HomeMy WebLinkAbout21-City Manger
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR couNcOR:1-GltJAL
Date: March 11, 2009
Subject: Set a public hearing for
Monday, April 6, 2009, at 4:00 p.m. in
the City Hall Council Chambers to
discuss the adjustment of various user
fees and the establishment of new user
fees.
From: Lori Sassoon, Assistant City
Manager
Dept: City Manager's Office
Meeting Date:
March 16, 2009
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
March 4 & March 11, 2009 - Reviewed by Ways and Means Committee and
recommended for approval
Recommended motion:
That a public hearing be set for Monday, April 6, 2009 at 4:00 pm in the City Hall
Council Chambers to discuss the adjustment and establishment of various user fees.
, i~ -' {f;.;~ L ,-/- S
'-../ Sig&;ture
Contact person: Lori Sassoon
Phone: 384-5122
Supporting data attached: Staff report & worksheets
Ward: All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Net additional revenue of approx. $770,000 in
FY 09-10
Source: (Accl. No.) Various
(Accl. Description) General Fund
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. .~ {
:3 '-/6- oq
STAFF REPORT
Subiect:
Set a public hearing for Monday, April 6, 2009, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers to
discuss the adjustment of various user fees and the establishment of new user fees.
Backl!:round:
Fees for service, otherwise called user fees, are calculated by determining the actual cost of the
services being provided. Since the late 1990's, the Mayor and Common Council has approved
numerous comprehensive user fee updates, usually in the spring of each year. The last of such updates
were approved in May and June of2008.
As part of the City's budget reduction measures to close the projected budget deficit, each department
was asked to re-evaluate fees and look into the possibility of new fees. The result of the department's
analysis is approximately $770,000 in additional revenue for FY 09-10. The majority of the proposed
fees were included as part of the budget discussions during the budget meetings on February 2 and
February 17, 2009. Departments submitting new and increased fees for analysis by the Ways and
Means Committee meeting include Animal Control, City Clerk, Code Enforcement, Development
Services, Facilities, Fire, Public Services, and Police.
Attachment A contains a summary of fees to be considered for establishment and/or revision at this
time. For each new and revised fee included in Attachment A, departments have completed cost
analysis worksheets with information regarding each service for which a fee is charged, including the
classifications of any employees involved, the amount of staff time involved in providing the service,
and other related costs for materials, supplies, equipment, utilities, etc. Information regarding hourly
salary and benefit rates is also included in the worksheets. Generally, each department's recommended
fees are based on this service cost; certain charges, such as fines, are not required to be based on the
cost of service. Staff has also gathered information concerning comparable fees in neighboring
jurisdictions, and that information is included on the worksheets.
Key changes to the fee schedule include the following:
. Animal Control is proposing to increase fees related to the boarding and apprehension of
animals. Many of these fees have not been updated for several years. The proposed fees would
eliminate the two tier apprehension fee for altered and unaltered pets. The new fees would set a
single fee of $100 for the first apprehension, $200 for the second apprehension, and $350 for
the third and subsequent apprehensions.
. Fee Adjustments for Animal Control would also eliminate a two tiered adoption fee for dogs
and cats ($25) versus puppies and kittens ($40) by establishing a single fee of $30. The change
in fee structure will not result in the loss of money for Animal Control.
. Code Enforcement is proposing two fee increases related to weed abatement. One fee is for
staff time for inspection of the vacant lots, notices, billing and coordination of the contractors
for the actual abatement. The other fee is for staff time involved in lien process, when
applicable, and includes the hearing with the Hearing Officer and the BBC. Neither of these
fees has been increased since 1996. Not only has the volume of work increased since that time,
3112/2009
1
but staff costs have also increased. Total estimated revenue from the fee changes IS
approximately $196,000.
. Code Enforcement has also proposed to update administrative fees for costs incurred on
abatements of private property, buildings, abandoned vehicles and weeds. The seven fees on
the resolution were consolidated into four fees, with an estimated revenue increase of
approximately $180,000. The majority of the proposed increase is attributed to the
consolidation of the administrative fees associated with the creation of a demand letters and for
each line item on the demand letter. Updating these fees would bring the combined fee to $65
for the creation of a demand letter.
. Development Services has proposed a number of new fees to recoup personnel costs for
multiple plan re-checks, revisions to approved plans, and citizen requested stop signs and red
curbs. The proposed fees include the creation of a combo permit, which combines the
excavation ($45) and lane closure ($45) permits that contractors typically request at the same
time; the cost of the combined permit would be $55. The new combo permit would allow the
contractors to pull one permit, creating efficiencies for both the City and the contractor.
Development Services staff estimates there is a proposed revenue loss of $10,900, which will
be offset by gains in efficiency.
. Development Services is requesting the addition of a NPDES inspection fee to offset the costs
of the City's NPDES inspection program. Once an inspection is completed, the costs of the
inspection will be added to the following year's business registration renewal. This process
will ensure the City will only collect fees on inspections that are actually completed, and will
reduce the General Fund's net cost for these federally-mandated reviews.
. The Facilities Department is proposing to increase all parking fees by $5 to comply with SB
1407, which has increased the State Courthouse Construction Penalty from $1.50 to $4.50 per
citation. Increasing the parking penalty covers the state penalty increase and collection costs as
allowed by CVC Section 40200.4(f). Estimated total revenue increase, net of the Courthouse
Construction Penalty increase which benefits the state, is $30,000.
. The Police Department is proposing to increase the fees charged for non-permitted false
robbery/burglary alarms. Also included are increases to the tow release fee and various photo,
tape and video reproduction fees.
. The Fire Department proposes to reduce its apartment inspection fees by 5% for compliant
property owners that have met two criteria: I) All fire code violations noted during the initial
inspection must be corrected when the first re-inspection is conducted; and 2) payment of the
first invoice that is sent to the property owner must be postmarked by the due date indicated on
the invoice. Several Councilmembers had previously expressed an interest in establishing such
an incentive program. Estimated revenue loss for a 5% reduction will equal $28,840. However,
Fire expects to generate revenue in excess of FY 08-09 budgeted amounts to offset this
reduction.
Proposed new and amended ordinances are typically reviewed by the Legislative Review Committee
before being recommended to the Mayor and Council for approval. However, two new fees brought
before the Committee will require enabling ordinances, so those ordinances were presented to the
Ways and Means Committee:
3/12/2009
2
. Code Enforcement is proposing a new fee for the removal of unauthorized signs. The fee will
require an ordinance adding Section 16.18, Unauthorized Signs, to the City's Municipal Code.
The new ordinance will define the responsible party as the owner or lessee of property used for
the illegally advertised activity or event. The ordinance will also provide a definition for an
unauthorized sign and will designate the Code Enforcement Department as the responsible
party for the enforcement of the unauthorized signs. Most importantly, the new ordinance
would allow for the infraction amount to be set by the Master Fee Resolution based on the cost
to the City for administering the program.
Code Enforcement does not suggest repealing Section 8.15.130, Posting Notices Prohibited.
This is essentially an anti-littering ordinance which can be used if someone is actually caught in
the act of placing illegal signs. See Attachment B for a copy of the proposed ordinance.
. Code Enforcement and the City Clerk's Office have worked together to propose a new yard
sale permit fee that will provide better regulation of yard sales. Currently, the City allows for
two yard sales each year, but does not have a system to track the number held each year at a
given property. An ordinance amendment would allow for the yard sales to be tracked in the
City Clerk's Office through a permit process, and enforced by Code Enforcement through the
issuance of administrative citations pursuant to Chapter 9.92 of the City's Municipal Code.
The yard sale permit fee would take affect 90 days from the effective date of the ordinance.
See Attachment C for a copy of the proposed ordinance.
Wavs and Means Committee Review:
On March 4 and II, the Ways and Means Committee reviewed the proposed fee adjustments and new
fees. Based on the Committee's feedback, the following modifications have been made to staffs
original proposal:
. Investigation fees for requested stop signs, no parking signs and permit parking signs have been
removed.
. The new yard sale permit fee will take effect ninety (90) days after the enactment of the
enabling ordinance.
. New Development Services fees for more than 3 plan checks and more then 3 WQMP reviews
will only be assessed upon the authorization of the Director or Deputy Director of Development
Services.
Next Steps
Staff recommends the following timeline for implementation of the new fee schedule. It is
recommended that the Mayor and Council act quickly so as to maximize the additional revenue to be
realized as a result of these changes:
April 6 - Public Hearing and first reading oftwo (2) new enabling ordinances. At the conclusion of the
public hearing, the Mayor and Common Council may adopt the fee resolution. Most fees become
effective upon adoption of the resolution.
June 6 - Development fees will become effective
3/12/2009
3
Financial ImDact:
The new and adjusted fees are projected to provide $770,000 in estimated additional annual revenue in
FY 2009-10.
Recommendation:
Set a public hearing for Monday, April 6, 2009, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers to
discuss the adjustment of various user fees and the establishment of new user fees.
3/12/2009
4
<
-
"
"'
E
.c
'"
..
-
<
o
i: "; ~ g
~8";=o~
,Ei_ -.:: E ~ ~
.- = ....
t;::g<~
'-"1< ~<A
-r:
-;~'2ci
o 'E ~ N
'"' .. ~
'" 0
u
~
-
"
..
Ei
Ei
o
U
0-
o '"
o Ei
0"2
- 'E
<A
_-00
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ V) .,..
~ ~ ~
.. ..
.s~
~<A<A
00
"'0
v-.N
<A <A
'" ~
10\0':
o-
N -
~ V:) iA QI"}
0'-'00
S ~gc:c:
~~~~~V)
..
~
iA iA tA EA
-= 0000
Q.lQ,joooc:
~Q,lv-iv-i"";M
=~-~-
U EAEAEAEA
'O~
~~;"""'1"
ClS.gQ.lgg
"'"SCNN--
"'
-
OS
'l:l
C.
~
"'
"'
~
..
"
'Il
~
'l:l
"
'Il
o
C.
o
..
Il..
'1<
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
<: ..
'Vi Z ~
= .....r <1)
" c.<:
.. ,,-
"'O:Jsg
~o~~~~
E: (!) ocao._
Q,I t.J.. ~ c: Q) ~
~ i'A ~~~~
5 5 ., Vl ~
(,) ,:2 g ~ E-<
:J....Jt1)t.J..c.:id
"'0"'0 ~ ~ 1-0
~ ~ c: s:::::: OJ
~ ~ ~ .~ ~
<<O..JO
'00
~ I-o.t::
i:' C c:
Q88
co
~ ~
E E
o 0
uu
cacacaca
E Ei Ei Ei
'2 '2 '2 '2
<<<<
-('.IM"1"
o
o
o.
-
"
~
c
o
';;;
c
"
.<:
"
~
0-
0-
'"
~
.3
o
~
-
"
-5
~
"
:;;
c
:~
iil
"'2
Ei o.
'2 l.(')
'E N
<A
o
o
o
o
-
00
If"!C:
r-- 0
~
<A
<A <A
~
o
..,;
~
N 00
.,,- '"
r...:..o
N ~
-
<A
<A <A
o
'"
o
v-.
-
00
00
00
NO
-
<A
<A <A
o
o
o
v-.
<A
00
V:C:
NO
- .,,-
<A <A
'"
o
o
N
'" .,,-
00
00
N N
,
"
"
u.. g:
g :.0
'Vi <.fl 1-0
".D '"
~;:cl5o
ill 0 ~ <1)
5. o.r'l u t.J..
C. c: .8 c:
12 < I:l:l Vl 0
o ~..c ~.~
'';: u E- '..J- "
.~ 0 ~ ..s::
"'0 'Vi ~ ~~ ~
.;!! ~ <1) E' c.
5: .- - ro c.
~","O..J<
'0
~
C!
o
U
OJ
Ei
'c
<
00
~ ~
- -
" C
o 0
Uu
cae;
E Ei
"2 '2
<<
v-.
