IP-based t�
surveillance. Integration options include Access Control, ALPR, Gunshot Detection, o
Video Analytics and others. v
ti
ti
M
Access Control ALPR d
c
Surveillance— J
Surveillance— Cit,r Facilities
•-----
SchoolslUniversity
r
Surveillance—3111 Parties CL
Genetec (banks, stores, o
Surveillance— restaurants, clubs, etc.) _
Airport/Port Management System N
M
0
LO
Detection Systems— Z
Surveillance— (Gunshot, etc.) Q
Wireless Downtown N
Cameras S_rrveiIlance— R
0
Ad-Iioc solutions p
0.
0
L
CL
c
c�
3.0 Wireless Network Design
As background information, the following design guidelines are provided for reference
purposes.
s
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 10191 Page 3-2
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 169
5.Lc
Technical Reference Information
3.C.1 General Network Design Guidelines
Based on our vast experience in designing and implementing citywide surveillance
systems for other cities,we have identified some general guidelines that we follow in the o
design of the backhaul network. `a
C
0
• Assessment of City Network Resources: It is useful to first assess possible City
Network assets that could be used within the project. We would review locations Q
on the City Network, such as city facilities (City Hall, library, etc.),police w
stations and fire stations. This way, camera clusters may be aggregated locally
using wireless technology, and then transported through the City Network to the E
server location.
• Assessment of Customer Goals,Plans and Budgets: Generally,many design
options are available for the backhaul design. Usually, when more bandwidth is
required in the backhaul network,the cost of the backhaul network will increase. a
Therefore, in the end,the backhaul network needs to take into account the City's
goals and expectations,but also the reality of available budgets. We sometimes
will offer different options for the backhaul design, including a lower cost option LL
with lower available bandwidth and a higher cost option with higher available
bandwidth. The final design also needs to take into account the City's plans for
expansion in the future.
m
• Assessment of Mounting Assets: In terms of the citywide cameras,we generally
target to mount the cameras on existing street light poles or traffic light poles (or ti
buildings), since placement of new poles adds significant cost to the project. M
Generally,building out a dedicated fiber network to connect the cameras is not a
feasible option, due to the high costs of the build-out that generally would
involve trench activities. In some cases, existing conduit is available, in which J
case new/additional fiber rollout could become a feasible option. Otherwise,
wireless technology is used to connect to the camera pole locations. In order to
build a wireless network, it is generally important to review also available o
rooftop sites of tall buildings in the area for placement of wireless repeaters, as =
part of the backhaul network. Use of government buildings is obviously ideal,but M
we have seen many cases where cities have been able to negotiate free rights for LO
mounting with building owners based on support for the city's plans to enhance a
safety in a certain area, leading to increased business and property values. m
• Assessment of Spectrum Options: When using wireless technology as part of a
the backhaul network for a citywide surveillance system, it is important to review 0-
available options for spectrum use. Typical options include licensed microwave r_
(6/11/18/23GHz), 60/80 GHz, and 4.9 GHz. We will make recommendations a
based on the project specifics. We generally recommend against the use of v
unlicensed spectrum for a public safety application, such as this one.
c
m
E
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-3
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 170
Technical Reference Information
3.C.2 General Wireless Design Guidelines
In regards to the wireless design for the camera clusters,we follow the following general
wireless design guidelines,to assure high capacity and high performance. A key enabling Q
factor in our cluster design is our multi-radio platform that allows for multiple radios per a
node, a concept that is followed more and more in the industry. 0
• Proper Site Survey and RF Planning: CelPlan develops and sells an industry-
! leading RF planning tool("CelPlanner"),renown for use with WiFi and WiMAX w
technologies. After a thorough site survey,we will implement the network into
our tool for RF propagation and interference testing to assure a smooth and E
predictable implementation process. We already have complete terrain,
morphology and street databases to accurately model the City of San Bernardino.
• Use Point-to-Point Architectures ("Static Multi-radio Mesh'): In most cases, in
use of point-to-point(PTP) links is ideal,using other wireless camera units as
repeaters, or actually adding additional repeaters. The key element is to dedicate a
one radio to only one link in order to assure near maximum throughput in each
link, and reduce interference.
• Use Point-to-Multipoint Architectures:The use of point-to-multipoint(PMP) w
architectures is sometimes useful to combine multiple camera feeds with a L
minimal number of hops,but one needs to be careful that collisions will impact 0
the link reliability and throughput, and should be used only with care, and the m
right type of wireless equipment. v
• Avoid Single/Dual Dynamic Radio Mesh:Although our products can also
supports this type of communications mode,we recommend against this type of M
implementation for this (video) application, since throughput, in the ideal case is
reduced by as much as 50% in case of multiple hops. Also,use of omni antenna C
systems reduces throughput(by operating at lower modulation levels) and _J
increases interference. In video surveillance projects, it will be impossible to
achieve satisfactory performance with this type of implementation. Q
• Spectrum Selection: We strongly recommend maximize use of the licensed 4.9 0
GHZ band for all wireless communications in all our projects. This band is =
available to the City at no cost, and avoids many possible issues that would arise M
CP
from using unlicensed spectrum (including interference,reliability and
performance issues). z
• Line-of-sight Design: Although the OFDM-based modulation allows for Non- ch
Line-of-Sight connections, such conditions will impact significantly the y
throughput and reliability/stability of the link. Therefore,we generally target(and o
carefully design our systems for) Line-of-Sight conditions. a
3.D Pole Camera Enclosure a
Unique about CelPlan is its modular and integrated"one-box"F1exiVideo(FV-2100)
camera unit design that allows for scalable citywide surveillance system a
implementations. Our single integrated enclosure package makes installation easy and E
esthetically pleasing. Also, it provides for a cost-effective solution that can easily be
moved. The solution was designed from the ground up for wireless video applications, a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-4
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 171
Technical Reference Information
and provides all the required features. Also, this solution was already selected for
deployments nationwide, with cities such as Los Angeles, Long Beach and Milwaukee.
We understand this is the lightest and most feature-rich pole camera solution in the d
industry today. The switch can be upgraded with media converter capabilities to allow for °
a
high speed fiber connectivity. This optional package would apply for complex mount o
locations that require specialty features, such as new fiber connections, wireless, etc.
�a
The modular approach is explained with the following diagram. X
W
U
r------ - "r- f0
t!)
Y
----- H.264 i H.264 i d
Encoder ; Encoder
--------
(� --- Multi-Radio _____-
-_-_--_- Platform
Added Ethernet =
(«I») Switch ____ Devices(such as LL
'-------- fixed IP cameras, ++
-------I ALPR,etc.)
Local Storage(Optional)
--------------------------
--------------------------------
y
____________________
Battery Backup(Optional)
------------------------------- m
D
Reset Circuit U
n
Power Supply �
M
d
Figure 4 Modular "One-box" Wireless Camera Approach
J
With a single enclosure, CelPlan can offer baseline, optional and future features. In the
initial design, each unit will include either a media converter(in case of fiber connection) w
or 4.9 GHz wireless radio (in case of wireless camera), switch (to connect to Ethernet o
backhaul at intersection),power supplies, encoder and reset circuit. Also, the unit can =
accommodate a media converter(in case of dark fiber).
0
3.13.1 Multi-radio Features z
a
Our solution uniquely offers scalability to 4 radios, allowing for a dedicated radio in U)
different directions, the only approach to make wireless video function properly. We can o
integrate various radio platforms into our solution, including CelPlan's own FlexiRadio, o
Radwin, Firetide, Alvarion and others. a
c
Based on thorough testing and comparison, we recommend the Radwin recent market a
introduction of the Radwin 2000B series. This radio is a carrier-class style radio, but the U
2000B series is affordable enough to be used within the camera clusters.
aD
The radio system offered presents the following features: E
U
• Each radio can be configured to any band in software (4.9GHz, or 5.xGHz) Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-5
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 172
Technical Reference Information
• Each radio can be configured to any bandwidth in software (5, 10, 20 MHz)
• Each radio is provided with integrated 2x2 MIMO antenna, with MIMO
supported also in 5 and 10 MHz channels
'o
L
c.
We realize that Firetide has done a strong job marketing their radios in the public safety a
space. Their latest line of radios (7000-series) is based on 11 In chipsets, with only minor
modifications. Most of the problems of taking an indoor technology (such as 802.1 In)
from indoor to outdoor are not addressed. As a result, the radios are known for a high w
sensitivity to interference. But perhaps the most crucial flaw is that,just like standard
802.1 In, MIMO is not supported in 5 and 10 MHz channel sizes. At these channel sizes, E
the Firetide 7000 series performance just like older generation radios from many years v
ago. Note that in order to make a functional citywide wireless surveillance design in the
protected 4.9 GHz public safety band, the use of 5 and 10 MHz channels is an absolute in
must. �
3.13.2 Camera Mount Options
For the FV-2100, we offer standard 1- and 2-camera configurations, using attached, or
detached cameras. The following picture shows options for attached camera �-
r
configurations.
,,Lnn
V,V,^
A k
m
0
V
ti
'�4,4Net. Via4Net `"
J
.Q
N
O
Figure 5 FV-2100 Attached Camera Mount Options N
CD
M
An advantage of the detached solution is that is allows for optimized location of the LO
camera and the wireless enclosure separately. As an example, when trees are an issue, to Z
a
optimize the location of the equipment, the camera might be positioned lower on the pole
to "see"below the trees,while the enclosure and radio components typically would be on o
the top end of the pole to "see" over the trees. o
L
a
3.E Surveillance Camera / Encoding System
a-
m
3.E.1 PTZ Camera Options
For years, Axis has been the market leading manufacturer of IP cameras, and their latest
generation of PTZ cameras are considered the bench-mark in the industry. We are
offering the Axis P5534 version with IMP (720p) resolution for improved detail. r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-6
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.173'
Technical Reference Information
In terms of encoding, all cameras offer H.264 encoding to provide for the most advanced
and most effective compression available in the industry today.
d
Table 2 Proposed Camera Options Comparison °
IL
0
Camera Options Type Resolution Angle of View
(degrees) Color B&W
CL
Axis P5522-E PTZ(18X) 704480 47-2.8 0.5 lux 0.01 lux k
W
Axis P5532-E PTZ 29X 704480 53.1 -2.0 0.5 lux 0.01 lux ro
Axis P5534-E PTZ 18X 1280x720 55.2-3.2 0.74 lux 0.04 lux
Axis Q6032-E PTZ 35X 704480 55.8-1.7 0.5 lux 0.008 lux E
Axis Q6034-E PTZ(18X) 1280x720 55.2-3.2 0.74 lux 0.04 lux U
Axis Q6035-E 11 PTZ(20X) I 1920x1080 1 54.1 -2.9 1 0.8 lux 1 0.04 lux
ca
cn
It is noted the P-series models are intended for limited guard tour operations. CU
a.
3.E.2 Camera Optical Zoom
For reference purposes only, the following charts explain the capabilities of the 18X and U_
35X PTZ zoom options for 4CIF style (704x480 resolution) cameras. The 720pand 1080p
models offered will provide further distances at the same level of optical zoom. On the
other hand, such cameras will require more bandwidth on the wireless network, offer m
reduced low-light sensitivity, have a higher cost, and require more storage space. v
Table 3 Optical Zoom and Resolution
M
Distance to object(feet) 300 ft. 600 ft. 900 ft.
m
c
Resolution at distance(using 18X zoom 48 pixels/ft. 24 pixels/ft. 16 pixels/ft.
option)
Resolution at distance(using 35X zoom 80 pixels/ft. 40 pixels/ft. 26 pixels/ft. f°
option) N
O
x
co
LON
M
O
r
Z
fC
O
O_
O
L
a
{ c
ca
FL
d
U
w
c
■ i
v
E
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-7
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential information
Technical Reference Information
3.E.3 Video Frame Rate, Resolution and Encoding
Video images are defined by the video frame rate and video screen resolution.
The frame rate (in Frame per Second (FPS)) gives a perception of continuity to a
movements and we get an impression of a continuous movement for rates above 15 FPS. o
For slow changing environments lower frame rates can be used, while for fast changing
environments higher frame rates may be required.
CL
X
The video resolution expresses the number of vertical and horizontal pixels (YcbCr 2-
sequence) of a video screen. Resolutions are standardized in the Common Intermediate v
Format (CIF). A summary is provided in the table below.
U
For comparison purposes, a regular digital TV format uses 720x480 (DI) at 30 FPS while
movies have a resolution equivalent to 1920x1080 with a frame rate of 24 FPS. in
Conventional surveillance systems use QCIF at 5 FPS.
a
Table 4 NTSC Pixel Resolution Q
NTSC pixel resolution LL
horizontal vertical pixels per video frame
C7
QCIF 176 120 21,120
CIF 352 240 84,480 m
0
2C I F 1 704 1 240 1 168,960 U
4C I F 704 480 337,920
ti
M
One pixel is defined by its depth in bits. Depths of 4 to 32 bits are common. We are
considering a depth of 12 bits in this proposal.
J
The table below shows the data rate of uncompressed video frames for different frame
rates (FPS) and resolutions (with reference to CIF). r
Q
0
Table 5 Data Rates for Uncompressed Frames =°
Data rate for uncompressed frames in Mb s
M
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 LO
T
QCIF 0.25 0.51 1.01 1.52 2.03 2.53 3.80 7.60 Z
CIF 1.01 2.03 4.06 6.08 8.11 10.14 15.21 30.41 Cn
2CIF 2.03 4.06 8.11 12.17 16.22 20.28 30.41 60.83 E
4CIF 1 4.06 1 8.11 1 16.22 1 24.33 1 32.44 1 40.55 1 60.83 1 0
sz
0
The video data generated in this case is huge and compression techniques are used to c
reduce the data, by eliminating redundant information. The most common compression n
techniques are defined in the MPEG (Moving Picture Experts Group) specifications. The
MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 compression techniques have long been the main techniques for
compression. In these techniques,besides occasional"key frames" (where complete
information on an entire frame is sent), the encoding technique provide for efficiencies by
sending only change information between frames that follow each other. As a result,
when there is little motion in a picture, there is little information sent, while, when there Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-8
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 175
5.Lc
Technical Reference Information
is a lot of motion, a lot of information is sent. Typically, there industry would reference
frame rates up to 4 Mbps for high motion video, for 30 FPS at 4CIF resolution. Because
these techniques are much more efficient, that techniques that send individual frames
(such as Motion-JPEG and JPEG-2000), MPEG-4 has long been the preferred encoding °
a`
technique for wireless camera implementations. o
The following tables show the data rate for compressed frames using MPEG-4, with"low
motion", "high motion" and"average motion", respectively. x
w
M
Table 6 Data Rates for Low Motion Compressed Frames d
E
M
Data rate for com pressed frames with low motion in Mbps v
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30
QCIF 0.004 0.008 0.017 0.025 0.034 0.042 0.063 0.127 in
CIF 0.017 0.034 0.068 0.101 0.135 0.169 0.253 0.507 L
2CIF 0.034 0.068 0.135 0.203 0.270 0.338 0.507 1.014 a
4CIF 0.068 0.135 0.270 0.406 0.541 0.676 1.014 2.028 m
LL
_
Table 7 Data Rates for High Motion Compressed Frames
Data rate for com pressed frames with high motion in Mbps
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 m
QCI p
F 0.008 0.017 0.034 0.051 0.068 0.084 0.127 0.253 v
CIF 0.034 0.068 0.135 0.203 0.270 0.338 0.507 1.014 cc
r.
2CIF 0.068 0.135 0.270 0.406 0.541 0.676 1.014 2.028 M
4CIF 0.135 0.270 0.541 0.811 1.081 1.352 2.028 4.055
m
Table 8 Data Rates for Average Motion Compressed Frames >,
Data rate for compressed frames with average motion in Mbps
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 c
QCI x
F 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.17 N
CIF 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.14 0.18 0.23 0.34 0.68 c
2CIF 0.05 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.68 1.35
4CIF 0.09 0.18 0.36 0.54 0.72 0.90 1.35 2.70 Z
Q
From the tables above, the data rate required to transmit video information varies c
between 4 kbps and 4 Mbps (based on MPEG-4 encoding). Based on available o
bandwidth, the encoding systems can be configured to meet the available bandwidth and a`
application. Some surveillance applications require the capture of movements and others o
not. Trash dumping or drug dealing can be captured at low number of frames (2 to 5 FPS) a
but will require high resolution for plate and face recognition. Also, intelligence can be v
added to a solution in relation to resolution and frame rate. For example, live surveillance
can be done at intermediate resolution levels,but an occurrence of an event may have to E
be examined at high resolution levels.
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-9
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 176'
5.I.c
Technical Reference Information
Recently, a new encoding technique has been introduced to the market,typically referred
to as "11.264". H.264 encoding technique is generally based on the same concept as
MPEG-4 encoding,whereas similarities between following frames are used to reduce the AD
overall stream. However, in market reference materials and in our own testing,we have 0"L_
found significant improvements of H.264 encoding compared to MPEG-4 encoding. In o
fact,we have seen a reduction of bandwidth of over 50% from MPEG-4 to H.264. It Ln
should be considered though that with higher compression, H.264 is more sensitive to a
errors. Given the bandwidth limitations inherent to citywide wireless style video camera w
systems, and given the level of maturity of H.264 encoding, we generally recommend L_
Q
new deployments to use H.264 encoding. E
U
In the following, we are providing a comparison table between the leading compression
techniques in the market, including H.264, MPEG-4, Motion-JPEG and JPEG-2000. The
table presents a comparison between H.264 and other compression techniques, at 10% Y
compression/ 15 FPS/medium to low motion. Particularly also with the emergence of a
megapixel technology, the use of H.264 encoding has become even more crucial. The -�
below table highlights this by indicating also required rates for resolutions beyond 4CIF.
U.
Table 9 Compression Technique Comparison (at 15 FPS) _
L
(in Mbps)
Resolution Image Size H.264 MPEG-4 M-JPEG JPEG2000 m
4CIF 704x480 0.6 1.5 5.1 4.6 U
1 Me apixel 1280x720 1.5 4.0
2 Me apixel 1920x1080 3.4
5 Me apixel 2592x1944
8 Me a ixel 1600x1200 *4 m
c
c�
The optimum level of video surveillance should be defined for each case, so the
surveillance objective is achieved while the transmission rate and storage capacity are
minimized. .
N
O
In summary,video definition is a mix of frame rate and video resolution, and should be =
specified for each camera. Once the video definition is chosen, the video transmission N
requires an approximately constant data rate,with a low latency for camera control and
LO
low jitter for proper frame sequencing. The transmission medium should have enough Z
bandwidth for the data rate required and a properly designed wireless access so the delays <
are small and not very variable,with a minimal error rate so that frames are not jittery. N
Based on our broad experience,we have taken all these factors into account into our 0.
design. Also, our white paper about surveillance design, included in this proposal, °
provides additional background information. r_
a-
IF Deployment Services v
w
CelPlan will provide all necessary services to provide for turn-key installation, including a
site survey, system design, equipment installation, configuration, testing and auditing and
project management. a
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-10
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 177
Technical Reference Information
As required, CelPlan can leverage its own RF planning tools and experienced services
team for site survey, network design and network auditing. r
U
d
0
L
a
N
X
v s W
9' L
1
k-k T
Cn
ZI
0.
.
C
U.
t
c
cC
Figure 6 Example Network Design Plots t9
0
Our proposal is based on the following assumptions: o
U
• Re-use of existing poles and structures (traffic lights, light poles,buildings, towers, cc
etc.) for mounting of camera units and wireless components, unless specifically stated M
otherwise. Use rights/mount approvals shall be between pole/ structure owner and
Customer(and are required by project start to avoid delays). Any lease costs or =
application fees for mount approvals are not included in our proposal. CelPlan will
assist on as needed basis.
