Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout45- Publi Works CITY OF SAN BER1' IRDINO - REQUEST COR COUNCIL ACTION File No. 1.895 Award of Contract - Rehabilita- From: ROGER G. ):ARDGRAVE Subject: tion of Pavement on Arrowhead Avenue, Mill St. to 3rd. St. , per Dept: Public Works/Engineering Plan No. 8815 --- MATICH CORPORATION Date: July 13 , 1993 Synopsis of Previous Council action: July, 1991 - Allocation of $500 , 000 . 00 in 1991/92 Street Construc- tion Fund budget approved. 02-16-91 - Transfer of $500 , 000 . 00 to Street Resurfacing - Various locations approved and $500 , 000 allocated from Subordinate Tax Allocation Bond Issue of 1991 . 02-17-92 - Resolution No. 92-55 adopted authorizing execution of an agreement with L.A. Wainscott for professional services. 02-15-93 - Resolution No. 93--43 adopted authorizing execution of Program Supplement No. 77 . 04-19-93 - Plans approved and authorization granted to advertise for bids . Recommended motion: 1. Adopt resolution. cc: Shauna Clark 2. That the appropriation of $818,000 under Barbara Pachon Account No. 242-362-57895 , "Rehabilita- Jim Penman tion of Arrowhead Avenue, from Mill St. to Third St. " consisting of $703, 500 in Federal-Aid STP Funds and $114 , 500 from City Measure "I" , be approved. rA i ea tu re Contact person: Gene R. Klatt Phone: 5125 Staff Report, Report of Bids , Supporting data attached: and Resolution Ward: 1 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $818 , 000 (Street Construction Fund) Source: (Acct No.) 242-362-57895 Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: Z 160F Agenda Item No. CITY OF SAN BERNRDINO - REQUEST I>R COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Bids for this project were opened at 2 : 00 p.m. , on Tuesday, 7-6-93 . A total of 5 bids were received, ranging from $593 , 383 . 50 to $759 , 374 . 00 . The low bid of $593 , 383 . 50 is 3 . 8% under the Engineer' s Estimate of $616 , 504 . 00 . Federal-Aid Surface Transportation Program Funds have been programmed to finance the prescribed portion of the total project cost. At least 10% of the aggregate total of our annual Federal- Aid Highway Funds must be expended on Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) . A goal of 20% was established in the contract documents for DBE participation on this project in order to balance out our traffic signal projects, which typically_ have no DBE participation. The low bidder submitted documentation showing 12% DBE participation, and requesting that a finding be made that they had made a "good faith" effort, to achieve the established goal of 20% . Caltrans reviewed their documentation, but did not concur that the low bidder had made a "good faith" effort. Documentation submitted by the second low bidder indicated that the 20% goal would be met. Therefore, Caltrans has concurred in awarding the contract to the second low bidder. The second low bid of $626 ,413. 00 is 1 . 6% over the Engineer' s Esti- mate of $616, 504 . 00. Below is the total estimated project cost, based upon the actual second low bid price. Construction Contract $ 626, 413. 00 Design Consultant' s Fee 40, 000. 00 Construction Engineer (W.O. #1965) 45 , 000. 00 Sub-Total $ 711 ,413. 00 Contingencies (15%) ± 106 ,587 . 00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 818,000.00 All costs incurred for this project will be charged to Account No. 242-362-57895, "Rehabilitation of Pavement on Arrowhead Avenue, from Mill Street to Third Street. Federal-Aid Surface Transportation Funds have been approved by SANBAG to finance about 86% ($703 , 500) of the total estimated project cost. The 14% local agency share will be financed from the City' s Measure "I" Local 1/24� Sales Tax funds. We recommend that a contract be awarded for the second low bid price. 7-15-93 75-0264 i z w LL. {� J \ a M N I_ Z o J O CJ p V a z ! m m z i W 3 w o `� o 0 m v n\ I Z Q U z Z Zf a o ux Q � W cc D o \ Y NJ » _ z us 6 J m m J U. Z4, 1 V Q: m o i% a z m Ix z a oINI I\j >[�, g LLJ O ►- v m m v �� W °c z z O z Uz % LLJ o , Z' � Z w Z Oyo a z W m ` ' Oho OZ O V v w a z ° d �= z N aaw a O i 0 o An m � � m i z z z o O v V N U w Z W w 0 I Z = a O m O O O d I .. N e+� v u� �o ^ ao o+ o Z 0 N Ht. cn m tnl I w ¢ m e 0 0 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE MATICH CORPORATION FOR PAVEMENT REHABILITATION ON 3 ARROWHEAD AVENUE, FROM MILL STREET TO THIRD STREET. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 5 SECTION 1 . The Matich Corporation is the lowest 6 responsible bidder for: Pavement Rehabilitation on Arrowhead 7 Avenue, from Mill Street to Third Street, per Plan No. 8774 . A 8 contract is awarded accordingly to said bidder for the total 9 amount of $626 , 413 . 