Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout65-Planning Department (~~'. 1 OF SAN BERNARD.~O - REQU...ST FOR COUNCIL At, rlON Michael W. Loehr From: Interim Director of Planning Dept: Planning Date: November 4 , 1988 ftlJ:Gt'tt .. Ai.?Eeal of Planning. Commission Su J1! . "~~'1:1tvfFFof Tentatlve Tract I~Bo N"IJ No. 1353 O' ;:J f) v,. -9 p~,/ I.. ~ Maydt '11rM3- Council Meeting of November 21, 1988, 2: 00 p. Synopsis of Previous Council action: On October 18, 1988, the Planning Commission, by a 5 to 0 vote conditionally approved Tentative Tract No. 13530. There has been no previous Council action. Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed; that the Mayor and Council deny the appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 13530, subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the October 4, 1988 staff report; and, that the Mayor and Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the project (original staff recommendation and Planning Commission action) . or That the hearing be closed; that the Mayor and Council approve the appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 13530 subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval, including that Meyers Road access to Mr. Walters property be provided by a temporary cul-de-sac abutting his property, and Standard Requirements contained in the October 4, 1988 staff report; and that the Mayor and Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the project. . f1 ! / f / / ' ,i /l .I , /1 j/ 0/ /; i~ / " ;I. I J.~. 1./" v' I . Signature Michael W. Loehr Contact person: Michael W. Loehr 384-5057 Phone: Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: nla Amount:_____ Sowce: jAr,:;ct. fi9:l__... J.;:"cc t. D t:..:?C.!jQ t i q[I.L___ Finance: Council Notes: 7C\_n?h? Anpnrl::l I tpm Nt') ~ - (j) S-- ClTY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTluN STAFF REPORT Sub,]ect: ,\ p pea 1 0 [ IentatIve Mayc1r and Planning CommIssIon's Appr()v~l if 1'ra(' t No, 1353U Counc i 1 Meet 1 ng of November 21. 18bB HtQl1r,~I I hell e i g h b 0 r i n g I all d 0 w n C I', M r, A I a" \{ a I \. c]' S, ]:3 ,\ P pea I 1 I H1, tile f'lal\nin~ C"mmissioll':" approval of Ient.at.l\'C [ract Nn 1:~53U and the df'lt'l ion ,,(' t.he recplir'cment to pro\lde access to Ill:, propert:- b\' an 1111\lT'o\'I~d publiC Sll'eet (Meyers Hoad), Hi> I,S reque:-:t.lng that UlP ~I a y () r a II d C (\ \l n c i I r p con S 1 de r tlH' a p pre, \ (' II "0 n d i t Ion s () t the tea i~ l , ~ n d t 11 a t Uw !1 eye r s no a rl ace.. S '':; \ 'I his p l ,) p e f' t ~ her e q ui r t'd a s a condltlun uf approval, l30ChQBmltj l}_,~~D_A~AL'i ;2J~ Tental.ivI,Tracl. No, 13:',3() Sin~lc-rallli ly Suburban propert) is a 15,1 D('I'" o h i c, 1:1 n d l '(} ] m 1~ v I" n 'ltc' ~~ 1 n t s a I ~ ], , t'i L\ I,' j ! \ ) " i () n i Ii t I}l' la~ld US(~ dC'SJ~1l81 , 'iJ \ ( Ii? 1. tIe s () u t tl I',' est \e~"jr'm('11 t ;\l'ea, 1 n l H"--1-10,HI)\', ] un . fll," corner ,Jt He:3 ] ,it:l, i :'; ] t ( t lw V I" 111 (: \l Jar IH' i ' " S s i:~ p r (J P 0 sed t (, [\ , P r () \' 1 de cI l' y' t II [' e,', ::i () f 0 0 t \-il (,k p1lbl iet\. di~dlcated ['oads ~dll h c [end from Palm and OIlIO Avenues, Orw If tj;"S(' rilads ]8 Heyer:" f,l()ad WhICh IS a rlLOl\"-of-hay that has d,'dllcde'i to the Clty If: IS'!?, HOlve\""'r, al that tJlne it has a~:S:H\lf:d :\)(\1 7,20U SqUdl" fCI(}t~lls \,()Illd Iii> df'\eluped, and the alignnwnl (if thl' r<:ad I'.:';; :'h'ed I) I ()l.r"; h,"'tfUi; af'Uunc! !2U feet df~l'p by ;:':(1 ft"'I' wHle, fill' I ntci' ill! Pi)! D'i'ument and I'l'''fcrred Land Use .\ltl'r!iatl\P.' n,)\,; requJl'C tlwl 1t1'> minimum lot :"L'e by to,Hen s qUit J' c' f ,,', f,' 1 T'tHr': at" 1\'Ii\\ SCf'Jlarl is of IIi i':')p:nl:ll\ 'lJil,'erIJlng the Tental ]', Trhci In \'( lal ion to :-lr, \~aJ If'r -:; ,'r"l~,i'rl 'lIle l'lr,.:;\ scenario IS fi cl e \ e I ') i " :n t' n t 0 f t 11 f' t T: \ < ' t i il il 'r' i (:] I ' s f () r a (' n n tin \I (i J:" COil n (' (' t I '!! 1 cf Hey"''', Hoad lt1r'ill\.'h ;VIr, 1;\"["'; P['Upt'l'l\ that turns ,l'1d p['ol~i'('d" ',nuth til UP lmollt t\\.Clii" \. :;('f' \\.1 a,'hmc'llt L) fhe sec()!J(\ scen811U !:~ a de,\plopnwrl1 Lhe trill;! that doe:" 1'1,,1. provIde 11 connt>("! 1\ of tvle,yers Hoad ji) Mr, \\2\.1 lyr"S pre!!)!.'I'l\, l)ld l'I'ould sllu\-; a ,'ul-,)i-:c,3(' development WIlL al",,~es; f,,')IU !V'll\lont Avenue (see ,~I I ai' hllw n t F) T h u !-' 1 a L i I I n g C 0 mm 1 S ), ) f\ 0 rig j Ii (,; I :- ! ' , \ n ) d ( i e d I.! 1<' f l. r s t S C I" Jl 11 j' I (I , hut I,he final approval eH'lIon ()j' lilt COWP1ISSlon \~a::J to approve Ihe sl,,'und :;"(,1Iario of dt"\elopmeni \Tlll' r}J:-innln~ CUlll\lllSsion vote "as [; iu () ,,! Ol,tuber lB, l~WH,) lIltS appr:)\al did flot vacate \tIe (iiJpr()l;I'I:l.t,> se(~l j<)!JS of Lll'. 11 1:J:1I\al !'lC\,PI'S Huad !'lght-o[-I^ia\. T II ; SINO U I d h (1 :" 11 I S e 'Ill (-, n I i'. (' t I (n (I f tile r-l a v 0 ran Ii I,' 0 U n ell aft e r Up' apprl}lll'lat.-: \(l;'alIUll tli'ti,,':lUI"':"; ~~fcl'" dppllf'\l for [)~ the dc\elup\'f' r,ir, \,valtt'f'S' appr'i\l Iptter (ll)Jec\s LI' the \8catlofl, tlul 2\ \'ili'aLll)11 has flU! (H"'ur'red, li"",,'\'!'I', hy appr'\\llll.; the tract ln Ill!, ('OnflgllraLlOn of scenario #~. t.he Clt.y IS informally indicating , ,', n ; t i r\ Y'\ f n r v 11 cat i ng pOI' t ion s 0 f ;-1 eye r s H () 0 d ' T h us, n " \'Ii Appeal of Nayur and Page 3 l'lanning Commlss]()!l Approval of T.T. i (lunci] ~1f'et ing of Novt~mlH'r ;Z I. I ~H~8 No, 1:1:'<10 is an appr'nprlate time to de"i,dp "n thIS mattpr, Mr. w a I I. f' r s' 0 b .i e c t i () n s I. 0 t h (' \ e, (' :.l t I (' n a T' (. d S f o! I (\ h':-; : The f' ,J (' 1. Mr. Wa 1 t (' r s' has b e f' n II S i Tll~ ttw a c ( .' e :, S ! h J S ChrIstmas tree form for almo:c;t ('Ieven yeal", \ sewer lIne pxtends road and Iw hants to till' ful.ure t <) \ ! ~3 P i ~ ',) p () r' t y alung Into It I : I (' () t. B P ;, b i f In ht, lilt;, pr(~ff-.'rI'ed saf(,t\ i Il~U'ess and egress t, a.spf'cLs nt t"o !.11 s pr()l'f'l't~ II f mt'all~~ His Chr'lstBlas and ~"ou ! d IjP) .ghborhood, trpf' Ildt fal iii lJll~ IllC;;S Impae1. thp IS Sl"l:,ullal r-f' sid ," n t l:t I illS onl.. mf~allS 1'1 ~leyel's Road ant: l1a\'lo to (leve! ,>!, ,Ll I',! a l. C' 0 n S I ( ) I' r ; I Ie ;.; I' ,Ii tni' IJrf'S,'lli IS \ <leat ell, llc 1~"ll! d OJ b('lmold '\\'Il'lf' .,," , ~\ ~ C": ') :~" i' ! 1;.';\" ~ tat e i a \'i \ ) r I I I. e I . 1 hi:'. ;\I'C'CSS fur hllll, illt' Lcadf:-r,fi 1':> , 1(' \' t., I 0 pIll /' n I. r ( J' '~'ropert:, ,'~;hi(.tl LJ' ICISS L() · !H' dc> .j '} "tiP iot in the (:"11~(~f'SE; t~) hIS Ii hl; unL)t'ar;.\blc ; I- t j (/;~ t~ ,>11 L 11)",,<1 ,f '::' 1 :~1 c'r" , f' P ! a 1 I n c~ :. 0 ~,\ r, IV;>! ' ' h: '('tions (i[":' as iol Jows: ~il', wall r'~, 1'~ M f' Y ic' r :'3 H () a d r' J ,r l \ I , ' ;. ,'ad i ] Y 'd'!' J " I i4. hi,., , 1 r; ~r ; I i III J S L, I I ~ ': i r'Jpr'r I Y (-., ~.. , I '_.1 (' ;-1 :, I 'I'll '\ Ii C I I: hi'" j[ I C Ii :~ " h ,\ i ; 11 C f., L . 11 c! ", iu r (; ::, ;c, ['", t fr'IHIl Pa.lm :\V\!lU a ',,',1',.: the ";e,,'ers Huad !'ic~IIL- fl'! .-way. rll i s ~ I ii(' f,JUf~~~ rl(-~-t t,~:\ L{~nd t 0 ~t r. v,: a I t f' r s' p r' (I P p r i ,'.', IV! "", \ C. r , t" I ::1 u, ! ,I r f' 11m I i 1 i.' [':. IlHilcat ions from the !'uhliC I.~'ori\s Dep<1rtmvl1t ,Ire that illl:::. :,I'hcr : il,( l'Il"leI pr'(l!)ahiy nul he \ I ::; a. b I e r (I r i ,', ,;" '.i; \ " i ,I i jf'; ( ) Ii tv! [', w;~ i I e f"'; i'l'oper Ly dll: t i.i I" 1<. lUll !1!'i.dl i ('nl~;. II lie hOU j d lla Vf' t ( iH' but \ I f ('UW H,' i mOll t A\ ,C' Till (: , lengths Iii' up i,) :'l() I Prig L lJ hnu I d a I ; o\\' lei'S' pro p e f' t \' . A t e S s I '" C () n S 1 ,] (' " 'c' d IIII'. Codl' a.1 iilt,::; !'ul,-Ut'-:~a!' f e f' l. . ,\ l (U I - (1 , ' .- :; a c () j U i L\. 1 full d('veltil11ll('nt of "'!r Ival (u j ....dl'-. ';;1,' (I f SOO f ef; 1 :if' :\Plwal of Planning Commission Approvr'll of T."[. No. 1:3530 Mayor and COllnei I Heeting of November' 21. 1~)88 Page ,j I 0 III e e t the ] Il ten tor h a \ i ng t ',0; 0 ill e a n s u l' Ingress and egress. A ChI' i s tmas seasonal, but I anger than the Walters. Also, the maIntenance tree farm is Lunsidered tn be the sale of Lree3 is usually three wef~ks a" indicated by ~.jr. the f' e ,.;, r a f f ; c g 1:' n e f' ate d by of tne tree farm year-round. As can he seen from Ihe aerial p!lllto dated December 2U. l ~)B7 (At laclunent G). there IS 11 IlIai ntenance road ar'Hjnd ~lr. \""J tel'S' proper cy n 11 t h f' SOU t It w her e ace e ::; S (' (;n ; d rea d ] I y ; 1(' pro v ide d 0 f f (I f Bel m 0 n t A v e n II,~ . Ihl' City \ttornev'f. (jfflce is Inves( 19atlng the compPllsat Ion Issue f( i' a \ i!Cal. J f"i of access. lile cases Cl Leel Ln. V;i: Lei' flo! oj Indi(',de I h e c ire tUIl~; tall c e s p (' i' t ill n J n,~ t 0 J'v1 r. Wa 1 t f~ r s \,,1 1 1 ! l pub: j " pro per t y J r i' Hi Be J In U 11 J\ \ "rOi l' ' !!, f)f devf~lupm"flt. the judgenH'1I t ~, . a.cC'ess to hlS fe' J t lH'r 101('8[1a r J 0 >11'. Waltr'rs COrre(' '.' !l!f,nllflt';O; ttlC trad"-'-'i.1if r ;:' r the d eve I ') per a ::-. a 0 \.) ...- 1 () t. 1 0 S :c:; 1 f ~1 c v f' f' S Huftd j s bu I II as a thn';H;-h ('uHd. HOvvCVf'T'. r )If, ,0 S 1. L 0 \1 r'. wa It,. f';; I." diu s S 0 f 0 n p t 0 I. 0 E hiS I and. I II f~ , , x I r :-j ,~ ( I i~ ) U 1 1 d ; n \; add] t 1 CO> Il (1 I length of load, thf' iosl OJ \'c-i,,;orklng the nee p s sa r;. I "Ill P (> [' a I' Y U ! .- d l' - ;i ,H' '1. L the end II f ;\kyers Hoad ill 1,,'nLb:. !",c" [r(\,'t\o 135JU. and all 1 nCTUi:l se 1 n t 1'2\ f i . ( due l,' a through l'(!nd for hi;-.: ,1,'v(' 1 'Jpnwni. rile Pl1::lllllln~ ;.:;taff feels that. \.:)\05'.1 r,pproprialf' il(cess to tile (' h r 1 :-d ilIa :~ I f' t' e far 1Il s h 0 q i d b (~ i, 0 m Ii elm Ci n t A v e n u e il n d n () t t h r 0 ugh il t' e sId e n t I a J sub d 1 \ > i S j ':' n . A i I' nlD u f' 11 I' ) i' II j -> cl C" - sac a j the d e a den <J of ME>yer', Hoad should be t'cq'Jllt'd access to tvlr. Walters' I,roperty IS approved. FInally. based on the City :..tlc,rney's input. UH' cOlnp('nsation Issue of (-i P(;~,:c,ll.:!e VdC3,tl(JJ1 .,.,'ould tJave a bearin\! Uf) I h,~ ~1B yo ,. and COHn;' i l . s :h'!' I S I ul (,n I hi S dppe:)! . QPIIQ~S_8Y~ILADLL_IQ_1li[_M~lQB_1bD_~QV That. tt1e tlearing by closed; tna1 Uw \la~'or and u)uIL'il deny the appeal eJnd approvp 'jentatlve Irac't No. IJ:)30 subject to the Findin.;s ',/' Fact. ('-oTlditions 01 '\PIH'l)\ai and Stalidal'd Requirements conLallH'd In the October 4, 19HH :c:;taff report: and, that the 1'1ayoI' and CUUflr'!l a.dop! a Nf.sfatl\'!' 1)l'c]'l,a110n 1'0[' the pro,)Pl'1 I, Or : ),~ I na i S t a f f n~('(IIJHll',~nda t j nil a nel 1'1 ann j n11, Comm I Ss inn Be t Ion. j Appeai of llanning Commission Appro\al of T,!. No, 1:35:30 Mayor and Coune i I Meet i fig of November 21, i F~88 Page 5 or That the hearIng be closed: that the 1'1ayol' anci COUllC'l! approve the appeal and approve Tentative fract No, 13530 subJect to the FindIngs of Fact, ConditIons of ,A,pproval, IflCiuding that access to Mr. Valters' proper'ty be pruvided hy :\ tempor:'!)':, cul-de-s(}(' abutting hIS property. and Standacd lkqul"ements contained in the October ,1. 1988 staff report; and Ula.! the Nayor and Counci I adopt a N e gat i v e' Dee I a rat i on for t 11 e J' I' (I) e (- t , H1~QMMf,tHHIIQH ff the ell\ would b(~ requIred Lt', ,..r'rn] 'an~ t>pf ,,1 i,:ompensaL!,')/i to HI'. wL111,~rs for a possiblp \'uci,tic;n ,j( d pC)r'lloll. f rleyers j<UcHt. ills I'P. '>lllmended that the SPCU1Hl !'IOt 'C>I' [Of' adupt(.:! by the 1'13;.'11' and COUll'- J I. However. 1 f ('()mp!~'L-'; i Ol! ! "~ I~~j' r'equ i l'c'd. then I tv' fir'st motion is recomlllf.'lHh'd i... Itihi :;)(,::11n h,)ultl hp a.n err..r' t.o 1I\1tIgHtC' potential land "',':, i 1(1 Lc.J\,pPl1 \.)11' resid(~ntiaj neighborh",l and the ell!' sIn,)" lr',' ,:'!::1 P "e pa,' ,e'd i .J ( i h ! ,\' 1 :, )J j ~~ ( 'J IH f~ ;. :'f! . ['I,nel,AlI f'lanllf'f' r () I' :11 C h a e 1 'w -',i r~ t) Ini 1'1111 DII'('(,'tor of PlannIng B 1 e t t f' r ' , and C.'ljn:' Si al i':H.en:. ,l (' 'j ~~1 ~'-.1. \,-' C i\ t. L,~ (' ~unf' tj t :'~: /\ if )' fie I I; I 1 i hi) fl 'j ! L~; { 'I.; d... I ~=: ;.; I }. j; ,\ \~. L ~ i) n (' ~J I 11 U t " . :', , PliinninJ ~1 f' e tin g ;l t" Y) i (' ;) !n in "; IBH i (i l:'j fl ()C [.iLer' 1 >j;.: .... a f 1 " L [{C-POI' I f ) f' d ~; (' c' II , ~la i' I c:PC'!HI Sf (, .V'l'lal In! ',:/rapll III L f j I /1 I Ij H ( . \ k l' ;') () \ 'li 1 : i :; j 0 'TACHMENT B City of San Bernardino STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT Number: Tentative Tract No. 13530 Applicant: Dennis Stafford, McKeever Engineering ACTION Meeting Date: October 18, 1988 X Approved Adoption of Negative Declaration and Request subject to the following Findings of Fact and Conditions and Standard Requirements (Attachment A) . Denied. Other. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. All lots created mee~ or exceed the minimum lot requirements of Title 19, 20n1nq Code, and also meet the requirements of Title 18, Subdivisions, of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. 2. No lot created 15 less than the minimum dimension required by Code. 3. The size and shape of each lot meets the design requirements of the Planning Department in that adequate area is provided on each lot to accommodate a residence with accessory structures and meet the setback requirements of the zonE. 4. All lots created abut on dedicated streets as required by Code. Circulation in the general area will be enhanced by improvemen~s to Palm Avenue and Ohio Avenue. 5. The subdivision is nor being made contrary to the provisions of Title 18 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code nor the California Map Act. 6. All proposed stn~ets mr~(~t th(~ mInimum requirements of the Department of Public Works for street improvements. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL This project was approved subject to the conditions and standard requirements contained in Attachment A. I City of San Berna._ino STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Tentative Tract No. 13530 Page 2 VOTE Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Absent: Corona, Nierman, Lindseth, Lopez, Sharp None None Brown, Cole, Gomez, Stone I, hereby, certify that th~s Statement of Official Action accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino. j~ ~, IJIJ1 (J:. 0/!L___ Signature /0/5/ /;f Date Michael W. Loehr, Name and Title Interim Director of Planning /mkf PCAGENDA: PCACTION ~! (~, I ATTACHHEN'T A ;?). L/~'T' /9 /98B ./ -I--~ ~--~/ V ~1 C:;;c),dC/L f// Pi 1 /:-r::? .~""',A ;;--- /~ / .{::.J ~ ,,) --- ~C.Z-/I//5L=~;-' 1,/ ,/8/ Pur;?c;##.-7C;-P /7 ./lC:;zE Lc://' oAf t56.L-41~~T AVG;JUt;, r1 ~r ;;:::- / vz:: ;V'~/1d7:E:p /~ /'-) -f r?-:---- ( ,~...,- r>-" AI t/ ./-'- "'--"'"' ,,~ ,/' ,/./ ,._-~ \./;~)2~5 /4;..Jp 77/c/-,/ C7/ ~/~ 7>1/ ff:7 -r~c;'?:~;~~, ~. J L/;r- /} . /~' .c:' /~.A-/ /'~ /;/')2:?:.-,/ J ,/ =~~zs ~L/-O[c.//,d{~/ /1 /"- " /7::'/'.- ."...., 1'--,,' --f''',' . ,/ .---,- ~... -z- -FD4-/--d/J;-?P;C;D .L::-'~7r7Z-~ 76 7:~ &7)" b/c:::'/,vEb2. , /14/ 5'L?,U-nAAel//:3 / /. ~ ~--;/ I~ /? /...>'L---- --r- / ~:;;:-..: c.:::/i /~<' ,~::~:'. :,J.-;::"11 /-1/ Ll5/--: / /J:?- ______/1' r';.t ,/ j.--- ! (/.'.....-/ /I~ I I / r"?IL /4 /978 , > . &,..--~,2EMcc /?' ~yc/.?~ g~P ~ &./-~ ~E j#Y/ hrvdC s;./2'';-L'"r P;{c/?7/"',J C:::;;rj/ p~/~/~g drf/' a/" :5CJ/-:t-::~A)9d?Z7/"d (~ ~C "'. {:?,,' /:1r ,/ /' -- --7':> /7 r Ur- r L-5/l "5:2 ,,~~..-==- /;' '0 f// ::JC P //:1'/:7'" r J- ..:;J C U//L-L C:;:;;'A/"~~A:/t..j..c:-"': ~",T;:::; U~E #6Y/~~5 ;;::;40 ~,,/p ;=;"?d,44 &41' /;:!k~:/{j};;- /r::~;/2 (~ccES~ 70 ,/My/ , ~K 0 ,r.:? c,2' rtj/. ~~!? l'?G')? / c-~)~.;:t r E p ;) r/P LE.= E 7- 70 aJ# / C ;. f R6/~ /5 ;?/o"P/20)(//01A-~L- y/ 600 r:'EEr ~\ ~ ~ ~ /2 7// (~A/ v /--qL7/:~~"- ,Ll;::L.., '~V W.L:. ,.#~,u / #vE/Jv'E /~/P ~x/E/Jp5 .,4/Jr'>;2~;x'/N4/5"L..V ;?OO rEc/ ~//35;r o~ ;:-?;./-# 4VE,UUc ~"J -r//E ~/2.:DEMO.A/T ;42L'"/9 o,.c ;;:/.e' C"y d..L' ~/~P?.,</,4k?!h..J.J I a//:5"h"" 70 /~H"':?/H' j/dU 77./.4/' I U)oVLP c:"/8c:rfc::.7- 70 4A/f/' ;C:-UTu4?E SrREE'T l,/~C'AT/oAl c:>~ 415PER5 ~AD 4/ 77//~ /oc4 // o"J. ~tI/~ .ftgbu/ /l Y~;ld ;lw/ iJ //4LF //-&0-" ---x&-,-JT,47/Y.c ---/'~/l.c;'/ 135"30 ~45 -~vl?#/r:TE'? -:/0 -/~ T2dA/.-t.//~Jc:-- C;;;d4'/>5/,l~, 47 7/I;J -;r;.#c-> I 577f~Z7 4/}/ O~EC7/o.A17D -r~ ?~oPo.:5z:=:.:o 44::=Y'ff"d.5 k3427 ST~-/ Vd'e-/J-'/'/o,J ~ /PCC.C55 < /0 /H;/ ,o12oH::;/&7}/ U>>UL-P /10 ..LO,;{/{;":c=k?' 6~ Yb:55/l6?Lb ~ /;::- /~r471vE --r~4-L/')~ /3S3o uJ/1~ ?rrk0~E]:J /1:5 PR;P?:~/AlJ ;;;~;.'t"'.- 'l~~{~~. /tjoahl-ro/2/ t//W c:::: /fA'/!' E'" rJL. o~/;.- /J/,,-~t-:7-7E-/-~J-r4// vG' -r~R-cT /3530 u/85 I;/E'-- 27 G.J,?) LJA/-r)L /1-11;5 tjE""IlR, --r:. ' J /c::.r Q. A.--;7 ~. 77>'). / ~ ---.. ..."..- / i-= ~I ~/CJ.' ~ :/7 ~'/J ./ C/ /' -L. . '-.> ,,'._--...-- / ;~7Z:_ ~ V~.L- rc:::/ c.. >//-14 r 1 o;CJP 0 ;t.-:J' /~l?5 -;'/24c-r eN /- ~ cJ AI 7;/ k 6/J 51 ~:< -7:1-;~:lT _7 ~/).5 ;BC/;-J(; PE;J I EP 7/:12'-".~::~7/;~/:~~z3~r7-- /7-/47- I HAop J3.eE'~ u'::;; / ;Jc:> Y::;;a iEIJ;2S. /?/2?zj~4~. ~,4?;~ .6E72<JEW f)~t11 ,l/vu;UE ff#P . fly 'tY/2'o/ZJ~ry/ tW/95 27!SP/CA7Z'D /lAiD ~c.z;:~~p ;:3;1 /'Hr 07 /4 Ju;JC /972- w LJ--- -;7?-/.z.:- ~~/e:--u::?/ /b /j-i3B ~A/-U/~? //7 ~ C:;;44'~/~5/CJ~ r"4~&?~7/~~ 7//Z:=- /~/PC7- .:J ~V.z:;LCirc-/2 5~7ED 0/JC/Pe'i</1/l.t-.L-y, /9~rz;:,R?- 7/f'0~b- ,4Al CJft7;z/ c~ r,b,JE5Tf) 7#,4/ 4&':/~,;Z~ ~/lP U/OU.L-O ~ BE V;9 c4/cJ7 . d//k!d' Z /,7"/7c-;#?rEP 7D VO/GE 4/1 CJgcr~C7/d~ --/0 /;;7 _5'7'?2E.z;:-:r V'l0c~7/'o;J /~ ~//#/>S-/L)/() (~~-;;;41~I.:2~/dAi C7c/T 4~E: /J ~~ b-? 9 c:-I .,0--;>)'/>.:, /2. ' / / ,,-~ 1 /J./ -r-;::.-r-i / . I/n G/"- ~ /- / --./ f ..A:/ (:::r,n ";""":JC/ /,(/7 ~ / /7 / fi./v-- ~ ,,/ -/~ ~r;:-Ec:=;F~ ,/ u!!-IA.f /f/!()~ ~ :I~ ~___.'l1~ ~ t4d~~- c~;7 C/CJ{/j:2 57'4EEr /) . / ~~ --..-........ / ,----- - -;>. / -r U J 2/ z.,:r;z.s ".--1/-,-'/// .~2 "j .----;"/-- Jbj, j.'l~- I c-" A ^ l ..-L- / J , ./ /7 L-- /C.-L_- 1':::::> I I v " /L 1 'lD I 0 -r-/ "~- /J/~z:.~- ," - --- /;J . ~r-r' ,r- .,--r;' / /J ,-,--' ,,~.lL//_ /7'. /.- C~'f't\ / (~~ / 0/- ;/ // /7 ,J / /-/P;?~77A./~~ _.~::?::.::;/./ ./j?A/' 8b ~/FlE:Z71 ~-- /,,)/1..-/" .-;-/ ;z::..:~-::::-'r" /) '0' L-.-,/_ -7'--; / A---;-- ~ /-;--- --,.L-- / f/(/ /7' _/ 1-/ ?---- / .' /,::.-~/ //./.1.::. /// /7 /j / -:/ /"'"rC ~-V~L-O~'Z K-t':J{./.l.-l:) K};.~7Z.Jp,J .ft/ ,62- 5J 8:-;c q) t.);-E::/Jj/ C~~~,~';/"';?/}'>'"7/t,/ '5 S/ ()~) /I1P? 7> d? c,U/:/# c-2J~2!;Z:3c'7:!:~P c0--.~AJs -7#,4;/ dJ()!/LZ; /1 ~/1 I /!~r;r-'d - /> ~ //~,4 rr:-:?7.'1 AA 4.7 /l/f ~7;;? / /7/ V /1:7 b;; ""?';/::/.~.::7!1-::~-:~CJd-L) r/~/r( r /Y~// ~5Pv'e /0 /117' t'1~/5;/-2~ -7~J ~-f~7/~? u/c/ ;to ~~e~~~ L:; c:;:;-//7#~ -:;:'/;/2:""" fL ;d/.ddr G#,M/5:5/dAJ .J""-'" (:::~~::r:,'7~:J/::5~ /Z /8 ) c;J 23 8 ./ ' " ,.."'-"'-7 ,,' . ' A. - --" ...... <.--c> --;/4'4'7 ~....( /.--r/ ~ " //~ .4-:-::- /, J /', F' ~_"'~- /'L.. __/ (./f./ ~~ --.,,-.- ...,>.._~..-~-_._.,,--_....._-...- --- re~#lJ /~7c;Z'~'" ----- /f?--- ~/ )//'.pl '-f/-7-rr-: p:::.-;C::::- ~ (/ -L:::5 ~ / / Z=:.- .., ,--;;") ::;=:::"j /r;Z::~ / ,,) ~=---:- ./7 / //} 'T-; . ,L--<L...-- I ."'--- C:---<--'lT L::.-;;/ L- /7./7 .L:-' ..._"C;>...,. ,__ /J ..... I / ~- .-r ft A./'--' /' ~ ~7 .. /)::_~_,y",:~-/7 /77/ 1/ r::;:. //&ffT~ / ..:J J '-:;:1 0 /~ ~ C:;:;/2Y {:;/,,(/~~!.~-;c(. ~/{ )112 A-'wt/J.,? u' /l-Ct4 7/ ~ ? j .''''-.. #,G"tjg~5 12:;; ./#E r.L-/#~J)& p~I1;:2"7#&c)7 (Vi ,4A/ ;;3-72?Vz;7Ai{) 5'//J7E}: u)~ ~~ (AJ~ .0J C/g;;r~o,v5 S;pt/J ;?7;G /&A/'0/225D, ..~~ ~,.dP/d'&'aU44/>9,J ~Cc~~n.Eo7?;;C:; -7i:~/k::r: ff /0 7J,d~ )/E/77~/2. ff;t- .7;;;r;~ ~&-U~7 /b ~o/2;J7 /l~' OC7-Z;;(":?c~/v2/ /IB 4/Z3'z?"7/"dd-s a/#5.2 ./ /J.L-?-cJu/~P -/b 57~~ t/C.4-g4.L~Y U/#j/ I U//5'JIEP ~ .k6//J/~ ~d3yfi1;!5 ~P. --a~/' /:5' c~~/ I ~ t1//Y#L'-/#? l F7~ &7 c;;d>>c/L-, P /P-LL ;;cA/P'-"vc-s;;_:> A~45b c:::<:::J,U~.JPE/.2 #.1 c/i?J~c::::'7/0~S -;0 /7-//5 57dbE'/' VAc,1/Jo) / -r /j/!V'r 131:::-;3/) C,/':3;J/-J{y --'/1//::; 5/;::2E~ ". I + :;0/2 #()~ -:/dA//J /// 5//-2'-/145, "'7 -r/k:4'~ /5 /J ,5~~7~~~~/ ~./~.z: oAJ ~ I MErj;E):25 ~.4P -77-//1/ ..E:/7E~VS /?/&-h'7-- LJfJ 7V /M7 0~/!7C-. ~)/E'u I8u/L.17 I 1_ --- r ^)-, -{J-'r-/', / ~-r" ~ /7'0# /.;::' / -I- ,j:~ /1''/ L/ ./ . 3, // .I' ,'" 5',---/- -/},~ /l? -;r).//. '~t 7" /'/ / c:::- r- ./ I' J ' // $~ ~Py /2A , /11251%/25 ~#.D ,,4;UD ~F ~;Z:';2.-4/c7~ 4~.dcJE ab(}~D ;fl5 6i5/;r7E/~;::;' -~j /:>rL!::;7Z~/; 1:/'/1/4T- /5 7/!/z:~ " l7',~~L) ~7'- .5;:F/,:Fc~ET ~ //~' C//;/ ;F//2E 4~c ~~7- --/0 S'u15PI v/vGv J3c L~G4.L. /1 f~?'