• Power(continuous 1 IOVac) and ground shall be available at pole locations (photocell
or base of pole), without trenching activities. No meters, panels or circuit breakers are =
included, and use of existing circuits is assumed. At building rooftop installation, an
existing power outlet is assumed within 25 ft from our unit. c
LO
T
• Project pricing based on good faith site assumptions, and availability of rooftops, Q
poles, etc. per design and proposal. U)
�a
• Traffic control is assumed by the City. o
0L
0
• No tree trimming assumed within proposal. a
c
• No permit costs assumed or included. a
d
• Remote access is assumed for CelPlan to the network through secure connection to v
Internet by City to facilitate installation process, remote diagnostics and maintenance.
(Maintenance activities may be suspended until remote access is resumed.)
0
• The implementation plan may be impacted by adverse weather conditions. Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-11
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 178
Technical Reference Information
• Police support during installation, on a case by case basis, may be required(for
example, in case of unsafe conditions).
a�
Any changes to or conflict with the stated assumptions may result in timeline adjustment o
or impact on cost proposal. r-
O
.N
_
R
Q.
K
W
O
L
O
E
CU
U
d
M
N
L
ca
G.
d
_
O
tL
_
t9
``L^^
rV
MV
W
U
LO
ti
h-
M
d
_
f6
J
a+
.Q
N
O
2
to
N
M
O
r
Z
Q
fC
N
O
M
O
L
a
c�
LL
m
U
:r
_
d
E
s
U
t0
r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-12
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 179
J �51c
� 12 W 4 N e fm
J$1GSS Global Technologies nrvrsioa et tfrGrra trrnnatapJff. �nr.
V
d
O
L
0.
C
O
.y
C
Q.
X
W
L
E
U
A
d
4. Organization and Project Plan N
L
0.
C
U-
C
,,Lnn
,V
MV
W
U
ti
ti
M
d
C
R
J
A
.r
.Q
N
O
2
t0
N
M
O
u"!
T-
Z
Q
N
O
CL
O
L
a
c
IL
m
U
c
m
v
w
Q
Ref.No.:SANI50326
Packet Pg. 180
Organization and Project Plan
This chapter describes the organization, key personnel, contact information and project
plan.
m
0
4.A Organization and Key Personnel a
CelPlan has a strong, experienced team focused on its Wi4Net activities. The following 0
details the related organizational structure. a
X
w
ca
CEO/CTO E
Leonhard M
Korowajczuk U
Qi
t4
tI)
R
Director, Finance VP, Technical/ Director,Systems Director, R&D Director, n-
/HR Marketing/Sales Program Director Engineering Aluisio Ribeiro Operations
Eliani Korowajczuk Jasper Bruinzeel Paulo Leite Karla Chagas Wagner Mello =
3
LL
.r
_
f6
Sr. Systems Sr. Systems Sr. Network Lead Technician Quality&Support Production 0
Engineer Engineer Engineer Gary Tarbell Manager Manager m
Nikhil Mathur Zarci Cotias Leo Korowajczuk Cristine Korowajczuk Jayne Pavone
U
ti
ti
M
Figure 7 Organization Chart
a�
Most employees have been with the company for many years, and provide for a reliable, J
stable work-force,with most employees having an interest in the company. Each of the
employees has been carefully selected, and often recruited using trusted references, or r
based on prior relationships. The employees of CelPlan are the core asset of the company, y
with a strong dedication to customer satisfaction and keeping customer commitments. _
The engineering team has a strong educational background, typically with bachelor or N
master degree engineering studies completed. o
Some of the core engineering individuals that may get involved in the project include a
(number of years with company indicated):
• Zarci Cotias (4 year) o
0-
0
• Cristine Korowajczuk (12 years) a
c
• Leonardo Korowajczuk (8 years) a
as
U
• Paulo Leite (15 years)
_
• Nikhil Mathur(6 years) E
• Wagner Mello (13 years) w
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-1
Packet Pg. 181'
Organization and Project Plan
• Jayne Pavone (6 years)
• Aluisio Ribeiro (15 years)
0
• Karla Chagas (5 years) li
C
O
• Gary Tarbell (4 years)
4.B Project Management W
L
With regards to the deployment and implementation, Paulo Leite has been assigned as the
program manager and responsible for technical and safety matters. He successfully ro
managed high-profile projects for the company, including the references with Milwaukee,
Modesto, Long Beach, Los Angeles and others. He will assemble a project team upon
contract award. His contact information is provided as follows: Y
L
Paulo Leite, Director of Engineering a.
CelPlan Technologies, Inc.
1897 Preston White Dr., 3`d Floor
Reston, VA 20191 r
Main: +1 (703) 259-4020 V3
Direct: +1 (703) 259-4025 0
Fax: +1 (703) 476-8964 0
E-mail: paulo(&celplan.com v
h
4.0 Project Team and Resume Information
In regards to the proposed project team, the following project chart is provided:
J
.r
Sr.Business&Technical
Management +�-
Leonhard Korowajczuk Q.
WTT)/r:Tn) to
O
O
N
M
O
v7
Account Manager Proiect Manager CelPlan !-
Jasper Bruinzeel Paulo Leite Z
(VP,Marketing/Sales) (Technical Director)
to
O
rL
O
L
a
er Installer
On-Site Supervision CelPlan Project Manag C
Gary Tarbell
n TBD
(Lead Technicia ) d
FD
U
c
Q
In terms of CelPlan back-up staffing, back-up personnel is available within CelPlan's
core team, for the various key project team positions, including Nikhil Mathur, Leonardo 2
Korowajczuk, Aluisio Ribeiro, Wagner Mello and Karla Chagas. Mr. Mathur has acted Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 10191 Page 4-2
Packet Pg. 182
5.I.c
Organization and Project Plan
AOWftl
already as prime Project Manager in some of CelPlan's wireless camera deployments,
including City of Toledo (OH), City of Taylorsville (UT), and City of Milwaukee
(Mitchell Street expansion project). Others mentioned have been team members on a
various wireless camera network deployments. a
L
In addition, CelPlan can tap from its remaining group of 500 of staff, most of which are 0
in
in technical services roles.
sz.
X
w
4.C.1 CelPlan Resumes
Various summary resumes are explained below. E
U
Resume:Zarci Cotias,Sr. Systems Engineer
a�
Tasks: Coordiniaton of production activities.
Background: Zarci brings over 20 years of experience in telecommunications,and is L
responsible for system design and product customization,based on customer and project
specific requirements. Zarci has a bachelor degree in engineering.
Duration: Support will be during production phases of the project,primarily. _
U-
Resume:Leo Korowajczuk,Sr. Network Engineer
Tasks: Radio software programming&coordination during production process.
Background: With a background in computer sciences,Leo leads system design and c9
implementation on customer projects,with regards to IP based computer and storage o
architectures,and software implementation. �?
Duration: Support will be during production phases of the project,primarily. rC°
ti
Resume:Paulo Leite, TechnicabProgram Director
a�
Tasks: Overall project management.
Background:As one of the original members of the CelPlan management team,Paulo >,
brings over ten years of senior engineering experience to his role at CelPlan. Today, t
Paulo leads a team of engineers in the development of various products. Prior to his role Q
with CelPlan,Paulo served in a senior engineering position with Alcatel. Paulo is o
working towards an MS in Information Systems Technology and holds a BS in Electric =
Engineering with a focus on telecommunications. N
M
Duration: Support to project from beginning to end. Paulo will maintain project manager CD
responsibility during the maintenance phase. Z
a
Resume:Nikhil Mathur,Sr. Systems Engineer N
Tasks:Project management support tasks&customer service coordination. o
Back orb Nikhil is responsible for customer systems design,implementation and o
project management.Nikhil has an MSEE degree from the Auburn University. a.
c
Duration: Support to project from beginning to end.Nikhil will also coordinate the f°
a
customer support services during the maintenance phase. v
Resume: Gary Tarbell,Lead Technician
a�
Tasks: Monitor installation and camera network installation support and coordination. E
As lead technician,Gary manages field deployment and installation activities for
customer projects. Gary brings over 10 years of experience in video, surveillance and at
security.
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-3
Packet Pg. 183
S.I.c
Organization and Project Plan
Duration: Support is concentrated during on-site installation activities.
4.1) Project Plan o
L
A project plan will be provided at formal project start. We expect an implementation plan .
in about 2 months.
�a
a
X
W
L
E
M
U
d
4-
M
L
0.
_
LL
_
''Lnn
,V
V
m
U
cc
ti
ti
M
d
_
lII
J
A
Q
N
O
to
N
M
O
M1
T
Z
Q
N
0
Q.
a
L
a
_
a.
a�
U
_
d
E
M
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-4
Packet Pg. 184
k l�r
CelPlracn W ttpd� 4Net'Y
11��@SS GlObal Technologies ttrrrsraa at C#(Ptgn Inc.
ate+
U
A)
O
L
CL
_
O
N
_
co
CL
x
w
e�
L
dd
G
m
V
d
5. Cost Proposal Details N
L
a
M
m
U.
,,L^^
'V
MV
W
�0
V
ti
M
wV,
W
_
J
A
a+
.Q
N
O
2
IV^
W
N
M
O
T
Z
Q
U)
W
O
M
O
L
a
_
IL
0
v
_
W
E
U
w
Q
Ref.No.:SANI50326
Packet Pg. 185
Cost Proposal Details
In the following, the proposed costs are explained.
r
5.A Baseline System
Unit Price Extended °"
c
0
• 3x Wireless Camera Unit(FV21oo): $9,804.10 $29,412.30
• lx PTZ Camera System w
CO
• lx Axis P5534-E (with environmental done/ 18X optical zoom/
720p) or equivalent v
• Pole mount system
M
• Ix Equipment Enclosure Y
L
• lx Equipment Enclosure (with environmental control, switch, a
power supplies, etc.) (scalable for multi-radio configuration)
c
• 1 x Radwin 2000/5000 MIMO radio with integrated MIMO high-
gain directional antenna
L
• lx Local Edge Server/Storage (1 TB) 0
0
CO
• 1 x Genetec Camera Connection License v
• lx Mount/cable kit
ti
M
• 2x Cellular Camera Unit(FV21oo): $9,804.10 $19,608.20
a�
• 1 x PTZ Camera System
a
• 1x Axis P5534-E (with environmental done/ 18X optical zoom/ "=
720p) or equivalent a
N
• Pole mount system =
• 1 x Equipment Enclosure M
0
�.n
■ lx Equipment Enclosure (with environmental control, switch, Z
power supplies, etc.) (scalable for multi-radio configuration)
■ 1 x Cellular Modem o
sa
■ lx Local Edge Server/Storage (1 TB) °
a
c
■ lx Genetec Camera Connection License
a
■ lx Mount/cable kit v
• Ix Repeater Unit(FR2100): $1,995.00 $1,995.00
o lx Equipment Enclosure
w
<t
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 5-1
Packet Pg. 186'
`Pre"
5. .0
Cost Proposal Details
■ lx Equipment Enclosure (with environmental control, switch,
power supplies, etc.) (scalable for multi-radio configuration)
m
■ 1 x Mount/cable kit o
o.
• 5x Additional Radio: $1,568.00 $7,840.00 0
.N
• Incremental to Wireless Camera Unit or Wireless Repeater Unit Q.
X
• Ix Radwin 2000/5000 MIMO radio with integrated MIMO high-gain w
directional antenna aD
E
• lx Misc materials & integration v
• Baseline Services (discounted): $57,060.86
Cn
• Site survey
M
a
• Design a
• Cameras, wireless backhaul network installation, configuration and
U.
commissioning r
c
• Management system installation, configuration and commissioning
0
• Project management CO
U
• Training
c0
• Maintenance Plan (until June 30, 2015): $833.33 ~M,
• Taxes (8.25%): $4,855.58
J
• Total(with taxes): $121,605.28
w
r
Q
N
O
x
N
M
O
LO
r
Z
Q
Cn
N
O
Q
O
L
a
c
a
a�
U
r
a>
E
v
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 5-2
S.I.c
Cost Proposal Details
53 Notes, Term and Conditions
Notes, terms and conditions to our offer include: o
L
• Validity:Validity of proposal is until May 8th,2015. C
O
• Proposal pricing is based on CelPlan standard payment terms(30-day net)as follows: in
c
• Hardware&Tax invoiced at delivery of related components,by camera site w
• External/Site Labor invoiced at installation,by camera site
E
• Maintenance invoiced at start of maintenance term
U
CelPlan can discuss alternates,but changes might impact price proposal.
ea
• Offer includes taxes,based on our understanding of current rates.Actual rates will apply Y
at the time of the project. a
• All pricing includes a one-time, special 20%project-discount.Pricing in general is based
on system pricing,and break-down prices for services and maintenance in Chapter 1 are
approximate and for reference purposes to fit break-down tables,and can not be regarded U.
individually.A special discount was provided additionally on one-time basis.
L
• Services,maintenance and software charges are based on items provided as part of the
baseline proposal. Charges for these items may need to be adjusted based on selected m
0
options,if applicable. U
' • Statement of work and assumptions as stated throughput this proposal are applicable to n
h
this offer;any changes to the assumptions may impact the offer accordingly.
• No bonding considered or included.
J
• CelPlan will not take any responsibility for damage due to misuse,mishandling,
accidents,purposely inflicted damage,vandalism,natural disaster,etc., from time of
delivery to Customer site,regardless of system acceptance. The Customer will be N
responsible for cost or provisioning of appropriate insurance or repair/replacement costs. 0
We will charge the Customer for the repair and/or replacement components,and
associated services. N
M
O
LO
T_
Z
a
Cn
Ii
N
O
Q
O
L
a
c
�a
o.
d
U
c
m
E
s
U
w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 5-3
Packet Pg. 188
CelPlan" WY4 N e fi rye Wir eless Global Technologies i Crn r#Coftolapfes. Inc.
U
O
O
L
(L
c
O
.N
C
f�
Q
K
W
R
L
E
m
U
.r
d
R
Annexes `n
L
m
0.
d
U-
w
C
'V
V
m
0
U
to
ti
ti
M
d
C
m
J
A
w
r+
.Q
N
O
to
N
M
O
tt')
T
Z
Q
U)
N
O
O.
O
L
a
c
c�
CL
U
::
c
d
E
U
co
w
Q
Ref. No.:SANI50326
Packet Pg. 189
Annex A—Glossary and Acronyms
Annex A - Glossary and Acronyms
0
0
AP Access Point
CIF Common Intermediate Format w
COTS Commercial Off The Shelf 2-
a�
DAS Direct Access Storage E
DSRC Dedicated Short Range Communications L)
a
DVB-H Digital Video Broadcasting-Handheld a
FPS Frames Per Second N
ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems
LAN Local Area Network
LOS Line of Sight
MP Megapixel LL
MPEG Moving Picture Expert Group
NAS Network Attached Storage
c�
NLOS Non Line of Sight o
PCB Printed Circuit Board v
PMP Point-to-Multipoint
PS Power Supply
PTP Point-to-Point
c�
QI -4 Quarter of calendar year(I -4) -'
a
QoS Quality of Service
RF Radio Frequency y
SAN Storage Area Network =
US United Stated of America N
WAN Wide Area Network
LO
WiFi Wireless Fidelity; interoperable radio standard based on IEEE Q
802.11 cn
WiMAX Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access; interoperable y
radio standard based on IEEE 802.16 C
L-
0.
c
R
a
aD
U
c
d
E
t
v
ca
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 10191
Packet Pg. 190
Table of Contents
0
Table of Contents
0
a
c
0
.N
c
R
LIST OF FIGURES a
W
L
LISTOF TABLES..................................................................................................................V d
E
M
1. STATEMENT OF WORK..........................................................................................1-0 U
A
I.A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................ 1-1 ca
1.13 CAMERA SECTION................................................................................................... 1-2 N
1.B.1 Wirelessly Networked Safety Camera..................................................................................... 1-3 a
1.B.2 Cellular Safety Camera............................................................................................................ 1-3 -a
I.0 CORE NETWORKING SECTION 1-4 m
c
I.D PROJECT COST SUMMARY....................................................................................... 1-4
LE REFERENCE LISTING 1-5 }'
I.F MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT PLAN....................................................................... 1-5
t9
2. COMPANY AND EXPERIENCE.................................................................................2-0
OD
O
2.A CELPLAN TECHNOLOGIES,INC. ..............................................................................2-1 V
2.B CELPLAN'S W14NET DIVISION ...............................................................................2-2 m
2.0 CELPLAN PARTNERS...............................................................................................2-3 M
2.13 COMPANY CONTACT INFORMATION........................................................................2-3
2.E CELPLAN EXPERIENCE............................................................................................2-3
0
3. TECHNICAL REFERENCE INFORMATION 3-0
.............................................................. a
U
3.A BEST OF BREED DESIGN APPROACH 3-1 >'
3.B VISION OF GROWTH AND IP-BASED SCALABILITY..................................................3-1
3.0 WIRELESS NETWORK DESIGN.................................................................................3-2
3.C.1 General Network Design Guidelines.......................................................................................3-3 a
3.C.2 General Wireless Design Guidelines.......................................................................................3-4 --
3.1) POLE CAMERA ENCLOSURE ....................................................................................3-4 C)
3.D.1 Multi-radio Features................................................................................................................3-5 °
LO
3.13.2 Camera Mount Options...........................................................................................................3-6 Z
3.E SURVEILLANCE CAMERA/ENCODING SYSTEM.......................................................3-6 Q
3.E.1 PTZ Camera Options...............................................................................................................3-6
co
3.E.2 Camera Optical Zoom..............................................................................................................3-7 N
0
3.E.3 Video Frame Rate,Resolution and Encoding..........................................................................3-8 Q
0
3.F DEPLOYMENT SERVICES .......................................................................................3-10 a
C
4. ORGANIZATION AND PROJECT PLAN....................................................................4-0
a
4.A ORGANIZATION AND KEY PERSONNEL....................................................................4-1 U
4.13 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 4-2
4.0 PROJECT TEAM AND RESUME INFORMATION 4-2 E
4.C.1 CelPlan Resumes .................... ....... ..............4-3
a
4.13 PROJECT PLAN 4-4
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page ii
Packet Pg. 193
Table of Contents
Q 5. COST PROPOSAL DETAILS.....................................................................................5-0
v
5.A BASELINE SYSTEM
5.B NOTES,TERM AND CONDITIONS .............................................................................5-3 p
ANNEX A—GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS 0
ANNEX B—UNITS
W
m
L
E
m
U
A
4-
L
m
LL
S_
/V
W
U
ti
ti
N
L
E
U
Y
L
LO
0
0
Ln
r
Z
Q
N
0
Q
0
L
a
c
c�
a
d
U
c
m
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page i1i
Packet Pg. 194
Annex B— Units
Annex B — Units
a
C
O
degree a
CM centimeter x
w
dB decibel L
dBm mill Watt expressed in decibels E
R
dBW Watt expressed in decibels v
ft feet ,a
GB Giga Byte
le
GHz Giga Hertz O`R.
kbps kilo bits per second
Mbps Mega bits per second c
TB Tera Byte u-
Y
V Volt L
c�
m
0
�o
ti
ti
M
d
R
J
Y
R
Y
Q
N
O
N
M
O
LO
T"
Z
Q
R
N
O
Q
O
L
a
c
R
a
d
U
Y
cCD
C
U
.lY.+
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191
S.I.d
_CelPlan W �' 4 N e t
Wireless Global Technologies � ;xFa;an at tewr�n rtrnnotap,rx, U
Q
L-
a.
