The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-Planning Department ~.. 'j" '- ~~~ 7,~-:-, k: C. M. GOULD" WI LLIAM C. FARRER. LEON S. ANGVIRE* VI NCENT C. PAGE. STANLEY E. TOBIN. JACK R. WHITE. HARRY L. HATHAWAY. KYLE D. BROWN- WILLIAM M. BITTING. ROBERT P. HESS'" DAVID A. EBERSHOFF* STUART H. YOUNG, JR,- STEVEN W. BACON- TIM C. BRUINSMA* WM. HAROLD BORTHWICK'" ARTi-IUR B. COOK. JAMES G. JOHNSON- GEORGE KOIDE- JONATHAN M. BRANDLER. DARLENE B. FISCHER. SCOTT L. GilMORE'" KEVIN H. BROGAN JAMES A. BOWLES NEIL D. MARTIN MICHAEL J. DIBIASE HILL, FARRER & BURRILL TELECOPIER FREDERICK J, RYAN, JR. ALFRED M. CLARK. m DANIEL J. MCCARTHY RONALD W. NOVOTNY DAVID K. ROBBINS DAVID T. ROMNEY AUGUST W. CAIMI DEAN E. DENNIS CLAl RE F. M I LEY WilLIAM A. WHITE SUSAN L. SCHWARTZ JAMES R. EVANS, JR. RONALD C. PEARSON PATRICK J. FOLAN LORETTA SICILIANO JENNIFER G. COOK CURTIS A. WESTFALL.. PAUL O. MANETTl MICHAEL 5. TURNER MICHELLE A. MEGHROUNI A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW THIRTY-FIFTH FLOOR-UNION BANK S~UARE 445 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-1666 LOS ANGELES COUNTY TELEPHONE (2l3) 620-0460 ORANGE COUNTY TELEPHONE (714) 641-6605 TELEX 298905 HILL A. J. HILL (1881-1953) WM. M. FARRER (1894-1971) STANLEY S. BURRilL (I902-19S7) OF COUNSEL JOHN N. MCLAURIN. EDWIN H. FRANZEN* (213) 624-4840 (213) 4BB-1593 "'A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Decennber 15, 1988 The Honorable Mayor Evlyn Wilcox Mennbers of the City Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, California 92418 Re: Adoption of Fundannental Land Use Issue Policv Statennents -- Policy No, 16 Honorable Mayor, Mennbers of the Council: " You have before you for consideration and adoption certain Fundannental Land Use Issue Policy Statennents reconnnnended by your Citizens' Advisory Connnnittee ("CAC"), For the record, Stubblefield has the highest respect for Mr, Woody Teischer and his connpany, Enviconn, as well as the CAC, and, in fact, supports the ideals for high quality developnnent across the foothills of San Bernardino, However, the Hillside Managennent ("MH") Policy Statennents ("Policies"), particularly Nos, 16b and 16c pertaining to the annount of developnnent which will be pernnitted in the MH zone, violate State planning policy in at least four (4) nnajor respects: 1. The Policies lack any factual or analytic support; 2, The Policies are hopelessly unclear and ambiguous; 3. The process by which the Policies have been considered and adopted is defective; and 4, The Policies ignore vital social and econonnic factors, Mayor and Councllmembers December 15, 1988 Page 2 For purposes of this analysis, the General Plan Guidelines, promulgated by the Office of Planning and Research ("G.P. GUidelines"), serve as a convenient tool for disclosing just how deficient the MH 'Policies are when examined in light of State law. 1. The Policies lack anv factual or analytic support. The G.P. Guidelines explain that "[s]ound policy depends on solid information" and emphasize the importance of documenting the .,. factual and analytic basis for policy: "It should also be remembered that data without analysis are seldom useful: analysis serves as the bridge of logic from raw data to policy." G.P. Guidelines at 8. Not only should vital background information be given "some official status," but it should be "readily available to decisionmakers and the public and used as a benchmark for evaluating changes in conditions when future general plan revisions are needed." Id. The fact of the matter is that no one really knows what data underlie these new policies. The effects of these policies have not been measured, or even estimated, by the City's consultant or Staff. The CAC has failed to do this because they do not have the time. '. We believe that the Staff and the consultant's measurement of the slope steepness in the local foothills is understated. Referring to the Technical Background Report prepared by Envicom, February, 1988, Figure 54, and Table 49. We believe the majority of the San Bernardino hillsides are far steeper than represented in this report. We can state for a certainty that on Stubblefield Enterprises' property on which the slopes have been measured, Figure 54 is not an accurate representation of this property. Because of this understated estimate of the true steepness of our slopes, we believe that Staff, consultant, and the CAC are operating under false premises, and because of this, we do not believe that the density standard as proposed will ever allow the City of San Bernardino to achieve a proper housing balance. Since the majority of all vacant land owned by Stubblefield exceeds 40% slope, Stubblefield cannot achieve the number of units required to make any project economically feasible. In truth, it would be financially impossible to support the infrastructure required to build in the hills. Yet, your Staff has done no analysis to Mayor and Councilmembers December 15, 1988 Page 3 determine the impact of this new Policy on residential development in the City. Furthermore, Stubblefield has an unique situation on property it owns at the end of Citrus Street and La Praix Avenue. This property is approximately 50 acres in size. All land to the east, west, and south Is developed at a density of 3112 to 4 dwelling units per acre. Under the CAC proposal, this area of 50 acres could only be developed at an extremely lower density than adjoining developments, precluding the development of the property in an economically viable manner. ... We believe that the placement of this land within the MH category is not based on sound planning principles, but rather is an expedient response to political and community pressure. 2. The Policies are unclear and ambiS2:uous. The G. P. Guidelines provide as follows: "For policy to be useful as a guide to action, it should be clear and unambiguous. Legally, as well as practically, the common practice of adopting broadly drawn and vague policy is unacceptable. It is particularly important that the "general plan set clear direction and standards for judging the consistency of zoning and subdivisions. . . For instance, the standards for. . . Land use intensity called for in Government Code Section 65302(a) must be clearly specified for the various land use designations in the plan." aE... Guidelines at 9. We do not ask that you reject the CAC's work on the subject of MH in its entirety. However, we ask that you direct the Staff and the consultant to demonstrate in the real world of the San Bernardino foothills, the results and the impact of this proposed density standard, so that you, the Council, can determine if that result meets the needs of all of the citizens - rich and poor - and if it is what you want and expect for this city. To do less would be an injustice to all land owners in the MH category. The City cannot seriously question the fact that the MH Policy is vague and ambiguous. Your Deputy City Attorney wrote to me in July, 1988, stating as follows: Mayor and Councilmembers December 15, 1988 Page 4 "You will notice that, although the Interim Policy Guidelines set forth a slope-density gradient (Section 70k), the document contains no methodolofSY for calculating. Hie slope of a Darcel. I have pointed out this omission to the Planning staff who said the consultant is preDarinsz: an apDropriate methodologv. " (Copy of the letter dated July 5, 1988, is attached.) The deficiency clearly articulated by your City Attorney still has not been remedied. "P 3. The Drocess bv which the Policies have been considered and adopted is defective. The G. P. Guidelines provide that because gathering data is time-consuming and costly, "the local government should collect and organize information in the early phases of the general plan DrofSram so it can be used later to evaluate the effects of planning options and to satisfy the environmental review requirements..." G.P. Guidelines, at 55. The City has failed to do this. In March, 1988, the CAC adopted the new land use designation called "Hillside Management" without adequately discussing the underlying standards. These same nonspecific "standards" were thereafter adopted, in their entirety, by the City's Planning Commission and, eventually, the Common Council. At the time these guidelines were adopted by each body, City officials openly and publicly conceded that they did not understand and could not interpret the guidelines, but were told that specific standards were being prepared by the City's consultant and would soon be adopted. To date, that has not occurred. To date, properties located in the MH category are the only parcels in the City that cannot move forward with development because no standards exist specific enough to allow the development to be designed, let alone processed. None of the defects has been remedied and the G. P. Guidelines' mandate to collect and organize information early has been ignored. Mayor and Councilmembers December 15, 1988 Page 5 We request that the City Council select three (3) of this City's existing foothill developments, such as those on Seine Avenue in the Mountain Shadows area and those located on Hemlock Drive. They are in steep slopes similar to the remaining undeveloped MH area. The City has in its files all of the detailed contour maps on these properties. The consultant should measure the average slope steepness of these projects and demonstrate to the Council the density results that might occur under the proposed CAC recommendation. The Council then would be in a position to compare the results of proposed standards against what exists today. This then would place the Council in a much stronger position of having exercised due diligence in its deliberation of the MH density standards. 