~ r--
"
~
c
o
'~
o
'0
'"
~
.~
o
Z
"'
-5
~
"'
:;;
c
:~
iil
, 00
00
o~ o~
v-.
<A
<A
<A <A
<A <A
<A
0000000
C:C:C:C:oC:C:
ON V') lr) . lrl N
N N 0
::::
V:)f.A.EAiAiAVJ.iA
OOOMlr'llJ)O
C"'"!.....r--:N~-
1,,0 '<1"N..o I.O-.:t
1,0 N VI "1""" N
-
fAv:){AVtf;A&"j.iA
0000000
oooc:c:c:o
OOOOOlrlM
O_V'lMM__
-
EA;:AiAiAEAf:,0'7iA
0000000
OOC:C:OOC:
600lrl\l')OOO
00 NN"1".............
EFt iA Vt EA Vt Vl €A
..,...,.\0..,...,. \0
000000\0
0000000\0
NNNNN......N
Ie
"
'"
<:;~; -
d ~ ';;;
U'O 0
"'0 c: "'00...
C ~ a <l)
<1) ~ ~ ciS ~
~ ~.~ e,~ ~.~
g"O t: 3j 3j 0 'u
'Vi I-, v w.. w.. v u
C C'I:I f/l C C C c<:S
.,g ~ ~.2 .2 '€ >
"--'.,,.,,"'~
C5.==~oo~:.c
go ~ .~ "0 "0 2 C'I:I
<00..<<0":
0000000
~~~EEE~
o 0 0 0 0 0 0
UUUUUUU
cacacacacacaca
E Ei E Ei Ei E E
"8 "8 "8 '8 '8 '8 "8
<<<<<<<
OO~O
, 0
o
o.
v-.
,,;
'- ...
o u
$ .;;
~ ~
o 1A
u "
" '"
.s .~
i; c
> 'c
o "'
u'dJo
o > <A
.; 13 .~
"' - "
~ U :l
5 ~ =
~ - "
U C >
..5 8 ~
,
<A
- N
"
z
o
o
o
-0
'"
<A
o
'"
v-.
N
<A
.,,-
":
-
N
<A
o
o
o
N
-
<A
o
'"
v-.
~
<A
~
~
~
-
>>
1::
"'
0-
o
OJ ~ _
~EP-.
> " '"
"C E -
P-.OJ;g
- ~ 'C;
t.8~ on
" '" '"
~ gp 5
OJ:.a :.=
> ..... ~
.~ g.5
;,-
'2 f'"~
"E g. '3
~ So ~
...
'0
o
U
'"
-
o
o
N
N
'"
<A
o
or;
o
00
<A
00
r--
N
o
-
<A
o
'"
o
o
-
<A
o
or;
'"
-
<A
~
~
~
-
o
o
'"
..,;
.,,-
-
00
00
00
M r---~
N
c
'"
'0
~...
c~
]ca
U c
g "E
"~ :.a
$--g
"0 OJ__
::s .s "0
":1"-;
~ ~ ;;
Or---=
{i&qg
- ca ::s
'8 = U'l
::s .g =
..c ~ 'C;
u ~ E
'" '0 ...
"" '" ~
o
o
-0
00
<A
o
'"
r-.:
~
-
<A
o
o
o
00
-
<A
o
o
..,;
~
<A
~
~
~
-
" "
-0 ~ ~
-08 >.>.
t E OJ g g
~ 0 ~~ .g
- -";;;' = [i 5
~ ~5~A. 0..
~ ~:J~~ ~
o (3 ~ ~ ,g ~ "~
OJ ~ ~ OJ 0"0 -0
'E.~".od"iiZ::SZ
EEEVi-4-<-4-
1;; OJ ~ Bog 0
"0 E "0 ~ ~ ~ <.t=< ~
,- V ..... - :.; ~ 0 c<:S
E~E~B.~~~
"O~-OOJ::SOJ~OJ
<<<..J0..:2...:
"
'0
o
U
.,,-
-
<A
<A <A
o
o
o
~
00
c:c:
o ~
_ 00
<A
<A <A
00
":
o
o
.,,- 0
"'''l
or--
'" '"
-
<A
<A <A
o
o
o
o
-
00
"'0
00
'" 00
-
<A
<A <A
o
o
o
-
00
c:c:
0"'-
N ~
<A <A
<A
~
'"
~
-
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
- -
...
'0
o
U
... "'
'0 '0
o 0
uu
v-.
-
~ r--
- -
...
'0
o
U
o
o
o
..,;
~
<A
o
'"
v-.
~
-
<A
o
":
r--
r--
N
<A
o
'"
v-.
r--
N
<A
o
o
o
-
<A
~
~
~
-
0;-
>
o
.D
'"
'0
"
'"
~
-
'c
:l
~
'0
...
"' ~
~o
~..J
0_
u.. c
" '"
" U
u.. '"
,,>
> "
'~ 0
-bE
~ "'
'c ~
'E &j
'0 .D
<<
...
u
2i
o
"'
'0
o
U
~
-~
"
M
"''''
~:5
~C!
eN
u~
00
-
<>:
-
=
'"
e
-=
"
'"
-
-
<>:
~
-
=
"
E
E
"
U
'E"; ~
-=";=
CIS.S = =
e.-=C~
-..: "0 = ~
r.t}"C<_
"'< ...
000000000
000000000
O~O",O",or:,V) 0 0 r- 00
M 0 \r'll,f') '" '" '" '"
VI ~It: 0\
000
000
ONt-
o-,'" ('.I'"
N
~~&,,:)fAfA-fA-fAfA-fAfAfA-fAfA-VtVt
__oooooISoooooOOOO
~~~~~~OOor'lv)o~~V)~~~
ClSClSl,f')Ov)V)~~~~~OO N-lrl-
~~N~_V)~I~r-OOO\~~~~~~
.. ~
.s~
-VtVtfAfAVtfA-fA-VtVtVtVtfAVtfAfA
_0\00\
.-=~O\Oo;
-;~CC'lr--:"oV'l
_'>~~O"""v)
o l. ';:. N""'"
... " ~
CfJ "
U
OOt-.......r-NO"i"O'\N
v)OONr--:~O\M~~
-oOOo\OO......r-i-o.n......
t-oo 0\ "1" \0"1" 0 o::t\O
- --
fA-VtVtVt
fA-Vt fA fA-fA-fAVt fA fA-
e gg~~
e~cioo.nl.r)
O~"1"O-l.(')
Y~N-
"
~
0000000000
'V:V:Oo.nV:V:Oc:v:
\oOOO\OO-N-lrl.....
r-OOO\"'i"\O:!;:'<T\O
fA-fA-VtVtVtVtfAfA-fAfA-fAVtfAfAfA-
-
= 0
~ dol c:
.. "'"
;~-
U i;;
00
'c:c:
'" '"
" "
fAVtfAfA-fA-fA-VtfA-VtfAfA-fA-fAfA-
'0
_d.l'i:'oo
r.t} ~ ClS 0
e-: "C dol 0
...;l c.> N
=>~
"'''''''
~~~
;Z;Z;Z
'0'0"'''''''''''''''''''''''''
gg~~~~~~~~~
'"
-
'"
"0
""
~
'"
'"
r;..
...
'"
'"
~
"0
'"
'"
o
""
o
...
~
~
-~
~
,,'0
" "
;"'" N
Cl) 'C
._ <I) 0 Q)
~]~~
t 0 c<:I .......
... 0:: :3 E -<: "
~ "- 'l! E -
o 0 I-l. t ~
t-< (;.2 0.. 0
.2;:;..dO[)
u 0 Vl ..c
:2 E"EE 0,)
Q) 11) c<:I 0 a
>o::>-u..J
...
...
...
"
.g
L>
"
" ~
o "
-- ...
" -
;> "
",-'"
L> 1ii
><-
~Cll
~ ~
.~ 6 g a
~~'.;:::'.p~c
~ ~ ~I ~ ] .g
U :t c c 0 ~
~~i~!8
M M 'Vi ~ 0 ~
a a ~ C5 ~ Q)
-=-=-"'""
t-< f- CI"l 0 u
Q) (]) LiJ.~ 'Vi I.+:
~ '- a :c 'S: '€
o 0 c.. ;::I d.) Q)
:E:E;zc..O::U
000
000
- " '"
00
00
N N
","
""""
00
c:v:
N ...
'0 "
'"
""""
,,-
C:V:
N-
'0 "
'"
""""
00
~'"
N -
'0"
'"
""""
""""
"''''
~~
;z;z
U
>
~
.0
-
"
~
~
"
<l<
gj
:;<
~
:;;:
0000000000000
c:c:c:c:c:c:c:c:oc:c:c:o
-n-n-n-n-n-n-n-n.,)-n-n-n.,)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ro ro ro ro ro ~ ro ro ro ro ro ro ~
cl::cce1::cel::cce1::
0000000000000
oc:c:ooc:c:c:ooc:c:o
ooooooo-noo-noo
"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t"'<t
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
, ,
00
c:c:
'" '"
'" '"
""""
00000000000
c:c:c:c:c:c:oc:oc:o
-n-n-n-n-no.,)-no-n-n
MMMMM"'<tMM"'<tMM
~~~~~~~~~~~
-0 ::c
" -
~ ~ v B ::c
~ ~ ~ e~ 5
~ ..c ~ ~o (,)
~ ~ 1:: g ~ ~ GI ~ ~ g
20 roE.Vi ~1<ou_~5i"
0.. _ 0 __ ~u N
=> ,1:1 -~ - -~ ~ ~ 1: ~ -:: -;;:
1::r- -Q 8:::-ro -.2~~c
o ro '€ Vl ~ a ~ ~I::: ~ :52 ~
'Vi J,..., ~ 1:: ~.....:> "", c ~ J,..., Vl
C 0 U - ro C .- ou 1;j ro :3
" '" _" ,,-c -- -t: " " <'5 .0 ~
X c 3 C G c: 2: ~ ~ I ~ ~ _~ ttJ c: t)
~__e ",,,,,,"~_~.'W___~.o_
~~'~~~~.~~~i~.~~"~"~8~
"~ 0. ~ ,- E (,) ~ > .... (.) ~ ro -g 1:: E ..::t.: "'0 :.2
OUVlttJ"_~(.)>~O~1::~OOo~U~
c..~O::Cll...OO~;ZCll~c....J;ZNc..O::>
-'"
-
"
o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ u u (.) (,) U U (,) (,) (,) U U u
.B .~ "E 'E 'E "~ .~ .~ "E 'E .~ "~ 'E
U ou ttJ ~ ~ ~ ou ttJ ~ ~ ~ ou ttJ
.......rJJrJJC/'.JC/'.JC/'.JrJJC/'.JC/'.JC/'.JrJJrJJrJJ
~ ~ ~ > > > > > > > > > > > >
o 0 0 ou ou ou ~ U ou ~ ou ~ ou ou ~
UUUClClClClClClClClClClClCl
~
...
~
'1t
0-,0- N
- N N N
M'<:t-nI.Ol'-ooO\O-
NNNNNNNMM
~ ~
" ...
L> L>
';; .;;
- -
... "
VJVJ
> >
" "
ClCl
N '"
'" '"
00000000000000000000000000
0000000000000
0000000000000
NNNNNNNNNNNNN
Vl Vl Vl ~ ~ Vl ~ Vl ~ Vl Vl Vl ~
:E~~~~~~~~~~~~
'u 'u 'u 'u 'u "u 'u 'u "u 'u 'u 'u 'u
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro
~~~~~~~~~~~~'-
ti vi'
" ;>,
~.2
,,0;;
o ~
.=: ~
-
'"
0..
'0
2
-5
:.::i
N
000
c:c:c:
'" '" '"
""""""
'" '" '"
'eel::
000
c:c:o
000
"""
""""""
000
c:c:c:
'" '" '"
'" '" '"
"" """"
00 00 00
000
000
NNN
~
o
t:
'"
"
~
~
"
o
-;;;
~
~s
5 E
o 0
..c:U
ii; f! ~
== J,..., 1::
ro ou:52
" ;> -
;;;1 ~ g
c c.~
ti ~ :52 E
ou J,..., J,..., J,...,
t:: ro ro ou
~o..o..o..