00 , but such award shall be effective only 10 upon the contract being fully executed by both parties. All 11 other bids, therefore, are hereby rejected. The Mayor is hereby 12 authorized and directed to execute said contract on behalf of the 13 City; a copy of the contract is on file in the office of the City 14 Clerk and incorporated herein by reference as fully as though set 15 forth at length. 16 SECTION 2 . This contract and any amendment or modifica- 17 tions thereto shall not take effect or become operative until 18 fully signed and executed by the parties and no party shall be 19 obligated hereunder until the time of such full execution. No 20 oral agreements, amendments , modifications or waivers are 21 intended or authorized and shall not be implied from any act or 22 course of conduct of any party. 23 SECTION 3 . This resolution is rescinded if the parties 24 to the contract fail to execute it within sixty (60) days of the 25 passage of this resolution. 26 27 28 7-13-93 1\L J\J C1Y VL91\1J 11VV I_VLV L1\C1\.l 1V 1'12111\.11 Y_1-i 1\S V1YC]11V1V i V1Y iAY1,•'aa,ai { V REHABTLITATION ON ARROWHEAD AVENTTT. 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 2 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 3 Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the 4 day of 1993 , by the following vote, to-wit: 5 Council Members : AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 6 NEGRETE 7 CURLIN 8 HERNANDEZ 9 OBERHELMAN 10 (OFFICE VACANT) 11 POPE-LUDLAM 12 MILLER 13 14 Rachel Clark, City Clerk 15 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this 16 day of 1993 . 17 18 Tom Minor, Mayor 19 City of San Bernardino Approved as to form 20 and legal content: 21 James F. Penman City Attorney 22 23 By 24 25 26 27 28 2 - C I _. Y O F S A N B E R N A R DN O Interoffice Memorandum TO: SHAUNA CLARK, City Administrator FROM: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Continued Agenda item (Item # 19) --- Resolution Amending Application for Annexation # 343 DATE: August 19, 1993 FILE: 12.01-323 Item X619 on the August 16, 1993 Council Agenda (Resolution amending Resolution No. 93-205) was continued at our request to the September 7, 1993 Council meeting. Attached is a revised Exhibit "C" which replaces the Exhibit "C" currently attached. We have also included a new map, which should replace the map attached to the staff report. Please contact me at x 5111 if you need further information. Sincerely, ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Director of Public Works /City Engineer ALES FOGASSY Sr. Real Property Specialist /LF attach. 44 0 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-205 ENTITLED IN PART TO READ "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MAKING 3 APPLICATION TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE ANNEXATION OF THE TERRITORY LOCATED SOUTHWESTERLY OF 4 CAJON BOULEVARD AND SOUTHEASTERLY OF DEVORE ROAD" BY AMENDING EXHIBIT "A" AND EXHIBIT "C" . 5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN 6 BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 7 SECTION 1. That Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "C" of Resolution No. 93-205 is 8 hereby amended as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "C" attached hereto and 9 incorporated by reference as fully as though set forth in length herein. 10 SECTION 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed and authorized to file a 11 certified copy of this Resolution with the Executive Officer of the Local 12 Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 07/27/93 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 93-205 0 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the 2 Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a 3 meeting thereof held on the day of 4 19 , by the following vote, to-wit: 5 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 6 NEGRETE 7 CURLIN 8 HERNANDEZ 9 OBERHELMAN 10 OFFICE VACANT 11 POPE-LUDLAM 12 13 MILLER 14 City Clerk 15 16 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of 19 17 18 19 TOM MINOR, Mayor 20 City of San Bernardino 21 22 pproved as to form d legal content: 23 JAMES F. PENMAN, 24 ity torney 25 B y: 26 27 2$ 7/27/93 2 EXHIBIT 'A' Justification for Proposal and Preliminary Environmental Description Form For LAFCO Use Only TO: Local Agency Formation Commission 175 West Fifth Street, Second Floor San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 (714) 387-5866 INTRODUCTION: The questions in this form are designed to obtain enough data about the proposed project site to allow the commission and staff to adequately assess the project. By taking the time to fu11Y respond to the questions below, you can reduce the processimL time for your project. You may also include any additional information which you believe is pertinent. Use additional sheets where neces- sary, or attach any relevant documents. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. NAME OF PROPOSAL: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ANNEXATION NO. 343 2. APPLICANT: CITY OF SF„1 BERNARDINO 3. GENERAL LOCATION: SOUTH'W'ESTERLY OF CAJON BLVD, SOUTHEASTERLY OF DEVORE ROAD 4. Does the application possess 100% written consent of each property owner in the subject territory? YES NO XX (If YES, attach written authorizations.) 5. Indicate the reasons that the proposed action has been requested. Reauest by a maiority landowner (i .e, CAL-IMAT) for industrial development. 6. Would the proposal create a totally or substantially surrounded island of unincorporated terri- tory? YES XX NO __ If YES, please justify the proposed boundary and attach that Justifica- tion to this application. LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL 1. Total land area: 1316 Acres 2. Dwelling units in area: none 3. Approximate population in area: O 4. Indicate the General Plan designation of the affected city (if any) and uses permited by this designation(s): IL ( Industrial Light) ; IE ( Industrial Extractive); IH (Indus- trial Heavy); ;CG-1 (Commercial General ) ; SP (SP 90-01) : SP/1L, SP/IH. SP/IE, SP/OS : Specific Plan Ind. Light, Specific Plan Ind. Heavy, Specific Plan Ind. Extractive; Specific Plan Open Space, respectively; PFC, Public Facility n'7 r)7 aQ 1~Y14TRTT "A” 4 -2- San Bernardino County General Plan designation and uses permitted by this designation(s): FW (Floodway) ; CG (Commercial General ) ; IC (Community Industrial ) ; IN (Insti- tutional ) ; IR (Industrial Regional ) ; 3M-RM1' (Multiple Residential ) 5. Describe any special land use concerns expressed in the above plans. Refer to EIR 6. Indicate the existing land use. Industrial , vacant, Public Flood control . What is the proposed land use? Industrial , mining, public facility, open space. 7. Has the area been prezoned? YES XX NO N/A . Is the area in the process of prezon- ing? YES NO N/A X� . If YES to either question, what is the prezoning classifi- cation, title, densities permitted. City has a one map system - please refer to item 4 above . 8. Will the proposal require public services from any agency or district which is currently operating at or near capacity (including sewer, water, police, fire, or schools)? YES NO XX If YES. please explain. PLAN FOR SERVICES (Reorganizations and Annexations) Section 56653 of the Government Code requires the submission of a Plan for Services with every proposal initiated by a resolution of a legislative body. The Commission has adopted standards for the prepara- tion of these documents. Please attached to this application a narrative description of the Plan for Services which includes, at least. the following information: 1. An enumeration and description of the services to be extended to the affected territory. 2. A description of the level and range of those services. 3. An indication of when those services can feasibly be extended to the study area. 4. An indication of any improvement, or upgrading of infrastructure or other conditions the local agency would impose or require within the affected territory (for example, the payment of fees, the upgrading of structures. roads. water and sewer facilities, etc.). 0 -3- 5. An indication of how the agency's services will be financed if the change is approved. 6. An indication of whether the affected area is or will be proposed for inclusion within an existing or proposed improvement zone. redevelopment area, assessment district or community facilities district. The submitted Plan for Services must demonstrate that the range and level of service currently avail- able will, at least, be maintained following completion of the change. The Plan for Services needs to be signed, dated, and certified as to its completeness and accuracy by an official representative of the affected city or district. A Plan for Services will be required for each affected agency contained within a reorganization proposal. NOTE: Sponsors of a proposal initiated by petition may submit their proposal without a Plan for Services. In these cases, the LAFCO office will notify the affected city or district that they will be required to submit a Plan for Services. FACTORS OF CONSIDERATION FOR SPHERE OF INFLUENCE REVIEW ONLY PiPase attach to this application a narrative description of the following: 1. Present and planned land uses in the area. 2. The present and probable need for public facilities and services in the area. 3. The present capacity of public facilities and adequacy of public services. 