/l;JLE L~/J(:) ;;:::0/2 J /J ~E'~7-L.// / D~,dhl/ 1/&- cYr-F -r;I/5 v/ #7 //,bJrc~~3/ -r// 8-:/ ~ c;;;i;;;;;'/.. ../1 --7/-/r /Z/;~/;,l//(./; pJ /~r~?Z;;vc&' 1/' /~;~1 ;,:;::' 5// 61 L.L ;::)747Cp 'i1J-F-""-~ "r- I .<ll/j' ...L.-C)7- W6dC J .- Z) E -.5:;4 c ~ 0 L/L~.p ,.... ~. - ---) (~J -~CCCWP kcyrj/J -77 /.. ,..~~:-. t.. L- P/!?& F E.l2/2l:?X) o jL_-:- A /2E I -~.~~;~~~~ , / ,./' / t.u/J /[/75 ~~ S ,;Ilel ')"'-,,..Z:::'::c- C:J <. ! T.7 4- CL 7=_;..---- c'" ~'P"'- ,- ,..- ...;~- ... ....-'/./ j,; / ( If P -c::-~::,:, J i/f-.._J , /, /' r'---"-" ----- ,. /;Z/(j-' /t.--CJL-L u/h2L. f '~./" --) 1 __--/ ,,--~ .' 1... "/~ ..--..,,-, ./"'J ---- ,,---- " /--;...1-':;::-.../...... 7/)'1/-;r-c") /-;'zE ~- '-- / /.. ~ ,,____j " ,I < __ / <I!. 'L.,-~ ._.~-". (r;. ;Z;E~...~/:::;{7/2./-;-//;/Z:-;A/T #/flD 7:;~,4 }EN c: lc.n{j~L,X-:J 5 -r~grAL-- c:J,M.l-7 ~ /2!- -/!!/2Z!~Z-::: /ff& c/~r4A?- /~/ - "..----.- 1 y::::? .#rf.c- /2:5 1 ?-'J/LL- $L~~ 1::3 cJfi! /) ~.._- ".' /~: ~ :'1 7;7 ,-- c'" ~_,,)/ /.; C #~7 .::-;; -r- // " j t~~:~~5-J< 5- CJ U 7~ pC- -.- .c-"-:;:- I / -.:r k ~ -;::-<: ._) ,e::::.- ~~ c-.t-- -..j ,,~ /.5' v4cA7c~/.. .- .--)'-) --7-A ..--, ~ LJ "7/ ./'l.' / / '. C,'-/ L/ c..-HL-'~ ~ (~l./f./ b Vo7L?"u:> CJF-.'" /II # / A.J U/'4 /2:?:,:;2~- A ~ p{/ a-/7~/2" -;- ~ Ad 7'==;. .J ~-fi7 c' -L ;r- / jV/ ~ 7/;;::"e:. .,...J UJ / L-/-. L'-{) ... ... ""-'7-- '".;>::::'<:::::: :;:;::-~ . /' :c.::-L.L__, ----:;:? 4/t/,z::J ~S '-70 /f!cCC}/#,-f/O;.J47 .~/? /~ A I ~--:../ ,j ,.~.4 /'..-'-/ /fA/I /.-r if,;;---; It . /-- (.. /t- / I......... L..-/...- / f/ / v/Av / " "..c:: Iv .... '\ I /~S' V:4c/J I ED :1: /-.'7 ,,--..--~ :;.-----' c- ~/ 7C--"_L"_~ ~:::.> ~__ ~ /- .-:r-;r,;:c...:-' ,/~:::- / /\:.>.'" / ~ 1__' ?-..-- k L_---. .,::..-<--"1;"": ..' ~'7";;.'--j /-T'//1~/ "e:' ,... "J ."..,., / L__'/V / /7' -' " {/ L-- T/ ~j-'h.-/7 tA/ / /-- L ,.,...--.- -r---- (,,::'.7 L-::: I .-rh-/ ,..-..,-.-.' ", I) /J ) j> 'j.'/' , ,I ,,/ L//._ /7,?-- '....,.,,_v__.___..____. /?l - ~-(..../7 / /-) #/.:S ~>' '7 --- ~ .-r/1~ .1 c:1 /./ / c::::::;../ / /7 / L ~-/0 //V /7-.---. /1 '// /y ,/'7 ',,--7' . --- /-- U/:5 L./ c~.~ ..c:-,..-- -2 --- .------ . __) / ~ L:::-L:; / .-/' 31 cj 4-<;-:/ l.c/(<~:; c:A,J p CJ -/ ;;:3 L-~';:- \.J U '5 'J c~;;,:.l/l r::~-;-:--- I ,-"" .) /-" 7 .::.> Z:...-: / h~r (/ _~ ./;:::..0 ?~ o v.J ,)--(23;/2) -? '/L~;C:;' /u/7dour /' .... / ./ ~ /I'/Ab I l/ ./.' .I. ......./ /-1/ //.. [-'/..5 1/' / 7) ---/ / j l V ., / - L. ~// / t'7L I .' - C::;ry 7r1;kL? 1:: U_5';:::- ~/JN /lg;/~ .:5-j/c:?-EE7 7//d /7- /._:1::,',-;-- /c;? .,~JELfl ~;)2 j ,,' I y -c-- .~ ,--- -. /1,..1' /).-;7 -;..-~-:-- .. / ....-....r-r- /' /1// / 1/ < /'.F,: ,-::-//c--c ...?~---" ./ I' . /71':;; <> ) R /7/ 1// <j /"'; i../" 81 :7 ~E t7',L-4,d~~ /-/& -771#/ ~,!/.z;e:~ :5/ "/ U 4'/~,.L7 -;7C1 -;C;;o r L.LJ7s /~I;;(<z.~) ;Z;:;07 Lo/5 -7'//.8/ / /- 7// / ~ /7 -:::;"'2":'- /;7'/"2.-;,1...;-:- , /"<:v / -;; "c:~-' C~A J-::/ L-/ ~. ......;;> ---,,, //0:::..-' / / C/ I . ~... 1 / /L-- " --r (/f7C.--/i/C s- //ZG..2~7~ " S-//~Z:I -1 I ...--- /. ./ ' -----...... / ," ......,,/ -m/5 /:-~. ~, ,-;J ( ) / /~.;) ;--- ;c-~ (-J--" ~ ~ .,,'---~ ~J7/pIU;~_=- a~.L-~>~EP (4);;:~,2~~., .----7 . ;' ~ /'/ /JL'j r , J r...r-; (.// L___ p ~ ;;1 j , \..-J A-./ v/ ;1-0.-,/ / / -'-/---//;/~' /J rT' //.r.<~ /./'rt:',;, - . /1 / / f.///2-;' ~7 r-,~';/2.... l?c~/i9/ /-/L;~2~7 //,;~:::]~ 5/ c;J / /-"C) Y'=;:=='~ / c-' -) VAc/f'7cP c;1);;;: A-- P Z;) 17'-? ------- rt--{)(s U L-;/;/ 7/V .I /~ 14. - /' ~ ~' -- /Jo'/ -----:::;>,-.-.---,,- /--..-- <! , ~ /.~.-::.. /-/.- "II / / ...----/ L-~ // / j ? .k?'-'''/ 4/;;::::/)~ ~7'-/J.c/:-) i '-' / "P' / L-../,/\-/ /' :......) /7 /.,:!..~~. .,t> // ,/ /<:~;:~!/? D) c://~95 ()/~/ 6/ ~4 ,.,:!.-/;' 1.'-;7 ; ,c.-,/": ..{/( ./ l/Z::~- '7",/00 SCPL)/l/2;:'z:~- (),/.. (/ //J a /"', /...... "::::--r;'J / 1 /;',' ,;//?'.;:: ~. ..- '~ 0 L-/ L..-/ -..:;; Cy- '-./ / .i.. <-.-L/ /7 . /?~:<:._.....-........ I )'1 /.?' -;:::~-~ /]") /t / /J 17/ / / / / /< (.". L~::::--C-?--)c / ,L_t._/+--:> jV/ ,7 L- 'l' .." /"~ C.:'c; (:'~.;;;~"f hJ N L '/ -Y HE' ,//;f;J C;' vL3}:::> 72J -7ULP=") LL- ,";r-- ~Ll j /r;;; ,;//\/j.. .c::-: . J' J ~ 7/,L- .~.. --.-....--....-r-' Ii ,/1-'17 p~~z;;; ///1/;/ /;:~~ -///#7- ?VE.=:;;:?;~~~ './:~'- . ~" /7;-:- --- / 1 F ./- ,?'... (:"j//".i~ tf< /\..b '" r (""--'-.-'~ ..,_,,) f / "->/7/t/ ~..- ./5:C.; .-(/ [/ ~'ry, (' J <':.=- ,/ ".----- L_./ /..~ L,/ J A .^ //,//Z/.._- .' /'.---r- ~> /" " / -- / - //.::::.. /// /L- C.1"I ...::~/ <-__>, -- ,/-;) /<:","(j . >:-'::::-1 /J.-r:.:- / ; ~-.-f-'l -L .," -.- {..- ~!:-.:j ,.r.L-t:" ,\1-1'-::;-/7 c:: ('--6-/~I,{/~ 1/ (~ r--) ,/].. J'-' (/ ,.""'/ ..1.../ ? .f .?/ ~-- If.> )/0 /'i aJO{)~-L . ..) ;f2 Z- d 52-' ~/./~-/ Z?<' CJ8 0E c77 c:J"u':;; .- ~ V;! I ~<,_~.., , I _~ -7' ~ // -;:: /-- ----r- Lf { _' -7" i <);' / .-/ /'-~ .t:-- / / / (,. l V .. /:1/ j/J 0'2o/~~/- - / V'L. {I L/ JC D --/---- _._L (~//5d ///~::- ~ V~..,!. 0 p:E'/2, --;/2:) RI 6-1-f'/ ~U l-- L-- 51 ~T~/~~:'- // I '//J-r {/l/~/7/f/ /"'''-- ...':::J <::::./JL::J {,j fA,,) /,L L / <.,~' ?/2~s~/:2t/s- /W / ~IF, , .' / /' L',./ ! "-,-c' . "..-1';' / ~~/' e?~1 '/ -f:~u !- L c/ ,. .....-/ ('.--.-" _"",,,J r "., A r>rJ \ l"i c') ~'- ". ,,_ J-./ oi f'.J - ----"""'.,"""'"'=_.. "'*<''''-,.....~.,....''-.. """"'"' .,,."'. "'.~_.....~=<..--",.-".."""'- ,(';'(-'~' ii- " . \ \, ;, " ~ "--; . .'1 ~.:r.oJ,.;.)~ !~'" o .c , r<> h~~ i l{) i~~a , ~ ~ ieh; .. . ft~! .. 0 ';1::1' : z l:':l' .. ::lell haJ r- I~i u :~~ g ..iU; ~~~:i~ "i I!l:::i) W. E!~ ,1 911 ,. 1~~ .0 ,! ~ gi ~ !it t) .. f i; l I . 'i " . ~~~ ~ , . ~ ~ II,; , . ~'..' ~. I' y~ 1 .~. ~~ ~~_~ J. R 1 ~?' Ii l,r, ,"' 5' ..,' ", I' ,tV g , 11 ~~ E ' i... 'j' , :' !.r !. ~ ~ /1 \ \ \ ~I ti ,tk j ,I r ,tI ",,' if!' ~. i.\ I i ~~ H ii ~.t,. .... ~..: H,v' ~ 14 ~ 3E " ( r , i " I I , I I ~ l i ! II ~ r '", , I~.- -~-~ '-.",'\ ~ ' i" \ a '\ t~ \ \ " \ 'r. I' '\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ .~. ; \ \ I' I I \ \~ \' , J' { \ \ ~ i .1 i I I .j \,' .. r'.... () <D C\j .::.~ G go -..; ~ ~} < c ...., ~ .U m8 ~><o In t2 r;::. .Q ::1 tl) d <.) ... ~ ~ dj~ 1:):::::' CIJ1l ..5~ c::: o ...- C) .c.: ~ ~ Q", .\ //..~ -. ,1-"- .~:::-..j?,' ~ I ! \ \ " ',,::, _";l 'f. .---.:~Tn:,,\J/r:t 0.""'\ ~\,~J (-;:::'l :", '--' g o I ,.... , ----.. ~ _.<\ '-]Fl ;'\,~ =J"~";f --1! ' i~ ; -r:::-' .~-,.:,) ;..: ~1j1 _;;'-.---.--...----- J I Hi'\ti - - -? '"- . .- r ~~~~J '-If"- i '-J ~.I~ ~-_JJ.> l ,01 '. F')WI ! ,'" ~. "e b j 1 9. ,......J.. ~ I '[S-11 i L' ~ Ii -,~ -~ !~ . -'1 __...._ '__' Ii ----['1 -. ,l 1 ! I ! I ! I ---'-H ~._l _" ,~ II ! ',->) ~. If ~ <:. I ~ '." ..~.~~ _ ~ i I i li _.._._~, .. .. ,.......r :~::.:,,-::::?:;. lr.,'Jl5~H~- ~ _I__f.;i\ , , _~__ '\0 P - - -;~q"; d: ~ .' -1~ ! I I., : d t.... r---'-- ! .I~i. ~~ '\ _ -:, t:..tt ~ I' Ii ~ I G): t. ~ -- j ~ t r> ". i tll ~,@ i ~~ :: ..., . "- '_~.,~ \} ~, 8 ,I c..t.. I .. . .J'';' ..t.-........, .-- ..-" ii' L .....:. ;'r(;i~" .-... ' ---'" .. ,. ". \c::::'.. .. _..._J:J..L!L. r - ..Sl:: - _,h ',..)' _. ..... - .-- - .... ---- .J> ;, .J': ,~~ ~.... " c"''/' ~~} \ ~,-Y" .-C~ /;t",?' ..-.......-- --1 I I I I I I I I I >- I ~ I :5 I ~ .._._ __ ----.!' ..N ________~_~l<'>;-;., ~. ~_:- -, r '1. Do ..~ ~ 1 ! --1"1 ~ ~! 1 I g.:?,~ I ~ ~ ~ ' - ~. ..w r:;; o tn ;.:.;. ~c-.: ~ ... -'C W. .. 8 c:; I ~~~ t ! t l I "'" . , " ,~ . l~ , t ~ .... -- -.. Iq:,~:;~ ~. ............. ~ ............ - ----~ ~.:.: .3.... ltl~ ...... '"'" gu CiS, ~... i i: ~ 0> f _.::. -..... x_ ~ ~ .. 4 ~f; ~~ f ~ f f ~ f ~ ~ CD .... , ~ :i f ~ 0- .., .... ti ;;c ... Q :e .. " <> ll.. ~ f qlI: .. -----------, I ~;mi~, m~_,!i.llr,i_:mm "_~~ ~2_": - .. CI -"'~-..... -,=,:,;0 .2;Q-":::~"'~6_pg:,;::~.- !lijii!~~~!ji, .. - . ~ - ., ~ ..;) a- S ~J :\J~'--~:';I~.}::' t,' :; ~'~ ~ ~ .:: :J ~ Qi ~ l.~ ~ I ~ i~ ~_.. =. ...~' ~ as "4: ;0.:: _ ii\ ;~~... - ~~~~.!:: CiI...;;r.1 'f~ ::!.. p~~~ - -, -' "OCJQ.. o~~;;~ OO~~. fQ i.;" :~;~~ ~d~tJ !~:~~ I~:q-~ '~..s :.~ ;; 1- _... Q, :: ,,1.::: III (\/ 4J \ _: t: -,':: .::l. ~i~~~~ ~;;~lf\~tg~,,'1~~r: ; ~ ~ '~ ~ ~ ;.. c ~ ;; '" <l. :::... a ~ j 0\ i .... ~ r.; - <l. (li e>L ~,~ ~ : '\ ~ c 31: ' "'_ ' ~ ?:.-" :-_=,:~]~~:C; c-~-= c.~~--c'\I~:::~ ~ _ _ 0; ~ ~ : ~ 'I? ~ ~ ~ ~:3, 0 ;"' _~ 1 ~ 0 0 c; (- _ CeO c..~ .... '!! '!.,~ ,:;:. ~cr?\ --." ~ !J ':".'; c .......... ~ ,-::' ~ ~"E ~; ~ i'O - .E ~: [i ~ S:;-- ~_:'~ ~,.., :~~ .~ ~,-,~.', "ii:, :,.." ~ - 1...::: ' l... ;; _ ~ ,..:if Co. s. ~ . \ _ : J. _ : ;:;a Q' 0 ~ ' ClJ ~ O:a /;00 ~l' ~ to 0;; ~, _ ~. t.f. - ~;.. --= Ill~. 2 \ ~ ;; ::: .... ~~, c..-:;::. .:E . ~ .'-4_4 EO'. -.... ... ,... .... - J'-~ _~r._~O_"f' t--~~c;"g:;:o\,O,:"'''o,~~'~~~__~ .--, t..I u.,.O <J; _ "'C} ...:;j S..o j.:Q Q'i .:: '" ~ I f --_J---__ :< t ~ ~l~ ;: 2~E-=1~ ~ !! ~ ~~~ ~mm ~ ~~~.l;: ;# 10 J.' lloo ~ ~ii~ U~ -~ ~ . ";::.= : :- ::4 :.. :'':~ ~ . . ~ ~ . -' 2 .- ~ c ~ ~ ;; -" ~ w -. C'. ." ~ ::c: " . ~ p. ~ -f.: ~ <, 0 < -i' -'" '" ~ 0 .' -.:; ~ " ;r:. t;.: .. " ;i -'- ~ ~~ ~ (.1. i< -.; ~ Ul .., -;; " " /. . 0 ~ " t';; ~ r...... " "' Cl -. E --= " " " '" ; ~ " ~ '" Ci ~ --: -0 c . - ,,~, ~ t '. '" . B .. . . " ;:; 0 e . 0 .. e . i< "~ c, ~ "; .., "0 i< , , " c ~ 1 il " 0 ~ " E u ~ c .c u - - -- "t " ,., .. .. ,- '0 VJ ~ ~ ,- ~ ~- Co t- o :. ~ on ." . -0 ~ "- . . ;; .. " rj ~ " ~ ~ E " :,. '0 " -; "" " ~' ~ -;: ,. .. ~ . e -- t ~ 0 .. C ." ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ 0' Co .. ::: F ,- ; '" ;r .. ~ " ;; " . ~ <L " . ~ '0 - - " ~ "' " lJ ~ -> c "- ~ " >;.; '. ~ ~ '" 0 .- " c) C, . ;; .' .. E ~ i< " ~ ., " i a ~ .. " "i I -. - " ~ ~ 0 ~ :1[; - ~ rii .. ; ci U 0; ~ " ~ ~~ '" .- ;.. '" E ,: ., '. .0" l>- e .... ,r : ~m~mmm~ ~ clt~1..E.;;ae~CI~o:::<u ':::-:",:~~= ~'C...~':..c:.'O <1f" '":;mmm~~ ~~H ~ ;~i~r~ ...."'" <'.J ,-;, ~.. ':Ii ;.. ~;~t, jIBt~,~t,~~; ~.~ i f: ~ ~ e ,: ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~. t ~ ~ 0 ::.e~:-~ 0 co, p fU 'o.~: E~~._ : ~~; ~: t ;>; : : j:;, ~,:..'~ J; -~.. ~ "" ;:;. -" --~ ';' ~ . -,~ ~ ; , -0 . " , ;j ~ . '" 0 . ~ '" -;, ~ ~~~ '0 '" -~ . ,', 01 C. 0 "- ~ . ~ . ~ -0 . " ~ ~ . " ~ " .. - ~ .. , ~ ~ .;: R 0 -" 1 <. . ',' 1 ~ ~ . ~ ,.,....... - ,0:: . ~ .0' <:J.'-' C >- '" . -. :::", " ~ - ..J .' -. ~ 'E .; ~ i? " _. ... ;''fi ~ " ::... "" c:. " " '0 ~ ." " C ~ . " -- 0' R - .. '" E . . .. - -0 ~ ~ " j: - ~ .;; e ;; .- ;:: . ,., ... -0 ..- ii: Q ~ " .,Q " .. J ~ .3 ~~.~ ~J ... 8 ~ C ~ ... '" " on '5 c is ~. ;) ..... .- ':: .:'l.".' ::: .:~ ~ ~. ~, ,~ ~ ~~. '.'" .... ., ~~;j,~~~r. w ~....~ ',"", -.-..l ~ ~ c. ~. ~ u1 .... a ;.. '~'_' _ a 1.:,' ... Cl 1-..- HHw ~ ~ .... >' Pt; ~~; ~~nr"; ~, Q '2'~' ~~hr' ;/(, ;:. .~ "" <'-' I;t:> l ...~~~ ~ ~:rlf."""""~T "''''''-~Tl!1'''';''''>C~", ~'~ ,.,;; ,:.;-~.,,(~~t~~ '~' h~llj!i:J.;'i;~il\.li;!i\l;r;-~1~;~,n.:;,-<.;y:[ ~ . _ '......~.". ,\Or",.,.~.ri.'~~1:wrL ';..:,. c, r~;'>'''J ~ C ::; ~ ~ ~ 'i g is ~. r: fO .~ ~ ~: ~ ~ ~ .~ -~ ~ ~': ~ ~ 3 ~~'~~~~E.c"8I-:.J :~ ~ .' _~ t... ~ -.. ~ ~.~ , c 5 "i ~ ~ c ~ E ~ _ ~~ ~ ~ ~lL.c~5-::i:.o:ru-;; .: ~i?~:.J t Of\~'" ....a8-=u ~ ] 9 _~ 2 ~; g ; ~ ~:) ~ ':)-0 ';;:"O..c;2-5~~~~ :~,~~~'~~~'f).g~~3 . ...~~~'-o~~:;~~....;~ ~ ~. <II 7. e 3 ~ ;.:. "2 ~ C -u<"J ~ ~ .''")'''_ o~"...) _. a. '~[~O~~u:c_t;g2r;;- I~,,::vgo~~~o;;<{<(~'/) )~ ~~--c :E~:;."..~u.. ;~~-5~~OI;~~,,'V;~v :-~ .c ~ e- 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~tJ ...:: ;:: _ '" ::.c c: Vl oil ... _;;>:$ ~~~s o~ .~~.c2, 2~ .... ," '1t ~ _ i ~ ~ H t: ~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ ;- ..o:ll!\fI III ::J.... 5.c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~-:; r 5 = ~ ~ g~j r-:~-~~~J; ~~~,~::~ ~Q~~~NO ~iz';;~"~~~ ~ ~ c:: I,/l..c '-"- VE~''''.;U - .0 >..c C::l"'~ ~ a. ~ r: ]~3~~O r6 OV~C--~ : ~..,,,,~~.g ~ :~ ~ ~ ::: '3 ~ ..; :~~~~~ n :.c,~.g2_c .:: r: '_' ~ >- c C -0 .., l::: '1.... ....;::l:l.) -~ 6' ~ g ~ 3 ~ m ~g~3~;~g ~~ ': : ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ' ?~.o~"~,S'li>~ ~n~~~;~~~ ':. s ~: ~ ~:~ 0 u ) ;~1 ':~. ~: ~ ~ ~ ~ z 'g ~ c~ ::. 2 ~ 9 ~ ~ ".c:2.c~o.e~~ !l,g~~g~E2Et1!' : ~ ~ .2 a. S _0 ~ ?2 ~ ~ V '":J ."" ~ ~ ~ C "'0 "0 C:...:: c::::: "'J - ti N o~1;s~~:5~a. iiliml!,t -~~~JO~t~~ t~ ~~'~~~~~:a.>~ ~ ~ >, 0 2 ~ >. ~ ~ t] ~ ~i3~.s E ~~ c'::J:u 3~"'#I>.~jc:"Q' ~~~-g~~E~ 7;. tile ~ ~ ~.~ ~,~ C E " ~" ..c CJ e; '" ~~~i I'>! ~ 11,' C;.(\ ~ ~~ - .r: ~: .~ ~ :~. "s' J ~ _, 0. ;: rY, e -,; 1..U '" ::, '-~;::;~~~~.f;.'t""oUn!~:r~ .... -.:.: t: i, <,_. li '-'" ~'" -1 ~~~~~ ,~.>~'.)U ~ ~ l.,' c," ::.' '-f) C ,5 ,~: ~ .~~ :f. (' ~, :~ 'J., ("I .- :"1 .... '"" 'Q CJ c -s, ~ u f! '0 ~ -5 u ~ 0 ~ " c C ~ ~ - > :0 .c ..c C t c l? '< ~ ,~ ~ N '0 .c < ," 0 '1 ::; 5.<<0 ~ '" e ;cr:' .c ,. ".1,' 2 " J', e 0 CI .c '" (C .; 5 ~ ~ '< ~. E ~ < .L: :-t. " .r <; a. 0 ~ ,~ L ;' " ;; v c a: '< C e :: " '< 7-c :? .. -;; r ,. " co.c c .~ .c L , ~ g " -;0 ~ '", " ~ x' - c U ;; ~. '" J" 1 " '" .2 - " .. , ... " 0 '" .c 0 .., v ~ " ,:j ;.; .. c. .. .. - -:, 1: ~- e .,. .c " .L r.J '3 C" , C " ~ " '0 - " 13 '" '1 -. " " ~ .r:: c- " " " ;;; ~ C ~ '" f") .- ., B '" -( - -0 '0 ~ tS ,;ro, ", Of ~ ~ -:: .. .. " " c :;; ;; c ~: ,~ " ~.: .. ~ t: :: .c ~ c t; r ] " "J - c_ (~ ,,-1 " i .c s: ,. , ~ r" 3 r. < ~ .c 1:: ~; c: 1: '-,' <1> " S .. VJ 0< i': , c.: .. lL ,~ '" ~3 ;;: e':-r ~ N C v; " .., 'C ~ " ,; < a. ~ c ;; '" d..c Z ;-; ~ (,) :; " :} ~ 1 " ,.., ;.: " ~ ~ E " a. .,: ~.~ ... .c ,~ .> " '" " 0 '.J c c y -;; S ~ 0 <. U ~ " u ::0 t: u. ~ ,. "- U -" -' ~ 'i:: Vi -" :c.; ~ :;; 0 ;:; W '" C ~ ~ ~ r.: .c - .c ~ ; ~ a. < -= !: rJ. (5 ~ ," C i; 'r '., ," ~ .D M c w'":) :;' ('I t :\. ':! ~ ,..., ;>.ViJtJlCO ";~ ;;~..~~_mi !~ " -- " - - E ~ ; l;~mH~~i~ ~ ~~} ~ E c:;' 3 ~ "~ ~~~~~.~~~ 'J'l; 3"'1~Of.Q.,- v c:> 0... "'J M_ e ~J -:; u. .. c ... ~ ~ l ~-~ " _' M '" :.: :; :'l ~~t':0' 'I'l C; ""l '" ::~ , (,., .....1 ~ (- ~.:::: ~ _ 1 i~ti~ r.r: ,')~ ':J ~ ~ E ~ .Jj ...-: ~ ~ E '"j ~; U '~" ~ ~ ~~~,:11) 3j~~~,~ ~ "\ r. ;: ~. C: ~ ~ ; :/1 ~!_~; ,,~ -.:.5 ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~~ ~,,~v:.~ ~ ~: :.~ ,~ l~.f: ~::2 ~ .l~ 2 ~ .\) ~ ~.c f: " w; ~...,.J. In L ~'2 ~ " Ii t.', c.. ... ~'i u ... ~~ -'? '7; ~ r: :~ .' '-:l ,vo,c ,:.: ;-: [' ~. ~; ;!-..., .1 , -- -- ~ ,- v 1: E: :~; '-I~ L! 0.. ~~ 'lL'<"l C lti.~? ,_~', ~ "' E ~ = ~: _;':- " C\.':;: ~ i .~: '<::; ^ ~ -;:; v G. u <) r: ..., S ~: ~~ ....lri ,,; '" :l ~ c ~,J .t ~ ?: ~ E" ~~ e:l .0 - ..l~ ?... - C 0 r:.cc'Ou .u 0 :; ,~ ..Q ~ ~1~j"d~~ t ~ j ~' ; 1II o...l. Cil.;"': ..cc.c5..,u U.O-h~6I') CV......c(.i'"? ~f'..;~~~ ~~~~6~ p. ~.... :> ~ooc:Q""'a. ; c.~~~~ .n~~g.3u ;::;;;5~ N ~ '" 5~~ . - '" .c c: ~~4.I .c ~ E '0 :>> ~ ~ 5 6 > ..:: u.. u 00 r~S .=P'J ~:~ go. ~:n';; 4JiX ~ o~..1:: Vi a:i ~ _ ~u E =~2 ~~ 8.0:" ~: to ~ e <- ~ ~o. ~: 4.lc~ It.I...... ;;o.c "t ~~3 ;~~ ~ ~ --" _ v ~ .r. .. OIl 0 "3 ~. '3 ~ ~ ::: ~ c:: ::.&. ~, N ~ . ~. .. :: ;s ~ .~ -~ (\l ,C . C;l ~.~;~'~ .J C .L: 0..-.:. ~ -0 <11 <.....c :J IS <:...c ~.s~-5:~'o o - IL "l "i - .c.o..:: ..... VI .c ;,.... -0 ..;:: ~ VI ~ ~ ;....c. "0 ~ ;i; C 4.1 ~.. c ~ '0 ~ ;S "" " ;:; (:; .-/../- . ... '. ," -5 v ~ :~~~~ VI 1~:~E.c~ ;:e 'o~Ec~ ~f.e~< 0 :', c: - ,>:: 3~-~~ t~ ..0 v. .C ... ~ .D (; OJ.\ C S. ~ tfi..c <'i -< tIdi V 2 ~:~~~ ..~ r.,f).l:: U ~ t: - '" U.c 8.-~: a.'.:: ;c ~ ']" o ~.. 0. C'I ~~~~'5'o ~.~< ~~f..,l.)o~E\) u~~ ....--r.I'~ ~:g5~~ .... c. c u 0 /'" / ; ) ~\. " J cc .0 e, 10" '"' c: .... ("~ o 0 ~ f7~ ~,Q fTJ ~ 'J i:~~~6~'08~~ ~.:: E iLl '- .c iLl 0., 0 ~E~-g;~~j~g ~ ~, : .. -g $ ~!] ~ ~ 1:: - VI "i J'. ~ I'd V) ~ .,..., r::.-. ..... .. (l4j (,.I .....:;; "5 J',;;' a..;: '$ c:..c g..:: 0 en ~ ...~ ~ ~~_ 0. ~ ~ -~ :: ~~-o:o~:S~3 U4,.l~"'~ ::IUo.. ~:g~~~:~ oc.Q"..-~oo. --0 0.., ':;,'..( 00 C: ' >, 8~~5 '" a. 0 ~ ~ e.... "<<i "0 0." ;. ;~ lC.2 voO co-5.c .:M .. - .. o'02g - ~ '" h ...... 4,.. "l.c: o VI 4J"- a.f~~ - ~ ~ ~-5EIo'l .2.....0.1: ~; ~ ~ cocft3.x~ ~~8fj~a:~ ~ "O~:Cl'Q~~,; 8,=~lLIO~:r:f' .~ :E ~ -g 'Q .. :II '" -" 0.., ~.~ uLJ ~ a [ r.:. ~ ~ ~ .~~~ ,~~ ""_ ...... '''~ ,.. c cc: o~~J~~~J ~.r.: ~ E ~ (1., j... ~ rJ; ~ ~ f. ;"" II. ('tl . .... <t,; ~ C, t>-l,. Cl..> ;s -5 <1" ...., ( ~1H~m:' ~~0~8~~~ ~(J) ~ ~ I ; i i g :' '" i-. < ~~ :.) U ~o. ;::<t: v;~ ;;;v ~:;J J .,; ~T ~~ 'Q ....; ;;\ i/.:" ~~ :~ f: .. .:; b 'C .- .....:: i, .(; .' , .C ~ ..) ..~ J:. ,!:; M - o :;' ~...~ 3 '-; o .~~ v,o -6 .. ~ ~ 4: ~.t :;. '-~ ~ ~ ; WHmIL~~ ; oe-'~~2-g~:~~::: 0 ~~~~:~~~~~ '-' J... ... 0 " <Q <lJ f~ ~ .. < ..-: ~ ~ ~ ~~ - - ,__ Q ~ ,J: ~ ~.~ F1~:: ~~:; 'u ~J ~:::~ p -'c ~~.g -~_...f. : ~~ =: ~ ~ ~.: ~~.;_;.'.. ~l ~~~~~i~~H- ., ~~'8~~E=g.~ ~- . ~ E ~.~ ~ ~ t\ :.: _ .~ -. ;, 0 .i.; ~ c!:-. - ~ '0 N .. :~J ~ :z " , .. <, ;)', .. ~ 0 N :; s i t'; t. ~ "~~ c '" ~" .. "? c ~ .' -) , u. ~ .. '"' '" " ^ .!.:~ ~ ~. 0- 0. c -'~ c, , ~ s ~, ct: ~ ~ n ., .>,1 " - .. .. .~ .3 .. > - oj ., ~. ~ ~ ~ ,:' LJ w :; '" ~ ~ ~ '" :. ". ., " ~ M ... Co. .- - e- M f: " i::" :a " ::4.. '-']'". .. ,il '" c ~ :<t - ,.,.., ~ .. " ~ E c: - ~ ~ I:: , C 0 ~ ~) C ? 2 ~ ;'. ~' , ,. ";:1 '- (. ~ ~ > ~ (:; 3 <- '.0 .~ " -' '" ~ 'A - ;;; -6 . .. .. " ~ ~ {~ .' N . ~ ~ c., 0; ; ~ :; c. 0( '- ;,,-: < , " S 0: cO " ~ ~, ., " ~.,. ~ " ~ .-: ~ u IJ c. " .- - '" _. '" ~ " .c c. -- -6 u :J -- '0 Vi 2i. '" ..-~ . c 5 :Ii #4.J dlk-/~~s 49:5~;-' s/ ..::::54J&~;I~/JJ 0 .?38 2. /:J~4 /?E - $~gr4L aP' ~#PIC;;S/d~5/L5 ~/,,;;h,)#L Or- r-r. /5'5'30 ~L'dNC (/). 5;,hv,Lp ~4P - /~ J?N(//l~t :?7~ ~ ------ ~ - (}&-c 5/;,( ((; ) . ~~J.?JJ 4"/;0- / r #41/;5 5b4;J U5>~ 71/>.5 S'/~Cb'/ .;z;;:,e /lz-..#~5/ // 76?;/k?S, J C '!t'lT ;:-.; -: -, i .'.s r;:;) ; ': ~. "'= I ~ \ . L.:) I)L; T 2ft \988 " ' . 'I i.', 1 l .. i .TTACHMENT C t If , city of San B7rn~rdino t' M' t f 8/16/ 8 ~ JrPlanning Comm1ss1on Mee 1ng 1nu es 0 8 ~ " page 12 ~, ~\~l [.8 i , I ITEM NO. 6 Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2 Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.03 acres having a frontage of 150 feet on the south side of 23rd Street and 150 feet on the north side of Highland Avenue and being located approximately 100 feet west of the centerline of Mountain View Avenue and further described as 220-226 East Highland Avenue. The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit under authority of Code section 19.28.020(C)15 to permit a 64 unit motel in the C-3 General Commercial zone. Owner: Great Western Development Applicant: Patrick Chiu ward 7 Proposed Negative Declaration, Staff Recommends continuance to Septem- ber 6, 1988. .. This item was considered on the Consent Agenda and was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 6, 1988. . 