C
0
N
C
Q
X
W
N
L
CELPLAN PHASE 6 EXPANSION SOW
U
FOR
Y
DOWNTOWN SURVEILLANCE CAMERA SYSTEM a
v
FORa
u-
Y
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
m
0
U
ti
ti
M
N
f0
L
d
E
U
a>
4-
tv
N
Y
L
C)
LO
r
Z
Q
N
is
N
OQ
0
L
a_
C
cts
d
d
APRIL,5,2015
C
RESTON,VIRGINIA/SAN DIEGO,CA
AWN
.0
U
y
Q
Ref.No.:SAN150405
Packet Pg. 192
List of Figures
List of Figures
_
0
FIGURE 1 CELPLAN HEADQUARTERS...............................................................................2-1
FIGURE 2 EXAMPLE RF COVERAGE ANALYSIS WITH"CELPLANNER"TOOL....................2-2 w
FIGURE 3 W14NET'S FLEXIVIDEO SOLUTION DEPLOYED.................................................2-3
v
FIGURE 4 MODULAR"ONE-BOX"WIRELESS CAMERA APPROACH....................................3-5
FIGURE 5 FV-21 OO ATTACHED CAMERA MOUNT OPTIONS..............................................3-6 U
FIGURE 6 EXAMPLE NETWORK DESIGN PLOTS...............................................................3-11
FIGURE 7 ORGANIZATION CHART.....................................................................................4-1 Cn
L
0.
Q�
0
LL
yw
'V
MV
W
V
L
Q�
U
Y
W
N
.1.
L
n.
L0
Nr
CD
Lt)
r
Z
Q
0
CL
0
L
a
C
o.
Q
U
c
a�
E
t
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page ii'
Packet Pg. 195
I
Slcl 4
List of Tables
r
List of Tables
a
_O
.y
TABLE 1 SECURITY INDUSTRY TRANSITION.....................................................................3-1
TABLE 2 PROPOSED CAMERA OPTIONS COMPARISON......................................................3-7 X
w
TABLE 3 OPTICAL ZOOM AND RESOLUTION.....................................................................3-7
L
TABLE 4 NTSC PIXEL RESOLUTION.................................................................................3-8
E
TABLE S DATA RATES FOR UNCOMPRESSED FRAMES......................................................3-8 U
TABLE 6 DATA RATES FOR LOW MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES....................................3-9
TABLE 7 DATA RATES FOR HIGH MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES ...................................3-9
TABLE 8 DATA RATES FOR AVERAGE MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES............................3-9 U)
TABLE 9 COMPRESSION TECHNIQUE COMPARISON(AT 15 FPS) ....................................3-10
v
_
LL
r+
_
l�
L
m
U
m
ti
ti
M
N
iC
L
d
E
m
U
A
d
N
L
a
LO
0
v
0
LO
T
Z
Q
N
O
CL
O
L
a
c
c�
a
a�
U
_
m
E
U
w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page v
Packet Pg. 196
Su
C�-ffllan Wi 4 t
WiY41eGlUJQd TeG)IClOgleS tt ataq.0s
m e
0
(D
O
L
IL
0
y
tQ
Q
X
W
M
L
(1
E
t4
U
a
m
N
Y
L
1 . Statement of Work
C
U-
L
m
0
U
ti
ti
M
N
R
L
U
m
v-
N
Y
L
a
LO
0
v
0
LO
Z
a
Y)
U)
0
CL
0
L
a
c
n.
d
U
c
v
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150405
Packet Pg. 197
Statement of Work
This Chapter contains the detailed information for the various sections of the"Statement
r
of Work" section. Additionally, Chapters 2 through 5 provide further information in
addition to this Chapter. Also, various Annexes are provided with background
a
information. _
0
_
1.A Executive Summary Q
X
(1) CelPlan's Experience: Since 2006, CelPlan has been involved with some of the M
largest citywide (wireless) surveillance projects and largest cities in the country, E
including multiple 100+ camera systems. Our local track record includes v
deployments with some of the largest local Cities, including Los Angeles and Long
Beach,but we also have been awarded initial and expansion contracts with smaller local
entities such as Modesto, Culver City, Oakland, UCSB and UCB. We have done work for N
Je
CalTrans also. a
Security Cameras On 6lihvaukee Street Corners Hey
CatcP Cruninats ' t
_
I �
LL
_
" tE
,,L^^
'V
_ V
Wh T 'A'AiHIN �01�
U
Security cameras aid in arrest of Downtown camera catches assault ofTurlock man
man witb stolen gun to
ti
N
Pine Ave.pipe bomb 2-
suspect appears in court d
t E
l0
U
a
r
tv
Unique is our deep understanding of wireless technologies, as evidenced in two published N
books on wireless technologies,published with Wiley. We are currently in the process L
to write a book for Wiley about public safety surveillance systems design. n
Li
0
LO
cdma2000 a
to
-X-Am Systems
0
0`�" L
WiMAX aid LTE a
Network Design,
Optimization and a
Performance Analysis
W[LEY
w
a�
E
U
r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Pagc 1-1
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 198
Statement of Work
sxwtpr Cumras On NOW80ee sweet conA.n HNv
carca c��en v
O
L
a
_
0
.N
_
c�
X
W
Security cameras aid in arrest of m
Downtown camera catches assault
Q)
man with stolen gas
U
Pine Ave.pipe bomb
' suspect appears in court
lot Y
fC
CL
a�
(2)Project Expansion: This project represents an expansion of the existing system, using ;
the same standards, technologies, while assuring full compatibility. w
L
13 Camera Section 0
M
All camera units are based on CelPlan's field-proven,modular pole camera unit that is v
described in great detail in section 3.D of this proposal, including pictures and diagrams. to
This unit was first introduced to the market in 2005/2006 in Long Beach, and is currently ti
in its 5th generation. Because this unit(CelPlan's F1exiVideo FV-2100) is modular, it can
be configured to suit the needs of a specific project. This is the only solution compatible
with the current system. The following details about the configuration, applicable to all Q)
14 sites, are provided as follows:
• PTZ Camera: We suggest the Axis P5534-E model, with improved resolution at
IMP (720p) in order to get better details in the pictures. N
Y
L
• Wireless: For two sites, we have assumed radio technology consistent with the a
initial project,while the remaining 12 sites are harder to reach, and are suggested LO
with cellular modem.
0
• Edge Camera Storage: As a unique feature of our solution, we can accommodate Q
a full-scale archiving server, operating on windows platform and Genetec in
management software. We are providing a 1 TB capacity with each camera unit. y
0
CL
0
L
a
c
a
a�
U
Y
_
d
E
V
.16
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-2
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 199
Statement of Work
The camera locations are summarized as follows:
w
A. Nunez Park(5th St/Medical Center Drive)
0
L
a.
• 3x Cellular Safety Cameras (Camera Site 1-3) c
B. Dellman Heights Park (Flores St/30th St)
a
• lx Cellular Safety Camera(Camera Site 4) w
�a
L
C. Anne Sherrills Park(California St/Baseline)
R
•
Ix Wirelessly Networked Safety Camera (Camera Site 5) v
a�
D. La Plaza Park (Mt Vernon/7th St)
Y
• lx Wirelessly Networked Safety Camera (Camera Site 6)
a.
E. Seccombe Lake Park(5th St/Sierra Way)
• 3x Cellular Safety Cameras (Camera Site 7-9) Ui
F. Perris Hall Park(Highland Ave/Harrison St)
C9
• 5x Cellular Safety Cameras (Camera Site 1014) m
0
G. Lytle Creek Park v
• lx Cellular Safety Cameras (Camera Site 15) M
1.13.1 Wirelessly Networked Safety Camera
d
As for the pricing table, the following is provided: E
U
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 9,804.10
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included)
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 9,804.10 Cn
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 808.84 L
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 10,612.94 a
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included) c
7. Non-taxable Maintenance(to June 30, 2016) $ 2,000.00 0
LO
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 8,400.00 Z
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included) <
10. Subtotal of Items 6—9 $ 10,400.00 Cn
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 21,012.94 0
CL
0
L
1.13.2 Cellular Safety Camera L
This site is at Diners & Hospitality. a
d
As for the pricing table, the following is provided: v
w
c
d
E
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-3
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 200
Statement of Work
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 9,804.10
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included)
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 9,804.10 0
L
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 808.84 n-
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 10,612.94 0
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included)
7. Non-taxable Maintenance (to June 30, 2016) $ 2,000.00 a
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 8,400.00 W
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included)
10. Subtotal of Items 6—9 $ 10,400.00 E
E
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 21,012.94
Y
m
1.0 Core Networking Section Cn
Two sites are wirelessly connected and require additional radio network efforts. a
As for the pricing table, the following is provided, related to the backhaul connection
network for the first three camera sites: 0
U_
1. Taxable Total for Hardware $ 3,136.00 c
2. Taxable Total for Shipping and Handling (included)
3. Subtotal of Items 1 and 2 $ 3,136.00 t9
4. Necessary Sales Tax at 8.25% $ 258.72 0
5. Subtotal for Items 3 and 4 $ 3,394.72 U
6. Non-taxable Shipping and Handling (included) to
7. Non-taxable Maintenance(to June 30, 2015) $ - M
8. Non-taxable External/Site Labor $ 4,990.00
9. Other Non-taxable Site-specific Costs (included)
10. Subtotal of Items 6—9 $ 4,990.00 m
11. Grand Total for Group or Site $ 8,384.72 cEa
U
Y
1.D Project Cost Summary
Cn
With reference to the previous sections, the below table summarizes the project costs,
based on the assumptions and information contained in this proposal. a
LO
1. Camera Section Subtotal $ 315,194.07 °�
2. Core Networking Section Subtotal $ 8,384.72 LO
3. Grand Total for Project $ 323,578.79 Q
In addition, Chapter 5 contains a more detailed summary and break-down of the costs,
terms and conditions. o
CL
0
L
a
c
o.
d
U
c
m
E
t
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1910 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 10191 Page 1-4
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Info rmation
Packet Pg.201
Statement of Work
1.E Reference Listing
d
The following specific references are provided: a
c
City o Modesto (Police De p t.)
.c N
Contact: Fabian Zacharia o
n.
Phone : +l (209) 342-9128 /+1 (209) 652-6137 w
E-mail : fzacharia(aa-)modesto ovg .com
E
Description: (CelPlan Reference) A 44-camera system, complete with v
monitoring center and SAN storage. Citywide downtown system, including also
building cameras at City facilities. Initial contract from December 2008, with
expansion from March 2010; still under contract for maintenance services. 19-
camera expansion contract was recently ordered. (Key field staffing including a
Paulo Leite, Gary Tarbell and Nikhil Mathur.)
c
UL
City of Los Angeles (Police Dept.) _
Contact: Sandy Russell
Phone : +1 (213) 486-7054 m
E-mail : G9461(&lapd.lacity.org v
Description: Contract implementation for wireless camera systems for multiple
area stations within the City of LA. Initial contract award of$1.3M included
Mission, Topenga, West Valley and Foothill Area Stations. Expansions with
Southwest and 77th division. CelPlan also provided wireless camera systems for d
LAX perimeter protection. (Key field staffing including Paulo Leite, Gary
Tarbell,Nikhil Mathur and Leo Korowajczuk.) U
a�
w
Y
11 Maintenance and Support Plan a
The standard maintenance plan on the main system is extended to the expansion sites, v
with coverage for a one year term, to June 30, 2016. ,°
T
Z
Q
N
O
Q
O
i
a
c
a
U
c
m
E
s
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-5
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet 09' .202
Ceffllan* WY4 N e t-
reless GlobalTechnologie.5 fa oNgtes,
V
AD
O
I-
a.
c
O
N
C
t0
G.
X
W
O
L
O
E
0.
R
U
A
O
O
to
L
ca
2. Company and Experience
LL
a�
C
t4
''Lnn
'V
V
m
U
to
ti
N
tC
L
d
E
U
r
U
L
a
uO
0
v
0
uj
Z
Q
R
N
O
O.
O
L
a
c
R
a
a�
U
w
c
d
U
w
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150405
Packet Pg. 203
S.Ld
Company and Experience
This chapter describes CelPlan, its qualifications, teaming partners and experience.
U
N
2.A CelPlan Technologies, Inc. a
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. (a Virginia company) is a privately-held wireless technology o
company, established in 1995, and wholly owned subsidiary of CelPlan International,
with 500 employees worldwide. The company is headquartered in Reston, VA, and has x
two US-based satellite offices; one in the Chicago area, and one in the San Diego area.
Furthermore, CelPlan has strong global presence through local offices in South America,
Asia and Africa. In relation to this project, CelPlan possesses the required C-7 California v
State Contractors License (925007), and has technical field offices in Los Angeles and
Long Beach.
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. can act as prime contractor and has its corporate offices at
1920 Association Drive, 3rd Floor, Reston,VA 20191 and our federal corporate ID a
number is 54-1766195. Bids are presented by the following individuals,both authorized w
to execute agreements for the company:
U_
• Mr. Leonhard Korowajczuk, CEO/CTO,phone 703-259-4022,
lonhard @celplan.com
• Mr. Jasper Bruinzeel, VP of Marketing& Sales, phone 760-274-4214, CO
jasper @celplan.com U
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. has the required financial capability and funding to undergo h
major citywide or regional projects. CelPlan Technologies, Inc. is totally debt free and
has a good reserve to develop its projects. (Dun& Bradstreet: 87-906-1281). Already,
CelPlan has successfully implemented similar projects, including large-scale projects for
major cities, including the City of Los Angeles and Long Beach.No past or current legal v
actions exist against CelPlan. CelPlan is not debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible
with any federal, state or local agency.
cc
x ta Cn
L
LO
o
v
0
Z
Q
u7
0
CL
a
a
c
a
a�
U
W
Figure I CelPlan Headquarters
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-1
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 204
5I -
Company and Experience
CelPlan is a leading provider of advanced Radio Frequency ("RP) software planning
tools for the purpose of wireless network planning. The industry-leading"CelPlanner"
suite supports multiple technologies, including the most advanced technologies such as a
DVB-H, Mobile WiMAX and the latest WiFi standards. Also,the company offers a
unique family of drive-test tools ("CelSignal")for automated characterization of wireless N
networks. CelPlan features an extensive customer list, and has provided its tools and a
professional services to the world's leading carriers (incl.Verizon and Sprint), X
W
communications solutions providers (incl. Ericsson and NSN) and integrators (incl. ;a
I Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman). Based on its tools and professional services E
team, CelPlan can offer the Customer unsurpassed services in this project, in terms of
wireless network planning and configuration,to guarantee optimum performance.
U_
Y 0
m
� Q
U
to
ti
r`
R
L
Figure 2 Example RF Coverage Analysis with "CelPlanner" Tool E
U
A
23 CelPlan's Wi4Net Division
M
Cn
Due to the growing demand with government and public safety agencies for IP-based
large-scale and citywide surveillance systems, CelPlan brings its Wi4Net division, a
committed to the development and deployment of integrated(IP-based) surveillance o
solutions for public safety and government organization. Our group is focused on more o
complex design problems, including issues such as bandwidth and processing of large z
numbers of cameras,high-capacity fiber networking,wireless connectivity,multiple Q
locations, legacy system integration, video analytics,ALPR, and gunshot detection. to
Already in May 2005, CelPlan/Wi4Net introduced its fixed and wireless IP-based o
surveillance systems to Cities and public safety organizations,throughout the United n
States. Since then,many large government entities have contracted with CelPlan, C
including the Los Angeles,Las Vegas,Milwaukee,Long Beach,McAllen and others. n
Generally, CelPlan has provisioned turn-key solutions for its customers, including 0
camera units, fiber or wireless infrastructure, fully equipped monitoring centers
(including large-capacity(SAN) storage solutions), IP-based video management E
0
software, vehicle-based connectivity and comprehensive maintenance plans.
r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-2
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 205
Ld
Company and Experience
a�
0
L
a
0
.N
c
R
CL
X
w
L
cdc
G
M
Figure 3 WNNet's Flexi Video Solution Deployed U,
m
2.0 CelPlan Partners cn
L
CelPlan offers the Customer a turn-key solution, providing project management, network a
design, installation, system commissioning and training. For this surveillance project,
CelPlan introduces leading companies as partners, and local subcontractor for superior 3
installation and maintenance support. The main team partners include Axis, Radwin,
Genetec, and Dell.
C7
t9
m
0
U
L CO
GENETEC ICIMGL M
N
Rf
L
2.1) Company Contact Information E
U
For follow up to this proposal, communication can be addressed to:
Jasper Bruinzeel, Vice President of Marketing & Sales rn
CelPlan Technologies, Inc.
1920 Association Dr., 4th Floor
Reston, VA 20191
Main: (703) 259-4020
Cell: (760) 274-4214 a
Fax: (703)476-8964 m
E-mail: jasper(.celplan.com N
0
CL
0
a.
L
2.E CelPlan Experience
Wi4Net represents unique experience in providing turn-key large-scale surveillance a
solutions to public safety and government organizations. Wi4Net customers include the v
City of Los Angeles, the City of Las Vegas, the City of Long Beach and the City of C
Milwaukee. The City of Long Beach deployment is still considered one of the first and E
largest wireless, citywide video surveillance systems deployed in the United States, and
generally considered a showcase of what is possible in wireless surveillance. This project
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-3
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.206
- S.Cd
Company and Experience
is highlighted below, along with the Las Vegas, McAllen, Milwaukee, Reading, Modesto
r
and Los Angeles projects. m
0
Some project highlights are provided below. 0-
0
Long Beach, CA
�o
Currently a 53-camera citywide camera system(in process to expand x
to 72), all current signals are streamed wirelessly, simultaneously and W
continuously,to a monitoring command center equipped with six 40" W
screens and four 17" screens. The monitoring system offers 30 days of v
storage, utilizing an 18 T13 storage area network solution. Exclusively
using the 4.9 GHz band for all video streaming, all cameras connect
wirelessly to a single aggregation point. The system is live monitored Cn
during critical times, such as Friday and Saturday nights.
rX
a
d
c
CO
0
� r
..
R R CO
• i `t`
N
L
d
E
M
U
r
d
w
R
Las Vegas, NV U)
L
Initially a 50-camera system, the Las Vegas system now includes 174 camera a
connections, with the solution supporting 7 downtown wireless PTZ pole camera system,
in addition fixed and temporary uses. Las Vegas police department also uses the system
for various covert operations. Z
Q
U)
0
a
0
L
a
c
c�
n.
m
U
w
c
d
E
t
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-4
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.207
5.I.d
Company and Experience
r
m
O
L
a
c
0
CL
X
co
L
E
M
U
a
d
w-
ta
N
L
a
McAllen, TX
a�
With a focus on downtown sections and City Parks, the initial phase of the McAllen
project includes 100+ cameras. With a strong emphasis on license plate recognition, the =
system features a mix of PTZ and fixed megapixel cameras. Already, the system was
expanded to 150+ cameras, including integration with convention center security system 0
and other facility cameras and systems. o
U
The system is based on a hybrid fiber-wireless backhaul infrastructure.
ti
M
L
d
E
LO
d
N
0
v
0
LO
T
Z
Q
N
Milwaukee, WI 00 CL
0
L
With a 60+ node wireless network design, the system provides coverage throughout the a.
City's 96 square mile, and supports 7 districts and 7 district offices. The initial phase
deployed 15 wireless cameras, with additional expansion phases adding 3, 12, 7 and 4
cameras for a current total of 41. The central command center, monitored 24/7, features a v
r
I server with Storage Area Network supporting 30 TB of storage capacity (for 120 days of a
storage). 24/7 monitoring staff supports the police operations, and improves efficiencies. E
U
w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-5
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 208
Company and Experience
�■ Security Cameras On MiWaukee Street Corners ttetp
Catch Chminats m
Cfte camer" O
e.
CL
_
0
_
l4
Q
X
W
L
tasma.l.+.+.m+a✓w.-m �
ro�xmereae<ameas awXeneW tem3cu rn E
Kph MYKLEBY T a WASiI
r 1 ,NGlII U
d
ce
Y
L
Reading,PA a.
aD
In an effort to reduce crime, and improve the City, the City of Reading and Police =
Department have deployed initial phases with currently 28-cameras, with plans to expand U-
to 75. The system is live monitored at times, and has provided many successes from the
start. On average, 45-60 minutes of relevant footage is extracted every week.
