HomeMy WebLinkAbout32- Development Services •
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Valerie C. Ross, Acting Director Subject: Public meeting --10:00 AM—
Proposed formation of Assessment
Dept: Development Services District No. 1018 (Northpark &
Mountain—Tract No. 14448)
Date: July 11, 2000
File No.14.40-107
Synopsis of Previous Council Action: MCC Date: 07-24-2000
01-22-1996—Resolution No. 96-16 was adopted, approving Tract No. 14448.
03-18-1996—Authorization was given to proceed with the formation of Acquisition
Assessment District No. 1018.
08-08-1996—Resolution No. 96-249 was adopted, approving the execution of a
Reimbursement Agreement with the developer of Tract No. 14448 (Osborne Development)
06-19-2000—Resolution No. 2000-136 was adopted, setting a public meeting date of 07-24-
2000 and a public hearing date of 08-07-2000.
Recommended Motion:
That the Public Meeting be closed and that any protests and determination of ballots be carried
forward to the Public Hearing to be held at 10:00 am on August 7, 2000
"i(/--R�
Valerie C. Ross
Contact person: LASZLO "Les"FOGASSY Phone: 5026
Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Map Ward: 5
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $4,000 (Processing fee paid by applicant)
Source: (Acct. No.) 254-000-4075
(Acct. Description) Assessment Districct�1018
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. ��
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO — REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report
SUBJECT:
Resolution of Intention — Northpark and Mountain Acquisition Assessment District (AD 1018,
Tract No. 14448)
BACKGROUND:
On January 22, 1996, Resolution No. 96-16 was adopted, approving the final map for Tract No.
14448, located south of Northpark Boulevard and east of Mountain Drive.
The developer of this tract, Osborne Development, had requested that the City form an
acquisition assessment district to help finance some of the offsite improvements, consisting of
perimeter block walls, landscaping and sidewalks. Normally in these types of districts, the City
acquires the improvements from the developer and then is reimbursed through assessments. For
this district, however, it was proposed that the City would not pay for the improvements, but
would reimburse the developer through the assessments collected.
On March 18, 1996, authorization was given to proceed with the formation of the district and a
petition was submitted that was signed by 100% of the property owners at that time. The
developer also paid the necessary formation costs of$4,000. On August 8, 1996, Resolution No.
96-249 was adopted, authorizing the execution of a Reimbursement Agreement with the
developer. Despite numerous contacts with the developer, the developer only recently submitted
the information necessary for the preparation of the Engineer's Report, consisting of quantities
and costs of the improvements to be acquired.
On June 19, 2000, Resolution of Intention No. 2000-136 was adopted setting a public meeting
date of July 24, 2000 and a public hearing date of August 7, 2000. The Engineer's Report, on file
in the office of the City Clerk, was also preliminarily approved. The Report gives the details as
to the improvements to be acquired, the assessment spread and how the assessments will be
collected. In summary, the total cost of the improvements is $218,128.00. This amount will be
spread evenly across the 98 lots within Tract No. 14448. As proposed, the annual assessment per
lot, which includes improvement costs, interest and administrative fees will not exceed $268.77
per year. The total assessment per parcel is $2,225.80 collected over 15 years and may be paid
off in full at anytime.
Ninety-seven of the ninety-eight lots within the proposed district have been sold. As required by
law, all property owners were sent a notice of the public meeting and hearing, by mail. The
notice also included an Assessment Ballot, which the property owners may use to indicate
support or opposition to the proposed assessment. At the conclusion of public hearing to be held
on August 7, 2000, a determination of the ballots submitted will be made. If over 50% of the
ballots returned are in opposition, the proceedings for the formation of the assessment district
must be terminated. Ballots are weighed in proportion to the assessment amount.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO — REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report- continued
In the event that the formation of this district is not successful, the City will have no further
obligation to the developer, as stated on the Reimbursement Agreement.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None. Applicant has paid the $4,000 processing fee. The City will not be up-fronting any costs,
but will reimburse the developer directly from assessments collected if formation of the
Assessment District is approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the public meeting be closed and that the item be continued to the public
hearing on August 7, 2000.
Location of Proposed
Assessment District
0
o ,Qf
.F
Q
ke 18
�aoo
15 Northpark Blvd. NO Scale
�r
�O•
7 40th St. 330
ai
c >
'o a
imp 2 0
O
Marshall Blvd.
_— — 210 °
3 a
Highland Ave. 2 s9
0
in a E
a�
Bose Line St. '1' V) °
ai
9th St a
5th St. `
c
Rialto Ave.
a
M. 15
Mill St. o
C
0
aUi 210
a
Orange Show Rd. a
10
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT-
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT NORTHPARK AND MOUNTAIN
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION ACQUISITION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
® indicates un—incorporated areas (AD 1018)
within City's Sphere of Influence
ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1018
NORTHPARK BOULEVARD & MOUNTAIN DRIVE
ACQUISITION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
for the
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Filed in the office of the City Clerk in the City of San
Bernardino this day of ,2000.
RACHEL CLARK,
City Clerk,City of San Bernardino
r` I hereby certify that the within map showing the
• ` proposed boundaries of Assessment District No.1018 of
the City of San Bernardino,County of San Bernardino,
_ —— Slate of California,was approved by the City Council of
1 _
AGp jyp —————— —————— ——— the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof,
1 —__ _ _ B&A VARO —— — nem on the day of z000,
1 D N - - - -1 by Resolution No. ,and was filed in the
R 17 n ll _ office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County.
1 R� State of California, on the day of
1 '* a A A X r O r N r * ♦p p 94 O 1 .2000 in Book
Js — —— — — % 97 Comemsunity Facilities Districts s of Assessment and
1 r R v N 65 36 1
• a9 R Jl SE g�ply} _ RACHEL CLARK,
n r Js s
6/ City Clark,City of San Bernardino
1 Q I 1 r� � / �E'f
I M ■ A
40 It I
1 u
I
1 K 77 n A N » R 71 if r l
J7
Z'
N JJ H !J Y JI s h IJ
7i r
1 -- N -------- J --- -- 1
HIL �A4/VE— UVO O�0 U
SCALE: 1'-200'
LEGEND
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BOUNDARY ————————
V, ESS/ LOCATION OF
qg�°�ywoNgAFy� ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Q �
No.CE41880
Exp.0331-pn0a D?
OVII P 15 Q O NOR PAW( BLVD,
4�ff GBFO%� HILL DR.
F F
z
0
f
40TH ST.
DRAWN r: APPROVED 20-
r:
RECOMMENDED By: CITY T RED CIVIL R NO 41880
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DRAWING
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION NO'
NORTHPARK&MOUN TAIN 10096 Z41
ACQUISITION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT SHEET —OF
1 SHEETS VICINITY MAP