~
3
~
-
~
:;r
,,~
~:~-3~~
'u u:G 8 ~
'" '" '"
.........
-<
-
=
'"
e
-=
...
"
-
;:
"E= Q,I
.....=-;=
=.:: :I C
e - = Q,I
'; .- c ...
rIl "0..( Q,I
o.l~ ~
~
-
=
..
e
e
"
u
~i'g;~~~~~~~g;~~~~~
=CConlrlV)l.I')<r)VlV)V)V)V)lf')V)V)lI')
.. ..
.. ..
.. ..
= ..
-Q
-;;A (;A V)V7 {A &'3-&'3-&'3-&'3-&'3-&'3-Vlf;0'7 &"7
-
-; t "=
o 'E ~
f- '" ~
'" "
u
~ C':1~~~ ~ i:tl ro~~ ro~=~~
cccct::'Cccccc cc
5 ~ggg~~ggg~~gg~
CQ,looooooo6ciooooV"'l
oQ,l~"::t""::I"'...q-r--"::t"::t""::I"'''::t"-.::to::to::t..,.V)
...r... -
..
~
&'3-&'3-V7fA&'3-&'3-liAV7f:A&'3-&'3-&'3-&'3-&"7
;: 0
Q,I Q,I c:
.. '" "'
; ~ M
U
o
<=:
"'
M
"''''
0000
c:c:c:c:
on on V) In
f""'lMI.OM
00000
c:c:c:c:c:
II') on on lrl on
MMMMM
&'3- V3- {A &'3- fA
00
<=:0
",0
M "'
"''''
&'3-&'3-&'3-&'3-
o
<=:
"'
M
'"
~~
~-=~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
==Q,jOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
~X>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
;J~
'"
-
"
'l:l
C.
~
'"
'"
...
..
'"
'"
~
'l:l
'"
'"
o
c.
o
..
~
'u
= 0;
g :E
o~ v
:2~~ ~
E;;u:E e
~~~gg
~ ~ "fr ~
~~~~
.':::.'t:::: Il)
E E ...'='
Il) ti ~.5
0... 0... r.Il...J
~
~
f-
E ~ ~"'O ~
".- .Si ~ 0::
~ ~ ~:.c -t &s; C
~~.,g~gZl3g~
~= (/)......o:E,:'O~
ll)CIlCll~CO~-; u
u"'O"g l-.V'l.~= C ~''''''E- ~
_ '" > Il) CIl .- .."_ '.
~ E; 0 > .5 l:: ~ - :v 0..
> " e o. -'" 0 ~ ij ~.:!l
-o"'E~!i1c'::>o-o
g a ..... .- 1-0'- C!' 0 Z 0
o 'a ::s ~ -0 ..!l .S !?!' I -
]:::> &: 2 cI5 .~ .5 \0 _~
(OJ vl E '6 I- 3 ~ 1.0
.D (],) 0 > ._ 0 '0:::' d _ '(ti
<O::UO::...l"-~o..O::,,-
e-
'"
Q en en en en en en en en en en en en en en
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'u '0 '0 'o'u U u'o '0 '0 'u 'u 'u '0
d d ro d d d ro d ro d d ro d ro
t.o...(.J.,~~~~~~~~~~~~
'"'
0000000
C:C:C:C:C:C:C:
lrllrllrllrllrllrllrl
Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi Vi
'"
1;;
t)
-5
.~
'^'
'^' ~
o '"
_.0
t;8 c:
"," '"
I- t:: ti
0] .;;;
~.9 g,..;
-- c <) C
"'0 0 (1) .9
~ "'0 ..0 ~
.;; ~ t:: .8 "'5
o ttI ~ "'0 OJ)
I- .0 .:-_ (1) (1)
0... "OJJ tJJ) I-
(1) [l: U'1 t:: "'0
~._ t:: ttI t::
E'~ o...c ttI
.-= '0 ~ ~ [l:
UJ~''E~2
o '
o
o
0-
M
'"
ttI ttI ttI ttI ttI ttI ttI ttI
t:t:t:t:t:c:i::i::
0000000
c:c:oC:C:C:C:U'1
OOOlrllrloo::s
"O:t"O:t"O:t~~O\O\o
.~
fl7ViViVtVtVtVt>
0000
C:C:C:C:
lrllrllrl 0
MMMoo
M
VtVtVtf17
00
o<=:
0",
00 00
M
'"
o ~
<=: "
"' 0
.00 .~
>
"''''
0000000000000000
00000000
00000000
NNNNNNNN
0;
.~
o
:t
'"
1;;
t}
=
o
1;i
0..
g
U'1 ~
= -
.g a
u
"5 of ~ g
[l: 8.5 ~
I- ..::c: ~
'^' E !i1 -
o 0 I-' "'0
t:: t.l::; C ~
._9" 0 ~
ttI 00 ~ U'1
:s;~g'6
> ...c "'2 gf
g~:o:';;;:
~ 15 ~ g
o\:::EiSCii
<5
c
~
'"
o OJ)
~c
U'1:';;;:
;n 5 ~
,.-< '.g c..
.=- - ~-
.J::.9 <)
"~> ~
" OIJ E
c: .5 8
~~ ttI ..::c: 0
...... I- a u
a-g~<1)
.....J.J::_"'O
<1)<1)~..2
.::.:: 0 g
~ ~ 1:-<._
U'1 V'l U'1 U'1 V'l V'l V'l V'l
~~~~~~~~
"g 'g "g "g 'g 'g 'g .g
~~~~~~~~
'"
~
00
'"
-
e
'"
o
<=:
o
"'
'"
00
"'
.".
-
'"
00
o
o
N
'"
-
'"
c
"
o
C!
.;;;
c: 0..
B E
~ 0
";;; u
= -
8 ~ <E
~ ~.g
- ~ g
-g~-g
gf "'0 I-
'" = '"
.J::ttI:::O
u U'1 ";;;
'" '" ~
~2~
'"
1;;
t}
-5
.~
-
o
'<>
'"
;;
,,;.gf u
<1)';;; "'0
- C C
'" '" '"
u ..
>.:.:3 ~
'" - 0
CI "~ co
>.""::: ,
:=C,,-...
ECc<<i
o .-
~ c "_ c:
~ t) <1)
~:::2 ~~ ~
a:2 V'l [l: ~
.....Ju.5o:::~
.".
'" '"
.::: I-
~ ~
.".
M
'"
~
00
"'
-
e
'"
o
<=:
o
"'
'"
00
'"
-
.".
'"
00
o
o
N
"'
M
'"
:;;
-
VJ
-5
.~
C!
B
~
'on
c
o
u
'"
.0
2
-0
'"
>
0-0
E =
'" '"
- ~
'" '"
"'"5
"- -
0-
o
"'.
00
(::!,
'"
'"
~
00
'"
~
'"
'C
'"
>
-
.".
-
~
'"
~
"
o
'C
"
>
'"
~
"
o
'C
'"
>
00
'"
.".
'"
:::
'-'l
Z
00
o
o
N
~
=
.:2
1;;
"5
OIJ
'"
-
o
"'
N
~
"'
'"
o
<=:
"'
N
'"
"'
.....
.".
N
'"
o
<=:
o
.".
N
'"
o
<=:
"'
-
N
'"
00
o
o
N
'"
u
C '"
- '" '"
'" a ~
0... QJ QJ
O-rJl
~ 5 ~
ce ~ ',,= Q)
U<i:~o::
~<<i ~ QJ
CI ::s c '0
c -:.a
>. C QJ iU
]$g>
ttI c ttI -0
~ <l) [i c
~:9.~ 2E
a:.a '" ='
...lu:E_
..
~
o
OIJ
C
'on
"
o
:t
b
.~
"-
0;
C!
'"
0::
'"
-
<i:
'"
-
<i:
'"
~
-
ti
gp
c'"
~o
os;;:;
N
"''''
~J;;
o
0..
'<>
M
..:
-
=
"
e
-=
"
"
-
-
..:
]'i ~
_c'i=
= 0 = c
e""c c ~
-= :.s c >
~ ..:"
"'~ r.>:
-
" .-
- " =
".- e
'0 i::-
~ " ~
00 0
u
Q) l!) (!) E
Vl Vl OIl ~
~~~ 3dOE
"'0 ~ E "'0 Q) Vl g
Q) Q) Q)~;z! r::r
.;: -5 g. .;: ~ ~
E .5 Q) E ...c: oS ,J:l
~i1 ~'~"2 ~
s::::: :::3 ...... C "'0 ..:.=" c
o 0 c: 0 C '-"J ro
Ci:t':! cro6-:S
'€....-s '€43..2~8
g~5-g~:;;!-y..;
~{.J.,!-<lrlc.,::. ~C^fA
..c ~ ~t-..c-oO-
OJ)'-"'-"- bJ)O > 0 Vl
= I(") OfA ::sO <1)('<') $::
Ot-O\'-'ONC/"JfAt:
..2~~3..2e^,;;~
::: e e e ::: ,,0 "
~~~[;3~~~tia~
:Li:-add~de~~
o 100
o 00
'"
~ Mc--f
N
~
1:
"
e
e
o
u
c;dt':!c;c;
e e.s.s.s
'c"2 c c c
'S 'SS 'S 'S
~oo
~~~I(")
= =..... 0
" "
.. ..
" ~
.5i:l
~<A
0000
o.n~~~
OMl.(')V)
N
<A
<A <A <A
o
o
o
o
-
<A
o
'"
o
N
N
<A
o
~
o
o
N
<A
o
~
o
o
<A
"O~
_~lo.\O\O\O\OI.O"<:t
f.rl==oooooo
="O~oooooo
....;! c..~NNNNNN
;:,~
"
-
"
'"0
Q.,
~
"
"
'"'
..
"
'"
~
'"0
"
'"
o
Q.,
o
....
~
""
fA fA fA fA fA
~MI(")I(")O(".l
NM~-OOo.n
r--:OM..olrl"o
N ("")("')\0 000'\
fA fA fA fA fA fA
e gg~g~~
e~r---:ci('<')-oo.nl,f')
O~NMM\OOOt-
"...
"
r.>:
fA fA fA fA fA fA
-
c 000000
~Col~lI'"!~~O~
~~~~~~g~
U
tAfAfAfAfAtA
~
"
o
c '.p
.g g
~ en u -g
E=,~ ~ ~.g c;
tl ~ ~ S e ~
...1 g g B ~ 9
_ ..... 0 ro
o o.t: !; ~
..c...c:~~
~ 0... _ E-o-fi
o _
V)r--..-2~
x x X '"0 1i
MlrlOo>a
~
"
i:l
Q) Q) 0 Q) Q) (],)
.~ .S! .S! .S! .~ .S!
00'0000
o...o...o...o...o...c..
t-OOO\O-N
M M M "<:t..,.-.:t'
.".
o
o
N
e
..
'"
:;;:
c
'"
biJ
..
"
ell
"
~
;;
"-
e
..
'"
:;;:
c
"
.0
.0
o
'"
"
~
;;
"-
"
.Sl
"0
0..
'"
.".
000
OO~
600
N '" '"
'"
<A <A <A
."..".'"
oo~~
NOOl(')
N '" N
'" -
<A <A <A
000
~oo
006
N"'O
00 -
<A <A <A
00
l~~
00
0'"
'"
<A <A <A
~"''''
~gg
ZNN
~
"
Q) Q) Cti
"- " ..
I::: "- "
ql ~ j
.~I'c ~
{/)I ~ ~
cU~
.9 d l+-<
5 ~ 0
u ~ !::
....l.9 OJ
U J,..., -0 .~5
IE " "
d ::: ~ d
?:~.5u
~ ~
" "
" "
';; .;;
.. ..
" "
0000
~ .2 .2
.2 :0 :0
'0;:1 ;:I
0..0..0..
.". '" '0
."..". .".
..,.