4. The Policies ignore social and economic factors. Although State requirements for a general plan emphasize environmental and physical development, "all phvsical development fulfills economic and social needs and. in turn. orofoundlv affects economic and social conditions. Indeed, s:r.eneral ulan policv is social and economic oolicv." G. P. Guidelines at 7. To put it bluntly, the CAC has put the cart before the horse. It has not set any kind of goal for housing units in the MH zone, nor has it examined the relationship between its hOUSing needs. See, e. g., Housin~ Market Studv, September 24, 1978, Empire Economics. At the Planning Commission meeting of December 12, 1988, the consultant stated that you have no legal obligation to consider the economic and/or social viability of foothill development. We note with interest that the consultant is capable of giving you very specific, measurable results of the density and intensity of development in the commercial/industrial arenas, and further has considered very specific economic units of measurement for arriving at their recommendation. Even though it has been stated that they don't have to, it appears that staff and the consultant are capable of producing this evidence for study when they want to. It is apparent that those property owners in the hillside management category are being discriminated against and are being treated differently from property owners in other land-use categories in the City. Mayor and Councilmembers December 15, 1988 Page 6 For all of the above reasons, I urge you, on behalf of Stubblefield Construction Company and Stubblefield Properties whom I represent, to reject the CAC's recommendation to adopt Policy 16 and to request your Staff to undertake a proper and legally valid study which will be based on a factual framework, be clear and unambiguous, and take into consideration social and economic factors. Very truly yours, ~j~ Darlene Fischer Phillips DFP: gaj DEe 13 '88 03:45 HILL,_FARRER&BURRILL P.7/7 ..~ i':,: ~.. , BERNARDINO 300 NORTH "0" STREET, SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 82418 JAMES F. PENMAN CITY A11'OANliY ('11') 384.aU JUly. 5, 1988 Darlene Fischer, Attorney at Hill, Farrer & Burrill 445 South Figueroa Street 34th Floor-Union Bank Square Los Angeles, CA 90071-1666 Re: Stubblefield Construction Company, etc. at al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al. Law Dear Ms. Fisher: Enclosed is a copy of the preferred Land Use Alternative Map and the Interim Policy Guidelines. Apparently, your client's property is in the "Hillside Management" land use classification after all. You will notice that, although the Interim Policy Guidelines set forth a slope-density gradient (Section 70k), the document contains no methodology for calculating the slope of a parcel. I have pointed out this omission to the Plannin~ staff who said the consultant is preparing an appropriate methodology. Please let me know if you need additional information about the interim plan. Very truly yours, 4... ~ a,6..,~~ CYNTHIA R. GRACE Deputy City Attorney CRG:cm Encl. C I T Y 0 F SAN B ERN A R D L N 0 INTEROFFICE ~1EMORANDUM 8812-806 TO: Jack Reilly, Second Wa~d Councilman FROM: Valerie C. Ross, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Recommendation DATE: December 16, 1988 COPIES: -----~-------------------------~---------------------------- In the downtown area, senior residential projects may be permitted to exceed 36 units per acre provided that an analysis is performed that demonstrates its long term feasi- bility. Such projects will be subject to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and shall be subject to all development stan- dards such as parking, landscaping, open space, etc. ,/ The ~. ea is definectlas Rialto Avenue on the south, the freeway on 1:: '. w e,~t up t6 SiX. ~h, stre.et-.,,',\,' SiXi. /stree1\:". over to "G" Street, "'G" S \ t up to Elgl+th $tr,~~t.~ov r t~. h~lfway betwee:n'~'DII ~".tt~ ..e~_t_,gnd.~rr?~.~<;\,,::"'..::.~e-at;d' d, 0 n t ~-s~,:enth Street.,. ;e~"'= street to Slerra Way aTId--S4-eJ:;:ra' Way t ,lal to , ~~ Avenue." -"~ " . /,/id /w77. cJ{ /6--e:/CC~7J'2t':n f t2( .et11U (J ak~ ,/. (' / a Ul U) . C:~~ ~(/'-t'.J!/ --?0 d-C-C/-tLd/ c:c~ " ~ /) /2.f!.c <.--? f ;t(U/72 7U?'lf . / I r.~uI #~ ?Z/~ (..(/<.0' 4-d ~'/)/ld/k~.f- C I T X 0 F SAN R ERN A R D L N 0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 8812-805 TO: Jess Flores, Third Ward Councilman FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Recommendations DATE: December 16, 1988 COPIES: -------------------------------------------------------------- A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) runs with the land. The City cannot revoke a CUP unless the conditions of approval are not being met. We cannot require a CUP for a change in property or business ownership. A certificate of Occupancy 1:3 required with a change in property ownership, change of business ownership or after a building has been vacant for 180 days. All new buildings require a certificate of Occupa:.1cy. 11OTION All projects (or all commercial and industrial projects) should be reviewed prior to issuance of a certificate of Occupancy to ensure that th.~y meet all applicable Code requirements. This should bi~ addressed in detail in the Development Code. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO COMMISSION MEMBERS: Cieryl Brown Pfuhard Cole VICtor Corona Filancisco Gomez Nfchael Lindseth Rlaben Lopez Fiby Nierman Al'exander Sharp ~ert Stone 300 NORTH 'D' STREET, SAN BERNARDINO. CALIF0f-1NIA 92418 ----Pl.-ANNINGGOMMISSION AGENDA (\1 '- .f..... i' December )/3, 1988 c I ,-"iV' -6;~OO"p.m. Council Chambers 1. Key Land Use Issues A. B. c. r 10'. C , t: ' chair, citizen fl-- n.,'"._ ,t^ Presentation by John Traver, Advisory Committee Presentation by Woodie Tescher, ENVICOM Corporat:ion ,n! l-n.(~ 1'~ ~U:blic Hearing Ir .4 i\iLAt Discussion of Key Land Use Issue Policy stateme';lts' ,"I)'/il,' 2, Public Comments - Items Not on Agenda A/lden" . ~t, tUlt"/,ll if'/- j~{ ) ',(lrz 'J1.I'vi It / II; ,"U ~,}; l,t{-~ ' j""') :,' .' ,"~~l",t i 1" I; ll" '),bl /J ,fl.."''' /. r 1.1 (..", / /!rL-.1 A, ." 'r '" "r . '''", ij~ i,,(V lei IV t) v ' I f/ ' iV/!'<.J(!'v ;";{, ''JuI,!I!'' 1;' csj/12-13-88 PC:HTG12l388 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM Key Milestone Dates to Complete the General Plan WEEK DATE EVENT Z 1 2 <( 3 January 21 PC/CAC review of draft LU map ...., 4 January 28 PC/CAC review of draft LU map CO 5 January 30 MCC review of 6 LU issues UJ 6 L1- 7 8 February 25 Draft LU maps "Open House" 9 March 3 Draft GP & EIR Screencheck a: 10 <( 11 ~ 12 March 24 Draft GP & EIR available 13 April 1 First PC public hearing 0: 14 a.. 15 April 13 Final PC recommendation <( 16 17 April 24 MCC presentation of GP 18 >- 19 . May 11 EIR review period ends <( 20 ~ 21 22 May 31 General Plan adopted C I T Y J F SAN B ERN A R D N 0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 8812-604 TO: The Mayor and Common Council FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: Fundamental Land Use Issue Policy Statements DATE: December 15, 1988 COPIES: ------------------------------------------------------------- The attached pages represent the Planning Commission's additions to the Fundamental Land Use Issue Policy State- ments. They supplement the original document which repre- sents the recommendations of the citizen Advisory Committee which were distributed Friday, December 9, 1988. ~ ...... -. -- ADDENDA AND ERRATA 1. Page 7, No. 16c, second bullet: Density may be transferred to lesser slopes according to the following standards Single-family detached: 50% in areas increase above the allowable density in the slope category 2. Page 13, No. 20c, third bullet: . Community-serving and other commercial uses: FAR -l-:G 0.7. 3, Page 29, No. 35c: . FAR ~ 1.0 (except for hospitals) 4. Page 29, No. 36c: · FAR {}.; 0.7 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED REVISIONS TO FUNDAMENTAL LAND USE DECISIONS The following indicates the revisions to the Fundamental Land Use Decisions for the City of San Bernardino General Plan recommended by the Planning Commission on 13 December 1988. Deletions are indicated by strikeout and additions are indicated by underline. The Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Decision document with these revisions. 1. Page 3, Number 4, second bullet: · Tri-City /Hospitality Lane/Commercenter: region-serving mixed use center, capitalizing on its location on the Interstate 10 corridor, and incorporating corporate and professional offices, light industry, hotels, restaurants, entertainment, promotional retail, high density residential, and supporting retail and service uses. 2. Page 5, Number 9, add new bullet: /h/ /, "' ,I , C:~,~,{,.:.~ e",f / - · Develop "themed" specialty commercial centers and districts which reflect the historic and/or ethnic heritage of the community in the Mount Vernon area (4th to 8th and 16th to Highland), Santa Fe Railroad area, and other appropriate locations. 3. Page 5, Number 10, first bullet: -,-,-,- · Consolidate commercial uses into activity centers at key intersections and develop intervening areas for medium to medium high density residential. 4. Page 5, Number 11 (NOTE: The following indicates revisions endorsed by the CAC following publication of the Decision Document): ... As existing used car dealerships and commercial businesses discontinue operations, redevelop for medium density residential and preclude other commercial uses. · Permit used car dealerships to continue; if there is a change of ownership or the use is discontinued, a Conditional Use Permit shall be required. · In the interim, Rr.equire that existing uses provide design improvements (landscape, signage, decorative walls, etc.) and apply enhanced design standards for new development. 1 5. Page 7, Number 16b: {,r /l ;-/- 5 · 0-25% slope: single-family detached and attached towfihonles on cut and fill pads or stepped footings. · 25-40% slope: residences on stepped footings, with mInimUm grading as required for streets, driveways, siting of unit, site drainage, slope stability, and fire protection. · Above 40% slope: no development: allowable units may be transferred to lesser slopes. 6. Page 10, Number 19a, add the following: · High volume discount retail commercial uses (typically, using low cost warehouse space) along the 1-10 frontage. 7. Page 18, Number 25: · More economic pattern of land uses; developing commercial activity nodes at key intersections specialty commercial and cultural center reflecting the ethnic heritage of the area between 4th and 8th Streets light manufacturing and incubator industries north of Base Line Street medium to medium high density housing in the intervening areas 8. Page 19, Number 25d, third bullet: ,------ · Medium to medium high density residential in locations between the commercial centers. 