HomeMy WebLinkAbout31-Planning Department
(.11 -I OF SAN BERNARDI....O -
REQU&.,--.oI r FOR COUNCIL AC\"ON
Michael W. Loehr
From: Interim Director of Planning
bt!~.. ... ~~p.~~l of Planning. Commission
SUU)H't ." ......ve;fof Tentat1ve Tract
1988 NOV ~o. 13~3Cf
~yll 'tir36 Council Meeting of
November 21, 1988, 2: 00 p.
Dept: Planning
Daw: November 4, 1988
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
On October 18, 1988, the Planning Commission, by a 5 to 0 vote
conditionally approved Tentative Tract No. 13530.
There has been no previous Council action.
Recommended motion:
That the hearing be closed; that the Mayor and Council deny the appeal
and approve Tentative Tract No. 13530, subject to the Findings of Fact,
Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the
October 4, 1988 staff report; and, that the Mayor and Council adopt a
Negative Declaration for the project (original staff recommendation and
Planning Commission action) .
or
That the hearing be closed; that the Mayor and Council approve the
appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 13530 subject to the Findings of
Fact, Conditions of Approval, including that Meyers Road access to
Mr. Walters property be provided by a temporary cul-de-sac abutting his
property, and Standard Requirements contained in the October 4, 1988
staff report; and that the Mayor and Council adopt a Negative Declaration
for the project.
/rnJ~iJ
Michael W. Loehr
Michael W. Loehr
Phone: 384-5057
Contact person:
Supporting data attached:
Staff Report
Ward:
5
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
n/a
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Descriotion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No.
3/
en _f OF S~N BERNARDI~_~ - REQUEl.~. FOR COUNCIL ACt .."'N
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of
Tentative Tract No. 13530
Mayor and Council Meeting of November 21, 1988
Bf;QYESI
The neighboring land owner, Mr. Alan Walters, is appealing the
Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract No. 13530 and the
deletion of the requirement to provide access to his property by
an improved public street (Meyers Road). He is requesting that the
Mayor and Council reconsider the approved conditions of the tract,
and that the Meyers Road access to his property be required as a
condition of approval.
~AQKUBQY~~_A~~_A~A1YSlS
Tentative Tract No. 13530 is a 45 lot subdivision in the R-1-10,800
Single-Fami ly Suburban Residential land use designation. The
property is a 15.1 acre site located at the southwest corner of
Ohio and Palm Avenues in the Verdemont Area.
Vehicular access is proposed to be provided by three, 50 foot wide
publicly dedicated roads which extend from Palm and Ohio Avenues.
One of these roads is Meyers Road, which is a right-of-way that was
dedicated to the Ci ty in 1972. However, at that time it was
assumed that 7,200 square foot lots would be developed, and the
alignment of the road was based on lots being around 120 feet deep
by 60 feet wide. The Interim Policy Document and Preferred Land
Use Alternative now require that the minimum lot size by 10,800
square feet.
There are two scenarios of development concerning the Tentative
Tract in relation to Mr. Walter's property. The first scenario is
a development of the tract that plans for a continuous connection
of Meyers Road through Mr. Walter's property that turns and
proceeds south to Belmont Avenue (see Attachment E). The second
scenar i 0 is a deve I opment of the tract that does not provide a
connection of Meyers Road to Mr. Walter's property, but would allow
a cul-de-sac development wi th access from Belmont Avenue (see
At tachment F).
The Planning Commission originally considered the first scenario,
but the final approval action of the Commission was to approve the
second scenario of development. (The Planning Commission vote was
5 to 0 on October 18, 1988.) This approval did not vacate the
appropriate sections of the original Meyers Road right-of-way.
This would be a subsequent action of the Mayor and Council after
the appropriate vacation procedures were applied for by the
developer. Mr. Walters' appeal letter objects to the vacation, but
a vacation has not occurred. However, by approving the tract in
the configuration of scenario #2, the City is informally indicating
a predisposition for vacating portions of Meyers Road. Thus, now
75-0264
AGREEMENT
I, Michael Cole, hereby agree to the following terms and conditions
in relation to the realignment of Meyers Road in conjunction with
the construction of Tract No. 13530.
1. The realignment will not exceed a 20.00 foot offset.
from its current position at the westerly boundry of
Tract No. 13530.
2. At the construction stage of development a sewer lateral
will be constructed in Meyers Road to the westerly boundry
of Tract No. 13530.
3. At the construction stage of development, the existing
fence and gate will be relocated, and the existing dirt
driveway will be regraded to allow future access to the
Walters Parcel from the westerly end of future Meyers.
Road.. Yl{f :~~~'-ge
I, Alan Walters, in return for the.. a. b~ ve condi.tiOZ.S' . reby
withdraw my appeal of Tentative Tr~ No. 13530.
.>;./ .... 1/~2/-&frS
. ( / {' t" t f ( .~../c1 (..&.d_~ - :;
'Alan Walters Date
\.....
3/
Appeal of Planning Commiss~~n Approval of _.T. No. 13530
Mayor and Council Meeting of November 21, 1988
Page 3
is an appropriate time to decide on this matter.
Mr. Walters' objections to the vacation are as follows:
Mr. Walters' has been using the access to his
Christmas tree form for almost eleven years.
A sewer line extends to his property along the
road and he wants to be able to tap into it in
the future.
The preferred safety aspects of two means of
ingress and egress to his property.
His Christmas tree farm business is seasonal
and would not impact the residential
neighborhood.
His only means of access at the present is
Meyers Road and if it was vacated, he would
have to deve 1 op an access of f of Be Imont Avenue
at considerable expense.
State law protects this access for him.
The trade-off is the loss of one lot in the
development for continued access to his
property, which he feels is not an unbearable
loss to the developer.
The facts relating to Mr. Walters' objections are as follows:
Mr. Walters is accessing
Meyers Road right-of-way.
readily verifiable.
his property from
Time of use is not
An eight-inch sewer line extends for 655 feet
from Palm Avenue along the Meyers Road right-
of-way. Thi s 1 ine does not extend to Mr.
Walters' property, however. Also, preliminary
indications from the Public Works Department
are that this sewer line would probably not be
usable for lots developed on Mr. Walters'
property due to elevation problems. A line
would have to be built from Belmont Avenue.
The Code allows cu I-de-sac 1 engths of up to 500
feet. A cul-de-sac of that length would allow
full development of Mr. Walters' property. A
cul-de-sac of 500 feet or less is considered
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of T.T. No. 13530
Mayor and Council Meeting of November 21, 1988
Page 4
to meet the intent of having two means of
ingress and egress.
A Chr i stmas tree farm is cons idered to be
seasonal, but the sale of trees is usually
longer than the three weeks as indicated by Mr.
Walters. Also, there is traffic generated by
the maintenance of the tree farm year-round.
As can be seen f rom the aer i a 1 photo dated
December 20, 1987 (At tachment G), there is a
maintenance road around Mr. Walters' property
on the south where access could readi ly be
provided off of Belmont Avenue.
The City Attorney's office is investigating the
compensation issue for a vacation of access.
The cases cited by Mr. Walters do not indicate
the circumstances pertaining to the judgements.
Mr. Wal ters wi 11 have publ ic access to his
property from Belmont Avenue in ei ther scenario
of development.
Mr. Walters correctly identifies the trade-off
for the developer as a on-lot loss if Meyers
Road is built as a through road. However, the
cost to Mr. Walters is a loss of one lot on his
land, the extra cost of building additional
1 ength of road, the cost of re-working the
necessary temporary cul-de-sac at the end of
Meyers Road in Tentative Tract No. 13530, and
an increase in traffic due to a through road
for his development.
The Planning staff feels that the most appropriate access to the
Christmas tree farm should be from Belmont Avenue and not through
a residential subdivision. A temporary cul-de-sac at the dead end
of Meyers Road shou 1 d be requ ired if access to Mr. Wa I ters '
property is approved. Finally, based on the City Attorney's input,
the compensation issue of a possible vacation would have a bearing
on the Mayor and Council's decision on this appeal.
QfIIQHS_AYAILADLE_IQ_IHE_MAYQB_AND_QQ~NQIL
That the hearing by closed; that the Mayor and Council deny the
appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 13530 subject to the
Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements
contained in the October 4, 1988 staff report; and, that the Mayor
and Council adopt a Negative Declaration for the project.
(Original staff recommendation and Planning Commission action.)
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of T.T. No. 13530
Mayor and Council Meeting of November 21, 1988
Page 5
or
That the hearing be closed: that the Mayor and Council approve the
appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 13530 subject to the
Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval, including that access to
Mr. Walters' property be provided by a temporary cul-de-sac
abutting his property, and Standard Requirements contained in the
October 4, 1988 staff report; and that the Mayor and Council adopt
a Negative Declaration for the project.
BE~QMMEl!DAIIQN
If the City would be required to provide any type of compensation
to Mr. Walters for a possible vacation of a portion of Meyers Road,
it is recommended that the second motion be adopted by the Mayor
and Council. However, if compensation is not required, then the
first motion is recommended because that motion would be an effort
to mitigate potential land use conflicts between the residential
neighborhood and the Christmas tree farm.
Prepared by:
Attachments:
mk f 1 11 4 / 8 8
C:\WP50\TT13530
John Montgomery. AlCP, Principal Planner
for Michael W. Loehr, Interim Director of Planning
A
Letter of Appeal to Mayor
and Council
Statement of Official
PI anning Commi ss ion Act ion
Minutes of the 8/16/88
Planning Commission
Meeting
October 4, 1988 Staf f
Report
First Scenario Map
Second Scenario Map
Aerial Photograph
B
C
D
E
F
G
... "'TACHMENT B
city of San Bernardino
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
PROJEC'J'
Number:
Tentative Tract No. 13530
Applicant:
ACTION
Dennis Stafford, McKeever Engineering
Meeting Date: October 18, 1988
X Approved Adoption of Negative Declaration and
Request subject to the following Findings of
Fact and Conditions and Standard Requirements
(Attachment A) .
Denied.
Other.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. All lots created meet or exceed the minimum lot
requirements of Title 19, zoning Code, and also meet the
requirements of Title 18, Subdivisions, of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code.
2. No lot created is less than the minimum dimension
required by Code.
3. The size and shape of each lot meets the design
requirements of the Planning Department in that adequate
area is provided on each lot to accommodate a residence
with accessory structures and meet the setback
requirements of the zone.
4. All lots created abut on dedicated streets as required
by Code. Circulation in the general area will be
enhanced by improvements to Palm Avenue and Ohio Avenue.
5. The subdivision is not being made contrary to the
provisions of Title 18 of the San Bernardino Municipal
Code nor the California Map Act.
6. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirements of
the Department of Public Works for street improvements.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
This project was approved subject to the conditions and
standard requirements contained in Attachment A.
't f ( ,
C1 Y 0 San Berna__1no
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Tentative Tract No. 13530
Page 2
Y2n
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
Corona, Nierman, Lindseth, Lopez, Sharp
None
None
Brown, Cole, Gomez, Stone
I, hereby, certify that this Statement of Official Action
accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning
Commission of the City of San Bernardino.
!};1 / ,if tu.tL
Signature
/
/~h~~f
Date
Michael W. Loehr, Interim Director of Planning
Name and Title
/mkf
PCAGENDA:
PCACTION
..
r-'l'ACHMENT A
G'C"T, // /;788
./
--.-:/ v
c;:ry ~u-c/C/L.
-1// Z43~'#8E.Q /:J7B f Pur26//'.45EP
./
~I J/.l3' /JC4E Lcrr oAl ilo.L-41e:'J,A./T AI/G/.h.JG.
/l
f ;P'.?--A,U"7"23p G~4~ 0.d~5 rt/JP 7#E",u
C7/d/~r~.4? -r~:5.
/&;JYE/.J~.> ~O 1.;::D~/J~PEp
-///JS ~.L-L-<:/w/,d? .L..~r7~ 75 7#c
&7/ fi/~/,vZ;-DZ:., /1/7 :5".c:F;U'l144etJ}:5
~dL3" 7~ 5#,#;;7 7'CjD4y,
\.
/-,' . , 6..- , ~I ~ '''/ , 0
. ;(Er~4EA/Cc . 4
ff.EY/ER'S &#P ~ &~ ~E
~y/ hrVdc ~4.c.6'""r ;tC,4';~
ti/~
. ?gj;u/ r4 Y/Z;lJZ: #dP &//ttL-F /1-&Op
--7&-"J7'd-7/y'~ -r~4-c7 135'30 a/4-55v#4//7rEz,
-;r~ -:;r,//&" ~dA.l.d/ ~? C;;; 4";'/ ~ 5/ iJ #, 47 7/IA
//~E,.> I S7/f7E"P ~y O~~C7/CJN-ro
-rrlE .f?;2oPO;:5&fl 44=t/F.4'.5 ~4.2J Sr/r~/
V,.4c-47'/o.J - ,4cce;:-ss ~/v /H'j' ;::/ao~~
U>>UL.,-p ,1(10 L-od(y:E~ 5E ~55/~b IF'
/~477~ --r~/J,cr /3530 t:-<.J~;; ~~~kbtl~.tJ
~> PR~t::d#1 -Y;/eA.l 177k 4-I~/2~rCJ/2/tI/W
C;-/1~~ t9L.O~&- /J/t/z;:;' /~/;4"7'/vG-r~
/5530 W45 ;I.EL-p uP UA//JL "/1/1;5 tj.cAR,
:t:/.J /57& /' I 70~ -Trk" ~i/EZo~/Z
"71/.47 1" o~Pa:5Cb #/::5 -rflZ4-cr e)J~i
CJ,U 7;/E 44~/~ -r;/4T r cU/'&.5 :88/;J?
~)J/Ep --;/,dE 57/ZeE/' --r1/4T f IIAP
7323~~ c/>/P&- ~r.2 i~A{25.
#~~d-5 6/117 8&'J2<Je-a! G.M1 ~ut
.-- /~ \ ./
4,dp .fij/ ~40rz;.;e!:-7Z/ tX/J9:5 7.JGP/C4"J2;D
A~O AJcc::-.e-;t?~p t15y /"8E' 07 /.d
JUN~ /972 ~
. /17 7#..k ~Vc- .{/~7 /tS / /.aE3 h/.-v"u/,de:.-
C::;44',.#/-55/CJ,d ~8?>>P~ -$& /~/1C/
~1/&.u:Jrc-,z 57'ff7ED (:;A/C/P~.?.L-y.
~/'"-rZ7~ -:r4/<?-U&;P,d CJA-d a~ r,bA/fi5/f)
/"//4/ 4c:l~~s ~,,4p ~ou.J-/J ~!" 13E:.
V;4 c;A-rc..p ·
d///&;J :Z~7/Z'#/7fP 7D VOJQ3 41i
c:?8LT~c.;.7io,J -ro ;77 5/~E~r v,4c.~7/CJJJ
/~ C4/~/>5/0,J Q,4//&~"&Al <::::::?UT #IE"
G:JFP g pi 5'/,4'7/ P'&- ScJ4/z;?/#/ pC;- 7'b
-7~ z=-P.p-Ec./ ,I U(HA-r .41CJ~ ~ j?!!
. W~ -- y!?UV~ &CT/ 7~{/r,2 5~4Ec0 /)
f v..</o?/2S7AAlz::;:;' Ill/Jr 7'&~ IS A)J
~PICJ 7/9~E' /~.v5c~JP/ of 77&'/
/-/.e2?77,.J~ -V/-/dT c:::::'-d,J :85 ~/F1e-p,
.-r-rU/&.5 Pz=?re-~4//~p. -/#4r ~
~vE"L-of?E~ u/C/U,L-p R~/u~d ~/ ~
;5'J85'~qJUEd7 a~~/ :Ss/o~ .41~Z3'7/P?-
','.
u//7# c:::;?/~8cr.EP ~~AJ5 7/1~::T aJtJt!LZ
tR$?/'A/.J 41:e,/~5 k?-4.D p=Z2g# ~
/P5,vVE -/2;; .411 ~/P..a~
'lfrAJ c;:.~~ 7//E h-J/. ;tJ/.db- G?#tI1/5:5/_)}
.-#~7/~? CJ,V dCJT&.l3'f/Z- /8/ )<7~'8. ,
~ ~Jg.L/c; ~o,,#~.z;:-/</7.5" t-d&'"~
~e~4IJ7'/e1JiJ ~~ ~:aev2?~~/2 //~Z/
--
Rc:::=~v$#/ rTEp -rPJ/4n Vb --r#Ac;; /3530
4.:5 ~d/?/##~.L-:I ;P/2g.~,J.::> u~,47/,v?
