Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBook 06 12/11/67 - 08/01/68 523 [ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEM- BERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1967, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Wilson, Wein, Austin and Webster Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary It was noted that the Regular Meeting scheduled for December 7. 1967 was post- poned to December 11, 1967 pursuant to the following Notice which was sent to all Members on December 5. 1967. [ NOTICE is hereby given that the Regular Meeting of the Members of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, scheduled for December 7. 1967, is hereby postponed until Monday, December 11, 1967. at 4:00 o'clock p.m., 323 Court Street, Room 305. in the City of San Bernardino, California. the regular meeting place thereof. Dated this 5th day of December, 1967. s/Warner W. Hodgdon Warner W. Hodgdon, Chairman MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 20, 1967 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson approving the Minutes of November 20, 1967 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson. Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Minutes of the Special Meeting of November 27. 1967 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin approv- ing the Minutes of November 27, 1967 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Webster. Austin. Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: [ The expenditures for the month of November. 1967 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster approving the expenditures as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin. Webster, Wils09. Weln and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 524 REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: J Hr. Varner reported that he has not received the report of Meadowbrook Con- demnation from Hr. Ward, Condemnation Attorney, but that Mr. Ward has in- formed him that ~his report should be ready for the next regular meeting, concerning the estimated trial dates. REQUEST FOR EARLY CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. GEORGE CARLTON, R-79: Mr. Varner reported that since the previous meeting, Hr. Greenestone (Bee's Variety Store) has retained Hr. Goldie as his attorney. Mr. Goldie has ask- ed for time to have the property appraised at his clients own expense, and should be ready to discuss this matter by the next regular meeting. Mr. Varner recommended that this matter be deferred until the next regular meet- ing in order to allow time for an appraisal of the property as requested by Mr. Goldie. Motion was made by We in and seconded by Wilson to defer said matter until the next regular meeting. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REVIEW OF PROPOSALS TO PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR GRADE CROSSING OF "D" STREET R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon s.ated that we have received three proposals for the construction plans for "D" Street. They are as follows: Joseph E. Bonadiman and Associates Arrowhead Engineering Corporation Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy $3,350.00 3,450.00 8,850.00 J Joseph E. Bonadiman and Associates was declared the low bidder. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein accepting the proposal of Joseph E. Bonadiman. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 564 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR- MAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. 6 TO CONTRACT BY AND BBTWEEN THE AGENCY AND BONADlHAN & ASSOCIATES FOR CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR "D" STREET, R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California has under date of August 22, 1960 entered into a Contract with Joseph E. Bonadiman and Associates; and WHEREAS, said Contract dated August 22, 1960 was amended by Contract Amend- ment No.1, dated May 7, 1964, Contract Amendment No.2, dated November 8, 1966, Contract Amendment No.3, dated May 19,1967, Contract Amendment NO.4, dated June 19, 1967 and Contract Amendment No.5, dated December 12, 1967 J 525 r L WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor to include construction plans for "D" Street; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting of said Agency held December 11, 1967, the Members agreed to execute a Contract Amendment to Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates Contract to include said sefvices. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. 6 by and between the Agency and Joseph E. Bonadiman and Associates for the services set forth in said Contract Amendment No.6. Hotion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin adopting Resolution No. 564. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR EARLY CONDEMNATION ACTION, BLOCK 20, PARCEL 2, DAISY MARTIN & HEIRS & DEVISEES OF B. E. MARTIN, OWNERS: Mr. Varner stated that he has reviewed the matter and that all parties in- volved request condemnation action. He further stated that he can see no reason why this matter should not be considered for eminent domain proceedings. The following Resolution was introduced: [ RESOLUTION NO. 565 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CER- TAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO.1, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 (Block 20, Parcel 2, DAISY HARTIN & HEIRS AND DEVISEES OF B. E. HARTIN) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or re- moval of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandon- ment of some interior street areas and the demolition of ~ther areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparceli- zation of the area, rough grading of the acquired land. installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plan. [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director. Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in anddfor the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency. for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with 526 the prov~s~ons of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. J BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 20, Parcel 2, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson adopting Resolution No. 565 authorizing condemnation proceeding for Block 20, Parcel 2, and further directing Mr. Allen Gresham, Conde.nation Attorney, to handle said proceed- ings. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, PROPERTY OWNED BY W. J. AND HELEN W. PURCIEL: The Members were presented with a letter from Mr. and Mrs. W. J. Purciel requesting condemnation proceedings. They were advised that Mr. Harper, Deputy Director, confirmed Mr. Koren's, (tenant) desire to also acquire the property through condemnation. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 566 J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 (Block 18, Parcel 1, W. J. PURCIEL AND HELEN W. PURCIEL) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by OrdiBance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or re- moval of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandon- ment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparceli- zation of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plani BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Proce- dure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. J 527 [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 18, Parcell, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein adopting Resolution No. 566 authorizing condemnation proceedings for the property at 649 and 653 Third Street, and further directing Mr. Allen Gresham, Condemnation Attorney to handle said proceedings. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None VICTOR GRUEN & ASSOCIATES PROPOSAL REGARDING CENTRAL CITY PARKING DECK STRUCTURE: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to table said matter until the first meeting in January, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: NOne Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, BUD AMMONS ELECTRIC SHAVERS, 550 WlST THIRD STREET, R-79: [ Mr. Varner stated that at the present time there is an action pending between parties involved on the above matter. He recommended that this matter be deferred until such time as the present action is determined. The Members stated that they would like to have a written report from the attorney, Mr. Goldie, regarding this matter, said report should contain the estimated date that this action will be completed. The Members also felt that Mr. Varner should obtain a report from the attorneys for the Kantor - Wein property. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Web*ter to defer the matter of con- demnation proceedings for Bud Ammons Electric Shavers until such time as the pending action on this property is determined, and further instruction Mr. Varner to obtain a written report from the Attorney, Mr. Goldie, regarding this pending action. It was further moved that Mr. Varner be instructed to obtain a report on the pending action on the Kantor - Wein property. Said reports are to be presented at the next regular meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT AND DEED BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND GLASER BROS., R-IO: [ The Members were presented with a letter from the Bank of America regarding Reuse Parcels 91 and 92, R-10. The bank requests that the Agency modify the Agreement of Sale and Deed for financial purposes. This modification will not affect the Agency in any way; it is merely in the wording of the "good faith clause". . Mr. Varner recommended that a letter be directed to the Bank 528 requesting that this modification be handled by a Letter Agreement duly executed instead of actually modifying the Agreement and Deed itself. If the Bank of America will not agree to such a Letter Agreement, Mr. Varner recommended that we modify the Agreement and Deed as requested. , ..... Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster that the Attorney be instructed to direct a letter to the Bank of America requesting that the modification of the Agreement and Deed between the Redevelopment Agency and Glaser Bros. be handled by a Letter Agreement, and the Chairman and Secretary be authorized to execute said Letter Agreement if acceptable to the Bank. If not acceptable to the Bank of America, the Chairman and Secretary be authorized to execute and record a modified Agreement and Deed for the sale of said property. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster adjourning the meeting at 4:25 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None l .... J 529 [ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 21ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 1967, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Austin and Wein Agency Members Absent; Webster and Wilson Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director, Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Contreras, Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein the Minutes of December 11, 1967 as submitted. following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein and Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Webster 11, 1967 were presented to the and seconded by Austin approving The motion was carried by the Hodgdon Noes: None [ REPORT FROM AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner reported that eminent domain action on Martin, Winstead, etc., has been filed and is in the process of being served. It will take about one week for services to be completed. Mr. Varner will keep the Members informed as the matter develops. Mr. Varner gave a report on Meadowbrook eondemnation Proceedings from Mr. Ward, Condemnation Attorney, as follows: According to the last report the remaining parcels have been set up in three trials. The most important ones now are parcels 4 and 5. The certificates of readiness have been filed and we are ready for trial. Mr. Ward is in the process of filing a motion for an early trial date, and was informed by the court that it will be ready for the case in court by January. He talked to counsel for the other side, Mr. Thomas Baggett, who stated that the only issues remaining to be resolved in this case is evaluation problems and they predict that all three trials on remaining parcels will be handled in four trial days. The trials will be handled consecutively in January, and at the latest should be through by March 1, 1967. REQUEST FOR EARLY CONDEMNATION ACTION, CARLTON - BENDER PROPERTY, R-79: Mr. Varner stated that there is no possibility of settling this matter. Parties involved are requesting that the case be placed in condemnation. The follow- ing resolution was introduced: n f '-.J RESOLUTION NO. 567 530 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CON- DEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. I, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 (Block 3, Parcel 12, FLORA C. BENDER AND GEORGE L. CARLTON) J BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of theCCity of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pur~uant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or re- moval of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandon- ment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparceliza- tion of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this .gency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. --, *! 1 ..." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 3, Parcel 12, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin adopting Resolution No. 567 authorizing condemnation proceedings for Block 3, Parcel 12, and further directing Mr. Allen Gresham, Condemnation Attorney, to handle said proceedings. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Nees: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Wilson. REPORT ON JACK GOLDEN PROPERTY (BUD AMMONS ELECTRIC SHAVERS) Mr. Ray Goldie, Attorney for Jack Golden, reported that the trial will be in court by March 1968 before condemnation proceedings. Mr. Goldie has written to counsel for Hr. Ammons and expects reply within thirty days. A motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin that this matter be deferred for 30 days J 531 [ pending reply from Mr. Ammons' Coun~el, and Mr. Goldie will give report at this time. Motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Hodgdon, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent; Wilson and Webster WEED ABATEMENT CONTRACT, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, R-79: Mr. Quinn read the results of the opening of Weed Abatement Bids to the Mem- bers. Mr. Enoch Wood and Associates was the only bid submitted for this contract, with a bid of $48.000 per acre per year. Mr. Jarner stated that he has examined the bid and found that there are no irregularities in said bid. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 568 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT FOR WEED ABATEMENT IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA WITH WOOD AND ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino is responsible for controlling the growth of weeds upon properties owned by said Agency within the City of San Bernardino; and ,..., i , '- WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Agency to have Weed Control performed by contractors; and WHEREAS, the Agency did on the 18th day of December, 1967, open bid submitted by Contractors for the purpose of controlling weeds in the project area; and WHEREAS, Wood and Associates presented the only bid for this Contract; and WHEREAS, Wood and Associates' bid encompassed all items set forth as require- ments of this Agency; and WHEREAS, the bid price was not a major deviation from the Agency's estimate: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Executive Director and Chairman are hereby directed to execute Contract for Weed Abatement by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino and Wood and Associates for the Calendar year 1968. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 568. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Webster. SANITARY SEWER DESIGN CONTRACT FOR CENTRAL CITY: ,..-, The Members were presented with three proposals for the Sanitary Sewer Design Services for R-79. Mr. Quinn stated that all three firms are qualified to perform the services required. After further discussion the following resolu- tion was introduced: \,..., 532 RESOLUTION NO. 569 J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO t CALIFORNIA t AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING CORPORATION FOR SANITARY SEWER DESIGN SERVICES FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT CALIF. R-79 WHEREASt the Local Public Agency haSt under date of March 21t 1967t entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the CentBal City Project Area No. It Calif. R-79t with the United States of America providing for the fi- nancial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1945 as amended by all amendatory acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and WHEREASt pursuant to such Contractt the Local Public Agency desires to engage a contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with sanitary sewer design services for the Central City Project Area No. It Calif. R-79; and WHEREASt the Local Public Agency at a Regular Meeting held the 21st day of Decembert 1967t found and determined that Arrowhead Engineering Corporation was best qualified to perform said sanitary sewer design services. NOWt THEREFOREt BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardinot C'liforniat that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authaDized on behalf of the Agency to enter into a Contract with Arrowhead Engineering Corporation to provide for the sanitary sewer design services needed for the Central City Project Area No. It Calif. R-79. .. .....tI Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin approving the adopting of Resolution No. 569. The motion was carried by the fOllowing vote to wit: Ayes: Weint Austin and Hodgdont Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Webster DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE CONTRACTt UNIT NO. 3t R-79: The Members were presented a tabulation of bids for Demolition and Site Clear- ance Unit No. 3t R-79. Said bids were opened on December 19t 1967. A. S. Hubbs was declared the low bidder with a bid of $24t300. Mr. Varner stated that there is no irregularity in the bid. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 570 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOt CALIFORNIAt AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR- MAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH A. S. HUBBS FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF UNIT NO. 3t CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. It CALIF. R-79 --- ......., 533 [ WHEREASt the Agency hast under date of March 21t 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No. It Calif. R-79t under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949t as amendedt and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project Area No.1; and WHEREASt the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearancet Contractt Unit No. It for the demolition of buildings and structures and site clearance of certain areas in said project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREASt an invitation for bidst therefort was duly published in the San Ber- nardino Sun-Telegramt a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on the 1st and 8th days of Decembert 1967 and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREASt said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 19th day of Decembert 1967t at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Streett San Bernardinot California; and [ WHEREASt a number of such bids were received at the time and place above speci- fied and upon such bids being opened at a duly called public meeting of said AgencYt the lowest ,ualified bid was offered by A. S. Hubbs in the sum of $24t300. WHEREASt it appears to said Agency that said A. S. Hubbs is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of said Agency to accept their bid: NOWt THEREFOREt BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardinot Californiat that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by Agency Counsel and the Department of Housing and Urban Developmentt said bid of A. S. Hubbs in the sum of $24t300 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the said Contract for Unit No. 3 on behalf of the Agency. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 570. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Weint Hodgdont and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Wilson REFUND OF DEPOSIT - NATE ROSEt REUSE PARCEL NO. 72: [ A letter was presented to the Members from Nate Roset dated December 15t 1967t regarding cancellation of his Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel 72 in the Meadow- brook Projectt and r~questing refund of deposit in the amount of $822.50. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by We in cancelling the Offer to Purchase and refunding Mr. Rose's deposit of Reuse Parcel 72. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Hodgdont Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Wilson 534 TRIP TO WASHINGTON: 'J Mr. Quinn advised the Members that Mayor Al C. Ballard, Mr. Warner W. Hodgdon and Mr. Bruce D. Varner traveled to Washington, D. C. on December 5, 1967 and December 13, 1967. These trips were essential to the continuing conduct of Agency business. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 571 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING MAYOR AL C. BALLARD, MR. WARNER W. HODGDON, AND MR. BRUCE D. VARNER TO TllAVEL TO WASHINGTON, D. C. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be speci- fically authorized by a Resolition of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found to be essential to the continuing conduct of Agency business that the Mayor of the City of San Bernardino, the Chairman of the Agency Board, and the Agency Counsel travel to Washiagton, D. C. on December 5, 1967, and December 13, 1967. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Mayor of the City of San Bernardino the Chairman of the Agency Board, and the Agency Counsel were authorized to travel to Washington, D. C. on the above dates, and their expenses are hereby approved in accordance with the provisions of Resolution 302 of the Agency. --- ~ ....J Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin Resolution No. 571. The motion was carried by Ayes: Austin, Hodgdon and Wein Noes: None Webster and Wilson authorizing the adoption of the following vote to wit: Abstention: None Absent: CHANGE ORDER, CULLEN & SON DEMOLITION CONTRACT, UNIT NO.1, R-79: Request was made for authorization to execute a Change Order to Cullen and Son Demolition Contract, Unit No.1, R-79, to decrease the services of the Contractor by omitting the filling of the basement on Item 2, Group III. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 572 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND CULLEN & SON FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT 1, R-79 .., ......- ,..- L" ,-, :I L r- , i........ 535 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California by its Resolution No. 520 entered into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No.1 in the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, said Contract was executed on the 1st day of August, 1967; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino desires to decrease the services of the Contractor by omitting the filling of the base- ment on Item 2, Group III; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting held the 21st day of December, 1967 the Members approved the execution of said Change Order to Cullen & Son. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order by and between the Agency and Cullen & Son for Demo- lition and Site Clearance, Unit No.1, R-79. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin approving the adopting of Resolution No. 572. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Hodgdon, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Webster WRITE OFF RENT, ORVILLE WILLIAMSON, BLOCK 7, PARCEL 20 Mr. Hodgdon stated that there was a request to write off rent for Orville Williamson, a tenant in our project area who has left owing the Agency rent in the amount of $105.53; Mr. Quinn stated that the matter has been pursued to try to find him. Mr. Varner then suggested that this be turned over to a collection agency. Wein made~a motion and seconded by Austin that if the col- lection agency is unsuccessful, to write off the rent. Motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None, Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Webster REMOVING AND TRIMMING OF TREES IN PROJECT AREA R-IO: Mr. Quinn stated that the Agency had received two proposals; one from Ballinger Tree Service and one from Wood and Associates. Wood and Associates was the low bidder in the amount of $975. A Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the removal and trimming of trees in Project R-IO by Wood & Associates. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Hodgdon and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and WEbster GEORGE KANTOR PROPERTY, SANFORD WEIN, BLOCK 3, PARCEL 7: Varner requested that the Board consider making Wein temporary Chairman of the meeting while the next item is discussed due to Wein's interest in this item. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein making Wein temporaPy Chairaan. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Hodgdon, Austin and Wein Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Webster 536 Mr. Wein stated that he would abstain from voting on this matter, but that he would discuss and answer questions. ~ , ...J Mr. Varner stated that he has been in continuous contact with Mr. Apter re- garding the Municipal Court action and that the $206,000 amount which was offered to Mr. Kantor is not going to be acceptable, so the case will have to proceed to condemnation. It has been discussed further with Mr. Kantor and Mr. Apter and they agree that this is what they want to do and they hope that the action from Municipal Court can be consolidated with condemnation pro- ceedings. Mr. Varner recosmended that this matter proceed to condemnation. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 573 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNA- TION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO.1, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 (Block 3, Parcel 7, GEORGE KANTOR) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as fol- lows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area NO.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on Feb- bruary 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demoli- tion of other areas for street widening, street installation or ther street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the ac- quired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevel- opment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plan. ~ 'i ,~ ~ laIIIIII BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 3, Parcel 7, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the .gency. ... --' 537 r i \...- Motion was made by Hodgdon and seconded by Austin adopting Resolution No. 573. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Hodgdon, Austin Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: Webster and Wilson OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Quinn presented the Members with a letter from Mr. Bierschbach requesting condemnation in favor of Mr. Gold. Mr. David Jordan who represents the owner requested that due to the fact that he had not seen this request, that the matter be tabled to the next meeting. Mr. Jordan further stated that he and Mr. Gold were close to negotiating settlement in this matter, but due to other parties of interest in the lease, that he intented filing a petition for declaratory relief from the Superior Court asking that the court determine who the parties of interest in the lease are. He will contact Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel after he checks into the matter. Varner will also investigate the matter. Wein made a motion and seconded by Austin to table this matter until the next meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Hodgdon, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Webster c Austin informed the Members that he has received a copy of a letter from Currie Engineering Company which required a reply. Mr. Quinn informed him that it was just a formal way of excusing themselves of not submitting proposals. Wein thought the Board should meet with Currie Engineering Company to discuss the situation. Mr. Quinn said he would explore into the matter and find out if the Currie Engineering Company wishes to meet with the Board Members. Mr. Varner informed the Members that he was in the process of meeting with Mr. Henchel and Mr. Jacobs to go over terms and conditions for low cost housing. He will inform the Agency on this at a later date. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin to adjourn the meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Hodgdon, Wein and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Webster [ 538 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. HELD ON THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY. 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 C&UlT STREET. SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA .., ! ....." The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Webster, Austin. Wein and Wilson Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn. Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter. Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 21. 1967 were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Austin requested that on Page 5 under Other Business the wording be changed on the first line of the second paragraph to read: Austin informed the Members that he has received a co~y of a letter from Currie. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin approv~ng the Minutes of December 21, 1967 as corrected. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Webster. Wein. Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: ~ The Expenditures for the month of December. 1967 were presented for approval. --Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson approving the expenditures as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ...." REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner informed the Members that the first Condemnation Case in the Central City Project ( Martin & Heirs) has been served and is being processed. The attorneys have indicated that they will submit their responses as soon as pos- sible. Mr. Varner further stated that condemnation of Carlton-Bender and Kantor-Wein are now in the process of being served. The dates for the above trials should be known by the end of February. Mr. Varner stated that he has not received any correspondence from Mr. Ward regarding R-10 condemnation actions, but that he will look into the matter if so desired. CULLEN & SON, CONSIDERATION OF LIQUIDATED DAMAGES, UNIT NO.1, R-79: .., ~ ~ .....IIi A letter was presented to the Members from Cullen & Son, Inc., Demolition and Site Clearance Contractor for Unit No.1, R-79. The letter requests consideration 539 r- '- of the liquidated damages for Group IV in the amount of $250.00. They ran five days over their contract time for this work. Mr. Wilson stated that the assess- ment of liquidated damages was as required by the Contract and that insufficient reasons existed to allow the Agency to set a precedent by the remission of liquidated damages. Mr. Varner stated that he knew of no legal reason why the Agency should not be entitled to the amount of the damages so specified. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin denying the request of Cullen and Son, Inc. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit; Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, JORDAN - MAC PHERSON - BRUNNER: Mr. Varner stated that none of the parties concerned have contacted him regarding this request for condemnation. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson to table this matter until the next regular meeting and instructing Mr. Varner to contact the parties concerned. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR AUTHORIZATION TO PURCHASE SIGNS FOR RELOCATED BUSINESSES: [ Mr. Quinn requested authorization to purchase signs for relocated businesses in the project area. Said sign will state that the business has been relocated by the Redevelopment Agency and state the new address. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the Executive Director to obtain proposals for the purchase of said signs and to make the proper determination concerning their purchase. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 4:15 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: NOne Abstention: None Absent: None Resolutions 574 thro~gh 593 omitted through typing error -- not to be used. ,.... /1 '-- 540 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA J The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Webster, Austin, Wein and Wilson Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 4, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the minutes as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner reported that the progressing satisfactorily. calendar he believes that it are set for trial. condemnation cases in the Central City Project are He further stated that after review of the court will be late spring or early summer before the cases ,., i '-" REQUEST FOR CONDEMANTION PROCEEDINGS, JORDAN, MAC PHERSON AND BRUNNER, R-79: Mr. Varner informed the members that there is a possibility that the parties involved in this request might come to an understanding within the next week. He recommended that the Board authorize condemnation proceedings, but instructed the Executive Director to withhold any execution of proceedings for a week in order to determine if the parties involved can reach an agreement. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 594 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 3, Parcel 9, JORDAN, MAC PHERSON and BRUNNER) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in ~ .......Ii 541 [ the City of San Bernardinot Californiat pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24t 1964 by Ordinance No. 2649t and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereont the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street wideningt street installation or other street improvementst reparcelization of the areat rough grading of the acquired landt installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plant and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counselt Allen B. Greshamt and its Executive Directort Peter W. Quinnt Jr.t be and they are hereby author- ized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this AgencYt for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. r '- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No. It Project No. Calif. R-79t and in the City of San Bernardinot County of San Bernardinot State of Californiat and is designated at Block 3t Parcel 9t being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 594 but instructing the Executive Director to withhold any exe- cution of proceedings for a week in order to determine if the parties involved can reach an agreement. The motion was carried by the following votet to wit: Ayes: Austint Webstert Weint Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR ACQUISITION APPRAISALS R-lO: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to obtain acquisition appraisals for the parcel affected by the "D" Street Relocation. We will need two appraisals on this property. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the Executive Director to obtain a first and second appraisal on the property affected by the "D" Street Relocation as requested. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing votet to wit: Ayes: Weint Wilsont Austint Webster and Hodgdon Noes: NOne Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR REUSE APPRAISALS R-IO: r Mr. Hodgdon explained that reuse appraisals are needed for the City Water De- partment and the railroad right-of-way property in the Meadowbrook Project Area. Reuse Appraisers recommended are as follows: ...... Reuse Appraisers John Shaddy Al Knor $3,000.00 3,500.00 $6,500.00 542 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the Executive Director to obtain reuse appraisals on the City Water Department and the Rail- road right-of-way property. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None ., j ~ ...J REQUEST TO ESTABLISH SECOND BANK ACCOUNT FOR E-5: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to establish a second bank account for the Code Enforcement Program E-5 Account for administratives expenses. Motion was made by Webster, and seconded by Wein authorizing the establishment of a second bank account for the Code Enforcement Program. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: WEbster, Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PHIL SHANEDLING COMPANY, R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 595 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO PHIL SHANEDLING COMPANY WHEREAS, Phil Shanedling Company hereinafter called the Redeveloper, has enter- ed into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereinafter called the Agency; and .., . ...J WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated October 7, 1966 was recorded on April 11, 1967, in Book 6801 on Page 434 and said Grant Deed, dated October 7, 1966, was re- corded on April 11, 1967, in Book 6801, on Page 425, both in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redeveloper covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Grant Deed to furnish the Redeveloper with an instrument certifying com- pletion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof upon the following described real property: That portion of Lots 3, 4, and 5, Block 14, in the City of San Bernardino County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 1, records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Lot 5; thence South along the West line of Lots 5, 4, and 3, 406.93 feet, more or less to a point 187 feet North of the Southwest corner of Lot 2 of said Block 14; thence East parallel to the South line of said Lot 2, 298.685 feet, more or less, to .. ~ 543 [ a point in the East line of said Lot 3, 187 feet North of the South line of said Lot 2; thence North along the East line of Lots 3, 4, and 5, 258.44 feet, more or less, to the Northeast corner of said Lot 4; thence West along the North line of said Lot 4, 81.33 feet; thence South 1.8 feet; thence West 37.57 feet; thence North 1.22 feet to the South line of that certain parcel of land conveyed by George M. Cooley to A. C. Denman, Jr., et at, by Deed dated September 15,1906 and recorded in Book 380 of Deeds, page 313; thence West along the South line of land so conveyed to A. C. Denman, Jr., et al., and through the center of the brick wall referred to in said Deed, a distance of 77.89 feet, more or less, to a point 101 feet 8 inches East of the West line of said Block 14; thence North to a point in the North line of said Lot 5, 101 feet 3 inches East of the Northwest corner of said Lot 5; thence West along the North line of said Lot 5, 101 feet 3 inches to the point of beginning NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies, and gives notice that the Redeveloper has fully satisfied, terminated and completed for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agree- ments with respect to the Obligation of Redeveloper for the Construction of Improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinabove described real property. [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, the "Certificate of Compliance" in the form approved by Resolution No. 238 of this Agency dated August 2, 1962. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 595. The Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONSIDERATION OF RENTAL AGREEMENTS -- QUALITY PLATING and SCOTTY'S MUFFLER, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon presented a letter from Mr. John H. Gardner dba Quality Plating. Mr. Gardner, because of HUD procedures, has been unable to move from his present location in the Central City Project; however, he is also paying rent on a new location. Mr. Gardner requests Agency consideration of releasing his rent com- mitment. A letter was also submitted from Charles Scott dba Scotty's Muffler Service. Mr. Scott, also because of HUD procedures, has been held up on his move to his new location. He requests a refund of rent for the month of January, 1968. r- t r [ .... Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the cancellation of payment of rent from November 1, 1967 to all future months for Quality Plating and also authorizing the refund of January, 1968 rent to Scotty's Muffler Service. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 544 Mr. Hodgdon informed the Members that bids for Weed Abatement, R-IO~ were opened January 12, 1968. The apparent low bidder is Wood and Associates for the bid price of $48.00 per acre per year. The following resolution was introduced: J REVIEW OF WEED ABATEMENT BIDS, R-IO: RESOLUTION NO. 596 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRE- TARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR WEED ABATEMENT, R-IO, WITH WOOD AND ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino is responsible for controlling the growth of weeds upon properties owned by said Agency within the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Agency to have Weed Control performed by Contractors; and WHEREAS, Wood and Associates presented the lowest bid for this Contract; and WHEREAS, Wood and Associates' bid encompassed all items set forth as require- ments of this Agency; and ~ WHEREAS, the bid price was not a major deviation from the Agency's estimate: ....., NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Executive Director and Chairman are hereby directed to execute a contract for Weed Abatement, R-IO, by and be- tween the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, and Wood and Associates for the calendar year 1968. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 596. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT ON JACK GOLDEN PROPERTY (BUD AMMONS ELECTRIC SHAVERS) R-79: Mr. Varner explained to the Members that Mr. Jack Golden died some months ago, and prior to his death he filed an Unlawful Detainer on Mr. Bud Ammons. After discussion of the details involved, the Members instructed the Agency Counsel, Bruce Varner, to contact Mr. Weddell, attorney for Mr. Ammons, and Mr. Novack, attorney for Golden heirs, in order to determine if the acquisition price was acceptable to all parties. Mr. Ammons was informed that the Agency Counsel would keep him in touch with his progress and if necessary a special meeting would be held for this matter. ., I ....J 545 [ CANCELLATION OF ESCROW, THE CHANCELLOR BUILDING, R-IO: A letter from the Chancellor Building, Inc., was presented to the Members.. Said letter states that they have not received any definite commitment for financing for the purchase of Reuse Parcels 2 and 3, R-IO, and request Agency consideration in cancelling their escrow. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the cancellation of the escrow between the Agency and the Chancellor Building for the purchase of Reuse Parcels 2 & 3, R-IO, and in accordance with the Letter Agreement of November 10, 1967 the deposit of $6,500.00 is to be .returned to Developer. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: NOne Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL 69, R-IO KEN BUSSEY & L. HUDSON REDEVELOPERS: An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel No. 69, R-IO was presented to the Members from Ken Bussey and L. Hudson Redevelopers. There was much discussion regard- ing the purchase of this parcel. Warm Creek Channel runs through the upper westerly portion of the parcel. The plot plan pr~sented to the Members only indicated that portion of Parcel 69 below Warm Creek Channel. The Members were concerned as to whether Mr. Bussey & Hudson should purchase the portion of parcel 69 above Warm Creek Channel or if this portion of parcel 69 should be sold in the future to a developer desiring the purchase of the adjoining westerly parcel. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: [ RESOLUTION NO. 597 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF A PORTION OF PARCEL NO. 69 TO KEN BUSSEY AND L. HUDSON REDEVELOPERS, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE PLOT PLAN AS SUBMITTED BY THE AGENCY WHEREAS, the REdevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8, and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, at the REgular Meeting of the Agency held January 18, 1968, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase and related documents submitted by Ken Bussey and L. Hudson Redevelopers, hereinafter called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain real property described as: NET PARCEL: r L All that real property in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as: All that portion of Lot 1, Block 10, RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, per Map recorded in Book 7, page 2 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of said County, des- cribed as follows: 546 Beginning at the intersection of the East line of said Lot 1 with the North line of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company Right-of-Way, 50.00 feet wide; thence NORTH, along said East Line, 304.00 feet to the be- ginning of a tangent curve concave Southwesterly with a radius of 20.00 feet, said curve is also tangent to the North line of said Lot 1; thence Northwesterly along said tangent curve through a central angle of 90001'35" a distance of 31.43 feet to the last mentioned North line; thence South 890 58' 25" West, along said last mentioned North line, 138.72 feet; thence South 00 01' 35" East, 3.95 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve con- cave Westerly with a radius of 315.00 feet; thence Southerly along said tangent curve through a central angle of 220 10' 47" a distance of 121.94 feet; thence South 220 09' 12" West, 114.35 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southeasterly with a radius of 585.00 feet; thence Southwesterly along said tangent curve through a central angle of 90 46' 29" a distance of 99.80 feet to the first mentioned North line; thence North 890 59' 25" East, 254.69 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 1.489 Acres. PARCEL TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO: All that real property in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernar- dino, State of California, described as: ..... 1 .J All that portion of Lot 1, Block 10, RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO per Map recorded in Book 7, page 2 of Maps in the Office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence SOUTH along the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 20.01 feet to a point of cusp with a tangent curve concave Southwesterly with a radius of 20.00 feet, said curve is also tangent to the North line of said Lot 1; thence Northwesterly along said tangent curve through a central angle of 900 01' 35" a distance of 31.43 feet to said North line; thence North 890 58' 25" East, 20.01 feet to the Point of Beginning Containing 0.002 Acres. .. J WHEREAS, at said Regular Meeting of the Agency, held January 18, 1968, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land are in order and in conformance with the rules and regula- tions as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the disposition of project lands. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase and related documents, including the Statement for Public Dis- closure of said Redeveloper are satisfactory; that negotiation is the appropriate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redeveloper possesses the qua- lifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price, FORTY FOUR THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($44,550.00) is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and is not less than the resale price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. .., ...... 547 [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted, subject to the Developers approval of the plot plan to be submitted by the Agency to the Developer at the earliest possible date. Pursuant to Developers approval of the Plot Plan, the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale, and all other documents necessary or convenient to carry out the terms of the Agreement. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 597. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin instructing the Executive Director to contact Arrowhead Engineering in order to obtain an immediate survey of that portion of Reuse Parcel No. 69 east of Warm Creek Channel. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: After motion was duly made and seconded, the meeting was adjourned to a personnel conference. [ [ ~,",.",,-', 548 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA J The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members present: Hodgdon, Webster and Wein Agency Members absent: Wilson and Austin Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mr. Gresham, Condemnation Attorney; and Mrs. Baxter Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 18, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein approv- ing the Minutes as submitted. The Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Austin EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of January, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. After discussion, motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein approving the expenditures as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Austin J REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Allen Gresham, Condemnation Attorney, reported the status of the Central City Condemnation Cases. The cases of Martin and Purciel were filed on December 21,,1967 and we have received all answers. The County of San Bernardino is preparing the statement of taxes on these parcels. There is a dispute over the partition of the award in the case of Martin, Libman and Winstead. It has been agreed between the attorneys for Martin and Libman to have the lease validity ruled upon prior to any contested action as to value. A determination as to the validity of the lease could expedite a determination of the value issue:J,which would be tried separately. Mr. Koren, tenant of the Purciel property, was served in December. He had ten days in which to appear, which he did not. We have, therefore, declared default on Mr. Koren. The trial regarding this action will be on February 15, 1968. 4:10 p.m. -- Mr. Wilson arrived at the meeting ~ ~ I ....J '---j 549 r L The answer regarding the Kantor property should be received shortly. Mr. Apter, attorney for Mr. Kantor, has stated that it has been prepared and mailed. Equitable Trust and Security Bank have filed. Mr. Wein has not yet filed but we are assured that he will within the week. The case of Carlton - Bender was filed on January 4, 1968 and the answers are coming in satisfactorily. Mr. Greenestone and National Dollar Stores are still discussing a settlement, but Mr. Gresham indicated that he believed that the matter would have to be settled through condemnation. The trial date should be sometime in April or May. The case of Jordan, MacPherson and arunner has been prepared and will be filed tomorrow, February 2, 1968. Mr. Varner reported on the Wallis - Piercy property. It was explained to the Members that the Agency bought the property from Wallis with the understanding that the tenant, Mr. Piercy, did not have a lease for the property. Mr. Piercy states that he has a lease to said property. Because of the misrepresentation on the owner's part, the property was bought without obtaining an offset statement from Mr. Piercy. The members discussed the alternative methods of handling this situation. [ 1) We can request Mrs. Wallis to agree to rescind the entire transaction. 2) If Mrs. Wallis will not agree to this method, we can file an Unlawful Detainer against Mr. Piercy to determine if Mr. Piercy's lease is valid. This action would be filed against Mr. Piercy. 3) We could file a Declaratory Relief action which would determine the rights of all parties concerned. If this action determined that Mr. Piercy does not have a valid lease, we would then have to file an Unlawful Detainer against Mr. Piercy in order that he vacate the property. Mr. Varner stated that it was his recommendation to file an Unlawful Detainer Action against Mr. Piercy because he felt that the lease was not valid. This action would determine the validity of the lease. This would also be the quickest and least expensive method (Mrs. Wallis would bear costs). Mr. Wein stated that he believed that it was not our position to file such an action. It was because of the misrepresentation of Mrs. Wallis that this situation occurred and that she should be involved in the action. He felt that if all possible, the entire transaction should be rescinded and an offset state- ment obtained from Mr. Piercy. After.much discussion, Mr. Hodgdon requested a motion as follows: r L Motion that the Agency Counsel be instructed to direct a letter to Mr. Bierschbach, attorney for Mrs. Wallis, requesting that his client agree to rescind the pur- chase of her property, and that all funds involved be refunded, due to the fact that Mr. Piercy, the tenant, states that he has a lease on said property and that contract conditions are not compiled with; and 550 That this matter be tabled until the next Regular Meeting in order that the Members may review Mr. Bierschbach's reply to our request. At this time the Members can make a determination as to what action the Agency should take. " 1 ...J Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster as hereinabove stated. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Hodgdon and Wilson, NOBS: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin 4:45 -- Mr. Webster is excused from the Meeting REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, WALTER AMMONS: Mr. Hodgdon stated that this matter was tabled until this meeting in order to allow the heirs of the estate of Golden to approve concurred in requisition price. We have not heard from parties involved concerning this offer. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 598 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 (WALTER AMMONS, BLOCK 3, PARCEL 10) BE IT RESOLVED that the Real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on Feb- ruary 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demoli- tion of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the ac- quired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevel- opment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plan. , ...; BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, :1 .....J 551 [ and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 3, Parcel 10, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson adopting Resolution No. 598. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, JOHN G. SIMS: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 599 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 (JOHN G. SIMS, BLOCK 1, PARCEL 10) [ BE IT RESOLVED that the Real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on Feb- ruary 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demoli- tion of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the ac- quired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevel- opment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 1, Parcel 10, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. 552 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 599. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin and Webster .... 1 ..J CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, PHIL SHANEDLING COMPANY: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 600 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO PHIL SHANEDLING COMPANY WHEREAS, Phil Shanedling Company hereinafter called the Redeveloper, has entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereinafter called the Agency; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated August 30, 1967 was recorded on October 9, 1967, in Book 6902, Page 944 and said Grant Deed, dated October 3, 1967 was recorded on October 9, 1967 in Book 6902, Page 935, both in the official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redeveloper covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement; and ..., ..J WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Grant Deed to furnish the Redeveloper with an instrument certifying com- pletion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof upon the following described real property: That portion of Lot 3, Block 14, City of San Bernardino, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino. State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, Page 1, record~ of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the East line of said Lot 3. 167 feet North of the South line of Lot 2; thence West 73 feet, more or less, to the Easterly line of the right-of-way easement of the Pacific Electric Company now in use across said Lot 3; thence Northeasterly along said right-of-way easement to a point 187 feet North of the South line of said Lot 2, thence East 55 feet. more or less, to the East line of said Lot 3; thence South 20 feet to the point of beginning. ~ . -- I [/ [ [ 553 That portion of Lot 2, Block 14, City of San Bernardino, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, Page 1, records of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 2, thence West along the Southerly line of said Lot 2, 48.5 feet, more or less, to a point 248.5 feet East of the West line of said Lot 2; thence North 127.5 feet; thence East 8.5 feet, more or less, to a line 40 feet West of the East line of said Lot 2, thence North along said 40 foot line 13 feet; thence East 40 feet to the East line of said Lot 2; thence South along said East line of Lot 2. 140.5 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies, and gives notice that the Redeveloper has fully satisfied, terminated and completed for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agreements with respect to the Obligation of Redeveloper for the Construction of Improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agree- ment and Grant Deed upon the hereinabove described real property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, the "Certificate of Compliance" in the form approved by Resolution No. 238 of this Agency dated August 2, 1962. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 600. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin REQUEST TO EXTEND RENTAL AGREEMENT, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO: A letter from Mr. Jerman, City Administrator for the City of San Bernardino was presented to the Members. In said letter the City requests an extension of their present Rental Agreement for property at 131 Rialto Avenue. This property is used for a Teen Center for San Bernardino. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the extension of the present Rental Agreement with the City of San Bernardino. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION, ESTATE OF INA HUMPHREY: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 601 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 1, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 IESTATE OF INA HUMPHREY, BLOCK 6, PARCEL 21) 554 BE IT RESOLVED that the Real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on Feb- ruary 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demoli- tion of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the ac- quired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevel- opment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plan. -, i ~ ~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. .... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 6, Parcel 21, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. .....J Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 601. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: NOne Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION, HAROLD C. NICHOLSON: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 602 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 1, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 (HAROLD C. NICHOLSON, BLOCK 6, PARCEL 18) ~ 1 -J 555 r- k: \ l... BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as fol- lows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on Feb- ruary 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demoli- tion of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the ac- quired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevel- opment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of said Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. r I f '- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 6, Parcel 18, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 602. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin REQUEST FOR CHARGE OFF OF UNCOLLECTABLE RENT, R. L. CALHOUN: A Memo was presented to the Members from the Accounting Department requesting authorization to write off a balance of $2.90 owed the Agency from Mr. R. L. Calhoun moved from the Andrew's Trailer Court. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the Agency to charge off the balance of $2.90 as requested. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin CITY AUTO PARKS, REVIEW OF RENTAL AGREEMENT: r- , I, 11'i Mr. Quinn explained to the Members that City Auto Parks have been renting a parcel from us at the rate of $90.00 per month. We have notified them that they would have to pay the economic rental of $250.00 in the future. City Auto Parks ....... 556 have requested termination of this rental agreement rather than pay additional rent. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by We in authorizing the termi- nation of the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and City Auto Parks as of February 29, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin -, .~ ...J RENTAL OF REPRODUCTION EQUIPMENT: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agency would like authorization to cancel our present rental of reproduction equipment and rent a Xerox Copier. The copies are much clearer on the Xerox, and because of the volume of work that we reproduce, the price would be approximately the same. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the rental of a Xerox Copier and cancelling the present rental of reproduction equipment. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin NATIONAL HOUSING CONFERENCE: Mr. Quinn stated that there will be a National Housing Conference in Wash- ington D. C. on March 3 and 4. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 603 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ATTENDANCE AT THE NATIONAL HOUSING CONFERENCE, MARCH 3 AND 4, 196B, IN WASHINGTON D. C. , ...J WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found to be essential that the Agency Members be authorized to travel to Washington D. C. to attend the National Housing Conference; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Members are authorized to travel to Washington D. C. to attend the National Housing Conference, March 3 and 4, 196B, and that their expenses are hereby approved in accordance with the provisions of Resolution 302 of the Agency. Motion was made by We in and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution 603. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, We in and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin HOLIDAY INN EXPENSES: The Chairman stated that authorization is needed to pay for the expenses incurred at the Presentation given at the Holiday Inn on January 30, 196B. Such expenses are deemed eligible project costs per Urban Renewal Manual Sec 30-1-2. ~ i ......, 557 ~- The Chairman, Mr. Hodgdon, stepped down from the Chair and it was assumed by Mr. Wilson, Vice Chairman. L... The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 604 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF EXPENSES INCUR- RED AT THE AGENCY'S ANNUAL PRESENTATION OF JANUARY 30, 1968, AT THE HOLIDAY INN, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, NOT TO EXCEED $400 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, conducted a business meeting at the Holiday Inn, San Bernardino, California, for the purpose of briefing the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, and distinguished business personnel, and personages of the City and surrounding areas with a vital interest in the progress of the Redevel- opment Agency, of the current status and financial position of the Agency; and WHEREAS, certain expenses were incurred by the Agency for the conducting of said Annual Presentation; and [ WHEREAS, the Members, at their Regular Meeting held February 1, 1968, deter- mined that the Attendance, on a once a year basis, of the guests at this meeting is necessary to the conduct of LPA operations and deemed expenses for the meeting are an eligible project cost as per Urban Renewal Manual, Section 30-1-2; and WHEREAS, the Members further determined that said expenses should not exceed the amount of $400.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the payment of expenses incurred at the Agency's Annual Presentation of January 30, 1968, at the Holiday Inn, San Bernardino, California, are hereby authorized. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said authorized expenses shall not exceed the a- mount of $400.00. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Hodgdon authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 604. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wilson Absent: Webster and Austin Mr. Hodgdon reassumed the Chair. AMENDATORY APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT, R-79: [ The following resolution was introduced: 558 RESOLUTION NO. 605 ... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINOt CALIFORNIAt AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN AMENDATORY APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT FOR PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 --' WHEREASt it is necessary and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardinot Californiat avail itself of the finan- cial assistance provided by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949t as amendedt to carry out the urban renewal project described as Central City No. It Calif. R-79 and bounded generally by 4th Street on the Northt 2nd Street on the Southt Freeway (U.S. 395) on the Westt and Arrowhead Avenue on the East hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and WHEREASt it is recognized that the Federal contract for such financial assist- ance pursuant to said Title I will impose certain obligations and responsibili- ties upon the Local Public Agency and will require among other things (1) the provision of local grants-in-aid; (2) a feasible method for the relocation of families displaced from the project area; and (3) other local obligations and responsibilities in connection with the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects; and WHEREASt Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964t and the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating that Titlet provide that no person shallt on the ground of racet colort or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits oft or be subject to discrimination in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects assisted under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and J WHEREAS, the objectives of the Urban Renewal Plan cannot be achieved through rehabilitation of the Project Area: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE AGENCY MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 1. That the United States of America and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California with regu- lations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 2. That an amendatory application on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an Amendatory to the existing Loan and Grant Contract with the Federal Government, dated March 2lt 1967t for additional project capital grant in the amount of $6,110,710 for undertaking and financing the Project is hereby approved, and that the Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to file such an Amendatory Application with the Department of Housing and Urban Developmentt to provide such additional information and to furnish such documents as may be required on behalf of the Agency, and to act as the authorized correspondent of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardinot California. .., t ....,., 559 r --- Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 605. The motion was carried by the following votet to wit: Ayes: Wilsont Wein and Hodgdon Noes: NOne Abstention: None Absent: Webster and Austin ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson 5:05 p.m. The motion was Wilsont Wein and Hodgdon Webster and Austin and seconded by We in adjourning the meeting at carried by the following votet to wit: Ayes: Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: ... r ...... r L.... 560 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CAL- IFORNIA j ~ .....- The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members present: Hodgdon, Wein, Austin and WEbster Agency Members absent: Wilson Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; I'lr. Gresham, R-'l9 Condemnation Attorney; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 1, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approv- ing the minutes as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Allen Gresham, R-79 Condemnation Attorney, reported the current status of R-79 Condemnation Cases. .., , ....", The case of Martin-Purciel was brought to court today. The Agency was successful in obtaining title to the property at the concurred in price as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Mr. Purciel waived his right to appeal decision. Mr. Koren did not appear at the trial to state his interest. Judge Fogg ruled that there was no lease. The case of Nicholson-Simms has been filed. believes that the differences could be resolved. legal owner of the property. The law suit should ownership quickly. Mr. Gresham stated that he There is a question as to the settle this matter of legal Mr. Gresham advised that he has heard from Mr. Cury, a~torney for Mr. Carlton regarding the Carlton-Bender case. Mr. Cury indicates that the parties involved may be able to resolve their differences. 4:10 p.m. - Mr. Wilson arrived at the meeting OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCELS 93b, 94 and 9Sb, R-IO, 6730 H. P. CORP: The Chairman presented an Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcels 93b, 94 and 95b to the Members. A Pep Boys Store is proposed to be built in this location. The plan was shown. Mr. Hodgdon explained that if acceptable by the Members this would "'1.. be a 60 day escrow, and the Agreement for Sale would stipulate that construction 1 I ......, 561 r I L... on said property would commence within 120 days from the date the Agency ac- quires their present property located within the Central City Project. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 606 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCELS NO. 93b, 94 and 95b, R-lO, TO 6730 H. P. CORP. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Rede- velopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8, and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of the Agency held February 15, 1968, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase and related documents submitted by 6730 H.P. Corp., hereinafter called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain real property described as: -- Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 21, 22, 23 and 24, Block "A", THE PEPPERS, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, Page 8, records of said County. Together with the west half of the vacated portion of Stoddard Avenue adjoining on the East. Excepting therefrom the north 25 feet. "...... i WHEREAS, at said REgular Meeting of the Agency, held February 15, 1968, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land are in order and in conformance with the rules and regu- lations as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the disposition of project lands. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determined that said Offer to Purchase and related documents, including the Statement for Public Disclosure of said Redeveloper are satisfactory; that negotiation is the appro- priate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redeveloper possesses the qualifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price, SIXTY THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS ($63,750) is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and is not less than the resale price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. ,.... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute an Agreement of Sale, and all other documents necessary to carry out the terms of the Agreement. \.,.: 562 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein adopting Resolution No. 606. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ .~ ~ .....J ELECTION OF AGENCY OFFICIALS: The Chairman declared this was the time and place designated for the election of officers of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino for the year 1968. The Chairman declared the nominations open for Chairman. Mr. Wilson nominated Mr. Hodgdon for Chairman on the basis of his allegiance, vision and application to the problems that have confronted the Agency over the past year, and his outstanding job as Chairman over the past year in placing the Agency on a solid foundation. Mr. Webster seconded the nomination. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded man for the year 1968. The motion was Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Austin Absent: None by Webster appointing Mr. Hodgdon as Chair- carried by the following vote, to wit: Noes: None Abstention: Hodgdon The Chairman declared the nominations open for Vice-Chairman. Mr. Wein nominated Mr. Wilson for the office of Vice Chairman. Mr. Webster seconded the nomination. Motion was made by We in and seconded by Webster appointing Chairman for the year 1968. The motion was carried by the wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Absent: NOne Mr. Wilson as Vice- following vote, to Abstention: Wilson .., .,; ~ '-1 ...., The Chairman declared the nominations open for the appointive office of Secretary- Treasurer. Motion was made by WEbster and seconded by Wilson appointing Mr. Quinn Secretary-Treasurer for the year 1968. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Hodgdon, Wein, and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT AMENDMENT BRUCE D. VARNER, R-79: The Chairman explained that the upset figure for Mr. V.rner's contract for R-79 must be increased. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 607 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND BRUCE D. VARNER, FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 488, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, on April 7, 1967, designated Bruce D. Varner as General Legal Counsel for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and ~ - r L r i \- r \.... 563 WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Chairman and Secretary executed a written contract with Bruce D. Varner dated April 11, 1967 for said services, as set forth in said contract, in an amount not to exceed the aggregate sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000); and WHEREAS, it is now necessary to increase the total amount of said Contract, by $10,000 to provide said legal services for the time of the project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 4 is amended to read: "The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000.00), which shall constitute full and complete compensa- tion for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid at the rate of Thirty Dollars ($30.00) per hours, in every case subject to receipt of an invoice for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the Contract and that he is entitled to receive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. In addition to the compensation provided above, the Local Public Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from the Local Public Agency's principal place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Local Public Agency. The limitations on cost of transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which cur- rently prevail for staff members of the Local Public Agency. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the total compensation and reimbursement, if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the max- imum sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20,000) for all of the services required." Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 607. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT AMENDMENT, BRUCE D. VARNER, R-IO: The Chairman explained that the upset figure for Mr. Varner's contract for R-IO must also be ~ncreased. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 608 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND BRUCE D. VARNER FOR THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 487, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California on April 7, 1967 designated Bruce D. Varner as General Legal Counsel for the Meadowbrook Project Area, Calif. R-IO; and 564 WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution, the Chairman and Secretary executed a written contract with Bruce D. Varner, dated April 11, 1967 for said services, as set forth in said Contract, in an amount not to exceed One Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Dollars and 25/100 ($1,750.25); and ., ~ .~ ....,J WHEREAS, it is now necessary to increase the total amount of said Contract by $4,499.75 to provide said legal services for the time of the project: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the REdevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 4 is amended to read: "The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed Six Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars and No/IOO ($6,250), which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid at the rate of Thirty Dollars ($30.00) per hour, in every case subject to receipt of an invoice for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the Contract and that he is entitled to receive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. In addition to the compensation provided above, the Local Public Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from the Local Public Agency's principal place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Local Public Agency. The limitations on cost of transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which currently prevail for staff members of the Local Public Agency. ... . ...J It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the tQtal com- pensation and reimbursement, if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the maximum sum of Six Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($6,250), for all the services required." Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 608. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None FIXED RELOCATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization for the Executive Director to make minor changes to the adopted Fixed Relocation Payment Schedule, pursuant to LPA Letter No. 362, and subject to HUD concurrence. This will enable the Agency to pay displacees more per room to move. After discussion, the following Resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 609 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES TO ADOPTED FIXED RELOCATION PAYMENT SCHEDULE ~ --J f""'" t it. \..... r ~ L- r ~ L 565 WHEREAS, The REdevelopment Agency, by its Resolution No. 357, adopted March 18, 1965, approved the Schedule of Fixed Relocation Payments in connection with its Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO and its Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Public Agency Letter No. 362, dated February 10, 1966, the Department of Housing and Urban Development amended regulations governing relocation payments under Section 114 of Title I, as published in the Federal Register on December 8, 1965; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the Local Public Agency determined that the Executive Director be given authority to make minor changes to the adopted Fixed Relocation Payment Schedule in accordance with said Local Public Agency Letter No. 362. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Executive Director is hereby authorized to make minor changes to the adopted Fixed Relocation Payment Schedule, pursuant to LPA Letter No. 362, and subject to HUD concurrence. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 609. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AVERAGE ANNUAL GROSS RENTAL SCHEDULE, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization for the Executive Director to make minor changes to the Average Annual Gross Rental Schedule, pursuant to LPA Number 321, subject to HUD Concurrence. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 610 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO MAKE MINOR CHANGES TO THE AVERAGE ANNUAL GROSS RENTAL SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, by its Resolution No. 356, adopted March 18, 1965, approved the Schedule of Average Annual Gross Rentals for Standard Housing in the locality in connection with the Meadowbrook Project, Calif R-IO, and its Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Pursuant to Local Public Agency Letter No. 321, dated January 13, 1965, the Department of Housing and Urban Development amended regulations governing relocation payments under section 114 of Title I, as published in the Federal Register on December 8, 1965; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body of the Local Public Agency determined that the Executive Director be given authority to make minor changes to the adopted Average Annual Gross Rental Schedule in accordance with Local Public Agency Letter No. 321. 566 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Executive Director is hereby authorized to make minor changes to the adopted Average Annual Gross Rental Schedule, pursuant to LPA Letter No. 321, and subject to HUD Concurrence. ..., ....J Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by lution No. 610. The motion was carried by Wilson, Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Absent: None Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- the following vote, to wit: Ayes Noes: None Abstention: None APPRAISAL OF REUSE PARCELS 76, 77, 45, 46, 47, 50 and 44, R-10 RAY HASTINGS: The Chairman requested authorization to enter into a contract with Ray Hastings for reuse appraisal of Parcels 76, 77, 45, 46, 47, 50 and 44, R-10 for the amount of $3,000.00. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 611 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH RAY HASTINGS FOR REUSE APPRAISAL OF REUSE PARCELS 76, 77, 45, 46, 47, 50 and 44 IN THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a contract for Loan and Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all amendatory acts, including the Housing Act of 1954; and -, ...." WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of its Meadowbrook Project Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the services of a contractor to render certain services and assistance in connection with appraisal services for the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting, held February 15, 1968, the Members found and determined that Ray Hastings was best qualified to perform the services so desired. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are herepy authorized to execute a Contract by and between the Agency and Ray Hastings for the Reuse Appraisal of Reuse Parcels 76, 77, 45, 46, 47, 50 and 44 in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing Resolution No. 611. The motion was carried by the following Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None None Absent: None the adoption of vote, to wit: Abstention: .-.- -..tIll 567 r 'I ~ ~~ CONTRACT FOR SITE CLEARANCE OF REUSE PARCELS 2 & 3, R-IO: \-. Two bids were submitted for the Site Clearance work of Reuse Parcels 2 & 3, R-IO: They are as follows: Wood and Associates A. S. Hubbs Contracting $ 950.00 3,000.00 Wood and Associates was declared the low bidder. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 612 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH WOOD AND ASSOCIATES FOR SITE PREPA- RATION OF REUSE PARCELS 2 & 3, R-IO WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a contract for Loan and Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all amendatory acts, including the Housing Act of 1954; and r- i WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of its Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO; and L. WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the services of a contractor to render certain services in connection with site preparation of Reuse Parcels 2 & 3, R-IO; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting, held February 15, 1968, Wood and Associates was determined the lowest qualified bidder for the performance of said services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that said bid of Wood and Associates be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract for the Site Preparation of Reuse Parcels 2 & 3, in the Meadowbrook Pro~ect, Calif. R-IO. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 612. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT AMENDMENT, WOOD & ASSOCIATES, REUSE PARCELS 93b, 94 and 95b, R-IO: The Chairman requested authorization to amend the Contract with Wood & Associates for R-IO to include Reuse Parcels 93b, 94 & 95b. The following Resolution was introduced: r- !( \ (( --- 568 RESOLUTION NO. 613 ., I ....J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO AMEND THE CONTRACT WITH WOOD & ASSOCIATES FOR THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 596, dated January 18, 1968, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the execution of a Contract for Weed Abatement, R-IO, by and between the Agency and Wood & Associates; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor to include Reuse Parcels 93b, 94 & 95b, R-IO; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that said Contract by and between the Agency and Wood and Associates be amended, to include Reuse Parcels 93 and 95, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute said Amendment on behalf of the Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 613. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None LEONARD KOREN, REUSE PARCEL 93a, R-IO: .... 'f Mr. Hodgdon explained to the Members that Mr. Koren encountered an excavation problem when Harry Press was conducting the site preparation work, for him, on Reuse Parcel 93a. Additional excavation costs for this sub-surface obstruction was $583.00. The Chairman requested authorization to make up extraondinary costs of this excavation to Mr. Koren. After discussion, the following resolu- tion was introduced: Ji J1 ~ ..J RESOLUTION NO. 614 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF EXPENSES EN- COUNTERED BY MR. LEONARD KOREN BECAUSE OF EXTRAORDINARY SUB- SURFACE CONDITIONS ON REUSE PARCEL 93a, R-IO WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 506, adopted July 6, 1967, the Agency authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel 93a, in the Meadowbrook Project, to Leonard Koren; and WHEREAS, Mr. Leonard Koren, while conducting the site preparation work on this parcel of land, encountered an excavation problem because of a sub-surface obstruction on said parcel; and WHEREAS, expenses incurred because of this sub-surface obstruction amount to the sum of $583.00; and ~ WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that said expenses of the Developer, Leonard Koren, should be incurred by the Agency. ....." ,...... ~. "-- ".- 1 it L ".... ..... 569 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency, at its Regular Meeting held February 15, 1968, hereby finds and determines that said expenses incurred by Mr. Leonard Koren are eligible agency expenses, and authorizes the payment thereof. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 614. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None WALLIS - PIERCY, DECLINATION OF RECISSION OF SALE, R-79: A letter from Mr. Robert Bierschbach, attorney for Mrs. Wallis, was presented to the Members. Said letter states that Mrs. Wallis does not feel that there is any ground for rescission of the sale and declines to agree to such. Mr. Varner stated that there is a meeting scheduled between Mrs. Wallis and Mr. Piercy. After discussion,motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin tabling this matter until the next regular meeting, pending the results of the scheduled meet- .ing between Mrs. Wallis and Mr. Piercy. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, MEYER - SHAPIRO, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 4, R-79: A letter was presented to the Members from Mr. Shapiro, who occupies the property at 551 West Fourth Street, Keyser Cafe. Mr. Shapiro requests that the Agency initiate condemnation proceedings on this property because he has not been able to negotiate with the property owner, Mr. Fred Meyer. Mr. Varner stated that a legal opinion must be obtained in order to determine whether or not the equip- ment fixtures owned by Western Union (also a tenant of the Meyer Property) are considered as real property or as personal property. Mr. Varner recommended that this matter be tabled until such legal opinion is obtained. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by We in to table this matter until the next regular meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None JOHN S. GRIFFITH - CURCI-TURNER, PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT, PROPOSED AMENDMENT, R-79: Mr. Varner explained to the Members that the Predisposition Agreement between the Agency and John S. Griffith Company & Curci-Turner Company should be amended at this time. Said Predisposition Agreement, in paragraph 6, stipulates that the Agency must meet certain time limits to perform certain obligations. Paragraph 6 also provides that the time limit may be extended upon mutual agreement of the parties concerned. Mr. Varner explained that the developer agrees to an extension of time. The new time limit will be April 15, 1968. The Predisposition Agreement, in paragraph 5, stipulates that the Agency shall obtain properly executed owner participation agreements with three major tenants for the mall proper. It is requested that this paragraph be amended to require two major tenants. This amendment is acceptable to the Developer. 570 Mr. Varner further stated that the proposed amendment as presented to the Members ... was only in draft form and not reviewed by the Developer. He requested that a resolution be adopted to authorize the execution of an Amendment to the Pre~ ..I disposition Agreement and authorizing any necessary changes in wording necessary for acceptance by the Developer. After discussiont the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 615 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINOt CALIFORNIAt AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PREDISPOSITION AGREE- MENT BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND JOHN S GRIFFITH COMPANY and CURCI-TURNER COMPANY WHEREASt the REdevelopment AgencYt by its Resolution No. 540t adopted August 23t 1967t approved and provided for the execution of a Predisposition Agree- ment by and between the Agency and John S. Griffith Company and Curci-Turner Company; and WHEREASt pursuant to said Resolutiont the Predisposition Agreement was executed under the date of August 23t 1967; and WHEREASt said Predisposition Agreementt in paragraph 6t stipulates that the Agency must meet certain time limits to perform certain obligations. Paragraph 6 also provides that the time limit may be extended upon mutual agreement of the parties concerned; and -., .~ .....I WHEREASt said Predisposition Agreementt in paragraph 5t stipulates that the Agency shall obtain properly executed owner participation agreements from three major tenants for the mall proper; and WHEREASt it is mutually agreeable to amend Paragraph 6 to extend the time limit of performance of certain obligations until April 1St 1968; and WHEREASt it is mutually agreeable to amend Paragraph 5 to stipulate that owner participation agreements must be obtained from two major tenants; NOWt THEREFOREt BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardinot California that the Predisposition Agreement by and between the Agency and John S. Griffith Company and Curci-Turner Company be amended to include the matters set forth abovet and that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute said amendment to the Predisposition Agreement. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 615 and authorizing the revision of the drafted amendment as necessary for acceptance by the Developer. The motion was carried by the following votet to wit: Ayes: Austint Wilsont Weint Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention None Absent: None ,.... - r i l.. r I '-- r L- 571 OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Quinn informed the members that bids will be opened February 20, 1968 for Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No.4, R-79. Bids will be opened February 27, 1968 for Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No.5, R-79 and Unit No. 11, R-lO. The results of these bids will be at the Regular Meeting of March. The Members discussed the status of the Condemnation cases in the Meadowbrook Project. Mr. Varner stated that he has written numerous times to Mr. Ward re- questing that a report of the status be presented to the Board, but has heard no reply. All members agreed that a Special Meeting should be scheduled for Tuesday, February 20, 1968, to review of status of R-IO condemnation with Mr. Ward. Mr. Quinn stated that such a special meeting would be scheduled. Mr. Hodgdon informed the members that most of the property between "F" and "G" Street in the Central City Project has been acquired. Most of the property between "E" and "P" Streets for the mall, has been acquired except for those parcels under condemnation. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein to adjourn the meeting at 5:05 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 572 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO~ CALIFORNIA~ HELD ON THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY~ 1968~ 323 COURT STREET~ ROOM 305~ SAN BERNARDINO~ CALIFORNIA ~ n ~ -J The Chairman reported that this Special Meeting was held pursuant to a duly dated and signed Notice of Special Meeting which was mailed to each and every member in due time~ form and manner as required by law. Said notice is as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO~ CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Rede- velopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino~ California~ will be held at the offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino~ 323 Court Street~ Room 305~ in the City of San Bernardino~ California~ the regular meeting place thereof~ at 4:00 p.m.~ on the 20th day of February~ 1968~ for the purpose of reviewing the status of properties under condemnation in the Meadowbrook Project with Mr. William Ward, Meadowbrook Project R-IO Condemnation Attorney~ and for transacting any other business which may properly come before it. DATED this 16th day of February~ 1968. slWarner W. Hodgdon Warner W. Hodgdon, Chairman .., i ...J 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I~ P. W. QUINN~ JR.~ Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino~ California~ HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 16th day of February~ 1968~ I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino~ California~ in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL. WITNESS my hand this 16th day of February~ 1968. siP. W. Quinn~ Jr. P. W. Quinn~ Jr.~ Executive Director The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members present: Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Agency Members absent: Wilson and Austin Also Present: Mr. Quinn~ Executive Secretary; Mr. Varner~ Agency Counsel; Mr. Gresham~ Condemnation Attorney R-79; Mr. Ward~ Condemnation Attorney~ R-IO; and Mrs. Baxter~ Executive Secretary ~ .-; 573 r L WILLIAM J. WARD, CONDEMNATION REPORT OF R-10 PROPERTIES: Mr. Ward reported that there are 12 remaining parcels in the Meadowbrook Project that must be acquired through condemnation. These twelve parcels have been divided into three trials, as follows: Trial 1 Block 4, Parcel 6 - Sanchez Block 4, Parcel 9 - Andrews Block 4, Parcel 10 - Blackenship Block 5, Parcel 1 - Ruiz Trial 2 ".- ! i l... Block 5, Parcel 6 - Lopez Block 5, Parcels 9 & 10 - Espinoza-Rios Block 5, Parcel 17 - Jackson (Hemingway) Block 5, Parcel 24 - Fisher Block 5, Parcel 29 - Hamilton Trial 3 , Block 6, Parcel 2 - Castro Block 6, Parcel 3 - Abe Block 6, Parcel 4 - Morana-Bautista A definite trial date of April 1, 1968 is set for Trial No.1. Trial No. 2 is tentatively scheduled for April 8, 1968. Trial No. 3 is tentatively scheduled for April 15, 1968. Motions to set trial should determine the definite trial dates for the remaining two sets of trials not already definitely scheduled for trial. (Trial No. 2 and Trial No.3) Mr. Ward stated that he anticipated a four or five day trial on each of these sets of trials. Mr. Ward further stated that he will contact Mr. Severson, Appraiser for our condemnation parcels in R-10, in ample time for him to review the parcels con- cerned in order that he may testify, if necessary, regarding the appraisal of the property. 4:30 p.m. - Mr. Varner was excused from the meeting, and Mr. Gresham assumed the position of general counsel for the remainder of the meeting. r '-- 574 OTHER BUSINESS: Wood and Associates, Contract Amendment, R-IO 1 ...." Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to amend Wood & Associates contract to in- clude the trimming of nine (9) large palm trees located on property owned by the Agency in the Meadowbrook Project. It will cost the Agency $450 for this work. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 616 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO AMEND CONTRACT FOR WEED ABATEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND WOOD & ASSOCIATES, R-IO WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 596, adopted January 18, 1968, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorized the execution of a contract for Weed Abatement, R-lO, by and between the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California and Wood and Associates for the calendar year 1968; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Agency to amend said Contract to include the trimming of nine (9) large palm trees located on property owned by the Agency in the Meadowbrook Project. -, I ..." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract Amendment to Wood & Associates Contract for Weed Abate- ment of the Meadowbrook Project to include the trimming of nine (9) large palm trees. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 616. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin and Wilson PHOTOGRAPHIC COVERAGE OF REDEVELOPMENT AREAS: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to contract with a commercial photographer for photographic coverage of the Meadowbrook area, the construction progress of this project, and the Central City demolition progress. It will also include the progress of the Delmann Heights Program. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the contracting of a commercial photographer for photographic coverage of our redevelopment project areas. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin and Wilson POLICY ON PAYMENT OF INTEREST FOR RIGHT OF IMMEDIATE POSSESSION A letter was presented to the Members from Robert Webber, attorney for National Dollar Store. Mr. Webber has raised the question of whether or not the Agency may agree to acquire property on a possessory basis and if so, may we pay interest for the period of possession as would be customary under an Order for Immediate Possession. In the event the Agency is capable of so doing, property could be acquired more rapidly. J 575 f""'" ~ , ~ ........ After much discussion, the Chairman requested a motion, as follows: Motion for the approval of the payment of 7% interest for immediate possession, subject to the ratification of Agency Counsel that said procedure is a legal and eligible cost; and the implementation of such payment to be at the discretion of our Condemnation Attorney. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein as hereinabove requested by the Chairman. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Austin APPRAISAL CONTRACT, BLOCK 20-1, R-79 (Harris Company): It is necessary to let an appraisal contract for a portion of Block 20, Parcell, The following appraisers have submitted proposals as follows: Al Knorr Bob Cooley Morrison & Hill $1,500.00 900.00 1,250.00 After review, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 617 '- RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND ROBERT COOLEY AND A CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND MORRISON & HILL FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES, R-79 r"' WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project Area No, 1, Calif. R-79, with the United States of America providing for the financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1945, as amended and all amendatory acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency desires to engage Contractors to render certain technical service in connection with appraisal services; and WHEREAS, at a Special Meeting of said Agency, the Members determined that Robert Cooley and Morrison & Hill were best qualified to perform said services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that the Chairman and Secretary be authorized to execute a contract for appraisal services with Robert Cooley and Morrison & Hill for the appraisal of a portion of Block 20, Parcell in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79. r ~ Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein adopting Resolution No. 617. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent; Wilson and Austin '- 576 REQUEST FOR PUBLICATION IN LOCAL NEWSPAPERS: ,., Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to obtain a four page pictorial and article in the Sun and Free Press regarding our Meadowbrook, Central City, and Delmann Heights Projects. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the expense of publications in the local papers for publicity purposes in order that the community may be better informed of the Redevelopment Agency's progress. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Austin J) ~ -I PERSONNEL - BOYCE J. HARPER, DEPUTY DIRECTOR: Mr. Hodgdon requested that Mr. Boyce J. Harper, Jr., Deputy Director, be given a salary increase from $1,052 to $1,164. The following resolution was intro- duced: RESOLUTION NO. 618 RESOLUTION ADOPTING A REVISED SALARY SCHEDULE FOR THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 521, the Redevelopment Agency adopted a personnel policy and established a salary schedule for Agency Staff positions; and -, ..J WHEREAS, Mr. Boyce J. Harper, Jr., Deputy Director, has demonstrated out- standing ability, knowledge, tireless efforts, and devotion to duty in his present position; and WHEREAS, all salary increases shall be in accordance with the Redevelopment Pay Schedules as approved by the Agency on June 15, 1967; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Mr. Boyce J. Harper, Jr., is commended for his actions for and on behalf of the Agency and Mr. Harper's present salary ($1,052.00) is raised to $1,164.00 effective March 1, 1968. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 618. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Austin REVIEW OF DEMOLITION BIDS, UNIT NO.4, R-79: The following bids were submitted for the Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No.4, Central City Project, Calif. R-79: Standard Building & Wrecking Co. Pres co Building Materials A. S. Hubbs Roger Roy Land Clearing Co. $64,893 58,740 78,900 45.990 l ......J 577 r Roger Roy Land Clearing, Inc., was declared the low bidder. The following Resolution was introduced: \i"...,. RESOLUTION NO. 619 a RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ROGER ROY LAND CLEARING, INC., FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO.4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, The Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Contract, Unit No.4, for the demolition of buildings and structures and site clearance of certain areas in said project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and ,,- WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Bernardino Sun Telegram a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on the 1st and 8th day of February, 1968, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and ..... WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 20th day of february, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Roger Roy Land Clearing, Inc, in the sum of $45,990.00; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Roger Roy Land Clearing, Inc., is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of said Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by Agency Counsel and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Roger Roy Land Clearing, Inc., in the sum of $45,990.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the said Contract for Unit No. 4 on behalf of the Agency. "".,.- Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 61ga The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin and Wilson ...... 578 ADJOURNMENT: -, .~ -J Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 5:05 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson and Austin. ..~ ~ -- -., a ,j ...." ..... --- 579 r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA '-' The Chairman called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members present: Hodgdon, Webster, Austin and Wein Agency Members absent: Wilson Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 15, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin approving the Minutes of February 15, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson r- The Minutes of the Special Meeting of February 20, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein approv- ing the Minutes of February 20, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson "- REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, stated that Mr. Gresham, Condemnation Attorney, has advised that the condemnation action of Golden and Ammons has now been filed and is in the process of serving the defendants. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, REUSE PARCEL NO. 41, R-IO: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 619 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO DON J. MEEKS AND MARJORIE E. MEEKS, HUSBAND and WIFE, JOINT TENANTS r ~ i ....... WHEREAS, DON J. MEEKS and MARJORIE E. MEEKS, husband and wife, joint tenants, hereinafter called the Redeveloper, has entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereinafter called the Agency; and 580 WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated April 8, 1966, was recorded on April 27, 1967, in Book 6810, page 174 and said Grant Deed, dated April 8, 1966, was recorded on April 27, 1967, in Book 6810, page 158, both in the official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redeveloper covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreements; and WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Grant Deed to furnish the Redeveloper with an instrument certifying com- pletion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof upon the following described real property: The East 144 feet of the North 176 feet of Lot 8, Block 3, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 1, records of said County. SUBJECT to an easement over the southerly 2 feet thereof for public utility purposes, as per Deed recorded in Book 6246, page 416, Official Records of San Bernardino County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies, and gives notice that the Redeveloper has fully satisfied, termi- nated and completed for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agreements with respect to the Obligation of Redeveloper for the Construction of Improvements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinabove described real pro- perty. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, the "Certificate of Compliance" in the form approved by Resolution No. 238 of this Agency dated August 2, 1962. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the adoption of REso- lution No. 619. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 11, R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon stated that bids were opened for Demolition and Site Clearance on February 27, 1968. The low bidder was Wood and Associates in the amount of $3,188.00. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 620 ~ , J .... .... 'l ,~ ..." ,., .......; 581 ~ RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE WITH WOOD AND ASSOCIATES FOR UNIT NO. 11, R-IO ",.,... WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 2~, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Contract, Unit No. 11, for the demolition of buildings and structures and site clearance of certain areas in said project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Bernar- dino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on the 8th and 15th days of February, 1968 and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and f"- WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 27th day of February, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and '-- WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above speci- fied and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Wood and Associates in the sum of $3,188.00. WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Wood and Associates is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of said Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by Agency Counsel and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Wood and Associates in the sum of $3,188~'00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the said Contract for Unit No. lIon behalf of said Agency. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster approving Resolution No. 620. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO.5, R-79: r- r L Bids were opened for Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No.5, R-79, on February 27, 1968. Edwin Webber was the low bidder for the amount of $15,870.00. The following resolution was introduced: 582 RESOLUTION NO. 621 ,., 6 ..J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE WITH EDWIN WEBBER FOR UNIT NO.5, R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Contract, Unit No.5, for the demolition of buildings and structures and site clearance of certain areas in said project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Ber- nardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on the 8th and 15th of February, 1968, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 27th day of February, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and ., ....- WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Edwin Webber in the sum of $15,870.00; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Edwin Webber is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of said Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by Agency Counsel and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Edwin Webber in the sum of $15,870. be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the said Contract for Unit No. 5 on behalf of said Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 621. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, WEbster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson. ., ~ ....J 583 r- ~ ~ "'- RATIFICATION OF AGENCY'S ACTIONS APPROVING THE AMENDATORY, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that Resolution No. 605 authorizing the filing of the Amenda- tory Application for Loan and Grant for Project No. Calif. R-79 was adopted February 1, 1968. Mr. Webster and Mr. Austin were absent at this meeting, and the Agency would like their concurrence in this Resolution for Agency record. Mr. Webster and Mr. Austin stated that they concur in the adoption of Resolution No. 605 adopted February 1, 1968. RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT BY CIVIC LEADERS, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that he would like to file for Agency record the Resolution adopted by civic leaders of the community, pursuant to the presentation at the Holiday Inn on January 30, 1968, commending the Chairman, Agency Members, and Staff for their efforts in connection with the Central City Project and indicat- ing their support of same. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster directing the Executive Director to file said Resolution as Agency Record and the same to be spread on the minutes. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR CENTRAL CITY PROJECT R-79 Recitals: r- \- Each of the undersigned persons attended a briefing presented by Warner W. Hodgdon, Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, on the Central City Project, Calif. R-79, held at the Holiday Inn of San Bernardino, California, on January 30, 1968; and Upon hearing a thorough presentation by Mr. Hodgdon of the background, cur- rent problems and suggested methods for the consummation of said Project, and upon motion made by William E. Leonard and seconded by Allen B. Gresham, the following resolution was unanimously adopted by the undersigned persons: RESOLVED: That Warner W. Hodgdon, Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Members of the Agency and the Agency Staff, be and they hereby are, commended for their efforts in connection with said Central City Project, and that each of the undersigned hereby indicates his support of the Central' City Project, and the efforts of the Chairman, the Agency and its staff in connection therewith. MOTION: Leonard, William E., President Leonard Realty Company SI William E. Leonard r L SECOND: Gresham, Allen B., Attorney Lonergan, Jordan, Gresham & Varner . sl Allen B. Gresham MAYOR: Al C. Ballard sl Al C. Ballard 584 COMMON COUNCIL: Seccombe,Druscilla First Ward s/Druscilla Seccombe ~ ......" Fagan, Michael Second Ward s/Michael Fagan Katona, William Third Ward s/William Katona Henley, Robert Fourth Ward s/Robert Henley Guhin, Al Fifth Ward siAl Guhin Gregory, Norris Sixth Ward s/Norris Gregory Shepherd, Donald Seventh Ward s/Donald Shepherd UNITED STATES SENATOR: Savell, Virginia S., Field Representative s/Virginia Savell Kuchel, Thomas H. Senator MEMBERS "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES" Goodspeed, Charles, Field Representative s/Charles Goodspeed Pettis, Jerry L. Congressman ~ .... Wayland, Douglas R., Field Coordinator Tunney, John V. Congressman s/Douglas R. Wayland Ackley, G. David, Editor & Vice Pres. Sun Telegram s/David G. Ackley Beck, Robert, Eastern Div. Manager Southern California Edison Company SIR. B. Beck Baughn, William, Vice President Bank of America N.T.& S.A. s/W. H. Baughn Butler, Jack, Vice President & Manager Title Insurance & Trust Company s/Jack Butler Ford, Charles, Executive Vice President Security First National Bank s/Charles R. Ford -., ......., 585 r- '--' Freeman, Warren, President Warren Freeman Company s/Warren Freeman Griffith, Lloyd, Vice Pres. & Manager United States National Bank s/Lloyd Griffith Hand, William, Division Manager Southern California Gas Company s/Wm. P. Hand Harris, Donald, Partner The Harris Company s/Donald Harris Harris, Harold, Partner The Harris Company s/Harold Harris Harris, Melville, Partner The Harris Company s/Melville Harris Holcomb, Robert, Attorney Chairman, San Bernardino Water Board s/Robert Holcomb Holmes, Hugh, President Ice Products s/Hugh Holmes (!""'. .. Johnstone, John Division Manager General Telephone Company s/John Johnstone """- Jordan, Donald, Attorney Lonergan, Jordan, Gresham & Varner s/Donald Jordan Lonergan, John, Attorney Lonergan, Jordan, Gresham i Varner s/John B. Lonergan Martin, Ernest, President & Manager Barnum and Flagg s/Ernest Martin Miller, Robert, Manager United California Bank siR. Miller Moodey, Robert, President Inland Action, Ic. s/Robert Moodey Meyers, Bennet A., Partner The Harris Company s/Bennet Meyers Obst, Oscar P. Jr., President Golden Valley Land Company s/Oscar P. Obst, Jr. ",..... Patterson, Lawrence, President Santa Fe Federal Savings & Loan siLo P. Patterson ......., 586 Parker, William, President Investment Consultants Corporation s/Wm. Parker .., ~; ! ....J Reimer, Marvin, W., General Manager Sun Telegram s/Marvin Reimer Sivelle, James, Manager J. C. Penney Company s/James Sivelle Snyder, Joseph, President First Federal Savings & Loan Asso s/Joseph Snyder Trask, Lowell, President Redco s/Lowell Trask Walker, Art s/Art Walker Wood, C. Wayne, President & Manager First American Title Company siC. Wayne Wood Young, Robert, Vice Pres. & Manager Bank of California s/Robert Young Zenz, Harold, Vice Pres. & Manager Security Title Insurance Company s/Harold Zenz ...., .." OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL 55b, R-10: Mr. Hodgdon stated that the Agency has received two Offers to Purchase Reuse Parcel 55b, R-10. Mr. George Shane, et.al., have submitted an offer for the proposed development of a "Referee in Bankruptcy" suite. The deposit has been received and all documents have been received. Mr. Shane's development only requires 1/2 of the parcel, but he stated that if the Agency desires sale of the entire parcel he is agreeable. Mr. Shane proposes a 60 day escrow with construction to start as specified. The proposed development is a $150,000.00 structure. Desert Provision has also submitted an offer for this parcel. Mr. Doumani was present representing the Desert Provisions Company. Desert Provisions desires the entire parcel for expansion of their present business adjacent to reuse parcel 15b. They have submitted their deposit for this parcel also. Mr. Doumani explained that they must expand their business and parcel 55b is the only practical location. They request a 6 month escrow, in order that they may complete their plans and expansion layout. The development will>be approximately a $1,000,000 investment, and will be in phases as outlined in the letter dated March 5, 1968 mailed to the Agency by Desert Provisions. A copy of said letter is attached to these minutes. ~ ...-l 587 r I r '- Mr. Doumani stated that Desert Provisions would agree to a four month escrow, with construction of the first phase of construction, as outlined in said letter, to commence within 60 days after close of escrow, and to be completed within 1 year from commencement of construction. Construction of the second phase, as outlined in said letter, will commence within 60 days of completion of construction of first phase, and will be completed within 1 year from com- mencement of 2nd phase. Mr. Hodgdon explained that Desert Provisions was previously Freeman Foster Meat Company and one of the first Owner Participants in our Meadowbrook Project. He further stated that because of the length of the escrow, a provision would have to be incorporated into the Agreement whereby a 25% penalty fee would be charged in the event that they could not perform. Mr. Doumani stated that Desert Pro- visions would be agreeable to this provision. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 622 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO. 55b, R-IO, TO DESERT PROVISIONS r- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and L.. WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8, and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of the Agency held March 7, 1968, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase submitted by Desert Provisions, herein- after called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain real property described as: REUSE PARCEL NO. 55b Lots 16, 17, 18 and 19, according to Subdivision of Part of Block 4, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 5, records of said County. ",... ~ ~ ~ WHEREAS, at said Regular Meeting, held March 7, 1968, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land are in order and in conformance with the rules and regulations as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the disposition of project lands. 588 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper is satisfactory; that negotiation is the appropriate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redevelopment possesses the qualifications and financial resOUrces necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price, FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($40,000) is satisfactory, not less than the fair mar- ket value of land for uses in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and is not less than the resale price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. .., i I .""J BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that escrow for said property will be for a period of 4 months, with construction of the first phase of construction, as outlined in their letter to the Agency of March 5, 1968, to commence within 60 days after close of escrow, and to be completed within 1 year from commencement of cons- truction. Construction of the second phase, as outlined in said letter, will commence within 60 days of completion of construction of first phase, and will be completed within 1 year from commencement of 2nd phase. (Said letter of March 5, 1968 is attached to minutes of March 7, 1968); and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the offer to purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted, subject to receipt from the developer of all necessary documents. Pursuant to the Agency's approval of all necessary docu- ments, the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale and all other documents necessary or convenient to carry out the terms of the Agreement. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 622 to Desert Provisions because Desert Provisions has proposed the best development for the use of the land. Also authorizing the incorpora- tion into the Agreement of Sale the provision of a 25% penalty fee in the event that the developer cannot perform. Said resolution is subject to re- ceipt from the developer of all the necessary documents prior to the next regular meeting of March 21, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson .., -J Mr. Hodgdon thanked Mr. Shane for his interest in the property and stated that if Mr. Shane desired another location available, the Agency would do all they could to execute the sale as rapidly as possible for the benefit of himself and his client. MODIFICATION OF PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT, PHIL SHANEDLING, R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the time period for the Predisposition Agreement by and between the Agency and Phil Shanedling Company for Reuse Parcels 17 and a portion of 13b, 15 and 16 has expired. The proposed development for this land is a four story office tower, which will resemble the office tower of the Bank of California building. Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agency is not in a position to deliver good and marketable title to the property covered by the Predisposition Agreement until the Southern Pacific Railroad abandons their facility encumbering the property. The appraisers have been contracted so that we can obtain a concurred in reuse price from HUD. The Railroad has given the abandonment of these tracks ..... I I ....J 589 r ~, \..... top priority and it is hoped that we can acquire them soon, but we have no date certain. Mr. Hodgdon recommended that a motion be entertained approving the extension of the Predisposition Agreement for 90 days, and instructing the Executive Director to write a letter to Phil Shanedling Company stating that during this 90 day extension the Agency will entertain any alternate proposal wherein Phil Shanedling Company could construct their development before the abandonment of these tracks is completed. When the railroad property is avail- able, Phil Shanedling Company will acquire same. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 623 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF PRE- DISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH PHIL SHANEDLING COMPANY, REUSE PARCELS 16, AND A PORTION OF l3b, 15 and 16, R-lO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California has under date of July 17, 1967, entered into a Predisposition Agreement with Phil Shanedling Company, for the disposition of Reuse Parcels 16, and a portion of l3b, 15 and 16, in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-lO; and r- WHEREAS, the Agency desires to extend the time period of said Predisposition Agreement for 90 days in order that the Agency may be in a position to deliver good and marketable title to said real property: '- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that said Predisposition Agreement by and between the Agency and Phil Shanedling Company be amended to provide that the term of said agreement is extended for a period of 90 days from the date of this meeting. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary be, and they hereby are, authorized to execute an amendment to said Agreement providing for such an extension of the term of said Agreement Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 623, extending the Predisposition Agreement by and between the Agency and Phil Shanedling for 90 days, and instructing the Executive Director to write a letter to Phil Shanedling Company stating that during the time of this extension, the Agency will entertain any alternate proposal wherein Phil Shanedling Company could acquire the property before the abandonment of the railroad tracks. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTION - REUSE APPRAISER MR. AL KNORR: r v l.. Mr. Hodgdon requested the ratification of action removing Mr. Al Knorr's name from list of prospective Reuse Appraisers for appraisal of City Water Department and Railroad Right-of-Way Property in R-lO, as recorded in minutes of January 18, 1968. Mr. Knorr performed the acquisition appraisal on these parcels and there- fore cannot perform the reuse appraisal. Motion was made by Wein and seconded 590 by Webster removing Mr. Al Knorr's name from the list of prospective Reuse Appraisers for the appraisal of the City Water Department and the Railroad Right-of-Way property in R-IO, as recorded in the minutes of January 18, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson ~ [, ~ -J WRITE-OFF OF UNCOLLECTABLE RENT, ORVILLE E. WILLIAMSON, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that all reasonable efforts to effect collection of delinquent rent in the amount of $90.00 from Orville E. Williamson, have been enacted. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 624 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING WRITE-OFF OF UNCOLLECTABLE RENT OF ORVILLE E. WILLIAMSON WHEREAS, Section 15-2 of the Urban Renewal Manual requires extensive efforts to effect collection of delinquent rents; and WHEREAS, this Agency has made all reasonable efforts to effect collection of delinquent rent in the amount of $90.00 from Orville E. Williamson, 322 North "G" Street, and has in fact requested assistance through a recognized collection Agency, and is assured that there is no reasonable prospect of collection, and that probable costs of further efforts to collect would be unwarranted. ~ 11 '.....J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby authorize the charge-off of delinquent rent in the amount of $90.00 for Agency property located at 323 North "G" Street, San Bernardino, California Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 624. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson PAYROLL ACCOUNT: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 625 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A BANK ACCOUNT AT UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK FOR PAYROLL WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has offered the Redevel- opment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, a Loan and Grant Contract authorizing the expenditure of said Loan and Grant Funds in accor- dance with the approved budget therefore; and --, WHEREAS, said Agency, at a Regular Meeting held the 7th day of March, 1968, directed the Chairman and Secretary to open a new account with the United States National Bank to be designated "Payroll Account" ......,J 591 r fi ~ '-- Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 625. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson PURCHASE - TYPEWRITER: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to purchase one electric typewriter, not to exceed $400.00. Motion was made by Weinand seconded by Austin authorizing the purchase of one electric typewriter, not to exceed $400.00. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 10, NIKOLOPULAS, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that all the tenants of the Nikolopulas property have requested condemnation action, inasmuch as they have not been a~le to corne to an agreement and all efforts have failed to resolve any such agreement between Mr. Nikolopulas and the tenants. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 626 ",..,... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT (Block 4, Parcel 10, NIKOLOPULAS) ~ BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. r- i '-- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. 592 ...., BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 4, Parcel 10, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. .....J Motion was made by Resolution No. 626 motion was carried and Hodgdon Noes: Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of and instructing Mr. Allen Gresham to initiate same. The by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson MEYER - SHAPIRO, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 4, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that he believes that we can obtain approval from HUD to purchase the Meyer property subject to the Western Union lease. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein to purchase the property of Mr. Fred Meyer, subject to the Western Union lease, with HUD concurrence. Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson WALLIS-PIERCY, DECLINATION OF RESCISSION OF SALE, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that this item has been deleted from the agenda because it has been resolved. .... RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTION - FRANKLIN PRESS: 'WIIIItI Mr. Hodgdon explained that we must have a ratification of our actions for the purchase of brochures from Franklin Press in the amount of $651.00, R-79. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 627 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING THE AGENCY'S ACTION OF THE PURCHASE OF COLOR BROCHURES FROM FRANKLIN PRESS IN THE AMOUNT OF $651.00 FOR R-79 BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino do hereby ratify the Agency's actions of the purchase of color brochures from Franklin Press in the amount of $651.00 drawn on its Revolving Fund by Check No. 2367, December 7, 1967, and the expenditure of said funds is hereby approved. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 627. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson ~ ......,J 593 [ RELOCATION OF "FOR SALE" SINGS, AND PAINTING OUT OF PRESENT DIMENSIONS ON SIGNS, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to pay for the relocation of "For Sale" signs from Reuse Parcels 69 and 72 to Reuse Parcels 2 and 3, and Reuse Parcel 16, and to paint out present dimensions on signs. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the payment of relocation of signs and painting out of present dimensions. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT, HENRY HENSCHEL, ET.AL., R-IO: Mr. Varner stated that the Predisposition Agreement proposed by Henry Henschel has been redrafted and is agreeable to both parties. All of the items desired to be changed by the Board have now been met. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 628 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO ENTER INTO A PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH HENRY HENSCHEL ET.AL., R-IO: r L WHEREAS, Henry S. Henschel and Robert J. Erwin, hereinafter collectively and individually referred to as the "Developers", desire to purchase from the Redevelopment Agency, hereinafter referred to as the "Agency", certain real property consisting of approximately 7 1/2 acres and bounded generally by Rialto Avenue, Second Street, Mountain View Avenue and Sierra Way, in the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; WHEREAS, the Developers propose to develop a multi-family low and moderate income residential housing area, financed pursuant to Section 221 (d)(3) of Section 202 of the National Housing Act, as amended; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting of the Agency, held March 7, 1968, the Agency Members found and determined that the proposed development of Henry Henschel and Robert Erwin was in the best interest of the Meadowbrook Project Area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary be hereby authorized to execute a Predisposition Agreement by and between the Agency and Henry S. Henschel and Robert J. Erwin, for the purchase of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32, in the Meadowbrook Project Area, Calif. R-IO. [ Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 628 and instructing the Executive Director to deposit the $5,000 deposit on said property in the Special Account. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson 594 IRENE STEPHENS, ACQUISITION OF BLOCK 5, PARCELS 16, 17 & 18, R-79: .., Mr. Varner explained that the leasee of the subject property has abandoned his lease. Mr. Skipper, attorney for Irene Stephens, has forwarded a Declaration of Abandonment and Termination of Lease to the leasee at his last known address. Mrs. Stephens has also executed a Hold Harmless Agree- ment, holding the Agency harmless from any and all civil proceedings insti- tuted by the former lessees of any portion of the property. Mr. Varner approved from a legal standpoint, the acquisition of the Stephens property without an offset statement from the former tenant. The following resolution was introduced: 11 ill ~ .....J RESOLUTION NO. 629 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF BLOCK 5, PARCELS 16, 17 and 18, R-79 WITHOUT AN OFFSET STATEMENT FROM THE FORMER TENANT, LEE R. CRESSWELL and CAMILLE CRESSWELL WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to acquire property owned by Mrs. Irene Stephens in its Central City Project, Calif.. R-79, described as Reuse Parcels 16, 17 and 18; and WHEREAS, the tenant to said property, Lee R. Cresswell and Camille Cresswell, have abandoned their lease; and --. N f iwIIIIII WHEREAS, Irene Stephens has executed a Declaration of Abandonment and Ter- mination of Lease against said tenants; and WHEREAS, Irene Stephens has also executed a Hold Harmless Agreement, holding the Agency harmless from any and all civil proceedings instituted by the former lessees of any portion of the property: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that in view of the circumstances hereinabove stated, the Members find and determine that the Agency may acquire Reuse Parcels 16, 17 and 18, in the Central City Project, from Mrs. Irene Stephens without obtaining an offset statement from the former tenant, Lee R. Cresswell and Camille Cresswell. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 629. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson PRESENTATION BY AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS and THE CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS: Representatives from the American Society of Civil Engineers and the California Society of Professional Engineers were presented to the Members. They re- quested that the Agency adopt a written policy on the procedures for contracting 0 professional services. Their main objection was that the Agency requests that 1 they state their price for services on their proposal. They stated that selection [ "...- '"'- r f .... 5'?5 of consultants for working with public agencies should be based on qualifica- tions as the preliminary determining factor with negotiation or mutually agreed upon fees to be determined following selection. The Members stated that qualifications were also the preliminary determining factor in choesing a consultant for engineering services. Price is only used when the Board believes that certain firms are perfectly equal on qualifications and cannot determine the best qualified because they are not in a position to be able to judge who is the best qualified. The Members stated that the work they have received in the past has been very satisfactory. Mr. We in read a letter they have wherein it was stated by Mr. Mount of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, that the plans received from the Agency prepared by Joseph Bonadiman were "the most complete set of plans I have seen for quite a while". After much discussion, Mr. Hodgdon stated that he did not believe that the Agency should prepare a written procedure for contacting professional services, because we in effect had the same policy that the engineering societies require. When we cannot determine which firm is best qualified, we must determine our choice by price. The representatives from the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Califor- nia Society of Professional Engineering were thanked for their time and pre- sentation. OTHER BUSINESS: Ratification of Resolution No. 461 Mr. Hodgdon requested ratification of Agency actions authorizing withdrawal of Boyce J. Harper, Jr., resignation of December 31, 1966 and effecting continuous employment with the Redevelopment Agency from September 1, 1964, and rescission of Resolution No. 461. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 630 RESOLUTION Of THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY Of SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 461, AND RATIfYING AGENCY'S ACTION OF BOYCE J. HARPER JR'S RESIGNA- TION OF DECEMBER 31, 1966 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by its Resolution No. 461 accepted the resignation of Mr. Boyce J. Harper, Jr; and WHEREAS, subsequent to said Resolution for resignation, Mr. Boyce J. Harper, Jr., withdrew his resignation and continued his employment with the Agency; and WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 461 was never rescinded to continue the employment of Boyce J. Harper, Jr,; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency Members to ratify the Agency's actions by authorizing the withdrawal of Boyce J. Harper, Jr.'s resignation of December 31, 1966. 596 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency Members do hereby ratify the Agency's actions by authorizing the withdrawal of Boyce J. Harper, Jr's resignation of December 31, 1966 and effecting continuous employment with the Redevelopment Agency from September 1, 1964 and hereby rescinds Resolution No. 461. J Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 630. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson Amendment to Personnel Policy Mr. Hodgdon explained that a prov~s~on should be entered into our present Per- sonnel Policy for Jury Duty. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 631-- I /, I Y'-' 3'/),: ;J ~_I,- ,! RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 521 WHEREAS, REsolution No. 521 established Official Personnel Policies for Staff Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, it now becomes necessary to establish an additional section to said Personnel Policy regarding the serving on a jury by any staff member; ., .~ ....... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Section nine be added to the personnel policies as follows: "9. Jury Dutz.: An employee who is called to serve on a jury panel for the County of San Bernardino, State of California, be paid his full salary during the time of his or her service; and further that any monies received as a jury fee shall be endorsed to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California." Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 631. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: - Wilson Personnel Policy Resolutions The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 632 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING SPECIFIC PREVIOUS PERSONNEL POLICIES .., J , .1 -......J r ! '-- r"'- ......... r- if ~ 597 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 381 established official Personnel Policies of the Agency; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 521 further adopted and revised Official Personnel Policies; and WHEREAS, it was the intent of the Agency Board of Directors of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino to Descind Resolution No. 381 and all previous personnel policies when adopting Resolution No. 521. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 381 and all previous per- sonnel policies are hereby rescinded and Resolution No. 521 is the Official Personnel Policy of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 632. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson John S. Griffith & Curci-Turner Co. Mr. Varner stated that the Predisposition Agreement with John S. Griffith and Curci-Turner Company should be amended to eliminate the construction of the parking garage. The Department of Housing and Urban Development will not approve construction of said parking structure by Agency as an eligible Item II project cost. The amendment will also delete Reuse Parcels 18, 19 and 20 from the Predisposition Agreement, in the event the Department of Housing and Urban Development does not authorize the acquisition and disposition of these parcels. In the event the Agency does obtain approval for the acquisition and disposition of these parcels, the Developer agrees to purchase same. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 633 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE SECOND AMENDMENT TO PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND JOHN S. GRIFFITH & CO., AND CURCI-TURNER COMPANY WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, on August 23, 1967, executed a Predisposition Agreement, which Predisposition Agreement was amended on February 16, 1968, with John S. Griffith & Co. and Curci-Turner Co,; and WHEREAS, among other things, said Predisposition Agreement provided for the con- struction by Agency of a four-level parking structure in accordance with the pro- visions of said Agreement; and 598 WHEREAS, subsequent to the execution of said Predisposition Agreement, Agency was advised by the U. S. Government, Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment, that it will not approve construction of said parking structure by Agency as an eligible Item II project cost; and --, .....Ii WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has been advised that approval of the acqui- sition and disposition of certain parcels of real property was subject to Paragraph 15 (b) of the Loan and Grant Contract, executed between the Agency and the U. S. on March 21, 1967, referred to in the Predisposition Agreement. Said Paragraph 15 (b) proscribes the acquisition and disposition of Reuse Parcels 18, 19 and 20, which parcels were to be sold to the Developer in accor- dance with the terms of said Predisposition Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has requested that the requirements of said Paragraph 15(b) of the Loan and Grant Contract referred to in said Predisposition Agreement be deleted to authorize the acquisition and sale of said Reuse Parcels 18, 19 and 20 as provided in the Predisposition Agreement; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend said Predisposition Agreement to delete the requirements for the construction of said parking structure, and to delete Reuse Parcels 18, 19 and 20 from the provisions of.said Predisposition Agreement, in the event the Department of Housing and Urban Development does not authorize the acquisition and disposition of said Reuse Parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, that the Predisposition Agreement by and between the Agency and John S. Griffith & Co. and Curci-Turner Company be amended to delete the requirement for the construction of said parking structure, and to delete Reuse Parcels 18, 19 and 20 from the provisions of said Predisposition Agree- ment, in the event the Department of Housing and Urban Development does not authorize the acquisition and disposition of said Reuse Parcels. ., ~ ....... Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 633. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin to adjourn the 6:20 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None meeting at Ayes: Absent: Wilson March 5, 1968 Redevelopment Agency City of San Bernardino San Bernardino, Calif. ~ .~ ! .....J Gentlemen: Re: Reuse Parcel 55-B r :? This letter is to clarify certain points regarding our offer to purchase parcel 55-B. The following is to explain our needs for this parcel, and to answer certain questions asked by the agency: ...... 1. Our offer to purchase is contingent upon having six months to close the escrow. This time will be needed to draw plans, get permits from City and Federal Government's, obtain permanent fi- nancing, and bid the job out. The reason for this length of time is that the improvements to be constructed now are only a small part of the total improvements that we envision. We, there- fore, will have to master plan our entire pro- ject before starting on the first phase. Con- struction on the first phase will commence 30 days after the closing of the escrow. 2. The first phase of construction will include the following: A. Freezer space of not less than 4000 square feet or 72,000 cubic fee~ ",.- B. Additional inside work area of not less than ~ square feet. "-- C. Parking area for not less than 30 cars. Our existing plant does not have the required number of parking spaces for its size and the acquisition of parcel 55-B will thus allow us to conform to the city requirements for parking. 3. The cost of improvements in the first phase of construction will exceed $120,000. The value of the merchandise stored there will be in excess of $100,000. The equipment to be installed in the 2000 square feet of work area will be valued in excess of $60,000. The total value is approximately $280,000, not including land value. 4. The second phase of construction which should commence approximately two years hence will in- clude an additional 15,000 square feet of building and will be used for the manufacture of certain Meat products such as Sausage, Luncheon Meats, Hams, Cube Steaks and Corned Beef. r- ~ L. The cost of this improvement will be in excess of $350,000 and the cost of the equipment to be installed in the building will be in excess of $500,000, as can be verified by the enclosed estimate by Certified Manufacturing Inc. 599 600 With the completion of the second phase of construction the total value of improvements and equipment will be in excess of $1,000,000. ... if ....." 5. Upon completion of the first phase of construction we will employ approximately 6 to 8 more people. Upon final completion of all the improvements, we then will be employing a minimum of 80 additional people. Our gross business is projected to increase from its present $12,000,000 per year to over $30,000,000 per year. 6. Desert Provision Co. employs over 100 people at the present location with an annual payroll in excess of $900,000. Since moving ot our present location at 444 West Rialto in November of 1965 the sales have increased from approximately ~4,000,000 per year to the present $12,000,000 per year. Employment has increased from approx- imately 40 to the present 100 people. If our growth is to continue we must have the adjoining property available for expansion. There is no other con- tiguous piece available and the nature of our operation is such that it is economically unfeasible to operate out of two separate locations. If we are unable to obtain parcel 55-B, any future expansion would mean completely relocation our entire plant. The investment in our present plant would preclude us from doin this for quite some time. .., ....." Sincerely yours, s/Carl K. Doumani Carl K. Doumani ..., ! ...... r- ........ ,."'"*' ........ r- r , ...... 601 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman reported that this Special Meeting was held pursuant to a duly dated and signed Notice of Special Meeting which was mailed to each and every member in due time, form and manner as required by law. Said notice is as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Rede- velopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at the offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 Court Street, Room 305, in the City of San Bernardino, California, the regu- lar meeting place thereof, at 4:00 p.m. on the 14th day of March, 1968, for the purpose of reviewing Offer to Purchase submitted by Mr. George Shane et al., for the purchase of Reuse Parcel No. 35, Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO, and for transacting any other business which may properly come before it. DATED this 11th day of March, 1968. siP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Executive Director 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUINN, JR., SECRETARY of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY, that on the 11th day of March, 1968, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL WITNESS my hand this 11th day of March, 1968. siP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Executive Director The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Webster, Wein and Wilson Agency Members Absent: Austin Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL 35, Shane et al., R-IO: 602 An Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel No. 35, R-IO, was submitted to the Members from Mr. George Shane and Mr. Hyman Shane. The proposed development for this parcel is a "Referee in Bankruptcy" suite. The deposit has been received. The purchase price is $29,000 and the development is approximately a 7,500 sq. ft. structure. Mr. Shane proposes a 60 day escrow with 60 days from close of escrow for construction to commence. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: -... '" ..... RESOLUTION NO. 634 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO. 35, R-IO, TO GEORGE AND HYMAN SHANE WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8 and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, at the Special Meeting of the Agency held March 14, 1968, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase submitted by George Shane and Hyman Shane, hereinafter called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain real property described as: .., ....J REUSE PARCEL NO. 35 Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16, in Block 3, BEDFORD BROS. SUBDIVISION, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 8 of Maps, page 30, records of said County, together with the North 1/2 of the 15 foot alley adjoining said lots on the South, as va- cated by Resolution No. 6146 of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on November 6, 1961, a certified copy of such Resolution being recorded in Book 5586, page 234, Official Records. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper is satisfactory; that negotiation is the appropriate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the REdeveloper possesses the qualifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price, TWENTY NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($29,000), is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and is not less than the resale price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted, and the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale and all other documents necessary or convenient to carry out the terms of the Agreement. ~ '-' ,..... I ~ \...... ~ r [ ~ 603 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 634. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Austin Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin O'MELVENY AND MYERS: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to obtain the services of O'Melveny and Myers for legal opinions regarding bonding of both the Meadowbrook Project and the Central City Project and as to the validity of Agency and City obligations under the proposed mall and parking maintenance agreements. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting at 4:10 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin 604 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALI- FORNIA, HELD ON THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALI- FORNIA ~ J The Meeting was called ,to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Webster, Austin, Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel: and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 7, 1968 were presented to Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin the Minutes of March 7, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon None Abstention: None Absent: None the approving the fol- Noes: The Minutes of the Special Meeting of March 14, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the Special Meeting Minutes of March 14, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None , ~ EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of February, 1968 were presented to the Members. Several wording corrections were made. After discussion, motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson approving the expenditures for the month of February, 1968, as corrected. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 4:15 - Mr. Webster is excused from the meeting 4:20 - Mr. Webster returned and assumed his place at the meeting. REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that all condemnation cases have been filed, and that most of the parties to be served have been contacted. He further stated that Mr. Gresham, Condemnation Attorney, R-79, would attend the next Regular Meeting to give the Members an up to date report on all R-79 condemnation cases. ~ J 605 [ Mr. Quinn informed the Members that he has been informed by Bill Ward, Condemna- tion Attorney, R-10, that April 1st is the firm date for the Trial No.1. The hearing for setting of Trial No. 2 and Trial No. 3 was held March 19, 1968. The judge scheduled May 6, 1968 for the firm date for these remaining cases. 4:25 - Mr. Webster is excused from the meeting. PHIL SHANEDLING, PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT 13b, 15, 16 & 17, R-10: A letter from Phil Shanedling Company regarding the Predisposition Agreement for Reuse Parcels No. 13b, 15, 16 & 17, R-10, was presented to the Members. Mr. Shanedling requests that the Predisposition Agreement be cancelled and his deposit, $5,944.38, be returned. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 635 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLA- TION OF PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND PHIL SHANEDLING COMPANY FOR THE SALE OF RE- USE PARCELS 13b, 15, 16 & 17, R-10, AND AUTHORIZING THE RETURN OF THEIR OPTION DEPOSIT ~ I t I I...- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, on May 18, 1967, authorized the execution of a Predisposition Agreement by and between the Agency and Phil Shanedling Company for the sale of Reuse Parcels 13b, 15, 16 & 17 in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, said Predisposition Agreement, dated July 17, 1967, stipulated that in the event the Agency could not deliver good and marketable title to said real property within 6 months from the date of Agreement, the Agency may terminate Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency has been unable to deliver good and marketable title to said real property within the time so stipulated; and WHEREAS, the Developer has requested the cancellation of said Predisposition Agreement and the refund of his option deposit of $5,944.38. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary be and are hereby authorized on behalf of the Agency to cancel the Predisposition Agreement of July 17, 1967 between the Agency and Phil Shanedling Company and are authorized to return the option deposit for said sale. ,,-. I: ! e '-- Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 635, and instructing the Executive Director to write a letter to Phil Shanedling informing them of same. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster 606 RELOCATION WORKSHOP: Mr. Hodgdon explained that there will be a relocation workshop in Los Angeles on March 21 and 22. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 636 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE AT- TENDANCE AT A RELOCATION WORKSHOP IN LOS ANGELES, MARCH 21 and 22, 1968, FOR MESSRS. HARPER, JONES, GONZALES AND GRIFFIN WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found to be essential that Messrs Harper, Jones, Gonzales and Griffin, attend a Relocation Workshop to be held in Los Angeles, CalifDrnia, on March 21 and 22, 1968. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Messrs Harper, Jones, Gonzales and Griffin are authorized to travel to Los Angeles to attend a Relocation Workshop, March 21 and 22, 1968, and that their expenses are hereby approved in accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. 302 of the Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 636. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster AUTHORIZATION TO INCUR EXPENSES: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization for the payment of expenses incurred at the lunch of March 14, 1968 for Bonding House representatives, not to exceed $20.00. The following resolution was intrt.duced: RESOLUTION NO. 637 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF EXPENSES INCURRED AT LUNCH OF MARCH 14, 1968 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, conducted a meeting March 14, 1968 with Bonding House Representatives, con- cerning bonding for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and ., .J ... .~ ~i ..." ,., J 607 r I '-- WHEREAS, certain expenses for lunch were incurred pursuant to said meeting; and WHEREAS, the Members, at their Regular Meeting of March 21, 1968, determined that said expenses incurred are eligible project costs per Urban Renewal Manual, Section 30-1-2: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the payment of expenses incurred at lunch of March 14, 1968 for Bonding House Representatives is hereby authorized. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said authorized expenses shall not exceed the amount of $20.00. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 637. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster 4:40 - Mr. Webster returned to the meeting. BERGMAN TIRE, REQUEST TO WRITE OFF FEBRUARY RENT, R-79: t........ Mr. Hodgdon requests authorization to write off February rent of Bergman General Tires, Inc. A memo from the Relocation Department states that the Agency re- ceived an Intent to Move from Bergman Tire on December 29, 1967. At that time, their plans were to relocate to their new location on Mill Street on or about February, 1968. However, due to additional information required by HUD, we were unable to move this concern until we received a phone call from Mr. Richardson of HUD on February 28, 1968. At this time, Mr. Richardson authorized the Agency to relocate Bergman Tire. The following resolution was introduced: r i RESOLUTION NO. 638 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE WRITE-OFF OF FEB- RUARY RENT FROM BERGMAN GENERAL TIRE INC. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has acquired property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets, San Bernardino, in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the tenant of said property, Bergman General Tire Inc., has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Agency until such time as his relocation is complete; and WHEREAS, said Bergman General Tire Inc. submitted his Intent to Move on December 29, 1967, however, due to additional information needed by The Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Develop.ent, was unable to relocate until February 28, 1968; and ,....... WHEREAS, Bergman General Tire Inc., has requested the write-off of his February rent because of HUD delay. '-- 608 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby authorize the write-off of February rent from Bergman General Tire Inc. ., ~ -" Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 638. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, DESERT PROVISIONS (FREEMAN AND FOSTER), R-10: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 639 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF OWNER PARTICIPANTS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO FOSTER MEAT COMPANY, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, dba FREEMAN AND FOSTER WHEREAS, Foster Meat Company, Inc., a California corporation, dba Freeman and Foster, hereinafter referred to as the Owner Participant, has entered into an Agreement with the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIF- ORNIA, hereinafter called the Agency; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated May 19, 1961, was recorded on May 24, 1963, in Book 5901, page 916, in the Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and .... ~ 1; ....., WHEREAS, in Section 2 of said Agreement, Owner Participant agrees to build upon and improve said land and such construction and improvements shall be carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code require- ment of the City of San Bernardino, California and the State of California and the provisions of the Plan and the Declaration of Restrictions and in ac- cordance with the final plans and specifications approved by the Agency on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner set forth in said Agreement. Parcell: The West ~ of Lot 15, and the West ~ of Lot 16, according to plat showing Subdivision of Block 4, City of San Bernardino, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 5, records of said County. Parcel 2: The North 25 feet of the West 118.5 feet of Lot 18, and the West 118.5 feet of Lot 17, according to Subdivision of Block 4, City of San Bernardino, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 5, records of said County. .... ....... 609 r-'" Parcel 3: -- The South 50 feet of the West 118.5 feet of Lot 18, according to Subdivision of Block 4, City of San Bernardino, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 5, records of said County. Parcel 4: That portion of Lot 1, Block 4, City of San Bernardino, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of Calif- ornia, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 1, records of said County, described as follows: Commencing 138 feet West of the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 55 feet; thence West 130.6 feet to Rousseau Street; thence South 55 feet; thence to the point of beginning. Otherwise described as the West 130.6 feet of Lot 19, according to plat showing Subdivision of Block 4, City of San Bernardino, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 5, records of said County. ,...... "-- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, con- clusively certifies, and gives notice that the Owner Participant has fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, for itself, its successors, and as- signs, all covenants and agreements with respect to the Obligation of Owner Participant for the building upon and improvements to said land carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code requirement of the City of San Bernardino, California, and the State of California and the provisions of the Plan and the Declaration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and specifications approved by the Agency and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement upon the hereinabove described real property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 639. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REMOVAL OF DEBRIS ON BERGMAN TIRE PROPERTY, R-79: "".-. Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to remove the debris from the old Bergman Tire property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets. The Fire Department has asked that the debris be removed. Because the Agency now "'- 610 ownes this property it is our responsibility to remove same. ciates have submitted the low bid of $475.00 for this work. resolution was introduced: Wood and Asso- The following .., -...II RESOLUTION NO. 640 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH WOOD & ASSOCIATES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DEBRIS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH AND "F" STREETS, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency has acquired property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets, San Bernardino, R-79; and WHEREAS, after relocation of tenant, Bergman General Tire Inc., property re- quires the removal of debris remaining thereon; and WHEREAS, Wood and Associates have submitted the low bid for the removal of said debris, for the amount of $475.00. ... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into a Contract with Wood and Associates for the removal of debris on property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets, San Bernar- dino, Central City Project, Calif. R-79. ...,IfIij Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 640. Mr. We in stated that he felt that the tenant (Bergman Tire) actually should be responsible for this removal. Mr. We in made a motion that Resolution No. 638 be rescinded to disallow the write-off of Mr. Bergman's February Rent, if we are going to pay for the removal of the debris. The motion was tabled until later on the Agenda in order for the attorney to review the Rental Agreement of Bergman Tire Co. CONTRACT FOR LAND MAINTENANCE: Mr. Hodgdon stated that we should enter into a contract for Land Maintenance of the Meadowbrook Project. Two bids were received. Wood and Associates submitted the low bid of $1,450.00. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 641 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH WOOD & ASSOCIATES FOR LAND MAINTENANCE OF THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-lO ..... -"'" 611 r I ! ...... WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO; and WHEREAS, the Agency is desirous of obtaining a contractor to maintain the pro- ject area in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO; and WHEREAS, Wood and Associates submitted the low bid for said maintenance in the amount of $1,450.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract by and between the Agency and Wood and Associates for land Maintenance of the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 641. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None r- CONTRACT AMENDMENT, A. S. HUBBS, UNIT NO.3, R-79: l..- The Members were presented with two letters from A. S. Hubbs requesting reimburse- ment in the amount of $1,078.40. Mr. Hubbs explains in his letter that they encountered some large submerged concrete footings at 559 Court Street. A. S. Hubbs indicated that they feel these footings were not included in the Specifica- tions and request reimbursement for the work involved in removing them. He further requests that two additional days be granted them on their contract. Mr. Hodgdon recommended that the request for the additional money be denied, as he did not believe it was a valid expenditure. The Specifications allow the bidder to inspect the buildings he is submitting a bid for; therefore, A. S. Hubbs should have known of the fottings before he submitted his bid. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson to deny the request of A. S. Hubbs for reimburse- ment in the amount of $1,078.40. The motion was carried by the following vote, to vote: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 642 ,..- RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO AMEND CONTRACT WITH A. S. HUBBS FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE TO ALLOW TWO ADDITIONAL DAYS FOR CON- TRACT COMPLETION. --- 612 ...... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has entered into a contract with A. S. Hubbs for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.3, Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and ...... WHEREAS, the Contractor has requested that two additional days be added to his contract completion date; and WHEREAS, the Members have determined that said additional days are valid and authorized. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to amend the contract with A. S. Hubbs, Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.3, R-79, to allow two additional days for contract com- pletion. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 642. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: Wein Abstention: None Absent: None REMOVAL OF DEBRIS ON BERGMAN TIRE PROPERTY, R-79: The matter of the removal of debris from the Bergman Tire Property was again brought before the members. The resolution was repeated as follows: '-' RESOLUTION NO. 640 ,... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH WOOD & ASSOCIATES FOR THE REMOVAL OF DEBRIS ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 4TH AND "r" STREETS, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency has acquired property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets, San Bernardino, R-79; and WHEREAS, after relocation of tenant, Bergman General Tire Inc., property re- quires the removal of debris remaining thereon; and WHEREAS, Wood and Associates have submitted the low bid for the removal of said debris, for the amount of $475.00. '-'- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized ....... 613 [ to enter into a Contract with Wood and Associates for the removal of debris on property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets, San Bernardino, Central City Project, Calif. R-79. Mr. Hodgdon explained that it is our responsibility to clear this property. After discussion, The motion made by Webster and seconded by Wein to adopt Resolution No. 640 was repeated. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The Members were informed that the Rental Agreement between Bergman Tires and the Agency states "Tenant shall, at tenants own cost and expense, keep all of said premises in as good order, condition and repair as reasonable use and wear will permit". After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 643 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF RESO- LUTION NO. 638 [ WHEREAS, Resolution No. 638, adopted March 21, 1968, authorized the write-off of February rent from Bergman General Tire Inc. due to the delay in their relocation caused by the Department of Housing and Urban Development procedures; and WHEREAS, Bergman General Tire Inc. relocated from their property leased to them by the Agency, and upon relocation left property cluttered with debris; and WHEREAS, Rental Agreement by and between Agency and Bergman General Tire Inc. states "Tenant shall, at tenants own cost and expense, keep all of said premises in as good order, condition and repair as reasonable use and wear will permit"; and WHEREAS, the Members found and determined that Bergman General Tire Inc. should be responsible for removal of debris remaining on said property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Resolution No. 638 be amended to authDrize the write-off of February rent from Bergman General Tire Inc., subject to Bergman Tire Company's removal of debris from property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets, San Bernardino, R-79. [.c. : I . Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 643, whereby Resolution No. 638 will be amended to read "Resol.tion of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorizing the write-off of February rent from Bergman General Tire Inc., subject to Bergman Tire Company's removal of debris from property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets". The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None If Mr. Bergman agrees to remove the debris, the contract autho~ized by Resolution No. 640 will not be executed. 614 REQUEST FOR DISPOSITION POLICY - REFERENCE - ADJACENT OWNER AUTHORIZED FIRST REFUSAL: , ....,# Mr. Wein requested that the Agency set a policy whereby before the Agency sells a parcel of land to a proposed developer, the adjacent owner of the par- celfor sale should be contacted to give them notice that said parcel has been requested by a developer. Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agency does not have a written policy to this effect, but that this is always done. All members felt that this was satisfactory. CONTRACT WITH CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR SITE IMPROVEMENT & CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, R-lO and R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 644 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO CONTRACT WITH THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR\,SITE IMPROVEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION OF THE MEADOWBROOK PRO- JECT, CALIF. R-lO & CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, it is necessary that an inspection be made of site improvements and construction in the Meadowbrook Project Area, Calif. R-IO, and the Central City Project Area, Calif. R-79; and ] WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, have approved a contract for this work to be executed between the Agency and the City of San Bernardino, California; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute contracts for Site Improvement and Construction Inspec- tion of the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO, and the Central City Project, Calif. R-79, with the City of San Bernardino. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 644. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None FRANCIS L. LUSH, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 13, REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that there seems to be no means of agreement on the Agency acquiring Block 4, Parcel 13. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 645 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 4, Parcel 13, Francis L. Lush) '-' .J r L r- "'- r- t \.- 615 BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelop- ment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State,'of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is desig- nated as Block 4, Parcel 13, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 645. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin, Wilson, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None JOSEPHINE DANIELSON, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 2, REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that Danielson has been contacted several times and still no agreement. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 646 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 4, Parcel 2, Josephine Danielson) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, It 616 California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of ___ the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and ..J structures thereon, the parcelization of the area, rough grading of the ac- quired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelop- ment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 4, Parcel 2, being more particularly described in the Title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing Resolution No. 646. The motion was carried by the following Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None None Absent: Rone the adoption of vote, to wit: Abstention: ., ~ ...J AUTHORITY TO DEDICATE G, H, 3RD AND 4TH STREETS TO THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to dedicate "G", "H", 3rd and 4th Streets to the City of San Bernardino, as set forthoin the Redevelopment Plan. The following resolution was introduced: ~ RESOLUTION NO. 647 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE DEDICATION OF "G", "H", 3RD AND 4TH STREETS TO THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AS SET FORTH IN THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project requires that cer- tain streets be widened and/or realigned; and WHEREAS, upon completion of said widening and/or realignment ce~tain streets will be dedicated to the City of San Bernardino. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that "G", "H", 3rd and 4th Streets be dedicated to the City of San Bernardino, California, as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79. '~ -J 617 [ Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 647. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO.6, R-79: The bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.6, R-79, were opened March 19, 1968. The low bidder is Dakeno, Inc. of San Gabriel, California, in the amount of $2,674.00. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 648 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC., FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO.6, R-79: WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and r WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.6, for the demolition of buildings and structures and site clearance of certain areas in said project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and i \....... WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Bernardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on the 29th day of February and the 7th day of March, 1968, and an Affidavit show- ing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 19th day of March, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Dakeno, Inc, in the sum of $2,674.00; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Dakeno, Inc. is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of said Agency to accept their bid. r- i ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subje~t to approval of Contractor and bid by Agency Counsel and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said bid by Dakeno, Inc., in the sum of $2,674.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the said Contract for Unit No. 6 on behalf of the Agency. i '- 618 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 648. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .... ti ~ 11 IItIItIIIl CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, ARROWHEAD LAND & INVESTMENT CO., R-IO: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 649 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF OWNER PARTICIPANTS, CER- TIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO ARROWHEAD LAND & INVESTMENT CO. WHEREAS, Arrowhead Land and Investment Company, a corporation, hereinafter called the Owner Participant, has entered into an Agreement with the REDE- VELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, hereinafter called the Agency; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated 18, 1958, and Supplement dated November 10, 1959, were recorded on January 3, 1961, in Book 5317 on Page 515, in the Official Records of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and WHEREAS, 1a Section 5 of said Agreement, Owner Participant agrees to build upon and improve said land and such construction and improvements shall be carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code require- ment of the City of San Bernardino, California and the State of California and the provisions of the Plan and the Declaration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and specifications approved by the Agency on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the man- ner set forth in said Agreement; ., 3 ...J As recorded in the office of the Tax Assessor of the County of San Bernardino, California; 136-031-13 - F J Halls subdivision Lots 47, 48, 49 and 50 Block A and East ~ alley adjacent on west 136-031-14 - F J Halls subdivision Lots 40 to 46 inclusive Block A and east ~ alley closed adjacent on west NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies, and gives notice that the Owner Participant has fully satisfied, terminated, and completed, for itself, its successors, and assigns all covenants and agrBements with respect to the Obligation of Owner Participant for the building upon and improvements to said land carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code requirement of the City of San Bernardino, Calif- ornia, and the State of California and the provisions of the Plan and the Declaration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and specifica- tions approved by the Agency and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement upon the hereinabove described real property. ... .....JII 619 [ IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 649. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: ,None DESERT PROVISIONS, REUSE PARCEL 55b, R-10: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agreement of Sale and Resolution No. 622 authorizing the Sale of Reuse Parcel No. 55b to Desert Provisions, should be amended as follows: Desert Provisions will purchase the entire Reuse Parcel No. 55b. Within 60 days after close of escrow, construction will start on the northerly portion of said parcel. Within l~ years after completion of this portion of Reuse Parcel 55b, construction will start on the southerly portion. In the event Desert Provisions fail to start construction on the southerly portion, the Agency may purchase this portion of Reuse No. 55b for $ which is $10,000 less than value of this parcel. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: r i ~ i '- RESOLUTION NO. 650 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE MODIFICATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 622 AND THE MODIFICATION OF THE AGREEMENT OF SALE BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND DESERT PROVISIONS FOR REUSE PARCEL NO. 55b, R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, by Resolution No. 622, authorized the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 55b to Desert Provisions for expansion of their present business located adjacent to said Reuse Parcel No. 55b, R-IO; and WHEREAS, the Developer and the Agency desire to amend the Agreement of Sale and said Resolution approving sale. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino>that the Agreement of Sale for the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 55b to Desert Provisions and said Resolution No. 622 approving the sale be amended to stipulate that within 60 days after close of escrow, construction will start on the northerly portion of Parcel No. 55b. Within l~ years after completion of this portion of Parcel 55b, construction will start on the southerly portion. In the event Desert Provisions fail to start construction on the southerly portion, the Agency may purchase this portion of Reuse No. 55b for $ , which is $10,000 less than value of this portion. r- I' ~ Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 650. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 620 RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTION: I..... 11 .~ g ,...,j Mr. Hodgdon requested that the Members ratify the Agency's Actions of June 15, 1967 wherein the recommended Pay Scale for the Redevelopment Agency ~as submitted by Mr. Sanford H. Wein was approved. Said Pay Scale was not in- corporated into the minutes of that meeting. Mr. Wein stated that he has examined the Pay Scale and it is the same that he presented on June 15, 1967 as approved by the Members. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin ratifying the Agency's Action of June 15, 1967 approving the Pay Scale, as incorporated into the minutes of this date. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO BASIC COMPENSATION SCHEDULE 1966-1967 "A" RATE STARTING 6 mos. 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year RANGE NO. PER HOUR A B C D E 10 1.14 198 207 217 227 238 11 1.20 207 217 227 238 249 12 1. 25 217 227 238 249 261 " 13 1.31 227 238 249 261 273 14 1.37 238 249 261 273 286 15 1.44 249 261 273 286 299 .wI 16 1.51 261 273 286 299 313 17 1.58 273 286 299 313 328 18 1.65 286 299 313 328 343 19 1.73 299 313 328 343 359 20 1.81 313 328 343 359 376 21 1.89 328 343 359 376 393 22 1.98 343 359 376 393 411 23 2.07 359 376 393 411 430 24 2.17 376 393 411 430 450 25 2.27 393 411 430 450 471 26 2.37 411 430 450 471 493 17 2.48 430 45~ 471 493 516 28 2.60 450 171 493 516 540 29 2.72 471, 493 516 540 565 30 2.85 493 516 540 565 591 31 2.98 116 540 565 591 618 32 3.12 540 565 591 618 647 33 3.26 565 591 618 647 677 34 3.41 591 618 649 677 708 35 3.57 618 647 677 708 741 36 3.74 647 677 708 741 775 37 3.91 677 708 741 775 811 '., 38 4.09 708 741 775 811 849 39 4.28 741 775 811 849 888 ......1 40 4.48 775 811 849 888 929 621 [ "A" RATE STARTING 6 mos. 1 Year 1 Year 1 Year RANGE NO. PER HOUR A B C D E 41 4.69 811 849 888 929 972 42 4.90 849 888 929 972 1017 43 5.12 888 929 972 1017 - 1064 44 5.36 929 972- 1017 1064 1113 45 5.61 972 1017 1064 1113 1164 46 5.87 1017 1064 1113 1164 1317 47 6.14 1064 1113 1114 1217 1273 48 6.42 1113 1164 1217 1273 1331 49 6.72 1164 1217 1273 1331 1392 50 7.02 1217 1273 1331 1392 1456 51 7.32 1273 1331 1392 1456 1523 52 7.65 1331 1392 1456 1523 1593 53 8.00 1392 1456 1523 1593 1666 54 8.37 1456 1523 1593 1666 1743 55 8.75 1523 1593 1666 1743 1823 56 9.16 1593 1666 1743 1823 1907 57 9.58 1666 1743 1823 1907 1995 58 10.12 1743 1823 1907 1995 2087 59 10.48 1823 1907 1995 2087 2183 60 10.96 1907 1995 2087 2183 2283 [ [ 622 ~ < ..:I < s:: s:: s:: (/) 0 0 0 ori -,... -,... ..., -tJ -tJ -tJ cu cu cu ll.. '0 ] '0 Q ~ s:: s:: u < < u r;Q < u < r;Q < < < ~ E-< Q) Q) Q) Q (/) ~ ~ ~ 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. ~ ~ z Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ ..., 0 -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ -tJ X 0 0 0 (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) (/) X~ Q) Q) Q) at!) c:r: c:r: c:r: '_._1" UZ N N t"- t"- r-I N r-I 0) 0) 0 ID r-I 00 00 II) ~< 0 0 0 .:t .:t ('t) ('t) ('t) ('t) ('t) N N ('t) N ('t) N N N c:r:c:r: Z z z c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: c:r: '" -Ie '" t!) II) r-I r-I .:t 0) .:t .:t r-I N 0 00 0) 00 .:t r-I r-I 0 Z r-I ID ID 0 00 r-I r-I ('t) t"- II) 00 t"- oo II) II) II) ID H ID ('t) ('t) 0 0 00 00 ID t"- ID II) II) .:t t"- II) II) .:t ..:1>0 .. .. .. .. .. H< r-I r-I r-I r-I r-I <P.. > I ~ c:r: t"- N N ID t"- O) 0) 0 II) 0 ('t) ID N r-I t"- t"- N ll.. .:t N N N 0) ID ID N ('t) II) 00 t"- o N II) II) 00 ('t) r-I r-I 00 00 ID ID II) ID II) .:t .:t .:t ID .:t .:t ('t) .. .. r-I r-I r-I s:: 0 -,... -tJ -,... E-< CI) Z II) N N .:t t"- ID ('t) 0) t"- o r-I 0 0 N II) t"- t"- t"- ~>o II) ('t) II) II) 00 0) ID r-I 0 00 t"- ID lilt II) .:t N 0 00 (/)< II) r-I 0 0) 00 ID ID II) II) .:t .:t .:t ~ .:t .:t .:t .:t ('t) ~ll< .. .. c:r: r-I r-I r-I Q) ll.. Z ~ ..:I ::J A ~ CI) ::r: CI) 0 CI) CI) u ~ 0 IS 0 0 (/) u IS IS IS ::r:H 0 >0 E-<> II) r-I ('t) N < t!)c:r: ll.. Z~ CI) CI) CI) CI) CI) CI) ..... ~(/) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ :I ~ ~ :I Q ..:I >. :I :I E! :I :I >. :I ~ a Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q ('t) N N Z Z N 0) Z N Z Z r-I Z Z :zoo ...J :z: ~ x x a s:: u 0 ~ -,... -tJ cu CI) ~ s:: ~ -tJ 0 be CI) -,... X -,... -tJ -tJ s:: '" >. CI) -,... ~ -tJ H H -,... . E! Q) ~ H H ~ r-I H s:: . ~ '0 0. cu -,... ~ 0 < a 0. -tJ -tJ '" -,... -tJ IS Q) -tJ 0 CI) CI) -tJ 0 Q) .c CI) '0 0. 0 ~ ~ ~ -,... -,... Q) Q) '0 0 -,... < a Q) 0 0 ll.. r-I r-I ~ 0. -,... Q) r-I ~ l+-t l+-t '" '" 0 (/) < X H cu ~ f:l ~I -,... ..., -,... -,... Q) H H H -,... 0 -tJ Q 0 . ~ 0 0 (/) Q) ~ Q) 0 l+-t l+-t CI) ~ ~ s:: Q) Q) -tJ -tJ 0 ~ ~ Q) -,... Q) -,... -,... -,... 0 0. p.. Q) s:: cu -,... s:: p.. >. ~ p.. > Q Q ~ -,... (/) (/) > "' -tJ ~ ~ p.. 0. (/) ~ ~ -,... Q) -tJ -,... -tJ CI) Q) Q) cu -tJ ~ ~ Q) "' -tJ s:: ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) . -tJ -tJ ::s s:: 0 0 0 ::s ::s s:: -tJ ~ ~ 0 Q) Q) ~ 0 ::s ::s -,... 0 0 0 0 0 r-I -,... s:: ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ p.. ~ r-I r-I r-I Q) 0 "' be -,... 0 0 r-I 0 0 Q) >C Q) Q) Q) Q) >C 0 Q) s:: "' 0 0 Q) Q) Q) r-I ~ Q Q ~ c:r: c:r: c:r: ~ < c:r: ~ ::E r;Q r;Q c:r: (/) (/) u . 6 ~ '":l ~ ~ Q) CI) -tJ .. s:: 0"" "' CI) ~ -tJ ~ s:: ~ ~ ~ Q) s:: Q) 0 CI) Q) p.. -,... ~ p.. CI) s:: ~ ~ '0 ~ :..:: ~ CI) CI) ~ s:: Q) 0 -tJ ~ -tJ -,... cu Q) Q) -tJ ~ .c Q) -,... -tJ s:: ., ::J: ::r: -tJ s:: .. 0 ::r: 0 Q) ~ ..Q 0 r-I 0 (/) s:: 0 J! 0 '":l r-I t!) IS s:: r-I U ~ ori '":l ~ Q) 0 -Ie H s:: -,... G ~ ll.. '":l '0 cu U -tJ 0 U '" Q) -,... ::E Q) >0 ~ ll.. s:: cu -tJ c:r: '" 0 >. (/) r-I '1 a CI) Q) cu 0 ~ Q) Q) ~ "' ~ -tJ r-I --' ..:I s:: Q) 0 .c s:: s:: -tJ '0 -,... s:: s:: Q) s:: r-I ~ s:: Q) -,... Ai Q) fa ~ 0 Q) cu r-I s:: >C cu .c IS Q) r-I Q) ~ s:: 0 B" p.. -,... p.. Q) 0 "' ~ Q) 0 r-I 8- "' .c Q) "' .3 a '":l r;Q c:r: a Q t.... (/) '":l '":l ~ ::J: (/) t.... '":l 623 [ * City and County only ** Agency job not fully comparable with compared jobs *** Recommend Wallace Green be promoted to Bookkeeper II NOTE: All newly hired employees and promoted employees shall start at their indicated range Step A No employee shall suffer a reduction in pay due to this schedule, and and employee so affected shall stay at his present pay until he quali- fies for a higher pay. All employees in Step A are eligible for Step B starting on the 1st day of their 7th calendar month of employment. All employees starting above Step A are eligible for the next step in- crease on the 1st day of the 13th month from date of adoption of this schedule. EXERCISE OF OPTION, RELIABLE BEARING, R-IO: [ Mr. Hodgdon requested that we put Reliable Bearing on notice that they have 60 days in which to exercise their option, as incorporated in their Owner Parti- cipation Agreement, to purchase the property adjacent to their property. Until we put them on notice, we cannot sell this property to any perspective developer. M~. Austin requested that we table this matter until Mr. Quinn can verbally dis- cuss this with them. Mr. Quinn stated that Reliable Bearing has discussed with him the possibility of developing an Industrial Park in our Meadowbrook Project, which would include the property adjacent to their present building. These plans are only in the preliminary states and no definite plans have been pre- pared. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin that this matter be tabled until the next Regular Meeting in order that the Executive Director and Mr. Austin can discuss further with Reliable Bearing their intentions regarding this property. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin adjourning the meeting at 5:05 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayest Webster, Austin, Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None [ \ ~- 624 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA J The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Webster, Austin, Wein and Wilson Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 21, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Webster pointed out that Resolution No. 645 and 646 were not consistent within the Resolution regarding Block and Parcel numbers. Mr. Quinn stated that Resolution No. 645 should authorize condemnation for Block 4, Parcel 13 and that Resolution No. 646 should authorize condemnation for Block 4, Parcel 2. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 21, 1968 as corrected. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None J PUBLIC HEARING: Mr. Hodgdon stated that this was the time and place for the Public Hearing for the predisposition of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32, Meadowbrook Project, to Henry Henschel et. aI, and asked if there were any objections to the sale of these parcels to Mr. Henschel. There being no objections, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 651 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, STATING THAT THERE WERE NO OBJECTIONS AT PUBLIC HEARING OF APRIL 4, 1968, Henry Henschel, et al WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held on the 4th day of April, 1968, for the Pre- disposition of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32, in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO, to Henry Henschel et. al.; and WHEREAS, no objections were declared, or additional offers made for said par- cels, at Public Hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that no objections or additional offers were declared at the Public Hearing of April 4, 1968, for the Predisposition of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32 to Henry Henschel et. aI, and therefore, the Predisposition Agreement by and between the Agency and Henry Henschel et. al., is hereby ap- proved. l ....,,;I 625 r- I \- Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin adopting Resolution No. 651. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Henschel explained the preliminary plan for the development of Parcels 23 through 32 to the Members. Mr. Hodgdon informed Mr. Henschel that the Agency will move forward as rapidly as possible with our submission of the R-IO Amend- atory in order that he may open escrow on said parcels, upon approval from HUD. REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that Mr. Gresham will be present at the next meeting to give the Members an up to date report on condemnation of R-79 properties. He informed the Members that Golden and Ammons will go to court on April 29th to determine the validity of the lease. VICTOR GRUEN, CONTRACT AMENDMENT: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to include in the Parking Design contract with Victor Guren, the sewer design for the Central City Project. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 652 ,''''- .~ RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO VICTOR GRUEN'S CON- TRACT FOR PARKING DESIGN TO INCLUDE SEWER DESIGN, R-79 ~- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 560, authorized the execution of a contract by and between the Agency and Victor Gruen Associates for technical advice and assistance in con- nection with Engineering Services for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 Parking Area; and WHEREAS, said Contract was executed December 8, 1969; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to increase the services of the Con- tractor to include the Sewer Design for said Central City Project, Calif. R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, does hereby authorize Contract Amendment to Victor Guaen's Contract for Parking Design to include Sewer Design, R-79, with additional compensation to the Contractor in an amount not to exceed $1,500.00, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute said Contract Amendment. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 652. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None c' 626 .., RELIABLE BEARING, EXERCISE OF OPTION: , :~ ..J Mr. Hodgdon explained that we have received a proposal from Reliable Bearing for the purchase of Reuse Parcel No. 88 for $17,000 for the development of an Industrial Complex. They propose a 30 day escrow with construction to start within one year. The north 25 ft. of Reuse Parcel No. 88 has been under option to them per their Owner Participation Agreement with the Agency. Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agreement will stipulate that in the event construction does not commence within 12 months from close of escrow, Reliable Bearing will sell back to the Agency the south 60 feet of No. 88 at the acquisition cost less 25% penalty. They will retain only the north 25 ft of property which is now under option to purchase. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 653 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PAR- CEL NO. 88 TO RELIABLE BEARING, R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Rede- velopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8, and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and --- ....., WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of April 4, 1968, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase submitted by Reliable Bearing, hereinafter called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain real property described as fol- lows: REUSE PARCEL NO. 88 BEGINNING at the Northeast corner of Lot 26, Block "D", THE PEPPERS, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, Page 8, records of San Bernardino, said point being also in the intersection of the South line of the A.T.& S.F. Railroad right-of- way, 50 feet wide and the West line of Arrowhead Avenue, 82.5 feet wide; thence South along the West line of Arrowhead Avenue 150 feet to the true point of be- ginning; thence South 89 59'25" West 282.84 feet; thence Northeast along a curve concave Easterly having a radius of 720 feet through a central angle of 4 00' 18" a distance of 85 feet; thence North 89 59' 25" East 282.84 feet to the West line of Arrowhead Avenue; thence South along the West line of Arrowhead Avenue 85' feet to the true point of beginning. WHEREAS, the North 25' of Reuse Parcel 88 has been under option to Reliable Bearing per Owner Participation Agreement between Agency and said Reliable Bearing. I~ 1 ~ ,.......J 627 [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper is satisfactory; that negotiation is the appropriate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redeveloper pos- sesses the qualifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price, SEVENTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS ($17,000) is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and is not less than the resale price of said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the length of escrow will be 30 days, with construc- tion to start within one year, and the Agreement of Sale will stipulate that in the event construction does not commence within 12 months from close of escrow, Reliable Bearing will sell back to the Agency the south 60 feet of No. 88 at the acquisition cost less 25% penalty. They will retain only the north 25 ft of property which is now under option to purchase. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale as hereinabove specified and all other necessary documents to carry out the terms of the Agreement. \.- Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 653, under the terms as set forth above by Mr. Hodgdon which will be incorporated into the Agreement of Sale. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,'- WOOD AND ASSOCIATES, CONTRACT AMENDMENT: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agency's contract with Wood and Associates calls for the trimming of ten (10) palm trees. The Agency would like to increase this to read twelve (12) palm trees. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 654 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO WOOD ~ ASSOCIATES CONTRACT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, under date. of February 19, 1968 entered into a contract by and bwtween the Agency and Wood and Associates for Weed Abatement of the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO; and WHEREAS, said Contract was amended to include the trimming of (10) ten palm trees and the removal of debris on Calif R-IO; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to amend contract to include two additional palm trees. ,.-.- NOW,'llHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute Contract Amendment No. II, to increase from 10 to 12, the number of palm trees to be trimmed in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO. ~ 628 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an equitable adjustment of the Contract price will be incorporated into the Contract Amendment to cover the work above specified. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 654. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION, BLOCK 19, PARCEL 4, VOSS: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 655 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 19, Parcel 4, Voss) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described ia necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project ARea No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of the existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widen- ing, street installation or other street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the pro- visions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Real Property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 19, Parcel 4, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. .., i ..... ] , I,J '-' I f ...... 629 [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 655. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REQUEST FOR CONDEMNATION, BLOCK 18, PARCEL 12, HARBOR OIL: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 656 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 18, Parcel 12, Harbor Oil) ,",- BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino, California. Said public uses and purposes are~as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance NO. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of the existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, reparcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. 11"- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter:c W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Bernardino in the Dame of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in Accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT EURTHER RESOLVED that said Real Property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 18, Parcel 12, being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the:Agency. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 656. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wileen, Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent None ,.- '"- , - "- 630 NAHRO MEMBERSHIP DUES: ., I ...,., The Chairman requested authorization to pay the NAHRO Membership Dues for the year ending April 69. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein author- izing the payment of NAHRO Membership Dues for the year ending April 1969. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wei., Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None f' NAHRO FISCAL WORKSHOP: The Chairman requested authorization for Mr. Quinn and certain members of the Staff to travel to Fresno, April 22 & 23, 1968, for a Fiscal Workshop. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 657 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND CER- TAIN STAFF MEMBERS TO TRAVEL TO FRESNO FOR FISCAL WORKSHOP, APRIL 22 & 23, 1968 WHEREAStleaolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a resolution of the Agency Members; and ~ WHEREAS, it is found to be essential that the Executive Director and Certain Staff Members travel to Fresno for a Fiscal Workshop, April 22 & 23, 1968. ...... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Executive Director and certain Staff Members are authorized to travel to Fresno to attend a Fiscal Workshop, April 22 & 23, 1968, and that their expenses are hereby approved in accordance with the pro- visions of Resolution No. 302 of the Agency. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 657. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO. lB, R-IO: The Chairman requested authorization to advertise for bids for the Site Prepara- tion of Unit No. lB, (Warm Creek Channel) in the Meadowbrook Project. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the Executive Director to advertise for bids for Site Preparation f50r\tmit lB, Meadowbrook Project. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson Austin & Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None '.... - [ 't, ,'- \ \ L ,- ~ 631 STORM DRAIN & SEWER CONSTRUCTION, R-79: The Chairman requested authorization to request bids for the Storm Drain and Sewer Construction of the Central City Project. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the Executive Director to advertise for bids for Storm & Sewer Drain Construction. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None BLANKET RESOLUTION, APPRAISAL CONTRACTS, R-lO & R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agency has already authorized certain appraisal Contracts, Change Orders and Amendments for R-lO and R-79, by motion of the Agency Members in previous meetings; however, as a result of the current audit, the auditor has stated that minutes are not sufficient and we must in each instance have a resolution authorizing the action. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 658 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING: Change Order No. 2 to Cooley and Severson Contract; Change Orders No. 2 & 4 to Morrison & Hill Contract; Original Contract to Willis O. Severson; and Original Contract to John R. Shaddy; ALL FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES AND ALL IN THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-lO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino authorized cer- tain Change Orders, Amendments and Contracts for appraisal services, by motion of the Agency Members in previous meetings; and WHEREAS, it is found necessary that these Change Orders, Amendments, and Contracts be specifically authorized by Resolution of the Agency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Change Order No. 2 to Cooley and Severson's Contract; Change Orders No.2 & 4 to Morrison & Hill's Contract; Original Contract to Willis O. Severson; and Original Contract to John R. Shaddy, are hereby authorized by Resolution of the Governing Body of the Redevelopment Agency. Said Change Orders, Amendments, and Contracts are for appraisal services rendered for the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-lO. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 658. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 659 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO MORRISON & HILL CON- TRACT FOR APPRAISAL SERVICES, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 L_ 632 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, under date of May 21, 1965, entered into a Contract with Morrison and Hill for appraisal services to be rendered for cer- tain parcels of land in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and .., ....,. WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to increase the services of the Appraiser to include the appraisal of Block 9, Parcels 4 and 5, Block 10, Parcel 4, Block 12, Parcel 4, and Block 13, Parcel 3; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to Amend contract by and between the Agency and Morrison & Hill to include the property as hereinabove specified. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 658. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AMENDMENT ROGER ROY LANDCLEARING: Mr. Hodgdon requests authorization to add to Roger Roy Landclearing's Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.4, approximately 15 additional build- ings. He explained to the Members that if the Agency was to request bids for these 15 buildings, it would take approxt.ately 60 days to start demolition, because of the publication of the notice, the bid opening, and then the approval of the contractor and contract documents. In order to expedite the demolition of these buildings it is requested that Roger Roy's Contract be amended to include same. HUD allows amendments to Demolition contracts waich do not ex- ceed 25% of the contract amount. The following resolution was introduced: .., ,it -~ ...,j RESOLUTION NO. 660 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CON- TRACT AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN AGENCY AND ROGER ROY LAND- CLEARING, DEMOLITION & SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO.4, R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 6l9a, designated Roger Roy Land Clearing as Contractor for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit NO.4, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor as follows: Remove all improvements, rubble, concrete, asphalt, trees, etc., from Block 5 Parcell (398 "F" Street); Block 5, Parcel 2 (adjacent to the West side of 398 "F" Street); Block 6, Parcel 9 (adjacent to the East side of 679 Court Street); Block 6, Parcel 10 (679 Court Street); Block 6, ParcellS (696-698 West 3rd Street; 317 - 321 "G" Street); Block 8, Parcell (394 "G" Street); Block 18, Parcel 18 (241-257 "G" Street); Block 18, Parcel 11 (215-217 "G" Street); Portion of Block 19 Parcel 11 (South of 234 "F" Street); and saw cut the East Wall of the Building on Block 20 Parcel 3. l~ I ....."J 633 [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Contract by and between the Agency and Roger Roy Land Clearing, Inc., be amended, to include the services hereinabove specified, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute said Change Order. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an equitable adjustment of the Contract price and the Contract Time will be incorporated into the Change Order to cover the work above specified. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 660. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT AMENDMENT, GARDNER-PIERCY & CO. AND MARVIN CASALINA $ CO., R-79: The Chairman requested authorization to amend the negotiators contract to include the following properties: Block 5, Parcels 14, 16, 17 & 18 Block 7, Parcel 12 Block 9, Parcels 4 & 5 Block 11, Parcels 1, 2 & 5 r- Block 12, Parcel 5 Block 14, Parcel 5 "- Block 15, Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 Block 16, Parcels 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 11, 12 & 14 Block 17, Parcels 3 & 5 After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESO~UTION NO. 661 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH GARDNER-PIERCY & CO. and MARVIN CASALINA & CO. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, under date of November 14, 1967, has entered into a contract by and between the Agency and Gardner-Piercy & Co. and Marvin Casalina & Co. ,for negotiation services for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency desires to increase the services of the Con- tracter to include the following properties: r !~ ij....., Block 5, Parcels 14, 16, 17 . 18 Block 7, Parcel 12 Block 9, Parcels 4 & 5 Block 11, Parcels 1, 2 & 5 Block 12, Parcel 5 ,. 634 Block 14, Parcel 5 Block 15, Parcels 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 Block 16, Parcels 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 11, 12 & 14 Block 17, Parcels 3 & 5 , ....J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized on behalf of the Agency to Amend Contract by and between the Agency and Gardner- Piercy & Co. and Marvin Casalina & Co. to include the properties hereinabove specified. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing Resolution No. 661. The motion was carried by the following Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Absent: None the adoption of vote, to wit: Abstention: None OTHER BUSINESS: The Members were advised that Mr. Greenwood's SBA loan has been approved and he is now in the process of submitting all the necessary documents. Reuse Parcel No. 42, (Garner, Tee, Tracadas, Troy, Morrison & Hill, Buster and Cloud) has closed escrow. To date, construction has not commenced. The Members were concerned about the condition of this parcel. Fill material has been dumped on the land and it is presently being used for parking. The Members instructed the Executive Director to get in touch with the developers regarding the condition of said parcel. Also to advise developers that the Members have requested an anticipated construction date. '1 ....", Glaser Brothers has closed escrow and the time of performance has run out. Mr. Hodgdon stated that the Agency would contact Glaser Brothers regarding said sale. Mr. Quinn stated that Bergman General Tire Co. has agreed to pay their February rent in lieu of paying for the removal of the debris on the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 4:55 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .., ..~ 635 [ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 18TH DAY OF APRIL, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA In the absence of the Chairman, Mr. Wilson, Vice Chairman, called the meeting to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Webster, Austin, Wein and Wilson Agency Members Absent: Hodgdon Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 4, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the approval of the Minutes of April 4, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Austin, Wein, Webster and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Hodgdon [ 4:08 p.m. - Mr. Gresham arrived at the meeting, and in the absence of Mr. Varner Agency Counsel, assumed the position of counsel for the meeting. EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of March, 1968, were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the approval of the Expenditures as submitted. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster and Wilson Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Hodgdon REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Gresham, Condemnation Attorney, R-79, reported on the status of condemnation cases, as follows: John G. Sims, Block 1, Parcel 20: Mr. Gresham explained that this action is more a title problem than a condemnation problem. Mr. Sims originally owned the property. There are ,now several encum- brances on the property, and their interest is at issue. Our law suit will give us title to the property. After we have obtained title, the other parties will settle their interest with a separate law suit. MacPherson, Brunner, Jordan, Block 3, Parcel 9: [ Mr. Gresham advised that this action has caused some difficulty in service. MacPherson, and Brunner have been served and have 30 days from service to file answer. He explained that he has been unable to serve on Mrs. Jordan. Mr. Quinn 636 advised that he has reason to believe that we will be able to file on Jordan later in May. Mrs. Jordan feels it is to her advantage to answer the complaint' during the month of July for business reasons. ..., il ""'*'" Golden property, Ammons Leasee, Block 3, Parcel 10: The Members were advised that there is another action filed regarding this case. The action is between the landlord and tenant. The attorneys for Mr. Ammons have requested that their action be consolidated with our condemnation action. Mr. Gresham advised that he would deny such a request because of the delay that this wou~d cause when it comes to trial. Carlton, Bender, Block 3, Parcel 12: Mr. Gresham informed that he has been advised that he will be given a trial date in July for this action. All parties involved have appeared. Anna & Steve K. Nikolopulas, Block 4, Parcel 10: Nikolopulas is the owner of the property. Mr. Cotugna, tenant, has filed a disclaimer in this proceeding. Mr. Nicolino, tenant, has refused to sign a disclaimer and we are now in the process of serving him. Harold E. & Laura May Nicholson, Block 6, Parcel 18: Mr. Gresham advised that Mr. Nicholson was served on, February 20, 1968. No appearance has been made and he wishes to take default on parties. , 1\ -J Harbor Oil, Block 18, Parcel 12: Mr. Gresham advised this action is really a dispute over what fixtures and/or equipment is included in the acquisition price. The Summons and complaint will be served on an officer of the corporation in San Gabriel. George Voss, Block 19, Parcel 4: All parties have been served on in this action. We are now waiting for answers. 4:30 - Mr. Hodgdon arrived at the meeting, and assumed the Chair. Benjamin E. & Daisy P. Martin, Block 20, Parcel 2: Mr. Gresham advised that Winstead has disclaimed any interest in said property. The attorneys for both Martin, owner, and Libman, tenant, have indicated that they will give us possession of the property when needed, even if their case to determine the possible lease hold interest has not come to trial. He further stated that he has the feeling that the acquisition pr'ce is acceptable. George J. & Pearl Kantor, Block 3, Parcel 7: The Members were advised that Mr. Kantor, through personal feelings regarding the Agency and Urban Renewal in general, has indicated that he does not want ] 637 [ us to get this case to trial. He has retained a new attorney, necessitating trial to be set over until May 3rd. Mr. Kantor has also filed a cross complaint against tenant. Pursuant to the cross complaint, proceedings can not continue until the issue between landlord and tenant is resolved. Mr. Gresham stated that he has drafted an Affidavit for approval and Chairman's signature requesting an early trial date because of the urgency of our public program. Mr. Gresham stated that such an affidavit would be used as there was an urgency for early trial date involved. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 662 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE AFFIDAVIT STATING THE URGENCY OF EARLY TRIAL DATES FOR ANY AND ALL CONDEMNATION CASES IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, WITH APPROPRIATE MODIFICA- TIONS WHEREAS, certain real property within the Central City project is urgently needed for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and [ WHEREAS, because of the urgency of early trial dates for certain condemnation cases, within said Central City Project, the Agency Members find and determine that the Chairman shoud be authorized to execute an Affidavit to this effect, requesting early trial dates. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman is hereby directed and authorized on behalf of the Agency to execute Affidavit stating the urgency of early trial dates for any and all condemnation cases within the Central City Project, with appropriate modifications for each parcel and/or situation. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 662. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTIONS, JAMES P. WIDERSTROM: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 663 [ RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 512, AND RATIFY- ING AGENCY'S ACTION TO REMOVE AUTHORIZATION OF JAMES P. WIDERSTROM TO COUNTERSIGN AGENCY CHECKS 638 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 512, adopted June 15, 1967, designated James P. Widerstrom as countersigner for checks and vouchers of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and J WHEREAS, P. W. Quinn, Jr., was hired by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino as Executive Director at a personnel meeting held July 12, 1967; and WHEREAS, P. W. Quinn, Jr., was appointed by the Agency Board Members as Secretary- Treasurer of the Agency, at the Regular Meeting of July 20, 1967; and WHEREAS, at said Regular Meeting of July 20, 1967, by Resolution No. 527, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., was designated to countersign Agency checks and vouchers; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 512 was never rescinded cancelling the designation of James P. Widerstrom to countersign Agency checks and vouchers: and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency Members to ratify the Agency's actions by rescinding Resolution No. 512 adopted June 15, 1967. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Reaevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency Members do hereby ratify the Agency's actions by rescinding Resolution No. 512 designating James P. Widerstrom as Agency Countersigner for Checks and Vouchers. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 663. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None J PROCUREMENT AUTHORIZATION: The following resolution was introduced: dJ 3~~ c LJ~V RESOLUTION NO. 664 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE POLICY FOR AND AUTHOR- IZING THE PROCUREMENT OF SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WHEREAS, Resolution No. 121 adopted June 9, 1959 authorized the Director to enter into agreements for procurement of supplies, equipment and services; WHEREAS, it now becomes necessary, due to rising costs of services, supplies, and equipment, to increase the Executive Director's procurement authority; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 121 is amended as follows: "BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Director be authorized to purchase or approve the expenditure for the purchase of minor equipment and supplies and miscellaneous items of service, the cost of which does not exceed the ~ ] 639 [ sum of $200.00 for each individual item or service rendered without prior approval of the Agency, but an itemized statement of all vouchers paid pursuant to this authority shall be presented to the Agency at the next regular meeting of this Agency following such payment; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that with the exception of the items mentioned above, all proposed purchases of equipment, supplies, services, and micellaneous items in excess of $200.00 each shall be presented to the Agency for authorization before such purchases are made or services contracted. Upon authorization and approval by the Agency to purchase such equipment, supplies, services, and miscellaneous items, the Executive Director is authorized to approve vouchers and to administer and consummate on behalf of the Agency such transactions." Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 664. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONSIDERATION OF WAIVER OF CONTRACT PROVISION, MORRISON & HILL: r ~ The Chairman advised that Morrison and Hill are the brokers for the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 69 in the Meadowbrook Project. They also are contract appraisers for acquisition parcels in Central City and Meadowbrook. Paragraph 15 of the Contract, dated May 21, 1965, for the Central City Project, prohibits the ap- praiser from acquiring an interest in the Project lands, including an interest as real estate broker. Change Orders have been added to this contract to include parcels in the Meadowbrook Project. Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to waive this contract prov1s1on, whereby Morrison & Hill could receive their broker fee for Reuse Parcel No. 69. Mr. Varner's letter of April 11, 1968, concerning this matter was presented to the Members. Said letter stated "It should be noted that this clause was not intended for this situation, and under the circumstances there is no compelling reason that a normal broker's commission should not be paid." After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein that this matter be deferred until the next regular meeting, in order that the Secretary can examine previous R-lO appraisal contracts to determine whether this clause was incorporated in contracts in the past. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REVISED TRAVEL POLICIES: ,.... Mr. Quinn stated that the present Resolution establishing travel policies must be amended. The new resolution will prohibit payment of travel expenses for City Officials. It will also authorize advance travel payment. Travel by third party contractors, will be reimbursed upon completion of travel and sub- mission of supporting billings. I L.. ,-"" 640 The Members felt that this new policy was not adequate. All Members agreed that if at all possible, the Agency should authorize the payment of expenses for City Officials. After discussion, motion was made by Wein, and seconded by Wilson tabling this matter until the next regular meeting. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None J ACQUISITION POLICY, R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 665 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, REQUIRING THAT ACQUISITION OF PRO- PERTY EASTERLY OF "E" STREET BE AUTHORIZED BY BOARD APPROVAL WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desire to maintain a more definitive contrel over real estate ex- penditures as they might affect our obligation to obtain funding of our local share upon the expenditure of 75% of real estate acquisition costs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that any acquisition of property easterly of "E" Street must be authorized by Board Approval. '1 ...... Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 665. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None KEYSER CAFETERIA, DECREASE OF RENT, R-79: A letter was presented to the Members from Mr. Shapiro requesting a rent re- duction, because of the extremely slow flow of business on Third Street. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 666 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING RENTAL REDUCTION, KEYSER CAFETERIA WHEREAS, Mr. Arnold Shapiro, dba Keyser Cafeteria, has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Agency until such time as his relocation is completed; and WHEREAS, Mr. Shapiro, because of the slow flow of business on Third Street, has requested a rental reduction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Mr. Arnold Shapiro, dba Keyser Cafeteria, is hereby amended to reduce Mr. Shapiro's rent. Rent for this property is hereby reduced to $170 per month. ] 641 [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 666t reducing Mr. Shapiro's rent to $170 per month. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilsont Austint Webstert Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONSIDERATION TO WRITE OFF RENT FROM NICHOLSON'S FURNITURE: A letter was presented to the Members from Mr. Nicholson requesting write off of February rent. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin that said request be deniedt pursuant to Memo from the Relocation Department that the Agency did in no way delay Mr. Nicholson's move. The motion was carried by the following votet to wit: Ayes: Wilsont Weint Austint Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASEt REUSE PARCEL 87t LEWIS MILLER: Mr. Hodgdon presented an Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel 87 from Lewis Miller to the Members. Mr. Miller was presented to the Members. Mr. Miller requested that this matter be tabled until the next regular meeting. Mr. Hodgdon advised Mr. Miller that other developers have indicated an interest in this parcel and that the Agency could not guarantee the sale of this parcel to him if deferred. Mr. Miller stated that he understood the situation. Mr. Quinn was instructed to advise interested parties of the deferral. [ EDWIN WEBBER, CHANGE ORDER NO. It R-79: The Chairman requested the authorization to execute Change Order No. It to contract by and between Agency and Edwin Webber for the demolition of Nicholson Warehouse. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 667 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIAt AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. It TO CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCEt UNIT NO. 5t EDWIN WEBBER WHEREASt the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardinot by Resolution No. 62lt designated Edwin Webber as contractor for Demolition and Site Clearancet Unit No.5, Calif. R-79; and WHEREASt the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor as follows: Remove all improvementst rubblet concretet asphaltt treest etc. from Block 19t Parcel 13 (270 "F" Street) [ NOWt THEREFOREt BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardinot Californiat that the Contract by and between the Agency and Edwin Webber be amendedt to include the services hereinabove specifiedt and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute said Change Order. 642 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that an equitable adjustment of $3,900 to the Contract J price and the Contract Completion date extension of 14 days will be incorporated into the Change Order to cover the work above specified. . ..... Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 667. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DAKENO, INC., CHANGE ORDER NO.1, R-79: This item tabled at the request of the Chairman. APPROVAL OF FINANCIAL CONSULTANT CONTRACT: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 668 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR FINANCIAL CONSULTANT SERVICES, BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND HORNBLOWER & WEEKS, HEMPHILL, NOYES WHEREAS, Pursuant to Ordinances No. 2233 and 2649, respectively, the City of San Bernardino adopted Official Redevelopment Plans for the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO, and the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and .., I .... WHEREAS, subsequently, Agency entered into contracts for Loan and Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Loan and Grant Contracts, the United States Govern- ment is providing Agency with financial aid for certain of the costs of said Projects, and Agency must provide its own financing for the remaining costs of said Projects; and WHEREAS, the Agency requires the services of a nationally recognized consultant on municipal finance to assist Agency in perfecting a sound and workable plan or plans of finance that will fit the needs of Agency in connection with each of said Projects and in accordance with the provisions of said Loan and Grant Contracts. WHEREAS, the Agency has deemed it advisable to engage the services of Hornblower & Weeks, Hemphill, Noyes to serve the Agency by assisting it to develop financial plans for said Projects and to provide for the sale of Agency's obligations to be issued with respect to the Projects in such amounts and at such times as may be required for the orderly consummation of the Projects. ~ ! ...".; 643 [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute a contract by and between the Agency and Hornblower & Weeks, Hemphill, Noyes for Financial Consultant Services. A copy of said Contract is attached to this resolution. AGREEMENT FOR FINANCIAL CONSULTING SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of April, 1968, by and between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA (hereinafter referred to as "Agency") and HORNBLOWER & WEEKS-HEMPHILL, NOYES investment bankers and financial consultants (hereinafter referred to as "Consul tant" ) . Recitals: This Agreement is made with reference to the following facts: (a) Pursuant to Ordinance Nos. 2233 and 2649, respectively, the City of San Bernardino adopted Official Redevelopment Plans for the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-10, and for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79. The City of San Bernardino has the res- ponsibility for implementation and consummation of said Projects. [ (b) Subsequently, Agency entered into contracts for Loan and Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended. (c) Pursuant to said Loan and Grant Contracts, the United States Government is providing Agency with financial aid for certain of the costs of said Projects, and Agency must provide its own financing for the re- maining costs of said Projects. (d) Agency requires the services of a nationally recognized consultant on municipal finance to assist Agency in perfecting a sound and workable plan or plans of finance that will fit the needs of Agency in connection with each of said Projects and in accordance with the pro- visions of said Loan and Grant Contracts. (e) Agency has deemed it advisable to engage the services of Consultant, and Consultant has offered to serve Agency by assisting it to develop financial plans for said Projects and to provide for the sale of Agency's obligations to be issued with respect to the Projects in such amounts and at such times as may be required for the orderly con- summation of each of said Projects. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: [ 1. Agency hereby employs Consultant as financial consultant to assist Agency in the development of perfected financing plans for the Meadowbrook and Central City Projects, and to further assist Agency 644 with all proceedings incident to the sale and issuance of any and all obliga- tions determined to be required by the respective plans of financing concern- ing each of said Projects. ., .J 2. It is understood and agreed that Consultant shall prepare separate financial plans for each of said Projects, and that all provisions of this Agreement with respect to services of Consultant, including, but not limited to, consulting services, plans of finance, sale and issuance of Agency bonds or obligations, shall apply to each of said Projects, provided, however, that the total principal amount of long-term bonds or obligations of Agency sold and issued under this Agreement, including both of said Projects, shall not exceed the sum of Twelve Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($12,5000,000.00). 3. It is understood and agreed that Consultant may rely upon any pertinent written data or reports furnished to Consultant by Agency, its staff and its technicians in the preparation of the plans of financing and in performing all other services rendered by Consultant under this Agreement. Agency agrees to make available to Consultant any data or reports Agency has or may hereafter develop or acquire pertaining to the subject of Consultant's services under this Agreement. Agency agrees to cooperate with Consultant in making its staff and personnel available for such con- ferences and consultations as may be necessary to carry out the terms of the Agreement. 4. Consultant agrees to complete the preparation of said financing plans within a reasonable time, and upon completion of a plan of financing as provided herein, Consultant shall submit said plan to Agency for Agency's approval. .... 11 -II 5. Upon approval of each plan by Agency, Consultant shall pre- pare an appropriate statement setting forth all the data necessary for the determination of the intrinsic worth of the obligations or bonds con- templated to be issued by that plan of financing. Such statement shall be submitted to Agency for approval, and upon approval by Agency said state- ment will be widely distributed by Consultant to banks and trust companies, pension funds, insurance companies, and other pertinent investors, and to potential underwriters of such obligations or bonds. 6. Consultant shall assist Agency's bond counsel with the pre- paration of an appropriate Notice of Sale and Proposal for Bid, and shall advise Agency as to a time for such sale which will attract to it the greatest amount of competitive interest and the least amount of interference from the sale of comparable obligations or bonds of other borrowing units. Consultant shall also advise Agency as to the terms and conditions under which such obligations or bonds are to be offered which, in the Consultant's judgment, will produce the lowest possible interest cost obtainable therefor. 7. Consultant agrees to submit a copy of the Notice of Sale, the Official Statement, pertinent reports, and the authorizing Ordinance to the nationally known agencies reporting on or rating municipal credits. Consultant agrees to review with such agencies the details of the financing , I ...... 645 r L plan and the obligation or bond issues in order that the Agency will have the maximum possibility of having its obligations or bonds rated and/or evaluated by such agencies in order that such agencies may be in a position to advise their respective clients as to their views and merits of the obligations or bonds to be issued to finance each stage of the subject Projects. 8. Consultant shall, prior to the date fixed for the sale of each issue of such obligations or bonds, make itself available to any potential underwriting group or to any institutional investors for the purpose of dis- cussing the various aspects of such financing. 9. Prior to the release or distribution of any news articles, reports, official statements or any other financial, legal, or engineering, data, Consultant shall first obtain the approval of Agency for such release or distribution. 10. Unless notified by Agency that such ~ction would not, in its opinion, serve its best interest, Consultant reserves the right to partici- pate in a bidding syndicate formed for the purpose of purchasing such bonds at a public competitive sale. 11. Consultant agrees to assist with the signing and delivery of each series of obligations or bonds sold with respect to each of said Projects. -- "'-- 12. For the services to be rendered hereunder, Agency agrees to pay to Consultant from the proceeds of any sale of a bond or obligation of Agency, a sum equal to Two Percent (2%) of the total principal of such bonds or obligations actually sold, paid for and delivered. Agency shall not other- wise be liable to Consultant for any other sums except as specifically set forth in this Agreement. It is understood that with respect to any interim short-term financing, Agency will pay to Consultant a sum equal to One Percent (1%) of the total principal of such short-term bonds or obligations actually sold, paid for and delivered and a sum equal to One Percent (1%) of the total principal when such bonds are converted or substituted into long-term bonds and such long-term bonds or obligations are actually sold, paid for and delivered. It is understood and agreed that in the case of any such substitution there will be no duplication of compensation. At the time of issuance of any obliga- tions or bonds, pursuant to this Agreement, the parties will specify whether such bonds or notes are deemed long term or short term. The maximum principal of long-term bonds or obligations to be sold and issued under this Agreement, including all bonds and obligations of each of said Projects, shall be Twelve Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($12,500,000.00). 13. It is understood and agreed that Consultant will not pay any costs of printing or mailing of the official statements, resolutions or Notices of Sale with respect to the issue or issues of bonds as provided in this Agreement. In addition, costs of preparing the issue or issues of bonds and all fees of bond counsel and local counsel will be paid by Agency. ".- 14. It is understood and agreed that Consultant will pay, without reim- bursement by Agency, all of Consultant's out-of-pocket expenses, including -- 646 telephone, telegraph, stenographic work, and any other expenses it may incur which are not specifically authorized by Agency as reimbursable by Agency to Consultant. .... ...., 15. This Agreement shall terminate on the final sale of bonds or obligations of Agency in the total principal amount of Twelve Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($12,500,000.00) as provided herein, or within five (5) years from the date hereof, whichever is sooner, provided, however, that the term of this Agreement may be extended upon mutual agreement of the parties hereto. 16. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the successors and interests of each of the parties hereto, but shall not be assignable by either party without the express written consent of the other party to this Agreement. 17. This Agreement is subject to approval by the United States Government, Department of Housing and Urban Development, of Agency's appli- cation for an amendment to said Loan and Grant Contract pertaining to the Central City Project. This Agreement is also subject to the provisions of that certain Predisposition Agreement executed between Agency and John S. Griffith Co. and Curci-Turner Co., as amended on February 16, 1968, and as amended on March 11, 1968. of , California, this day -.. EXECUTED at , 1968. ...." REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA By By HORNBLOWER & WEEKS-HEMPHILL, NOYES By By Approved as to Legal Form and Adequacy Bruce D. Varner Agency Counsel ,.... ......, 647 r L Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 668. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None BERGMAN TIRE, WRITE OFF OF RENT ($416.50), R-79: Mr. Quinn explained that the Members, at the Regular Meeting of March 21, 1968 authorized the write off of February rent for Bergman Tire, Subject to Bergman Tire Company's removal of debris from property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets. Through our error, the debris had already been removed by Wood and Associates at the time of this authorization. Because of our error, Bergman Tire Company was not given the option of removal of debris on their old location. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 669 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE WRITE OFF OF FEB- RUARY RENT FROM BERGMAN GENERAL TIRE INC., AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 643 "....... , WHEREAS, The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by Resolution No. 638, authorized the write-off of February rent from Bergman General Tire Inc; and 10.- WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 643, Resolution No. 638 was amended, by authorizing the write off of February rent for Bergman Tire, subject to Bergman Tire Company's removal of debris from property located at the southwest corner of 4th and "F" Streets; and WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of Resolution No. 643, said debris had already been removed from property by Wood and Associates, therefore, Bergman General Tire Company was not given the option of removal of debris on their old location; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Resolution No. 643 is hereby rescinded and the Agency does hereby authorize the write-off of February rent from Bergman General Tire Inc. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 669. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EASEMENT DOCUMENT, CALIF. R-10: The following resolution was introduced: ,,- , ~ 648 RESOLUTION NO. 670 .. !.i j,.J ',0 -J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO SIGN EASEMENT DOCUMENT, CALIF. R-lO WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has requested the conveyance of corner radius located at the Southwest corner of Rialto Avenue and Arrowhead Avenue described as follows: All that portion of Lot 1, Block 10, RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, per Map recorded in Book 7, Page 2 of Maps, in the office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Lot 1; thence South along the East line of Said Lot 1, a distance of 20.01 feet to a point of cusp with a tangent curve concave Southwesterly with a radius of 20.00 feet, said curve is also tangent to the North line of said Lot 1; thence Northwesterly along said tangent curve through a central angle of 900 01' 35" a distance of 31. 43 feet to said North line; thence North 890 58' 25" East, 20.01 feet to the Point of Beginning. WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino at its regular meeting held April 18, 1968, authorized the conveyance of said property in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan for the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-lO. .. ...." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of San Bernardino, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute Easement Deed for property herein above described. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 670. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None TRAVEL POLICY: The revised Travel Policy was again brought before the Members. All Members believed that the Agency should amend the present Resolution No. 302, to authorize advance travel payment and to set forth the condition that third party contractors will be reimbursed upon completion of travel and submission of supporting billings. They also believed that payment of travel expenses for City Officials should be authorized. The following resolution was intro- duced: RESOLUTION NO. 671 RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 302 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN POLICIES ON TRAVEL EXPENSES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ..... WHEREAS, by its Resolution No. 302 the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, redefined and established certain travel policies on ....J 649 ..... travel expenses of its members, Executive Director, Attorney, and other officers and employees traveling on authorized official business of the Agency, outside the City of San Bernardino; and r WHEREAS, it has been determined that said Resolution No. 302 requires amendment to clarify and extend existing policies; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Resolution No. 302 of said Agency is hereby amended to read as follows: 1. Paragraph A thereof is amended to read as follows: ,..- A. That there be allowed to Agency members, Executive Director other officers, and employees of the Agency and City Officials traveling on official business of the Agency within the City limits of the City of San Bernardino, California, and with prior approval of Department Heads, within a radius of 75 miles outside the Gity limits of the City of San Bernardino, California, (1) mileage for the use of privately owned automobiles at the rate of 10 cents per mile for miles actually traveled to and from the place where said official business is to be transacted up to and including the actual amount of first class transportation, including parking, if private transportation is used or (2) the actual amount of any railroad or airplane fare less the Federal Tax, bus or taxi transportation and incidental expenses as required; that there be allowed such person full reimbursement for subsistence not to exceed $25.00 per day for any such travel which necessitates such person remaining overnight and away from the City 9f San Bernardino, California, or the actual amount of expenses for subsistance for a "travel day" if such person can return to the City of San Bernardino, California the same day said travel commences, providing said latter per diem expenses do not exceed the sum of $25.00. Absence from the City of San Bernardino, Calif- ornia on authorized business of the Agency for a period of time in excess of ten hours in anyone day shall con- stitute a "travel day", as herein provided. '-- 1. Advance travel reimbursement, not to exceed 75 percent of estimated per diem expenses, may be authorized with the approval of the Executive Director or Deputy Director, for these official Agency trips in excess of one (1) travel day. 2. Paragraph B thereof is amended to read as follows: [ B. That each trip of Agency Members, Executive Director, Officials and other officers or employees of the Agency and City, to a destination outside of the City of San 650 Bernardino, California with the exception of an official trip to the Regional Office of DHUD in San Francisco, Calif- ornia or an official trip to the Los Angeles, California area which does not exceed (two) travel days, as herein defined and which is charged wholly or in part to a Title 1 Project be specifically authorized by a resolution of the Agency Members approving such trip as essential to a Title 1 Project. .., fl 'i .....I 1. Travel and transportation costs of third party contractors, if authorized by contract, will be reimbursed in amounts not to exceed limi- tations set forth in this Resolution upon com- pletion of travel and submission of property supported billings. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 671, and authorizing the travel expenses of City Officials for Agency official business. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Austin requested that a Real Estate Report be prepared, setting forth the developers who have performed and those who have not performed under their Agreement of Sale. Mr. Quinn stated that such a report would be prepared. .., )1 " 1} :1 ...IIiii ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the meeting to adjourn at 5:15 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ....... - 651 ,..... ...... MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 2ND DAY OF MAY, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Webster, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Agency Members Absent: Wein Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 18, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Webster stated that Resolution No. 671 establishing travel policies does not specifically state that City Officials travel expenses are authorized on Agency Business. Mr. Quinn stated that it would be incorporated within the resolution. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 18, 1968 as corrected. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein fI"""""4Ito REPORT OF AGENCY COUHSEL: ""'- Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report, other than remarks regarding items to follow on the Agenda. REQUEST FOR WRITE-OFF OF RENT, FRANK BLAYLOCK, dba LITTLE JIM'S LIQUOR: A letter request from Mr. Frank Blaylock, dba Little Jim's Liquor, was presented to the Members. Mr. Blaylock requests a write-off of rent from November 1, 1967 through March 31, 1968 ($675.00). Mr. Hodgdon recommended that this request be denied. Mr. Blaylock did not suffer any hardship at his old location and the Agency did not delay Mr. Blaylock's move in any way. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin denying the request of Mr. Frank Blaylock for write-off of rent from November 1, 1967 through March 31, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein CONSIDERATION OF WAIVER OF CONTRACT PROVISION, MORRISON & HILL: r-- Mr. Hodgdon stated that the Agency should consider waiving the provision of Paragraph 15 of the contract by and between the Agency and Morrison and Hill (Contract dated May 21, 1965), which prohibits the appraiser from acting as Real Estate Broker, Mr. Hodgdon read a section from the Urban Renewal Manual (13-2-1) as follows: "He may, however, act as a broker or redeveloper on land he has appraised for acquisition purposes". The Members were informed that Morrison and Hill appraised the Water Department property. They had nothing to do with the appraisal of Reuse Parcel No. 69, and even if they had appraised said property, the Urban Renewal Manual authorized the appraiser to act as broker. ...... 652 Mr. Varner stated that it is his legal op~n~on that a Waiver to this contract provision may be allowed. The following resolution was introduced: .., ......J RESOLUTION NO. 672 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A WAIVER OF CONTRACT PROVISION BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND MORRISON AND HILL WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a contract with Morrison and Hill, dated May 21, 1965; for appraisal services of property in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Change Orders were added to said contract to include parcels in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-lO. Said Change Orders having the effect of extending the application of the contract to the Meadowbrook Project; and WHEREAS, Paragraph 15 of said contract of May 21, 1965 prohibits the appraiser from acquiring an interest in the project lands, including an interest as real estate broker; and WHEREAS, Morrison and Hill are acting in the capacity of real estate broker for the sale of Reuse Parcel 69, Calif. R-79, for Ken Bussey, Developer; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency Members to waive said Contract Provi- sion of Paragraph 15 of contract of May 21, 1965, in order that Morrison and Hill may receive payment for services as real estate broker. ..., .... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereby waives said Contract Provision of said Con- tract to allow Morrison and Hill to receive appropriate compensation for services rendered as real estate broker in connection with Reuse Parcel 69. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 672 because of the unusual circumstances in this matter. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein Mr. Hill was present at the meeting. He informed the members that construction on Parcel No. 42 should be able to start next week. 4:10 p.m. - Mr. Wein arrived at the meeting. OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL NO. 87, LEWIS MILLER, R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon stated that Mr. Miller has requested cancellation of this Offer and return of his deposit. The following resolution was introduced: ~ I I ........ 653 .".- RESOLUTION NO. 673 ..... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL 87, LEWIS MILLER, AND RE- TURN OF THEIR DEPOSIT ON SAID PROPERTY WHEREAS, Lewis Miller deposited with the Agency the sum of $1,600 for the pro- posed sale of Reuse Parcel 87, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, Lewis Miller requested cancellation of said Offer to Purchase and the Agency Members authorized said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel 87, from Lewis Miller (Miller Properties) is hereby cancelled and refund of deposit of $1,600 is hereby authorized. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 673. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ANNUAL CONFERENCE (NAHRO): ,""';'... The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 674 .......... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, STAFF AND MEMBERS TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL NAHRO CONFERENCE IN PHOENIX, ARIZONA, MAY 26, 27 & 28, 1968 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 302 of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, requires that each trip made by an Agency Member or Staff Member to a destination outside of the City of San Bernardino be specifically authorized by a Resolution of the Agency Members; and WHEREAS, it was found to be essential that the Agency Members and Staff be authorized to travel to Phoenix, Arizona to attend the Annual NAHRO Conference; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Members and staff are authorized to travel to Phoenix, Arizona, to attend the Annual NAHRO Conference, May 26, 27, & 28, 1968 and that their expenses are hereby authorized in accordance with the provisions of Resolution No. 302 of this Agency. ,... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Staff Members attending NAHRO Conference, shall be subject to the approval of the Executive Director ....... 654 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 674. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ ...,.j POSSIBLE PURCHASE OF REUSE PARCEL 48, McMAHAN, R-79: A letter from McMahan's Furniture Stores was presented to the Members. Mr. McMahan requested consideration of a possible purchase of a portion of Reuse Parcel 48 in the Central City Project. This parcel is located on the northeast corner of "E" and 2nd. Mr. Hodgdon stated that a complete study of this area east of the Mall Complex has never been taken. A development of this size may not be compatable with the overall development of this area. Mr. Hodgdon informed the Members that a meeting has been set for Wednesday, May 8, 1968 at the Holiday Inn. Approximately 100 businessmen in the San Ber- nardino area have been invited to the meeting. The meeting will brief them on the Agency's progress of the Meadowbrook project and the Central City Pro- ject. It will also discuss the need for a Planning and Survey study to be ac- complished on property in the vicinity of the Central City Boundaries. Mr. Hodgdon stated that the surrounding area should compliment the mall itself. There is also a need for a study to be made of redevelopment property east of the Mall Complex. The Agency must determine the best suited development for this area, so that it too will compliment the mall. All members felt that Mr. McMahan's request for possible purchase of a portion of Reuse Parcel 48 was premature at this time. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson denying Mr. McMahan's request on the basis that his offer is premature. An overall study must be accomplished in order that the best possible use may be given to this property. The motion was unanimously carried. ... ...... OWNER PARTICIPATION CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE, R-IO: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 675 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF OWNER PARTICIPANTS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE TO NATIONAL LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY OF NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE WHEREAS, National Life and Accident Insurance Company of Nashville, Tennessee, hereinafter referred to as the Owner Participant, has entered into an Agreement with the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, here- inafter called the Agency; and WHEREAS, said Agreement, dated November 12, 1958, and Supplement, dated July 8, 1960, were recorded on January 3, 1961, in Book 5317, Page 529, Official Records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and ~ - 655 r ...... WHEREAS, in Section 5 of said Agreement, Owner Participant agreed to build upon and improve said land and such construction and improvements to be carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code requirement of the City of San Bernardino, State of California, and the provisions of the Plan and the declaration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and specifi- cations approved by the Agency on the hereinafter described real property. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO portion Lot 1 Block 19 commencing at Southeast corner said Lot 1 thence west 124.2 feet thence north 106.8 feet to a point which is 150 feet South of the south line Court Street thence east 124.2 feet to east line said Lot 1 thence along said east line south 106.8 feet to point of beginning, as per records of the Tax Assessor of the County of San Bernardino. ".- I I I '-- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies, and gives notice that the Owner Participant has fully satisfied, ter- minated, and completed, for itself, its successors, and assigns, all covenants and agreements with respect to the Obligation of Owner Participant for the building upon and improvements to said land carried out in conformity with the fire, health, and building code requirement of the City of San Bernardino, Calif- ornia, and the State of California and the provisions of the Plan and the Decla- ration of Restrictions and in accordance with the final plans and specifications approved by the Agency and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement upon the hereinabove described real property. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino a "Certificate of Compliance". Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 675. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None COOLEY & SEVERSON, CONTRACT MODIFICATION: Mr. Hodgdon requested a modification to Cooley & Severson~s contract to provide for the updating of all original appraisals specified in their contract of September 15, 1966. Cooley and Severson had to reappraise these parcels for condemnation action, and their contract price does not include this reappraising. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 676 r L RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CON- TRACT MODIFICATION TO CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND COOLEY & SEVERSON 656 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, has entered into a contract with Cooley and Severson, dated September 15, 1966 per appraisal services; and , -.J WHEREAS, the appraiser was required to update his original appraisals because of condemnation actions, and original contract price does not include said re-appraisals. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and SecEetary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute a modification to contract by and between the Agency and Cooley & Severson, dated September 15, 1966, to increase the contract price to include updated appraisals of parcels involved, $785. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 676. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT, GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY: The Members were presented with a list of changes that have taken place regarding street lights and traffic signals; storm drains; and streets. The Scope of Work for the Street Design and Storm Drain Contracts by and between the Agency and Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy has been changed, therefore, the Contractor has incurred expenses to modify the engineering plans to accomplish the changes. ... The total expenses incurred is approximately $14,000. Mr. Hodgdon requested ~ authorization to amend their contracts to cover these expenses. . The changes were explained and discussed in detail. Mr. Wilson stated that if the Agency had known of the changes needed at the conception of theoriginal contract, the contract price would just about equal the original contract price plus the change orders discussed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 677 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDERS TO CONTRACTS BY AND BETWEEN AGENCY AND GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS, & TROY FOR STORM DRAIN DESIGN AND STREET DESIGN WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California is under contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas, and Troy for Storm Drain Design of the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency is also under contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas, and Troy for Street Design of said Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Scope of Services has been revised in both the Storm Drain Design Contract and the Street Design Contract; and .... .~ ~ ..... WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency Members to Amend said contracts to provide for said services. 657 r- ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute Change Orders for contracts by and between the Agency and Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy for Storm Drain Design and Street Design, and an equita- ble adjustment to the contract price is hereby approved for said changes. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 677. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO.1, R-79: The Chairman explained that bids were opened May 1,1968,4:00 p.m., for Site Preparation of Unit No.1, Calif. R-79. Pete Salata Construction Inc. was de- clared the low bidder with a bid of $429,000. Mr. Varner stated that mid docu- ments were in order and there were no irregularities. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 678 -- RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN AGENCY AND PETE SALATA CONSTRUC- TION INC., FOR SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO.1, CALIF. R-79 - WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1961 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Site Preparation Unit No.1, for the Site clearance of certain areas in said project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Bernardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino on 19th and 26th of April, 1968, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 1st day of May, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and r- ..... WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Pete Salata Construction Inc., in the sum of $429,000; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Pete Salata Construction Inc., is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of said Agency to accept their bid. 658 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Pete Salata Cons- truction Inc., for the sum of $429,000 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the said Contract for Unit No. 1 Site Preparation, on behalf of the Agency. --.. ;y .....J Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 678. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DEMOLITION, BLOCK 10, PARCELS 2, 3, and 4, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that Presco Building Materials have bidded $483.00 for the demolition of Block 10, Parcels 2, 3, and 4, R-79. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 679 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS FOR DEMO- LITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, BLOCK 10, PARCELS 2, 3, and 4, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 196r: entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and ... .... WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of Presco Building Materials for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 10, Parcels 2, 3, and 4, in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the Agency, to enter into a Contract by and between the Agency and Presco Building Materials, for Demolition and Site Clearance for Block 10, Parcels 2, 3, and 4, Calif. R-79, in the amount of $483.00. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing Resolution No. 679. The motion was carried by the following Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None None Absent: None the adoption of vote, to wit: Abstention: LEGAL SERVICES, CONDEMNATION, R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to cancel the contract by and between the Agency and William Ward for condemnation, Calif. R-IO, pertaining to Block 5, Parcels 6, 9 ~ 10, 17, 24 and 29; and Block 6, Parcels 2, 3, and 4. He further ~ -J 659 [ requested that Mr. Allen Gresham be contracted to take over these parcels re- quested for cancellation from Mr. Wards contract. After discussion, the following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 680 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF A PORTION OF CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND WILLIAM J. WARD FOR CONDEMNATION SERVICES, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency desires to cancel a portion of that certain contract entered into the 15th day of June, 1966 by and between the Agency and William J. Ward for legal services in connection with Condemnation'R-lO; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to cancel the Contract for Condemnation R-IO by and between the Agency and William J. Ward, pertaining to Block 5, Parcels 6, 9 & 10, 17, 24 and 29 and Block 6, Parcels 2, 3, and 4, Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO. ~ L Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 680. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 681 RESOLUTION OF THB REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ALLEN GRESHAM FOR CONDEMNATION ~~GtNERAL LEGAL SER- VICES, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage the services of Allen B. Gresham to render certain legal services to the Agency in the prosecution and litigation of eminent domain proceedings as well as general legal services, for the Meadowbrook Project, wherein the Agency, as plaintiff, will seek to acquire certain parcels of real property in said project area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute a contract by and between the Agency and Allen B. Gresham for General Legal Services in addition to Condemnation actions, R-IO. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 681. The Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None [ 660 AMENDATORY APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT, PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 Mr. Hodgdon explained that Resolution No. 605 authorized the filing of an Amendatory Application for Loan and Grant for Project No. Calif. R-79. Said application has been subsequently revised to adjust project capital grant amount from $10,852,464 to $15,312,416. The following resolution was introduced: J RESOLUTION NO. 682 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 605 WHEREAS, Resolution No. 605 authorized the filing of an Amendatory Application for Loan and Grant for Project No. Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, said application has been subsequently revised to adjust project capital grant amount. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 605 is hereby rescinded. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 682. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Because of this rescission of Resolution No. 605, the following resolution was then introduced: , -" RESOLUTION NO. 683 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN AMENDATORY APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT FOR PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, avail itself. of the financial assistance provided by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, to carry out the urban renewal project described as Central City No.1, Calif. R-79 and bounded generally by 4th Street on the North, 2nd Street on the South, Freeway (U.S. 395) on the West, and Arrowhead Avenue on the East hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and WHEREAS, it is recognized that the ~ederal contract for such financial assistance pursuant to said Title I will impose certain obligations and responsibilities upon the Local Public Agency and will require among other things (1) the provision of local graats-in-aid; (2) a feasible method for the relocation of families displaced from the project area; and (3) other local obligations and responsibilities in connection with the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects; and WHEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating that Title, provide that no person shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to dis- -, i -.J r L.. "....... - r .... 