Q
on
on
,..:'
...
...
""
~
0;
"
"
=
'"
"
"
=
"
..
..
..
~
"
=
0;
-
o
~
~
u
IE
o
~
'..
"
on
~'"
=0
~O
:EN
;c.~
U;:;;
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Account
User Fee Description
Altered License Fee
Date
2/20/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee to license an altered dog for 1 year will be increased from $15 to $20. Licenses for 2 years ($25) and 3 years ($35) will
stay the same.
Personnel Costs , Labor Rates ,.
Straight Time Fringe TolalDirecl Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead LaborCoslIHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Animal License Supervisor 20.79 8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.2 6.50
License Checker 11 0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.5 6.33
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 12.82
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each QuanlityRequired UnilCost
License T aa 0.35 1 0.35
Door Hanaer 0.1 1 0.1
Cash Receipt 0.1 1 0.1
Postage 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.89
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each QuantilyRequired Unit Cost
Com outer Eauioment & Software 4.00 1 4.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 400
Comoansons to ProDosed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino County
Moreno Valley
Riverside County
Fee oer Unit
15.00
10.00
8.00
More (Less) than SIB.
Dollars Percentaoe
15.00 -33.33%
(10.00 -100.0%
(12.00 -150.0%
Total $ervice DireclCosl
18.71
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@10.75%
2.01
20.73
TotalServiceCostlUnit
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Currenl Fee Amounl
20.00
0.73
15.00
5.00
Recommended Fee
Fee Increase (Decrease)
001
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fund Account User Fee Description Date I
Animal Control I 124 4320 Altered License Fee Refund 2/20/20091
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the refund amount from $25 to $50 that an pet owner can be refunded for spaying or neutering their
dog within 60 days of purchasing an unaltered pet license.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
NA
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnitCosl
NA
Other Costs (Equipment, facilil1 rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comoarisons to Prooosed Fee
More (Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars PercentaDe
This is not an additional fee but a reduction
Total Service DireclCost
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rale@10.75%
Total Service CostfUnil
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
002
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmenUDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Animal Control Department 124 4430 Delinquency Penalty (Licensing) 2/20/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the penalty fee added to the cost to the pet license fee for failure to license from $15 to $20
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal License Supervisor
License Checker
Straight Time
Labor
20.79
11
Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Benefits labor Cost Overhead labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.4 13.00
0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.4 5.06
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
18.06
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Cash Receipt 0.1 1 0.1
Postage 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.44
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 15.00 (5.00) -33.33%
Moreno Vallev 18.00 (2.00 -11.1%
Riverside County 8.00 (12.00) -150.0%
Total Service DireclCost
18.90
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@10.75%
2.03
/093
Total ServiceCostlUnit
Current Fee Amount
2000
0.93
15.00
1; 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
00:,
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmenUDivision
Animal Control
Account
User Fee Description
Re lacement &Transfer Ta
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Increases the "additional tag issued to replace a lost, stolen misplaced or damaged tag" from $3 to $5
Increases the "transfer of ownership of a licensed dog to a new owner in lieu of a fee for new license" from $3 to $5
Increases the "transfer of a current license from another jurisdiction" from $3 to $5
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.orDiv. Total Burdened Hours by Total labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead LaborCosVHr PosilionperUnit Cost per
Animal License Sunervisor 20.79 8.75 29.54 2.954 3249 0.2 6.50
License Checker 11 0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.2 2.53
0 000 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 9.03
Material & Rental Costs
Description CoslEach QuanlityRequired Unit Cost
License T ao 0.25 1 0.25
Door Hanqer 0.1 1 0.1
Cash Receiot 0.1 1 0.1
Postaqe 041 2 0.82
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
T atal Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.77
Other Costs IEauiDment, facilit rental, Dart.time labor wlo benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnilCost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Prooosed Fee
More (Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentane
San Bernardino County 5.00 - 0.00%
Moreno Vallev 3.00 12.00 -66.7%
Riverside County 2.00 13.00 -150.0%
001
Total Service DireclCosl 10.80
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@10.75% 1.16
Total Service CoslIUnil 11 qR
Recommended Fee snn
Recommended Fee Subsidy 696
Currenl Fee Amounl 300
Fee Increase (Decrease) ? on
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Livestock ApprehenSion Fee - Greater Than
Animal Control 124 4759 500lbs 2/20/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the livestock (over 5001bs) apprehension fee from $50 to $150
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Control Su ervisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Rap/Dips
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by TolalLabo
Lobo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead LaborCostlHr. PositionperUnil Cost per
26.32 9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57 0.4 15.83
18.95 7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83 1 28.83
17.17 6.85 24.02 2.402 26.42 0.4 10.57
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 55.23
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnitCosl
Veh icle/F uel/Maintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EQuipmenUMaintenance 5 1 5.00
Specialized Hauling EquiDment 100 1 100.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 120.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facili~ rental, part.time labor WiD benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentane
San Bernardino County 100.00 (50.00 -50.00%
Moreno Vallev 75.00 (75.00) -100.0%
Riverside County 90.00 (60.00) -66.7%
Total Service DireclCost
175.23
C~y-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rele@10.75%
ToleiServiceCoslIUn~
18.84
1Q4 OR
CurrenlFeeAmounl
1fiOOO
4406
5000
10000
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Feelncreese(Decrease)
005
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Fund
User Fee Description
Lar e Livestock Board
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the large livestock daily board fee from $12.50 to $20.00
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Su erviso
Animal Shelter Attendant
Straight Time
Labor
21.47
16.25
Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by TolalLabor
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostIHr. Position per Unit Cost per
8.92 30.39 3039 33.43 0.2 6.69
6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18 0.4 1007
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 000
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Material & Rental Costs
Description CoslEach Quantity Required UnitCosl
Animal Care 8 1 8.00
8.00
Other Costs tEauioment, facilit rental, oart-time labor wlo benefits\
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service"
C
omparisons to Pro Dosed Fee
More (Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino Countv 15.00 5.00 -33.33%
Moreno Vallev 11.00 9.00 -81.8%
Riverside County 15.00 5.00) -33.3%
Total Service DireclCosl
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rale@10.75%
Total Service CostlUn~
24.76
2.66
'74?
Fee Increase (Decrease)
7000
742
1250
7 ~O
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amounl
OOG
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Fund
Account
User Fee Description
Apprehension Fee
Date
2/20/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This eliminates the two tier Apprehension Fee for altered and unaltered pets and establishes a single fee of $100 for the first
apprehension, $200 for the second and $350 for the third
Personnel Costs
26.32
18.95
17.17
Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead laborCostlHr. Position per Unit
9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57 0.4
7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83 1
6.85 24.02 2.402 26.42 0.4
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Labor
Cost per
15.83
28.83
10.57
0.00
Position
Animal Control Supervisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re IDips
Straight Time
Labor
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
55.23
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle/Fuel/Maintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EquipmenUMaintenance 5 1 5.00
Animal Care/Disposal 75 1 75.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 95.00
Other Costs (Equipment, faeilit rental, part~time labor w/o benefits\
Description CoslEach Quantity Required UnitCosl
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
P
dF
ompansons to ropose ee
More (Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino County 80.00 120.00) -25.00%
Moreno Vallev 50.00 150.00) -100.0%
Riverside County 35.00 165.00 -185.7%
TotalSarviceDireclCosl
150.23
City-Wide Gen &Admln
Rale@10.75%
TotelServiceCosllUnil
16.15
166.38
Recommended FooSubsidy
varies
66.38
80.00
20.00
Recommended Fee
Currenl Fee Amounl
Foolncrease(Decreese)
00',
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Account
User Fee Description
Board Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the daily board fee from $8.00 to $10.00
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead LaborCostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Animal Shelter Kennel Suoerviso 21.47 8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43 0.2 6.69
Animal Shelter Attendant 16.25 6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18 0.4 10.07
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 000
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each QuantilyRequired Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, nart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each QuantilyRequired Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino County 9.00 (1.00 -11.11%
Moreno Vallev 6.00 (4.00 -66.7%
Riverside County 15.00 5.00 33.3%
Tolal Service DireclCosl
City-Wide Gen & Admin
Rate@10.75%
21.76
TolalServiceCosVUni\
2.34
?410
Fee Increase (Decrease)
1n nn
1410
800
? nn
Recommended Fee
Recommended FeaSubsidy
Curren\FeeAmounl
008
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
User Fee Description
Pick-U Service Char
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the fee charged for pick-up services from $25.00 to $50.00
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Control Supervisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re /Di s
StraighlTime Fringe T alai Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Labor Benefits LaborCost Overhead LaborCostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
26.32 9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57 0.2 7.91
18.95 7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83 0.5 14.42
17.17 6.85 2402 2.402 26.42 0.2 5.28
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 27.61
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnitCosl
Vehicle/Fuel/Maintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EouiomentlMaintenance 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.00
Other Costs (EQuipment, facili I rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits
Description CoslEach Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee ner Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino County varies varies varies
Moreno Vallev varies varies varies
Riverside Countv varies varies varies
Total Service Direct Cost
47.61
City.Wide Geo. & Admin
Rate@10.75%
Total SeNice CostlUnit
5.12
~? 7~
Fee Increase (Decrease)
!in nn
2.73
2500
?!i nn
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
OO~j
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Fund
Account
4756
User Fee Description
Adoption Fee
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This creates a single adoption fee of $30.00
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $25 to $30 for each dog or cat
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $40 to $30 for each puppy or kitten
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Su erviso
Animal Shelter Attendant
Straight Time
Labor
21.47
16.25
Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead labor CosUH r. Position per Unit Coslper
8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43 0.2 6.69
6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18 0.4 10.07
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 16.76
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 5 25.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 25.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, nart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More {Less than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 20.00 (10.00 -50.00%
Moreno Valley 30.00 - 0.0%
Riverside Countv 75.00 45.00 60.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen & Admin
Rate@10.75%
TotalServiceCostJUnit
41.76
4.49
4fl?fi
Recommended Fee
3000
1625
4000
(1n nO)
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amounl
Fee Increase (Decrease)
010
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Fund
Account
User Fee Description
Quarantine Da;1 Board
Date
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This increases the quarantine daily board fee from $10.00 to $15.00
Personnel Costs
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Superviso
Animal Shelter Attendant
SlraightTime
Labo
21.47
16.25
Fringe Total Direct De:pt. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labo
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead LaborCosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
8.92 30.39 3.039 33.43 0.2 6.69
6.64 22.89 2.289 25.18 0.4 10.07
0 0.00 0.00
0 000 0.00
0 0.00
0 000
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service' 16.76
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service' 5.00
Other Costs (Equipment, facili~ rental, nart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each QuanlityRequired Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee ner Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino Countv 9.00 1.00 11.11%
Moreno Vallev 6.00 400 66.7%
Riverside County 15.00 (5.00) -33.3%
Total Service Direct Cost
City-Wide Gen & Admin
Rate@10.75%
21.76
TotalServiceCoslJUnil
2.34
'41n
Fee Increase (Decrease)
1S00
910
1000
!; nn
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Curreot Fee Amount
011
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Animal Control
Fund
Account
User Fee Description
Rabies Vaccination Deposit
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The rabies vaccination will be increased by $2 to cover the cost the contracted veterinarians charge to the City.
Personnel Costs
Position
Straight Time
Labor
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits LaborCosl
Dept.or Div.
Overhead
Total Burdened
Labor CosUHr.
Hours by Total Labor
Position per Unit Cost per
NA
Material & Rental Costs
Description
Cost Each
Quantity Required
Unit Cost
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description CoslEach Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
Jurisdiction
THIS IS A DEPOSIT ONLY
Fee per Unit
More (Lessl than SIB.