4. The existence of any social or economic communities in the area. ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION 1. State general description of topography. area is generally flat with gradual southeasterly gradient 2. Describe any existing improvements in the site as t of total area. Residential 0 % Agricultural 0 % Commercial 0 % Vacant 92 % Industrial 8 S Other S 3. Describe the adjacent land uses. Residential , Commercial , Industrial , vacant to the northeast; vacant to the northwest; public facility, vacant to the southwest; Residential , vacant to the southeast. 0 -4- 4. Describe site alterations that will be produced by improvement projects associated with this proposed action (grading, flow channelization, etc.). Proposed rail orientated light and heavy industrial ; construction material users , open space (habitat preservation) ; mining (sand & gravel ) develop= ment. 5. 11111 service extensions accomplished by this proposal induce growth on this site? YES XX NO Adjacent sites? YES XX NO Unincorporated Incorporated 6. Is this project a part of a larger project or series of projects? YES NO XX If YES, please explain. NOTICES Please provide the names and addresses of persons who are to be furnished copies of the agenda and staff report and who are to be given mailed notice of hearing. NAME LES FOGASSY TELEPHONE NO. (909) 384-5111 City of San Bernardino ADDRESS ,100 N "n" StraPt- 'an Bernardino- CA 92418 NAME SHAUNA CLARK, City Administrator TELEPHONE NO. ' (909) 385-5122 City of San Bernardino ADDRESS 100 N "fl" Strapt , San Rprnardi nn- U V41 R NAME RACHEL CLARK ,City Clerk TELEPHONE NO. (909) 384-5002 City of San Bernardino ADDRESS 'inn N "n" Ctrppty tan Rprnardi nn, ['A 92 41 R _- CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented herein are true and cor ct to Lbestof y knowle dge and belief. CIT OF N ER DATE (VIII G URE OF APPLICANT PHONE `( -a 300 N. "D" Street ADDRESS San Bernardino, CA 92418 Revised 6/18/93 LAFCO 2758 Revision #1 08/17/93 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 343 TO THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ALL THAT REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCLUDING PORTIONS OF THE RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS, PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY AND ALL TRACTS, SUBDIVISIONS AND PARCELS, OR PORTIONS THEREOF, LYING WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY: COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINES OF THE 1-215 FREEWAY AND PALM AVENUE; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF PALM AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 950 FEET MORE OR LESS TO AN ANGLE POINT ON THE CORPORATE CITY LIMIT LINE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE CORPORATE CITY LIMIT LINE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO AN ANGLE POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID CORPORATE CITY LIMIT LINE ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD NORTHWESTERLY TO AN ANGLE POINT; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CORPORATE CITY LIMIT LINE TO AN ANGLE POINT, SAID POINT BEING ON THE CENTERLINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED IN BOOK 6490, PAGE 203 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID CORPORATE CITY LIMIT LINE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SOUTH 510 31 ' WEST A DISTANCE OF f1A /1 O /O'l 1:YUTRTT f'r" 2 2,020 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO; THENCE NORTH 21* 19 ' 34" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1,618. 