#5~$~~ ~&;D. 'i.r/e ;:;;~,1~.th;&
pdl1 IZ-r 41 c.d/ (VI VI ,4,.J ;:5'7EVz;rN~ :5'71J713'1.
uJ~ ~;I W/V7/E.-J 08;;r~7Jo~5 sl;bt/i.
g;G /6-A/IJ/2B'P, /~ ~"d~/,()t?C?#44/~9t!
ftcc::.z?r:7:#o/~ -r;e:/1C/'. ff,/lo 7?.#~
J1.c:/~/2- /1-/ -r//$ ~tP-U>7 /b ~".rZ t9.:r
/7~ O~/ZJ86n- /8 4/~:z;?"//'#c?5 ~4>.I
"/
d~u/fP .-/~ 574723' VC'd-8A.LhY UJ#"j/
l' UJ/5;/cP ~ ~6''/4/~ ~d:y~5 ~.P. .
///~/ /:5 tU///y' r ~ t1//g-#~/--tJ?
F' :7~ &7 c:;;d.vCIL-. P /9-LL
;e;;/~~.&-~~"y Ar4s'E c::i:Y'u5'.JPE/2 /1"11
CJ;?J'?c'7?o~5 /ZJ /1-//5 57d$Er' VAc.1l1o)
/~ J /!dJ/'r 13~~p U5J;:J{y -1"11/:> 5/~PT
~/2. #CJ~ /#~A,/ // 9'c/14~,
;?, -7~4$ ./5 /1 523p</E"E ~/#E oAJ.
Mcrj.f45 ~,4p 7##/' E"x:7Z?#'Z?5 ;<?/tf-//r-
UP "/0 #7 GA/:C, ?O;/E~ r 23U/LP
/l Jvh.#E? I C/'P/C.J pE /tU7V /7,
3. ~ c/rz;! H/Zc ~d~5//4LL 0747E"p
"/2:> .#23 /l/4r /F 41f .,/-or cd8d,?
S'Ug'PI VI J?G'v A GUi, - Vc-.5;4c : vVo i/Lp
;/
J3E L.z:.::-G4L ?ur t4 5ccoAlP k:3,4,D
f#/"d./!)./tCE t-OOUL-z:;; 73~ P~&FE/2/2l?P
~/Z :5~p-?/ Y /,-(J C45i3 eF FJI2F, /#&"
r3-.~~P/;/? ~/11/~~/o,A) t.t./t?A//S -:7D S'#U7'
cYrf-"'- /7-1/5 0r4L 5L?"CONP 4CLE<5"S, ~
r#!j /p;::;c~ KJ/otY/t/? FUI-L ~b2L.
-rr//Jr I ~~w ~/&/S/414-5 /4~L=<;;.
.4. --?/IF: /::2.~.dft/db ;o8/ql~7-#;g~ //--#p
S-//l~p /'//4/ //;::/1//1 ~/prFic tmcJL-P
$~ G;):?,JJE /2A7JEO CJ#.AZ;;Y?~5 ~#-,D
/p-tUD ~ / ~.#t7A// ~"dtJE a<JtJ,i-;D
~5 ~;!3P//E"/Z 5U/7cP, ilJII4T /5 ~
pJ?rE~pdc&" uJ;/4-T 5/~Er /~~
5
~
'7
.. -r~drA,-" IS 0/'</ -~. S/P&;;~ /T /<
CJ#.I- jI ~ d-- 711'~Z;= W..6EJ:C. 5 O~ <:E.
7;-h3- 7/.234/2. 7;14/ f 5&'~ -r,(2&e5,
1p:::: ~.P/f/25 ~/JP /5 vA-CA7C~
/'
1" VU/L-L $E ~~CEP 70 c::q/o~ PO~
P0713",uS CJF yoc.J~&-- /;e'..c:'"F5 ,4'</.0 4-Iav
,4/",,9/A-J a/4~/2- L/~s -ro #CCO#4/0P#/
A ~ PtI Z;A//.4-/J"ucE' m{)41 !b.,#d4 AV.G",vl
I~,4IEcjEpZ5 ;:2;/lp 15 VA-C::,47cP :x
UJ/~j... :LOSE"".4 5~4c'~5-
-77-~ -v-~VZ;;;-L-O~R' 0;::::7 rz5<.!//l-7/t/g-r,:2Ac'j
?U/~L G.z=/ C7Nc APv)/!oJJ/l.L- L.~/
/p #/~ Su8 VI VIS/C)N.
Sr/l-rr--- ~da/ 5~:5 --r//~r 4 Pu8L/c:::.
5-r~;E#-r ..;EVeN alHE/J $E/;/u U5&P
.?
13</ ~ 5/,.Jt?LE" ;7,.:20n-.a-77j ov/~/2::>
~/J~C/-r :5~ VA-C!A-7E.z;::::> ~//dour
JU<57 c::2.#W,Js-/J7/~,J, jtI~ .5;{6U.L-P '7~
dry -r-~.k'E /9aJ~ /'1 57.R?EE77//47
f uSC" ..50 -7##7 ~ :t:7Z=/E'".LL;;R?tf2
~4N h'4t/E C/,.JZ? ,41?J/Zc~r /;1/ /1/.5
?
5d15P/Vls/cJ)J,
.~ ~ ~ .7~.u"a ,tie::- z:b-/,,-e7 $5>>7' :5':r47~1D
///#:r ~-y~:;; 4/Jp wt%- cJ~6/p,4L.L-Y
:5//u4-.~p /D 5421/E 7.200 51'u/J4E
-;007 L.o7s ~~P pot-</ /'3 86CJ S-9U/1~
~7" LoT-5 ,4/Z-5 ~U//2gp;) /pf>>-'1/,d6
-T-d'/l/ // /5 ~27c~S:5/j/&Y 7ZJ ]/1lc4/E
-7'///> 'S-:r,4:GET; c:;l~A'~N.L-r 7Hb
S-/~E?T C/1~ :73c AtcJ~P ~ -i0L-ALL-
-7// /.5 ~c::pu//2b~r /1)/17 5'7/~L
,
C::OV77//,uE ;:/0 4:D\/o/,V /PIJfi20~
-
~C:;..t:-o~&P 4~ /ZOo dld;::?.s 7//47 P/'G&E
2?d/lwAJ /3}/ 7/~ ~vc~opg-r< ~ J.b/2::=
-;/;/~r #fr<j~> ~~p qAl ;BE"
-
;?&f/J/pZ?"P FOa /MY ~,u7/.dUgD U.55,
~50 pc> pC /7-1,17 oz::- ,#;Et:j;=:/25 ~4P
/s'. 1/Ac4-~~ /I-/z? ~V~~Pi;;?/2 6~//J5
q)J~.' ffPPI7/o~AL LOT ~I
aJ6UL-'P "/,,4/> S:E F;41/2 ~ )10 1'/ uJOCJJ-..l-
...)
jJo7 3:3? F;1/i2 ~
;fdE I'l SE CC:J4s / 27c/'Z /-9-L-.L ,,# Y'
c:J8.:JEc:::7/o#:> -rz:; -r#/-S ,Pdo//o5cD
5/~g.z=:-/ VA-C/l-//oN~ -L' tv/$"# /~E
~vF..?C)~/Z -:70 #Aj/~ U/~'/ /5
R/&I-f7'FUI-L-tj ;'//S,
--.z- ~ /'//#r 5/0U uI/..LL
/'l2t::5e:~t/E UJ#~r /5 /?;t?/-1/~UI-L-Y
/W J ~,
4tJs'3 ~ 5,
Sf\tJ ~gJ2.jJAJ2PJ(Q6
J;: ,
~ h'l'
~ i!ill
g g~11
lIe'!
t; Is~'
~ ii!~
/1
EI
i II i i
II i I
J, i II
I Ii I Ii
~ n' I I!
! I:: I i 'iiii
I ., ! i Jill!
,: ~j~ ! i!j,i1i1il
il,E q ! !
i. sEI i E I .1 i
_II!! ,f I "':1-
i !, :;' ,I ~ ! lid
\' , \
: \;\h~;!; ;.~~.; i~" ~'i .~~ i. .
\.! "'i ill :In
!!~ ~l.
"'e I
, 2ij
, ., . ,f
\ .. .
\ Ill, !!l i .
. ) f \
,
'-,'l .
i' .. I
lL'1 -J
I
\ .-
_,J 1:1
\
i
I
\ I
.-
I ,
" .1
.I -'
'ri
II Ish
.; .,
:IE .
c
"
~
l ,.1
~ " (
, I
,,\,, "
"-
o
,
-
lO
t\I
~
<3
20
'- 0
b..
Ci~
C..
..'U
00
aJu
c..o
~ti!,.;
.ci
::s
U)
d
U
~
cu
-
~
CO~
"tJ~
CCft
..9C1:
c:
.E
o
.c::
~
-
~
c.:.
.--------.
~
~
4:
,/ -'J'~
~. .~ <: ~
/ ~;I '.L
. ~ . ,
-. -~-;...P'1 ")t 1_ .-- ._..._-~. 1'f1tIi. . " __
;.. . , -' ~~ 2C.!-.:. _05,-. ---:::-:. -:':":"l.-
: Ir;---- ....~---~---;-- [--~------J---~)~I
II Ii; ~ - ~~ I Q I .. e '" ~
:J, <' <;', ~ I 'i t ;)
I ~~ ~ : ~:~. \ L e {~
I ~ '\ ~ G;) .. ~: .. 'i)'" ~ ciJ-1
\ k~ .. ~~.". el ~ r '" \ r:~ I
I ,\;, - <::: ' I
~~ I e\ I
I ~ -..so ,
'.1 -..~.. J
. ~ --
I
1
I
I
1
I
1
I
III
I
-] rr-!"'''A' l
I I
1 I
1 I
1 ~~G I
....
I I
1 I
: ;
L-______J
-.
I
.,...S' I
e ~\~ J
...c>
~:
"\
...~@
~
.__t_
ol.
(;) '!'.
Co
.
r--
1
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
L__
--, r
I I
I I
If:
..
I .f ..
I I
I I t;\"'~
11\::1"
I I
I I
__, L___
~e
"'~
@
.---------.--- ---
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
01
'" 1
o ,
I I"'
,..1
I
-. -l---Jo,'/]".1
.11
e ~ -
h
wi
r"
-- ----------1
I
I
I
I
I
'l..e I
~ I
I
I~
Iii
<
I~
IQ
G~
~
..
.....
@
I
I
I
I
I i
..J- !
-- I ~
lr.."L~H~-.-i-.~
-; ~r ",
~ !
f' .1-
wn;f.'.:";':.., .!.. \-:_
---~ r
f c'
, .:
. .
1= ,
to: " .. -~..
tI: ........ .....
,,-;-...
. ........-
" .
-.!..:"..=::..:: -
~
C
~':t
0<3
C\,...,
o '=' c
~~'~
...._ 2
~ to ~
=~C\
o.>oc
"'gc
<Q~
3..
ca~
..'!t
uu
S ,$I
0" ~
~ 9' f'
="
!~
~& ~
~~ .
2: t
t
,
fD ,
"-
~ f
~
ca.:.
0
,.,
~
0
:c
"
0
:a
-
..
'"
l
~f
!!.
"
~
. of' . .. &. ". :. ... c . ~ . 2 . .. ~ .
. - t" ~.. ~:5-=-=-=; 0'- ~~ t1i'~':.JtJ
:':_ ;_-~-~'_~_', =_~..~_' ~_:_'" ~":;='_' ~'~i-:; i h n ~; ~ :'~ ~ ~,~; : ~
:... - -. & .! : - . M ;. ! i: .:: ~ ~.! Q s ~
: =-g'; t t-E. ::.51i'P. to!~ .
~H-i~i:.' :~;;:;~:t~:~:~'i~~
, -~ .c~,::! .:!a~_~wl.J:~'.~'::?!:":'"':"
~.:i':.j ~::.:. : =.~~ ~: 04~ ,.:i:"i': i.!~
.~~ ~ ~ ~O ~ .! :i'O-~:!:.. ~a.. ~ III:! :-.:
:. _ _ ..~ :: 1,1 " _ Q... ~ ~ .' a ~~.
'0; t . 'I i:"'t; ... "-='~1- lot ~ t- 0"'::'. ~..::3
l::;~~r H:~tH~~i~;~;;~
~.- ~ K":': ,i: : CI -! 5!...;-= J6 2 ~"S : :f:
.::. -= ~ t ~ ,t.::: .. !,. :i t ':: -= = ~ ;;; Q,:; : . "; 1-
J: ~ ~ t j; :~-: ~; ::'~!l 0 !"'f g ~ ~ ! . e <"
- ..: - _.. - ~ ~... ~. . D 0 _ _ ... = ..._
~-,---
~~ ~ ~i~ j'Oj: ~i
i .;i !~!~ E~it~
-: :~~ ~ :':.~ -::-g~i
i [~~~ i~ g~ii~
! O~~.~!::= .~..c't<
:: =-::~:t -::a~;~:';
g":;..:!:~~ ~~:.:.~
c ;; x ... ~'i ~ c: 0 0 g ~
~j ~j . ~':a 5;"=n
o~'~2::: !t-sa;;
~~i!~'Q, f;!t!::':
..; r.-r.....~t2. ~ t:.SEo:
::::i.! i.A.~ .!!..:: e::
;1~*:'i
o 1IJ.,:;a
i\~~"'~~
5'i5.8..!::~~
: lSee'eg
. 2.",E~"'.
. t= -:: :~;;!
1 t =..ii''':';~--:
i 'I -: ~ i .: -:5
.. :.-.; Eli :8..:
c. ~g=o~~i:!
-: -..AI......
: ~"S1 ;~;~
. .. ClO It:!
~ -=1 ~ "'i"'~
- ~..:...:: .,
r."'~~=1~
~.sit::~:::
2
.." . . ..
:': ~1.:
p~.~!
IS - ~. ~
o ~ ,~ ;.: 2... ~ ~:=
Q_~6'O ::I~.,;
~ t E~ !:~.;'c; =~
o'&E-?=..: =;:.t;"
~_.::~~ j~~':~.
& ...."'-= -- ... -
,.. l: Coo :oJ c::;; . 0-0 '" j""
,ec;Q~& =-"Qa ec
- " 0 ,!: :c :: \ t ~ · 0
_,2-f"Ez c:......_~
0-:&;"=:'= e :.0:..;
-gg;.: =.;~g~
..:::.:~.:: ~ i_- a'=i5~
.~~~.:..:::J:.::! .
.,~;a='oi:p~o:a:
i: ~-=.,;"i "\,,. C;~'ii
.... ~ 0 " ~ 0 \0 " .. 0 ..
p...:. .~'G 1 ;Q &~IQ
t
II e~"o~
It....:..
l! o~~.
...w .
" w -
!iti~
~ ~.:l .' ~
a Co ....._
.. "... _.-
o _,~ i~'
... ti e .
t.. ..._
!..] -0;
11 :~e
-<"'jjg~
.s. .C,.)fC
,';
i
~
;i&
:;. ~
: :..::;
:..
::':~
.<I.
~ ~ ~
, ;,C:
&
Cf
...
,,-
~i5i~
-,,-
. C 4'i: ..
.:i'~!; ~;
.~ ~=~
i:~......(
~ ~ ~~J
~~~~
~ c =c
1!~~
:i_ .:,,,:
,.~!~:
e;: .."
(,I . . . .... - .
~~lt:~.s:~
Q.=~.."i:=aa;
..,_.::-:2~iJ_.
:~sg~~=tCJ
. .~.';:AIl")
:S;;-!O"EZ=
- .&-=.0-
! .::-... A__C,tl
'II .a C'.sa: ~15
: l'oao.g"'i:_
:~!.t;J!g:.! .
:1Io.&~=p~C;;
. II - ; ;: .' ~ -;;. ~
.'~~.':o-"".,c1
:: g~]i...g]:~
~E.iI-~. .0
~ ::t;.=ti1~~
~ ()i~.!~.ilQie
~-...
~e-!
s... ..~~
=E ~
~~;a:~
2.~-='1
· 0"- CJ
o:ir.a~
U ":
" ....
~ ;.g-
-= S 0.-0
~";.~:!
.=.!lt~
~.:~...
"~~i
~ g..-
.0_
.. a~ tg-=~
CI: .. _11'"
::~e';gi
=E.~c..a'*
-g"~2!.&::'
!:ia'aZ~
. e,J...a:!
tc~l~:GG
&.~~c~':ti
2Aj...SA'S..
a....oe.!"='
_;aCO-!:t;;i"'1
o"f."3_l:::i:1
..._...G..l:(,ICClQ
...... t e'!:a ~
et -::if~
o 0'''-:: 0.0
!iE:;;::l
f; .. 4.1 t "C ~~
.oS;: :-fQ.
......c....,..... . . .
a-=~ t.g o-r,'fe
&.!l" ~.! ijl.!.!
D_.~-:6_ ..:;
:fot · & ;~C) .
':'1:;: ~- & "_If)
]....~.E:;.a:o:
.~-=.,g"=-!-=Q~
::~.s-;_:o;u
i:;'f~'c~t:::~R
e..& ",i:&~ ..