41 ITEM NO.7 I ~ ~ppeal of Extension of Time for Review of Plans No. 86-127 -- Subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approx- imately 3.1 acres having a frontage of approximately 266 feet on the north side of Highland Avenue and being located approximately 295 feet east of the centerline of Palm Avenue. The proposal is to construct a 42,520 square foot multi-tenant commercial building in the C-3A Limited General Commercial zone. Owner: Highland Palm, Ltd. Applicant: Monaco Homes, Ltd. Ward 4 Categorically Exempt from CEQA, Staff Recommends continued to September 6, ~988. This item was considered on the Consent Agenda and was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of September 6, 1988. ITEM NO. 8 Tentative Tract No. 13530 Subject property is a rectangularly- shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres located at the southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue. The request is to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-1-10,800 Single-Family Residen- tial zone. Owner: Palm Avenue Investors (~Applicant: McKeever Engineering, Dennis Stafford -'Ward 5 Proposed Negative DeClaration, Staff Recommends Approval. . ' ~. city of San Bernardino planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 8/16/88 t' Page 13 vivian Stevens presented comments, as contained in staff's report. She noted residents' concerns regarding flooding and dust control during construction. She also noted corrections to conditions of approval. Ms. Stevens stated that staff recommends approval subject to condi- tions, as amended. Mr. Glen Gipson, of 6495 Palm Avenue, was present in opposition to the proposal because he felt it was inconsistent with what is out there now and the infrastructure is incomplete. Mr. Gipson was concerned about 'flooding in the area, noting that currently residents have to use sandbags. Mr. Gipson commented on the horse trails proposed for Chestnut Avenue, noting that the proposed lot sizes are too small to accommodate horses and owners of those lots will be asked to pay for . ~ ' part of the development of the tra11. He stated that none of the lots front on Palm Avenue which does not go along with what is there. He stated that, if the proposed tract was of one-half acre lots, a lot of the opposition would disappear. Mr. Gipson stated that he would like to see some consistency in the Verdemont Area. He did not think 10,800 square foot lots were consistent with one-half acre lots and stated that with one-half acre lots they could get by with much less infra- (e structure. Mr. Allan Walters, of 4933 "F" Street, homeowner in the area for 28 years, was present in opposition to approval of the tract as proposed prior to this meeting. He stated that he had purchased a lot immed- iately west of this site and had visited the lot every day to maintain grape vines, fruit trees and pine trees and had used Meyers Road for access. He stated that it is a dedicated street deeded in June, 1972. He stated that he was not notified of the p~oject. Ms. stevens stated that Meyers Road will not be deleted. Mr. Walters stated that he would like to continue using Meyers Road as secondary access to his property and wanted to be assured that the sewer line would remain in the street that is finalized. Mr. Loehr stated that staff would have to report back. Mrs. Helen Kopczynski, of Cable Canyon Road, stated that the site plan does not show Meyers Road correctly. She stated that all projects for this area that have been reviewed in the last several weeks relate to the same flood control conditions of approval. She stated that all of the affects (of the projects) together in themselves would need an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). She noted the need for channels, diversions and debris basins. Mrs. Kopczynski noted that the Environmental' Checklist shows a change in the land use which requires I.n EIR. Mrs. Kopczynski also noted that problems in regard to the infrastructure are not resolved. Ms. July Barbara Sky, of 6464 Palm Avenue, was present and noted that on 5, 1988 the Planning Commission approved a tract with conditions city of San Bernardino ...Jplanning Commission Meeting Minutes of 8/16/88 r Page 14 and the Mayor and Council deleted five conditions from that project. She did not understand why the Mayor and Council did that. She stated that she would like to .see an explanation of what is being done before they are locked into any projects in the Verdemont Area. She stated that she would like to see Ken Henderson speak in regard to what is going on in the area and have questions answered before proceeding further on these proposed tracts. Dennis Stafford, representing the applicant, was present and stated that they were in agreement with all conditions. He requested modification to the extension of Meyers Road, stating that they would like to move the connection approximately 20 feet to the north. He stated that they would regrade Mr. Walters' driveway, ~set his gate and stub. the sewer out there. Mr. Stafford stated that the proposed project meets a~l requirements of Code, concerns have been addressed and the comments made by Ms. Sky are in regard to another project. There being no further comments from the public, the public hearing was closed. ~commissioner Brown asked staff if they could tell the Commission what '.,conditions were deleted on the project referred to by Ms. Sky. Mr. Loehr responded that Standard Requirement #39, which is applied to other projects in the area, requires the developer to participate in a uniform infrastructure plan for the area. commissioner Nierman stated that the Commission had disapproved two projects in the area because they did not have all the data in regard to an infrastructure plan to approve the projects. Commissioner Nierman felt that they had to have an infrastructure plan and needed to take a look at what all these projects are going to do to the area and an EIR would address that. Commissioner Corona felt that, it the Mayor and Council desired a higher density in the area, they should implement an infrastructure plan to address any hazards that could occur. Staff answered further questions from Commissioners. Commissioner Lopez stated that the report mitigates all impacts and noted the Environmental Checklist. Discussion ensued regarding services and if needs will be addressed. Commissioner.Sharp telt that 10,800 square foot lots were not high density and that the issue ot residents was that of "no growth." Commissioner Nierman restated that they needed 'to have something that told them what ettect all the developments are going to have on improvements, services, etc., noting that t~ey could be approving as many as 4,000 houses for the area. He (. asked lf the project was compatible with the Verdemont Area Plan. He furth~r stated that he would have no problem approving subdivisions if the Clty had a plan which addressed provision ot improvements to the area. city of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 8/16/88 I Page 15 Discussion followed. Commissioners concurred with Commissioners Lopez and Nierman when they suggested that three items needed to be placed on the next joint Mayor and Council and Planning Commission luncheon agenda, those items suggested were the Verdemont Area Infrastructure Plan, and Environmental Impact Report, and how or what procedures are . to be implemented/followed for sUbdivisions at this time. Attorney Empeno noted the rules of the Planning Commission governing action taken on items not on the agenda. .. Mr. stafford agreed to a continuance of Tentative Tract No. 13530 to the next available meeting, September 20, 1988. Commissioner Brown to the meeting of Commissioner Lopez sioner Stone. made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13530 September 20, 1988. The motion was seconded by and carried with all but the abstention of Commis- o ITEM NO. 9 Parcel Map No. 11659 -- Subject property is a 3.55 acre parcel located on the southwest corner of Highland and Guthrie. The proposal is to adjust the lot lines on three parcels to create three parcels of different configurations. Owner/applicant: Highland Village Investors Ward 7 Proposed Negative DeClaration, staff recommends approval. This item was considered on the Consent Agenda and was approved based upon findings of fact contained in the staff report dated August 16, 1988 and subject to the conditions and standard requirements listed therein. The Negative Declaration for environmental impact was also approved. * * * l\'t'TACHMENT D CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLA'NNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY . AGENDA ITEM _ 7 HEARING DATE 10,4/~O WARD 5 .., B APPLICANT: Palm Avenue Investors 1438 Dorothea Road La Habra Heights, Ca. 90631 Tentative Tract No. 13530 OWNER: Same as above ; "" :) o .., a:: " cr .., a:: <I The proposal is to establish a 45-lot subdivision in the R-1-10,800 Single Family Residential zone. Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres, located at the southwest corner of Ohio and Palm Avenues having a 711 foot frontage on Ohio Avenue and 961 foot frontage on Palm Avenue. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION Subject Vacant R-I-IO,800 R-I-IO,800 North Vacant R-I-IO,800 R-I-IO,800 East Vacant R-1-14,400 R-I-IO,800 South Vacant ,Single Fam. Res. R-I-IO,80C R-I-IO,800 West Vacant R-I-IO,800 R-I-IO,800 GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD DVES OZONE A C S€WERS \[] YES ) HAZARD ZONE co NO ZONE [JNO OZONE B ONO HIGH FIRE G]YES AIRPORT NOISE / DVES REDEVELOPMENT DVES HAZARD ZONE DNO CRASH ZONE [XJ NO PROJECT ARE^ []NO ..J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z Xi APPROVAL ~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0 WITH MITIGATING - C Zm MEASURES NO E.I.R. ti CONDITIONS We!) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO II.Q 0 2Z II.ffi DENIAL z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS OQ WITH MITIGATING ;!2 !Xl CONTINUANCE TO a:Z MEASURES 02 >L&: 0 10/4/88 Z ~NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS (.) &&J SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.R. C. ..... EFFECTS MINUTES a: NOV. 1911 REVilED JUL.Y 1112 SKY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENt CASE TT 13530 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM. 7 _ HEARING DATE _10/ 4 / 88 PAGE r -., 1. REOUEST The applicants request approval to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-l-lO,800, Single-Family Residential Zone. /. . S IT:f._!~O-';~<!'J_OJl The subject property is a 15.1 acre site, located at the southwest corner of Ohio and Palm Avenues. 3 . MONJJ:;:t Pl\J.!. _ C;OPJ:' J~t'lP_ _G~~~AAt. _ PJ~t1_ ~.Q~f9JUU\NCF. Tentative Tract No. 13530 is consistent with the Municipal Code as shown in Attachment wAw. It is also consistent with the Interim Policy Document adopted by the Mayor and Cowman Council on fo'ay 23, 1988, and amended on June 6, 1988, and approved by the State Office of Planning and Research on June 9, 1988. 4. ;:.f~Q1}_ p_"A"US .. An Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to the Environmental Review Committee on May 5, 1988. The Committee recommended a negative declaration. The Initial Study was advertised and made available fnr public review and comment from ~ay 12, 19na to May 25, 1988. No comments were received. See Attachment wFw, Initial Study. 5 . RACKGB.Q.tI~r This Tentative Tract and three others in the same area, \/ere considered by the Planning Commj~sion on February 3, 1987. The four tracts were continued until the March 5, 1987 hearing, to allow staff to address the issues of building standards and timing of improvemenlR relcted Lo drainage, flood control, ~treet access, signalization and schools. On Hatch 5, 19R7, the Planning Commission vot.ed to deny the project, directing the ~tarf to prepare negative f ind ing~ for the next Plann ing Commi~s j 0... '}. ~iJ : r s. Staf f pl (.r.;enle(l the r ind tn~:-, on r\~arch 17, 1987. Our ing that h(~rjn9, the Planning Commission continued the ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13530 OBSERVATIONS - AGENDA ITEM .J._ HEARING DATE 1JLI4 / 88 PAGE 3 ~ Tentative Tract indefinitely and required the applicants to prepare a Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont area. The applicable section of the minutes of those meetings are included as Attachment -E-. On June 11, 1987, the State Office of Planning and Research imposed a moratorium on the City of San Bernardino. Because of the moratorium, the applicant was unable to proceed with the project. A letter dated February 5, 1988 from the State Office of Planning and Research lifted the moratorium on development lots, 10,800 square feet and larger in the Verdemont area. Thereafter, this Application was allowed to proceed. The tract was scheduled for the June 21, 1988 Planning Commission Hearing. However, it was rescheduled to allow staff additional time to receive a Council clarification to determine how a tentative tract map would be required to comply with the Interim Policy Document. The applicant requested a hearing in late July. 6. ANALYSJS T9p_QgrAP-oy_~nd Geology The subject site is located in an area of limited environmental constraints. The general existing topography drops approximately forty feet from north to south at an approximate gradient of five (5) percent. The northernmost portion of the property is approximately 2,000 feet south of the San Andreas Fault Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. Based on the distance, a geology study for fault netermination will not be required. C irculat ion .Clllit.J\Gces.s Vehicular access will be provided via three, 50 foot- wide publicly dedicated roads which extend from Palm and Ohio Avenues. The proposed lots will not front onto Palm Avenue since it is designated as a collector street from Belmont Avenue to Ohio Avenue. Lots will front ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENl CASE TT 13530 OBSERVATIONS - AGENDA ITEM _. 7 _ HEARING DATE lO/4/~8_ PAGE 4 """Il Ohio Avenue which has been designated as a local collector street with a 60 foot right-of-way. Projected future traffic levels along Ohio Avenue are low enough not to create an undesirable or unsafe living environment. Lot Characte~istics The 45 lots range in size from the required 10,800 square feet to 17,120 square feet. The five irregularly shaped lots meet the Municipal Code requirements for irregular lots. The 40 rectangularly-shaped lots meet the Municipal Code for lot width and depth. The Interim Policy Document requires a 35 foot front setback. All lots are deep enough to meet this requirement and maintain the required 20 foot rear setback Environme~Concerns The attached Initial Study addressed the need for storm drain improvements to the Chestnut Street Drain and Debris Basin. The Interim Policy Document requires that the plan for public improvements and infrastructure be approved prior to any new development in the area. Development has been determined to be the issuance of grading permits or building permits. The infrastructure plan will include improvements to the following: (1) Palm Avenue Box Culvert, (2) Bailey Canyon Storm Drain and Debris Basin, (3) Traffic signal at Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive. The Interim Policy Document further requires all developers to participate in the preparation of this plan and the costs for improvements. In addition, the proposed tract must meet all the requirements set forth in the Verdemont Area Palm including the conditions imposed for the high wind and high fire hazard areas. Neighbors CQn~nR Mr. Gillermo H. Gallardo, who resides north of the proposed tract, expressed four areas of concern. First, he stated that there is occasional flooding from a small creek located approximately 475 feet west of the intersection of Palm and Ohio. Second, he wants to ~ \... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMEN1 CASE TT 13530 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM __ 7 _ HEARING DATE 10/4/88 PAGE l) ,. '" insure that there is dust control during construction. Third, he contends due to possible wind damage, the houses should not face Ohio. Fourth, he maintains larger lots should be located along Ohio to avoid an obvious visual change in lot size. Lots across Ohio are zoned R-1-14,400. The lots in this tract vary from 10,800 to 17,120 square feet. There will not be a sudden change in the size of lots as this tract offers a minimum of lot sizes. See Attachment "G", Gallardo Letter. Mr. Gallardo's concerns about drainage and dust control are addressed in the' St~ndard Conditions. This tract is engineered to drain toward the southeast to Palm Avenue. Final drainage plans will be reviewed by the City Engineering Department to insure they meet the City requirements. Dust control is mandatory on all construction sites in the City. The attached Standard Requirements address dust control in Item No.5, 6, 8 and 13. The proposal is located within the High Wind Hazard Zone. The mitigation measures required by that zone are conditions of approval for this tentative t r ac t . Mr. Alan Walters, owner of a Christmas Tree farm to the southeast of this tract opposes the abandonment of Meyers Road. He has been using the dedicated street for over ten years and feels that he should be allowed to maintain this access to his property. However, Mr. Walters does have 300 feet of frontage on Belmont Avenue, and thus this proposal will not eliminate all access to his property. (See Attachment "H", Walters Letter.) Mr. Cole, the owner of this property contacted Mr. Walters concerning this matter. The Verdemont Area Plan shows Meyers Road extended to the end of this property. Compliance with that Plan is a condition of approval of this tract. Therefore, Meyers Road right-of-way will be retained. "-- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13530 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM _ 7 HEARING DA1l:.1-Q/li88c- PAGE 6 '"' r 7. AGENCY G-OMME'NTS The California Regional Water Quality Control Board has suggested that the applicant be required to provide a certified statement to the Board Office from the City of San Bernardino Water Department stating that adequate waste treatment capacity is available in the City's treatment plant and that connection of this project to the sewer system will not result in a violation of the Board's waste discharge requirements Southern California Edi~on C9mpany stated that the proposed subdivision will not unreasonably interfere with the free and complete exercise of any easements held by the Edison Company within the boundaries of said tentative tract map. . The City parks and Recreation Department has suggested a. size requirement for future street trees. A condition reflecting this suggestion has been added. The San Bernardino the project will be established by the District. Unified School District notes that subject to school facility fees as San Bernardino City Unified School 8. CONCLUSION This tract meets all Municipal Code requirements for the development of a subdivision in that the lots are of the proper size and dimension, the area has two means of access, and the streets proposed are the proper width. the environmental concerns have been mitigated. The requirements of the Interim Policy document and the Verdemont Area Plan are Conditions of Approval. The infrastructure plan ;must be approved prior to any development. 9 . RECOMMENDflS.I.IDi It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Approve the Negative Declaration; and .J '"-- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEP ARTMENf CASE TT 13530 OBSERVATIONS AGENOA ITEM - ..7 _ HEARl NG DAn. lQJ 4 / 8 ~ _ PAGE -, , 2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 13530 subject to the following Findings of Fact (Attachment "B") and Conditions of Approval (Attachment .C") and Standard Requirements (Attachment "D"). Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL W. LOEHR Interim Director of Planning ~~ Vivian Stevens Planner II VS:csm Attachment "A" - Attachment "B" - Attachment "C" - Attachment "0" - Attachment "E" - Attachment "F" - Attachment "G" - Attachment "H" - Attachment "I" - Attachment "J" - doc.pcagenda 135300 7/13/88 .... Municipal Code & General Plan Conformance Findings of Fact Conditions of Approval & Standard Conditions Standard Requirements Minutes of February 3, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting, Minutes of March 5, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting and Minutes of March 17, 1987 Planning Commission Meeting. Initial Study Mr. Gallardo's Letter Mr. Walter's Letter Site Plan Location Map ~ ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13530 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM _ 7 HEARING DATE 10/4/88 PAGE 8 , """'IIi MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Category Project Municipal Code General Plan Permitted Use Tentative Tract Yes Yes Setbacks 35 feet Defer to IPD 35 feet Lot Size/ Dimensions 10,800 min. 10,800 min. 10,800 mln. width 80 ft. min. 80 ft. min. 80 ft. min. Depth 100 ft. mln. 100 ft. min. 100 ft. min. Density 3.33 du/ac 4.04 du/ac 3.1 - 4.3 du/ac Special Requirements: Plan for Public Improvements Conditions of Approval Defer to IPD Required prior to Development. \... ~ Attachment "B" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13530 FINDINGS of FACT AGENDA ITEM __ 7 HEARING DATE 10 / 4.LB 8- PAGE 9 \.. ,. "'" 1. All lots created meet or exceed the minimum lot requirements of Title 19, Zoning Code, and also meet the requirements of Title 18, Subdivisions, of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. 2. No lot created is less than the minimum dimension required by Code. 3. The size and shape of each lot meets the design requirements of the Planning Department in that adequate area is provided on each lot to accommodate a residence with a~cessory structures and meet the setback requirements of the zone. 4. All lots created about on dedicated streets as required by Code. Circulation in the general area will be enhanced by improvements to Palm Avenue and Ohio Avenue. 5. The subdivision is not being made contrary to the provisions of Title 18 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code nor the California Map Act. 6. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works for street improvements. doc.pcagenda TT13530F 7-13-88 ~ \... Attachment "e" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13530 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM 7 HEARING DATt. 10/4/88 PAGE 1. Tentative Tract No. 13530 shall comply with requirements of the Interim Policy Document. all 2. No development shall occur until the comprehensive infrastructure plan has been approved. 