Dollars Percentage
TolalSSNiceDirectCosl
0.00
City_Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rale~10_75%
Tolal Service CostlUnil
0.00
000
Recommended Fee 0 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy 0 00
Current Fee Amount 0 00
Fee Increase (Decrease) 000
012
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Accou nt User Fee DescriDtion Date
Administrative fee for private property building
Code Enforcement 001 4733 abatements resulting in a lien aoainst a property 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This ~95 administrative fee is added to the total amount of the hearing costs when these costs have not been paid in the lime given
to the property owner and the hearing order is processed. The total amount is then placed as a lien against the property. The
proposed fee modification is to reflect increases in salaries and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has
not been uodated in accordance with increases in salaries and materials since 1 996.
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. orDiv Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo< Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Administrative Assistant $24.09 $7.23 $31.32 $3.13 $34.45 3 $103.35
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $103.35
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Mailinas $0.42 2 $0.84
Printina/copies/receipts/reporU $0.10 7 $0.70
fax cover sheeUCountv Recorder)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.54
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilitv rental, part-time labor wlo benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comoarisons to ProDosed Fee
More (less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino 120.00
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
10489
City-Wide Gefl. & Admifl
Rate@16.07%
Total Service Cost/Unit
16.86
17174
CurrefltFeeAmouflt
17000
174
9500
7~ 00
Recommended Fee
Recomm...,ded F"" Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
01~1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentJDivision Fund Accou nt User Fee Description Date
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement
Code Enforcement 001 4815 liens on vacant lots 3/1/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement liens against properties whose owners have failed to pay the abatement costs for
vacant lots. There has been no fee increase since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries, and other
administrative costs associated with this process.
Person nel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Oiv Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefrts Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 92.81
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnilCost
MailinQs 0.42 3 1.26
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.26
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
C
omparisons to Proposed Fee
More (less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino nla nla
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total Service DireclCost
92.81
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@16.07%
Tolal Service Cost/Unit
9.98
10? 7R
Current Fee Amount
1nn nn
278
1950
Rn fin
Recommended Fee
Recommended F""Subsid~
FeelncreBse(Decrease)
0111
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Accou nt User Fee DescriDtion Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733 Request for demand lelter 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
When Code enforcement places a lien on a property, they file a Notice of Pendency with the County Auditor-Controller Recorder
(ACR). When an individual or company tries to buy, sell, refinance, etc they may be noticed by the ACR's Office the property may
show a lien. A demand letter is typically requested from an escrow company during the saie/transfer/refinance of property, which
details total amount owed to the City for liens, administrative citations or other charges pending against a property. Currently, the
City collects a $10 administrative fee for preparing a demand letter and $5 for each additional line item fee that includes abatement
costs, existing citations and hearing orders that have not yet been liened and a calculation of any interest owed on each of the debts.
Based on the average demand letter containing 5 additional line items ($5 for each item), for a total of approximately $35 per
demand letter. Updating these fees for personnel costs would bring the combined fee to $65 for the creation of a demand letter (no
charges for additional lines).
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.13 34.45 2.5 86.13
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 86.13
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each ' Quantity Required Unit Cost
Printino /cooies/fax $0.10 7 $0.70
cover sheet)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.7
Other Costs (Eouioment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefitsl
Description CoslEach Quantity Required UnitCosl
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Doliars Percentaoe
Other iusisdictions do not ore are demand letters.
Total Service DirectCosl
8683
Cily-WideGeo&Admio
Rale@16.07%
13.95
1007R
Total Service CosVUoil
CurreotFeeAmouot
100 00
078
1000
Recommended Fee
Recom",endedFeeSuooidy
Feelocrease(Decrease)
015
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmenlIDivision Fund Account User Fee Descriotion Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733' Duplicate Release of Lien fee 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The $20 fee is an administrative fee for producing a Duplicate Release of Lien. This occurs when our department previously
complied with a request for a demand letter, the lien was paid through escrow, and a release was issued that was not recorded by
the party receiving the original release. The request must also be researched for additional fees owing and interest re-calculated.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.1317 34.45 0.75 25.84
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 25.84
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Printino lcooieslfax $0.10 3 $0.30
cover sheet)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service 0.3
Other Costs (Equipment, facili y rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cosl Each Quantity Required UnilCosl
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 000
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino 30.00 0
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
2614
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@16.07%
Tolal Service CostJUnit
4.20
~o ~4
Current Fee Amount
~ooo
034
2000
1000
Recommended Fee
Recommende<1F....Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
, Account No. 001-000-4733 is used far building abatement fees
Account No. 001-000-4411 is used for administrative citation fees
OlfJ
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Code Enforcement 001 4735 Release of Notice of Pendency Fee 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
A Notice of Pendency is a document that is recorded with the County Recorder's office to notify any potential buyer and/or lender
that there is some type of administrative action pending against the property and/or there is a lien against the property. This is an
administrative fee for releasing a notice of pendency for costs incurred. Fee modification to refiect increases in staff time, salaries,
and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has not been updated in accordance with increases in salaries
and materials since 1996.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by T olal Labor
Position Labor Benefrts Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cosl per
Code Compliance Officer II $34.15 $10.25 $44.40 $4.44 $48.83 2 $97.67
Code Compliance Proc. Assl. $20.74 $6.22 $26.96 $2.70 $29.66 2 $59.32
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $156.99
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnitCosl
MailinQs $0.42 2 $0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.84
Other Costs (Eauipment, facilitv rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description CoslEach Quantity Required Unit Cost
County Recorder Fee $13.00 1 $13.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 13.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentage
Not available
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
16999
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@16.07%
27.32
1Q7 ::\0
Tolal Service GostlUnit
Current Fee Amount
1RO 00
1730
9400
Rn 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended F... Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
01'(
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Descriotion Date
Administrative fee for weed abatement on vacant
Code Enforcement 001 4815 lots 3/1/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Administrative fee for weed abatement incurred costs and staff time for processing abatements. There has been no fee increase
since 1996. Fee modification to refiect increases in staff time, salaries and other administrative costs associated with this orocess.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Code Comnliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 190.48
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Mailinns 0.42 5 2.1
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2.1
Other Costs IEnuinment, facilitv rental, cart-time labor wlo benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle Exnense 30 30.00 2.00 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 60.00
Comoarisons to Prooosed Fee
Fee Der Unit More (Less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nla nla
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
250 48
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rale@16.Q7%
26.93
?77 4n
Total Service Cost/Unit
RecommendOodF...Subsidy
?7~ nn
240
11000
1n~ nn
Recommended Fee
Curreot Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
018
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeDartmentlDivision Fund Account User Fee DescriDtion Date
Code Enforcement 001 4743 Vehicle Tow Release Fees 2/9/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. This fee was first adopted by Code Enforcement in 2008 to mirror the fee charged by
the Police Department for the same service. CVC 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as GTA are
not charQed and can obtain a release 7 days a week 8am-7om. All other releases can be obtained M-F 7:30-5:30 om. The current
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe T olal Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead laborCostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Code Compliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Sr.lSup Officer 57.03 17.11 74.14 7.4139 81.55 0.25 20.39
Code Enf. ProcessinQ Ass! 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 1 29.66
Admin. Svcs. Super. 34.15 10.245 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.25 $12.21
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 159.92
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Photos $2.00 4 $8.00
Regular Mailinos 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 8.84
Other Costs (Equipment, facili ." rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnitCosl
Vehicle Expense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
T atal Other costs per Unit of Service: 40.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino n/a n/a
Total Service DlrectCosI
208 76
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@16.07%
33.55
?A.? ~1
TotalServiceCostlUnit
Recommended Fee Subsidy
?4n nn
231
Recommended Fee
Currant Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
un nn
GiB
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DenartmentlDivision Fund Account User Fee Descrintion Date
Code Enforcement 001 4411 Removal of Unauthorized Signs (New Fee) 2/9/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Direct costs incurred for removal of unauthorized signs. Recommended fee is for removal per sign. If an ordinance amendment is
approved to remove the certified mail requirement, costs would be reduced by $5.21, but the $100 fee per sign would still be
ustified.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. orDiv Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo, Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Code ComOliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.4 19.53
Sr.lSup Officer 43.87 13.16 57.03 5.7031 62.73 0.2 12.55
Code Enf. Processina Asst 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 0.5 14.83
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 46.91
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Certified Mailinos 5.21 1 5.21
Reaular Mailinas 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 6.05
Other Costs IEouinment, facilitv rental, part-time labor wlo benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle Exoense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 40.00
Comoarisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nla nla
Riverside 100.00 0.00 0.0%
Corona 80.00 (20.00 -20.0%
020
Total Service Direct Cost 9296
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@16.Q7% 14.94
TolalServiceCosVUnil 107 ~O
Recommended Fee 10000
RecommendedF_Sub.!.idy 790
Currenl Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) 10n 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeDartmentlDivision Fund Account User Fee DescriDtion Date
City Clerk 001 4901 Yard Sale Permit Fee (New Fee) 3/1/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Nominal fee for issuance of yard sale permit
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by TolaJlabor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Coslper
Business Reo. Reoresentative 20.72 6.22 26.94 2.6936 29.63 0.467 13.84
0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 13.84
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnilCost
0
0
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs IEouiDment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefits\
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnitCosl
0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comoarisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Penmit Fee Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino nla nla
Redlands 2.50 112.50 -83.3%
Ontario 3.00 112.00 -80.0%
Fontana 8.00 17.00 -46.7%
Yucaina 2.50 112.50 -83.3%
Total Service DirectCosl
1384
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rale@16.07%
TotalServiceC<JstlUnit
2.22
1ROR
Recommende<l Fee Subsidy
1~ nn
106
Recommended Fee
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
1~ 00
021
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Development Services
Fund
Accou nt
4351
User Fee Description
Blanket/Combo Permit
Date
2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
A combo permit would combine the excavation permit ($45) and lane closure permit ($45) that contractors typically pull together.
The cost of the combined permit would be $55. The combo permit would allow the contractors to pull one permit saving the City
and contractors time. Develooment Services staff estimates there is a orooosed revenue loss of $1 0,900.
Personnel Costs
Position
Development Services Tech.
En ineerin Assistant 1
Straight Time
Labor
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
Depl. or Div.
Overhead
Total Burdened
Labor CosUHr.
Hours by
Position per Unit
1
15%
Total labor
Coslper
38.16
6.32
0.00
0.00
24.06
26.58
7.22 31.28
7.97 34.55
6.88116
7.60188
o
o
o
o
o
38.16
42.16
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
44.48
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each QuaniilyRequired Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost $ 44.48
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen. 8. Admin
San Bernardino $ 55.00 n/a n/a Rate@25.86% $ 11.50
Corona $ 80.00 $ 25.00 45% TolalServiceCosVUnit $ SS Q9
Ontario $ 85.00 $ 30.00 55%
Redlands $ 216.00 $ 161.00 293% Recommended Fee $ ss no
T emecula $ 338.00 Annual $ 283.00 515% Recommended Fee$ubsidy $ 0.99
Temecula $ 39.00 Monthly $ (16.00 -29% Current Fee Amount $
Chino $ 177.00 $ 122.00 222% Fee Increase (Decrease) $ ss no
022
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 184 Account Blanket Inspection Fee ( New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to utility companies to inspect the work covered under the blanket permit, 16 square fee. The recommended
fee is $76.50. This is based on one hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II and .18 hours of a Construction
/Survey Manager's time. Not all cities have adopted a separate fee, it is included in the permit.
Personnel Costs
Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr Position per Unit Cost per
9.26 40.13 8.82882 48.96 1 48.96
12.49 54.13 11.90904 66.04 0.18 11.89
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 000
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Position
Construction Inspector II
Construction/Survey Mana er
Straight Time
labor
30.87
41.64
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
60.85
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino $ 76.50 N/A N/A
Corona Full Cost N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev $ 15.00 Per Location $ (61.50) -0.80392157
Ontario Included in permit fee N/A N/A
Temecula $ 194.00 $ 117.50 154%
Chino $ 177.00 $ 100.50 131%
Q~~
Total Service Direct Cost $ 60.85
City-Wide Gen & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 15.74
Total Service CosUUnil $ 7658
Recommended Fee $ 7650
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.08
Current Fee Amount $
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 7650
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 Various More than 3 Plan Checks (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, or public safety. The recommended fee is $88.50 per hour. This represents review
time for an Engineering Assistant III, the Senior Civil Engineer, the City Engineer, and the Development Services Tech.