~~ ~ !'~:a 2 E'O;)
-;-=:;A: "'=! ~
..;g:.!S:e"5c.
.,.....-e ..-0...
Eio5]::i:i~~
a~ i ~.-i 8.,2~:;
<.g. ]'S'= a.:!
A.a.!I...._.~_
R .;..~
:e_
.. "'t-
;::.,Ot
,,-
....-
~~~
w......
....-
~"'.c
w.w
---
.!!!:=
:-.,:
~A'":)
~:~i
-aw..
:'E!..:
::li\:u
:~ ~
C.,i ~....:
:.i
- . .,
.::cz:
...::~.
~ .,-
.: &:
:-!
,,_ w
]~'i
:~i:;i
- -- .
0..0
.. & fl:;
~ . &-
-'9 ~:I
4.."': CoI",
.....a...
c~--
~ ~= t
- - . - .~.: ii o;j
~ .:. i:":'... ~ & a:
.
..
..
~ =: ~ ~~lo !.~i:-;~
Jl Q.,! -. Q",:, ...!:i"'"
=,:1 ::t _ ..; i ..CI 2 ~ ~
. .t i . ~ ! . A := :.: ,.~
] ~ t -! .! ; ~ .~]:.i <.J J
... "......~
':=:t;oe:~;'::;&4
j.':: ~.. .1:-,:1 o~;..
...::t.Q"-':"-..c:o~
t.f.o.f,;g:lUJ
'i': !~B:i. if... ~'O ~
:s.!i.j".2-=O..:~
t - .. :a - ~ : ~ = ~:5 ~
:i.!B~'O::~~C3..,....
..ri:;r~il.:;=
;: .:II..-.....!;::-
:- ..-: .-::. -0 -= ~
~ ~.;'l ~.;'-: t~1;~
_ c.. ~... w .. .. Il'1o'" __
...-",:,.-;_.::t~.~ "'''':lI
~o.~~af.=- ..:.." 1,).....
.-"'-.-e-- !wo: 'g:~
iJ S'a ~ i: .:. ~ ~ .:: = ~~ : of. ~
1 5 .~ ~.: J! ~ :.~ ~.t:; ~ 'ij ..
.... ~ ;:I-.! "2 t ..; -= l:. : ~ ~
",.;- ~ 0 ;:: :"[ ~ ~ ~ i. ..; .. 0 a
~:a:E.go.!~_f~~'E. Jiti=
a :;. . - :. 0 0 :it ...:: oCZ; 0 ~ ;.t,
;;:giio:i"'i~it~ ]~5
l~; lil ::a'~!E U~ra 'Hi
~~E':..i~'i;~ =_ ;8 ~
&,..!le f..i..~l.= ...1
._.!l":"3..="'~i .,..
!-gg:.1I.o"3.t~::' e;~,
='::':::_Q!a..."'S.~_t~ ;to
~E":'o&,;i~."o"M "fa
:~ ~:., 4.1 a"~ a" "j-r:'';.".!
... ~ . E :.2: .-.. All _,,1'1. - a;
;. iJ -;: fit.. '!,.!:':.!:&l -< . ... ~
.1
ia5.s-;~.:~
~ : ; 0 :; E i'-
o.!.::'~~;::~
..:: :a.t:... ~ -
~:. 0 ~=;.! =~
~~'1~!~~~
....~~:. \o=~
.. x- 'Wo_
t:.='."S- ~'G~
e:i~t;.jJQ.
~i ~"~'t-o.=~
:: ~~~ f'i~
~~~!.';C.=;
-C"E ~.~'; ~.;:::
~~~]~"i~~
~!i.s!.s-!i
~
is ~:i
...:~~oi
!1~i":;;
~j~o~
:;~~z~
..: .- MN
;:121:;:
i~j~~
~=:1:
P:~.~
~ f': ..;':'
..EQ"~
a....2
~i~g~.
~~w"ll
:i.~.ii:.i
, i~ ~.!.~e-i.i~8g]=?a 1~~l~2~iiJl~~J$~~ "2':~co..~ -., .~
a~"!.].J 0-:"8
: -w:: :Gi;':~: .~~ ~i:;~5 o;!~ il t.: f-c ~-o o.si E:~ - ..
i.s;:i-.-: - -
:.--= ~ t -= ~ .,~.; -.! ~=A...:l~ "_~~.a_~i !~a&~.~ ..~ -
~"1 .~e:lE~a .0.-
,-f ~ *.t_'f!..~Ji~11.. ...O....!J%"5 .. e........'::. ~ ::--;1
.... "0:. " , . "'11 '0 "....- '=:'''1 &..'SA= .- M. ..
- .=:.J .:a.,._
~ "':~ .:.... Co.... .'-=:w';':.I.;Qi ~~.AC-_:~~ A -... 1Io0a..... ~ ",~o.
.~.~.~~-_.~...~.s:- e:e~::.::;
~~ ~ ~t &1:::22-2.:= ~Ct i~~=';!~S~Sl~~~.~~ aE....!:
f:~ - ~. ...- " :I" !. 0 .... . .. .!:-'=j::C1 .-=1:.
- .'.:- II'C... .-.!:.' e .-c< ~ .~ ~"ag.. ~
QiI-::..l;:i I::-x'::'=u ~ ie..2~'il;;:SlS .i1~io &.~:a .~CJ .: A';:: "
. WI" .2 2 C....
~~?; ,:;,"=2-f .!'V"'!': 'I;t .... ! ~~~~~~o:~ O~_.:a~ ::t't~ ~ ...
.~ ~: ati~!.j .~!.ir.;d .. a...s~= ::0...: :s......t"7ct ..........1 ~ .... j .
.. .' '0 '" & ~.:: :..:: #. go: J a .. ~ ~:o ~ .. a.. . j:. s:
- ~'~ .='-; ~i'::--o'teoo as ~ ..",- 0
. _A!=;i;;..f_e~~.a. ...:=s=~; . ._-
" !:i :.~
.. . ....:s = . _..:. . S c: ... i -"~:>=~C1
i... ~ ~'::'~:.~2i: .'E'-f~ cE. .&Jo : 0-.... O'.=o~ :'01; O-;c.
... =:E~~~to~~~~~J..~= _ o.':.::v
~-; 7.:eiSa'-::::i~~.... " ~...~~~ -~ ~ ,9 ::10.. .;.~ ~... ~. f'? .= '", c..,..,.
~f ~ ~i1 ~ t;~.~;ii .. ..;~E~l~le~2E~.~~~~ '':~'': C:i ;t~ ~ 'I t ,...
. - ~:";c..:,:
- 0 i.~:t~il:. ~.:';~i'~~ ".;.~~f~ ~ ~ -. ~~
'. c. ~~c._~ ~~~IIJ_~~__~~ ~ . to -~. . _ :II')
.- .,; ~j!:;lJ='g=~~S~~~~~ ~.!!i15i=U ~j ~ ~ .
. .- ;. ;.. = <.. '" a.5 _ 0 .. ,. ~- .. ,,-,,'"
oJ'" .:.::~':~;~"I~r7r,i;'~~~r~~r'~.:' \1'
-
.
.
..
..
..
..
i
1-
..
~
..-
-.
i:l!
I
.Ilt..;:..!:.!l';'f,'15
&....:0. .,
c'::"i:~~~oi
~" tE::~-e
· 'E ~ ., ., ; E .:'-
'0"5:-':: w.! g.!
E r i..~ i.;!:: ~~.
E....~.;i.~~;
::; :1: = i ., ., ~
:i:i:.S:~~
____..__6_
-=........~ .
-"o..!~:i.j:t:;
:~ ~ ....o!: g: ~ .'
!i.~~:~.t~~f.
:::e2!!'~:~!.
~":'!!"'&="'.~,,~
t:.;...!"-=a-:;
~2-=~~j:g-;
,. -:- .~~ ,.:~ :~'..~~:.
" '
.,J.._..~":'............
't ":j
;la
. .-=
.5.~~
a~~
.5_
E;!!
~ . -
:;Q::5
.. .~
...-
. .
~t:i.
~::i
!=I'C~
II "
o .... .
~17
-::a
'E~~~
j.! ....U
<~~~
::=; ~ ::'U
:-:~..
I ~~ ~';N i
'3.~;~~ ,
...;; .~.... \
;i~l~
e-f ;:c~ \
=-.5~::;: .
1. &.:i
;;-oE::
~ .'~ ::
_:t,!ou:.
::!=~
~..e=.
~~ ~ t.3 .
'!is'Oti
~ . ;,.... -.,. :):.. ~.....
==;il~~ -;1.9-:
ol_"a8t.: :'2...~~
.~ : ~ : ~ : ..: ~ ~ a~ ~
::i~.::'."'. 2~Jo ~
. 'C1i5!'S w..- !II
~i.=~~.~ 1::;~:
....o_~- .; f't:..~o
~ t....;;,Q t-i:i:..; ~ ~.e.~...
g : ~ iIJ .; i ~ i." - '. -:.
- - .. . ... - "'~'_.! g'c
I. ",c: ~ ~.~ "
.-,....~a.i~ :i~o.!!.
..Ill..!...... ~....
.. C!:i .:: ,:.-..... B ~ t.=~ ~
0.. 'Q i -= t ~i t ~ - ::: ".
~ .2~~e- =-!:jJ!B
~c,j ~ . .; "Go;::" . -= z: ., B
ici=..e;l~ .;~.-=.
~ so! &-:.=- ';'-:';: 0
0__0...._.:1
"fo":-=-a-:.
_:o~a"''''a,....
~~:J..!i;!
'co~2::t. .t'i.
.." A:_S_II
s."':I!:,.w:e.i~
;~-;:t';':
"ti:::....;..=o]
=: ..!:- .;..~
..~;:g.!!~="!-
.a-:~":'::i:'
~S;~~i.Et~
"'&';:"':;:=%
-..~ii:....2'
f~=.~~:'=~ a.
A-.E~i'=2:~~
c3~~-=~~.~~l
j ::.!!-; - ~-;:-
~ t=.;J..;
i 'g'HCJ
.-.:-.
t c::~==
'i.2.~,,;
=-: ...!...
t';~ fa.:
J=i;i...
. i: -8'1
1".:sCJ _
...!~~i
~l ~~~
"~ o8-Q
,,~ I.l
~.t. .~~ ~
~! ::~2 .
(..I.oc...-
.!:si:.'l:;l
\,;
1
I"""".:~~~WC'J~. ' '."" ~.~gft~Dl~:ai..'\tlitlm~~"~-!A~....."~...~...-.-,,,,!r--..,.
. .0.... ',_' 4 '~-'.~".r:~-:-"'-f;;.~r~' i..~~r--~.~~.!! ' ...... .. I .
~ t ~ : : ~ 'Z g A>';': !
E2:.~:s.~~.. ;.... N
- ;'1 ,I'.., ..r: C.J " .,. r'''' .
Jo. J :.; ; :: .' -i; -~ ~ ~ ti ~ VI
~ .,. ... >. E ~ ... l o..c '& .- :j
l~ '"; ~ -:: tn _~ g ,. E '0 U ...
[', } ~- - 0 _ -. .
i:~i~~c::E~~~';>
~ gl&.c"~~>ox"8-;
"""..:.Ie = t.!u
'1."'c-:: t.ltlfl~ oJ4:
~ ~.ci ~ g ~.~ &;; WI:5-:;
":' "0 ""'l......"o"O 0 5 lit ~ Ii ~ .
;; II ~_ ~ ~ E c ~ 0 ~:a 0
.J.' c -=" '" ,,_ II "C -:sU .
";;;~~~"'Ot"i~~a.. .~
c Co Zoo oJ ~ .D r; -;:; "t ...,
g i; ;:...: v .... ~ ~.c '" ~ u.... Ii
..E!-o.8~~:s:;;~~~~
E~.;go;Jaf.o=<-<"V)
, ~ .a: ~ .~ ... E ..:E ;; ~.-... ~ ~
..-vv...Qt ..~ ;;;;0
:-.:.2 ~ 0.50..;1 Z'! "'."
..2$~~~c;.n;;...2~='
~ '; 'Ce .a ~
~'~.ca ~~
c :" ~~. .: 'J
c~.,c_~~:~
~~~~;>~I
"0 .- ~ ... "5 '- ~
~ i ~ ~. ~ ~ ,.~
.0 Of) WI III ::S'"
50 'c~ ~ :E 8 :-
......::I:t.._ .
.c~B"CC11
I- 'c '" ~ ~ 'cw
...: ~ -= ~ ~ '5 ~
~~~~o~.
- :s ,,'_s: '_ut
~ :5 ~ ~ .~ ~ 0 .
~~~~.g~~~
~.~~;~o~-
~.g ~''fo
::s a. 3: 'C
.~~.,;~ t~
t'g~; gr-.
~ n~ Uli
...o_lt _0.
~~~E C~
~"",~ cO;;
~c~=' u~
~:8.~ .M
';; ;;- ~ ~ >
t:r ",..c ~;t
~~~:E ;0
lj.2:~ 8l:C;
.;. ~.D.c ".~;
::J:::It;;~ V;CN
- 2 E .~ 8 ~ ..(
Q. .":: "U
c. 31 eo . l! 1;;...
::5~~~ ~c8~
u:;~,~~8
.t: ~ 2!' i:
.. c _: c
"1~~!~l; :3
ovoc-'! N
~~~"'ec::l ~
:: r. -" -=,~ ~ l'
~;'~t~~ S
t~6~~~ :
...... -,:J ~- ~ .....:
~.~::....OO'a..
E;,...::!cv~~v
;!.o ~~ ~ 3.t:m
'2 ~ 'c ~ ~ "J9 ~ ..
: ~ ,s.... " ~ .; e
='-"1\ c=.a~
~:::",'-.go<.N
"'CDF.~Ou ...,
'~""-a="-"'>f"'I
'-aE~~f"';"",
"coo. .. -('If
;2.g~c'O~te.(
. C~)'- -",~.
! >. II! _ Jl ~ >'-5 0 u
'=: ':0" I' ~ z
~>''''~'oll
"~' c:; ~: 0 .~ '5
~lc!:~>:Hg .~
.. .c 2 .- t: .. > .- 1\_
~"Q,e.:
WI 0" .~ 0. t.I 0.::J E ~
:-; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ -d ~
~ ~ .~ ';::c ~ ~ c: ~
~~:g;=~~;~~
o c c. VI .S '" ... :I:
....!_~~-5aQ;o6
';-3 o~ o.ce'~bCM
~ =.5.~ 9 :a-g;." wr
~,5'8; =.5 u.~~~
"o..."-~,, c
,..: :r:: c t -a C a~ ~ .
= ... "9. -t '"' ,~ i v = ~ ~
- ;: ;); '0 '0 ~ ",.c .~ ,...
tt~~..~'t-'o.>~
u ~ lit 't) ~ .
.:>.0~"...~~t1~
'aa~~ ~.l! .a 05.!:U
U~:'l'l>-i1c
:~~~ g t '!: E '!
C: ,c J! ~ ~ ".i: ~ ~ ~
oo...o",-oQt.-= _
U~t::Fe:.c~~
"'''-~G'''''''- ~
!i:;:~]:l3~~ ,...
lIt2:;;~!!i~-5'i ~
~"ii~b~t:;g. .a.
- ~ ~ g -5 : ~ lit ~ ~cft
ta:va'~~;.~e~
.c>.,,'2 .c~=::I....
~C'l!O~to~~c"O~
~~..2~ ~:t",o!!
. ~-a ,E t;; "2 ~ fJ _ ~ tit
;~;~~~'O~~t>si
- ~ i ft '0 ~ ~ a c i:g;
!l::;; :J lS -gd g h
~ff~E~.!!'O~~';8~
~ ~ ~ ~ :a n t... .!! ~ u
i: 00; ij >..~:~
~s~~:a~:to...
........ .. .........
. 41 .,. 0 I ., -u <<; ~,.:
2 -5 ~ ~ ~.!! ., - ... CD
:x ~ ~ .~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~tM~~~~ u~
~...~~~tI~.. .~at:
.c n IIt.g~ ~t~~ 'C-,;
"tJ'C >.,,;.: ""'" o~ "u
~ ,~ .! .! :: ; ~ U ..... U r-..
~ "0 'ii. ~ " '" >. . . C"')
~ gE:lJI~t"'>:
-d '" .- .u eo.c ':i '8 ~ ;;
i~~g~'a2cn~;d .
f ~ ~ ~:;; ~ ~ ~ 0 8 ~o
~ :.c"-.a.c c ",....
c::~=,g~"~c:~'a"
::J:I; .,. "'_ e tJ or( 0 "'~
o -a.::J..cO>.:J:.,.utn4(
v1J~fIS"_"'C~ ...0
fc;e:;S3<;~e1;;...
uU;... .UO<~-ON
~'-OI.cv u ~ocu",
"0 "'-... U'I
flSflIO~""~U
~fo~~-i~~
:!'C.8~~=~CD
'!.i;;jg.: ~8
~~I':!)t~ ~N
.- ;,.= tJ> ....
