Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout32- Facilities Management CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: James Sharer Subject: INTRA LATA AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE SERVICE CONTRACT Dept: Facilities Management Date: Sept. 22, 1997 C �� Synopsis of Previous Council action: 94-326 Resolution to award long distance service contract to MCI . 97 -25 Resolution to award Intra Lata and Long Distance Service Contract to AT&T. Recommended motion: Adopt Resolution Signature Contact person: James Sharer Phone: 5244 Supporting data attached: Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: 48,000. Source: (Acct. No.) 630-262-5156 (Acct. Description) Long Distance Service Finance: Council Notes: . Res 97- 75-0262 Agenda Item No. �� CJTY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT On February 3, 1997, the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino issued Resolution 97-25, authorizing the Purchasing Manager to issue a purchase order to AT&T for Intra Lata and Long Distance Telephone Service . The resolution gave him 60 days to issue this purchase order. Part of the bid specification required AT&T to comply with Chapter 3 . 44 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, and the City' s UUT Administrative Rules contained in the bid package. These Code Sections and Rules contain the duties and responsibilities of providers for collecting and remitting taxes, and allow the City to audit the providers records . AT&T had not been able to let the City access these records, and the purchase order was not signed in the 60 day window. The Facilities Manager and the Purchasing Manager went back to see if it would be feasible to award the bid to the second lowest vendor, MCI . A review of the bid indicated that the second lowest bid came in at $0 . 06 per minute, which is 100% higher than the bid received from AT&T, at $0 . 03 per minute . Staff determined that it would be in the best interest of the City to work with AT&T to resolve the problems they were having with opening up their records to the City. On August 15, 1997, AT&T sent the attached letters notifying the City that they could now meet the contract requirements . Facilities Management and Purchasing both concur that the AT&T bid was the lowest bid to best meet the City' s Intra Lata and Long Distance needs . It is therefore recommended that the Purchasing Manager be re-authorized to issue a purchase order based on the bid proposal from AT&T . 75-0264 ANT 412 Mt.Kemble Avenue August 15, 1997 Morristown, NJ 07962 Mr. John Murphy, Purchasing Manager City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Re: Municipal Resource Consultants (MRC) Utility Users Tax Review Dear Mr. Murphy: AT&T has always been ready and willing to allow San Bernardino to audit our books and records as they pertain to the Utility Users Tax. However, the use of independent contractors (MRC)to perform the audit raises some serious concerns for AT&T. Not withstanding these concerns, AT&T is willing to work with(MRC) provided that all our concerns are adequately addressed. Enclosed is a letter to Donald Maynor dated June 23, 1997, addressing some of our concerns. If you care to speak with me I may be reached at(201) 644-1595. Sincerely, Mario A. Verri Assistant Tax Director States & Local Sales Tax Audit Recvcled Paper - AUT C.Stephen Rosander Room S247 Attorney 4112 Mt Kemble Avenue Morristown, NJ 07960 201 644-8465 FAX 201 644-8548 June 23, 1997 Donald H. Maynor, Esq. 3220 Alpine Road, Suite A Portola Valley, CA 94028 Re: MRC UUT Compliance Review in Califomia AT&T Dear Mr. Maynor: I have received and reviewed your letter of May 16, 1997 to Mario Verri of AT&T related to the above issue. Your letter sets forth several points with respect to the proposed audit which clarify the situation and the facts surrounding the audit request. Presently, and at all times in the past, AT&T stands ready and willing to cooperate with any audit of the subject taxes that is performed by a municipality's employee who is subject to appropriate confidentiality restrictions. However, when a municipality seeks to have an audit performed by an independent contractor, who is not subject to the same statutory restrictions, confidentiality concems become substantially magnified and need to be satisfactorily addressed. In that regard, if we can be assured that the following restrictions will be complied with, AT&T will arrange for the requested audits to take place and to be performed by Municipal Resource Consultants (MRC). First, MRC and any consultant of that firm who performs any part of the audit or comes in contact in any way with any information of AT'&T will be required to sign a confidentiality agreement which will prohibit the dissemination or use of any of AT&T's information for any purpose other than the subject audit and will subject the parties to the statutory penalties that would apply if such individual were an employee of the State of Califomia or its municipalities. Second, MRC and any consultant of that firm who performs any part of the audit or comes in contact in any way with any information of AT&T will be required to sign an agreement that any other audit performed by MRC or that individual related to any Califomia tax will similarly be restricted to a prospective basis only. GD �& Recycled Paper Donald H. Maynor, Esq. June 23, 1997 Page 2 The purpose of the first restriction is obviously to limit the use of any of AT&T's information which is obtained in the audit. I am sure you can appreciate the extensive damage that could potentially result from the misuse of this confidential information. The second restriction is to reinforce what appears to be the intent of the UUT Compliance Review as an assist to utilities with prospective effect on tax application issues which appear in Article IG. AT&T would like the further reassurance that such restrictions continue to apply to employees who leave MRC. Please let me know your thoughts on the above so that the agreements can be prepared and the audits can begin. Thank you again for your letter and your assistance in this matter. Very truly yours, S�t uc_. NU-A d. C. Stephen Rosander cc: Mr. Jim Thompson, MRC