The system features a hybrid fiber—wireless infrastructure with mobility layer for access o
to vehicles and other purposes. y v
N
II L
E
co
LO
i Y
F
L
> iota—" O
LO
r
r
[t Z
0
CL
0
L
IL
0
a-
U
_
a>
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-6
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 209
Company and Experience
Modesto, CA
In this project, CelPlan designed and implemented for the City of Modesto an IP-based o
centralized surveillance solution,to reach critical locations in the down-town area,but a`
also integrate with the largest local shopping mall security system, and various municipal o
in-building security systems, such as the police department,bus yard and transit center.
Backhaul design is a fiber-wireless hybrid solution.
W
The system has been highly successful and assisted in solving about 20 cases within the
first 12 months of operation, including prevention and arrest of four perpetrators in a case E
CU
of rape and murder attempt in progress. U
a
w
Cn
Y
L
n.
CD
t_
3
LL
a+
V
Los Angeles, CA o
In this project, CelPlan was awarded an initial contract for four of LAPD's police area
stations to establish local camera systems for high crime areas/hotspots in the area for
monitoring from the local area stations. The initial contract award includes systems for
Mission,Foothill, Topanga and West Valley,with expansions planned for Southwest
(completed) and other area stations. The goal of the contract has been to establish a
standard for citywide surveillance system throughout the City of Los Angeles.
U
Consistent(CelPlan) technology was also deployed at the perimeters of LAX airport.
Ow .,
Y
- L
LO
O
LO
Q
3 Cn
0
0
L
a
c
n.
m
U
c
d
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-7
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 210
Cel�°la W 4N e t
SGlObalTechnologia 00vislOft of satFUn technoraptar, Inc.
V
d
�O
L
CL
c
O
.N
c
Q.
x
w
ro
L
m
E
U
a�
3. Technical Reference Information Y
a
m
-a
v_
`Ln
'V^
MV
W
Q
U
ti
ti
cc
L
E
U
m
co
N
L
ca
(L
LO
0
v
0
W)
Z
Q
N
O
M
O
L
a
c
c�
d-
9)
U
c
d
E
t
U
Q
Ref.No.:SAN150405
Packet Pg. 211
5.Ld
Technical Reference Information
In addition to Chapter 1 (Statement of Work), this Chapter provides further technical
background information in critical areas, such as system, cameras,wireless and a
management solution.
a
Further to this chapter, find technical documentation(equipment datasheets) and relevant o
white papers included in Annex C and D,respectively.
X
3.A "Best of Breed" Design Approach
i
G1
The security industry has gone through significant transformations in recent years. Video
streams are now processed as "digital"signals,rather than"analog". With recognized
encoding standards (such as MPEG-4 and H.264), communications standards (such as
Ethernet/IP),wireless standards (Wi-Fi, WiMAX, etc.) and hardware standards (such as vi
Windows-based operating systems), it is now truly possible to recommend "best-of-
breed"components for each part of the solution. a
Our proposal is based on this"best-of-breed" open-standards based approach in the
various aspects of the design. Particularly in the video management section,we would U_
compare some of the open architecture solutions (such as Genetec, Milestone and OnSSI)
to closed systems (such as IndigoVision, Avigilon, DVTel,Verint and Pelco).
c�
Table I Security Industry Transition o
U
Closed System Open Architecture
M
Proprietary Solution Standards Based
Analog IP / Digital
4)
Single Vendor Trap Best of Breed Selection
33 Vision of Growth and IP-Based Scalability N
Although initially a smaller project for just surveillance, this system should be able to
migrate and integrate other surveillance system,within one state-of-the-art IP-based °-
surveillance environment. It should allow for citywide surveillance,tying together c
multiple locations (City facilities, schools,university, airport, 3rd parties, etc.) and
LO
multiple applications (surveillance, access control, ALPR, etc.). Z
a
Genetec,Milestone and OnSSI are considered the leading video management solutions in `n
the industry, and we are certified with all three companies. For us,the proposed Genetec o
solution is by far the most professional,most scalable and most advanced surveillance o
solution in the industry, and the clear choice for citywide surveillance applications. This a.
is evidenced by the fact that Genetec has already been selected by the Top-3 cities in the
United States (i.e. New York,Los Angeles and Chicago).
U
Specifically on New York and Chicago (see picture below),these systems feature the
largest city government video systems in the country, with over 10,000 cameras already, E
including integration with other entities, such as transport, schools and others. In case of L)
r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-1
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 212
5.Ld
Technical Reference Information
New York, under certain conditions (like hitting of panic button), the police will gain
r
access to third party commercial systems in the City (like GAP and JC Penny). 0
0
L
a
_
0
U)
CL
X
w
M
L
E
U
d
N
Y
L
a
a�
_
U_
_
The below diagram indicates the overall vision for citywide security with City
government,pulling together multiple locations and multiple applications into a single 0
security platform. We can explain more about the many options available with IP-based o
surveillance. Integration options include Access Control, ALPR, Gunshot Detection, �?
Video Analytics and others.
ti
N
Access Control ALPR
d
Surveillance— E
Surveillance— City Facilities U
Schools/University
!
Surveillance—31d Parties to
Genetec {banks,stores, Y
Surveillance— restaurants, clubs, etc.} �
Airport/Port Management System °-
uO
0
v
Detection Systems— 0
LO
Surveillance— (Gunshot, etc.)
Wireless Downtown Z
Cameras Q
Surveillance— �
Ad-hoc solutions �a
N
0
a
0
L
a
3.0 Wireless Network Design a
As background information, the following design guidelines are provided for reference U
purposes.
E
0
s
Y
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-2
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 213
Technical Reference Information
3.C.1 General Network Design Guidelines
U
Based on our vast experience in designing and implementing citywide surveillance o
systems for other cities, we have identified some general guidelines that we follow in the a`
design of the backhaul network. o
.y
• Assessment of City Network Resources: It is useful to first assess possible City Q
Network assets that could be used within the project. We would review locations w
on the City Network, such as city facilities (City Hall, library, etc.),police
stations and fire stations. This way, camera clusters may be aggregated locally E
using wireless technology, and then transported through the City Network to the
server location.
t4
• Assessment of Customer Goals,Plans and Budgets: Generally,many design N
Y
options are available for the backhaul design. Usually,when more bandwidth is a
required in the backhaul network,the cost of the backhaul network will increase. -°
Therefore, in the end,the backhaul network needs to take into account the City's
goals and expectations,but also the reality of available budgets. We sometimes
will offer different options for the backhaul design, including a lower cost option
with lower available bandwidth and a higher cost option with higher available
bandwidth. The final design also needs to take into account the City's plans for 0
expansion in the future. o
U
• Assessment of Mounting Assets: In terms of the citywide cameras,we generally co
target to mount the cameras on existing street light poles or traffic light poles (or M
buildings), since placement of new poles adds significant cost to the project.
Generally,building out a dedicated fiber network to connect the cameras is not a L
feasible option, due to the high costs of the build-out that generally would
involve trench activities. In some cases, existing conduit is available, in which v
case new/additional fiber rollout could become a feasible option. Otherwise,
wireless technology is used to connect to the camera pole locations. In order to
build a wireless network, it is generally important to review also available Y
rooftop sites of tall buildings in the area for placement of wireless repeaters, as a
part of the backhaul network. Use of government buildings is obviously ideal,but LO
we have seen many cases where cities have been able to negotiate free rights for c
mounting with building owners based on support for the city's plans to enhance LO
safety in a certain area, leading to increased business and property values. a
• Assessment of Spectrum Options: When using wireless technology as part of 6
the backhaul network for a citywide surveillance system, it is important to review °M
available options for spectrum use. Typical options include licensed microwave °
a
(6/11/18/23GHz), 60/80 GHz, and 4.9 GHz. We will make recommendations
based on the project specifics. We generally recommend against the use of n.
unlicensed spectrum for a public safety application, such as this one.
a�
E
Cw�'
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-3
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 214
Technical Reference Information
3.C.2 General Wireless Design Guidelines
U
In regards to the wireless design for the camera clusters,we follow the following general o
wireless design guidelines,to assure high capacity and high performance. A key enabling a
factor in our cluster design is our multi-radio platform that allows for multiple radios per o
node, a concept that is followed more and more in the industry.
a
• Proper Site Survey and RF Planning: CelPlan develops and sells an industry- w
leading RF planning tool("CelPlanner"),renown for use with WiFi and W1MAX
technologies. After a thorough site survey,we will implement the network into E
our tool for RF propagation and interference testing to assure a smooth and
predictable implementation process. We already have complete terrain,
morphology and street databases to accurately model the City of San Bernardino. ca
Cn
• Use Point-to-Point Architectures ("Static Multi-radio Mesh'q: In most cases, L
use of point-to-point(PTP) links is ideal,using other wireless camera units as a.
repeaters, or actually adding additional repeaters. The key element is to dedicate
one radio to only one link in order to assure near maximum throughput in each
link, and reduce interference. U_
w
• Use Point-to-Multipoint Architectures:The use of point-to-multipoint(PMP)
L
architectures is sometimes useful to combine multiple camera feeds with a c�
minimal number of hops,but one needs to be careful that collisions will impact m
the link reliability and throughput, and should be used only with care, and the v
right type of wireless equipment.
• Avoid Single/Dual Dynamic Radio Mesh:Although our products can also M
supports this type of communications mode,we recommend against this type of
implementation for this (video) application, since throughput, in the ideal case is i
reduced by as much as 50% in case of multiple hops. Also,use of omni antenna
systems reduces throughput(by operating at lower modulation levels) and
increases interference. In video surveillance projects, it will be impossible to
achieve satisfactory performance with this type of implementation.
• Spectrum Selection: We strongly recommend maximize use of the licensed 4.9 Y
GHz band for all wireless communications in all our projects. This band is a
available to the City at no cost, and avoids many possible issues that would arise
from using unlicensed spectrum(including interference, reliability and o
performance issues). LO
r
• Line-of-sight Design: Although the OFDM-based modulation allows for Non-
Line-of-Sight connections, such conditions will impact significantly the
throughput and reliability/stability of the link. Therefore,we generally target(and o
carefully design our systems for) Line-of-Sight conditions. o
a.
3.13 Pole Camera Enclosure
Unique about CelPlan is its modular and integrated"one-box"F1exiVideo(FV-2100)
camera unit design that allows for scalable citywide surveillance system U
implementations. Our single integrated enclosure package makes installation easy and
esthetically pleasing. Also, it provides for a cost-effective solution that can easily be
moved. The solution was designed from the ground up for wireless video applications,
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-4
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 215
Technical Reference Information
and provides all the required features. Also, this solution was already selected for
deployments nationwide, with cities such as Los Angeles, Long Beach and Milwaukee. 2
We understand this is the lightest and most feature-rich pole camera solution in the a
industry today. The switch can be upgraded with media converter capabilities to allow for r_
high speed fiber connectivity. This optional package would apply for complex mount 0
locations that require specialty features, such as new fiber connections, wireless, etc. a
X
The modular approach is explained with the following diagram. W
c�
L
E
" M
U
m
a-
ca
ca
(< >) a
----- H.264 ; H.264 ;
Encoder i-
(�< Encoder
--- ----- Multi-Radio
Platform
Added Ethernet LL
(« ») Switch ---- Devices(such as _
------ fixed IP cameras, lLC
------------------- -------, ALPR,etc.)
Local Storage(Optional)
-------------------------------1
-------- ------------------------ m
Battery Backup(Optional) U
-------------------------------!
Reset Circuit �p
n
ti
Power Supply
N
R
L
Figure 4 Modular "One-box" Wireless Camera Approach E
With a single enclosure, CelPlan can offer baseline, optional and future features. In the
initial design, each unit will include either a media converter(in case of fiber connection)
or 4.9 GHz wireless radio (in case of wireless camera), switch (to connect to Ethernet N
backhaul at intersection),power supplies, encoder and reset circuit. Also, the unit can
accommodate a media converter(in case of dark fiber).
LO
0
v
CD
IDA Multi-radio Features LO
z
Our solution uniquely offers scalability to 4 radios, allowing for a dedicated radio in N
different directions, the only approach to make wireless video function properly. We can
integrate various radio platforms into our solution, including CelPlan's own FlexiRadio, o
Radwin, Firetide, Alvarion and others. o
CL
Based on thorough testing and comparison, we recommend the Radwin recent market
introduction of the Radwin 2000B series. This radio is a carrier-class style radio,but the a-
2000B series is affordable enough to be used within the camera clusters. v
The radio system offered presents the following features:
• Each radio can be configured to any band in software (4.9GHz, or 5.xGHz)
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-5
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.216
5.f
Technical Reference Information
• Each radio can be configured to any bandwidth in software (5, 10, 20 MHz) r
• Each radio is provided with integrated 2x2 MIMO antenna, with MIMO Q
supported also in 5 and 10 MHz channels a
c
We realize that Firetide has done a strong job marketing their radios in the public safety
space. Their latest line of radios (7000-series) is based on I In chipsets,with only minor
modifications. Most of the problems of taking an indoor technology (such as 802.1 In) w
from indoor to outdoor are not addressed. As a result, the radios are known for a high 2-
sensitivity to interference. But perhaps the most crucial flaw is that,just like standard 0
802.1 In, MIMO is not supported in 5 and 10 MHz channel sizes. At these channel sizes, ci
the Firetide 7000 series performance just like older generation radios from many years
ago. Note that in order to make a functional citywide wireless surveillance design in the
Cn
protected 4.9 GHz public safety band, the use of 5 and 10 MHz channels is an absolute L
must. a L
3.D.2 Camera Mount Options
For the FV-2100, we offer standard 1- and 2-camera configurations,using attached, or U_
detached cameras. The following picture shows options for attached camera
configurations.
(7
m
k
ch
31 iHC#
Wi bfltit T I (/J
fi (6
E
R
U
r
a. y
c�
co
L
Figure 5 FV-2100 Attached Camera Mount Options a
LO
An advantage of the detached solution is that is allows for optimized location of the o
camera and the wireless enclosure separately. As an example, when trees are an issue,to
LO
optimize the location of the equipment, the camera might be positioned lower on the pole Q
to "see"below the trees, while the enclosure and radio components typically would be on Cn
the top end of the pole to "see" over the trees. o
CL
0
L
3.E Surveillance Camera / Encoding System
3.E.1 PTZ Camera Options
For years, Axis has been the market leading manufacturer of IP cameras, and their latest
generation of PTZ cameras are considered the bench-mark in the industry. We are E
offering the Axis P5534 version with IMP (720p) resolution for improved detail.
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-6
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 217
Technical Reference Information
In terms of encoding, all cameras.offer H.264 encoding to provide for the most advanced
r
and most effective compression available in the industry today. a
0
L
Table 2 Proposed Camera Options Comparison =
0
.N
Camera Options Type Resolution Angle of View Low Light SensitivityQ,
(degrees) Color BM X
w
Axis P5522-E PTZ(18X) 704480 47-2.8 0.5 lux 0.01 lux M_
Axis P5532-E PTZ 29X 704480 53.1 -2.0 0.5 lux 0.01 lux
Axis P5534-E PTZ 18X 1280x720 55.2-3.2 0.74 lux 0.04 lux M
Axis Q6032-E PTZ 35X 704x480 55.8- 1.7 0.5 lux 0.008 lux U
Axis Q6034-E PTZ(18X) 1280x720 55.2-3.2 0.74 lux 0.04 lux
Axis Q6035-E PTZ(20X) I 1920x1080 1 54.1 -2.9 1 0.8 lux 1 0.04 lux M_
N
L
CU
It is noted the P-series models are intended for limited guard tour operations. a
v
3.E.2 Camera Optical Zoom LL
For reference purposes only, the following charts explain the capabilities of the 18X and
35X PTZ zoom options for 4CIF style (704x480 resolution) cameras. The 720pand 1080p
models offered will provide further distances at the same level of optical zoom. On the m
other hand, such cameras will require more bandwidth on the wireless network, offer o
reduced low-light sensitivity, have a higher cost, and require more storage space.
to
Table 3 Optical Zoom and Resolution
Distance to object(feet) 300 ft. 600 ft. 900 ft. L
d
Resolution at distance(using 18X zoom 48 pixels/ft. 24 pixels/ft. 16 pixels/ft. E
option) v
Resolution at distance(using 35X zoom 80 pixels/ft. 40 pixels/ft. 26 pixels/ft.
option) in
L
M
a.
LO
0
0
LO
T
Z
Q
Cn
R
O
O
aL
_
M
a.
d
U
_
d
E
M
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-7
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg 218
Technical Reference Information
3.E.3 Video Frame Rate, Resolution and Encoding
Video images are defined by the video frame rate and video screen resolution. o
L
IL
The frame rate (in Frame per Second (FPS)) gives a perception of continuity to
movements and we get an impression of a continuous movement for rates above 15 FPS. •2
in
For slow changing environments lower frame rates can be used, while for fast changing a
environments higher frame rates may be required. w
The video resolution expresses the number of vertical and horizontal pixels (YcbCr
sequence) of a video screen. Resolutions are standardized in the Common Intermediate U
Format (CIF). A summary is provided in the table below.
as
For comparison purposes, a regular digital TV format uses 720x480 (D1) at 30 FPS while
movies have a resolution equivalent to 1920x1080 with a frame rate of 24 FPS. L
Conventional surveillance systems use QCIF at 5 FPS. a
v
m
Table 4 NTSC Pixel Resolution
U-
NTSC pixel resolution
horizontal vertical pixels per video frame C�
t7
QCIF 176 120 21,120 0
CIF 352 240 84,480 V
2CIF 1 704 1 240 1 168,960 1 cc>
4CIF 704 480 337,920 M
One pixel is defined by its depth in bits. Depths of 4 to 32 bits are common. We are 2-
considering a depth of 12 bits in this proposal. E
The table below shows the data rate of uncompressed video frames for different frame v
rates (FPS) and resolutions (with reference to CIF).
�a
rn
Table S Data Rates for Uncompressed Frames
a
Data rate for uncompressed frames in Mb si,
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 °v
0
QCIF 0.25 0.51 1.01 1.52 2.03 2.53 3.80 7.60 r
CIF 1.01 2.03 4.06 6.08 8.11 10.14 15.21 30.41 z
Q
2CIF 2.03 4.06 8.11 12.17 16.22 20.28 30.41 60.83 N
4CIF 1 4.06 1 8.11 1 16.22 1 24.33 1 32.44 1 40.55 1 60.83 1 121.65 N
0
sz
The video data generated in this case is huge and compression techniques are used to
0
reduce the data,by eliminating redundant information. The most common compression
techniques are defined in the MPEG (Moving Picture Experts Group) specifications. The a
MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 compression techniques have long been the main techniques for v
compression. In these techniques,besides occasional "key frames" (where complete
information on an entire frame is sent), the encoding technique provide for efficiencies by E
sending only change information between frames that follow each other. As a result, v
when there is little motion in a picture, there is little information sent, while, when there Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-8
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.'219
Technical Reference Information
is a lot of motion, a lot of information is sent. Typically, there industry would reference
r
frame rates up to 4 Mbps for high motion video, for 30 FPS at 4CIF resolution. Because d
these techniques are much more efficient, that techniques that send individual frames 0 a.
(such as Motion-JPEG and JPEG-2000), MPEG-4 has long been the preferred encoding C
technique for wireless camera implementations.