3....~o~ .V!
ei:'-t.~>.~
-:~~~~..I'...;
. Ii ,"'" = fIS _._...
~~:r >.e..;O:
~ ~ ~ ; .;; ~ ~-;
- ,,0 2::u
~.~ f; U tj.."JCft
~~~tgW:i-
~t.c~..u>;
...""o:lo'g'c.a.
~~~..i:U::l::l"
_o~c:""'E~8~
ci..ti3~~:J~..~
Q,~ Z't ....!:!CD;;~
..;._'" .:0..0.
ti~..~~.t:;UU
u '" ~ 0 a .1Il
=;o,..eli
,,_..:._<
~
a.
~
.a
"
c.
t
.c
<;
..
,g
>>
..
!t
~
:l!
'l5.
a&.
:l
=t
~
-e -g "0 ti ~ ~ ~ '5t.5 8 ~
:a "Je.c::s~.:: 6 c'': N
:t: 01.'" at .~ c 0 .c =' :I
.;~c~:os: -:::i ui
.,-....::s.c..~c:-'..c
~"8 0. g,,,,- ::i
!! lit ~ -- t ~ 8
Cl)c-~.5o:: '2" :.:
"2E~t~~:tt~(;
.~~t~!8~"it5. ~
oi ::>e~~:l..,Ii;;;>>~ i
~ Uo.lh"- c:E .a.. 0
t:.~:E:;lO~~l~ u
tI " .- '5 ~ e '2 ,5 1:: ".
,..: u ,,~.C' c o.:.;,:].a ~~~
."e~:<"e C"~D
... 3 " '2 e- ;0,';.".:; :;
:;..~~..31~.aef'alll~
~.g3E~~ail~~"..::I
utn8g~-;,~-:~-:'O_~
c:i] ~~.- e .. - t e ~ 3
~c~1'-~1:~~
.,::I.I:......O'-.......~
....
..
...
.. ..
g!
E .2!'
_x
~ui
rJ
~. ... .. ....~...-. ............. ".-..' .....--...
~!.:= t.!J~
,., ,':\llII ~ 2)
~~C;-:lN
".:otc.ao
,,g ~ c oS '2 s
"": ~ :; _ tI Q,
t~:~f~
C:C:~"'~"
.-;. 3: 11 '" -.,u
== .g EE 8.~-=o
..... c ill" "0:
.=; ;> ::; .,.. ..
.~ ..".0':) CO" ~
..,. .l'.lle-:1-S;
.. .. ::s = c E
~ 0 0.Q.~:t1Ki
~w:g-V)~
cl.H~~':~
:t~::!'tl.~.!!.c
>....,..:~.r::coe8'.
c. v J ~ ~ '- .~ :. u
.Q :0 .c: ...
~ ~a'i.s
=..:u,~ ~
.c!i':~
~t:80~ $
:t >. E ~ '$ I'.
o ; ec c .;
:~ e c; 0 a.
'::; i: ,!: 't ~ ~
~~ ~~~ u
"..c 0 co
c; So 'c IS .c ~
-<.:-g'O .
..5.1:.8c .5
.s:....z: ill ,9 u
tI~~Vlt:wici~
-'C:.ift&': .Cl
A'C...~~~~~
~~~'.:;'5'C5~
j;.5'-'Go~E~
U.x.~..--V'l
~~~~~
... 0. 0 ... 0
~"c:c ~
~=cE~ N
~. ~ : ~.VI a)
J:;:E>.V1 ~
~~~;; ~
~.....c Q.
5.~-g! ~Ma;
""g"'_t7r;
".31Jwi~;;':U
...i~~o~::;
C ",:::1 ~~ .
E ~ u "CI.:! .; ~
~ ...~ ~ .. '8 'il
-g ;;~-~-5~D::t:
" c.cOQt
~;o8oi:a.~
c:~"-~>.~-;~
8.-,t:-t:"EU
~ t E V1 ~ t;V'I
; ~ -~ ~~
~e2~:;C ~
>- ... ... - ~
-5;~~ ,...0
~~&.~.s ~
~~0:E~
tlI c""::s ~
~.t~.2: a;
~ ... c: 5,- -;;
o ~ ~ 'E _8 ~ u
v.", .; :; g fD
d ~ 'Q E ~ ~ :
'" o-e81
. "'0 ~ ... III'::; 0
" ~ "c'.} ,c: C fD
! ;.~~-;,~ >~
i~~ a.:; "'0 &."
~ e ~ 5.~'~ :~
;i"~-;E~~U
v ~.D 2''''0 .; .....
.s";i53Z'
_.-!'~U&.~
.. "
~ .:.-
"'"
:=- '"
c -t -~
~ 'J>
: ~ t E ~ ~ ~'.E ~ g -0 ~
!1:;~~~':,!.E:; ..-r
~~ ::J.c"JOf:l.c: e~
:~=2~;,~>."~ €~
..,,;;q..,g"'~gu "'"
1! c':;::~::'"= 8'..:8 !~
. !! g ~!: ~ ~ ll. II &. ,,;
~~~..~..,~=., ~t
.,:;scif......ct-5 g~
.., t. o}..- ~ ;: 0 II .. to. ;.
~ ~ ~ 5...: w =; G ~ > oi
~: '.' ~ = '" e II C -5 ...J "'0 III -
; }; -j ., = ~ ~ : '~ .~ :; ~ ~
~ .' ,'. = "d ...:: -a - . ~ N
~~;:: ~c~~~eQ,~.;:.oo(
r..'~ .' '., C - (: " u U
~~ ~~;~~t3~iN
~~ I'.~ ~ ~ g ~.5<; f'l!:
~fll'.i~~v:;>.~o.
:.' - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E .~ ~
"
:0
"
~
..
~
o~
~...
f~
~<>.
"''''
o c..,.
w ~:
.l: >.
oc .c"
c: .. t
" ""
-5 f~
!!~~>oi
=~-g~,;;
~r'J"'~~
~q.~..:
oE,,~v
...O'Q..DN
~;f6:~
0:"<>.
...
"
~'Ot"J~~t,cti g:
ftI...~"-'''''::O N
=~-St'O~~~ .c
t 'C t ~'v f: E ~ ~
Qt..,.I:.~...$ e"
= ::;!: ...-eo III
e .! ~ ~ ;:a a u ~.
!'g~.g-g&.l:l!.3~
.r:.; ~.'O [...;""'O~
...s ~.a -8.c.q --...~
~ ...c '2 .. " ...." t! ":: u
-:2~=~...u
:cg~~uA,Z-.;>~
eft ",,~.~:g... ~~ t! c-
- "3 O'~2:;j.... O'~"':
D.~:; :;;~?;..g g~ a;!;
c.::"~"::""c:~"'1
:5">'~ 3.~:-(E~
u III ~5 ~'u ... e ,III .E! a.
~g.tv~e.g~C) .
~c ~. ~: -5 F. ";: ,~~ 1
: '0 ~.~ ~"
.c """ C"o!
...E!.c:l<
vCIDO"'-t,j
~'C:~,goo
oc.~.,-_
~.~: ~ ~ s
._"'uo ..
~ >.- ~:3
] g~:: ~
..uc'5~~
1l~0~2'"
"< I'll >-.~ N
"t:...",~
.,,8,.c....
=~e.~.c~
- " D..c DIm
tl.o1!~c>
i5; - 6J ." ~
<(~o...t:-a~
;;~=~!.90Cl
u.~~;~a:
.I: ~ ~ _
.::~-o~~
~~~~:;
oS .~ ~r5::
rot:c ::2 _c IDI
!=B"2.;
.. o.c 0'0
~E8;;8 -:
Q, e .!! ::I .c
.,--aSee c
t~~gJ: ~
~~"2:;;" <;,
!.c :lI ~ ::
~.3H.~.";
G>"!!~E;;;S18'
-'tS._ 0 ~
sf:;S':.5g::J
is''''''~3C1)'ii
...c:;e'2~~
~ e ~ s'O ~~
~ Ii "!.l-
" E e,; !i
c vi
- ..
o~
.g ~
.. ..
.. .
~~
c._
g a
u ...
~~ ~
,,'"
..., 0:
.,; C .;J
:<< " ~.J
-!; ?-..
>~~J
';"c~
it .....::>
03:;;"'"
f!~-
:!<
~
.S!
~
;;
.a
o
~
=1
,; e ..;
1 ~
s! ...
;~ ~ ~
c.3. l! it
:.5 !If '5
-jl Ii :z:
~~...
i i5
~~.g~.;
K 0 >>1-=
o u., co....
aiE ~:E 0
g ~ ~ ~~ c;
"'OK~S: S
~ e".!! ....
.cita.:::~>....
..CO.....c.r,
t "; ~itA.
0; g ~ ~l!:
0='....:.:: .eN
u ~ - _ .
~ ~ C '0 ~ ~ .~
8,a.""ClI'tt
f >>~f.~ EtIl
a. :; :g'c ~ e >
~s:.~;'-a~
.c' ":1c:~0-
~:l!t~.."..:
~~ 2 -g e
..,
N
.(
U
.5 ;i
~5
g...
.- ..
~o
:,1'"
Ir.
e~
08
..../::
l~
0:
";J..~
:U!;.-!
-e~'"
,.' c ~ J
:~~~
it..~:J
.::Jji' '"
~~-
.~ ~.!i$o ~ji
~~.g."c ~~
~ Q, 3 ;; ': ..' ~
:: ~ 2' ~ 2 ' l~
- - .....
~~;~~ ~i
_';J:c8 -O!
It E .. "'... ;.;:.....;
.~ ... 'i ~. -s tJ,
'2~e..l =",
~;J=!:~ ;;-
c .~ = e f .9- >;
8.~g'O~ ac.
:s ... ~=....
c .~ .~ .~ e . ~ 0 ~
.8 ~'5 it e~ ~..~
;;..;1l-31117il.c
8. -0 .:: t ... "" tit .:) U
e=o",~~IS:.J
-0-'" C cl.lJ
U..,~:t:l
'O~~8e
., t I.....-a =
:iJ IA~'~"~2 '"
~~~S~.~.. vi
.::c-5.~~~ ..
.2"......~_ -l "
"2 .. :: - "... - il
Q. :: ~ .! .~ .:: ;.. u
t.I.5V)E'50f! :.: ..
~l'2~~~g ~ e
'60 a it - u u"2 c: .2
~ tl :l U ~ ~ t!: g ':l
!!e~ta...t:llU u
tIl~....._...cZ' '2
"=!=,,,~~, :.' --"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 _.X
5g~]~;;:I~:ci. II
>>'C ~c"2 ~ il a. 0(
~~..:;!8r;.ee!~ ~
,c8~oa:g~:::;'" u
:$ 8 !! n. ~ a ~ wI ~
~ ~ J€ = ,!j .5 ;
;~]~~~.;~ ~ ~
~ :: 2 ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ri -
~c..c..!e"'''' ~ ;
"';8E~-0:;::
tit" 'C ClG":; !
te:sQ.c~" ~ -u
c "o..,,:s~ ~
;Js"i-ei'" ti ';
.gee oC::s'" V ....
c",o._oc~ CJt
~E-tC~.=o '" ~
..,! c: t'!.. c e: . .
:; g it -.g 8'" e Ai
.., ..-81\ c .. l; Ii .. .
~a.-c;'-o-..-a ~
:I: ;:i.!!~ .";3 ~~; Ji
- ~ ~ ~.- g ~ ~ ~ )0 ~ -S
1:1 ii 'S e 'a .~ 0 .. = ~ ~
o !t.,. 0'3....- 0"
U ... Q..,," v .5 t ';: ::;.( ..
~i):~ii!!'-U :
'C i'i-8 e 8.!:
i
.
. .
.5 :
'OS
c:
~=
=~
L
ga
i! !
... ei.
.. c: . ~
! ~ ~~
-:5~~
,.~<...
~ at.!
..... .::J
.3;2~~
~~
~~.
" "
c.c
" ;r
-..
o c .
n~
~ - Z!
:!.o .;
e c E
-8 - .. .
~ ~ia
ue.;;-
. to. -.
~ c. WI .,
!'ii ~-
.:~H
.. "...
ca:::~'t"Ju
. ........;
.. = ,,-
..I 2 t'!,...
C ;:.
1
E: ~~
e;r ,Q.
:~'C'.e :=
c.GC:o~.
· 0); .0110
-:i . \'i. ~ 0;
.l:!1.~,.'U
$~~ ::~
~ -~ ~1'> J
~a-e:",
'C '" "".c ; "1"
. ..... e'"
~t:J:"Q:ts:i
~2~~da;
l5._ ~..... ~
,,0 all",,,
lic.J!Ji~";
.,.-5 t; g.~U
ft-sct
.. " ..
-5 ~ f
.-..
..c:c_
........
.- - 4.1
..c:~E
'0>"
c: c :.
..op
- c.
;'l! !;
r~~
~ ~fJ'O
~ _ a;
~ .5: ^
8.t;
~s e
~>.Q"
"'C" i:b
_o~ ClC"
;l: ~1~
~ -.:. ~.:
i:~i
5
..
4 ~
~~~
3:: ~~
c :1&.... -"0
..;:;, ~C"'f
c;,~ ~(J
.;; el 0-
" ;%.~ u ..
~41.c 'ital
0-:'0 {;a:
~"2 li ~..;
~;ti::<.e.
6LSF.s~
~ lit ~ . u
~~~~~~
-,..... c."
:;'t:o~7i~
..J=--e>
~ ~ ~
o~_
C.uo
~~~t~5 ~
=~~50Q M
.. u.c ...
~ t'O .. i5.; ...
~~~~:..- Q.
~c~~.g: <<.
: 0 '"" ... . _..
., c [~~'l ~
~ 0 .~ -: ;
;~~:g:~ .
t~~~.= 2 g
~~~~~s '2.
==-..:,,3.. ~lD
~. ....oc- .:J~
'mtVj I
~.,._--~'" u
~.s.:..:...~~ ~~
~ &'.50''' ..gC"~
$:o~t~o ."'":Z
=~:i~~;E2'O~
e,,- lit ".,JJ ..,
~ ;':'" "! X ~ a a~
-~~....(j ~:~~
o t :I . ~ ~ ~ c: _ IJ
_;'c~$;-o'a(Q
.cc"..ou"QU::I...
~= E ""0 .c _~ .. e ~
.l:~=wg~~i~~'ii
~:.:..g~.~!'E~
... l:.. ::I :i .'. .... <II
." >.,_ ~ it'. .
'": f~' ~~ !~ g c6':
;:a.fo... 15.S:J!~
~'5:So~,"-;;~8'~
c:I :; .~ lit :: ~ .g .~ ct
FA ~..c::..c::":o
~ !8.~.f!~.a
/~~. v~ I
______,~--- J ~
~".cu~ \Q 'cit,::o,- ...
,~._-.~tlI..c ~ 12ct~t Q.
'. ~;Jt_.c V:"LoOF D;
't..::go!;: ~ ,!:e;:cg :..
/"..e.c""... ;;SEo:>. U
. ~ ~ e" ~ .g ~ :: e ~ ::l
,'~l~i;. ~; ~~j f ~.
: :I .~ 1-' '" ' Q .; ~ :J t.4I '^ ;I-
~~8M~ ~~~~5:8~
:I'C'.:a,... 3t~~~u_~
~Q,"''1:'o M cnKfJ.c~~O
: ~ g; t ~ ~ ~ ~ o~.~
... ':.c ~.2 if d ~ _ - s _ u -c;
I ~~ l:..; ~.,; lias ~ ~ ~ ,; U
-c il Vi&,:; . '" - i ;:: .. ~ e g 8
~~~f;~>~ ~~~~O~~N
~ .,. :l,.!:!.c ~ .c.( -< c E ~ ... '" ., ro'
~~c~~;~u oe~~=~'~
CJ:i.~... --CIJ t~:;_Vi
~~.sEi -g$&,'~~~
... Q, 0 U 0 ,,_ lit 'C
---
...~
~.<
Qu
. , ~...
c:ct:tl
8~8.-S
~ f e:
.'Q g".
~ ~.il.2
cooS.c
. - ..
ooSg
-" "'...
'0 .~ ;: oS
g.ilt:;
.- · il
~ oS ;: ..
is_ 41.-
-;'s:ct ~f
c.rCJ -
'5~g."'~-2
~~u..c:~a:.. .