9. Page 20, Number 25f, second bullet: · Residential: 9.1 to ~ 14 units per net acre and a maximum bonus of 50% for senior citizen and congregate care facilities, provided that an analysis determines long-term feasibility. 10. Pages 23-24 NOTE: The following indicates revIsIons endorsed by the CAC following the publication of the Decisions document: 29. What should be the functional role of the "E" Street corridor between 8th Street and Base Line Street? 2 Recommendations: . AG aisting used car dealerships and commercial booinesscs discontinue operations, redevelop the area for multi family residential. . Continue existing used car dealerships and other commercial uses. . In the interim, R,require that existing uses provide aesthetic improvements. 29a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendations: . Multi family residential units; to;'/nhomes, condominiums, and/or apartments. . Existing auto-related and commercial uses should be allowed to continueL until sold for residential developmeRt on change of ownership, or discontinuation of use a Conditional Use Permit sh 11 be re uired.. d &~~ U'. / v .u.a~:l j ~-d/7<<) 871 . e/,P a~ u/?.c · Communit#~rnmeY:cial uses. 29b. What should be the physical form and character of the "E" Street corridor? Recommendations: ... High quality multi family residential neighborhood; distinctiy/e architecture; ay/oidance of "block lik.c" structures (indhidual unit building facades, separate entries, offset facades, etc.). · Compatibility with and linkages to adjacent residential neighborhoods. · Emphasis on orienting buildings to peripheral sidewalks (minimum percentage located on the street frontage) unifying individual buildings in multi-structure projects by architectural design elements avoiding the development of large, "box-like" structures, creating offset volumes and multiple facade articulation increased pedestrian orientation of the ground floor of buildings (interconnecting linkages, transparent surfaces, etc.) increased site landscape increased unity in site signage and lighting 3 29c. How much development should be permitted in the lIE" Street corridor? R~commendations: .. Rcsidcntial: 124 to 24 units pcr net acrc. ... Senior citi~n and congregate care RousiRg: a maximum Bonus of SOl?{ provided that an analysis dcmonstFates long term fcasibility. · Commercial: FAR 0.7. 11. Page 32, Number 41 a, last bullet: · Senior Citizen Residential Projects: a maximum density of 50% greater than the density of the underlying residential zone and 36 units per acre in Commercial Office zones provided that ill an analysis is conducted which demonstrates its long-term feasibility and (2) a plan is prepared for the conversion of the seniors _1_ units to standard units and a reduction in their number to that allowed by the underlying zone which shall be implemented if the project is not occupied by qualified seniors. 4 __ .-.......- -<:;0' I"T ': -- ~~ r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM ~ ~ ! ;1 , FUNDAMENTAL LAND USE ISSUE . POLI:CY STATEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE DECEMBER 1988 ___~'_'~"""""__ '~,'.'''''''''__ ~.__.,,,,::,,,,,,:,,_._ ....__..:..~,,_."_... __'. .....-:t- ~.___:...,"':..;~";.,, ~. _...'__~.._'~. .on........ ~.......'.... r GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVICOM CORPORATION in association with DKS ASSOCIATES, ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES, NATELSON LEVANDER WHITNEY, SAGE ASSOCIATES December, 1988 SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN FUNDAMENTAL LAND USE DECISIONS AS APPROVED BY THE CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Determination of the final land use plan for the City of San Bernardino is dependent on the resolution of a number of fundamental planning issues. The response to these will effectively direct the pattern and amount of uses to be accommodated in the City and its sphere of influence. Essentially, these will be the key philosophies (or "controls") by which all other plan policies will be determined. Ultimately they will be expressed as a goal, objective, or policy by the Plan. This document has been prepared to facilitate the resolution of the fundamental issues and definition of a preferred direction. The fundamental issues during the land use plan are stated as questions. For these one or more responses are recommended for consideration. Where more than one is listed, they should be considered as an integrat- ed set of recommendations. The recommendations have been approved by the Citizens Advisory Committee, as derived and revised from the goals, objectives, and policies contained in the consultant team's preliminary draft documents. Their wording has been simplified for the purposes of the document and have not been stated in ultimate "policy" format. The questions and recommendations are presented in two sections. The most significant (and, possibly, controversial) issues impacting land use development are contained in the first section. Secondary issues and those related to specific geographic sub-areas of the City are included in the second. Please note that this division has been made for the convenience of review based on the preliminary judgment of the consultant and City staff. Other value judgments could shift the importance of a defined issue among the sections. However, this is not critical to the planning process. 1 SECTION ONE: OVERRIDING ISSUES 1. What types of land uses should be located in the City and who should they serve? Recommenda tions: · Uses which maintain and enhance San Bernardino as the "capital" of the Inland Empire; including major region-serving governmental, retail, commercial, cor- porate offices, recreation, entertainment, cultural, hotel and convention, educa- tional, transportation, and similar uses. · Uses which serve existing residents and population growth; including housing, commercial services, schools, parks, and similar uses. · Uses which provide employment opportunities for residents of the City and greater Inland Empire (regional) area; in particular enhancing job opportunities for those living in the City and commute to other areas. · Uses which capitalize on the available natural resources (e.g., mineral produc- tion). · Open space to protect significant environmental resources and provide a high quality of life for the City's residents and visitors. 2. How much development should be accommodated? Recommendations: · As demanded by the market within the constraints of infrastructure capacities environmental sensitivities and hazards preserving the scale and character of existing stable and viable residential neighborhoods and commercial districts · A minimum of housing units by 2010; including a mix of _% single-family and_% multi-family. · Industrial, office, and retail uses which provide for a minimum of 27,000 jobs. · A minimum of 1000 acres of new industrial development. · A minimum of 90 acres of new commercial office development. · A minimum of 75 acres of new regional commercial development. 2 · Sufficient local-serving commercial, minimum of _ acres, to support resi- dential growth. · A minimum of _ acres for parks to support residential growth. · A minimum of _ acres for schools to support population growth. · Sufficient land to accommodate expanded City, County, and other governmen- tal uses. 3. What should be the pattern of new development in the City? Recommendations: · Focus regional and major high activity local serving uses in a number of dis- tinct and interconnected centers and corridors, abutted by moderate and high density residential, and with intervening "flatland" areas for lower intensity residential and supporting uses and the hillside areas for high quality residen- tial sited to maintain the unique environmental character of the hillsides. · Uses in each key activity node/ corridor shall be limited to reflect their func- tional role and establish an unique identity. 4. What should be the key regional-serving nodes and corridors of the City and what should be their functional role? Recommendations: · Downtown: symbolic center of the City, incorporating a mix of governmental, regional retail, professional offices, convention facilities, entertainment and similar uses and high density residential. · Tri-City /Hospitality Lane/Commercenter: region-serving mixed use center, capitalizing on its location on the Interstate 10 corridor, and incorporating corporate and professional offices, light industry, hotels, restaurants, entertainment, high density residential, and supporting retail and service uses. · ''Regional Opportunities" Corridor linking downtown with Tri City (including the Inland Center and National Orange Show nodes): opportunity for the intensification of the National Orange Show and Inland Center sites and introduction of new regional-serving uses, which link the downtown and Tri- City /Commercenter areas. 3 · Norton Air Force Base and abutting commercial and industrial lands: continue use for U.S. Air Force operations and supporting uses, pursue potential joint use for commercial and/or industrial operations, and develop adjacent properties for complementary industrial, commercial, and residential uses. · Waterman Avenue Corridor (between the Santa Ana River and 3rd Street): develop a new corporate office and business park as a major region-serving center of the City, linked to downtown, Tri-City /Commercenter, and the Regional Opportunities Corridor. 5. Where should new regional retail commercial be located? Recommendations: · As intensification of Central City Mall and Inland Center~/v;-rU/2'-Ci"/ 6. What other areas or specialty uses serve or may serve regional and local residents which should be continued and intensified? Recommendations: · California State University San Bernardino and abutting commercial lands · Club Area · Auto Center 7. What areas potentially could be reused for region- and/or local-serving uses? Recommenda tions: · Santa Fe Railroad Yards and adjacent properties: for industrial, transportation (e.g., commuter raiD, and supporting retail uses and adaptive reuse of the depot and adjacent Del Monte Center area for a specialty commercial center and possible international market. 