The following tables show the data rate for compressed frames using MPEG-4, with"low x
motion", "high motion" and"average motion",respectively. w
a�
Table 6 Data Rates for Low Motion Compressed Frames
Data rate for compressed frames with low motion in Mbps
u
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 M
QCIF 0.004 0.008 0.017 0.025 0.034 0.042 0.063 0.127 -19
L
CIF 0.017 0.034 0.068 0.101 0.135 0.169 0.253 0.507 a
2CIF 0.034 0.068 0.135 0.203 0.270 0.338 0.507 1.014
4CIF 0.068 0.135 0.270 0.406 0.541 0.676 1.014 2.028 =
U.
t
Table 7 Data Rates for High Motion Compressed Frames
'L^
V
Data rate for compressed frames with hi h motion in Mbps 0
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 m
0
QCI U
F 0.008 0.017 0.034 0.051 0.068 0.084 0.127 0.253
CIF 0.034 0.068 0.135 0.203 0.270 0.338 0.507 1.014 M
2CIF 0.068 0.135 0.270 0.406 0.541 0.676 1 1.014 2028.
4CIF 0.135 0.270 0.541 0.811 1.081 1.352 1 2.028 4.055
L
I_
Table 8 Data Rates for Average Motion Compressed Frames v
Data rate for compressed frames with average motion in Mbps
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 CO
QCI
F 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.17 a
CIF 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.14 0.18 0.23 0.34 0.68 0
2CIF 0.05 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.68 1.35 c
4CIF 0.09 0.18 0.36 0.54 0.72 0.90 1.35 2.70 r
z
a
From the tables above, the data rate required to transmit video information varies n
between 4 kbps and 4 Mbps (based on MPEG-4 encoding). Based on available o
bandwidth, the encoding systems can be configured to meet the available bandwidth and o
application. Some surveillance applications require the capture of movements and others a
not. Trash dumping or drug dealing can be captured at low number of frames (2 to 5 FPS)
but will require high resolution for plate and face recognition. Also,intelligence can be -(,
added to a solution in relation to resolution and frame rate. For example, live surveillance
can be done at intermediate resolution levels,but an occurrence of an event may have to
be examined at high resolution levels. E
�a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-9
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.220
sa.a
Technical Reference Information
Recently, a new encoding technique has been introduced to the market,typically referred
to as"H.264". H.264 encoding technique is generally based on the same concept as
MPEG-4 encoding,whereas similarities between following frames are used to reduce the
1 overall stream. However, in market reference materials and in our own testing,we have °
found significant improvements of H.264 encoding compared to MPEG-4 encoding. In 2
fact,we have seen a reduction of bandwidth of over 50% from MPEG-4 to H.264. It a
should be considered though that with higher compression,H.264 is more sensitive to w
errors. Given the bandwidth limitations inherent to citywide wireless style video camera
systems, and given the level of maturity of H.264 encoding,we generally recommend E
new deployments to use H.264 encoding.
In the following, we are providing a comparison table between the leading compression
techniques in the market, including H.264, MPEG-4,Motion-JPEG and JPEG-2000. The cn
table presents a comparison between H.264 and other compression techniques, at 10%
compression/ 15 FPS/medium to low motion. Particularly also with the emergence of n
megapixel technology,the use of H.264 encoding has become even more crucial. The
below table highlights this by indicating also required rates for resolutions beyond 4CIF.
Table 9 Compression Technique Comparison (at 15 FPS)
(in Mbps)
m
Resolution Image Size H.264 MPEG-4 M-JPEG JPEG2000
U
4CIF 704x480 0.6 1.5 5.1 4.6 to
1 Me apixel 1280x720 1.5 4.0 ►�
ti
2 Me apixel 1920x1080 3.4
5 Me apixel 2592x1944
8 Me apixel 1600x1200 *4
E
The optimum level of video surveillance should be defined for each case, so the
surveillance objective is achieved while the transmission rate and storage capacity are
minimized.
U)
In summary,video definition is a mix of frame rate and video resolution, and should be
specified for each camera. Once the video definition is chosen,the video transmission a
requires an approximately constant data rate, with a low latency for camera control and C>
0
low jitter for proper frame sequencing. The transmission medium should have enough LO
bandwidth for the data rate required and a properly designed wireless access so the delays a
are small and not very variable,with a minimal error rate so that frames are not jittery. cn
Based on our broad experience,we have taken all these factors into account into our y
design. Also, our white paper about surveillance design, included in this proposal, °0-
provides additional background information. °
a.
IF Deployment Services a
CelPlan will provide all necessary services to provide for turn-key installation, including v
site survey, system design, equipment installation, configuration, testing and auditing and
project management. v
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-10
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 221
Technical Reference Information
As required, CelPlan can leverage its own RF planning tools and experienced services
r
team for site survey, network design and network auditing. d
0
L
a
c
0
v,
M
X
y ✓ r L
G
M
:s L
a
F g�
U.
/L
V
Figure 6 Example Network Design Plots t9
m
Our proposal is based on the following assumptions: v
0 • Re-use of existing poles and structures (traffic lights, light poles, buildings, towers,
etc.) for mounting of camera units and wireless components,unless specifically stated
otherwise. Use rights/mount approvals shall be between pole/ structure owner and
Customer(and are required by project start to avoid delays). Any lease costs or
application fees for mount approvals are not included in our proposal. CelPlan will
assist on as needed basis. v
d
• Power(continuous 110Vac) and ground shall be available at pole locations (photocell M
or base of pole), without trenching activities. No meters,panels or circuit breakers are L
included, and use of existing circuits is assumed. At building rooftop installation, an a
existing power outlet is assumed within 25 ft from our unit. o
• Project pricing based on good faith site assumptions, and availability of rooftops, LO
poles, etc. per design and proposal. Z
a
m
• Traffic control is assumed by the City.
0
• No tree trimming assumed within proposal. o
a
• No permit costs assumed or included. C
a-
• Remote access is assumed for CelPlan to the network through secure connection to
U
Internet by City to facilitate installation process, remote diagnostics and maintenance.
(Maintenance activities may be suspended until remote access is resumed.)
• The implementation plan may be impacted by adverse weather conditions.
`rrr� Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc., 1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-11
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.222
Technical Reference Information
1
• Police support during installation, on a case by case basis, may be required (for
example, in case of unsafe conditions).
0
Any changes to or conflict with the stated assumptions may result in timeline adjustment a
or impact on cost proposal. o_
N
C
f�
Q
X
W
R
L
E
U
a
Y
m
M
N
L
CL
m
v
c
U-
Y
c
�a
L
C9
t9
m
0
U
t`
ti
N
R
L
O
E
lC
U
a
Y
N
Y
L
a
LO
0
Iq
0
LO
T
Z
Q
Cn
R
N
O
O_
O
L
a
c
c�
a
m
U
(D
E
v
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston,VA 20191 Page 3-12
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential information
Packet Pg.223
5.I.d
Ceffllan' Wc'f' 4 N e t
WirrelessGloMITechnologies vivistoo of CetPten retnootoptos, tot.
V
d
O
L
a
C
O
c
ca
c.
x
w
L
D
E
U
a
O
ca
4. Organization and Project Plan Y
C
U-
//Ln�
,V
MV
W
U
r�.
M
N
f0
L
U
m
w-
m
L
a
LO
0
v
0
LO
T-
Z
Q
Cn
cv
N
O
CL
O
L
a
c
a-
0
U
m
E
U
i�
Q
Ref.No.:SAN150405
Packet Pg. 224
Organization and Project Plan
This chapter describes the organization, key personnel, contact information and project
plan. d
0
L
a
4.A Organization and Key Personnel o
CelPlan has a strong, experienced team focused on its Wi4Net activities. The following
details the related organizational structure. x
w
L
d
E
CEO/CTO
Leonhard V
Korowajczuk
y-
l4
N
R
0.
Director, Finance VP, Technical/ Director,Systems Director, R&D Director, m
/HR Marketing/Sales Program Director Engineering Aluisio Ribeiro Operations =
Eliani Korowajczuk Jasper Bruinzeel Paulo Leite Karla Chagas Wagner Mello
LL
C
lC
L
C9
Sr.Systems Sr.Systems Sr. Network Lead Technician Quality&Support Production m
Engineer Engineer Engineer Gary Tarbell Manager Manager U
Nikhil Mathur Zarci Cotias Leo Korowajczuk Cristine Korowajczuk Jayne Pavone
tD
ti
M
Figure 7 Organization Chart ZI
L
d
Most employees have been with the company for many years, and provide for a reliable, E
stable work-force,with most employees having an interest in the company. Each of the
employees has been carefully selected, and often recruited using trusted references, or d
based on prior relationships. The employees of CelPlan are the core asset of the company,
Cn
with a strong dedication to customer satisfaction and keeping customer commitments. L
The engineering team has a strong educational background, typically with bachelor or 0..
master degree engineering studies completed. o
Some of the core engineering individuals that may get involved in the project include
(number of years with company indicated): Z
a
rn
• Zarci Cotias (4 year)
0
• Cristine Korowajczuk (12 years) 0-
a
• Leonardo Korowajczuk (8 years)
a-
• Paulo Leite (15 years)
• Nikhil Mathur(6 years)
E
• Wagner Mello (13 years)
�a
w
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-1
Packet Pg. 225
Organization and Project Plan
• Jayne Pavone (6 years) r
2
• Aluisio Ribeiro (15 years) o
CL
• Karla Chagas (5 years) o
N
• Gary Tarbell (4 years) Q
X
W
4.13 Project Management L
With regards to the deployment and implementation,Paulo Leite has been assigned as the
program manager and responsible for technical and safety matters. He successfully
managed high-profile projects for the company, including the references with Milwaukee,
Modesto, Long Beach, Los Angeles and others. He will assemble a project team upon N
Y
contract award. His contact information is provided as follows: M
Paulo Leite, Director of Engineering
CelPlan Technologies, Inc.
1897 Preston White Dr., 3rd Floor Y
Reston, VA 20191 0
Main: +1 (703) 259-4020
Direct: +l (703) 259-4025
Fax: +1 (703) 476-8964 v
E-mail: paulo(ii)celplan.com
ti
4.0 Project Team and Resume Information
N
5
In regards to the proposed project team, the following project chart is provided: E
M
U
Sr.Business&Technical
Management
Leonhard Korowajczuk
r�Fn i crrn N
L
a
LO
0
�t
Account Manager Project Manager CelPlan O'
Jasper Bruinzeel Paulo Leite LO
(VP,Marketing/Sales) (Technical Director) Z
Q
to
f0
to
O
O
On-Site Supervision CelPlan Project Manager Installer L
CL
Gary Tarbell TBD
(Lead Technician) ca
FL
CD
U
c
In terms of CelPlan back-up staffing, back-up personnel is available within CelPlan's
core team, for the various key project team positions, including Nikhil Mathur, Leonardo
Korowajczuk, Aluisio Ribeiro, Wagner Mello and Karla Chagas. Mr. Mathur has acted
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-2
Packet Pg.226
5.I.d
Organization and Project Plan
already as prime Project Manager in some of CelPlan's wireless camera deployments,
including City of Toledo (OH), City of Taylorsville (UT), and City of Milwaukee d
(Mitchell Street expansion project). Others mentioned have been team members on 0_
various wireless camera network deployments. o
In addition, CelPlan can tap from its remaining group of 500 of staff,most of which are
in technical services roles.
X
W
4.C.1 CelPlan Resumes
Various summary resumes are explained below. v
a
Resume:Zarci Cotias,Sr. Systems Engineer
Tasks: Coordiniaton of production activities. cn
Background: Zarci brings over 20 years of experience in telecommunications,and is a
responsible for system design and product customization,based on customer and project
specific requirements.Zarci has a bachelor degree in engineering.
Duration: Support will be during production phases of the project,primarily.
Resume:Leo Korowajczuk,Sr. Network Engineer o
Tasks: Radio software programming&coordination during production process.
Background: With a background in computer sciences,Leo leads system design and °0
implementation on customer projects,with regards to IP based computer and storage v
architectures,and software implementation. c�c
Duration: Support will be during production phases of the project,primarily.
Resume:Paulo Leite, TechnicabProgram Director
L
Tasks: Overall project management.
Background: As one of the original members of the CelPlan management team,Paulo j
brings over ten years of senior engineering experience to his role at CelPlan. Today,
Paulo leads a team of engineers in the development of various products. Prior to his role
with CelPlan,Paulo served in a senior engineering position with Alcatel. Paulo is N
lie
working towards an MS in Information Systems Technology and holds a BS in Electric
Engineering with a focus on telecommunications. °-
Duration: Support to project from beginning to end. Paulo will maintain project manager
responsibility during the maintenance phase. C)
r
Resume:Nikhil Mathur,Sr. Systems Engineer
cn
Tasks: Project management support tasks&customer service coordination. 6
N
Background:Nikhil is responsible for customer systems design,implementation and o
CL
project management.Nikhil has an MSEE degree from the Auburn University. o
0.
Duration: Support to project from beginning to end.Nikhil will also coordinate the
customer support services during the maintenance phase. a
Resume: Gary Tarbell,Lead Technician
Tasks: Monitor installation and camera network installation support and coordination.
As lead technician,Gary manages field deployment and installation activities for s
customer projects. Gary brings over 10 years of experience in video, surveillance and
security. Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-3
Packet Pg.227
Organization and Project Plan
Duration: Support is concentrated during on-site installation activities.
a�
4.1) Project Plan a
A project plan will be provided at formal project start. We expect an implementation plan o
in about 2 months. C
M
CL
X
w
ro
L
E
U
a
Y
O
a-
ta
N
L
a
C
LL
Y
c
L
C7
m
0
U
Q0
ti
ti
N
L
d
E
U
A
Y
M
N
L
a
0
v
0
LO
r-
Z
Q
N
O
Q.
O
L
a
C
�a
a-
d
U
c
O
E
t�
Y
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-4
Packet Pg.228
5.I.d
Wireless Global Technologies Wf'
t CN7l1ra trennatoytrx„ Inc.
a�
0
L
a
_o
N
C
N
Q
K
W
m
L
O
E
m
a.+
W
a�-
RS
5. Cost Proposal Details
LL
r+
L
CO
C?
ti
ti
N
lC
L
U
r
m
c�
N
L
a
LO
0
0
r
Z
Q
N
iv
N
O
O_
O
L
0.
C
a
0
U
c
O
E
V
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150405
Packet Pg. 229
Cost Proposal Details
In the following, the proposed costs are explained.
w
d
5.A Baseline System a
Unit Price Extended c
.y
c
• 2x Wireless Camera Unit(FV21oo): $9,804.10 $19,608.20 x
w
• lx PTZ Camera System
d
• lx Axis P5534-E (with environmental done/ 18X optical zoom/ E
720p) or equivalent
d
• Pole mount system
x
• 1x Equipment Enclosure
a
• lx Equipment Enclosure (with environmental control, switch, v
power supplies, etc.) (scalable for multi-radio configuration)
U_
• lx Radwin 2000/5000 MIMO radio with integrated MIMO high- _
gain directional antenna
• lx Local Edge Server/Storage (1 TB) CO
• 1 x Genetec Camera Connection License v
ti
■ lx Mount/cable kit
• 13x Cellular Camera Unit(FV2loo): $9,804.10 $127,453.30
L
d
• lx PTZ Camera System E
U
• lx Axis P5534-E (with environmental done/ 18X optical zoom/ Y
720p) or equivalent
• Pole mount system
a
• lx Equipment Enclosure L,
0
• lx Equipment Enclosure (with environmental control, switch,
°
power supplies, etc.) (scalable for multi-radio configuration) d
lx Cellular Modem N
• lx Local Edge Server/Storage (1 TB) o
L
• lx Genetec Camera Connection License
c
• 1 x Mount/cable kit a
as
U
• Ox Repeater Unit(FR2100): $1,995.00 $0
d
o 1 x Equipment Enclosure E
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 5-1
Packet Pg.230
Cost Proposal Details
• lx Equipment Enclosure (with environmental control, switch,
power supplies, etc.) (scalable for multi-radio configuration)
'o
L
• Ix Mount/cable kit �-
_
0
• 2x Additional Radio: $1,568.00 $3,136.00
o Incremental to Wireless Camera Unit or Wireless Repeater Unit w
o lx Radwin 2000/5000 MIMO radio with integrated MIMO high-gain
directional antenna E
v
o lx Misc materials & integration
• Baseline Services (discounted): $130,990.00 to
Y
L
• Site survey a
• Design
• Cameras, wireless backhaul network installation, configuration and "-
commissioning
r7
• Management system installation, configuration and commissioning m
• Project management v
• Training
ti
M
• Maintenance Plan (until June 30, 2016): $30,000.00
• Taxes (8.25%): $12,391.29
• Total(with taxes): $323,578.79
r
a�
Cn
L
a
U)
0
v
0
LO
T_
Z
Q
ch
Rf
N
O
tZ
O
L
a
_
a
d
U
w
_
(D
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 5-2
Cost Proposal Details
53 Notes Term and Conditions
Notes, terms and conditions to our offer include: °
a
c
• Validity: Validity of proposal is until May 8th,2015. 0
.N
• Proposal pricing is based on CelPlan standard payment terms(30-day net)as follows:
X
• Hardware&Tax invoiced at delivery of related components,by camera site
L
• External/Site Labor invoiced at installation,by camera site cEa
U
o Maintenance invoiced at start of maintenance term >,
d
CelPlan can discuss alternates,but changes might impact price proposal.
• Offer includes taxes,based on our understanding of current rates.Actual rates will apply
a.
at the time of the project.
°
• All pricing includes a one-time,special 20%project-discount. Pricing in general is based c
on system pricing,and break-down prices for services and maintenance in Chapter 1 are U.
approximate and for reference purposes to fit break-down tables,and can not be regarded
individually.A special discount was provided additionally on one-time basis. U
• Services,maintenance and software charges are based on items provided as part of the o
baseline proposal. Charges for these items may need to be adjusted based on selected U
options,if applicable.
ti
• Statement of work and assumptions as stated throughput this proposal are applicable to M
this offer; any changes to the assumptions may impact the offer accordingly. N
°
L
• No bonding considered or included. m
E
°
• CelPlan will not take any responsibility for damage due to misuse,mishandling, U
accidents purposely inflicted damage,vandalism natural disaster,etc. from time of
Pm'p Y g ,
delivery to Customer site,regardless of system acceptance.The Customer will be °
Cn
responsible for cost or provisioning of appropriate insurance or repair/replacement costs. L
We will charge the Customer for the repair and/or replacement components,and a
associated services. LO
0
v
0
u�
Z
Q
N
N
O
O_
O
L
a
c
c�
a
d
U
C
m
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 5-3
Packet Pg. 232
TM
CelPlan W 4 N e t
0 GJrtstaa et L�tPt to ItCArtetapUx„ tnr.
�reiess Global Technologies
aD
0
L
a
_
0
_
o.
X
w
c�
L
c�c
G
m
U
m
m
N
Annexes Y
m
a
d
_
UL
�a
L
C9
c�
CO
0
U
co
ti
M
N
L
cdc
C
U
Y
N
L
a
Ln
0
0
W
T
Z
Q
Cn
N
0
0-
0
L
CL
c
ca
a
(D
U
_
d
E
U
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150405
Packet Pg. 233
r
Annex A—Glossary and Acronyms
v
Annex A - Glossary and Acronyms
I-
0-
a
0
.N
C
AP Access Point x
CIF Common Intermediate Format w
ca
COTS Commercial Off The Shelf d
E
DAS Direct Access Storage U
DSRC Dedicated Short Range Communications
DVB-H Digital Video Broadcasting—Handheld cn
FPS Frames Per Second L
R
ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems °-
v
LAN Local Area Network
c
LOS Line of Sight
MP Megapixel
MPEG Moving Picture Expert Group c�
NAS Network Attached Storage m
NLOS Non Line of Sight v
PCB Printed Circuit Board ti
PMP Point-to-Multipoint M
PS Power Supply
PTP Point-to-Point d
Q1 -4 Quarter of calendar year(1 —4) E
U
QoS Quality of Service
RF Radio Frequency N
SAN Storage Area Network L
US United Stated of America a
WAN Wide Area Network o
WiFi Wireless Fidelity; interoperable radio standard based on IEEE °n
r
802.11 a
WiMAX Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access; interoperable
radio standard based on IEEE 802.16 0
a
0
a
c
ca
a
d
U
c
d
E
v
w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191
Packet Pg.234
Annex B— Units
Annex B - Units
a`
C
O
C
° degree
cm centimeter w
L
dB decibel
E
dBm mill Watt expressed in decibels
dBW Watt expressed in decibels
4-
ft feet
GB Giga Byte I-
GHz Giga Hertz IL
kbps kilo bits per second
CD
Mbps Mega bits per second U.