1Il-"O~A!!~;
~ ~e. -:r--
.. . .. - 11
C ...og
.g:l~'9
-o.ilt
...~
~<
iJu
'O.~.~Eg;;-.i~~
5 5:8 !: S e .~.g ~
t1 ~ ~ ~ e ,2 >.~ a
- U'loo.iit:o"
O~'=.5~:; !....;-i
- II Ili III " ClG 0 C.u
~ - :; 'E '! f ~~
'C ~ Vi ~ f 1j :"".c:;;
~~~Ii~ag~o
fJ ... "t _ U'I 0 U'I
~g-n~~.ae .
I.? -si"'..oJ:;o-
r..: E ~ 'u ~ f;o - '0 a i!
:i: ;~c e 1 :; li .' ~
-: g .~ e E a ..; ~ : ~
It a. il'O ..'>:U
:-5 i gl8.~ SQ,..~~
_":Oil -..o2:S'"
uO....!lI.....
-g.- a Ii
.:!a';\ & ~
...:-:
....
u_
.5'"
"'i
~a:
~3
III
.....
y~
<=
,:.=
>"":
....
u_
.5'"
. ..;
ea.
~~
.. .
:;u
..l3
Y.i
; "a ::.111 ~~
.olll_l.o:!. .0-
.~;~- i...
t;.5~2 ~
F. It lit -.c '0..;
~ 1 : .~ 'i it ~
'..a ~ ~ L: ~ 5X
C ~ ..
~oo,g-: ,cU
o t: ... ~~
~t~~~ 0
100ft" ~-g
<;;1:00 ....-
'" ... C It
V.c ..,. c:: "tJ C
...:..:... '^ ~ c ~
!ist_ .:~~
. ,EfJ-g,g='III'tJ
a." ClII"tJ .C'- .:.c M
~c:':; _ ~-a..o~
;i&.l:"1~2:SU
u ~ 8.: - CoA.
::0 E ~~ g
.:Jc..,__u
-.--'.--
~5'&. ~,.,;
:~g ~~
~.5-5 A...;
:.8.;.:. ~a
N: C'lII A:;
:: ~1 . eJ
. ...~~Q.....
~-a.A:O.cV)
~;'O:i~o"
f:;ve::
o.s.=1Jt: ~...;
c:gco"t::~
'~lIIt2:iQ"
tS~~>o>~
~~1::::=.:j
-83,.~-a1s~
~;~.g ~t~~
.c :J '::J
Uti
o~2t
:B-g~
.. ....
~~E'O
_ e c;i
00.&1" aii
~III'; ~u
g :: ,..5 5 :;;
UUfI__.c
:s~E':~;c.ci
,,~t~.cE=
.3 ;;'&, ~ ~ ~ t: L
:::I J 1:' III "0 r.:;!
~~t~=cQ"O
100._._ 0 C. N
~..coat~.>.(
e'" 0 0. fa a:) fJl .
:~'O~41.;(U
~~"~uQ.5~
!l~.;.::;:2~'"
"'.g~.~&....
j!l];;
-----J--
)"c- ~.- c,&,.-
- - 0" "0 :>'.-.::.c.'
,,~.;:; ....~"'~-i
""",:J __ \"''''CC..o",
!l ".0 .-. , .. 51 0 · ~ -
)..,.=c.. ~t"..,;..:i"1:
-5 _2 C .; 0 a'O ; ~ E .. 100
- C"e.. )......."".1: 101-0 1=..
O.i:" C4 t:.c~ WI......
:.A.E.cc. "..~.cO ".,J".~
~c .~<~{~oefJ6~f~~~
~ ;,.... c e s ~ ... - .c ~: ... ~ ;! "U
Ioo~~~~~ o."tJ~;E~t~~~
'" .:..;; ".... ~ - ~ '" - ~.o -= c'- ~
~ e lit " 0 u -"'"0 ~ ~"O .; " ~ U
Q. : ~ .6' tw) ~ ~ ~ .~ u ~ _ go :' M
..; " C ~ U ~ ~ "" ~ g..~ ~ :e ~ u ~
I~"e";. eQta=_g~,..
-"''Oo-l3 ....:.c. g .;:-s..~.
"'c ~.s. -o~'O:t.,.~.c~~
~~~cc~ -.c~a~t~~~
-: 0. 3 .g ~: ~ g : IA "s.g E'~ ~:
~ "u 0 '. lilt" ._ 'W
.: : g ~ 0: i to t ~;r: S( q a:
~..l ~.5~~~~~
.
'-J
,..,
:.... ~:
E .t:
~lt
.;J ..
. .
- ..
.~
:..i.
:~ 1
.....
L: ...
....c::
C)~
Z
.,
=a.
....
":8
~t
...:~
"0
...
r:
-.
~ r";
:0 a~
,,'"
.....;
'0:
~.~.~'Oo~v,o~~c~~~ .~~
~t~"-~~~-=~~_ ~~
t8.se"'t~"~E5"~ u ,,-
"O~- ~~~~c.,._.oUc ~
~~E8j~i~:~~~~~~ ~i
~ -en " t ~ ,. ~ =.-: = 5 '0 fJ x."'.' 0 ~
~E 1:~~""a"",,,,~~ .-u
g~'O -f~~t:...g,;:$"...~~
Co f ; ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~'3 '" ~~ t 'S ~ E ~
~t~~~-~:~ffi~2a~~~~
,,"0:3 ;;':'---; ....,E tAt- ~ it... C~~.1' S'
~ 0 ... $ C $ ~ ,!WIc .c 0 '0' -. -5 c _ _ Q c
:S--t~ .. c .. <,.., -g
~o...oc~~.;C~jE.S~~~~
.~Et~~~~!~~~~!~_~~~;
!~~~~~lj~~!l~;~~~~~
~ciUtcg~-.~~~~$ 8~ ~0
~2ic2Ut~5"S~t~--z~~
ti .Cc"O .-c.t:... .....~....;
",o..c::&,.-c'Oo....... ...,,"'.,,;$....
.=...u e~~-!'=-gS:2M....~
llll t '0 ~ .: ;.. c l' t Ji ... ; N 'C
u.i~agijai:t~;lS~d
::.t
~?
'0 .:;
..
,....
c :.0;
1, "
Q6.':'
g~
:; s
~e
..
~~
..Olo
.C
c:.
~.'#
....
'11"
u ,-
"
.i.1
. .. '10'", ..........,......................"...Pl..............._...............~....,_:~.....,.... ........~......._ ....... . .
;E1i~;~.~~~ i
~~.E.~~.B3o::!~ o~
f GO;,.. = E ~ ~ c ~.: ~-
: .s'C..~ o.e-go v~
5 ~ f~ ~ ~ 8"-:; ~ -g en ~ c..i
~ :: Q. ~ = ... ~ ';'~ ~ 5 ~ ~
i ~.: = ; ~ e ~ -g ~ ~ 0 0
e- " "0 c: C " ,- fJ ii ..... ._
.c 8. c: ~ · 0 c"g ;c _ t: 0."'0
'.~ .., ~ t; ~ ~ ;:! e ~ ~ ~~ ~
. ~ "' ... ,. - - ,c C ,0'" .
<-a.s ~:;.~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~
....: .21 :; )0 .c " ~ ~ 0 III .c;.c ,
."....Cl~~::.~=~.!;~,,~
= " ;.:: - e : ~ .-: .5 .!:!.!: ::
~,,-ogOGJ-;...!"'~8'~
... '" "" ...;; ... g c;; "
U~M"'_:lOC~ccQ.,
"t'll~~~;;e1:&.
. foI S A.._._ QCl Q. _ ~
=Ci~'i:;
-B-:-J =_ a.-ne
..~o..a-
;....'O~$.-a
1::_",,,"IC"'f
8.~_.>'-'"
U -55 2;!
_:-"O!.N
~ ~ ~ .~ [.!
~"Cg.,,'5
~:~~-S~
,,~...~~~
~.~~~.:!
~ ~cf= cO
":-;'!,~$'M
;-:.c~:g:;
-,~.!'l'" VlQ,N
..;:E..c::.~~2U
I:l all E ~...
.~; ~ So .
A
,
'S
S :S -t '0 s ~ g ~ Vi
uiz~c~<", N
g8~tEtwt~ g
u.€S"O!ii ;:0_._,_...
.5 ~ c ~ -is .. II CJi ~
-..oc.ce~. a.
~~~;~~~ C'f"
;::c;;c"icl.8 .-
~:;~~-s~.!-: "
~ a.s~ t'i~~::J ~
a ~ s 8';' ~.~:: iii
~_";;ij~1i ._j?,
o 0 c: a.o.- Clot ~ _
itsc:"Q~~u it..
..:i-8fgti:l..c: >;
ci.= ...,~~iii~O:E ~~
a. t ~ ~ >.. ~ ~ <
--:=aiii~c"~ Co.
~ VI ~ _ Q..::1 ;.: . 2 u
vc_o~7iot~o.
~c'~-5~ot:g
._ " III 0 > _ VI 0'1
i
..
oS
~
'6
....
~
.. .
2l ~
c: .c
t:.o
~:l:
" .
"<II
~j
..
or;
:J
c:
.i
~;;,
....
;;$
a:
::.,gotg::. ~
~j~~u; ~
~c~'OS~ <t
J:o_o~:X: Ii
.5~~~8-g ~
,~ ~ '2 ';; ~. -:
o Ii:;.- Ii ~ "0
~ -= 'S : : ~ ~
ftlc;o~-5V) ....
" c" 0 ,MN ~
as'OtJ::~8oi~
~ .~ ~ ~ .g t - . -
U) ~ ~. -a ':' ~ ~hn ~
NU:l'O"50~:':cc;
~ 0 .~ ~ .2 - 8 t ~
!!-:Ofo~"5,-:!!<
. ~ [.c >. C~] ~
."0 Ii "t: 0 u
U._",_"C';~
~l! II e~-g
a. ~ t Q,..I: U
~E:=:i.. ;!;
3-c: :;
8"'0 a ~ 0
-: c: toO It Q[,
0".5 ~ ~
~ ~.~ t ...;
:!~~= ~
s~~<II ...:
~ ~ -a~' ;e; GO
:, cC ~ . ~
;ij~B~~;-
~ ::1:'o~~~
~tscoq,~:
~~~E~:2.(
=o~.c"8.EC")
3 ~~UU"
~l1 .DenCIJ
~~.~ ~
l: " ;: ~
'2 "2 ~ .; " ~ ~..:: o"f :. ~ e~ iii ~
~"E ~ g t :I ~.: .:: ~. ~ e 2 ~-
>0'" "'O:Jo"'>~ c.=.
g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :.g ~ ~ :. ~ q ~
Ci.=~-5.s;~~~ctGS"O~
""0 0 'QCC"'~:I~E:a.
~... ci.a -.5" ~ ~ - 8 0 ~-at:
to~ ~ ~:: ~ e ~"5 >,-S t:'3oi
fJc:t:~_..c:OfJ"O ,QC.uU
tt~UCQD-..;~~~..,ee:
..c:~~~~~~:~eg..,-:~'"
~...~o ~f.c>.'O-r:ie_,,;
.>.VI...~.t-ge~;~.2E:s
CI"',o~$'O't~81o"'i!..e= .
1'Q~;~......=.u=_. ,~
-; _o~goo"'~~~"O"g
ci. - 0. '-1."0 C C c'o ;:, ;I- e t tI Ci ~
:~E~~~~~~g~lIIi~~<
. .0 :"I:Je." O. ~.,.J'
~o>'i ,ceoc1""o .!u
U"'''$"O''' U~-=:=T'!VI..L.
:J~c~.!::"O~~~..cco~~
.a"5~3;E~file$,.g
~ ~. ~. ~ 1: ~ -6."" ~
~.t-').o.8..
i ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~
:2.2-o~~a:;~
::J-C~-...L:8M
e~g~~~~-...:
t U; 2 :;~ ~ ~:::~
i9~~"8111~g."
O>.g .b2t~;.
~t:U~C_CUN~
t: " ... 1:: O.c "en '0
tg.~ ~.::: WI;; ;;.~-
oa~e-3:~i<!l",
~"" 0 c.~.~ ~~~~
.c:.2O(faQ"'&ux::...j
~ c2 '2 0 ~ '0 -g -E .(
.8 e .ij'c; co.. . .a M
.:::- -a5!Cu-u"
<.::-'ll.a'Oct:<II
Il'C o-;~~
~!.g~8~1ii
i ~ ~ ~.~~
.a~ ~i. ~1
. .. 0
0- ......
- - -
o..j3 .... Q.
-~_c'- c"
- . - .
U'I ~ .~ ~ ;j
., .....'0 ~
~~;~g
::'O:a-
E"$",8o~
... '" - c..
. ". 0
~;~ef.:tM
!! 0 .~ ~ . ~
ci. c~. E ....0
.t,g-ac.a~
;i 2u c .!:: ~ U
u -...-
~.c-5X
0"'_
uCo
.
"
"
Co
- ..
. OJ
..
cO
.-
...
g~
~ ~
c _
" 0
C)r:
"
criE
Ii
-.~
...,
U
~o
3::;
~
..
tgt~~'5~r:~
c..~~~":I"".i'
:J C :I $ ... .,. >'01:
VI" "'..c.- "
~o.~~!!!':l'lf;'lf....
l;oC~. .,.~.
"EgW;LoC-a!'.S~
~~~~;;~'e;;''8 !
~ -6 ~.~ g.g ~: 4 ~
.....'0 $ 0 " c: 0 ... ~ c
C s:: -;. .. ,~ ~ .,. ~_ ~
,3 ::c ~':g · ~ ~:c 0_;0:.
.c,,:J...S- ..
o~~8~..~~~ <
=tBo;~"'t~ S-
-$"" 011 t:sE ell)
ci8.~5it'~'a. ::2
~U'l5-t:.$!":~~~ ~
~~~ &g ~;:~ -
<.....J"'- c A
...- -e"' .c"'~
~ "C.,s -., ;; ~", '" 0
~liUn:i~ll1
...
~'6
=";i
ia
tf
~~
..13
"..
~'5
..13
:~
,,-
.. ..
Ji~
Q'a
....
o~
L, 'S:!
"
~~ :.
'"
...
~
...
~
::
.,;
..
~. ::
S ~ ~
e -a -0
~ i .,c
-evi;
/:,-i
~ ~ ~
:J !I
...
..
;..
:: ~
.., ,
c .c
l! !+
~~
... :I,
('-1
, .J
i.
::J
1
ffi4~ dlh-/~~s
495~ r Sr
.::::WJ~~#n<P/JJ 0
&8 2./~~4
/?E - $r::'e/pL. CJP' ~'#/~S/t:J,vI5~.s
~/,/hV~ or:' -r-r. /.75'30
~L!' C'--vc (/),
5;,hv~p ~4P ~
/^!- J1--Vt/4~ :?7~
--- ~ ------ ~
--
(}&-c 5/0( (C ).
~~JL-JJ 4/p-
/ f /1'41/;5' &~ d5"/~ 71.//5 S:r,eCGr
~..e #~5;/ // ;YG'd/2S.
-
:F\~E'lT
r- ,. ~ '" r ..:- ? ~
' -, "I ':, . '-', ,~:"3\
: ':' :' , -: ',I.:: !\
:<" 0
138 l' 2ll 1989
.:. . . ,.:'1 L",
1
."'TACHMENT C
city of San Bernardino
IrPlanning Commission Meeting Minutes of 8/16/88
~ Page 12
r
I
ITEM NO. 6
Conditional Use Permit No. 88-2 Subject property is a
rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 1.03
acres having a frontage of 150 feet on the south side of 23rd Street
and 150 feet on the north side of Highland Avenue and being located
approximately 100 feet west of the centerline of Mountain View Avenue
and further described as 220-226 East Highland Avenue. The applicant
requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit under authority of Code
section 19.28.020(C)15 to permit a 64 unit motel in the C-3 Gen~al
Commercial zone.
Owner: Great Western.Development
Applicant: Patrick Chiu
Ward 7
Proposed Negative Declaration, Staff Recommends continuance to Septem-
ber 6, 1988.
..
This item was considered on the Consent Agenda and was continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of September 6, 1988.
i,G ITEM NO.7
~ppeal of Extension of Time for Review of Plans No. 86-127 Subject
property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approx-
imately 3.1 acres having a frontage of approximately 266 feet on the
north side of Highland Avenue and being located approximately 295 feet
east of the centerline of Palm Avenue. The proposal is to construct a
42,520 square foot multi-tenant commercial building in the C-3A Limited
General Commercial zone.
Owner: Highland Palm, Ltd.
Applicant: Monaco Homes, Ltd.
Ward 4
categorically Exempt from CEQA, Staff Recommends continued to
September 6, ~988.
This item was considered on the Consent Agenda and was continued to the
Planning Commission meeting of September 6, 1988.
ITEM NO. 8
Tentative Tract No. 13530 Subject property is a rectangularly-
shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres located at
the southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue. The request is to
establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-1-10,800 Single-Family Residen-
tial zone.