661 crimination in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects assisted under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and WHEREAS, the objectives of the Urban Renewal Plan cannot be achieved through rehabilitation of the Project Area: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE AGENCY MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 1. That the United States of America and the Department of Housing and Urban Development Secretary be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, with regu- lations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 2. That an Amendatory Application on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an Amendatory to the existing Loan and Grant Contract with the Federal Government, dated March 21, 1967, for a total project capital grant substantially in the amount of $15,312,416 (an increase of $4,459,952) and a total Project Temporary Loan through direct or private financing under the existing Loan and Grant Contract of $27,930,356 (an increase of $3,296,326), for undertaking and financing the Project is hereby approved, and that the Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to file such an Amendatory Application with the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development, to provide such additional information and to furnish such documents as may be required on behalf of the Agency, and to act as the authorized correspondent of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 683. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin, Webster, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson adjourning the meeting at 5:15 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 562 MINUTES OF THE POSTPONED REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 16, 1968, OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 20TH DAY OF MAY, 1968 IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ,., ;~ .J The Meeting was called to order at 4:05 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Agency Members Absent: Wilson Also Present: Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mr. Quinn, Executive Ddirector; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 2, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Quinn made reference to Resolution No. 683, last paragraph. He stated that the word substantially should be added before the total project capital grant amount, as set forth--"2. That an amendatory application on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an Amendatory to the existing Loan and Grant Contract with the Federal Government, dated March 21, 1967, for a total project capital grant substantially in the amount of $15,312,416 (an increase of $4,459,952) . . . . of the City of San Bernardino, California." Motion was made by Regular Meeting of following vote, to Abstention: None Webster and seconded by Austin approving the Minutes of the May 2, 1968 as corrected. The motion was carried by the wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Absent: Wilson .., ....ii EXPENDITURES: The Expenditures for the month of April, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster approving the expen- ditures for the month of April, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he had nothing to report other than remarks regarding items to follow on the Agenda. He stated that Mr. Gresham would arrive later during the meeting and would report on the status of Condemnation parcels. JOHN LIBMAN (DAISY MARTIN PROPERTY) R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that Mr. Libman, tenant for Martin property, has requested a reduced rent from the close of escrow until August 1, 1968. The escrow should close May 31, 1968. Mr. Libman will move prior to the 90-day notice. The pro- posed rent for these two months is $100 total. Mr. Hodgdon stated that this is a hardship case and it is his recommendation to comply with the request. The following resolution was introduced: ,., '~ ......J 663 [ RESOLUTION NO. 685 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING RENT FOR JOHN LIBMAN BLOCK 20, PARCEL 2, 533 3RD STREET, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, on or about May 31, 1968, will close escrow on Block 20, Parcel 2, in the Central City Project, and obtain pos- session thereof; and WHEREAS, John Libman, tenant for the property, has requested a reduced rent from close of escrow until August 1, 1968, at which time he will vacate the premises; and WHEREAS, the Tenant Rental Policy of the Agency, adopted June 1, 1967 and revised August 17, 1967 states "In the case of extreme hardship, when requested by the tenant, and upon proper documentation, the Agency may further reduce rental rates", and in accordance with HUD regulations as contained in Section 15-2 of the Urban Renewal Manual; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members, at a Postponed Meeting held May 20, 1968, determined that the request of Mr. Libman qualified him for a reduced rent for said property pursuant to said policy. ".- i ~ \ '-- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement, by and between the Agency and Mr. John Libman, shall stipulate a rental rate of $100 for the period, from close of escrow until August 1, 1968, due to extreme hardship, in accordance with Tenant Rental Policy and Urban Renewal Manual Section 15-2. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 685. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson EXTENSION OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT, PIERCEY (MISSION HOTEL) R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that Mr. Piercy would like to discontinue business on June 5, 1968 and have two weeks after that date rent free to vacate his property. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 686 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING RENTAL AGREEMENT OF G. A. PIERCEY (MISSION HOTEL) R-79 WHEREAS, Mr. G. A. Piercey has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Rede- velopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Calif. R-79; and r I ....... WHEREAS, said Rental Agreement expires June 5, 1968; and 664 WHEREAS, Mr. Piercey has requested an additional two weeks, rent free, in which to vacate the premises; and .., ~ ..... WHEREAS, the Agency Members, at a Postponed Regular Meeting held May 20, 1968, found and determined that Mr. Piercey must discontinue business on June 5, 1968, with two additional weeks in which to vacate the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that Mr. G. A. Piercey is hereby granted an additional two weeks from close of business on June 5, 1968, in which to vacate the building. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 686. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wilson EXTENSION OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT, WAITMAN (MISSION CLEANERS) R-79: Mr. Wein stated that Mrs. Waitman needs to relocate somewhere close to her present location. If possible, she would like to relocate in the project area and at a later date relocate again. Mr. Hodgdon explained that because of our demolition schedule this would not be feasible. Mrs. Waitman stated that she has been trying to relocate herself and this has not been successful. She requests additional time on her rental agreement in order that the relocation staff can find her a new location. 4:20 - Mr. Wilson arrived at the meeting 4:20 - Mr. Gresham arrived at the meeting ...., i;j Jj I ....I After further discussion, the members felt that Mrs. Waitman's rental agreement should be extended to June 19, 1968. This would give the relocation staff time to work with her on a new location. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 687 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING RENTAL AGREEMENT OF RUTH WAITMAN (MISSION CLEANERS) R-79 WHEREAS, Mrs. Ruth Waitman (Mission Cleaners) has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Waitman has requested an extension of her rental agreement in order that the relocation staff can find a compatable location in which to relocate; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that Mrs. Ruth Waitman (Mission Cleaners) is hereby granted an extension of time on her Rental Agreement, and that said Rental Agreement will terminate June 19, 1968. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 687. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None .., -' 665 ",... (, t ...... EXTENSION OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT, ACADEMY OF BEAUTY, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Academy of Beauty wishes to relocate to 429 & 431 "E" Street. Mr. Libby is now the tenant at this location. He proposes to vacate the premises on or before July 31, 1968. The Academy of Beauty will need a few weeks to remodel the building and bring it up to the State of California Cosmetology Inspection Standards. Therefore, they have requested an extension of their rental agreement to allow for remodeling and moving into their new location on September 1, 1968. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 688 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING RENTAL AGREEMENT OF THE ACADEMY OF BEAUTY, R-79 WHEREAS, the Academy of Beauty has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, the Academy of Beauty has requested an extension of time on said Rental Agreement, to September 1, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved and feel that such an extension is proper under the circumstances. ,- ....... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and the Academy of Beauty is hereby extended to September 1, 1968. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 688. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF CONDEMNATION ATTORNEY, ALLEN B. GRESHAM: Francis L. Lush, Block 4, Parcel 13: Mr. Gresham stated that he has received the answer from Lush, the owner of the property. Besoyan has not answered as yet. Mr. Gresham advised that he has written Mr. Goldie, attorney for Besoyan, requesting that an answer be submitted pro~p~ly. After we receive his answer, the Agency can request a trial date. Until the case is at issue, no dates may be set. Anna & Steve K. Nikolopulas, Block 4, Parcel 10: ,... i '-- Nikolopulas is the owner of this property. Mr. Catugna, tenant, has filed a disclaimer in this proceeding. Mr. Nicolino, tenant, has refused to sign a disclaimer. Mr. Gresham advised that he is going to enter Mr. Nicolino's default. As soon as this default is filed, we will be in a position to set the case for trial. 666 .... MacPherson, Brunner,Jordan, Block 3, Parcel 9: All parties have been served, except for Mrs. Jordan. We are having difficulty in serving her. Mr. Gresham requested authorization to hire a process server to serve Mrs. Jordan. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the hiring of a process server to serve papers on Mrs. Jordan. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mrs. Jondan has 1/4 interest in this property. ...... Golden property, Ammons Leasee, Block 3, Parcel 10: Mr. Gresham advised that the ejection action between Mr. Golden, owner, and Mr. Ammons, leasee, has been tried and is now awaiting ruling. Mr. Gresham has requested that Goldie, attorney for Golden, prepare and file an answer on behalf of the estate on or before June 1, 1968. George Voss, Block 19, Parcel 4: We have not received an answer from Voss. Nicholson has answered the Harbor Oil has been served and we are awaiting an answer. As soon as are received, the Agency can request that the case be set for trial. complaint. the answers Harold E. & Laura May Nicholson, Block 6, Parcel 18: ... This case is set for trial Thursday, May 23, 1968. John G. Sims, Block 1, Parcel 20: ..... Mr. Simpson has stated that he is going to make an effort to settle the division of funds to be paid by the Agency for this Property. He thinks a settlement can be made. Carlton, Bender, Block 3, Parcel 12: Everybody has appeared, therefore, we can proceed to trial on this case. Mr. Gresham advised that he is attempting to obtain September 3rd for a trial date. George J. & Pearl Kantor, Block 3, Parcel 7: Mr. Wein and Kantor are still at issue regarding their interests in this property. Motion to set trial was filed on Friday, May 17th. We should receive the answer at any time. PLANNING STUDY, R-79: The Chairman requested authorization to pay $5,000 as a proportionate share of the $25,000 planning study for "E" Street, "D" Street and Court and 2nd Streets. The following resolution was introduced: ~ -...; 667 [ RESOLUTION NO. 689 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF $5,000 FOR PROPORTIONATE SHARE OF PLANNING STUDY PREPARED BY VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California recognizes the need for a planning study to be accomplished in the vicinity of the Central City Boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Agency Members determine that the cost of said planning study should be shared proportionately between the Agency and local businesses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the payment of $5,000 for a proportionate share of a planning study prepared by Victor Gruen, for property located in the vicinity of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 689. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT AMENDMENT, VICTOR GRUEN ASSO, R-79: ,,- L The Chairman requested a Contract Amendment to Victor Gruen's contract for Mall Design in the amount of $8,500, for architectural services. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 690 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH VICTOR GRUEN'S CONTRACT FOR MALL DESIGN WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, under date of March 22, 1967 entered into a contract with Victor Gruen Asso. for engineering services for the Mall Design, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of contractor in con- nection with the change in scope of work. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized on behalf of the Agency to amend contract between the Agency and Victor Gruen Associates to increase the contract price by $8,500 for such services. [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 690. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 668 DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO.7, R-79: ] Bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.7, R-79 were opened May 7, 1968. The low bidder for this job was Dakeno, Inc. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 691 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH DAKENO, INC. FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO.7, R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area NO.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.7, for the demolition of buildings and structures and site clearance of certain areas in said project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Bernar- --, dino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San f Bernardino, on the 13th and 20th day of April, 1968, and an Affidavit showing such --' publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 7th day of May, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Dakeno, Inc., in the sum of $7,840.00; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Dakeno, Inc. is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of said Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Dakeno, Inc., in the sum of $7,840.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Unit No. 7 on behalf of the Agency. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 691. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: NOne Abstention: None Absent: None , ~ ! --i 669 ,.... r ~ SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO. IB, R-IO: Bids for Site Preparation, Unit No. IB (Warm Creek Channel) R-IO, were opened May 13, 1968. The low bidder was Edmond J. Vadnais. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 692 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR SITE PREPARATION WITH EDMOND J. VADNAIS, UNIT NO. IB, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Site Preparation Contract, Unit No. IB, for the site preparation of certain areas in said project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and fIP'''..'''fIIl,. WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefor was duly published in the San Bernardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation in the County of San Bernardino on the 22nd and 29th of April, 1968, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency;. and ...... WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m. on the 13th day of May, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Edmond J. Vadnais in the sum of $377,000. WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Edmond J. Vadnais is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Edmond J. Vadnais in the sum of $377,000.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Unit No. IB on behalf of the Agency. """.. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 692. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: NOne Absent: None ..... 670 The following resolution was introduced: l ..... AGENCY ACTION, HUD LETTER DATED MAY 6, 1968: RESOLUTION NO. 684 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT MR. SANFORD H. WEIN'S PARTICIPATION AS A MEMBER OF THE AGENCY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79, IS NOT CONTRARY TO PUBLIC INTEREST WHEREAS, on March 15, 1958, Mr. Sanford H. Wein purchased the Sunset Hotel business located at 592 W. Third Street, San Bernardino, California, and executed a rental agreement with the owner of said real property; and WHEREAS, said real property is located within the boundaries of Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 1967, Mr. Wein was appointed to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, by the Mayor and Common Council of said City; and WHEREAS, by letter dated May 6, 1968, the Agency was advised by the United States of America, Department of Housing and Urban Development, that if Mr. Wein's interest in said real property was acquired by him prior to his becoming a member of the Agency, or before the effective date of the Survey and Planning Contract between the United States and the Agency, dated February 24, 1964, Mr. Wein could not participate in any action by the Agency affecting said Central City Project until the Agency determined that such participation is not contrary to the public interest, ... '........ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California hereby finds that on March 15, 1958, Mr. Sanford H. Wein acquired an interest in real property located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area NO.1, Calif. R-79. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That the Agency hereby finds that Mr. Sanford H. Wein acquired said interest in said real property prior to February 24, 1964, the date of said Survey and Planning Contract, and prior to January 9, 1967, the date Mr. Wein was appointed to the Agency. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That the Agency hereby finds and determines that Mr. Sanford H. Wein's participation as a member of the Agency in decisions concerning said Central City Project is not in violation of Section 704 of the Loan and Grant Contract, and that said participation is not in violation of State or Federal laws and is not contrary to the public interest. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That Mr. Wein has not and shall not participate as an Agency member in decisions of the Agency affecting said real property or his interest therein, and that all transactions concerning said real property shall be in accordance with the California Com~unity Redevelopment Law, and applicable Federal laws and regulations. ., -J. 671 r L RESOLVED, FURTHER: That the Agency finds that Mr. Sanford H. Wein submitted a letter of disclosure to the Agency on January 19, 1967, disclosing his interest in said real property and that the foregoing resolutions confirm the action of the Agency in accepting said letter. Accordingly, the foregoing resolutions are hereby made retroactive to January 19, 1967. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That the Secretary of the Agency is hereby instructed to attach a copy of said letter dated May 6, 1968, to these resolutions. May 6, 1968 Mr. Peter W. Quinn Executive Director Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino First American Title Building 323 Court Street, Room 308 San Bernardino, California 92401 Dear Mr. Quinn: Subject: Calif. R-79, Central City Amendatory Application for Loan and Grant r ! , I ""- Our review of the subject application reveals that several items need clarification before processing can be completed. Resolution No. 605, adopted February 1, 1968, authorized the filing of an amendatory application for an increase in the pro- ject capital grant. However, since the adoption of that reso- lution, the amendatory application has been revised to include an increase of $3,293,495 in Project Temporary Loan. It is therefore necessary that we have from you a resolution reflect- ing this increase. The Project Cost Estimate and Financing Plan indicates a Project Temporary Loan of $27,927,525, but the Application erroneously indicates a request for a Project Temporary Loan of $29,927,525. We would appreciate receiving a corrected application form. We understand that Agency member Sanford Wein holds a lease on a hotel within the project area, which lease is to run until 1978. No indication is given as to when the lease was acquired by Mr. Wein. If he acquired such lease while a member of the Agency and after February 24, 1964 (the effective date of the Survey and Planning Contract) his interest is held in violation of Section 508 of the S&P Contract and of Section 704 of the Loan and Grant Contract. In this case, Mr. Wein must either divest himself of the lease or resign from the Agency. If the interest was acquired r L. 672 before becoming a member of the Agency or before the effective date of the S&P Contract, Mr. Wein may not participate in any action by the LPA affecting the Project unless and until the Agency by reso- lution determines that, in light of the personal interest in property within the Project held by Mr. Wein, his participation in action affecting the Project would not be contrary to the public interest. Please advise this office of action taken by LPA to resolve this matter. ... ',1 J ~1 ...J Should you have any questions do not hesitate to call. Sincerely yours, /s/ Charles L. Austin Charles L. Austin Acting Assistant Regional Administrator for Renewal Assistance Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 684. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wein Absent: None CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 9, R-IO: Presco Building Materials has submitted a bid for Block 4, Parcel 9, 187 West Second Street, Calif. R-IO, in the amount of $430.00. The following resolution was introduced: ... .~.. t~ ....J RESOLUTION NO. 693 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS FOR THE DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 4, PARCEL 9, R-IO WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $430.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the De- partment of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Presco Building Materials in the sum of $430.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Block 4, Parcel 9 on behalf of the Agency. ., J 673 [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of resolution No. 693. The motion was made by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None OFFER TO PURCHASE, REUSE PARCEL 87, CALIF. R-IO: This matter was tabled at the request of the proposed developer until the next Regular Meeting. RUMMAGE SALE, R-79: Authorization was requested for the Catholic Social Services to use the old Bible Supply Store located at 535 W. Fourth Street, Block 4, Parcel 3, for a rummage sale. They will provide the necessary insurance coverage and necessary utility charges for this building. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 694 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE USE OF BLOCK 4, PARCEL 3, 535 W. FOURTH ST., TO THE CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES FOR FOUR DAYS FOR THE PURPOSE OF A RUMMAGE SALE, R-79 r-'" WHEREAS, the Catholic Social Services has requested the use of the building at 535 West Fourth Street, for four days, for a rummage sale; and i L WHEREAS, the Catholic Social Services has agreed to provide the necessary insurance coverage and necessary utility changes for said period of four days. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the request of the Catholic Social Services for use of 535 W. Fourth Street is hereby approved, and said Catholic Social Services shall provide the necessary insurance coverage and utility changes for the period of four days. Motion was made by Wein, and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 694. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Webster Absent: None INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES, REDUCTION IN RENT, R-79: A letter was presented from Gerald S. Fisher, attorney for the International House of Pancakes requesting a reduction in their rent. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster denying the request of International House of Pancakes for a reduction in rent. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None r i>: L AMENDMENT TO PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT, JOHN S. GRIFFITH & CURCI-TURNER CO: Authorization was requested to amend the Predisposition Agreement with John S. Griffith Co. and Curci-Turner Co. to extend the date until December 31, 1968. The following resolution was introduced: 674 RESOLUTION NO. 695 ,., J ft ...J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CON- TRACT AMENDMENT WITH JOHN S. GRIFFITH AND CURCI-TURNER COMPANY WHEREAS, on August 23, 1967, Agency and Developer executed an agreement, "Pre- disposition Agreement." Certain provisions of said Agreement provided for the parties to meet specified requirements within the time limits set forth in said Agreement, but provided that such time limits could be extended by mutual agreement of the parties; and WHEREAS, said Agreement was amended on February 16, 1968 and on March 11, 1968. The First Amendment to said Agreement extended certain of the time limits of said Agreement to April 15,"1968; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to again extend said time limits by amending said amended Predisposition Agreement, as hereinafter provided. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the first sentence of said Paragraph 6, is hereby amended to read as follows: "On or before December 31, 1968, Agency agrees to do the following things:..." Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 695. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None AbstentioN: None Absent: None ,., ~ ..." CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 6, R-lO: Presco Building Materials has submitted a bid for Block 4, Parcel 6, 155 West Second Street in the amount of $485.00. The following resolution was intro- duced: RESOLUTION NO. 696 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS FOR DEMO- LITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 4, PARCEL 6, R-lO WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif.R-lO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $485.00. ~ -..J 675 r- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the De- partment of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Presco Building Material in the sum of $485.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Block 4, Parcel 6 on behalf of the Agency. iI '- Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso lution No. 696. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None "H" STREET STORM DRAIN, R-79: Final Plans for the construction of the "H" Street Storm Drain are expected to be approved by the Economic Development Administration very shortly. The City estimates $2,166,000.00 for construction of this storm drain. Authorization was requested to deposit $266,625 to the City of San Bernardino for our estimated portion of this storm drain. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 697 ,.-. RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE DEPOSIT WITH THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO OF $266,625, AS THE ESTIMATED PRO- PORTIONATE SHARE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF. THE "H" STREET STORM DRAIN ""'- WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79, re- quires the installation of certain storm drains within the boundaries of said project; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino is in the process of executing a contract for the Construction of the "H" Street Storm Drain, said storm drain will continue through a portion of the Central City Project, as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has requested deposit of $266,625 in a trust fund for the Agency's proportionate share of the construction of this storm drain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the. Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to pay the City of San Bernardino $266,625 as the Agency's estimated proportionate share of the construction of the "H" Street Storm Drain. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon final determination of the exact amount of the respective shares of the construction costs of Agency and City, all excess amounts deposited with the City pursuant to this resolution shall be forthwith returned to the Agency. "... .... Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 697. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 676 JOHN F. GRAY, REQUEST FOR TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS: ~ The following resolution was intreduced: ...... RESOLUTION NO. 698 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE TERMINATION OF CONTRACT FOR ACCOUNTING SERVICES WITH JOHN F. GRAY FOR THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT AND THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California is under contract with John F. Gray for Accounting Services for the Central City Project and the r'1eadowbrook Project; and WHEREAS, the Contractor has requested termination of said contracts. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to terminate contract dated April 6, 1967 for Central City Project and contract dated March 8, 1963 for the r1eadowbrook Jroject. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 698. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Hein, Austin, Hebster, Hilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ... CONTRACT FOR ACCOUNTING SERVICES: ....... A drafted contract for accounting services by and between the Agency and Mr. Harry S. Yaffee was presented to the Members. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 699 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH HARRY S. YAFFEE FOR ACCOUNTING SERVICES ~~EREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California desires to engage a Contractor to render certain technical services and advice in connection with accounting for the Central City Project and the Headowbrook Project; and \{HEREAS, Harry S. Yaffee has proposed a contract for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San, Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a contract by and between the Agency and Harry S. Yaffee for Account- ing Services. Motion was made by Hilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 699. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ --" 677 CONVEYANCE OF EASEt1ENTS FOR STREET PURPOSES, R-79: [ The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 700 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMMl AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE DEEDS TO THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO FOR THE WIDENING OF STREETS WITHIN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 'fflEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 requires that certain streets within the boundaries of said project be widened and/or realigned; and WHEREAS, upon completion of said widening and/or realignment of certain streets, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino will dedi- cate to the City of San Bernardino all those areas necessary for street and highway purposes; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has requested that such conveyance shall be of easement title. [ NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute as needed appropriate easement deeds to the City of San Bernardino for the widening of the above referred to streets for right-of-way purposes as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan for the Central City Project, Calif. R-79 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 700. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: vlilson, Austin, Hein, Hebster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 701 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFOrolIA, AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF REDEVELOPERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLI~MCE TO FORREST S. KARST HHEREAS, Forrest S. Karst hereinafter called the Redeveloper, has entered into an Agreement and Grant Deed with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, hereinafter called the Agency; and [ WHEREAS, said Agreement dated October 7, 1966 was recorded on June 23, 1967 in Book 6842 on page 6~2 and said Grant Deed, dated October 17, 1966, was recorded on June 23, 1967, in Book 6842 on page 633, both in the official records of the County Recorder of the County of San Bernardino, State of California; and 678 vlliEREAS, in Section 3 of said Agreement and in Section 3 of said Grant Deed Redeveloper covenanted and agreed, for itself, its successors and assigns to construct certain improvements on the hereinafter described real property, within the time and in the manner as set forth in said Agreement; and ..., ! I --i WHEREAS, the Agency agreed in Section 4 of said Agreement and in Section 4 of said Grant Deed to furnish the Redeveloper with an instrument certifying completion of said improvements in accordance with the provisions of said Grant Deed upon Redeveloper's completion thereof upon the following described real property: That portion of Lots 2 and 3, Block 4, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 1 records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the I'lest line of said Block 4 distant North 124.96 feet from the Southwest corner of said Block 4, said point also being the Northwest corner of the land conveyed to Robert H. Hirsch, a married man, by deed recorded March 3, 1966, in Book 6581, page 70, Official Records; thence East along the North line of the land so conveyed to the West line of Stoddard Avenue; thence North along the West line of Stoddard Avenue 125.45 feet, more or less, to a point 50 feet 1 inch South of the North line of Lot 3 of said Block 4, said point being the intersection of the West line of Stoddard Avenue and the South line of the land conveyed to James E. Spain, Jr. and Hilliam D. Spain, as trustees under the will of James E. Spain, deceased, by deed recorded December 27, 1957, in Book 4400 page 441, Official Records; thence West along said South line to the West line of said Block 4, thence South along the West line of Block 4, 125.45 feet,more or less, to the point of beginning. .., i. " ~ ....J Said property is also known as Lots 3, 4 and 7, according to Map of Hospital Tract as per plat recorded in Book 4 of Maps, page 5, records of said County EXCEPTING THEREFROM the South 24.8 feet of Lot 3 Said property is also shown on Licensed Land Surveyors Hap Book 24, pages 51 to 54, inclusive, records of said County. NOH, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency does hereby determine, conclusively certifies, and gives notice that the Redeveloper has fully satisfied, terminated and completed for itself, its successors and assigns, all covenants and agree- ments with respect to the obligation of Redeveloper for the construction of im- provements and dates for the beginning and completion thereof, provided for in said Agreement and Grant Deed upon the hereinabove described real property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino --, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute and have recorded with the County Recorder of --J the County of San Bernardino, the "Certificate of Compliance" in the form approved by Resolution No. 238 of this Agency dated August 2, 1962. [ r \-.. ,..... \r....I 679 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 701. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None APPROVAL OF PHASE 3, VICTOR GRUEN PLANS: Final plans, constituting Step 3, of Contract with Victor Gruen for Mall Design was presented for approval. Mr. Hodgdon stated that he has reviewed the plans and he recommends approval. The following resolution was intro- duced: RESOLUTION NO. 702 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PHASE III OF CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN FOR MALL DESIGN DATED MARCH 22, 1967, AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREOF WHEREAS, the contract by and between the Agency and Victor Gruen Associates for Mall Design, dated March 22, 1967, requires approval of phases as completed; and WHEREAS, Victor Gruen has submitted for approval the final plans constituting Phase III of their contract for Mall Design. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the final plans for Phase III, submitted by Victor Gruen Associates under Contract of March 22, 1967, are hereby approved and payment of same is hereby authorized. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 702. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None LINESCH & REYNOLDS, R-79: Preliminary Plans from Linesch & Reynolds were presented for approval. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 703 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY PLANS SUBMITTED BY LINESCH & REYNOLDS UNDER LANSCAPE CONTRACT DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 1967 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California entered into a Contract with Linesch and Reynolds dated September 28, 1967 for Preliminary Plans for the landscaping required for the Central City Pro- ject, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, Linesch and Reynolds have completed said Preliminary Plans and have submitted them for approval. 680 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California that the Preliminary Plans as submitted by Linesch and Reynolds under contract of September 28, 1967 are hereby approved and payment thereof is authorized. .. d oft ....tI Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 703. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT, LINESCH & REYNOLDS, R-79: A proposal from Linesch & Reynolds was submitted for the working drawings and installation phases of the landscape treatment for R-79. The following reso- lution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 704 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH LINESCH & REYNOLDS FOR WORKING DRAW- INGS AND INSTALLATION PHASES OF THE LANDSCAPE TREATMENT FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79 with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and .. fi ~f ....tJ WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of said Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage a Contractor to render cer- tain technical advice and assistance in connection with Working Drawings and Installation Phases of the Landscape Treatment for the Central City Project, R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency determined at a postponed Regular Meeting held May 20, 1968, at 4:00 p.m. in Room 305 of the Offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the proposal of Linesch and Reynolds was in the best interest of the Project Area and the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal of Linesch and Reynolds be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary of said Agency ape hereby instructed to execute said Contract for Working Drawings and Installation Phases of the Landscape Treatment of the Central City Project, for the sum of $46,292. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 704. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ -..J 681 [ EXTENSION OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT - STERRETTS OPTICAL LAB, R-79: A request from Sterrett Optical Laboratory for an extension of time on their rental agreement was presented to the members. The Chairman requested a resolution authorizing this extension until July 15, 1968. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 705 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT WITH STERRETT OPTICAL LABORATORY WHEREAS, Sterrett Optical Laboratory has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, Sterrett Optical Laboratory has requested an extension of time on said Rental Agreement until July 15, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved and determine that such an extension is proper under the circumstances. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Sterrett Optical Laboratory is hereby extended to July 15, 1968. [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 705. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION, BLOCK 4, PARCEL 10, R-lO: Pres co Building Materials has submitted a bid for Block 4, Parcel 10, 181-183 Mount View Avenue for the sum of $700.00. The following resolution was intro- duced: RESOLUTION NO. 706 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS FOR DEMO- LITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 4, PARCEL 10, CALIF. R-IO [ WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Pres co Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $700.00. 68~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said bid of Presco Building Materials in the sum of $700.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Block 4, Parcel 10 on behalf of the Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 706. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ORIENTATION MEETING, MAY 8, 1968: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 707 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE INCURRING OF EXPENSES FOR ORIENTATION MEETING, MAY 8, 1968, HOLIDAY INN, NOT TO EXCEED $75.00 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, conducted a .. meeting, May 8, 1968, at the Holiday Inn, San Bernardino, California, for an Orientation Meeting; and WHEREAS, The Members, at their Postponed Regular Meeting, held May 20, 1968, determined that expenses incurred at said meeting are eligible project costs per Urban Renewal Manual Section 30-1-2. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the payment of expenses incurred at the Orientation Meeting of May 8, 1968, is hereby authorized. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That said authorized expenses shall not exceed the amount of $75.00. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 707. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RELOCATION OF SITE OFFICE: Authorization was requested to relocate the site office into the Andreson Building. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 708 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE MOVING OF THE SITE OFFICE INTO THE ANDRESON BUILDING, 320 NORTH "E" STREET J J ] [ r .1- [ 683 WHEREAS, because of the Demolition and Site Clearance of the Central City Project Area, it is necessary to relocate the Agency Site Office to a more permanent office; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Members do hereby authorize the relocation of the Agency Site Office from 581 West Fourth Street, San Bernardino, to the Andreson Building, 320 North "E" Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairman and Secretary be and they hereby are authorized and directed to execute an appropriate lease for said premises. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 708. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit, Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES: The Chairman stated that the Agency requested proposals for engineering services to furnish plans and specifications for the widening of "E" Street, from Athol Street to 2nd Street. Two proposals were received. Joseph E. Bonadiman & Associates proposed to do the work for the amount of $5,600. Garner, Tee, tracadas & Troy proposed to do the work for the amount of $3,855.00. The fol- _ lowing resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 709 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS AND TROY FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for fi- nancial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage a contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with the widening of "E" Street from Athol Street to Second Street, for the Meadowbrook Project, R-IO; and WHEREAS, invitations requesting proposals for said services were sent to Engineer- ing firms in the City of San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, at a Postponed Regular Meeting of the Agency, held May 20, 1968, at 4:00 p.m., in Room 305 of the offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, said proposals were reviewed; and WHEREAS, the Agency determined at said Postponed Regular Meeting that the proposal of Garner, Tee, Tracadas and Troy was in the best interest of the Project Area. 684 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal of Garner, Tee, Tracadas, and Troy be accepted, and the Chairman and Secretary of said Agency are hereby instructed to execute a contract for the street designing of portions of the Meadowbrook Project for the sum of $3,855.00. J Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 709. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXTENS]ON OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT, HOUSE OF FABRICS: A request for extension of time on rental agreement from the House of Fabrics was presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Hodgdon recommended that this request be denied. This property is in line for demolition contract shortly. The Agreement with House of Fabrics terminated in December, 1967 and the relocation staff has been trying to get them to relocate. This is the first time they have requested an extension of their Rental Agreement. All Members felt that because of the circumstances House of Fabrics did not qualify for an extension of their Agreement. Mr. Wein felt that an extension should be given them because of the fact that their building was located next to Bee's Variety. Mr. Greenestone of Bee's Variety is having difficulty in settling interest of the property with the owner of the property. Mr. Wein felt that if the House of Fabrics vacated the building, Mr. Greenestone's business would decrease and this would force him to accept any offer of the owner of the pro- perty for settlement of interest. ., ..J Mr. Hodgdon explained that this was another issue. The main interest of the Agency should be the earliest possible vacation and demolition of buildings in Central City. After much discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin denying the request of House of Fabrics for an extension of time on their Rental Agreement. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: Wein Abstention: None Absent: None OTHER BUSINESS: The Chairman requested authorization to increase Mr. Thomas White's salary to $849. This would also change his title from Administrative Assistant to Administrative Officer. The Salary Schedule would have to be amended to add this position. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 710 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING. THE ADOPTED SALARY SCHEDULE, ADOPTED JUNE 15, 1967, TO ADD THE POSITION OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, RANGE 42 WHEREAS, the Agency Members at a Regular Meeting held June 15, 1967, adopted the official Salary Schedule for the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California; and .., ...... 685 r WHEREAS, The Agency Members desire to add the position of Administrative Officer to said Salary Schedule under Range 42. -- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the position of Administrative Officer is hereby added to the Salary Schedule adopted by the Agency Members June 15, 1967. Said position shall have a range scale of No. 42 on said salary schedule, effec- tive June 1, 1968. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 710. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 711 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, PROMOTING THOMAS A. WHITE TO THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER, SAID POSITION STARTING AT RANGE 42 ON THE ADOPTED SALARY SCHEDULE OF JUNE 15, 1967 WHEREAS, the Agency Members desire to promote Thomas A. White to the position of Administrative Officer. ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Members do hereby promote Thomas A. White to the position of Administrative Officer, said position starting at Range 42 on ~ the adopted Salary Schedule of June 15, 1967. ,........: Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 711. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None R-lO AMENDATORY APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 712 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN AMENDATORY APPLICATION FOR LOAN AND GRANT FOR PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, It is necessary and in the public interest that the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, avail itself of the financial assistance provided by Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, to carry out the urban renewal project described as Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-lO; and r '-- WHEREAS, on the 20th day of February, 1958, by Resolution No. 50, and amended by Resolution No. 63 on August 22, 1958, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, authorized the filing of the Application for Loan and Grant Contract for Project No. Calif. R-10; and 686 WHEREAS, it is recognized that the Federal Contract for such financial assistance pursuant to said Title I will impose certain obligations and responsibilities upon the Local Public Agency and will require among other things (1) the provision of local grants-in-aid; (2) a feasible method for the relocation of families dis- placed from the project area; and (3) other local obligations and responsibilities in connection with the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects; and WHEREAS, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating that Title, provided that no person shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination in the undertaking and carrying out of urban renewal projects assisted under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and WHEREAS, the objectives of the Urban Renewal Plan cannot be achieved through reha- bilitation of the Project Area: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE AGENCY MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 1. That the United States of America and the Department of Hossing and Urban Development Secretary be, and they hereby are, assured of full compliance by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, with regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development effectuating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 2. That an amendatory application on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, for an Amendatory to the existing Loan and Grant Contract with the Federal Government, dated October 23, 1958, for a total project capital grant substantially in the amount of $3,307,044 (an increase of $1,380,319) and a total Project Temporary Loan through direct or private financing under the existing Loan and Grant Contract of $6,469,425 (an increase of $1,960,000), for undertaking and financing the Project is hereby approved, and the Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute and to file such an Amenda- tory Application with the Department of Housing and Urban Development to provide such additional information and to furnish such documents as may be required on behalf of the Agency, and to act as the authorized correspondent of the Redevelop- ment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 712. The motion was carried by the Following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 5:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: N ., .... lIIIIII ..... .... ........ 687 [ MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD ON THE 27TH DAY OF MAY, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA The Chairman reported that this Special Meeting was held pursuant to a duly dated and signed Notice of Special Meeting which was mailed to each and every Member in due time, form and manner as required by law. Said notice is as follows: 1. NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that a Special Meeting of the Members of the Re- development Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, will be held at the offices of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 Court Street, Room 305, in the City of San Bernardino, the regular meeting place thereof, at 4:00 p.m., on the 27th day of May 1968, for the purpose of considering proposed Lease Agreements between the Agency and the City of San Bernardino for the parking lot and the public mall, for the Central City Project, R-79. DATED this 24th day of May, 1968. r L siP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director 2. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, P. W. QUINN, JR., Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 24th day of May, 1968, I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Special Meeting on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Cali- fornia, in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL. WITNESS my hand this 24th day of May, 1968. siP. W. Quinn, Jr. P. W. Quinn, Jr. Executive Director The Meeting was called to order at 4:10 p.m. Roll Call Showed the following: [ Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Wein, Wilson and Austin Agency Members Absent: Webster Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary 688 Mr. Hodgdon explained that we have received the Legal Opinion from O'Melveny & Myers concerning the drafts of the lease agreements for parking lot and mall area to the City of San Bernardino. Said opinion stated that said agreements are proper ones for the Agency and the City to enter into, and that each lease agreement, when duly authorized and executed by the parties, will constitute a valid and enforceable obligation of the City. J The lease agreements were explained and discussed. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 713 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE LEASE BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE MALL FACILITY WHEREAS, in furtherance of the objectives of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, the City of San Bernardino has undertaken a program for the clearance and redevelopment of slum and blighted areas within its city limits; and WHEREAS, in accordance with such program, on February 23, 1965, by its Ordinance No. 2649, the City of San Bernardino adopted an Official Rede- velopment Plan for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, and vested Agency with the responsibility for implementation and consummation of said Project; and J WHEREAS, the proposed land use under said Redevelopment Plan provides for a mall facility to be constructed in said Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in implementing said Redevelopment Plan intends to construct and develop said mall facility; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the construction of said mall facility, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has determined that it would be in the best interests of the public to lease said land and improvements constituting the mall facility to the City of San Bernardino (a copy of the proposed Lease Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"); and WHEREAS, on July 17, 1967, the City of San Bernardino, by its Resolution NO. 8746 of the Mayor and Common Council, indicated its desire to occupy and maintain said mall facility; and WHEREAS, on May 20, 1968, the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers gave its opinion that said Lease, when duly executed by the Agency and City, would constitute a valid obligation of the City, which opinion is concurred in by Agency Legal counsel; ] 689 [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California: That the Agency hereby determine that said Lease Agreement attached hereto providing for the lease of the mall facility to the City of San Bernardino for a period of fifty (50) years and requiring that the City maintain such property and improvements for said period, is in the best interests of the public. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That said Lease Agreement is hereby approved by the Agency. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That the Chairman and Secretary be, and they hereby are~ authorized to execute said Lease Agreement and present the same to the City of San Bernardino for approval and execution. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 713. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster RESOLUTION NO. 714 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE LEASE BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FOR THE PARKING FACILITY ,.... I I '-- WHEREAS, in furtherance of the objectives of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California, the City of San Bernardino has undertaken a program for the clearance and redevelopment of slum and blighted areas within its city limits; and WHEREAS, in accordance with such program, on February 23, 1965, by its Ordinance No. 2649, the City of San Bernardino adopted an Official Rede- velopment Plan for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, and vested Agency with the responsibility for implementation and consummation of said Project; and WHEREAS, the proposed land use under said Redevelopment Plan provides for a parking facility to be constructed in said Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, in implementing said Redevelopment Plan intends to construct and develop said parking facility; and WHEREAS, upon completion of the construction of said parking facility, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino has determined that it would be in the best interests of the public to lease said land and improve- ments constituting the parking facility to the City of San Bernardino (a copy of the proposed Lease Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"); and [ WHEREAS, on July 17, 1967, the City of San Bernardino, by its Resolution No. 8747 of the Mayor and Common Council, indicated its desire to occupy and maintain said parking facility; and 690 WHEREAS, on May 20, 1968, the law firm of O'Melveny & Myers gave its op1n1on that said Lease, when duly executed by the Agency and City, would constitute a valid obligation of the City, which opinion is concurred in by Agency legal counsel; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California: That the Agency hereby determine that said Lease Agreement attached hereto providing for the lease of the parking facility to the City of San Bernardino for a period of fifty (50) years and requiring that the City maintain such property and improvements for said period, is in the best interests of the public. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That said Lease Agreement is hereby approved by the Agency. RESOLVED, FURTHER: That the Chairman and Secretary be, and they hereby are, authorized to execute said Lease Agreement and present the same to the City of San Bernardino for approval and execution. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 714. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes:None Abstention: None Absent: Webster Mr. Varner suggested that the opinion of O'Melveny & Myers be spread on the minutes. Mr. Quinn stated that this would be done. ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin to adjourn the meeting at 4:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Webster LETTER FROM O'MELVENY & MYERS AND THE LEASE AGREEMENTS ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. J .., !1 ~~ I~ ...JJ -, ~~ ....", :r :L " " : I : 1 ~ i[' '\ -. . .. : .C....... , - . ), 691 LAW Of"F1CES Of" -"-<'~"O'M ELVENY & MYERS ..33 SOUTH SPRING STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90013 TeLePHONE eZO.IIZO BEVERLY HillS Of"FleE 0601 WI\.SHIRC DOUL["A~O ee:VCRL"f HI1.\.5.CALI"O~;H'lI'" 00210 TI:Lf:PHONE. 213-.4111 ----- - _..:.~- --'-.'""'CA!3L!:AODRE:SS''-tOM5u ~ ~i;Y;; 1~6: ~ . Hay 20th 1 9 6 8 . EUROPEAN OffiCE . ".P.LACe:O~ LA CONCOF=i'O[' . pARIS 8.,..-RANCE TeLEPHONe. Z05 :sg.33 lONERGAN. JOROMl & GRESHAM OUA "ILE NU~'OER 747,827-5 Redevelopment Agency of the city of San Bernardino San Bernardino, California SAN BERNARDINO REDEVELOP- MENT AGENCY CENTP~L CITY PROJECT NO. I Gentlemen: . Pursuant to your request we have examined the final drafts (as furnished to us by your attorney, Mr. Varner) of two Lease Agreements between the City of San Bernardino and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. Both agreements relate to your Central City Project No. I (Calif. R-79). Under one agreement the Agency leases to the City a mall area and under the other agreement the Agency leases to the City aparking,area. We have considered these lease agreD~ents in connection \'lith various limitations upon the pmvers of ci ties and of redevelopment agencies and, \<lhile' \.;e have found no decisions of the appellate courts of this state directly passing upon the type of lease agreements here involved, there are favorable decisions on analogous agreements. Based upon those decisions and other accepted principles of la\'l, we are of the opinion that' said agree- men~cs are proper ones for the Agency.and the City to enter into, and tha.t each lease agreement, \.,hen duly authorized alld executed by the pa.rties, '\ViII constitute a valid and enforceable obligation of the City. Respectfully submitted, Z;'MELiJ;''': HYE~S _'lA . w ~ ,/ tL<U"W./~ . " . / ~ffi' By If . Ray H. Lindman .RHL:rc I 692 (Parking) LEASE AGREEMEN'l' THIS LEASE AGREEMENT (hereinafter called "Lease") ] is made and entered into this _ day of June, 1968, by and between the Crey OF SAN BERNARDINO, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (hereinafter called "City") and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALH'ORNIA I a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the la\vs of the State of California (hereinafter called "Agency"). Reci-tals: This Lease is made with reference to the following fac-ts: (a) In furtherance of the objectives of the Conununi ty ,., Redevelopment Law of the State of California, City has undertakE~ a program for the clearance and redevelopment of slum and blighted areas within "its City limits. Under this program, City adopted an Official Redevelopment Plan (hereinafter called the "Redevelop- ment Plan") for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79 (hereinafter called the "Project"), and vested Agency ,.lith the res'ponsibility for implementation and consli..rrLrnation of the Project. The Redevelopment Plan for the Project was adopted by City on February 23, 1965, by Ordinance No. 2649. (b) On March 21, 1967, Agency entered into a Loan and Grant Contract with the United States of illnerica under which the United States has agreed to make financial assistance/] in the form of loans and capital grants, available to the ,'; Agency to assist it in undertaking and carrying out the Redevelon- ment Plan. r i i ~ [ [ ) 693 (C) Pursuant to the Loan and Grant Contract, Agency has acquired or is in the process of acquiring certain parcels of real property located in the Project to be used as part of a commercial complex. Said parcels of real property (herein- after called t:he "Project Areall) are outlined in red on the map attached hereto as Exhibit lIA", and by this reference made a part hereof. (d) The proposed land use for the Project Area under the Redevelopment Plan requires, a~ong other things, the con- struction of a parking facility. The location of the parking facility is ~hovm on the map attached heret:o as Exhibit liB II , and by this reference made a part hereof. (e) The following exhibits are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof: (1) Exhibit IICII - Legal description of the parking area. (2) Exhibit IIDII - Legal description of the mall area. (3) Exhibit IIEII - Legal. description of property adjacent to the mall (hereinafter called the "Commercial Areall). (f) Agency proposes to develop and complete the parking facility in order to provide cost-free public parking to the users of the completed co~~ercial facility. Upon completion of said improvements, Agency desires to lease the property and improvements constituting said parking facility to City as hereinafter provided. (g) In order to insure the continuation of cOffi.:.l'.ercial expansion within its corporate limits and to provide facilities for public cost-free parking on the real property described in -2- 691+ Exhibit "C", attached hereto, City desires to lease the property and improvements constituting the parking facility from Agency as hereinafter provided. (h) On August 23, 1967, Agency entered into a ~. i -J Predisposition Agre~ment with John S~ Griffith & Co., a Cali- fornia corporation, and Curci-Turner Co., a general partnership, jointly and severally (hereinafter individually and collectively .referred to as the f1Developerfl), providing for the development by Developer of certain of the Commercial Area. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. Lease of Premises. a. Agency hereby leases to eity the real property described in Exhibit "e" attached hereto, and the improvements to be constructed thereon by Agency (hereinafter called "leased J premisesfl) on the terms and conditions hereinafter set. forth. b. The term of this Lease shall commence on that date following completion of said improvements when sufficient retail stores (including Harris Company, an Owner Participant) comprising a minimum of Six Hundred Thousand (600,000) square feet of building area situated upon the Con@ercial Area are completed and open for business, and shall continue for a period of fifty (50) years. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Lease, if the term of this Lease has not cowmenced by April 1, 1988, this Lease shall termin- ate as of such date without notice to or action of the parties ...., I ..~ t .....J -3- r I , I '--' r ...... [ -, 2. Rent. City agrees to pay to Agency an annual 695 rental of One Dollar ($1.00) for the leased premises. Said rental shall be payable in advance on the date the term of this Lease COMuences and on each anniversary thereof during the term of this Lease.. 3. TaxeS and Assessments. Throughout the term of this Lease, City agrees to pay all taxes and assessments of any nature whatsoever levied or assessed upon the leased pre-- mises, including, but not limited to, excise taxes, ad valorem and specific lien special assessments and gross receipts taxes. 