Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout36-Planning Department elf / OF SAN BERNARD""40 - REQUE....., r FOR COUNCIL AC\.oN Michael W. Loehr From: Interim Director of Planning Subject: Change of Zone No. 87-12 Dept: Planning Mayor and Council Meeting of October 24, 1988, 2:00 P.~/' Date: October 10, 1988 Synopsis of Previous Council action: Planning Commission recommended approval on July 19, 1988 by a 5-0 vote. No previous council action. Recommended motion: That further reading of said ordinance be waived and said ordinance be laid over for final passage. 1h11A/J Signature Michael W. Loehr Contact person: Michael W. Loehr Phone: 384-5057 Supporting data attached: Staff Report with Ordinance Ward: 3 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: n/ a Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. DescriPtion) Finance: Council Notes: 75-0262 Agenda I tern No. 36 Cli 'r OF SAN BERNARDr '0 - REQUE T FOR COUNCIL AC1 ON STAFF REPORT Subject: Change of Zone No. 87-12 Mayor and Council Meeting of October 24, 1988 REQUEST To change the land use zoning district from R-2 Two-Family Residential to R-1-~200 single-Family Residential. BACKGROUND Forecast corporation is requesting the above zone change for about 23.4 acres on the south side of Rialto Avenue approxi- mately 1,690 feet east of Meridian Avenue. The purpose of this zone change is to allow the development of a 96 lot single-family subdivision. Tentative Tract No. 13532 was conditionally approved by the Planning Commission on July 19, 1988, however, the Council must take final action on zone changes. The land use designation on the Preferred Land Use Alterna- tive Map of the Interim Policy Document (IPD) is RS Suburban Residential which allows standard single-family homes on lots which are a minimum of 7,200 square feet per unit. The consistent underlying zoning districts for RS Suburban Residential land use designation are PRO, R-1-7200, R-1- 10,800, and R-1-14,400. Therefore, Change of Zone No. 87-12, which is a request for the R-1-7200 zone designation, is consistent with the IPD. If the zone change was not approved, the developer would be limited to the most restric- tive compatible zone of R-1-10,800 standards and the minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OPTIONS: Approve or deny the zone change. RECOMMENDATION That the Mayor and Council approve of Change of Zone No. 87- 12 by adopting the attached ordinance. Prepared by: John Montgomery, Principal Planner For: Michael W. Loehr, Interim Director of Planning Attachment A: Change of Zone No. 87-12 Ordinance B: Map mkf10/10/88 M&CCAGENDA:CZ8712 75-0264 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REZONING A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND, AMENDING THE LAND USE ZONING MAP, WHICH IS 3 INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE IN SECTION 19.06.020 OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (PETITION NO. 87-12, LOCATED ON THE 4 SOUTH SIDE OF RIALTO AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 1,690 FEET EAST OF MERIDIAN AVENUE), AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. 6 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 7 SECTION 1. Pursuant to Chapter 19.06 of t~e San Bernardino 8 9 Municipal Code, the following described parcel of real property, approximately 23.4 acres located on the south side of Rialto Avenue approximately 1,690 feet east of Meridian Avenue is rezoned from R-2, Two-Family Residential District, to R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential Development: All that real property situated in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, described as follows: 16 That portion of the North one-half of the Northeast one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter and the Southwest one-quarter of the Northeast one- quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 7, Township 1 South, Range 4 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, according to the Official Plat thereof, lying easterly of and contiguous to the following described line: 17 18 19 20 21 Commencing at the point of intersection of the center line of Rialto Avenue, with the center line of Southern Pacific Transportation Company's main track (Palmdale-Colton), said point being distant South 890 47' 40" West along said center line of Rialto Avenue and also the northerly line of said Southwest one-quarter of Section 7, a distance of 844.09 feet from the Northeast corner of said Southwest one- quarter; thence North 890 47' 40" East along said center line of Rialto Avenue, 210.51 feet to a point in a line parallel with and distant 200.0 feet southeasterly, measured at right angles, from said center line of main track and the Actual Point of Beginning of the line to be described; thence South 17 0 58' 33" West along said parallel line, 145.66 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HE/dys October 12, 1988 1 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 feet; thence South 170 18' 50" West 155.40 feet to a point in a line concentric with and distant 200.0 feet easterly, measured radially, from said center line of main track; thence southerly along said concentric line on a curve to the left having a radius of 2091.88 feet and a central angle of 100 24' 15" (tangent to said curve at last mentioned point bears South 150 56' 41" West) an arc distance of 379.86 feet; thence South 40 10' 16" West 155.40 feet to a point in a line parallel with and distant 200.0 feet easterly, measured at right angles, from said center line of main track; ,thence South 30 30' 33" West along last said parallel line 496.75 feet to a point in the southerly line of said Northeast one- quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of said Section 7. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (PETITION NO. 87-12) SECTION 2. The zoning map, which is incorporated by 11 12 reference in Section 19.06.020 of the San Bernardino Municipal 13 Code, is amended to reflect the change of zone set forth in this ordinance. 14 SECTION 3. The negative declaration for environmental review, as adopted by the Environmental Review Committee, attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby approved and adopted. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1988, by the following vote, / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / HE/dys October 12, 1988 2 1 ORDINANCE... REZONING A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND, AMENDING THE LAND USES ZONING MAP . . . (PETITION NO. 87-12 ACRES LOCATED ON 2 THE SOUTH SIDE OF RIALTO AVENUE . . . EAST OF MERIDIAN AVENUE), AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW. 3 4 to wit: 5 AYES: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NAYS: ABSENT: City Clerk The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this day of , 1988. EVLYN WILCOX, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form an~ Legal Content: -, / .....) ,., A., t." ,.'~ , ,..~/(,~"",........ , v'(~;1f...),.......,. .,91 ty Attorney I // HE/dys October 12, 1988 3 EXH!' 'A ,. ~ CITY OF SAN BEANAAD~NO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST "'" ~ "'" Project Description: Tentative Tract No. 13532 and Chanqe of Zone No. 87-12 To create a 96-1ot sinqle family subdivision Application Number: with lots of at least 7,200 ~u~fe feet. -- - ---.- --------------- -..--------> Location: South side _~f Ri~1!~~~enue approximately 1,690 feet ~_~t of Meridian Avenue. Environmental Constraints Areas: General Plan Designation: Residential 4-7 dwe11inq units per Jl.c.r.e L___ ----------- Zoning Designation: R-1-7200, R-2 -------------- .---- --------- .._"--- _.------ --- B. ~~vIFQ~~~NT~~~PA~TS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. ~9f~h_E~~9~~ces Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? X b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15\ natural grade? X c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? X d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? X .... ~ REVISED 12/87 SW/csj PAGE 1 OF 8 5-2 "w TT 13532 & CZ 87-12 , e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? g. Development sutilject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? h. Other? 2. ~IR_RESQ~RCES: Will the proposal result in: a. ai r upon emissions or ambient air Substantial an effect quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Development within a high wind hazard area? 3. W~TE~___ EESOURCES: proposal result in: Will the a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? \.... REVISED 12/87 'w Yes x No x Maybe """ x x x x x x x x x x y: ~ PAGE 2 OF 8 , TT 13532 & CZ 87-1~ YE'S No Maybe '" 4. BIOLOGIC~L R~~9YRC~~: proposal result in: Could the a. Change unique, species habitat trees? in the number of any rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of x b. Change unique, species habitat? in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their x c. Other? x 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? x b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? x x c. Other?_ 6. ~bm>_ USE: result in: Will the proposal a. A change in designated Plan? the land use as on the General x b. Development within an Airport District? x c. Development within "Greenbelt" Zone A,B, or C? x d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? x x e. Other? \.... j PAGE 3 OF 8 REVISED 10/87 'w r ~T 13532 & CZ 87-1 Yes No Maybe 7. MAN-~~~._!i,.~~Jq)~ : project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? x b. Involve the release hazardous substances? of x c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? x x d. Other? 8. HOUSING: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? x x b. Other? 9. 1'Bb~~PQETATIO~LCI~!;;!J~ATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? x b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? x c. Impact upon existing public transportotion systems? x d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? x e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x x PAGE 4 OF 8 REVISED 10/87 ,.. ( Yes No ~T 13532 & CZ 87-1 Maybe A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? h. Other? of x g. 10. PUBLIC_SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? b. police protection? Schools (Le. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? c. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? g. Other? 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? 2~ Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? b. Result in a pattern of extensions? disjointed utility c. Require the construction of new facilities? PAGE 5 OF 8 REVISED 10/87 -, x x x x x x x x x x x x x x ;..'\;..\~--. --€:~- tT 13532 & CZ 87-1 ~ 12 . AESTHET]!;;p: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. ~Y~TY~~_-Ft~QYRCES: proposal result in: Could the a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b. Adverse impacts historic object? physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or c. Other? 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. \.. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant- or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate REVISED 10/87 "- Yes No Maybe ~ x x --::::- x x x x -- .J PAGE 6 OF 8 c~ TT 13532 & CZ 87-1 Yes No Maybe important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? x b.Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which 'occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the lmpact on each resource is relativelv small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) x d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) PAGE 7 OF B REVISED 10/87 ~- TT 13532 & CZ 87-i. D. DETERMI~bnQ~ On the basis of this initial study, I/(The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the L:J environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. r-, The proposed project ~1AY have a significant effect on the ~ environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENI'AL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ~!n.d-~~."'k---~ {Jf!IltM/th/flJk_I?LY1~~- ~~ m € Signature Date, _!oj~a/-f)r u_. PAGE80Fg REVISED 12/8, ... ~"'#...",... .. .. / I ....... ~...#... J ..... ~......# R-~ . -:ft / f,t/Hr.e, "'- &t) (MJ,,]e Aft:wH PN~) (Y<<.anl) (C"",merc/tZl Vacant) C-3-A ( YQl!.Qnl- ) ~.~Ae. (Mt#iJ, )/om~ Park) I~-I R-I Il-Z ~.. ~ ~ . t-. ATTACHMENT .. .. LINVII.I.K C_E~S___,,_ -............ - ........ I CA_. Yla __ 1 C -~-A ~ ~ ~t ~/~ :,P."c) ~z S7-ld ~-I- 7Z00 (Yacanf) 9. 34A(;. R-I- 7ZPD (Va can/ ) ~"'1-7r(}1) (va&IV1f) ZZ4k- 7.7~Ac.