64 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 25' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1,400 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE NORTH 530 27 ' 33" WEST A DISTANCE OF 520 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LAND CONVEYED TO CALMAT CO. AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF SURVEY IN BOOK 43 PAGES 17 AND 18 FILED APRIL 27, 1981 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY -RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE AND THE PROLONGATION THEREOF NORTH 380 37 ' 51" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1,559 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE CENTERLINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 11 OF MEYER AND BARCLAY SUBDIVISION MAP IN BOOK 12 PAGE 18 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 11 SOUTH 890 20' 47" WEST A DISTANCE OF 1,030 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT "Q" OF SAID MEYER AND BARCLAY SUBDIVISION; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT "Q" NORTH 20 30' 34" EAST A DISTANCE OF 454.40 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT "N" ; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT RIGHT- OF-WAY; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY TO A POINT ON THE 0 3 EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "Q" ; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT "Q" TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILROAD; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 686.88 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE SAN BERNARDINO WATER UTILITIES CORPORATION; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE NORTH 6046 '20" EAST A DISTANCE OF 80.1.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47011 ' 53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 43°15 ' 52" EAST (RECORD NORTH 42°52'22- EAST), PER RECORD OF SURVEY IN BOOK 44, PAGE 28 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY TO THE CENTERLINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CENTERLINE OF CAJON BOULEVARD TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL MAP N0. 457 FILED IN BOOK 4 OF PARCEL MAPS, PAGE 93, DECEMBER 10, 1970 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY AND THE EASTERLY LINE OF BLOCK 33 MAP OF DEVORE IN BOOK 17 , PAGES 79 AND 80; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 15° 42' 25- WEST A DISTANCE OF 2, 19 8.62 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY GLEN HELEN RANCH LINE, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 457; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 420 42' 16" EAST A DISTANCE OF 4,680.08 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE SOUTH 220 26' 33" EAST A DISTANCE OF 9,549. 18 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 25' 07" EAST A DISTANCE OF 1 ,753 . 11 FEET TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF FARM HOMES AS SHOWN ON COUNTY SURVEY MAP NO. 1156, AS SHOWN BY RECORD OF SURVEY ON FILE IN BOOK 42 OF MAPS, PAGE 88, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 890 55' 4 41" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3,323.74 FEET TO ITS POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 IN DEED TO CHARLES S. OLDER ET UX, RECORDED APRIL 30, 1954, IN BOOK 3374, PAGE 365 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE AND THE SOUTHERLY PROLONGATION THEREOF SOUTH 180 45' 00" EAST A DISTANCE OF 3,081.38 FEET; THENCE DUE EAST A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 750 37' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14° 22 ' 30" EAST A DISTANCE OF 225.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY AS ESTABLISHED BY DEED IN BOOK 6490, PAGE 203 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE DUE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 260.00 FEET; THENCE DUE EAST A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF SAID SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ITS POINT OF- INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF FARM HOMES AS SHOWN ON SAID COUNTY SURVEY N0. 1156, SAID POINT ALSO BEING AN ANGLE POINT ON THE EXISTING CORPORATE CITY LIMIT LINE; THENCE CONTINUING NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID RIGHT- OF-WAY AND EXISTING CORPORATE CITY LIMIT LINE TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE EXISTING ORPORATE CITY LIMIT LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. �oQRpFESS/pN9� STq F K L. G E 0 N DATE y ���' ��0 2G, #22449 W N rrl O. 22449 m ExP 4)_ 0 97 Za *J'f CIVIL Q`* 9tF OF C - Z 133HS 3N11 WON" / W N 2s Y E O 6 O f U M 6 1 6� -Z> 2 o Q�Q o YFa Y o 2 x C pp � x S 0?Q 1 W Q. IQ z In a a tc � a �o o SOP b $ N ci 1 kit= ZQ3 b 23 g �o N: rrpm rl 1 _ ti 1 2 t •i yty 3 jl 0 1 j _ � O 0 _ e � � V 1 , 11 h 1 I wi CZ 1 UNION o ., z � -� •J/•G�lW IIa1'MY 2 .WVXPW■II7NGfe 7 (14 a CAW AVMlWAPf LL z u • //O}I!lLll � w ,GYM-lO SN9/!'ONOY7/dY C O W 6 M','+loo7 10 Jr,IC3M N NO OW 7M7 ` F N ; 2 a d F uj 2S O W n o E a z a w� W e M z z ;6",36 e n ► < c 71lt1AYA1 J'-L t �L) f .' pf ��- o♦o i� I I { tP t 4��OaJ N ao i l ''""t 04 �F h �` 4 y��`► I It � rf�iiriij 1: .l YdpM�D � �l r o G ti ti 1 3HS 3N�� HXYN