4 . Use. a. It is .understood and agreed that the leased premises shall be maintained and used as a parking facility for the benefit of the shopping public patronizing the Conooercial Area, which facility shall be available to the public without charge, provided, hovlever, that City may adopt and enforce reasonable regulations with respect to such use, including parking time limits. b. City agrees that the use of the leased premises shall be restricted to uses consistent with the purposes speci- fied in subparagraph a. of this Paragraph. 5. Maintenance and Operation by City. City agrees to properly maintain the parking facility at its sole expense during the term of this Lease as follows: a. City shall maintain in good order, condition, repair and appearance, and shall operate the parking facility and all improvements thereon, including, but not limited to, -4-' 696 landscaping, sprinkling systenls, drainage systems, lighting, blacktopping, and doing all other things required for properly maintaining said parking facility during the term of this Lease. b. City shall maintain all sewer mains, water J mains, storage-drains, and other water and drainage lines underlying the parking facility during the term of this Lease. c. The standards of maintenance required under this Lease are set forth in the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "p" ,and by this reference made a par'c hereof. d. In the event City fails to perform the maintenance and operation of the parking facility as provided herein, Agency shall have the right to enter the leased premises and undertake or cause to be undertaken, such maintenance and operational activities. In such event, City shall reimburse Agency for all reasonable sums incurred by it for such maintenance and operational services. :J e. All operational and maintenance activities ~ undertaken by City for the parking facilit~, pursuant to this Lease, shall be carried on in such manner as not to unreasonably interfere with the operation of the COlnmercial Area. f. The parking facility shall be kept open for public us~ during all hours any comnlercial store~ening on the mall is kept open for business. 6. Termination. a. Unless prevented, delayed or hindered by means beyond the control of Agency, Agency agrees to complete all things required by it in order that the parking facility l -J -5- 697 may be under construction on or before December 1, 1969. If Agency fails to do so, city may terminate this Lease at r '-- any time thereafter, on ninety (90) days written notice to Agency, provi~ed that such notice shall be of no force or effect if, prlor to the expiration of such ninety {90) day period, the parking facility is under construction. 7. Extension of Time for Performance. If Agency is prevented, delayed or hindered from commencing the construction to be carried out on its part, as provided herein, or from pursuing such construction to completion after commencing the same, by a cause or causes beyond its reasonable control, the time for Agency's performance, as provided herein, shall be automatically e~tended for a period equal to that during which such condition continues to exist r- plus the length of time after such condition ceases to exist l- as shall be reasonably necessary to complete said construction. ..... 8. Schedule for Improvement of Parking Facility by Agency. In order to carry out its obligations hereunder, Agency shall do the following: a. Within one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date hereof, cause to be prepared by Victo~ Gruen Associates, Los Angeles, California, the architectural and engineering firm retained by Agency (hereinafter called the "Project Architect") schematic plans and specifications for the grading and construction of the parking facility, and cost estimates therefor. It is understood and agreed that r ! "- said plans and specifications will be subject to modifications and imp1e~entations upon completion of plans and specifications ~ . S?8 for overall improvements of the Project Area in order to achieve maximum coordination and economies of work. b. Obtain approval from all necessary parties J of the plans, specifications, and cost estimates referred to in Paragraph 8.a. hereof. c. Within ninety (90) days from the approval of said plans, specific~tions and cost estimates referred to in Paragraph 8.b. hereof, cause to be prepared by the Project Architect complete working drawing plans and specifica"tions for competitive bidding purposes and cause such plans and specifications to be submitted for bidding to a group of not less than four (4) qualified contractors, each of whom shall have been certified by City and Agency as a responsible contractor whose low bid shall be acceptable as r~presenting the fair cost of the work covered thereby. Thereafter, Agency shall J enter into a contract or contracts with the low bidder for carrying out the overall improvements in accordance with said plans and specifications. 9. Financing of the Parking Fac_ili ty. All costs involved in the construction of the parking facility shall be borne by Agency, pursuant to the Contract for Loan and Grant with the United States of America, with no costs for construction of same being borne by City, excepting, however, any tax alloca- tion bonds issued to cover the local share of the cost of said Redevelopment Project. 10. Exception and Reservation of Easement and Other Rishts. a. 1'.gency reserves to and for itself, its successor-, I .....J -7- 699 and assigns, including, but not limited to, Developer, and for the benefit of each and every portion of the Mall [ Area described in Exhibit "D" and the Commercial Area described in Exhibit "E", nonexclusive easements on, under and over the leased premises as follows: (1) Easements (hereinafter referred to as "installation easements") for: (a) The installation and maintenance of utilities as may be necessary or appropriate to provide utility service to the Commercial and Mall Areas. The term "u.tilities" as used herein includes, but is not limited to, works, lines and structures necessary to provide the following products or s.ervices to the Commercial and Mall Areas: water, smo'lers, drainage, electricity, gas, telephone, cable and closed circuit r '- television. (b) The purposes of erecting, construct- ing, maintaining and operating signs and other facilities to provide proper advertisement of and directions for business establishments located on the Commercial Area. (c) For access to and for the storage of materials and temporary buildings and struc.tures all in connection with the construction, maintenance, repair and reconstruction of the Commercial Area, provided the same does not materially impair the use of the parking facility as a public facility. (2) Easements for ingress and egress by [ any pedestrians, automobiles, trucks and any other vehicles to and from the Com.rnercial and Hall Areas, or any portion thereof, _ 8 - 700 by traversing the leased premises in any direction to or from any point on the COTIuuon boundary of the parking facility and the COMuercial and Mall Areas, or any portions thereof. b. The easement rights reserved hereunder include ] the power on the part of Agency, its successors and assigns, to grant licenses for the use of said easement rights to others including, but not limited to, the operators of business estab- lishments to be located in the COMuercial Area and their respec- tive employees, customers, patrons and other licensees. c. The easement rights reserved hereunder and any licen~es to be granted in connection therewith are subject to the following conditions: (I) No occupation under or use of any installation easement shall interfere unreasonably with the improvement and operation of the parking facility as proviqed (2) The rights of usage under said easements , ..., under and contemplated by this Lease. shall be nonexclusive, and in co~~on with the rights of usage on the part of each owner of or licensee under such rights and with all members of the public having the .right or privilege for like usage of the parking facility in accordance with the- terms and provisions of this Lease. 11. Damage by Casualty. a. City shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and maintained, in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Lease, a policy or 'policies of insurance against loss or damage to the improvements of the parking facility, resulting from fire, lightning, vandalism, I ] .-9- [ r I.- [ 7CJ~ "I malicious mischief and such other perils as are ordinarily included in "fire and extended coverage insurance/" plus earthquake damage endorsement and replacement cost endorsement/ providing coverage at 100% -of the replacement value of said improvemerits, as determined by a qualified insurance appraiser at least once every three years. It is agreed that said earthquake damage endorsement may include a usual and customary deductible clause for each loss. Proceeds of said insurance shall be applied towards the costs of repairs or reconstruction of the parking facility as provided herein. -b. In the event that during the first thirty-five (35) years of the term of this Lease the leased premises shall be ,damaged or destroyed by fire or other casualty/ City shall effect the repair or restoration therepf with all reasonable diligence; provided that City shall not be obligated"to expend in connection with such repair or restoration any SQms in c" excess of the proceeds of the insurance referred to in the preceding Paragrap~ ll.a.; provided/ however, that if the cost of such repair or restoration shall exceed the proceeds of said insurance/ and funds equal to the amount of such excess shall be tendered to City in order to pay such excess cost, then City shall effect said repair'or restoration of the leased premises, applying toward the cost thereof both the proceeds of said insurance and the funds so tendered. If any such damage or destruction shall occur after the thirty-fifth (35th) year of the term of this Lease/ City may effect such repair or restoration, but shall not be required to do so. '-10- 12. Liabilit~nsyran~~. a. City shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and maintained, in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Lease, a policy or policies of liability insurance protecting against liability for personal injury, death or property damage of any person or persons occasioned in or about the parking facility or any portion thereof. The liability under such insurance shall not be less than Fiv~ Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for anyone person injured or killed, not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for anyone accident; and not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) for property damage. Agency and Developer shall be named as additional insureds under such policies of insurance. b. Agency agrees to cause Developer to acquire agreements from its tenants indemnifying and saving Developer and City harmless from and against any and all claims arising from any act, omission, or negligence of such tenants, or their contractors, licensees, agents, servants, or employees, or arising from any accident, injury, or damage whatsoever caused to any person or property occurring in, or 'about the portion.of the Commercial Area occupied by such tenants, or any part thereof, and from and against all costs, expenses and liabilities incurred in or in connection with any such claim or proceeding brought thereon. c. City agrees to hold Agency and Developer and its tenants harmless from and against any and all claims 702 -11- J J ] r \- r I L r ! ....... 703 " arising from any act, omission or negligence of City or its agents, servants or employees, or arising from any accident, injury or damage whatsoever, caused to any person, or property, occurring in or about the parking facility. d~ City agrees to secure, and Agency agrees to cause Developer to secure, from the respective insurance carriers of City and Developer, a waiver of subrogation rights with respect to any claims that the respective insurers might have against either the City or Agency, or against the Developer or its tenants, as the case may be, because of the waiving party's negl~gence in causing losses. 13. Changes to Facility. City shall not make or permit to be made any changes or alterations to the parking facility which would change substantially the design, layout or arrangement of the parking facility for the uses and purposes - specified in Paragraph 4 of this Lease. 14. Access to Premises. City agrees that Agency, its agents and employees, and Developer, its agents, employees and designers shall at all times have the right to enter upon the parking facility for the purpose of inspection and for any purposes connected with Agency's or Developer's rights or obligations hereunder. 15. Transfer or Encumbrances. a. City shall have no right or power, either by voluntary act or by operation of law, to assign this Lease, or any of its rights hereunder, or to sublease the leased premises, or any portion or portions thereof, without -12- 70u the prior consent. of the Agency. b. City shall not cause, suffer or permit any lien to attaoh to the leased premises or improvements :J . of ~ixtures thereon, except the lien of taxes and assessments not delinquent. 16. Equitable Servitudes. City agrees that each and all of its covenants herein contained as respects the use, maintenance and operation of the leased premises are made for the benefit of each and every portion of the Co~nercial Area, and are made for its assigns and shall run with and bind the leasehold. It is intended that the agreements of City set forth in this Lease shall be construed as covenants and not as conditions and that, to the fullest extent legally possible, they shall run with the leasehold or constitute equitable servitudes as between the parking facility as the :l servient tenement and the Commercial Area and Mall Area, and each and every portion thereof, as the dominant tenement. 17. Other Lease. This Lease is made and executed in conjunction with that certain lease of even date herewith between the parties hereto with respect to the mall serving the Project Area. The parties understand and agree that the two instruments are to be performed and administered in conjunc- tion with each other. 18. Nondiscrimination. City covenants by and for itself and its assigns and all persons claiming under or through it, and this Lease is made and accepted upon and subject to ] -13- r-"" I '- [ [ the follmving conditions: 705 That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, national origin, or ancestry, in ,the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure, or enj'oyment of the premises herein leased nor shall the lessee itself, or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy, of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the premises herein leased. 19. Amendments. This Lease may be amended from time to time by \'lritten addendum attached hereto and executed bet'ween the parties, or their respective successors and assigns. It is recognized that certain ~mendments may be required by a lender or lenders as a condition to their assistance in financing of the overall improvements to be constructed by Agency. Agency and City agree that any such amendments which may be required by a proposed lender whose financing proposal is othenvise acceptable, which pertains to technical provisions of this Lease without involving any significant substantive change of the respective benefits and, burdens of the parties hereto, shall be accepted and agreed to by City and Agency within thirty (30) days of written notice of required amendment. 20. Notices. Any notices which will be required or may be given under this Lease shall be deemed sufficiently given if in writing and served in the following manner: If -14- 706 directed to Agency, by personal delivery to one of the officers of the Agency, or by sending .such notice by regis- tered or certified mail, addressed to t.he Redevelopment Age~cy of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 West Court Street, Room 308, San Bernardino, California 92401; if directed to the City, by personal delivery to one of the officers of the City, or by sending such notice by registered or certified mail, addressed to the City of San Bernardino, 426 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California 92401; if directed to the Developer, by personal delivery to one of the ,officers of the Developer, or by sending such notice by registered or certified mail addressed to John S. Griffith & Co., 8031 Stantor Avenue, Buena Park, California. 21. Binding Effect. Subject to the limitations on assig~ment contained herein, this Lease shall inure to and be binding upon the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 22. Invalidity. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or"phrase of this Lease, or the application thereof, to either party, or any other person or circlliustance is for any reason held invalid, it shall be deemed severable and the validity of the remainder of the Lease or the application of such provision to the other party, or to any person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby. 23. Severability. The paragr~ph headings contained -15- J J J ",...... ..... r L r--. ! L " 707 herein are for convenience and reference and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Lease. 24. Definition~ As used in Paragraph l.b. hereof, the, term "building area" refers to and includes the total number of square feet of all areas for exclusive use and occupancy of tenants, owners or other occupants of the Comn1ercial Area, measured from the exterior surface of exterior walls (and from the extensions thereof in the case of openings), including warehousing or storage areas, clerical or office areas, employee facilities, truck and delivery facilities, . mezzanine areas, and utility and mechanical equipment areas. EXECUTED at San Bernardino, California, this day of June, 1968. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA By Warner W. Hodgdon, Chairman By. P. W. Quinn, Jr., Secretary CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO By Al C. Ballard, Mayor By ATTEST: John A: Jerman City Administrator City Clerk 70S Approved as to Legal Form and Adequacy: J Bruce D. Varner Agency Counsel Ralph H. Prince City Attorney J .., J l ....,J -17- ) 709 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } S8. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO } [ , 1968, before me, the undersigned, On a ~otary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared WARNER W. HODGDON, known to me to be the Chairman, and P. W. QUINN, JR., knm'ln to me to be the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, a public body corporate and politic, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within Lease Agreement on behalf of said Agency, and acknowledged to me that such Agency executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said County and State r i....- STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO } , 1968, before me, the undersigned, On a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared AL C. BALLARD, known to me to be the Mayor, and JOHN A. JERMAN, known to me to be the City Administrator of the City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within Lease Agreement on behalf of said City and acknowledged to me that such Ci~y executed the same. ~ i l I , "- WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said County and State .-..,7-Js-'J,,>'">A<r.x><.~.._...~.. _.....I'o..,/..~."",;'-:c:r:.~"'"::::r.+.:..'--~"""""....."...I".."""...~_~"""...,._.....;.;- ....:;..-.-~,......,"'..,....'-"""';....; ...~. :"_';r_ ....~...':T~'VIr,~_"1:;;.."_-'::..':..:..... ..7:=.'_'''''':--;..' ..........-~.'"':J.,.a;.. ........-~'....;.....;.~.....~....-n:;-. '.~....::'-::-;; 1Y~ II.~: l::J. -:::'.: ~;:::.-;':'~'.:::' .0;;.0..;:. ":_~":,,~.':..-_~."\;.;.J. ~ _.,.,".."=.,.=.;.. -=-.-:;... _ :.._._:!~" ARROWHE'O --.----1----1 ... Z AYENUE ~~ ~-~}~- '3:_--\ ~ . 0 ~ t '{;j--l :; &~~~1-0 ~ ,,(..-;'''~j''' n r?fl- I ~, €..:J . U E A lD 0 '" B ROO K ~ r~;7r;:) ~ ." ~."~t;~--; --______--.J "' L o STREET \ '"'~;-Jtz~~I: ~~P~~(jl; I, :r-:--:l] J ;rOcSTF.EET l '; f:r:, ~(cf-' = ,1:1 .. ~-, .~L'!Cj:!) ~:~- r-i..-I>---- Q ~ ~~_r~ --t i -IJ~ h~-~--- !. ~\ t e 2: ~ ~"i~~p-=-~F.S~~ [;-~~~ e-=--1_ --~"'------L r-~ STOOO:RD :: . 0 Q=t2) -~J--' ('-' t&~l ~e~-~.19-~~[:~,;~ 1; ~'l ;;' . ld~.'__'~.::...G..::_:I ~ I I-~ i ~lZQJ ARE A .. ~?t..,;:;C') @:, 0t-~.'A!1 3:1~'~I]J 1 '~--~ 0\ t' J' 11 G) I EJ "@'I@.Ji;IJ" '" ~," PROJECT BOUNDARY T ~ J ~ 'V r'" PROPOSED NEW STREET T-l.~__;;:- ~F"'- " --'''---'~'''-''-'-~'~'', 2 ~tE SHEET "I '1"F~r"""~" ~., I"'~ 9'.- J/ I, ,. ~i-J"' ... I~ ,0 i@",0@1'01'Q1;......:rJ; 03 ~~8J" @I(: . L ".~ I ~:r-~ .,/~-'"- ''L JJ t ~ L -0"'M'i.::'ri'~[..l.'-~ ,~,( ),;'0 1 -..~ -~ f@- , Q)'" r@-', ! CD .'.....,u L__..L;__"'--Go_':'",-,,- ~-00~~/ .f'il--~' j Ji G)~ i..-....0-0.._ , 0' \J'>'!>i'_'. G' . // r-j ~ ; 0E-fi~ 0~iVI~ ~; 0 ..~~ 0 it [} y., I - iI \:J I' I r-------::-:-- ,... - --t~;: =n--~ , /c'_.5D _ ~ o [T1~ f.l'l~"-:V"-~'~- ; K!:lJ @:l / ~j (i'1~-'1 0 ir 1: 0 /~'oibJ /"/~'--'77/ 7"- /'77-- , .?~I":J"'-{ E..Llw->:'r-',~-0." ~/~r:-. (\)-+h--T-'T", " 1-' _~L ~-'"'r" '" .., --I I ; 0 P" "': B ..:>lL-_-', j,G 01@, [ILG_!L/ I' 0 ~- i 'r.' , '; I '"' t1 . , r ---~ (l)00d1 "" r.\ i--+------Y' l i?> I, B :q~ /1-; ('i'l .-1' I' : 0 '9..3 1-_,c,...J,-__,__ / '--=~': I ;c, ;=t-=':.~2' :; '? i ----~~- ;1 0 t:: /'2) '" 011 .:.}, .... "'t;\l :/t~-:.;- --II ~ II A,~I?\-I' __ . - ~ 1.......1.. -, '-.;, --- ~~ 'i-- ~-----:1~ ,,----=--------- z~ -----1 ----' c .-:'1 ~~ t.... / (t':"/ i. .. ;; a> '?" 't::.: z=-= ~ "':- :' 1:~) I r,r::":;,w':->oli':.lw-Y--;-K- s ~ _~-=j ~~7;--; .c-=---i /'r:-"l5~~~P ':;:: 310;~<J)~'8\ :.. G) _J ",,-.r.!!-;;;:- 1, G ': / ;;-0-' " S .1-':. : I ~ l!, - ~ (D l--~---=t/~~r--;;-; r---=:=-- ~~ .:r;--\~- I ,- . __..----1 _8 ~ t:__":_-'-7" ~--;..,5~ 'J:2 ~~: ~J, I I .. : 0 If ~) r;., ;~:..,~ jl) ~~';\:10 ,CD @IG10~ : ~..::~l. ~ tr' i;:.;: r ~ C:~~' It 'Ii S? ~~:- ~ ..., I II ., I", I - -o~-TJ j.--7r,-,~ T/-~ l7-0--/'---r--- - ,/ ,,/ // // ~/" / " ..1r,' / i '(l;,i.....-'...L'l/r" n',&7 r8' I~::';: r- -1.1? 1'\";"'1 ~~91!J I @If t:0 Al_~~-J/r-Q;~~"i:~,;' ~'0i1e'iGil ~'--- -~k--J,L_.~._.. tr. f.- .---- 0' 11---c-1Y--- f.-l~t~i~~~~~i,i:~{ I. // '~:~;~tJ;'~~~f~ t; \1..~ .,(f ,-.-.----r-'-----' ,,/G" !I__,~,,-,,,_~ t;\j :: ~~~~~r'R-. :L-l~)~0~-.-~:~j,;ff~X:~=-~~~~ l:-~_L9~ r;-..;\~;--;--;:-;-" jt ':v ~ ~::'Zf;_'<-i,G-,_:r.,-ij i-<~~J~I(~5 5f~~;~?~-;~ / }=]'--f=-t ~~iili;~f~:Efj3i r. - .,.....,. -. ",- i ! ~ .0'.1' '. " \.<) J _/ 'I G) ~!/I ,., .v I \.:......;.-1 r.; ~ ~:CF:,,:__;_:..;G.,J;-:.:-,-"-L..::.:J Y~;;::-;-<I.L"u_)_"':''_''''['). '. .' " \ \.' / /. .., / / i ~ lot STREt:T I _-"':' .'", " ,.' . (;"../,. : lI) H STREET 32' _ - , .. ...~I' \ I'::~ . , ~ _; , / ~ ---(f~;f-.;-~..~w~,A:~-r -;-7-~~\l \;; -~-:~ ~..~.:~-~~ ,-~:r~-)~-:-~i; I >-IC;01"l0...T;"J. ~~::_~ !-.-_u~JJj 1\~-;;/~\ ~_!~ .~J7~-- ~1~-:-'-<' ~ ~ t:~~{-~0)~~::~ ~- i'~> 1 &~y ~;~.. ~ .%. ~,- '\ ":. _~~.~ ~:.- ~ . 0 ~;...... -- ~ u~ z ... . _ r'" ~ .... ... r ~ ((. .'i ). VI CE t~ T I:.) P., ! 'e. 1-:" l.:o c-r T V PRO..lr::CT fJ. F~ E t. r~O.1 CA L I F. f~' 'lr ~}... t..f. " ...' >- .., OJ to >- ., lEGEND '" >- ~ /-T7-~ STREET TO BE VACATED PRO?Ef:TY LINE @ BL OCK NO. @ PARCEL NO, PU3L1C OWt,ERSHiP TO BE ACQUIRED PRiVATE O\'IN::RS~I? ~JOT TO BE ACQUiRED F ;ST.REET RED EVE LOP fIlE N T J ""'" I j AGENCY OF 'HE CITY OF SAN BEF~NARDINO J ." 'AN a~R~..\i=I:;INO C~'.J" T f CALlFOF~NIA 'O'i 9L.\Ci(ST(J,,!: 9tJrlCI'~ 361 NO A =t"0'" '1(J.;) ~'/~~:J:: TELEP"O'iE Tu..,. 9J~")1 JE R 0 ~1. E F S:: A R S. ~ , EXECUTI VE ):RE:,O'l L ---~~-'-~v-z- n;'~p-t.=-~:J,;-:;;::'~=_E~:,;-2 10050 0 100 2CO JCo- ~OO SCALE IN fEET ( AVE. Pi O. I ~ ~I ~ STReET l r I STREET I ~ o .. r----~-------=----~-----------------~--]---~:~'''8E~...1 L____:~~:~_~ ~:___~:___~___~~~~~~~~x -------_~~_~__~_~_.J EXHI BIT "A" I: : : : : : : <~)~ ~ _.::.::--=:::-=-...:..:.::.:.:===.:-=~ ~:.. ::::::: >,c:,. =;~ _:~~~~~~~~t-~] l_.., ," ... ,_. ......-...... ~':"'.'.!"-. .. .. .. .... n._".. . ."..... r J ;f'jUn ~ ~ ;;:i~~\"j j \ \ \ \ \11 J __ ........1...'..::....:...... .t,\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ !.:i~~;/i~T~l~~.~;j?~:~l~{TITI---_~ "':.:r't.-..,:;~:~~~'1~-~......::~:v\ · . . . . . .. .. -:-.:.. ~. . 0 . I . · . . G r : : : : : : . . .. : . : : : . c . . & :! ~;tf::i: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ; : : . . 0 . ~'_~~~~; i: : : : : : : : : : I . . 0 . , . . . . . . . . 0 . . . t....::.:.:_:.:.:-. 0 . . .. . . ~ . . of \ . . . . . . " . . 't . . . . . ~ . . . ':.-:::::::: ~ . . . . . . CI .. ft : : : : : : : . . : : : : : : : : : : :~iR~tJ: : : : : : : : : : . . . . . . . . . . t . . . . . . . . ....;~:::-.-.::-~.. . . . . . 0 . . ". \ 0. . .. t. . 0 0 . . . . a . . 0 . . . <..:_:~:~::~. . . 0 . . 4 . .. I ,. . . . . a . . . .. . . . . . . . . . ': ~:::-.:.:.:. . 0 . 0 . . . . "'I . . . . . . . . . .. .. 0 . C 3 . . . . f:.-;.:.::.: -::~. 0 . . . . . . . ... . . c . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. _ :_: -:::-:... . . , . . . . . ~ . I . · . · . . . ~ . · . ....0. . . . . (~'::.::::.:~:~. . . . . . . . . ~'t .. . . . . . . . . . e -4 . . . .. . . . . :::::-.....~-~ ~ . 0 . . . . . . ~t' . . . . . . . ~ .. .. ~.. . . . . . . . t.:'_~::':::~.. .. . . . .. . . . I . . . · . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,:,;:=,::=::';. · . · . . . . · '1 ~'~rllml!il\\!II.!I.:!!I--. ~~E+~?~1~~l!~f~,!~j:,~2~-=::J .......... ...... -................... 0\ . . III .. . o. . . .. ~ . II . . ., 3...~..a...,...... )...o.o.....~o...o. .""...~....s.~"ooo.. >...,5t......!'....~ ~...-............. ..at2.. o....~.. t....,..........~. ~ . . . .. . . . . . . ..f . . . 't .....?~~.J;Q--l .. ........0....,.. .1.... : :. : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ) : : : : ~....,. 11.. ... 'I..' . J...., ').....".. ...."...1"...f!. ~ .. . . .. . . . .. . . . . ft . . 8. l . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . , . . .. . 0:._ ....,'\....0..'..1 .. . .. . . . . . .. . . ... . . . oJ' I..~..... ........;:: _ .....'-.f 1...~~~.-.. 1,.:';:.:..'.(;"": ,:_~~-,;,"-"',,-, ".,!. Cl Z ;2 <:!. <t C>. J J 1- r- I I I I I ..: , .... I .-" J 'f ........... ! I I ~ Cl :z I ~ C< <: c. I J ~ ::i T ~ ___J ~ ---.. .J) Cl :z ~ '" <:: ... J ::i 711 p" ....oj :.: Ct; <: o. ...~ -- ~ ~,'.~ .JI ,!:::,..-~ r:-::1 c:~ e ~:~: ..~.'"" [...'".f ,--:-, ...,;:~. .., L':l c::) ~I ..-.~:-'" . ~n_" f;'~~ If;; ... .... Cl ~ ~ t>< <: 0. ..., C l" ... ~;:!:.I ."; 't. \:., ~ .;..-:.;" J LO,,-'"J l:~~ ~J L'.~ (.;.' i~~~-~ ::> . F"'~ r,-:J i..'_ .~.. L~_l l......., r....; ['" ".... (,,:~ C';' Cl z l~}:.j S;J.:-_'"~, ~,.-~ .... 0;: ~ t.~.. C~: J J . , t~~. t r., '-'"~. ~ 0" C:. I::~'~ tC:~ , --. s' ~ ~;fC~ f' ....:.; le, "'. c: L~ (~ """ ~. . , ,." t~ . Cl Cl 0 0 ." 0 -' t ~ Z l') -' c::) t- O 0 c::l -' ... -' ~ -' -' ~ <ol 0 :l: c' .~ ::> ::> ... '1 :: to) 0 Z V Co< 0 0 ---~ c?' ~ t- V -. ( €J. .... ..... ~ V Z ." - -' :J <: Z <'. <~ 0 .,-.-, 0 <( ~ l:":'.~ ~) Z I.U 0 ::> u. "- Z <( .. 1'1 "- t- O <: :t ;. ~; ~ ---f .....-1 ~.i;l b":l "7/1 I::'.::J 1:' ~ ~ -1 ,''1. r~..l 1.00'1 \::1 i"-, I k-j i':-:'. ..1 ~.,~l : /1 -,-- f:.:..., ..~ .~: . '-. I...:.... :j,,.,,.I) 712 EXHIBIT "C" (PARKING AREA) ,., J LEGAL DESCRtPTION: All that portion of Blocks 10, II, 12, 21, 22 and 23, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, Page I, Records of_said County, shown as D.L: Parking and 1.,.1.,. Parking on Exhibit "B" on this Lease Agreement. ] ...., ......; EXHIBIT "ClI 713. EXHIBIT "D" (HALL AREA) r L LEGAL DESCRIPTION: AIl.that portion of Blocks 11, 12, 21 and 22 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Boo~ 7 of Maps, Page I, Records of said County, shown as public mall and open court on Exhibit "B" of this Lease Agreement. "...... , ~ ,-. \-" EXHIBIT "D" 714 EXHIBIT "E" (COIvlHEI-ZCIAL AREA) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that portion of Blocks 11, 12, 21 and 22 CITY OF SAN BEIU"l"ARDINO, i1) the City of San Berna)~dino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, Page 1, Records of said County, shown as tenant building, Andreson Building, Harris Building and WoohlOrth Building, on Exhibit "B" of this Lease Agreement. ~ EXHIBIT "E" ,., j , ....J ..., ...,.J STANDARDS OF MAINTENANCE - PARKING FACILITY 715 1. The surface of the parking facility and sidewalks ".... shall be maintai~ed level, smooth and evenly covered with ~: \"... the type of surfacing material originally installed thereon, or such substitute thereof as shall be in all respects equal thereto in quality, appearance and durability. 2. All trash and rubbish containers located in the parking facility shall,be ernptied daily and shall be washed at intervals sufficient to maintain the same in a clean condition. 3. All landscaping shall be properly maintained in accordance with standards of maintenance, replanting and replacement, recommended by the Project landscaping architects and approved by Agency. ".- 4. All hard-surfaced markings shall be inspected \...... at regular intervals and prom~tly repainted as the same shall become unsightly or indistinct from wear and tear or other cause. 5. All sewer catch basins shall be cleaned on a schedule sufficient to maintain all sewer lines in a free-flowing condition and all mechanical equipment related to sto~m and sanitary sewer facilities shall be regularly inspected and kept in proper working order. 6. All asphalt paving shall be inspected at regular intervals and maintained in a first-class condition. 7. All stairways and/or escalators shall be: ,..., (a) swept and washed at intervals sufficient to maintain \,..., . EXHIBIT "F" 716 the same in a clean conditioni (b) inspected at regular intervals and (c) promptly repaired upon the occurrence of any irregularities or worn portions thereof. 8. AII- parking facility amenities, benches, and in- ., J stitutional, directional, traffic and other signs shall ! -i be inspected at regular intervals, maintained in a clean and attractive surface condition and promptly repaired or replaced upon the occurrence of any defects or irregularities thereto. 9. All lamps shall be inspected at regular intervals and all lamps shall be promptly replaced when no longer properly functioning. 10. The improvements on and to the parking facility shall be repaired or replaced with materials, apparatus and facilities'of quality at least equal" to the quality of the materials, apparatus and facilities repaired or replaced. ., 11. . i The parking facility shall be illuminated in such ~a~ as the parties shall determine at least during such hours of -darkness as any of the stores shall be open for business to the public and for a reasonable period thereafter in order to permit safe egress from the cOIlliLlercial complex by its users, and shall also be illuminated during such hours of darkness and in such manner as will afford reasonable security for the stores. 12. All parties shall use their best efforts to arrange with local police authorities to (a) patrol the parking facility at regular intervals, and (b) supervise traffic direction at entrances and exits to the commercial complex ~ ....-J . -2- 717' during such hours and periods as traffic conditions would reasonably require such supervision. r L 13. Th~ City and Developer shall use their best efforts to require users of the commercial complex to comply with all regulations with respect to the parking facili ty, including, but: not by '.vay of limitation, posted speed limits, directional markings and parking stall markings. r I.- ,..., '-' -3- 7l~ ,~ (Hall) LEASE AGREEr.IEWe THIS LEASE AGREEfv1EN'r (hereinafter called "Lease") is made and entered into this ___ day of June, 1968, by and J betvleen the CITY OF SAN BERNA-R.DINO, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (hereinafter called "City") and the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, a public body corporate and politic organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (hereinafter called "Agency"). Recitals: This Lease is made with reference to the following facts: (a) In furtherance of the objectives of the Cow~unity Redevelopment Law of the State of California, City has undertaken a program for the clearance and redevelopment of slum and blighte<-' areas within its City limits. Under this program, City adopted -J an Official Redevelopment Plan (hereinafter c'&lled the "Redevelop- ment Plan") for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79 (hereinafter called the "Project"), and vested Agency with the responsibility for implementation and consQ~mation of the Project. The Redevelopment Plan for the Project was adopted by City on February 23, 1965, by Ordinance No. 2649. (b) On March 21, 1967, Agency entered into a Loan and Grant Contract \'li th the United states of America under which the United States has agreed to make financial assistance, in the form of loans and capital grants, av~ilable to the ..... Agency to assist it in undertaking and carrying out the Redevelop I ment Plan. -.J 719 (c) Pursuant to the Loan and Grant Contract, Agency has acquired or is in the process of acquiring certain parcels [ of real property located in the Project to be used as part of a conunercialcomplex. Said parcels of real propert.y (herein- after called the "Project Area") are outlined in red on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "A", and by this reference made a part hereof. (d) The proposed land use for the Project Area under the Redevelopment Plan requires, among other things, the con-. struction of a mall, a portion of which is open, and a portion of which is enclosed and covered. (Hereinafter, all references to "the mall" include both the enclosed and covered and the open portions of the mall.) The location of the mall is shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit -"B", and by this reference ,....... I made a part hereof. \....... (e) The following exhibits are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof: .. (1) Exhibit "c" - Legal description of the mall. (2) Exhibit "D" - Legal description of the enclosed and covered portion of the mall. (3) Exhibit "E" - Legal description of the open portion of the mall. (4) Exhibit "p" - Legal description of property adjacent to the mall (hereinafter called the "Conunercia.l Area") . (f) Agency proposes to develop and complete the mall, including, with respect to the enclosed and covered portion ",... '-' -2- 720 of the mall, necessary heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems. Upon completion of said improvements, Agency desires to lease the prop~rty and improvements constituting the mall .., . ....,J to City as hereinafter provided. (g) In order to insure the continuation of commer- cial expansion within its corporate limits City desires to lease said property and improvements constituting the mall from Agency. (h) On August 23, 1967, Agency entered into a Predisposition Agreement with John S. Griffith & Co., a Cali- fornia corporation, and Curci-Turner Co., a general partnership, jointly and severally (hereinafter individually and collectively referred to as the "Developer"), providing for the development by Developer. of certain of the Commercial Area. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises., .~ and agreements herein contained, the parties hereto agree as -i follows: 1. Lease of Premises. a. Agency hereby leases to City the real property described in Exhibit "C" attached hereto, and the improvements to be constructed thereon by Agency (hereinafter called "leased premises") on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. b. The term of this Lease shall commence on that date follm.ling completion of said improvements ~tlhen sufficient retail stores (including Harris Company, an O\'ffier Participant) comprising a minimluil of Six Hundred Thousand (600,000) square feet of building area situated upon the Commercial Area are -- ......" -3- 721 cqmpleted and open for business, and shall continue for a period of fifty (50) years. Notwithstanding anything to the r'" j I """""'" contrary contained in this Lease, if the term of this Lease has not commenced by April 1, 1988, this Lease shall termin- ate as o~ such date without notice to or action of the parties. 2. Rent. City agrees to pay to Agency an annual rental of One Dollar ($l~OO) for the leased premises. Said rental shall be payable in advance on the date the term of this Lease commences and on each anniversary thereof during the term of this Lease. 3. . TaXes and Assessments. Throughout the term of this Lease, City agrees to pay all taxes and assessments of any nature whatsoever levied or assessed upon the leased pre- mises, including, but not limited to, excise taxes, ad valorem ,....- and specific lien special assessments and gross receipts taxes. 4. Use. - a. It is understood and agreed that the leased premises shall be maintained and used primarily for the benefit of the shopping public patronizing the Commercial Area. Such uses shall include walking and resting areas and shall be consistent with generally acceptable standards of health, safety apd convenience for the shopping public. b~ City agrees that the use of the leased premises shall be restricted to uses consistent with the purposes spec i- fied in subparagraph a. of this Paragra~h, provided, however, that City shall be allowed to use the leased premises for "".. appropriate civic uses, subject to approval of Agency, which ....... A 722 approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. c. Nothing contained herein shall preclude the use of the mall by Developer for promotion of the Co~nercial Area, including use of the mall for promotional events and ,., displays offered free of charge to the shopping public. \I ?l ....; 5. Maintena.nce an<:l Operati?n by City. City agrees to properly maintain the mall at its sole expense during the term of this Lease as follows: ? Ci.ty shall maintain in good order, condition, repair and appearance, and shall operate the mall and all improvements thereon, including, but not limited to, maintaining the roof and interior and exterior of the mall, and heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems thereof; maintaining the public escalators; maintaining the water and electrical facilities serving the mall; illuminating the enclosed portion of the mall; washing windows; maintaining landscaping, floors ., and columns; and doing all other things required for properly .....J maintaining the mall during the term of this Lease; and shall pay all utility charges in connection therewith. b. City shall maintain all sewer mains, water mains, storage drains, and other water and drainage lines underlying the mall"during the term of this Lease. c. The standards of maintenance required under this Lease are set forth in the schedule attached hereto as Exhibit "Gu, and by this reference made a part hereof. -.;. d. In the event City fails to perform the ~ -....I -5- 723 maintenance and operation of the mall as provided herein, Agency shall have the right to enter the leased premises and undertake r I I..- or cause to be undertaken, such maintenance and operational activities. In such event, City shall reimburse Agency for all reasonable sums incurred by it for such maintenance and operational services. e. All operational and maintenance activities undertaken by City for the mall, pursuant to this Lease, shall be carried on in such manner as not to unreasonably interfere with the operation of the Commercial Area. f. The enclosed mall shall be kept open for public use during all hours any store in the Co~~ercial Area opening on said enclosed mall is open for business. 6. Termination. "....... i a. Unless prevented, delayed or hindered by \",.... means beyond the control of Agency, Agency agrees to complete all things required by it in order that the mall may be under construction not later than December 1, 1969. If Agency fails to do so, City may terminate this Lease at any time thereafter, on ninety (90) days written notice to Agency, provided that such notice shall be of no force or effect if, prior to the expiration of such ninety (90) day period, the mall is under construction. 7. . Extension of Time for Performance. If Agency is prevented i delayed or hindered from connnencing the . construction to be carried out on its part, as provided ,.... '-- """ -6- 724- , ' herein, or from pursuing such construcJcion to completion after co~uencing the same, by a cause ,or causes beyond its reasonable control, the time for Agency's performance, as provided herein, shall be automatically extended for a period equal to that'during which such condition continues to exist J plus the length of time after such condition ceases to exist as shall be reasonably necessary to complete said construction. 8. 'Schedule for Improvement of Mall by Agency. In order to carry out its obligations hereunder, Agency shall' do the following: a. Within one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date hereof, cause to be prepared by Victor Gruen Associates, Los Angeles, California, the architectural and engineering firm retained by Agency (hereinafter called the "Project Architect") schematic plans and specifications for the grading and construction of the mall, and cost estimates , :..J therefor. It is understood and agreed that said plans and specifications will be subject to modifications and implemen- tations upon completion of. plans and specifications for overall improvements of the Project Area in order to achieve maximum coordination and economies of work. b. Obtain approval from all necessary parties of the plans, specifications, and cost estimates referred to in Paragraph 8.a. hereof. c. Within ninety (90) days from the approval of said plansr specifications and cost estimates referred to in Paragraph 8.b. hereof, cause to be prepared by the Project -, 4 << ....J I . -7- 725: Architect complete working drawing plans and specifications for competitive bidding purposes and cause such plans and r I \..- specifications to- be submitted for bidding to a group of not less than four .(4) qualified contractors, each of whom shall have been certified by City and Agency as a responsible contractor whose low bid shall be acceptable as representing the fair cost of the work covered thereby. Thereafter, Agency shall enter into a contract or contracts with the low bidder for carrying out the overall improvements in accordance with said plans and specifications. 9. Finan<:?ingof the Mall. All costs involved in the construction of the mall shall be borne by Agency, pursuant to the Contract for Loan and Grant with the United states of America, with no costs for construction of same "......., being borne by City, excepting, however, any tax allocation ""'""" bonds issued to cover the local share of the cost of said Redevelopment Project. 10. Exception and Reservation of Easement "and Other Rights. a. Agency reserves to and for itself, its succes- sors ~nd assigns, including, but not limited to, Developer, and for the benefit of each and every portion of the Commercial Area described in Exhibit "F", nonexclusive easements on, under and over the leased premises as follows: (1) Easements (hereinafter referred to as "installation easements") for: (a) The installation and maintenance of ,-. "'-'- -.8- 726 utilities as may be necessary or appropriate to provide utility service to the Commercial Area. The term "utilities" as used herein includes, Qut is not limited to, works, lines and structurJ to the necessary to provide the following products or services Commercial Area: water, sewers, drainage, electricity, gas, telephone and cable or closed circuit television. (b) The purposes of erecting, construct- ing, maintaining and operating signs and other facilities to provide proper advertisement of and directions for business establishments located on the Commercial Area. (c) For access to and for the storage of materials and temporary buildings and structures all in connection with the construction, maintenance, repair and reconstruction of the Commercial Area, provided the same does not materially impair the use of the mall as a public facility. .~ (2) Easements for ingress and egress by any ~~ ..... pedestrians, and/or maintenance or service units and personnel to and from the Commercial Area, or any portion thereof, by traversing the leased premises in any direction to or from any point on the common boundary of the mall and the Commercial Area, or any portion thereof. (3) Easements in, to, over, under and across the leased premises for the construction, reconstruction, erection and maintenance on, over, across and under the leased premises of footings, supports, canopies, roof and building overhangs, signing, lighting and other similar appurtenances ...... ....." -9- ""- 727' to the respective' stores in the Commercial Area. The locations of such appurtenances will be shown on the plans referred to 'in Paragraph 8.a. hereof, and are subject to approval of City, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. b. The easement rights reserved hereunder include the power on the part of Agency, its successors and assigns, to grant licenses for the use of said easement rights to others including, but not limited to, the operators of business estab- lishments to be located in the Cownercial Area and their respec- tive employees, customers, patrons and other licensees. c.The easement rights reserved hereunder and any licenses to be granted in connection therewith are subject to the following conditions: (1) No occupation under or use of any installation easement shall interfere utireasonably with the improvement and operation of the mall as provided under and contemplated by this Lease. (2) The rights of usage under said easements shall be nonexclusive, and in common with the rights of usage on the part of each owner of or licensee under such rights and with all members of the public having the right or privilege for like usage of the mall in accordance with the terms and provisions of this Lease. 11. Damage by Casualty. a. City shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and maintained, in full force and effect at r \..,... "..-, . ",.... -- -10- 7'28 all.times during ~he term of this Lease, a policy or policies of insurance against loss or damage to the improve- ments of the malf, resulting from fire, lightning, vandalism, malicious mischief and such other perils as are ordinarily ., ~ Ii -J included in "fire and extended coverage insurance," plus earth- quake damage endorsement and replacement cost endorsement, providing coverage at 100% of the replacement value of said improvements,.as determined by a qualified insurance appraiser at least once every three years. It is agreed that said earthquake damage endorsement may include a usual and customary deductible clause for each loss. Proceeds of said insurance shall be applied t~wards the costs of repairs or reconstruction of the mall as provided herein. b. In the event that during the first thirty-five ~ (35) years of the term of this Lease the leased premises shall be damaged or destroyed by fire or other casualty, City shall ....., effect the repair or restoration thereof with all reasonable diligence; provided that City shall not be obligated to expend in connection with SDch repair or restoration any sums in excess of the proceeds of the insurance referred to in the preceding paragraph "ll.a.; provided, howevei, that if the cost of such repair or restoration shall exceed the proceeds of said insurance, and funds equal to the amount of such excess sha.ll be tendered to City in order to pay such excess cost I then City shall effect said repair or restoration of the leased premises, applying toward the cost thereof both the ~ proceeds of said insurance and the funds so tendered. If any ........ , , ""- 729 such damage or destruction shall occur after the thirty-fifth (35th) year of the term of this Lease~ City may effect such repair or restoration, but shall not be required to do so. 12. Liability Insurance. a. City shall procure and maintain, or cause to be procured and maintained, in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Lease, a policy or policies of liability insurance protecting against liability for personal injury, death or property damage of any person or persons occasioned in or about the mall or any portion thereof. "The liability under such insurance shall not be less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00) for anyone person injured or killed, not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) for anyone accident, and not less than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) for property damage. Agency and Developer shall be named as additional insureds under such policies of insurance. [ ,,- b. Agency agrees to cause Developer to acquire agreements from its tenants indemnifying and saving Developer and City harmless from and against any and all claims arising from any act, omission, or negligence of such tenants, or their contractors, licensees, agents, servants, or employees, or arising from any accident, injury, or damage whatsoever caused to any person or property occurring in, or about the portion of the Co~~ercial Area occupied by such tenants, or any part thereof, and from and against all costs, expenses ",.... -...... -12- 730 and liabilities incurred in or in connection with any such claim or proceeding brought thereon. c. City agrees to hold Agency and Developer ] and its tenants harmless from and against any and all claims arising from any act, omission or negligence of City or its agents, servants or employees, or arising from any accident, injury or damage \vhatsoever, caused to any person, or property, occurring in or about the mall. d. City agrees to secure, and Agency agrees to cause Developer to secure, from the respective insurance carriers of City and Developer, a waiver of subrogation rights with respect to any claims that the respective insurers might have against either the City or Agency, or against the Developer or its tenants, as the case may be, because of the waiving' party's negligence in causing losses. 13. Changes to Facility. City shall not make or ., II ~ permit to be made any changes or alterations to the mall which would change substantially the design, layout or arrangement of the mall for the uses and purposes specified in Paragraph 4 of this Lease. 14. Access to Premises. City agrees that Agency, its agents and employees, and Developer, its agents, employees and designers shall at all times have the right to enter upon the mall for the purpose of inspection and for any purposes connected with Agency's or Developer's rights or obligations hereunder. --- - -13- 731 15. Mechanical and Electrical and Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning Systems. City agrees to maintain and operate r . \.- the heating, ventilation and air-conditioning systems and illum- ination systems for the mall, to meet reasonable standards of comfort and illumination within the design criteria, as set forth in the plans and specifications by the Project Architect. 16. Name Signs. a~ City agrees that it will cooperate with Agency with respect to the approval of placement in the mall of appropriate signs by tenants of the Comnlercial Area. The placing of a~l such signs shall be subject to approval of Agency, and once erected such signs will not be changed without ".- name to be given the mall, and on the placing of an appropriate ...... commemorative plaque naming the mall in a conspicuous place at or near the mall entrance. Such name and commemorative plaque shall not be changed by City during the term of this Lease without prior approval of Agency. 17. Transferor Encumbrances. a. City shall have no right or power, either by voluntary act or by operation of law, to assign this Lease, or any of its rights hereunder, or to sublease the leased premises or any portion or portions thereof without the prior consent of the Agency. ".... ....... -14- 722 b. City shall not cause, suffer or permit any lien to attach to the leased premises or improvements of fixtures thereon, except the lien of taxes and assessments - , ....J not delinguent~ 18. Eguitable Servitudes. City agrees that each and all of its covenants herein contained as respects the use, maintenance and operation of the leased premises are made for the benefit of each and every portion of the Conunercial Area, and are made for its assigns and shall run with and bind the leasehold. It is intended that the agreements of City set forth in this Lease shall be construed as covenants and not as conditions and that, to the fullest exten~ legally possible, they shall run with the leasehold or constitute equi table servitudes as bebveen the mall as the servient tenement and the ComInercial Area and each and every portion ~ thereof, as the dominant tenement. ..... 19. . Other Lease. This Lease is made and executed in conjunction with that certain lease of even date herewith between the parties hereto with respect to the parking area serving the Project Area. The parties understand and agree that the two instruments are to be performed and administered in ?onjunction with each other. 20. Nondiscrimination. City covenants by and for itself and its assigns and all persons claiming under or through it, and this Lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: That there shall be ~ .....", -15- 733 no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, national r I I..- origin, or ancestry, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein leased nor shall the lessee itself, or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use, or occupancy, of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the premises herein leased. 21. Amendments. This Lease may be amended from time to time by written addendum attached hereto and executed between the parties, or their respective successors and assigns. It is recognized that certain amendments may be ",-... required by a lender or lenders as a condition to their assistance in financing of the overall improvements to be \0...- constructed by Agency. Agency and City agree that any such amendments \-Thich may be required by a proposed lender whose financing proposal is otherwise acceptable, which pertains to technical provisions of this Lease without involving any significant substantive change of the respective benefits and burgens of the parties hereto, shall be accepted and agreed to by City and Agency within thirty (30) days of written notice .' of required amendment. 22. Notices. Any notices which will be required or may be given under this Lease shall be deemed sufficiently "... . ..... -16- 734~ . given if in writirig and served in the following manner: If directed to Agency, by personal delivery to one of the tered or certified mail, addressed to the Redevelopment .., ~ ;j .".,.J officers of the Agency, or by sending such notice by regis- Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, 323 West Court Street, Room 308, San Bernardino, California 92401; if directed to the City, by personal delivery to one of the officers of the City, or by sending such notice by -registered or certified mail, addressed to the City of San Bernardino, 426 West Third Street, San Bernardino, California 92401; if directed to the Developer, by personal delivery to one of the officers of the Developer, or by- sending such notice by registered or certified mail addressed to John S. Griffith & Co., 8031 Stantor Avenue, Buena Park, California. ... 23. Binding Effec~. Subject to the limitations ..... on assignment contained herein, this Lease shall inure to and be binding upon the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. 24. Invalidity. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Lease, or the application thereof, to either party, or any other person or circumstance is for any reason held invalid, it shall be deemed severable and the validity of the remainder of the Lease or the application of such provision to the other party, or to any person or circumstance, shall not be affected thereby. ..... ....." -17- Severability. The paragraph headings contained 735 .25. - herein are for convenience and reference and are not intended to define or limit the scope of any provision of this Lease. [ 26. Definition. As used in Paragraph l.b. hereof, the term "buil~ing area" refers to and includes the total number of square feet of all areas for exclusive use and occupancy of tenants, Oi.vners or other occupants of the Commercial Area, measured from the exterior surface of exterior walls (and from the extensions thereof in the case of openings), including warehousing or storage areas, clerical or office areas, employee facilities, truck and delivery facilities, mezzanine areas, and utility and mechanical equipment areas. EXECUTED at San Bernardino, California, this day of June, 1968. ,,- REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ......- By Warner w~ Hodgdon, Chairman By P. W~ Quinn, Jr., Secretary CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO By Al C. Ballard, Mayor ATTEST: By City Clerk John A. Jerman City Administrator l""""" Approved as to Legal Form and Adequacy: --- Bruce D. Varner Agency Counsel RalDh H. Prince -18- 736 STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } SSe COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) , 1968, before me, the undersigned, J On a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared WARNER W. HODGDON, known to me to be the Chairman, and P. W. QUINN, JR., known to me to be the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, a public body corporate and politic, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within Lease Agreement on behalf of said Agency, and acknowledged to me that such Agency executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and for said ~ County and State STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ...J On , 1968, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for .3aid County and State, personally appeared AL C. BALLA~D, known to me to be the Mayor, and JOHN A. JE~JAN, k~own to me to be the City Administrator of the City of San Bernardino, a municipal corporation, and known to me to be the persons who executed the within Lease Agreement on behalf of said City and acknowledged to me that such City executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. ~ ...... Notary Public in and for said County and State ~I__-.l ;L :; AVE.NUE [: ~~~rr- '0 .04 '0j r.J:I,'C0 0 r"U] ~ 6:-~- 'M E A ID 0 W B' ROO k SCAlEE'N FEET ~,,1n::> J :: - 82> t::i;t;; -; , ., L o STREET _\ "" [';J"'~2G~~ ~fr~~~ii~'l @+-'I, ; [~RI J ;[_0 C STTF.EET ~~ f; lfu;i::l ~~f- e-__ . .. :::,_ - I!,'" M "",jQ ~'_iV._ -~.. .. ',r=-r-,.,-F--, _J ,,,, j D, 0 ..., :"\l~~:."t} 1.--" ii 3...~~) --~} r~ ~ ~ e % It: ~.L-::=-r2C::-rJ:;: :_~ .l~ I N .. 1=0- ~-:-,-.!i . Q ~ .... L - ., ~.-.,---,.~.,.~~ ,'_ -. .-----:::~8 ~ _STODDA~D AVE. ~ ; 0 ~ @, -~ . tJr~~~"j:tfrt~2'1 ; ~~~ . . ,. "., u r~~~~~ @ il ~l-';'~J @ ell@l~ d] e : 0 ?tJ L.~~_,,_....J L-.'-L....." "'~~ ~ ~L ~ \!~9 .. {!J ",. l!I E STREET "'-r;.?,i~1 I :I e', ,1/ i ,. I" r n'" I~ r- 10 1@11@~~0 8:~"--J.' ~; ~ 0 ILJ~C' @.L ~0 ~~~~' ."~<f"' - ~ f ; ~ ~~"E~~7 . 0~LP-.V ii ~ J: .. -~g.:. : 0 0~~ -i'~' ~ -:1 /1-~r--% 0-"L-. ; ~~~~c.;, .1' CD ~l...tiJ - . 0 rTIrg:[~' : Gf:.:-j (!) . ~u 0.n /iG: ~I~i 0 i )i CD / "'------:g' 7r:r~: ~~;~/ / /:7,,7777--- -~, '7~liti~""'--r TV r61r'r"l"T'I~- . 0@-"-: '0 ~s'~ F=il G 101 i !fJ@1 = ~~/ I: 0 [i' ~ 0TI0~<i 0 . 0' r-s--I -, 0 ,1}J;1 /G-+--13 ~t 'i I . '. \ '9' t;-T-' '---"-5-7--..-"0) --"----1' iG ,.'~=~~::(!) f~-~ j' 0 [':0~ d J . (2) ... @ I r; '4l ' (8 S /'. 0 I . M--'i---::::......----1~l;-=---i.'- ~ ~ a-:".L~1 "'<<:"1':: ' -0::::-'--'~ " ~. 0 r; _ It;,; .,-~ (7)-:"'::\ :1", ~: 01 p-i,......,..;\~w-, 10)--''')-, w- r-", I ~~'~---'~~'":;o;~--= =-.; .., ~-------<!;E> it/ I 1.:,1 ci).~_.t;:r.'""i ,;--, /1' 0 --,~.,jG,9GI3:i9, '~;~-j;--s ;:_~;( ~ ~~g ';;J '[01 jl '-] ; 0 I 0 ~ l'@01"'9_"I,'",,!i'--'l':G'I\ ,0~;l)1-~'-tl1~,,1~ r.-~'"110i ~0 i~01@iOII(l'l (l).. ,~,.~,j ~" '" -"'7"~ .~/. 7' ~~, - I.. ,I. -,1 . / 7 / -'7!3~/ .- /.0/'>-'-',7' - - - . ~~" / .. ,/ri) II: ~';, i "rJ/r-T{j-&-; 1, 0 !;;;~~ r '-'J.?-=ii'l '"'' I g 01- '0 C>~I--=--:i /r:----=-;;~-::..-<:, ~/ l!'00'("':j;! fi(1'< _ -lL L L 'i).--:( C.'~--.J I:'''' 0 I: LL!J r;'~~"., - I ~ "?\ :-=-=-_:-0 I y' @ !fi?;T,\,:1 ,;g::1;:t-: ~~';~,' ~,:. />t1'::f~;'~"~ "rl G STRtET F:-6:~"1 ... i I r- - -7"::'\-- <> /' '3\ 1-1Q;/.od - '.: l,ll r;- ~I r--_'.V-=--""" '.7) ,.....- II' ! ",--r;:.'='--- :. --~---:=--'f[: ~-- :lf1-~07--I~:"A~';::~~~": ~'I:ll h0-' "6 ' t--,,--- ---):: 'I 0 f/"'; .'-~- ~0D' '~~S~-<,i ..~~i~::gi~j. . '~,': 0 ~ f.:;"~~;5~~];j ': :V' "~'. ;:L---.r_~-{ ~--~ i::"':-')" i' -I' " :1 L-.---fq Q;~...~.. Ii if'" )\ /1 : I r~_' -....:.....- I?-- "'"::\~::--_~ 1:~J 40]~~:'1~ /=.:"'...t ~,; ~~-.Jy '3: ~! ~:i7 .~: .::,.~1.0);! ~_~______,-~./_~__\ \ ,W-----r---...;-Y ~__~_.."\j-/---_/-~J ".. H STRC:ET I ....'"": ,/ fi' " \' // / .,- t"i'/ J ~~ Ii $T~cET ~{'''''.J.- -.f-~'.."b .~~-;'-1'---;:;--:-"-\J" \ 1:-.-' .-"'~I.:r. "-~::"".C.'~",~i)..-:"q 'r,:~T~.-'f":' .......:..-~~./:0 f...,-;- (V r ,': ~.; ...."';'-; -....1"":;" ".::;""-/.:-:3 -\..- l~ c"", "'''.....'c..J --' .-. ~ '-<---r" '.,',,....- , -'I'~ h ~ ~ ~~~ ; - ~ I . ~-:-1:-'- ---J 'f--:!~-~)-_!" j~!-\'9.~_;-;-io-~'".?" ~- ~ .-:'-;-;-~-I':\----:::~.'" ,.!Jul" -f)~"' .. p_.1~"~ ~ .. l:'~.~'1 '.,. r;::- .~ - 'I ~ .'- .. ., ~- -~---- ~J ,~ ___~ x .......... r.;. r. ____~.::r Io.J ~ ':t ~ 0 ,.. p~ ,~ " ~ v ':. z ... P\"- .....,.. N fP(t'If)."f VI [ 737' ARROViHEAO CE N 'I" H t\ L C'I T Y ~..:--\-:?--~~~ PROJECT AREA Cft.LI F. [{ h 7 D LEGEND PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED NEW STREET / / . / //--L. STREET TO BE VACATED @ PROPERTY LINE BLOCK NO. PARCEL NO. PUBLIC OWNERSHIP @ ,- ! TO BE ACQUIR.ED PRIVATE OWNERSHIP NOT TO BE ACQUIRED ~ , .STREET RED EVE LOP r,j E NT ""'" 1 j j AGENCY OF Tl'iE. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO l~ S"-N BfR:'..~Cf::"O C~'.n~T r CALIFORNIA '06 9t.:':1<5TO':. 3'JIL01~G 362 NO AF'UtOw",,~:'O ~..~~UE TElEPI'iO~E l~.~t. 93~~! r-- JEROME F SO: ~RS, J, ..... EXECUTI'JE :)I? E::1 OR NO.1 .. '" '" '" .. .. ~?2::~~;~~-:~-;c~ 100 ~o 0 100 200 300 <1100 .. .. .. '" .. .. ::: .. .. J._..l I ~ f STREET J c .. ., L --PR m RTY :' ~ ~~~~~ ~Z~~~~" ~~r-- ~~~=--~ 64 I 1<'Y1..n RTl' 11 All 738 ..: '" -! 'V r- ...::::::> . < . . . . , " : .: 1-' --- .'- - ~-~_m_ --: / ~-L :::::::: i. . =-~~~~ :':"-~-:::=.=-:-::.~ .~-:..:.. !/ ~':"~~l';:: ~~:;~';~:-l :>>~~n {~ nT~ of l 1,- :.~-- :..:. ~: ~...... ~ 'f :.: ,.---:.::"....... e1i , !,.~ . . . 6 . . e ....._..~ ..~ G . . . . . 0 > ~~: ~. t.... t. r>~:;::':~::;I' ~.... c. .~~ .~ tl . . .. I~. __u_ "l"' 0 C . ~ . . ~ f!. : : : : : ; : 1<~i;;i.i:~;;:i'c.~:;:'~'~"'~';)~1 -~ ._.__..H............_n._.__..... ..,... :: : : : : : : j':H~:{{c~:.;:.~:.,hc:~~.~:~:.:;~ _____'--. _~~.=~.~.~._.._.u..} ~...... I..':.:.:'.'....:.j......... '~( . . . . c c c . . . . 0 , . c .. .. . . ~_::~:~~;- c. . (> .. . . , t . II;~ t., . 0 . C . ~ c C tI " Cl ., COIL; ::_~:~ ." 0 .. . . <: 0 ., .. t~ · . .. C' 0 .. .IC . . t 9 , . CO . . 1. ':::~.:' t- . . .. C C . .. . ..~. . . . PO, ~ ~.. . . ~ Q 4l . . 0 e '. --,,:'~:'l' . t e .. . Co . II It'": " . l' . . . . .. .. $ C' " .. . ( G . .. 0 {~:::;~;: . 0 e . . . Co . .. <: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : }-~ =::'(: H: : : : : : : : : ;. I . . . ~ c ,. . . . . .. " 0 . . .. ~~:..;::~::!. . .. . .. ~ . . . ~!! .. t 'C. ~... C1.. e.."... ~~:~_:.:-..::.:;". eo. c e". <:~! : : ~ : : : : : : : ; : : : : : : : : 1~~;;-~~~-~: : : : : : : : : :~ I ;_:.~- -, -~. , .. I . . . · . c . . e . . . .. . . . . . . :,.:~:i:~: I~ C t'. C Cl . . ; t.i..1 " . e - .. c . . - (I. . . . . : : : : : ~_'...:..:;:..:.:~ 1- .. . . 0 " . . . t:; I : : : : : : : : : : : ; : : · . . . . ~~}j~~~m: : : : : : : : : :~! .. . . . . . c . . . .. . . . . . . '0 0 ; ~:-:.:::~ I. . . . II 0 C . . c ~ I " . · 0 . . c c . . . ~ . . . , . . . ~-.:~;:t::lc- . . . 0 0 . . . ~~ ~~'~~'~u.~~:;:;:-;i~;~;:~:;::~:;,:~:sm~\j: : : : : : : : : :i I ---- 'i~.:c~:.:~:.-::-::I'}E~m:?}~]: : : : : : : : : :il . . . . . " .. , _::-'--:~;~;;~~~-,}. . . " .. CI C .. . c. ; : : : : : : ,~fWR~t:~J: : : : : : : : : : j . :::: : : :l~~~~~~f;J=:_:c-;~;:;~lLc; ----~ . · .. . . . .: :-;.:;.:.;~-,~:;:~~:.:-;:~--;:;:.~~:::;=-:-~~~:~:..;.:;-;-:1 _..;-~.~;..:-:-~:I..~ :;~::-:~.,~::.,;~~::..::~.:.~:i. '.;. ~::~'.~_:_ i______ I.. .. .. ..0 . . . . .. . . . . ~ " ~! 1". .. . . . G . . . . .. . . .. e 'i: :::::::: .:::::::j' " 9' . 0 . 0.. c . 0.. C'... .e 1 . . . .. . . .0 .. C . 6 . . . 0 . .;._ i.& e . " 0 << So 0 C' . . . . . c . . i ~...............'o.-. ,.......,........1 ....e.............'j ..........0......\ : : : : : : : : : : : : ;.: : : : }':.~:'-:~, · .. . ... . . .<<.. . . . . . .,f. .. . _, · . - . . . . - .. . . .. . . . . .j ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ". . g . . . . . . . · .. . . . . . . . . · . ~4 . . . . t . . . ... . .. It . . . . a . . .. i . . . . ~ ) . . . 4l . .. e .. . . . . . . . 0- I. _-=-...~_.~"So... . .... ,'li........,.. J ...:..:..~~:~:~~-~.:.. : ~_~-'-.:_.~-1___~ C> :Y. Y. r" < .. l<: C~ < n. ..i ..i J _i C> Z Yo .', ~ ..i :> Cl z ~ '" < 0. J Cl !E ~ ce <I: 0. :> J _i ~. Il . ~-------- ~ '~ -------------~ c::::-.:::) ~ S) -. oJ < :: " Z o -, ::> Co) z o '^ "J ;,.t ... l.~ Cl ... <", .... Co: ::> o u r.t !'~j ;~l 1"1 :'\ tll t\11 .,.~ ~- Z < Z '" t- Co Z < u Z UJ "- o -. c-:: ::. 0. b-~' \,',/i h't l,:'j I~~: -1 < ., i .". ;~ ..- ~...,:') E :: ~"-..I r;';l V.-" f""" I .;:~:.:<~ EXETBl'l' "n" c::.-= 2<> . C> o oJ en c- O oJ c:.l o V :r: t- '" o :c .~ -, '" Co< Co: < :r o o > ... f---'; ~--: i'-; i:-~-'~; ",,-.__.t. ttl ( /'- c ,- , ( . J~ .,. '" .r:: (. "II r;: N " --". r. c;. I,. C. E', i' .' " L - r: r.... I' (; ... l~ " .- .... f f ~ l- e .. c r .. ,. . C L ( [ ... .. c r __'~ ( '...... , 739. ,..... I I \- EXHIBIT IIClI (HALL AREA - OPEN and CLOSED) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that portion of Blocks 11) 12) 21 and 22 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO) in the City of San Bernardino) County of San Bernardino) State of California) as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps) Page 1) R?cords of said County) sho"\.m as public mall and open court on Exhibit "BlI of this Lease Agreement. '" , ,..""".. "'-- ,.... -- EXHIBIt "ClI 71+0 EXHIBIT II DII ... i -J (ENCLOSED HALL) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: J: . . ;, ". All that portion of Blocks 11, 12, 21 and 22 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per' plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, Page 1, Records of said County, shm'7l1 as public mall on Exhibit II B" of this Lease Agreement. .... .... ..... ......;. EXHIBI'r liD II EXHI BIT "Ell [ (OPEN HALL AREA) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 71+1. All that portion of Blocks 12 and 21 CITY OF SA.N BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino) County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps) Page 1, Records of said County) shown as open Court on Exhibit "BlI of this Lease Agreement. ,..- ........ r-' i " '-- EXHI BIT "E" '--- 7', " '+L EXHIBIT "Ftl (CONHERCIAL AREA) ~ , J LEGAL DESCRIPTION: All that portion of Blocks II, 12, 21 and 22 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino) State of California) as per plat recorded in Book 7 of Maps, Page 1, Records of said Cou~ty) shown as tenant building, Andreson Building, Harris Building and WoohlOrth Building, on Exhibit "B" of this Lease Agreement. -' .., I jf!j ......... ,. .., ....... EXHIBIT "}''' . 7'+3. S'J~ANDARDS OF MAINTENANCE - r-lALL AREA [ 1. All papers, debris, filth and refuse shall be removed from the mall, and tiled or terrazzo areas shall be washed or thoroughly swept as required. All sweeping and washing shall be at intervals before any store in the adjoining commercial area shall be open for business to the public. 