8. What should be the principal community-serving commercial districts? Recommenda tions: · Highland Avenue · 40th Street · Mount Vernon · Base Line (> South "E" Street · 9th and Waterman 4 9. How can community-serving commercial development be channeled to ensure economic vitality and prevent long-term economic and physical blight? Recommendations: · In existing "viable" strip corridors (Highland, 40th Street, and South "E" Street): infill at prevailing scale and intensity, expand property depths where shallow, and provide additional parking. · In declining strip corridors: consolidate uses into key activity centers. 10. How should the Mount Vemon and Base Line commercial corridors be more effectively used to improve their economic viability and benefit the community? Recommendations: · Consolidate commercial uses into activity centers at key intersections and develop intervening areas for medium to medium-high density residential. · Establish an ethnic-themed specialty commercial center on Mount Vernon between 4th and 8th Streets. 11. How should liE" Street north of downtown (8th to Base Line) be revitalized? Recommenda tions: · As existing used car dealerships and commercial businesses discontinue operations, redevelop for medium density residential and preclude other commercial uses. · In the interim, require that existing uses provide design improvements (landscape, signage, decorative walls, etc.). 12. What should be the principal areas of the City whose primary use is industrial? Recommendations: · West and southwest of Norton Air Force Base. · West of Interstate 215, south of Foothill Boulevard, east of Rancho Avenue, north of Rialto A venue (and areas flanking the railroad tracks to the south) · Between Interstate 215 and Cajon Boulevard, northwest of University Parkway. 5 13. How should new residential uses be developed in the City? Recommendations: . Maintain and preserve existing viable and significant residential neighborhoods (e.g., historic, recognized by the community, distinct neighborhood character, and resident identity). · Permit recycling of older deteriorated single-family residential neighborhoods for moderate and high density housing (principally, areas bounded by Highland, 1-215, downtown and Waterman, with exclusions). . New development be sited and designed to reflect environmental sensitivities and constraints. 14. Where should multi-family residential uses be located? Recommendations: . Disperse multi-family residential throughout the City locating in proximity to existing and planned commercial services and public transportation corridors. 15. Where should senior citizen housing facilities be developed in the City? Recommenda tions: · Within and adjacent to downtown and other key multi-family residential and commercial office areas in proximity to public transportation, supporting commercial, and health and social services. 16. Should residential uses be developed in hillside areas differently than on flat land sites? Recommendation: · Yes, to reflect the variations of topography, environmental sensitivities and hazards; and visual character. 16a. In what areas should the development of residential uses be "managed" to reflect hillside characteristics? Recommenda tions: · Uniform land masses of 15 percent slope and greater. 6 · Areas located within 15 percent boundary (''Hillside Management") depicted on the Land Use Plan shall have a slope map prepared by an engineer prior to development. · The "management" boundary can be adjusted to reflect the engineer- determined 15 percent slope; with lands of less than 15 percent slope reverting to the land use designation of adjacent parcels. 16b. What type of residential should be permitted? Recommenda tions: · 0-25% slope: single-family detached and attached townhomes on cut and fill pads or stepped footings. · 25-40% slope: residences on stepped footings. · Above 40% slope: no development. 16c. How much development should be allowed in hillside areas? Recommenda tions: · Determine by the following categories of slope 0-15 15-25 25-30 30+ 2.0 dul acre 1.0 dulacre 0.5 dul acre 0.1 dul acre · Density may be transferred to lesser slopes according to the following standards Single-family detached: 50% in areas above the allowable density in the slope category Multi-family units: 100% increase above the allowable density in the slope category 16d. How should hillside development projects be reviewed by the City? Recommenda tions: · By Conditional Use Permit, incorporating all product requirements of a Specific Plan, an Environmental Impact Report, and public review for projects of 5 lots and greater. 7 17. Should the City expand its sphere of influence and pursue annexation of unincorporated areas? Recommendations: . Pursue annexation of all unincorporated areas in the sphere of influence; establishing unincorporated islands surrounded by the City as the first priority. . Expand sphere of influence to incorporate areas which may require urban and suburban services from the City. 8 SECTION TWO: PRINCIPAL ISSUES -- ... 18. What should be the functional role of downtown San Bernardino? Recommendations: · Symbolic center of the City; major activity area. . Center of governments region-serving commerce, professional offices, conven- tion facilities, entertainment, cultural, and supporting uses. · Limited high density residential to support other uses. . An am-pm activity sub-area (generally between liD", liE", 2nd and 5th Streets). · Pedestrian-oriented 18a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendations: · Expansion of City, County, and other governmental uses . Professional offices which support governmental uses, financial headquarters offices, corporate offices, and similar uses . Regional serving commercial as intensification of Central City Mall · Expanded convention related uses (hotels, restaurants, meeting facilities, etc) · AM/PM uses (restaurants, theaters, nightclubs, specialty shops, etc) · Public oriented cultural uses (museums, libraries, etc) . Pedestrian oriented uses on the ground floor (restaurants, gift shops, retail sales, etc) · Public open spaces (parks, pedestrian promenades, etc) . Preclude local-serving commercial uses (except where they support and are ancillary to the principal regional-serving use), industrial, warehousing, and other uses not typical of urban centers 18b. What should be the physical form and character of downtown? Recommenda tions: · Sense of a primary urban center of the region · Highest overall development intensity in the City · Mix of low, medium, and high rise structures · Buildings sited to encourage pedestrian activity · Individual buildings and sites visually integrated by urban design improvements (streetscape, signage, etc) · Improved linkage of Central City Mall with adjacent parcels 9 ...... ---- - --- 18c. How much development should be permitted in the downtown? Recommenda tions: . Commercial, office, and government uses (excluding Central City Mall area): FAR 3.0 . Central City Mall (regional retail): FAR 1.5 · Residential: a. Sites exclusively developed for housing: 36 units per acre b. Senior citizen housing: a maximum bonus of 50% (to a maximum density of 54 units per acre), provided that an analysis determines long-term feasibility . Vertical integration of residential with commercial: additional FAR of 1.0 19. What is the functional role of the Tri-City/Commercenter area? Recommendations: . Regional serving mixed use center, capitalizing on its location on the Interstate 10 corridor; incorporating corporate and professional offices, light industry, hotels, restaurants, entertainment, high density residential, and supporting retail and service uses . Acts as a symbolic "anchor" at the southern edge of the City which is linked to the downtown area 19a. What uses should be emphasized in the Tri-City/Commercenter area? Recommenda tions: . Expanded corporate office, research and development, high technology, and similar uses . Hotels/motels, restaurants, entertainment, and other uses providing for the needs of Interstate 10 travelers and visitors to local corporate and industrial uses . Financial institutions, small scale retail facilities, and similar uses which support the office and industrial uses. . High density residential in undeveloped areas along the eastern perimeter of the area (outside of high noise exposure areas) and above the first floor of commercial structures. 10 . Preclude major regional serving retail uses, heavy industries, and major local serving commercial uses. 19b. What should be the physical form and character of the Tri-City/Commercenter area? Recommendations: . Unified urban center. . Second highest intensity of development in the City. . Mix of low, mid and high rise structures; within necessary restrictions to maintain aviation activities at Norton Air Force Base, . Buildings sited in urban-park like setting, incorporating extensive landscape and water elements. . Improved linkages among individual buildings and sites. . Buildings sited adjacent to linkages to the Santa Ana River. . Selected pedestrian oriented sub-areas. . Light industrial buildings designed to convey urban-like character; avoiding undifferentiated box-like facades. 19c. How much development should be permitted in the Tri-City/Commercenter area? Recommendations: . Commercial, office, and overnight accommodations: FAR 3.0. . Research and development and light industrial: FAR 1.5. . Residential: 36 units per acre. . Residential vertically integrated with commercial: additional FAR of 1.0. 20. What should be the functional role of the "Regional Opportunities Corridor?" Recommenda tions: . Opportunity for the intensification of the National Orange Show and Inland Center sites and introduction of new regional serving uses, which link the downtown and Tri-City /Commercenter areas. 