TB Tera Byte C
L
V Volt t�
t9
m
V
ti
ti
N
tC
L
d
E
U
r
m
L
a
ui
0
v
0
LO
P
Z
a
N
O
Q
O
L
iL
C
M
0.
d
U
m
E
V
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191
Packet Pg.235
5.Le
4z
>'
CelPlan' Wi 4 N e t
WIreless Global Technologies �=Kts�, c^ ��r °a- =rcn•> _ xz, roc
a+
U
O
O
i
a
c
O
N
c
Q
x
w
CELPLAN PHASE 5 EXPANSION SOW 0)
E
ca
U
FOR
DOWNTOWN SURVEILLANCE CAMERA SYSTEM
a.
FOR _
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA =
ca
0
v
M
N
d
L
Q
L
L
CD
O
cl'
O
T"
T"
Z
Q
R
t/!
O
Q
0-
a
a.
a�
U
APRIL 8,2015 =
Q
RESTON,VIRGINIA/SAN DIEGO,CA
U
r_
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150408
Packet Pg. 236
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
0
a
0
.N
LISTOF FIGURES...............................................................................................................iv
CL
X
W
LISTOF TABLES..................................................................................................................V
E
1. STATEMENT OF WORK..........................................................................................1-0 0
U
LA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................ 1-1
4
1.13 SOW SUMMARY °
1- Cl)t
LC PROJECT COST SUMMARY....................................................................................... 1-2 -�
L
1.D REFERENCE LISTING 0 0.
E MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT PLAN ....................................................................... 1-3 Q
I.
.0
2. COMPANY AND EXPERIENCE.................................................................................2-0
_
LL
Y
2.A CELPLAN TECHNOLOGIES,INC. 2-1
..............................................................................
2.13 CELPLAN'S W14NET DIVISION 2-2 C7
2.0 CELPLAN PARTNERS...............................................................................................2-3
DO
2.1) COMPANY CONTACT INFORMATION........................................................................2-3
U
2.E CELPLAN EXPERIENCE............................................................................................2-3
to
ti
3. TECHNICAL REFERENCE INFORMATION 3-0 r'
3.A "BEST OF BREED"DESIGN APPROACH....................................................................3-1
3.13 VISION OF GROWTH AND IP-BASED SCALABILITY..................................................3-1
3.0 WIRELESS NETWORK DESIGN 3-2 L
CL
3.C.1 General Network Design Guidelines.......................................................................................3-3
3.C.2 General Wireless Design Guidelines.......................................................................................3-4
3.1) POLE CAMERA ENCLOSURE 3-4 L CD
3.1).1 Multi-radio Features................................................................................................................3-5 N
3.D.2 Camera Mount Options...........................................................................................................3-6 0
3.E SURVEILLANCE CAMERA/ENCODING SYSTEM.......................................................3-6 CD
3.E.1 PTZ Camera Options...............................................................................................................3-6 Z
3.E.2 Camera Optical Zoom..............................................................................................................3-7 Q
3.E.3 Video Frame Rate,Resolution and Encoding 3-8 N
3.F DEPLOYMENT SERVICES .......................................................................................3-10 0
Q.
4. ORGANIZATION AND PROJECT PLAN....................................................................4-0 0
a
4.A ORGANIZATION AND KEY PERSONNEL....................................................................4-1
4.13 PROJECT MANAGEMENT .........................................................................................4-2 a
4.0 PROJECT TEAM AND RESUME INFORMATION ..........................................................4-2 U
4.C.1 CelPlan Resumes.....................................................................................................................4-3
4.1) PROJECT PLAN 4-4
E
5. COST PROPOSAL DETAILS.....................................................................................5-0
S.A BASELINE SYSTEM..................................................................................................5-1
a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page ii
Packet Pg.237
Table of Contents
1� $.B NOTES,TERM AND CONDITIONS .............................................................................5-2
ANNEX A—GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS r
O
L
ANNEXB—UNITS................................................................................................................. d
r-
0
N
_
(0
Q
k
W
L
CCD
G
m
U
.�h
i�
LD
m
L
a
Q
u.
_
,,Lnn
,V
MV
W
U
m
M
N
O
m
L
Q
L
d
Cn
co
O
0
tt')
r
Z
a
U)
N
O
C.
O
L
a
_
c�
o.
d
U
w
_
O
E
v
.r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page Iii
5.I.e
List of Figures
List of Figures
L
c
O
FIGURE 1 CELPLAN HEADQUARTERS
FIGURE 2 EXAMPLE RF COVERAGE ANALYSIS WITH"CELPLANNER"TOOL....................2-2 x
FIGURE 3 W14NET'S FLEXIVIDEO SOLUTION DEPLOYED.................................................2-3 w
L
FIGURE 4 MODULAR"ONE-BOX"WIRELESS CAMERA APPROACH....................................3-5
FIGURE S FV-2100 ATTACHED CAMERA MOUNT OPTIONS..............................................3-6
U
FIGURE 6 EXAMPLE NETWORK DESIGN PLOTS...............................................................3-11 >,
FIGURE 7 ORGANIZATION CHART.....................................................................................4-1
to
Da
-v
U_
c
/LR
,VM1M1
ca
U
0
ti
M
V1
N
t�
L
Q
L
(D
U
00
0
v
0
LO
Z
Q
Cn
tC
N
O
Q
O
i
a
c
a.
U
:s
c
a�
E
t
w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Pa-C h'
Packet Pg. 239
r
List of Tables
List of Tables
0
L
_
O
TABLE 1 SECURITY INDUSTRY TRANSITION.....................................................................3-1
TABLE 2 PROPOSED CAMERA OPTIONS COMPARISON......................................................3-7 Q
TABLE 3 OPTICAL ZOOM AND RESOLUTION.....................................................................3-7 w
TABLE 4 NTSC PIXEL RESOLUTION.................................................................................3-8 t4
L
TABLE S DATA RATES FOR UNCOMPRESSED FRAMES......................................................3-8 E
TABLE 6 DATA RATES FOR LOW MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES....................................3-9 U
TABLE 7 DATA RATES FOR HIGH MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES...................................3-9
TABLE 8 DATA RATES FOR AVERAGE MOTION COMPRESSED FRAMES............................3-9
TABLE 9 COMPRESSION TECHNIQUE COMPARISON(AT 15 FPS) ....................................3-10 L
a
a�
_
u-
La
''Lnn
/V
�V
W
0
U
ti
ti
M
N
d
LC
L
Q
L
L
d
S
00
O
Iq
CD
Ln
P
z
.4
Cn
N
O
O_
O
L
Q.
_
a
a�
U
_
a�
E
s
U
RS
rr
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page v
Packet Pg. 240
CelPlan* WY4 N e t-
reless Gl bal Technologies ptvisrsa of crtarin rAraneteyrts, Inc.
V
d
O
L-
a.
c
0
C
M
CL
x
w
L
d
E
U
.r
m
M
N
L
1 . Statement of Work M
U.
co
L
0
U
ti
ti
M
N
d
t4
L
al
CL
L
d
L
(D
N
O
O
d'
O
LO
T-
Z
Q
U)
t4
y
O
a
O
L
a
c
CL
d
U
c
m
E
M
v
cv
Q
Ref.No.:SAN150408
Packet Pg. 241
Statement of Work
This Chapter contains the detailed infonnation for the various sections of the "Statement
of Work" section. Additionally, Chapters 2 through 5 provide further information in
addition to this Chapter. Also, various Annexes are provided with background 2
0
information. a-
c
0
1.A Executive Summary
(1) CelPlan's Experience: Since 2006, CelPlan has been involved with some of the w
largest citywide (wireless) surveillance projects and largest cities in the country,
including multiple 100+ camera systems. Our local track record includes E
deployments with some of the largest local Cities, including Los Angeles and Long v
Beach,but we also have been awarded initial and expansion contracts with smaller local
Y
entities such as Modesto, Culver City, Oakland, UCSB and UCB. We have done work for
CalTrans also. L
to
a
a Securny Cameras On kiawaukee Street Corners Help .a
Catch cammais
C cameras �� �
"Eli[ U-
L
t ♦A
Kash Id UBY TopaNWHIN °� m
Security cameras aid in arrest of Downtown camera catches assault of Turlock man V
man with stolen eun
tp
ti
ti
M
Pine Ave.pipe bomb jp
suspect appears in court d
:� l4
t51
!Z
M
L
Unique is our deep understanding of wireless technologies, as evidenced in two published
books on wireless technologies, published with Wiley. We are currently in the process in
to write a book for Wiley about public safety surveillance systems design. 00
0
v
Ln
Z
cdma2000'
Systems N
O
O
L
CL
WiMAX and LTE tests
Network Design, a
Optimization and d
Performance Analysis V
1111111 WILEY c
tv
E
U
O
w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-1
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 242
Statement of Work
sa�narc.aerm oa Nee snaetcornersiwa
carca canwaa
c
m
0
IL
c
O
.N
Kathy MvutESV Toya WASHI •�`•••:'•.:' !Z
X
LLI
Securitt cameras aid in arrest of Downtown camera catches assault of Turlock man
man with stolen gun
E
O
U
Pine Ave.pipe bomb
suspect appears in court N
L
o.
(2)Proiect Expansion: This project represents an expansion of the existing system, using
the same standards, technologies, while assuring full compatibility.
U.
c
1.B SOW Summary c�
This project upgrades the backend part of the system for added processing capacity, o
storage and mobile server functionality. We are adding a new R520 Dell server to U
accommodate the planned expansions (including a fair amount of storage capacity). The
current server is repurposed to operate as the mobile server, which will stream view to
mobile devices.
1.0 Project Cost Summary
sz
The "Backend Section" Subtotal is $18,345.83, and this is the same as the grand total in
this phase.
d
In addition, Chapter 5 contains a more detailed summary and break-down of the costs, ch
00
terms and conditions.
0
LO
Z
a
to
N
O
a-
0
L
a
c
a
v
U
c
m
E
U
.r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-2
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 243
Statement of Work
1.13 Reference Listing
The following specific references are provided: o
L
a
City of Modesto (Police Dept.) o
Contact: Fabian Zacharia
Phone : +1 (209) 342-9128/+1 (209) 652-6137 x
E-mail : fzachariaC&modesto ov.com W
L
Description: (CelPlan Reference) A 44-camera system, complete with E
monitoring center and SAN storage. Citywide downtown system, including also U
building cameras at City facilities. Initial contract from December 2008,with
expansion from March 2010; still under contract for maintenance services. 19- in
camera expansion contract was recently ordered. (Key field staffing including
Paulo Leite, Gary Tarbell and Nikhil Mathur.) a
a�
c
City of Los Anzeles (Police Dept.) U.
t
Contact: Sandy Russell L
Phone : +1 (213) 486-7054
E-mail : G9461(cr INd.lacit t�org o
U
Description: Contract implementation for wireless camera systems for multiple
area stations within the City of LA. Initial contract award of$13M included M
Mission, Topenga, West Valley and Foothill Area Stations. Expansions with
Southwest and 771h division. CelPlan also provided wireless camera systems for
LAX perimeter protection. (Key field staffing including Paulo Leite, Gary 2
Tarbell, Nikhil Mathur and Leo Korowajczuk.)
L
d
1.E Maintenance and Support Plan
00
O
The standard maintenance plan on the main system is extended to the expansion sites, C)
with coverage for a one year term, to June 30, 2016. z
Q
N
O
Q
O
L_
a
a
d
U
w
c
m
E
U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 1-3
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
toC
o efflkn WY4 N e t
hwe�e Inr,� fJ lF 6S
a+
V
N
O
L
a
c
O
c
R
C.
X
w
M
L
E
M
U
Y
N
Y
L
2. Company and Experience
U.
Y
IILn
/V
�rV
W
0
U
ti
M
N
O
.a
(C
OWN
L
Q
L
d
d
Q
M
LO
r
Z
a
U)
U)
O
a
O
L
IL
c
m
CL
d
U
Y
d
U
R
aY+
Q
Ref.No.:SAN150408
Packet Pg. 245
5.I.e
Company and Experience
This chapter describes CelPlan, its qualifications,teaming partners and experience.
v
2.A CelPlan Technologies, Inc. o
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. (a Virginia company) is a privately-held wireless technology o
company, established in 1995, and wholly owned subsidiary of CelPlan International,
with 500 employees worldwide. The company is headquartered in Reston,VA, and has a
:z
two US-based satellite offices; one in the Chicago area, and one in the San Diego area. w
Furthermore, CelPlan has strong global presence through local offices in South America,
Asia and Africa. In relation to this project, CelPlan possesses the required C-7 California £
State Contractors License(925007), and has technical field offices in Los Angeles and v
Long Beach.
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. can act as prime contractor and has its corporate offices at N
1920 Association Drive, 3rd Floor, Reston,VA 20191 and our federal corporate ID
number is 54-1766195. Bids are presented by the following individuals,both authorized a.
to execute agreements for the company:
• Mr. Leonhard Korowajczuk, CEO/CTO, phone 703-259-4022, U_
lonhard @celplan.com o
• Mr. Jasper Bruinzeel, VP of Marketing& Sales,phone 760-274-4214, CO
jasper @celplan.com
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. has the required financial capability and funding to undergo to
major citywide or regional projects. CelPlan Technologies, Inc. is totally debt free and M
has a good reserve to develop its projects. (Dun&Bradstreet: 87-906-1281). Already,
CelPlan has successfully implemented similar projects, including large-scale projects for
major cities, including the City of Los Angeles and Long Beach.No past or current legal
actions exist against CelPlan. CelPlan is not debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible
with any federal, state or local agency.
CD
CO
L
X30,4 h {. Y vav rf (7
` l C)
LO
r
Z
W,,Q^
N
O
Q
O
L
a
c
o.
m
U
c
O
s
Figure I CelPlan Headquarters r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Pagc '-I
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 246
5.I.e
Company and Experience
CelPlan is a leading provider of advanced Radio Frequency("RF") software planning
tools for the purpose of wireless network planning. The industry-leading"CelPlanner"
suite supports multiple technologies, including the most advanced technologies such as d
DVB-H, Mobile WiMAX and the latest WiFi standards. Also,the company offers a a
unique family of drive-test tools ("CelSignal")for automated characterization of wireless o
networks. CelPlan features an extensive customer list, and has provided its tools and
professional services to the world's leading carriers(incl. Verizon and Sprint),
communications solutions providers (incl. Ericsson and NSN) and integrators (incl. w
Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman). Based on its tools and professional services
team, CelPlan can offer the Customer unsurpassed services in this project, in terms of E
wireless network planning and configuration,to guarantee optimum performance. U
w
-
,e AFA&W FAQ a.
«_ C
n
U.
t
C
�Iflll
GIi� m
O
V
Asa, ti
M
N
Q
Figure 2 Example RF Coverage Analysis with "CelPlanner" Tool
a
2.B CelPlan's Wi4Net Division
d
Due to the growing demand with government and public safety agencies for IP-based
large-scale and citywide surveillance systems, CelPlan brings its Wi4Net division,
co
committed to the development and deployment of integrated(IP-based) surveillance
solutions for public safety and government organization. Our group is focused on more LO
complex design problems, including issues such as bandwidth and processing of large Z
numbers of cameras,high-capacity fiber networking,wireless connectivity,multiple Cn
locations, legacy system integration,video analytics, ALPR, and gunshot detection. o
Q.
Already in May 2005, CelPlan/Wi4Net introduced its fixed and wireless IP-based °
surveillance systems to Cities and public safety organizations, throughout the United C
States. Since then, many large government entities have contracted with CelPlan,
including the Los Angeles,Las Vegas,Milwaukee,Long Beach,McAllen and others. v
Generally, CelPlan has provisioned turn-key solutions for its customers, including
camera units, fiber or wireless infrastructure, fully equipped monitoring centers
(including large-capacity(SAN) storage solutions), IP-based video management
software, vehicle-based connectivity and comprehensive maintenance plans. w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-2
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 247
Company and Experience
. t
Q
0
L
CL
o
0
C
R
Q
X
W
R
L
E
Figure 3 Wi4Net's FlexiVideo Solution Deployed
m
2.0 CelPlan Partners
CelPlan offers the Customer a turn-key solution, providing project management, network
design, installation, system commissioning and training. For this surveillance project, CL
CelPlan introduces leading companies as partners, and local subcontractor for superior
installation and maintenance support. The main team partners include Axis, Radwin,
Genetec, and Dell. _
L
t�
CO
0
I - AX
can UN.CATiaras '� GLNEIEC to
n
ti
M
N
G1
2.1) Company Contact Information
CL
For follow up to this proposal, communication can be addressed to:
L
Jasper Bruinzeel, Vice President of Marketing& Sales
CelPlan Technologies, Inc. v�
1920 Association Dr., 4th Floor w
0
Reston, VA 20191
Ln
Main: (703) 259-4020
Z
Cell: (760) 274-4214 N
Fax: (703) 476-8964 6
E-mail: jasper celplan.com 0
&
0.
0
L
a
2.E CelPlan Experience .a
Wi4Net represents unique experience in providing turn-key large-scale surveillance v
solutions to public safety and government organizations. Wi4Net customers include the
City of Los Angeles, the City of Las Vegas, the City of Long Beach and the City of 0
E
Milwaukee. The City of Long Beach deployment is still considered one of the first and
largest wireless, citywide video surveillance systems deployed in the United States, and
generally considered a showcase of what is possible in wireless surveillance. This project Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc., 1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-3
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 248
5.Le
Company and Experience
is highlighted below, along with the Las Vegas,McAllen, Milwaukee, Reading, Modesto
and Los Angeles projects. w
U
G1
Some project highlights are provided below. a
Long Beach, CA o
Currently a 53-camera citywide camera system(in process to expand Q
rr nt signals are streamed wireless) simultaneous) and x
to 72), all cue g y, Y w
continuously,to a monitoring command center equipped with six 40"
screens and four 17" screens. The monitoring system offers 30 days of E
storage,utilizing an 18 TB storage area network solution. Exclusively v
using the 4.9 GHz band for all video streaming, all cameras connect
as
wirelessly to a single aggregation point. The system is live monitored
during critical times, such as Friday and Saturday nights. L
�a
a
m
.v
e
L
CO
�e D
U
N
to
L
i51
L
Q
Las Vegas,NV
S
Initially a 50-camera system,the Las Vegas system now includes 174 camera CO
connections,with the solution supporting 7 downtown wireless PTZ pole camera system,
CO
LO
in addition fixed and temporary uses. Las Vegas police department also uses the system z
for various covert operations. N
m
0
a
0
L
a
c
n.
v
U
:s
c
m
E
s
U
f0
r+
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston,VA 20191 Awe 2-4
All design specific information shall he CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 249
Company and Experience
(D
0
L
a
c
_o
N
t0
Q
X
W
R
L
E
M
U
w
d
c�
U)
L
McAllen, TX a
v
With a focus on downtown sections and City Parks, the initial phase of the McAllen
project includes 100+ cameras. With a strong emphasis on license plate recognition,the LL
system features a mix of PTZ and fixed megapixel cameras. Already, the system was
expanded to 150+ cameras, including integration with convention center security system 0
and other facility cameras and systems.
m
0
The system is based on a hybrid fiber-wireless backhaul infrastructure. U
M
II d
R
l`r
L
4)
CO
0
IT
0
LO
Z
Q
CO
R
N
O
CL
Milwaukee, WI 0-
a.