3. The Tentative Tract shall comply with all requirements of the Verdemont Area Plan. 4. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map d,oes not include approval of a vacation of Meyers Road. 5. Street trees shall be at least 15 gallon size and planted on 35 feet center spacing unless otherwise indicated by the Department of Parks and Recreation. The Department shall determine the varieties and locations prior to planting. Trees shall be inspected by the Parks and Recreation Division prior to planting. doc.pcagenda tt13530e 7/13/88 CITY OF SAN SER. ARDINO PL .NNING DEP ARTMEN', STANDARD CASE TT 13530 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM _7 HEARING DATE Wjl~8 _ PAGE 11 "" 7 . x Minor amendments to the plan shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10 percent of the square footage or a significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to (Planning Commission) ~~xv~xv~~ review and approval. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plans approved by the Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Director of Planning. Four ~~ sets of Landscape Plans, along with the appropriate fee, shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for processing. No grading permits will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. 6 . x At all times the business will be operated in a manner which does not produce obnoxious noise, vibration, odor, dust, smoke, glare, or oth~r nuisance. 8 . x Subject to the Conditions of the Department of Parks and Recreation (attached). 9 . x In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition. A sign program for the multi-tenant commercial/ industrial center shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of Certifi cate of Occupancy. SP:lmc PCAGENDA STNDCONDITIONS \... ..J CITY OF SAN BL...tNARDINC CASE AGENDA ITEM 7 HEARING QA lI...l.U.LA1.B...8 _ PAG E 12 TT 13530 ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1. x Tentative Tract No., 13530 shall be in effect for a period of ~ months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department. However, if no development has been initiated at the end of the ~-month time period the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planning Commission upon request of the applicant prior to expiration of the ~-month time period. Expiration Date: October 18. 1990. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D. a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC & Rls) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC & Rls shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC & R's shall also include a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within the complex except for central antenna systems. b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC & R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC & Rls shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. c. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or II" slly CITY OF SAN 9~RNARDIN('\ CASE TT 13510 REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 7 HEARING DATE. 10/ Ai 8 8 PAGE 1 ':\ STANDARD 2. x Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least a six-foot high decorative wall with screened gates. There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or other specifically designated area, a loft or other usable storage area with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition to standard utility storage. Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to the City Traffic Engineer's approval. A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on Standard Drawing No. 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to the development. Location and design shall be subject to approval of the Engineering Division. Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the Planning Department. All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall. Location, size, type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent. Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local requirements. LANDSCAPING: a. Four (4) copies of a master landscape plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed. 2) Irrigation plan. 3) Such other alternate plants, materials and concepts as may be proposed. design 4) Erosion control plans. 19" slly CITY OF SAN Br "lNARDINC CASE TT 13530 AGENDA ITEM _ 7 HEARING DATE JQ/4(88_ PAGE 1 4 ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior to planting by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department or his/her designee. A minimum number of one inch caliper/IS gallon, multi-branched trees shall be planted within the parkway for each of the following types of lots, as per the City's specifications: 1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree; 2) Interior lot -- two trees; 3) Corner lot -- three trees. c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, surfaces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10%, 15 gallon; 40% 5 gallon; 50%, 1 gallon. Shrubs 20%, 5 gallon; 80%, 1 gallon. Ground cover 100% coverage. d. Slopes required to irrigation system Department. be planted shall be provided with an approved by the Parks and Recreation e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership. 3 x f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, shall be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. All lots shall have a minimum area of 10,800 square feet, a minimum depth of ~ feet, and a minimum width of ~ feet, (~feet on corner lots). In addition, each lot on a cul-de- 1983 SIrf CITY OF SAN Sr'1NARDINO CASE TT 13530 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATe: PAGE 7 10/4/88 15 4. x 5 . x 6 . x 7. x 8 . x 9 . sac or on a curved street where the side lot lines thereof are diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 60 feet measured at the right angle to the lot depth at the midway point between the front and rear lot lines, and a width of not less than 40 feet measured along the front lot line as delineated on the tract map. Where lots occur on the depth of ~ feet will less than JUllL feet, a strate that a buildable lesser depth. bulb of the cul-de-sac, a minimum lot be permitted. If the proposed depth is plot plan must be submitted to demon- lot area is possible and to justify the Variable front building setback lines of at least ~ feet and averaging ~ feet, and side street building setback lines 15 feet shall be delineated on the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of 18 feet. Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or engineering design of the proposed wall. When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the City Engineer. Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation. Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required (if applicable). Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site plan. x During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control. 1~.' slly CITY OF SAN B ilNARDIN( TT 13530 CASE ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 7 HEARING DATe..1 o...L4 / B....a..- PAGE 10 10. x 11. x 12. x No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building unless screened as specifically approved by the Planning Department (except for solar collection panels). Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the maximum height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20 feet unless the Commission determines that due to unusual topographical or other features, such restrictive height is not practical. All utility lines shall be installed underground subject to exceptions approved by the Planning Department and the City Engineer. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued with these Standard Requirements as well as the San Bernardino Municipal Code. prior to compliance all provisions of csj/5-9-88 DOC:PCAGENDA DOCUMENTS.l , / :91S sJly CITY OF SAN BeRNARDINO PUBLIC "/ORKS/ENGR. CASE TT 13530 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM ._ 7. HEARING DATt.1 0/4/88 PAGE 1 7 "' Project Description: Tentative Tract No. 13530 - Create 45 SFR Lots at Southwest Corner Oh10 Avenue and Palm Avenue Date: 5/18/88 Page ~ of ~__ pages Prepared By: MWG Reviewed By: GRK Applicant: Palm Avenue Investors NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the appl1cant 1S responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainage and Flood Control 13. X All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer~ ~Jhich may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. X A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. _ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. _ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. _ Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. This drain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclusively show that the drain is not needed to protect your development or mitigate downstream impacts. 15. x All drainage from the development approved public drainage facility. drainage facilities and easements satisfaction of the City Engineer. shall be If not shall be directed feasible, provided to an proper to the "'" CITY OF SAN .,ERNARDINO PUBLIC. WORKS/1NQJIl CASE TT 13530 ST ANDAAO REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 7 _ HEARING DATE .10/4/88 PAGE - r Pro j e c t Des c rip t'i 0 n : ""'I Tentative Tract No 13~3n Date: 5/18/88 Page ~ OT b--- pages Prepared By: ~ Reviewed By: r,RK Grading 16. -LIf more than I' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. 1 I . --L- I f m 0 r e t h a n 5, 0 0 0 cub icy a r d s 0 f ear t h w 0 r k i s pro po sed, a g r' ad i n g bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in . accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must -be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement approval if reciprocal proposed to cross lot recorded to remove the shall be recorded prior to grading plan drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be interior lot lines. 18. X The project Landscape Plan shall be revie\-Jed and approved by the -City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. Utilities: 19. X Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in -accordance vJith City Code, City Standards and requirements of the s e r v i n gut i 1 i t y, i n c 1 u din g gas, e 1 e c t r ie, tel e p h 0 n e, VI ate r, s e \~ e r and cable TV. ~ \... CITY OF SAN BeRNARDINO PUBLIC ~'ORKS/ENGR. CASE TT 1 3530 ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS , AGENDA ITEM _ 7 _ HEARING DATE. 10/4/88 _ PAGE 1 q "'" Project Description: Tentative Tract No. 13530 Date: 5/18/88 Page -l- of ~ pages Prepared By: MWG Reviewed By: GRK 20. X Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer -facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. 21 . X Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be -constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. x be placed underground and easements II ~ - . Utility services shall provided as required. ) X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site ----on either side of the street sha 11 be undergrounded in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-601 (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65 (Non-subdivi sions). ') , .:.. -t . X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan. where practical. CITY OF. SAN b.:RNARDINO PUBLIC )/ORKS/ENGR. CASE TT 135 3 0 ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 7 HEARING DATE _1- 0 / 4 ~ PAGE ""'I r Project Description: Tentative Tract No. 13530 Date: 5/18/88 Page ~ of ~ pages Prepared By: MWG Reviewed By: GRK ,,- -'- :J . Street Improvement and Dedications: X All public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be -improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, sha 11 be desi gned and constructed in accordance with the Ci ty I s "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 26. X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street ----right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb lin~ (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-Way ( Ft. ) Curb Line (Ft.) Palm Avenue 3D' 20' Ohio Avenue 30' 20' ~nt~rior Str~~ts 25' 18' Ail rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from the following streets: A traffic study and report is required for this project. The report shall be prepared by a properly licensed Traffic Engineer or Civil Engineer knowledgeable in Traffic Engineering. The report shall be prepared in accordance vdth the City of San Bernardino Department of Public Works "Traffic Policy" and is subject to review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer. All recommendations, as approved by the City Engineer, shall become Conditions of Approval of the project. ) CITY OF SAN t.~ANAROINO PUBLIC JORKS/EtQt. CASE TT 135 3 0 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 7 10/4/88 21 r Project Description: AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE Tentative Tract No. 13530 Date: 5/18/88 Page 5' of 6- pages ---- -- Prepared By: ~ Reviewed By: GRK Mapping x A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. 27. 28. X All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer ----prior to Map approval. Improvement Completion 29. ~Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. 30. X If the required improvements are not completed prior to recordation of the Final/Parcel Map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer and the City will be required. If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ----ation of the Parcel Map, an ,improvement certificate shall be pl aced upon the Map stati ng that they wi 11 be compl eted upon development. Applicable to parcel map only less than 5 lots. 31 . Required Engineering Permits: ~Grading permit (if applicable). On-site improvements construction permit (except bui ldings - see ----Building and Safety) 32. ~Off-Site improvements construction permit Applicable Engineering Fees: 33. X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map. 34. X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements. Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except ----buildings; see Building and Safety). .J \.. CITY OF SAN biRNARDINO PUBLIC NORKS/ENGII. CASE TT 13530 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ""\ AGENDA ITEM 7 HEARING DATE. 1 0 / 4 / 8 8- PAGE ~2 - .J "" "'- r Project Description: Tpntativ~ Tral.t No 11~10 Date: 6L18/R8 Page ~ of ~ pages . Prepared By: Mlili- Reviewed By: GRK 35. ~Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required). Traffic impact mitigation in the amount of $~OO.OO D~r lot ----For Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive Traffic Si~nal ____Bridge improvement fee in amount of $315.00 oer lot (Palm Avenue Bridge) 36. X Drainage fee based on $ See Buildinq Deot. ----T 0 ta 1 fee = $ . per square foot. 37. ~Landscape Plan Review Fee $ 50.00 Traffic System Fee of $ per vehicle trip for City-\,Jide ----traffic mitigation based on ADT of Total Fee = $ 38. X Street Light Energy Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Additive Requirements Chestnut Storm Drain (Project 7-E13) shall be constructed from the Southerly tract boundary to the upstream end including the debris basin. Sufficient downstream improvements shall be made to mitigate downstream impacts. ~ \... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUIREMENTS CASE TT 13530 STANDARD AGENDA ITEM 7 HEARING DATE:. 10/4/88 PAGE 23 39. xx That the developer or property owner, as appropriate, participate in the development of the financing and implementation plan for the following improvements ana agree to pay their proportionate share of those improvements. 1. Palm Avenue Box Culvert. 2. Bailey Canyon Storm Drain and Debris Basin. 3. Chestnut Street Storm Drain and Debris Basin. 4. Traffic Signal at Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive. 5. Full street improvements, including curb and gutter at the following locations: a. Palm Avenue - from Kendall Drive to Ohio Street. b. Irvington Avenue - from Chestnut Street and Pine Avenue c. Belmont Street - from Chestnut Street and Pine avenue. d. Pine Avenue Street. from Belmont Avenue to Ohio ~ 19U Illy Attachment "E" City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 2/3/87 Page 5 ITEM NO. 8~ ward 5 Tentative Tract No. 13530 -- subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres located at the southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a frontage of approximately 961 feet on the west side of Palm AVenue. The applicant requests to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-l- 10,800 Single-Family Residential zone. Palm Avenue Investors, owner/applicant. Ronald Running presented comments, noting the request and location of the site and that it had been rezoned through the Verdemont Area Plan to low density residential use at four units per acre. Two fifty foot roads would serve the lots within the interior of the property. It was noted by Mr. Running that the site is located in the High Fire Hazard Zone and the two required means of access would be provided by this roadway network. He stated that the project has received agency approval from Southern California Edison and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board will require a certified statement that there is adequate waste treatment capacity in the City's treatment plant. Mr. Running stated that the Environmental Review Committee recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration for environmental impact and staff recommends approval of the tentative tract, subject to the conditions and standard requirements. Mr. Dennis Stafford was present representing the applicant and stated that they were in agreement with all recommendations and all proposed conditions. He was present to answer any questions. Mr. Al Walters, owner of five acres immediately south and west of this site, was present and stated that he had a dirt road for access to his property through the subject site. He stated that he did not live on his property but grew Christmas trees there and used the access road daily. Mr. Walters stated that he wished to retain access to his property and the proposed map would cut off his access. Mr. Running stated that he had discussed this situation with the Engineering Division and a modification to the proposed subdivision could include allowing access to remain for Mr. walters' property. Mr. walters stated that he had not discussed the situation with the applicant. Ms. Barbara Sky, a resident of the area, was present and submitted photographs of tracts of homes built last year in her area and showing wind damage from winds which occurred early Tuesday, February 3, 1987. Ms. Sky noted wind damage which had occured, such as roofs blowing off an,: block walls blowing over, and stated that the quality of construction was very poor and she was concerned that more homes of the same type would be built. ity of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 2/__ 87 Page 6 Ms. Sky also expressed concern about traffic on Palm Avenue and about the length of the cul-de-sac within the tract, noting that the site is within the High Fire Hazard Area. Mr. Schuma stated that projects that have been approved for the Verde- mont Area have been required to pay their fair share of proposed street signaliztion at locations on Kendall Drive and Palm Avenue and, in part, for payment of the ultimate construction of the Palm Avenue crossing of Cable Creek. Mr. Schuma stated that, to date, those improvements have not been done. He further noted that the Planning Commission does not have a voice in the collection of traffic signal fees and how they are spent and permits are not required for the construction of block walls for single-family residential development. After some discussion of building standards and the building inspection process, Commissioner Nierman made a motion to direct the Planning Department staff to write a letter to the Board of Building Commis- sioners, the Building and Safety Department and the Mayor and Council expressing concern that no building permit is required for a block wall, and calling attention to the fact that block walls in the Verdemont Area, which did not have reinforcement or grouting, are being blown down by high winds. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried with all but the opposition of Commissioner Lightburn. Mrs. Barbara Roberts, of 3766 Belmont Avenue, was present and stated that she had been touring the area with Ms. Sky and one of the problems is that there is not enough inspection. Ms. Roberts suggested that members of the Planning Commission come out to the area accompanied by Building Inspectors to see what the problems are as they occur. Mrs. Roberts stated that the safety of the people living in the area must be the uppermost concern. Mr. Bob Stone, of 3097 Belmont Avenue, was present and requested that Item Nos. 8, 9, and 10 be postponed to allow the residents an oppor- tunity to review the proposals more thoroughly. Commissioner Lightburn stated that, after seeing the photographs of the wind damage, he wanted something very definitive as to whether or not the proposed tract would be constructed the same as those pictured. the proposed tract would be constructed in the same manner as the one shown in the photographs. Commissioners Nierman and Maudsley concurred. Commissioner Nierman was in favor of continuing the items to allow staff to further review the proposals and to receive any input from neighbors. Mr. Phil Smith, of 6504 Churchill, was present and stated that he had received a notice of the hearing for Items 9 and 10, but had received no notice for Item 8, which is directly behind his property. Mr. Smith stated that the elementary school in this district is already over- burdened and has six auxiliary trailers. He also noted that only one ity of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting ~inutes of 2/_ d7 Page 7 house in his tract suffered wind damage from the recent winds and that damage was from a tract above where windows broke out and debris was blown by the wind. Approximately ten persons in the audience raised their hands indicating that they had not received a notice of the hearing for all items (Nos. a, 9 and 10). In response to a question from Commissioner Nierman, Mr. Schuma stated that staff had received a letter in opposition to Tentative Tract No. 13505, Item No. 10, from the San Bernardino Unified School District. Mr. Dennis Turley, of Washington Street, south of Irvington Avenue, was present and asked how needed schools would be built and where the school fees were going. He stated that his children could not go off their street because Palm Avenue is a racetrack. Mr. Turley also stated that he did not think it was right that the proposed tract would face he and his neighbors' properties which are one acre lots. Mr. Morenas Gedson, owner of property on Ohio Avenue, stated that one of his neighbors had their roof blown also noted that they had problems down on ftEft Street Verdemont Area. was present and off. Mr. Gedson just as in the Mr. Driscoll, a resident of washington Avenue, was present and stated that it was his understanding that the east side of Irvington Avenue was to be designated for one acre lots. Mr. Driscoll further commented that he had concerns on street improvements, water and envornmental concerns. He was concerned that projects would be approved prior to improvements being provided in the area. Mr. Driscoll stated that he had moved to the area because of the large lots and had horses and other animals and did not want the proposed homes in the area. Mr. Running explained the Area Plan and public notification process during which the area referred to by Mr. Driscoll was considered for a change in zoning designation. Mr. Running also noted that the City has not adopted a Capital Improvements Program which gives a schedule as to when improvements will be done. Discussion followed regarding the needed improvements of bridges, flood control measures, traffic signals, curb and gutter and other improvements required as safety measures. Assessment districts for improvements were also discussed. Chris Selnecke, a resident in the area of Palm and Belmont Avenues, was present and stated that what gets built is not quite like what the plans show. He stated that Building Inspectors are not catching everything and problems are being overlooked. Mr. Selnecke stated that he was in the construction business and could see things other people would not. He noted that when there is a power outage, the sewage goes in~o a basin and into the flood control channel. Mr. Selnecke asked who was going to pay for cleaning and sanitizing the whole north end of Kendall Drive. Mr. Selnecke also noted poor grading in the construc- ~ty of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting ~inutes of 2/~_ &7 Page 8 tion of block walls on the north side of Irvington Avenue where a brick . has been removed from the wall at each lot to allow for drainage. Mr. Selnecke further commented that the Verdemont Area Plan Citizen Advisory Committee was stacked with developers and what residents wanted was overruled by the Planning Commission and Mayor and Council. Ms. Susan Komanski, resident of the corner of Irvington Avenue and Chestnut Avenue, was present and concurred with the concerns previously expressed by her neighbors. She noted that there are beautiful hawks and eagles that live in trees on the site and their environment will be destroyed. She was also concerned that if the trees above her property were moved, she would have a flood in her yard. Mr. Ron Carlyle, of 3042 Belmont Avenue, was present and stated that the public is very much against the proposed developments and was not represented in the Area Plan. Mr. Carlyle stated that he lived in the area for the serenity and if these projects are built it would ruin all of his reasons for living in San Bernardino. Mr. Carlyle stated that there was really no need to rezone the subject properties, because there is plenty of property closer to the City (downtown area) that can be developed at a higher density instead of backwards as is being done. Mr. Carlyle also asked if there was going to be a City General Plan that would be updated every five years. He stated that residents of the area were not happy that the Verdemont Area Plan was adopted and felt that their safety and concerns were not considered. Ms. Joy Kolstad, of 1542 Indian Trail, requested that the items be continued to allow residents who were not notified to review the plans. Mr. Dennis Stafford stated that he was the representative for Item Nos. 8, 9 and 10. He stated that Tentative Tract No. 13530 (Item No.8) conforms with the General Plan and Verdemont Area Plan. He stated that notification is provided to property owners within a 500 foot radius of the site from the latest Assessor's roles. Mr. Stafford requested approval of the proposal. He stated that Mr. stone received a notice within a week of the hearing and it was difficult to determine his specific concerns. Mr. Stafford stated that he had not been approached by residents and he had not met with or knocked on any doors of residents of the area. Mr. Stafford stated that an offer of dedication for the portion of Meyers Road used for access by Mr. Walters for his five acre parcel was put on when the tract for 7,200 square foot lots was approved. He stated that the tract has expired. Mr. Stafford stated that the five- acre parcel (owned by Mr. Walters) would normally take access from Belmont Avenue. He noted that Meyers Road, at that location, is not a dedicated road but was an offer of dedication and the street has been m0:ed 200 to 300 feet north on the proposed map to facilitate the size of the proposed lots. _lty of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 2/3,87 Page 9 Discussion followed amongst Commission members and staff. Commissioner Lopez concurred with continuance of the items. Commissioner Nierman wanted staff to address the issue of poor construction and inspection in the Verdemont Area before he would put his approval on any further development in the area. Commissioner Lightburn repeated his concerns regarding quality of construction. Roofing materials were also discussed. Commissioner Nierman made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13530 (Item No.8), Tentative Tract No. 13307 (Item No.9) and Tenta- tive Tract No. 13505 (Item No. 10) to the Planning Commission meeting of March 5, 1987, with the instruction that the Planning Department staff address the issues of building standards and the timing of improvements related to drainage, flood control, street access and signalization, and schools. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lightburn and carried unanimously. Some discussion followed amongst Commission members regarding develop- ment standards in the Verdemont Area. lT~~_NO. 9, ward 5 Tentative Tract No. 13307 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 22.7 acres having a frontage of approximately 702 feet on the north side of Irvington Avenue and approximately 695 feet on the south side of Belmont Avenue and being located approximately 720 feet west of the centerline of Palm Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 71 lot subdivision in two phases in the R-l-IO,800 Single-Family Residential zone. Mirna-Overland Enterprises, Inc., owner/applicant. This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 5, 1987. Discussion and comments are noted under Item No.8, Tentative Tract No. 13530. ITEM NO. 10, Ward 5 T~pt~tive-1I~~~_No. 13505 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.6 acres located at the northeast corner of Belmont Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage of approximately 715 feet on the north side of Belmont Avenue and a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the east side of Palm Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 49 lot subdivision in the R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential zone. Richard Hobgood, owner; Mike Cole, applicant. This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 5, 1987. Discussion and comments are noted under Item No.8, Tentative Tl~ct No. 13530. Clty of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 3 * * * ITEM NO.5, Ward 5 Tentative Tract No. 13307 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 22.7 acres having a frontage of approximately 702 feet on the north side of Irvington Avenue and a frontage of approximately 695 feet on the south side of Belmont Avenue and located approximately 720 feet west of the centerline of Palm Avenue. The applicant requests approval to establish a 71 lot subdivision in two phases in the R-1-10,800 Single-Family Residential zone. Mirna-Overland Enterprises, Inc., owner/applicant. Chairman Flores indicated that Item Nos. 5, 6 (Tentative Tract No. 13530), 7 (Tentative Tract No. 13505), and 13 (Tentative Tract No. 13572) would be reviewed and discussed at the same time, since all of the tracts are in close proximity to each other. Ronald Running presented comments, describing each item and noting their location on the overhead map. He stated that the items were continued because of concern expressed by residents of the area regard- ing lack of proper building standards, Code enforcement and inspec- tions, and the lack of adequate flood protection, streets and school facilities. Mr. Running stated that representatives from the Building and Safety and Engineering Departments were present to answer ques- tions. Mr. Running stated that the southern portion of Tentative Tract No. 13307 is designated as a potential school site. He noted that the San Bernardino Unified School District has applied to participate in the Leroy F. Greene Lease-Purchase Program. The program provides funds for land acquisition and construction of schools based upon certain eligibility guidelines. The School District anticipates a favorable determination later in the year. Mr. Running stated that, while the School District does not have adequate funds at the present time, it is their intention to acquire school sites in the future. However, Mr. Running further indicated that approval of the subject tracts should not be contingent upon future School District action. Mr. Running noted the location of the 72 inch concrete pipe storm drain on Chestnut Avenue and that staff recommends that the condition regard- ing storm drain requirements be strengthened to require the applicant to install flood control improvements as specified in the Engineering Division's Storm Drain Project No.7, Line E-13. Mr. Running also noted the issue of access to Meyers Road and that an adjacent property owner had been using a stretch of Meyers Road to gain access to his property to the west. He stated that staff recommends that a condition be added to Tentative Tract No. 13530 that the right- ~_ty of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/07 Page 4 of-way be maintained and the lot layout be redesigned to provide for access. A schematic map, provided by the applicant's engineer, showing access to the property via Meyers Road was shown on the overhead projector. Mr. Running also noted the orientation of lots along Palm Avenue and that driveways will not be directly on Palm Avenue. He stated that staff recommends an additional condition requiring that the other two tracts (Tentative Tract Nos. 13505 and 13572) along Palm Avenue be required to participate in the establishment of an assessment district for maintenance of landscaping along Palm Avenue. In conclusion, Mr. Running stated that staff recommends approval of Tentative Tract Nos. 13307, 13530, 13505 and 13572 based upon findings of fact and subject to the conditions and standard requirements con- tained in the staff reports. Staff also recommends adoption of the Negative Declarations for environmental impact. Roger Hardgrave, City Engineer, was present and responded to questions from staff and Commissioners. Mr. Hardgrave stated that the Chestnut Avenue storm drain has not been started and as development occurs, he expected the storm drain to be installed. In regard to the Palm Avenue bridge, Mr. Hardgrave stated that the Engineering Division is recom- mending that a fee of $310 per lot be levied for each lot of the four subject tracts. He noted that a total of $66,000 would be collected in this manner towards the estimated $300,000 cost of the box culvert. Mr. Hardgrave stated that it was hard to say exactly when improvements would be put in, because it was dependent upon the rate of development. Commissioner Shaw noted the ~oncerns of area residents and asked when certain flood, road and traffic signal improvements would be put in place and if the City had defined a program which could explain to the public when certain improvements would be put in place to accommodate the development that the Verdemont Area Plan allows. Mr. Hardgrave stated that the City looked at the area and estimated the number of lots that could be developed and came up with a unit/lot cost and until development comes in, there is no money. In response to a question from Commissioner Lopez, Mr. Hardgrave stated that he did not expect improvements to be in before people move into the homes and that it could take up to five years before enough money is raised for the traffic signal and bridge improvements. Mr. Hardgrave felt that there were viable alternatives to the method of assessing fees as development comes in, currently used by the City, and suggested establishing assessment districts to spread the cost over all the properties and raise the money up front as a better way of providing improvements. Mr. Hardgrave suggested that the Planning Commission and Mayor and Council could place a hold on development until a mechanism was in place to finance improvements. Co~"issioner Watson noted that several cul-de-sacs a:e proposed in each tract and asked if these pose any problems to public safety or circula- tion. Mr. Running stated that the use of cul-de-sacs reduces speed and L.ty of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 5 the amount of traffic. He stated that the Fire Department and the Environmental Review Committee expressed no concerns. Mr. Anderson stated that cul-de-sacs are typically sought after by residents because of reduced traffic. He stated that they tried to balance the types of streets to get variation in design. Commissioner Flores had questions about wind damage, walls blowing down and roofing materials. Charles Dunham, Senior Plan Check Engineer of the Building and Safety Department, was present and responded to questions. He stated that he had seen the buildings and photographs of buildings with wind damage and noted that winds were recorded up to 93 miles per hour and a normal roof is designed to withstand 60 miles per hour. He said that roof companies would not even certify a roof for that kind of wind. Mr. Dunham stated that the area is noted throughout the United States for this unique high wind situation. Mr. Dunham stated that builders are required by the City to use a heavier shingle (300 pound), six nails instead of four and to hand tab until summertime when you get the real seal in your roof. He also stated that the wind damaged roofs were inspected and the six nail requirement had been met. Mr. Dunham responded to Commissioner Nierman regarding block walls, stating that most agencies have been lenient on block walls because they are low profile and normally do not experience a high wind area. He stated that most walls are designed to withstand ten pounds per square inch rather than 20 pounds, which is what the recent winds were. He also noted that, presently, there is no building permit required for fences (block walls) and this would be a new ordinance requirement, but a retaining wall over two feet in height requires a permit. Mr. Dunham also stated that there was a lot of wind damage to tile roofs. He stated that, to avoid any real safety problems, heavier roofing mater- ials and a greater number of nails or staples per shingle should be required. In response to a question from Commissioner Nierman, Mr. Dunham stated that the present City Building Codes do not design for the type of wind experienced recently in the area. Mr. Dunham stated that they require the stability of the buildings to be designed for a larger wind load and use the 30 percent exposure increase factor and require the struc- tural engineers to use 20 pound wind instead of the normal 15 pound. Commissioner Shaw asked if Mr. Dunham or other City staff would be able to prepare recommendations for changes in the City's building standards to address some of these problems that have been experienced. Mr. Dunham stated that they require earthquake ties, which is not a standard application, and require heavier tile (300 pound instead of 240 or 260) and a greater number of nails or staples per shingle. Mr. Dunham also noted that they had required the builders to post cash bonds to be sure that they made all repairs before the buildings wer~ finalized. _ty of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5,d7 Page 6 Ms. Barbara Sky, a resident of Palm Avenue, was present and felt that all development should be stopped in the Verdemont Area until the current problems are resolved. She submitted a copy of a letter from a roofing company which told residents to turn their roofs in to their insurance companies. She stated that she would like to see the build- ing inspectors carry a ladder in their truck so that they could climb onto the roofs to make inspections. Mr. Allen Bairns, of 2385 Hyatt Road, was present and stated that the shingles on his roof did not have more than two staples per shingle and he had had the roofers out three times to fix the roof since he had moved in January 10. He noted that the last wind was not more than 30 miles per hour and his roof came off. Mr. Bairns stated that the cellophane strips on the shingles were still on them. Mr. James Tissue, of 5945 Shepherd Dr~ve, was present and stated that his roof was blown off and one-third of the shingles still had the cellophane strip on them which is supposed to be removed for proper adhesion. Mr. Tissue stated that the house next door to him suffered no damage and he felt the roofing company was putting the shingles on incorrectly. He felt that further development should be stopped or building inspection procedures should be looked into. Ms. Jo Silvas, of 6113 Shepherd, was present and stated that she had had the same problems with her roof and it had been fixed three times. Ms. Silvas felt that Code requirements should be maintained to address the wind conditions. She stated that a building inspector inspected the roof next door after it was fixed and indicated that