20a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tions: . Intensification of the Inland Center site with new regional retail commercial and supporting uses. 11 . Intensification of the National Orange Show site with expanded exhibition, festival, commercial recreation, entertainment, and convention facilities and supporting uses (hotels, restaurants, gift stores, etc) and full-year scheduling of events and activities (fairs, festivals, entertainment, athletics and sports, fiestas, farmers markets, community picnics, conventions, etc). . Possible inclusion of permanent specialty commercial, restaurant, hotel, and similar uses on a portion of the National Orange Show site. . Introduction of new region-serving uses, provided that they are determined to be compatible with adjacent uses, can be adequately served by the circulation network and other utility infrastructure, do not contribute adverse environmental impacts, and contribute significant benefits to the City (revenue, jobs, etc.). . Community-serving commercial uses (food sales, building materials, automotive sales and repair, apparel and accessories, furniture and home furnishings, and eating and drinking establishments), personal services, financial institutions, entertainment, overnight accommodations, and similar uses along "E" Street, other principal streets, and at key intersections. . Light manufacturing, research and development, warehousing, and other similar uses adjacent to existing such uses and Interstate 215. . High density residential in the Corridor's periphery, outside of high noise exposure areas. . Inclusion of public transit facilities (bus, light rail, other), linked to downtown, Tri-City /Commercenter, Waterman Avenue Corporate Park, the railroad depot, and other major off-site areas. 20b. What should be the physical form and character of the "Regional Opportunities Corridor?" Recommendations: . Sense of an urban link between downtown and Tri-City /Commercenter. . Predominant low rise character with clusters of mid rise structures. . Development sited to focus on "E" Street as a major pedestrian oriented promenade; including the development of new structures at Inland Center and the National Orange Show in proximity to "E" Street. 12 . Design of major regional uses (e.g., expanded Inland Center) to convey a pedestrian character; avoiding undifferentiated, box-like structures. . Extensive visual improvements at key entries and along Interstate 215. 20c. How much development should be permitted in the "Regional Opportunities Corridor?" Recommendations: . Regional retail commercial (Inland Center): FAR 1.5. . National Orange Show (other than festival/commercial recreation uses): FAR 3.0. . Community-serving and other commercial uses: FAR 1.0. . Light industrial uses: FAR 0.75. . Residential: 36 units per acre. 21. What should be the functional role of the Norton Air Force Base area? Recommendations: . Continued use for U.S. Air Force operations and supporting uses. . Pursue potential joint use for commercial and/or industrial operations. . Development of adjacent properties for complementary industrial, commercial, and residential uses. 21a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tions: . Air Force related facilities (aircraft hangars and serVIces, military housing, personnel recreational uses, etc.). . If joint use: private aviation-related warehousing, manufacturing, research and development, high technology, and ancillary uses (restaurants, etc.). . Manufacturing, light industrial, office, and other compatible uses on adjacent properties in conformance with Air Installation Compatible Use Zone criteria on adjacent properties. 13 21b. What should be the physical form and character of the Norton Air Force Base area? Recommenda tions: · Landscaped air park environment. · Improved buffers with adjacent properties (e.g., landscape, noise walls, earthen berms, lighting controls, etc.). 21c. How much development should be permitted at Norton Air Force Base? Recommendations: · Air Force uses: no restriction on intensity. · Adjacent uses: a. Commercial: FAR 0.7. b. Light manufacturing: FAR 0.75. c. Warehousing: FAR 1.0 d. Heavy industrial: FAR 0.75. e. Residential: variable densities Building heights shall be limited as necessary to maintain airport aviation operations. · Joint use: to be determined by Specific Plan. 22. What is the functional role of the California State University area? Recommenda tions: · Continuation and expansion of Cal State for educational, cultural, recreational, and supporting uses. · Commercial and personal services to meet the needs of students, faculty, and visitors to the University on adjacent properties along North Park Boulevard, Kendall Drive, and State University Parkway. 22a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tions: · Cal State: academic administration, teaching facilities, student housing, athletic facilities, libraries, research facilities, cultural, and related uses. 14 - ----- -........ -'-~ . Adjacent properties: student and faculty oriented commercial, personal service, entertainment, eating establishments, food stores, and similar uses (e.g., book stores, art supply stores, grocery stores, cleaning establishments, shoe repair, hair styling/ cutting, banks and savings and loans, restaurants, and indoor motion picture theaters) and university-related research and development and professional offices. 22b. What should be the physical form and character of the Cal State University area? Recommendations: . Cal State University: a park-like campus setting, containing a mix of low and medium rise structures and extensive landscape. . Adjacent properties: a low rise commercial "village", containing small scale individual buildings focusing on pedestrian areas and open spaces and using architectural design idioms and materials which enhance the pedestrian environment. . Off-site commercial village and housing should be linked to the Cal State campus. 22c. How much development should be permitted in the Cal State University area? Recommendations: . Cal State University: density not subject to definition. . Commercial, office, and research and development uses: FAR 0.7. 23. What should be the functional role of the Santa Fe Railroad depot, yards, and adjacent areas? Recommenda tions: . Continued operation of the Santa Fe railroad yards for railroad and transportation related uses. . Adaptive reuse of the railroad depot and adjacent Del Monte Center properties for a community and region-serving specialty commercial center. . Linkage of the railroad depot area with downtown and the "Regional Opportunities Corridor" by public transit. 15 23a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tions: · Railroad, transportation related, and industrial uses at the Santa Fe yards. · Promote the development of a multi-modal transportation center integrating railroad, rail transit, bus, automotive, and similar uses at the railroad yards area. · Depot and adjacent properties: specialty commercial center, including possible restaurants, gift shops, art galleries, railroad museum, boutiques, movie theaters, entertainment facilities, food markets, international plaza, and other similar uses; emphasis on inclusion of pedestrian-oriented uses in the ground floor of structures. 23b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the Santa Fe Railroad Yards area? Recommenda tions: · Railroad yards: improved buffers with adjacent land uses (landscape, noise walls, lighting controls, etc.). · Depot and adjacent properties: adaptive reuse and restoration of the railroad depot siting of new structures fronting onto a pedestrian promenade (with possible limited automobile access) connecting to the depot entry from 2nd Street; incorporating extensive streetscape amenities (landscape, street furniture, lighting, signage, etc.) evocative of the historic heritage of the area. new buildings designed to enhance pedestrian activity; small scale, differentiated facades, visually and physically transparent, etc. · Streetscape improvements along 2nd or 3rd Streets, linking the Depot with downtown; including street trees, landscape, lighting, street furniture, signage, and other amenities. 16 23c. How much development should be permitted in the Santa Fe Railroad Yards area? Recommendations: . Industrial: FAR 0.75. . Commercial and entertainment uses: FAR 0.7. 24. What should be the functional role of the Club area? Recommendation: . A region-serving center of high volume discount retail uses, light manufacturing, and warehouses; capitalizing on its location on the Interstate 10 corridor. 24a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendations: . High volume discount retail commercial uses (typically using low-cost warehouse space) and supporting retail and service commercial uses. . Light manufacturing, warehousing, research and development and supporting retail uses (personal services, gift shops, etc.). 24b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the Club area? Recommendations: . Business park-like environment; large individual warehouse-like buildings with extensive surface parking and landscape; buildings should convey a distinctive architectural character (all facades should be articulated); au tomobile-orien ted. . Improved visual environment (entry signage from the freeway, landscaped parking and site periphery, attractive lighting, etc.) . Visual and physical linkages to Tri-City /Commercenter. 17 24c. How much development should be permitted in the Club area? Recommenda tion: · Commercial: 0.7. · Light Industrial: 0.75. 25. What should be the functional role of the Mount Vemon commercial corridor? Recommendation: · More economic pattern of land uses; developing commercial activity nodes at key intersections specialty commercial and cultural center reflecting the ethnic heritage of the area between 4th and 8th Streets light manufacturing and incubator industries north of Base Line Street medium to medium-high density housing in the intervening areas 25a. What uses should be emphasized in the 4th to 8th Street area? Recommendations: · Diversity of ethnic-themed and specialty uses, including restaurants, food sales, clothing, gift shops, entertainment, professional services, and similar uses. · Open air or semi-enclosed public markets; outdoor and semi-outdoor dining. · Cultural, social, educational, and other community-serving facilities and organizations. · AM/PM uses. 25b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the 4th to 8th Street area? Recommenda tions: · Adaptive reuse of existing structures and new construction which complements the scale, mass, form, and architectural character of existing buildings. 