Owner: Palm Avenue Investors
iAApplicant: McKeever Engineering, Dennis Stafford
.Ward 5
Proposed Negative Declaration, Staff Recommends Approval.
, city of San Bernardino
! planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 8/16/88
, Page 13
vivian Stevens presented comments, as contained in staff's report. She
noted residents' concerns regarding flooding and dust control during
construction. She also noted corrections to conditions of approval.
Ms. Stevens stated that staff recommends approval subject to condi-
tions, as amended.
Mr. Glen Gipson, of 6495 Palm Avenue, was present in opposition to the
proposal because he felt it was inconsistent with what is out there now
and the infrastructure is incomplete. Mr. Gipson was concerned about
.flooding in the area, noting that currently residents have to use
sandbags. Mr. Gipson commented on the horse trails proposed for
Chestnut Avenue, noting that the proposed lot sizes are too small to
accommodate horses and owners of those lots will be asked to pay for
part of the development of the trail. He stated that none of the lots
front on Palm Avenue which does not go along with what is there. He
stated that, if the proposed tract was of one-half acre lots, a lot of
the opposition would disappear. Mr. Gipson stated that he would like
to see some consistency in the Verdemont Area. He did not think 10,800
square foot lots were consistent with one-half acre lots and stated
that with one-half acre lots they could get by with much less infra-
.ce structure.
Mr. Allan Walters, of 4933 "Fit street, homeowner in the area for 28
years, was present in opposition to approval of the tract as proposed
prior to this meeting. He stated that he had purchased a lot immed-
iately west of this site and had visited the lot every day to maintain
grape vines, fruit trees and pine trees and had used Meyers Road for
access. He stated that it is a dedicated street deeded in June, 1972.
He stated that he was not notified of the project.
Ms. stevens stated that Meyers Road will not be deleted.
Mr. Walters stated that he would like to continue using Meyers Road as
secondary access to his property and wanted to be assured that the
sewer line would remain in the street that is finalized.
Mr. Loehr stated that staff would have to report back.
Mrs. Helen Kopczynski, of Cable Canyon Road, stated that the site plan
does not show Meyers Road correctly. She stated that all projects for
this area that have been reviewed in the last several weeks relate to
the same flood control conditions of approval. She stated that all of
the affects (of the projects) together in themselves would need an
Environmental Impact Report (EIR). She noted the need for channels,
diversions and debris basins. Mrs. Kopczynski noted that the
Environmental' Checklist shows a change in the land use which requires
{en EIR. Mrs. Kopczynski also noted that problems in regard to the
infrastructure are not resolved.
Ms.
July
Barbara Sky, of 6464 Palm Avenue, was present and noted that on
5, 1988 the Planning Commission approved a tract with conditions
city of San Bernardino
...Jplanning Commission Meeting Minutes of 8/16/88
r Page 14
,
and the Mayor and Council deleted five conditions from that project.
She did not understand why the Mayor and Council did that. She stated
that she would like to see an explanation of what is being done before
they are locked into any projects in the Verdemont Area. She stated
that she would like to see Ken Henderson speak in regard to what is
going on in the area and have questions answered before proceeding
further on these proposed tracts.
Dennis Stafford, representing the applicant, was present and stated
that they were in agreement with all conditions. He requested
modification to the extension of Meyers Road, stating that they would
like to move the connection approximately 20 feet to the north. He
stated that they would regrade Mr. Walters' driveway, ~set his gate
and stub the sewer out there. Mr. Stafford stated that the proposed
project meets a~l requirements of Code, concerns have been addressed
and the comments made by Ms. Sky are in regard to another project.
There being no further comments from the public, the public hearing was
closed.
. commissioner Brown asked staff if they could tell the Commission what
t.,conditions were deleted on the project referred to by Ms. Sky.
Mr. Loehr responded that Standard Requirement #39, which is applied to
other projects in the area, requires the developer to participate in a
uniform infrastructure plan for the area.
commissioner Nierman stated that the Commission had disapproved two
projects in the area because they did not have all the data in regard
to an infrastructure plan to approve the projects. Commissioner
Nierman felt that they had to have an infrastructure plan and needed to
take a look at what all these projects are going to do to the area and
an EIR would address that. Commissioner Corona felt that, if the Mayor
and Council desired a higher density in the area, they should implement
an infrastructure plan to address any hazards that could occur.
Staff answered further questions from commissioners.
Commissioner Lopez stated that the report mitigates all impacts and
noted the Environmental Checklist. Discussion ensued regarding
services and if needs will be addressed. commissioner "Sharp felt that
10,800 square foot lots were not high density and that the issue of
residents was that of "no growth." commissioner Nierman restated that
they needed : to have something that told them what effect all the
developments are going to have on improvements, services, etc., noting
that t~ey could be approving as many as 4,000 houses for the area. He
~asked 1f the project was compatible with the Verdemont Area Plan. He
furth7r stated that he would have no problem approving subdivisions if
the C1ty had a plan which addressed provision of improvements to the
area.
- -
city of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 8/16/88
I Page 15
~
Discussion followed. Commissioners concurred with Commissioners Lopez
and Nierman when they suggested that three items needed to be placed on
the next joint Mayor and Council and Planning Commission luncheon
agenda, those items suggested were the Verdemont Area Infrastructure
Plan, and Environmental Impact Report, and how or what procedures are
. to be implemented/followed for subdivisions at this time.
Attorney Empeno noted the rules of the Planning Commission governing
action taken on items not on the agenda.
..
Mr. Stafford agreed to a continuance of Tentative Tract No. 13530 to
the next available meeting, September 20, 1988.
Commissioner Brown
to the meeting of
Commissioner Lopez
sioner Stone.
made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13530
September 20, 1988. The motion was seconded by
and carried with all but the abstention of Commis-
()
ITEM NO. 9
Parcel Map No. 11659 -- Subject property is a 3.55 acre parcel located
on the southwest corner of Highland and Guthrie. The proposal is to
adjust the lot lines on three parcels to create three parcels of
different configurations.
Owner/applicant: Highland Village Investors
Ward 7
Proposed Negative Declaration, staff recommends approval.
This item was considered on the Consent Agenda and was approved based
upon findings of fact contained in the staff report dated August 16,
1988 and subject to the conditions and standard requirements listed
therein. The Negative Declaration for environmental impact was also
approved.
* * *
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned to the next
regul~r meeting of the Planning Commission to be held on September 6,
1988 1n the: Council Chambers, City Hall. 11:10 p.m.//
mkf .
MINUTES:PC8/16/88
~ PC8/16/88A
ATTACHMENT D
r CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT""'
SUMMARY
Ilrl...
IIJ
(I)
<I
(J
;
III
::)
CJ
&II
a:
'"
c:r
LIJ
a:
ex
AGENDA ITEM _ 7
HEARING DATE 10i4/l?O_
WARD 5 ~
APPLICANT: Palm Avenue Investors
1438 Dorothea Road
La Habra Heights, Ca. 90631
Tentative Tract No. 13530
OWNER:
Same as above
The proposal is to establish a 45-lot subdivision in the R-1-10,800 Single
Family Residential zone.
Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of
approximately 15.1 acres, located at the southwest corner of Ohio and
Palm Avenues having a 711 foot frontage on Ohio Avenue and 961 foot
frontage on Palm Avenue.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION
Subject Vacant R-l-lO,800 R-I-lO,800
North Vacant R-1-10,800 R-1-10,800
East Vacant R-l-14,400 R-1-10,800
South Vacant ,Single Fam. Res. R-1-l0,80C R-I-IO,800
West Vacant R-I-IO,800 R-1-10,800
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A ( l[) YES )
HAZARD ZONE IX] NO ZONE ClI NO OZONE B SEWERS oNO
HIGH FIRE [Xl YES AIRPORT NOISE / DYES REDEVELOPMENT DYES
HAZARD ZONE ONO CRASH ZONE [XJ NO PROJECT AREA []NO
..J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z a APPROVAL
~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - C
ZU) MEASURES NO E.I.R. ti CONDITIONS
IIJC) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO &1.0 0
2Z &l.ffi DENIAL
Z- SIGN IFICANT EFFECTS
00 WITH MITIGATING t!:E Iil CONTINUANCE TO
a:Z MEASURES U):E
>ii: 0 - 10/4/88
Z rn NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS (J
'" SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E. R. C. 1&.1
EFFE CTS MINUTES a:
NOV. .111 REVilED JULY 1111
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
OBSERVATIONS
-
AGENDA ITEM _ . 7 _
HEARING DATE _10/4/88
PAG T
~
,.
1.
REQUEST
The applicants request approval to establish a 45 lot
subdivision in the R-1-10,800, Single-Family Residential
Zone.
2. ~ ITE 1!..O-'~';''J.'J_01T
The subje'ct property is a 15.1 acre site, located at the
southwest corner of Ohio and Palm Avenues.
3 . MlJ1U_Cl P ~_lt _ CQPA )~l'1p_ _Gtl'1~.RJH. _ Pl~J1~:L ~.Q~t'9JU-t1\NCF.
Tentat i ve Tr act No. 13530 is cons istent with; tne
Municipal Code as shown in Attachment RAft. It is a}so
consistent with the Interim Policy Document adopted'by
the Mayor and Cowmon Council on ~ay 23, 1988, and
amended on June 6, 1988, and approved by the State
Office of Planning and Research on June 9, 1988.
4 . ~J'JllLp.:I'ATUS
An Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to
the Environmental Review Committee on May 5, 1988. The
Committee recommended a negative declaration. The
Initial Study was advertised and made available for
public review and comment from May 12, 19C5 to May 25,
1988. No comments were received. See Attachment RFR,
Initial Study.
5 . RACKGr.Ql.!~r
This Tentative Tract and three others in the same area,
were considered by the Planning Commission on February
3, 1987. The four tracts were continued until the March
5, 1987 hearing, to allow staff to address the issues of
building standards and timing of improvementR rel~ted to
drainage, flood control, street access, signalization
and schools.
On Harch 5, 1987, the Planning Commission voted to deny
the project, airecting the starf to prepare negative
find ings for the next Plann ing Commiss i. 0"'\ '}I!i'.l: r ~. Staff
pr ('senled the f: tnc1 in<Jr-. on t-~arch 17, 1987. Dur ing that
he~ring, the Planning Commission continued the
~
".
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM..-1 --
HEARING DATE 1..Q.[4 ~8
PAGE 3
Tentative Tract indefinitely and required the applicants
to prepare a Capital Improvements Program for the
Verdemont area. The applicable section of the minutes
of those meetings are included as Attachment wEw.
On June 11, 1987, the State Office of Planning and
Research imposed a moratorium on the City of San
Bernardino. Because of the moratorium, the applicant
was unable to proceed with the project. A letter dated
February 5, 1988 from the State Office of Planning and
Research lifted the moratorium on developm~nt lots,
10,800 square feet and larger in the Verdemont area.
Thereafter, this Application was allowed to proceed.
The tract was scheduled for the June 21, 1988 Planning
Commission Hearing. However, it was rescheduled to
allow staff additional time to receive a Council
clarification to determine how a tentative tract map
would be required to comply with the Interim Policy
Document. The applicant requested a hearing in late
July.
6. ANALYSJ.-S.
T9p_QgtAP-ny_~nd Geology
The subject site is located in an area of limited
environmental constraints. The general existing
topography drops approximately forty feet from north to
south at an approximate gradient of five (5). percent.
The northernmost portion of the property is
approximately 2,000 feet south of the San Andreas Fault
Alquist-Priolo Special. Studies Zone. Based on the
distance, a geology study for fault netermination will
not be required.
Circulation_an9_~Gcesp
Vehicular access will be provided via three, 50 foot-
wide publicly dedicated roads which extend from Palm and
Ohio Avenues. The proposed lots will not front onto
Palm Avenue since it is designated as a collector street
from Belmont Avenue to Ohio Avenue. Lots will front
\..
..J
",
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
OBSERVATIONS
-
AGENDA ITEM _._ 7
HEARING DATE l.Q / ~ / ea
PAGE 4
Ohio Avenue which has been designated as a local
collector street with a 60 foot right-of-way. Projected
future traffic levels along Ohio Avenue are. low enough
not to create an undesirable or unsafe living
environment.
Lot Charact~ristics
The 45 lots range in size from the required 10,800
square feet to 17,120 square feet. The five irregularly
shaped lots meet the Municipal Code requirements for
irregular lots. The 40 rectangularly-shaped lots meet
the Municipal Code for lot width and depth. The Interim
Policy Document requires a 35 foot front setback. All
lots are deep enough to meet this requirement and
maintain the required 20 foot rear setback
Env ironmen..tA.l.. Concerns
The attached Initial Study addressed the need for storm
drain improvements to the Chestnut Street Drain and
Debris Basin. The Interim Policy Document requires that
the plan for public improvements and infrastructure be
approved prior to any new development in the area.
Development has been determined to be the issuance of
grading permits or building permits. The infrastructure
plan will include improvements to the following: (1)
Palm Avenue Box Culvert, (2) Bailey Canyon Storm Drain
and Debris Basin, (3) Traffic signal at Palm Avenue and
Kendall Drive. The Interim Policy Docume~t further
requires all developers to participate in the
preparation of this plan and the costs for improvements.
In addition, the proposed tract must meet all the
requirements set forth in the Verdemont Area Palm
including the conditions imposed for the high wind and
high fire hazard areas.
Nei9hbors COQ~~
Mr. Gillermo H. Gallardo, who resides north of the
proposed tract, expressed four areas of concern. First,
he stated that there is occasional flooding from a small
creek located approximately 475 feet west of the
intersection of Palm and Ohio. Second, he wants to
\...
~
-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO .PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM _ 7 _
HEARING DATE 10/4/88
PAGE
r
~
insure that there is dust control during construction.
Third, he contends due to possible wind damage, the
houses should not face Ohio. Fourth, he maintains larger
lots should be located along Ohio to avoid an obvious
visual change in lot size. Lots across Ohio are zoned
R-1-14,400.
The lots in this tract vary from 10,800 to 17,120 square
feet. There will not be a sudden change in the size of
lots as this tract offers a minimum of lot sizes. See
Attachment "G", Gallardo Letter.
Mr. .Gallardo's concerns about drainage and dust control
are addressed in the Standard Conditions. This tract is
engineered to drain toward the southeast to Palm Avenue.
Final drainage plans will be reviewed by the City
Engineering Department to insure they meet the City
requirements. Dust control is mandatory on all
construction sites in the City. The attached Standard
Requirements address dust control in Item No.5, 6, 8
and 13. The proposal is located within the High Wind
Hazard Zone. The mitigation measures required by that
zone are conditions of approval for this tentative
tract.
Mr. Alan Walters, owner of a Christmas Tree farm to the
southeast of this tract opposes the abandonment of
Meyers Road. He has been using the dedicated street for
over ten years and feels that he should be allowed to
maintain this access to his property.
However, Mr. Walters does have 300 feet of frontage on
Belmont Avenue, and thus this proposal will not
eliminate all access to his property. (See Attachment
"H", Walters Letter.) Mr. Cole, the owner of this
property contacted Mr. Walters concerning this matter.
The Verdemont Area Plan shows Meyers Road extended to
the end of this property. Compliance with that Pian is
a condition of approval of this tract. Therefore,
Meyers Road right-of-way will be retained.
\..
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
OBSERVATIONS
AGENOA ITEM _ 7
HEARING OAT!. l-o/118e__
PAGE 6
,.
7 . AGENCY C-QMMENTS
The California Regional Water Quality Control Board has
suggested that the applicant be required to provide a
c~rtified statement to the Board Office from the City of
San Bernardino Water Department stating that adequate
waste treatment capacity is available in the City's
treatment plant and that connection of this project to
the sewer system will not result in a violation of the
Board's waste discharge requirements
Southern California Edison Company stated that the
proposed subdivision will not unreasonably interfere
with the free and complete exercise of any easements
held by the Edison Company within the boundaries of said
tentative tract map.
The City parks and Recreation Department has suggested a
size requirement for future street trees. A condition
reflecting this suggestion has been added.
The San Bernardino
the project will be
established by the
District.
Unified School District notes that
subject to school facility fees as
San Bernardino City Unified School
8. CONCLUSION
This tract meets all Municipal Code requirements for' the
development of a subdivision in that the lots are of the
proper size and dimension, the area has two means of
access, and the streets proposed are the proper width.
the environmental concerns have been mitigated. The
requirements of the Interim Policy document and the
Verdemont Area Plan are Conditions of Approval. The
infrastructure plan :must be approved prior to any
development.
9 . RECOMMF;NDP.1J..QH
It is recommended that the Planning Commission:
1.
Approve the Negative Declaration: and
~
"--
"~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
OBSERVATIONS
-
AGENDA ITEM _....1 _
HEARl NG DAn ill 4 / 8.L _
PAGE I
r
2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 13530 subject to the
following Findings of Fact (Attachment "B") and
Conditions of Approval (Attachment "C") and
Standard Requirements (Attachment "0").