it was still not fixed properly and we should contact Forecast Development and have them do it completely over. Mr. Silvas stated that she had contacted Forecast Development and they said they would take care of it the same way as they had done in the past. Mr. Glen Gibson, a resident of the intersection of Belmont and Palm Avenues (6495), was concerned about Tentative Tract No. 13505, directly to the north of his property. Mr. Gibson was very concerned about the construction of this tract to the north. Mr. Gibson was concerned about wind and flooding problems and did not feel that the problems of flooding had been adequately addressed by the developer. He also expressed concern about the problem with dust when the tract is built. He noted the dust problems currently experienced by residents to the south. Mr. Gibson was also concerned about the general traffic situation, noting that they do not have stop signs and bridges where they are currently needed, and the situation will only get worse if the proposed tracts are built without any advance planning before people move in. Mr. Gibson was in favor of holding down construction until these things (improvements) are addressed. Ms. Lily the high Price, of 2404 Hyatt Road, was present and stated that before winds occurred there were a number of homes, including her L cy of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/bl Page 7 own, where shingles were already coming off and when the high winds did strike, they lost their shingles down to the wood. Ms. Price stated that she called manufacturers and West Coast distributors of the shingles who suggested that, in our area of high winds, roofing nails be used instead of staples. Ms. Price wanted to see Forecast Development have their roofing company come out and nail everyone of those shingles down 50 that the damage does not reoccur. Ms. Price also noted that she had a big dip in her roof that was missed by inspectors. Ms. Connie Copp, of 2414 Hyatt Road, was present and stated that she had had the same problems with shingles blowing off and in the latest wind, which was not as high as previously experienced, they had lost almost as many shingles as when the winds were 80 plus miles per hour. She stated that her roof had been repaired twice previously and her insurance man, after inspecting the roof each time, indicated that it was not repaired properly and shingles were put in with staples or nails with heads 50 small that they had already cut through the shingle and it should be redone. Ms. Copp stated that a man from Forecast Development came and said that their roofing company had not been working out too well and they would repair the roof themselves with larger headed nails, however, Ms. Copp was still concerned about the rest of the shingles on the roof that still had staples. Mr. Allan Walters, of 4933 North "F" Street, owner of five acres immediately to the west of Tentative Tract No. 13530, was present and stated that his arguement would be eliminated if the developer agreed to redraw the map and not vacate Meyers Road. Mr. Anderson stated that a condition of approval is to be included for Tentative Tract No. 13530 requiring modification to the design of the tract to reflect a "T" intersection to maintain access via Meyers Road to Mr. Walers' property. Mr. Running noted the site plan on the overhead map, showing how access would be maintained to Mr. Walters' property via Meyers Road. Mr. Chris Saldecke of 6464 Palm Avenue, noted a waiver of storm drain fees which was requested by Forecast Development on November 3, 1986. He asked what had happened on the request and was concerned about where the money would come from if developers were getting waivers of fees. Mr. Saldecke also wanted to know what was going to happen with the General Plan. Mr. Hardgrave noted that the request referred to by Mr. Selnecke was denied by the Mayor and Council. Attorney Grace stated that the Mayor and Council adopted a work program for revision to the City's General Plan which should bring the City into conformance with State guidelines and the City is free to do business as usual unless there is a rescraining order or injunction placed upon the City. ~ city of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 8 . ~ , , Mrs. Barbara Roberts, of 3766 Belmont Avenue, was present and asked how many people were present at the meeting who lived in the Verdemont Area. (Approximately 25 persons raised their hands to indicate that they were Verdemont Area residents and 9 persons indicated that they resided in the Forecast Development tract.) Mrs. Roberts stated that there is a continuing problem with roofs blowing off and flooding and asked if there was any kind of figure as to how many houses they started with and how many have been built since 1974 to 1983. She stated that she had not seen any improvements in bridges or anything since 1974 and wanted to know where the fees were that had been collected. . Mr. Hardgrave stated that the ordinance requiring payment of storm drainage fees was adopted in 1978-79 and since that time developers have paid approximately $2,000 per acre which goes into the City-wide storm drain line construction fund. He stated that those funds are allocated on a yearly basis by the Mayor and Council in order of priority as they see fit. Mr. Hardgrave also noted that the crossing of Cable Creek would be a street improvement and those funds would not be applicable to that project. Mrs. Roberts stated that the Commission should look at the cumulative effects of development in the area. She stated that she had checked with her insurance company and they reported that 2,000 claims were filed in the area during the January 20, 1987 winds, 55 of which were Verdemont Area homes with damaged roofs, fences and windows. Mrs. Roberts felt it would be a valuable survey to have figures on the types of losses there were and when they occurred. She further noted that another insurance office had indicated that premiums for homeowners insurance in the verdemont Area would probably be raised because of the high losses occuring due to shoddy workmanship. Mrs. Roberts also expressed concern that access to planned equestrian trails be maintained. She noted a tract adjacent to her that was approved with a condition requiring equestrian trails, but since it has been completed it has been determined that the people who purchased the homes were not advised that the trails were not exclusively for them and feel that the trails belong only to them. Ms. Liz Grogan, a resident of the area, was present and stated that she owned several horses and did a great deal of riding. She stated that several years ago a group of residents, with the help of Ron Running, laid out an equestrian and hiking trail system for the Verdemont Area before most of this development was in. She stated that it appeared that all of their efforts were totally worthless, since the only so called equestrian trail has a chain link fence across it and is only for the use of the people who live in that development. She stated that some of the trail is on the side of a hill and another portion has a fence across it. Ms. Grogan stated that she had felt that the Verdemont Area was one of the last opportunities the City had to develop with some sort of class like other cities do, but obviously City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 9 the class is going out of the window and the equestrian and hiking trails proved this point to her. Mrs. Roberts stated that one of the tracts being considered (Tentative Tract No. 13307) includes an equestrian trail. Mrs. Roberts commented that she lived on and owned three acres adjacent to Tract No. 11118 on which they have patented water rights (Julius Meyer Water Patent) that were signed by President Howard Taft. She stated that those who put in the subdivision were required to realign the water system. Mrs. Roberts stated that Joseph Bonadiman had filed suit against her and 22 ftJohn Doesft claiming that they do not have rights to the water. She was concerned about approval of t~e proposed tracts without some determination as to the private water line easements for domestic use and felt that other people may become unwitting defendants as Mr. Bonadiman tries to acquire the water rights. She stated that the Julius Meyer water patent rights run all throughout the territory and she wanted to see all of the water lines marked and recorded. Mrs. Roberts also expressed concern about the equestrian trail system and the tract where residents are totally convinced that they own the equestrian trail which is shown on the City's maps. Mrs. Roberts further commented that she did not feel anyone was paying attention to details when the tracts go through. She wanted to know if every house had been inspected. She expressed concern about the lack of an adequate number of building inspectors and having to rely on the builder. Mrs. Roberts felt that current standards were not adequate and the Code should be strengthened and better enforced. Mrs. Helen Kopczynski, of 8150 Cable Canyon Road, was present and was concerned that the standards in the Verdemont Area Plan were deleted or changed by the Council Legislative Review Committee, which consisted of Councilmembers Quiel, Reilly and Strickler. She also asked how a site designated for a school became a housing site and was concerned that the Verdemont Area would not have adequate school facilities in the future. Mr. Anderson stated that the City had identified the site as a school site and the San Bernardino Unified School District has advised the City of their procedure. However, there is nothing the City can do to hold a property vacant until the school district is ready to purchase it, the school district must determine its priorities. Discussion followed. Mr. Running stated that the school district is willing to purchase the site but does not have the funds. Mrs. Kopczynski expressed concern regarding the total number of units proposed and density permitted. She also felt that there may have been a conflict of interest, since the Oeed of Trust for Tentative Tract No. 13307 was signed by an individual who was a member of the Verdemont Area Plan Citizen Advisory Committee. She expressed concerns regarding the need for a bridge at Cable Creek and whether the projects met the requirements for 80 percent of the average unit size within 500 feet of city of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 10 the sites. She commented that portions of Palm Avenue would be in a landscape maintenance district and portions would not be and existing homes would have block walls facing them. Mrs. Kopczynski was also concerned about the numerous cul-de-sacs and block walls proposed, noting that the site is in the High Fire Hazard Zone and fire trucks will have to go all the long way around to get to some units. Ms. Rita Harrison, of 6866 McClay, was present and stated that she had lived in her home for four months and had yet to have a walk-through inspection. Ms. Harrison stated that they had lost their roof three times and their insurance adjuster indicated that they had a defective roof. She stated that she had spoken with Don Hesterley, City Code Compliance Officer, who indicated that it would not be a good practice to leave the cellophane on the shingles and the shingles should have six fasteners each and fasteners may be nails or staples. Ms. Harrison stated that she appreciated the comments made in regard to correcting the situation, but wanted to see something done about the existing homes. Mr. Jim Ballard, of 2739 North "F" Street, was present and stated that he had been a resident for 33 years. He noted the poor drainage in the tracts referred to by residents with roofing problems. He stated that they would probably be looking at five to six years before there is a school built. Mr. Ballard questioned whether the Verdemont Area Plan was a stop-gap measure to continue growth and exploitation of the open area land. Mr. Ballard also was concerned about potential conflict of interest in regard to the voting that took place on the Verdemont Area Plan. Mr. Ballard felt that the City should read the message that the citizens of-the Fifth Ward and throughout the City cast on Tuesday night (March 3, 1987) and deny the proposed tracts or postpone action on the tracts until sometime in May when there will people who can make decisions on public policy who will answer to the people instead of private interest. Barbara Sky submitted photographs of Chestnut Avenue and of grading that was approved in the Verdemont Area. Mrs. Kopczynski asked if the applicant had satisfied the requirement that adequate waste water treatment capacity was available to accommo- date the proposed units. Dr. Jim Mulvihill, of the University of California - San Bernardino, was present and stated that there was concerned about many basic things. Dr. Mulvihill noted that the Mayor and Council had initiated procedures for a revised General Plan and he was concerned that there would be a tremendous rush of development taking place by individuals who want to propose projects prior to revised standards taking place. Dr. Mulvihill requested that the Commission deny the requested Negative De~larations until the Council establishes procedures to deal with potential development that may take place between now and when the new General Plan takes effect. City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 11 Dr. Mulvihill commented in support of Mr. Selnecke's concerns in regard to the General Plan by reading a portion of a court case, Camp vs. the MendQ~lD9_County Boar9_of Supervisors, where a subdivision was approved at a time there existed no adequate General Plan for physical development of the County. Dr. Mulvihill stated that the Mendocino County Board of Supervisors could not legally find the subdivision to be consistent with the requisite General Plan and such approval was, therefore, unlawful and would be set aside. In response to a question from Commissioner Shaw, Dr. Mulvihill stated that he felt the Verdemont Area Plan did not have any real legal significance. Dr. Mulvihill noted that in the Noise, Housing and Scenic Highways Elements of the Verdemont Area Plan reference is made to standards that exist that will be contained in the General Plan, which, in fact, do not presently exist. Dr. Mulvihill repeated his concerns in regard to the flood of development that is anticipated during the two to three year period prior to new standards taking effect. He noted the thousands of apartments, existing and proposed, and the very high vacancy rate in the State College Area. Dr. Mulvihill felt that the Mayor and Council needed to prepare interim procedures or adopt a slowed growth policy. He stated that the City's General Plan could never stand litigation and the City would be in an extremely weak position if taken to court. Mr. Tom Minor, of 5429 North "E" Street, was present and requested that all of the subject tracts be denied. Joy Kolstad, of 1542 Indian Trail, was present and stated that she had purchased her home six years ago and it was a lemon. Ms. Kolstad stated that the problems experienced by the homeowners are not new and have been going on for years. She related the numerous problems she had had with her home, including, poor grading which created a natural swimming pool on the property, flames coming out of electrical outlets, water coming out of the walls and the shower head pulling out because plumbing was never hooked up, the siding on her house (and entire tract) falling off, and the 400 foot block wall built for the development falling down three times. Ms. Kolstad stated that one fourth of her roof would blow off at a time and she finally did get her ten-year warranty because she had gotten the manufacturer from Chicago to come out and see if it had been installed correctly. Ms. Kolstad related the problems that she and her neighbors had when they got together to get the contractor to replace the siding on their homes. She noted that her neighbors had similar problems with elec- trical outlets and she was aware of bathroom walls falling down in homes on an adjacent street and of six tracts that have had roofs blown off and shingles flying into windows. Ms~ Kolstad stated that some- thing is wrong here and she said residents are asking the City to do City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 12 something about the problems. Ms. Kolstad also noted the provisions of the existing General Plan for schools and parks and other public facilities which have not been fulfilled. Mr. Joseph Bonadiman, of 606 East Mill Street, was present and stated that problems mentioned should be brought up with the City Council. He noted that there is a wind problem throughout the County of San Bernar- dino and just because people are having problems in this area does not justify a moratorium on building in the entire Verdemont Area. Mr. Bonadiman suggested a workshop to discuss alternatives regarding engineering issues amongst staff. He stated that changes to the Verdemont Area Plan were not significant and some revisions to the Plan may still be needed. He noted that problems discussed were unrelated to the proposed developments. Mr. Bonadiman responded to a question from Commissioner Watson, stating that the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Fire Code, plumbing standards and others are used, but the things described this evening indicate shoddy workmanship. Mr. David Mlynarski, representing a development company with a very substantial interest in the area, was present and stated that a moratorium could affect potential projects of his company and his company desired to build quality homes and the City should not be prejudiced against all builders because of the tr~cts having shoddy workmanship. Mr. Mlynarski requested that the Commission allow the proposed projects to proceed. Dennis Stafford, representing the applicant for each of the subject proposed tracts, was present and stated that the isssues of drainage and traffic have been addressed and they have agreed to all conditions and the special assessment district and have agreed to enter into future assessment districts. Mr. Stafford stated that the projects meet the letter of the Verdemont Plan and have been awaiting the approval of that Plan. In regard to Tentative Tract Nos. 13505 and 13572, Mr. Stafford stated that they are in complete agreement with conditions and findings and have no problem with staff's recommendation. In regard to Tentative Tract No. 13307, Mr. Stafford asked for clarification of the condition regarding the Chestnut Avenue drainage facilities Mr. Running stated that staff is suggesting that the applicant install flood control improvements on the westerly portion of the tract. Mr. Stafford stated that they would be opposed to such a condition, since the natural drainage course does not flow alongside their property but comes down Chestnut Avenue to the corner of their property and curves off in a westerly direction and there would be no outlet for water if there is construction of a portion of the channel. He noted that they would not be opposed to entering into an assessment district for future construction of a storm drain. - City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 13 In regard to Tentative Tract No. 13530, Mr. Stafford commented that the property could be developed as shown on the overhead site plan, how- ever, if the stub street (Meyers Road) was developed, it would be a burden. Mr. Stafford noted that Mr. Walters' property has access to Belmont Drive and they would be opposed to providing Meyers Road as a stub street in that location. Mr. Stafford requested that action be taken on the proposed tracts. Staff members responded to questions. Attorney Grace stated that staff testified that there was an offer of dedication for Meyers Road and if it has not been accepted by the City, it is not a dedicated road and does not require vacation. Discussion and comment followed amongst Commission members. Commissioner Nierman stated that he was convinced that, at this time, they were not prepared to handle development in the Verdemont Area. He complimented the Planning Department for doing everying to bring information to the Commission and the Building and Safety Department for doing what they have done with a limited number of people, however, the problem is the fault of the City. Commissioner Nierman felt