The account will vary based on the type of plan being checked.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.1 3.82
En ineerin Assistant III 34.11 10.23 44.34 9.75546 54.10 1 54.10
Senior Civil Engineer 48.36 14.51 62.87 13.83096 76.70 0.1 7.67
Cit En ineer 62.06 18.62 80.68 17.74916 98.43 0.05 4.92
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 000
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 70.51
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaae
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
er os s qUlpmen , aCI I renta , part-time a orwo ene Its
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Oth C t (E
t f Tt
I b
I b
f )
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 88.50 Per Hour N/A N/A
Temecula $ 93.00 Per Sheet $ 4.50 $ 0.05
Moreno Valley (Maps) $ 190.00 Per Sheet $ 101.50 $ 1.15
Moreno Valley (Improvements) $ 248.00 Per Sheet $ 159.50 $ 1.80
Moreno Valley (GradinQ) $ 207.00 Per Sheet $ 118.50 $ 1.34
02'1
Total Service DireclCosl $ 70.51
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 18.23
Total Service CosVUnit $ 8874
Recommended Fee $ 8850
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.24
CUlTent Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 8850
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 188 4780 More than 3 WQMP Reviews (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, public safety, or adequate water quality best practices. The recommended fee is
$99.00 per hour. This represents review time for the NPDES Coordinator, the City Engineer, and the NPDES Customer
Service Rep.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
NPDES Customer Service Rep. 17.84 5.35 23.19 5.10224 28.29 0.5 14.15
NPDES Coordinator 37.68 11.30 48.98 10.77648 59.76 1 59.76
City En ineer 62.06 18.62 80.68 17.74916 98.43 0.05 4.92
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
78.83
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
PostaQe
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 99.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev (Preliminarv) $ 321.00 3rd Review $ 221.79 224%
Moreno Vallev (Basic Final) $ 750.00 3rd Review $ 650.79 656%
Moreno Valley (Standard Final) $1,440.00 3rd Review $ 1,340.79 1351%
Moreno Valley (Complex Final) $1,824.00 3rd Review $ 1,724.79 1739%
I
I
025
Total Service Directeos! $ 78.83
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 20.39
Total Service Cost/Unit $ 9900
Recommended Fee $ 99 ?1
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 10.21)
Currenl Fee Amounl
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 99 ?1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmenUDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 188 Account NPDES Business Inspection (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
As required by the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS-4) staff is required inspect all businesses to
insure they are in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The recommended fee is
$148.50. This represents .40 hours of documentation time for the NPDES Customer Service Rep, 2 hours of inspection time for
the NPDES Inspector and .15 hours of review time by the NPDES Coordinator. The permit is a federal requirement and
regulated at the State and regional level.
Pensonnel Costs
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
NPDES Customer Service Rep. 17.84 5.35 23.19 5.10224 28.29 0.4 $ 11.32
NPDES Inspector (Construction 30.87 9.26 40.13 8.82882 48.96 2 $ 97.92
Inspector II) 0 0.00 $
NPDES Coordinator 37.68 11.30 48.98 10.77648 59.76 0.15 $ 8.96
0 000
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $ 118.20
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: $ -
Other Costs (Equipment, facili rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollans Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 148.50 N/A N/A
Ontario (Commercial) $ 171.00 Averaae $ 22.50 15%
Ontario (Industrial) $ 263.66 Average $ 115.16 78%
Redlands $ 71.00 $ (77.50) -52%
Moreno Valley (Industrial) $ 451.00 $ 302.50 204%
Moreno Vallev (Commercial) $ 311.00 $ 162.50 109%
Moreno Vallev (Restaurant) $ 271.00 $ 122.50 82%
02b
Total Service Direct Cost $ 118.20
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rale@25.86% $ 30.57
Total Service CosVUni\ $ 14R 77
Recommended Fee $ 14R 50
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.27
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 14850
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 184 Various Public Works Re-Inspection (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The current fee covers one inspection and there are many times when the inspector is called to a site by the contractor and
the contractor is not there or the site is not ready for inspection and then is requested to revisit the site. The original
inspection fee is based on a percentage of the cost estimate. The recommended fee is $61.50. This represents one hour of
inspection time for a Construction Inspector II. Moreno Valley based their fee on a 4 hour minimum. Not all cities have
established this fee. The account will vary based on the type of inspection being performed.
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
Dept. or Div.
Overhead
Personnel Costs
Position
Construction Inspector II
Straight Time
Labor
30.87
8.82882
o
o
o
o
o
o
9.26 40.13
Total Burdened Hours by
Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit
48.96 1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Labor
Cost per
48.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
48.96
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaae
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 61.50 N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev $ 432.00 Each $ 370.50 602%
02',
Total Service Direct Cosl $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 12.66
Tolal ServiceCostlUnil $ 61.62
Recommended Fee $ 61.50
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.12
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 61.50
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmenUDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 Various Revisions to Approved Plans (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who request changes to their plans after the plans have been through the
plan check process and have signed mylars. The recommended fee is $142.50 per sheet. This fee represents review time
for a Senior Civil Engineer, a Construction/Survey Manager and documentation time for a Development Services Tech.
Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a consultant.
Personnel Costs
Position
Senior Civil En ineer
Develo ment Services Tech.
Construction/Survey Manager
Straight Time
Labor
Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Oiv. Total Burdened Hours by
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit
14.51 62.87 13.83096 76.70 1
7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.1
12.49 54.13 11.90904 66.04 0.5
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
48.36
24.06
41.64
Material & Rental Costs
Total Labor
Cost per
76.70
3.82
33.02
0.00
113.54
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postaoe
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino $ 142.50 Per Sheet N/A N/A
Corona $ 625.00 Per Sheet $ 624.60 438%
Temecula $ 241.00 Per Sheet $ 98.50 69%
Chino $ 614.00 $ 471.50 331%
Moreno Vallev (Minor) $ 261.00 Per Sheet $ 118.50 83%
Moreno Valley (Maior) $ 269.00 Per Sheet $ 126.50 89%
028
Total Service Direct Cost $ 113.54
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rale@2586% $ 29.36
Total Service Cost/Unit $ 14? 90
Recommended Fee $ 14? SO
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.40
Current Fee Amounl
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 14? SO
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 4782 Certificate of Correction (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who have non-substantive changes to their tract/parcel maps after the maps
have been signed and recorded. The recommended fee is $101.00, minimum one hour. This represent 1 hour of review
time for a Senior Civil Engineer. Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a
consultant.
Personnel Costs
Position
Senior Civil En ineer
Development Services Tech.
Straight Time
Labor
Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
14.51 62.87 13.83096 76.70 1 76.70
7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.1 3.82
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
48.36
24.06
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 80.51
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less \ than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 101.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
Corona $ 735.00 $ 634.00 628%
Temecula $ 651.00 $ 550.00 545%
Moreno Vallev $ 496.00 $ 395.00 391%
Ontario $ 334.00 $ 233.00 231%
028
Total Service Direct Cost $ 80.51
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 20.82
Total Service CosUUnit $ 101 ~4
Recommended Fee $ 10100
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.34
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 10100
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmenUDivision Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Development Services 183 4352 Permit Extension (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
There are circumstances when a contractor needs to extend the permit time frame; staff enters the extension request into
Permit Plus and verifies with the Construction Manager that the extension is warranted. The recommended fee is $45.00.
This is based on 0.2 hours of review time by the Construction Manager and documentation time by staff.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
24.06 722 3128 6.88116 38.16 0.55 20.99
26.58 7.97 34.55 7.60188 42.16 0.05 2.11
41.64 1249 54.13 11.90904 66.04 0.2 13.21
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 36.30
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilil1 rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
t P
dF
ompansons 0 ropose ee
More (Less than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 45.00
03IJ
Total Service DirectCosl $ 36.30
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 9.39
Total Service CosUUnit $ 41; fi9
Recommended Fee $ 41; 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.69
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 41; 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New Inspection for a TUP/CUP Bond Release
Development Services 183 Account (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This is an inspection fee charged to applicants who requested a Temporary Use Permit or a Conditional use Permit. The
inspection is required before the applicant's cash bond can be returned. The recommended fee is $61.50. This represents
1 hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II.
No other cities have established this fee as it is included in the application fee.
Personnel Costs
Position
Construction Inspector II
Straight Time
Labo
30.87
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
Dept. or Div
Overhead
9.26 40.13
8.82882
o
o
o
o
o
o
Total Burdened
Labor CosUHr.
Hours by
Position per Unit
1
Total Labo
Cost per
48.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
48.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
48.96
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 61.50 N/A N/A
031
Total Service Direct Cost $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 12.66
Total ServiceCostlUnil $ fi1 fi2
Recommended Fee $ fi150
Recommended Fea Subsidy $ 0.12
Currenl Fee Amoun\
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ fi150
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 184 Account Billina Fee (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently staff provide a service to the utility companies by billing them a monthly invoice for permits as no charge. The
recommended fee is $62.04 per invoice. This represents 1.5 hours of review time for an Administrative Assistant.
No other cities have established this fee.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labo
Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost pe
20.72 6.22 26.94 5.92592 32.86 1.5 49.29
0 0.00 0.00
0 000 0.00
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Position
Administrative Assistant
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
49.29
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 62.04 N/A N/A
032
Total Service DireclCost $ 49.29
City-Wide Gen & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 12.75
Total Service CosUUnit $ 6704
Recommended Fee $ 6700
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.04
Current Fee Amounl
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 6700
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
New
Development Services 183 Account TeO Insoection (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to an applicant who is requesting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant is required to post
a bond to insure all outstanding work is finished. The recommended fee amount is $541.50. This fee is based 2.5 hours
of field review time by the Construction/Survey Manager, 2.5 hours of review time by the City Engineer and 0.5 hours of
documentation time by the Director. No other Cities have established this fee because it is not always standard practice.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by
Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit
41.64 12.49 54.13 11.90904 66.04 2.5
62.06 18.62 80.68 17.74916 98.43 2.5
24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 38.16 0.5
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
Material & Rental Costs
Total Labor
Cost per
165.10
246.07
19.08
430.25
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
PostaQe
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Eauiament, facilit rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
omparisans to Proposed Fee
More (Lessl than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 541.50 N/A N/A
03~)
Total Service Direct Cost $ 430.25
City-Wide Gen & Admin
Rate@25.86% $ 111.26
Tolal Service CostfUnil $ 54151
Recommended Fee $ 54150
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 0.01
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 541 50
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Large Family Day Care (9-14 Children) -Initial
Fire 001 4336 LicensinQ Pre-Inspection Fee. 3/1/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permit. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State
requlations, has nronosed to modifv insnection fees for care facilities
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Coslper
Fire Prevention Officer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each QuanlilyRequired UnilCost
Supplies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.60
Other Costs (Enuinment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Vehicle 40.00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentage
N/A
Total Service OiraclCosl
123.60
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@14.55%
TotalServiceCosUUnil
17.98
141 nR
CurrenlFee Amounl
SOOO
9158
141.58
-91 SA
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Oecraase)
03'1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Fire 001 4336 Residential - Board and Care 6 or fewer 3/1/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permit. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State
reaulations, has orooosed to modify insoection fees for care facilities
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
SlraighlTime Fringe Total Direct Dept.orDiv. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits LaborCosl Overhead LaborCostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Fire Prevention Officer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Supplies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.60
Other Costs lEquiDment, facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits\
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnitCosl
Vehicle 40.00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Pro Dosed Fee
More (Less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage
N/A
TolalServiceDiractCost
123.60
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@14.SS%
TotalServiceCosVUnit
17.98
141 oR
Fee Increase (Decrease)
nO 00
9158
14158
_q1 fiA
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
035
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeoartmenUDivision Fund Account User Fee Descriotion Date
Police 001 4743 Tow Release 1/6/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. CVC 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as
GTA are not charged, and can obtain a release 7 days a week, 8am-7pm. All other release can be obtained M-F, 8am-4pm.