Respectfully submitted,
MICHAEL W. LOEHR
Interim Director of Planning
~~
Vivian Stevens
Planner II
VS:csm
Attachment "A" -
Attachment "B" -
Attachment "C" -
Attachment "0" -
Attachment "E" -
Attachment "F" -
Attachment "G" -
Attachment "H" -
Attachment "I" -
Attachment "J" -
doc.pcagenda
135300
7/13/88
\.
Municipal Code & General Plan Conformance
Findings of Fact
Conditions of Approval & Standard
Conditions
Standard Requirements
Minutes of February 3, 1987 Planning
Commission Meeting, Minutes of March 5,
1987 Planning Commission Meeting and
Minutes of March 17, 1987 Planning
Commission Meeting.
Initial Study
Mr. Gallardo's Letter
Mr. Walter's Letter
Site Plan
Location Map
A'I"l'ACHMENT "A"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM _ 7
HEARING DATE 10/4./ 8 8
PAGE 8
.,
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
Category Project Municipal Code
Permitted Tentative Yes
Use Tract
Setbacks 35 feet Defer to IPD
Lot Size/ 10,800 min. 10,800 min.
Dimensions
width 80 ft. min. 80 ft. min.
Depth 100 ft. min. 100 ft. min.
Density 3.33 du/ac 4.04 du/ac
Special Conditions Defer to IPD
Requirements: of Approval
Plan for
Public
Improvements
General Plan
Yes
35 feet
10,800 min.
80 ft. min.
100 ft. min.
3.1 - 4.3 du/ac
Required prior
to Development
~
'-
Attachment "B"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
FINDINGS of FACT
AGENDA ITEM _ 7
HEARING DATE 10/ US 8-
PAGE 9
'"'-
"""Ill
l.All lots created meet or exceed the minimum lot
requirements of Title 19, Zoning Code, and also meet the
requirements of Title 18, Subdivisions, of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code.
2. No lot created is less than the minimum dimension
required by Code.
3. The size and shape of each lot meets the design
requirements of the Planning Department in that adequate
area is provided on each lot to accommodate a residence
with accessory structures and meet the setback
requirements of the zone.
4. All lots created about on dedicated streets as required
by Code. Circulation in the general area will be
enhanced by improvements to Palm Avenue and Ohio Avenue.
5. The subdivision is not being made contrary to the
provisions of Title 18 of the San Bernardino Municipal
Code nor the California Map Act.
6. All proposed streets meet the mlnlmum requirements of
the Department of Public Works for street improvements.
doc.pcagenda
TTl3530F
7-13-88
'"'-
~
Attachment "e"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE TT 13530
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM 7
HEARING DATi:. 10/4/88
PAGE
"'"
r
1.
Tentative Tract No. 13530 shall comply with
requirements of the Interim Policy Document.
all
2. No development shall occur until the comprehensive
infrastructu~e plan has been approved.
3. The Tentative Tract shall comply with all requirements
of the Verdemont Area Plan.
4. Approval of this Tentative Tract Map dpes not include
approval of a vacation of Meyers Road.
5. Street trees shall be at least 15 gallon size and
planted on 35 feet center spacing unless otherwise
indicated by the Department of Parks and Recreation. The
Department shall determine the varieties and locations
prior to planting. Trees shall be inspected by the Parks
and Recreation Division prior to planting.
doc.pcagenda
tt13530e
7/13/88
-"
\.
,.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
STANDARD CASE TT 13530
CONDITIONS
~
"'--
AGENDA ITEM ._7
HEARING DATE 1e~ 4/~.8 _
PA 11
""'"
7 .
x
Minor amendments to the plan shall be subject to
approval by the Director of Planning. An increase
of more than 10 percent of the square footage or
a significant change in the approved concept
shall be subject to (Planning Commission)
(i)evea.~xv~xv~~ review and
approval. Construction shall be in substantial
conformance with the plans approved by the
Development Review Committee, Planning Commission
or Director of Planning-
Four
~~ sets of Landscape Plans, along with the
appropriate fee, shall be submitted to the
Engineering Department for processing. No
grading permits will be issued prior to approval
of landscape plans.
At all times the business will be operated in a
manner which does not produce obnoxious noise,
vibration, odor, dust, smoke, glare, or oth~r
nuisance.
6.
x
8 .
x
Subject to the Conditions of the Department of
Parks and Recreation (attached).
9.
x
In the event that this approval is legally
challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim or action and will
cooperate fully in the defense of the matter.
Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its
officers, agents and employees from any claim,
action, or proceeding against the City of San
Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to
reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys'
fees which the City may be required by a court
to pay as a result of such action, but such
participation shall not relieve applicant of his
obligation under this condition.
A sign program for the multi-tenant commercial/
industrial center shall be approved by the
Planning Department prior to issuance of ~ertifi
cate of Occupancy.
SP:1mc
PCAGENDA
~ STNOCONOITIONS
,..-tachment "0"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
TT 13530
CASE
AGENDA ITEM 7 .
HEARING OAi~lJlL41a8_
PAGE 12
,.
"'
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
1.
x
Tentative Tract No.' 13530 shall be in effect for a
period of ~ months from the date of approval by the Planning
Commission and/or Planning Department. However, if no
development has been initiated at the end of the ~-month time
period the approval shall expire. Additional time may be
approved by the Planning Commission upon request of the
applicant prior to expiration of the ~-month time period.
Expiration Date: October 18.1990.
COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D.
a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC & R's) shall
be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to
final approval of the tract maps. The CC & R's shall
include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the
open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads,
and exterior of all buildings. The CC & R's shall also
include a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be
included within the complex except for central antenna
systems.
b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold
unless a corporation, association, property owner's group,
or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess
all properties individually owned or jointly owned which
have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas
and common facilities in the development, such assessment
power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity,
and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all
of said mutually available features of the development. Such
entity shall operate under recorded CC & R's which shall
include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or
dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet
changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services.
Recorded CC & R's shall permit enforcement by the City of
provisions required by the City as conditions to approval.
The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this
requirement to, and receive approval of, the Commission
prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not
apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
c.
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an
appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an
undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or
~
~
.tI' slly
-
CITY OF SAN SERNARDI~O
CASE
TT 13S30
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
. .
AGENDA ITEM 7
HEARING OATE.I0/~J.88 _
PAGE , ~
,
"
2.
x
Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least
a six-foot high decorative wall with screened gates.
There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or
carport, or other specifically designated area, a loft or other
usable storage area with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition
to standard utility storage.
Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be
subject to the City Traffic Engineer's approval.
A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on Standard Drawing
No. 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to
the development. Location and design shall be subject to
approval of the Engineering Division.
Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be
granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over the
private drives within the project for all necessary City
vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles,
and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this
matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the
Planning Department.
All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative
wall. Location, size, type and design of wall are subject to
the approval of the Planning Department and Division of Public
Services Superintendent.
Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and.
local requirements.
LANDSCAPING:
a.
Four (4) copies
submitted to the
approval. The plan
the following:
1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed.
of a master landscape plan shall be
Engineering Division for review and
shall include, but not be limited to,
2) Irrigation plan.
3) Such other alternate plants, materials and
concepts as may be proposed.
4) Erosion control plans.
~ ~
design
..., slly
-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CASE
TT 13530
AGENDA ITEM _ 7.
HEARING DATE J.Q / 4 ~ 88_
PAGE 14
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior
to planting by the Director of the Parks and Recreation
Department or his/her designee. A minimum number of one
inch caliper/15 gallon, multi-branched trees shall be
planted within the parkway for each of the following types
of lots, as per the City's specifications:
1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree;
2) Inter ior lot -- two trees;
3) Corner lot -- three trees.
c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual
impact, surfaces of all cut slopes more than five feet in
height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall
be protected by planting with grass or ground cover plants.
Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall also be
planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten feet on
centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on
centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as. cover
plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall
be suitable for the soil and climatic conditibns of the
site:
Trees 10%, 15 gallon; 40% 5 gallon; 50%, 1 gallon.
Shrubs 20%, 5 gallon; 80%, 1 gallon.
Ground cover 100% coverage.
d.
Slopes required to
irrigation system
Department.
be planted shall be provided with an
approved by the Parks and Recreation
e. The maintenance of graded'slopes and landscaped areas shall
be the responslbility of the developer until the transfer to
individual ownership.
3
x
f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion
control planting of graded slopes, shall be done in
accordance with a grading plan approved by the City
Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any
grading being done.
All lots shall have a minimum area of 10,800 square feet, a
minimum depth of ~ feet, and a minimum width of ~ feet,
(~feet on corner lots). In addition, each lot on a cul-de-
,.., Slry
CITY
.
OF SAN
-
BERNARDINO
CASE
TT 13530
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM .7
HEARING DATE: 10/4/88
PAGE 15
,
"'"
4 .
x
5 .
x
6 .
x
7 .
x
8 .
x
9 .
x
\...
sac or on a curved street where the side lot lines thereof are
diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width
of not less than 60 feet measured at the right angle to the lot
depth at the midway point between the front and rear lot lines,
and a width of not less than 40 feet measured along the front
lot line as delineated on the tract map.
Where lots occur on the bulb of the cul-de-sac, a minimum lot
depth of ~ feet will be permitted. If the proposed depth is
less than ~ feet, a plot plan must be s~bmitted to demon-
strate that a buildable lot area is possible and to justify the
lesser depth.
Variable front building setback lines of at least ~ feet and
averaging ~ feet, and side street building setback lines 15
feet shall be delineated on the final tract map. All garage
entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of
18 feet.
Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double
frontage lots shall be designed and constructed to incorporate
design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback,
decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide
visual and physical relief along the wall face.
The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the
visual or engineering design of the proposed wall.
When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the
slope face shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to
this requirement must be approved by the City Engineer.
Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City
Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to
precipitation.
Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall
be required (if applicable).
Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas
or other amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on
the approved site plan.
During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around
all or a portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize
wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of
fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure
adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control.
..J
I." sKy
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
'"
"'Ill
CASE
TT 13530
AGENDA ITEM 7
HEARING DATE. _l~V.8..B-
PAGE ~
,
'"
10.
x
11.
x
12.
x
No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building unless
screened as specifically approved by the Planning Department
(except for solar collection panels).
Within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the
maximum height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20
feet unless the Commission determines that due t~ unusual
topographical or other features, such restrictive height is not
practical.
All utility lines shall be installed underground subject to
exceptions approved by the Planning Department and !the City
Engineer.
No certificate of occupancy shall.be issued
with these Standard Requirements as well as
the San Bernardino Municipal Code.
prior to compliance
all provisions of
csj/5-9-88
DOC:PCAGENDA
DOCUMENTS.l
'"
.
/
~
I'" SIl'y
~
CITY OF SAN BcRN~dDINO PUB_JC _/ORKS/ENGR.
CASE TT 13530
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM_. J.
HEARING DATt.1 0/4/88
PAG 1 7
""'ll
Project Description: Tentative Tract No. 13530 - Create 45 SFR Lots
at Southwest Corner Uh10 Avenue and Palm Avenue
Date: 5/18/88
Page ~ of ~ pages
Prepared By: MWG Reviewed By:
GRK
Applicant:
Palm Avenue Investors
NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are requir~d,
the appl1cant 1S responsible for SUbmitting the Engineering plans
directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior
to submittal of Building Plans.
Drainaqe and Flood Control
13. X All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be
subject to requirements of the City Engineer~ which may be based
in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood
Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all
necessary data relating to drainage and flood control.
X A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any
drainage improvements. structures or storm drains needed to
mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be
designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and
right-of-way dedicated as necessary.
_ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance
Rate Maps; therefore. a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued
by the City Engineer shall be required.
_ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance
Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the
surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer.
_ Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in
the vicinity of your development. This drain shall be designed
and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can
conclusively show that the drain is not needed to protect your
development or mitigate downstream impacts.
15.
X
All drainage from the development
approved puOlic drainage facility.
drainage facilities and easements
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
shall be
If not
shall be
directed
feasible,
provided
to an
proper
to the
~
CITY OF SAN yERI \RDINO ""'LtC. WORKI/1NQJl
CASE TT 13530
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM 7 _
HEARING DATE J..0/4 L 8Jl_
~
Project Description:
Tentative Tract No. 13530
Date: 5/18/88
Page ~ OT ~ pages
Prepared By: ~ Reviewed By:
r;~K
Grading
16. -LIf more than l' of fi 11 or 2' of cut is proposed, the si te/pl otl
grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil
Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan
shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading
Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings",
unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance.
17. . X If more than 5,000 cubi c yards of earthwork is proposed, a gr"adi ng
-bond wi 11 be requi red and the gradi ng sha 11 be supervi sed in
. accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code.
A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must
-be submi tted and approved pri or to issuance of a gradi ng permi t.
Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction
report shall be incorporated in the grading plan.
An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where
-feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan
and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the
Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The
on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
A reciprocal easement
-approval if reciprocal
proposed to cross lot
recorded to remove the
shall be recorded prior to grading plan
d r a i nag e, a cc e s s, s ewer , and 1 or park i n g i s
lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be
interior lot lines.
18. X The project Landscape Plan shall be revie\~ed and approved by the
-City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4
copies to the Engineering Division for checking.
An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and
-approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with
the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical.
Utilities:
19.
X Desi gn and construct all
-accordance with City Code,
serving utility, including
and cable TV.
public utilities to serve the site in
City Standards and requirements of the
gas, electric, telephone, water, se\~er
\...
~
..
~
CITY OF SAN BcRN;"II~DINO PUB~ JC -'ORKS/ENGR.
CASE TT 13530
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM _ 7 _
HEARING DATE .10/4/88 .-
PAGE
""
Project Description:
Tentative Tract No. 13530
Date: 5/18/88
Page -l- of ~ pages
Prepared By: ~ Reviewed By:
GRK
20.
X Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer
----facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing
such services in the area.
21 .
X Sewer main extensions required to serve the site. shall be
----constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be
~esigned and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer
Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings.
22. X Uti 1 i ty serv ices sha 11 be pl aced underground and easements
----provided as required.
2- X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site
----on either side of the street shall be undergrouncJed in accordance
with Ordinance No. MC-601 (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65
(Non-subdivisions).
24. X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be
----relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City
Engineer.
Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be
----maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to
City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction
Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer
and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can
be incorporated in the grading plan. where practical.
\.
CITY OF. SAN ~..:RNARDINO PUBLIC AORKS/ENGR.
CASE TT 13530
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM 7 _
HEARING DATE: JO/4/88
PAGE
"'"
Project Description:
Tentative Tract No. 13530
Date: 5/18/88
Page --L of -fL- pages
Prepared By: MWG
Reviewed By:
GRK
25.
Street Improvement and Dedications:
X All public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be
-improved to include combination curb and gutter. paving. handicap
ramps. street lights. sidewalks and appurtenances. including. but
not limited to. traffic signals. traffic signal modification.
relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with
new construction. striping. signing. pavement marking and markers.
and street name s i g n i n g . All des i g n and con s t rue t i on shall be
accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street
Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings". unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting. when required.
shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's
"Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall
be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise
approved by the City Engineer.
26.
X For the streets listed below. dedication of adequate street
-right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline
to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation
to the street centerline shall be as follows:
Street Name Right-of-Way (F t . ) Curb Li ne (F t. )
Palm Avenue 30' 20'
Ohio Avenue 30' 20'
-1RtQrior StrQQts 25' 18'
All rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from
-the following streets:
_A traffic study and report is required for this project. The
report shall be prepared by a properly 1 icensed Traffic Engineer
or Civil Engineer knowledgeable in Traffic Engineering. The
report shall be prepared in accordance with the City of
San Bernardino Department of Public Works "Traffic Policy" and is
subject to review and approval of the City Traffic Engineer. All
recommendations. as approved by the City Engineer. shall become
Conditions of Approval of the project.
~
~ 'CITY OF SAN LRNARDINO PUBLIC JORKS/ENGR. ..,
CASE TT 13530
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM 7
HEARING DA~~ 10/4/88-
PAG~ 21 ~
"---
""'\
Project Description:
Tentative Tract No. 13530
Date: 5/18/88
Page ~ of ~_ pages
Prepared By: ~ Reviewed By:
GRK
Mapping
27.
x
A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required.
28. X All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer
----prior to Map approval.
Improvement Completion
29. X Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire
~project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City
Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map.
30.
X If the required improvements are not
----recordation of the Final/Parcel Map, an
accompanied by an agreement executed by
City will be required.
compl eted pri or to
improvement security
the developer and the
If the required improvements are not completed prior to record-
----ation of the Parcel Map, an improvement certificate shall be
pl aced upon the Map sta ti ng tha t they wi 11 be compl eted upon
development. Applicable to parcel map only less than 5 lots.
31.
Required Engineering Permits:
~Grading permit (if applicable).