2. All trash and rubbish containers located in the mall shall be emptied daily and shall be washed at intervals sufficient to maintain the same in a clean con- dition. ,-. I...- r- ..... EXHIBIT "G". 14l~ be cleaned at intervals sufficient to maintain the same ii1 a clean condition. 7. All surface utility facilities servicing the mall area, including, but not by way of limitation, ., ~ '1;l ....J hose bibbs, s-tandpipes, sprinklers and domestic water lines, shall be inspected at regular intervals and promptly repaired or replaced, as the occasion may require, upon the occurrence of any defect or malfunctioning. 8. All mall amenities, benches, and institutional, directional, traffic and other signs shall be inspected at regular intervals, maintained in a clean and attractive surface condition and promptly repaired or replaced upon the occurrence of any defects or irregularities thereto. 9. All lamps shall be inspected at regular intervals and all lamps shall be promptly replaced when no longer properly functioning. .. :j 01 10. The improvements on and to the mall shall be ~ repaired or replaced with materials, apparatus and facilities of quality at least equal to the quality of the materials, apparatus and facillties repaired or replaced. 11. The mall shall be illuminated at least during such hours of darkness as any of the stores in the adjoining cOffinlercial area shall be open for business to the public and for a reasonable period thereafter in order to permi-t safe egress from the conunercial area by its users, and shall also be illuminated during such hours of darkness and in .... I - -2-- 7':"5 such manper as will afford reasonable security for the stores. 12. The parties shall use their best efforts to [ arrange with local police authoritiei to (a) patrol the mall at regular intervals, and (b) supervise traffic direction at ~ntrances and exits to the COIDsrrercial complex during such hours and periods as traffic conditions would reasonably require such supervision. 13. The City and Developer shall use their best efforts to require users of the commercial complex to comply with all regulations with respect to the mall. 14. with respect to all mechanical and electrical facilities and systems serving the mall, including, but not by way of limitation, the lighting facilities, vertical transportation facilities, heating, ventilating and cooling "..... I systems, and actuated or manually operated doors, City shall i I '-- (a) inspect the same at regular intervals, (b) promptly repair the same upon the occurrence of any failure, defect or malfunctioning, and (c) as respects the said heating, ventilating and cooling systems, maintain the same so as to comply with the performance specifications therefor. 15. All surfaces of the mall which are painted or otherwise finished shall be cleaned at regular intervals and repainted or otherwise refinished at least once during every five-year period, and the ceiling of the mall shall be regularly cleaned, and painted or repainted as necessary, giving particular attention to the areas surrounding the r '-- diffusers. -3- 746 r- \Jr"... MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD JUNE 6, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:10 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Webster, Wein and Wilson Agency Members Absent: Austin Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel, and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Postponed Regular Meeting of May 16, 1968 held May 20, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of May 20, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin ",...... The Minutes of the Special Meeting of May 27, 1968 were presented for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson approving the Minutes of May 27, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin '- REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he had nothing to report at this time. OFFER TO PURCHASE, REUSE PARCEL 87, CALIF. R-IO: The Chairman stated that the Agency has received three offers to purchase Reuse Parcel No. 87, Calif. R-IO. -- (1) Westbrook Van & Storage proposes a 12,000 sq. ft. warehouse. (2) Burck's Printing proposes a 14,000 sq. ft. printing plant and (3) Barnum and Flagg proposes a 40,000 sq. ft. stationary supply and print- ing office. Westbrook and Bureks propose the normal 60 day escrow according to all terms and conditions of the Agreement of Sale. Barnum and Flagg desire to purchase 87 and also a portion of 81 directly behind 87. Because of the construction of the Warm Creek Channel on Parcel 81, they propose to buy 87 now with a 60 day escrow, and desire to enter into a Predisposition Agreement on Parcel 81 for approximately 6 months, with the customary 5% deposit. Their building will be constructed on 87 and 81 will be used for parking. r- Mr. Hodgdon stated that this land is on Arrowhead Avenue and very desirable for vehicular as well as walk in traffic. His recommendation was to reject the offer of Westbrook Van and Storage on the basis that this land is far too valua- ble for retail use, to construct a warehouse. All members agreed. \Jr"... 747 Mr. Hodgdon stated that the Agency has the responsibility and an obliga- tion to future relocatees of the Central City Project. Also the size of the buildings must be considered in determining which Offer to accept. The Members were concerned about the time of performance of Barnum and Flagg. The Members raised the question that if the Agency was unable to purchase Barnum and Flaggs parcel in the Central City Project during the six months Pnedisposition Agreement period of Parcel 81, would they still be in a posi- tion to buy the property in R-79. Mr. Wein felt that using a portion of Parcel 81 for parking purposes would lessen the desirability of the remain- ing parcels on that block on "D" Street. ,., ....J After much discussion regarding the two offers, motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson to accept the offer of Burcks Printing for Reuse Parcel No. 87. The motion was denied by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein and Wilson Noes: Webster and Hodgdon Abstention: None Absent: Austin Motion was made by chase submitted by following vote, to Abstention: None Wilson and seconded by Wein to reject the Offer to Pur- Westbrook Van & Storage. The motion was carried by the wit: Ayes: Hilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Absent: Austin Mr. Hodgdon suggested that the matter be tabled until the next Regular Meet- ing, June 20, 1968, in order that Barnum and Flagg may schedule a definite date for start of construction to accompany their Offer. After further dis- cussion, Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to table the Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel No. 87 until the next Regular Meeting in order that Barnum and Flagg can submit a schedule of start of construction to accompany their Offer. If at any time before June 20, 1968, it is agree- able to all parties, a Special Meeting will be scheduled. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin ~ .... RESOLUTIONS AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION PROCEEDINGS, R-79: The following resolutions were introduced:. RESOLUTION NO. 715 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JE~T AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 15, Parcels 2 and 3 - Arden Farms) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area NO.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re- ...... ......,; [ ,...... i L ,... \..- 748 parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation "of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 15, Parcels 2 and 3 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. i\ RESOLUTION NO. 716 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 14, Parcels 2, 3, and 4 Lewis Snyder) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardin6 on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of exist- ing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area NO.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 14, Parcels 2, 3, and 4 being more particularly described 71+9 in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 717 .... J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 12, Parcel 5, Enola Wright) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. J BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnating counsel, Allen b. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and pur- poses specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 12, Parcel 5 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 718 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 12, Parcels 1, 2, and 3, Robert and Josephine M. Lewis) ~ --J 750 r '-' BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utili- ties essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. '-- BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 12, Parcels 1, 2, and 3 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. r-"" RESOLUTION NO. 719 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 11, Parcels 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Robert and Josephine M. Lewis) r- ~ BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widen- ing, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in ac- cordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. '-- 751 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. ,.. 1 ~ ....,J BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79 and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of Califor- nia, and is designated as Block 11, Parcels 1,2,3,4 and 5 being more parti- cularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 720 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 9, Parcels 4 and 5 - Budd and Hyatt) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as ' follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the pre- paration of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelop- ment Plan. .., ..".,JIi BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the 'Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, .., .......J 752 f""" I t \..... and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California and is designated as Block 9, Parcels 4 and 5 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 721 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 9, Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 11, Mabel Aucutt) ""'- BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utili- ties essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in ac- cordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. ,..... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby autho- rized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 9 Parcels 1, 2, 3, and 11 being more particularly described 'in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 722 ",... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 7, Parcels 7, 13 and 14 - Salvation Army) \,..., 753 BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on Feb- ruary 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parcelization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the pre- paration of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelop- ment Plan. ... ~ ~ 1~ ..." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and pur- poses specified above. .... BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79 and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 7, Parcels 7, 13, and 14 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. ..... RESOLUTION NO. 723 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (Block 7, Parcels 5 and 15 - Art Parlas) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or re- moval of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandon- ment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-par- celization of the area rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real ~ --' 753a [ property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counselt Allen B. Greshamt and its Executive Directort Peter W. Quinnt Jr't be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of Californiat in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this AgencYt for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No. It Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of Californiat and is designated as Block 7, Parcels 5 and 15 being more particularly described in, the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. RESOLUTION NO. 724 [ RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIAt AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO. It CALIF. R-79 (Block 7t Parcels 17 and 18 - Hiram Smith) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardinot California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To Develop the area known as Central City Project Area No. It in the City of San Bernardinot Californiat pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24t 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649t and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buiddings and structures thereont the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street wideningt street installation or other street improvementst re-parcelization of the areat rough grading of the acquired landt installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plant and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counselt Allen B. Greshamt and its Executive Directort Peter W. Quinnt Jr., be and they are hereby autho- rized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency, in' accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Com- munity Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. 753b BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79 and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 7, Parcels 17 and 18 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. J Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolutions 715 through 724. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin DEMOLITION CONTRACT, UNIT NO.9, R-79: Bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.9, R-79 were opened May 31, 1968. The lowest qualified bidder was Roger Roy General Engineering in the amount of $14,800. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 725 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGINEERING FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 9, CALIF. R-79 , ....iI WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Con- tract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America pro- viding for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.9, Calif. R-79, for the demolition and site clear- ance of ce~tain areas in the project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Bernardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of gene~al circulation, in the County of San Bernardino on the 9th and 16th of May, 1968, and an Affidavit show- ing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m., on the 31st day of May, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above specified, and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Roger Roy General Engineering, in the sum of $14,800; and .., I ,; ....... 754 [ WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Roger Roy General Engineer- ing is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Roger Roy General Engineering, for the sum of $14,800 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the said Contract for Unit No.9, Demolition and Site Clearance, on behalf of the Agency. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 725. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin DEMOLITION CONTRACT, UNIT NO. 10, R-79: r i- Bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 10, R-79, were opened June 5, 1968. The lowest qualified bidder was Roger Rcy General Engineering in the amount of $6,400. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 726 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGINEERING FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEAR- ANCE, UNIT NO. 10, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has under date of March 21, 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its €entral City Pro- ject No.1, Calif. R-79 [ 755 THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK ,., j .... ...... ..., ..... 756 r L- under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended and pursuant to that Con- tract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 10, Calif. R-79, for the demolition and site clearance of certain areas in the project and said Contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS, an invitation for bids therefore was duly published in the San Ber- nardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino on the 18th and 27th of May, 1968, and an Affidavit showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and WHEREAS, said invitation called for the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m., on the 5th day of June, 1968, at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street, San Bernardino, California; and WHEREAS, a number of such bids were received at the time and place above spe- cified, and said bids were opened and read aloud, the lowest qualified bid was offered by Roger Roy General Engineering, in the sum of $6,400; ,..-. WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that said Roger Roy General Engineering is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid. ""- NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Roger Roy General Engi- neering, for the sum of $6,400 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Unit No. 10, Demolition and Site Clearance, on behalf of the Agency. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 726. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin CHANGE ORDER NO.1, DEMOLITION CONTRACT, UNIT NO.9, CALIF. R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 727 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGINEERING, DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO.9, CALIF. R-79 "".. -..., 757 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Reso- lution No. 725 designated Roger Roy General Engineering as Contractor for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.9, Calif. R-79; and ~ J ...., WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor as follows: All materials, including trees, foundations, and paving are to be removed from the sites. All sites to be rough graded to meet surrounding proper- ties. The work will require 30 calendar days. Block 8, Parcel 8 and Block 8, Parcel 9 The Contract price for such work shall not exceed the sum of $2,850.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Contract by and between the Agency and Roger Roy General Engineering be amended, to include the services and cost as hereinabove specified, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute said Change Order BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an equitable adjustment of the contract price and the contract time will be incorporated into the change order to cover the work above specified. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded' by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 727. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon None: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin ~ ..... CHANGE ORDER NO.1, DEMOLITION CONTRACT, UNIT NO. 10, CALIF. R-79: The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 728 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGINEERING, DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 10, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution 726 designated Roger Roy General Engineering as Contractor for Demolition and Clearance, Unit No. 10, Calif. R-79; and . WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor as follows: All materials, including trees, foundations, and paving are to be removed from the site. Site to be rough graded to meet surrounding pro- perties. The work will require 15 calendar days - Block 20, Parcel 2. .... ......." 758 r- The Contract price for such work shall not exceed the sum of $1,500.00 ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Contract by and between the Agency and Roger Roy General Engineering, be amended, to include the services and costs as hereinabove specified, and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute said Change Order. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an equitable adjustment of the contract price and the contract time will be incorporated into the change order to cover the work above specified. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 728. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin DEMOLITION CONTRACT, BLOCK 5, PARCEL 9, R-10: Two bids were submitted for the demolition and site clearance of Block 5, Parcel 9, R-10. Askey & Pollard - $825.00. Presco Building Materials - $480.00 the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 729 ",..-. - RESOLUTION OF THE. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 5, Parcel 9 WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS MEADOWBROOK PROJECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24,1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-10 under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract ~he Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 9 in the Meadowbrook Project Area; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $480.00. ,... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development, said Bid of Presco Building Materials in the sum of $480.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 9, on behalf of the Agency. '-- 759 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson Resolution No. 729. The motion was carried by wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon None Absent: Austin authorizing the adoption of the following vote, to Noes: None Abstention: .. ..... DEMOLITION, BLOCK 5, PARCEL 10, R-IO: Two bids were received for the Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 10, R-IO. Askey & Pollard - $325.00. Presco Bui1dtng Materials - $370.00. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 730 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 5, PARCEL 10, WITH H. G. ASKEY & B. R. POLLARD MEADOWBROOK PROJECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and .... WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 10 in the Meadowbrook Project Area; and ....- WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that H. G. Askey & B. R. Pollard is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $325.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said Bid of H. G. Askey and B. R. Pollard in the sum of $325.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 10, on behalf of the Agency. Motion was made by Resolution No. 730. Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Absent: Austin Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None DEMOLITION, BLOCK 5, PARCEL 17, R-IO: Two bids received were: Askey & Pollard - $795.00 The following resolution was introduced: Presco Building - $465.00 ...... ......"., 760 r L RESOLUTION NO. 731 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 5, PARCEL 17, WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS MEADOWBROOK PROJECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 17 in the Meadowbrook Project Area; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $465.00. ........ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the Depart- ment of Housing and Urban Development, said Bid of Presco Building Materials in the sum of $465.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 17, on behalf of the Agency. ,....... Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 731. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin CONSTRUCTION COSTS COMPLETED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO: The Chairman requested authorization to pay the City of San Bernardino for the construction work performed by tQem in the Meadowbrook and Central City Projects. The Following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 732 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, OF $2,604.80, FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS WITHIN THE MEADOW- BROOK PROJECT, PERFORMED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ".... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, in order to prevent vehicular traffic from crossing Redevelopment cleared property, authorized the necessary replacement of driveway cuts, curbs, gutters and sidewalks in the Meadowbrook Project Area to be accomplished by the City of San Bernardino; and ...... 761' WHEREAS, said services have been accomplished for a total sum of $2,604.80. .., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency Members do hereby authorize the payment to the City of San Bernardino of $2,604.80 for construction costs within the Meadowbrook Project performed by the City of San Bernardino. ....,j Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution 732. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin RESOLUTION NO. 733 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PAYMENT TO THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, OF $471.65, FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS WITHIN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, PERFORMED BY THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, in order to prevent vehicular traffic from crossing Redevelopment cleared property, autho- rized the necessary replacement of driveway cuts, curbs, gutters and sidewalks in the Central City Project Area to be accomplished by the City of San Ber- nardino; and .., WHEREAS, said services have been accomplished for a total sum of $471.65; .... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency Members do hereby authorize the payment to the City of San Bernardino of $471.65 for construction costs within the Central City Project, performed by the City of San Bernardino. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 733. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, We in and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin VICTOR GRUEN GRAPHICS PROGRAM, CALIF. R-79: The Chairman stated that Victor Gruen Associates have proposed to perform the Graphics Program for the Central City Project for the amount of $7,500.00. This program would design the signs for the Central City Project. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 734 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO,CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN AND ASSOCIATES FOR PRO- FESSIONAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE GRAPHICS PROGRAM FOR CALIF. R-79 ~ - 782 [ WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79, with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and WHEREAS, pur>suant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking cer- tain activities necessar>y for the execution of said Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage a Contractor to render cer- tain technical advice and assistance in connection with the Graphics Program for Central City Project, R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency determined at a Regular Meeting held June 6, 1968, at 4:00 p.m., in Room 305 of the Office of the Redevelopment Agency, that the proposal of Victor Gruen was in the best interest of the project area and the public NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal of Victor Gruen Associates be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary of said Agency are hereby instr>ucted and authorized to execute said Contract for professional services in connection with the Graphics Program for Calif. R-79, in the amount of $7,500.00. \i",..- Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution 734. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, and Hod,gdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin ~ RATIFICATION OF AGENCY ACTIONS OF MARCH 14, 1968: MI". Hodgdon explained that the Agency has authorized by motion the contracts with O'Melveny & Myers for legal opinions regarding bonding of Meadowbrook and Central City and also opinions regardipg the lease agreements with the City of San Ber>nar>dino. This action should, hav~ been by resolution. In order to ratify the Agency's actions, the following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 735 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING AGENCyl S ACTION OF MARCH 14, 1968, AUTHORIZING CONTRACT WITH O'MELVENY & MYERS - BONDING, R-IO WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernandino, California, at a Special Meeting held March 14, 1968, authorized the Chairman and Secretary to contract the services of O'Melveny & Myers for legal opinions regarding bonding of the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO; and ",,- WHEREAS, the Agency desires to ratify their actions of March 14, 1968, by Resolution; ...... 763 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Agency's motion of March 14, 1968, authorizing the execution of a Contract with O'Melveny & Myers for legal opinions regarding bonding of the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO is hereby approved. .... ......., Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 735. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin RESOLUTION NO. 736 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING AGENCY'S ACTION OF MARCH 14, 1968, AUTHORIZING CONTRACT WITH O'MELVENY & MYERS - BONDING R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, at a Special Meeting held March 14, 1968, authorized the Chairman and Secre- tary to contract the services of O'Melveny & Myers for legal opinions regarding bonding of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and . WHEREAS, the Agency desires to ratify their actions of March 14, 1968, by Resolution. ... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency's motion of March 14, 1968, authorizing the execution of a contract with O'Melveny & Myers for legal opinions regarding bonding of the Central City Project, Calif. R-79, is hereby approved. """"'" Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 736. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin RESOLUTION NO. 737 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, RATIFYING THE AGENCY'S ACTION OF MARCH 14, 1968, AUTHORIZING CONTRACT WITH O'MELVENY & MYERS - VALIDITY OF LEASE AGREEMENTS FOR PARKING AND MALL, R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, at a Special Meeting held March 14, 1968, authorized the Chairman and Secre- tary to contract the services of O'Melveny & Myers for legal opinions regard- ing the validity of Agency and' City obligations under the mall and parking leases; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to ratify their action of March 14, 1968 by Resolution. ~ - 764 [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Agency's motion of March 14, 1968, authorizing the execution of a contract with O'Melveny & Myers for legal opinion regarding the validity of Agency and City obligations under the mall and parking leases, is hereby approved. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 737. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin REQUEST FROM THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, BLOCK 2, PARCEL 23, LEASE AGREEMENTS. The Chairman requested authorization to lease to the City of San Bernardino the northwest corner of 3rd and "D" Streets, Block 2, Parcel 23. The City wishes to use this land for parking for the City Hall employees and visitors. This pro- perty has not been acquired yet. We must acquire it and then demolish the building thereon. After discussion, the following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 738 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDiNO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF BLOCK 2, PARCEL 23, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 r ! L WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 665, adopted April 18, 1968, resolved that the acquisition of property in the Central City Project, easterly of "E" Street must be authorized by Board approval; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to acquire Block 2, Parcel 23 in the Central City Project - the Northwest Corner of 3rd and "D" Streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Acquisition of Block 2, Parcel 23 is hereby approved in accordance with Resolution No. 665, adopted April 18, 1968. Motion was made by We in and seconded by Wilson Resolution No. 738. The motion was carried by Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Austin authorizing the adoption of the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Abstention: None Absent: RESOLUTION NO. 739 ",... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, FOR RENTAL OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON NORTHWEST CORNER OF 3RD AND "D" STREETS, R-79 \...- 765 WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has requested use of property located on the Northwest Corner of 3rd and "D" Streets, Central City Project, for parking purposes; and ~ :;i ~i -' WHEREAS, the Agency Members have determined that said request of the City of San Bernardino shall be authorized, subject to the acquisition and demolition of the property thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that pursuant to the purchase of Block 2 Parcel 23 and the demolition thereof, the Chairman and Secretary are authorized and directed to enter into a lease agreement with the City of San Bernardino for said property for parking purposes, at a rental of $1.00 per year. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by We in authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 739. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin VICTOR ADDING MACHINE: A request was submitted from the Accounting Department for the purchase of a new Victor Adding Machine. The old adding machine will be used as a trade- in. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the trade-in of the Victor Adding Machine No. 1242641 on a new model. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin .., .~ ~ ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein to adjourn the meeting at 5:25 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin ~ --' 766 ".... t I l.... MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 20th DAY OF JUNE, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Wein, Webster, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 6, 1968 .were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Webster requested that the Resolutions in the future indicate the date of adoption. Mr. Hodgdon stated that this would be done. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of the Minutes of June 6, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ,-. EXPENDITURES: '-- The expenditures for the month of May, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the approval of the expenditures for the month of May, 1968 as submitted. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. OFFER TO PURCHASE REUSE PARCEL NO. 87, CALIF. R-IO: Mr. William Leonard, realtor for Barnum and Flagg, stated that Barnum and Flagg cannot set a definite date for start of construction, if they were to purchase the property. Mr. Hodgdon stated that it would be better for the Agency to move ahead on a firm foundation, such as the offer of Burck's Printing, rather than accept the offer of Barnum and Flagg, although their development would be of a larger size. The assessed valuation of both Barnum and Flagg and Burck's Printing was shown to the Members. After furhter discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 740 ,.... ......., RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO. 87 '70 BURCK'S PRINTING 767 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell p~perty located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and --- ..... WHEREAS, said property was advertized in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8, and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of the Agency held June 20, 1968, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase and related documents submitted by Burck's Printing hereinafter called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain real property described as: Parcel No. 1 BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Lot 20, Block D of the Peppers Subdivision, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, page 8, Records of said County, said point also being in the West line of Arrowhead Avenue, 82.50 feet wide; thence North, 149.937 feet along said West line to its intersection with the North line of Lot 22 of the said Subdivision; thence South 89059'21" West, 285.00 feet along said North line to its intersection with the East line of Warm Creek Channel, 30.00 feet wide; thence South, 149.937 feet along said West line to its intersection with the South line of Lot 20 of the said Subdivision; thence North 89059'17" East 285.00 feet along said South line to the POINT OF BEGINNING ~ ..... Parcel No. 2 A strip of land 15.00 feet wide, lying along and parallel with the South line of said Lot 23, Block D of the Peppers Subdivision, as per Official Records of the said City of San Bernardino, Book 1643 page 244. WHEREAS, at said Regular Meeting of the Agency, held June 20, 1968, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land are in order and in conformance with the rules and regulations as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the disposition of Project land. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase and related documents, including the Statement for Public Disclosure of said Redeveloper are satisfactory; that negotiation is the appropriate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redeveloper pos- sesses the qualifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price THIRTY TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS ($32,000.00) is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, and is not less than the resale price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. ... ....." 768 [ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted and the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale, and all other documents necessary or convenient to carry out the terms of the Agreement. Adopted June 20, 1968 , Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 740, authorizing the sale of Reuse Parcel No. 87 to Burck's Printing, based on a 60 day escrow, 30 days thereafter construction is to start, and 12 months thereafter construction will be completed. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 741 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE REFUND OF OPTION DEPOSIT TO BARNUM AND FLAGG r- i f L WHEREAS, Barnum and Flagg has deposited with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, an option deposit on Reuse Parcel No. 87 and a portion of 81 in the Meadowbrook Project, in the amount of $3,375; and WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of the Agency, held June 20, 1968, the Members accepted the Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel No. 87 submitted by Burck's Print- ing; and WHEREAS, due to the acceptance of the offer of Burck's Printing, the option deposit of Barnum and Flagg should be refunded. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to refund to Barnum and Flagg their Option Deposit in the Amount of $3,375 for the purchase of Reuse Parcel No. 87 and a portion of 81. Adopted June 20, 1968 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 741. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.1, DEMOLITION UNIT NO.7, R-79: ,.... Authorization was requested to execute a Change Order to contract with Dakeno, Inc. to include Block 15, Parcel 6, Block 17, Parcel 3, and Block 17, Parcel 5, for the sum of $1,750. The following resolution was introduced: l.- 769 RESOLUTION NO. 742 J~ ~ ....J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND DAKENO, INC., DEMOLITION & SITE CLEARANCE UNIT NO.7, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino by Resolu- tion No. 691 designated Dakeno, Inc. as Contractor for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.7, R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor as follows: Remove all improvements, rubble, concrete, asphalt, trees, etc. from Block 15, Parcel 6 (250-25~ Crescent St.); Block 17, Parcel 3, (251 Crescent St.); and Block 17, Parcel 5 (225 Crescent St.). The Contract price is to increase $1,750.00 and the Contract time is to be extended 7 days. The new contract completion date is July 18, 1968. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Dakeno, Inc. for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.7, Calif. R-79, to include the ser- vices, cost, and time extension, as hereinabove specified. ~ ....., Adopted June 20, 1968 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 742. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.1, SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO. lB, CALIF R-10: Authorization was requested to execute a Change Order to contract with Edmond J. Vadnais, for increase in services. The following resolution was introduced; RESOLUTION NO. 743 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT BY AND BETWEEN THE AGENCY AND EDMOND J. VADNAIS, SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO. lB, CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by REsolution No. 692, designated Edmond J. Vadnais as Contractor for Site Preparation, Unit No. lB, R-10; and ..... .... 770 [ WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor as follows: 1. Install an additional manhole at junction pf 36" C.M.P. 2. Remove trash and debris from and recompact area bounded by A.T.&S.F. R.R. on the north, Athol Street on the south, "D" Street on the west, and new Warm Creek Channel on the east. Existing sewer lines in this area to remain in this area to remain in place and not to be affected by this operation. The contract price to be increased by $44,300 and Contract time to be extended 10 days. The new contract completion date to be February 16, 1969. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Edmond J. Vadnais, Unit IB, R-IO, to include the services, cost and time extension, as hereinabove specified. Adopted June 20, 1968 r- ! ! l...... Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 743, authorizing a Change Order to Edmond J. Vadnais Con- tract, to include the removal of aebris and the recompaction of soil on par- cels 80, 81 and 82. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None DEMOLITION CONTRACTS, CALIF. R-IO: The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 744 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF Block 5, Parcel 29, UNIT NO. 20, WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1968, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America pro- viding for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No. 1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pur- suant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and ,..... WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 29 in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO; and '-- 771 WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $440.00. .., ~ ;1 ....J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said Bid of Presco Building Materials in the sum of $440.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 29, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted June 20, 1968 RESOLUTION NO. 745 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF Block 5, Parcel 24, UNIT NO. 22, WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS PROJECT ,'a. CALIF. R-IO WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1968, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the Unite~ States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and ., h 'j .... WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 24 in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $385.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the De- partment of Housing and Urban Development, said Bid of Presco Building Materials in the sum of $385.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 5, Parcel 24, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted June 20, 1968 RESOLUTION NO. 746 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF Block 6, Parcels 2 & 3, UNIT NO. 19, WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-10 ..... .....ii . .. -.. I 772 [ WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1968, entered into a Con- tract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area NO.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 6, Parcels 2 & 3 in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $385.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said Bid of Presco Building Materials in the sum of $385.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 6, Parcels 2 & 3, on behalf of the Agency. Adopted June 20, 1968 ..-- RESOLUTION NO. 747 i.- RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF Block 6, Parcel 4, UNIT NO. 21, WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS PROJEC"lNO. CALIF. R-10 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1968, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-IO under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execu- tion of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 6, Parcel 4 in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid for the sum of $675.00. ,.... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that subject to approval of the Contractor by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, said Bid of Presco Building Materials in the sum of $675.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 6, Parcel 4, on behalf of the Agency. ..... Adopted June 20, 1968 773 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution Nos. 744 through 747. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Wein. Webster. Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None . Abstention: None Absent: None -... ) ~ ...." LYNN SCHOOL OF DANCE, EXTENSION OF TIME, R-79: A letter was presented from Lynn School of Dance requesting an extension of time on their rental agreement. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 748 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING RENTAL AGREEMENT OF THE LYNN SCHOOL OF DANCE, R-79, UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1. 1968 WHEREAS, the Lynn School of Dance has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California; and WHEREAS, the Lynn School of Dance has requested an extension of time on said Rental Agreement until September 1, 1968; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency have reviewed the circum- stances involved and feel that such an extension is proper. .... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Lynn School of Dance is hereby extended until September 1, 1968. j ....Iiii BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary is directed to schedule said pro- perty for demolition to commence September, 1968. Adopted June 20, 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 748, authorizing the extension until September 1, 1968 to Lynn School of Dance, and further instructing the Executive Director to schedule for demolition aaid property to commence September, 1968. HEAP & HEAP VAN AND STORAGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, R-79: Mr. Truitt Westbrook of Heap & Heap Van & Storage requested an extension of time on his rental agreement until September 1, 196B. Mr. Westbrook stated that he would like as much of an extension as the board could possibly grant him. He stated that he has been unsuccessful in finding a place for storage that will allow him to store his contents for less than one year. Mr. Westbrook is a prospective developer of property in the Meadowbrook Project, and would like to store his contents temporarily, until such time as he can purchase and build another building. ..... ....... 774 [ Mr. Hodgdon stated ~hat Mr. Westbrook's Rental Agreement expired on October 9, 1967. Then he was given until July 1, 1968 to vacate. Now he is asking for an additional extension. The Board explained to Mr. Westbrook that this property is vital to the project, and must be vacated by September 1. If the extension was granted it would have to be understood that no further ex- tensions could be granted past the September 1, 1968 date. After further discussion regarding Mr. Westbrook's request, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 749 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING RENTAL AGREEMENT OF HEAP & HEAP VAN AND STORAGE CO., R-79, UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1, 1968 WHEREAS, Heap and Heap Van & Storage Company has entered into a Rental Agree- ment with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, Heap and Heap Van & Storage Company has requested an extension of time on Rental Agreement until September 1, 1968. WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved and feel that such an extension is proper. [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Heap & Heap Van & Storage Company is hereby extended until September 1, 1968 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary is hereby directed to schedule said building for demolition to commence September, 1968. Adopted June 20, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 749 authorizing Heap & Heap's extension until September 1,1968 and further instructing the Executive Director to schedule said building at 775 West Fourth Street for demolition to start September 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None VICTOR GRUEN, PLANNING SURVEY: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to execute a contract with Victor Gruen Asso. for the Planning Survey within the Central City Project Area, between "D" and "E" Streets. This study will be our proportionate share of the overall planning study for the City of San Bernardino downtown area. The cost for such study will be an amount not to exceed $10,000. The following resolution was introduced: r , ...... 775 RESOLUTION NO. 750 ,., I ....J RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES, FOR A PLANNING SURVEY, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79 with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of said Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage a Contractor to render certain technical advice and assistance in connection with a Planning Study for the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, the Agency determined at a Regular Meeting held June 20, 1968, that the proposal of Victor Gruen was in the best interest of the project area and the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal of Victor Gruen Associates .., be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary of said Agency are hereby instructed I and authorized to execute said Contract for a professional services in con- ... nection with a planning survey for Calif. R-79, in an amount not to exceed $10,000.00. Adopted June 20, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by We in authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 750. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ECONOMIC MARKET ANALYSIS, ECONOMICS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that the latest Economic Analysis was conducted in 1963. He requested that the Agency execute a contract with Economics Research Asso- ciates for such an analysis to be conducted at a cost not to exceed $15,600. After further discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 751 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ECONOMIC RESEARCH ASSOCIATES FOR AN ECONOMIC MARKET ANALYSIS, CALIF. R-79 ] 776 [ WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has under date of March 21, 1968, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79 with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking cer- tain activities necessary for the execution of said Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage a Contractor to render cer- tain technical advice and assistance in connection with an economic market analysis for Central City; and WHEREAS, the Agen9Y determined at a Regular Meeting held June 20, 1968, that the proposal of Economic Research Associates was in the best interest of the project area and the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the proposal of Economic Research Associates be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary of said Agency are hereby instructed and authorized to execute said Contract for a professional services in connection with an economic market analysis for Calif. R-79, in an amount not to exceed $15,600. [ Adopted June 20, 1968 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 751. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Austin, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REUSE PARCEL NO.3, CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79: Mr. Hodgdon stated that we are now in a position to sell Reuse Parcel No. 3 to the Bank of America. At the present time, the Bank is in escrow for the pur- chase of Meadowbrook Property adjoining Reuse 3. This purchase will complete the sale of the land they need for the development of their bank. After dis- cuss~on, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 752 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NUMBER 3, CENTRAL CITY, TO THE BANK OF AMERICA WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell property located in its Central City Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and [ WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Central City Project, on May 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, 1968; and 777 WHEREAS, at the Regular Meeting of the Agency held June 20, 1968, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase submitted by the Bank of America, hereinafter called the "Redeveloper", for the purpose of that certain real property described as follows: , ...., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel No.3, Calif. R-79, from the Bank of America, is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Sec- retary are authorized and directed to enter into an Agreement of Sale for Said property. (Legal Description Attached) Adopted June 20, 1968 All that real property in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino State of California, described as: That portion of Block 19, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, as per map recorded in Book 7, Page 1 of Maps, in the Office of the Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the South line of said Block 19 with a line parallel with and distant 8.75 feet Easterly, measured at right angles, from the West line of said Block 19; thence South 89058'32" East, along said South Line, 211.24 feet to a line parallel with and distant 70.58 feet Easterly, measured along said South line, from the West line of Lot 3 in said Block 19, thence North 0002'51" West, along said parallel line, 256.93 feet to the South line of Court Street as conveyed to the City of San Bernardino by deed re- corded February 16, 1928 in Book 328, Page 339, Official Records of said County; thence Nortp 89056'58" West, along the last mentioned South line, 191.20 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Southeasterly with a radius of 20.00 feet, said curve is also tangent to said parallel line 8.75 feet Easterly of the West line of said Block 19; thence Southwesterly along said tangent curve, through a central angle of 90005'46", a distance of 31.45 feet to said parallel line; thence South 0002'44" East, 236.99 feet to the Point of Beginning. , i; ..... EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Lots 3 and 4, Block 19, CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 7, Page 1 of Maps, records of said County; and that portion of Kier's Subdivision, as per plat recorded in Book 13, Page 14 of Maps, records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Southwest corner of Lots 2 and 3 of the Kier's Subdivision; thence North along the West line of said Subdivision 171.46 feet, more or less, to the Northwest corner of Lots 7 and 8 of said Subdivision; thence East along the North line of said Lots 7 and 8, and its Easterly prolongation, to a point on the East line of said Subdivision; thence North along said East line to a point 200 feet North of and at right angles to the North line of Third Street as shown on said Maps; thence East parallel with the North line of said Third Street, 22.34 feet; thence North 30 feet 2 inches to a point that is 66 feet 10 inches South of the North line of said Lot 4, Block 19, City of San Bernar- dino, and 44 feet West of the East line of said Lot; thence East 44_feet to 'J 778 [ the East line of said Lot 4; thence South along the East line of said Lot 4, also being the West line of Lot 3 of said Block 19, to a point 55 feet South of the South line of Court Street, as established by Deed to the City of San BernaEd,iRo, recorded February 16, 1928 in Book 328, Page 339, Official Records thence East parallel with the North line of Third Street, 70 feet 7 inches; thence South to a point on the North line of said Third Street, said point being 70 feet 7 inches East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 3, Block 19; thence West along the North line of Third Street to the point of beginning. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Lots 9 and 10, Keir's Subdivision of Lot 4, Block 19, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 13, Page 14 of Maps, records of said County, described as follows: COMMENCING at a point on the East line of ~D" Street, 15.4 feet South of the Northwest corner of said Lots; thence South 23.05 feet to the South line of said Lots; thence East along the South line of said Lots 85.05 feet to the East line of that certain alley way known as Keir Place; thence North along the East line of said alley way 23.05 feet; thence West to the Point of Beginning. r i ~ ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM that portion of Lots 9 and 10 and alley adjoining said Lots on the East, Keir Place Subdivision, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 13, Page 14 of Maps, records of said County, described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Lots 9 and 10, thence East along the North line of said Lots and prolongation thereof, 106.05 feet to the East line of said Alley way; thence South along said East line 6 feet; thence West 21 feet; thence South 9.4 feet; thence West 85.05 feet to the West line of said Lots 9 and 10, thence North along said West line, 15.4 feet to the point of ~eginning. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 752. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESCHEDULING OF REGULAR MEETING: Mr. Quinn stated that the next Regular Meeting falls on July 4, 1968. Because July 4th is a National Holiday, the meeting should be rescheduled. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson scheduling the first Regular Meeting for the month of July to be held July 2, 1968. The motion was carried by the fol- lowing vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RATIFICATION OF LEASE AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO: Mr. Webster stated for record that he is in approval of Resolution Nos. 713 and 714, adopted at the Special Meeting of June 20, 1968, authorizing the Chairman and Secretary to enter lease agreements with the City of San Bernardino for the Mall and Parking areas. [ OTHER BUSINESS: 779 Malki Auto Service, Import Auto Repair, Block 7, Parcell: , ...J The Members discussed the vacation of property (Block 7 Parcell) under Rental Agreement with John Malki. Mr. Halki has stated that he did not think he could relocate for approximately six months. All previous correspondence regarding his agreement was discussed. Mr. Malki did not want the help of the Relocation Department in finding another location. Mr. Wein stated that he believed that if the Agency found him a place to move he would cooperate. Mr. Hodgdon stated that we could not grant him an extension, because of the vital position this parcel is in regarding our demolition schedule. After thorough discussion and review, the Members determined that this item should be placed on the July 2nd Agenda. This would give the Relocation Department time to assist Mr. Malki in his efforts. Truitt Westbrook, Offer to Purchase, Reuse Parcel No. 80: Mr. Westbrook stated that he has just signed an Offer to Purchase Reuse Parcel No. 80, R-IO. Mr. Hodgdon stated that this offer should be subject to a 6 month escrow in order that the Agency may have time to prepare the parcel. Debris must be removed, and the grade elevation must be raised. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 753 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REUSE PARCEL NO. ao TO TRUITT WESTBROOK -, ~' .g ~ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, desires to sell property located in its Meadowbrook Project to qualified Redevelopers to develop the land in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan thereof; and WHEREAS, said property was advertised in the Sun Telegram under Notice of Reuse Parcels for Sale in the Meadowbrook Project, on September 5, 6, 7, and 8 and on the week of September 25 through 29, 1967; and WHEREAS, at a Regular Meeting of the Agency held June 20, 1968, the Agency Members examined the Offer to Purchase and related documents submitted by Truitt Westbrook herein called the "Redeveloper", for the purchase of that certain real property described as: COMMENCING at the intersection of the centerline of A.T.&S.F. Railroad and the old centerline of "D" Street, 82.50 feet wide; thence South 25.00 feet along said centerline of "D" Street; thence North 89059'25" East 123.75 feet along South line of A.T.&S.F. Railroad, 50 feet wide, t. the point of a non-tangent curve concave to the West with a radius of 291.25 feet and a radial bearing of South 900 West, said point also being the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 25000'00" an arc distance of 127.08 feet to , ~ ....J 780 [ a tangent line; thence South 250 West, 73.28 feet along said tangent line to the point of a tangent curve concave to the East with a radius of 258.75 feet and a radial bearing South 65000'00" East; thence Southerly along said curve through a central angle of 8024'35" an arc distance of 37.98 feet to the intersection of the South line of Lot 23, Block D, of the Peppers Subdivision, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per plat recorded in Book 17 of Maps, page 8, Records of said County; thence Nortb 89059'21" East, 272.306 feet, along said North line to its intersection with the West line of Warm Creek Channel, 30.00 feet wide; thence North 44.169 feet along said West line to the point of a tangent curve concave to the East with a radius of 735.00 feet and a radial bearing of North 900 East; thence Northerly along said curve, through a central angle of 9059'25" an arc length of 128.16 feet to a tangent line; thence North 9059'25" East, 54.10 feet to the intersection of the South line of said A.T.&S.F. Rail- road; thence South 89059'25" West, 221.102 feet along said South line to the POINT OF BEGINNING WHEREAS, at said REgular Meeting of the Agency, held June 20, 1968, the Agency finds and determines all documents submitted by said Redeveloper for the pur- chase of said land are in order and in conformance with the rules and regula- tions as established by the Department of Housing and Urban Development for the di'Sposition of project lands. [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Agency does hereby determine that said Offer to Purchase and related documents, including the Statement for Public Disclosure of said Redeveloper are satisfactory; that negotiation is the appro- priate method for the disposal of said parcel; that the Redeveloper possesses the qualifications and financial resources necessary to acquire and develop said property in accordance with said plan; that the proposed price THIRTY THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED ($30,500) is satisfactory, not less than the fair market value of land for uses in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, and is not less than the resale price for said property as concurred in by the Department of Housing and Urban development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Offer to Purchase of said Redeveloper for the purchase of said land is accepted and the Chairman and Secretary of the Agency are heneby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to execute said Agreement of Sale, and all other documents necessary or convenient to carry out the terms of the Agreement. Adopted June 20, 1968 [ Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 753, authorizing the sale of Reuse Parcel 80 to Truitt Westbrook, with a six month eSErow, construction to start 30 days after close of escrow, and construction to be completed 12 months after start of construction, subject to the approval of the grade elevation by the developer. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 781 ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson to adjourn the meeting at 5:30 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None . J J ] 782 [ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. HELD- JULY 2. 1968. IN ROOM 305. 323 COURT STREET. SAN BERNARDINO. CALI FORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m.. Tuesday. July 2. 1968. pursuant to the following notice: 1. NOTICE OF CHANGE OF MEETING DATE TO THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA NOTICE is hereby given that the first Regular Meeting for the month of July. 1968. has been scheduled for Tuesday. July 2. 1968. at 4:00 p.m., 323 Court Street. Room 305. the regular meeting place thereof. The first Thursday for the month of July. 1968. falls on July 4th. a national holiday. Dated this 21st day of June. 1968. sIP. W. ~uinn. Jr. P. W. uinn. Jr.. Secretary Exec Director 2. CERTIFICATE OF SECRETARY [ I. P. W. QUINN. JR.. Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. HEREBY CERTIFY. that on the 21st day of June. 1968. I served a true copy of the foregoing Notice of Change of Meeting Date on each and every member of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. in the following manner: BY UNITED STATES MAIL Witness my hand this 21st day of June. 1968. slP. W. Qui~n. Jr. P. W. Qtithn. Jr.. Secretary Exec Director Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members present: Wein. Wilson. Webster and Hodgdon Agency Members absent: Austin Also Present: Mr. Quinn. Executive Director;and Mrs. Baxter. Exec. Secretary MINUTES: [ The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of June 20. 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Mr. Webster stated that on Page 4 (HEAP & HEAP VAN AND STORAGE. EXTENSION OF TIME. R-79). paragraph 1. uses the word furniture to describe Mr. Westbrooks contents in his warehouse. Mr. Quinn stated that the worM would be changed to contents. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster approving the Minutes of June 20. 1968 as corrected. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Webster. Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Austin 783 4:15: Mr. Austin and Mr. Varner arrive at meeting. MALKI RENTAL AGREEMENT. R-79: J Mr. Malki explained to the Members that he is now in the process of applying for an SBA loan. He desires to develop a new building on 9th Street. Mr. Ma1ki further stated that he has been searching for a place to relocate tem- porarily but has been unabl,,:,to find a suitable one. The Members explained to Mr. Ma1ki that they are unable to allow him to occupy his present building past September 1. 1968. because this building is scheduled for demolition then. Storage of his material and equipment until his new building is developed was discussed. Mr. Hodgdon explained to Mr. and Mrs. Ma1ki that Mr. Quinn would assist him in every way possible to try to find a suitable location to move, or if this is not possible to store his material and equipment. After further discussion, the following Resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 754 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, EXTENDING RENTAL AGREEMENT OF MALKI AUTO SERVICE - IMPORT AUTO REPAIR - UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1, 1968, AND WAIVING THE TRIPLE RENT CONDITION HERETOFORE ESTABLISHED WHEREAS, Mr. John Malki, dba Ma1ki Auto Service - Import Auto Repair, has en- tered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California; and J WHEREAS. because of the Agency's unsuccessful efforts to have Mr. Malki vacate the premises. the triple rent provision of the Agreement was enforced; and WHEREAS, Mr. Malki has requested a further extension on his rental agreement and a waiver of the triple rent clause so established; and WHEREAS. the Agency Members have carefully reviewed the circumstances involved and have determined that an extension could be granted until September 1, 1968. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and John Ma1ki is hereby extended until September 1. 1968. and the triple rent condition so established is hereby waived through said date of extension. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 754. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Webster. Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Wein LEES CHILDRENS SHOP. REQUEST FOR RENTAL REFUND. R-79: A request for rental refund in the amount of $107.18 was presented to the Members. Mr. Quinn stated that Lees Childrens Shop had been given free rent by previous 1and10pd because of their drop of business. The Agency purchased the property on May 23. 1968 and they discontinued business on June 12. 1968. The following ] resolution was introduced:: 784 [ RESOLUTION NO. 755 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING RENTAL REFUND IN THE AMOUNT OF $107.18 TO LEES CHILBRENS SHOP WHEREAS. Lee's Chi1drens Shop has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Re- development Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California; and WHEREAS. Lee's Chi1drens Shop has requested a rental refund of $107.18 for period May 23. 1968 until June 12. 1968; and WHEREAS. the Members of the Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved and determine that such a refund fs proper under the circumstances. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. that Rental Refund of $107.18 is hereby approved to Lee's Children's Shop. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 755. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Wein. Webster. Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Absetntion: None Absent: None DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE. UNIT NO. 11, R-79: [ Bids for Demolition and Site C1e.~ance. Unit No. 11. Calif. R-79 were opened July 1. 1968. The low bidder was Presco Building Materials, for the sum of $38.417. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 756 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE. UNIT NO. 11. CALIF. R-79 [ WHEREAS. the Agency has under date of March 21. 1967 entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No.1. Calif. R-79. under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949 as amended and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the exe- cution of the Central City Project. R-79; and WHEREAS. the Agency invited competitive sealed bids for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 11, R-79 for the demolition and site clearance of cert.in areas in the project and said contract to be in accordance with the Contract Documents furnished all bidders; and WHEREAS. an Invitation for Bids therefore was duly published in the San Ber- nardino Sun Telegram, a newspaper of general circulation, in the County of San Bernardino on the 13 and 20 day of June. 1968. and an Affidavit Showing such publication is on file in the office of said Agency; and , ,., 785 WHEREAS. said invitation called for "the receipt of such bids until 4:00 p.m.. on the 1st day of July. 1968. at the office of the Agency located at 323 Court Street. San Bernardino. California; and WHEREAS. a number of such bids were received at the time andp1ace above speci- fied. and said bids were opened and read aloud. the lowest qualified bid was offered by Presco Building Materials. in the amount of $38.417; and WHEREAS. it appears to said Agency that said Presco Building Materials is qualified to be awarded said Contract and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. that subject to approval of Contractor and bid by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the bid of Presco Building Materials. for the sum of $38.417. is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 11. Calif. R-79. on behalf of the Agency. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Reso- lution No. 756. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Wein. Webster. Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None J MR. W. R. GRUBBS. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT. R-79: A request for an extension of Rental Agreement was presented to the Members f~Dm J. . Mr. W. R. Grubbs. dba Palms Cafe. Mr. Grubbs present building is scheduled .. for demolition very shortly. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin denying the request of Mr. Grubbs for an extension on his Rental Agreement. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wilson. Wein. Webster. Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None VICTOR GRUEN CONTRACT. PLANNING SAN BERNARDINO CORE STUDY (NON HUD CONTRACT): M~. HOdgdon stated that a study has been requested by the Central City Committee for the area north of 4th Street and south of 2nd Street. This study will be funded by the Central City Committee. but the Agency has been requested by the Committee to administer said contract. After further discussion. the follOWing resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 757 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALI FORNI A. AUTHORIZING THE iACCEf)TA'NCE: 'Offi:J';(J}(OS" 'F'~OW 'fftE" CENTRAL' CIiY COMMITtEE Fnrf SERVlOttf;ORPLMN1NG STUDY OF SAN BERNARDINO CORE AREA WHEREAS, at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Central City Committee of the City of San Bernardino held on July 1. 1968, said Board of Directors authorized an expenditure of $25,000.00 for studies and planning of the San Bernardino central core area to coordinate with existing rede- , ..,...j 786 [ velopment projects, and to provide for optimum development and use of the pro- perty located in such area; and WHEREAS, said Board of Directors further authorized payment of said sum of $25,000.00 to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino to allow the Agency to enter into appropriate contracts for such planning and studies, and to administer the expenditure of said funds to carry out such contracts; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to arrange for such studies with appropriate firms and organizations and further desires to administer the contracts providing for such studies; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the Agency hereby accepts said sum of $25,000.00 to be held by it in a special bank deppsit and to be utilized solely for planning and studies of the San Bernardino central core area and such other areas as may from time to time be designated by the Central City Committee. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That, if possible, the Agency shall utilize such funds in such a way as to qualify the Agency and/or the City of San Bernardino for any appropriate grants or reimbursements from Federal and State Governments or other appropriate entities. Adopted July 2, 1968 [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 757. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 758 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH VICTOR GRUEN ASSOCIATES FOR A PLAN- NING STUDY OF SAN BERNARDINO CORE AREA WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, the City of San Bernardino and certain citizens of the City of San Bernardino have determined that it is necessary to undertake a study of the central city core area to coordinate said area with existing redevelopment projects and provide for optimum development and use of the properties located in such area; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino and certain of the citizens thereof have provided the necessary funds and have requested the Redevelopment Agency to enter into appropriate contracts providing for such planning study; and WHEREAS, the Agency has received a proposal from Victor Gruen Associates, Inc. to provide said planning study at a price of $15,500.00; [ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the proposal of Victor Gruen Associates, Inc. be accepted and that the Chairman and Secretary of said Agency be and 787 they hereby are instructed and authorized to execute a contract with Victor Gruen Associates, Inc. providing for said planning study, with the contract price in an amount not to exceed $15,500.00. ] Adopted July 2, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 758. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin to adjourn the meeting at 4:35 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ~ ~ ~ ~ J 788 [ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Wein, Webster, Austin and Wilson Agency Members Absent: None Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes for the Regular Meeting of July 2, 1968 were presented to the Members for approval. Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster autho- rizing the approval of the Minutes for July 2, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXPENDITURES: ~ i . i' '-- The expenditures for the month of June, 1968 were presented for approval. After discussion, motion was made by We in and seconded by Webster authorizing the approval of the expenditures for the month of June, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster, Austin, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. REQUEST FOR ADVANCE ACQUISITION, CALIF. R-79: [ Request for advance acquisition of property owned by Jim Davis, Dorothy Wilson and the Antlers Hotel were reviewed by the Board. Mr. Hodgdon explained that it is the policy of the Agency not to acquire property east of "E" Street at tais time. According to the Agency's original acquisition program, the pro- perty east of "E" Street would not be acquired until late in 1971 or early 1972. Because of our acceleration of the project, we should be in a position to pur- chase their property late in December, 1968 or at the beginning of the year. After discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein deferring the matter of advance acquisition of the properties above, until the first meeting in December, 1968, and instructing the Executive Director to advise the parties of the Agency's decision. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 789 CHANGE ORDER NO.1, SALATA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, UNIT NO.1, CALIF. R-79: .., The Chairman explained the changes and additions desired to be added to Salata Construction Company's Contract. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: 11 ...... RESOLUTION NO. 759 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CHANGE ORDER WITH SALATA CONSTRUCTION, INC., FOR SITE PREPARATION UNIT NO.1, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 678, authorized the execution of a Contract with Salata Construction Inc., for Site Preparation, Unit No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the Contractor as follows: 1. Storm Drain The complete construction of additional lines on Second Street from Stoddard to "G" Street and includes concrete concrete from 45" diameter v to 18" diameter, inlet basins, manhole, and junction structures. $77,550.00. .. 2. Sewer Lines ..., Telephone ducts running north and south on "E" Street are interfering with sewer line, (which cannot be relocated). Solution involves the construction of a drop manhole at approximate station 20 + 24 (approx center of "E" St. & 2nd St.) and removing and relaying the 10" clay pipe west of this manhold from station 18 + 27 to 20 + 24 (Approx 300') The drop manhold will permit the 10" line to be constructed just above the telephone conduit. There was a 12 inch water line in- terfering at this point which the Water Company has already moved. $3,420.00. 2a. Frame & Cover Frame & manhole cover additional cost of galvanized cover over $10.00 each, additional cost of concrete rehab - $14.40. For total $24.40 27 basins x 24.40 = $658.80. 3. Reroute Street Line Circuits Unit price rerouting street light conduits. 1) 1 1/4 or 1 1/2 conduit $5.00 per foot 2) Cable .70 per foot per single run 3) Junction box, $35.00 ea .... .,.",.; 790 [ 4) Removing and replacing electrolier $200.00 ea, final payment can be based upon actual quantities used. This would be the most equitable manner to handle this situation. 4. Telephone ducts running north and south on "E" Street cannot be re- moved from path of the sewer line on 4th Street. This requires the re- moval and replacement of 10" VCP between station 18 + 54 and Station 20 + 24 on 4th Street together with the construction of 2 brick manholes, construction of 24' of 6" cast iron pipe, and modification of manhole bottom at station 18 + 52. Lump sum price for change is $4,100.00 with 2 additional days required. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Salata Construction Inc., for Site Preparation, Unit No.1, Calif. R-79, for the services above specified; and an equitable adjustment of the Contract Price and Contract time will be incor- porated within the Change Order to cover said services. Adopted: July 18, 1968 ",.... Motion was made by Resolution No. 759. Ayes: Wilson, Wein, None Absent: None Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: -- CHANGE ORDER NO.1, ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGINEERING, UNIT NO.9, R-79: Block 8, Parcels 8 and 9 were requested to be added to contract with Roger Roy for Unit No.9. The followi~g resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 760 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT WITH ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGINEERING, DEMOLITION & SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 9, CALIF. R-79; and RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 727 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolution No. 725 designated Roger Roy General Engineering as Contractor for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No.9, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency by Resolution No. 727, approved a Change Order to said Contract for the inclusion of Block 8, parcels 8 and 9; and r-- L WHEREAS, due to a conflict of schedules this Change Order will not be consumated, and in lieu of said Change, the Agency desires to enter into a subsequent Change Order for the demolition and site clearance of Block 18 Parcel 12 and Block 16, Parcel 14. 791 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Roger Roy General Engineering, Unit No.9, Calif. R-79, to include Block 18, Parcel 12 and Block 16 Parcel 14; and that an equitable adjustment of the contract price in the amount of $3,700, and the contract time of 15 days, will be incorporated into the Change Order to cover the work above specified. ~ ......I BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 727, authorizing the inclusion of Block 8, Parcels 8 and 9, is hereby rescinded. Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 760. The motion was Carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER NO.1, ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGINEERING, UNIT NO. 10, R-79: Block 20, Parcel 2 was requested to be added to contract with Roger Roy for Unit No. 10. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 761 .... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT WITH ROGER ROY GENERAL ENGI- NEERING, DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 10, CALIF. R-79 and RESel.DIK. RESOLUTION NO. 728 ..... WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Reso- lution No. 726 designated Roger Roy General Engineering as Contractor for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 10, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency by Resolution No. 728, approved a Change Order to said Contract for the inclusion of Block 20, Parcel 2; and WHEREAS, due to a conflict of schedules this Change Order will not be con- sumated, and in lieu of said change, the Agency desires to enter into a sub- sequent Change Order for the Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 16, Parcel 12 and Block 9, Parcel 9. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Roger Roy General Engineering, Unit No. 10, Calif. R-79, to include Block 16 Parcel 12 and Block 9, Parcel 9; and that an equitable adjustment of the contract price in the amount of $1,500, and the contract time of 15 days, will be incorporated into the Change Order to cover the work above specified. ~ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Resolution No. 728 authorizing the inclusion of Block 20, Parcel 2 is hereby rescinded. ...... Adopted: July 18, 1968 792 [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 761. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None CHANGE ORDER NO.1. PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS, UNIT NO. 11, R-79: Authorization was requested to add the demolition of Block 20, Parcel 2, also removal of trees on Block 13, Parcel 3; Block 16, Parcel 16; Block 7, Parcel 11; and Block 8, Parcel 12, to Presco Building Materials Contract. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 762 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE A CHANGE ORDER TO CONTRACT WITH PRESCO BUILDING MATERIALS DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE, UNIT NO. 11, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, By REsolu- tion No. 756, designated Presco Building Materials as Contractor for Demolition and Site Clearance, Unit No. 11, R-79; and ,..... WHEREAS, the Agency desires to increase the services of the contractor as follows: '-' Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 20, Parcel 2, also removal of trees on Block 13, Parcel 3; Block 16, Parcel 16; Block 7, Parcel 11; and Block 8, Parcel 12 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Presco Building Materials, Unit No. 11, Calif. R-79, for the services above specified, and an equitable adjustment of the Contract price in the amount of $9,665.00 and Contract time of 15 days, will be incorporated within the Change Order to cover said services. Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing Resolution No. 762. The motion was carried by the following Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None None Absent: None the adoption of vote, to wit: Abstention: EXTENSION OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT, ASSEMBLY OF GOD: The request of the Assembly of God Mission for extension of time on their rental agreement was reviewed. The following resolution was introduced: ,.... RESOLUTION NO. 763 ~ RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREE- MENT WITH THE ASSEMBLY OF GOD MISSION TIL SEPTEMBER 1, 1968 793 WHEREAS, the Assembly of God Mission has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the Assembly of God Mission has requested an extension of time on their Rental Agreement; and ~ ....,; WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, have reviewed the circumstances involved and believed that such an extension is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and the Assembly of God Mission is hereby extended until September 1, 1968. Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 763. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None INTERIM RENTAL OF AGENCY PROPERTY, DAVID E. JORDAN, BLOCK 21, PARCEL 8: Mr. Hodgdon explained that Mr. Jordan has requested the rental of Block 21, Parcel 8 (the old Hubbard Studio building). Mr. Hodgdon stated that the Agency has purchased the Unclaimed Clothes building and they wish to relocate at the Hubbard Studio building. He further advised Mr. Jordan that Mr. Quinn Executive Director, has the authority to ~ent this building to him without board approval. He suggested that Mr. Jordan contact the owner of Unclaimed Clothes and discuss this with him. After they have determined what they want to do, they can contact Mr. Quinn and he can arrange for the rental. \ .., ....", EXTENSION OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT, INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES: The request from the International House of Pancakes for an extension of time on their rental agreement was reviewed. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 764 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREE~ MENT WITH THE INTERNATIONAL HOUSE OF PANCAKES UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1, 1968 WHEREAS, the International House of Pancakes has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, the International House of Pancakes has requested an extension of time on their Rental Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved and believed that such an extension is proper. ...... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Ber- nardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Inter- national House of Pancakes is hereby extended until September 1, 1968 ....", Adopted: July 18, 1968 794 [ Motion was made by Austin and s~onded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 764. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Wilson, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None EXTENSION OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT, DR. KLEIN: The request of Dr. William Klein for an extension of his rental agreement of 90 days. Mr. Hodgdon explained to Dr. Klein that it is impossible for the Agency to extend his rental agreement past September 1, 1968 at this time. He further stated that in September, if Dr. Klein has been unsuccessful in relocating, and the Agency is not yet in a position to demolish his building, his request will be reconsidered. After further discussion, the following resolution was in- troduced: RESOLUTION NO. 765 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF RENTAL AGREE- MENT OF DR. WILLIAM KLEIN UNTIL SEPTEMBER l, 1968 "..... I \....... WHEREAS, Dr. William Klein has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Rede- velopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and' WHEREAS, Dr. Klein has requested an extension of time on his Rental Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved and believe that such an extension is proper. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Dr. William Klein is hereby extended until September 1, 1968. Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 765. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None LINESCH & REYNOLDS, MEADOWBROOK, R-10: "... Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to enter into a contract with Linesch & Reynolds for the Perimeter Street Landscaping in the Meadowbrook Project. This will include ~!E" Street - Second Street to Atho1; "0" Street - Second Street to Ria1to; Arrowhead Avenue - Second Street to Atho1; and Second Street - Arrowhead Avenue to Sierra Way. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: ~ 795 RESOLUTION NO. 766 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH LINESCH AND REYNOLDS FOR LANDSCAPING SERVICES, MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-10 .., j 'I -J WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of October 24, 1958, entered into a Con- tract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-10 under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Meadowbrook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-10; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Perimeter Street Landscaping for said Meadowbrook Project; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Linesch and ReynoldS is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $4,814. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Calfiornia, that the Bid of Linesch and Reynolds in the amount of $4,814, is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby autho- rized to enter into a Contract for said Services. Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 766. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ., iJ .."J EXTENSION OF TIME ON RENTAL AGREEMENT, STERRETTS OPTICAL LABORATORY: A request was presented from Sterretts Optical Laboratory for an extension of time on their Rental Agreement. After discussion. the following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 767 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT OF STERRETTS OPTICAL LABORATORY UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1, 1968 WHEREAS, Sterretts Optical Laboratory has entered into a Rental Agreelent with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, Sterretts Optical Laboratory has requested an extension of time on his Rental Agreement; and ...... .....". 796 [ WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency have reviewed the circumstances involved and believe that such an extension is proper NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Sterretts Optical Laboratory is hereby extended until September 1, 1968. Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 767. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION NO. 599: Mr. Hodgdon stated that in adopting Resolution No. 599, which authorized the condemnation of the John G. Sims property, Block 1, Parcel 10, the Agency omitted Parcel 11. This resolution should now be amended to include Parcel 11. The following resolution was introduced: "- RESOLUTION NO. 768 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 599, BY AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CEN- TRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 (John G. Sims, Block 1, Parcels 10 and 11) r- ! ,-. WHEREAS, Resolution No. 599 authorized the condemnation of property owned by John G. Sims, designated as Block 1, Parcel 10, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency desires to amend said Resolution No. 599 to include Parcel 11. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 599 is hereby amended to include Parcel 11, and the Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 1, Parcel 11 (property of John G. Sims), being more particularly described in the Title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. \.... Adopted: July 18, 1968 797 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 768. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Wein. Wilson. Webster. Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 'IIIIII! .......I RESOLUTIONS TO PROVIDE FOR THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE LOAN DOCUMENTS AND NOTES FOR FUNDING OF THE CENTRAL CITY AND MEADOWBROOK PROJECTS: Mr. Hodgdon explained that it is necessary to adopt resolutions regarding the funding of the Central City and Meadowbrook Projects. The following resolutions were introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 769 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECES- SARY AND APPROPRIATE LOAN DOCUMENTS AND NOTES FOR THE FUND- ING OF CENTRAL CITY PROJECT NO.1. CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS. the San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract with the United States of America on March 21. 1967. providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project No. 1. Calif. R-79. under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949. as amended; and WHEREAS. pursuant to said Loan and Grant Contract. the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of said Central City Project; and ~ :4 1 ....., WHEREAS. from time to time it is necessary for the Agency to obtain loans from the United States of America and private banks and financial institutions in connection with the funding of said Central City Project; and WHEREAS. the Agency desires to authorize the Chairman and Secretary to obtain such loans as may be from time to time required in connection with the fund- ing of said Project. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California: That the Chairman and Secretary be. and they hereby are. authorized to enter into loan arrangements with the United States Government and/or private banks and financial institutions as authorized by the laws of the State of California and/or appropriate federal laws and regu- 1 a ti ons. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Chairman and Secretary be. and they hereby are, authorized to execute all necessary documents to consummate such loans; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the authority granted to the Chairman and SEc- retary pursuant to this resolution shall continue until otherwise directed by the Ag ency . Adopted: July 18. 1968 ..., ......tJ 798 "..- L Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution Ho. 769. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 770 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY AND APPROPRIATE LOAN DOCUMENTS AND NOTES FOR THE FUNDING OF MEADOW- BROOK PROJECT NO.1, CALIF. R-10 r-- WHEREAS, the San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract with the United States of America on October 24, 1958, providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Meadowbrook Project No.1, Calif. R-10, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said Loan and Grant Contract, the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of said Meadowbrook Project; and WHEREAS, from time to time it is necessary for the Agency to obtain loans from the United States of America and private banks and financial institutions in connection with the funding of said Meadowbrook Project; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to authorize the Chairman and Secretary to obtain such loans as may be from time to time required in connection with the funding of said Project, ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California: That the Chairman and Secretary be, and they hereby are, authorized to enter into loan arrangements with the United States Govern- ment and/or private banks and financial institutions as authorized by the laws of the State of California and/or appropriate federal laws and regulations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the Chairman and Secretary be, and they hereby are, authorized to execute all necessary documents to consummate such loans; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the authority granted to the Chairman and Secretary pursuant to this resolution shall continue until otherwise directed by the Agency Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 770. The motion was carried by the following vote to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein, and Hodgdon Noes: None Absent: None Abs*ention: None CONDEMNATION RESOLUTIONS: ",.,. ~. The following resolutions were introduced: ~ 799 RESOLUTION NO. 771 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA. AITHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO.1. CALIF. R-79 (Block 3 Parcel 15 TENNESSEE RAVENWOOD PROPERTIES. INCORPORATED). BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernar- dino. California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project AEea No.1. in the City of San Bernardino. California. pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24. 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649. and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon. the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening. street installation or other street improvements. re-parce1ization of the area. rough grading of the ac- quired land. installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the pre- paration of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan. and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel. Allen B. Gresham. and its Executive Director. Peter W. Quinn. Jr.. be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California. in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the C04e of Civil Procedure and the Commu- nity Development Law of the State of California for the uses:8nd purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1. Project No. Calif. R-79. and in the City of San Bernardino. County of San Bernardino. State of California. and is designated as Block 3. Parcel 15. being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: July 18. 1968 RESOLUTION NO. 772 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO.1. CALIF. R-79 (BLOCK 4. PARCELS 16 through 21 GILBERT SHEETS) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1. in the City of San Bernardino, California. pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24. 1965 by Ordinance 2649. and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon. the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening. street .... ......, .... -.-II -.. ...... 800 r ~ installation or other street improvements, re-parce1ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in"the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the'..Centra1 City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 4, Parcels 16 through 21 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: July 18, 1968 r- RESOLUTION NO. 773 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (BLOCK 4, PARCEL 22 MAULDIN AND HOLLERAN) ...... '-' BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parce1ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelop- ment Plan and in order to carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with ,..... 801 the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law ~ of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1. Project No. Calif. R-79. and in the City of San Bernardino. County of San Bernardino. State of California. and is designated as Block 4. Parcel 22 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: July 18. 1968 ...J RESOLUTION NO. 774 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AREA NO. 1. CALIF. R-79 (BLOCK 4. PARCEL 23 SAN BERNARDINO MASONIC BUILD- ING ASSOCIATION) BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1. in the City of ... San Bernardino. California. pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the . .. Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24. 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649. and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of ... existing buildings and structures thereon. the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening. street installation or other street improvements. re-parce1ization of the area. rough grading of the acquired land. installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to carry out the pro- visions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel. Allen B. Gresham. and its Executive Director. Peter W. Quinn. Jr.. be and they are hereby autho- rized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California. in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency. for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1. Project No. Calif. R-79. and in the City of San Bernardino. County of San Bernardino. State of California. and is designated as Block 4 Parcel 23 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: July 18. 1968 ~ ~ 802 .... RESOLUTION NO. 776 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN PARCELS OF REAL PROPERTY IN THE CENTRAL CITY PRO- JECT AREA NO.1, CALIF. R-79 (BLOCK 20, PARCEL 11 JOSEPH ROSE AND CLARA ROSE) "... fII"""'I' BE IT RESOLVED that the real property hereinafter described is necessary for the public uses and purposes of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. Said public uses and purposes are as follows: To develop the area known as Central City Project Area No.1, in the City of San Bernardino, California, pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan adopted by the Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 24, 1965 by Ordinance No. 2649, and to clear portions of said area by demolition or removal of existing buildings and structures thereon, the vacation and abandonment of some interior street areas and the demolition of other areas for street widening, street installation or other street improvements, re-parce1ization of the area, rough grading of the acquired land, installation of street lighting and utilities essential to the preparation of building sites for use in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan, and to convey the real property thus acquired in accordance with said Redevelopment Plan and in order to .carry out the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Agency condemnation counsel, Allen B. Gresham, and its Executive Director, Peter W. Quinn, Jr., be and they are hereby authorized to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of San Bernardino in the name of this Agency, for the purpose of acquiring said property for this Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Community Development Law of the State of California for the uses and purposes specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said real property is located within the boundaries of the Central City Project Area No.1, Project No. Calif. R-79, and in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, and is designated as Block 20 Parcel 11 being more particularly described in the title searches furnished by First American Title Company now on file in the records of the Agency. Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolutions Nos. 771 through 775. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wi1soU, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ...... BRUCE D. VARNER --- ALLEN GRESHAM: fIIIIIIIIi Mr. Ho~gdon stated that Allen Gresham does not desire to act as Condemnation Attorney for the Condemnation of the San Bernardino Masonic Building Associates. Mr. Hodgdon suggested that the Agency contract Bruce Varner as condemnation counsel for this one case. The following resolution was introduced: ....... 803 RESOLUTION NO. 776 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH BRUCE D. VARNER FOR CONDEMNATION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE CONDEMNATION OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MASONIC BUILDING ASSOCIATES, CALIF. R-79 ... ...... WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all amendatory acts including the Housing Act of 1954 for its Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract the Local Public Agency is undertaking cer- tain activities necessary for the execution of said Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to engage the services of Bruce D. Varner for Condemnation Services in connection with the condemnation of the San Bernar- dino Masonic Building Associates. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a contract with Bruce D. Varner for Condemnation Services in con- ... nection with the condemnation of the San Bernardino Masonic Building Associates, Cal if. R-79. -' Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 776. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Ui~j Absent: None DEMOLITION PROPERTIES, R-79: Two bids were submitted for the demolition and site clearance of Block 18, Parcel 18; Block 13, Parcel 2; Block 9, Parcel 7; Block 7, Parcel 2; and Block 8, Parcel 6. Askey & Pollard's bid was $2,260.00. Presco's bid was $2,425.00. Tbe following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 777 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ASKEY & POLLARD FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF UNIT NO. 12, CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has, under of March 21, 1967, entered into a Loan and Capital Grant Contract with the United States of America pro- ... ......., 804 [ r ~ viding for financial aid to the Local Public Agency ~nder Title I of the Housing Act of 1945. as amended by all amendatory acts including the Housing Act of 1954 for its Central City Project Area No.1. Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS. the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 18. Parcel 18; Block 13. Parcel 2; Block 9. Parcel 7; Block 8. Parcel 6; and Biock 7. Parcel 2; and WHEREAS. Askey & Pollard submitted the low bid for said services in the amount of $2.260.00; and WHEREAS. it appears to said Agency that Askey & Pollard is qualified to be awarded the Contract. and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid in the amount of $2.260. NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. California. that said Bid of Askey & Pollard in the sum of $2.260 is hereby accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 18. Parcel 18. Block 13. Parcel 2; Block 9. Parcel 7; Block 8. Parcel 6; and Block 7. Parcel 2. to'be described as Unit No. 12. Central City Project. Calif. R-79. Adopted July 18. 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 777. The motion was carried by the following vote. to wit: Ayes: Austin. Webster. Wein. Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None Mr. Hodgdon advised the Members that the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment has raised the amount of money from $1.000 to $2.500 which does not require public bidding. to enter into contract. OTHER BUSINESS: Mr. Phil Davis from the Alcoholic Association requested rental of property in our Central City Project. Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Agency has no property that is available for rental. He suggested that Mr. Davis contact Mr. Winstead of the City. regarding a vacant building owned by the City. Mr. Hodgdon requested authorizition to increase the amount per hour of Bruce D. Varner's contract from $30.00 to $35.00. All Members expressed their desire to increase said amount. The following resolutions were introduced: t ~ RESOLUTION NO. 778 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA. AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SEC- RETARY TO AMEND CONTRACT WITH BRUCE D. VARNER BY INCREASING THE HOURLY RATE FROM $30.00 TO $35.00, FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT ,.... t 1 \..." 805 WHEREAS. the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino. by Resolution No. 488. entered into a Contract dated April 11. 1967. with Bruce D. Varner for Legal Services in connection with the Central City Project. Calif. R-79; and ..., ~ -l WHEREAS. the Agency by Resolution No. 607. authorized the execution of Contract Amendment No.1. Dated February 16. 1968. increasing the upset figure of the Contract from $10, 000 to $20,000; and WHEREAS. it is the desire of the Agency to execute Contract Amendment No.2. increasing the hourly rate of the Contract from $30.00 per hour to $35.00 per hour. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California. that Paragraph 4 is amended to read: "The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20.000.00), which shall constitute full and complete com- pensation for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid at the rate of Thirty Five Dollars ($35.00) per hour, in every case subject to receipt of an invoice for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the Contract and that he is entitled to receive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Con- tract. In addition to the compensation provided above. the Local Public Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from the Local Public Agency's principal place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Local Public Agency. The limitations on cost of transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which currently prevail for staff members of the Local Public Agency. It is e~press1y understood and agreed that in no event will the total compensation and reimbursement, if any. to be paid hereunder exceed the maximum sum of Twenty Thousand Dollars ($20.000) for all of the services required." ., -ij t., ...J Adopted: July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 778. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 779 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO AMEND CONTRACT WITH BRUCE D. VARNER, BY INCREASING THE HOURLY RATE FROM $30.00 TO $35.00 FOR THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT, CALIF. R-10 .... j!, WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Resolu- tion No. 487. entered into a Contract with Bruce D. Varner dated April 11. 1967, for General Legal Services in connection with the Meadowbrook Project. Calif. R-10; and ..J 806 [ WHEREAS, the Agency by Resolution No. 608 authorized the execution of Contract Amendment No.1, dated February 16, 1968, increasing the upset figures of the Contract from $1,750.25 to $6,250; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Agency to execute Contract Amendment No.2, increasing the hourly rate of the Contract from $30.00 per hour to $35.00 per hour. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that Paragraph 4 is amended to read: "The Local Public Agency will pay the Contractor not to exceed Six Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars and n6/100 ($6,250), which shall constitute full and complete compensation for the Contractor's services hereunder. Such sum will be paid at the rate of Thirty Five Dollars ($35.00) per hour, in every case subject to a receipt of an invoive for payment from the Contractor specifying that he has performed the work under this Contract in conformance with the Con- tract and that he is entitled to receive the amount invoiced under the terms of the Contract. r L.... In addition to the compensation provided above, the Local Public Agency will reimburse the Contractor for travel and subsistence expenses away from the Local Public Agency's principal place of business when said travel is specifically requested by the Local Public Agency. The limitations on cost of transportation and subsistence expenses shall be the same as those which current- ly prevail for staff members of the Local Public Agency. It is expressly understood and agreed that in no event will the total compensation and reimbursement, if any, to be paid hereunder exceed the maximum sum of Six Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($6,250) for all the services required." Adopted July 18, 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 179. Tie motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wilson, Webster, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin to adjourn the meeting at 5:10 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Austin, Wein, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None r- 1 k ..... 807 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, HELD THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 1968, IN ROOM 305, 323 COURT STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA The Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following: Agency Members Present: Hodgdon, Wilson, Austin and Webster Agency Members Absent: Wein Also Present: Mr. Quinn, Executive Director; Mr. Varner, Agency Counsel; and Mrs. Baxter, Executive Secretary MINUTES: The Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 18, 1968 were presented to the Mem- bers for approval. Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the approval of the Minutes of July 18, 1968 as submitted. The motion carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein REPORT OF AGENCY COUNSEL: Mr. Varner stated that he has nothing to report at this time. FRANK LUSH, REAPPRAISAL OF PROPERTY, R-79: Mr. Frank Lush owns the property at 550 Court Street (Block 4, Parcel 13). Mr. Lush requested a reappraisal of his property. Mr. Hodgdon stated that two appraisals have already been conducted on this property, and that the decision as to whether the appraisal of the Agency is fair will be determined in court on August 26, 1968. Mr. Quinn stated that he has reviewed the Appraisal Reports and that he could not recommend any reappraisal of this property. After mueh discussion, motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin denying the request of Mr. Lush for a reappraisal of his property, inasmuch as the Agency cannot authorize, without HUD approval, the reappraisal of the property; and that the proper decision will be determined in court August 26, 1968. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: Wein 4:15 - Mr. Wein arrived at the meeting Mr. Quinn was directed to see that the Relocation Staff contact Mr. Lush regarding proper settlement for his relocation; and Mr. Vaughn Besoyan, tenant, regarding a suitable building in which to relocate. CONTRACT HARRY S. YAFFEE, FISCAL YEAR 1968-69: The following resolution was introduced: ~ , ~ , ~ , ~ 808 [ RESOLUTION NO. 780 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH HARRY S. YAFFEE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1968-69, FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT AND THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, de- sires to engage a contractor to render certain technical services and advice in connection with accounting and financial assistance for the Central City Project and the Meadowbrook Project; and WHEREAS, Harry S. Yaffee has proposed a contract for said services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelop~ent Agency of the City of:San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract by and between the Agency and Harry S. Yaffee for Account- ing Services for the fiscal period July 1, 1968 through June 30, 1969. Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 780. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wilson, Wein, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ".- 1 I L. TRI CITY MAYFLOWER, EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT: A request for extension of rental agreement was presented from Tri City Mayflower. Mr. Hodgdon stated that such an extension would interfer with the September 1 demolition schedule. Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin denying the request of Tri City Mayflower for an extension of their Rental Agreement. The Motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CONTRACT MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to enter into contract with the Municipal Water Department for the construction of and relocation of water mains for the Central City Project. Mr. Wilson and Austin belived that such work should be put out to bid. Mr. Hodgdon explained that the Municipal Water Department owned the lines and that they were the only ones able to do the work. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 781 ",.... RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT FOR THE CENTRAL CITY PROJECT, CALIF. R-79 L.. WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into A Loan and Capital Grant Contract for the Central City Project No.1, Calif. R-79 809 with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Local Public Agency under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended by all Amendatory Acts including the Housing Act of 1954; and ..... ....." WHEREAS, pursuant to such Contract, the Local Public Agency is undertaking cer- tain activities necessary for the execution of said Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, the Local Public Agency desires to engage a Contractor to render certain services in connection with the construction and relocation of water facilities for the"Central City Project area; and WHEREAS, the Agency determined at a Regular Meeting held August 1, 1968, that the proposal of the Municipal Water Department for said services, was in the best interest of the project area and the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the proposal of Municipal Water Department be ac- cepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Municipal Water Department for the Construction and RElocation of Water Facilities for the Central City Project Area No.1, Calif. R-79. Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 781. the motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: Wilson Abstention: Austin Absent: None .... ...." AMENDMENT ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING CONTRACT, R-79: Mr. Hodgdon requested authorization to amend contract with Arrowhead Engineering to increase the hourly rate of their contract, under the escalation clause. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 782 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH ARROWHEAD ENGINEERING, CHANGING THE HOURLY RATES OF THEIR CONTRACT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, by Resolution No. 569, authorized the execution of a contract with Arrowhead Engineering for the Sanitary Sewer Design of the Central City Project; and WHEREAS, said Contract was entered into the 12th day of January, 1968; and WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Agency to amend said Contract, to increase compensation of the hourly rates. ... ....tiI 810 r ...... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Contract Amendment to contract with Arrowhead Engineering, amending the compensation of the hourly rates of their Contract. Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 782. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Webster, Austin, Wein and Hodgdon NOes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER, EDMOND J. VADNAIS, UNIT NO. IB, R-IO: Mr. Hodgdon re~uested authorization to execute a Change Order to Edmond J. Vadnais contract to furnish an additional sixty five feet of wall adjacent to the existing wall on the northwest side of the outlet end of the Arrow- head Culvert for the sum of $1300. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 783 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CHANGE ORDER WITH EDMOND J. VADNAIS TO THEIR CON- TRACT FOR SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO. lB, R-10 ,.... L WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, by Resolution No. 692, authorized the execution of a contract with Edmond J. Vadnais for Site Preparation of Unit No. lB, Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-IO; and WHEREAS, said Contract was entered into the 22nd day of May, 1968; and WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Agency to amend said Contract to include additional services to be set forth in Change Order No.1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Edmond J. Vadnais, increasing the services of the contract, and compensation for said additional services to be in the amount of $1,300. Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 783. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: Bone Absent: None CHANGE ORDER, GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY "..- l- The Chairman requested authorization to execute a Change Order to Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy's contract for the widening of "E" Street between 2nd and Athol, to include the striping design. The amount of this change would be $600. After discussion, the following resolution was introduced: 811 RESOLUTION NO. 784 ~ RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO. CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CHANGE ORDER WITH GARNER, TEE, TRACADAS & TROY, TO INCLUDE STRIPING IN THEIR CONTRACT FOR THE "E" STREET WIDENING --' WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, by Resolution No. 709. authorized the execution of a contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy for the widening of "E" Street between 2nd and Athol, in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-10;; and WHEREAS, said Contract was~.ntered into the 10th day of June, 1968; and WHEREAS. the Agency now desires to amend said Contract to include the striping plan for "E" Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute a Change Order to contract with Garner, Tee, Tracadas & Troy, to include striping plan of "E" Street in contract dated June 10, 1968, and the compensation for said striping plan to be in the amount of $600.00 Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 784. The motion was made by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ..... ..."J ACE UPHOLSTERY, EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREEMENT: A request for an extension of Ace Upholstery Rental Agreement was presented to the Members. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 785 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN EXTENSION OF RENTAL AGREE- MENT WITH ACE UPHOLSTERY UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1. 1968 WHEREAS, Ace Upholstery has entered into a Rental Agreement with the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino; and WHEREAS, Ace Upholstery has requested an extension of time on their Rental Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, have reviewed the circumstances involved and believe that such an extension is proper. .... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San -J [ ...... , , ......, ,.... "-' 812 Bernardino, California, that the Rental Agreement by and between the Agency and Ace Upholstery is hereby extended until September 1, 1968. Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 785. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None AUTHORIZATION FOR DEMOLITION CONTRACT, R-79: Bids were reviewed for the Demolition and Site Clearance of certain parcels in the Central City Project, as follows: a) Block 8, Parcel 18; Block 11, Parcel 5; and Block 16, Parcel 2 --- Dakeno - $2,375.00 Presco - 2,910.00 RESOLUTION NO. 786 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 8, PARCEL 18; BLOCK 11, PARCEL 5; and BLOCK 16, PARCEL 2, UNIT NO. 17 WITH DAKENO, INC. PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No. 17, in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Dakeno, Inc. is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $2,375.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the~City of San Bernardino, California, that said Bid of Dakeno, Inc. in the sum of $2,375.00, be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 17 on behalf of the Agency. ADOPTED: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 786. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wilson, Wein and HOdgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None 813 b) Block 16, Parcels 5, 13 and 6 Dakeno Roger Roy - $2,500.00 3,600.00 ..., _ii i! 11 ...... RESOLUTION NO. 787 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 16, PARCELS 5, 13 and 6, UNIT NO. 15 WITH DAKENO, INC. PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No. 15, in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Dakeno, Inc., is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $2,500.00. ... ~ u NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, Calfiornia, that said Bid of Dakeno, Inc. in the sum of $2,500.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 15 on behalf of the Agency. ....., Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 787. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Wein, Webster, Wilson and Hodgdon Noes: none Abstention: None Absent: None c) Block 16, Parcels 17, 18 and 16; Block 15, Parcel 4; Block 13, Parcel 3; Block 8, Parcel 21;and Block 7, Parcel 11 --- Askey & Pollard - $2,050.00 Presco Building - 2,660.00 RESOLUTION NO. 788 RES6LUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNAR- DINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 16, PARCELS 17, 18 and 16; BLOCK 15, PARCEL 4; BLOCK 13, PARCEL 3; BLOCK 8, PARCEL 21 and BLOCK 7, PARCEL 11 UNIT NO. 16 WITH ASKEY AND POLLARD PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 ...., ...,;j 814 [ WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for fi- nancial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No. 16, in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Askey and Pollard is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $2,050.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that said Bid of Askey and Pollard in the sum of $2,050.00 be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 16 on behalf of the Agency. Adopted: August 1, 1968 "".,.. Motion was made by Austin and seconded by Webster authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 788. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Austin, Webster, Wilson, Wein and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None CHANGE ORDER, PETER SALATA, UNIT NO.1, R-79: II.."" The Chairman:,requested authorization to execute a Change Order to Peter Salata's contract for Site Preparation, Unit No.1, R-79, due to a conflict with under- ground'electrical conduits at 2nd Street and Arrowhead Avenue. It will be necessary to construct a reinforced concrete structure to be used in lieu of 72" pipe in order to pass the drain under the conduits and to be used as a connector between pipe lines. The cost for such change would be $4,000. The following resolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 789 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CHANGE ORDER TO PETER SALATA'S CONTRACT FOR SITE PREPARATION, UNIT NO. 1, R-79 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency, by Resolution No. 678, authorized the execution of a contract with Peter Salata for Site Preparation, Unit No.1, Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, said Contract was entered into the 2nd day of May, 1968; and ........ WHEREAS, the Agency Members at the Regular Meeting held July 18, 1968, authorized by Resolution No. 760 Change Order No.1, for additional services not to exceed the total amount of $93,228.80 for said Change; and ~ 815 WHEREAS, it is now the desire of the Agency to include in said Change Order No.1, the construction of a reinforced concrete structure, in order to pass drain under conduits and to be used as a connector between pipe lines on Arrowhead Avenue. ...., .....", NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to include in Change Order No. 1 the construction of a reinforced concrete structure, for the sum of $4,000.00, increasing the total of Change Order No. 1 to the sum of $97,228.80. Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 789. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Webster, Wein, and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ASKEY & POLLARD, DEMOLITION CONTRACT, R-79: One estimate was received for the Demolition and Site Clearance of Block 12, ParcelS and Block 11, Parcel 3 from Askey & Pollard in the amount of $1,125. The following ~esolution was introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 790 .., RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE OF BLOCK 12, PARCEL 5 and BLOCK 11, PARCEL 3, UNIT NO. 18 WITH ASKEY & POLLARD PROJECT NO. CALIF. R-79 ...." WHEREAS, the Agency has, under date of March 21, 1967, entered into a Contract for Loan and Capital Grant with the United States of America providing for financial aid to the Agency for its Central City Project, Calif. R-79, under Title I of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, and pursuant to that Contract the Agency is undertaking certain activities necessary for the execution of the Central City Project No.1; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to enter into a Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance of Unit No. 18, in the Central City Project, Calif. R-79; and WHEREAS, it appears to said Agency that Askey and Pollard is qualified to be awarded the Contract, and it appears to be in the best interest of the Agency to accept their bid, for the sum of $1,125.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that said Bid of Askey and Pollard in the sum of $1,125.00, be accepted and the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to execute the Contract for Demolition and Site Clearance Unit No. 18 on behalf of the Agency. ..... Adopted: August 1, 1968 ....., 816 [ Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Austin authorizing Resolution No. 790. The motion was carried by the following Ayes: Wilson, Austin, Wein, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None None Absent: None the adoption of vote, to wit: Abstention: OTHER BUSINESS: Henry Henschel and Robert Erwin, Predisposition Agreement, R-10 The following resolutions~~ere introduced: RESOLUTION NO. 791 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO TAKE ALL STEPS NECESSARY TO INITIATE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THE AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE MEADOWBROOK PROJECT WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan for the Meadowbrook Project was approved by Ordinance No. 2233 of the City of San Bernardino, July 22, 1958; and [ WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan did not envision residential zoning within the Project Area; however, continuous evaluation and analyses of housing requirements for the elderly and low and middle income persons and families have required changes to the initial Redevelopment Plan for Meadowbrook and would be in keeping with and support of all National Goals; and WHEREAS, the Members of the Agency having realized the above, desire the Redevelopment Plan to be amended to allow for such residential zoning. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the Agency to take all steps necessary to initiate the Public Hearings on the Amendment to the REdevelopment Plan for the Meadow- brook Project Area No.1, Calif. R-10. Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Webster and seconded by Wein authorizing the adoption of Resolution No.791. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Webster, Wein, Wilson, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None RESOLUTION NO. 792 r I L.. RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BER- NARDINO, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO ENTER INTO A AMENDMENT TO PREDISPOSITION AGREEMENT WITH HENRY HENSCHEL ET AL TO EXTEND THE TIME OF COMPLETION BY AN ADDITIONAL 120 DAYS 817 WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, by Letter Agreement, executed the 8th day of March, 1968, entered into a Predisposition Agreement for the sale of Reuse Parcels 23 through 32 in the Meadowbrook Project, Calif. R-I~; and .... - WHEREAS, the Agency desires, and the developer agrees, to amend the Letter Agreement, by increasing the time of completion by an additional 120 days. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino, California, that the Chairman and Secretary are hereby authorized to enter into an Amendment to Letter Agreement of March 8, 1968 with Henry Henschel et aI, increasing the time of completion by an additional 120 days. Adopted: August 1, 1968 Motion was made by Wein and seconded by Wilson authorizing the adoption of Resolution No. 792. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wein, Wilson, Webster, Austin and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: None ADJOURNMENT: Motion was made by Wilson and seconded by Webster to adjourn the meeting . at 4:50 p.m. The motion was carried by the following vote, to wit: Ayes: Wilson, Wein, Austin, Webster and Hodgdon Noes: None Abstention: None Absent: none ... :~ d " ~~ .....J ...., --i