The current fee is $215.00.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe TotalOirecl Oept.orDiv. Total Burdened Hours by TolalLabor
Position Labor Benefits laborCosl Overhead LaborCosUHr. Position per Unit Coslpe
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.25 7.10
Disoatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.25 9.64
Police Officer 4043 19.92 60.35 604 66.39 1.33 88.29
Communilv Service Officer II 21.77 8.95 30.72 3.07 33.79 1.25 42.24
SerQeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 749 8240 0.5 41.20
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service' 18847
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnilCost
Police Reoort Fee 0.15 5 0.75
Certified PostaQe 3.94 2 7.88
Total Other costs per Unit of Service" 20.88
Other Costs tEouiDment, facili rental, nart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description CoslEach Quantity Required UnitCosl
Total other costs per Unit of Service"
Comparisons to ProDosed Fee
Fee ner Unit More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino 215.00 n/a n/a
Ontario PD 125.00 {115.00 -47.9%
Corona PD 155.00 {85.00 -354%
Redlands PD 175.00 {65.00 -27.1%
Pomona PD 100.00 (140.00 -58.3%
Riverside 205.00 110.00 -4.2%
TolillServiceDirectCosl
209 35
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rete@15.48%
Tolal$erviceCostlUnit
3241
'417f)
Fee Increase (Decrease)
'40 nn
175
21500
7S 00
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amount
03b
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De artmentlDivision
Police
User Fee Descri tion
Police Photographs 3" x 5"
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, inciuding the cost of film, film developing, printing
and staff time to process requests. Comparisons with other cities are difficult because of the services provided
are different. There has not been a fee increase since 2006.
Personnel Costs I Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe T olal Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead labor CosUHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Forensic Specialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32
Material & Rental Costs
Description lcostEach Quantity Required UnitCosl
Film developinq & printinq 0.27 1 0.27
=
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.27
Other Costs (EouiDment, facilitv rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino 26.00 I nla nla
San Bernardino Sheriff 2.00 I (25.00 -92.6%
Riverside PO 9.00 CO no reorints 118.00 -66.7%
Ontario PO 15.00 CO no renrints 112.00 -44.4%
Fontana PO 32.00 CO no renrints 5.00 18.5%
Chino PO 35.00 CO + 25 cents per 8.00 29.6%
I
TolalService DireclCost
23.59
Crty-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rale@15.45%
TotalServiceCoslIUnil
3.65
77 74
Current Fee Amounl
'700
024
2600
100
Recommended Fee
Reoommended Fee Subsidy
Fee Increase (Decrease)
03i
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De artmentlDivision
Police
User Fee Descri tion
Police Photographs 5" x 7"
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, including the cost of film, film developing, printing
and staff time to process requests. City comparisons are difficult because of different services provided
There has not been a fee increase since 2006.
Personnel Costs I Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dep!. or Div Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. Position perUni! Cost per
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Forensic Soecialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32
Material & Rental Costs
Description ICoslEach Quantity Required UnilCosl
Film develoDina & printina 2.95 1 2.95
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2.95
Other Costs (Eauioment, facilitv rental, Dart-time labor w/a benefits I
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarisons to Prooosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino I 29.50 nla nla
San Bernardino Sheriff 6.00 124.00 -80.0%
Riverside PO 9.00 CO (21.00 -70.0%
Ontario PO 15.00 CO (15.00 -50.0%
Fontana PO 32.00 CO 2.00 6.7%
Chino PO 35.00 CO 5.00 16.7%
TolalSel'lice Directeos! 26.27
City_Wide Gen. & Admin
Rale@15.48% 4.07
Total Service CostlUnit ~n ~~
Recommended Fee ~O 00
RecammendedFeeSubsidy 033
Currenl Fee Amount 2950
Fee Increase (Decrease) o ~O
038
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Police 001 4741 Police Photographs 8" x 10" 3/17/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, including the cost of film, film developing, printing
and staff time to process requests. There has not been a fee increase since 2006.
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Forensic Specialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32
Material & Rental Costs
Description I Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Film develooino & orintino 6.00 1 6.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 6.00
Other Costs (Equioment, facilitv rental, oart-time labor wlo benefitsl
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 33.00 nla nla
San Bernardino Sheriff 6.00 27.50 -82.1%
Riverside PO 9.00 CO 24.50 -73.1%
Ontario PO 15.00 CO 18.50 -55.2%
Fontana PO 32.00 CO (1.50 -4.5%
Chino PO 35.00 CO 1.50 4.5%
Total Service Direct Cost 29.32
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rale@15.48% 4.54
Total Service CostlUnit 3385
Recommended Fee 3350
Recommende<l Fee Subsidy 0.35
Current Fee Amount 33.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) 050
03~1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division
Police
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
For reproduction of video cassette tapes (VHS).
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Police Detective 45.67 21.02 66.69 6.67 73.36 0.5 36.68
Police Seraeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.25 20.60
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 57.28
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitv rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (less) than S.E
Jurisdiction Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentalle
San Bernardino 17.50 (48.50 -73.5%
Riverside 50.00 (10min) $1.75 add'l (16.00) -24.2%
Ontario 25.00 (41.00) -62.1%
Fontana 32.00 (34.00) -51.5%
Tolal Service Direct Cost 57.28
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rale@15.48% 8.87
Total Service CoSVUnil 6615
Recommended Fee 6600
Recommended F... Subsidy 015
Currenl Fee Amounl 6300
Fee Increase (Decrease) ~ 00
04(1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De artmentlDivision
Police
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing Police Dispatch logs and CAD printouts
The fees have not been increased since 2006.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. orDiv Total Burdened Hours by Total labor
Position Labor Benefits LaborCosl Overhead laborCostlHr. PosilionperUnit Cost per
Disoatch Suoervisor 30.87 12.27 43.14 4.31 47.45 1.25 59.32
Police Communications Mar 35.85 14.98 50.83 5.08 55.91 0.25 13.98
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 73.30
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Audio Tape 1.00 1 1.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service" 1.00
Other Costs fEauipment, facilitv rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnilCost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Pro Dosed Fee
More (Less) than 5.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ner Unit Dollars PercentaQe
San Bernardino 80.00 nla nla
Riverside PO 300.00 215.00 253%
TolalSelViceDirectCosl
74.30
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@15.48%
TotalSelViceCostJUnit
11.50
R!'i Rn
Re<ommende<lFoeSub$idy
R!'i nn
080
8000
!'i nn
Recommended Fee
Currenl Fee Amount
Fee Increase (Decrease)
041
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De artmentlDivision
Police
User Fee Description
False Bur la Alarm Fines
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false burglary alarm calls. Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines incurred for permitted
locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1 stto 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th-9th false alarm will be $90 and the 10th and subseauent false alarm $175.
Fees have not been increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.5 19.28
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 0.5 33.19
Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.25 20.60
Senior Office Assistant 19.84 7.96 27.80 2.78 30.58 0.33 10.09
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 83.16
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required UnitCosl
Postaoe 0.42 1 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.42
Other Costs {Equipment, facilit rental, part-time labor wlo benefits}
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentao e
SBPD 75.00 nla nla
Riverside PD Fine #5 75.00 0.00 0.0%
Pomona PD #5 220.00 145.00 193.3%
Newport Beach PD - Fine #5 125.00 50.00 66.7%
Irvine PD #5 150.00 75.00 100.0%
Ontario #5 150.00 75.00 100.0%
Huntinoton Beach #5 200 125.00 166.7%
Total Service Direct Cost
83.58
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@15.48%
Total Service CosVUnit
12.94
On S?
Fee Increase (Decrease)
7S nn
21.52
50.00
?snn
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee$ubsidy
CurrenlFeeAmounl
042
Cost Analysis Worksheet
I Department/Division Fund Account! User Fee Description Datel
IPolice 001 47471 False Robbery Alarm Fines 1/6/20091
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false robbery alarm calls. Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines incurred for permitted
locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1 st to 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th-6th false alarm will be $250. 7th-9th will be $300 and the 10th and
subsequent false alarm $350. Fees have not been increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Oi'.'. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labo
Position Labo Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor CosVHr. osition per Unit Cost per
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.75 28.92
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.67 110.86
SerQeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20
Senior Office Assistant 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 190.35
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Postage 0.42 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.42
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitv rental, part-time labor wlo benefits)
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentag
SBPD 175.00 nla nla
Riverside PO Fine #5 300.00 100.00 50.0%
Newport PO #5 125.00 (75.00 -37.5%
Irvine #5 150.00 750.00 -25.0%
Ontario #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
Huntinaton Beach #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
Total Service Direct Cost
e City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@15.48%
Total Service CosUUnil
190.77
29.53
??O 30
Fee Increase (Decrease)
?OO 00
20.30
125.00
7500
Recommended Fee
Recommended Fee Subsidy
Current Fee Amounl
04,',
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee DescriDtion Date
Police 001 4743 Traffic Citation Sian-off fees 3/3/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Police Officers issue traffic citations to the motoring public who operate vehicles with mechanical violations. These violations
must be corrected and signed off by police officers prior to the publiC contacting the court. Currently the Police Department
does not charge a fee for personnel to inspect vehicles, verify corrections have been made and sign off the citation.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Depl.orDiv. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits laborCosl Overhead laborCostlHr. Position per Unit Cost per
Community Service Officer I 22.74 9.13 31.87 1.75 33.62 0.33 11.09
Lieutenant - Watch Commander 62.8673 27.68 90.55 4.75 95.30 0.1 9.53
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 20.62
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each QuanlityRequired UnilCost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs IEouiDment, facili I rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description CoslEach Quantity Required UnitCosl
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Pro Dosed Fee
Fee Der Unit More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Dollars Percentaoe
San Bernardino nla nla
Ontario PD 0.0%
Corona PD 120.00 -100.0%
Redlands PD (20.00 -100.0%
Pomona PD 120.00 -100.0%
Total Service DireclCost 2062
City-Wide Gen. & Admin
Rate@10.15% 2.22
TolalServiceCosVUnit ?? AA
Recommended Fee ?OOO
Recommended Fee Subsidy ? A4
Current Fee Amount 000
Fee Increase (Decrease) ?O 00
04'1
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Public Services 132 4820 Sewer Lateral Capping Fee 2/25/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently, staff charges an applicant who is requesting sewer laterai capping services $500, the cost of the contractor only.
To recover the costs of City personnel needed to inspect the sewer lateral capping services, Public Services is proposing to
increase the fee by $350.
Personnel Costs
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept. or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost pe
30.97 10.84 41.81 4.18095 45.99 2 91.98
100 35.00 135.00 13.5 148.50 1 148.50
17 5.95 22.95 2.295 25.25 0.25 6.31
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 246.79
Position
Sewer Maintenance Supervisor
Inspector Costs
IW Customer Service Rep.
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitv rental, part-time labor w/o benefitsl
Description Cost Each uantity Required Unit Cost
Contractor Cost 500.00 1 500
Fleet Charaes Vehicle 539 15.5 3 46.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 546.50
Comparisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service DirectCosl $ 793.29
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
San Bernardino N/A N/A N/A Rale@25.86% $ 205.15
Riverside Inspection on Iv $300 $148.50 N/A Total Service Cost/Unit $ 998 44
Rialto InsDection on Iv $157 $148.50 N/A
Redlands Inspection onlv $282 $148.50 N/A Recommended Fee $ WiO 00
Lorna Linda N/A N/A N/A Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 148.44
Moreno Vallev N/A N/A N/A Current Fee Amount $ 500.00
Ontaria N/A N/A N/A Fee Increase (Decrease) $ 350 00
045
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Public Services 132 4820 Sewer Lateral Inspection Fee 2/24/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently, staff charges $50.00 for sewer lateral inspection services. Staff recommends that the fee be increased by
an additional $50.00 for a total of $100.00 per inspection.
Personnel Costs
Position
Ins ector Costs
Straight Time
Labor
100
Fringe Total Direct
Benefits Labor Cost
Dept. or Div.