that in order to forestall insurance companies from collectively filing suit against developers and the City, they needed new standards. Be noted that it appeared that standards in the Verdemont Area Plan were voted out by the Legislative Review Committee. Commissioner Nierman was concerned that the City had the lowest standards of any City in South- ern California and that proposals meet the bare minimum. Commissioner Nierman felt that, before there is any further development in the area, they needed standards to cope with high wind and needed the Building and Safety Department to present standards for new ordi- nances for walls and roofing. Commissioner Nierman indicated that he could not approve any of the four subject tracts. Commissioner Brown made a motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 13307, with the direction that the Planning Department staff prepare findings of fact for adoption at their March 17, 1987 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lightburn and carried with the following vote: AYES: Brown, Lightburn, Nierman, Shaw, Watson NAYS: Knowles, Lopez ABSTAIN: Flores, Maudsley, ABSENT: None Prior to the vote being taken, some discussion ensued amongst staff and Comu1ission members. Mr. Anderson suggested the alternative of sending the items back to the Environmental Review Committee for a wind study and preparation of a Capital Improvements Program. - City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 14 Commissioner Lopez stated that he would like to see standards strengthened and made more uniform in the area of high winds, but he stated that, whenever you build in the canyons or foothills you are accepting problems unique to the area and not encountered in the flat lands. Commissioner Lopez stated that he was not in favor of a moratorium, but was in favor of getting better standards. Commissioner Shaw stated that he agreed that development should not proceed until such time as improved development standards are adopted. Commissioner Nierman wanted the word sent out that developers are going to have to do better than the minimum. Attorney Grace indicated that Commission members Flores and Maudsley would be entitled to one vote, either as Planning Commission members or in their near" future status as Council members. Commissioner Maudsley withdrew his motion for denial of Tentative Tract No. 13530. Commis- sioners Flores and Maudsley stepped down and did not participate in action taken on the subject tracts. Commissioner Knowles stated that he did not disagree with testimony presented but concurred with Commissioner Lopez, stating that the State Subdivision Map Act does not address quality control improvements. He stated that he would be in favor of the staff report and would recommend approval of the tracts based upon the fact that issues would be treated separately. Commissioner Watson was concerned about quality control and stated that the developer was not concerned about the quality of work and he would have liked to hear the developer give some testimony that the quality of work would be improved in these proposed developments. Commissioner Lightburn stated that he had not seen anything in this County quite as serious as the situations in the photographs (submitted by resident, Barbara Sky) and stated that he could not support approving any of the tract maps. Commissioner Nierman stated that storm drain needs have not been adequately addressed and he repeated his comments regarding the need for standards for block walls and roofing. Commissioner Nierman was in favor of directing staff to come up with a Capital Improvements Program so that a program can be implemented for major improvements and that an ordinance be prepared providing new standards for flood control, drainage and traffic circulation and that staff work with the Building and Safety Department to develop the ordinance necessary for block walls and fences and the ordinance addressing roofing requirements in the high wind areas. City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87 Page 15 ITEM NO.6, Ward 5 Tentative 1I~ct No. 13530 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres located at the southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a frontage of approximately 961 feet on the west side of Palm Avenue. The applicant requests approval to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-I-IO,800 Single-Family Residential zone. Palm Avenue Investors, owner/applicant. Staff's report, discussion and public comment on this item are noted under Item No.5, Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were consid- ered concurrently because of their location in close proximity to each other. Commissioner Nierman made a motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 13530, with the direction that the Planning Department staff prepare findings of fact for adoption at the March 17, 1987 meeting. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried with the following vote: AYES: Brown, Lightburn, Nierman, Shaw, Watson NAYS: Knowles, Lopez ABSTAIN: Flores, Maudsley ABSENT: None ITEM N9. 7, Ward 5 T~ntative Tract No. 13505 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.6 acres located at the northeast corner of Belmont Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage of approximately 715 feet on the north side of Belmont Avenue and a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the east side of Palm: Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 49 lot subdivision in the R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential zone. Richard Hobgood, owner; Mike Cole, applicant. Staff's report, discussion and public comment on this item were noted under Item No.5, Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were consid- ered concurrently because of their location in close proximity to each other. Commissioner Watson made with the direction that of fact for adoption at se~~nded by Commissioner a motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 13505, the Planning Department staff prepare findings their March 17, 1987 meeting. The motion was Lightburn and carried with the following vote: AYES: Brown, Lightburn, Nierman, Shaw, Watson City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87 Page 7 Commissioner Brown stated that she was concerned because she was in that parking lot twice weekly and there is a problem with parking in the lot and she had to be very careful about leaving children in the area. She noted that cars have been broken into in that parking lot. There was no one present to speak to this item. Mr. Anderson noted four letters of protest received by the Planning Department from Glenn Skinner, of 380 West 23rd Street; Myrna Lunsford, of 372 West 23rd Street; Bernice L. Rirsema, of 372 West 23rd Street; and Cherie Nielsen, of 379 West 23rd Street. Concerns noted in the letters included the current lack of parking, congestion in the area, close proximity to a school, crime and drug dealing currently experienced, late hours, noise, broken glass and trash, numerous police calls and disturbance to the nearby residential area. Deputy City Attorney Grace stated that there was concern about the enforcement of parking agreements, since they are private agreements and the City is not a party and they could be rescinded as soon as the Conditional Use Permit is approved. She further con~ented that the hours of operation of adjacent businesses conflict and there would be no way of ascertaining whether the lease agreements were voided by both parties and no way of notifying leasees of the adjacent, currently vacant spaces. Attorney Grace recommended that leases be recorded and be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney's office. Commissioner Watson made a motion to deny Conditional Use Permit No. 87-6 based upon findings of fact contained in the staff report dated March 17, 1987. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lopez and carried with all but the opposition of Commissioner I,ightburn. ITEM NO._~_~g_~ TentatjY~I9~~ No. 13513 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.2 acres located at the southeast corner of Ohio Avenue and Olive Avenue and having a frontage of approximately 697 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a frontage of approximately 559 feet on the east side of Olive Avenue. The applicant requets approval to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential zone. Donahue and Dorothy Wildman, owners; Robert Sessa and J. F. Davidson, applicants. This item was heard after Item Nos. 6, 7, 8, and 9, at which time the applicant, Mr. Addison, stated that he had just received conditions of approval and needed time to answer questions. Mr. Addison requested a continuance of the item for an unspecified length of time. Mr. Addison also agreed to waive the statutory time requirements for City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87 Page 8 processing of tentative tract maps according to the state Subdivision Map Act. Commissioner Knowles 13513 indefinitely. carried unanimously. made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lopez and IT~M_NQ. 6. Ward 5 ~AtiY~_TIAk~ No. 13307 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 22.7 acres having a frontage of approximately 702 feet on the north side of Irvington Avenue and approximately 695 feet on the south side of Belmont Avenue and being located approximately 720 feet west of the centerline of Palm Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 71 lot subdivision in two phases in the R-l-10,800 Single-Family Residential zone. Mirna-Overland Enterprises, Inc., owner/applicant. Vice-Chairman Shaw indicated that Item Nos. 6, 7 (Tentative Tract No. 13530), 8 (Tentative Tract No. 13505), and 9 (Tentative Tract No. 13572) would be reviewed and discussed at the same time, since all of the tracts are in close proximity to each other. Attorney Grace stated that at the last meeting the Commission took no action on the Negative Declarations for the subject tracts and the Commission should make a motion as to their decision to approve or not to approve them. Mr. Anderson presented comments, stating that staff has a request from the applicant representing the four tracts for a continuance to allow the applicant to present to the Planning Commission a full summary of improvements which the developer intends to provide for that area and speaking to the issues of drainage. bridge crossings and issues of high wind relative to roofing and fencing materials. Attorney Grace stated that in order to take the items off calendar for an indefinite period of time, the applicants would have to waive their rights in regard to the statutory time limits for processing and approval of tract maps as contained in the Subdivision Map Act, California Environmental Quality Act and Permit Streamlining-Act. Commissioner Lopez was in favor of allowing a continuance for 30 days, with the stipulation as specified by Attorney Grace. Commissioner Lopez made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13307 for an indefinite period of time to allow the applicant to prepare a Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont Area for' review and consideration by the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lightburn and carried with all but the opposition of Commissioner Brown. city of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87 Page 9 Prior to the vote being taken, discussion ensued amongst Commission members and staff. In response to comments from Commissioner Nierman, Mr. Anderson stated that the applicant had met with staff and the Councilman of the Ward and the developers indicated that they would provide a bridge crossing and channelization for Cable Creek and would address roofing issues through an actual ordinance amendment and adhere to certain requirements for construction permits for any walls and fences. He noted that the wall issue could be addressed through adoption of standards for all block walls. The issue of roofing materials such as tile roofs and heavier materials and addressing tie downs for tile components would also be reviewed. Mr. Anderson stated that the applicants wish to cooperate in each of the areas. Commissioner Shaw stated that the Commission had asked staff to return with a Capital Improvements Program and had specific questions regarding building standards and answers were not satisfactory. He stated that now the applicant has met with staff and agreed to come up with a more detailed set of programs for evaluation by the Commission and he hoped that the applicant would meet with residents of the area so that they would be aware of the new proposals. Commissioner Nierman noted that the Commission voted to deny the subject projects and had directed staff to prepare findings of fact and he saw no reason for the items to come back before the Commission. Attorney Grace stated that she had advised the Commission that their decision would not be final until adoption of findings of fact and a move to continue the items would mean that the action was not final. Attorney Grace concurred that, in essence, what had been presented was a request for reconsideration. Commissioner Lopez stated that most of the damage noted previously by residents was to new buildings and he was in favor of allowing for a reconsideration of the projects to see if the applicants could show improved quality in the buildings. Commissioner Nierman stated that it sounded like there are definite problems in the area and action was needed by the City to overcome problems. He felt that allowing one developer to come in and say he would do things for his project was putting a band-aid on something that needs a turniquet or major surgery. Commissioner Nierman felt that a continuance, rehearing or reconsideration of the four subject tracts may solve the problems for these tracts, but not for the entire Verdemont Area. Mr. Anderson stated that the intent is to provide a means by which improvements could be made up front and the applicant would like to propose a method by which improvements could be made for the entire area so that they have a coordinated effort. Commissioner Shaw felt that it was productive to have City property owners work together to come up with comprehensive staff and solutions City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87 Page 10 to development problems in that region of the City and if the Commission feels that the solutions are not adequate, the Commission has the discretion to say so. Commissioner Nierman felt a continuance would be productive, if they were going to attempt to resolve improvement problems for the entire area. Mr. Dennis Stafford, applicant representing the four subject tracts, agreed to waive the statutory time limits for processing and approval of tract maps, (as contained in the Subdivision Map Act, CEQA, and Permit Streamlining Act) and stated that they hope to have a reasonable proposal within the next 30 days. Commissioner Shaw stated that the proposal should be well thought out and should include the participation of residents. He did not think 30 days was sufficient time to accomplish that. Commissioner Shaw again stated that he felt it would be productive that residents' of the area have an opportunity to review the proposed plan and participate prior to the next hearing on these items. He stated that, when the program is ready, the Commission would ask that staff notify residents of a workshop prior to consideration of the plan by the Planning Commission. IT~M NO. 7~ Ward 5 TentatiY~__TIA~t No. 13530 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres located at the southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a frontage of approximately 961 feet on the west side of Palm Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-l- 10,800 Single-Family Residential zone. Palm Avenue Investors, owner/applicant. Discussion and comment on this item are noted under Item No.6, Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were considered concurrently because of their location in close proximity to each other. Commissioner Lopez made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13530 indefinitely until such time as the applicant is prepared to present a Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont Area for review and consideration by the Planning Commission. City of San Bernardino Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87 Page 11 ITEM NO.8, Ward 5 T~ntative~A~t No. 13505 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.6 acres located at the northeast corner of Belmont Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage of approximately 715 feet on the north side of Belmont Avenue and a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the east side of Palm Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 49 lot subdivision in the R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential zone. Richard Hobgood, owner; Mike Cole, applicant. Discussion and comment on this item are noted under Item No.6, Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were considered concurrently because of their location in close proximity to each other. Commissioner Lopez made a motion to continue Tentative ~~act No. 13505 indefinitely until such time as the applicant is prepared to present a Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont Area for review and consideration by the Planning Commission. !T~M_NO. 9. Ward 5 TeDtg~ly~~~t No. 13572 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.4 acres located at the southeast corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue. The request is to establish a 48 lot subdivision in the R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential zone. Melvin Harrison, owner/applicant. Discussion and comment on this item are noted under Item No.6, Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were considered concurrently because of their location in close proximity to each other. Commissioner Lopez made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13572 indefinitely until such time as the applicant is prepared to present a Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont Area for review and consideration by the Planning Commission. * * * Commission members discussed Engineering Division approval for projects. Commissioner Shaw stated that the conditions are vague and do not address solutions to engineering issues. He stated that conditions do not nail down solutions to problems that members of the public raise as concerns. Commissioner Shaw also requested that standard requirements be included in Planning Commissioner's packets. conditions of ATTACHMENT lit- PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF SAN BERNARDJNO Initial Study for Environmental Review Tentative Tract No. 13530 Southwest Corner of Ohio and Palm Avenue May 5, 1988 Prepared by: Vivian Stevens Planning Department 300 North nOn Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 (714) 384-5057 Prepared for: Palm Avenue Investors 1438 Dorothea Road La Habra, CA and Me Keever Engineering 647 North Main St. I 2-A Riverside, CA 92501 Section 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.2.1 3.2.2 4.0 4.1 4.2 5.0 6.0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . Proposed Project . . . . . . Project Impacts .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . Location . . . . . .. ...... Site and Project Characteristics. . . . . Existing Conditions ... Project Characteristics . . . . . . . ENVI RONMENTAI. ASSESSMENTS ........ Environmental Setting ........ Environmental Effects .... REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXHIBITS . . Exhibit - A Environmental Impact Checklist ......... . . . . . . . Exhibit - B Site Plan . . . . . . . . Exhibit - C Location Map ., . . . . Page 1-1 2-1 2-1 2-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 3-1 4-1 4-1 4-1,4-2,4-3,4- 5-1 6-1 6-2 6-10 6-11 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report is provided by the City of San Bernardino as an Initial Study for Tentative Tract 13530 for a 45 lot subdivision of 15.1 acres in the R-l-IO,800 Single Family Residential District at the southwest corner of Ohio and Palm Avenues. As stated California Guidelines, to: in Section 15063 of the State of Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) the purposes of an Initial Study are 1. Provide the Lead A~ency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an EIR or a Negative Declaration; 2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared, thereby, enabling the project to qualify for a Negative Declaration; 3. Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is required by: a. Focusing the EIR on the determined to be significant, effects b. Identifying the effects determined not to be significant, c. Explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant. 4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of a project; 5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative Declaration that a project will not have a significant effect on the environment; 6. Eliminate unnecessary EIRS. 7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project. 1-1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530 45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues May 5, 1988 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 Proposed Project The applicant proposes subdivision in the residential zone. The acre parcel located at and Palm Avenues. to establish a 45 lot R-l-lO,800, single-family subject property is a 15.1 the southwest corner of Ohio 2.2 Project Impacts Impacts identified include: in the attached checklist l.a. The cut of 16,000 cubic yards and fill of 12,000 cubic yards. 2.c. The proposal will result in development within a high wind hazard area. 3.a. The proposal could result in a change in the absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces. 3.e. The proposal may result in exposure of people or property to flood hazards. 6.a. The proposal could result in a change in the land use as designated on the General Plan is different that that being proposed. 6.c. The proposal will result in development within "Greenbelt Zone C." 6.d. The proposal could result in development within the high fire hazard zone. 11.5. The proposal could impact the capital improvements program beyond the capability to the city to provide adequate levels of service and require the construction of new facilities. 2-1 . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530 45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues May 5, 1988 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 Location The proposal is located on a 15.1 acre site at the southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue in the Verdemont area. 3.2 Site and Project Characteristics 3.2.1 Existing Conditions The site is vacant and the topography drops approximately 45 feet from north to south at an approximate gradient of five (5) percent. The northernmost portion of the property is approximately 2,000 feet south of the San Andreas Fault Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. 3.2.2 Project Characteristics The proposal is to create a 45 lot single-family subdivision in the R-l-lO,800 single-family residential district. The lot sizes range from 10,800 square feet to 17,120 square feet. Five of the lots are irregularly shaped but comply with the San Bernardino Municipal Code requirements regarding minimum dimensions of irregular lots. All of the lots front on improved streets. Ohio and Palm Avenues provide access to the project. 3-1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530 45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues May 5, 1988 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 4.1 Environmental Setting Ohio Avenue is the northern boundary of this 15.1 acre site and the Palm Avenue is the eastern boundary. The area is relatively flat with about a 45 foot drop from north to south over the 900 foot length of the parcel. The area has been disked. 4.2 Environmental Effects The environmental checklist identifies several areas of potential concern. Each item checked "maybe" or .yes" on the checklist is identified below and followed by a recommended mitigation measure. l.a. Will the proposal (cut and/or fill) more? result in earth movement of 10,000 cubic yards or The Preliminary Environmental Description submitted by the applicant indicates 16,000 cubic yards of cut and 12,000 cubic yards of fill. Slopes will be 2:1. The City Engineering Department will require that a grading bond be posted for any earthwork over 5,000 cubic yards to insure that the work is done in accordance with Section 7014 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. 2.c. Will the proposal result in development within a high wind hazard area? The City requires that new projects located in the high wind area have tile roofs with hurricane clips for wind protection. 3.a. Will the proposal result in a change in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? The Tract is engineered to drain toward the southeast into Palm Avenue. The City Senior Civil Engineer, Mike Grubbs, reviewed the preliminary plans and found the Tract meets the City's preliminary requirements for drainage. 4-1 . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530 45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues May 5, 1988 3.e. will the proposal result in exposure of people or property to flood damage? The property in question is sometimes flooded and as a result a condition of approval of the tract will be that the debris basin in the foothills and the storm drain along Chestnut be developed. The improvements are to be designed and bonded prior to recordation and constructed prior to occupancy. 6.a. Will the proposal result in a change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? The June 11, 1986 letter from the State Office of Planning and Research prevented the City of San Bernardino from accepting or processing any permits north of the Saldecke Sky line. It further released the City from maintaining a complete and adequate general plan. The processing of applications north of the Saldecke Sky line on Single Family lots of 10,800 square feet and larger was allowed by the February 5, 1988 letter from the State vffice of Planning and Research. 6.c. Will the proposal result in development within "Greenbelt Zone C." The proposal is Greenbelt Study. enumerated below. located in Mitigation Zone C of measures the are The project is required and does have two publicly dedicated ingress and egress routes in that both Ohio and Palm are points of entry or exit. In addition the development will be required to have non-combustible and reflective street markers and 3 inch high house numbers that are all visible for 100 feet. The development will be required to provide 6 inch or larger circulating mains and storage capacity sufficient to provide the minimum fire flow duration and hydrant spacing with a residual pressure of 20 4-2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DErnRTMENT INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530 45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues May 5, 1988 pounds per inch. Each hydrant shall be identified with approved blue reflecting street markers. Utilities are to be placed underground. Open ends of tile roofs must be capped with non-ignitable material to prevent bird nests or other combustible material to be located within the roof structure. Vents are to be covered by 1/4 inch corrosion resistant wire mesh, not to exceed 144 square inches. UBC exterior 1 hour fire walls. Chimney spark arrestor, 12 gage wire screen 1/2 inch opening mounted in vertical position visible from ground. Vegetation clearance and modification: 30 feet from structure (some ornamental and ground cover exceptions). No combustible materials on-site until the water is on-site. G.d. Will the proposal will result in development within the high fire hazard zone? The proposal is located within the high fire hazard zone and the mitigation required for the Greenbelt zone C are the same. 11.5. will proposal impact the capital improve- ments program beyond the capability of the City to provide adequate levels of service . and require the construction of new facilities. The City Engineering Department will impose fees, approved by the Common Council, based on their estimate of the future needs of the area. The fees will be for improvements such as storm drainage, park fees and etc. The developer will be required to connect to the City Water and Sewer facilities. At 4-3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530 45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues May 5, 1988 present the water and sewer rights are available. A fee will be imposed to complete the bridge across Palm Avenue. The bridge will be constructed when all monies have been collected. 4-4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530 45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues May 5, 1988 5.0 REFERENCES Mr. Huston T. Carlyle, Jr. Director Office of Planning and Research 1400 Tenth Street Sacramento, California 95814 (Letters of June 11, 1987 and February 5, 1988) Persons contacted: Michael Grubbs, Civil Engineering Association, City Public Works Charles Dunham, Plan Check Engineer, Department of Building and Safety 5-1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530 45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues May 5, 1988 6.0 EXHIBITS Exhibit "A" - Environmental Impact Checklist Exhibit "B" - Site Plan Exhibit "C" - Location Map csj/5-S-88 DOC:MISC ISTT13S30 6-1 J::"An~D~... - n CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACKGRO!lND Application Number: Tentative Tract 13530 Project Description: 45 lot subdivision on 15.1 acre site. Location: Southwest corner of Ohio and Palm Avenues Environmental Constraints Areas: General Plan Designation: N/A zoning Designation: R-I-IO,800 B. ~NVIEQNM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. Ea~~h Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No" Maybe ,",.. :\ a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? X b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15' natural grade? c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? x x d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x PAGE 1 OF 8 REVISED 12/87 VS/csj 6-2 TT 13530 Yes No Maybe e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? x x g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? x x h. Other? 2. bIR_RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial an effect quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? air upon emissions or ambient air x x c. Development within a high wind hazard area? X 3. WbTEB RESOURCES: proposal result in: Will the a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? x b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? X c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? x X x REVISED 12/87 PAGE 2 OF 8 TT 13530 Yes No Maybe 4. BIOLOGICAL R~SOURC~9: proposal result in: Could the a. Change unique, species habitat trees? in the number of any rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of x b. Change unique, species habitat? in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their x x c. Other? 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? x b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? x c. Other? x 6. LAND_ USE: result in: Will the proposal a. A change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? X b. Development within an Airport District? X c. Development within "Greenbelt" Zone A,B, or C? x d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? x e. Other? x REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8 TT 13530 Yes No Maybe 7. MAN-MADE HAE~FP.$: project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? x b. Involve the release hazardous substances? of x c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? x d. Other? x 8. HOUSING: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? x b. Other? x 9. ~RANSFORTATION/CI~CULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? . x b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? x c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? x d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? x e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? x x REVISED 10/87 PAGE 4 OF 8 TT 13530 g. h. Yes No Maybe A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? Other? of x x 10. FUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. b. c. d. e. Fire protection? x police protection? x Schools (i.e. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? x Parks or other recreational facilities? x Medical aid? x f. Solid waste? x 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: g. Other? x a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? x 2. Electricity? x 3. Water? x 4. Sewer? x 5. Other? x b. Result in a pattern of extensions? disjointed utility x c. Require the construction of new facilities? x REVISED 10/87 PAGE 5 OF 8 .. TT 13530 , Yes No Maybe .., 12. AESTHETI~~: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? x b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? x c. Other? x 13. ~P~~U~~--F~~QYRCES: Could the proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? X b. Adverse physical or aesthetic impacts to a prehistoric or historic site, structure or X object? c. Other? X 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. \... a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate REVISED 10/87 ~ PAGE 6 OF 8 TT 13530 Yes No Maybe important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) x x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) x d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF 8 TT 13530 D. DETERMI~b~JQ~ On the basis of this initial study, o The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project ~~y have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. o D ENVI RONMEN'l'AL REV I EW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA I!JiWK.tWMFfN11rt. J(GYlW tlJHM rr~ Name and Title YJit.tW t.R~ Signature Date: AI, ~fJBS REVISED 12/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 Att..dchment "G" \ June 20, 1988 roJ un rs (IU P, n ~.- If. b r ;--., i ' JUN ;'0 P8R Guillermo Gallardo 2950 Ohio Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92407 CITY Pli.,,,. ,. SAN Bbi,jf+;:i" '~:,. C.:' ,'I RE: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13530 TO: Members of the Planning Commission I am unable to attend the public hearing regarding tentative tract No. 13530. I am a (14) year resident directly north of the proposed project residing on t.he northwest corner of Palm and Ohio Avenues. There are several concerns I wish to express and would like read into public record. These are four items which need to be conveyed to the Planning Commission: 1. Located adjacent to my home is a small creek approximately 475 feet from the corner of Palm and Ohio Avenues. During a moderate rain this creek will quickly fill up. The path this stream follows runs through the proposed develooment site. At present, during the summer months, it appears harmless, but when rains occur iL will surely flood the homesites. 2. What precautions will be made regarding dust control during construction? Over the years my family and I have enjoyed a cool northerly breeze in the afternoons. I would hope that a condition be made for the developer to keep the level of dust down during and until the completion of the project. 3. The Santa Ana ~inds, as you know, can be fierce. Over the years the hurricane force winds have done extensive damage to my home and the surrounding area. These winds wlll continue to do extensive damage and there needs to be a consideration of this factor. The homes on Ohio should maybe face away from the wind like the other housing projects along Ohio. . June 20, 1988 Tentative Tract No. 13530 continued. 4. There is a final concern regarding the proposed lot sizes of R-1 10,800 and my property that is zoned R-1 14,400. The transition of a larger lot size should not be between the street, as in this case, along Ohio Avenue. The flow of homes should be in a progressively larger lot size as the project goes north. In this case there. should be homes adjoining Ohio on the south with larger lot sizes so as not to have an obvious visual change of zones from one side of the street to the other. I hope that some of these concerns can be addressed and I look forward to hearing further discussion on the proposed development. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ~~~;/Q~~ Guillermo H. Gallardo " Attacnment "H" ~.~. / 26:> /3B8 -;r;; 7~ ~~.tI&..e'P/NO ~..v,tl/.Jc,; ~#/.sS/d#- //'/ /~frEP 4~ 4/f/ ~/JI,#e~/5 ~A.-,;p ~r'~J~ 17/t!J~ 7Z/ -76'~,4-77t/~ ~ /-g~o "'" '=------ /9.~ /,/ ;':5 c:;:;.;.4,,~n. y ~/b5G.!7" ~:4d ta. "-7 c:/2S 4 ~_;? ~~ ,.z:;- ::> r c-;;;'Al &/2A/ /l/2p/#o ~ ~A .9:2407 714 8BZ 195-1- ---' I' ~A~/a ,,- ,-.,' J r \ . ~ ~ \ :" ~~, ,:' I I (; \ I,' , j ",:. ~ n ,I -' t. J Ii". : "( . ~:: I ~ }; 'J J i..." --' C'::" I'''~,i',;': i!i'~u :.'(,. .. ,d... f SAN tF,I'~f;:::':h.,~:, :;b . 5A~ r542JJAr2.PJIJo R.IvJJJI~tr C;:;MMJ{'5JoJJ : Qt0Af2P/JJ~ --TeJ.-J-rATi JC.TAA~~1 ~"'3E)3V- 'I A(v\ N6-r o>PPO?G"P -r 0 Nf!::vJ )-\ous,,,-)G-' ~ O~'Tl-Je c4~fZ7Af2Y ~ I AM ALL.-. f=Oa. IT, .1-b':>6J E:"r2 r AM oP,?<:?-S G'D -tc-..1 0 ~ e AS P'-t;Je-:.''- ., ~r=- -,rile; 'J12~Gl.--r;:}l~ S\..1-aPl\Jl~'O"J F12DP~Gc;, "D ~BNJD(")N MeV(?;f2s r~Ao w/o ~J-M A..JG'~)()~, ~ yeA..J2., Ac:rO / ~ 1~ csAMG' ~Ol\J) S)ON wA.S ~E:SBt-.JJE"D 'To ~\--\e 'R-A.~tJJ~)('" C-~^^M,~~)(}~J h3i2. A'PP(<OvAl- "-t-JP I VotC.c:;D ,Ml{ QMPL-AJ,J, AT-r\-~ATT'MFA1-~ M C( FJve kA(2re <:. f=>A.{2JI A 1-1..-._ Y ~() (2 DG:~ ~ ~H/c;. I8JTA,JVE T~A~ o)JTtl6" ~~Ac("-,~ & ~., ~ ,., ___~. /'J. I) r"l""? ~ . . _ _ _ 6 , ~ ~ _ _.. \./ --r-~;,............. . ,t-1[:; l_ov-..)ea Pbt2-TID,.) ~FTt~}S T~c\ IS A PG:O, C'A'"TE'P ~ae-t::l ~ Me'1)~;::Z> r<,AP. 'IT~/~ S,f2-6"r;-, c5i\ll5<<;; Mt=:: AC-.:eBSS 10 ~Lfv' AVE;/'Jue, I ~~\j~ ~et:tv\ vSJJ...)(~ --rH is S'Jj2.t~t:?"I ~12- -rH8" P.A~ \ oY~ Y~A1Z.~ 6 rc0C'U '--0 1 ~ V 1 ,E -rt-fE '~\J€1-D~{?-/ ~vJ,J G (2... CJF --n-t)~ j(2..Acr N.Jv ",rtE yc.^~\tJ,~) &- ~MM 1 sS) ON -t'O G~~(;lr-J -'-,tG ..---, .) ---, "j<..) E1J~tJ6t::-j2/~6- ThfA/2..TI\l1~~)J M'rP 7;-11.:7 ~.,-(\J A,-,O(2.}J6,,) ~ CJFFI c~ lC"J C:O)J'F/f2tv\ 'HAT -ntJS 1-$ i~~ED A PevlcA,cD C::;"\f2. 6" 0T A.:N -p -ni A,- CAJ.-, F ot2.,,->, ~ c::\ \.I') ).-.. ~2-;" ~o"GS NO'] kLCJW M.I\I..JP,1,.JMI=:NJ CJt==" ~Plc-A-rt::' D ~-ra.o-Z;::TS; .Hhi ~f2c:i .. S, , 1.- L- 'N tJ ~ t:: . --rt4-E:- 'P8JE::LOPe:(L. ).\1\:$ SvGG~~TeD ,HAT r ~1 VS: uP -THE "J~b ar;=- fJrcY~J25, POAP AND USe '6cL.MONT AVeNV~ WHI et-l - ~o,.JT~ MY Pi2c)'?e'(2JC!. -L cAt-J <?"-JL-'( iv<^~t=: A ~,MfJL-~ cC9MPAf2l ~ON. '-po YOl~ o\.AJ~ -nNo L. - AV'D.>MOt3i \.-~s? WOULD YOl -\..Ut > H -ro ~,V~ I'^ c o,.J G OF -tt t"EM '? C-(OL) COl)t.-D STJl.L- u~~ -rI4G all-is-a o,,-Jc ( -rT-4A, $ r\-oW ..L ~eeL A..'Bou'J -n/Jo A.,cC-B<;;.S 5'Tr2..6E,-s ~ M Y 'P(.2o PG""(2'llJ . r :St==-E No 1<E;;ASON --r~~AT I S \;--\-OUL-P ~CL-J,Jll>L)'S~~ J..Aec(~(2$ 'i2oA'D 5',MPJ-t( r;'12. ,tie &+JEFi, $1= I?2N- T "3E; .3 L) f ./~// //#/ L At ~hment "r" !i: , ~ II', Ii ~ 1;111 d oid z ~~I .... l!Ji I g llill I il i I I, i.' !. iiH , I' , ! rli I," 1..li Ii :~>> i I ~lllit . ~ ~i I: HII,l.ll II!! I, I 'III" I !'~;I~I~~IIII ., /1 -:1 I , j l i_' _ ',J I 'i ",.. \ \ J\ It ,'I '. \ 6-10 C'" ~(~<, ) , ~./ , I, ~ ,I .. If II H ;1 II !IE c i \-__iOi€~Vlll 3~bi.VJ.N;U "". '0 .L . ..-::. =rc- \ . \ , 'r 'I o ;' ; \ \ .' Att .1ment "J" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ AGENDA .., ITEM #: LOCATION CASE TT 13530 7 HEARING DATE _ 10/4/.88 _ ""- .....IIIIl R-1-14,400 R-1-20,OOO ~ ,": 800' 4 R- ~~ .- ~ ~ .. , C _ 1 1 " ~,N "- 1":"00' l:'TACR-tENT E t..> ....\\..... AJ':- ""....~.. '4 I I I j I I I ! , I \---lllUrf -1- - i I . I . I -\ '. - ----.j, _ ; Lo I' r --- i ,..," - ~ ~--,--- ,..c, OV ~l(.,' // --I ---1 " _ n_ h_ i 1--; '{-- , '-- ~___J '-- ~AI'-"I!:~C, rr") _ I --r-- __ ___ I 'e \ ~ \0, &::0 C;,r l..oiC, I IV .:> < .~ J ~ -\ --~ MEI.{H"? k?OAQ CON-.Jk.'lOAol 0' v..)AL"tH.<;', 0.) I'" LD"" tr:ANN. 1W"~ Ie. 1.6or.. \0) I~' Mo/Lt- ~ C! I&,-~) ~) ~~ ~4""'/l.D')Io..'" PIt,,,..c,,,\ 1!EI."""-.l"T ...'~ hRS7' SC'EI'//ltf'/~ ()jC LJe. t/ELtJr::'~E",../7- . '. .. . TTACHMENT F \. ,*.,.' K'l - lO,!CO S,i='. Lo"TS ~A,- F'-'\\J~ 'Dev~~ -_.._~ I -_J '--- ';'~IO =-~~_-_-_==:- -.... -.._.- --- ---- I I I I I I , I I I I II 1.,J ~'l i ~-~~~~ n;---~~~~ __u_ 1- L_ ---. 1:1 ~ -- -.. r ----- I I 1- .. . - - - -- I ; ~-:------ I I - ~ -- , , ~ t I / / / / , , I \ I \ \ " -. I , I I , \ , _1' ... .. I ( I I , , .- -.--- - - . - - -:- - - - - . ~EL..N\ONT S€' ~oA//J 3~EII/~~/() tJt:' LJE(/ELo~r?EIfI'/ c:,. /I//~()V~O 6y ,c;.tANA/~ c: ~"'I'J:.f /.::7# /()-/3'-3"tf --.. .. ..