With a 60+node wireless network design, the system provides coverage throughout the
City's 96 square mile, and supports 7 districts and 7 district offices. The initial phase d
deployed 15 wireless cameras, with additional expansion phases adding 3, 12, 7 and 4 U
cameras for a current total of 41. The central command center, monitored 24/7, features a
server with Storage Area Network supporting 30 TB of storage capacity (for 120 days of E
storage). 24/7 monitoring staff supports the police operations, and improves efficiencies. L)
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Pac?-J
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 250
Company and Experience
Secttrtty Cameras on tttwaukee Street Comers Heap
catch►crkninats
Crime cameras )
0
L
a
0
:z
X
W
M
L
.�¢'T.;;o asc ameraz ac�a3k t=a!n tMs.e u�..x.
UhY MYKLE8Y T a W E
M
U
d
M
Reading,PA a
In an effort to reduce crime, and improve the City, the City of Reading and Police
Department have deployed initial phases with currently 28-cameras, with plans to expand
to 75. The system is live monitored at times, and has provided many successes from the a-
start. On average, 45-60 minutes of relevant footage is extracted every week.
c�
The system features a hybrid fiber—wireless infrastructure with mobility layer for access m
to vehicles and other purposes. v
ti
M
�e
M
CL
Q.
� X �
J — L
g 91 t�
E'
00
CI
CICD
LO
Z
N _
'a
SZ
O
L
a
_
M
a
a�
U
c
m
E
t
v
d
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-6
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 251
Company and Experience
Modesto, CA
In this project, CelPlan designed and implemented for the City of Modesto an IP-based
centralized surveillance solution, to reach critical locations in the down-town area, but o
also integrate with the largest local shopping mall security system, and various municipal -
in-building security systems, such as the police department,bus yard and transit center. 2
Backhaul design is a fiber-wireless hybrid solution. Q
The system has been highly successful and assisted in solving about 20 cases within the w
first 12 months of operation, including prevention and arrest of four perpetrators in a case
of rape and murder attempt in progress. v
� a
d
R
cn
L
a
_
_, -• LL
t
,L^
V
Los Angeles, CA m
In this project, CelPlan was awarded an initial contract for four of LAPD's police area
stations to establish local camera systems for high crime areas/hotspots in the area for
monitoring from the local area stations. The initial contract award includes systems for M
Mission, Foothill, Topanga and West Valley,with expansions planned for Southwest
(completed) and other area stations. The goal of the contract has been to establish a
standard for citywide surveillance system throughout the City of Los Angeles. 2-
a�
Consistent (CelPlan) technology was also deployed at the perimeters of LAX airport.
L
If■�Y TI 7.
■1 IVY{'�IgIG) L
Cn
O
d'
O
LO
r
Z
i � N
a �
N
O
O
L
a
c
a
d
U
_
d
E
v
O
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1920 Association Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 2-7
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 252
'elPla W 4 N e t
Global Technologies Gtvtriaa at t#t0ira F&CA0#1e0itt, for.
r+
V
d
O
L
a
a
O
'w
c
Q.
x
w
ca
L
E
U
A
w
3. Technical Reference Information N
L
a
d
C
M
U.
c
ca
,,L^^
,V
MV
W
U
ti
ti
M
N
d
t6
L
G1
Q
L
d
L
CD
U)
CO
O
0
T-
r
Z
Q
U)
R
N
O
O_
O
L-
0-
m
U
r
C
d
s
U
t6
rr
Q
Ref.No.:SAN150408
Packet Pg. 253
Technical Reference Information
In addition to Chapter I (Statement of Work),this Chapter provides further technical
background information in critical areas, such as system, cameras,wireless and
management solution. °'
0
L
Further to this chapter, find technical documentation(equipment datasheets) and relevant
white papers included in Annex C and D,respectively. 0
c
3.A "Best of Breed" Design Approach W
The security industry has gone through significant transformations in recent years. Video
streams are now processed as"digital" signals,rather than"analog". With recognized v
I encoding standards (such as MPEG-4 and H.264), communications standards (such as
Ethernet/IP),wireless standards (Wi-Fi, WiMAX, etc.) and hardware standards(such as
Windows-based operating systems), it is now truly possible to recommend "best-of-
breed"components for each part of the solution.
a
Our proposal is based on this"best-of-breed" open-standards based approach in the
various aspects of the design. Particularly in the video management section,we would
compare some of the open architecture solutions (such as Genetec,Milestone and OnSSI) LL
Y
to closed systems (such as IndigoVision,Avigilon, DVTeI,Verint and Pelco). L
Table I Security Industry Transition m
0
Closed System Open Architecture U
Proprietary Solution Standards Based M
Analog IP / Digital
Single Vendor Trap Best of Breed Selection
a
D
3.B Vision of Growth and IP-Based Scalability
L
Although initially a smaller project for just surveillance, this system should be able to in
migrate and integrate other surveillance system,within one state-of-the-art IP-based o
surveillance environment. It should allow for citywide surveillance, tying together
Ln
multiple locations (City facilities, schools,university, airport, 3rd parties, etc.) and Z
multiple applications (surveillance, access control, ALPR, etc.). <
Genetec, Milestone and OnSSI are considered the leading video management solutions in o
the industry, and we are certified with all three companies. For us,the proposed Genetec o
solution is by far the most professional,most scalable and most advanced surveillance a
solution in the industry, and the clear choice for citywide surveillance applications. This
is evidenced by the fact that Genetec has already been selected by the Top-3 cities in the °-
a
United States (i.e.New York,Los Angeles and Chicago). U
Specifically on New York and Chicago (see picture below),these systems feature the E
largest city government video systems in the country,with over 10,000 cameras already,
including integration with other entities, such as transport, schools and others. In case of
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-1
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 254
Technical Reference Information
New York,under certain conditions (like hitting of panic button), the police will gain
access to third party commercial systems in the City (like GAP and JC Penny).
d
0
L
0
CL
K
LU
L
d
CO
CU
CU
N
L
a
m
c
U_
The below diagram indicates the overall vision for citywide security with City
fa
government,pulling together multiple locations and multiple applications into a single 0
security platform. We can explain more about the many options available with IP-based m
surveillance. Integration options include Access Control, ALPR, Gunshot Detection, v
Video Analytics and others.
ti
ti
M
Access Control ALF'R
CD
Surveillance—
ro
Surveillance— City Facilities
Schools/University
L
Surveillance—316 Parties
Surveillance— GeneteC (banks,stores, v restaurants,clubs,etc.) Cn
Airport/Port Management System o
v
0
a7
Detection Systems— Z
Surveillance— (Gunshot,etc.)
Wireless Downtown Q
Cameras Surveillance— w
Ad-hoc solutions w
0
CL
0
CLL
o.
c
to
3.0 Wireless Network Design
U
As background information, the following design guidelines are provided for reference
purposes.
s
U
y
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-2
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 255
5.Le
Technical Reference Information
3.C.1 General Network Design Guidelines
Based on our vast experience in designing and implementing citywide surveillance
systems for other cities,we have identified some general guidelines that we follow in the o
design of the backhaul network. a
C
0
• Assessment of City Network Resources: It is useful to first assess possible City
Network assets that could be used within the project. We would review locations x
on the City Network, such as city facilities (City Hall, library, etc.),police w
stations and fire stations. This way, camera clusters may be aggregated locally
using wireless technology, and then transported through the City Network to the E
ea
server location. v
• Assessment of Customer Goals,Plans and Budgets: Generally,many design N
options are available for the backhaul design. Usually,when more bandwidth is L
required in the backhaul network,the cost of the backhaul network will increase. a
Therefore, in the end,the backhaul network needs to take into account the City's
goals and expectations,but also the reality of available budgets. We sometimes
will offer different options for the backhaul design, including a lower cost option i
with lower available bandwidth and a higher cost option with higher available
bandwidth. The final design also needs to take into account the City's plans for
expansion in the future.
m
0
• Assessment of Mounting Assets: In terms of the citywide cameras,we generally 0
target to mount the cameras on existing street light poles or traffic light poles (or
buildings), since placement of new poles adds significant cost to the project. M
Generally,building out a dedicated fiber network to connect the cameras is not a N
feasible option, due to the high costs of the build-out that generally would
involve trench activities. In some cases, existing conduit is available, in which ,
CL
case new/additional fiber rollout could become a feasible option. Otherwise,
wireless technology is used to connect to the camera pole locations. In order to
build a wireless network, it is generally important to review also available
rooftop sites of tall buildings in the area for placement of wireless repeaters, as
co
part of the backhaul network. Use of government buildings is obviously ideal,but
we have seen many cases where cities have been able to negotiate free rights for LO
mounting with building owners based on support for the city's plans to enhance Q
safety in a certain area, leading to increased business and property values. to
'R
• Assessment of Spectrum Options: When using wireless technology as part of Q
the backhaul network for a citywide surveillance system, it is important to review o
a.
available options for spectrum use. Typical options include licensed microwave
(6/11/18/23GHz), 60/80 GHz, and 4.9 GHz. We will make recommendations a
based on the project specifics. We generally recommend against the use of
unlicensed spectrum for a public safety application, such as this one.
a�
E
U
d
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 10191 Page 3-3
All design specific information shall he CelPlan Proprietary and Confi den tialInformation
Packet Pg. 256
S.I.e
Technical Reference Information
3.C.2 General Wireless Design Guidelines
In regards to the wireless design for the camera clusters,we follow the following general
wireless design guidelines,to assure high capacity and high performance. A key enabling o
factor in our cluster design is our multi-radio platform that allows for multiple radios per a
node, a concept that is followed more and more in the industry. o
N
C
• Proper Site Survey and RF Planning: CelPlan develops and sells an industry-
leading RF planning tool ("CelPlanner"),renown for use with WiFi and WiMAX w
technologies. After a thorough site survey,we will implement the network into
our tool for RF propagation and interference testing to assure a smooth and E
predictable implementation process. We already have complete terrain, v
morphology and street databases to accurately model the City of San Bernardino.
• Use Point-to-Point Architectures ("Static Multi-radio Mesh'q: In most cases,
use of point-to-point(PTP) links is ideal,using other wireless camera units as
repeaters, or actually adding additional repeaters. The key element is to dedicate
one radio to only one link in order to assure near maximum throughput in each
link, and reduce interference.
• Use Point-to-Multipoint Architectures: The use of point-to-multipoint(PMP)
architectures is sometimes useful to combine multiple camera feeds with a
minimal number of hops,but one needs to be careful that collisions will impact
the link reliability and throughput, and should be used only with care, and the o
right type of wireless equipment. v
• Avoid Single/Dual Dynamic Radio Mesh:Although our products can also to
supports this type of communications mode,we recommend against this type of M
implementation for this (video) application, since throughput, in the ideal case is y
reduced by as much as 50%in case of multiple hops. Also,use of omni antenna a
systems reduces throughput(by operating at lower modulation levels) and
increases interference. In video surveillance projects, it will be impossible to
achieve satisfactory performance with this type of implementation.
• Spectrum Selection: We strongly recommend maximize use of the licensed 4.9
GHz band for all wireless communications in all our projects. This band is
available to the City at no cost, and avoids many possible issues that would arise v
from using unlicensed spectrum(including interference,reliability and
performance issues). z
• Line-of-sight Design: Although the OFDM-based modulation allows for Non- Cn
Line-of-Sight connections, such conditions will impact significantly the N
throughput and reliability/stability of the link. Therefore, we generally target(and 0.
0
carefully design our systems for) Line-of-Sight conditions.
c
3.D Pole Camera Enclosure
Unique about CelPlan is its modular and integrated"one-box"F1exiVideo(FV-2100)
camera unit design that allows for scalable citywide surveillance system
CD
implementations. Our single integrated enclosure package makes installation
easy and E
esthetically pleasing. Also, it provides for a cost-effective solution that can easily be
moved. The solution was designed from the ground up for wireless video applications,
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-4
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 257
Technical Reference Information
and provides all the required features. Also, this solution was already selected for
deployments nationwide,with cities such as Los Angeles, Long Beach and Milwaukee.
We understand this is the lightest and most feature-rich pole camera solution in the o
industry today. The switch can be upgraded with media converter capabilities to allow for a`
high speed fiber connectivity. This optional package would apply for complex mount o
locations that require specialty features, such as new fiber connections, wireless, etc.
�a
The modular approach is explained with the following diagram. w
to
L
M
U
i
L
----- H.264 H.2647 IL
(",'>) Encoder Encoder ; y
`""-'""- Multi-Radio j--- -p
---
--- Platform Added Ethernet
(« >>) Switch ____ Devices(such as LL
'-------- fixed IP cameras, +'
C
--------------------------------, ALPR,etc.) ftS
Local Storage(Optional) L
Ur
--------------------------------, V'
Battery Backup(Optional) m
-------------------------------- O
Reset Circuit U
Power Supply
M
N
Figure 4 Modular "One-box" Wireless Camera Approach
L
With a single enclosure, CelPlan can offer baseline, optional and future features. In the CL
initial design, each unit will include either a media converter(in case of fiber connection)
or 4.9 GHz wireless radio (in case of wireless camera), switch (to connect to Ethernet
W
backhaul at intersection),power supplies, encoder and reset circuit. Also, the unit can A
accommodate a media converter(in case of dark fiber). v
0
LO
IDA Multi-radio Features z
a
Our solution uniquely offers scalability to 4 radios, allowing for a dedicated radio in `o
different directions, the only approach to make wireless video function properly. We can o
integrate various radio platforms into our solution, including CelPlan's own F1exiRadio, o
Radwin, Firetide, Alvarion and others. a`
C
Based on thorough testing and comparison, we recommend the Radwin recent market a
introduction of the Radwin 2000B series. This radio is a carrier-class style radio,but the
2000B series is affordable enough to be used within the camera clusters.
a�
The radio system offered presents the following features: s
• Each radio can be configured to any band in software (4.9GHz, or 5.xGHz) a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-5
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.258
Technical Reference Information
• Each radio can be configured to any bandwidth in software (5, 10, 20 MHz)
• Each radio is provided with integrated 2x2 MIMO antenna, with MIMO
supported also in 5 and 10 MHz channels o
L
a
We realize that Firetide has done a strong job marketing their radios in the public safety o
space. Their latest line of radios (7000-series) is based on 1 In chipsets, with only minor
modifications. Most of the problems of taking an indoor technology (such as 802.1 In) x
from indoor to outdoor are not addressed. As a result, the radios are known for a high w
sensitivity to interference. But perhaps the most crucial flaw is that,just like standard
802.1 In, MIMO is not supported in 5 and 10 MHz channel sizes. At these channel sizes, E
the Firetide 7000 series performance just like older generation radios from many years v
ago. Note that in order to make a functional citywide wireless surveillance design in the a
protected 4.9 GHz public safety band, the use of 5 and 10 MHz channels is an absolute N
must.
R
a
3.D.2 Camera Mount Options
For the FV-2100, we offer standard 1- and 2-camera configurations, using attached, or
detached cameras. The following picture shows options for attached camera 'L
configurations. a
C9
0
m
V
�
to
Wi 4N,t ..✓ i.;iM1f- r
y
lC
L
Q
M
L
L
II�^
vI
Figure 5 FV-2100 Attached Camera Mount Options c
CD
CD
An advantage of the detached solution is that is allows for optimized location of the LO
camera and the wireless enclosure separately. As an example, when trees are an issue, to a
optimize the location of the equipment, the camera might be positioned lower on the pole m
to "see"below the trees, while the enclosure and radio components typically would be on N
the top end of the pole to "see" over the trees. c
L
a
3.E Surveillance Camera / Encoding System
CL
m
3.E.1 PTZ Camera Options
w
For years, Axis has been the market leading manufacturer of IP cameras, and their latest
generation of PTZ cameras are considered the bench-mark in the industry. We are
offering the Axis P5534 version with IMP (720p) resolution for improved detail.
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-6
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet,Pg.,259
Technical Reference Information
In terms of encoding, all cameras offer H.264 encoding to provide for the most advanced
and most effective compression available in the industry today. (Note that cameras are
not added in this Phase 5.)
0
L
a
Table 2 Proposed Camera Options Comparison o
.2
_
tSf
Camera Options Type Resolution Angle of View Low Li ht Sensitivity -
x
(degrees) Color B&tW W
Axis P5522-E PTZ(18X) 704x480 47-2.8 0.5 lux 0.01 lux
Axis P5532-E PTZ 29X 704x480 53.1 -2.0 0.5 lux 0.01 lux
Axis P5534-E PTZ 18X 1280x720 55.2-3.2 0.74 lux 0.04 lux is
Axis Q6032-E PTZ 35X 704480 55.8-1.7 0.5 lux 0.008 lux U
a
Axis Q6034-E PTZ(18X) 1280x720 55.2-3.2 0.74 lux 0.04 lux
Axis Q6035-E N
PTZ(20X) 1920x1080 54.1 -2.9 0.8 lux 0.04 lux
a.Y
L
It is noted the P-series models are intended for limited guard tour operations.
d
a
3.E.2 Camera Optical Zoom U_
r
For reference purposes only, the following charts explain the capabilities of the 18X and
35X PTZ zoom options for 4CIF style (704x480 resolution) cameras. The 720pand 1080p ca
models offered will provide further distances at the same level of optical zoom. On the m
other hand, such cameras will require more bandwidth on the wireless network, offer °
U
reduced low-light sensitivity, have a higher cost, and require more storage space.
Table 3 Optical Zoom and Resolution
Distance to object(feet) 300 ft. 600 ft. 900 ft.
c�
L
Resolution at distance(using 18X zoom 48 pixels/ft. 24 pixels/ft. 16 pixels/ft.
Q.
option)
L
d
Resolution at distance(using 35X zoom 80 pixels/ft. 40 pixels/ft. 26 pixels/ft.
option) N_
Co
0
v
0
LO
Z
a
U)
y
O
C-
O
CL L.
C
9 ,
d
_
M
- E
v
r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-7
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Technical Reference Information
loop-
3.E.3 Video Frame Rate, Resolution and Encoding
Video images are defined by the video frame rate and video screen resolution.
0
The frame rate (in Frame per Second (FPS)) gives a perception of continuity to a
movements and we get an impression of a continuous movement for rates above 15 FPS. o
For slow changing environments lower frame rates can be used, while for fast changing
environments higher frame rates may be required. Q
X
The video resolution expresses the number of vertical and horizontal pixels (YcbCr 2-
sequence) of a video screen. Resolutions are standardized in the Common Intermediate 0
Format (CIF). A summary is provided in the table below. v
For comparison purposes, a regular digital TV format uses 720x480 (D1) at 30 FPS while ,a
movies have a resolution equivalent to 1920x1080 with a frame rate of 24 FPS. co
Conventional surveillance systems use QCIF at 5 FPS.
o.
Table 4 NTSC Pixel Resolution
NTSC pixel resolution U.
horizontal vertical pixels per video frame
C7
QCIF 176 120 21,120
CIF 352 240 84,480 m
0
2CIF 704 240 168,960 �?
4CIF 1 704 480 337,920
h
Cl)
One pixel is defined by its depth in bits. Depths of 4 to 32 bits are common. We are
considering a depth of 12 bits in this proposal.
�a
L
The table below shows the data rate of uncompressed video frames for different frame a
rates (FPS) and resolutions (with reference to CIF). M
L
d
L
Table S Data Rates for Uncompressed Frames N
00
Data rate for uncompressed frames in Mbps
v
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 ,°O
QCIF 0.25 0.51 1.01 1.52 2.03 2.53 3.80 7.60 z
CIF 1.01 2.03 4.06 6.08 8.11 10.14 15.21 30.41 U)
2CIF 2.03 4.06 8.11 12.17 16.22 20.28 30.41 60.83 R
N
4CIF 4.06 8.11 16.22 24.33 32.44 40.55 60.83 121.65 0
0.