18 . "Village" pedestrian oriented character; siting of buildings in direct proximity to sidewalks (no parking in front of structures) and extensive streetscape improvements (street trees and furniture, pedestrian oriented lighting, projecting signs, attractive signage, etc.). . Relationship of buildings and urban design improvements to existing park/plaza. 25c. How much development should be permitted in the 4th to 8th Street area? Recommendations: · FAR 1.0. 25d. What uses should be emphasized in the area south of Base Line Street (excluding specialty area)? Recommendations: . Commercial centers at the intersections of Mount Vernon Avenue and Base Line Street, Medical Center Drive and Base Line Strett, Mount Vernon Avenue and Mill Street, Mount Vernon Avenue and Rialto Avenue (adjacent to the railroad yards) and other appropriate locations. . Community serving commercial uses, including food sales, building materials, apparel and accessories, furniture and home furnishings, restaurants, book store, cleaning establishments, beauty salons/hair cutting, laundries, entertainment, theaters, automotive service, and similar uses. . Medium ~h density residential in locations between the commercial centers. . Senior citizen and congregate care housing in locations between the commercial centers. 25e. What should be the physical form and character of development in the area south of Base Line Street? Recommendations: . Commercial centers: typical "suburban" centers with increased siting of buildings in proximity to peripheral sidewalks and extensive landscape on the periphery, in parking areas, and integrated with the buildings. 19 . Residential: low rise, individual unit design "sense" (individual entries, multiple building volumes, off-set facades, etc) and on-site amenities; compatibly integrated from adjacent commercial uses (security, noise, lighting). 2Sf. How much development should be permitted in the area south of Base Line Street? Recommendations: . Commercial: FAR 0.7 )u I . Residential: 9.1 to.-2'4 units per net acre and a maximum bonus of 50% for senior citizen and congregate care facilities, provided that an analysis determines long-term feasibility. 2Sg. What uses should be emphasized in the area north of Base Line Street? Recommendations: . Small incubator industries, light manufacturing, and supporting retail uses. 2Sh. What should be the physical form and character of development in the area north of Base Line Street? Recommendation: . Landscaped, low rise industrial park compatible with adjacent residential uses (buffers, etc). 2Si. How much development should be permitted in the area north of Base Line Street? Recommendation: · FAR 0.5. 26. What should be the functional role of the Highland Avenue corridor, between Waterman Avenue to "E" Street? Recommendation: . Continued development for community-serving commercial uses; consistent in scale and character with existing buildings, with expanded parking, and improved compatibility with adjacent residences. 20 26a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendations: . Community serving commercial uses including food sales, apparel and accessories, furniture and home furnishings, restaurants, book stores, cleaning establishments, beauty salons/hair cutting, laundries, entertainment, theaters, professional offices, and similar uses. 26b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the Highland Avenue corridor? Recommendations: . Design and siting of buildings to enhance pedestrian activity. . New construction consistent in scale and character (storefront rhythm, transparent facades, etc.) . Parking sited at the rear of structures. . Introduction of streetscape amenities and consistent signage. 26c. How much development should be permitted in the Highland Avenue corridor? Recommendation: · FAR 1.0. 27. What should be the functional role of the Waterman Avenue corridor? Recommenda tion: . Development of a new corporate office and business park as a major region serving center of the City; linked to downtown, Tri-City/Commercenter, and the Regional Opportunities Corridor. 27a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tion: . Corporate offices, light manufacturing, research and development, and supporting retail service uses (financial, florists, etc.). 21 27b. What should be the physical form and character of the Waterman Avenue corridor? Recommenda tions: . Corporate/business park setting; extensive site landscape, unifying signage, pedestrian paths, and open spaces, common architectural vocabulary, and employee amenities. . High quality of architectural design (e.g., Irvine industrial areas). . Streetscape improvements along Waterman Avenue (landscaped median and sidewalks, uniform signage, entry monument, aesthetic lighting elements, etc.). 27c. How much development should be permitted in the Waterman Avenue corridor? Recommendation: · FAR 1.0. 28. What should be the functional role of the Base Line Street area east of Interstate 215. . ~1ore economic pattern of land use development; concentrating commercial centers at principal street intersections ("E" Street, Arrowhead Avenue, Sierra Way, Waterman Avenue, Tippecanoe Avenue, and other appropriate locations) and developing intervening areas for medium to medium-high density multi- family residential. 28a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tions: . Community serving commercial uses at the key intersections, including food sales, apparel and accessories, furniture and home furnishings, restaurants, book stores, cleaning establishments, beauty salons/hair styling, laundries, entertainment, theaters, and similar uses. . Medium to medium-high density residential in areas between the commercial centers. 22 28b. What should be the physical fonn and character of development in the Base Line corridor area? Recommenda tions: . Commercial: typical "suburban centers" with increased siting of buildings in proximity to peripheral sidewalks and extensive landscape in periphery, in parking areas, and integrated with buildings. . Residential: low rise individual unit design "sense" (individual entries, multiple building volumes, off-set facades, etc.) and on-site amenities; compatibly integrated with adjacent commercial uses. 28c. How much development should be permitted in the Base Line Street corridor? Recommendations: · Commercial: 0.7. . Residential: 9.1 to 24 units per net acre. 29. What should be the functional role of the "E" Street corridor between 8th Street and Base Line Street? Recommendations: . As existing used car dealerships and commercial businesses discontinue operations, redevelop the area for multi-family residential. . In the interim, require that existing uses provide aesthetic improvements. 29a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tions: . Multi-family residential units; town homes, condominiums, and/or apartments. . Existing auto-related and commercial uses should be allowed to continue until sold for residential development. 29b. What should be the physical fonn and character of the "E" Street corridor? Recommendations: . High quality multi-family residential neighborhood; distinctive architecture; avoidance of "block-like" structures (individual unit building facades, separate entries, off-set facades, etc.). . Compatibility with and linkages to adjacent residential neighborhoods. 23 29c. How much development should be permitted in the "E" Street corridor? Recommendations: . Residential: 14 to 24 units per net acre. . Senior citizen and congregate care housing: a maximum bonus of 50% provided that an analysis demonstrates long-term feasibility. 30. What should be the functional role of the Verdemont commercial area? Recommendation: . Low intensity, low rise commercial center which offers retail and personal service uses for local residents and is integrated and linked to adjacent residences. 30a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendations: . Commercial and personal service uses which provide for the needs of the local residential population; including food stores, convenience shops, shoe repair, beauty parlors/hair cutting-styling, cleaning establishments, banks, book stores, art galleries, and similar uses. . Emphasis on inclusion of pedestrian oriented uses (outdoor dining, farmers market, flower stalls, etc.) . Preclude uses which generate high activities and/or noise (movie theaters, arcades, etc.). 30b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the Verdemont commercial area? Recommenda tions: . Low rise commercial village character; buildings grouped around pedestrian areas and open spaces, use of architectural design styles and materials which complement the rural setting, visual integration of all structures, and incorporation of pedestrian oriented amenities. . Unifying urban design and streetscape improvements (landscape, signage, lighting, etc.). . Linkage to adjacent residential areas. 24 -- - - .......... --- ...... ..... 30c. How much development should be permitted in the Verdemont commercial area? Recommendation: · FAR 0.35. 31. What should be the functional role of the 40th Street commercial centers? Recommenda tion: . Continued use and enhancement/rehabilitation of the community serving commercial centers located on 40th Street and Sierra Way. 31a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendation: . Community serving retail and service uses; including grocery stores, building materials, apparel and accessories, furniture and home furnishings, garden supplies, restaurants, book stores, cleaning establishments, shoe repair, beauty salons/hair styling, entertainment, theaters, automotive service, and similar uses. 31b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the 40th Street commercial centers? . Upgraded "suburban" commercial centers; building renovation, improved signage, increased landscape, siting of new buildings in proximity to abutting streets and sidewalks, and unifying site signage. 31c. How much development should be permitted in the 40th Street commercial districts? Recommendation: · FAR 0.7. 