Overhead
0.00 0.00
Total Burdened Hours by
Labor CosUHr. osition per Unit
Total Labor
Cost pe
100.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
100.00
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilit rental, Dart-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each antity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino N/A N/A N/A
Riverside N/A N/A N/A
Riaito N/A N/A N/A
Corona N/A N/A N/A
Loma Linda N/A N/A N/A
Moreno Valley N/A N/A N/A
Ontario N/A N/A N/A
046
Total Service Direct Cost $ 100.00
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rate@25.86% $ 25.86
Total Service CosVUnit 9; 175 R6
Recommended Fee 9; 100 00
Recommended Fee Subsidy $ 25.86
Currenl Fee Amount $ 50.00
Fee Increase (Decrease) 9; 5000
Attachment B
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 16.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
1
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino has an ongoing and serious problem of
businesses posting signs on public property creating a public nuisance and blight
throughout the City; and
2
3
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino find that it
is necessary to hold owners and/or businesses that profit from these unauthorized
signs responsible for the cost of removal of these una~th/ilrized signs.
NOW THERFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMMQt:l))~,~~NCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ,<..
4
5
6
7
Section 1.
8
9
10
16.18.010
11 16.18.020
12 16.18.030
16.18.040
13 16.18.050
'-,....,
Chapter 16.18 of Title 16 is ~~rehy added to read.as follows:
Cha!'tli!r 16.18
.~.;j,\".
UNAUTHOR,lZED SIGNS
;"
:S::{i,,'''-/::\:,
'....;c..,,<.,"
Definitions.
Prohibitions.
Cost of Removal.
Colle . . ",costs.
Viol ....:'piji~~lty.
14
15
16.18.010 Defim
':~~~i&f;~i~':'~i~~~~~~~~I~'i:~nles~i~~erwise a~parent f~om contex!, words
" es USe~ii!othrs.',~apter sna,ffii,~~~~ '~:e meanings hereinafter deSignated.
Ths, .... itions in tfil~;i:~raPt~Efre included~!lrreference purposes only and are not
intendei~:i!O narrow tI1~if7COP~,?f definitions set forth in federal, state or other
applicable.~~~s or regulal'~~~. Wl:).f9,s used in this chapter in the singular may include
the plural afld:4he plural rT':~y include)he singular. Use of the masculine shall also
mean femininei'altld neuter. " .
.
16
17
18
19
20
.'....,'
,':,:.'>._ .-,.i
'>;;'.;,<.c
i>"'. ,",.';:
A. "Code" means the. Si3l'1 Bernardino Municipal Code.
B. "Development Code" means Title 19 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code.
21
22
23
C. "Director" means the Director of Code Enforcement or his/her designee.
24
D. "Responsible party" means the owner or lessee of property used for a
commercial activity or event; or the sponsor or promoter of a sporting event,
concert, theatrical performance, or similar activity or event. Any information
that appears on a sign that is removed may be used to establish that the
25
26
27
28
1
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 16.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
1 person or venue listed on the sign is the actual responsible party including, but
not limited to, information identifying a person or corporate identity.
2
3
E. "Unauthorized sign" means any notice, writing of letters, words or numerals,
pictorial presentation, illustrations or decorations, emblems or devices, symbols
or trademarks, flags, banners or pennants, graphic announcement, posters,
pictures or any item used to advertise in anym~l'lner businesses, services or
events at some location other than that upon,~~iph the sign is located.
4
5
6
7
16.18.020 Prohibitions.
8
,-"c.'i'," C"::".>',
-".:,':\:.\::".:,' -'.'
No person shall place, affix, erect, ext~~~'f~~r~ject over, susp;:;i!l~,iW maintain or cause
to be placed, affixed, erected, extende'Cl,~!f~uspended or maintaiff any unauthorized
sign in, over or on public property, publiGu~ljW polesulj~8t poles, p ..rights-of-ways,
trees in the public right-of-wa r on publiel~'i?w..~pt maintained' ~,Q.. or property
adjacent to the public right-o nless odf" .: permitted by the'''~evelopment
Code or other applicable laws.. ;.,.~ctivitY'S,..l1 constitute a nuisance and the
Director may proceedi~ a summ'." '~~~li1rto at>a~-lil.,~uch nuisance by causing the
unauthorized sign t().'.....,q~i~..fP.pved imA'J~. piatelYl! .
.....,.:.,,';....:.,....:y,..,',"../-:,.,'.,. "..:.....
9
10
11
12
13
....>............. '..
sign by':City employees and/or City contractors
~ by tfi~responsible party. The cost of removal
'tion of the Mayor and Common Council.
14
;/;9:.:,,:,
15
The cost
pursua
shallti
of the rel'T;loval of
his c::haptet~h
'lis'Med by S'e'P
16
17
-:,',
16.18~040
-....:.. ....>::.'
'::'-::-,' ':':-,,'::',..
.-....:.,," ',,';
Collection of co~b!,
18
: ,'J:,',:,., -:,>
Unpaid cost~i?f removal sh~!1 be ad~l?t to the City and subject to all remedies for debt
collection as all9wed by law." .
19
"iX'-:
20
16.18.050 Violati6~'."0,pen.~ll~
A violation of this cha~i~t'~~~ be enforced or punished in any manner prescribed by
law, including but not limited to issuance of administrative citations pursuant to
Chapter 9.92, through issuance of administrative civil penalties pursuant to Chapter
9.93, or through any other process or procedure established or allowed by this code or
applicable law.
21
22
23
24
25
Section 2. In the event that any provision of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or
26 any application thereof to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be
27
2
28
5
III
6 /II
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 3
1
2
3
4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 16.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or ineffective by any court of competent
jurisdiction on its face or as applied, such holding shall not affect the validity of the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance, or any part thereof, or any application thereof
to any person or circumstance or of said provision as applied to any other person or
circumstance. It is hereby declared to be the legislative intent of the City that this
Ordinance would have been adopted had such unconstitutional, invalid, or ineffective
provision not been included herein.
3 COUNCIL MEMBERS:
AYES
4
ESTRADA
5
6 BAXTER
7 BRINKER
8 VACANT
9 KELLEY
10
JOHNSON
11
MC CAMMACK
12
13
14
15 The
16
17
18
19 Approved
20 JAMES F.
21 City Attorney
22
23 By:
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ADDING CHAPTER 16.18 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNAUTHORIZED SIGNS
ON PUBLIC PROPERTY.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the _ day of , 2009, by the following vote, to wit:
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
_ day of
,2009.
PATRICK J. MORRIS, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
4
Attachment C
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 5.68 OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING YARD
SALES.
1
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino finds that there is a proliferation of
unregulated yard sales which create a public nuisance and blight throughout the City;
and
2
3
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino find that it
is necessary to require permits for those resident desiring to hold a yard sale in order
to facilitate regulation of such sales.
4
5
6
NOW THERFORE, THE MAYOR AND COMMONKi~l)NCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: <";,,,,;,;
7
8
as follows:
Section 1.
Chapter 5.68 of Title 5
repealed and
9
10
11
5.68.010 Definitions.
5.68.020 Permit required.
5.68.030 Permit Fee.
5.68.040 Permit-
5.68.050 Frequ
5.68.060 Displli!
5.68.070 Signs.',
~".,.,
5.68.080 mption~.; . ..........
5.68.0n -'Pe"~,,~;"f
12
13
14
15
16
,';;,.."
17
.......<:..;..:.:.......-. ,-'."
'.:f:' ','
5.68.01(),Defi nitions.
18
-,>,'-:
-'<>""':'" ::.......: ',',':','
A. "Yara!~~.lf means ~ll'~limer~n~~les, open to the public, conducted from or on a
premise~fjp.any resid~~!ial or mobile home zone for the purpose of disposing
of persorial.;i~~operty,i~~luding, but not limited to, all sales entitled, advertised
or called "g~I'~S!3/';'!!I-~?'" "yard," "porch," "flea market" or "rummage" sale.
B. "Personal proP~rt~r~eans property which is owned, utilized or maintained by
an individual or members of a residence or family and acquired in the normal
course of living in or maintaining a residence. It does not include merchandise
which was purchased for resale or obtained on consignment.
19
20
21
22
23
24
5.68.020 Permit required.
25
26
It is unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to conduct or carry on a yard sale
within the city without having first obtained a permit from the City's City Clerk.
27
28
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 5.68 OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING YARD
SALES.
1
5.68.030 Permit Fee.
2
The fee for such permit shall be set by separate resolution of the Mayor and Common
Council.
3
4
5.68.040 Permit - Posting.
5
It is unlawful for any permittee to conduct a yar
unless a valid permit is posted in a prominent,
all times that the sale is in progress.
~~l,eas provided in this chapter
;i!pcation on the premises during
6
f"
7
:!;>','
5.68.050 Frequency and Hours.
8
.:......d..:...:....,...:> :"":,,,
.:.':.:.:...:.,....,. ""..,':.::','.
,-"'.., '-
An individual or household shall be IiMt~~g to four yard saleS~~r!,~?lendar year and
each sale shall be limited to three conseq.""!ive day (here shali~f;j"lO consecutive
sales. Yard sales may be c0l19Y9ted only Jj~~e hours of seV~l'Il7) a.m. and
eight (8) p.m. . '. . .... . .
9
10
11
12
5.68.060 Display of Goods.
Sale goods may n9t~,~~/disP~cYed in tt\~publi tl"t;9f-way"and all sale goods shall be
arranged so tha~4Ifi:\safety seivice and 0 id~ls'l:l'lay'nave access for inspection
at all times durinllf!the sale. Sale goods'. y only betli~played on the days of and
between the hoursdt.sales as ~(-6:\tided in f chapter.
13
14
15
,,'-,':'.(>i>':
16
5.68.07tfiSigns:' .
17
:':::::/:<':.,;/":.".... "i'"
Threeiy~lighted Signs.'~.~aIlPf.lipermittedWdt exceeding four square feet in area
advertisirttlsuch sale. S\l~r siW'!l~.shall be displayed only during the period of the
sale. The Si9R.shall be per~ittedql)lx on the property where such sale is located.
Such sign rriaY.Re posted\~~nty-four (24) hours prior to the sale and must be
removed immedi~t~IY followil1~'I1ale.
5.68.080 Exemptions.>
18
19
20
21
22
The provisions of this chapter shall not apply to the following:
23
A. Any bona fide charitable, educational or cultural institution or organization,
when the proceeds from the sale are used directly for charitable,
educational or cultural purposes; or
24
25
B. Persons selling goods pursuant to the order of any court of competent
26 jurisdiction.
27
28
2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 5.68 OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING YARD
SALES.
1
5.68.090 Violation - Penalty.
2
3
A violation of this chapter may be enforced or punished in any manner prescribed by
law, including but not limited to issuance of administrative citations pursuant to
Chapter 9.92, through issuance of administrative civil penalties pursuant to Chapter
9.93, or through any other process or procedure estal;>J..i..~\"j~d or allowed by this code or
applicable law. .
4
5
6
,.::;J'<'J/
Section 2. In the event that any provision qf t~j~Ybfatl':l~nce, or any part thereof, or
any application thereof to any person or S~~~.~Qi~tance,I~::tqr any reason held to be
unconstitutional or otherwise invalidqr;kji~~ffective by '~~~ court of competent
jurisdiction on its face or as applied, .~~~~/fiolding shall nof~~~pt the validity of the
remaining provisions of this Ordinance,~!i,.eny part thereof, or an~. plication thereof
to any person or circumstance or of said';11l~61vision a pplied to ther person or
circumstance. It is hereby to be'f I . e intent of .,t,;~ity that this
Ordinance would have been had sue stitutional, invalid;'ltlt ineffective
provision not been included
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 5.68 OF THE
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING YARD
SALES.
1
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on
the _ day of , 2009, by the following vote, to wit:
2
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
tnJ~,---- day of
,2009.
PATRICK J. MORRIS, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
4