0
CL
L
The video data generated in this case is huge and compression techniques are used to
reduce the data,by eliminating redundant information. The most common compression a
techniques are defined in the MPEG (Moving Picture Experts Group) specifications. The v
MPEG-2 and MPEG-4 compression techniques have long been the main techniques for
compression. In these techniques, besides occasional "key frames" (where complete
information on an entire frame is sent), the encoding technique provide for efficiencies by
sending only change information between frames that follow each other. As a result, �?
w
when there is little motion in a picture, there is little information sent, while, when there Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-8
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.261' '
Technical Reference Information
is a lot of motion, a lot of information is sent. Typically, there industry would reference
frame rates up to 4 Mbps for high motion video, for 30 FPS at 4CIF resolution. Because
these techniques are much more efficient, that techniques that send individual frames o
(such as Motion-JPEG and JPEG-2000), MPEG-4 has long been the preferred encoding a
technique for wireless camera implementations. c
y
The following tables show the data rate for compressed frames using MPEG-4, with"low
motion", "high motion" and"average motion", respectively. x
w
�a
L
Table 6 Data Rates for Low Motion Compressed Frames
;_
M
Data rate for compressed frames with low motion in Mbps v
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 d
4-
QCIF 0.004 0.008 0.017 0.025 0.034 0.042 0.063 0.127 in
CIF 0.017 0.034 0.068 0.101 0.135 0.169 0.253 0.507 L
2CIF 0.034 0.068 0.135 0.203 0.270 0.338 0.507 1.014 a
4CIF 0.068 0.135 0.270 0.406 0.541 0.676 1.014 2.028 m
Table 7 Data Rates for High Motion Compressed Frames
Data rate for com pressed frames with high motion in Mbps
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 C7
QCI p
F 0.008 0.017 0.034 0.051 0.068 0.084 0.127 0.253 V
CIF 0.034 0.068 0.135 0.203 0.270 0.338 0.507 1.014
2CIF 0.068 0.135 0.270 0.406 0.541 0.676 1.014 2.028 M
4CIF 0.135 0.270 0.541 0.811 1.081 1.352 2.028 4.055
N
d
tC
Table 8 Data Rates for Average Motion Compressed Frames
o.
Data rate for compressed frames with average motion in Mbps
FPS 1 2 4 6 8 10 15 30 L
QCI to
F 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.08 0.17 00
CIF 0.02 0.05 0.09 0.14 0.18 0.23 0.34 0.68 °v
0
2CIF 0.05 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 0.45 0.68 1.35 LO
4CIF 0.09 0.18 0.36 0.54 0.72 0.90 1.35 2.70 Z
a
From the tables above, the data rate required to transmit video information varies o
between 4 kbps and 4 Mbps (based on MPEG-4 encoding). Based on available c
bandwidth, the encoding systems can be configured to meet the available bandwidth and a`
application. Some surveillance applications require the capture of movements and others
not. Trash dumping or drug dealing can be captured at low number of frames (2 to 5 FPS) a
but will require high resolution for plate and face recognition. Also, intelligence can be v
added to a solution in relation to resolution and frame rate. For example, live surveillance
can be done at intermediate resolution levels, but an occurrence of an event may have to E
be examined at high resolution levels.
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-9
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg.262
S.Le
Technical Reference Information
Recently, a new encoding technique has been introduced to the market,typically referred
to as "H.264". H.264 encoding technique is generally based on the same concept as
MPEG-4 encoding,whereas similarities between following frames are used to reduce the d
overall stream. However, in market reference materials and in our own testing,we have a
L
found significant improvements of H.264 encoding compared to MPEG-4 encoding. In o
fact, we have seen a reduction of bandwidth of over 50% from MPEG-4 to H.264. It
should be considered though that with higher compression, H.264 is more sensitive to Q
errors. Given the bandwidth limitations inherent to citywide wireless style video camera W
systems, and given the level of maturity of H.264 encoding,we generally recommend
new deployments to use H.264 encoding. E
U
In the following,we are providing a comparison table between the leading compression
techniques in the market, including H.264, MPEG-4, Motion-JPEG and JPEG-2000. The
table presents a comparison between H.264 and other compression techniques, at 10% Y
compression/ 15 FPS/medium to low motion. Particularly also with the emergence of a
megapixel technology,the use of H.264 encoding has become even more crucial. The
below table highlights this by indicating also required rates for resolutions beyond 4CIF. c
U_
Table 9 Compression Technique Comparison (at 15 FPS) c
(in Mbps)
Resolution Image Size H.264 MPEG-4 M-JPEG JPEG2000 m
4CIF 704x480 0.6 1.5 F 4 6 V
1 Me apixel 1280x720 1.5 4.0 3 9
_ m
2 Me apixel 1920x1080 3.4 I _ �. 1 31.3 M
5 Megapixel 2592x1944 76.0
_.
8 Me apixel 1600x1200 *4 r 115.E
'a
The optimum level of video surveillance should be defined for each case, so the a,
CL
surveillance objective is achieved while the transmission rate and storage capacity are
minimized. m
In summary,video definition is a mix of frame rate and video resolution, and should be in
specified for each camera. Once the video definition is chosen, the video transmission co
0
le
requires an approximately constant data rate,with a low latency for camera control and
Ln
low jitter for proper frame sequencing. The transmission medium should have enough z
bandwidth for the data rate required and a properly designed wireless access so the delays N
are small and not very variable,with a minimal error rate so that frames are not jittery. a
Based on our broad experience,we have taken all these factors into account into our a
design. Also, our white paper about surveillance design, included in this proposal, o
provides additional background information. a.
C
�a
a
IF Deployment Services U
CelPlan will provide all necessary services to provide for turn-key installation, including a
site survey, system design, equipment installation, configuration,testing and auditing and E
project management. U
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston,VA 20191 Page 3-10
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 263
Technical Reference Information
As required, CelPlan can leverage its own RF planning tools and experienced services
team for site survey, network design and network auditing. w
CD
0
L
Y a
...... _ c
a
a'.,. , W
L
a
G
t
�"r A
N,A
U.
Y
Figure 6 Example Network Design Plots c�
c7
Our proposal is based on the following assumptions: o
U
• Based on good faith understanding of specifications and site conditions. 10
• No permit costs included.
• Power, furniture, specialty monitor stands,rack, UPS by Customer. -CD
c�
L
• In this project, existing system server will be repurposed as Mobile Server. a
Any changes to or conflict with the stated assumptions may result in timeline adjustment 0
or impact on cost proposal. 0
S
00
0
v
0
Ln
Z
a
0
0.
0
L
a
c
�a
n.
v
U
Y
E
V
Y
Y
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 3-11
All design specific information shall be CelPlan Proprietary and Confidential Information
Packet Pg. 264
CelPlan� �
W i 4 N e -f-
Global Technologies G�vriian of c�tPt�a 7ecnnatap�rz, rnz
V
d
O
L
a
_
0
.N
0
CL
x
w
m
L
d
E
m
U
.r
4. Organization and Project Plan
U)
Y
L
m
a
a�
0
U-
_
0
L
m
0
U
h
h
M
N
d
m
L
Q
L
d
'CD
0
00
0
0
r
Z
a
U)
Ii
U)
0
CL
0
L
a
_
R
a
d
U
_
m
s
U
a+
w
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150408
Packet Pg. 265
r
Organization and Project Plan
This chapter describes the organization, key personnel, contact information and project
plan.
a�
0
4.A Organization and Key Personnel Ii
_
CelPlan has a strong, experienced team focused on its Wi4Net activities. The following 0
details the related organizational structure. Q
X
w
L
m
CEO/CTO E
Leonhard U
Korowajczuk
F_
------------ A
.+
d
4—
td
CO F__
R
Director, Finance VP, Technical/ Director,Systems Director, R&D Director, a
/HR Marketing/Sales Program Director Engineering Aluisio Ribeiro Operations d
Eliani Korowajczuk Jasper Bruinzeel Paulo Leite Karla Chagas Wagner Mello
_
LL
_
Sr. Systems Sr.Systems Sr. Network Lead Technician Quality&Support Production m
Engineer Engineer Engineer Gary Tarbell Manager Manager 0
Nikhil Mathur Zarci Cotias Leo Korowajczuk Cristine Korowajczuk Jayne Pavone U
to
ti
ti
M
Figure 7 Organization Chart
m
Most employees have been with the company for many years, and provide for a reliable,
stable work-force, with most employees having an interest in the company. Each of the a
employees has been carefully selected, and often recruited using trusted references, or :3
L
based on prior relationships. The employees of CelPlan are the core asset of the company,
with a strong dedication to customer satisfaction and keeping customer commitments.
Cn
The engineering team has a strong educational background, typically with bachelor or co
master degree engineering studies completed. o
rn
Some of the core engineering individuals that may get involved in the project include z
(number of years with company indicated):
• Zarci Cotias (4 year) o
CL
0
• Cristine Korowajczuk (12 years) a`
• Leonardo Korowajczuk (8 years) a-
• Paulo Leite (15 years) v
w
_
• Nikhil Mathur(6 years) E
• Wagner Mello (13 years) w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-1
Packet Pg.266
Organization and Project Plan
• Jayne Pavone (6 years)
• Aluisio Ribeiro (15 years)
d
0
• Karla Chagas (5 years) a
O
• Gary Tarbell (4 years)
a
4.B Project Management W
L
With regards to the deployment and implementation, Paulo Leite has been assigned as the
program manager and responsible for technical and safety matters. He successfully v
managed high-profile projects for the company, including the references with Milwaukee,
Modesto, Long Beach, Los Angeles and others. He will assemble a project team upon
contract award. His contact information is provided as follows:
L
�a
Paulo Leite, Director of Engineering a
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.
1897 Preston White Dr., 3rd Floor
LL
Reston, VA 20191
Main: +1 (703) 259-4020
Direct: +1 (703) 259-4025
c�
Fax: +1 (703) 476-8964 0
E-mail: paulo(a,celplan.com v
ti
4.0 Project Team and Resume Information M
In regards to the proposed project team, the following project chart is provided: Q
c>s
L
Sr.Business&Technical O
Management
L
Leonhard Korowajczuk
!r rn cTM
d
O
LOO
d'
0
Account Manager Project Manager CelPlan
Jasper Bruinzeel Paulo Leite Z
(VP,Marketing/Sales) (Technical Director) Q
N
ca
to
O
Q
O
L
a
On-Site Supervision CelPlan Proiect Manager Installer =
Gary Tarbell TBD tC
(Lead Technician) d
d
U
w
c
m
In terms of CelPlan back-up staffing, back-up personnel is available within CelPlan's
core team, for the various key project team positions, including Nikhil Mathur, Leonardo w
Korowajczuk, Aluisio Ribeiro, Wagner Mello and Karla Chagas. Mr. Mathur has acted Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-2
Packet Pg.267
15 I.
Organization and Project Plan
already as prime Project Manager in some of CelPlan's wireless camera deployments,
including City of Toledo (OH), City of Taylorsville (UT), and City of Milwaukee
(Mitchell Street expansion project). Others mentioned have been team members on o
various wireless camera network deployments. a
c
In addition, CelPlan can tap from its remaining group of 500 of staff, most of which are °
in technical services roles.
a
X
4.C.1 CelPlan Resumes
Various summary resumes are explained below. E
U
Resume:Zarci Cotias, Sr. Systems Engineer y
d
Tasks: Coordiniaton of production activities. rn
Background: Zarci brings over 20 years of experience in telecommunications, and is L
responsible for system design and product customization,based on customer and project a
specific requirements.Zarci has a bachelor degree in engineering.
Duration: Support will be during production phases of the project,primarily. _
U-
Resume:Leo Korowajczuk,Sr. Network Engineer =
Tasks: Radio software programming&coordination during production process.
t7
Background: With a background in computer sciences, Leo leads system design and m
implementation on customer projects,with regards to IP based computer and storage p
architectures, and software implementation. �?
Duration: Support will be during production phases of the project,primarily. rt°•
ti
M
Resume:Paulo Leite, Technical/Program Director
Tasks: Overall project management. m
a
Background: As one of the original members of the CelPlan management team,Paulo
brings over ten years of senior engineering experience to his role at CelPlan. Today, CL
Paulo leads a team of engineers in the development of various products. Prior to his role
with CelPlan,Paulo served in a senior engineering position with Alcatel.Paulo is
working towards an MS in Information Systems Technology and holds a BS in Electric rn
Engineering with a focus on telecommunications. c
Duration: Support to project from beginning to end. Paulo will maintain project manager o
responsibility during the maintenance phase. z
a
Resume:Nikhil Mathur, Sr. Systems Engineer Cn
Tasks: Project management support tasks&customer service coordination. o
Background: Nikhil is responsible for customer systems design, implementation and o
project management.Nikhil has an MSEE degree from the Auburn University. n-
Duration: Support to project from beginning to end.Nikhil will also coordinate the M
customer support services during the maintenance phase.
U
Resume: Gary Tarbell,Lead Technician
Q
Tasks: Monitor installation and camera network installation support and coordination. E
t
As lead technician, Gary manages field deployment and installation activities for
ca
customer projects. Gary brings over 10 years of experience in video, surveillance and Q
security.
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-3
Packet Pg.268
Organization and Project Plan
Duration: Support is concentrated during on-site installation activities.
4.D Project Plan o
L
A project plan will be provided at formal project start. We expect an implementation plan .
in about 2 months. °
N
C
t6
Q.
K
W
tC
L
d
E
M
U
.r
d
M
N
L
a
n�
C
U.
C
,,Lnn
rV
MV
W
0
U
ti
ti
M
N
d
f0
L
Q
L
d
d
Cn
CO
O
V
0
LO
T_
Z
Q
R
N
O
Q
O
L
a
C
a
v
U
c
m
E
M
U
r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 4-4
Packet Pg.269
. YeIeSS Global Technologies 11-,Sion or cr7Pttn Ttrm-ofoprrs.. !nr..
a�
V
d
O
L
a
c
O
.N
_
CL
x
w
�a
L
E
cn
R
U
A
m
4-
5. Cost Proposal Details
L
o.
_
U-
_
,,Lnn
'V
MV
W
0
ti
M
N
d
CO
L
Q
L
L
d
co
Lrj
r
Z
Q
N
R
N
O
O_
O
L-
L)
w
_
m
E
s
r
r
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150408
Packet Pg. 270
5.1.e LL'
Cost Proposal Details
In the following, the proposed costs are explained.
u
5.A Baseline System s
L
a
_
0
.N
c
QUANTITY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TAX AMOUNT a
X
W
is
1 Professional Dell 8520 Server with 9,680.00 Y 9,680.00 0
E
2x5OOGB RAID1 and 4x4T6 RAID6 V
5 Genetec-Mobile viewing licenses 336.00 Y 1,680.00
0
1 Services N 4,890.00 N
ICeS{PM,instal,set up,commissioning} �
1 Maintenance(June 30, 2016) 1,158.63 N 1,158.63 a
v
d
_
0
SUBTOTAL $ 17,408.63 U.
TAX RATE 8.250%
SALES TAX 937.20
SNIPPING -
TOTAL $ m
U
ti
M
N
d
R
L
L
d
d
00
CD
LO
T
Z
Q
Cn
U)
0
Q
0
L
a
0
a-
4)
U
_
d
E
s
v
w
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc., 1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 5-1
Packet Pg. 271
Cost Proposal Details
5.B Notes, Term and Conditions
Notes, terms and conditions to our offer include: c
L
• Validity: Validity of proposal is until May 8th, 2015.
a
0
• Proposal pricing is based on CelPlan standard payment terms(30-day net) as follows: c
is
CL
• Hardware&Tax invoiced at delivery of related components X
III
M
• External/Site Labor invoiced at installation
E
• Maintenance invoiced at start of maintenance term M
U
a
CelPlan can discuss alternates,but changes might impact price proposal. '
c�
• Offer includes taxes,based on our understanding of current rates. Actual rates will apply Cn
at the time of the project.
a
v
• All pricing includes a one-time, special 20%project-discount. Pricing in general is based
on system pricing,and break-down prices for services and maintenance in Chapter 1 are
approximate and for reference purposes to fit break-down tables,and can not be regarded u_
w
individually. A special discount was provided additionally on one-time basis.
L
C7
• Services,maintenance and software charges are based on items provided as part of the
baseline proposal. Charges for these items may need to be adjusted based on selected 00
0
options, if applicable. v
cfl
• Statement of work and assumptions as stated throughput this proposal are applicable to
this offer; any changes to the assumptions may impact the offer accordingly.
• No bonding considered or included.
L
• CelPlan will not take any responsibility for damage due to misuse,mishandling,
accidents,purposely inflicted damage,vandalism,natural disaster, etc.,from time of
delivery to Customer site,regardless of system acceptance. The Customer will be
responsible for cost or provisioning of appropriate insurance or repair/replacement costs. (D
We will charge the Customer for the repair and/or replacement components, and S
associated services. o
0
Ln
T"
Z
Q
N
N
O
Q
O
L
a
c
ca
a
d
U
c
O
E
t
v
r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191 Page 5-2
Packet Pg.272
'elPlan W Y4 N e 1�
VIN Global TQC{'IY{OjpglC5 G�rtsrm� al [rtVrrn trcnrratep'es, am
♦:r
0
d
0
L
a
_
0
.N
ca
a
X
w
is
L
d
E
U
d
is
Annexes
L
a
m
�a
a
c�
,,Lnn
,V
V
m
0
n
ti
M
N
d
c0
L
a
D
L
d
L
d
CO
0
Ln
T"
Z
Q
N
0
a
0
L
a
c
ca
a
d
U
w
_
d
E
v
co
Q
Ref. No.:SAN150408
Packet Pg. 273
i
Annex A—Glossary and Acronyms
Annex A - Glossary and Acronyms '
L-
a.
_
0
AP Access Point C
CIF Common Intermediate Format x
w
COTS Commercial Off The Shelf
DAS Direct Access Storage E
DSRC Dedicated Short Range Communications v
a
DVB-H Digital Video Broadcasting—Handheld
FPS Frames Per Second cn
I
ITS Intelligent Transportation Systems a
LAN Local Area Network -a
0
LOS Line of Sight
MP Megapixel U-
MPEG Moving Picture Expert Group
NAS Network Attached Storage
t7
NLOS Non Line of Sight o
PCB Printed Circuit Board v
PMP Point-to-Multipoint
PS Power Supply
PTP Point-to-Point
Q1 —4 Quarter of calendar year(1 —4)
QoS Quality of Service
RF Radio Frequency
SAN Storage Area Network
to
US United Stated of America a,
0
WAN Wide Area Network o
LO
WiFi Wireless Fidelity; interoperable radio standard based on IEEE z
802.11 Q
c6
WiMAX Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access; interoperable y
radio standard based on IEEE 802.16 0
a
0
L
a
ca
a
d
U
:j
_
d
E
s
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191
Packet Pg.274
Annex B—Units
Annex B — Units
O
L
a
c
O
° degree C
cm centimeter x
w
dB decibel
dBm mill Watt expressed in decibels E
CO
dBW Watt expressed in decibels v
ft feet
GB Giga Byte N
GHz Giga Hertz a
kbps kilo bits per second
Mbps Mega bits per second c
TB Tera Byte u-
V Volt
m
0
U
ti
h
M
N
O
fC
L
Q
L
d
L
CD
Cn
CO
O
LO
T-
r
Z
Q
N
N
O
Q
O
L
a
C
�a
a
d
U
C
O
E
s
U
Ce r
Q
CelPlan Technologies,Inc.,1897 Preston White Dr.,Reston, VA 20191