32. What should be the functional role of the City's community serving commercial districts? Recommendation: . Continue to develop commercial uses which provide for the day-to-day needs of local residents. 25 32a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendation: . Community serving retail and service uses; including grocery stores, apparel and accessories, furniture and home furnishings, garden supplies, restaurants, book stores, cleaning establishments, shoe repair, beauty salons/hair styling, and similar uses. . Preclude major commercial uses which serve regional markets and major office projects. 32b. What should be the physical form and character of the community serving commercial districts? Recommenda tion: . Typical "suburban" shopping center developments; with emphasis on orienting buildings to peripheral sidewalks (minimum percentage located on the street frontage) unifying individual buildings in multi-structure projects by architectural design elements avoiding the development of large, "box-like" structures, creating off-set volumes and multiple facade articulation increased pedestrian orientation of the ground floor of buildings (interconnecting linkages, transparent surfaces, etc.) increased site landscape increased unity in site signage and lighting 32c. How much development should be permitted in the community serving commercial districts? Recommendation: · FAR 0.7. 33. What should be the functional role of the City's commercial office districts? Recommendation: . Continuation and new development of administrative and professional offices and supporting retail commercial uses. 26 33a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendations: . Administrative and professional offices. . Supporting retail services; including restaurants, gift shops, florists, newsstands, and similar uses. 33b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the City's commercial office districts? Recommendations: . Other than the primary regional centers, office development should be low rise, architecturally distinctive, complement the district in which it is located and abuts (materials, massing and form of development, etc.), incorporate extensive landscape, and enhance pedestrian activity. . Office development on Arrowhead Avenue should complement existing residential structures and incorporate a program of consistent and integrated signage. 33c. How much development should be permitted in the City's commercial office districts? Recommendation: · FAR 1.0. 34. What should be the functional role of the City's neighborhood commercial areas? Recommendation: . Low intensity, small scale commercial centers providing for the convenience needs of residents located within one mile of the site. 34a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommendation: . Neighborhood serving commercial uses; convenience grocery stores, shoe repairs, cleaning establishments, laundries, beauty parlors/hair cutting, gourmet foods, florists, and similar uses. 27 34b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the neighborhood commercial areas? Recommendations: . Small scale buildings, generally less than 10,000 square feet in size, sited on pedestrian areas and open spaces; unifying architectural and site design elements for multi-structure projects; convey a "village-like" character (pedestrian oriented, "soft" materials, etc.) . Increased siting of buildings in proximity to peripheral sidewalks. . Linked to adjacent residential areas. 34c. How much development should be permitted in the City's neighborhood commercial districts? Recommendation: · FAR 0.35. 35. What should be the functional role of the City's commercial health care districts? Recommendation: . Continuation and expansion of public and private health care facilities and development of adjacent sites for medical offices, convalescent homes, and other related uses. 35a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tion: . Public and private hospitals, sanitariums, convalescent homes, medical and dental offices, physical therapy facilities, research and treatment laboratories, and related medical uses and supporting commercial uses (pharmacies, restaurants, medical book stores, etc.). 35b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the City's commercial health care districts? Recommenda tion: . Low and mid rise structures, architecturally distinctive (avoidance of box-like structures, extensive facade articulation, use of materials which complement 28 ~ ~ -- --- their location, etc.), extensive landscape and public open spaces, and adequately buffered from adjacent residential uses. 35c. How much development should be permitted in the City's commercial health care districts? Recommendation: . FAR 2.0 (except for hospitals) 36. What should be the functional role of the City's heavy commercial districts? Recommendation: . Development of uses which, normally, are incompatible with other types of commercial uses due to their visual character, industrial-like impacts (noise, etc.), and/or requirements for extensive outdoor site utilization. 36a. What uses should be emphasized? Recommenda tion: . Automobile sales, auto and truck repair yards, lumber yards, nurseries, salvage yards, building materials yards, and similar uses. 36b. What should be the physical form and character of development in the City's heavy commercial districts? Recommenda tion: . Land extensive developments with mInimUm building coverage; use of extensive landscape and screening walls or berms on the periphery. 36c. How much development should be permitted in the City's heavy commercial areas? Recommendation: · FAR {}.5. 0, l 37. What types of industrial uses should be accommodated in the City? Recommenda tions: . Mix of light (research and development, high technology, warehousing, etc.), medium, heavy, and mineral extractive industries. 29 . Encourage the development of job-generating industrial uses; providing for the needs of existing and future residents. . Preclude industrial uses which produce extensive pollution (air, water, etc.) and toxics which cannot be adequately mitigated, require infrastructure support (water, energy, transportation, sewage disposal, etc.) for which capacity cannot be provided, and could result in significantly adverse impacts on adjacent land uses. 38. What uses should be accommodated in the City's light industrial areas? Recommendations: . Manufacturing, warehousing, research and development, and similar uses. . Supporting retail and personal service commercial uses as a limited percentage of the area. 38a. What should be the physical form and character of development of the City's light industrial areas? Recommendations: . Typical industrial park environment; large scale, low rise buildings, surrounded by extensive landscape and open space. . Buildings facades should incorporate distinctive architectural design elements to provide visual interest; all four elevations should be "treated". . Multi-structure projects should incorporate unifying streetscape, signage, site landscape, lighting, and other elements. 38b. How much development should be permitted in the City's light industrial areas? Recommendation: · FAR 0.75. 39. What uses should be accommodated in the City's heavy industrial areas? Recommendation: . Heavy manufacturing uses characterized by their large land utilization and physical facility requirements, and low employee intensity (e.g., steel fabrication, aircraft assembly, food processing, salvage yards, and similar uses). 30 . Preclude uses which contribute unmitigable toxic wastes and pollution. 39a. What should be the physical form and character of the City's heavy industrial areas? Recommenda tions: . Large land areas; simple box-like structures; heavy equipment; outdoor storage and parking. . Improved buffers with adjacent uses and streets; landscaped setbacks, screening walls and fences (aesthetically designed), controlled access, control of on-site light and noise, etc. 39b. How much development should be permitted in the City's heavy industrial areas? Recommenda tion: . Sufficient acreage to meet the demands of the type of use to be accommodated, within environmental resource and infrastructure constraints; a variety of development parcels should be available for maximum flexibility. · FAR 0.75. 40. What types of uses should be accommodated in the City's extractive industrial areas? Recommendation: . Sand and gravel, other mineral resource production uses, and supporting retail and office commercial facilities. . Interim uses which do not impair the long term ability to extract and process the mineral resources; including outdoor storage, lumber yards, nurseries, used automobile sales, recreation, and similar uses. 40a. What should be the physical form and character of development of the City's extractive industrial areas? Recommenda tion: . Adequately buffered from adjacent land uses and streets; landscaped setbacks, screening walls and fences (aesthetically designed), attractive sign age, controlled access, and on-site limitation of light and noise. 31 40b. How much development should be permitted in the City's extractive industrial areas? Recommenda tion: . Dependent on resource size and location. 41. What types of residential uses should be accommodated in the City? Recommenda tion: . Full range of unit types; low density estate and equestrian, single family detached, duplex, triplex, townhomes, apartments and condominiums. 41a. What ranges of residential development density should be permitted? Recommendations: . Residential Estate: 1 unit per gross acre. . Residential Low: 1-3 units per net acre, minimum of 10,800 square feet per lot. . Residential Suburban: 3.1-4.5 units per net acre, minimum of 7,200 and maximum of 10,800 square feet per lot (allowing increased sizes for cul-de-sacs and hillside areas, provided that the average size of a lot in this subdivision is within this range). . Residential Urban: 4.6-9 units per net acre; minimum lot sizes of 7,200 square feet for duplexes and second single family homes on a lot and 5,000 square feet within a Planned Residential Development. . Residential Medium: 9.1-14 units per net acre. . Residential Medium-High: 14.1-24 units per net acre. . Residential High: 24.1-36 units per net acre. . Hillside Management: determined by slope (refer to Question 16c). . Senior Citizen Residential Projects: a maximum density of 50% greater than the density of the underlying residential zone and 36 units per acre in Commercial Office zones provided that an analysis is conducted which demonstrates its long-term feasibility. 