Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBook 09 08/08/69 - 04/02/701151 MINUTES OF TflE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST, 1969, IN ROOM ~ 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the Meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson, Wein and Webster Agency Members Absent: None Aiso Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary Mr. Austin stated that Mr. Varner will be at the meeting shortly. MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 17, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 17, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Minutes of the Special Meeting of July 31, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the Minutes of the Special Meeting of July 31, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCELS 47 & 48, CALIF. R-79, SUBURBAN ASSOCIATES, LTD: Mr. Frank Dominguez presented an Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcels 47 & 48, Calif. R-79 to the Members from Suburban Associates. This property is located at the northeast corner of 2nd and "E" Streets. (The existing Firestone Property). Mr. Dominguez stated that they desire to develop a seven story office building, with approximate building value of $2,500,000, and 72,000 sq. ft. He further stated that the parking ratio for this development will be 2:9--60 parking spaces will be on site, and an alloted 150 spaces from the parking garage. 4:10 - Mr. Varner arrived at the meeting. Mr. Dominguez stated that they want to start with the building as soon as the Agency can deliver clear title. Construction can start 30 days after close of escrow. The Plot Plan and rendering were shown to the Members. Suburban Associates desire to have an assurance from the Agency that the parking structure will be built, but they do not require that the parking structure be under construction before they purchase the property and start their construction. Mr. Varner stated that the Agency cannot at this time definitely state that the parking structure will be built. They can only incorporate the parking structure 1152 as a condition in the escrow documents. Mr. Varner further stated that it _~ is hoped that by the time the Agreements and Escrow Documents are drawn the Agency can guarantee construction of the parking structure. Mr. Wilson asked if union construction would be used on this building. Mr. Domingues stated that it would. The Members asked Mr. Quinn if there is any problem as far as parking is concerned in this Offer to Purchase. Mr. Quinn stated that Suburban's proposal regarding parking is consistent with Gruen Associates' concept. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2001 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT SUBURBAN ASSOCIATES IS THE REDEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79, REUSE PARCELS 47 & 48, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER'S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the Offering of Reuse Parcels 47 & 48 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its intention to sell Reuse Parcels 47 & 48 to Suburban Associates, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Central City Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held August 21, 1969. Adopted: 8/8/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2001, in that the proposal of Suburban Associates is within the concept of the Agency for highest and best use of the land. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1153 Mr. Wilson stated that Suburban Associates should be commended for their proposal and confidence in the Central City Project and the Agency. Mr. Austin expressed the Board's appreciation to Suburban Associates and to Redco for their efforts and confidence in the project and the Agency. REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that the Agency now has title to the Masonic Property. The notice has been sent to Griffith/Curci-Turner, and their 120 days to close escrow started Monday, August 4th. Mr. Varner stated that the Agency is ready to move on the City Hall Condemnation action. The City is not happy with the price offered. COMMISSION SEYMOUR LEVIN, REUSE PARCEL 33, R-10: Mr. Austin requested authorization from the Members to pay to Seymour Levin the finders fee of $1,300, for the sale of Reuse Parcel 33, R-10, to George and Hyman Shane. Mr. Quinn stated that this Offer to Purchase was authorized prior to the Agency's policy that all Brokers involved in an Offer be authorized by Board Action. The Notice to Realtors was signed November 12, 1968, by Mr. Levin and Mr. Shane, and the approval of the sale was made by Resolution 883, adopted November 21, 1968. Dlr. Wein was concerned that in some instances Finders Fee might be looked upon as a discount. He further stated that in this case the Agency has no other alternative but to approve the finders fee. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2002 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PAYMENT OF $1,300 COM- MISSION TO SEYMOUR LEVIN REGARDING SALE OF REUSE PARCEL 33, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, on November 12 1968, an Offer to Purchase, together with all necessary documents, was deposited by redeveloper on Reuse Parcel 33, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, on November 21, 1968, by Resolution No. 883, the Agency approved the sale of Calif. R-10, Reuse Parcel 33, to George and Hyman Shane; and WHEREAS, on August 5, 1969, the escrow on Calif. R-10, Reuse Parcel 33, closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino is hereby authorized to disburse to Seymour H. Levin the sum of $7,300 representing a 5% commission for the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 33, Calif. R-10, to George and Hyman Shane. Adopted: 8/8/69 1154 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2002. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Members inquired as to the development of Reuse Parcel 33. Mr. Shane stated that they closed escrow August 5, 1969. Ile further stated that they have received an indication from a federal institution regarding developing Reuse Parcel 33. If Texaco delays any longer in approving plans for Reuse 33, another proposal might be submitted to the Board for a different development to be built on Reuse Parcel 33, other than Texaco. Mr. Webster stated that a Notice to Realtors is incorporated in the Suburban Associates proposal for the purchase of 47 & 48, R-79. Mr. Frank Dominguez is listed as the Realtor for this purchase. Mr. Wein stated that this should have been brought up at the time Suburban submitted their proposal. Mr. Glassock stated that he had a conference with Mr. Newby of Suburban Associates regarding his proposal, but that it was Mr. Dominguez who brought in the Offer to Purchase and the deposit. Mr. Wein stated that a Finders fee was for the purpose of paying a realtor for finding the property for his client. In this case Mr. Newby had actually made the initial contact with Mr. Glassock for this property. Mr. Quinn stated that the proposed resolution designating Mr. Dominguez as realtor would not be presented to the Board until after the Public Hearing which should be at the next Regular Meeting. Mr. Wein stated that in the future he would like to see the matter of realtor brought before the board at the time of the original pre- sentation. Mr. Quinn stated that this would be done. NAHRO REGIONAL DUES: Mr. Austin requested authorization to pay $170 for NAHRO Regional dues. This amount is 10% of our National Dues. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the payment of $110 to NAHRO for Regional Dues. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PIRATES DEN RELOCATION: A summary sheet of the Pirates Den Relocation was presented to the Members. Mr. Wein explained the circumstances involved in this Relocation. He stated that the owners of the Pirates Den purposely kept their moving expenses under $10,000 so that their bids would not have to be sent to HUD for approval. They had had a bad experience with SBA delays, and were concerned that HUD approval would cause further delays. Their actual moving expenses were over $10,000. They claim that an additional $3,784.32 was spent for moving expenses. They were not concerned about this additional expense at the time because it was their belief that they would be eligible far the $2,500 relocation payment. Because they were not able to use their last years tax st#tement (the year in which they moved) HUD determined that they were not eligible for the $2,500 1155 relocation payment. Mr. Wein further explained that their contractor charged them an additional $7,000 for an additional room that they did in fact build themselves. Mr. Quinn stated that after discussions with the owners regarding this matter, the Agency sent to HUD a request for payment of this additional money. The request was accompanied by the Bid from the Firm that actually performed the work. HUD denied the request in that it was not accompanied by three bids, as required under normal circumstances. HUD further stated that some of the items listed on the bid have already been paid far.by the Agency. Mr. Quinn stated that the Staff reviewed the bid and did find some items that had already been paid for. The balance over and above the $9,976 that the Agency paid, was $3,784.32. Mr. Quinn stated that the Agency has resubmitted this request to HUD with the three bids and our determination of the work already paid for and that not paid for, We are awaiting reply. In summarizing, Mr. Wein stated that the owners have been caused quite an additional amount of money in their displacement from Third Street. It is his belief that the Agency should pay from local funds the $3,784 over and above the $9,976 that the Agency paid, if HUD does not approve this second request. The Board asked Mr. Varner what the Agency's position would be in this matter. Mr. Varner stated that if the Board so determines that the circumstances in- volved warrant reimbursement to the owners of additional costs, under extra- ordinary circumstances the Board may authorize from Local Funds the payment of expenses incurred. Messrs Austin and Wilson were concerned about the precedent this would set and the repercussions that might occur from dissatisfied displacees. Mr. Wein stated that he believes the situation of the owners of the Pirates Den is unique, and that the Agency should judge it on its own merits. The wiring of the fixtures in their new location was discussed. Mr. Wein stated that they received no reimbursement for the expenses they incurred for this wiring. We have had similar wiring expenses from other relocatees that have been paid by HUD. Mr. Wein stated that it is hie belief that HUD did not approve these expenses because the expenses were submitted after the move, instead of prior to the move accompanied by three bids. After further discussion, the Members determined that more time should be spent to properly come to a decision. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster tabling this matter until the Agency Staff is able to analyze the request in depth, and submit to the Board their analyzed report. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention; None Absent: None EASEMENT DEED "E" STREET: Mr. Austin requested authorization to execute Easement Deed to the City of San Bernardino fora certain portion of Reuse Parcels 52 R 53, R-79, due to the widening of "E" Street. The following resolution was introduced: 1156 RESOLUTION N0. 2003 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE EASEMENT DEED TO THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR PORTION OF R-79, REUSE 52 & 53 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, in executing the Official Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79, has determined the necessity for widening "E" Street an additional 8.75 feet on the East side of said street; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino now holds title to the property located on the East side of "E" Street, south of 2nd Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary be authorized to execute an Easement Deed to the City of San Bernardino for the necessary property needed for the widening of "E" Street. Adopted: 8/8/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2003. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CALIF. R-79, THIRD AMENDATORY CONTRACT: The following resolutions were introduced by the Chairman, A. M. Austin, and considered: RESOLUTION N0. 2004 (1) A resolution entitled: RESOLUTION APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION OF A THIRD AMENDATORY CONTRACT AMENDING LOAN AND GRANT CONTRACT N0. CALIF. R-79 (LG), BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BE IT RESOLVED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The pending proposed Third Amendatory Contract (herein called the "Amendatory Contract"), to amend that certain Loan and Grant Contract No. Calif. R-79 (LG), dated March 21, 1967, by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, (herein called the "Local Public Agency") and the United States of America (herein called the "Govern- ment"), is hereby in all respects approved. 1157 SECTION 2. The Chairman is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendatory Contract in two counterparts on behalf of the Local Public Agency, and the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to impress and attest the official seal of the Local Public Agency on each such counterpart and to forward such counterparts to the Department of Housing and Urban Development, for execution on behalf of the Government, together with such other documents relative to the approval and execution of such counterparts as may be required by the Government. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall take effect ir~ediately. Adopted: 8/8/69 RESOLUTION N0. 2005 (2) A Resolution entitled: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF PROJECT LOAN NOTES IN CONNECTION WITH URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, (herein called the "Local Public Agency") is duly authorized and proposes to undertake and carry out a certain urban renewal or redevelopment project (designated Project No. Calif. R-79) of the character authorized by law with financial aid by the United States of America (herein called the "Government"), in the form of a Project Temporary Loan Under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1450 et seq) which may be made by the Government to the Local Public Agency with respect to said Project in accordance with a certain Loan and Grant Contract (herein called the "Contract"), by and between the Local Public Agency and the Government; and WHEREAS, in order to enable the Local Public Agency to obtain such financial aid, it is necessary for the Local Public Agency to authorize and, from time to time, issue certain obligations in the form of Project Loan Notes, as here- inafter provided: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Local Public Agency as follows: Section 1. Whenever the following terms, or any of them, are used in this Resolution the same, unless the context shall indicate another or different meaning or intent, shall be construed, are used, and are intended to have meanings as follows: (1) The term "Resolution" shall mean this Res®lution. (2) All other terms used in this Resolution and which are defined in the Contract shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Contract. Section 2. The Contract entered into between the Local Public Agency and the Government for the above identified Project is hereby declared to be a part of this Resolution and all applicable provisions thereof shall be deemed 1158 incorporated herein to the same extent as if the provisions thereof were expressly set forth in full herein. Section 3. In order to evidence payments made by the Government on account of the Project Temporary Loan pursuant to the Contract with respect to the Project and to refund, renew, extend or substitute for any Note by this Resolution authorized to be issued (or any such Note by any other resolution authorized to be issued and which is outstanding, or on deposit for delivery pending payment therefor, as of the date this Resolution becomes effective), there are hereby authorized to be issued, from time to time, Project Loan Notes of the local Public Agency in an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time (whether authorized by this Resolution or any other resolution authorizing the issuance of Project Loan Notes) not in excess of the amount of the Project Temporary Loan available under the Contract. Section 4. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to file with the Government from time to time as funds are required, requisitions, together with the necessary supporting documents, requesting payments to be made on account of the Project temporary Loan available under the Contract, and the proper officers of the Local Public Agency shall prepare, execute and deliver to the Government Notes hereinafter authorized and shall accept payment therefor from the Government in the form of cash or other Notes issued by the Local Public Agency, and such officers are authorized to do and perform all other things and acts required to be done or performed in order to obtain such payments. Cash proceeds from the issuance of all Project Loan Notes shall be deposited and disbursed only in accordance with the provisions of the Contract. Section 5. Each Project Loan Note shall bear interest and be payable in the form and manner prescribed by the Contract and this Resolution; shall be signed in the name of the Local Public Agency by the Chairman; and shall have the official seal of the Local Public Agency impressed thereon and attested by the Secretary; and shall otherwise be in substantially the form of HUD-9107 which is incorporated herein by reference. Section 6. This Resolution shall supersede all previous resolutions authorizing Project Temporary Loan Notes, and the Project Notes authorized by this Resolution shall be exchanged for any Project Temporary Loan Notes heretofore issued pursuant to any previous resolution. Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect immediately. Adopted: 8/8/69 Mr. Ray M. Wilson moved that the foregoing resolutions be adopted as introduced and considered, which motion was seconded by E. George Webster, and upon roll call the "ayes" and "Nays" were as follows: AYES NAYS Ray M. Wilson None E. George Webster Sanford H. Wein A. M. Austin The Chairman thereupon declared said motion carried and said resolutions adopted. 1159 CPA SERVICES, R-10: Mr. Austin stated that the Agency has received two proposals for the Meadowbrook Project Bond accounting. The lowest bid has been received from Victor Fenster for $15.00 per hour. Mr. Fenster estimated the total cost to be $750.00. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2006 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH VICTOR FENSTER, CPA, FOR ACCOUNTING SERVICES, TAX ALLOCATION FUND WHEREAS, the terms of the Meadowbrook Project Bond issue require that, within 120 days after the close of each fiscal year, a financial statement in reason- able detail covering the Project, certified by an independent certified public account be prepared, and supplied to each and any bondholder on request; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited proposals from Certified Public Accountants within the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, proposals were received for said services, and examined at the Regular Meeting of the Agency held August 8, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Members find and determine that the proposal of Victor Fenster, for an hourly rate of $15.00, is the most desirable for the Agency and the City of San Bernardino. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to enter into Contract with Victor Fenster, for an hourly rate of b75.00, for,Accounting Services in connection with the first annual audit of Meadowbrook Project, as required in the Tax Allocation Bond issue. Adopted: 8/8/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2006. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER FONTANA PAVING, UNIT N0. 4, R-79: Mr. Austin explained that the manufacturers of the traffic signal equipment ere unable to ship the balance of the controller units to Fontana Paving until August 22, 1969. Because of this delay, a change order is necessary to allow Fontana Paving an additional 45 days for contract completion. The following resolution was introduced: 1160 RESOLUTION N0. 2007 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER N0. 13 WITH FONTANA PAVING, SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California entered into a Contract with Fontana Paving Inc., for Site Preparation Unit No. 4, Calif. R-79 dated the 6th day of December, 1968; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 was executed January 17, 1969; Change Order No. 2, on February 7, 7969; Change Order No. 3 on March 7, 1969; Change Order No. 4 on April 18, 1969; Change Order No. 5 on April 4, 1969; Change Order No. 6 on April 18, 1969; Change Order No. 7 on April 24, 1969; Change Order No. 8 on May 2, 1969; Change Order No. 9 on May 23, 7969; Change Order No. 10 on May 23, 1969; Change Order No. 11 on June 6, 1969; and Change Order No. 12 on June 20, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to extend the contract completion date by 45 days due to the fact that the manufacturers of the traffic signal equipment are unable to ship the balance of the controller units until August 22, 1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 13 with Fontana Paving, Site Preparation Unit No. 4, Calif. R-79, adding an additional 45 days to their contract completion date. Adopted: 8/8/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2007. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ROBINSON'S MEN'S WEAR, EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT: A request was presented from Robinson's Men's Wear for an extension of their Rental Agreement through December, 7969. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein denying the request of Robinson's Men's Wear for an extension of their Rental Agreement, because such an extension would interfere with Agency time schedule for the Central City Project. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ..., 1161 ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 5:15 p.m., for a personnel session. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1162 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT -~ AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 21ST DAY OF AUGUST, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson, Webster and Wein Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 8, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the minutes of August 8, 1969 as presented. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of July, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. After review, motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson approving the Expenditures for the month of July, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that the Agency has acquired title to the Pep Boys property for $130,000. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Mr. Austin stated that this is the time and place designated for the Public Hearings for the sale of property in the Central City Project and the Meadow- brook Project. a) Arrowhead Development Corporation - Reuse 4, 9, 45 & 50, Calif. R-79. Mr. Varner stated that the form of Agreement is on hand for examination. There were no questions or comments. b) Arrowhead Development Corporation - Reuse 44, 45, 46 & 47, Calif. R-10. Mr. Austin asked if there were any questions or comments regarding this sale. There were none. c) Suburban Associates, Ltd - Reuse Parcels 47 and 48, Calif. R-79. Mr. Varner stated that the form of Agreement is on hand for examination. There were no questions or comments. 7763 There being no objections to the above proposed sales, the Public Hearings were closed. ARROWHEAD DEVELOPMENT, DISPOSITION AGREEMENTS: The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2008 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- PIARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 4 and 9, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, TO ARROWHEAD CORPORATION & TED R. NICOLAY & ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcels 4 and 9, Calif. R-79, by Resolution No. 7097, to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Associates, a joint venture; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcels to said Redeveloper was held August 21, 1969, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, after due consideration of all pertinent facts, in- cluding any possible conflict of interest, the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 4 and 9 Central City Project, to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Associates, a joint venture, subject to approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Adopted: 8/2I/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the sale of Reuse Parcels 4 and 9, R-79 to Arrowhead Corporation & Ted R. Nicolay & Associates, and the adoption of Resolution No. 2008. The motion was carried by the fallowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION N0. 2009 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 45 and 50, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, TO ARROWHEAD CORPORATION & TED R. NICOLAY & ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE 1164 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California r declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, by Resolution No. 1098, to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Associates, a Joint Venture; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcels to said Redeveloper was held August 21, 1969, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec. 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, after due consideration of all pertinent facts, including any possible conflict of interest, the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, Central City Project, to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Associates, a joint venture, subject to approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Adopted: 8-27-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2009. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: P,yes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION N0. 2010 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 44, 45, 46 and 47, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, TO ARROWHEAD CORPORATION & TED R. NICOLAY & ASSOCIATES, A JOINT VENTURE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, by Resolution No. 1099, to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Associates, a Joint Venture; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcels to said Redeveloper was held August 21, 1969, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec 4. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, after due consideration of all pertinent facts, r „ including any possible conflict of interest, the Chairman and Secretary are 1165 hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, Meadowbrook Project, to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted. R. Nicolay & Associates, a joint venture, subject to approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Wein and Seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2010. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SUBURBAN ASSOCIATES, DISPOSITION AGREEMENT: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2011 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 47 and 48, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, TO SUBURBAN ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcels 47 & 48, Central City Project, by Resolution No. 2001, to Suburban Associates; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec 4; and WHEREAS, A Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcels to said Redeveloper was held August 21, 1969, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec 4; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 47 and 48, Central City Project, to Suburban Associates, subject to the approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon the close of escrow, a commission in the amount of 2;% of the purchase price of said parcels will be paid to Vanir Research Company, a licensed real estate firm, pursuant to the "Notice to Realtors and Redevelopers" dated August 8, 1969, and in accordance with Resolution No. 2012, which sets forth the Agency's determination regarding this commission fee. Adopted: 8/21/69 1166 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2011. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Varner informed all parties that all documents were subject to HUD review and approval. FINDERS FEE, VANIR RESEARCH COMPANY, Reuse 47 & 48, R-79: Mr. Austin stated that Company as realtor for Members were concerned Agency has had previou parcels 45 & 50, R-79, stated that in view of justify the payment of Suburban Associates have designated Vanir Research the purchase of Reuse Parcels 47 and 48, R-79. The about the justification of this Finders Fee. The > negotiations with Suburban Associates regarding which was sold to Arrowhead Corporation. Mr. Varner this fact, it was his opinion that the Agency could not a finders Fee to Vanir Research. Mr. Frank Dominguez of Vanir Research Company was presented to the Board. He explained that he initially contacted Mr. Lambeth of Lambeth Realty regarding the purchase of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, R-79, which was sold to Arrowhead Corporation. Mr. Lambeth and his associates (Suburban Associates) them pro- posed an Offer to Purchase these parcels (45 & 50), for the development of a twelve story office building. Their "Notice to Realtors" designated Lambeth Realty as the realtor for the property. An agreement was made between Mr. Lambeth and Mr. Dominguez that the finders fee would be split between them. When the Board determined that there might be a legal problem involved because the designated realtor was also an associate of the purchasing firm, Mr. Lambeth withdrew his request for Finders fee. This left Mr. Dominguez with no possible compensation for his efforts. Mr. Wein stated that although Mr. Dominguez did bring in the actual Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcels 47 and 48, h1r. Newby of Suburban Associates actually contacted the Agency regarding these parcels. A finders Fee was for the pur- pose of paying a realtor for finding the property for his client. In some cases a Finders Fee might be looked upon as a discount. Mr. Lambeth, of Lambeth Realty, stated that after their proposal for Reuse 45 and 50 was denied, they did not have any intention of looking for another parcel of land within the project area. He stated that Mr. Dominguesz came to them regarding Reuse Parcels 47 and L8, and it was at this time that they decided to offer to purchase these parcels. Mr. Dominguez was very instrumental in initiating their Offer to Purchase these parcels. .., After further discussion and consideration of all circumstances, the Members determined that 1/2 of the regular 5% Finders Fee would be justified in this case. The following resolution was introduced: 1167 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF FINDER'S FEE TO VANIR RESEARCH COMPANY, IN THE AMOUNT OF 2%,% OF THE PURCHASE PRICE OF REUSE PARCELS 47 and 48, TO BE SOLD TO SUBURBAN ASSOCIATES, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, a Notice to Realtors and Redevelopers has been deposited with the Agency in which Vanir Research Company was named as the broker in a trans- action on R-79, Reuse Parcels 47 and 48; and WHEREAS, said Notice to Realtors and Redevelopers sets forth that a 5% fee would be paid by the Agency to said broker who generates a purchase contract with the Agency for parcels of property; and WHEREAS, it is the opinion of the Agency Board that Vanir Research Company did perform a function in generating the offer on Reuse Parcels 47 and 48 by Suburban Associates; however, Suburban Associates had previously been aware of said parcels; and WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that Vanir Research Company should be compensated by the Agency for their part in generating Suburban Associates proposal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that an amount equal to 2z% of the purchase price of Reuse Parcels 47 and 48, R-79, will be paid to Vanir Research Company at the close of escrow on said parcels. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2012. The motion was carried by the fallowing vote, to wit: (ryes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ROBINSON'S t4EN'S WEAR, REQUEST FOR REDUCTION IN RENT: Mr. Justin McCarthy, attorney for Mr. Lippit of Robinson's Men's Wear, was presented to the Members. Mr. McCarthy stated that in addition to the request for a reduction in rent, he would like to request that his client be permitted to remain in their present location through December, 1969. He stated that this would benefit the downtown area and also allow Mr. Lippitt ample time to find a suitable location to relocate. Mr. McCarthy stated that his client wishes to relocate within the same area and wants to be out of business as little as possible. Mr. McCarthy stated that it is his belief that the Lippits are entitled to re-determination of the Agency Board, to stay in their present location through December, 1969. Pir. Austin explained that the Agency denied Mr. Lippits request at the last meeting (August 8, 1969) because such an extension would interfere with the Agency time schedule for the Central City Project. Mr. McCarthy requested authorization to contact 7168 Griffith/Curci-Turner Company to determine if such an extension would in fact delay their construction of the Mall. Mr. Quinn stated that he has spoken to Bill Brown, President of Griffith Company, regarding the construction of the Mall. Mr. Brown stated that it is their intention to start construction of all of the buildings of the mall simultaneously, on or about January 7, 1970. We have the responsibi- lity to deliver clear title to the Griffith/Curci-Turner Companies in time for them to start their construction on this date. Mr. Wein stated that such a request to the Griffith Company might be accepted because the delay would be to their advantage, due to the tight money market at this time. He further stated that our obligation is to the City of San Bernardino and that we cannot authorize this extension because it would definitely delay the project. Mr. Wilson stated that he would be opposed to anything that would delay the project in the least. Mr. Austin stated that he would not like the Agency to be exposed to any repercussions from other people in the area who desire to remain in their locations longer. Mr. Webster stated that he also would be opposed to any delay. Mr. McCarthy stated that in view of the fact that an extension cannot be granted, it is his desire to request that his client be given a 50% reduction in rent. All Members agreed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2013 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A REDUCTION IN RENT FOR ROBINSON'S MEN'S WEAR, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, Robinson's Men's Wear has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for property located at 380 North "E" Street; and WHEREAS, because of the loss of business due to the execution of the Central City Project, Mr. Alfred B. Lippitt of Robinson's Men's Wear, has requested a 50% reduction in rent. WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved and believe that such a reduction is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE I7 RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that a 50% reduction of rent for Robinson's Men's Wear is hereby approved, effective August 5, 1969. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2013. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 116° ALPERT'S RED CROSS SHOES, REQUEST FOR REDUCTION IN RENT: f1r. Austin stated that Alpert's Red Cross Shoes is located in Block 4, Parcel 23, R-79. It is within the same group of buildings as Robinson's Hen's Wear. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2014 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGEtJCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A REDUCTION IfJ RENT FOR ALPERT'S RED CROSS SHOES, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, Alpert's Red Cross Shoes, has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for pro- perty located on, Block 4, Parcel 23; and WHEREAS, because of the loss of business due to the execution of the Central City Project, I.1r. Alpert has requested a reduction in rent; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency have reviewed the circum- stances involved and believe that such a reduction is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that a 50°~ reduction of rent for Alpert's Red Cross Shoes is hereby approved, effective August 5, 1969. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2014 authorizing a 50% reduction in rent for Alpert's Red Cross Shoes. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: fJOne OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCELS 52 & 53, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Austin stated that we have received two Offers to Purchase Reuse Parcels 52 & 53, Calif. R-79. They are as follows: Checkboard Properties Inc.---Mr. Edmond Leger was presented to the board. for. Leger stated that Checkboard Properties desires to purchase Reuse Parcels 52 & 53 for the development of a Jack-in-the-Box restaurant. The plot plan was shown. The building will have 900 sq. ft. on the first floor and 900 sq. ft. on the second floor. The second floor will be used for equipment and an office. The total value of the building and improvements will be $140,000. Mr. Wein stated that the Agency is concerned about the assessed value of the building. ftr. Leger stated that the building would be assessed for 5140,000. Scope Industries -- Mr. Carl Waelder was presented to the Board. Mr. 4faelder stated that Scope Industries would like to purchase the property for the development of the Marinello School of Beauty (formerly Ferguson's Beauty College). Two retail stores will also be built within the building. Iir. Waelder stated that they have been negotiating with Luke & Vondey Jewelers and Jerry Kavanaugh, Optometrist, for these locations. All three will be displacees of the Central City Project. The building will have 9,000 sq. ll~o ft. for t4arinello School of Beauty, including 2,000 sq. ft. for retail store use. The estimated cost of the development is $110,000. There will be 17 parking spaces. The P1embers reviewed the two proposals. 1~1r. Wein stated that the Agency has an obligation to the Beauty School because of their displacement, and in view of the fact that Scope Industries has presented the best and highest use of the property, he believes their proposal should be accepted. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2015 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPt4ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAPJ BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERF1INING THAT SCOPE INDUSTRIES IS THE h10ST QUALIFIED REDEVELOPER TO REDEVELOP REUSE PARCELS 52 & 53, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO. 1, CALIF. R-79, AND AUTFJORIZ- ING PUBLICATION OF TkIE "REDEVELOPER'S STATE(+IENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC fJEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 to qualified redevelopers; and WHEREAS, the Agency has offered certain parcels of land for sale under the fixed price competition method setting forth criteria by which proposals to redevelop the offered parcels would be evaluated; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. PJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, has determined that the proposal of Scope Industries is in the best interest of the Central City Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon close of escrow for said sale to Scope Indus- tries, a finders fee in the amount of $3,305.00 will be paid to Carl Waelder, a licensed real estate firm, pursuant to the "Notice to Realtors and Redevelopers' dated August 19, 1969. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2015. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None FINDERS FEE, PARCELS 52 & 53, R-79: .-., F1r. Austin stated that Mr. Carl 4laelder has been named as Realtor for Scope Industries for the purchase of Parcels 52 & 53, R-79. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the finders fee for Reuse Parcels. 1171 52 & 53 to be paid to Mr. Carl Waelder upon close of escrow. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AMENDMENT TO PERSONNEL POLICIES: Mr. Wein requested that the Agency's personnel policy be amended to add: "Employees who have wages garnisheed will be cautioned both verbally and in writing, by the Executive Director, that a repetition of the garnishment, or a second garnishment, will be cause for dismissal. Two garnishments within a calendar 6 minths will result in automatic termination of employment". All Members agreed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2016 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION N0. 527, OFFICIAL PERSONNEL POLICIES WHEREAS, Resolution No. 521, Official Personnel Policies, was adopted July 20, 1967; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to amend said Official Personnel Policies, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 8, of Resolution No. 521, is amended to add: "(a) Employees who have wages garnisheed will be cautioned both verbally and in writing, by the Executive Director, that a repetition of the garnish- ment, or a second garnishment, will be cause for dismissal. Copies of .this correspondence will be furnished to each Board Member, Two garnishments within a calendar six months period will result in automatic termination of employment" Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2016. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RELOCATION REPORT - PIRATES DEN: Mr. Wilson stated that he read the data submitted to the Members from the Relocation Department regarding the relocation of the Pirates Den. The 1172 Report set forth the payments paid to various other displacees of the project. Mr. Wilson further stated that after review of the report, it appears that the request of the Pirates Den for reimbursement of their expenses over and above the $9,976 paid to them is valid. If the Pirates Den had exercised their right to go over the 510,000 relocation costs, we would of had to pay them the $3,240.32 for such costs. On the bases of the data submitted to the Board, hir. Wilson stated that he feels that the Pirates Den's request is in order. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2017 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT OF ADDITIONAL MOVING EXPENSES TO THE PIRATES DEN FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY REDEVELOPMENT FUND WHEREAS, the Pirates Den, a business previously doing business within the Central City Project Area, did relocate from 573 West Third Street, San Ber- nardino, California, on September 6, 1968; and WHEREAS, said business, did reduce moving expenses for said business below $10,000 in order not to have to receive HUD approval for said move; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, did from Project Expenditures Account, make payments in the amount of $9,976.00 for relocation and moving expenses to the Pirates Den; and WHEREAS, actual relocation and moving expenses amounted to $13,760.32 or $3,784.32 above the amount reimbursed by the Agency to the Pirates Den; and WHEREAS, through a series of exchanges of correspondence between the Agency and HUD an additional $544.00 in relocation and moving expenses has been authorized to be paid to the Pirates Den; and WHEREAS, Agency Members are of the opinion that the Pirates Den should be fully reimbursed for all expenses and the Department of Housing and Urban Development has disallowed certain portions of the Pirates Den Claim. WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED reimburse the Pirates Den from the sum of $3,240.32, which sum incurred beyond that authorized and Urban Development. Adopted: 8/21/69 that the Secretary is hereby authorized to the Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment Fund has been determined to have been expenses for reimbursement by the Department of Housing Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2077. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None _~ 1173 RESOLUTION TO CORRECT RESOLUTION N0. 973: Mr. Quinn stated that a review of the files indicates that Resolution No. 973 (Sale of Parcels 23 - 32, R-10, to Henschel) states that the developer is Henry S. Henschel and Robert J. Erwin. The name of M. H. Golden Construction Company should also be included as one of the developers of this property. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2078 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA CORRECTING RESOLUTION N0. 973 TO INCLUDE M. H. GOLDEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY AS ONE OF THE REDEVELOPERS OF REUSE PARCELS 23 THROUGH 32, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California at its Regular Board Meeting on March 6, 7969 adopted Resolution No. 973 authorizing the sate of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32, 651if. R-10 to Henry S. Henschel and Robert J. Erwin; and WHEREAS, the name of M. H. Golden Construction Company was intended to be included in said Resolution No. 973 as a redeveloper but was inadvertently omitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that Resolution No. 973 adopted March 6, 1969 is amended to include the name of M. H. Golden Construction Company as one of the redevelopers of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32, Calif. R-10. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2018. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT - TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE & TRUST C0: Mr. Austin advised the Members that Transamerica Title Insurance and Trust Company will be open5ng for business in San Bernardino on September 1, 1969. Authority was requested to submit an identical contract to Transamerica, which has been submitted to the other four existing title companies in San Bernardino. The following resolution was introduced: 1173 RESOLUTION N0. 2019 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH TRANSAMERICA TITLE IN- SURANCE CO., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION FOR DISPOSITION TITLE SERVICES AND ESCROW SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No. 7, California R-79, with the United States of America, providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1945, as amended by all Amendatory Acts, including the Housing Act of 1968; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services for the Central City Project Area No. 7, Calif. R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized, on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a California Corporation to provide for Disposition Title Services and Escrow Services, needed for the Central City Project No. 1, California R-79. Total compensation under said Contract not to exceed the sum of $14,850. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2019. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SITE PP,EPARATION CONTRACT, UNIT N0. 3, PHASE 3, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Austin advised that bids for Site Preparation Unit No. 3, Phase 3, (interim Parking) were opened August 18, 1969. The low bid was submitted by E. L. Yeager in the amount of $77,650. Mr. Varner stated that the bids were in order. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2020 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH E. L. YEAGER COMPANY FOR SITE'iPREPARATION UNIT N0. 3, PHASE 3, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for 1174 financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 7, Calif. R-79, under Title 1 of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Site Preparation Unit No. 3, Phase 3, for Site Preparation of certain areas in the project and said Contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation to Bid therefore was duly published in the San Bernardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on the 28th day of July, 1969 and the 4th day of August, 1969, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 78th day of August, 1969, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by E. L. Yeager in the amount of $11,650; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said E. L. Yeager is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of E. L. Yeager for the sum of $71,650 is hereby accepted, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Site Preparation Unit No. 3, Phase 3, Calif. R-79. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2020. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PRESCRIPTION CITY DRUGS, REDUCTION IN RENT: Mr. Quinn explained to the Members that after the Agency brought the Katz Building, Prescription City Drugs entered into a Rental Agreement with the Agency, but did not continue to operate their business. If they had moved into storage until their relocation, it would have cost the Agency between $800 and $900 a month for this storage. They handled their own move, which involved a little under $20,000. Because of their financial situation, due to slow business before their close of operations, and their subsequent close of business, 1175 they are actually requesting a write-off of their rent due, in the amount of $2,760. After discussion, the Members determined that the $2,760 due from Prescription City Drugs should be considered an uncollectable debt. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2021 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE WRITE-OFF OF RENT DUE FROM PRESCRIPTION CITY DRUGS, BLOCK 2, PARCEL 12, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino purchased property occupied by Prescription City Drugs, on June 2, 1969; and WHEREAS, Prescription City Drugs had discontinued business prior to acqui- sition of the property; and WHEREAS, Prescription City Drugs remained at said location until their relo- cation on August 14, 7969; and WHEREAS, because of their financial burden, due to slow business before their close of operations, and their subsequent close of business, Prescription City Drugs has requested a write-off of their rent in the amount of $2,160; and WHEREAS, had Prescription City Drugs moved into storage between the time of acquisition and relocation, the costs of said storage would have exceeded rent due in the amount of $2,160; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved, and recognize Prescription City Drugs' financial burden due to the redevelopment activities of the Central City Project, and have determined that said $2,160 due from Prescription City Drugs should be considered an uncollectable debt. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that rent owed in the amount of $2,160 from Prescription City Drugs is hereby considered an uncollectable debt, and is hereby authorized to be written off the Agency's records. Adopted: 8/21/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2021. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE, E-5: Mr. Austin read a letter dated August 7, 7969 from Councilman Norris Gregory, to the Regional Director in HUD, regarding possible collusion in the Delmann Heights Code Enforcement Program. A letter dated August 11, 7969, from Mr. 1176 Quinn to Mr. Richardson, HUD, setting forth the Agency's concern and inviting any investigation from HUD, was also read by Mr. Austin. Mr. Austin further read Mr. Richardson's reply of August 19, 1969 suggesting that the first step should be taken by local investigation, of the City as well as the Agency. Mr. Webster requested that the above letters be spread on the Minutes. (copies attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof) Mr. Webster further stated that a formal letter should be sent to the Mayor requesting their initiation of an investigation into the allegations contained in Councilman Gregory's letter of August 1, 1969. He suggested that Mr. Wein be appointed as Agency representative to assist the City in this investigation. All Members agreed. The Members instructed the Executive Director to direct a letter to the Mayor and Council requesting said investigation, and appointing Mr. Sanford H. Wein as Agency Representative to assist the City in this investigation. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein to adjourn the meeting at 5:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None. E. ~/~y04 THEC~rY aII~ust 1, 19e9 a .9UG 413~c~ ~' ~ r rj~~ . $eolGnal Dir::CtOr Departa:ent Gf I:Ou817:~ 2~d iirh2n uC'v°I07`ul Et)t Fosi Office Sox'Sv03 San rranci~eo, California 54109 Dear Slr: A matter Involvir.; the TatII.2na &ei„hts Ccde EaforceTMient ]?rcgrar.~, within this city, has renchV~? prcpoMors :rhich require some zcticn as reepon;e. Numerous CCmpialnt5 G.24e h°.en diri;CiL`d CO my attC::tiOn rC;~a:Ylln~ purport~u wor!:m2n- ship•defIcienclss on these contracts hair; performed by i,lco ~suilders ar' the inspection approvals given these work performances by a Code. Trs_rector, ilir. Clyde AIe::aIIder, o: the Code Enoreement Oiiica. - 1; bSay I requ,~st th2t tL•ese uiztters 6e thorou„hIy investl;;zted Ly your oific_. Reports of co[Iusion between thz mepticned contracti:o firm ark sebjcct lnspsctor should either be confirmed or denied. '. Our cttIzens ceaaInly deserve the greatest efforts pcssl*ule from those who either administer or perform wori; for the irustIno public. I lncleed hop: that these reports aryl claims are unfounded; however, to satisfy these nnmeroua compl2Ints, as iavesti;;atlen should offer lnforn:atton and assurance t'~t - anb-st;,ndard, In:preper and unethical practices do cot elist. SlncereIy, -~-~-,T~~~- . Norris Grc~crf, ,ir. Councilmzn, Sl:dh v~ard NGJ: k , MEMBERS A! M. gU$TIN, CMnl a:aAv RAV M. •N ILSO N. VICE~CRn:a VPN E. GEORGE WEB STER SANFORD H. WEIN PETER W.•O UIN N. JR. ESFCVTIVE OIgcCTOR SECRETARY.TA EASVRER ~~~1~~~' OF iflE Cliy August 11, 1969 Mr. James D. Rieh~rdson Assistant ibegional Administrator for Rene~::al Assistance Department of Hosing ,~ Urban Development 450 Golden Gate A~erue, box 36003 San Francisco, California 941 D2 Dear tir. Richardsea: At a personnel session of the Agency Board, conducted August 8, 1969, the enclosed copy of utter from Councilman Norris Gregory, Jr. bras revir~;ed by the:y~oard. ' Inasraucit as certain allegaticns .contained tn_r2rr might have, f_fcund ta_be true, serious reflections net only as to the indivi- duals t~ncerned, 6a as to the Delmann Heights Coda Enforcemen Program edmtntsti•ation andlor possibla manag2nent;~the 5oard, at this meeting, instrugted_me to inquire of your office as to-trhathei• you.mignt desire an indept~i_inyestigation_by-our staff as to tne.situaticn6= = -- =_ The Board feels that`allegations of this kind car. be damaging to_the overal~~effectiveness of programs such as-this,-and of course"s;elcomes any inves~igation Sy your office regarding the validity or invalidity of Lire alFegatidns, and I would like to offer the Soard's and my full assist- ance and cooperation in any investigation .which might be init~ated. I dm, by copies oi` this correspondence, iriforming Mayor Al C. `Ballard, Councilman Gregory and;4r. Gary Van Osdel of the Bcard's feelings in this matter, and main reiterate the 3oard's onest concern in this matter. _ . _ _._ _. ----~ - / "Very truly y r W. Quin Encl . _... Pk'Qaab cr. tlayor Al C. Ballard Councilman torris Gregory Gary Var, Osdei ~T A ~;+." MOM Eir'TUM MAKES THE OIFF.~zc JOE 1178 r -~ - ~~ ~ yi ~,- SflC BERCflfl01~0, CflIIFOPrCIfl 323 COVRT SiaEEt 6AN BERNAp OINO, CALIFG a. paA P2402 PMONi TUpNEa R.1311 P.Q. DRq~N ER 332 ~1U9 ,,,'n,N.'.(.~.,, a'*u;~~~~*+o DEPAFTMENT OF HOUSING ANC UR9AN DEVELOPMENT may' ~Y~ll'll i50 GOLDEN GATE AVE.. P.O.BO% 3800),SPN FR4N CISC U, CA LIF. 96102 1 ae b~iA3U+M~. REGION VI Renewal Assistance Office Mr. Peter W. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino 323 Court Street, Room 308 San Bernardino, California 92401 IN RE PLV FEcER TO: AUG 19 1~"0~ Dear Mr. Quinn: Subject: Calif. E-5, Delman Heights Complaint Concerning Workmanship and Inspection lde have your letter of August 11, 1969, on the above subject, and enclosing a copy of Councilman Gregory ~s request, dated August 1, 1969, directed to the Regional Direc*_or of HUD for Federal investigation. We are strongly of the opinion that the first step should be a local investigation of the allega- tions. In our opinion, this is a concern of the City, as well as of the Redevelopment Agency, and both should be involved in such an investigation. Please keep us informed concerning local developments in this matter. Sincerely yours, ~ James D. Richardson ~~~j;G Assistant Regional Administrator ' ...: --L,-. nso MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS Of THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 4th DAV OF SEPTEMBER, 1969, IN ROOh1 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:15 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Webster and Wein Agency Members Absent: Wilson Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 21, Members for approval. Motion was made by Webster the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 21, was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: 1969 were presented to the and seconded by Wein approving 1969 as submitted. The motion Webster, Wein and Austin Mr. Varner stated that he has no report at this time. DEVELOPERS PROPOSAL, SOUTHLAND BANK BUILDING: Mr. Austin read a report regarding the Southland Bank Building. Mr. Dave Whitson realtor for the purchase and leasing agent for Southland, was presented to the Board. Mr. Whitson stated that Southland's original proposal was for the development of a five story building, with approximately 50,000 sq. ft. and 127 parking spaces. They wish to revise their proposal to a 12 story structure (10 floors for offices and two storys for parking - the two story parking will contain three levels of parking area). The new proposal contains approximately 700,000 sq. ft., with 220 indoor parking spaces and 59 outdoor parking spaces. The new rendering and plot plan were shown and explained to the Members. hlr. Whitson stated that they have commitments for 75% occupancy, and that financing has been arranged. They are anxious to close escrow and start construction in November of 1969 if possible. Mr. Whitson explained that the only problem that would cause any delay in start of construction would be the possession of Reuse Parcel No. 17 (The Railroad Property). Mr. Whitson stated that they would be willing to start construction without title to Parcel 17 if they could obtain some type of physical possession to it. h1r. Quinn stated that he has contacted the Railroad, and they are checking out the feasibility of giving the Agency a license for possession for this property. If it is authorized, the Agency should receive said license within a few weeks. llsl Mr. Wein stated that the Agency has sold property to two other developers who will develop large buildings in our Central City Project. (One a 12 story building, and the other a seven story building). Mr. Wein asked if the other developers are aware of the revised proposal of Southland Bank. Mr. Quinn stated that he informed the other developers of the new proposal. Mr. Frank Dominguez, leasing agent and realtor for Suburban Associates, stated that he believes San Bernardino can support these structures. He further stated that Southland Bank should be commended for their proposal of this large structure. Mr. Wein requested the Executive Director to notify the developers concerned in writing regarding the new proposal of Southland. Mr. Quinn stated that this would be done. Mr. Varner stated that this new proposal of Southland will require modifi- cation to their contract with the Agency, and will require an Amendment to their Contract. Therefore, it is his recommendation that the Agency should set this Amendment for Public Hearing at the next regular meeting. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein that in view of the recom- mendation of the Agency Counsel, the Amendment to Agreement for Sale of Reuse Parcels 15, 16, portion of 13b and 17, Calif. R-10, be set for Public Hearing at the next Regular Meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson PUBLIC HEARING, SCOPE INDUSTRIES, PARCELS 52 & 53, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Austin closed the meeting for the Public Hearing of the Sale of Reuse Parcels 52 & 53, Calif. R-79 to Scope Industries. Mr. Varner stated that the form of Agreement is on hand for examination. There were no questions or comments. Mr. Austin closed the Public Hearing. DISPOSITION AGREEMENT-SCOPE INDUSTRIES: The following Resolution was Introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2022 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 52 & 53, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, TO SCOPE INDUSTRIES WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcels 52 & 53, Central City Project, by Resolution No. 2015, to Scope Industries; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec 4; and 1182 WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcels to said Redeveloper was held September 4, 1969, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec 4; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 52 and 53, Central City Project, to Scope Industries, subject to the approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon close of escrow for said sale to Scope Industries, a finders fee in the amount of $3,305.00 will be paid to Carl Waelder, a licensed real estate firm, pursuant to the "Notice to Realtors and Redevelopers" dated August 19, 1969. Adopted: 9/4/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2022. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson UNITED COMMUNITY SERVICES: 4:40 - Mr. Wilson arrived at the meeting. Mr. Bob Johnson from United Community Services was presented to the Board. Mr. Johnson explained that United Community Services is in need of a large building that will promote a campaign type atmosphere for their UCS Drive this year. They will need the building for approximately 2; months, from September 15 through November, 1969. He stated that the Blacks for Men location and the Prescription City Drug location would be suitable. Mr. Jones Relocation and Property Manager, stated that Blacks have not moved out of their building yet, and he does not anticipate that they will be moved in time for Mr. Johnson's campaign. Mr. Austin suggested renting the Prescription City Drug building to United Community Services for $1.00 per month. All Members agreed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2023 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH UNITED COMMUNITY SERVICES FOR THE RENTAL OF BLOCK 2, PARCEL 12, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, United Community Services has requested rental of Block 2, Parcel 12, from September 15, 1969 through November, 1969; and 1183 WHEREAS, the Agency Members have determined that the fixed rental price shall be $1.00 per month. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into Rental Agreement with United Community Services for the rental of Block 2, Parcel 72, Calif. R-79, for the sum of $1.00 per month. Adopted: 9/4/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2023. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DISPOSITION PROPOSAL, WEST END, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Varner stated that he has completed negotiations with h1r. Degnan, attorney for the Griffith Company regarding the purchase of the West End of the Central City Project (Parcels 25 through 35). The purchase price for these parcels is $1,815,500. The proposal for the purchase of these parcels is from Central City Company, a joint venture of John S. Griffith and Company and the Curci- Turner Company. They have issued a check to the Agency for deposit on these parcels in the amount of $90,775. They propose to develop the West End of the Central City Project in accordance with the West End Study prepared by the Gruen Associates, dated March 12, 1969. The value of the improvements will be approximately $10,000,000. They propose construction to start within one year and construction completion to be within one year from start of con- struction. The rendering was shown to the Members. Mr. Austin stated that no other proposals have been received by the Agency for the Purchase of this property. Mr. Webster asked if a finders fee is involved. h1r. Varner stated that all negotiations were performed by himself, therefore no finders fee is involved. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2024 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT CENTRAL CITY COMPANY, A JOINT VENTURE, IS THE MOST QUALIFIED REDEVELOPER TO REDEVELOP REUSE PARCELS 25 THRU 35, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO. 1, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPERS STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and 1184 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, by Resolution No. 998, established a cut- off date of May 26, 1969, for proposals for disposition of those parcels of land comprising the West End of the Central City Project (Parcels 25 thru 35) and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, by Resolution No. 1086, extended the date for receipt of such proposals to and including 12:00 noon, September 4, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Agency has received one proposal for the purchase of said pro- perty. Said proposal being received from Central City Company, a joint venture, comprised of the John S. Griffith and Company and the Curci-Turner Company. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its intention to sell Reuse Parcels 25 thru 35 to Central City Company, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Disposition of said parcels to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Central City Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing is to be held September 18, 1969. Adopted: 9/4/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2024. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Atisent: None Mr. Wilson stated that this proposed Disposition of the West End of the Central City Project brings the entire Project into fruition. This was the area the Agency was most concerned about, as to whether we could sell it or nat. This proposal makes it possible for the City to feel secure in the Project, and our tax situation will be clear. AWARD OF CONTRACT, DEMO & SITE IMPROVEMENTS, UNIT 1D, CALIF. R-10: The Chairman stated that bids for Demolition and Site Improvements, Unit No. 1D, Calif. R-10 were opened September 2, 1969. The low bid was submitted by E. L. Yeager in the amount of $10,785. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2025 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH E. L. YEAGER COMPANY FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS, UNIT N0. 1-D, CALIF R-10 1185 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its' Meadowbrook Project No. 1, Calif. R-10, under Title 1 of the Housing Act of 7949 as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Site Improvements, Unit 1-D, in the project and said Contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation to Bid therefore was duly published in the San Ber- nardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on the 13th day of August, 7969 and the 20th day of August 1969, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 2nd day of September, 1969, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received.at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by E. L. Yeager in the amount of $10,785.00; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said E. L. Yeager is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of E. L. Yeager for the sum of $10,785.00 is hereby accepted, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Site Improvement Unit No. 1-D, Calif. R-10. Adopted: 9/4/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2025. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REVISION OF "E"..STREET WIDENING PLANS: Mr. Austin explained that an Amendment to Garner, Tee, Tracadas, and Troy's Contract for the "E" Street Widening is needed, for the revision of the "f?" Street Widening Plans. The revision is for the section of "E" Street just north of the Santa Fe Railroad Tracks. 1186 The Members expressed their concern regarding the Santa Fe Tracks. Mr. Wilson stated that it is his belief that every effort should be expended for the removal of these tracks. "E" Street is the only possible means for a connect- ing link between the State College, the San Bernardino Downtown Area, and the Inland Center Area. It is our obligation to beautify "E" Street, and use every means to do so. Mr. Varner stated that because "E" Street is a City Street, the Agency should adopt a Resolution setting forth the Agency's concern for the beautification of "E" Street and our desire that the railroad tracks just south of Rialto Avenue be abandoned. This Resolution should be forwarded to the Mayor and Council requesting authorization for the Agency to pursue every effort possible for the abandonment of these tracks. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2026 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE h1AYOR AND COhIMON COUNCIL TO TAKE DUE AND DILIGENT NOTICE OF THE HINDERANCE TO PROPER PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFOR- NIA, CAUSED BY THE CONTINUING USAGE OF THE "E" STREET GRADE CROSSING 2U-1.0 and REQUESTING THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL TO TAKE APPROPRIATE LEGAL ACTIONS TO HAVE SAID CROSSING VACATED AND ABANDONED WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino, California, and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California are involved in a multi-million dollar Renewal Program within the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, the removal of blight and the continuous beautification and redevelop- ment of the City of San Bernardino is being impeded by the sporadic railroad usage of the "E" Street Grade Crossing 2U-1.0; and WHEREAS, the continuous usage of Grade Crossing 2U-1.0 would require a revision of present plans for the widening of "E" Street and cause traffic congestion where the "E" Street Widening Program would terminate, approximately fifty (50) feet North and South of Grade Crossing 2U-1.0; and WHEREAS, "E" Street is envisaged as a major thoroughfare for the City of San Bernardino and widening of said thoroughfare is absolutely essential for proper traffic control and expeditious movement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Grade Crossing 2U-1.0 is a hinderance to proper planning and development of the City of San Bernardino, and that all actions to satisfactorily resolve this problem have been in vain and it is therefore respectfully requested that the Mayor and Common Council, through the City of San Bernardino's Legal Authorities, take all appropriate action with the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railroad and the California Public Utilities Commission to have Grade Crossing 2U-1.0 vacated and abandoned. Said Abandonment is considered to be in the best interest of proper planning for the City of San Bernardino. Adopted: 9/4/69 11x7 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2026. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None All Members agreed that the Amendment with Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy for the revision of Plans was necessary at this time. The following reso- lution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2027 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT N0. 2, WITH GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS AND TROY, FOR "E" STREET WIDENING DESIGN, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a Contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy for Street Design for the Meadowbrook Project, dated June 10, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Agency entered into Contract Amendment No. 1 on the 2nd day of October, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to amend said Contract to increase the services as set forth in Contract Amendment No. 2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 2 to Contract by and between the Agency and Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy for "E" Street Widening Design, to increase the services for an amount not to exceed $300.00. Adopted: 9/4/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2027. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Pyes: Wein, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None LUKE AND VONDEY JEWELERS, REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT, R-79: P1r. Austin stated that an extension of Rental Agreement for Luke and Vondey Jewelers will not create any .problem or cause any delay to the project. Mr. Wein suggested that the Agency authorize said extension, with the contingency that he will vacate the premises within 30 days after written notice is g4ven to him by the Agency to vacate. All Members agreed. The following resolution was introduced: __ _ _ n as RESOLUTION NO. 2028 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH LUKE AND VONDEY JEWELERS WHEREAS, Luke and Vondey Jewelers has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, Luke and Vondey Jewelers has requested an extension of time on their Rental Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, have reviewed the circumstances involved and believe that such an extension is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Luke and Vondey Jewelers is hereby extended, with the contingency that said tenant wilt vacate premises within 30 days after written notice given to him by the Agency to vacate. Adopted: 9/4/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2028. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION PROGRAM, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Desrochers, Operations Officer, stated that the City has informed him that they will not be able to program the new Traffic Signalization System now being installed in the Central City Project. Krueger Engineering is the only local firm able to conduct such a study. They propose to perform these services for the sum of $1,180. After discussion, the following resolution was intro- duced: RESOLUTION N0. 2029 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH KRUEPER ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES FOR PROGRAMMING OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date for Loan and Capital Grant with the financial aid to the Agency for its Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, the Agency is undertaking certain a the Central City Project No. 1; and of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract United States of America providing for Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under as amended, and pursuant to that Contract :tivities necessary for the execution of WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage a contractor for the programming of the Traffic Signals in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and 1189 WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the firm of Krueper Engineering & Associates is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their proposal, for the sum of $1,180. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Contract with Krueper Engineering & Associates for Programming of Traffic Signals, Calif. R-79, not to exceed the sum of $1,180. Adopted: 9/4/69 P1otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2029. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 32ND NATIONAL NAHRO CONFERENCE: Mr. Quinn stated that the 32nd National NAHRO Conference will be held October 12-15, 1969, in Bal Harbour, Florida. Authorization was requested for Agency Staff and Members to attend. Mr. Wilson suggested that the Mayor and Agency Counsel also be authorized to attend. All Members Agreed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2030 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AGENCY MEMBERS, STAFF, AGENCY COUNSEL, AND SAN BERNARDINO MAYOR AL C. BALLARD, TO ATTEND NAHRO 32nd NATIONAL CONFERENCE, BAL HARBOUR, FLORIDA, OCTOBER 12-15, 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, requires that each trip made to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it is found essential that Agency Members, Staff, Agency Counsel, and San Bernardino Mayor Al C. Ballard, be given authorization to attend the 32nd National NAHRO Conference, to be held October 12-15, 1969, at Bal Harbour, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Agency Members, Staff, Agency Counsel, and San Bernardino Mayor Al C. Ballard are hereby authorized to travel to Bal Harbour Florida, October 12-15, 1969, to attend the 32nd National NAHRO Conference and their travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 302. Adopted: 9/4/69 1190 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2030. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Mr. Wilson asked if the per diem allotted for travel could be raised from the $25.00 established. He stated that $25.00 per day would not be adequate for this trip. The Executive Director was instructed to look into the matter, and report to the Members his findings at the next meeting. Mr. Wilson sug- gested that the City be contacted to see what per diem they allow. SACRAMENTO TRIP, SEPTEMBER 10, 1969: Mr. Quinn requested authorization for himself and Mr. Varner to travel to Sacramento, September 10, 1969, to meet with representatives of the State Employees Retirement System, regarding the financing of the local share. After discussion the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2031 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND AGENCY COUNSEL TO TRAVEL TO SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA, SEPTEMBER 70, 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it is found essential that the Executive Director and Agency Counsel travel to Sacramento, September 10, 1969, to meet with representatives of the Public Employees Retirement System. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Executive Director and Agency Counsel are hereby authorized and directed to travel to Sacramento, September 10, 1969, to meet with representatives of the Public Employees Retirement System, and their travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 302. Adopted: 9/4/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2031. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSIPJESS: Mr. Austin read a letter from "Clean Air & KRNO" regarding an Anti-Smog Rally to be held Saturday, September 6, 1969, in the Harris Company parking lot, _. _ _ 1191 which they are renting from the Agency. Mr. Austin asked if there were any objections. They will be using only the west end of the area, therefore there will be no loss of parking revenue for the day. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson, authorizing the use of an Anti-Smog Rally to be held on Agency owned parking lot on 2nd Street. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None C & J enterprises, Extension Mr. Austin read a letter from C & J Enterprises requesting an extension for start of construction on Reuse Parcel No. 88, Calif. R-10. They are having difficulty in obtaining a suitable tenant for their development. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2032 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXTENSION OF TIME TO CONSTRUCT ON REUSE PARCEL 88, CALIF. R-10, TO NOVEP4BER 6, 1969 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 653, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 88, Calif. R-10, to C & J Enterprises; and WHEREAS, the escrow closed on June 6, 1968, thereby setting the date of construction to no later than June 6, 1969; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1071, adopted June 19, 1969, the Redevelopment Agency extended time to commence construction to no later than September 6, 1969; and WHEREAS, C & J Enterprises has been unsuccessful to date in obtaining a suitable tenant for said Reuse Parcel No. 88; and WHEREAS, the Agency P4embers have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that a 60 day extension of time to commence construction is in order. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that C & J Enterprises are hereby authorized an extension to no later than November 6, 1969 to commence construction on Reuse Parcel No. 88, Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10. Adopted: 9/4/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by lJilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2032. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1192 bank of America, Construction h1r. Quinn stated that he has been advised that the Bank of America has awarded their construction contract and they should be under construction within the next couple of weeks. Acquisition, Calif. R-79 The Members were advised that all property west of "E" Street has been acquired or is committed to the Agency. The Rose Property is under condemnation, and the Agency has urged them to reply early in order to set the case for trial. Harris Company, Time Schedule Mr. Wilson inquired about the progress of the Harris Company. for. Quinn stated that the architect has indicated construction will start the first of the year. Mr. Wilson expressed his concern that citizens of San Bernardino might feel that the Agency is giving the Harris Company preferential treatment regarding their time schedule. He requested that a representative of the Harris Company be invited to the next Regular Meeting to discuss their time schedule. Mr. Quinn stated that he would contact the Harris Company regarding Mr. Wilson's request. Andreson Building. Owner Participant Mr. Wilson inquired about the disposition of the Andreson Building. Mr. Quinn stated that the Plan provides that the Andreson Building become an Owner Participant. HUD has determined that the building is too good to be torn down. Mr. Varner stated that an Owner Participation Agreement has been presented to Allied Properties, owners of the Andreson Building, but that they are reluctant to sign it. If they refuse to sign the Agreement, the Agency must then advise the City of their refusal, and request the City to take necessary steps to give notice to Allied Properties that they must bring the Andreson Building up to City Code Standards. Mr. Wilson stated that he believes the City and Project would be better served if the Andreson Building was demolished rather than brought up to code. He further stated that the cost of purchasing and demolishing it would most likely not surpass the cost of remodeling it. Pir. Varner stated that the plan calls far the Andreson Building to become an Owner Participant. A formal Amend- ment to the Plan would be required to change this portion of the Plan. Mr. Wilson requested that a detailed study be performed regarding the possibility of using local funds to purchase and demolish the Andreson Building, rather than going through the procedure of an Amendatory. All Members agreed. The Executive Director was instructed to perform such a study and report his findings. 1193 Amendatorv. R-79 Mr. Austin informed the Members that the Amendatory is now in Washington D. C. for approval. Mr. Quinn stated that upon approval of the Amendatory, Penney Company and Wards should give the Griffith Company their firm commitment for participation in the mall area. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 5:40 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None. 1194 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEh16ERS OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEf1BER, 7969, IN ROOh1 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA The meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency h1embers Present: Austin, Wein, and Gutierrez Agency Members Absent: Webster and Wilson Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; htr. Varner, Agency Counsel, and P1rs. Baxter, Executive Secretary 4:06 p.m. - Mr. Webster arrived at meeting. The Chairman introduced the newly appointed Board f4ember, Mr. Fiesiquio E. Gutierrez, to the f9 embers of the Board. P1r. Gutierrez was appointed September 8, 1969 by the Mayor and Common Council. tgINUTES: The f4inutes of the Regular Meeting of September 4, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 4, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention; Gutierrez Absent: Wilson EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of August, 1969 were presented to the Members. After review, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the expenditures for the month of August, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Gutierrez Absent: Wilson PUBLIC HEARINGS: The Chairman reported that this is the time and place designated for the Public hearing on the sale of the following parcels: SOUTHLAf1D NATIONAL BANK - REUSE PARCELS 15, 16, ootion of 13b and 17, CALIF R- 0 P1r. Austin stated that this public hearing is for the Amendment to Contract with Southland National Bank, changing their building from a five story building to a twelve story facility. tlr. Varner reported that the form of Amendment is on hand for examination. There were no questions or comments. 1195 Central City Company - Reuse Parcels 25 thru 36, Calif. R-79 IIr. Varner stated that the form of Agreement is on hand for inspection or question. He further stated that the contract has been drafted and prepared for review. Reuse Parcels 25 thru 36, Calif. R-79, are located in the western sector of the Central City Project. There were no questions or comments. I~1r. Austin closed the public hearings. SOUTHLAND fdATIONAL BANK - AMENDMENT: Authorization was requested to execute Amendment to Contract with Southland National Bank increasing their structure from a five story building to a 72 story facility. Mr. Wein stated that although no one opposed the in- creased size of Southland at the Public Hearing, he still believes that the Agency should recognize the fact that such an increase could affect the financing of all other developments within the area. He further stated that he is not against the increase of building, but believes that the Agency should keep in mind for the future that if the Agency keeps increasing buildings above what the ERA Report specifies San Bernardino can support, we might find ourselves in trouble. Mr. Webster stated that he was very happy to see an out-of-town firm seeking a development in San Bernardino, but he too realized the need for the Agency to consider very carefully all other proposals for larger buildings than ERA specifies. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2033 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO AGREEI4ENT REGARDING SIZE OF IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON MEADOW- BROOK PROJECT REUSE PARCELS 15, 16 PORTION OF 13b and 17 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 1088, adopted July 17, 1969, accepted a proposal from Southland National Bank to construct a five story building, containing appro- ximately 50,000 sq. ft. on hieadowbrook Project, Reuse Parcels 75, 16, portion of 13b and 17; and WHEREAS, on September 4, 7969, Mr. David Whitson, Agent for Southland National Bank, presented a proposal to the Redevelopment Agency Board wherein South- land National Bank now desires to construct a 12 story office building, containing at least 100,000 sq. ft. Said building would contain no less than 220 parking spaces within said building, and surface parking of no less than 57 spaces; and 11°6 WIIEREl1S, the Redevelopment Agency has advertised a Public Ilea ring for said Amendment to be held this date, and there being no objections, NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San 6ernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into an Amendment to Agreement authorizing Southland National bank to construct a 12 story building, containing no less than 100,000 sq. ft. and said building to contain no less than 220 parking spaces, and surface parking of no less than 57 spaces. Adopted: 9-18-69 P1otion was made by Webster and seconded by Idein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2033. The motion was carried by the following vote, to ~•iit: Ayes: Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Gutierrez Absent: Wilson GRUEN ASSOCIATES PRESENTATION - CIVIC-CULTURAL CENTER: Mr. Dan Branigan, President of Gruen Associates, was presented to the Board. f•1r. 6ranigan stated that the Schematic Phase of their Contract is complete. The next phase will be the Preliminary Plans, and the last phase will be the Bid Documents. Mr. Lance Berg from Gruen Associates was presented to the board. Mr. Berg explained the schematic drawings to the P1embers on the Civic Cultural Center. I.1r. Berg stated that the Civic-Cultural Center connects "D" and "E" Streets, and therefore links the future financial center area to the commercial mall. The pedestrian bridge linking the Civio-Cultural Center with the second floor of the mall was explained. Stairs would be used to allow pedestrians access to "E" Street and the ground floor of the mall. The ~1embers discussed the possibility of a ramp as well as stairs for access to "E" Street, so that there would be no hardship to the incapacitated. P1r. Branigan stated that they would review their plans to enable such a ramp. Mr. Branigan advised the Board that they have worked closely with the F1ayor and City Administrator regarding their plans. The Members thanked P1r. Branigan and P1r. Berg for their presentation and stated that they were very pleased with the schematics as presented and explained. HARRIS COP1PAfIY PRESENTATION: Mr. Leslie Harris and tir. Harold Harris, Jr., were presented to the Board. Mr. Leslie Harris commended the Board and staff for their diligence in pursuing the Central City Project. Mr. Harris stated that they have been working very steadily on their plans for expansion and remodeling of their present building. The renderings of the ex- pansion and present building were shown and explained to the Dlembers. Interior 1197 views were also shown. The h1embers requested a schedule of construction. Mr. Harris stated that they are unable to give a definite date for con- struction to start at this time. They are hoping to start construction in the spring of 1970. Mr. Harris explained that when they obtain a commit- ment for financing they will be in a position to schedule a definite date for commencement of construction. Mr. Harris requested the status of the Penney and flontgomery Ward tenancy in the mall. Mr. Quinn advised that Penney Company and the Upham Trust Company have come to an agreement about the lease, and that representatives from Penney's would meet with Griffith Company next week regarding their develop- ment. The Agreement has not been signed with Wards yet, but they are working towards it. tor. Harris stated that they were in no position to build the expansion and remodel their present store until they were certain that Penneys and Wards would occupy space in the mall. for. Quinn requested determination by the Board of a proposed Change Order with Gruen Associates (for the engineering) and Diffenbaugh (for the construction), for the protection of the Agency mall, due to the future abuttment of the Harris Company basement against the mall. Mr. Quinn stated that the Harris Company has advised that they cannot commit themselves for the reimbursement to the Agency for this change order at this time. If the engineering is accomplished. now, it will cost $7,500. If it is done after the public mall is built, it will cost approximately $15,000 to $77,000. Mr. Varner stated that it is his opinion that this change order cannot be authorized unless the Agency has some agreement with the Harris Company for reimbursement of expense to the Agency. Mr. Harold Harris stated that perhaps the responsibility for cost of the Change Order should be shared jointly between the Agency and the Harris Company. After further discussion, the Members directed the Agency Counsel to meet with the Harris Company and their attorney to discuss the change order and possible resolution. The Members directed the Executive Director to call a Special Meeting if a resolution was needed before the next regular meeting. AL LIPPITT-R06IfdSON'S MEN'S WEAR: Ilr. Wein stated that he invited Mr. Al Lippitt, of Robinson's Men's Wear, to attend the Board fleeting in the hopes that some resolution could be met re- garding his relocation. for. Wein suggested several locations in the downtown area to which Mr. Lippitt could temporarily relocate. Mr. Lippitt stated that he did not have any fixtures of his own to furnish a new location with. He further stated that he did not want to relocate into a building that would in a matter of time be scheduled for demolition by the Agency. He stated that if the Agency could grant him an extension until the end of November, he might be able to find a location where he could take over a short lease, and not have to supply his own fixtures. Mr. Wein stated that perhaps P1r. Harper could work out a vaay that he could buy his fixtures from the location he now occupies and relocate in the old Black's f1en's Wear building. This building will not be demolished for some time. 1198 Mr. Lippit stated that he had been told by Mr. Quinn and Mr. Webster that he would be allowed to remain in his present location until the end of November. Mr. Quinn stated that he and Mr. Webster had met with Mr. & Mrs. Lippitt and presented them with a schedule of possible events regarding his vacation of the building. It was set forth that they must vacate the premises in time for the Agency to be able to deliver clear title to the property to the Griffith Company within 120 days written notice to the Griffith Company. Said written notice was dated August 4th; whereby setting date for delivery to December 4th. In order to allow ample time for demolition of the property, the Lippitts must vacate the premises by November 4th. Mr. Quinn stated that Mr. Lippitt perhaps misunderstood the conversation, and understood that he must vacate within 120 days from written notice. Mr. Austin stated that at the last two board meetings the date of November 4th was set for the vacation of the Robinson's Men's Wear Building, and that the Agency had no other choice but to deny Mr. Lippitt's request. If Mr. Lippitt remained in his building until the end of November, the project could be delayed. Mr. Jones stated that 220 businesses had been relocated from the Central City Project. Mr. Lippitt has been the last business requested to vacate. Mr. Wein again mentioned the passibility of relocating, at Agency expense, in another building in the area. He further stated that he was sure the Agency could work with Mr. Lippitt. Mr. Lippitt stated that he would keep the name of Robinson's Men's Wear alive, even if he could not find another location to put his stock. Mr. Lippitt left the meeting. Mr. Austin stated that the Agency will continue to work with Mr. Lippitt in hopes that we can find him a suitable location in which to relocate. CENTRAL CITY COMPANY, REUSE PARCELS 25 thru 35, R-79: Authorization was requested to execute disposition documents for the sale of reuse parcels 25 thru 35, Calif. R-79. Mr. Quinn explained to Mr. Gutierrez that this is the entire West End of the Central City Project. The developers have agreed to construct in accordance with the study of the West End prepared by Gruen Associates. Mr. Varner stated that the execution of the disposition agreement was subject to HUD approval. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2034 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 25 THRU 35, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT TO CENTRAL CITY COMPANY WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, de- clared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcels 25 thru 35, Central City Project, by Resolution No. 2024 to Central City Company, a joint venture; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap 4, Sec. 4; and 1199 WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held September 18, 1969, in accordance with RHA 7274.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, the Agency has been assured by the Central City Company that the Offer and the Construction of the improvements is not contingent upon any Federal Financing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 24 through 35, Central City Project, to Central City Company, a joint venture, subject to the approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Adopted: 9/18/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2034. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Gutierrez Absent: Wilson CONTRACT DEMOLITION UNIT N0. 26, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Austin stated that bids for Unit No. 26, R-79, were opened September 16th. This is for the demolition of the Masonic Building, within which the Robinson's Men's Wear is located. Mr. Quinn stated that there is a bid for the total demolition including the salvage, and a bid for demolition without salvage. Salvage would include the fixtures of Robinson's Men's Wear. The Members suggested that the matter be tabled until the next Regular Meeting, whereby Mr. Quinn could advise Mr. Press of the situation regarding Mr. Lippitt's need for fixtures. Mr. Lippitt and Mr. Press could then work out the possibility of purchase of the fixtures so that Mr. Lippitt could have fixtures for his relocation. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the tabling of Demolition Contract, Unit No. 26, until the next Regular Meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PEP BOYS, REUSE PARCELS 93b, 94 and 95b, R-10: The following resolution was introduced: 1200 RESOLUTION NO. 2035 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER CERTIFICATE OF COh1PLIANCE TO 6730 H. P. CORPORATION, DBA PEP BOYS WHEREAS, 6730 H. P. Corporation, a California Corporation, hereinafter called Redevelopers, have entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated April 9, 1968, was recorded on April 18, 1968, in Book 7011 on page 8, and said Grant Deed, dated April 5, 1968, was recorded on April 18, 7968, in Book 7011 on page 7, both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redevelopers covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency, agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Deed to furnish the Redevelopers v+ith an instrument certifying completion of said improvements in accordance with provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof, on the following described property: That portion of Lots 3 and 4 Block 13, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 1 records of said County. BEGINNING at a point in the West line of said Lot 4, distant 748i feet North of the Southwest corner of said Block 13; thence North 50 feet, thence East 240 feet; thence South 51 feet; thence West 700 feet; thence North 1 foot; thence West 140 feet to the point of beginning. TOGETHER with an easement and right-of-way over and across the property described as follows: COMh1ENCING at a point on the West line of Block 13, of the City of San Bernardino, in the City of San Bernardino, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Plops, page 7, where the same is intersected by the South line of Lot 4 in said Block 13; thence East along the South line of Lots 4 and 3, in said Block 13, 230 feet to the true point of beginning; thence North 198.5 feet to a point in the Southerly line of land conveyed to San Gorgonio Hotel Association, a corporation, by Deed recorded June 3, 1937 in Book 1208 of Official Records, page 331; thence East 20 feet; thence South 198.5 feet to the South line of said Lot 3; thence West 20 feet to the aforesaid true point of beginning. EXCEPTING THEREFROM the interest in the East 10 feet as conveyed to the City of San Bernardino for alley purposes by Deed recorded July 11, 1950 in Book 2603, page 337, Official Records. 1201 P;OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certify and give notice that the Redevelopers have fully satisfied, terminated and completed for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agreements with respect to the obligation of Redevelopers for the construction of improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinabove described real pro- perty. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". Adopted: 9-18-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2035. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: lJilson CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, BURCKS ADVERTISING, REUSE PARCEL 87, R-10: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2036 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1EP1T AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER CER- TIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO NORfN1N GAYNOR AND DOROTHY GAYNOR, DBA BURCKS ADVERTISING AND PRINfiING WHEREAS, Norman Gaynor and Dorothy Gaynor, husband and wife, hereinafter called "Redevelopers" have entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, said Agreement dated June 25, 1968, was recorded on August 15, 1968, in Book 7077 on page 733 and said Grant Geed, dated June 25, 1968, was recorded on August 15, 1968, in Book 7077 on page 758, both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redevelopers covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Deed to furnish the Redevelopers with an instrument certifying completion of said inprovements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof; and lzc2 WHEREAS, said property is described as follows: The East 285 feet of Lots 20, 21, 22 and the South 15 feet of the East 285 feet of Lot 23, Block "D", THE PEPPERS, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page II, records of said County. NOW, ThIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certify and give notice that the Redevelopers have fully satisfied, terminated, and completed for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agree- ments with respect to the obligation of Redevelopers for the construction of improvements and dates far the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinabove described real property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance." Adopted: 9-1II-69 1~lotion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution IJo. 2036. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2037 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF OWNER PARTICIPANTS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO THE ATCHISON, TOPEK{1 AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COf4PANY WHEREAS, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, hereinafter referred to as the "Owner Participant", has entered into an Agreement with the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereinafter called the "Agency"; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated PJovember 12, 1958, was recorded on January 27, 1961 in Book 5337, Page 298 in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in said Agreement, the Owner Participant covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to contruct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the manner set forth in said Agreements, and agrees that said property shall be devoted to the uses speci- fied in the Plan and that said property or any part thereof will not be devoted to any other use or be used for any other purpose. 1203 In the records of the tax assessor, County of San Bernardino, California. Parcel PJO. 17 - Map 804-36-105, Records of the State of California. The foregoing consisting of a railroad right of way 50 feet in width extending from the Westerly line of "E" Street to the Easterly line of Arrowhead Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies and gives notice that the Owner Participant has fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, for itself, its successors and assigns all covenants and agreements with respect to the obligation of the Owner Participant provided for in said Agreement and Supplement Owner Participation Agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". Adopted: 9-18-69 f~~otion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2037. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson ~ -• J. D. DIFFENBAUGH CO., REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIP1E FOR COf1PLETIOfJ: for. Austin requested authorization to extend contract completion date 36 days for J. D. Diffenbaugh Co. Contract for f4a11 Construction, due to the Operating Engineers strike. The following resolution was introduced: P.ESOLUTIOf! NO. 2038 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRt~1AN APJD SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER N0. 1 TO CONTRACT WITH J. D. DIFFENBAUGH SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 2, PUBLIC P1ALL CONS- TRUCTION, R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with J. D. Diffenbaugh for Site Preparation Unit No. 2, Calif. R-79, dated the 27th day of June, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to extend the time of completion of said Contract, from July 7, 1970 to August 12, 7970, whereby allowing the Contractor 36 additional days due to the Operating Engineers Strike. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby 1204 authorized to execute Change Order tJo. 7 with J. D. Diffenbaugh, Site Preparation Unit No. 2, I4a11 Construction, Calif. R-79, adding an additional 36 days to contract completion date. Adapted: 9-18-69 Plotion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution PJo. 2038. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson SURVEY & PLAIDS, URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT (COLLEGE PARK): P1r. Austin requested authorization to file a Survey and Planning Application for the College Park area. The proposed project area was pointed out on the project map. Mr. Jones stated that there are approximately 24-25 businesses and 238 residents within the area. t°ir. Varner stated that schools and parks would be designated public areas and the Agency would not include these in our program. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION IJO. 2039 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPI.1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNDERTAKING OF SURVEYS AND PLANS FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT APJD FILING OF AN APPLICATION WHEREAS, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended (herein referred to as "Title I"), the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is authorized to extend financial assistance to local public agencies in the elimination and prevention of the spread of their slums and urban blight through the planning and undertaking of urban renewal projects; and WFIEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin under any program or activity re- ceiving Federal financial assistance and Executive Order 17063 prohibits dis- crimination on basis of race, color, creed or national origin in sale, lease or other disposition of residential property (including land intended for residential use) or in the use or occupancy thereof; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, make surveys and prepare plans, presently estimated to cost approximately Eight Hundred and Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($835,000), in order to undertake and carry out an urban renewal pro- ject of the character contemplated by Section 110(c) of Title I, in that area proposed as an Urban Renewal Area, situated in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, and State of California, which is described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof 12^5 N04J, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDIPJO, CALIFORPJIA: 1. That the proposed Urban Renewal Area described above is appropriate for an Urban Renewal Project, and that the undertaking by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, of surveys and plans for an urban renewal project of the character contemplated by Section 110(c) of Title I in the proposed Urban Renewal Area is hereby approved. 2. That the financial assistance available under Title I is needed to enable the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, to finance the planning and undertaking of the proposed Project. 3. That it is cognizant of the conditions that are imposed in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects with Federal financial assistance under Title I, including those relating to (a) the relocation of site occu- pants, (b) the provision of local grants-in-aid, and (c) the requirement that the locality present to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development as a prerequisite to appnoval of the application described below, a workable program for community improvement, as set forth in Section 101 (c) of Title I, for utilizing appropriate public and private resources to eliminate and prevent the development or spread of slums and urban blight. 4. That the United States of America and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the ., kedevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, which regula- tions of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 7964 and applicable executive Orders. 5. That it is the sense of this body (a) that a feasible method for the relocation of individuals and families displaced from the Urban Renewal Area, in conformity with the requirements of Title I, can be prepared, and (b) that local grants-in-aid can and will be provided in an amount which will be not less than one-third of the Net Project Cost of the Project and which, together with the Federal Capital grant, will be generally equal to the difference between Gross Project Cost and the proceeds or value of project land sold, leased, or retained for use in accordance with the urban renewal plan. 6. That the filing of an application by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an advance of funds from the United States of America, in an amount not to exceed Eight Hundred and Thirty Five Thousand Dollars ($835,000), for surveys and plans for an urban renewal project in the proposed Urban Renewal Area described above is hereby approved, and that the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, is hereby authorized and directed to execute and file such application with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, to provide such additional infor- mation and to furnish such documents as may be required by the Secretary, and to act as the authorized representative of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Adopted: 9-18-69 1zoE Motion was made by Wein and seconded by 4lebster authorizing the adoption of Resolution fVo. 2039. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson VOUCHER CERTIFIER: hir. Quinn requested formal motion to designate Morse Topper as Agency Voucher Certifier and Tom White as Alternate Voucher Certifier. f•1r. Quinn explained that fqr. Topper and Mr. White have been designated as Certifiers by a memorandum signed by him, but the auditor suggested that said designation be made by motion of the Agency Board. Plotion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster designating h1r. 6lorse Topper as Voucher Certifier and P1r. Tom White as Alternate Voucher Certifier. The motion vaas carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson RULING ON TAX EXEMPT STATUS, R-79: Mr. Varner explained that the Agency has received a letter from O'P1elveny and Myers, contracted bond counsel for the Agency, stating that legislation is presently pending which could cause doubt on the "Tax Free" status of Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Bonds. Tax Allocation Bonds require an unqualified tax opinion from O'hielveny and Myers. They have stated that they cannot give their unqualified opinion until they have applied to the Internal Revenue Service fora ruling on tax exempt status for Tax Allocation Bonds. Mr. Varner recommended that we authorize O't~1elveny and foyers to apply for said ruling. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2040 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LAW FIRM OF O'h1ELVENY AND P1YERS TO APPLY TO THE UNITED STATES INTERfJAL REVENUE SERVICE FOR A RULING ON TAX EXEP1PT STATUS OF TAX ALLOCATION BONDS WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California is engaged in an Urban Renewal Project known as central City No. 1, Calif. R-79, and WHEREAS, financing of the above Redevelopment Project depends on both Federal and Local Funds; and WHEREAS, the availability of local funds is derived primarily from the sale of Tax Allocation Bonds; and WHEREAS, sale of Tax Allocation Bonds require an unqualified tax opinion from a recognized law firm and bond counsel ;and 1207 WHEREAS, legislation is presently pending which could cause doubt on the "Tax Free" status of Redevelopment Agency Tax Allocation Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, does hereby authorize the lavr firm of O'Melveny and Myers, to apply to the United States Internal Revenue Service for a fuling on tax exempt status of Tax Allocation bonds. Adopted: 9-18-69 Rtotion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2040. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY, AGENCY VS WRIGHT: i4r. Varner explained that due to a conflict of interest regarding parties of the Wright Property, neither he nor 14r. Gresham would be able to serve as condemnation attorney for this case. He suggested that the Agency substitute Philip Lanzafame in lieu of either P1r. Gresham or himself. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2041 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- R€TARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH PHILIP LANZAFAP1E FOR CONDEMNATION SERVICES ON WRIGHT PROPERTY, 6LOCK I, PARCELS 4, 5 and 6, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 493, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, designated Allen B. Gresham as Condemnation Counsel for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Allen B. Gresham has requested a substitution of attorney for con- demnation of the Wright Property, Block 1, Parcels 4, 5, and 6, due to a conflict of interest regarding parties of the Wright Property; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to engage the services of Philip Lanzafame to render certain legal services in the prosecution and litigation of eminent domain proceedings, wherein the Agency, as Plaintiff, will seek to acquire property known as Block 1, Parcels 4, 5, and 6, Calif. R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute contract with Philip Lanzafame for the performance of all necessary legal services in _ TM the prosecution and litigation of eminent domain proceedings for the acquisition of the Wright Property,,6lock 1, Parcels 4, 5 and 6, CALIF. R-79. Adopted: 9-18-69 1208 !4otion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2047. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson EASEMENT DOCUMENT, "H" STREET STORM DRAIN, R-79: Mr. Austin advised that construction of the "H" Street Storm Drain has been completed. Authorization was requested to execute Easement Document to the City of San Bernardino regarding this storm drain. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2042 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE EASEMENT DEED FOR PORTION OF THE "H" STREET STORM DRAIN AFFECTING THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in cooperation with the City of San Bernardino has determined that a storm drain facility known as the "H" Street Storm Drain would be beneficial to the City of San Bernardino and to the Central City Project Area; and WHEREAS, construction of said "H" Street Storm Drain has been completed through said project area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Easement Deed for a portion of the "H" Street Storm Drain affecting the Central City Project. Adopted: 9-18-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2042. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Austin and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Varner stated that in the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 22, 1969, the minutes do not reflect the determination of the Agency Board, that the Agency shall consider each case brought before them on an individual case to case basis regarding any possible conflict of interest. Mr. Varner recom- mended a motion amending these minutes setting forth this policy. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster amending the Minutes of May 22, 1969, reconfirming the Agency's past policy regarding any possible conflict of interest, determining that each individual case would be considered by the 1209 Agency Board separately on its own merits. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Gutierrez Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson Travel Poli The Members asked if an inquiry had been made of the City to establish what per diem is allotted in the City's travel policy. Mr. Quinn explained that the City Policy allows payment of $12.00 per day for food, along with reimbursement for all hotel expenses and additional expenses. Mr. Quinn explained that the Federal Government will only pay $25.00 per day. Any amount over and above this $25.00 per day, would have to be reimbursed from local funds. The Members agreed that $37.00 per day should be used as an upset figure for per diem. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2043 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ESTABLISHING CERTAIN POLICIES ON TRAVEL EXPENSES OF ITS MEMBERS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, LEGAL COUNSEL, OTHER OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY OFFICIALS OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, TRAVELING ON OFFICIAL BOSINESS OF THE AGENCY AND RESCINDING PREVIOUS TRAVEL POLICIES OF THE AGENCY WHEREAS, the Agency has recognized the fact that attendance by various Agency officials and employees, and City Officials of the City of San Bernardino, California, at conferences and meetings for the purpose of exchanging ideas and methods involving Urban Renewal and at meetings far the purpose of presenting information on behalf of the LPA and the City is desirable, and recognizing the need fora uniform policy governing expenses incurred by officials and employees, while on authorized and official business of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, the LPA hereby establishes a policy for requesting, authorizing and controlling such travel and attendance and setting forth authorized expenses eligible for reimbursement by the LPA;and WHEREAS, the LPA has included funds for travel and official conference expense in the Annual Administrative Budget as recommended by Department Heads and ap- proved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development; and WHEREAS, the governing factors in authorizing travel for official business of the LPA are the anticipated benefits to accrue to the LPA as a result of such travel, the availability of funds, and the status of work load; and WHEREAS, each trip of Agency Members, Executive Director, and other officers and employees of the Agency and City, to a destination outside the City of San Bernardino, California, with the exception of an official trip to the Regional Office of DHUD in San Francisco or an official trip to the Los Angeles area which does not exceed two (2) days, as hereinafter defined and which is charged wholly or in part to a Title I Project be specifically authorized by a resolu- tion of the Members approving such trip as essential to a Title I Project. t21D NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the following schedules of reimbursements and policies for official travel of Agency Members, Executive Director, Legal Counsel, other officers and employees and City Officials shall be effective with enactment of this Resolution: a. For the purpose of this Resolution, a travel day is defined as absence from the City of San Bernardino, California on authorized business of the Agency for a period of time in excess of ten hours in any one day. b. While traveling on official business of the LPA within the City limits of the City of San Bernardino, California, and with prior approval of Depart- ment Heads, within a radius of 100 miles outside the City limits of the City of San Bernardino, California, Agency and City Officials and Employees of the Agency will be reimbursed, (1) mileage for the use of privately owned automobiles at the rate of 10 cents per mile for miles actually traveled to and from the place where said official business is to be transacted up to and including the actual amount of first class transportation, including parking, if private transportation is used; (2) the actual amount of any railroad or airplane fare, less Federal Tax, bus or taxi transportation and incidental expenses as required; (3) for meals consumed when travel is one (1) travel day or longer as defined in a. above. c. While traveling to and from conferences and meetings exceeding the limi- tations specified in b above, air, train, or bus transportation expenses will be reimbursed or advanced based on an amount not to exceed the existing first class fare rate. Authorized personal automobile travel to destinations exceeding 100 miles radius from the City of San Bernardino shall be reimbursed at the equivalent first class air travel fare. d. While in attendance at conferences or meetings, all expenses, including but not limited to official conference registration fees, lodging, meals, telephone and telegraph, taxi and/or bus charges from point of arrival to conference destination, and other incidental expenses may be reimbursed pro- vided, however, the maximum reimbursement for meals shall be twelve ($12.00) Dollars per day, and maximum reimbursement for lodging shall not exceed Twenty-five ($25.00) Dollars per day. Be it further provided, that reimburse- ment from Title I Project Funds for meals and lodging shall not exceed Twenty- five ($25.00) Dollars in any one travel day. e. Advance travel funds, not to exceed 75 percent of estimated per diem expenses, may be authorized with the approval of the Executive Director or Deputy Director, for these official Agency trips in excess of one (1) travel day. When an advance of funds for authorized travel or conference expense is greater than the actual reimburseable expense incurred, the difference shall be refunded to the Agency within five (5) days after return. f. Travel vouchers, properly supported by receipts for meals, and hotel _ rooms; air, bus, or railroad fare receipts; registration fees; etc., will be - submitted for final payment no later than ten (10) days following return from authorized travel. g. Travel and transportation costs of third party contractors, if authorized by contract, will be reimbursed in amounts not to exceed limitations set forth in this Resolution upon completion of travel and submission of properly supported billings. tzil H. This Resolution supersedes Resolutions Number 302 and 671 and takes effect as of September 18, 1969. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez approving the adoption of Resolution No. 2043. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson Trailers for Temporary Relocation The Members were presented with a letter from Aurora Mobile Homes, Inc., dated September 17, 7969. Mr. Quinn advised that he and Mr. Harper have been looking into the possibility of leasing or purchasing trailers to be rented to relocatees who wish to set up temporary business until they can occupy space in the new mall. These trailers would be set up at the west end of the parking lot. Mr. Quinn further advised that the possibility of trailer relocation has been mentioned to Mr. Lippitt, and perhaps after more review of cost and procedure, Mr. Lippitt will agree to this type of temporary relocation. The Members directed Mr. Quinn to look further into the matter, and report to the Board his findings at a later meeting. Railroad Tracks - Southland National Mr. Quinn stated £hat the railroad has National Bank right-of-entry to build Southland can build around the tracks. with the Southland people. stated that they will give Southland their 12 story facility, if The matter is now being explored Andreson Building Mr. Quinn stated that the matter of acquiring and demolishing the Andreson Building is now being investigated and the Agency should have a report by the next meeting. Catholic Social Services A letter was presented from the Catholic Social Services. Mr. Austin read the letter in which they request the use of the Pep Boys Building for a Rum- mage Sale. They desire the building for October 6 & 7. Mr. Quinn stated that it would not interfere with the demolition of the building. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the Catholic Social Services to use the old Pep Boys Building for a Rummage Sale. The Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, and Austin Noes: None Absent: Wilson Abstention: Webster. Mr. Webster abstained from voting because of his participation on the Executive Board of the Catholic Social Services. Harris and Frank Mr. Varner stated that it is anticipated that we will go to trial the 1st of the year regarding Harris and Frank. ~G1L Barnum and F1 Trial is expected for the spring of 1970 regarding Barnum and Flagg. Amendatory, Calif. R-79 hir. Quinn reported that the Amendatory, Calif. R-79, is in IJashington, D. C. ADJOURNMENT: h1otion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein adjourning the meeting at 6:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Gutierrez, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson izis This page not used. ' F~ttachment to P,esolution 'rlo. 2039LEGAL DESCBI~TIO_"J"d Exhibit A 1. Boundz ries of Nrban Renec.zl Area - _ t Those portions of Secti_ous7, 8, 9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21., 28 and 29, Toca ship I North, Racoe 4 Fes[ ar.d that portion of Secti o-n 13, Township I North, Range 5 West, San Bernardino Mcri- dian, if said Section lines were extended across the Rancho tFuscupiabe zs per plat thereof recorded in Book 7 of Ptaps, page 23, records of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of Ca_liforni.a and those portions of those various sub- divisions included within said Sections, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the East Line of 'destern --Avenue, 30.00 feet wide and the North line of Highland Avenue; `thence Norrherly along said East line of Slestern Avenue and the l~or[herly prolongation thereof, a distance of 1145.00 fee[, more or less, to the Southwesterly line of Cajon Boulevard; [hence Borthweste rly zlong said Southcaes[erly lire of Cajon Boulevard, adistance of 15,315.00 feet, more or less, to its intersection with the Southwesterly prolongation of the Iesterly line of the property conveyed to the San Bernardino County Flood Control - District by Deed No. 131, recorded July 27, 1948 in Book 2268, page 166, Official Records o£ said County; thence Northeasterly along said prolongation and the 4esterly line of said Flood Con- trol property, a distance of 1000.00 feet, ,ro re or less, to its intersection with the Westerly prolongztion of a line described as "North 65° 02' S2" West, b4.83 feet" in the Easterly line of __.-_._ maid Flood Control property; thence Easterly along said Westerly prolongation and said Line, South 65° 02' S2" East, a distance of -200.00 feet, more or Less, to the Northcaesterly~line of that cer- lain pzrcel described as Parcel No. 3 in the document to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District recorded July 27, 1948 as Document No. 130 in Book 2268, page 142, Official Records of„ said Counry; thence Northeasterly along said Northwesterly Line of said Flood Control property, a distance of 1400.00 feet, more or less, [o the Northeasterly line of State tfighway 395; thence Southwzsterly along said Northeasterly line of Highway 397, a - _ dis [anee of 6000.00 fee[, more or less, to its intersection with the Westerly line of State College Parkwey; thence Northerly along said kesterly line ar.d following all its various courses and distances, z distance of 5700.00 fee[, more or Less, to [he South- ves[erly Line of Northpark Boulevard; [hence Northerly along said .South«-esterly Line of Northpark Boulevard znd its Northwesterly proIorgatiee, a distance of 3000.00 feet, more or Less, to the Vesterly prolongation of the Southerly Line of the propei[y con- . veyed to the San Bernzrdino County Flood Control District by Deed recorded in Book 4671, pace 364, et seq., Official Records of said Coun[p; thence Easterly aLorg said prolongation and the South line of said Flood Control properly, z distance of 3995.00 fee[, core or less, io the Northerly line of the property conveyed to the State of California by Deed No. 7, recorded .1u ty 23, 1964 in Book 6195, page 946, Official Records of said County; [hence along the - '~_ $ortherly line of said State property the following courses and distances; [hence C~or[h 34° 59' 10" Eas[, 113.93 feet; thence -i- 7_' S North 17° 51' 07" 4iest, 12.89 feet to a point on the Southerly - line of [he Ba 2,ger Canyon right of w2y as shot.-.i on map filed in Book 4, pages 9 zed 10, Records of Survey- e.` said County; thence North 54° 52' 26" Fast, 95.07 feet; thence \orth 81° 21' S5" East, 65.94 fee y thence North 52° 43' 06" East, 156.08 feet; thence North 52° 55' 24" East, 264.17 feet; thence North 84° 47' 50" Eas[, 503.99 feet; [hence North fi9° 50' 20" East, 381.32 feet; thence leaving said State p;opcrty, Easterly in a straight Line, a distaace of 1150.00 fee[, rt!ore or Less, to Station ,1-29 in. the Northerly boundary line of said Rancho Plu scupiebe; thence Sou[heaste rly- along said Northerly line of Rancho Muscup iabe, a distance of 900.81 feet; [hence South 03° 50' East along the Easterly Iine of the property conveyed to the San Bernardino County Flood Control District as parcel No. 4 in Deed No. 18 re- corded Apri.1 23, 1940 in Book 1415, page 37, Official Records of said County, a distance of 2113.10 feet; thence South 12° 46' 30" ~ k'est along said Easterly line, a distance of 440.67 feet; [hence South 89° 32' 30" West along the South line of said Flood Control properly, a distance of 30.00 feet, more or less, to its inter- -section eai. tii a Line which is paral l.el with and 44.00 feet Easterly of and measured at right angles to the Northerly prolongation of Lhe centerline of Pfo untain Drive; thence Scu th along said parallel Line, a distaace of 2020.00 feet, more or less, to the South Line of Hill Drive; thence idest a1~ng the South 1i.ne of said Hi11 Drive, a distance of 2040.00 feet, more or less, to the East line of ~~ -~ Western Avzaue as said street is delineated on the Map of Tract - 1746 as pe:: plat thereof recorded in Book 25 of Afaps, page 59, records of the County Recorder of said County; thence South along said East line of Western Avenue, a dis[a nce of 1300.00 feet, more or~less, to the centerline of Forty-seccad Street; thence Wes[ 21org said centerline of Forty-second Street, a distance of - 20.00 €eet to the East line of said Section 17; thence South along the Eas [. Line of said Section 17, a dis[a ace of 1005,00 fee[, more or less, to the Northerly line of the property conveyed to the San Bernardino County Flood Control Distr_tt by said Deed No. 18 recorded April 23, 1940 in Book 1415, pave 37, Official Records . of 'said' County; [hence Southeasterly along said Northerly line, a distance of 4840.00 feet, more or Less, to a point in.a line which is parallel wi [h and 150.00 feet East of and measured at- right angles to the East line of North "E" Stree [, (aLs o-known as ' tad Avenue); thence South along said parallel line a distance of 57.71 feet to the Northerly nigh[ of way Lire of Kendall Drive, (State Highway); thence Southeasterly along said Northerly right - of way line, a distance of 1455.00 fee[, more or less to its intersection with the Northerly prolongation of the centerline of "F" Street; [hence South along said Northerly prolonga lion, a distaste of 410.00 feet, core or less, to the North line of Tract 2733 is per plat th_reof recorded in Book 26 of Maps, pages 7 Chrv 12, records of th=_ County Recorder of said County; thence Wes[ zlong the said North Line of Tract 1733 and its Westerly prolongation a distance of 1104,12 feet to the West Line of - Crescent Ace..-~uz; thence South along said Iles r_ Line of Crescent Avenue and its Southerly prolongation, a distance of 1542.00 feet, more or Iess, to the Southerly Line of Circle Road; thence Sourly westerly along said Southeasterly line of ;aid Circle Road and 2 L following e11 its various courses and distances, a distance of 878.00 feet, ~;zore or less, to its intersection with the North= ens Lerly prolongation of Cha North line of Trac[ 2320 as per plat thereof recorded in Book 33 of P[ap s, page 46, records of the County R.e corder of said County; [hence Southwesterly and Westerly along said prolonga lion znd the PZor th line of said Tract 2320 to the North~~:est corner of Lo[ 65 a€ sz id Trac[ 2320; thence South along the F:est line of said Lot 65, a distance of 212.50 fee[ to the North line of. Tract 231b as per plat thereof recorded in Book 33 of Naps, page 81, records of the County Recorder of said County; thence West al oag the Nortn line of said Trac[ 2318, a distance of 125.00 feet, more or less, to the East line of Lot 4 of said Trac[ 2318; thence North along the East line of said Lot 4 of Tract 2318 to the Northeast. corner thereof; thence West along the North Line of said Tract 2318 and the Sleste rly prolongation there- of~ a distance of 713.50 feet to a line which is 1883.36 feet West of and parallel with the We>t line of the Air o~ahead Tract, ' as per plat thereof recorded in Book 11 of Naps, page 37, records. of the County Recorder of said Covnty; thence South along said parallel line, a distance of 904.86 fee[; thence West. a distance of 114.14 feet; thence South 0° O1' West a distance of 149.46 feet; thence South 66° 45' West a distance of 230.00 feet; thence South I6° 45' West a distance of 55.00 feet; thence Northwesterly at 'right angles a distance of 150.00 feet; thence Southwesterly at .right angles, a distance of 50.00 fee[ to a point in a line which fs parallel with and 200.00 feet Northerly of and measured at right angles io the Northerly lice of said Aarshall Boulevard; thence Westerly along said parallel line, a distance of 802.00 .feet; thence South at right angles, a distance of 5.00 feet to a point in a line which is parallel with and 195.00 feet Northerly of and measured at right arg Les to the Northerly Line of said Marshall Boulevard; thence 4esterly along said parallel line, a distance of 152.87 feet to its intersection with the Southerly prolongation of the East Line of Lot 30, Tract 4413, as per plat thereof recorded in Book 58 of Maps, page 81, records of the County Recorder of said County; [hence Northerly along said Southerly prolongation and the East line of said Tract 4413, and Northerly, Westerly and Southerly- along the boundary lines of Tract 5464, as per plat thereof recorded in Book 75 of ?laps, page 67,. records of the County Recorder of said County and Southerly along the Westerly line of said Tract 4413 to the most Northerly corner of Lot I4 of said Tract 4413; [hence West a distance of 30.00 feet to the West line of Mt. Vernon Avenue; [hence South along the West line of said Mt. Vernon Avenue to the North line of_ Tract 3614, as per plat thereof recorded in Book 49 of Naps, page &7, records of [he County- Recorder of said County; thence idest along said ;Io rth lint of Tract 3614 and the North line of Tract 4078, as per plat thereof recorded in Book 52 of btaos, page 79, records of the County Recorder of said County, a distance of 9I1.25feet to the Northwest co rrer of Lot 1 of said Tract 4078; thence South aLon~ the [rest line of said Lot 1 and its Southerly prolongation, z distance of 165.04 feet to the centerline of Marshall Eoulevard; thence Westerly along the centerline of said Marshall Boulevard to its intersection with [he Eas[ Line of. Little Mountain Drive; thence Southerly along said East line of -Little Moen twin Drive a distance of 1800.00 feet, more or less, to its ir. tersection with the Southerly line of Tract 6716, as 0 __ - _ __ _. ~~ per plat thcdeof recorded in 3ook 85 of Dlz ps, paves 32 and 33, . records of ti~:e County Recorder of said County; [hence Easterly along said Southerly line of Tract 6716 ar,d the South line of Tract 4077 as per p1a.t thereof recorded in Book 52 of ,taps, page 74, records e` the County Recorder of-_. said County, to [he Northerly prolongation of the (lest line of Lot 't 0, Tract 6=dw, as per plat thereof recorded in Book S1 of Maps, pages. So a:.d 57, records of the County Recorder of sa id Count}'; thence Sou ti; a1on~ said Ner[h- erly prolon~a tlon, the West line of said Lct 20 and its Southerly - - prolongation to the centerline of Turrill Str=_et; thence (lest along said ceaerline of Turrill Street, a. distance of 7.00 feet, more or less to the Northerly prolonga [icn of the Sde st line of a North-South alley as delineated on the Map of said Tract 6446; thence South a1on3 said Wes[ line and the Southerly prolonga _ion thereof,. a c'..istance of 680,00 feet to the South line of Lot 1 of Tract 7399, zs per plat thereof recorded in 5ook 92 of Maps, - page 1, records of the County Recorder of said County; [hence ~ Eas t. along tze South line of said Lot '_ and [he South line 'of an East-West aiiy as delineated on the Ptap of said Tract 6440, a distance of 575.00 feet, more or less, to the East 1ir,e of Pit. .Vernon Avenue; thence South along said Fast li.n e- of ML Vernon - Avenue, a~ distance of 2740.00 feet, more or less, to [he South line of High 1'ad Avenue; thence [lest along the South line of Highland Avenue and followi g its various u:id[hs, a dicta ace of 1370..00 feet, more or less to a point due South of the point of beginning; thence North to the Point of Begirm ir.g. - --. `. - 4 lzl "r1INUTES OF THE SPECIAL PIEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDIfJO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEPI6ER, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman reported that this special meeting is held pursuant to a duly mailed Notice of Special Meeting. Said flotice is as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL h1EETING OF THE h1EP16ERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at the office of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 Court Street, Room 305, in the City of San 6ernardino, the regular meeting place thereof at 4:00 p.m., the 22nd day of September, 7969, for the purpose of Considering Contract Change Order Relative to Harris Company Property. Dated this 19th day of September, 1969 s/P. 41. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Secretary 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUiNN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 19th day of September 1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special hleeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES h1AIL WITNESS my hand this 19th day of September, 7969 s/P. W. Quinn Jr. P. W. Quinn, r. Secretary The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:10 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency h1embers Present: Austin, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Wilson Agency f4embers Absent: None Also Present: h1r. Quinn, Executive Director; P1r. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary R1r. Austin stated that at the last Regular Meeting the Members instructed the Agency Counsel to meet with the fiarris Company and their attorney, Mr. Bierschbach, to discuss a Change Order with J. D. Diffenbaugh necessary for the protection of the Flgency's friction piles at the surface of the arcade. t•ir. Austin explained that the Harris Company will be ready at a later date 121° to dig their basement. Because the basement will abutt the friction piles already poured by Diffenbaugh, the Agency will need the Change Order for protection of these piles. Mr. Quinn stated that if we have the work done now, it will cost approxi- mately $7,500. If it is done after the public mall is built, it will cost approximately $15,000 to $17,000. A further problem would be the responsi- ble party to pay for the Change Order. h1r. Bierschbach, attorney for the Harris Company, was presented to the Board. Mr. Bierschbach stated that he wanted the Board to understand that the Barris Company was in no way trying to evade paying for the Change Order if it is their obligation. Their architect suggested that there might be a possible share of cost between the Agency and the Harris Company, due to a provision in the Uniform Building Code (Depth of Excavation Law). 1Ar. Varner stated that he has reviewed the matter, and has determined that our situation is unique. It must be understood that the City maintenance agreement would recognize the encroachment of the Harris Company. The Gruen Association has already prepared plans for the protection and encroachment. The Change Order will be in accordance with Gruen's plans. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION fJO. 2044 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN B[R- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIPJG THE EXECUTION OF CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT WITH J. D. DIFFENBAUGH FOR MALL CONSTRUCTION WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with J. D. Diffenbaugh for Site Preparation, Unit No. 2. Calif. R-79. dated the 27th day of June, 1969; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2038, adopted September 18, 1969, the Agency Board authorized the execution of Change Order No. 1 adding an additional 36 days to contract completion date; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Change Order No. 2 with J. D. Diffenbaugh in order to protect the public mall from damage due to the future excavation of the Harris Company basement adjacent to the east arcade of said mall; NOW, TfiEREFORE, 6E IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to enter into Change Order flo. 2 with J. D. Diffenbaugh for implementation of engineering changes, due to tfie future excavation of the Harris Company Basement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all costs for engineering calculations and drawings and costs for said Change Order No. 2 with J. D. Diffenbaugh, will be reimbursed to the Agency by the Harris Company. Adopted: 9/22/69 122° P4otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2044, whereby the Agency authorizes the execution of Change Order with Diffenbaugh for reinforcement of friction piles, and the encroach- ment of the fiarris Company. Said cost to be borne by the Norris Company, with no damage or structural change to the Mall. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~1r. Quinn advised that no other major tenants propose to have a basement, so we should not be faced with this problem again. ADJOURNI~1ENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 4:45 p.m. The motion was made by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1221 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALI- FORNIA, HELD THE 2ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF- ORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wein, Webster and Wilson Agency Members Absent: Gutierrez Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of September 18, 1969 were submitted for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the Minutes of September 18, 1969 as submitted. The Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wilson Absent: Gutierrez The Minutes of the Special Meeting of September 22, 1969 were submitted for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the Minutes of the Special Meeting of September 22, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Gutierrez REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time, but that Mr. Gresham was present to report on the condemnation actions. City Hall - Mr. Gresham stated that we now have a decision of the court, and are ready to acquire title to City Hall as soon as they relocate. They anticipate relocating by November 1st. Aucutt - Trial is set for October 20, 1969. Williamsen - They are very anxious to get to trial DeBOis-Winstead-Shane - Answers have been filed on DeBois and Shane. The Winstead answer should be coming shortly, they have been cooperative. Security Pacific - This case should be resolved without litigation. Garner-Martin - All have answered, and we will be moving for an early trial date. Love-Ringholtz-Delzore - All have answered, and we are moving for an early trial date. Barnum & Flagg - Have answered, and we are moving for an early trial date. Don't anticipate getting to trial until the end of the year or perhaps February 1970. 1222 Phillips - All have answered and we are ready to set for trial. Western Union - We have a trial date. Western Union expects some consideration of their underground cables. 4:20 - Mr. Gutierrez arrived at meeting. Mr. Gresham stated that we have to acquire the easement of the Stewart alley way in Block 21. Rose - The affidavit for early trial is prepared. The Members were concerned regarding the vacation date set by the Harris Company for the portion of their store that will be demolished. Mr. Varner stated that he feels that the Harris Company will be requesting an extension of their vacation date. The Members requested that Mr.Quinn evaluate their anticipated vacation date, to determine whether or not it will interfere with the Agency's schedules. EXTENSION OF ESCROW, R-10 Reuse 2, 3 & 4 and R-79 Reuse 2b- WINSTEAD: Mr. Winstead presented his rendering of the Wells Fargo Building to the Members and explained the minor changes on the plan. The Wells Fargo Bank will be the second largest banking establishment to come into the project. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2045 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING THE ESCROW TIME ON R-79 REUSE PARCEL 2b AND R-70 REUSE PARCELS 2, 3, and 4 WHEREAS, on September 18, 7968 the Agency entered into a Disposition Agreement with William P. Winstead and Jerome T. Winstead for Reuse Parcels 2 and 3 Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 1969, the Agency entered into a Disposition Agreement for Reuse Parcel 2b,Centra7 City Project, Calif. R-79, with Messrs Winstead; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 1969 the Agency entered into aDisposition Agreement for Reuse Parcel 4, Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10, with Messrs Winstead; and WHEREAS, said escrows were to be closed on September 18, 1969; and WHEREAS, Messrs Winstead have petitioned the Agency for an extension of time to close escrows to November 15, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have studied the request for extension and have determined that said extension would be of the best interest of the Agency and the City of San Bernardino 1223 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the escrows for the sate of Reuse Parcels 2, 3 and 4 Calif. R-10 and escrow for sale of Reuse Parcel 2b, R-79, are hereby authorized to be extended until November 15, 1969. Adopted: 10/2/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2045. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR DISPLACEMENT PAYMENT - DOTTY LEE INC.: Mr. Joe Sarver, dba Dotty Lee Inc., was presented to the Board. Mr. Varner stated that he has reviewed the letter from Mr. Sarver dated September 19, 1969 and has had several conversations with Mr. Sarver. Mr. Varner stated that Mr. Sarver is not eligible for a Displacement Payment because his income during the two years prior to his move was not under $10,000. Mr. Varner stated that Mr. Sarver did not qualify for any Federal assistance with respect to the move in question. Therefore any payment to Mr. Sarver would have to be from local funds and would be the discretion of the Members. The Members should carefully review all the circumstances of the case to determine if in the public interest any such expenditure should properly be made. Mr. Sarver stated that he will receive a Loss of Property payment from the Agency. He further stated that he now understands that because of his income, he is ineligible for a Displacement Payment. He requested reimbursement from the Agency for the expenses he incurred in moving his location on Third Street to "E" Street. He stated that if he had remained at his location on Third Street for a period of six more weeks, his moving expenses would have been paid by the Agency. Mr. Sarver explained that he had the opportunity of renting a location on "E" Street, which he was afraid to turn down because locations in the area were very hard to find. He could not take the chance that the Central City Project would be approved shortly, and perhaps lose the opportunity to relocate within the area. The Members asked Mr. Sarver for the cost involved in his move from the Third Street location to the "E" Street location. Mr. Sarver stated that he would have to review his records to determine the actual cost of moving. After careful review, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson to table the request of Mr. Sarver for reimbursement of moving expenses until the next regular meeting, in order that Mr. Sarver can present to the Board the actual cost involved in his move. The motion was carried by the following vote, to Wit: ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 122a GRIGGS-NORWOOD - CHANGE ORDER N0. 4, UNIT NO. 3, PHASE II, R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2046 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER N0. 4 WITH GRIGGS- NORWOOD INC., UNIT NO. 3, PHASE II, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Griggs-Norwood Inc., for Site Preparation Unit No. 3, Phase II, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Change Order No. 1 was executed the 21st day of February, 1969; Change Order No. 2 executed the 23rd day of May, 1969; and Change Order No. 3 the 14th day of July, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to decrease the services of the Con- tractor as shall be set forth in Change Order No. 4. Said decrease to be in the amount of $1,039. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 4 with Griggs-Norwood Inc., Unit No. 3, Phase II, Calif. R-79, decreasing the contract by $7,039.00. Adopted: 10/2/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2046. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Austin and Gutierrez Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PRESCO BUILDING, AWARD OF CONTRACT UNIT N0. 26, R-79: The Members were advised that Mr. Lippitt has not stated whether or not he would desire to purchase the fixtures in his present location. It was requested that the Agency enter into the Contract with Presco Building Materials, and the resolution so state that if Mr. Lippitt desires to purchase the fixtures for $500, the Agency will award the contract for $3,740. If Mr. Lippit does not desire to purchase the fixtures, then the contract will be awarded for $3,240. Mr. Varner explained that the Agency must sell the fixtures far the difference between the bid with salvage and the bid without salvage ($500.00). There was some discussion regarding what was considered salvage. Mr. Wein stated that salvage would be alt material from the job. The members determined that if Mr. Lippitt does not determine whether or not he wants the fixtures before October 10th, the contract will be awarded for the $3,240 (with salvage). The following resolution was introduced: 1225 RESOLUTION N0. 2047 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 26, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract, the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 26, for the demolition and clearance of certain areas in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on August 29, 1969 and September 5, 1969, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 16th day of September, 1969, at the office of theAgency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, Presto Building Materials has submitted a bid with salvage in the amount of $3,240; and a bid without salvage in the amount of $3,740. Said bids being the lowest bids submitted; and WHEREAS, the Members desire to give Mr. Al Lippitt, dba Robinson's Men's Wear, the option to buy the fixtures (salvage)from his present location, which is involved in the demolition of Unit No. 26, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, if Mr. Al Lippitt desires to purchase said fixtures, the Members desire to award the contract with Presco Building Materials in the amount of $3,740 (without salvage); and WHEREAS, if Mr. A7 Lippittdoes not desire to purchase said fixtures, the Members desire to award the contract with Presco Building Materials in the amount of $3,240 (with salvage). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that, subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of presto Building Material is hereby accepted, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 26, Calif. R-79, on behalf of the Agency. 1226 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Contract shall be awarded in the amount of $3,740, if on or before October 10, 1969, Mr. Al Lippitt desires to purchase the fixtures from the Agency for the sum of $500. If Mr. Lippitt does not desire to purchase said fixtures, the contract shall be awarded in the amount of $3,240. Adopted: 10/2/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2047. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None VESSUP ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, R-79: Mr. Quinn explained that three informal bids were received for the moving of an electrical panel box. The low bid was from Vessup Electrical in the amount of $7,300. This work has already been accomplished in order to proceed with the construction of the Southwest arcade of the mall. Authority was requested to award contract to Vessup Electrical. Mr. Wilson stated that he believes the Agency should invite more than three proposals when the work is under $2,500. It was suggested that an eligibility list be made up by the Agency staff. This list should be divided into groups of five. When informal proposals are required, the Agency should solicite proposals from five firms, rotating the groups of five. After further dis- cussion it was determined that the Agency should set a definite policy on the soliciting of bids for work under $2,500. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein instructing the Executive Director to study the situation, and present a suggested policy regarding the soliciting of bids at the next board meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2048 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH VESSUP ELECTRICAL CO. CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to relocate an electrical panel box in order to proceed with the construction of the Southwest Mall Arcade; and WHEREAS, the cost to perform these services warrants only informal bidding and three informal bids were received, Vessup Electrical being the lowest; and 1227 WHEREAS, Vessup Electrical Company has agreed to perform the required work at a cost not to exceed $1,300.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chaittnan and Secretary be hereby authorized to enter into a Contract with Vessup Electrical Company at a cost not to exceed $1,300.00. Adopted: 10/2/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2048. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: Wilson Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Wilson stated that he voted against the resolution because he is against numbering the proposals down to three, because of the established standards in the construction industry. Some contractors can bid lower because their standards are not equivalent to the standards required. When the number of bids are narrowed down to three, you might have a below standard contractor bidding and being awarded the contracts. BONADIMAN & ASSOCIATES, R-10: Authority was requested to increase the upset figure of contract with Bonadiman and Associates, R-10, increasing their contract by $1,805. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2049 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO CONTRACT WITH JOSEPH E. BONADIMAN & ASSOCIATES, FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a Contract with Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates for Engineering Services for the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10, dated August 22, 1960; and WHEREAS, Contract Amendment No. 1 was executed May 7, 1964; Contract Amendment No. 2 executed November 8, 1966; Contract Amendment No. 3 executed May 19, 1967; Contract Amendment No. 4 executed June 19, 1967; Contract Amendment No. 5 executed Decanber 12, 1967; and Contract Amendment No. 6 executed January 5, 1968; and Contract Amendment No. 7 executed January 29, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the compensation of the Contractor to include all additional engineering work to be accomplished for the remainder of the Meadowbrook Project. 122a NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute Contract Amendment No. 8 with Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates increasing their contract compensation by $1,805 for all additional engineering services required for the Meadowbrook Project. Adopted: 10/2/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2049. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PROJECT SIGN: Mr. Austin requested authorization to purchase a Central City Project Sign to be placed on the Diffenbaugh fence between the Harris Company and the Andreson Building. This sign will not exceed the amount of $300, and will keep the public informed of the construction of the Central City Mall. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2050 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN $300 FOR CENTRAL CITY PROJECT SIGN WHEREAS, the Agency Members desire to erect a Central City Project sign between the Harris Company Building and the Andreson Building to inform the public of the construction of the Central City Mall; and WHEREAS, said sign shall not exceed the amount of $300. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency Of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than $300 is hereby approved for the purchase of a Central City Project sign. Adopted: 10/2/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2050. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Austin stated that it is the City's desire that the fence between the Andreson Building and the Woolworth building (after demolition of the Masonic Building) be cut 3 feet, so that the public can watch the progress of the Central City Mall. 1229 In place of the three feet of wood fence to be removed, it is our desire to put hog wire. The City has stated that possibly picnic tables and benches could be put in this vacant area, as a rest area and viewing spot. The fence belongs to J. D. Diffenbaugh Company, so perhaps they will incur the expense for this revision. It would be to their benefit for advertising purposes. The Members instructed the Executive Director to speak to Mr. Diffenbaugh to determine if he would revise the fence as suggested. Treatment of Parkin Area - Mr. Quinn requested authority to have the area of tTie par ing of tat is not blacktopped yet treated for protection against the rain and wind. The Members instructed Mr. Quinn to review the situation to determine the best method for treatment of this area, and to report his find- ings at the next regular meeting. "E" Street Post~o_nem~ent - Mr. Austin requested authority from the Members to postpo- ne ti~or-(c on the "E" Street widening until after the Christmas shopping season. All agreed. Postponement of Regular Meeting - Mr. Wilson stated that he would not be able to atten t e next regu ar meeting of October 16, 1969. He requested that the meeting be postponed until October 23, 1969. All Members agreed. Lease, Cit~o~f San Bernardino - hir. Varner stated that in order for the temporary parking are- a even 4th Street and the Mall to be properly main- tained and patroled, the Agency should enter into a lease with the City of San Bernardino for this area. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2051 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ABTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, FOR CENTRAL CITY PARKING LOT WHEREAS, it is to the benefit of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, to enter into Rental Agreement with the City of San Bernardino for the rental of Central City temporary parking area between 4th Street and the mall, in order to enable property maintenance and patrol. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute Rental Agreement with the City of San Bernardino for rental of temporary parking area between 4th Street and the mall, on a month to month tenancy, for $1.00 per year. Adopted: 10/2/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2051, authorizing the execution of Rental Agreement with the City for the Central City Temporary Parking Area, for the sum of $1.00 per year, on a month-to-month tenancy. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1230 Barricade, Parking Area - Mr. Quinn requested authority to enter into contract ~ ange r er wit L. Yeager for an increase in services by providing for a barricade to be constructed along the upper perimeter of the temporary parking area off of 4th Street. The Change Order will not exceed the sum of $400: After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2052 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT WITH E. L. YEAGER, SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 3, PHASE 3, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with E. L. Yeager for Site Preparation Unit No. 3, Phase 3, Calif. R-79, dated the 27th day of August, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to increase the services of the Con- tractor by providing fora barricade to be constructed along the upper perimeter of the temporary parking area off of 4th Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute Change Order No. 1 with E. L. Yeager contract for Site Preparation Unit No. 3, Phase 3, Calif. R-79, not to exceed the sum of $400.00. Adopted: 10/2/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2052 providing for barricade to be constructed along upper perimeter of the temporary parking area. Said barricade shall not consist of any cable. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Polic~rding Devel_ opers - Mr. Varner stated that the Agency must adopt a po icy setting forth our guide lines regarding Agency Members and Employees acquiring any interest or the appearance of any interest in any property in a Redevelopment Project. There are no Federal guide lines for the Agency to follow so we must set our own policy. The policy will prohibit any Board Member or Staff Member from acquiring property for a period of one year after he leaves the Agency. Mr. Varner stressed that the need for this policy is simply a matter of policy and is not to reflect that there is any conflict of interest at this time. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2053 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING POLICIES PERTAINING TO AGENCY MEMBERS AND EMPLOYEES 1231 WHEREAS, in furtherance of the objectives of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has undertaken programs for the clearance and redevelopment of slum and blighted areas in the City of San Bernardino, and in this connection has undertaken and is now carrying out two redevelopment projects designated as Meadowbrook Project Area No. 1, Calif. R-10, and Central City Project Area No. 1, Calif. R-79, respectively; and WHEREAS, the Agency has entered into contracts with the United States of America, Department of Housing and Urban Development, under which the United States Government has agreed to make financial assistance, in the form of loans and capital grants, available to Agency to assist it in undertaking and carrying out said redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS „pursuant to California law, and in accordance with said loan and grant contracts, the Agency is engaged in the pursuit of urban renewal activities, including acquisition and disposition of real property, entering into contractual relations with public and private entities within its Project Areas, and pre- paring plans for proposed Project Areas; and WHEREAS, the Agency deems it necessary to the public interest to establish policies and guidelines for the conduct of its members, officers and employees with respect to such urban renewal activities, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California: That no member, officer or employee of the Agency, shall be involved, directly or indirectly, as an oweer, partner, participant, joint venturer, employee, or otherwise, or enter into any contract or agreement in connection with any project or property included, or planned to be included, in any project under the jurisdiction of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, while serving as an officer, member or employee of the Agency, or €or one year following termination of his service with the Agency. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That the Executive Director shall establish personnel policies to implement these resolutions. Adopted: October 2, 1969 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2053. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None It was suggested that said policy be put into the Agency Personnel Policies, and atl new employees and present employees be made aware of it. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 6:45 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: W ter, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: NO+rc~ sent None 1232 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD OCTOBER 23, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Webster and Wilson Agency Members Absent: Gutierrez and Wein Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 2, 1969 were presented for appro- val. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 2, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Gutierrez and Wein 4:10 p.m. - Mr. Gutierrez arrived at the meeting EXPENDITURES: The expenditures for the month of September, 1969 were presented for approval. After review, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Expenditures for the month of September, 7969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he and Mayor A7 Ballard were requested by officials in Washington D. C., to meet with various Senators, Congressmen, and Urban Renewal Officials, to discuss the proposed appropriation of funds for Urban Renewal and Housing Programs. HUD was very happy to see our Agency taking an active part in trying to get more funds appropriated for Urban Renewal projects. Mr. Varner further stated that the success of our Central City Project was well known by representatives at the discussions held. Mr. Quinn stated that Mr. Thatcher from HUD Regional Office in San Francisco was in the office today and was also very impressed with the progress we have made. CENTRAL CITY BROCHURES: The following resolution was introduced: 1233 RESOLUTION N0. 2054 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF NDT MORE THAN $441.80, FOR THE PURCHASE OF 1,000 4 PAGE COLOR BROCHURES OF THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desire to purchase of 1,000, 4 page color brochures of the Central City Project for public publicity purposes; and WHEREAS, bids were solicited, the lowest bid being submitted by Inland Printing and Engraving Company, in the amount of $441.80. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of $441.80 is hereby approved for the purchase of 1,000, 4 page color brochures of the Central City Project from Inland Printing and Engraving Company. Adopted: 10-23-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2054. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein PRESCRIPTION CITY DRUG A request for payment of moving expense for air conditioning equipment was presented to the Members from Mr. David 0. Smith, owner of Prescription City Drug Store. At the time of the move of Prescription City, they were not prepared for the move of the air conditioning equipment. Since the actual move the air conditioner has been moved to 2724 North Waterman Avenue, San Bernardino. The cost submitted for this move is $6,997.00. Before their actual move to Banning, HUD approved the moving of this air-conditioning equipment, which was an amount of 36,997 for removal and installation. Mr. Webster stated that if it costs $6,997 to move the air conditioner to Banning it should cost less to move it to Waterman Avenue in San Bernardino. Mr. Smith stated that the actual cost to move it to Waterman Avenue was $6,997 and included as such in the bid. The write-off of delinquent rent in the amount of $2,160 was discussed. Mr. Austin stated that perhaps the written off rent should be deducted from the amount to be reimbursed for the moving of the airconditioner. Mr. Wilson stated that he did not believe the two had any bearing on each other. The rent was written off because Prescription City had discontinued business and were receiving no income fora certain period of time. Again there was question as to the actual cost of moving this air conditioning equipment. After discussion, Mr. Wilson stated that he would be in favor of reimbursing Prescription City for the moving of the air conditioning equipment subject to determination of actual costs. The following resolution was introduced: 1234 RESOLUTION N0. 2055 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE REIMBURSE- MENT OF COSTS FOR MOVING OF AIR CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT TO PRESCRIPTION CITY DRUGS, SUBJECT TO DETERMINATION OF ACTUAL COSTS WHEREAS, Prescription City Drugs relocated from 498 West Third Street to Banning, California on August 14, 1969; and WHEREAS, bids were received from movers and general contractors to perform all phases of the move. Included in the low bid for the total move, was an amount of $6,997 to remove and reinstall air conditioning equipment; and WHEREAS, at the time of the move, Prescription City was not prepared for the move of the air conditioning equipment;and WHEREAS, since that date, Prescription City has had air conditioning equipment removed at 498 West Third Street and has installed substitute equipment at 2724 North Waterman Avenue, San Bernardino, California; and has submitted a bill for said services in the amount of $6,873; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency have reviewed the circumstances and have determined that Prescription City Drugs should be reimbursed for the removal and installation of air-conditioning equipment to 2724 North Waterman Avenue, subject to determination of actual costs involved for this move. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the reimbursement to Prescription City Drugs is hereby approved, for the removal of air conditioning equipment from 498 West Third Street and installation of substitute equipment at 2724 North Waterman Avenue, San Bernardino, California, subject to determination of actual costs. Adopted: 10-23-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2055. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson ,.Webster, Gutierrez Noes: Austin Abstention: None Absent: Wein DOTTY LEE INC. Mr. Quinn stated that at the last meeting of October 2, 1969 the Board moved that the matter be tabled in order that Mr. Sarver could present to the Board actual costs involved in his move from Third Street to "E" Street. It was explained that this move would not qualify under HUD regulations because he moved before the project was approved. Any reimbursement would have to be with local funds. If Mr. Sarver had waited until the project was approved, and then moved, HUD would have approved the move. 1235 Motion was made by Mr. Wilson authorizing the reimbursement of actual moving costs to Mr. Sarver from his location of Third Street to his location of "E" Street. Mr. Austin stated that he is against the payment of moving costs to Mr. Sarver because Mr. Sarver was informed by Mr. Harper before his move, that if he moved prior to approval of the project he would not be reimbursed for his move. Also, he was concerned with the reactions the Agency might receive from others who relocated shortly before the project was approved. Mr. Wilson withdrew his motion. After further discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster denying the request of Mr. Sarver for reimbursement of moving expenses from his location on Third Street to location on "E" Street, prior to the approval of the Central City Project, because Mr. Sarver had been informed prior to his move that he could not be reimbursed for said move, if made before the project was approved. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein AMENDMENT TO COOPERATION AGREEMENT, R-10: Mr. Quinn stated that this Amendatory is necessary to amend the Cooperation Agreement with the City of San Bernardino to include the recent Amendatory, R-10. The City has already approved the amendment. The fallowing resolu- tion was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2056 RESOLUTION AMENDING LOCAL GRANT-IN-AID AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, on the 4th day of August, 7958, a Local Grant-In-Aid and Cooperation Agreement was executed by and between the City of San Bernardino, a chartered City of the State of California (herein called the "Local Government") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, a public Body corporate and politic, duly created and functioning under the laws of the State of California (herein called the "Local Public Agency"); and WHEREAS, said Agreement was amended by the adding of Section 10 thereto; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was further amended on the 30th day of April, 1963, by Amending the Fifth Whereas,paragraph beginning on Page 2, Line 19; Section 1, beginning on Page 3, Line 21; and Section 3, beginning on Page 4, Line 26; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to further amend said Agreement in certain respects to cause said agreement to be in conformance with the Loan and Capital ^-^ Grant Contract, as amended, by and between the United States of America and the Local Public Agency; and 1236 WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolu- tion No. 9980, have offered to amend said Cooperation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Local Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement, dated the 4th day of August, 1958, as amended, is hereby amended in the following particular: 1. The Fifth Whereas paragraph beginning on Page 2, Line 19, is amended to read: "WHEREAS, upon the basis of reasonable estimates of cost prepared by the Local Public Agency, it appears that the presently estimated net project cost of the Project to be incurred by the Local Public Agency in carrying out the Project constituting the difference between the gross cost of the Project and the proceeds derived from the disposition of the land„ amounts to approximately Four Million, Five Hundred Ninety- Nine Thousand, Eight Hundred and Fifty-Two ($4,599,852), of which amount the Federal Government is expected to provide not more than three- quarters (3/4) thereof, estimated to be One Million, Nine Hundred Twenty Six Thousand, Seven Hundred Twenty Five Dollars ($1,926,725.00) in the form of a capital grant, leaving a balance of Two Million, Six Hundred Seventy Three Thousand, One Hundred Twenty Seven ($2,673,127) to be provided in the form of local grant-in-aid" BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman of the Agency is hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the Agency any Further instrument or docu- ment necessary or covenant to evidence said amendment. Adopted: 10-23-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2056. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK, R-79: Mr. Artwell Haydon was presented to the Members. Mr. Haydon represents Southland National Bank. Mr. Haydon stated that Southland National Bank has received approval from Washington to locate their banking facility at 2nd and "D" Streets. They will be the major tenant in the American West Building. Because the banking laws require some activity on the part of the bank prior to the com- pletion of the bank building, they must obtain a temporary location. The Comptroller of Currency has approved the temporary location on the west side of "D" Street. Mr. Haydon stated that Southland will level and pave the area and erect a temporary 2,000 sq. ft. facility. Upon sufficient completion of the American West Building, they will remove the facility and paving and locate into the new building. They anticipate moving into their new location by September 1, 1970. Mr. Quinn stated that it would not interfere with the Agency's schedule as long as they were out by September 1, 1970. A rental fee of $350.00 was suggested. Mr. Quinn stated that Southland desires a 95' frontage along "D" Street. If the Agency approves this location, a portion of the location is under Disposition Agreement to Arrowhead Development Corporation. 1237 Mr. Hodgdon was presented to the Members. Mr. Hodgdon stated that he has had discussions with Security Pacific Bank regarding a temporary location on the proposed parking area of Reuse 45 and 50, until they can move into the 12- story development. This would interfere with Southlands request. Mr. Hodgdon stated that he had mentioned this temporary site for Security Pacific to Mr. Quinn, because he realized that they might be requesting temporary location there. The Members determined that Southland National Bank could have a frontage of 75' without trespassing on Reuse 45 and 50. Mr. Haydon was asked if a 75' frontage would be adequate. Mr. Haydon stated that they would make it do under the circumstances. Mr. Hodgdon stated that Security Pacific Bank would also be satisfied with this arrangement. The area would be small for both banks but under the circumstances it would do. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2057 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INTERIM RENTAL OF R-79 PORTION OF BLOCK 21, PARCEL 28 TO SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK FOR A RENTAL FEE OF $350.00 PER MONTH WHEREAS, Southland National Bank has submitted an acceptable offer to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino to construct a 12 story office building on Meadowbrook Project, Reuse Parcel No. 13b, 15, 16 and 17; and WHEREAS, the escrow for this sale was subject to the approval of the Comptroller of Currency for the establishment of a branch banking facility for Southland National Bank within the downtown area of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the Comptroller of Currency has approved said location and it has been agreed :that Southland National Bank would have a facility in operation by December 1969; and WHEREAS, Southland National Bank desires to rent a portion of Calif. R-79, Block 27, Parcel 28, for interim use as a banking facility until their new bank is sufficiently complete to allow occupancy; and WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that the south 75' of Block 27, Parcel 28 is available and will not be needed for Agency purposes until September 1970 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the south 75' of Calif. R-79, Block 21, Parcel 28, is hereby authorized to be rented to Southland National Bank for the sum of $350.00 per month. Adopted: 10-23-69 1238 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2057. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: We in EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT, MC MAHANS FURNITURE STORE: Request for extension of Rental Agreement until January 25, 1970 was requested by McMahans Furniture Store. Mr. Varner stated that the building will be sche- duled far demolition in February. After discussion the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2058 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREE- MENT WITH MC MAHANS FURNITURE STORE UNTIL JANUARY 25, 1970 WHEREAS, McMahans Furniture Store has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, McMahans Furniture Store has requested an extension of time on their Rental Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, have reviewed the circumstances involved and believe that such an extension is proper. NOW> THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and McMahans Furniture Store is hereby extended until January 25, 7970. Adopted: 10-23-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2058. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein MORRISON AND HILL, R-79 CONTRACT: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2059 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT N0. SIX TO CONTRACT WITH MORRISON AND HILL FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES, CALIF. R-79 1239_ __ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Morrison-and Hill dated the 21st day of May, 1965, for Appraisal Services in Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, it is desired by the Agency to establish an upset figure of $17,000 for Eminent Domain Trial Preparation and Testimony in view of the remaining work to be completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 6 to Contract with Morrison and Hill to establish an upset figure of $17,000 for Eminent Domain Trial Pre- paration and Testimony, Calif. R-79. Adopted: 10-23-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2059. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein DEMOLITION CONTRACT, UNIT N0. 27, R-79: Bids were opened October 6, 1969 for Demolition Unit No. 27. Dakeno was the low bidder, fora bid in the amount of $9,440. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2060 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC. FOR DEMO- LITION AND SITE PREPARATION, UNIT N0. 27, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended and pursuant to that Con- tract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 27 for the demolition and clearance ofi certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefor was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on Sep- tember 18, 1969 and September 25, 1969 and an Affidavit showing such publi- cation is on file in the office of said Agency; and 120 WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 6th day of October, 1969, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and 4JHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of DAKENO, INC., is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development the bid of Dakeno, Inc. for the sum of 59,440 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 27, Calif. R-79, Central City Project on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 10/23/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing adoption of Resolution No. 2060. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit; Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wilson, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: alone Absent: Wain CONTRACT AWARD, UNIT I10. 5, CALIF. R-79: Bids for Unit No. 5, Calif. R-79 (Tree Planting) were opened October 14, 1969. The low bid was submitted by Moulder Brothers in the amount of $53,934. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION PJO. 2061 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPI.1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERIJARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH P10ULDER BROTHERS FOR SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 5, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of (larch 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 7, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary far the exe- cution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and IdHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed buds for work consisting principally of providing street trees for the following areas: Fourt Street from "G" to "H", Second Street from "E" to "H", "G" Street from Fourth~to Second, "H" Street from Fourth to "G", and Third Street (extension from "G" to Freeway; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, California on September 26, 1969 and October 3, 7969, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and 1241 4JHEREAS, said Invitation called for tfie receipt of such bids until 4:OC p.m. on the 14th day of October, 1969, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the tune and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud; and IJHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Moulder Brothers, is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. IJOIV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of fioulder Bro- thers for the sum of $53,934.00 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Site Preparation, Unit No. 5, Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79 on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 10/23/69 Motion was made by 4Jilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution fJo. 2061. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: fJone Absent: Wein PROPOSED SPOT RADIO ANPJOUNCEP1ENTS: f•1r. Austin stated that he requested the Staff to look into proposals for Radio spot announcements to keep the public informed regarding the Central City Project. A memorandum was presented to the members from Thomas White, Adminis- trative Officer setting forth the proposals. KCAL proposes 6 announcements per day O $4.25, for a Total of 13 Weeks = $1,989 (This station is a Spanish station, and the announcements will be spoken in the Spanish language). KI1EN proposes 6 announcements per day C $6.50, a total of 13 weeks = $2,535. PJr. Austin stated that the Agency will work with the radio stations to draft the announcements. ('Ir. Wilson stated that perhaps 6 announcements per day would to too many, in that we are not trying to promote sales, but only wanting to keep the public informed. f9r. Webster stated that he would like to hear a tape of the announcements before the Board authorizes the expenditure of these funds. Motion was made by L^lebster and seconded by Wilson tiibling this matter of Spot Radio Announcements until October 28, 1969, which is the date set for Special Meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: IVOne Absent: Wein CHAIN LINK FENCE, R-79: hir. Austin stated that informal proposals were received for the installation of 1242 a 460 foot, 4' high chain link fence along the south side of Fourth Street, between Woolworths Building and "F" Street, to enhance the safety of lives and property, and to prevent vehicles from parking on .the unpaved area. The low bid was received from Pioneer Chain Link Fence Company in the amount of $474.00. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2062 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER CONTRACT WITH PIONEER CHAIN LINK FENCE CO. NOT TO EXCEED $425.00 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to have installed approximately 460 feet of 4' high chain link fence along the south side of Fourth Street, between Woolworths Building and "F" Street, to enhance the safety of lives and property, and to prevent vehicles from parking on the unpaved area; and WHEREAS, the cost to perform this service warrants only informal bidding; and WHEREAS, four bids were received for said services; the lowest being received from Pioneer Chain Link Fence Company in the amount of $414.00. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute contract with Pioneer Chain Link Fence Company for the installation of chain link fence along the south side of Fourth Street, between Woolworth's Building and "F" Street, Central City Project, not to exceed the sum of $425.00. Adopted: 10/23/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2062. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention None Absent: Wein REMOVAL OF EXCESS MATERIAL, WEST END, R-79: Mr. Quinn requested authority to have the excess material deposited on the West End of the Central City Project removed. John S. Griffith Company has requested that this be done, in order that they may show the area to pers- pective tenants. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the Executive Director to have the excess material on the West End of the Central City Project removed. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein 7243 TRAVEL: Authorization was requested for the payment of expenses of Agency Counsel and Chairman to travel from Florida to Washington, D. C. on October 14, 1969, to meet with HUD officials to accelerate approval of the Amendatory Applica- tion for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2063 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND AGENCY COUNSEL TO TRAVEL FROM MIAMI, FLORIDA TO WASHINGTON, D. C., OCTOBER 14, 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2030 authorized Agency Members, Staff, Agency Counsel, and P1ayor Al C. Ballard to travel to Bal Harbour, Florida, October 12 - 15 1969, to attend a NAHRO National Conference; and WHEREAS, it was found essential that the Agency Counsel and Chairman travel from Florida to Washington D. C. to meet with HUD Officials to accelerate approval of the Amendatory Application for Central City Project, Calif. R-79; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby approve the travel of the Agency Counsel and Chairman on October 14, 1969 to Washington D. C. to meet with officials of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and their travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 10/23/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2063. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2064 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE AGENCY COUNSEL AND MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, TO TRAVEL TO WASHINGTON D. C. OCTOBER 20, 7969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and 1244 WHEREAS, it has been found essential that the Agency Counsel and Mayor of the City of San Bernardino, Al C. Ballard, travel to Washington D. C. at the re- quest of officials from Washington D. C., to discuss with various Senators Congressmen, and Urban Renewal Officials, the proposed appropriation of funds for Urban Renewal and Housing Programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby approve the travel of the Agency Counsel and Mayor Al C. Ballard to Washington, D. C., October 20, 1969, to testify to the Senate and House Committee on Housing, and their travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 10/23/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2064. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein REPAIR OF ANDRESON BUILDING, R-79: Due to the demolition of the building adjacent to the Andreson Building, same damage was caused to the Andreson Building. Informal bids were received for the repair of this damage. The low bid was received from C. J. McCabe in the amount of $200.00. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2065 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH C. J. MC CARE, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 7, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino desires that the following work be performed on the Andreson Building due to the demolition of an adjacent structure. Remove door which has been exposed and fill result- ing opening, together with utility opening which also has been exposed with solid grout cement block with water proofing on the exterior; and WHEREAS, the cost to perform these services warrants only informal bidding and five informal bids were received, C. J. Mc Cabe being the lowest; and WHEREAS, C. J. McCabe, a Union Shop has agreed to perform the required work at a cost not to exceed $200.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chairman and Secretary be hereby authorized to enter into a Contract with C. J. McCabe at a cost not to exceed $200.00 Time limit will be seven days from the awarding of said Contract. Adopted: 10/23/69 1245 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2065. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein BARRICADE, TEMPORARY PARKING AREA 4TH STREET: Mr. Austin explained that at the last meeting, a resolution was adopted to enter into Change Order with E. L. Yeager for the construction of a barricade along the upper perimeter of the temporary parking area. Since that time, E. L. Yeager has stated that they would not have the time to construct this barricade. Informal bids were received for this work, the lowest bid was received from Christensen Construction Company in the amount of $1,045.14. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2066 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH CHRISTENSEN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to construct a barricade three feet high consisting of four by four ince post with ten foot centers and one two inch by six inch longitudal rail with Type W-21-R Reflectors every ten feet on rail. Posts must be firmly imbedded in the ground; and WHEREAS, the cost to perform these services warrants only informal bidding and four informal bids were received, Christensen Construction Company being the lowest; and WHEREAS, Christensen Construction Company, a Union Shop has agreed to perform the required work at a cost not to exceed $1,045.14. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chairman and Secretary be hereby authorized to enter into a Contract with Christensen Construction Company, at a cost not to exceed $1,045.14. Time limit will be seven days from the awarding of said Contract. Adopted: 10/23/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2066. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Austin and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein 1246 CHANGE ORDER N0. 1, DAKENO, INC., R-79 Mr. Austin explained that Dakeno is under contract for the building adjacent to 468 Third Street, and therefore the Agency has requested his bid for demo- lition of 468 Third Street. Said bid is in the amount of $850.00. The follow- ing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2067 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER N0. 1, TO CONTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC., DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEAR- ANCE, UNIT N0. 25, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Contract with Dakeno, Inc., for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 25, Calif. R-79 on the 31st day of July, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Agency to enter into Change Order No. 1 with Dakeno, Inc., for the removal of a portion of Block 2, Parcel 12, known as 468 Third Street, San Bernardino, California (Diamond Loan and Jewelry) in an amount not to exceed $850.00 with Contract extended tilt November 7, 1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. t with Dakeno, Inc., Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 25, Calif. R-79, not to exceed the amount of $850.00 nor contract completion date of November 7, 1969. Adopted: 10/23/69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2067. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Austin read the Telegram approving the Amendatory for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79. h1r. Wilson stated that he would not be able to attend the next Regular Board P1eeting to be held November 6, 1969. He asked if this meeting could be postponed until November 13, 1969. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster postponing the Regular Meeting of November 6, 1969 to November 13, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster Wilson and Gutierrez Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein A Memorandum was presented regarding Board Policy for Informal Bidding. The following resolution was introduced: 1247 RESOLUTION NO. 2068 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING BOARD POLICY FOR IN- FORMAL BIDDING WHEREAS, Federal and State laws do not require legal advertising for the receipt of bids for work under $1,500; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency Board to set forth an Established Policy for Informal Bidding, for all work under $1,500; and WHEREAS, in order to ensure maximum local participation, it has been determined that a list of local and reputable contractors should be prepared, in coordination with Allied Construction Industries, a local Contractors Organization; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that in order to ensure that workers contracted by the Agency through the informal bidding procedure are paid in accordance with Federal Wage Regulations, a Contractors List shall be prepared. Minority Contractors will be included who have signed an Agreement with the Union. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said list will be approved by the Local Building and Trade Union Involved. Adopted: 10/23/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2068. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein A business card was shown to the Members where the Agency "Logo" was being used, Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the Chairman to write a letter to said party, requesting the discontinuation of its use on business cards and stationary. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Gutierrez Noes: None Abstention: Austin Absent: Wein ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 5:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein 1248 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPPlENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1969, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman reported that this Special Meeting is held pursuant to a duly dated and signed Notice of Special Meeting. Said notice is as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that velopment Agency of the City of the office of the Redevelopment 323 Court Street, Room 305, San place thereof at 4:00 p.m., the purposes. a Special Meeting of the Members of the Rede- San Bernardino, California, will be held at Agency 6f the City of San Bernardino, California, Bernardino, California, the regular meeting 28th day of October, 1969, for the following 1. Award of Demolition Bid, Unit No. 28, Calif. R-79 (City Hall) 2. Presentation of Proposed Spot Radio Announcements 3. Commission, Bob Parker, Reuse No. 80, R-10 ($1,525.00) Westbrook Van & Storage DATED this 24th day of October, 1969. s/P. W.~uinn, Jr. P.T. Quinn, Jr., Secretary 2. CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY I, P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 24th day of October, 7969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES NAIL WITNESS my hand this 24th day of October, 1969. s/P. W. Guinn, Jr. . W. Quinn, Jr., Secretary The meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson and Webster Agency Members Absent: Wein and Gutierrez Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary 1249 PROPOSED SPOT RADIO ANNOUNCEMENTS: P1r. Zimmerman from radio station KCAL (A Spanish speaking station) and Mr. Thorton from KMEN were presented to the Board. A tape of the spot radio announcement regarding the Central City Project was played. Mr. Wilson stated that he was in favor of the spot radio announce- ments as long as all continuity is approved by Mr. Quinn prior to being played on the air. PIr. Wilson further stated that he would like for any Member or Staff who is involved in .the preparation of the continuity to sign a declaration stating that they shall not receive any fee from the radio station for said services. Mr. Varner stated that this would be incorporated into the Agreement with both radio stations. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2069 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN) AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH KCAL RADIO STATION FOR SPOT RADIO AN- NOUNCEMENTS WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date for Loan and Capital Grant with the financial aid to the Agency for its Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, the Agency is undertaking certain a the Central City Project No. l; and of P1arch 21, 1967, entered into a Contract United States of America providing for Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under as amended, and pursuant to that Contract :tivities necessary for the execution of WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of KCAL Radio Station for Spot Radio Announcements, by scheduling 6 announcements per day @ $4.25 per day fora total of 13 weeks (Total of $1,989), in order to keep the public informed of the progress of the Central City Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract with KCAL Radio Station for Spot Radio Announcements not to exceed the sum of $1,989. BE IT FURTHEF. RESOLVED that all continuity wilt be approved by the Executive Director prior to being played on the air, and that any Board or Staff Member involved in the preparation of said continuity, is required to sign a declaration stating that he shall not receive any fee from the radio station for said services. Adopted: 10-28-69 RESOLUTION NO. 2070 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH KMEN RADIO STATION, FOR SPOT RADIO ANNOUNCEMENTS 1250 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 27, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No. l; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of KMEN Radio Station for Spot Radio Announcements, by scheduling 6 announcements per day for $6.50 per day for a total of 13 weeks (Total of $2,535), in order to keep the public informed of the progress of the Central City Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract with KMEN Radio Station for Spot Radio Announcements not to exceed the total sum of $2,535. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all continuity will be approved by the Executive Director prior to being played on the air, and that any Board or Staff Member involved in the preparation of said continuity, is required to sign a decla- ration stating that he shall not receive any fee from the radio station for said services. Adopted: 10/28/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolutions No. 2069 and 2070 authorizing the execution of contracts with radio stations KCAL and KMEN for spot radio announcements, upon the stipulation that all continuity will be approved by P1r. Quinn prior to being played on the air, and that any Board or Staff Member involved in the preparation of said continuity shall be required to sign a declaration stating that he shall not receive any fee from the radio station for said services. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein and Gutierrez AWARD OF DEMOLITION CONTRACT, UNIT N0. 28, R-79 Bids for the demolition of Unit No. 28, R-79 (City Hall) have been opened this date by Mr. Desrochers, Operations Officer. The low bid was submitted by Presco Building Materials in the amount of $23,440. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2071 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS, FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 28, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO. 1, CALIF. R-79 1251 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its' Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 28 for the demolition and clearance of certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefor was duly published in the Sun Tele- gram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on October 10, 1969 and on October 17, 1969, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the Office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 28th day of October, 1969, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Presco Building Materials is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED'by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the.-Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Presco Building Materials for the sum of $23,440.00 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 28, Calif. R-79, Central City Project on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 10/28/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2071. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein and Gutierrez Mr. Varner stated that it has been requested by 61r. Winstead at City Hall, that the demolition of the building be coordinated with his office and Mr. Hodgdon. FINDERS FEE, 608 PARKER, REUSE PARCEL 80, R-10: Mr. Quinn stated that Reuse Parcel 80 R-10 (Westbrook Van & Storage) has closed escrow and ground has already been broken. Mr. Bob Parker is the ori- ginal broker for this sale. The finders fee is in the amount of $1,525. Mr. Wilson asked if P1r. Varner has found all the documents in order. Mr. 1252 Varner stated that he has not examined the documents. It was noted that Mr. Austin's signature was not on the Notice to Realtor. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to table this matter until the Regular Meeting, to be held November 13, 1969, in order that the Legal Counsel may review the documents. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein and Gutierrez ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 4:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein and Gutierrez 1253 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 7969, ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The meeting was called to order at 2:30 p.m., pursuant to a Notice of Change of Time of Regular Meeting sent to each member on November 7, 1969. Roll call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Webster, Wein, Wilson and Gutierrez Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary PiINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular tdeeting of October 23, 1969 were presented for approval. Mr. Austin stated that he voted No for the payment fo expenses for moving air-conditioning equipment to Prescription City Drugs on Water- man Avenue. tdotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 23, 1969 as corrected. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Gutierrez Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None The Minutes of the Special Meeting of October 28, 1969 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing approval of the Minutes of the Special Meeting of October 28, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. SCOPE INDUSTRIES: Plr. Carl Waelder, Realtor for the Sale of Reuse 52 & 53, presented hir. Lee Brown, Vice President of Scope Industries to the Members. Mr. Brown explained that the original size of their proposed building was 8,100 square feet and allowed for 16 parking spaces. They now propose to increase the size of their building to 10,500 sq. ft., which would require 18 parking spaces in conformance with existing City Codes. The size of the parcel does now allow the additional square footage plus the two extra parking spaces. Scope therefore is requesting a two parking space variance. Mr. Austin stated that he has discussed this situation with the Planning Department and has been informed that a 10% variance from City Codes for parking does not create a significant problem and can be allowed. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: 1254 RESOLUTION NO. 2072 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TfiE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A PARKING SPACE VARIANCE TO SCOPE INDUSTRIES FOR R-79, REUSE PARCELS 52 and 53 WHEREAS, Scope Industries has submitted an acceptable Offer to Purchase R-79 Reuse Parcels 52 and 53 to construct an 8,100 square foot building with 16 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, Scope Industries now wishes to increase the size of the proposed building to 10,500 sq. ft. which would require 18 parking spaces in conformance with existing City Codes; and WHEREAS, the size of parcels 52 and 53 does not allow sufficient area for the 10,500 sq. ft. building and 18 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that a l0Y variance from City Codes for park- ing does not create significant problems. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, that Scope Industries is hereby granted a 2 parking space variance subject to approval by the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission. Adopted: 11-13-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2072. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Plone Absent: None P1r. Myer Luskin, President of Scope Industries, was presented to the Board. Mr. Luskin requested authority from the Members to remain in his present location, the Security Bank Building at Third and "E" Streets, until his new building on Reuse Parcels 52 & 53 were ready for occupancy. This would be approximately the end of June, 1970. Mr. Luskin further stated that he was told by a representative of the Agency that he could see no problem in his occupying the building until the end of 1970. Because he believed he could remain in his present location until the end of 1970; he proposed the develop- ment of his new Beauty School to be complete by July 1970. He did not realize that there would be a period between vacation and occupancy. Mr. Luskin stated that he has a commitment to his students and cannot break their schooling for any length of time until his new location is complete. Mr. Austin stated that it would be impossible for the Board to authorize Scope to stay in their present location past February 28, 1970 because the Agency must have the property ready for construction of the new City Hall by May 1, 1970. This would mean that demolition in that area should start around the first of March, 1970. Mr. Luskin was asked who told him he could remain in his building until the end of 1970. Mr. Luskin stated that it was not a member of the Board but of the staff. He stated that he would rather not state the persons name. He said that he was told by this person in July 1969, that he could see no problem in his occupying the property until the end of 1970. h1r. Austin stated that in July it was not anticipated that construction would be 1255 started on the new City Hall so soon. The Members explained to Mr. Luskin that the vacation of his present location was not linked to the purchase of his new building according to Agency policies. Each is an individual tran- saction. h1r. Austin asked the contractors for the new Scope Building if Mr. Luskin?s new location could be ready for occupancy by February 28, 1970. They stated that if everything went very well they might be able to have it ready, but that they were only in the preliminary planning stage and it would be diffi- cult. The Members stated that an interium move was evident. Mr. Luskin stated that an interium move would be fine with him if it could be arranged. Because of the extra plumbing and special fixtures needed it would be difficult to arrange one. Mr. Wein suggested that Mr. Luskin meet with Mr. Harper of the Agency regarding an interium move, and that he was sure the Agency could work something out for Scope Industries with no undue expense on them. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson to table this matter until the next Regular Meeting, to be held November 20, 1969, in order that P1r. Luskin can meet with Mr. Harper regarding the possibility of an interium move. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None FINDERS FEE - BOB PARKER - REUSE 80, R-10: h1r. Varner stated that he has reviewed the documents and it is his recommend- ation that Bob Parker is entitled to receive the Finders Fee for the sale of Reuse Parcel 80. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2073 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A $1,525 FINDERS FEE PAYABLE TO BOB PARKER FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL no. 80, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, Bob Parker, Realtor, introduced developer of Meadowbrook Project, Reuse Parcel 80, to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, the escrow on Reuse Parcel 80 closed October 23, 1969; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that a 5% finders fee in the amount of $1,525 is hereby authorized to be paid to Bob Parker, for the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 80, Calif. R-10 Adopted: 11-13-69 f~otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption .of Resolution No. 2073. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 125E C. & J ENTERPRISES, EXTENSION OF TIME, REUSE 88, R-10: Mr. Austin stated that C & J Enterprises have been unsuccessful to date in securing an acceptable tenant for their proposed building, but because of their extended efforts he recommends that the Agency authorize an extension of 60 days to commence construction. He further stated that this extension will not hold up the project. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2074 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A 60 DAY EXTENSION TO C & J ENTERPRISES TO COP1MENCE CONSTRUCTION ON REUSE PARCEL 88, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, C & J Enterprises was to have commenced construction on Reuse Parcel No. 88, Calif. R-10, on November 6, 1969; and WHEREAS, C & J Enterprises has been unsuccessful to date in securing an accept- able tenant for their proposed building; and WHEREAS, C & J Enterprises has and is contacting many possible tenants for the proposed building and require additional time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that C & J Enterprises, Reuse No. 88, Calif. R,10, is hereby granted an additional 60 days to commence construction on Reuse No. 88, Calif. R-10. Adopted: 11-13-69 f4otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2074. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None WALTER DU BOSE, EXTENSION OF ESCROW, REUSE 82, R-10: A letter was presented from Mr. Du Bose requesting an extension of time to close escrow on Reuse 82, R-10. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2075 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO CLOSE ESCROW ON MEADOWBROOK PROJECT PARCEL N0. 82, TO WALTER DU BOSE WHEREAS, Walter DuBose has submitted a successful Offer to Purchase for Reuse Parcel 82, Calif. R-10; and 1257 WHEREAS, the escrow on Reuse No. 82 was to close November 7, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Small Business Administration has denied financing of Mr. DuBOSe's proposed building on a technicality; and WHEREAS, Mr. DuBose is resubmitting a loan application to Small Business Administration and is seeking other loan assistance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that an extension to close escrow on Reuse Parcel No. 82, Calif. R-10, is hereby granted to Walter DuBose until December 15, 1969. Adopted; 11-73-69 F1otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2075. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY, CHANGE ORDER -- STORM DRAIN DESIGN R-79: In order to modify the Storm Drainage Plans to accommodate the plans of the Civic Cultural Center it is now necessary to enter into Change Order to contract with Garner Tee, Tracadas & Troy for said modification. The following resolu- tion was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2076 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRPIAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT N0. 5 WITH GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS AND TROY FOR STORM DRAIN DESIGN, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a Contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy for Storm Drain Design for the Central City Project, dated April 27, 1967; and WHEREAS, the Agency has entered into Contract Amendment No. 1 on May 19, 1967, Contract Amendment No. 2 on May 17, 1968; and Contract Amendment No. 3 on October 3, 1968; and Contract Amendment No. 4 dated January 31, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Agency to Amend said Contract to increase the services as set forth in Contract Amendment No. 5 in order to modify the Storm Drainage Plans to accommodate the plans of the Civic Cultural Center. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 5 to Contract by and between the Agency and Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy for Storm Drain Design to increase the services for an amount not to exceed $750.00. Adopted: 11-13-69 1258 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2076. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None GRUEN PRESENTATION - CENTRAL CITY PARKING CONTROLS: Mr. Dan Branigan and Mr. Al Rubenstein were presented to the Board. Mr. Rubenstein presented the plans for the two parking structures. The Civic-Cultural Center Structure will have 1,610 parking spaces. The levels and traffic movement were discussed. It was explained that each level has been designed to accommodate the people most likely to be parking there. It is proposed that the different levels will have different parking limit times. Colored stickers will be assigned to employees. The colors will designate the level the employees should be parking on. It is proposed that a parking patrol will be used to enforce the time limits. The Mall Parking Structure will have 1,100 parking spaces. This structure will be only for customer use. It is not anticipated that there will be any time limit or patrol for this structure. The convenience to and from the structure and retail mall was explained. The Members thanked Mr. Branigan and hir. Rubenstein for their presentation. CIVIC CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE - ENGINEERING CONTRACT: Letters were presented to the Board from Mr. Dan Branigan, Partner of Armstrong- Ulmer/Gruen Associates. The letters explained that now that the exploratory studies for the Civic Cultural Center Parking Structure were complete, a con- tract must be entered into for the continuing work on the structures. Mr. Branigan, in his letter of April 30, 1969 and October 30, 1969 stated that this continuing work would be done for a fee of $121,500. In Mr. Branigan's letter of November 4, 1969, he stated that an error had been made on his part, when reconfirming this figure in his letter of October 30, 1969. Mr. Branigan requests that the contract be executed for an amount of $139,000 in lieu of the $121,500 previously proposed. This increase is due to the increase in size of the structure. Their original proposal assumed that the parking structure would be four levels, since that proposal they have determined that a five level structure is necessary. The Plembers stated that the original proposal in April, 1969, (under "Work Depth") set forth that the fee would include the number of levels required. h1r. Branigan stated that this is so, but that they assumed at that time that the structure would be four levels. The Members also stated that the letter of October 30, 1969 reconfirmed this figure of $121,500. I4r. Branigan stated that this was an honest mistake on their part. The Members were concerned as to whether the Agency could justify this increased expenditure. 1259 After further discussion, motion was made by Wein and seconded by lJilson to refer the letters of Mr. Branigan to our Legal Counsel for recommendation to the Agency Board at the next regular meeting. D1otion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AWARD OF CONTRACT, UNIT NO. 29, CALIF. R-79: Bids for Unit No. 29 (Pep Boys Building) were opened, October 12, 1969. Dakeno was the low bidder for a bid in the amount of $1,833. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2077 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH DAKENO INC. FOR DEh10LI- TION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 29, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 29 for the demolition and clearance of certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefor was duly published in the Sum Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino on October 25, 1969 and November 1, 1969 and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the Office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 12th day of November, 1969 at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above spe- cified, and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Dakeno Inc is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Dakeno Inc for 1260 the sum of $1,833.00 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 29, Calif. R-79, Central City Project on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 11/13/69 4lotion was made by 4lebster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2077. The motion was carried by the following vote, to Wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None AWARD OF CONTRACT, UNIT N0. 30, R-79: Bids for Site Clearance, Unit No. 30, R-79 were opened this morning. The low bid was submitted by David Salm in the amount of $7,250. The following reso- lution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2078 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPP1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRf4AN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH DAVID SALP1 FOR SITE CLEARANCE UNIT fJO. 30, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of P1arch 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its' Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Site Clearance, Unit No. 30, for site clearance of certain areas in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefor was duly published in'the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on October 27, 1969 and November 3, 1969 and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the Office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 10:00 a.m. on the 13th day of November, 1969 at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WIJEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of David Salm is the best qua- lified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. 1261 WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of David Salm for the sum of $7,250.00 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the contract for Site Clearance, Unit No. 30, Calif. R-79, Central City Project on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 11/73/69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2078. The motion was carries by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT FOR UUST CONTROL, CENTRAL CITY: Bids for Dust Control, R-79, were opened November 6, 1969. The low bid was sub- mitted by Edgington Oil Refineries in the amount of $4,163.64. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2079 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH EDGINGTON OIL REFINERIES INC., FOR DUST CONTROL, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Dust Control of certain areas in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefor was duly published in the Sun Telegram a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on October 21 and 27, 1969, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 3:00 p.m., on the 6th day of November, 1969, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud; and 1262 WHEREAS, it appears to the Agency that the bid of Edgington Oil Refineries, Inc., is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Ber- nardino and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the bid of Edgington Oil Refineries Inc. in the amount of 54,163.64 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract for Dust Control, Calif. R-79, with Edgington Oil Refineries Inc. for said amount. Adopted: 11-13-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2079. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASE, P1IDLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE, PORTION OF REUSE 13b and 17, R-10: An Offer to Purchase Reuse 13b and 17, R-10 was submitted to the Agency. Mr. Quinn pointed the parcels out on the map. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2080 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA DETERMINING THAT MIDLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY IS THE REDEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF R-10 REUSE PARCELS 13b and 17, AND AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER'S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIPIG WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelop- ment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcels 13b and 17 was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its intention to sell Reuse Parcels 13b and 17, to Midland P1utual Life Insurance Company, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. 1263 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Nearing is to be held the 4th day of December, 1969. Adopted: 11-13-69 Plotion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2080. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RENTAL AGREEMENT - NEW MAINTENANCE OFFICE: Mr. Austin requested authorization to enter into a Rental Agreement with Ken Bussey for Agency rental of 110 South Arrowhead Avenue to use for Agency t~iaintenance Office. The old maintenance office at 425 West Court Street has been demolished. Mr. Quinn explained that the rental for this space is $120 per month, and the rental agreement wilt be on a month-to-month tenancy. RESOLUTION N0. 2081 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH KEN BUSSEY FOR AGENCY RENTAL OF SPACE AT 110 S. ARROWHEAD AVENUE FOR MAINTENANCE OFFICE WHEREAS, due to demolition of the Agency Maintenance Office located at 425 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California, occasioned by the execution of the Central City Project, new quarters must be located; and WHEREAS, the location at 110 South Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, California, has been designated as new quarters for Agency Maintenance Office. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute Rental Agreement with Ken Bussey for rental of 110 S. Arrowhead Avenue, San Bernardino, for Maintenance. Office Rental for said property is $720.00 per month. Adopted: 11-13-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2081. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1264 ISSUANCE OF PROJECT LOAN NOTES: The following resolution was introduced by Mr. Austin, discussed and consi- dered: RESOLUTION N0. 2082 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF PROJECT LOAN NOTES IN CONNECTION WITH URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, (herein called the "Local Public Agency") is duly authorized and proposes to undertake and carry out a certain urban renewal or redevelopment project (designated Project No. Calif. R-79) of the character authorized by law with financial aid by the United States of America (herein called the "Government"), in the form of a Project Temporary Loan under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1450 et seq.), which may be made by the Government to the local Public Agency with respect to said Project in accordance with a certain Loan and Grant Contract (herein called the "Contract"), by and between the Local Public Agency and the Government; and WHEREAS, in order to enable the Local Public Agency to obtain such financial aid, it is necessary for the Local Public Agency to authorize and, from time to time, issue certain obligations in the form of Project Loan Notes, as hereinafter provided: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Local Public Agency as follows: Section 1. Whenever the following terms, or any of them, are used in this Resolution the same, unless the context shall indicate another or different meaning or intent, shall be construed, are used, and are intended to have meanings as follows: (1) The term "Resolution" shall mean this Resolution. (2) All other terms used in this Resolution and which are defined in the Contract shall have the respective meanings ascribed thereto in the Contract. Section 2. The Contract entered into between the Local Public Agency and the Government for the above identified Project is hereby declared to be a part of this Resolution and all applicable provisions thereof shall be deemed incorporated herein to the same extent as if the provisions thereof were ex- pressly set forth in full herein. Section 3. In order to evidence payments made by the Government on account of the Project Temporary Loan pursuant to the Contract with respect to the Project and to refund, renew, extend or substitute for any Note by this Reso- lution authorized to be issued (or any such Note by any other resolution authorized to be issued and which is outstanding, or on deposit for delivery pending payment therefor, as of the date this Resolution becomes effective), there are hereby authorized to be issued, from time to time, Project Loan 1265 Notes of the Local Public Agency in an aggregate principal amount outstanding at any one time (whether authorized by this Resolution or any other resolu- tion authorizing the issuance of Project Loan Notes) not in excess of the amount of the Project Temporary Loan available under the Contract. Section 4. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to file with the Government from time to time as funds are required, requisitions, together with the necessary supporting documents, requesting payments to be made on account of the Project Temporary Loan available under the Contract, and the proper officers of the Local Public Agency shall prepare, execute and deliver to the Government Notes hereinafter authorized and shall accept payment therefor from the Government in the form of cash or other Notes issued by the Local Public Agency, and such officers are authorized to do and perform all other things and acts required to be done or performed in order to obtain such payments. Cash proceeds from the issuance of all Project Loan Notes shall be deposited and disbursed only in accordance with the provisions of the Contract. Section 5. Each Project Loan Note shall bear interest and be payable in the form and manner prescribed by the Contract and this Resolution; shall be signed in the name of the Local Public Agency by the Chairman or in his absence or incapacity the Acting Chairman; and shall have the official seal of the Local Public Agency impressed thereon and attested by the Secretary or in his absence or incapacity the Acting Secretary; and shall otherwise be in substantially the form of HUD-9107 which is incorporated hereby by reference. Mr. Ray M. Wilson moved that the foreging resolution be adopted as introduced and considered, which motion was seconded by P1r. Sanford H. Wein, and upon roll call the "Ayes" and "Nays" were as follows: AYES NAYS Ray M. Wilson Sanford H. Wein NONE E. George Webster Hesiquio E. Gutierrez A. M. Austin The Chairman thereupon declared said motion carried and said resolution adopted. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Quinn stated that McMahans Furniture Store has requested authorization to put a sign on the old Prescription City Drug Building stating that they are still in business located directly behind Prescription City. P4otion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing McMahans Furniture Store to erect a sign on Prescription City Drug Building. The motion was carried by the follow- ing vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1266 Letters commending the radio broadcasting announcements of the Agency were read to the Board. Mr. Varner stated that the Wells Fargo Bank has requested a letter from the Executive Director stating that the Agency approves the first trust deed and lease to Wells Fargo Bank, and in the event of any default, we will recognize, said first trust deed and lease. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the Executive Director to direct said letter to the Wells Fargo Bank. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 4:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1267 DIINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEr1BER, 1969 IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Gutierrez, Webster, Wein and Wilson Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 13, 1969 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez ap- proving the Minutes of November 13, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Webster, Wilson, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: PJOne Absent: None EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of October, 1969 were presented for approval. f4otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the expenditures for the month of October, 7969, as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. EXTENSION OF ESCROW, W. T. WINSTEAD ET AL: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2083 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE €XTENSION OF ESCROW FOR REUSE 2, 3, AND 4, R-70, AND REUSE 2b, R-79, UNTIL JANUARY 37, 1970 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California,. by Resolution No. 828, Resolution No. 1076 and Resolution No. 1075, authored the sale of Reuse Parcels 2, 3, and 4, R-10 and Reuse 2b, R-79, to William P. 1268 Winstead Jr., and Jerome Taylor Winstead; and WHEREAS, Escrow was to close on or before September 19, 1969; and WHEREAS, a request has been submitted for an extension until January 31, 1970; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that such a request is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the extension of Escrow on Reuse Parcel 2, 3, and 4, R-10 and Reuse 2b, R-79, is hereby approved to no later than January 31, 1970. Adopted: 11/20/69 Potion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2083, authorizing an extension of escrow based upon the lease agreement with the Winsteads. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SCOPE INDUSTRIES - EXTENSION OF TIME: Dlr. Brown, Vice President of Scope Industries, was presented to the Board. Dlr. Brown stated that they are working as rapidly as they can toward an early completion of their new location. Mr. Austin stated that it will be impossible for the Agency Board to authorize an extension past the February 28, 1970 date. After discussion, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson that if the Agency's deadline date of February 28, 1970, for vacation of buildings, is of necessity moved to a later date, all persons involved in this deadline date shall be notified of the extension, and therefore shall be given an exten- sion for vacation until said later date. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Harper stated that he and hir. Brown met regarding an interim move for Scope Industries, and he is sure something can be worked out for them. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster denying the request of Scope Industries to remain in their present location (the Security Pacific Bank Building) past the scheduled February 28, 1970 date. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES: Mr. Varner stated that he has reviewed in detail the letters presented at the last Regular Meeting, from Dan Branigan, and under the legal statutes, it is his opinion that there is a contract between Armstrong-Ulmer/Gruen Associates and the Redevelopment Agency. It is his opinion that the amount of the 1269 contract to be executed for the continuation work on the parking structure should be $721,500 as originally set forth in Gruen's letter of April 30, 1969, and reconfirmed in his letter of October 30, 1969. Mr. Varner further stated that after explaining the Agency's position to Dan Branigan, Mr. Branigan has stated that the contract shall be executed for $121,500 as originally quoted. Mr. Branigan and Mr. Armstrong were present at the meeting. Mr. Branigan stated that the Agency would receive the same cooperation and service that they have received in the past from Gruen Associates. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2084 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRh1AN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH ARMSTRONG-ULMER/GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR COMPLETION OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE CIVIC-CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a contract with Armstrong-Ulmer/Gruen Associates, a joint venture, for exploratory planning and design of a parking structure in the Civic-Cultural Center Complex dated the 5th day of h1ay, 1969; and WHEREAS, said service is complete, and it is now necessary to enter into a contract for the completion of engineering services for the parking structure in the Civic-Cultural Center Complex; and WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that said contract should be executed in the amount of $127500. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute a contract with Armstrong-Ulmer/ Gruen Associates for the completion of engineering services for the Civic- Cultural Center Parking Structure, not to exceed the sum of $121,500. Adopted: 17-20-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2084. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: PJone Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Varner suggested that a letter should be sent to Dan Branigan to express the Board's appreciation for the professional attitude displayed regarding the Board's decision regarding the price of this contract. The Members instructed Mr. Quinn to draft such a letter for Mr. Austin's signature. Mr. Quinn stated that this would be done. 1270 CERTIFICATE OF COhPLIANCE, INLAND WAREHOUSE COMPANY: The fallowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2085 RESOLUTION 9UTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO INLAND WAREHOUSE CO. WHEREAS, Inland Warehouse Co., hereinafter called the Redevelopers, have entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Agreement dated January 17, 1969, was recorded on April 28, 1969, in Book 7221 on page 679 and said Grant Deed dated February 7, 1969 was re- corded on April 28, 1969 in Book 7221 on page 704 both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Grant Deed Redevelopers covenanted and agreed, to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 5 of said Grant Deed to furnish the Redevelopers with an instrument certifying com- pletion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed and Agreement upon Redeveloper's completion thereof; and WHEREAS, said real property is described as: Reuse Parcel No. 89, Meadowbrook Project Area No. 1, California R-10 BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of Lot 1, Block "D" of the Peppers Subdivision, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of~'Maps, page 8 Records of said County, said point also being in the East line of Stoddard Avenue, 60.00 feet wide; thence South 164.9, feet along the East line of said Stoddard Avenue to a point in the North line of Congress Street, 60.00 feet wide; thence North 89° 59' 21" East 282.78 feet along said North line of Congress Street to a point on a tangent curve concave to the North with a radius of 20.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 00° 00' 39" Weft; thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 64 59' 21", an arc distance of 22.69 feet to a tangent line; thence North 250 00' 00" East, 71.88 feet along said tangent line to a point on a tangent curve concave to th~ West with a radius of 208.75 feet and a radial bearing of North 65 00' 00" West; thence Northerly along said curve through a central angle of 250 00' 00", an arc distance of 91.OII feet to a point on the South line of the A. T. & S. F. Railroad, 50.00 feet wide; thence South 89° 59' 25" West 350.83 feet along said South line of Railroad right- of-way to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 54403 square feet more or less. 1271 NOW, THEREFOPE, BE IT RESOLVED in accordance with Section 4 of said Agreement and Section 5 of said Grant Deed, that the Agency does hereby conclusively certify and give notice that the Redeveloper has fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, all covenants and Agreements with respect to the obligation of Redeveloper for the construction of improvements and dates for the be- ginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the above described Real Property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, a "Certificate of Compliance". Adopted: 11/20/69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2085. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION: Authorization was requested for the Executive Director, Agency Counsel, and Chairman to travel to New York sometime during the first part of December to meet with representatives from the J. C. Penney Company. Mr. Wilson stated that he would like to have the resolution reflect that any interested member of the Agency or staff member could make this trip. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2086 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CHAIRMAN, AGENCY COUNSEL, MAYOR AL C. BALLARD, JIM LIf4, RE- PRESENTATIVE FROM GRUEN ASSOCIATES, AND ANY OTHER INTERESTED MEMBER OR STAFF EMPLOYEE TO TRAVEL TO NEW YORK, TO MEET 47ITH REPRESENTATIVES FROM J. C. PENNEY COMPANY - DECEMBER 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it has been found essential that the Executive Director, Chairman, Agency Counsel, and any other interested Member or Staff Employee, to travel to New York to meet with the representatives from the J._C. Penney Company during the month of December, 1969 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Executive Director, Chairman, Agency Counsel, Mayor Al Ballard, Jim Lim, and any other interested member or staff 1272 employee, are hereby authorized to travel to New York, during the month of December, 1969, to .meet with representatives of the J. C. Penney Company, and their travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 1-20-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2086. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS Mr. Austin stated that he has contacted the City requesting authority for the Agency to use the Council Chambers for their Regular Meetings, in that the Agency Board Room is sometimes too small to accommodate all the people who desire to attend. The City stated that we could use the Chamber. The Members discussed the percentage of meetings that were too large for the Board Room.. It .was suggested-that the Agency continue holding its meetings in the Board Room, and in the case of an extra large crowd, the Chairman could adjourn the meeting to the Council Chambers. All agreed. Mr. Wilson stated that he would not be available to attend the meeting for December 4, at 4:00. He requested that the meeting be held at 10:00 a.m. instead. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein to change the time of Regular Meeting for December 4, 1969, to 10:00 a.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster consenting to the holding of a Joint Public Hearing on December 29, 1969, for the proposed Amendment to the Rede- velopment Plan, Calif. R-79. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 4:40 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1273 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO> CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1969, 323 COURT STREET ROOM 305, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AT 10:00 A.M. The Meeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson, Wein, Webster and Gutierrez Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 20, 1969 were presented for approval. Mr. Quinn requested that Resolution No. 2086 adopted at this meet- ing be amended to include Mr. Jim Lim (Gruen Associates) and Mayor Al Ballard. Resolution No. 2086 authorizes travel of interested Members and Staff Employees to travel to New York to meet with representatives from the J.C. Penney Company. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson amending Resolution No. 2086 to include travel expenses for Jim Lim and Mayor Al Ballard to New York, December 9, 1969. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. REQUEST FOR REDUCTION IN SIZE OF DEVELOPMENT, DU BOSE, REUSE 82, CALIF. R-10 Mr. Walter DuBose, developer of Reuse Parcel 82, Calif. R-10, was presented to the Board. Mr. DuBose stated that his application to the Small Business Ad- ministration for a loan was turned down on the basis that he was not a small business. Because of this fact he will now have to apply for a loan with much higher interest. Mr. DuBose requested authorization to decrease the size of his proposed development from 15,000 sq. ft. to 8,000 sq. ft. Mr. Quinn stated that the parcel is 63,000 sq. ft. All Members agreed that a 8,000 sq. ft. development on 63,000 sq. ft. lot would not meet the Agency's obligation of best use of the property. Dividing the lot into two parcels was discussed. Mr. Quinn stated that he could see no problem in this suggestion. Mr. DuBose stated that this would be suitable to him, and that he would be able to have the development completed and occupied by March 1, 1970. He further stated that he would desire the corner lot. Mr. Wein suggested a price of 55Q a sq. ft. for the Northeast corner of "D" and Athol, a 50Q a sq. ft. for the remaining lot. A71 agreed. The following resolution was introduced: 1274 RESOLUTION N0. 2087 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO DISPOSITION AGREEMENT FOR SALE OF REUSE PARCEL 82, R-10, TO WALTER DuBOSE, BY REDUCING THE SIZE OF PARCEL, AND DECREASING THE SQUARE FOOT- AGE OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO NOT LESS THAN 8,000 SQ. FT. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelop- ment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the Agency has committed Reuse Parcel 82 Meadowbrook Project R-10 to Walter R. DuBOSe; and WHEREAS, it is now desired by Walter R. Du Bose to reduce the size of the planned development, from 15,000 sq. ft. to 8,000 sq. ft. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into Amendment to Disposition Agreement for the sale of Reuse Parcel 82, R-10, to Walter R. DuBose, reducing the square footage of the parcel to be sold, and selling Mr. DuBOSe the westerly portion of Reuse Parcel 82, described as follows: Portions of Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, Block "D" The Peppers, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, page 8, records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the North line of the South half of said Lot 9 and the East right of way line of "D"Street (82.5 feet wide), established by grant deed to the City of San Bernardino recorded November 9, 1966 in Book 6726, page 490, official records of said County; thence South along the East line of said "D" Street a distance of 204.905 feet to a point in a tangent curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 20.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along said curve a distance of 31.42 feet to a point in a tangent line, said point being in the North right of way line of Athol Street (60 feet wide); thence North 890 59' 10" East along the North line of Athol Street, a distance of 263.07 feet to a point; thence North a distance of 224.905 feet to a point in the North line of the South half of said Lot 18; thence South 89° 59' 15" West along the North line of the South half of said Lot 9 and Lot 18, a distance of 283.07 feet to the point of beginning. Saving and excepting therefrom the Easterly 141.00' Containing 31,868 sq. ft. 0.732 acres BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reduced development shall not be less than 8,000 sq. ft. Adopted: 12-4-69 lz7s Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2087, selling Mr. DuBose the Westerly portion of Reuse Parcel 82, R-10, for 55a a sq. ft., and decreasing the size of his development, to not less than 8,000 sq. ft. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit; Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None STATUS REPORT - HENSCHEL & ERWIN DEVELOPMENT: P1r. Henry Henschel was presented to the Board. Mr. Henschel reported on the pro- gress of his proposed development on Reuse Parcels 23 thru 32, R-10. He stated that the square footage of his development has increased in that plans have been changed from 10% one bedroom and 90% efficiency apartments to 33% one bedroom and 66% efficiency apartments. He stated that all plans have been approved by FHA and his application is at the top of the list to be resolved. After discussion and review of the plans and rendering, Mr. Henschel requested. an extension of dates to close escrow and start construction until April 1st instead of January 1st. He stated that he believes that his loan will be approved and he will be able to close escrow before this date, but requests the additional time in the event there is still some holdup in FHA. Mr. Wein suggested that the Board authorize a one month extension of all dates, and request the presence of Mr. Henschel at the second meeting in January for a Progress Report. If it is necessary to give him additional time at that meeting, the Board can then authorize a later date. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2088 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSIOfJ OF TID1E ON REUSE PARCELS 23 THROUGH 32, CALIF. R-10 IJHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino at its Regular Board Meeting on h1arch 6, 1969 authorized the Chairman and Executive Director to enter into Disposition Contract for the Sale of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, it has been deemed necessary by the developers and the Board that the escrow closing date be extended until the second Board Meeting in January, 1970; WOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the escrow closing date of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32, Calif. R-10, is hereby extended until the second Board Meeting in January 1970. Adopted: 12-4-69 fdotion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2088. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 127E 61r. Henschel stated that he will be requesting a parking variance from the City because of his increased square footage. Mr. Varner advised that the Agency board will also have to approve such a variance. TEMPORARY RELOCATION: For. Austin stated that the Agency has been working on a site for the temporary relocation of people in the Civic-Cultural area who will have to move by February 28, 1970. The proposed "D1ini-h1a11" area is on the North side of the R-79 parking area, adjacent to the temporary parking lot on 4th Street. Mr. Austin stated that Luke & Vondey, Harrison & Frank, and Security Pac. bank have approved this location. These three will have to relocate from the Civic-Cul- tural Center Block until their developments are ready for occupancy. Mr. Austin requested approval of the location and authorization for the Executive Director to invite bids for the erection of temporary relocation quarters. f1r Jim Cartee, Architect, was presented to the board. (ir. Cartee explained how Modular Concept units were erected and the approximate cost and size of the units. After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein approv- ing the proposed temporary relocation site, and authorizing the Executive Director to invite bids for the erection of said temporary relocation quarters. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin floes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SCOPE INDUSTRIES, AUTHORIZATION FOR SITE PREPARATION: Mr. Austin explained that Scope Industries in construction of their development on Reuse Parcel 52 & 53, found that the soil on the site was not in acceptable condition to support concrete footings, therefore the ground had to be com- pacted and backfilled. Presco Building I.1aterials submitted a cost not to ex- ceed $4,000.00. Dlr. Austin requested authorization to enter into a Change Order with Presco Building Materials for this necessary site clearance work. All Members agreed that it is our responsibility to deliver buildable land to a developer. Dlr. Austin explained that when the soil tests were conducted on this area, they were conducted on land around Reuse 52 & 53, but that none were evidently conducted directly on Reuse 52 & 53. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2089 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPhIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CFJAIRh1AN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER DJO. 1, TO CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS, SITE CLEARANCE UNIT N0. 23, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Contract with Presco building Materials, for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 28, Calif. R-79, on the 13th day of November; and 1z77 WHEREAS, it is ttie desire of this Agency to enter into Change Order No. 7 with Presco Building f4aterials inasmuch as it has been determined that the soil on Reuse Parcels 52 and 53, Calif. R-79, is not in acceptable condition to support concrete footings, therefore, the ground has to be compacted and backfilled; and WHEREAS, Presco Building f4aterials has submitted a bid not to exceed Four Thousand and no/100 ($4,000) for this necessary Site Preparation work with Contract extended until January 25, 1970. PJ04J, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order fdo. 1 with Presco Building Materials, Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 28, Calif. R-79, not to exceed an amount of $4,000, nor Contract Completion Date of January 25, 1970. Adopted: 12-4-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution iJo. 2089. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin tJOes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHAfJGE ORDER, J. D. DIFFENBAUGH, R-79: Mr. Quinn explained that Central City Company (joint venture of John S. Griffith Company and Curci-Turner) have discovered that some of the electrical closets in the plans were not located for the proper display of merchandise. Central City Company desire to have these electrical closets relocated. J. D. Diffenbaugh will relocate these closets for $15,854.56. The architectural services far changing the plans accordingly is $3,022.30 submitted by Gruen Associates. Central City Company has agreed to pay all costs. for. Quinn re- quested authorization to enter into a Change Order with J. D. Diffenbaugh for this work, with all expenses to be reimbursed by Central City Company. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2090 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPI4ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDI170, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF CHANGE ORDER TO DIFFENBP,UGH CONTRACT, AND PAYI4ENT OF STATEMENT FROPI GRUEN ASSOCIATES, FOR RELOCATIOPl OF ELECTRICAL CLOSETS, WITH ALL EXPENSES TO BE REI~IBURSEU BY CENTRAL CITY COh1PANY WFIEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, under date of June 27, 1969, entered into a Contract with J. D. Diffenbaugh for Site Pre- paration Unit tlo. 2, Mall Construction; and WHEREAS, the Central City Company as contained in Disposition Agreement with the Local Public Agency dated December 20, 1968, is committed to the develop- ment of the tenant structures adjacent toTentral City f4a11; and 1278 WfiEREAS, the Central City Company desires to modify the location of six electrical closets within the Central City P1a11 in order to obtain more leasable area; and WHEREAS, the Central City Company has authorized, through the Local Public Agency, the necessary modifications as desired by Gruen Associates. fJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order with J. D. Diffenbaugh. BE IT FURTfiER RESOLVED that tfie Local Public Agency is authorized to pay for said services upon receipt of document for services necessary for the changes, estimated to be 515,800 for J. D. Diffenbaugh and $3,600 for Gruen Associates. The Central City Company will reimburse the Agency for the above, upon the close of the escrow transferring the Central City Tenancy sites from the Redevelopment Agency to the Central City Company. Adopted: 12-4-69 I4otion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2090. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ARBITRATION-SEWER IfJSTALLATION: 1~ir. Austin explained that in the course of construction of the mall, a sanitary sewer line in the 4Jest Court and the Southwest Arcade was laid by the Contractor wherein it was discovered that the plans of Gruen Asso: were in conflice and that the line was not laid in conformance with City Codes. The responsible party for the cost of this removal of sewer line must be settled through Arbitration if no informal settlement can be met. Mr. Varner recommended that the Board author- ize himself and the Executive Director to proceed with the possible informal settlement of this disput; and if no settlement can be reached, institute formal- Arbitration. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2091 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPf1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTh'ORIZING THE CHAIRf+IAN AND SECRETARY TO INSTITUTE FORMAL ARBITRATION, IF NO SETTLEf1EtJT REACHED WITH REGARD TO THE UfJIT N0. 2 MALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, SANITARY SEWER LINE WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has, under the date of June 27, 1969, entered into Site Preparation Unit No. 2 Mall Construction Contract with the J. D. Diffenbaugh Construction Company; and WHEREAS, in the course of construction, a sanitary sewer line in the West Court and the Southwest Arcade was laid by the Contractor wherein it was discovered that the plans of Gruen Associates were in conflict and that the line was not laid on conformance with City Codes; and 1279 WHEREAS, a representative of the City Department of Building and Safety inspected the work of the Contractor in this area of concern with several discrepancies arising; and LJHEREAS, to remedy the situation, the Inspector for the Local Public Agency was instructed to prepare a workable solution in accordance with City Codes; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the J. D. Diffenbaugh Construction Com- pany in accordance vaith the terms of the Contract, be instructed to proceed with the sanitary sewer line construction, per Krueger Engineering Company, that the accountability be settled among the parties involved, namely J. D. Diffenbaugh Company, their plumbing sub-contractors, Taber Plumbing, Gruen Associates and the Department of Building and Safety, City of San Bernardino. FURTHERMORE, should no settlement be reached within a reasonable amount of time, a formal Arbitration Board will be instituted to determine accountability for the construction of the new sanitary sewer line, per Krueper Engineering Company Drawings, as well as the cost of said arbitration. Adopted: December 4, 1969 (.lotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of kesolution No. 2091. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, 4Jebster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 61r. Cook with J.D. Diffenbaugh advised that he would need a formal letter to proceed with his work under the contract. fhr. Quinn stated that he would have the letter today. PUBLIC HEARING REUSE PARCEL 17, AND PORTION OF 13b, R-10: P1r. Austin stated that this is the time and place so designated for the holding of Public Hearing on the sale of Reuse Parcel 17, and a portion of 13b, R-10 to P1idland f+lutual Life Insurance Company, 11r. Varner stated that the documents are available for inspection. h1r. Austin asked if there were any objections or comments regarding this proposed sale. There were none. The Public Hearing was closed. F1IDLAND h1UTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COPIPAPJY, AUTHORIZATION OF SALE: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2092 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPf4ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEh1ENT AtJD RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF A PORTION OF REUSE 73b AIJD REUSE 17, MEADOWBP,OOK PROJECT NO. 1 TO P-0IDLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 1280 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of a portion of Reuse Parcel 73b and Reuse Parcel 17, Calif. R-10, by Resolution No. 2080, to Midland Mutual Life Insur- ance; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RNA 7214.1., Chapter 4, Section 4;and WHEREAS, a Public bearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held December 4, 1969, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 4; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of a portion of Reuse Parcel 13b and Reuse Parcel 17, t1eadowbrook Project Calif. R-10, to Midland Mutual Life Insurance. Adopted: 12-4-1969 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2092. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: IJone NAHRO 410RKSHOP - OAKLAND, CALIF: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION fJO. 2093 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDIfJO, CALIFORNIFl, AUTHORIZ171G THE TRIP OF TWO STAFF P1EMBERS TO NAHRO WORKSHOP IN OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA, NOVEP16ER 17, 1969 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Plember or Staff Mlember outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized Gy a Resolution of the Agency h1embers; and WHEREAS, it was found essential for two Staff I1 embers to travel to Oakland, California, fovember 17, 1969, to attend a NAHRO Workshop. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the travel of two staff members to Oakland, Calif- ornia, November 17, 1969, is hereby approved, and their travel expenses are approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 12-4-69 1281 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by blilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution tlo. 2093. The motion was carried by the fallowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: fJone Absent: None AWARD OF CONTRACT, DEMO DIXON WHEEL: Informal bids were received for the demolition of the Dixon Wheel building, 61ock 21, Parcel 29, Calif. R-79. The low bid was received by Dakeno, Inc., in the amount of 42,350. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2094 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPP1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRD1AN AfVU SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER N0. 1, TO CONTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC. DEf40LITIOfJ AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 27, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Contract with Dakeno, Inc. for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 27, Calif. R-79 on the 28th day of October, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Agency to enter into Change Order No. 1 with Dakeno, Inc. for the removal of Block 21, Parcel 29, known as 284 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California (Dixon Wheel) in an amount not to exceed $2,350 with Contract extended until Uecem~rZ2,1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 1 with Dakeno, Inc. Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 27, Calif. R-79 not to exceed the amount of 42,350, new contract completion date of December 22, 1969. Adopted: 12-4-b9 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2094. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None SALARY REVIEW: Mr. Wein stated that he has reviewed the Salary Comparability Study, and it is tiffs recommendation that the Agency Staff be brought up to City scale. The City has had two increases since the Agency, so the increase of the Agency Staff would be a little better than 10~. tie further recommended that the Assistant Operations Officer advance three ranges. This wilt bring him four ranges below the Operations Officer, and in conformance with the other departments. 12P2 h1r. Wein stated that the Administrative Officer is now working in the capacity of Administrative Officer and Finance Officer. It is his recommendation that when he is working in the capacity of only the Administrative Officer, his range be 45, when in the capacity of also the Finance Officer, his range be 47. Mr. Wein recommended that the Executive Director's salary be established at $1,875 per month; and the Deputy Director's salary be established at $1,408 per month. Mr. Wein stated that the proposed resolution has incorporated all of the above recommendations. It also stipulates that henceforth, when the City of San Bernardino revises its Basic Compensation Plan for officers and/or employees, or graOts salary increases, the Agency, will, within 30 days following the City's actions, reexamine appropriate salary adjustments and personnel policies in light of the City's actions. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION fJO. 2095 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAM BERfJARDINO, CALIFORNIA, FIXLVG THE COPIPENSATION OF VARIOUS OFFICERS AfJD EMPLOYEES THEREOF, AND REPEALING CERTAIW SPE- CIFIC RESOLUTIONS AND PORTIONS OF I.IINUTES IJHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, is engaged in executing redevelopment projects known as P1eadowbrook Project Calif. R-10, and Central City Project Calif. R-79; and 6JHEREAS, Said Agency has heretofore adapted a Statement of Personnel Policies and amendments thereto; and WIJEREAS, in the interest of efficient management of the Agency's business, it is necessary from time to time to amend said Personnel Policies; and WHEREAS, the Urban Renevaal Handbook, Section RHA 7217.1, Chapter 1, Section 4, Page 2, Item 2, states that schedules of salary and wage rates established shall be comparable with the compensation practices of other public bodies in the locality, for positions of similar responsibility and required competence; and WHEREAS, by Agency I.1inutes of July 15, 1967, and P4arch 21, 1968, and Resolution PJO. 835, the Redevelopment Agency has heretofore established its schedules of salary and wages in accordance with those of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino, did on December 30, 1968, and December 1, 1969, revise its Basic Compensation Plan for officers and/or employees; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has accomplished the salary increases for its employees by advancing existing positions within the City to higher standard ranges; and 1283 WHEREAS, the Agency has reestablished the comparability for the various positions of the Agency with those of the City of San Bernardino; NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPh7ENT AGEtdCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARUL^J0, CALIFORNIA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERPIINE, AfJD ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section I. That except as otherwise specifically provided and subject to otY~er provisions of this resolution, each employee of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, shall be entitled to receive for his or her services in his or her position the applicable rate of compensation shown on the following basic five-step salary schedule (based on the Basic Compen- sation Plan for Officers and/or Employees of the City of San Bernardino, December 1, 1969) prescribed for the class in which his or her position is allo- cated, to wit: BASIC FIVE STEP SALARY SCHEDULE After After After After 1 yr. 1 yr. 1 yr Beginning 6 inos. 6 ino. Service Service rate Service Service StepC Stepp CLASSIFICATION A B C D E 27 475 497 520 544 569 28 497 520 544 569 595 29 520 544 569 595 623 30 544 569 595 623 652 37 569 595 623 652 681 32 595 623 652 6II1 713 33 623 652 681 713 747 34 652 637 713 747 780 35 681 713 747 780 817 36 713 747 780 817 855 37 747 780 817 855 895 38 780 S17 855 895 936 39 817 855 895 936 979 40 855 895 936 979 1024 47 895 936 979 1024 1072 42 936 979 1024 1072 7127 43 979 1024 7072 1721 1173 44 1024 1072 7127 1173 1227 45 1C72 1121 1173 1227 1283 46 1121 1173 1227 1283 1342 47 7173 7227 1283 1342 7404 48 1227 1283 1342 1404 1468 49 7283 1342 1404 1468 1535 50 1342 1404 7468 1535 7605 Section 2. The salary of the Executive Director is hereby established at $1,875 per month. 7284 Section 3. The salary of the Deputy Director is established at $1,408 per month. Section 4. That the following respective classifications are hereby allocated and assigned to the following respective offices, positions of employments in the service of said Agency hereinafter set forth opposite such respective classifications: Administrative Officer 45* Finance Officer 44 Chief Accountant 36 Accountant 33 Bookkeeper II 30 Real Estate f4anager 44 Land Agent 40 Real Estate Specialist 31 Administrative Assistant 34 Operations Officer 45 Asst. Operations Officer 47 Operations Assistant 33 Relo & Property Manager 44 Relocation Specialist II 38 Relocation Specialist II 38 Relocation Specialist I 32 Executive Secretary 32 Deputy/Dir Secretary 30 Real Estate Secretary 30 Relocation Secretary 30 Operations Secretary 30 Step increases shall be effective during the first pay period following comple- tion of the above requirements. Personnel promoted from within the Agency i.e., Clerk Typist to Stenographer, shall serve in the new position for twelve months before being eligible for a salary increase. * When functioning in dual capacity of Administrative and Finance Officer, Salary Range shall be increased two ranges. Section 5. That from now henceforth, when the City of San Bernardino revises its Basic Compensation Plan for officers and/or employees, or grants salary increases to officers and/or employees, the Redevelopment Agency, will, within 30 days following the City of San Bernardino's Actions, reexamine appropriate salary adjustments and personnel policies in light of the City's actions. Section 6. That Resolutions 799, 800, 801, 802, 835, 943 and that portion of the f•Iinutes of May 1, 1969, as pertains to establishment of the positions of Operations Assistant be and the same are hereby repealed. Section 7. This Resolution becomes effective on Gecember 1, 1969. 1285 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by 4dilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2095. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: lJein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin floes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION FCR Ih1f~lEDIATE POSSESSION: fir. Quinn explained that it is necessary for the Agency to request Immediate Possession of the parcels within the Civic-Cultural Center Area, in order that we can give each tenant their 90 day notice to relocate, and be able to deliver the property to the City of San Bernardino, for the construction of the new City Hall. The affected parcels are, Block 2, Parcels 16, 17, 18 and 19 and Block 21, Parcels 9, 10, 11 and 16. The Agency has already instituted eminent domain proceedings on these parcels. I~ir. Varner stated that the court will decide whether or not there is a need for immediate possession. If no parties contest, the Agency will automatically be authorized the right to immediate possession. If any parties contest, the Judge will rule. f•ir. Webster was concerned regarding the tenants of the build- ings in this area. Mr. Varner stated that all tenants will have the right to contest as do the owners, and if the Agency is authorized the right of immediate possession, they will receive a 90 day notice to relocate. P4r. Varner further stated that the City of San Bernardino will direct a letter this week to the Agency setting forth their need to have construction started May 1, 1970. After further discussion, the fallowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2096 PESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPI.IENT AGEfJCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, APPROVING THE TAKING OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF PROPERTY IN THE CEFITRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79, BY IP1MEDIATE POSSESSION UIVDER CONDEf4NATI0fJ PROCEEDINGS SUBJECT TO CONCURRENCE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF MOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino in executing the Official Redevelopment Plan of the Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, has determined that certain project acquisition parcels are included in property to be utilized by the City of San Bernardino for a new City Hall to be located in the center of the now existing Third Street, and for public P.ights of Way consisting of pedestrian walk vaays and mall; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has directed that construction of the new City Hall and Rights of Way will commence on f4ay 1, 1970; and WHEREAS, it is the Agency's obligation to rough grade the property on which said new City Hall and said Rights of Way vaill be located; and 1246 WHEREAS, said rough grading will be extended from "D" Street westerly to "E" Street encompassing areas which will be utilized as said public Rights of Way and to provide continuity of site improvement work; and WHEREAS, the affected parcels are as follows: Block 2, Block 27, Block 21, Block 21, Block 21, Block 21, parcels Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel Parcel 76, 17, 18 and 19 1 9 70 11 16 and WHEREAS, the Agency has made every reasonable effort to acquire the above listed properties by negotiated purchase; and WHEREAS, the Agency, after negotiating with the owners of the affected parcels for a reasonable period of time, instituted eminent domain proceedings and has or will have firm trial dates in the near future to litigate the parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, is authorized to take immediate possession of Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79 acquisition Block 2, Parcels 16, 17, 78 and 19; Block 21, Parcels 1, 9, 10, 11, and 76, subject to the concurrence of the Department of housing and Urban Development; providing that: 1. Agency staff will make a final offer in writing to each owner. Z. Agency will not require any person lawfully occupying each parcel of property to surrender possession without at least 90 days written notice of the date on which possession will be required. 3. Agency will not require the owner to surrender the right of possession of his property until Agency pays or causes to be paid to the County Clerk an amount to be determined by the court to be fair security for the property provided said deposit is not less than 75 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development's concurred- in-value for the subject property. Adopted: 12-4-69 Motion was made by ldilson and Seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2096. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: (lone Absent: None OTHER BUSIfIESS: The Riembers requested a Status Report of real estate to be presented at the next Regular Meeting. flr. Quinn stated that such a report would be prepared. 1287 ADJDURNP1ENT: Fiotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn.ahe meeting. P1otion was carried by the following votes to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Gutierrez IJoes: None Absent: None Abstention: None 1298 f1INUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE h1EMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGEfJCY OF THE CITY OF SAN 6ERPIARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 75th DAY OF DECE6IBER, 1969, IfJ ROOf9 305, 323 COURT STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the P1eeting to order at 4:00 p.m., and reported that this Special 1~teeting has been called in accordance with a duly dated and executed fJotice of Special fleeting, sent to each member. Said notice is as follows: NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE f1EMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT Ar,ENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the fiembers of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at the office of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 Court Street, Room 305, San Bernardino, California, the regular meeting place thereof, at 4:00 p.m., the 15th day of December, 7969, for the adoption of Resolution authorizing the acceptance of Project Note Proposals, which in- clude a request for payment of a placement fee. DATED this 11th day of December, 1969. s/P. W. Quinn, Jr. P. ld. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director Secretary 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUIfJN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 11th day of December, 1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Pteeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES f4AIL WITNESS my hand this 11th day of December, 1969. s/P. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr. Secretary Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson, Webster and Wein Agency Members Absent: Gutierrez Also Present: P1r. Quinn, Executive; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and hirs. Baxter, Executive Secretary 12oc RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR ACCEPTANCE OF PROJECT NOTES: The following resolution was introduced by fir. A. i~1. Austin, Chairman; explained and considered. The letter from Mr. William M. North, Jr., Regional Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development was read. The Secretary was instructed to spread said letter on the minutes as follows: Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino First American Title Building Room 308 San Bernardino, California 92401 Attention: f1r. Peter W. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director Gentlemen: Subject: Sale of Project Notes Bid Opening Date: December 16, 1969 The Department of Housing and Urban Development has determined that current market conditions relative to interest rates offered on Project Notes may neces- sitate the payment of placement fees by the Department to purchasers of future issues of Project Notes. In order to permit the payment of a placement fee for Notes to be issued by your Agency it will be necessary that the Agency adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance of Project flote proposals which include a placement fee request. We therefore ask that you adopt the enclosed resolution prior to the subject bid opening date. Please retain one copy of the enclosed resolution for your files and return two copies, along with appropriate minute extracts, to the attention of the undersigned. If you have any questions regard- ing this resolution please contact the undersigned or a member of my staff. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, 41ILLIAM i1. NORTH, JR. Regional Counsel By: Alfred J. DeP1artini Associate Regional Counsel General Program Services Enclosures RESOLUTION W0. 2097 RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE ACCEPTANCE FP,OM TIh1E TO TIf4E OF PRO- POSALS FOR PROJECT NOTES WHICH INCLUDE A REQUEST FOR PAYMENT OF A PLACEf1ENT FEE ,,,~~ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, (herein called the "Local Issuing Agency") has previously adopted a resolution titled "Resolution Authorizing the Sale, Issuance and Delivery of Project PJotes and the Execution of Requisition Agreements" on the 13th day of November, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Local Issuing Agency and the United States of America (herein called the "Goverment") recognizes the desirability of the Local Issuing Agency ob- taining funds for the purpose described in the aforementioned resolution from sources other than the Government despite the existence of abnormally high interest rates which prevail in the private money markets; and WHEREAS, the Government proposes to enable the Local Issuing Agency to continue to obtain loan funds from sources other than the Government by the Government making payment of a placement fee, where necessary, to the purchaser or pur- chasers of the Local Issuing Agency's Project Notes (herein called the "flotes") awarded from time to time: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Local Issuing Agency as follows: Section 7. The Executive Director, after receiving Government approval of a recommended award of the fJotes is hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Local Issuing Agency to award the Notes at the lowest interest rate or rates, not in excess of six percent (6%) per annum, offered in the proposals, without reference to premiums: PPOVIDED, HOWEVER, that as among proposals specifying the same lowest interest rate and specifying a premium, the award shall be made ~n the basis of the highest premium per dollar principal amount of the Notes specified in such proposal: PROVIDED FURTfJER, that in the event every proposal relating to all or any part of the notes specifies a placement fee to be received by the purchaser as compensation for the placement of such Notes, then the award of the Notes to which such proposal relate shall be made on the basis of the lowest placement fee specified per dollar amount of such fJotes. Section 2. Each proposal submitted for all or a part of the Notes shall be substantially in the form of HUD-9402 which is incorporated herein by reference, and which is hereby approved by the Local Issuing Agency. Section 3. The Local Issuing Agency hereby authorizes the Government to pay to any purchaser of the Notes a placement fee as compensation for services required in placing the PJotes. Section 4. Any and all prior resolutions of the Local Issuing Agency are hereby amended to the extent necessary to enable the carrying out of the actions authorized herein. Section 5. This resolution shall take effect immediately. Mr. E. George Webster moved that the foregoing resolution be adopted as intro- duced and considered, which motion was seconded by Ray P1. Wilson, and upon roll call the "Flyes" and "Noyes" were as follows: 1291 AYES PJAY S A. f~i. Austin hone E. George Webster Ray hi. Wilson Sanford H. Wein The Chairman thereupon declared said motion carried and said resolution adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 4:10 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Gutierrez 1252 P1INUTES OF THE REGULAR FLEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA HELD THE 18TH DAY OF DECEPI6ER, 1969, 323 COURT STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency P1embers Present: 4Jilson, Austin, Wein, Gutierrez, and Webster Agency flembers Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; P1r. Varner, Agency Counsel; and (irs. Baxter, Executive Secretary P1IfJUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 4, 1969 were presented for appro- val. Piotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez approving the f1inutes of the Regular Meeting of December 4, 7969 as subenitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Prone Absent: Prone The Minutes of the Special Meeting of December 15, 1969 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson approving the Minutes of the Special Meeting of December 15, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of November, 1969 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson approving the expenditures for the month of November, 7969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RELOCATION AND REAL ESTATE STATUS REPORT: Mr. Austin requested that if the Board has not had a chance to carefully review the report, they should do so and ask any questions at the next Regular Meeting. REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. TRAVEL, NAHRO WORKSHOP: The following resolution was introduced: 1293 RESOLOTION N0. 2098 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE RELOCATION MANAGER AND ADMIN- ISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO TRAVEL TO SEASIDE, CALIFORNIA, TO ATTEND NAHRO WORKSHOP, JANUARY 10, 1970 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it is found essential for the Relocation and Property Manager and the Administrative Assistant to travel to Seaside California, January 10, 1970 to attend a NAHRO Rehabilitation Training Workshop. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the travel of the Relocation and Property Manager and the Administrative Assistant to Seaside, California, January 10, 1970, os hereby approved, and their travel expenses are approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 12-18-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein approving the adoption of Resolution 2098. Motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER DIFFENBAUGH CONTRACT: Mr. Austin explained that there were several requests for Change Order to the Diffenbaugh Contract. Mr. John Cook from Diffenbaugh was presented to the Members. a) Storm Drain, Northwest Arcade. This change would be for the installation of 147' of 4" cast iron pipe for storm drain, connected to existing Mall system, at a cost of $1,416.90. When the mall plans were drawn, the configu- ration of the Penney Store was not known. Mr. Austin stated that it was the recommendation of the Staff to approve this change. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson approving the above change. The motion was carried unanimously. b) Under r~ ound Obstructions. This change would be for the removal of underground obstructions on tTie maTT site beneath the contract limits, far a cost of $7,858.71. Utility lines and railroad ties were found during construction acti- vities. Mr. Austin explained that it was the staff's recommendation to approve this change. After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the above change. The motion was unanimously carried. 1294 c) Junior Beams. Mr. Desrochers explained that the junior beams were not noted on tie shop drawings, but are on the plans. It is the opinion of Gruen Associates and Krueger Engineering that the junior beams are required but they are not an extra item since they were noted on the plans. Diffenbaugh has stated a cost of $130.52 for installation of these junior beams. Mr. Webster moved that this item be tabled until the next regular meeting, in order that Mr. Desrochers and Mr. Quinn could study the matter and determine if the error was Gruen Associates in that they did not have the junior beams noted on the shop drawings. The motion was unanimously carried. d) Tem orar Storm Drains a Mall Site. Diffenbaugh has proposed to take addi- tions measures w c e ee s goes beyond his contractural responsibilities to protect the mall site from storm waters. The cost of this work is esti- mated at $2,000. Mr. Austin advised that it is staff's opinion that the work is warranted, however, the contractor's responsibility. Mr. Quinn explained that the work mentioned is to actually protect the working area around the mall, not the structure itself. Mr. Cook explained that his contract pro- vides that they provide access to and from-the job site, which they have by a gravel road. The extra measures of proteotion would be to slope the area around the site, so that the storm waters would drain off and not saturate the soil. After much discussion, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez denying the above request, in that it was not the Agency's responsibility. The motion was unanimously carried. e) Fire~Alarm .Change. It was explained that the City Fire Department has re- viewe' d the shop drawings of the Mall Fire Alarm System. Although they approved the system two years ago, several developments have taken place. They recommend the new non-interfering type system be installed. Mr. Desrochers explained the system. Mr. Austin stated that our Inspector and Gruen Associates have concurred that it would be in order to proceed with the new system. The cost would be $2,040.64. After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the above request. The motion was carried unanimously. f) Time Re ues~t Ext_e_ns~ion. Due to the electrical closet Change Order, Diffenbaugh aTi s requested an additional 39 days to his contract. He has also requested an additional 77 days due to the Plumbers Strike. A 30 day extension has been recommended by the Staff, due to the electrical closet Change Order and other similar delays, through no fault of the Contractor. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the above requested time extension of 30 days. The motion was unanimously carried. The following resolution was introduced, incorporating all of the above changes that were authorized by motions of the Board: RESOLUTION N0. 2099 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER N0. 4 WITH THE J. D. DIFFENBAUGH COMPANY, SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 2, PUBLIC MALL CON- STRUCTION CONTRACT 1295 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with J. D. Diffenbaugh Company for Site Preparation Unit No. 2, California R-79, dated June 27, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Change Order No. 4 in order to accomplish the following: a. Install 147' df 4" cast iron pipe for storm drain, connect to existing Mall System, Northwest Arcade at an additional cost of $1,416.90. Remove underground obstructions on the Mall Site beneath the Contract Limits at an additional cost of $1,858.71. Install non-interfering type Fire Alarm System, as recommended by City Fire Department at an additional cost of $2,040.64. Grant the Contractor an additional 30 days time extension on completion of the Contract with new completion date of September 22, 1970. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency for the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby autho- rized to execute Change Order No. 4 in the amount of $5,316.25 in order to install additional storm drain in the Northwest Arcade, remove obstructions and install non-interfering type Fire Alarm System. FURTHERMORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Contractor is granted a 30 day time extension to the Contract with completion date set at September 22, 7970. Adopted: December 18, 1969 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2099, authorizing Change Order No. 4 to Diffenbaugh Contract, not to exceed an additional amount of $5,316.25, and increasing the contract completion date 30 days. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR PARKING VARIANCE, HENSCHEL ET AL., R-10, REUSE 23-32: Mr. Henry Henschel was presented to the Board. Mr. Henschel stated that he is requesting a variance in changing his tower from a six story structure to an eight story structure. He also is requesting that he be allowed to provide 74 parking spaces in lieu of 150 originally proposed. Mr. Henschel stated that he does have the area to provide the original 150 spaces, but would prefer to use this area for landscaping. If at a later date, it is determined that the additional space is necessary, they will be willing to take out some of the 1296 landscaping and provide the parking required. It was discussed that parking area needed in Senior Citizen Developments is much less than other developments. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2100 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING HENRY S. HENSCHEL, ET AL A PARKING AND BUILDING HEIGHT VARIANCE FOR ELDERLY HOUSING TO BE LOCATED ON PORTIONS OF R-10 REUSE PARCELS 23-32 WHEREAS, Mr. Henry Henschel, et al intend to construct housing for the elderly on portions of Meadowbrook R-70, Reuse Parcels 23-32; and WHEREAS, the actual parking required for elderly housing is less than the parking requirements set forth in the Revised Meadowbrook Redevelopment Plan and in City Ordinance 1991; and WHEREAS, the Revised Meadowbrook Redevelopment Plan and City Ordinance No. 1991 limit the height of building to six stories on said reuse parcels; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has determined that it is in the best interests of the City of San Bernardino and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, to grant a parking and building height variance to Henry Henschel et al. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereby grants a variance to Henry Henschel, et al, to provide no less than 74 parking spaces, and construct a building of no more than 8 stories for elderly housing to be located on a portion of Meadowbrook Project Parcels 23 through 32, contingent upon the approval of the City of San Bernardino, Planning Department. Adopted: 12-18-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2100, authorizing a parking and building height variance to Henry Henschel et al, contingent upon the approval of the City of San Bernardino Planning Department. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None h1AULDER BROTHERS: Mr. Varner explained that the landscaping contractor, Maulder Brothers, have discovered that in approximately 50% of the tree wells scheduled for planting, the street lighting electrical conduit interferes with the planting of these trees. Because of this interference, an additional cost of approximately $3,246 is involved for hand digging and trimming the balls of the trees that are in conflict with the electrical conduit. Mr. Varner stated that he has had discussions with Fontana Paving, the contractor responsible for the placing of the conduit. Fontana Paving has agreed that they have some responsibility with regard to the additional planting costs because of the conduit. Mr. 1297 Varner advise Maulder Brothers and Fontana Paving that the Agency is not res- ponsible for any additional cost. Mr. Austin requested concurrence from the Board of the Staff's notice to Maulder Brothers to proceed with the planting of the trees, responsibility for payment to be determined at a later date. Mo- tion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson concurring with the Executive Director's notice to Maulder Brothers to proceed with the planting of the trees. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, GLASER BROTHERS, R-10, REUSE 91 & 92: Mr. Quinn explained that Glaser Brothers is in need of a Certificate of Com- pliance in order to refinance their main building. They were informed that the Agency cannot issue a Certificate of Compliance until the development as illustrated on their plot plan was completed. The plot plan requires that the northerly parcel (91) be paved. In order to obtain the Certificate of Com- pliance as early as possible, Glaser Brothers have deposited a check in the amount of $2,500 and have agreed that the work will be done within 30 days. If the work is not done within this period of time, the Agency shall use the check to have the work accomplished. If it is done, the Agency shall return their check to them. Mr. Varner stated that he could see no legal reason why the Agency could not issue than the Certificate of Compliance, in that we have their check on deposit. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2101 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER'S CERTIFI- CATE OF COMPLIANCE TO GLASER BROTHERS, REUSE PARCELS 91 AND 92, MEADOWBROOK R-10 WHEREAS, Glaser Brothers, hereinafter called the Redeveloper, has entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Agreement dated July 13, 1966, was recorded July 10, 1967 in Book 6852, page 220 and said Grant Deed dated August 18, 1966 was recorded July 10, 1967 in Book 6852, page 272, both in Official Records of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redevelopers covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Grant Deed to furnish the Redevelopers with an instrument certifying completion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof; and WHEREAS, said real property is described as follows: 1298 Reuse Parcels 91 and 92, Meadowbrook R-10 That portion of lot 8 except the North 20' thereof, and of lots 9, 10, 11, 12 and 73, all in Block "D", The Peppers, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State df California, as per plat recorded in Book 77 of Maps, page 8, Records of said County, lying west of the southerly prolongation of the center line of "D" Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, in accordance with Section 4 of said Grant Deed, that the Agency does hereby conclusively certify and give notice that the Redeveloper has fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agreements with respect to the obligation of Redeveloper for the construction of improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the above described real property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency, to execute and have recorded with the County Recorders Office a Certificate of Compliance. Adopted: 12-18-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2707. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING: Mr. Austin stated that the Agency has three active contracts with Arrowhead Engineering. The contractor has presented to the Agency the new "Prevailing Fee Schedule" published yearly by the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors for use of members of the Southern California Chapter. It is their request that their contracts be amended to change the "prevailing fee schedule to read as follows: 2 man survey party 3 man survey party Supervision and con- ference time Drafting Computation Other office work $ 27.00 per hour 38.70 per hour 16.20 per hour 12.10 per hour 13.90 per hour 13.90 per hour Mr. Wein stated that their bid for the work was under the prevailing rate, and that he did not feel that the Agency should now pay the prevailing rate to them because of their bid. Mr. Quinn explained that we are not actually in- creasing their contract price, but only changing that portion of their contract 1299 setting forth the "Prevailing Fee Schedule" and in so keeping with our con- tract provision of Paragraph 3 whioh provides for rate renegotiation on a yearly basis. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2702 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT N0. 4 WITH ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING FOR SURVEY SERVICES, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino entered into a Contract with Arrowhead Engineering for Survey Services for the Central City Project dated the 15th day of November, 1967; and WHEREAS, the Agency executed Contract Amendment No. 7 on the 6th day of August, 1968, Contract Amendment No. 2 on the 19th day of November, 1968 and Contract Amendment No. 3 on the 26th day of May, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Agency to enter into Contract Amendment No. 4 changing the hourly rates of the Contractor to coincide with the pre- vailing fee schedule of the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors, retroactive to August 1, 1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No.4 with Arrowhead Engineering for Survey Services Contract. The Contract limit remains at $45,000. Adopted: 12-18-69 RESOLUTION N0. 2103 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT N0. 1 WITH ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Arrowhead Engineering for professional services for Calif. R-79 on April 24, 1969; and WHEREAS, Section 3 of said Agreement provides for renegotiating compensation for services rendered in fulfillment of said Contract; and WHEREAS, any change of rates shall be determined by using the "Prevailing Fee Schedule" published yearly by the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors; and 1300 WHEREAS, both parties to said Agreement desire to change the "Prevailing Fee Schedule" to read as follows: 2 man survey party 3 man survey party Supervision and con- ference time Drafting Computation Other office work $ 27.00 per hour 38.70 per hour 16.20 per hour 12.70 per hour 13.90 per hour 13.90 per hour NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that its Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 1, with Arrowhead Engineering for profes- sional services increasing the prevailing fee schedule in accordance with the most current schedule established by the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors. NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said rate change shall be effective retroactive to August 1, 1969. Adopted: 72-18-69 RESOLUTION N0. 2104 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR- MAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT N0. 1 WITH ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with Arrowhead Engineering for professional services for Calif. R-10 on April 24, 1969; and WHEREAS, Section 3 of said Agreement provided for renegotiating compensa- tion for services rendered in fulfillment of said Contract; and WHEREAS, arty change of rates shall be determined by using the "Prevailing Fee Schedule" published yearly by the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors; and WHEREAS, both parties to said Agreement desire to change the "Prevailing Fee Schedule" to read as follows: 2 man survey party 3 man survey party Supervision and con- ference time Drafting Computation Other office work $27.00 per hour 38.70 per hour 16.20 per hour 12.10 per hour 13.90 per hour 73.90 per hour 1301 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that its Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 1, with Arrowhead Engineering for professional services increasing the prevailing fee schedule in accord- ance with the most current schedule established by the California Council of Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors. NOW, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said rate change shall be effective retroactive to August 1, 1969. Adopted: 12-18-69 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolutions No. 2702, 2103, and 2104. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: John S. Griffith/Curci Turner Company Mr. Varner explained that the Company was to close December not close until major tenants they can be signed by January extend the close of escrow un was introduced: escrow with the John S. Griffith/Curci-Turner 4, 1969. The contract provides that escrow shall are signed. Penney Company has indicated that 15th. Mr. Quinn requested authorization to til January 75, 1970. The following resolution RESOLUTION NO. 2105 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING ESCROW CLOSING DATE TO NO LATER THAN JANUARY 15, 7970 , REGARDING THE CENTRAL CITY JOHN S. GRIFFITH/CURCI-TURNER DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, on the 20th day of December, 1968, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino entered into a Disposition Agreement with the John S. Griffith/Curci-Turner Company, wherein escrow was to close within 120 days from the date Agency gave Griffith Company et al notice that the Agency could deliver free and clear title to the subject property; and WHEREAS on August 4, 1969, said 120 day notice was given to the John S. Griffith Company et al; and WHEREAS, Paragraph 1(c) provides that should escrow nat close at the appointed time, and if such default continues for a period of 30 days, then the Dis- position Agreement shall be cancelled together with other provisions; and WHEREAS, additional time is required by the John S. Griffith Company et al to firm leases and construction financing; and 1302 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has determined that it is in the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Redevelop- ment Agency that John S. Griffith et al be granted additional time. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the escrow closing date is hereby extended to no later than January 15, 1970. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this extension supersedes any 30 day extension as contained in Paragraph 1(c) of the Disposition Agreement. Adopted: 12-18-69 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2105. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Arbitration-Sewer Installation Mr. Varner explained at the last Regular Meeting a Resolution was adopted authorizing the Chairman and Secretary to institute formal arbitration if no settlement can be reached with regard to Unit No. 2, Mall Construction Contract, Sanitary Sewer Line. Mr. Quinn stated that he has been advised that the would like the Agency to appoint a party to sit in on an informal arbitration. Mr. Wilson stated that if it is to be settled it must be in formal arbitration. All agreed that a formal action must be taken. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 5:25 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez, And Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1303 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1969, AT THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNCIL CHAMBERS This Special Meeting has been called pursuant to the following notice: NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at 10:00 a.m., December 29, 1969, at the City of San Bernardino Council Chambers, 392 West Court Street, San Bernardino, California, for the purpose of holding a Joint Public Hearing on the Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, Central City Project, Calif. R-79 DATED this 22nd day of December, 1969. s P. W. uinn Jr. uinn, r. Secretary 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 22nd day of December, 1969, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meet- ing on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL WITNESS my hand this 22nd day of December, 7969. s/P. W. Quinn, Jr. h uinn, r. Secretary Mayor Al C. Ballard reported that this is the time and place so designated for the joint Public Hearing on the Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, R-79. Motion was made by Hammock and seconded by Gregory opening the Joint Public Hearing. The motion was unanimously carried. Upon roll call the following City Council Members were present: Seccombe, Katona, Hammock, Guhin, Gregory, Wheeler and Amendt. The following were absent: None Chairman Al Austin called the roll of Agency Members. Present: Austin, Webster, and Wein Absent: Wilson and Gutierrez Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director and Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel. 1304 Mr. Austin explained that the Redevelopment Plan has been amended to provide for two tire, battery and accessory shops on land designated for parking. Tina two .major tenants have requested that this change be made. The time requirement placed on construction for the West end residential area has been removed in the Amended Plan. Mr. Austin read a portion of a letter from the Penney Company stating that they will open escrow on the property for their development January 15, 1970, and will close by January 15, 1971 or by construction start date, whichever is earlier. Mr. Varner explained that the Upham trust Company will actually purchase the land, and develop the building for J. C. Penney Company to lease from them. After discussion, motion was made by Hammock and seconded by Guhin approving the Planning Commissions recommendation to approve the Amended Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79. The motion was unanimously carried. The following resolution was introduced by the Redevelopment Agency for adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2106 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE AMENDED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, adopted the Official Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, on December 70, 1964 by Resolution No. 345; and WHEREAS, said Redevelopment Plan has been amended to provide for two tire, battery and accessory shops on land previously designated as parking area; and WHEREAS, said revision has removed the time requirement placed on the construction for the west end residential area, and minor language changes have been made throughout the plan for conformity and clarification; and WHEREAS, on December 29, 1969, a Joint Public Hearing was held at the City of San Bernardino Council Chambers on said Amended Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Amended Redevelopment Plan was reviewed and approved at said Public Hearing by the City of San Bernardino and the Redevelopment Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Amended Redevelopment Plan is hereby in all respects approved. Adopted: 12-29-69 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein approving the adoption of Resolution No. 2106. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit Ayes: Austin Webster, and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Gutierrez 1305 Motion was made by Gregory and seconded by Guhin closing the Joint Public Hearing of the City of San Bernardino and the Redevelopment Agency. The motion was unanimously carried. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster adjourning the Special Meeting of December 29, 1969, for the Joint Public Hearing of the Amended Redevelopment Plan, Calif. R-79. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Gutierrez 3106 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BARNARDINO CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 8TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1970, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roil Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez and Webster Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR THE YEAR 1970: The Chairman declared that this is the time and place designated for the Election of Officers for the year 1970. The Chairman declared nominations open for Chairman. Mr. Wein nominated Al Austin for the office of Chairman. Mr. Wilson seconded the motion, and it was unanimously carried. Mr. Webster moved that the nominations be closed. Mr. Gutierrez seconded the motion, and it was unanimously carried. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson appointing Mr. A. M. Austin as Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency for the year 1970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Gutierrez Naes: None Abstention: Austin Absent: None The Chairman declared nominations open for Vice Chairman. Mr. Webster nominated Ray Wilson for the office of Vice Chairman. Mr. Gutierrez seconded the motion, and it was unanimously carried. Mr. Webster moved that the nominations be closed. Mr. Wein seconded the motion, and it was unanimously carried. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez appointing Mr. Ray Wilson for Vice Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency for the year 1970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wilson Absent: None The Chairman declared nominations open for the appointive office of Secretary- Treasurer. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster appointing P. W. Quinn, Jr. as Secretary-Treasurer of the Redevelopment Agency for the year 1970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Chairman declared the election of officers closed. MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 18, 1969 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the 1307 P1inutes of the Regular Meeting of December 18, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Webster pointed out a typographical error on page 3 of the minutes. Mr. Quinn stated that said error would be corrected. The Minutes of the Special Meeting of December 29, 1969 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the minutes of the Special Meeting of December 29, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTION: Mr. Varner stated that two of the Members were not able to attend the Public Hearing on the Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for Central City. He therefore, thought that it would be appropriate to have a motion of the Agency Board ratifying the Agency's Action approving the Amendment to the Redevelop- ment Plan. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster ratifying the adoption of Resolution No. 2106 approving the Amended Redevelopment Plan, Calif. R-79, at the Public Hearing and Special Meeting of December 29, 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None MINI MALL CONSTRUCTION, R-79: Mr. Austin stated that proposals were opened January 5, 7970 for the construction of a Mini-Mall in the portion of the Agency Parking Lot adjacent to the temporary Parking Area on 4th Street. This Mini-Mall will be used for temporary relocation quarters for displacees of the Central City Project. Mr. Wilson suggested that each firm be allowed to give a ten minute presentation to the Members, after which the Members may ask questions. Mr. Austin stated that the presentations would be in the order of proposals opened on January 5th. Modular Construction & Development Corporation The representative from Modular Construction & Development Corporation explained that their proposal is for $15.63 a sq. ft., with a buy back provision of $125,000. The type of structure their firm provides was explained. He further explained that their bid includes the bank partitioning and duct work. This 1308 was not required in the proposal but through their own error they included it. The total bid price is approximately $315,000. The price of the extra parti- tioning and duct work is $16,225. If you subtract this extra partitioning and duct work, plus the buy back provision of $125,000 from the total price, the bid price would be approximately $8.62 a sq. ft., with no buy back pro- vision. They stated that they could complete the job within the time specified. Transport Pool, Inc. The representative from Transport Pool, for $17.50 a sq. ft. with the buy-back The type of structure they provide was done work for Redevelopment Agencies in for foundation (concrete) or extension that they could complete the job within Inc. explained that their proposal is to be negotiated at the time of buy back. discussed and explained. They have the past. Their bid does not provide and connection of utilities. They stated the time specified. Design Facilities, Corp. The type of structure provided by Design Facilities was explained and discussed. Their price per sq. ft. is $12.00 with no buy back provision. Mr. Austin pointed out that their bid states that the buildings will be manufactured and ready for shipment 120 days after official written notice by the Agency. This would not meet our time schedule of February 28th. The representative from Design Facilities confirmed that they could not meet the February 28th date. Panel Systems Panel Systems bid is $8.97 a sq. ft. with buy back to be negotiated. The actual buy back would be negotiated after inspection of the material, but they could guarantee a minimum of $1.00 per sq. ft. The type of structure they provide was discussed and explained. They stated that they would have no trouble meet- ing the time schedule of the Agency. Mr. Varner stated that if the Agency had desired they could have contacted one or two firms and negotiated a price for this temporary relocation quarters with them, but that he felt it would be more desirable to invite proposals. We in- vited proposals on a general basis, because we did not know the final specifica- tions of the tenants involved. He further stated that at the opening of the proposals he advised all present that the determination would be made by the Agency Board after review and discussion with each firm. After thorough review and discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2107 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY'OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH PANEL SYSTEMS, FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF TEMPORARY RELOCATION QUARTERS, CALIF. R-79 1309 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America, dated 3-27-67; providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 7949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking Certain Activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of a contractor to con- struct temporary relocation quarters for relocatees of the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, it is the determination of the Agency Board that Panel Systems, is qualified to be awarded the contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their proposal for the sum of $179,400 plus additional cost for any special items which will be negotiated between the Agency and the contractor. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the proposal of Panel Systems, in the amount of $179,400 plus additional cost for any special items is hereby approved and the Chairman and Secretary are authorized to execute said Contract for the construction of temporary relocation quarters, Calif. R-79. Adopted: 1-8-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2107. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Gutierrez Noes: None Abstention: Austin Absent: None Mr. Varner stated that he would like to disclose that he and his legal firm have had previous business with Mr. Jerry Miller and his associates, and doing business as Panel Systems. If the Board determines that such business asso- ciation would be deemed a conflict of interest in any way, that they should assign another attorney to draw the contract with Panel Systems. He further stated that Mr. Austin has in the past been in business with Mr. Frank Thorn, who is employed by Mr. Miller and that is the reason he abstained from voting. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster conflict of interest regarding Mr. Varner's nor with Panel Systems. The motion was carried by Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrea and Austin Absent: None determining that there is no Mr. Austin's past associations the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Noes: None Abstention: None RENT WRITE-OFF, JOHN GRIMES: Mr. Wein stated that Mr. Grimes is the owner of the Silver Dollar Cafe. He further explained that Mr. Grimes is requesting a refund of rent paid the Agency for the month of November, 1969. Mr. Grimes discontinued business on November 14, 1969 and released the premises to the Agency on November 28, 1969, therefore, he was in business only 8 days during the rental month of November. He has Cooperated fully with the Agency. Due to the fact that he discontinued business on November 14, and the Agency was demolishing the adjoining property 1310 (City Hall), Mr. Wein stated that he felt the refund was warranted. The fol- lowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2108 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING WRITE-OFF OF NOVEMBER, 1969 RENT FOR JOHN GRIMES, DBA SILVER DOLLAR CAFE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Rental Agreement No. 261A with John Grimes dated the 7th day of November, 7969, for property located at 408 West Third Street, in the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, Mr. Grimes discontinued his business on November 14, 7969 and released the premises to the Agency on November 28, 1969; therefore, being in business only 8 days during the month of November, 1969; and WHEREAS, Mr. Grimes has requested a refund of rent paid to the Agency for the month of November, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Members have reviewed the circumstances involved, and recognize the hardship due to lack of business because of the demolition of the adjoining property, and the cooperation of Mr. Grimes to vacate the premises. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that rent paid by Mr. Grimes for the month of November, 1969, be written off the Agency books and a refund in the amount of $95.26 be given to Mr. Grimes. Adopted: 7-8-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2108. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CITY-COUNTY-STATE-FEDERAL-CIVIC CULTURAL CENTER: Mr. Warner Hodgdon was presented to the Board. Mr. Hodgdon stated that he would like to apprise the Agency Board of the City's plans for certain areas in San Bernardino. He explained that the City of San Bernardino is preparing a proposed project for redevelopment of certain areas in San Bernardino. It will consist of four redevelopment projects --- the YMCA property; the YWCA property, a por- tion of the Seccombe Lake property; and a portion of the Meadowbrook Park pro- perty. The YMCA and YWCA would only increase the City revenue. It is proposed to develop a new YMCA and YWCA on the Seccombe Lake property. All of the land involved is either City, County, State, or Federally owned. No Federal Funds will be involved in this project. Mr. Hodgdon pointed out the areas involved on the map. 1311 After discussion, the Board Members expressed their interest in the proposed project. Mr. the Agency informed of the City's progress. DIFFENGAUGH CONTRACT, JUNIOR BEAMS: their thanks to Mr. Hodgdon and Hodgdon stated that he would keep Mr. Quinn explained that this item was on the Agenda at the last Board Meeting and tabled for further review. He stated that the junior beams were noted on the original plans. Through Diffenbaugh's own error, the junior beams were not noted on his shop drawings. The price for these beams is $130.52. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson denying the request for compensation of $130.52 for the installation of Jr. Beams. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RENT WRITE-OFF, CATANZARITI & FOCETT: It was explained that the Agency has been unable to locate Mr. Clarence Catanzariti & Mr. James Focett. The Agency employed a collection agency, but they had no luck. Mr. Catanzariti owes the Agency $137.75 and Mr. Focett owes $81.90. Mr. Quinn requested authorization to write off these balances. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2109 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE WRITE-OFF OF UNCOLLECTABLE RENT FROM CLARENCE W. CATANZARITI WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Rental Agreement No. 99A with Clarence W. Catanzariti, December, 16, 1967, in the amount of $52.50 per month; and WHEREAS, delinquent rent in the amount of $137.75 is due the Agency from Mr. Catanzariti under this Rental Agreement; and WHEREAS, attempts to locate Mr. Catanzariti have been unsuccessful. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that rent in the amount of $137.75 is hereby determined uncollectable, and said amount is authorized to be written off of the Agency records. Adopted: 1-8-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2109. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1312 RESOLUTION NO. 2110 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE WRITE-OFF OF UN- COLLECTABLE RENT FROM JAMES FOCETT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Rental Agreement No. 164A with James Focett, May 10, 1968, in the amount of $39.00 per month; and WHEREAS, delinquent rent in the amount of $81.90 is due the Agency from Mr. Focett under said Rental Agreement; and WHEREAS, attempts to locate Mr. Focett have been unsuccessful. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that rent in the amount of $81.90 is hereby determined uncollectable, and said amount is authorized to be written off of the Agency records. Adopted: 1-8-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2110. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Austin, Wein and Webster Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None BRUCE VARNER-CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES: Mr. Quinn advised that the up-set figures for contract for legal services with Bruce Varner should be increased. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2117 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO AMEND CONTRACT WITH BRUCE D. VARNER TO INCREASE THE UPSET FIGURE FOR GENERAL LEGAL ACTIVITIES, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 487, entered into a Contract with Bruce D. Varner dated April 11, 1967, for General Legal Services in connection with the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, the Agency by Resolution No. 608 authorized the execution of Contract Amendment No. 1, dated February 16, 1968, increasing the upset figures of the Contract from $1,750.25 to $6,250; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 4 is amended to read: 1313 "The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000) which shall constitute full and complete compensa- tion for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid at the rate of Thirty Five Dollars ($35,00) per hour, in every case subject to receipt of an invoice for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the Contract and that he is entitled to receive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. In addition to the compensation provided above, the Local Public Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from the Local Public Agency's principal place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Local Public Agency. The limitations on cost of transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which currently prevail for staff members of the Local Public Agency. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the total compen- sation and reimbursement, if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the maximum sum of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000) for all of the services required." Adopted: 1-8-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption. of Resolution No. 2111. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION N0. 2112 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO AMEND CONTRACT WITH BRUCE D. VARNER TO INCREASE THE UPSET FIGURE FOR GENERAL LEGAL ACTIVITIES, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 488, entered into a Contract dated April 11, 1967, with Bruce D. Varner for Legal Services in connection with :the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency, by Resolution No. 607, authorized the execution of'Con- tract Amendment No. 1, dated February 16, 1968, increasing the upset figure of the contract from $10,000 to $20,000; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Contract Amendment No. 3 increasing the upset figure for general legal activities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 4 is amended to read: "The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000.00), which shall constitute full and complete com- pensation for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid at the rate of Thirty Five Dollars ($35.00) per hour, in every case subject to 1314 receipt of an invoice for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the Contract and that he is entitled to receive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. In addition to the compensation provided above, the Local Public Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from the Local Public Agency's principal place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Local Public Agency. The limitations on cost of transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which currently prevail for staff members of the Local Public Agency. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the total compensation and reimbursement, if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the maxi- mum sum of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000) for all of the services required." Adopted: 1-8-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2112. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 11, R-10: It was explained that bids were opened January 5, 1970 for Site Preparation Unit No. 11, R-10 ("E" Street Widening). Only one bid was received and it is in the amount of $281,000. The estimate for this job is $180,000. Mr. Wilson moved that this job be readvertised for bid within 60 days, and 120 days for completion time. Mr. Wein seconded the motion. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AMENDMENT TO MALL DESIGN CONTRACT: Mr. Quinn explained that the Penney Company has requested in the mall design. They suggest that the ceiling height 7 feet on the second level and that grading modifications Lim from the Gruen Company was in New York at the time of these changes with the Penney Company. After discussion resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2773 some modifications be increased 5 to be implemented. Mr. discussion regarding the following RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR PRELIMINARY STUDIES OF MALL MODIFICATIONS AND GRADING 1315 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, under date of March 22, 1967, entered into a Contract with Gruen Associates for Engineering and Services for the Mall Design, Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to obtain preliminary engineering studies for the modification of the Central Mall in accordance with request by the J. C. Penney Co.; and WHEREAS, the J. C. Penney Co. has requested alterations to the grading plan in the Central City Mall Complex Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby autho- rized to execute a Contract Amendment with Gruen Associates for Preliminary Studies and Re-Design of the Central City Mall and Grading Modifications on the Site and in the vicinity of the J. C. Penney Co. Structure, at a cost not to exceed Five Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars ($5;500.). Adopted: 1-8 -70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2113. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF RENTAL PAYMENT, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO: Mr. Quinn requested authorization to transfer the rental aleeady paid by the City for parking area at Third and "D" to parking area now being used on Court Street. Some damage was caused to the parking area at Third and "D" during the demolition of the City Hall. This caused the City to vacate this lot and use the one on Court Street only. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein to table this matter until the next meeting in order that the Agency can con- tact Harry Press regarding the damage to the parking area on Third and "D". The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SURVEY AND PLANNING APPLICATION, COLLEGE PARK: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2114 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING UNDERTAKING OF SURVEY AND PLANS FOR AN URBAN RENEWAL PROJECT AND FILING OF AN APPLICATION WHEREAS, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended (herein referred to as "Title I"), the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development is authorized to extend financial assistance to local public agencies in the elimination and prevention of the spread of their slums and urban blight through the plan- ning and undertaking of urban renewal projects; and 1316 WHEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin under any program or activity receiv- ing Federal financial assistance and Executive Order 71063 prohibits discrimi- nation on basis of race, color, creed, or national origin in sale, lease or other disposition of residential property (including land intended for residential use) or in the use or occupancy thereof; and WHEREAS, it is desirable and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, make surveys and prepare plans, presently estimated to cost approximately Three Hundred Thirty Six Thousand, Six Hundred and Eight Dollars ($336,608), in order to undertake and carry out an urban renewal project of the character contemplated by Section 110(c) of Title I, in that area proposed as an Urban Renewal Area, situated in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, and State of California, Legal Description is attached hereto and by this reference is made a part hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA: 7. That the proposed Urban Renewal Area attached hereto is appropriate for an Urban Renewal Project, and that the undertaking by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, of surveys and plans for an urban renewal project of the character contemplated by Section 110(c) of Title I on the proposed Urban Renewal Area is hereby approved. 2. That the financial assistance available under Title I is needed to enable the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, to finance the planning and undertaking of the proposed Project. 3. That it is cognizant of the conditions that are imposed in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects with Federal financial assistance under Title I including those relating to (a) the relocation of site occupants, (b) the provision of local grants-in-aid and (c) the requirement that the locality present to the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development as a pre- requisite to approval of the application described below, a workable program for community improvement, as set forth in Section 101 (c) of Title I, for utilizing appropriate public and private resources to eliminate and prevent the development or spread of slums and urban blight. 4. That the United States of America and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, with regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and applicable Executive Orders. 5. That it is the sense of this body (a) that a feasible method for the relo- cation of individuals and families displaced from the Urban Renewal Area, in conformity with the requirements of Title I, can be prepared, and (b) that local grants-in-aid can and will be provided in an amount which will be not less than one-third of the Net Project Cost of the Project and which, together with the Federal capital grant, will be generally equal to the difference between Gross Project Cost and the proceeds or value of project land sold, leased, or retained for use in accordance with the urban renewal plan. 1317 6. That the fining of an application by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an advance of funds from the United States of America in an amount not to exceed Three Hundred Thirty Six Thousand, Six Hundred and Eight ($336,608) for surveys and plans for an urban renewal project in the proposed Urban Renewal Area attached hereto is hereby approved, and that the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California, is hereby authorized and directed to execute and file such application with the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, to provide such additional information and to furnish such documents as may be required by the Secretary and to act as the authorized representative of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California Adopted: 1-8-70 LEGAL DESCRIPTION That certain parcel in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described es: A portion of Sections 8, 17 and 18, Township 1 North, Range 4 West RANCHO MUSCUPIABE, as per map recorded in Book 7, page 23 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of the property described in the Final Order of condemnation to the San Bernardino City Unitied School District, recorded February 6, 1967 in Book 6768, page 741, Official Records of said County, said corner being on the East line of said Section 17; thence Northerly along said East line to the Easterly prolongation of the Northerly line of Northpark Boulevard; thence Westerly along said prolongation and along said Northerly line to the Northeasterly prolongation of the Westerly line of State College Parkway; thence Southwesterly and Southerly along said prolongation and along said Westerly line to a point that is Westerly of the intersection of the Easterly line of said State College Parkway with the Easterly line of State Street (Devil's Canyon Road); thence Easterly to said intersection; thence Northerly along said Easterly line of State Street to the West line of said Section 17; thence Southerly along said West line to the Southwest corner of the Wiggins Tract, per map recorded in Book 3, page 74 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of said County; thence Easterly along the South line of said Wiggins Tract to the Southwest corner of the Total property described in deed to Carlsberg Financial Corporation recorded October 18, 1968 in Book 7113, page 900, Official Records of said County; thence continuing Easterly, Southerly and Northerly along the Southerly boundary of said Carlsberg property to the West line of said School District property; thence South- erly along said West line to the South line of said School District Property; thence Easterly along said South line to the Northwest Corner of the parcel described in deed to the San Bernardino City Unified School District recorded February 26, 1968 in Book 6980, page 549, Official Records of said County; thence Southerly, Easterly, and Northerly along the boundary of the last mentioned School District Parcel to said South line of the first mentioned School District property; thence Easterly along said South line to the Point of Beginning. The above described parcel contains approximately 515 acres. 1318 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2114. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RENT WRITE-OFF, DIAMOND LOAN & JEWELRY C0: ~ Mr. Wein stated that Diamond Loan & Jewelry Co. has relocated. The Board previously reduced their rental from $250.00 per month to $125.00 per month for the months of August, September and October, 1969. In November it was raised back to $250.00. Mrs. Lipson, of Diamond Loan & Jewelry, is requesting a write off of this rental. Mr. Wein stated that she had a lack of business be- cause of the Project, and recommends that the Agency write-off rental at the reduced rate. This would amount to a write-off of $95.87. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2115 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE WRITE-OFF OF RENT FROM MRS. H. LIPSON DBA DIAMOND LOAN & JEWELRY COMPANY WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Rental Agreement No. 245A with Mrs. H. Lipson, dated June 27, 1969, in the amount of $250.00 per month; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 1090 rental rate was reduced to $125.00 per month for the period of time starting August 1, 1969 and ending November 1, 1969; and WHEREAS, per Resolution No. 1090 said rental rate was raised back to $250.00 on November 1, 1969; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Lipson completed her relocation on December 12, 1969, and has requested a write-off of rent owed the Agency in the amount of $191.74; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have determined that a write-off would be warranted based on the 50% reduced rate effective during the months of August-October. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that rent in the amount of $95.87 is hereby authorized to be written off the Agency records. Adopted: 1-8-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No.2115. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1319 OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Varner advised that the Diffenbaugh Company is ready to proceed with arbi- tration regarding the sewer installation. He requested that the Agency members appoint himself and Mr. Wilson to represent the Agency in this matter. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster appointing Mr. Wilson and Mr. Varner to represent the Agency in the arbitration regarding sewer installation,' under Contract for Mall Construction, Unit No. 2. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Gutierrez Noes: None Abstention: None Absent:NOne Mr. Joe Baker, Sun Telegran reporter, asked if the Agency has received notifi- cation from Secretary Romney that only one more amendatory may be submitted for our projects. Mr. Varner stated that we did receive such a notification, but that we will only need one more amendatory to complete the project. The Members were supplied with copies of the letter from the J. C. Penney Com- pany regarding the meeting held in New York on December 9, 1969. The Members instructed the Executive Director to spread said letter on the minutes. Letter as follows: Mr. A. Ballard - Mayor of San Bernardino Mr. W. Brown - John S. Griffith Company Mr. J. Degnan -John S. Griffith Company Mr. J. Lim - Gruen Associates Mr. P. Quinn - Redevelopment Agency Mr. A. Austin -Redevelopment Agency Mr. B. Varner - Redeve?opment Agency Mr. S. Wein - Redevelopment Agency Subject: Central City Project - San Bernardino, California Gentlemen: Please find attached minutes of our meeting held in New York on December 9, 1969. I would appreciate your reviewing them and forwarding to me, as soon as possible, any comments you might have regarding same. With kind personal regards. Very truly yours, J. C. PENNEY COMPANY, INC. 5/Ed E. Smolenski Real Estate Division (ENCLOSURE) Re: Relocation San Bernardino, Calif Central City Project (Urban Renewal) 1. Staff Meeting held - 72-8-69 2. Joint Meeting held with Developers - 72-9-69 1320 Attending: Mr. A. Ballard - Mayor of San Bernardino Mr. W. Brown John S. Griffith Company Mr. J. Degnan " Mr. J. Lim Gruen Associates Mr. P. Quinn, Jr Redevelopment Agency Mr. A. Austin " Mr. B. Varner " Mr. S. Wein " Mr. E. Jenner J. C. Penney Company Mr. E. Smolenski " Mr. H. Wilson " Mr. A. Kramberg " Mr. M. Zambetti " Mr. W. Daucher " Mr. M. Miller " Mr. R. Loose " Mr. R. Broglia " Mr. M. Lowenkron " There was a meeting with the above parties and the following was resolved: 1. We will have a construction yard located to the northwest of our site near the shopping center entrance and our T.B.A. location. 2. The mall court in front of our building will be 96 ft. wide. Our court ceiling height will be the maximum height possible with the first to second level being 17 ft. high and the second to third level to be 20 - 22 ft. high. 3. If Bullocks join the project, their entrance and court will be opposite our entrance and court. Court height and treatment to be restudied by Development Agency to add an additional 5 - 7 ft. to obtain a 20 - 22 ft hecight. J. C. Penney Construction to work with architect to determine exact height desirable. 4. If Bullocks does not join the project, then the cross mall opposite our entrance will be 30 ft. on upper level. 5. Mall column spacings will be 30 ft. on center 6. TBA curb cuts as shown are essential and final grades subject to Penney's approval. 7. Grades and shopping center entrance at rear of Penney's to be restudied by architect to provide turning area for trucks and to align our store entrances and patio shop. 8. Fire corridors will probably not be necessary. However, we will study our layout and code requirements with and without Bullocks to verify this. 9. Architect to prepare site line study to determine location of sign panel on south side of our building without Bullocks. 1321 10. As of now, Wards will not have a penthouse. 11. Parking ratio shall be not less than 3.50 cars per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross building area. City to build a civic center with a 1,600 car parking deck across street with a bridge to center. Employee parking to be on the periphery of the north and south side of the center. 12. We will cause landlord to go to escrow by January 15, 1970 and to close by January 15, 1971 or by construction start date, whichever is earlier. s/Robert A. Loose Robert A. Loose ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 6:00 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1322 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1970, AT 4:00 P.M., 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALI- FORNIA The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 8, Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster Regular Meeting of January 8, 1970 as submitted. following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: 1970 were presented for approval. approving the Minutes of the The motion was carried by the Wein, Gutierrez and Austin The Expenditures for the month of December, 1969 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez approving the Expenditures for the month of December, 1969 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Webster, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that in reviewing the documents relatiYe to the Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project, he has discovered that a motion made by the Board at the Regular Meeting of November 20, 1969 was not noted in the minutes. Mr. Varner requested a motion of the Board amending the minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 20, 1969 to include the following: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster consenting to the holding of Joint Public Hearing on December 29, 1969, for the proposed Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, Calif. R-79. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: byes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez & Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster amending the minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 20, 1969, to include the above stated motion, under Other Business in said minutes. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent; None 1323 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION Of OCCUPANCY, MCMAHANS, R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2116 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MC MAHANS FURNITURE STORE UNTIL MARCH 1, 1970 WHEREAS, McMahans Furniture Store has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2058 the Agency Members authorized the occupancy of the premises until January 15, 1970; and WHEREAS, McMahans Furniture Store has requested an extension of rental agreement until March 1, 1970, in order that an interim relocation move can be eliminated; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, have reviewed the circumstances involved and believe that such an extension is warranted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and McMahans Furniture Store is hereby extended until March 1, 1970. Adopted: 1-15-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2116. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SALE OF REUSE 22a, b, c, AND 20b, CALIF. R-10 Authority was requested to advertise for Public Hearing for the sale of Reuse Parcels 22a,b,c and 20b, Calif. R-10 to Samuelsen and Bolson. This actually is a deeding out of the Southern Pacific right-of-way to the adjoining property owner. It was understood by the Agency and Samuelsen and Bolson, that at the time the Agency could acquire the right-of-way, Samuelsen and Bolson would pur- chase it. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson determining that Samuelsen and Bolson, et.al. are the Redevelopers qualified to redevelop Reuse Parcels 22a,b,c, and 20b, Calif. R-10. The motion died. Mr. Frank Dominguez stated that he is the realtor for the above sale and that he would be receiving the finders fee, in that he was the realtor for the sale of the adjoining property. Mr. Wein stated that he felt the finders fee was being confused with a commission. 1324 It was determined that if the sale was tabled until the next meeting it would not cause any actual delay in that we have title subject to the final abandon- ment by the ICC. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson to table this matter until the next regdlar meeting, in order that the question of the finders fee could be studied and a recommendation made. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER, PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS, UNIT N0. 28, R-79: Mr. Quinn explained that the construction of the Wells Fargo Bank is scheduled to start on January 31, 1970. The Agency must have the property cleared by the close of escrow. Authority was requested to execute Change Order to Presco Building Materials Unit No. 28 contract to include the parcels necessary. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2117 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CHANGE ORDER N0. 2, TO CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS, SITE CLEARANCE UNIT N0. 28, CALIF. R-79. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Contract with Presco Building Materials, for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 28, Calif. R-79, on the 13th day of November and Change Order No. 1 with Presco Building Materials, Unit No. 28, Calif. R-79 on December 15, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Agency to enter into Change Order No. 2 with Presco Building Materials inasmuch as escrow is scheduled to close on Reuse Par- cel 2b, Calif. R-79 and Reuse Parcels 3 and 4, Calif. R-10. The Wells Fargo Bank Building is scheduled to be erected on this site. A portion of the pro- perty is now improved as a parking lot and in order to prepare the land for disposition, this Agency is obligated to demolish the improvements; and WHEREAS, Presco Building Materials has submitted a bid not to exceed Nine Hundred Eighty Five and no/100 ($985.) for this necessary demolition work with Contract extended until February 6, 7970. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Order No. 2 with Presco Building Materials, Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 28, Calif. R-79, not to exceed an amount of $985, nor Con- tract Completion Date of February 6, 1970. Adopted: 7-15-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2117. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1325 TRANSFER OF RENT, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, R-79: The damage of the parking area on the Northwest corner of Third and "D" Streets was discussed. The executive Director was instructed to give Presco Building Materials official notice to restore this parking area to its original condi- tion. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2118 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF RENT FROM AGREEMENT N0. 236A TO AGREEMENT N0. 238A, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has entered into Rental Agreement No. 236A with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for rental of parking area on the Northwest Corner of Third and "D" Streets; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino is also under Rental Agreement No. 238A with the Agency for the rental of parking area on the Southwest corner of Court and "D" Streets; and WHEREAS, due to the demolition of the old City Hall building, the parking area at Third and "D" was damaged, causing the City of San Bernardino to vacate said lot and utilize the area at the Southwest corner of Court and "D" only; and WHEREAS, the City has requested that the rent from Rental Agreement 236A be applied to Rental Agreement No. 238A; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have directed the Secretary to contact the contractor responsible for said damage of parking area on the Northwest corner of Third and "D", and instruct said contractor to repair the lot to its original order; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency have reviewed the transfer of rental fee, and have determined that said transfer is warranted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Fee from Rental Agreement No. 236A is hereby authorized to be applied to Rental Agreement No. 238A. Adopted: 1-15-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2118. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXECUTION OF EASEMENT DOCUMENTS, R-79 and R-10: The following resolutions were introduced: 1326 RESOLUTION N0. 2119 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE EASEMENT DOCUMENTS RELATING TO STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN CALIFORNIA R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, as amended, provides for the realignment, vacation and dedication of certain streets and public utility easements within the project area; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino and certain public utility companies have requested that the Agency execute certain documents pertaining to the realignment, vacation and dedication of Rights of Way for Street, Highway, and public utility easement purposes within said project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute those certain documents conveying Rights of Way to the City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation, and certain public utility companies, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 1-15-70 RESOLUTION NO. 2120 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN TAONDg7SRECEER7ESTARY TO EXECUTE EASEMENT DOCUMENTS RELATING CALIFORNIA'RH{~HWAYS, AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for Meadowbrook Project No. 1, Calif. R-70, as amended, provides for the realignment, vacation and dedication of certain streets and public utility easements within the project area; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino and certain public utility companies have requested that the Agency execute certain documents pertaining to the realignment, vacation and dedication of Rights of Way for Street, Highway, and public utility easement purposes within said project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute those certain documents conveying Rights of Way to the City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation, end certain public utility companies, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 1-15-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lutions No. 2179 and 2120. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1327 CERTIFICATES OF COMPLIANCE: The following Certificates of Compliance were introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2121 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF OWNER PARTICIPANT'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO HANFORD FOUNDRY COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO SAN BERNARDINO STEEL AND MACHINE WHEREAS, San Bernardino Steel and Machine, a California corporation, hereinafter referred to as the Owner Participant, has entered into an Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereinafter called the Agency; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated November 78, 7958, and Supplement, dated June 16, 1959, were recorded on January 3, 7961, in Book 5318, Page 70, Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of Calif- ornia; and WHEREAS, for valuable consideration, said real property was deeded to HANFORD FOUNDRY COMPANY, a California corporation, by Grant Deed dated March 15, 1968, and recorded in Book 6991, Page 837, Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, Paragraph 14 of said Agreement includes the recital that said Agree- ment will be binding upon the successors from the date of execution; and WHEREAS, in Section 5 of said Agreement, Owner Participant agreed to build upon and improve said land and such construction and improvements to be carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code requirement of the City of San Bernardino, State of California, and the provisions of the Plan and the Declaration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and specifications approved by the Agency on the hereinafter described real property. LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR REUSE PARCEL 75 That portion of Waters Subdivision of Lots 1 to 4, inclusive, and Lots 75 to 18, inclusive, Block 9 of the Rancho San Bernardino, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, Page 38, records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the northeast corner of Lot 6, Block 4 of said tract; thence west along the north ltne of said Block, 143.25 feet, more or less, to the easterly line of Lot 3 of said Block; thence south along said east line of Lot 3, and the prolongation thereof, 145 feet, more or less, to a point 10 feet north of the northerly line of Lot 7 of said Block; thence west parallel with and distant 10 feet north of the northerly line of Lot 7 to the west line of Block 4; thence south along the west line of Block 4 to the northerly line of the Santa Fe Railroad Company right of way, (formerly known as 1328 the California Central Railroad) as shown on said map; thence southeasterly along the northerly line of said Santa Fe Railroad Company right of way to its intersection with the east line of Sierra Way; thence north along said east line of Sierra Way to the point of beginning. Note: By resolution of City of San Bernardino, east of and adjacent to abandoned and vacated. was recorded August 6, Official Records. the Mayor and Common Council of the that portion of Boyd Avenue lying the property herein described was A certified copy of said resolution 1965, in book 6448, page 115, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies, and gives notice that the Owner Participant has fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, for itself, its successors, and assigns, all cove- nants and agreements with respect to the obligation of Owner Participant for the building upon and improvements to said land carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code requirement of the City of San Bernardino, California, and the State of California and the provisions of the Plan and the Declaration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and speci- fications approved by the Agency and dates for the Beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement upon the hereinabove described real property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance" Adopted: 1-75-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2121. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 2122 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF REDE- VELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO HANFORD FOUNDRY COM- PANY, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION WHEREAS, Hanford Foundry Company, a California Corporation, hereinafter called the Redevelopers, have entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated February 21, 1969, was recorded on May 8, 1969, in Book 7228 on page 389 and said Grant Deed, dated February 21, 1969, was re- 1329 corded on May 8, 1969, in Book 7228, page 413, both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redevelopers covenants and agrees, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Deed to furnish the Redevelopers with an Instrument certifying completion of said improvement in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redevelopers completion thereof on the hereinafter described property That Certain parcel in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: (Reuse Parcels 76, 77) Lots 1, 2 and 3 and a portion of the vacated alley adjacent to and Southerly of said Lots 7, 2 and 3 all in Book 4 of J. W. Water's, Jr. Subdivision per Map recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 38, in the Office of the Recorder of said County and a portion of Boyd Avenue, 60 feet wide, as vacated by City of San Bernardino Resolution No. 7811, recorded August 6, 1965 in Book 6448, page 175 Official Records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of said lot 3; thence South 0 degrees O1' 12" West along the East line of said Lot 3 and its Southerly prolongation, 145.00 feet to a line parallel with and distant 10.00 feet Northerly, mea- sured at right angles, from the North line of Lot 7 in said Block 4; thence South 89 degrees, 48' 50" West along said parallel line, 162.89 feet to the center line of said vacated Boyd Avenue; thence North 0 degrees 03' S0" East along said center line, 145.00 feet to the Westerly prolongation of the North line of said Lots 1, 2 and 3; thence North 89 degrees 48' 50" East along said Westerly prolongation and along said North line, 762.78 feet to point of beginning. NOW, THEREFORE, the Agency in accordance with Section 4 of said Agreement and Section 4 of said Grant Deed does hereby conclusively certify and give notice that the Redevelopers have fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, for it- self, its' successors and assigns,all covenants and agreements with respect to the obligation of Redevelopers for the construction of improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinafter described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, the "Certificate of Compliance" in the form approved by Resolution 238 of this Agency on August 2, 1962. Adopted: 1-15-70 1330 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2122. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AERIAL PHOTOS: Authorization was requested to in order to retain a pictorial Wilson :inquired as to the cos would look into the expense of black and white photos for the introduced: procure aerial photos of the Central City Project record of the progress of the project. Mr. t of color aerials. Mr. Quinn stated that he color photos. The Members agreed to procure pictorial record. The following resolution was RESOLUTION NO. 2123 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PROCUREMENT OF AERIAL PHOTOS OF THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency desire to retain a pictorial record of the Progress of the Central City Project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than $600.00 is hereby authorized for the procurement of aerial photographs of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 Adopted: 1-15-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2123, authorizing the procurement of aerial photos of the project, not to exceed $600.00. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None HENRY S. HENSCHEL, REUSE PARCELS 23 THRU 32, CALIF. R-10: Mr. Henschel stated that he has received verbal commitment from FHA for his development. It should be just a matter of time before he will receive the written commitment. Mr. Henschel further stated that he is awaiting the zoning change regarding the commercial portion of his development. Mr. Varner informed him that this was approved by a Joint Public Hearing of the hlayor and Common Council and the Redevelopment Agency on the Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. Mr. Henschel stated that his application for a parking variance will go before the Council on February 9th. He is assured by Mr. Reilly that it will be approved by the Planning Commission. 1331 It was stated that escrow would be able to close July 15, 1970 and construction start on July 16, 1970. Mr. Varner stated that under the terms of the contract, the Agency may charge a 6% penalty charge for failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement. Mr. Webster stated that in view of the fact that Mr. Henschel has put forth his best efforts to comply with the Agreement, he does not feel the Agency should charge him the 6% penalty. All Members agreed. Mr. Varner further stated that the Disposition Documents should then be amended to change the close of escrow date to July 15, 1970 and construction to start July 16, 1970. Mr. Quinn advised that Mr. Henschel will be required to deposit the additional amount of $73,262.75 for this purchase. Mr. Henschel stated that this would be done shortly. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2124 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EX ECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH HENRY S. HENSCHEL ET.AL., REUSE PARCELS 23 - 32, R-70 WHEREAS, Henry S. Henschel has submitted a successful Offer to Purchase for Reuse Parcels 23 through 32, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency Members to amend the Disposition Agreement with Henry S. Henschel et. al. by extending the escrow closing date to July 15, 1970 and extending the start of construction to July 16, 1970. WHEREAS, Henry S. Henschel, et.al., has agreed to deposit with the Agency the additional funds required for a 5% deposit on the purchase price of said pro- perty. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment to disposition Agreement with Henry S. Henschel et.al. for the purchase of Reuse Parcels 23-32, Calif. R-10. Adopted: 1-15-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2124. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE, MINI MALL: Mr. Austin advised that the Agency must pay for the temporary electrical ser- vice to be brought to the property line for the mini-mall. The cost of this installation and removal is $540. The following resolution was introduced: 1332 RESOLUTION NO. 2125 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE: EXPENDITURES OF NOT MORE THAN $540.00 FOR THE INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO MINI-MALL WHEREAS, the Agency Members recognize ..the need for temporary electrical service for the tenants of the temporary relocation quarters (mini-mall); and WHEREAS, the Edison Company will install and remove this temporary service for an amount not to exceed $540. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than $540 is hereby authorized for the installation and removal of temporary electrical service by the Edison Company to the mini-mall. Adopted: 1-15-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2125. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: Escrow-Central Citv Comoan Mr. Austin advised that the escrow with the Central City Company closed today at 3:50 p.m. Mr. Varner stated that since the Agency does not actually have its Local Share on hand, we made the agreement with them, that in the event the Agency did not perform, it would buy back the property from them at the original price. The escrow with Montgomery Wards opened today. They will be purchasing their property directly from the Agency. They anticipate closing their escrow May 15, 1970. The Penney Company opened escrow today through the Upham Trust Com- pany. They anticipate closing escrow January 15, 1971. It is the Agency's responsibility to make sure that the Montgomery Wards and Penney Company comply with their agreements for development. Mr. Varner requested a resolution from the Board authorizing the opening of a Special Bank Account at the Bank of California entitled Redevelopment Agency Special Trust Account. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2126 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A BANK ACCOUNT AT THE BANK OF CALIFORNIA, MAIN OFFICE, ENTITLED "REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIAL TRUST ACCOUNT N0. 1-0184 1333 WHEREAS, on December 20, 1968, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Disposition Agreement with the Central City Company, a joint venture between John S. Griffith & Co. and Curci-Turner Co.; and WHEREAS, under said Agreement, the Agency agreed to perform certain conditions as set forth therein; and WHEREAS, certain of said conditions have not yet been performed but the parties to said Agreement desire to close said escrow under said Agreement on January 15, 1970; and WHEREAS, in order to protect all the parties to said Agreement, it is necessary to open a special account for the purpose of holding the funds constituting the purchase price of the real property sold to the Central City Company under said Agreement, until all of said conditions have been performed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Chairman and Executive Director of the Agency be, and they hereby are, authorized to open a special account with The Bank of California, Main Branch, entitled "Redevelopment Agency Special Account No. 1-0184," which account shall be held in accordance with the letter of instructions attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and by this reference made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Chairman and Executive Director of the Agency be, and they hereby are, authorized to execute a copy of said instructions and to administer said account in accordance with said instructions. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Chairman and Executive Director of the Agency be, and they hereby are, authorized to take all necessary steps to carry out the foregoing resolutions. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2126. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1334 _ ~ ~'l ("\ January 15, 1970 Ban!< of California 3rd and "D" Streets San 6ernardino, Califiornia Re: P.ccount € i -~'~-5 Gentler>_n: The undersigned hand you here~•aith: l 1. United California Bank Tim? Certificate of Deposit No. 148715, dated 1-14-70, in the amount of 5724,200. 2. Bank of Am?rican Tir.:e Certificate of Deposit ao. O'yo~°(~ ,dated 1-15-70~ in the amount of X100,000. 3. Letter directed to you by John S. Griffith & Co., with respect to the deposit in the captioned '` account of the additional sum of $524,200 in cash or its equivalent. which you are instructed to hold in tiie captioned account, collecting and holding the interest thereon to be paid as hereinafter provided. You are authorized to deliver funds so held by you, together Yrith interest so collected to the P.edev~loorent P.eencv of the City of , San Bernardino, California ("Agency") ~rrhen the follo,~ing conditions have occurred: - A. Central City Company ("Central") has delivered to you a t•rritten stater..~nt that there has been furnished to it by Agency evidence reasonably 'satisfactory to ,Central that Ag?ncy has entered into firm construction - contract and has available to it sufficient funds to pay the entire cost of desion and construction. of _.-certain public imrovemants ~::ithin the cor;~ercial area of P,-79 (the ar?a bet:+een 2nd and 4th Streets, n u crn r and G and Stre?ts) generally consisting o~ _-surface parking facilities, lighting, landscaping, • the enclosed air-conditioned t:+c level mall, the three level and oarkina structure, all as substantially set forth in the Illustrative Site Plan for Central Lity Project attached to the !?edavelooment Plan for Central City Projects. ovcrTV rm ^n ~~ 1335 ~~f :~ Ban'; of Calior.;i:: Januar; 15, 19 i0 Page 7~ro B. Central has furnished to you a written stater:ant that there has been duly executed a so-called Construction, Operation and ^eciprocal Ease,rnt ~Agreer:a_nt by and between Central, Upham Trust, J. C. Penney, ~?on t0oll`?ry-~:~a rd, Hal'r15 COmGan`J, P.oencv and the City of San 5ernardino governing the develop:~~nt and operation o` the regional shopping center"to be constructed on tae comr:arcial aria of R-79. In the event that fife foregoing conditions have not occurred by January 15, 1971, then you shall re-deliver all documents to file .... .. _... .. ~ ,. ~ ,. v.. o ., d~^^r :,. .....",; „r~ - ~ all .,c',lc..~~d . ;tc,,st :h.reon to sx.. .. r., ra depositor. By its execution hereof, A,eency eerees that in the event the foregoing conditions do not occur by January 15, 1971, it shall accept deeds from Central to P.cency and Central agrees to execute and deliver to a_e,cncv such deeds re-conveying file lan8 acquired by Central this date throud~ First ,,^,m=_rican Title Company, Esc'rorr "587217, and o-;ill cencurr-ently reini~urs= Central-for the cost of docurentary stamps, recording charges and real estate tax^s paid of payable by Central because of its ovmership of said land for such period. `~ CENTP,AL CITY COi•!PA;IY __JOHN S. GRIFFITH E CO. CURCI-TUR~;ER C~. ' / REDEVELOPi;EP1T AGEi;CY OE THE CITY OF SAN BE.°,iIARDIi;O, CALIFORtIIA ~ ' ,~ /ers 1336 Mr. Varner further stated that due to the reduced size of the property to be purchased by Central City Company, because of the major tenants purchasing their property directly from the Agency, the Disposition Agreement should be amended. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2127 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO AMEND DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH THE CENTRAL CITY COMPANY, A JOINT VENTURE WHEREAS, on December 20, 1968, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Disposition Agreement with the Central City Company, a joint venture between John S. Griffith & Company and Curci- Turner Company; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend said Agreement as follows: (1) Changing the date of close of escrow to January 15, 1970; (2) providing for construction to be commenced not later than July 15, 1970, and to be completed within 24 months after the date of coxmiencement of construction; (3) providing that the Agency will construct a three-level parking structure in the commercial area, as set forth in the illustrative site plan attached to the Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and (4) providing for the direct acquisition of real property from the Agency by the Upham Trust for construction of a J. C. Penney Company facility, and by Montgomery Ward, or nominee, for construction of a Montgomery Ward facility, substantially in accordance with the escrow instruc- tions on deposit at First American Title Company, Escrow No. 587217, and pro- viding that in the event such developers elect to lease such parcels as opposed to purchase, Central City Company will purchase such property within the period provided in said escrow instructions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the~Chairman and Secretary of the Agency be and they hereby are, authorized to execute an amendment to said Disposition Agreement incorporating all of the matters hereinabove set forth. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Chairman and Executive Director of the Agency be, and they hereby are, authorized to take all necessary steps to carry out the foregoing resolutions. Adopted: 7-15-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2127. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Resolution of Commendation Mr. Ray Wilson introduced the following resolution: 1337 RESOLUTION N0. 2128 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING MR. AL M. AUSTIN, CHAIRMAN: MR. BRUCE D. VARNER, AGENCY COUNSEL: AND MR. P. W, QUINN, JR., EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WHEREAS, Mr. Al M. Austin, Mr. Bruce D. Varner and Mr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., have within the past twelve months displayed. outstanding executive and managerial abilities in planning, programming, and guiding the administrative and techni- cal aspects of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Califor- nia; and WHEREAS, Mr. A7 M. Austin, Mr. Bruce D. Varner, and Mrs. P. W. Quinn, Jr., have been iminently successful in negotiations on local and state level in fiscal and administrative matters which vitally effect the future of the Redevelopment Agency activities; and WHEREAS, over the past twenty-four months, Mr. A7 M. Austin, Mr. Bruce D. Varner, and Mr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., have been involved in negotiations with the Central City Company on disposition of properties within the Central City Project area and said negotiations have recently culminated in the unprecedented sale of over five acres of prime property in the downtown San Bernardino area, said sale being the largest achieved by the Agency; and WHEREAS, said sale of property will ultimately guarantee the success of the rede- velopment goals of the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency desire to express their appre- ciation and gratitude to Mr. Al M. Austin, Mr. Bruce D. Varner, and Mr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., for their tireless and timely efforts on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency and the City of San Bernardino. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that it express to Mr. Al M. Austin, Mr. Bruce D. Varner, and Mr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., and it does hereby so express, its appreciation and gratitude for their outstanding abilities, devotion to duty, and leadership as Chairman, Counsel, and Executive Director, respectively, of said Agency. Adopted: 1-75-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2128. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Contracts, Bruce Varner Mr. Webster stated that he felt our Agency Counsel's compensation should be re- viewed and compared with other attorneys in the area. Mr. Austin stated that he has looked into this matter himself, and has found that other attorneys are receiving $50.00 an hour. Mr. Varner receives $35.00 an hour. The following resolutions were introduced: 1338 RESOLUTION N0. 2129 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO AMEND CONTRACT WITH BRUCE D. VARNER BY INCREASING THE HOURLY RATE FROM $35.00 TO $50.00 FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 488, entered into a Contract dated April 11, 1967, with Bruce D. Varner for Legal Services in connection with the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Contract Amendment No. increasing the hourly rate of the Contract from $35.00 to $50.00 per hour. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 4 is amended to read: "The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000), which shall constitute full and complete compen- sation for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid at the rate of Fifty Dollars ($50) per hour, in every case subject to receipt of an invoice for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the :Contract and that he is entitled to receive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. In addition to the compensation provided above, the Local Public Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from the Local Public Agency's principal place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Local Public Agency. The limitations on cost of transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which currently prevail for staff members of the Local Public Agency. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the total compensation and reimbursement, if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the maxi- mum sum of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000) for all of the services required." Adopted: 1-15-70 RESOLUTION N0. 2130 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO AMEND CONTRACT WITH BRUCE D. VARNER BY INCREASING THE HOURLY RATE FROM $35.00 TO $50.00 FOR THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, R-70 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 487, entered into a Contract with Bruce D. Varner dated April 11, 1967 for General Legal Services in connection with the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and 1339 WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Contract Amendment No. 4 increasing the hourly rate of the Contract from $35.00 to $50.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 4 is amended to read: "The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($75,000) which shall Constitute full and complete compensation for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid at the rate of Fifty ($50) per hour, in every case subject to receipt of an invoice for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the Contract and that he is entitled to re- ceive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. In addition to the compensation provided above, the Local Public Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from the Local Public Agency's principal place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Local Public Agency. The limitations on cost transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which currently prevail for staff members of the Local Public Agency. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the total com- pensation and reimbursement, if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the maximum sum of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($75,000) for all of the services required. Adopted: 7-75-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolutions No. 2129 and 2130. The motion was carried by the following vote, To Wit: ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Change of Meeting Date Mr. Wilson stated that he will be unable to attend the meeting scheduled for February 5, 1970, and would like to request that said meeting be moved up to January 29, 1970. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez changing the February 5, 1970 meeting date to January 29, 1970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Public Hearing, Project No. 4 Mr. Austin requested authorization to hold a Joint Public Hearing on the Redevelop- ment Plan for the College Park Project No. 4. Mr. Wein asked if members of the staff have gone into the College Park area and met with the people. Mr. Quinn stated that they have had discussions with the people involved. Mr. Wein stated that he would not be opposed to the holding of a joint public hearing as long as all the people involved were aware of the proposed project. The following resolution was introduced: 1340 RESOLUTION N0. 2131 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CONSENTING TO JOINT PUBLIC HEAR- ING OF PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, COLLEGE PARK, PROJECT N0. 4 BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, as follows: SECTION ONE: That the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereby consents to the holding of a joint public hearing with the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, for considera- tion of a proposed Redevelopment Plan for the College Park Project No. 4. SECTION TWA: That said public hearing shall be noticed and held in accordance with the provisions of California Health and Safety Code Section 33458. SECTION THREE: That said public hearing is hereby ordered to be held not less than 30 days after review of the proposed Redevelopment Plan by the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino. Adopted: 1-15-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2131. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Quinn ,explained that the Public Hearing will be held not less than 30 days after review by the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT: Motion wes made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez adjourning the meeting at 5:10 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Austin, Webster and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1341 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 1970, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Webster Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 15, 1970 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 15, 1970 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. BOOTH BROTHERS REALTORS, FINDERS FEE: Mr. Austin read a letter from Booth Bros. Realtors, dated January 20, 1970, re- questing payment of a finders fee for the disposition of the commercial portion of the Central City Project to John S. Griffith/Curci-Turner Companies. Mr. Quinn stated that Mr. Booth is unable to attend the meeting today. Mr. Varner stated that there are still some funds to be deposited on February 1st by the Central City Company, and it is his recommendation to defer this matter until said funds are deposited and Mr. Booth is present to address the Board and answer any questions. Mr. Varner stated that he would have a report to present at the meeting, and felt that it would be appropriate to defer the matter until Mr. Booth could be present. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster to table this matter until the next Regular Meeting, to be held February 19, 1970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Quinn was directed to advise Mr. Booth of the Agency's action. SPOT RADIO ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mr. Austin stated that the 13 week radio contracts that the Agency has entered into have lapsed. Mr. Austin asked Mr. White, Administrative Officer, for his 1342 opinion regarding the benefits the announcements have produced. Mr. White stated that he believes the Agency has been successful in bringing its story of redevelop- ment activities across to the people in the community. We have received comple- mentary letters from citizens of the area on the broadcasts. He stated that he feels the Agency should continue the service to keep the public fully and daily informed of our future activities. Proposals were solicited for spot announcements and/or sponsorship of daily newscasts. Mr. Wilson suggested that each firm be allowed five minutes to present their pro- posal before the Board. Mr. Austin stated that perhaps the Agency should consider broadcasting to a broader variety of people, so that we could reach an undupli- cated audience. Mr. Wayne Thornton from KMEN was presented to the Board. Mr. Austin stated that KMEN is one of the contracts that has just lapsed for this type of service. Mr. Thornton stated that his written proposal is self-explanatory, and he would answer any questions the Board might have. It was determined that KMEN is mostly a popular music radio station. Mr. Sterling Zimmerman from KCAL was presented to the Board. KCAL is the other station which was under contract for radio announcements. KCAL is a Spanish speaking station. Mr. Zimmerman stated that they have proposed both spot announce- ments and news sponsorship. Mr. Gutierrez was asked for his opinion regarding the benefits of this station being used. He stated that the Spanish Community appreciate the announcements and it also cuts down the spread of rumors regarding redevelopment activities. Mr. Bill Bellman from KFXM Was presented to the Board. Mr. Gellman stated that they have presented three plans. One for KFXM only, which is mostly a popular music station; secondly, a proposal for radio station K8U0-FM, which attracts an Older audience; and a proposal for the combined service of KFXM and KDUO, which would attract a wide variety of people. Mr. Douglas irenner from KC KC was presented to the Board. Mr. Trenner stated that 92.5% of the Inland Empire use their radio. He stated that he would recommend 30 second commercials instead of 60 seconds. In this manner you can try to reach as many unduplicated people as possible. He further stated that of the 92.5% that listen to the radio, KC KC reaches 44% of the adults between 25 and 49 years of age. Mr. H. George Carroll from KRNO was presented to the Board. Mr. Carroll stated that his station attracts a more mature audience. He further stated that although his station is not listed as one of the top five, they are very interested in civic affairs and the community. Mr. Wilson stated that he is very impressed with the presentations of all radio stations and thanked them all for their proposals and attendance. He stated that he is not prepared to make a decision at this time and he would like a little more time to study the proposals. Mr. Wilson moved that the decision regarding proposals for radio announcements be tabled until the next regular meeting to be held February 19, 1970. Mr. Wain seconded the motion Mr. Austin stated that he would be in favor of this motion, but would like to continue our present contracts with KMEN and KCAL until the next meeting. All Members agreed. KM EN and KCAL 1343 authorized the continuation of their contracts. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASE, SAMUELSEN AND BOLSON ET AL (R-10): Mr. Quinn stated that this item was tabled from our last meeting because there was some question regarding a finders fee. He advised the Members that Mr. Frank Dominguez has withdrawn his request for a finders fee for this sale. The follow- ing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2132 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT NORMAN R. SAMUELSEN AND ELIZABETH C. SAMUELSEN, HUSBAND/WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS, AN UNDIVIDED 1/4 INTEREST, JOHN H. BOLSON AND MARY E. BOLSON, HUSBAND/WIFE AS JOINT TENANTS, AN UNDIVIDED 7/4 INTEREST, ELIZABETH C. SAMUELSEN, A h1ARRIED WOMAN, AS HER SEPARATE PRO- PERTY, AN UNDIVIDED 1/4 INTEREST, SAMUELSEN, BOLSON, WHITEHEAD AND BENES, A PARTNERSHIP, AN UNDIVIDED 1/4 INTEREST, A REDEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-10, REUSE PARCEL N0. 22A AND 22B, AND 22C AND 20B, AND AUTHO- RIZING PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER'S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcel No. 22A, 226, 22C and 20B, was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.7, Chapter 4, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino declares its intention to sell Reuse Parcel No. 22A, 226, 22C, and 206, to Norman R. Samuelsen and Elizabeth C. Samuelsen, husband/wife as joint tenants, an undivided 7/4 interest, John H. Bolson and Mary E. Bolson, husband/wife as joint tenants, an undivided 1/4 interest, Elizabeth C. Samuelsen, a married woman, as her separate property, an undivided 1/4 interest, Samuelsen „ Bolson, Whitehead and Benes, a partnership, an undivided 1/4 interest, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the disposition of said parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held the 79th day of February, 7970. Adopted: 1-29-70 1344 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2132. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None C & J ENTERPRISES, EXTENSION OF CONSTRUCTION DATE: Mr. McCririe was presented to the Board. Mr. McCririe stated that he is unable to start construction on Reuse Parcel 88, R-10, because they have been unsuccess- ful in securing a tenant for this property to date. They are still trying to find a tenant for the development of an industrial supply complex, which they feel is the best use of this parcel. Escrow closed June 6, 1968. They have been granted three previous extensions by the Board. Mr. Wein stated that he would be willing to give C & J the 90 day extension if they would agree that at the end of this 90 days, if they still have not received any kind of a commitment, they will permit the exercise of the buy back provision in the Agreement of Sale, and sell the property back to the Agency. Mr. McCririe agreed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2133 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING. THE EXTENSION OF THE TIME TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION ON REUSE PARCEL 88, R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 653, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel 88, Calif. R-10 to C and J Enter- prises; and WHEREAS, the Agreement entered into on April 76, 1968, by and between the Redeve- lopment Agency and C and J Enterprises called for an escrow of 30 days duration and construction to commence within 12 months from the close of escrow; and WHEREAS, the escrow closed on June 6, 1968 thereby setting the date of construction to no later than June 6, 1969; and WHEREAS, C and J Enterprises has unsuccessfully attempted to secure tenants for their proposed development; and WHEREAS, the Agency members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that it is in the best interest of the Agency to grant said extension; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that a 90 day extension of the commencement of construction is hereby granted, and that construction shall begin on or before April 29, 1970. Adopted: 1-29-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2133. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1345 REVISION OF PERSONNEL POLICY: Mr. Quinn stated that there has been some question as to time off allowed for doctor or dentist appointments for employees or minor dependents of an employee's family. The City has been contacted and although they have no written policy, they do allow one hour for appointments, and all time beyond that is chargeable to the ~nployees sick leave. Mr. Quinn requested authorization to revise the present personnel policy to allow the one hour as does the City. Mr. Wein stated that he believed the policy needed more study. Mr. Varner stated that if written it would have to state "one hour per---" Mr. Quinn suggested that the policy not be revised, but a memo be written allowing the "one hour per---", at the Executive Director's discretion. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein instructing the Executive Director, Agency Counsel and Mr. Wein to study the matter and take appropriate action. The Board shall be advised of the action taken at the next meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: none JOHN LIBMAN, REQUEST TO LOCATE IN "MINI-MALL": Mr. John Libman was presented to the Board. Mr. Libman read a letter from himself to Bruce Varner, Agency Counsel. The purpose of the letter was to request authori- zation to relocate in the Mini-Mall. Mr. Libman stated that this would test his ability as a business to later locate in the Central City Mall. Mr. Libman was a former business in the Central City Project area. At his own will he dis- continued business rather than relocating. Mr. Varner advised that at the time of Mr. Libman's discontinuation of business, the Agency did not have a mini-mall concept. We have only recently received authority from HUD to create a mini- mall. Even if the Agency had thought of the idea of a mini-mall at the time of Mr. Libman's discontinuation, we would not have had the cleared land. Mr. Varner requested that he be given time to review the matter thoroughly and prepare a written opinion. Mr. Wein suggested that perhaps the Agency and Mr. Libman could undo what has been done. If Mr. Libman returned to the Agency the funds received from Loss of Property and Small Business Displacement, perhaps the Agency could treat him as a person who has not taken his option. Mr. Varner stated that he would have to review all matters involved. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster turning the matter over to the Legal Counsel for review and legal opinion to be reviewed at the next Regular Meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SEWER LATERALS FOR MINI-MALL: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2134 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN $401.89 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TWO (2) SEWER LATERALS TO MINI-MALL 1346 WHEREAS, the Agency Members recognize the need for the installation of two (2) sewer laterals at 4th and "F" Streets, for the tenants of the temporary reloca- tion quarters in the "Mini-Mall"; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino will install said sewer laterals fora cost not to exceed $401.89. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than $401.89 is hereby authorized for the installation of two (2) sewer laterals by the City of San Bernardino, for use by tenants of the "Mini-Mall". Adopted: 1-29-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2734. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None WATER METER SERVICE, MINI-MALL: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2135 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURES OF NOT MORE THAN $220.00 FOR WATER METER SERVICE TO THE MINI-MALL WHEREAS, the Agency Members recognize the need for water meter service for the tenants of the temporary relocation quarters in the "Mini-Mall"; and WHEREAS, the City Water Department will install one (1) 1;" water meter service for a cost not to exceed $220.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than $220.00 is hereby authorized for the installation of one (1) 1%' water meter service by the City of San Bernardino Water Department, for use by tenants of the "Mini-Mall". Adopted: 1-29-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2135. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PROPOSAL TO CONDUCT STRUCTURAL SURVEY, R-79: Mr. Quinn advised that the Woolworth property is adjacent to the building site 1347 of the proposed parking structure. A structural survey is needed in order for the Gruen Association to design the proper footings in this area. CNJ Materials Laboratory has proposed to conduct this survey for a fee of $1,-500. The follow- ing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2136 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH C H J MATERIALS LABORATORY TO CON- DUCT STRUCTURAL SURVEY, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency, has under date of March 21, 1967, entered: into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No. 1, Calif. R-79, with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and all Amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking cer- tain activities necessary for the planning and execution of its Central City Project Area No. 1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency will construct a three level parking deck on "E" Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, Gruen Associates, under the date of March 14, 1969 has entered into a Contract with the Locat Public Agency to design the parking facility; and WHEREAS, the Woolworth property is adjacent to the building site of said im- provement; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting of the Agency held the 29th day of January, 1970, the Members found and determined that C H J Materials Laboratory was best qua- lified to conduct a Structural Survey; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that C H J MATERIALS LABORATORY conduct a foundation and structural survey of the Woolworth improvements adjacent to the parking deck site at a cost not to exceed One Thousand, Five Hundred and no/100 ($1,500.). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a report shall be issued to the Local Public Agency on the results of the survey. The report shall contain sufficient data in order for Gruen Associates to design the proper footings in the area of concern. Adopted: January 29, 1970 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2136. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1348 EXTENSION OF CONSTRUCTION DATE, SAN DERNARDINO GLASS & MIRROR: Mr. Everett Cisco from San Bernardino Glass and Mirror has requested a 60 day extension on date to commence construction on Reuse Parcel 81, Calif. R-79. In view of his past cooperation with the Agency Board, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2137 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF THE TIME TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION ON REUSE PARCEL 81, R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 942, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel 81, Calif. R-70 to Everett and Mary Cisco; and WHEREAS, the Agreement entered into on February 6, 1969, by and between the Redevelopment Agency and Everett and Mary Cisco called for an escrow of 60 days duration and construction to commence within 60 days from the close of escrow; and WHEREAS, the escrow closed on April 8, 1969, thereby setting the date of con- struction to no later than June 8, 1969; and WHEREAS, Everett and Mary Cisco have unsuccessfully attempted to secure financing for their proposed development; and WHEREAS, the Agency members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that it is in the best interest of the Agency to grant said extension; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that a 60 day extension of the commencement of construction is hereby granted, and that construction shall begin on or before March 29, 1970. Adopted: 1-29-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2137. The motion was made by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None WELLS FARGO BANK, ACQUISITION OF R-10 and R-79 PROPERTIES: Mr. Quinn advised that now that the Welts Fargo Bank desire to purchase the pro- perty directly from the Agency, for their development, instead of leasing from the Winsteads, negotiations are necessary for the transaction. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson instructing the Agency Counsel and Seceetary to negotiate with Wells Fargo Bank for the acquisition of R-10 and R-79 properties. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1349 AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR FENCES, R-79: Mr. Austin advised that the Agency desires to install approximately 670 feet of 4' high chain link fence in certain sections of the Central City parking area, around the mini-mall. Three informal bids were received, the lowest being from Frank's Roof and Fence Company in the amount of $627.00. The following reso- lution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0.2138 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH FRANK'S ROOF AND FENCE COMPANY, FOR INSTALLATION OF APPROXIMATELY 670 FEET OF FENCING, CALIF. R-79, NOT TO EXCEED THE SUM OF $627.00 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No. 1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for the installation of approximately 670 feet of 4' high chain link fence in certain sections of the Central City Parking area; and WHEREAS, informal bids were received for said service, the lowest being received by Franks Roof and Fence Company in the amount of $627.00. NOW, THEREFORE, 8E IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the bid of Frank's Roof and Fence Company is hereby accepted, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into a Contract for said Services for an amount not to exceed $627.00. Adopted: 1-29-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2138. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wilson Absent: None USE OF EXTERIOR PLASTER, UNIT N0. 2 MALL: The Members were advised that the plans and specifications call for the use of interior plaster on the exterior of the eight electrical boxes and at the "E" Street Arcade. These walls will be protected from the weather upon the completion of the construction of the tenant buildings. The plastering is scheduled to take place within the next week. Because of the length of time between this plaster- ing and the construction of the tenant buildings, it is requested that exterior stucco be used in lieu of the interior plaster. After thorough discussion, the following resolution was introduced: 1350 RESOLUTION N0. 2739 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER N0. 5, WITH THE J. D. DIFFENBAUGH COMPANY SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 2, PUBLIC IM LL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with J. D. Diffenbaugh Company for Site Preparation Unit No. 2, California, R-79, dated June 27, 1969; and WHEREAS, in the course of construction, interior plaster was to be used on surface, which will temporarily be exposed to the elements; and WHEREAS, the use of interior cement plaster, stucco finish, will provide the necessary protection of the areas, namely the eight electrical closets, exterior of "E" Street Arcade walls and the Northwest Arcade stairs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the J. D. Diffenbaugh Construction Company be authorized to substitute the exterior cement plaster in lieu of interior plaster on the exterior of the Mall in the areas described as follows: Eight Electrical Closets, exterior of the "E" Street Arcade, the Northwest Arcade Stairs at a cost not to exceed Two Thousand, Sixteen Dollars and no/100 ($2,016.00). Adopted: January 29, 1970 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2139 authorizing the Change Order No. 5 to Diffenbaugh's contract not to exceed $2,016. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Frank Dominguez was presented to the Board. Mr. Dominguez stated that he believes that many real estate brokers do not understand the difference between the finders fee and a commission. He suggested that some understanding be made between the Agency and a broker before the sale, that authorizes the payment of a finders fee. Mr. Quinn stated that the Agency does provide a Notice to Realtors at the time an Offer to Purchase is submitted, which designates under what conditions a realtor is eligible for the finders fee. After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein referring the question raised by Mr. Dominguez to the Agency Counsel and Secretary for study and recommendation of a Clarification Policy of the Agency regarding Finders Fees. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1351 ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 5:50 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1352 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, ]970, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Webster Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: P1r. Quinn, Executive Director; h1r. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary h1INUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 29, 1970 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 29, 1970 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Naes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of January, 1970 were submitted far approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the approval of the Expenditures for the month of January, 1970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING, REUSE PARCELS 22a, b, c, and 20b, CALIF. R-10: Mr. Austin reported that this is the time and place so designated for the public Hearing of the sale of Reuse Parcels 22a,b,c, and 20b, Calif. R-10, to Samuelsen and Bolson, Etal. Mr. Varner reported that the documents are on hand for exa- mination. There being no comments, the Public Hearing was closed. REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: John Libman Request Mr. Varner stated that at the last Regular Meeting he was instructed to review the request of Mr. John Libman to relocate in the Mini-Mall. Mr. Varner stated that he has studied the applicable Federal Laws and discussed the matter with the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and he must report that under the Federal law and HUD, Mr. Libman is not eligible to locate in the Mini-Mall. The purpose of the Mini-Mall is for the. temporary relocation of business currently in the project area. Mr. Libman discontinued business prior to the Mini-Mall concept. Mr. Varner further stated that the Agency must abide by HUD ruling, and deny Mr. Libman's request. 1353 Mr. Varner requested that the letter from HUD regarding their decision be made a part of the minutes. Said letter is as follows: Mr. John D. Libman 22 January 1970 2797 Fremontia Drive San Bernardino, California 92404 Dear Nir. Libman: This is in response to your letter of January 12, 1970, in which you in- quired as to your eligibility for being able to move into the proposed Mini-Mall. We have investigated the situation and find that you are not eligible to move into the Mini-Mall. The Mini-Mall was approved in order to provide temporary relocation sites for businesses who are presently doing business in the project area and who will be displaced due to project activities and not for businesses which have previously relocated or who have chosen to discontinue doing business. The Mini-Mall will only be a temporary structure with no business being able to remain permanently. We have contacted the San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency and have been informed that the Agency will assist you in finding a permanent place of business if you should desire further assistance in this matter. Sincerely yours, Barbara A. Bell Acting Director Relocation Division cc: San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency Mr. Varner advised Mr. Libman that the Agency can simply administer the rules that they operate under, i.e. HUD and the Federal Law. He advised Mr. Libman that if he desires to find a permanent location, the relocation department will work with him to find a suitable place. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster denying the request of Mr. John Libman for relocation into the Mini-Mall, upon the recommendation of Legal Counsel. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Central City Company Agreement hlr. Varner requested authorization to give the Central City Company a 30-day exten- sion to deposit $624,200 into the Special Trust Account, as required in the escrow instructions. The following resolution was introduced: 1354 RESOLUTION N0. 2140 RESOLUTION OF TI1E REDEVELOPtdENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A 30-DAY EX- TENTION TO THE CENTRAL CITY COMPANY TO DEPOSIT THE SUP1 OF X624,200 INTO SPECIAL TRUST ACCOUNT N0. 1-0184 WHEREAS, on December 20, 1968, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino and John S. Griffith & Co. and Curci-Turner Co., a joint venture, doing business as Central City Company, entered into a Disposition Agreement providing for the sale of certain real property located in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, under said Agreement, the date for close of escrow was extended to January 15, 1970; and WHEREAS, on January 15, 1970, the Agency and Central City Company entered into an escrow agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said escrow agreement, the parties deposited into the Bank of California, Special Trust Account No. 1-0184, the sum of $824,200; and WhIEREAS, pursuant to a letter dated January 75, 1970, the Central City Company agreed to deposit the additional sum of $624,200 into said Special Trust Account on or before February 1, 1970 (a copy of said letter is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and by this reference made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, after a full discussion and for good and sufficient cause, the Redevelop- ment Agency determined it to be in the best interests of the Agency, the City of San Bernardino and public to extend the time to deposit said sum fora period of 30 days from the date of this resolution. tJOIJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Redevelopment Agency hereby grants to Central City Company an extension of 30 days from the date of this resolution to deposit the sum of X624,200 into the Bank of California, Special Trust Account No. 1-0184 pursuant to said letter dated January 15, 1970. Adopted this 19th day of February, 1970. Plotion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2140. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None January 15, 1970 Bank of California Third and "D" Streets San Bernardino, California Re: Account ~ 1-0184 135 Gentlemen: On or before February 1, 1970, John S. Griffith & Co. promises to deliver into the captioned account the sum of $624,200 in cash or its equivalent, to be held by you in accordance with the terms of a certain letter of instructions, of even date, herewith directed to you by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, and the Central City Company. CENTRAL CITY COf1PANY JOHN S. GRIFFITH & CO. By S/ William C. Brown CURCI-TURNER COMPANY By s/John Curci REQUEST FOR FINDERS FEE, BOOTH BROTHERS: h1r. Varner stated that at the last Regular Fleeting he stated that he would have a report to give the Board regarding the request for a finders Fee, for the disposition of the commercial portion of the Central City Project to Central City Company. He stated that the Notice to Realtors and Redevelopers has been properly executed but that said Notice is merely a form which sets forth the conditions in which a Finders Fee is paid. He further stated that Paragraph (a) of this hlotice pro- hibits the payment of a Finders Fee if any member of the Staff or Board has had any dealing with the prospect, prior to the realtors contact. The Agency has had negotiations with Penney Company, Flontgomery Wards, and the Harris Company long before the disposition agreement with John Griffith/Curci-Turner Company. Paragraph (a) itself would preclude any payment of a finders fee for these parcels. He further stated that there is a conflict of evidence involved in the remaining parcels. At the time of this transaction, a principi~ of the Agency took all credit for finding the developer. The Notice of Public Hearing was published in the paper, and no one came forth at the Public Hearing to disclose any responsibi- lity for the transaction. t9r. Varner stated that if the Agency desires to review the evidence further, the matter could be discussed in detail at a regular meeting of the Agency, wherein the principals involved could present their evidence. Mr. Don Nickols, attorney for Jack Booth, was presented to the Board. Mr. Nickols presented a Doctors Certificate stating that Mr. Booth was confined in the hospital. hir. Nickols requested deferral of the matter until h1r. Booth could address the Board. ~ ., ~' Ja All h1embers agreed that the matter had been held over long enough, and should be acted upon. 1~1r. Wilson stated that he does not feel that there is sufficient evidence to authorize the payment of a finders fee. ~1r. Wein stated that be- cause the Board was led to believe that no realtor was involved, he believes that denial of the request is necessary. hiotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein denying the request of t1r. Jack Booth for a finders fee for the disposition of the commercial portion of the Central City Project to Central City Company. Upon a roll call vote, the following answered Aye: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: tJOne The Members advised hir. Nickols that if flr. Booth wants to address the Board when he is able, without witnesses, they would welcome his presentation, but that they did not want to be placed in the position of making a court decision. If Mr. Booth wants to formally contest the Board's denial, a decision will have to be reached through court. DISPOSITION AGREE61EfJTS, ARROWHEAD CORPOP.ATIOIJ: h1r. Austin read a letter from Ted R. fJicolay regarding the disposition agree- ments bet~deen the Agency and Arrowhead Corporation and Ted P.. Nicolay 1356 tor. Nicolay's letter stated that since the price concurrence received from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, for Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, R-10, exceeds the unit price as set forth in their agreement, considerably they will wish to withdraw their Offer to Purchase and Disposition Agreement. Mr. Quinn stated that he spoke to Mr. Holcomb today, and was advised that the intent of the letter was to cancel all three agreements. Mr. Varner advised that theAgency is obligated to refund the deposit of Arrowhead Corporation for these Agreements. He further stated that he believes that a Waiver of any and all liabilities which may arise from the transactions should be signed by Arrowhead Corporation and Ted Nicolay prior to refunding the deposit. All Members agreed. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2147 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH ARROWHEAD CORPORATION & TED R. NICOLAY & ASSO., A JOINT VENTURE, FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 4 and 9, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2008 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, authorized the execution of Disposition Agreement and related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 4 and 9, Calif. R-79, to Arrow- head Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Asso., a joint venture; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was executed and Escrow opened on the 21st day of August, 1969; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was made and entered into a conjunction with a Disposition Agreement of even date herewith, providing for the sale of Meadowbrook R-10 Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, and the provisions of said R-10 Agreement were made a part df said R-79 Agreement; and WHEREAS, the price concurrence from the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment for Meadowbrook R-10 Agreement exceeds the unit price as set forth in said R-10 Agreement; and WHEREAS, due to the above, Redeveloper has requested withdrawal of its Offer to Purchase and cancellation of Disposition Agreement; and WHEREAS, Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances, and have determined that said cancellation and refund of option deposit is warranted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Disposition Agreement and related documents, for the sale of Reuse Parcels 4 and 9, Calif. R-79, by and between the Agency and Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Asso., a joint venture is hereby cancelled. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Option Deposit for said sale, is hereby authorized to be refunded, subject to a receipt of an executed Waiver of any and all liabilities which may arise from said transaction on the subject property. Adopted: 2-19-70 1357 RESOLUTION N0. 2142 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH ARROWHEAD CORPORATION AND TED R. NICOLAY & ASSO., A JOINT VENTURE, FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 45 and 50, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2009 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, authorized the execution of Disposition Agreement and related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, Calif. R-79, to Arrow- head Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Asso., a joint venture; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was executed and Escrow opened on the 21st day of August, 1969; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was made and entered into in conjunction with a Disposition Agreement of even date herewith, providing for the sale of Meadowbrook R-10 Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, and the provisions of said R-10 Agreement were made a part of said R-79 Agreement; and WHEREAS, the price concurrence from the Department of Housdng and Urban Development for Meadowbrook R-70 Agreement exceeds the unit price as set forth in said R-10 Agreement; and WHEREAS, due to the above, Redeveloper has requested withdrawal of its Offer to Purchase and cancellation of Disposition Agreement; and WHEREAS, Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances, and have determined that said cancellation and refund of option deposit is warranted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Disposition Agreement and related documents, for the sale of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, Calif. R-79, by and between the Agency and Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Asso., a joint venture, is hereby cancelled. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Option Deposit for said sale, is hereby authorized to be r"efunded, subject to a receipt of an executed Waiver of any and all liabili- ties which may arise from said transaction on the subject property. Adopted: 2-19-70 RESOLUTION N0. 2743 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH ARROWHEAD CORPORATION AND TED R. NICOLAY & ASSO., A JOINT VENTURE, FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 44, 45, 46 and 47, CALIF. R-70 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2010 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, authorized the execution of Disposition Agreement and 1358 related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, Calif. R-10, to Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Asso., a joint venture;and WHEREAS, said Agreement was executed and Escrow opened on the 21st day of August, 1969; and WHEREAS, price concurrence from the Department of Housing and Urban Development exceeds the unit price set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances and have determined that said cancellation and refund of option deposit is warranted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Disposition Agreement and related documents, for the sale of reuse Parcels 44, 45, 46 and 47, Calif. R-10, by and between the Agency and Arrowhead Corporation and Ted R. Nicolay & Asso., a joint venture is hereby cancelled. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Option Deposit for said sale, is hereby authorized to be refunded, subject to a receipt of an executed Waiver of any and all liabilities which may arise from said transaction on the subject property. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolutions No. 2141, 2142 and 2143. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASE: Mr. Jon Vincent was presented to the Board. Mr. Vincent stated that he is a realtor in San Bernardino. His client C. W. Driver and Ted D. Eichelberger, a partnership, desire to purchase Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, R-79, for the develop- ment of a twelve story office structure. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2144 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETER~4INING THAT C. W. DRIVER, INC AND TED D. EICHELBERGER, A PARTNERSHIP, A REDEVELOPER, IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, PORTIONS OF REUSE PARCELS 45 & 50, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPER`S STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 to qualified redevelopers; and 1359 WHEREAS, the Agency has offered certain parcels of land for sale under the fixed price competition method setting forth criteria by which proposals to redevelop the offered parcels would be evaluated; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San 6ernardino has determined that the proposal of C. W. Driver, Inc. and Ted D. Eichelberger, a partnership, is in the best interest of the Central City Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon close of escrow for said sale to C. W. Driver, Inc. and Ted D. Eichelberger, a finders fee in the amount of Five Percent (5%) of the total purchase price will be paid to Jon Vincent, a licensed real estate broker, pursuant to the "Notice to Realtors and Redevelopers" dated February 19, 1970. Adopted: 2-79-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2144. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RADIO ANNOUNCEMENT CONTRACT: tAr. Austin stated that all the radio stations in the City reach a different type of audience, and because we are attempting to reach all citizens in the City, it would not be a good idea to rotate our spot announcements among all stations on a 13 week rotational schedule. All Members agreed. Mr. Austin requested authorization to table the decision regarding new contracts for announcements, and continue with our present contracts until such time as a decision for overall coverage is made. All Members agreed. REVIEW OF PRELIMINARY PLANS, CIVIC CULTURAL CENTER PARKING STRUCTURE: Mr. Dan Branigan, President of Gruen Associates was presented to the Board. P1r. Branigan explained the Preliminary Plans of the Civic Cultural Center Parking Structure to the Members. Mr. Branigan stated that they did not provide for an elevator in the parking structure, because all levels of the structure lead to a designated section of the plaza which had an elevator. All members felt that an elevator designated for handicapped and elderly persons should be provided in the structure. Mr. Branigan stated that the plans will be changed to include the elevator. The flow of traffic was discussed and the use of the particular levels of the structure explained. Mr. Branigan explained that the top level is uncovered, and they have included the planting of trees for some shade and beautification. 1360 The D1embers felt that this level should also be covered. Mr. Branigan was instructed to furnish plans and cost to roof the 5th level, in order that the Board may review and determine if this level should be covered. After further review and discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2145 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLANS AND AUTHORIZING THE WORKING DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CIVIC CULTURAL PARKING STRUCTURE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a Contract with Gruen Associates-Armstrong-Ulmer, a joint venture for the engineering and design of the Civic-Cultural Center Parking Structure; and WHEREAS, the joint venture has prepared preliminary plans, which is Phase A under the aforementioned Contract; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency Board has reviewed said preliminary plans. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the preliminary plans No. 4888 dated February 4, 1970 are approved with the following exceptions: a. A 2,000 lb. or thereabouts capacity elevator to service all levels from the north side of the building designated for special uses shall be included in the final plans and specifications. b. Preliminary plans and cost to roof the 5th level should be submitted to the Agency Board for review. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the joint venture is hereby authorized to proceed with the working drawings and specifications incorporating the above referred modifications. Adopted: February 19, 1970 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2145. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None BLACKS FOR MEN, CLAIM FOR SELF-MOVE EXPENSE: Mr. Bernstein, owner of Black's for Men, was presented to the Hoard. Dlr. Bernstein explained that he relocated in early 1968. The Agency paid for moving some of his merchandise from storage. He used his own personnel to move the remainder of his stock some time after his initial move. Mr. Bernstein stated that he did not realize that the Agency would pay for this additional move, and that is why he waited this long to submit a claim. HUD regulations dictate that a claim must be submitted within six months after the move. 1361 Mr. Quinn explained that reimbursement for self moves are based upon bids received from commercial moving companies. After much consideration, the Plembers determined that Mr. Bernstein's request should be submitted to HUD for their determination. Mr. Bernstein stated that whatever the Agency could do for him would be appreciated. EXECUTION OF DISPOSITION DOCUMENTS, SAMUELSEN AND BOLSON ET.AL: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2146 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 22a,b,c, and 20 b, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, TO SAMUELSEN & BOLSON ET.AL. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcels 22a,b,c, and 20b, Calif. R-10, by Resolution No. 2132, to Samuelsen and Bolson; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 4;and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held February 19, 1970, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 4; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 22a,b,c, and 20b, Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10, to Samuelsen and Bolson, et. al. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2146. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 31, R-79: Mr. Quinn explained that bids were opened February 2, 1970 for demolition and site clearance of Unit No. 37, Calif. R-79. After review, it was determined that Roger Roy's bid was low. The following resolution was introduced: 1362 RESOLUTION NO. 2147 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPP1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGINEERING, UNIT NO. 31, DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 31, for the demolition and clearance of certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on January 15th and 22nd, 1970, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 2nd day of February, 1970, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above speci- fied and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Roger Roy General Engineering is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Roger Roy General Engineering for the sum of $23,000 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 31, Calif. R-79, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution PJo. 2147, awarding the contract for Unit No. 31 to Roger Roy General Engineering, fora bid price of $23,000. The motion was carried by the follow- ing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1363 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF OCCUPANCY, MC MAHANS FURNITURE STORE: A request was submitted from McMahans Furniture Stare to remain in their present location until March 15, 1970, in order that an interim relocation'move can be eliminated. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2148 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH MC MAHANS FURNITURE STORE UNTIL MARCH 75, 1970 WHEREAS, McMahan's Furniture Store has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2116 the Agency Members authorized the occupancy of the premises until March 1, 1970; and WHEREAS, McMahans Furniture Store has requested an extension of said rental agree- ment until March 15, 1970, in order that an interim relocation move can be eliminated; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino have reviewed the circumstances involved and believe that such an extension is warranted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and McMahans Furniture Store is hereby extended until March 15, 1970. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2148. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF OCCUPANCY, DR. ROWAN: Dr. Rowan requested an extension of occupancy at his location in the Security Paci- fic National Bank building. The Members agreed that Dr. Rowan could occupy the premises until such time as Security Pacific National Bank vacates the building. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2149 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF 7HE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREE- f4ENT WITH DR. SANDFORD J. ROWAN 1364 WHEREAS, Dr. Rowan has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS. Dr: Rowan is a tenant in the Security Pacific National Bank Building, located at 499 Third Street; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency will be acquiring and demolishing said Security Pacific National Bank building, in order to carry out the execution of the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, Dr. Rowan has requested an extension of his rental agreement with the Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that Dr. Rowan could occupy the premises until such time as Security Pacific National Bank vacates the building. PIOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rentat Agreement by and between the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino and Dr. Sandford J. Rowan is hereby extended until such time as Security Pacific National Bank vacates the premises. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2149. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PLACEMENT OF AD IN LAND MARKETING CATALOG: Mr. Quinn explained that HUD has allowed for the placement of an ad in the Land Marketing catalog. The Agency is presently under contract with Norman Rogers Advertising. They have proposed a fee of $625 for total preparation of this ad. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2150 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN $625.00 AGAINST CONTRACT WITH NORMAN ROGERS ADVER- TISING, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, has entered into a Contract with Norman Rogers Advertising, for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members desire to place an ad in the Land Marketing Catalog in accordance with HUD Circular dated 1/15/70; and WHEREAS, Norman Rogers Advertising has proposed a fee of $625 for total pre- paration of said ad. 1365 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California „that the expenditure of $625.00 is hereby authorized to be charged against contract with Norman Rogers Advertising, Calif. R-79 Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2150. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DEPIOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 32, R-79: Bids for Unit No. 32, Calif. R-79 were opened February 4, 1970. The low bid was submitted by Dakeno in the amount of $13,648. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2151 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC., FOR DEMO- LITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 32, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 32, for the demolition and clearance of certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on January 17 and 24, 1970, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m, on the 4th day of February, 1970, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Dakeno, Inc, is the best qua- lified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the 1366 Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Da keno, Inc., for the sum of $13,648 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 32, Calif. R-79, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2151. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 33, R-79: Bids for Unit No. 33 were opened February 17, 1970. The low bid was submitted by Presco in the amount of $14,440. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2152 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS FOR DEP10- LITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 33, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 33, for the demolition and clearance of certain ayes, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Tele- gram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on January 30th and February 6, 1970, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 17th day of February, 1970, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above speci- fied and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Presco Building Materials is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. 1367._._...._ _ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the Approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Presco Building Materials for the sum of $14,440 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Sec- retary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 33, Calif. R-79, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2752. The motion wes carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None GAS CONNECTION TO HARRIS & FRANK AND FINISH GRADING & PAVING (MINI-MALL) The Members were advised that there is a need for operation of boiler for steam presses in the Harris and Frank portion of the Mini-Mall. The Southern Calif. Gas Company has agreed to provide a gas line for an amount not to exceed $366.82. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2153 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN $366.82 FOR OPERATION OF BOILER FOR STEAM PRESSES, HARRIS AND FRANK, MINI-MALL WHEREAS, the Agency Members recognize the need for operation of boiler for steam presses in the Harris and Frank portion of the Mini-Mall; and WHEREAS, the Southern California Gas Company has agreed to provide this service for an amount not to exceed $366.82 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the expenditure of not more than $366.82 is hereby authorized for the installation of gas lines for the operation of boiler for steam presses, service provided for by Southern California Gas Com- pany to the Mini-Mall. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2153. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Austin advised that a suitable walkway in front of the Mini-Mall must be provided. The Street Department of the City of San Bernardino hassagreed to perform the necessary work on a time and material basis at a cost not to exceed $1,800. The following resolution was introduced: 1363 RESOLUTION N0. 2754 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT h10RE THAN $1,800 FOR FINISH GRADING AND PAVING IN FRONT OF h1INI-MALL WHEREAS, due to the scheduled widening of Fourth Street not taking place until August and the scheduled opening of said Mini-Mall in March, it will be necessary to provide a suitable walkway in front of the Mini-Mall. It will be necessary that a layer of one one-half inch asphalt paving be installed from existing curb line to the edge of the building, beginning at the west side of °F" Street to the west end of the building. It is also necessary that a tem- porary asphalt driveway be installed just west of the building site. This will provide an entrance in this area for the east bound traffic;: and WHEREAS, the west and south side of the Mini-Mall will require an asphalt berm and asphalt paving on the two to one slope due to the level construction of the building. This will serve two purposes; protect the building from water runoff and as a bumperstop for cars that will be parked in this area; and WHEREAS, the Street Department of the City of San Bernardino has agreed to perform the necessary work on a Time and Material Basis at a cost not to exceed One Thousand, Eight Hundred and no/100. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of $1,800.00 be authorized for finish grading and paving in front of the Mini-Mall provided by the San Ber- nardino Street Department at a cost not to exceed $7,800.00. Adopted: February 19, 1970 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2154. The motion was carried by the fallowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None h1r. Gery Miller and Mr. Jim Cartee, from Panel Systems, were presented to the Board. Mr. Austin asked if the Mini-Mall will be completed on schedule. Mr. Miller stated that it will be ready on time, unless we have some exceptionally bad weather. h1r. Austin Stated that a Change Order to this contract in the amount of $40,000 will be brought before the Agency at our next meeting. This change is for additional square footage and partitioning required by the bank. The increase in bank rent will absorb much of this change order. AMENDMENTS TO GRANT-IN-AID AND COOPERATION AGREEMENTS BETWEEN AGENCY AND CITY: The following resolutions were introduced: 1369 RESOLUTION N0. 2155 RESOLUTION AMENDING LOCAL GRANT-IN-AID AND COOPERATION AGREE- MENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND THE REDE- VELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, fiEADOWBR00K PROJECT CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, on the 4th day of August, 1958, a Local Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement was executed by and between the City of San Bernardino, a chartered City of the State of California (herein called the "Local Government") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, a public Body corporate and politic, duly created and functioning under the laws of the State of California (herein called the "Local Public Agency"); and WHEREAS, said Agreement was amended by the adding of Section 10 thereto; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was further amended on the 30th day of April, 1963, and on the 15th day of October, 1969; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to further amend said Agreement in certain respects to cause said agreement to be in conformance with the Loan and Capital Grant Contract, as amended, by and between the United States of America and the Local Public Agency; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, by Reso- lution No. 10717, dated the 2nd day of February, 1970, have offered to amend said Cooperation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said f4eadowbrook Project R-10 Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement, dated the 4th day of August, 7958, as amended, is hereby amended, as set forth in the Amendment attached hereto and made a part hereof. 8E IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman is hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the Agency any further instrument of document necessary or convenient to evidence said amendment. Adopted: 2-19-70 AMENDMENT TO LOCAL GRANT-IN-AID AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is entered into this 20th day of February, 1970, by and between the City of San Bernardono, a chartered city of the State of California (hereinafter called the "Local Government"), and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, a public body, corporate and politic, duly created and functioning under the laws of the State of California (hereinafter called the "Local Public Agency"). WITNESSETH: that WHEREAS, on the 4th day of August, 7958, a Local Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement was executed between the Local Government and the Local Public Agency; and 1370 WHEREAS, said Agreement was amended on October 20, 1958, by adding Section 10 thereto; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was further amended on April 30, 1963, by Amending the Fifth Whereas paragraph beginning on Page 2, Line 19; by amending Section 1, beginning on Page 3, Line 21; and by amending Section 3, beginning on Page 4, Line 26; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to further amend said Agreement to cause said agreement to conform with the Loan and Capital Grant Contract, as amended by and between the United States of America and the Local Public Agency; NOW, THEREFORE, said Local Grant-In-Aid and Cooperation Agreement dated the 4th day of August, 1958, as amended, is hereby amended as follows: 1. The Fourth Whereas paragraph beginning on Page 2, Line 8, is hereby amended to read: "WHEREAS, in order for the Local Public Agency to effectuate the Redevelopment Plan and to undertake and carry our the Project, the assistance of both the United States of America (herein called the "Federal Government"), and the Local Government is required; namely, of the Federal Government by lending funds needed to defray a sub- stantial portion of the gross project cost of the Project and by contributing not more than three-quarters (3/4) of the net project cost of the project; and of the Local Government by making certain local grants-in-aid (required by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended prior to August, 1954) as hereinafter provided, in a total amount equal to the balance of the net cost of the Project; and" 2. The Fifth Whereas paragraph beginning on Page 2, Line 79, is hereby amended as follows: "WHEREAS, upon the basis of reasonable estimates of costs prepared by the Local Public Agency, it appears that the presently estimated net project cost of the Project to be incurred by the Local Public Agency in carrying out the Project constituting the difference between the gross cost of the Project and the proceeds derived from the disposition of the land, amounts to approximately Four Million, Five Hundred Ninety-Nine Thousand, Eight Hundred and Fifty-Two Dollars ($4,599,852), of which amount, the Federal Government is expected to provide not more than three-quarters (3/4) thereof, presently estimated to be One Million, Nine Hundred Twenty-Six Thousand, Seven Hundred Twenty-five Dollars ($1,926,725) in the form of a capital grant, leaving a balance of Two Million, Six Hundred Seventy-Three Thousand, One Hundred Twenty-Seven Dollars ($2,673,127) to be provided in the form of local grant in aid". 3. SECTION 2, beginning on Page 4, Line 14, is hereby amended to read: "SECTION 2. The Local Public Agency agrees to offer for sale Tax Allocation Bonds as provided under Chapter 6, Article 5, Section 33640 et seq. of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California 1371 in an amount sufficient to provide the Local Government's one- quarter (1/4) share of the net cost of the Project, plus additional funds to assure the completion of all site improvements which may be declared as ineligible project costs by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, together with interest, thereon for a period of approximately six (6) years or until such time as increased tax revenue produced by the Project Area will equal interest payments." 4. Except as otherwise expressly amended by this Amendment, all other provisions of said Local Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement, as amended, remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Local Government has caused this Amended Agreement to be duly executed in its behalf and its seal to be hereunto affixed and attested; and the Local Public Agency has caused the same to be duly executed in its behalf and its seal to be hereunto affixed and attested this 20th day of February, 1970 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO Al C. Ballard (SEAL) Lucile Goforth, By s/ Rosalie Corona City Clerk Deputy City Clerk REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA s/ A.M. Austin Chairman ATTEST: s/ P. W. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director, Secretary Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2155. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION N0. 2156 RESOLUTION AMENDING LOCAL GRANT-IN-AID AND COOPERATION AGREE- MENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, AND THE REDE- VELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 1372 WHEREAS, on the 1st day of November, 7966, a Local Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement was executed by and between the City of San Bernardino, a chartered City of the State of California (herein called the "Local Government") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, a public body corporate and politic, duly created and functioning under the laws of the State of California (herein called the "Local Public Agency"); and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to amend said Agreement in certain respects to cause said Agreement to be in conformance with the Loan and Grant Contract, as amended, by and between the United States of America and the Local Public Agency; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolu- tion No. 10116, dated the 2nd day of February, 1970, have offered to amend said Cooperation Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Central City Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement, dated the 1st day of November, 1966, is hereby amended, as set forth in the Amendment attached hereto and made a part hereof. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman is hereby authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the Agency any further instrument of document necessary or convenient to evidence said amendment. Adopted: 2-19-70 AMENDMENT TO LOCAL GRANT-IN-AID AND COOPERATION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT, is entered into this 20th day of February, 1970, by and between the City of San Bernardino, a chartered City of the State of California (hereinafter called the "Local Government"), and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, a public body corporate and politic, duly created and functioning under the laws of the State of California (hereinafter called "The Local Public Agency"). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, on the 1st day of November, 1966, a Local Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement was executed by and between the Local Government and the Local Public Agency; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to amend said Agreement to cause said Agreement to conform with the Loan and Capital Grant Contract, as amended, by and between the United States of America and the Local Public Agency; NOW, THEREFORE, said Local Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement dated the 1st day of November, 1966, is hereby amended as follows: 1. The Fourth Whereas paragraph beginning on Page 2, line 78, is hereby amended to read: 1373 "WHEREAS, in order for the Local Public Agency to effectuate the Urban Renewal Plan and to undertake and carry out the Project, the assistance of both the United States of America (hereinafter called the "Federal Government") and the Local Government is required; namely, of the Federal Government by lending funds needed to defray a substantial portion of the gross project cost of the Project and by contributing not more than three-fourths (3/4) of the aggregate net project cost of this Project and any other project heretofore under a Title I contract for grant; and of the Local Government by making certain local grants-in- aid (required by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended) as hereinafter provided, in a total amount equal to the balance of the net cost of the Project;and" 2. The Fifth Whereas paragraph beginning on Page 3, line 4, is hereby amended to read: "WHEREAS, upon the basis of reasonable estimates of cost prepared by the Local Public Agency, it appears that the presently estimated net project cost of the Project to be incurred by the Local Public Agency in carrying out the Project, constituting the difference between the gross cost of the Project and the proceeds derived from the disposition of the land amounts to approximately Thirty Two Million, Eight Hundred and Eighteen Thousand, Four Hundred and Fifty Three Dollars ($32,818,453.00), of which amount the Federal Government is expected to provide an amount estimated to be Twenty Million Four Hundred and Ninety One Thousand, Eight Hundred and Seventeen Dollars ($20,491,817.00) in the form of a capital grant, leaving a balance of Twelve h1illion, Three Hundred and Twenty Six Thousand, Six Hundred and Thirty Six Dollars ($12,326,636.00) to be provided in the form of a local grants-in-aid; and" 3. Section 1. (a), Table of Cash Local Grants-in-Aid, beginning on Page 4, and continuing on Page 5, is hereby amended to read: "TABLE OF CASH LOCAL GRANTS-IN-AID (Continued) Item ount 4. local Grants out of the proceeds from the sale of Local Public Agency tax allocation bonds. 5. Other $72,105,449 $ - 0 - 6. TOTAL LOCAL GRANTS-IN-AID $12,326,636 1374 4. Section 1. (a) (iv), beginning on Page 6, line 7, is hereby amended to read: "(iv) That with respect to all or any part of the amount set forth opposite Item 3 (cash payments to be paid by entities other than the Local Government, the Local Government will take all steps and actions which it may lawfully so do to see that such amount is timely paid by such other entities, and in the event that such amount or any part thereof is not so paid by such other entities on or before dates specified under Item 3 of the above table, the Local Government will itself promptly pay to the Local Public Agency from whatever source or sources it may lawfully so do, an amount, which together with the amounts, if any,. paid by the other entities, is not less than the amount set forth opposite Item 3 (cash payments);" 5. Section 1. (a) (v), beginning on Page 6, line 78, is hereby amended to read: "(v) That with respect to the amount set forth opposite Item 4 (local grant out of proceeds from the sale of tax allocation bonds) the Local Government wilt take all steps and actions to facilitate the sale of the Local Public Agency's tax allocation bonds, or in the event that such amount or any part thereof is not realizable or available on or before said date to the Local Public Agency from its sale of tax allocation bands, the Local Government will promptly pay to the Local Public Agency, from whatever source it may lawfully so do, an amount, which together with the amount, if any, which may be realized from any such sale that may have been held, is not less than the amount set forth opposite Item 4 (local grant out of the proceeds from the sale of tax allocation bonds)"; and 6. Section 1. (a) (vi), beginning on Page 7, line 5, is hereby amended to read: "That the Local Public Agency will, within twenty-four hours after receipt thereof, deposit all cash grants-in-aid received by it, from whatever source, in the Project Expenditures Account maintained by it for the Project in accordance with its Title I Contract and the Local Public Agency will expend such monies so deposited only in accordance with said contract. The parties hereto further specifically agree that upon com- pletion of the Project if whatever amount, including no amount, is set forth opposite Item 6 (total local grants-in-aid) of the above table, together with the total creditable cost or value of Non-Cash Local Grants-in-Aid actually provided for the Project, is less than that re- quired for the Project under the Local Public Agency's Title I Contract, said amount will be appropriately adjusted upward or increased pursuant to the provisions of Subsection (c) of this Section 1 (the amount of said upward adjustment or increase being hereinafter called "Dificiency Cash Local Grant-in-Aid"), and the Local Government, from whatever funds it may lawfully so do, will pay such Deficiency Cash Local Grant-in-Aid in cash to the Local Public Agency upon demand therefore. The Local Public Agency will promptly deposit such Dificiency Cash Local Grant- in-Aid in the appropriate fund required by the Local Public Agency's Title I Contract and the Public Agency will use such Deficiency Cash Local Grant-in-Aid for the purpose of paying the obligations and other indebtedness of the Project and for such other purposes as may be proper 1375 under the Local Public Agency's Title I Contract." 7. Section 1, (c), beginning on Page 11, line 5, is hereby amended to read: "(c) It is understood and agreed that cash and non-cash local grants- in-aid in an amount not less than one fourth (1/4) of the aggregate actual net cost of .this and all other projects of the Local Public Agency heretofore under a Title I grant contract are required to be provided, and that the amounts hereinabove set forth are based on estimates, and that if the actual aggregate net cost of such projects (as determined by the local Public Agency in accordance with its Title I Contract with the Federal Government) is greater or less than the estimated aggregate net cost of such projects, the amount of cash payments herein provided to be made to the Local Public Agency as set forth in this Section 1 above, shall be appropriately adjusted." 8. Section 10, Schedule 4. Supporting Facilities, beginning on Page 20, is amended to read: "Schedule 4. SUPPORTING FACILITIES Providing Gtant in i Identification Entity and Estimated Credit Source of Funds Total Cost % Est Amt. Improvements - Mall LPA Parking Area Tax Allocation Bonds 1,229,878 100 1,229,878 Structure - Mall LPA Parking Tax Allocation Bonds 1,938,640 100 1,938,640 Structure - Cultural LPA Center Parking Tax Allocation Bonds 3,928,000 100 3,928,000 Buildings - Cultural City Center & Exhibit Hall Joint Powers Bonds 3,000,000 25 750,000 Building - City Hall City -Joint Powers 3,500,000 25 875,000 Bonds Extension of Sanitary LPA Sewer Interceptor Tax Allocation Bond 26,495 100 26,495 Totals ! 13,623,013 8,748,013 ~~ 9. Section 71, Schedule 1. "Purchase by the Local Public Agency of Land from the Local Government", beginning on Page 21, is amended to read: 1376 "SEC. 11. Purchase, Sale or Retention of Land Schedules: Sc edule Purc ase by t e Loca Pub is Agency of Land from t e Local Government' Presently Identification of Land Estimated Fair Value Parcels 20, 27, 22 Block 2 $525,000.00 Exhibit "D" 10. Section 77, Schedule 2, "Sale by the Local Public Agency to the Local Government of Land for Reuse in Accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan", be- ginning on Page 21, is amended to read: Sche u e 2. Sa a by t o Loca u is gency to t o Loca overnment o Land for Reuse in Accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan Estimated Source of Beginning and Identification Fair Reuse Purchased Price Improvements Completion Value Funds to be built Dates Land - Parcel G $196,045 Joint Power Cultural May 1970 Revenue Bonds Center Apr 72 Exhibit "C" 11. Section 11, Schedule 3, "Retention by the Local Public Agency of Land for Reuse in Accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan", beginning on Page 21, is amended to read: chedule 3. Retention by the Local Public Agency of land for Reuse in Accordance with the Urban Renewal Plan stimate Source o eginning and Identification Imputed Purchase Price Improvements Completion of land Ca ital Value Funds to be built dates Five Level Cultural Center $ 765,443 Tax Allocation Public Park- Oct 1970 I Pkg - Exhibit "B" Bonds ing Structure Apr 1972 Mall Parking Tax Allocation Public Parking Sep 75'68 Exhibit "A" 3,763,537 Bonds Area & Three May 1971 Level Parking Structure 1377 12. Section 12, paragraph 5, beginning on Page 22, line 19, is amended to read: "5. The Local Government will assume operation and maintenance of the Mall as a Public Right-of-Way, pursuant to that certain Lease Agreement executed by and between the Local Government and the Local Public Agency dated June 10, 1968." 13. Section 12, paragraph 6, beginning on Page 22, line 22, is amended to read: "6. The Local Government will assume operation and maintenance of all public parking facilities within the project area and all public areas to be maintained by the Local Government, pursuant to that certain Lease Agreement executed June 10, 7968, and pursuant to certain Lease Agreement to be executed on or before June 1, 1970. 14. Except as otherwise expressly amended by this Amendment, all other provi- sions of said Local Grant-in-Aid and Cooperation Agreement dated the 1st day of November 1966, remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Local Government has caused this Amended Agreement to be duly executed in its behalf and its seal to be hereunto affixed and attested and the Local Public Agency has caused the same to be duly executed in its behalf and its seal to be hereunto affixed and attested this 20th day of February,1970. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA By s/ Al C. Ballard Ma or Title (SEAL) ATTEST: Lucille Goforth, City Clerk by Rosalie Corona, Deputy Title REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA By s/ A. M. Austin C airman (SEAL ATTEST: s/ P. W. Quinn, Jr. Secretary 1378 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2156. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None LEASE AGREEMENT, CITIZENS NATIONAL COMPANY, MINI-MALL: P1r.Varner stated that he has reviewed the proposed lease agreement between the Agency and Security National Bank for space in the Mini-Mall, and found it in order. This will be similar to the same agreements that will be executed with Harris and Frank and Luke and Vondey. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2157 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPI+IENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH CITIZENS NATIONAL COMPANY, CALIF. R-79 MINI-MALL WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, is desirous of acquiring a certain parcel of land known as 499 Third Street in the City of San Bernardino, which is presently used for the operation of a branch of Security Pacific National Bank; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has constructed a "Mini-Mall" in the Central City Project, for the temporary relocation of qualified business in the Central City Project area; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency desires to relocate Security Pacific National Bank in said temporary relocation quarters of the Central City "Mini-Mall", on the south side of Fourth Street, between "F" and "G" Streets; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Lease Agreement with Citizens National Company for the rental of space in the Central City "D1ini-Mall". Adopted: 2-19-70 Potion was made by Webster and seconded of Resolution No. 2157. The motion was Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wein, Wilson None Absent: None by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption carried by the following vote, to wit: and Austin Noes: None Abstention: POLICY AND PROCEDURAL WORKSHOP, SANTA MARIA: The following resolution was introduced: 1379 RESOLUTION N0. 2158 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ADMINISTRA- TIVE OFFICER TO TRAVEL TO SANTA P1ARIA, CALIFORNIA, TO ATTEND A POLICY & PROCEDURAL WORKSHOP, MARCH 5 & 6, 1970 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California requires that each trip made by an Agency Ptember or Staff Member outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it is found essential for the Administrative Officer to travel to Santa Maria, California, March 5 & 6, 7970, to attend a Policy & Procedural Workshop, to be presented by the Land Executives Association and the Renewal Assistance Office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the travel of the Administrative Officer to Santa Maria, California, March 5 & 6, 1970, to attend a Policy & Procedural Workshop, is hereby approved, and his travel expenses are approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 2-19-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2158. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLANS ON PROPOSED RENEWAL PROJECTS: t4otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez tabling this matter until the next Regular Meeting, The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REVIEW OF PERSONNEL POLICY ON INFORMAL TIME OFF: Mr. Quinn read a proposed Memorandum to all personnel regarding informal time off for doctor and dentist appointments. The Memorandum allows for non-chargeable time off, ordinarily not to exceed one hour in length, at the discretion of the department head. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the memorandum submitted for review. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None MALL SECURITY: Proposed Change Order No. 6 with the J. D. Diffenbaugh Company was presented for review. Mr. Austin stated that in that the tenants are not ready to start 1380 construction on their structure at the present time, the mall should be pro- tected from dirt and bad weather until these structures are complete. Diffenbaugh has proposed to enclose the mall with metal interlocking panels, with a baked enamel finish, complete with braces and weather stripping for a net cost of 534,500. This proposal was discussed with Krueger Engineering and Gruen Associates and they feel that the material is superior and the total price reasonable. for. Austin explained that with this structure enclosed, the site offices of the Montgomery Wards Company, Penney Company as well as perhaps the Agency could locate in the structure. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2159 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIfJG THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CfiANGE ORDER N0. 6 WITH THE J. D. DIFFENBAUGH COMPANY, SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 2, PUBLIC fdALL CONSTRUC- TION CONTRACT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with J. D. Diffenbaugh Co. for Site Preparation Unit No. 2, Calif. R-79, dated June 27, 1969; and WHEREAS, J. D. Diffenbaugh Co. proposes to enclose the mall for weather pro- tection. Materials suggested are metal interlocking panels, baked enamel finished, one side white, the other side various colors of brown, tan, beige and green. Panels to be placed according to color and are completely weather proof; and WHEREAS, the cost to install, complete with braces, weather stripping, would be a total cost of $38,400 to the Agency before buy-back. Said Buy-®ack will be 53,900, causing the total net cost of said work not to exceed $34,500 after Buy-Back; and WHEREAS, Gruen Associates and Krueper Engineering are in complete concurrence with the Contractor, J. D. Diffenbaugh on said proposal and price. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bhat the J. D. Diffenbaugh Construction Company be authorized to enclose the mall for weather protection at a net cost not to exceed Thirty Four Thousand, Five Hundred Dollars (534,500) after buy-back . Adopted: 2-19-70 f•1otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution flo. 2159. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, 4Jebster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention Wein Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meetin at 6:15 P.P1. The motion was carried by the following, to wit: Av^s: W s er, Wilson Wein, Gutierrez and Austin floes: None Abst nt;no•_tJaxte__ on W. 1331 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR h1EETING OF THE DIEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 5TH DAY OF MARCH, 1970, ROOf4 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Austin, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Webster Agency D1embers Absent: None Also Present: h1r. Varner, Agency Counsel; Dlr. Quinn, Executive Director; and f1rs. Baxter Executive Secretary MINUTES: The h1inutes of the Regular Meeting of February 19, 1970 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez approving the minutes of the Regular M1teeting of February 19, 1970 as submitted. The motion was carried by the Following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wein, Wilson and Austin floes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING, PORTION OF REUSE 45 & 50, CALIF. R-79: h1r. Austin announced that this is the time and place designated for the Public Hearing on the sale of Portion of Reuse Parcels 45 & 50, R-79, to C. W. Driver and Ted D. Eichelberger. IAr. Varner stated that the form of Agreement is avail- able for examination. Jan Vincent, realtor for the sale, was presented to the board. t1r. Vincent pre- sented Mr. Driver and Mr. Eichelberger. The rendering and plan of their proposed 12 story structure were shown. The total size of the development is approximately 115,000 sq. ft., with 60 parking spaces provided. Mr. Driver stated that his firm would do the actual construction work. Mr. Wilson stated that he is very pleased to hear this, because he is aware of the fine capabilities of this firm. After review, the developers stated that they would desire a 120 day escrow 60 days after close of escrow they would start construction,and construction would be complete 15 months after commencement of construction. The parking situation was discussed. The developer stated that the construction of the parking structure should be started before they could actually start con- struction on their proposed development. Calculations determined that the structure would be under construction about the same time as the proposed start of con- struction of their 12 story structure. I.1r. Varner stated that the Agreement would include a provision requiring the Agency to construct the parking structure. The Plembers were concerned as to whether or not there would be adequate parking even with the parking structure. hir. Dan Branigan, President of Gruen Associates, stated that the parking structure will have controlled parking, and he therefore does not foresee any parking problems. 1382 After further discussion, the Public Hearing was closed. SALE OF PORTION REUSE PARCELS 45 & 50, R-79: The fallowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2160 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF A PORTION OF REUSE PARCELS 45 & 50, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, TO C. W. DRIVER INC., AND TED D. EICHELBERGER, A PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of a portion of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, Central City Project, by Resolution No. 2144, to C. W. Driver Inc, and Ted D. Eichelberger, a Partnership; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcels to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Sec. 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcels to said Redeveloper was held March 5, 1970, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Sec. 4; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of a portion of Reuse Parcels 45 and 50, Central City Project to C. W. Driver, Inc. and Ted D. Eichelberger, a partnership, subject to the approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Adopted: 3-5-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2160. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Members requested Mr. Driver and Mr. Eichelberger to remain at the meeting until the plan review of the five level parking structure was discussed. OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL 82b, R-10: An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel 82b, Calif. R-10, was presented by Paige Electric Company. Mr. Hanahan from Paige Electric presented his rendering and plan. He stated that they are capable to start immediately. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: 1383 RESOLUTION NO. 2161 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT PAIGE ELECTRIC COMPANY, A DEVELOPER WHO IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE PIEAUOWBROOK PROJECT, NO. 1, CALIF. R-10, REUSE PARCEL NO. 82b, AND AUTHO- RIZING THE PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPERS STATEMEPIT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to redevelop the land in accordance with the Redevelop- ment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, the offering of Reuse Parcel No. 82b was published pursuant to the Urban Renewal Handbook RHA 7214.1 Chapter 4, Section 2; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, declares its intention to sell Reuse Parcel No. 82b to Paige Electric Company, subject to the concurrence of the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the disposition of said parcel to said redeveloper is in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Notice of Public Hearing. Said Public Hearing to be held March 19, 1970. Adopted: 3-5-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2161, approving the sale of Reuse Parcel 82b, Calif. R-10, to Paige Electric subject to the Public Hearing, which shall be held March 19, 7970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REVIEW OF PLANS, FIVE LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE: Mr. Dan Branigan presented two renderings to the Agency Board. One showing the tap level of the parking structure using trees far coverage and beautification. The cost involved for the trees is approximately $16,000. This price includes the pots and irrigation of the trees. The second view of the top level pictured the cars covered with a roof. Mr. Branigan stated that a louvered covering would cost approximately $114,000, and a solid covering would cost approximately $85,000. This is for 70% coverage of the area. He stated that esthetically, only the inside car should be covered. If coverage was provided for the outside cars, it would make the appearance of the structure far larger and less attractive. 1364 It was explained that City Employees will be using this level for parking. Mr. Austin stated that he has reviewed the situation with some of the City Employees, and they have stated that they would rather have a roof than the trees. Mr. Austin further stated that the structure itself will cost approximately 3.5 million dollars, and it would be worth the additional money to have the top level covered. Mr. Driver and h1r. Eichelberger were asked for their opinion regarding the structure. They stated that from an esthetic standpoint, trees would be more attractive, but they understand that because of our hot summers, the roof would be more practical. They further stated that whatever decision the Agency made would be fine with them. Mr. Branigan explained that if the Board delays their decision, it will also delay the structural work on their plans. If the decision is only delayed two weeks, they will not require an extension to their contract, but if it delays for a considerable time, then they will require an equal extension. The percentage of coverage was also discussed. Mr. Austin felt ,that the entire area should be covered. Mr. Webster and Mr. Wain stated that they thought 70~ would be esthetically better. Mr. Austin further stated that he felt the Agency should invite suggestions/proposals from other firms regarding a suitable coverage for this top level. Mr. Wilson stated that if our architect recommends the trees, he feels the Agency should go along with his recommendation. After discussion, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez tabling the decision regarding the top level of the parking structure until the next Regular Meeting, and directing the Executive Director to invite suggestions/ proposals, at no cost to the Agency, for different types of coverage. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wain, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Noes: Wilson Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Branigan stated that if the Agency determines that a cover is more suitable, then his firm will look into the different types of coverage. He further stated that if the Agency looks to another architect for an opinion, it would seem to him that the Agency is displaying a mistrust in his firm. The members assured Mr. Branigan that they wish him to explore the matter thoroughly. After discussion, motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein instructing the Executive Director to consult with the architect (Gruen Asso.) regarding the exploration of further possibilities of an esthetically acceptable roof. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CLAIM- ZOLA M. GALIVANT A claim in the amount of $10,000 from Zola P•l. Galivan, as a secured party, was presented to the Board. Mr. Varner stated that he has examined the situation thoroughly and it is his opinion that the claim as presented is not valid, and he would recommend its denial. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster denying the claim of Zola M. Galivan, in the amount of $70,000. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wain, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1385 RADIO SPOT ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mr. Austin stated that it is Mr. Quinn's recommendation to only consider for contracts the stations we have been in the past dealing with, i.e. KCAL, KMEN, KRNO, KCKC and KDUO. KOLA is a late entry and should be considered at such time as we submit our budget for 1970-71. This would allow us to place this type of specific budget item in our forthcoming Administrative Budget. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2162 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING 13 WEEK RADIO ANNOUNCE- h1ENT CONTRACTS WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has, under date of P1arch 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America pro- viding for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Con- tract, the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No. 7; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of radio stations KCAL, KMEN, KRNO, KCKC and KDUO for spot radio announcements under 13 week contracts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are authorized to enter into 13 week contracts with radio stations KCAL, KMEN, KRNO, KCKC and KDUO. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Contracts shall not exceed the following amounts: KCAL - Shall not exceed $780.00 KidEN - Shall not exceed $1,731.00 KCKC - Shall not exceed $909.80 KDUO - Shall not exceed $780.00 KRNO - Shall not exceed $715.00 Adopted: 3-5-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2162. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PANEL SYSTEMS, CHANGE ORDER - MINI-MALL: The following resolution was introduced: 13°6 RESOLUTION fJO. 2163 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPIIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRP1APJ AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO AMENDP1EfJT N0. 1 TO CONTRACT WITH PANEL SYSTEh1S, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into Contract with Panel Systems, dated January 20, 7970, providing for the construction of approximately 20,000 sq. ft. of temporary buildings (f4ini-Mall); and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency and the Contractor desire to amend said Agree- ment to provide for an additional 1,115 sq. ft. of building, and additional interior partitioning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to execute Amendment No. 1 to Contract with Panel Systems, Calif. R-79, for increased service, not to exceed the additional amount of $40,000. Adopted: 3-5-70 f4otion was made by VJilson and seconded by Webster approving the adoption of Resolution No. 2163, authorizing Amendment No. 1 to Panel Systems Contract, for additional interior partitioning, and an additional 1,115 sq. ft. of building. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: fJone Absent: None HIRING POLICY: Mr. Austin stated that he has received a f4emo from P1r. Quinn regarding the Agency's Employment Hiring Practices. Said D1emo is as follows: T0: Chairman, Redevelopment Agency March 3, 1970 FROM: P. W. Quinn, Jr. SUBJECT: Employment Hiring Practices 1. While the Agency has always adhered to the equal opportunity philosophy in its hiring practices, recent amendments to the Housing and Urban Develop- ment Act of 1969, would indicate that these practices should be formalized and made part of Agency Resolution No. 521. Therefore, I recommend the following amendment be placed before the Board on March 5, 1970. " In the administration of programs providing direct federal Financial assistance in aid of housing, urban planning, development, redevelopment,' or renewal, public or community facilities, and new community development, this Agency, shall, to the greatest extent feasible offer opportunities for training and employment arising in connection with the planning and carrying out of any project assisted under any such program to minority group members or lower income persons residing in tfie area of such project." s/P. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Qutnn, Jr. Executive Director 1367- Fir. Clyde Alexander, President of the NAACP, was presented to the Members. tlr. Alexander stated that this amendment to the personnel policy was acceptable - and he thanked the Agency for their attention. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION fJO. 2164 - RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERPJARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AP1ENUIfJG RESOLUTION N0. 527 OFFICIAL PERSONNEL POLICIES WHEREAS, Resolution No. 521, adopted 7-20-67, established the official personnel policies of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, recent amendments to the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1969, would indicate that the practices of equal opportunity, already adhered~to by the Agency, should be formalized and made a part of said Resolution No. 521. NOW, THEREFORE, BE SIT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, does hereby amend Resolution No.521, Paragraph 7, as follows: Hiring of Employees. A17 employees employed by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, shall be in accordance with the job classifications set forth in the recommended Pay Schedule adopted by the Agency on June 15, 1967. The executive Director shall be hired by the Agency. The Deputy Director for Administration and the Deputy Director for Operations shall be hired by the Executive Director, with approval of the Agency. All other employees shall be hired by the Executive Director. Each new employee shall be hired at the salary set forth for the appro- priate job classification in the Recommended Pay Schedule adopted by the Agency on June 15, 7967, unless otherwise approved by the Agency. All salary increases shall be in accordance with said Recommended Pay Schedule. No new job classifi- cation shall be created without Agency approval. I In the administration of programs providing direct Federal financial assistance in aid of housing, urban planning, development, redevelopment, or renewal, public or community facilities, and new community development, this Agency, shall, to the greatest extent feasible offer opportunities for training and employment arising in connection with the planning and carrying out of any project assisted under any such program to minority group members or lower income persons residing in the area of such project. Adopted: 3-5-70 13sa Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2764. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SUN TELEGRAh1 - "INLAND Ef•1PIRES PROMISE OF THE 70's": Mr. Austin explained that in May 16, 1970, the Sun Telegram is putting out a special supplement to the paper depicting what has been accomplished and where the Inland Empire is going in this decade. Authority was requested to parti- cipate by placang a two-page representation of the Agency. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2165 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF NOT MORE THAN 53,000 FOR NEWSPAPER SPACE WHEREAS, on Play 16, 1970, the San Bernardino Sun Telegram is putting out a special supplement to the paper depicting the accomplishments of the Inland Empire, to be entitled "Inland Empire's Promise of the 70's"; and WtIEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino desires to participate in purchasing space in the Sun Telegram Special Edition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of not more than 53,000 is hereby authorized for the purchase of space in the Sun Telegram Special Edition "Inland Empire's Promise of the 70's". Adopted: 3-5-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2165. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Gutierrez .Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None TRAVEL, WASHINGTON, D.C.: The Chairman requested authorization for himself, Mr. Quinn and h1r. Varner to travel to Washington D. C. March 8-10, 1970, for the purpose of disposition, R-79. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2166 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN, SECRETARY, AND LEGAL COUNSEL TO TRAVEL TO WASHINGTON D.C. MARCH 8, 1970 1389 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it is found essential for the Chairman, Secretary, and Legal Counsel to travel to Washington D. C., March 8, 1970, for disposition purposes, Central City Project, Calif. R-79 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman, Secretary and Legal Counsel are hereby authorized to travel to Washington D. C., March 8, 1970, and their travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 3-5-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 2166. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None LIGHTING, TEMPORARY PARKING LOT: Authority was requested to enter into Contract with Southern California Edison Company for lighting of the Central City Temporary Parking Lot. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2167 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR ADEQUATE LIGHTING OF THE CENTRAL CITY TEMPORARY PARKING AREA. WHEREAS, The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered under a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America, dated f4arch 21, 1967, providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency is desirous of obtaining the services of the Southern California Edison Company for the installation of adequate lighting to the temporary parking lot; and WHEREAS, the total up and down charges for this service will be $720.00, and the total monthly rental for the 10 poles needed will be $99.43. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute contract with Southern California Edison Company for the installa- tion of adequate lighting to the Temporary Parking Lot, Calif. R-79, not to exceed the amount of $720.00. 1390 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the monthly rental of $99.43, of the 10 poles required for the proper lighting, is hereby authorized. Adopted: 3-5-70 h1otion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2167. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK - DEFAULT: P1r. Austin explained that United States National Bank, who has purchased the assets and certain liabilities of the Southland National Bank, has. requested cancellation of Southland National Bank's offer to purchase Reuse Parcels 15, 16 and portion of 13b and 17. The Agency has several alternatives. We may return their deposit; keep their deposit; or charge them for all expenses in- curred in this transaction. Mr. Varner stated that he has reviewed the matter and has been in contact with United States National Bank. Mr. Griffith of United States National Bank was unable to attend the meeting, and desires the matter be deferred until the next meeting so he can be present. After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein to table the matter of Southland National Bank Default until the next Regular Meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SITE PREPARATION, UNIT N0. 11, R-10: Bids for Site Preparation, Unit No. 11 ("E" Street Widening) were opened March 2, 1970. The low bid was submitted by BWB CONSTRUCTORS, INC. in the amount of $207,900. Mr. Varner stated that one of the principals of BWB Constructors is Joe Bonadiman. h1r. Bonadiman worked on the plans for the widening of "E" Street, under the firm of Bonadiman & Asso. Mr. Varner stated that it is his opinion that there is no conflict of interest regarding Mr. Bonadiman and BWB Constructors bids. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2168 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH BWB CONSTRUCTORS, INC., FOR SITE PRE- PARATION, UNIT N0. 11, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project No. 1, Calif. R-10, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the fdeadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and 1391 WfIEP.EAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Site Preparation Unit No. 11, for the site preparation of certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on January 26, 1970 and February 2, 1970, and an Affidavit showing such publi- cation is on file in the office of the Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m., on the 2nd day of March, 1970, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above speci- fied and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of 6W6 Constructors, Inc., is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of BWB Constructors, Inc., for the sum of $207,900, is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Site Preparation, Unit No. 11, R-10, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: 3-5-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2768. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 34, R-79: Bids were opened on March 3, 7970 for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 34, R-79. The low bid was submitted by Da keno, Inc. The Members examined the map of the area to be demolished. The documents included the taking out of curbs and gutters, along with the demolition of several buildings. All members felt that streets, curbs and gutters should be part of a grading contract. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein rejecting the bids, and instructing the Executive Director to amend Unit No. 34 documents to include only the demolition of structures, and include the streets, curbs and gutters on the next grading contract. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None APPRAISER, ROBERT HILL: The Chairman requested authorization to hire Robert Hill to appraise the Security Pacific National Bank property. This additional appraisal has been requested by Allen Gresham, condemnation attorney. The following resolution was introduced: 1392 RESOLUTION f10. 2769 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ROBERT HILL FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES, R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of 3-21-67, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for finan- cial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of Robert Hill for an additional appraisal of the Security Pacific National Bank building, which is under eminent domain proceedings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVE by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed by behalf of the Agency, to execute Contract with Robert Hill for appraisal services, Calif. R-79, not to exceed the sum of $2,000 plus $150 per day, or $75.00 per half day, for testimony. Adopted: 3-5-70 (lotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2169. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RICHARD P. BATEEN, EXTENSION OF OCCUPANCY: Mr. Austin stated that Richard Bateen has requested an extension of his occupancy in the Security Pacific Bank building until March 23, 1970. Security Pacific will still occupy the building on this date. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2170 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREE- MENT WITH RICHARD P. BATEEN WHEREAS, Richard P. Bateen entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, Mr. Bateen has requested an extension of his Rental Agreement until March 23, 7970; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members have reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that said extension is warranted. 1393 NOW, THEREFORE; BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and Between the Agency and Richard P. Bateen is hereby extended until March 23, 1970. Adopted: 3-5-70 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2170. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Austin advised that the Mini-Mall will be complete March 151;h, and the Agency would like to have the dedication the week of the 15th. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the dedication of the P1ini-Mall the week of Ptarch 15, 1970. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 6:00 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1394 DIINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEDI6ERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 19TH DAY OF h1ARCH, 1970, 323 COURT STREET, ROOM 305, SAN 6ERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez, Webster and Austin Agency Plembers Absent: None Also Present: Dlr. Quinn, Executive Director; Dlr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and D1rs. 6axter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The D1inutes of the Regular Meeting of March 5, 1970 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson, and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the minutes as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of February, 1970 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the approval of the Expenditures for the month of February, 1970 as submitted. The motion was carried by the fallowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING, SALE OF REUSE PARCEL 82b, R-10: Dlr. Austin stated that this is the time and place designated for the Public Hearing for the sale of Reuse Parcel 82b, R-10, to Paige Electric Company. Mr. Varner stated that the form of Agreement is available for examination. There being no comments, the Public Hearing was closed. REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: h1r. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. PAIGE ELECTRIC, REUSE PARCEL 82b, R-10: The following resolution was introduced: 1395 RESOLUTION N0. 2171 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Of THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT AND RELATED DOCUMENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL 82b, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, TO PAIGE ELECTRIC COMPANY WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of Reuse Parcel 82b, Calif. R-10, to Paige Electric Company, by Resolution No. 2161; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcel to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcel to said Redeveloper was held March 19, 1970, in accordance with RHA 7274.1, Chapter 4, Section 4; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposition Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcel 82b, P1eadowbrook Pro- ject, Calif. R-10, to Paige Electric Co., subject to HUU concurrence. Adopted: 3-19-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2171, authorizing the sale of Reuse Parcel 82b, R-10 to Paige Electric, subject to the concurrence of HUD. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None NAHRO MEMBERSHIP DUES: A statement was presented to the Members from NAHRO, for renewal of Agency dues to NAHRO Membership for the year ending 1971. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2172 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF $1,000 FOR NAHRO MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR THE YEAR ENDING APRIL 1971 WHEREAS, the dues for renewal of the Agency's membership to NAHRO for the year ending April 1971, based on the population of the City of San Bernardino for projects Calif. R-79 and Calif. R-10, has been computed to the sum of $1,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the expenditure of $1,000 is hereby authorized for NAHRO tembership dues for the year ending April 7971. Adopted: 3-19-71 1396 Plotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2172. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER-MOULDER BROTHERS CONTRACT, R-79: A Memorandum was presented from the Operations Officer stating that the landscape contractor, Moulder Brothers, was unable to plant 10 trees and 290 juniper bushes throughout the project because of conflicts with street lights signals, due to lack of space. It is recommended that $2,559 be deducted from the contract price for the elimination of these trees. The Members stated that they would like a complete breakdown of all costs involved before this Change Order was considered. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson to table the matter until the next regular meeting, in order that all costs involved could be reviewed. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER - GRUEN ASSOCIATES, fMLL DESIGN CONTRACT It was explained that the preliminary engineering studies for the modification of the Penney Company has been complete. Said study has been approved by the Penney Company. Gruen Associates have submitted their cost of $16,000 to modify the mall plans. After review and discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2173 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO GRUEN ASSOCIATES CONTRACT FOR MALL DESIGN WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, under date of March 22, 1967 entered into Contract with Gruen Associates for Mall Design, Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency obtained preliminary engineering studies for the modifica- tion of the Central Mall by Resolution No. 2113; and WHEREAS, the J. C. Penney Company has reviewed the proposed design of the modification studies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Contract Amendment with Gruen Associates for the modification of plans of the Central Mall at a cost not to exceed $16,000. Adopted: 3-19-70 13°7 h1otion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2173. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wilson, Wein, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REVIEW OF FIVE LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE: P1r. Dan Branigan was presented to the Members. A rendering of the fifth level of the parking structure with 559' coverage was shown. Mr. Branigan explained that beams are shown on the rendering for esthetic purposes. The costs involved far the different additions to the covering were explained. After much dis- cussion and review of the coverings available, P1r. Branigan was asked if the fifth level could be built in such a manner that either the trees or the cover- ing could be used. R1r. Branigan explained that this could be done by the use of a special cap over each column. Mr. Wein stated that the structure will be and the City will be using the fifth level he believes the decision should be left to in such a way that they could put either c A provision could be incorporated into the be authorized to provide whatever covering leased to the City of San Bernardino for their parking use. He stated that the City. We could lease it to them ~vering or landscape on the top level. Lease Agreement whereby the City would they desire. After further discussion, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster instructing Gruen Associates to prepare the plans for the parking structure so that the fifth level could either be landscaped or covered, with the decision and cost involved for said top level to be borne by the Lessee, the City of San Bernardino. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: IJOne The Chairman instructed the Executive Director to notify the City of the Board's decision. OFFER TO PURCHASE, SANTA FE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAPJ, REUSE 4 & 9, R-79: An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcels 4 & 9, Calif. R-79, was presented from Santa Fe Federal Savings & Loan. They stated that they desire to build a four story structure, of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. They further stated that if something came up and they were unable to develop the four story structure, they would like their Offer to read not less than 3 stories, nor more than 4 stories high. The Members explained that the offer must be definite. If at a later date they see that they cannot build the four stories, they can present a request to the Board for an amendment to the agreement. They stated that they could start construction approximately December, 1970, with completion 12 months after start of construction. Their plan provides for 50 on site parking spaces. They stated that they would require 70 spaces on the first level of the parking structure, at the northeast end of said structure. After review of the Gruen Plan for the structure, it was noted that 54 spaces i^ have been designated for these parcels. The members explained that the park- ing in the structure would have to be negotiated with all parties involved at a later date, but that they could see no real problem in allowing the extra spaces. After further discussion, the fallowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2174 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT SANTA FE FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN, A REDEVELOPER, IS QUALIFIED TO REDEVELOP THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, NO. 1, CALIF. R-79, REUSE PARCELS 4 & 9, AND AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF THE "REDEVELOPERS STATEMENT FOR PUBLIC DISCLOSURE" AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to dispose of certain parcels of land in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 to qualified redevelopers; and WHEREAS, the Agency has offered certain parcels of land for sale under the fixed price competition method setting forth criteria by wh5ch proposals to redevelop the offered parcels would be evaluated; and WHEREAS, the Agency has evaluated all of the proposals received pursuant to the offering; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has determined that the proposal of Santa Fe Federal Savings and Loan, is in the best interest of the Central City Project and the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and that the Agency is authorized to publish the "Redeveloper's Statement for Public Disclosure" and a Plotice of Public Hearing. Adopted: 3-19-70 P1otion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2174, determining that Santa Fe Federal Savings & Loan is qualified to develop Reuse 4 & 9, R-79, with parking in the structure to be negotiated between all tenants at a later date. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin PJOes: None Abstention: None Absent: None NAHRO PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL CONFERENCE, HONOLULU, HAWAII: The following resolution was introduced: 1399 RESOLUTION fJO. 2175 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE AGENCY BOARD MEMBERS, AGENCY COUNSEL, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR P,ND ONE OTHER STAFF PIEMBER, TO TRAVEL TO HONOLULU, HAWAII, f9AY 24-28> TO ATTEND NAHRO PACIFIC SOUTHWEST REGIONAL COUNCIL CONFERENCE WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff f4ember outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency f4embers; and WHEREAS, it is found essential for the Agency Board, Agency Counsel, Executive Director and one other Staff Member, to attend the NAHRO Pacific Southwest Regional Council Conference in Honolulu, Hawaii, Play 24-27, 1970. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency Board, Agency Counsel, Executive Director, and one other staff member are hereby authorized to travel to Honolulu, Hawaii, May 24-28, 1970, to attend NAHRO Pacific Southwest Regional Council Conference, and their travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 3-79-70 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein, authorizing the adoption of resolution No. 2175. The motion was carried by the following vote, tb wit: Ayes: Willson, Wein, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The members expressed their desire to have Mr. Joe Baker, reporter with the Sun Telegram, attend the conference. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2176 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, COMMENDING MR. JOE BAKER, BUSINESS REPORTER, SUN TELEGRAM, AND RECOMMENDING HIS PARTICIPATION AT THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOUSING AND RENEWAL OFFICIALS PACIFIC SOUTHWEST ANNUAL CONFERENCE, HONOLULU, HAWAII WHEREAS, Mr. Joe Baker, Business Reporter, Sun Telegram, has been assigned the responsibility of reporting the activities of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for over a two year period; and WHEREAS, through Mr. Baker's adroitness and perspicacity to bring the story of renewal and redevelopment within the City of San Bernardino to the attention of not only the local community, but at times beyond the State of California borders, the City of San Bernardino has achieved national recognition in renewal circles; and 1400 WHEREAS, Mr. Baker has displayed a continuing interest in Urban Renewal activities on a local and national scale; and WHEREAS, the Pacific Southwest Annual Conference of the National Association of Housing and Renewal Officials would afford an excellent opportunity to broaden P1r. Baker's interest and knowledge in Urban Renewal and Housing Affairs; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency desire to express their grati- tude and appreciation to Mr. Joe Baker for his efforts on behalf of the Redevelop- ment Agency and recommend to his superiors at the Sun Telegram his attendance at the Forthcoming Pacific Southwest Annual Conference of the National Association of Housing and Renewal Officials. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that it express to P1r. Joe Baker, and it hereby does so express, its gratitude and appreciation for his outstanding ability to accurately portray renewal activities in the news media and further resolves and recommends that the management of the Sun Telegram give due and serious consideration to the attendance of Plr. Joe Baker at the forthcoming Pacific Southwest Annual Conference of the National Association of Housing and Renewal Officials, Honolulu, Hawaii, Play 24- 28, 1970. Adopted: 3-19-70 P•iotion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2176. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None NAHRO HEALTH & ACCIDENT INSURANCE P1EETING: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2177 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ONE STAFF MEMBER TO TRAVEL TO P1ERCED, CALIFORNIA, MARCH 23, 1970 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency P4ember or Staff Member outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it is found essential for one staff member to travel to P4erced, California, Plarch 23, 1970 to attend a NAHRO Health & Accident Insurance meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that one staff member is hereby authorized to travel to Merced, California, March 23, 1970 to attend the NAHRO Health & Accident Insurance Meeting, and his travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043. Adopted: 3-19-70 1401 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2777. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK DEFAULT: Mr. Varner stated that he has met with P1r. Lloyd Griffith, of the United States National Bank. The United States National Bank has purchased certain assets and certain liabilities of the Southland National Bank, and have requested can- cellation of Southland's offer to purchase Reuse 15, 16 and portion of 13b and 17. h1r. Varner further stated that the staff has calculated all expenses of the Agency incurred in this sale to total $7,250.66. Mr. Griffith has been most cooperative and has agreed to deed the property back to the Agency. All monies deposited by Southland Bank shall be refunded, less the $7,250.66 incurred by the Agency. All Members agreed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2178 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDIPIO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF THE PUR- CHASE OF CALIF. R-10 REUSE PARCELS 13b, 15, 16 and 17 BY THE SOUTHLAND NATIONAL BANK, A NATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION WHEREAS, on the 18th day of July 1969, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into an Agreement with the Southland National Bank; and WHEREAS, said Agreement provided for the disposition of Calif. R-10 Reuse Parcels 13b, 15, 16 and l7 to Southland National Bank; and WHEREAS, on the 19th day of August, 1969, a portion of said property was conveyed to said Southland National Bank by deed recorded in Book 7288, Page 654 of the official records, San Bernardino County; and WHEREAS, United States National Bank has acquired certain of the assets and liabilities of said Southland National Bank, including said real property con- veyed to Southland National Bank; and WHEREAS, it is mutually agreed and for the benefit of both the Agency and U. S. National Bank to cancel said agreement; and WHEREAS, it is also to the mutual benefit of both parties that said conveyed pro- perty revert to the ownership of the Agency; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to refund to U. S. National Bank all deposits and monies paid by the Southland National Bank, less all costs and expenses incurred by said Agency; and WFIEREAS, the costs and expenses incurred by said Agency total $7,250.66. 1402 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Disposition Agreement dated July 18, 1969, by and betvaeen the Agency and Southland National Bank is hereby cancelled. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the portion of said property which was conveyed to Southland National Bank by deed recorded in Book 7288, Page 654 official records shall revert to the Agency. FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that all deposits and monies. deposited and paid to the Agency shall be refunded to said U. S. National Bank, less all costs and expenses incurred by said Agency. Said expenses and cost incurred by said Agency total $7,250.66. Adopted: 3-19-70 Motion was made by Gutierrez and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2178, cancelling the purchase of Parcels 13b, 15, 16 and 17 to Southland National Bank, and refunding all money deposited and paid to the Agency, less all costs incurred by the Agency for this sale ($7,250.66). The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Gutierrez, Wilson, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, WEST BROOK, REUSE PARCEL 80, R-10: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2179 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO TRUITT AND MARGUERITE WESTBROOK WHEREAS, Truitt and Marguerite Westbrook hereinafter called the Redevelopers, have entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, said Agreement dated June 20, 1968, was recorded on October 23, 1969, in Book 7325 on page 495 and said Grant Deed dated June 25, 1968, was recorded on October 23, 1969 in Book 7325 on page 520 both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Grant Deed Redevelopers covenanted and agreed, to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 5 of said Grant Deed to furnish the Redevelopers with an instrument certifying com- pletion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed and Agreement upon Redeveloper's completion thereof; and WHEREAS, said real property is described as: 1403 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Reuse Parcel 80 A portion of Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 23, 24, 25 and 26 Block "D", The Peppers, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, es per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, page 8, records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the intersection of the centerline of A.T.&S.F. Railroad right-of-way and the old centerline of "D" Street, 82.50 feet wide; thence South 25.00 feet along said centerline of "D" Street to a point; thence North 89° 59' 25" East 123.75 feet along the South right-of-way line of A.T. & S. F. Railroad, 50 feet wide, to a point in a non-tangent curve concave to the West with a radius of 291.25 feet and a radial bearing of South 90° West, said point also being the TRUE POIIJT OF BEGINNING: thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 25° 00' 00" an arc distance of 127.08 feet to a point in a tangent line; thence South 25° West, 73.28 feet along said tangent line to a point in a tangent curve concave to the East with a radius of 258.75 feet and a radial bear- ing South 65° 00' 00" East; hence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 8 24' 35" an arc distance of 37.98 feet to the intersection of the South line of Lot 4, Block "D", of the Peppers Subdivision, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of 61aps, page 8, records of said County; thence PJorth 89° 59' 21" East, 272.306 feet, along the South line of said Lot 4 and the South line of said Lot 23 to a point; thence North 44.169 feet to a point in a tangent curve concave to the East with a radius of 735.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 90° East; thence Northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 9° 59' 25" an arc length of 128.76 feet to a point in a tangent line; thence North 9° 59' 25" East, 54.108 feet to the intersection of the South line of said A.T. & S.F. Railroad; thence South 89° 59' 25" West, 221.102 feet along said South line to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 52662 square feet, more or less. PJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED in accordance with Section 4 of said Agreement and Section 5 of said Grant Deed, that the Agency does hereby conclusively certify and give notice that the Redeveloper has fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, all covenants and Agreements with respect to the obligation of Redeveloper for the construction of improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the above described Real Property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, a "Certificate of Compliance". Adopted: 3-79-70 1404 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2179. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT AMENDPIENT, ALLEN GRESHAh1: The Chairman explained that the upset figure to Allen Gresham contract must be increased to run the length of the project for condemnation cases. The follow- ing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION) N0. 2180 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND ALLEN B. GRESHAM FOR CONDEMNATION, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 493, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino designated Allen B. Gresham as Condemnation Counsel for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Chairman end Secretary executed a written Contract with Allen B. Gresham dated May 4, 1967 for said services, as set forth in said Contract in an amount not to exceed the aggregate sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000) and WHEREAS, Contract Amendment No. 2 increased the aggregate sum of $10,000 to $20,000; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 810 increased said aggregate sum from $20,000 to $40,000; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 1005 increased said aggregate sum from $40,000 to $60,000; and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to increase the total amount of said Contract by $15,000, to provide for legal services for the length of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 3 is amended to read: "3. COMPENSATION AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. The Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed t e amount of Seventy Five Thousand Dollars ($75,000), which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid as follows: (a) Time spent in court -- $200 per day, or $700 for one half day or less (b) Time spent outside of court and preparation for trial $35.00 per hour lacy Payment of all amounts due in every case will be subject to an invoice for ., payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under tYie Contract in conformance with the Contract and that he is entitled to receive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. In addition to the compensation provided the Contractor far travel and subsistence pal place of business when said travel is The limitations on cost of transportation the same as those which currently prevail Agency. above, the Agency will reimburse expenses away from Agency's princi- specifically requested by the Agency. and subsistence expenses shall be for staff members of the It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the total compensa- tion and reimbursement if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the maximum sum of Seventy Five Thousand Dollars 075,000) for all the services required." Adopted: 3-19-70 hio4ion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2180. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER, BWB CONSTRUCTORS, "E" ST. WIDENING CONTRACT: Mr. Quinn explained that the Contractor has torn up the Street and has discovered that the soil is not stable. to bridge these unstable areas, additional Class 2 base change order to the contract is needed in order for the plish the additional services including additional sewe tions. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 2181 easterly side of "E" In order to be able will be required. A contractor to accom- ^ and gas line modifica- RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPh1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRh1AN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER N0. 1 WITH BWB CONSTRUCTORS, INC., SITE PREPARATION, "E" STREET WIDENING PROJECT, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a contract with BWB Constructors, Inc., far Site Preparation, "E" Street Widening Project, on the 19th day of Plarch, 1970; and WHEREAS, now that the eastern half of "E" Street has been uncovered, many problems with conflicting and uncharted utilities have arisen; and WHEREAS, there are a maximum of fifteen sewer laterals that must be lowered because of the new grade of the street. B W B Constructors has agreed to make the necessary modifications at a cost not to exceed $2,137.50; and ~~ ne6 WHEREAS, in seven instances elevation the curb is too high to conform with Constructors, Inc has agreed to lower $1,050.00; and of the gas lines from the meters behind the grades of the new o-ialk. B W B the lines at a cost not to exceed WHEREAS, the soil engineer has discovered that in several instances the native soil is not stable. In order to bridge these unstable areas, additional Class 2 base to a depth of six inches will be required. It is estimated that up to 350 tons be authorized at a price of X4.56 per ton, including excavation for a cost not to exceed $1,596.00; and WfJEREAS, because of the varying degree of elevation and soil conditions, addi- tional concrete and paving should be accomplished. Contractor has agreed to make the transitions in concrete or asphalt on a "time and material" basis at a cost not to exceed $500.00. PJOW, THEREFORE, QE IT RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency be and they hereby are authorized to execute Change Order fJo. 1 with BWB Constructors, Inc., for the above mentioned work at a total cost not to exceed the sum of Five Thousand, Two Hundred Eighty Three and 50/100 ($5,283.50) Adopted: 3-79-70 (.lotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution fJO. 2181. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: ldilson, Gutierrez, Wein, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: fJone Absent: None PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. VAULT: The Chairman requested authorization to enter into a contract with Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company for modification of an electrical vault which protrudes beyond the new curb alignment. The cost to perform the work on the vault is expected not to exceed $5,000. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2182 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CFlLIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY TO P10DIFY VAULT, "E" STREET, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R~10 WHEREAS, the Pacific Telephone Company Toll Building, South "E" Street, has an electrical vault which protrudes beyond the curb alignment and is from 3" to 5" higher than the new sidewalk elevation; and WHEREAS, the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company has deeded the necessary land to the City for the widening of "E" Street; and 107 WFIEREAS, because of the high security nature of the building, the Telephone Company will provide the crews to perform the modifications on a "time and Material verified basis". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino is hereby authorized to enter into an Agreement with Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company at a cost not to exceed Five Thousand and no/100 ($5,000) to modify said vault so as to conform with the "E" Street Widening Project. Adopted: 3-79-70 tlotion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2182. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None MALL SECURITY: The Chairman reminded the Board Members of the Mini-P1a11 Dedication Ceremony, Friday, March 20th, 7970, at 11:00 a.m. Mr. Austin explained that until all tenants have located into the Mini-Mall the Agency should provide security service for the building. All Members agreed. The bids submitted were reviewed. All members agreed that the low bid, submitted by Krekel Bureau, Inc. in the amount of $2.90 per hour should be accepted. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2183 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPP1ENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIf1G THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH KREKEL BUREAU, INC. FOR SECURITY SERVICES FOR THE MINI-t•1ALL WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, recognizes the need for security service for the Central City P1ini-Mall, until said Mini-Mall is fully occupied; and WHEREAS, bids were received for said service, the lowest being submitted by Krekel Bureau, Inc., for the amount of $2.90 per hour. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency, to execute contract with Krekel Bureau, Inc., for security services for the Mini-D1a11, until such time as the P1ini-f4a11 is fully occupied, not to exceed $2.90 per hour. Adopted: 3-19-70 14~?3 Motion was made by 6Jein and seconded by ldebster for the adoption of Resolution No. 2183, authorizing the contract with Krekel Bureau, Inc., for security ser- vice for the Mini-Mall until such time as all tenants have located in said I~tini-P1a11. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER 6USINESS: The Members were reminded of the Public Hearing on Project No. 4, to be held March 23, 1970, in the Council Chambers, 2:00 p.m. P1r. Quinn requested authorization for either himself or h1r. Harper to travel to Scottsdale, Arizona, April 16, 1970, to attend the 20th Southwest Regional Appraisal Conference. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2184 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPDIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIIJG MR. P. W. QUINN, JR. OR MR. ROYCE J. HARPER, JR., TO TRAVEL TO SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA APRIL 16, 7970 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2043 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Plember or Staff Member outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Piembers; and WfJEREAS, it is found essential for either fnr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., or ~•tr. Boyce J. Harper, Jr., to travel to Scottsdale, Arizona, April 16, 1970 to attend the 20th Southwest Regional Appraisal Conference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that either P. W. Quinn, Jr., or Boyce J. Harper, Jr., are hereby authorized to travel to Scottsdale, Arizona, April 16, 1970, to attend the 20th Southwest Regional Appraisal Conference, and his travel expenses are hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 2043 Adopted: 3-19-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2184. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Gutierrez, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None P1r. Austin announced that the Central City Company has deposited all funds in the bank for the purchase of the retail Central City Project. Mr. Austin further stated that Bullocks has not come to a decision as yet regarding occupancy in the mall, and that they will notify us soon as their decision is finalized. 14-09 f1r. Quinn stated that bids will be opened April 22, 1970, joint]y by the City and Agency, for the construction of the City Hall-Exhibit Hall and Public Areas. The only two parcels of land left in the Super Block are the proposed Notel Site and the Proposed apartment site. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 5:45 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1410 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPhENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERhlARDINO, CALIFORNIA,HELD THE 23RD DAY OF f1ARCH, 1970, TEMPORARY CITY COUNCIL CHAf•16ERS, 392 WEST COURT STREET, 2:00 P.h1. This Special Meeting was called pursuant to the fallowing Notice of Special Meeting: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF THE h1Eh16ERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERPJARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at 2:00 p.m. hiarch 23, 1970, at the City of San Bernardino, Council Chambers, 392 West Court Street, San Bernardino, California, for the purpose of holding a Joint Public Hearing on the proposed Redevelopment Plan for the College Park Project, Calif. R-742. DATED this 19th day of March, 1970. s/P. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Secretary 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 19th day of March, 1970, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special h1eeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Calif- ornia, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES fiAIL. WITNESS my hand this 19th day of March, 1970. S/P. W. ~uinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Secretary The Special fgeeting of f•1arch 23, 1970, was postponed due to lack of quorum, and request of many residents of the College Park Project, to Thursday, f°iarch 26, 1970, 7:00 p.m. la.il 11IfJUTES OF THE POSTPONED JOINT PUBLIC HEARING OF MARCH 2, 1970, HELD h1ARCH 26, 1970, AT THE TEM- PORARY CITY COUNCIL CHAh16ERS, 392 WEST COURT ST. SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AT 7:00 p.m. hlr. Quinn, Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency, was introduced to all present. hir. Quinn stated that he would like to familiarize the people concerned with the proposed project. The map of the area was shown. Mr. Quinn explained to all present that the concept of redevelopment for the College Area is not a new one, and actually has been contemplated since 7966. At that time an Industrial Park for this area was considered but never came into being. for. Quinn further explained that all necessary and proper steps have been taken by the City and the Agency to lead up to this Public Hearing. The City has adopted its General Plan for the College Area, and the Redevelopment Agency has submitted to the City the proposed Redevelopment Plan, in accordance with said General Plan. The Joint Public Hearing has been called to review this plan and either adapt or disapprove it. The concept of redevelopment for the area was explained. 61r. Quinn stated that this project will be one of rehabilitation rather than total clearance and de- velopment. Some vacant land will be bought by the Agency, sold to a developer, and developed in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan. Homes will be required to meet City code. Grants or loans with low interest rates will be available to home owners and businesses for renovation, upgrading, and/or increasing the size of their present structure. It was explained that the residence or businesses in the area would not have to incur the expense of public improvements, such as curbs, gutters, street lights, etc. This expense would be incurred by the Redevelopment Agency. 2/3:1/3 sharing of expense was discussed and explained. The Joint Public Hearing was called to order by both the City and the Redevelop- ment Agency at 7:20 p.m. The following City Council members were present: Guhin, Lackner, Gregory and Katona The following Council Members were absent: Seccombe, Wheeler and Hammock Also Present: Mayor Al C. Ballard, City Clerk Lucille Goforth, and Planning Director Jack Reilly and City Attorney, Ralph Prince The following Agency Members were present: Austin, Wein and Webster The following Agency I•iembers were absent: Wilson and Gutierrez Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director and P1r. Varner, Agency Counsel The hearing was opened for questions Mr. Varner asked if there would be any objection to having P1r. Quinn's comments recorded and made a part of the Minutes of the Joint Public Hearing. There were no objections. 112 Pir. Passeno from Kendall Drive asked I1r. Quinn if there would be any re-zoning or variances provided in the area. It was explained that there would be no re-zoning or variances. P1r. Baker, also from Kendall Drive, stated that the original `homes built in the area were set back some distance from the street. New homes have been built closer to the street. If they are to increase the size of their homes, they must be allowed to build closer to their property line; therefore, a variance must be made available. It was explained that the Redevelopment Plan itself does not call far any variances. If an individual feels that he needs such a variance to increase the size of his home, then he himself must apply to the City and Agency for such a variance. P4r. Ray Worman, from Hillhurst Drive, stated that he does not understand why his area was included in the plan. His neighborhood is a newly developed area and does not require any renovation. He stated that he and his neighbors were con- cerned with the development of access streets through their area. Mr. Quinn stated that the Agency realizes that this area does not need renovating. There has been some discussion by Gruen Associate for certain access roads. It was stated that there are private roads in this area. hir. Quinn stated that if these roads are privately owned the Agency could not bother them without legal proceed- ings. qtr. Varner stated that he wanted all persons to realize that the Agency does have the right of eminent domain, and could exercise this right to acquire property if needed. Jack Reilly, Planning Director, explained that one of the reasons the Hillhurst area was included was because of the drainage problem. Councilman Katona explained the portion of the project which will be Federally assisted and the portion of the project which will be financed under the provi- sions of the State law. One gentlemen from the area was concerned about Dr. Pfau's desires for the area. surrounding the college. fie had heard that Dr. Pfau desired that area to be redeveloped to the same design as the college itself. hir. Quinn explained that this is not true. Dr. Pfau understands that the project is one of renovation and upgrading, and he is very anxious to see this accomplished. h'r. Quinn further stated that property will not be acquired, unless there is no economic possibility for its renovation. There was concern from the residents of the area that there would be many repairs and much costly renovation. P1r. Quinn explained that interest on loans can be as low as 3`,~ and up to $12,500 total loan. Loans could cover the cost of sewer connection, from the dwelling to the property line. Ilr. Quinn stated that approximately 40 percent of the structures in the area are presently in satis- factory condition. Councilman Guhin stated that he would estimate it at 85 percent satisfactory. tor. Wein explained that the Redevelopment Agency is needed for this project because of our power to obtain federal funds. The homeowners would have to pay for all site improvements to their property if the Agency was not involved. 1413 It was explained to all present, that if a dwelling meets code, and the owner does not want to upgrade or increase it, it does not have to be done. If the owner does desire to increase or upgrade it, the loans with low interest rates will still be available. Councilman Lackner explained that residents do not have to meet the Uniform Building Code, but must meet the Uniform Housing Code. The Uniform Housing Code is not as strict as the Building Code. Mr. Wein explained that the project will increase the value of all residences and business in the area. There was a question raised as to the commercial sections of this project, h1r. Quinn explained that the project will be primarily residential, as it is at the present. P1r. Jack Reilly stated that there will be roughly five commercial clusters in the project area. These areas were explained and pointed out on the map. hir. Quinn explained that the detailed treatment of the area would be accomplished through the Survey and Planning of the area, by the staff, which treatment will be controlled by the General Plan for the area. !4r. Quinn was asked what treatment would be given the flood control channel. He stated that the bridging of this channel would appear to be an eligible cost. Mr. Quinn was asked if apartments would be built in the area. Mr. Quinn stated that apartments as such are not specified in the Redevelopment Plan. If cleared land is bought by the Agency, and a developer offers to purchase this property for the development of apartments, than it would be considered at that time. P•1r. Varner stated that whenever the Agency desires to sell a parcel of land, they are required to submit the sale to a Public Hearing, in order that any person in the area who is against this development may have an opportunity to state his views. h1r. Quinn further explained that the plan does call for open land for recreation, bridal paths, and open green area. Dr. Thomas of the State College, was introduced. Dr. Thomas stated that he wanted to make it clear that the College itself does not have a plan for the area. They have worked closely with the City and Agency on the General Plan and the Redevelopment Plan. He stated that they do not desire Kendall Drive to be strictly commercial -- that is all the way down the street, on both sides. Again he stated that the College does not have a plan for the area. Mr. P1ilton White stated that he is a resident in the area, and has had many dis- cussions with the people in his area about the project. He further stated that there have been many rumors spread around his area about the proposed project, but that he does not see any of his neighbors asking questions to verify these rumors. Fle further stated that if the Government will loan up to $12,000 with interest as low as 3% to upgrade his home, then he believes the project can only help the area. , There was question raised as to the development of low-cost public housing being developed in the area. f1r. Quinn stated that this has not specifically been incorporated in the plan. 141 htr. Quinn explained that the people in a redevelopment area are involved in the Survey and Planning stage of a project. h1r. Quinn was asked if all home owners will be required to sign Owner Participa- tion Agreements. Mr. Quinn stated that an Owner Participation Agreement is primarily far a major business that agrees to make certain improvements on their already existing building. The Agency will probably solicit 0. P. Agreements, but there will be no mandatory requirement for residents to enter into them. Certain residents from the Hillhurst Drive area again stated that they did not want to be included in this project. In order to delete this area the plan would have to be returned to the Planning Commission for revision. tor. Varner urged these residents to carefully study all the advantages of this project before they take any steps to exclude themselves. Mr. Jack Reilly again explained that this Little Mountain section of the project is an important part of the project because of the grading and drainage facilities. Mr. Quinn was asked about the percentage of interest available for commercial loans, and how long it would take before these funds would be made available. Mr. Quinn stated that loans could be granted as low as 4zY and up to 550,000. The amount of time to obtain these funds all depends on the Department of Housing and Urban Development in San Francisco. We have our Survey and Planning appli- cation in San Francisco now. In the event the Redevelopment Plan and our Survey and Planning Application are accepted, it would take a minimum of six months before the plan could be put into actual execution. Certain residents from the Hillhurst area again stated their desire not to be included in the project area. They stated that it is their understanding that they would not receive fair value for their property if eminent domain proceedings were used by the Agency. It was explained to these residents that the Agency obtains two appraisals from two independent appraisers in the area. If these appraisals do not meet the determined value set by the individual, they too may obtain their own appraiser for the property in question. Jack Sowers, representing a developer from the area, asked Mr. Quinn what affect the project would have on the vacant land in the proposed project area. Mr. Quinn stated that a Land-Use Study would be prepared, which Land-Use Study would be in accordance with the General Plan already adopted by the City for this area. Councilman Katona asked if the City or the Agency would conduct this Study. Rir. Varner stated that if the Redevelopment Plan is adopted, the Agency would be required to carry out this plan, and thus contract a firm to conduct this Study. The Agency would work jointly with the City on this, as they have on all other endeavors in the past. The success of the Redevelopment Agency lies largely on the cooperation between the Agency and the City. Councilman Katona asked what steps would be necessary at this Public Hearing to adopt the Redevelopment Plan. Fir. Varner stated that the Agency first must vote for its approval, and then recommend to the City Council its approval of the Plan as submitted. The Council must then vote for its approval or denial. P1r. Varner further stated that if any changes are desired to be made to this Plan after its adoption, these changes must be brought before the council and consi- dered at a Public Hearing, prior to amending the ordinance adopting the plan. 115 Dlr. Falterman, a real estate broker from Redlands, stated that he wants all persons to understand that once this plan is approved, the law is specific and the Redevelopment Agency has all power to carry out this plan without coming before the council. Mr. Varner stated that the Council directs the Agency by its adoption of the General Plan. The Redevelopment Plan has been written in accordance with the City's General Plan for the area. It was explained that if a home needs to be renovated, the Agency will work directly with the home owner. If the home is rented, the tenant will reap all the benefits with no cost for the improvements. Mr. Varner stated that under the Redevelopment Plan and the State law, if ttie Agency should acquire a home through eminent domain, the tenant or owner would have first preference to relocate back within the project area. The tenant or owner would also receive a cash relocation payment of $1,000. If this plan is adopted, it will become an Ordinance. Any change to an ordinance requires a Public Hearing, with notices sent to all concerned parties. It was again stated that the Redevelopment Plan is designed to maintain the com- munity, not to rebuild it. Dlr. Varner explained that if the Agency bought a parcel of land, and desired to sell it to a developer, the sale would have to be reviewed at a Public Hearing. The Notice of Public Hearing would be duly published. Dlr. Austin stated that after the Redevelopment Plan is accomplished the project is closed. Again the residents of the Hillhurst area were considered. h1any methods were discussed to give these people more consideration. Continuing the Public Hearing for two weeks and postponing the decision was also discussed. P1r. Reilly again stated that this area was considered because of drainage problems. It was noted that all residents in the area were advised of the Public Nearing, and only a small portion appeared to set forth their objections. An informal vote was taken of the audience. Three-to-one voted to accept the proposed Redevelop- ment Plan. Dir. 6i11 Leonard, realtor, stated that he would urge the Agency and Council to move on the adoption of the plan and the implementation of same as soon as possible. Councilman Katona asked if the City Inspectors would control the inspection of homes in the area. F1r. Varner stated that they could. The following Resolution was introduced by Sanford H. Wein: RESOLUTION N0. 2185 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAPJ FOR THE COLLEGE PARK PROJECT, AND RECOD1P4EfJDING ITS APPROVAL TO " i` THE CITY OF SAPJ BERNARDINO lcl5 WHEREAS, in connection witYi an application of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California (hereinafter called the "Local Public Agency") far financial assistance under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, the Local Public Agency's adoption of the Redevelopment Plan for the project area involved in such application is required by the Federal Government before it will enter into a contract for Loan and Grant with the Local Public Agency; and WHEREAS, the provisions of the California Community Redevelopment Law require the Local Public Agency to conduct a public hearing on the proposed Redevelop- ment Plan prior to its adoption of such plan; and WHEREAS, on (larch 26, 1970, a Joint Public bearing was held by the Local Public Agency and the City of San Bernardino, at 7:00 p.m., Temporary City Council Chambers, 392 West Court Street, on the proposed Redevelopment Plan, College Park Project; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan was reviewed and considered at length at said Public Hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Redevelopment Plan for the College Park Project, is hereby in all respects approved and adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, recommends that the P1ayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino adopt said Redevelopment Plan. Adopted: 3-26-70 11r. Wein moved approval of Resolution No. 2185. Mr. for the people in the Hillhurst area who are opposed project. fir. Webster assumed chairmanship, and for. Upon further consideration, the motion was carried b wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin and Webster Noes: None Wilson and Gutierrez for. Austin reassumed the Chair. Webster expressed his concern to being included in this Austin seconded the motion. y the following vote, to Abstention: None Absent: Lucille Goforth, City Clerk, read a letter of objection to the Redevelopment Plan, received by the City from Mr. John B. Surr. Councilman Gregory asked if the people in the area whose homes meet city code would receive a Certificate of Compliance from the Agency. Ilr. Varner stated that they would execute Owner Participation Agreements and then receive a Certificate of Compliance. The people in the Hillhurst area could be issued a Certificate of Compliance with the exclusion of the drainage facilities. lali Councilman Guhin moved for the acceptance of the Redevelopment Plan as sub- mitted. The motion was seconded by Councilman Gregory. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Guhin, Gregory, Lackner and Katona Noes: None Abstention: PJone Absent: Seccombe, I~lheeler and Hammock It was also stated that the Agency and City Council would welcome any comments or questions regarding the project from anyone in the area. P1otion was made by Weirs and seconded by Webster to close the Public Hearing at'1'0:15 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Weirs, Webster and Austin Noes: PVOne Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Gutierrez Dlotion was duly made and seconded by the City Council to adjourn the meeting at 10:15 p.m. The motion was unanimously carried. lhlc', MINUTES OF THE REGULAR fIEETIfJG OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPt1ENT AGENCY OF TFIE CITY OF SAN BERfJARDIfJO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 2ND UAY OF APRIL, 1970, ROOf4 305, SAtJ BERflAROINO,CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the 6leeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency h1embers Present: Austin, Webster, Gutierrez, Wein and Wilson Agency f•1embers Absent: PJOne Also Present: f1r. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and hirs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of (larch 19, 1970 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the Plinutes of D1arch 79, 1970 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None PUBLIC HEARING, SALE DF REUSE PARCELS 4 & 9, R-79, SANTA FE FEDERAL: f1r. Austin stated that this is the time and place set for Public Hearing for the sale of Reuse Parcels 4 & 9, Calif. R-79, to Santa Fe Federal Savings & Loan. fdr. Varner stated that the forms of Agreement & Deed are available for examination. He further stated that tor. Sachs, attorney for Santa Fe, would like the Agreement to read that 54 parking spaces in the parking structure will be made available, and an additional 16 spaces in the structure will be negotiated at a later date. There being no questions, the Public Hearing was closed. REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. SANTA FE FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAPJ, REUSE PARCELS 4 & 9, R-79: Pir. Wein asked if the developer has submitted a firm and definite plan for his proposed structure. Mr. Quinn stated that the developer has. The structure will be four stories high, with approximately 35,000 sq. ft. Escrow will close upon commencement of construction of the five level parking structure. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION fJO. 2186 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMEfJT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIPJG TFIE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSAL AGREEt4EfJT ANU RELATED DOCUf1ENTS FOR THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS 4 & 9, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, TO SANTA FE FEDERAL SAVIfJGS ANU LOAPJ 1419 WfiEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, declared its intention to dispose of a portion of Reuse Parcels 4 and 9, Central City Project by Resolution tio. 2774, to Santa Fe Federal Savings and Loan; and WHEREAS, public disclosure of the Agency's intention to sell said parcels to said Redeveloper was made in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chapter 4, Section 4; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing regarding the proposed disposal of said parcels to said Redeveloper was held on April 2, 1970, in accordance with RHA 7214.1, Chap. 4, Section 4; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Disposal Agreement and execute related documents for the sale of Reuse Parcels 4 & 9, Central City Project to Santa Fe federal Savings & Loan, subject to the approval of said sale by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Adopted: 4-2-70 D1otion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2186. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SUBSTITUTION AGREEDiENT, WELLS FARGO/WINSTEAD: The proposed Substitution Agreement, for the transfer of the sale of Reuse Parcel 2b, R-79 and Reuse Parcels 2, 3, and 4, k-10, from Winstead to Wells Fargo, was presented to all t4embers. Mr. Varner stated that he has reviewed this Agreement and finds it in order. tor. Vincent Cauley with Wells Fargo Bank was presented to the Board. hir. Cauley stated that they are requesting a 120 day escrow, This is a maximum figure, and if they can possibly close escrow before this date they will. They have requested this 120 days because of the time it might take to pass their Executive Committee, and obtain approval of the Comptroller of Currency. As soon as escrow is closed, they desire to erect a temporary structure on the site of the proposed parking area. In this manner they can be in business while they are constructing their structure. They will start on working drawings as soon as escrow closes. Construction will start upon receipt of their completed working drawings. This will take approximately 90 days. Mr. Cauley was asked if there were any contingencies in his agreement. Dlr. Cauley stated that the only contingency they would have would be, that they would not close escrow until the Agency would be able to deliver clear title to the Court Street Property (2b, R-79). This contingency was also in the - -. Winstead Agreements. lc2n (9r. Varner explained that upon approval of the Substitution Agreement, said Agreement would require a Public Hearing. After discussion, the following resolution wes introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2187 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- fJARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE PUR- POSE OF CONSIDERING THE SUBSTITUTION OF WELLS FARGO BANK, A NATIONAL ASSO. IN PLACE OF WILLIAM P. WINSTEAD JR., A MARRIED MAN, APJD JEROME T. WINSTEAD, AN UNh1ARRIED MAN, AS REDEVELOPERS ON REUSE PARCEL 2, 3, & 4 h1EADOWBR00K PROJECT PJO. 1 & REUSE PARCEL 2b, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 7 WHEREAS, under the dates of September 18, 1968 and June 20, 1969, the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into various Agreements with William P. Winstead, Jr., and Jerome T. Winstead; and WHEREAS, said Agreements provided for the disposition of Reuse Parcels 2, 3 and 4, Calif. R-10, and Reuse Parcel 2b, Calif. R-79, to William P. Winstead Jr., and Jerome T. Winstead; and WHEREAS, it is mutually agreed and for the benefit of the Agency, the Winsteads, and Wells Fargo Bank, that said Agreements and property be transferred and assigned to Wells Fargo. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency conduct a Public hearing on April 16, 1970 for the purpose of considering substituting Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, in place of William P. Winstead, Jr., a married man and Jerome T. Winstead, an unmarried man, as Redevelopers on Reuse Parcels 2, 3 and 4 P1eadowbrook Project No. 7 and Reuse Parcel 2b, Central City Project No. 1. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a Notice of such Public Hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation, as required by law. Adopted: 4-2-70 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution tJo. 2187. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHAIJGE ORDER, MOULDER BROTHERS CONTP,ACT, R-79: 1r. Quinn advised that this matter was tabled from the last meeting, in order that a breakdown of costs could be reviewed. After review, the following reso- lution was introduced: 1421 RESOLUTION N0. 2188 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDIfJO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRP1AfJ AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE CHAfJGE ORDER N0. ONE 41ITH 110ULDER BROS. SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 5, LAPJDSCAPIPJG COtJTRACT, CENTRAL CITY P{tOJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California entered into a Contract with Moulder Bros. for Site Preparation Unit No. 5, IJovember 4, 1969; and WHEREAS, during the course of the Contract ten trees amounting to .52,300 were unable to be planted due to conflicting drivevdays, light standards and the planting of 290 shrubs amounting to W609, became unnecessary; and WHEREAS, due to conflicts with electrical conduits, the Contractor was unable to plant the trees, per specifications and had to move off and back on the job-site an additional time and pay for additional barricades at a total cost of 5450; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency Ue authorized to enter into Change Order tJo. 1 with P1oulder Bros. at a net deduction from the Contract Price of $2,559. Adopted: April 2, 1970 P1otion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2188. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Gutierrez andAustin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: PJone RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTION: Plotion was made by Wein and seconded by of f4arch 26, 1970, adopting Resolution ment Plan for the College Park Project, City of San Bernardino. The motion was Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Webster, Wilson None Absent: None Gutierrez ratifying the Agency's action Vo. 2785, approving the Proposed Redevelop- and recommending its approval to the carried by the following vote to wit: and Austin (does: None Abstention: CHANGE ORDER, BWB CONSTRUCTORS, INC.: The changes necessary for the "E" Street Widening Contract with BWB Constructors were explained. The main reason for the change was for additional blacktop. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2189 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPf•1ENT AGEIJCV OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRf1AN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER N0. 2, WITH BWB CONSTRUCTORS, INC., SITE PREPARATION "E" STREET WIDENIIJG, UNIT NO. 17, CALIF. R-10 142?_ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, entered into a Contract with BWB Constructors, Inc. for Site Preparation "E" Street Widening Project, on the 19th day of Flarch, 1970; and WHEREAS, due to the construction of the new curb, gutter and driveway approaches on the east side of "E" Street between Second Street and Athol Street at two locations, Todds Restaurant and Greenwoods Uniform, the elevation at the back of the driveway approaches are 4 to 8 inches higher than the existing parking lot; and WHEREAS, the Contractor BWB Constructors, Inc. has agreed to do the necessary work at a cost not to exceed the sum of $2,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Redevelopment Agency and BWB Constructors, be authorized to enter into Change Order No. 2 for the above mentioned work at a cast not to exceed TWO THOUSAND ANU NO/100 DOLLARS, ($2,000.00) Adopted: April 2, 1970 h1otion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2189. I°iotion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: FJone Absent: None DEMOLITION AIJD SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT N0. 34a, R-79: Dids were opened April 1, 7970 for demolition and site clearance, Unit No. 34a R-79. The low bid was submitted by Dakeno, Inc., in the amount of $9,163. The difference between the bids submitted was reviewed. The Members were con- cerned whether the Contractors were paying federally approved wages to their employees. Fir. Gutierrez stated that he understands that some of the contractors hire Mexican Nationals, but do not pay them the Federal approved wage scale. Mr. Desrochers stated that they inspect the jobs about twice a month. Fir. Varner stated that it is the Agency's responsibility to make sure that approved wages are paid. The Members determined that the award of the Contract should be tabled for a review of the situation regarding workmen's wages. f1otion was made by bJein and seconded by 6Jebster to table said award of Contract for Unit No. 34a. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, IJilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: PJone AWARD OF CONTRACTS, UNIT N0. 35 AND UNIT N0. 12, PHASE I: f•lotion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez to table the award of Contract for Site Preparation No. 12, Phase I, and Contract for Demolition Unit No. 35. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Webster, Wilson and Austin Noes: fJone Abstention: None Absent: None It was determined by all members that h1r. Austin could call a Special Dleeting to award these three contracts, upon review of the wage rates of certain con- tractors. ___ 123 J. D. DIFFENBAUGH, CHANGE ORDER: Authorization was requested to enter into Change Order with J. D. Diffenbaugh for the change in the location of an 8 inch water main. The City Fire Department has requested this Change. The amount of this change will not exceed $750. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2190 RESOLUTION) OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TIIE CITY OF SAN BERNARDIfJO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRh1AN AND SEC- , TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER N0. 7, WITH THE J. D. DIFFENBAUGH COMPANY, SITE PREPARATION UNIT N0. 2 CONTRACT, PUBLIC P1ALL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San 6ernardino, California entered into a Contract with the J. U. Diffenbaugh Co. for Site Preparation Unit No. 2, California, R-79, dated June 27, 1969; and WhJEREAS, from information supplied by the City of San Bernardino Fire Department, a change in the location of an 8 inch water main is necessary. The fire sprinkler system was designed to run along the east line of the southwest arcade. Said line would interfere with other site construction and not be readily accessable to the Fire Department; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to run the line to the west side of the arcade. Said change would require an additional 25 feet of 8 inch pipe and trenching, compaction along side the arcade; and WHEREAS, the Contractor, J. D. Diffenbaugh Company proposes to do the modifi- cation at a cost not to exceed $866.25. NOW, TPJEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Redevelopment Agency and Diffenbaugh Co. be authorized to institute the above modification at a cost not to exceed the sum of Seven Hundred Fifty Dollars and n0/100 ($750.00) in Change Order PJo. 7 Central City Project flo. Adopted: April 2, 7970 t~iotion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2190. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CENTRAL CITY SITE Ih1PROVEMENTS - ENGINEERING: f1r. Desrochers' memorandum regarding completion of the engineering for the balance of the Central City Site Improvements was presented to all Members. Mr. Wein stated that he would like the proposal to go out to other local firms. All agreed. flotion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson instruct- ing the Executive Director to invite proposals from local firms for the engineering of completion of the Central City Site Improvements. These proposals shall be available for the next Board P1eeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: fJone Abstention: None Absent: None CONCURRENCE, SAfJ BERNARDINO 11UNICIPAL AIR PARK PROJECT: t•1r. Varner stated that the City has prepared a Preliminary Plan for the proposed 1~lunicipal Air Park Project. They have requested our review and approval of this Plan and the tentative boundaries. Nr. Varner stated that he has reviev;ed the area and the Plan with Mayor Ballard, and they have prepared a map of the tentative boundaries. The map and boundaries were explained. Ilr. Varner stated that firs. Brier, owner of Tri-City Airport, will have the option to either become an Owner Participant or sell her property to the Agency for development. The proposed project area is approximately 250 acres. The proposed Industrial Park area has been included in the tentative boundary map. Upon approval of the tentative boundaries and Preliminary Plan by the Agency the City can start annexation proceedings. After careful review, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTIOIJ N0. 2191 RESOLUTIOIJ OF THE REDEVELOPPIENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORIJIA, APPROVING THE TENTATIVE BOUNDARIES AND THE PRELIh1INARY PLAN, FOR THE PROPOSED PIUNICIPAL AIR PARK PROJECT AS SUBh1ITTED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANWING C011MISSIOIJ WHEREAS, there are survey areas within the City of San Bernardino requiring preliminary studies to determine the feasibility of particular redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 8800, adopted August 28, 1967, and amended by Reso- lution No. 8810, adopted September 6, 1967, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino designated a certain described area as a survey area and found that said area requires study to determine if a redevelopment project is feasible; and WIiEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, in compliance with the above mentioned Resolutions prepared a Preliminary Plan report for the Proposed Municipal Air Park Project; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to designate said described area as a Redevelopment Project. tJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, does hereby approve the tentative boundary and Pre- liminary Plan for the Proposed 1unicipal Air Park Project, as submitted by the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission. Adopted: 4-2-70 P-lotion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2191. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Gutierrez Noes: (lone Abstention: None Absent: None 14z5 JOINT POWERS AGREEP1ENT CONCEPT: hlr. Varner explained that we have been asked by the City of San 6ernardino for our approval or the Joint Powers Agreement Concept, h1r. Varner stated that by giving our approval of this concept, we are not approving the Agree- ment itself, but merely approving the concept. f1r. Varner stated that he has reviewed several drafts of the Agreement and feels that said Agreement will need careful review and consideration. Approving the concept is actually a statement of intent to consider the Agreement for Execution. The Agree- ment itself will enable the Agency-City-County to sell their Bonds more easily. After much discussion regarding the concept, tor. Wein suggested that vahen the actual agreement is prepared, a workshop meeting be held, so that all Members can fully understand the provisions of the Agreement. fir. Quinn stated that this would be done. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2192 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDIWO, CALIFORfJIA, APPROVING THE JOINT POWERS CONCEPT FOR THE CITY-COUNTY-REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY VdHEP,EAS, the City of San Bernardino, California, forwarded for approval to the Redevelopment Agency, a Joint Povaers Concept for the City of San Ber- nardino, County of San Bernardino, and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, this Agency has reviewed the Joint Powers Concept as submitted by the City of San Bernardino. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San 6ernardino, California, that the Joint Powers Concept, as submitted by the City of San Bernardino, California, is hereby approved. Adopted: 4-2-70 11otion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 2192. The motion was carried by the fallowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin floes: alone Abstention: None Absent: None PRELIPIINARY PLAN REPORTS ON FOUR SURVEY AREAS: f•ir. Austin stated that the City fias requested the Agency's review of thie four survey areas for proposed Redevelopment Project Areas. The areas are as follows: Fifth Street and Arrowhead Avenue; Fifth Street and "F" Street; Seccombe Lake Park; and the fleadowbrook Park Project. The following resolutions were intro- duced: 1426 RESOLUTION NO. 2193 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDIfJO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TENTATIVE BOUfJDARY AND THE PRELIt=1I NARY PLAfJ, FOR TIIE PROPOSED FIFTH & ARROWHEAD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT, AS SUBPIITTED BY THE CITY OF SAN 6ERNARDINO PLANNItJG COf4MISSION WIJEREAS, there are survey areas within the City of San Bernardino, requiring preliminary studies to determine the feasibility of particular redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 10088, adopted, January 5, 1970, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 6ernardino designated a certain described area as a survey area and found that said area requires study to determine if a redevelopment project is feasible; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, in compliance with the above mentioned Resolution prepared a Preliminary Plan re- port for the Proposed Fifth & Arrowhead Avenue Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, Lhe Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to designate said described area as a Redevelopment Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San 6ernardino, California, does hereby approve the tentative boundary and Preliminary Plan for the Proposed Fifth and Arrowhead Avenue Redevelopment Pro- ject, as submitted by the city of San Bernardino Planning Commission. Adopted: 4-2-70 RESOLUTION N0. 2194 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAPI 6ER- fJARDIPJO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIIG THE TENTATIVE BOUPJDARY AND THE PRELIt•1INARY PLAN, FOR THE PROPOSED SECCOMBE LAKE PARK REDEVELOP- MENT PROJECT, AS SU8h1ITTED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLAN- fJING COhif4ISSION WfiEREAS, there are survey areas within the City of San Bernardino, requiring preliminary studies to determine the feasibility of particular redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 10088, adopted January 5, 1970, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino designated a certain described area as a survey area and found that said area requires study to determine if a redevelopment project is feasible; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, in compliance with the above mentioned Resolution prepared a Preliminary Plan report for the Proposed Seccombe Lake Park Redevelopment Project; and 1427 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to designate said described area as a Redevelopment Project NOIJ, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, does hereby approve the tentative boundary and Preliminary Plan for the Proposed Seccombe Lake Park Redevelopment Project, as submitted by the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Adopted: 4-2-70 RESOLUTION N0. 2195 RESOLUTIONJ OF THE REDEVELOPtENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARUINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVIfJG THE TENTATIVE BOUNDARY AND THE PRELII~1INARY PLAN, FOR THE PROPOSED MEADOWBROOK PARK REDEVELOP- f4ENT PROJECT AS SUBPIITTED BY THE CITY OP SAFJ BERfJARDIPJO PLANfJIIJG COMPIISSIOIJ WHEREAS, there are survey areas within the City of San Bernardino, requiring preliminary studies to determine the feasibility of particular redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 10088, adopted January 5, 1970, the Piayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino designated a certain described area as a survey area and found that said area requires study to determine if a redevelopment project is feasible; and WIIEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California,in compliance with the above mentioned Resolution prepared a Preliminary Plan report for the Proposed Ileadowbrook Park Redevelopment Project; and WfIEP,EAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San 6ernardino, California, desires to designate said described area as a Redevelopment Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, does hereby approve the tentative boundary and Preli- minary Plan for the Proposed Meadowbrook Park Redevelopment Project, as submitted by the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Adopted: 4-2-70 RESOLUTION N0. 2196 RESOLUTIOtJ OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGEtJCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- tJARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPP.OVING THE TENTATIVE BOUNDARY AND THE PRELIMINARY PLAN, FOR THE PROPOSED FIFThI STREET AND "F" STREET REDEVELOPt~1ENT PROJECT, AS SUBh1ITTED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNAR- DI~lO'PLANNING COh1MISSION 1fl28 WHEREAS, there are survey areas within tt~e City of San Bernardino, requiring preliminary studies to determine the feasibility of particular redevelopment projects; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 10088, adopted January 5, 1970, the PAayor and Coimion Council of the City of San Bernardino designated a certain described area as a survey area and found that said area requires study to determine if a redevelop- ment project is feasible; and WFIEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino, California, in compliance with the above mentioned Resolution prepared a Preliminary Plan report for the Proposed Fifth Street and "F" Street Redevelopment Project; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to designate said described area as a Redevelopment Project. fJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, does hereby approve the tentative boundary and Preli- minary Plan for the Proposed Fifth Street and "F" Street Redevelopment Project, as submitted by the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Adopted: 4-2-70 D1otion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolutions No. 2193, 2194, 2195, and 2196. (lotion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Executive Director was instructed to notify the Planning Department as follows: In reply to your letter of January 27, 1970, please be advised that the Agency has reviewed the Preliminary Plan reports for the four survey areas as set forth by the Playor and Common Council, per Resolution No. 10088. The Agency concurs in the project boundaries and the Preliminary Plan reports as prepared by the Planning Staff and the Planning Commission. AUJOURNI4ENT J~lotion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein to recess the meeting to an Executive Session. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, Gutierrez and Austin Noes: PJone Abstention: None Absent: None After review of matters at the Executive Session, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Gutierrez to reconvene the Regular I•teeting. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Gutierrez, Wilson, Webster and Austin floes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 1429 The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION N0. 2197 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDIfJO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIIG THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EfJTER INTO COfTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC., UNIT N0. 34A, DEf10LITI0N & SITE CLEARANCE CEPJTRAL CITY PROJECT fJO. I, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of P1arch 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its' Central City Project flo. 1, Calif. P.-79 under Title I of the dousing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that contract, ttie Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive bids for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 34A, for the demolition and clearance of certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of General circulation, in the County of San Bernardino on March 9, 1970 and March 16, 7970, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on tiie 1st day of April 7970, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California, and WHEREAS, a number of bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud; and 6JHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the Bid of Da keno, Inc. is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. NOW, TIJEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Dakeno, Inc. for the sum of $9,163 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit 34A, Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79 on behalf of the Agency. Fldopted: April 2, 1970 RESOLUTIONV N0. 2796 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDIfJO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRfAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH GRIGGS-fJORlJ00D, INC. FOR UNIT 12, PHASE 1, SITE PREP- ARATION, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79 T430 WHEREAS, The Agency has under date of Piarch 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Con- tract, the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive bids for Site Preparation Unit 12, Phase I, for the site preparation of certain areas in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino on March 9, 7970 and March 16, 1970, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 1st day of April, 1970, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Gernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud;-and 41fIEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Griggs-Norwood, Inc. is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San Bernardino and the Agency. fJOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development the bid of Griggs-fJorwood, Inc. for the sum of $83,500 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Site Preparation Unit N0. 12, Phase 1, Calif. R-79, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: April 2, 1970 RESOLUTION fJO. 2199 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPPJENT AGEPJCY OF THE CITY OF SAFJ BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRh1AN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT IdITH GANGI EXCAVATION, UNIT N0, 35, DEMOLITIOW AND SITE CLEARANCE, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT N0. 1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of Piarch 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for fi- nancial aid to the Agency for its' Central City Project No. 1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and 1C?1 41HEP,EAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site - w Clearance Unit No. 35, for the demolition and clearance of certain areas, in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino, on March 15, 1970 and f4arch 22, 1970, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said Invitation called the receipt of such bids until 3:00 p.m. on the 2nd day of April, 1970 at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that the bid of Gangi Excavation is the best qualified and to the best interest of the City of San 6ernardino and the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Flgency of the City of San Bernardino, California that subject to the approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Gangi Excavation for the sum of $77, 800 be hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 35, Calif. R-79, Central City Project tJo. 1, on behalf of said Agency. Adopted: 4-2-70 P1otion was made by Webster and seconded by Gutierrez authorizing the adoption of Resolutions No. 2197, 2198 and 2199. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Gutierrez, Wein, Wilson and Austin Noes: None Abstention: fJone Absent: None Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, l9ein, Gutierrez and Austin floes: None Abstention: None Absent: None