32 ~ -- _.~~...... 41b. What should be the physical fonn and character of the City's residential districts? Recommendations: . Residential Estate: Large lot rural and estate environment, maintaining the natural topographic character of the site, using native vegetation except as modified for fire control, siting of structures to "fit" the topography and natural setting, use of architectural design styles which do not dominate their setting, and providing linkages to equestrian trails. . Residential Low: "High quality" large lot residential subdivisions, using architectural design styles which complement their setting and contribute to a neighborhood character, and incorporate consistent and well-designed street signage, entry signage or monument, community amenities, and similar improvements. . Residential Suburban: Typical single family "tract" subdivisions, incorporating community open spaces, parks, schools, and recreation facilities. . Residential Urban: convey visual character of a single-family neighborhood, include setbacks with single family areas, provide architecturally defined individual unit character, and (in larger projects) incorporate uniform street signage, entry signage or monument, community amenities, and similar uses. . Residential Medium, Medium-High, and High: design to convey the sense of individual units within a multi-family structure, including individual entries, off-set building volumes, and individual patios and balconies, incorporate landscaped setbacks from abutting streets, and include on-site recreational amenities. 33 _____ -.-..-.- - I~ - .... ,., J I 'i CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING /~J/t/3~ . NAME (5/ L ( J' 111 (k JI'? J'(;'l tv. lfl.. J Th<r/ ,) c; /7 /J e ~ Il q" d I Ii l? ,If n I' S' gcf 3--7)7 J- ZIP 72 St:J L {-:'ll 4/"" j,e/l c+- CO }14ft..rt'.'I{,e SPEAKER'S PHONE ADDRESS ORGANIZATION Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes. ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes -X-- No Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person written By - . .., II. Date: ! / / / 88 Time A.M. P.M. " j ,- position on Agenda PC MCC v/ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING J Z - 1 {y- ~g'- SPEAKER'S NAME :Yj rJ ~ fs B ~ ft PHONE ADDRESS 530 E,Sl~Gj<' WA'-{ I een~A-ND<; _____ .- ~ I . ORGANIZATION "J f/ u4 V t D ~OrJ4~C)ClA-'TG-~~ 6~3 ~dlO" ZIP q?"37~ Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes. ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED C~ v1I~1h r; (?.-'-:, A-C 12 C 6 t 0 t/..}<- tAJ At: <=-IL tN' ltNS'{ (/f'; L41VD ~ C (.;1 f' 106- ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes N'J No Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person Written By - F'~_" Date: ,; -1 / ' /. / 88 Time 'I / :' A.M. P.M. i ,~ ,^-",.,. position on Agenda PC MCC j,/ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK ! . DATE OF HEARING {I/ ( L /.(. \ SPEAKER'S NAME ~A \/ i ''D -'~ r1 --; \'! L ,-,~ .11,' " ,,,,",,,," ADDRESS __"." \, \~I \.. "F i~ i tv 'e' - ""7 L _ i-i ( '. ; - L--Z E PHONE 8- { .:': 7 ._,- ("~ C:~ /7C - ORGANIZATION ~.::/A'N ....---., , I)€ f2,~A. e "S\ I/'-'; C' v ,-t'Z L F;--.<- l ZIP if'7 .,) ...../ f:-, ------., " - ~ \ '.. . \ '-'~"-ItLA . , // ) - \ 'L' r, I'~ -n..: J , ~ ./' '- , \ /1, __ ' ~ Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, organizations - Max 5 minutes. ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED --- ri}rv' b'~1\1t2tV\7t"L L ,/\Jl 0-7~ ~ lll, ( f L- 1 ') [A,'iC 111 r:- tL "fC..::, I \ /, '- , '. ? '> L -1:::-- ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN ;COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes x No .' \. Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person Written By - I" f 1 '\ A.M\. Date: / . / I ' / 88 Time P.M. e position on Agenda PC MCC \, . , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK \2-/1 b / ~8 , { SPEAKER'S NAME V\A D Ni e.. S\"\ '-f'Pe~ ADDRESS 3\ \9 &oL1::>e\.l\ S. B J \ V\. ~ 0 W l2G?Ot L.."\\.{ DATE OF HEARING PHONE 993- 81Sh ZIP ORGANIZATION --. ~c.. . ~Oq o-D Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes No Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person written By - Date: /7/ /;; Time , / / 88 1..1 A.M. P.M. position on Agenda PC MCC CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING /..;..: ///V' /<6~-? / -_/ SPEAKER'S NAME .~/~;: ,11-;;/'/ (~;/:'}L N f1t-< ... , ",;/1.1 .. // /j / . J -- PHONE Y'i"' .... i/ ...?'): " ,/ I <.l../ "."\ -... I" _._/ ~ . , /"."'> /~; - -j / .. ADDRESS G.- / - '-- (/) ,/ ),j. /~/Ir:;>(~ -t.:/ ".}. {...Ii) .<} u Z /5)-::);, ), . ) ZIP (!:-2 ':;(/""/ " ../ Lr-/ ...., 0:.... [,.J,. .11-- ORGANIZATION .:::Vi/I.-< /.> j ';;2 .~. 7- l.; ~-"i . 1-/ )/4 )~~--<i:) L~C~- 1-- Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes. ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN, COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes I No Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person Written By - / ~..> , I /~1 Date: , / .'L / 88 Time ' . A.M. P.M. position on Agenda PC MCC ,.' ,f CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING I Z lu:~ /a3 S+€P~~ b k(?~ PHONE - A-u12(1r-i\J We ~l>J)l.,{)tt~ SPEAKER'S NAME '33:::; - -:::;-q '-f::j. ZIP 926/=1- ADDRESS ;l.bD ORGANIZATION Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes. "~/' ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED ~ ~712~ ~/A~~ . (tlC5770/1J . t!/ F .;;?cJ/V //1/6 ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes ~ No Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person Written By Date: Ii--- / ) h / 88 Time qA6 cQ P.M. position on Agenda PC MCC I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK /2--/? r--e iT{ 11 ADDRESS /1 e; 7 s. 6 iO qJ D ft.. , G: (Li><, v-J "('€.ILJLa Cf ZIP cq z .3..) cL , ORGANIZATION 'Pc: TTee- ~ J C S fA Ie. / S '3 u f1 /( fl--et1 I ro L.(> I Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, organizations - Max 5 minutes. DATE OF HEARING SPEAKER'S NAME --ro IV j PHONE ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED LAN;' l.{ t..Q.. E ~ H.e N" 1 C e N-e- tlJ V~J ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes If. No " Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person written By - ) , ) Date: ; '/ / " / 88 Time ; A.M. P.M. , If; ,-- position on Agenda PC MCC ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING I 2- / ),),! f , C) SPEAKER'S NAME ~C~'~ ~C\-T'tO \B."'E" ADDRESS 2---J;'trtrc E 13/)sE~J tV ~ . PHONE ~O;--77L-L- ZIP C( 2-4 <:.L.1 ORGANIZATION C ~C. v-.Pjcv. ~ Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, organizations - Max 5 minutes. ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED / s' T.. g rJr ro IS f)s I? t--J N(. I ustf"!J .q-~ ;2~7/'rlJ.--we-~ P BJ! cf,-ASSJJ~t?iJ ,A--s CG ,'-.:)oT CId ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN, ~OMMENTS PRIOR TO THE Yes ---2L- No HEARING? Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person written _By Date: {7/ / Ib / 88 Time .q:46 A.M. P.M. position on Agenda PC MCC I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING /1 - / c - ,'5'5 , I /1', SPEAKER'S NAME &/.j ~ VI'e /7e'/'({ / ' \; / ;' , t /) 5' /5><: , i l PHONE '/ ,-' I S ,/x" ? ,\ ) / ADDRESS .-, < '7 J/ f)j} .' ORGANIZATION /",,' /1 /1:::~ I "'c,{r '\ ) i \\' i /;'" .~ ',,> /'>J c":" J' ~ ' ZIP /.--,(,- ,:< ' , ,/,. / / __1_ f /- < ,- \----',/ ,( l-r'~ ..z ~ . '7 >'''';; ~- .....- . ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED (// /;-1 L... i L/(',. 'j' j- ~/ / / / (. " / /1 . ",,,,' Individuals - Max 3 minutes, Organizations - Max 5 minutes. " /.: "A /--; ',/,. c y 1..._""" t-/,--t" ....' , / " Note: /~.:'- //..:/ ""-'l._.--! ,:/ ( \ j ? /;/ ,.' . .y -- l ,.,....;., I.! ) ,; f //, 5 j ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes /'/' No Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person Written By - ./) ;.. Time 1 Date: 1.'/ / II: / 88 ( A.M. P.M. position on Agenda PC MCC / CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING ~ / &. I J1f? - I SPEAKER'S NAME. COt/LWE~ DOSE" ADDRESS S'fO J ([)S~uJJ ;2v,. PHONE 8f z- 4ft:; z. ZIP ORGANIZATION Note:~Vidual~ax 3 minutes, Org~nizations - Max 5 minutes. ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED f- .'- ~"; u'x<;: ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN, )COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE Yes --';t-- No HEARING? Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person Written By - , , / I~ .1 - Date: ,. ,/ /' / / 88 Time /'" A.MI. P.M. position on Agenda PC MCC CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING Id ;../t. - X't SPEAKER'S NAME <wtA.' ~'5:f)j,llo)/.,/j) PHONE ADDRESS c:J. ~5?f J3j('It~{/"T7cfJ/ I-p;)~ hv-,c;~ (?4 ' ORGANIZATION 0.;.) f..d;/ If (}P/Q) rN'//?,j P{t)t':<; p , t, Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, organizations 7/Lf' -. gC ,/-/5;J, 2- ZIP YCl39t;" - Max 5 minutes. ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED f('1I:>'/,-I?r; /'yJ,O} JtA,I ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes X No Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person written _ By Date: !,~ / !L" / 88 Time (1. ""v A.M. P.M. position on Agenda PC MCC l/ --.......- - - - - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM REQUEST TO SPEAK DATE OF HEARING 1.2 -/[--13?( ADDRESS SPEAKER'S NAME 1[/( J.../c~L[) c0 -fl/t,j~e la/ *7 // I d-~-sF' Bnc~tC!/1CV -- f!t;r4/a--zy" (..J ORGANIZATION =5-h/6Gk f'-< let'"! E,u' f.?"1 Pr-/SP,() ( PHONE f?tl-/5':2. 7- ZIP 9JZ3 ~6 ISSUES/AREA OF CITY TO BE ADDRESSED organizations - Max 5 minutes. t/;- /. 5'/.--/1": /'/'AtJ Aqe~11l~- V' Note: Individuals - Max 3 minutes, ARE YOU PLANNING TO SUBMIT WRITTEN COMMENTS PRIOR TO THE HEARING? Yes k No Staff Only Below This Line Request Received: Phone In Person Written _ By Date: )....") I' ! / / i ,;; / 88 Time " \ ./,'. A M1 .- '- ,.~ /" P.M. position on Agenda PC MCC V