On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see
----Building and Safety)
32. ~Off-Site improvements construction permit
Applicable Engineering Fees:
33. X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map.
34. X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements.
____Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements
buildings; see Building and Safety).
(except
\..
~
,
CITY OF SAN WRNAJlDINO PUBLIC NOMS/ENClR.
CASE TT 13530
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
'"
AGENDA ITEM 7
HEARING ~~ 1~24/88
\..
""
Project Description:
Tpntativp Tr~r.t No 11~10
Date: 6118/RB
Page ~ aT ~ pages
Prepared By: MHli- Reviewed By: C,RK
35. ~Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required).
____Traffic impact mitigation in the amount of $100.00 ppr lot
For Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive Traffic Si~nal
____Bridge improvement fee in amount of $315.00 oer lot .
(Palm Avenue Bridge)
36.
-1L-Drainage fee based on $ See Buildinq Deot.
Total fee = $ .
per square foot.
37.
~Landscape Plan Review Fee $ 50.00
Traffic System Fee of $ per vehicle trip for City-wide
----traffic mitigation based on ADT of .
Total Fee = $ .
38. X Street Light Energy Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a
period of 4 years.
Additive Requirements'
Chestnut Storm Drain (Project 7-E13) shall be constructed from the
Southerly tract boundary to the upstream end including the debris
basin. Sufficient downstream improvements shall be made to mitigate
downstream imp~ct~.
)
\..
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE TT 13530
AGENDA ITEM 7
HEARING DATt:. 10/4/88 -
PAGE 23
39.
xx
That the developer or property owner, as appropriate,
participate in the development of the financing and
implementation plan for the following improvements and
agree to pay their proportionate share of those
improvements.
1. Palm Avenue Box Culvert.
2. Bailey Canyon Storm Drain and Debris Basin.
3. Chestnut Street Storm Drain and Debris Basin.
4. Traffic Signal at Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive.
5. Full street improvements, including curb and gutter
at the following locations:
a. Palm Avenue - from Kendall Drive to Ohio
Street.
b. Irvington Avenue - from Chestnut Street and
Pine Avenue
c. Belmont Street - from Chestnut Street and Pine
avenue.
d.
Pine Avenue
Street.
from Belmont Avenue to Ohio
ItIS Illy
At) -::hment I;EIl
city of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 2/3/87
Page 5
ITEM NO.8. Ward 5
Tentative Tract No. 13530 -- subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres located at the
southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage
of approximately 707 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a
frontage of approximately 961 feet on the west side of Palm AVenue.
The applicant requests to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-1-
10,800 Single-Family Residential zone.
Palm Avenue Investors, owner/applicant.
Ronald Running presented comments, noting the request and location of
the site and that it had been rezoned through the Verdemont Area Plan
to low density residential use at four units per acre. Two fifty foot
roads would serve the lots within the interior of the property. It was
noted by Mr. Running that the site is located in the High Fire Hazard
Zone and the two required means of access would be provided by this
roadway network. He stated that the project has received agency
approval from Southern California Edison and the California Regional
water Quality Control Board will require a certified statement that
there is adequate waste treatment capacity in the City's treatment
plant. Mr. Running stated that the Environmental Review Committee
recommends adoption of a Negative Declaration for environmental impact
and staff recommends approval of the tentative tract, subject to the
conditions and standard requirements.
Mr. Dennis stafford was present representing the applicant and stated
that they were in agreement with all recommendations and all proposed
conditions. He was present to answer any questions.
Mr. Al Walters, owner of five acres immediately south and west of this
site, was present and stated that he had a dirt road for access to his
property through the subject site. He stated that he did not live on
his property but grew Christmas trees there and used the access road
daily. Mr. walters stated that he wished to retain access to his
property and the proposed map would cut off his access.
Mr. Running stated that he had discussed this situation with the
.Engineering Division and a modification to the proposed subdivision
could include allowing access to remain for Mr. Walters' property.
Mr. Walters stated that he had not discussed the situation with the
applicant.
Ms. Barbara Sky, a resident of the area, was present and submitted
photographs of tracts of homes built last year in her area and showing
wind damage from winds which occurred early Tuesday, February 3, 1987.
Ms. Sky noted wind damage which had occured, such as roofs blowing off
an,~ block walls blowing over, and stated that the quality of
construction was very poor and she was concerned that more homes of the
same type would be built.
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 2/3/87
Page 6
Ms. Sky also expressed concern about traffic on Palm Avenue and about
the length of the cul-de-sac within the tract, noting that the site is
within the High Fire Hazard Area.
Mr. Schuma stated that projects that have been approved for the Verde-
mont Area have been required to pay their fair share of proposed street
signaliztion at locations on Kendall Drive and Palm Avenue and, in
part, for payment of the ultimate construction of the Palm Avenue
crossing of Cable Creek. Mr. Schuma stated that, to date, those
improvements have not been done. He further noted that the Planning
Commission does not have a voice in the collection of traffic signal
fees and how they are spent and permits are not required for the
construction of block walls for single-family residential development.
After some discussion of building standards and the building inspection
process, Commissioner Nierman made a motion to direct the Planning
Department staff to write a letter to the Board of ijuilding Commis-
sioners, the Building and Safety Department and the Mayor and Council
expressing concern that no building permit is required for a block
wall, and calling attention to the fact that block walls in the
Verdemont Area, which did not have reinforcement or grouting, are being
blown down by high winds. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Brown and carried with all but the opposition of Commissioner
Lightburn.
Mrs. Barbara Roberts, af 3766 Belmant Avenue, was present and stated
that she had been tauring the area with Ms. Sky and one of the prablems
is that there is nat enaugh inspectian. Ms. Roberts suggested that
members of the Planning Cammissian come aut to the area accompanied by
Building Inspectars to see what the problems are as they occur. Mrs.
Roberts stated that the safety of the people living in the area must be
the uppermast concern.
Mr. Bob Stane, af 3097 Belmont Avenue, was present and requested that
Item Nos. 8, 9, and 10 be postponed to allow the residents an oppor-
tunity to review the proposals more thoroughly.
Commissioner Lightburn stated that, after seeing the photographs of the
wind damage, he wanted something very definitive as to whether or nat
the praposed tract would be constructed the same as those pictured.
the propased tract would be canstructed in the same manner as the ane
shawn in the photagraphs. Commissioners Nierman and Maudsley
cancurred. Cammissioner Nierman was in favor of continuing the items
to allow staff to further review the proposals and to receive any input
from neighbors.
Mr. Phil Smith, af 6504 Churchill, was present and stated that he had
received a notice of the hearing for Items 9 and 10, but had received
no, notice for Item 8, which is directly behind his property. Mr. Smith
stated that the elementary school in this district is already over-
burdened and has six auxiliary trailers. He also noted that only one
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 2/3/87
Page 7
house in his tract suffered wind damage from the recent winds and that
damage was from a tract above where windows broke out and debris was
blown by the wind.
Approximately ten persons in the audience raised their hands indicating
that they had not received a notice of the hearing for all items (Nos.
8, 9 and 10).
In response to a question from Commissioner Nierman, Mr. Schuma stated
that staff had received a letter in opposition to Tentative Tract No.
13505, Item No. 10, from the San Bernardino Unified School District.
Mr. Dennis Turley, of Washington Street, south of Irvington Avenue, was
present and asked how needed schools would be built and where the
school fees were going. He stated that his children could not go off
their street because Palm Avenue is a racetrack. Mr. Turley also
stated that he did not think it was right that the proposed tract would
face he and his neighbors' properties which are one acre lots.
Mr. Morenas Gedson, owner of property on Ohio Avenue,
stated that one of his neighbors had their roof blown
also noted that they had problems down on ftEft Street
Verdemont Area.
was present and
off. Mr. Gedson
just as in the
Mr. Driscoll, a resident of washington Avenue, was present and stated
that it was his understanding that the east side of Irvington Avenue
was to be designated for one acre lots. Mr. Driscoll further commented
that he had concerns on street improvements, water and envornmental
concerns. He was concerned that projects would be approved prior to
improvements being provided in the area. Mr. Driscoll stated that he
had moved to the area because of the large lots and had horses and
other animals and did not want the proposed homes in the area.
Mr. Running explained the Area Plan and public notification process
during which the area referred to by Mr. Driscoll was considered for a
change in zoning designation. Mr. Running also noted that the City has
not adopted a Capital Improvements Program which gives a schedule as to
when improvements will be done. Discussion followed regarding the
needed improvements of bridges, flood control measures, traffic
signals, curb and gutter and other improvements required as safety
measures. Assessment districts for improvements were also discussed.
Chris. Selnecke, a resident in the area of Palm and Belmont Avenues, was
present and stated that what gets built is not quite like what the
plans show. He stated that Building Inspectors are not catching
everything and problems are being overlooked. Mr. Selnecke stated that
he was in the construction business and could see things other people
would not. He noted that when there is a power outage, the sewage goes
in~o a basin and into the flood control channel. Mr. Selnecke asked
who was going to pay for cleaning and sanitizing the whole north end of
Kendall Drive. Mr. Selnecke also noted poor grading in the construc-
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 2/3/87
Page 8
tion of block walls on the north side of Irvington Avenue where a brick
has been removed from the wall at each lot to allow for drainage. Mr.
Selnecke further commented that the Verdemont Area Plan Citizen
Advisory Committee was stacked with developers and what residents
wanted was overruled by the Planning Commission and Mayor and Council.
Ms. Susan Komanski, resident of the corner of Irvington Avenue and
Chestnut Avenue, was present and concurred with the concerns previously
expressed by her neighbors. She noted that there are beautiful hawks
and eagles that live in trees on the site and their environment will be
destroyed. She was also concerned that if the trees above her property
were moved, she would have a flood in her yard.
Mr. Ron Carlyle, of 3042 Belmont Avenue, was present and stated that
the public is very much against the proposed developments and was not
represented in the Area Plan. Mr. Carlyle stated that he lived in the
area for the serenity and if these projects are built it would ruin all
of his reasons for living in San Bernardino. Mr. Carlyle stated that
there was really no need to rezone the subject properties, because
there is plenty of property closer to the City (downtown area) that can
be developed at a higher density instead of backwards' as is being done.
Mr. Carlyle also asked if there was going to be a City
that would be updated every five years. He stated that
the area were not happy that the Verdemont Area Plan was
felt that their safety and concerns were not considered.
General Plan
residents of
adopted and
Ms. Joy Kolstad, of 1542 Indian Trail, requested that the items be
continued to allow residents who were not notified to review the plans.
Mr. Dennis Stafford stated that he was the representative for Item Nos.
8, 9 and 10. He stated that Tentative Tract No. 13530 (Item No.8)
conforms with the General Plan and Verdemont Area Plan. He stated that
notification is provided to property owners within a 500 foot radius of
the site from the latest Assessor's roles. Mr. Stafford requested
approval of the proposal. He stated that Mr. Stone received a notice
within a week of the hearing and it was difficult to determine his
specific concerns. Mr. Stafford stated that he had not been approached
by residents and he had not met with or knocked on any doors of
residents of the area.
Mr. Stafford stated that an offer of dedication for the portion of
Meyers Road used for access by Mr. Walters for his five acre parcel was
put on when the tract for 7,200 square foot lots was approved. He
stated that the tract has expired. Mr. Stafford stated that the five-
acre parcel (owned by Mr. Walters) would normally take access from
Belmont Avenue. He noted that Meyers Road, at that location, is not a
dedicated road but was an offer of dedication and the street has been
m0:ed 200 to 300 feet north on the proposed map to facilitate the size
of the proposed lots.
city of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 2/3/87
page 9
Discussion followed amongst Commission members and staff. Commissioner
Lopez concurred with continuance of the items. Commissioner Nierman
wanted staff to address the issue of poor construction and inspection
in the Verdemont Area before he would put his approval on any further
development in the area. Commissioner Lightburn repeated his concerns
regarding quality of construction. ROofing materials were also
discussed.
Commissioner Nierman made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No.
13530 (Item No.8), Tentative Tract No. 13307 (Item No.9) and Tenta-
tive Tract No. 13505 (Item No. 10) to the planning Commission meeting
of March 5, 1987, with the instruction that the Planning Department
staff address the issues of building standards and the timing of
improvements related to drainage, flood control, street access and
signalization, and schools. The motion was seconded by Commissioner
Lightburn and carried unanimously.
Some discussion followed amongst Commission members regarding develop-
ment standards in the Verdemont Area.
JT~~ NO.9. ward 5
Tentative Tract No. 13307 -- subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 22.7 acres having a frontage
of approximately 702 feet on the north side of Irvington Avenue and
approximately 695 feet on the south side of Belmont Avenue and being
located approximately 720 feet west of the centerline of Palm Avenue.
The applicant requests to establish a 71 lot subdivision in two phases
in the R-l-lO,800 single-Family Residential zone.
Mirna-Overland Enterprises, Inc., owner/applicant.
This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 5,
1987. Discussion and comments are noted under Item No.8, Tentative
Tract No. 13530.
ITEM NO. 10. Ward 5
T~ptgtive TIgg~No. 13505 -- subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 11~6 acres located at the
northeast corner of Belmont Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a
frontage of approximately 715 feet on the north side of Belmont Avenue
and a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the east side of Palm
Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 49 lot subdivision in
the R-l-7200 Single-Family Residential zone.
Richard Hobgood, owner: Mike Cole, applicant.
This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of March 5,
1987. Discussion and comments are noted under Item No.8, Tentative
TL~ct No. 13530.
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 3
* * *
ITEM NO.5. Ward 5
Tentative Tract No. 13307 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 22.7 acres having a frontage
of approximately 702 feet on the north side of Irvington Avenue and a
frontage of approximately 695 feet on the south side of Belmont Avenue
and located approximately 720 feet west of the centerline of Palm
Avenue. The applicant requests approval to establish a 71 lot
subdivision in two phases in the R-l-10,800 Single-Family Residential
zone.
Mirna-Overland Enterprises, Inc., owner/applicant.
Chairman Flores indicated that Item Nos. 5, 6 (Tentative Tract No.
13530), 7 (Tentative Tract No. 13505), and 13 (Tentative Tract No.
13572) would be reviewed and discussed at the same time, since all of
the tracts are in close proximity to each other.
Ronald Running presented comments, describing each item and noting
their location on the overhead map. He stated that the items were
continued because of concern expressed by residents of the area regard-
ing lack of proper building standards, Code enforcement and inspec-
tions, and the lack of adequate flood protection, streets and school
facilities. Mr. Running stated that representatives from the Building
and Safety and Engineering Departments were present to answer ques-
tions.
Mr. Running stated that the southern portion of Tentative Tract No.
13307 is designated as a potential school site. He noted that the
San Bernardino Unified School District has applied to participate in
the Leroy F. Greene Lease-Purchase Program. The program provides funds
for land acquisition and construction of schools based upon certain
eligibility guidelines. The School District anticipates a favorable
determination later in the year. Mr. Running stated that, while the
School District does not have adequate funds at the present time, it is
their intention to acquire school sites in the future. However,
Mr. Running further indicated that approval of the subject tracts'
should not be contingent upon future School District action.
Mr. Running noted the location of the 72 inch concrete pipe storm drain
on Chestnut Avenue and that staff recommends that the condition regard-
ing storm drain requirements be strengthened to require the applicant
to install flood control improvements as specified in the Engineering
Division's Storm Drain Project No.7, Line E-13.
Mr. Running also noted the issue of access to Meyers Road and that an
adjacent property owner had been using a stretch o~ Meyers Road to gain
access to his property to the west. He stated that staff recommends
that a condition be added to Tentative Tract No. 13530 'that the ri~ht-
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 4
of-way be maintained and the lot layout be redesigned to provide for
access. A schematic map, provided by the applicant's engineer, showing
access to the property via Meyers Road was shown on the overhead
projector. Mr. Running also noted the orientation of lots along Palm
Avenue and that driveways will not be directly on Palm Avenue. Be
stated that staff recommends an additional condition requiring that the
other two tracts (Tentative Tract Nos. 13505 and 13572) along Palm
Avenue be required to participate in the establishment of an assessment
district for maintenance of landscaping along Palm Avenue.
In conclusion, Mr. Running stated that staff recommends approval of
Tentative Tract Nos. 13307, 13530, 13505 and 13572 based upon findings
of fact and subject to the conditions and standard requirements con-
tained in the staff reports. Staff also recommends adoption of the
Negative Declarations for environmental impact.
Roger Hardgrave, City Engineer, was present and responded to questions
from staff and Commissioners. Mr. Hardgrave stated that the Chestnut
Avenue storm drain has not been started and as development occurs, he
expected the storm drain to be installed. In regard to the Palm Avenue
bridge, Mr. Hardgrave stated that the Engineering Division is recom-
mending that a fee of $310 per lot be levied for each lot of the four
subject tracts. He noted that a total of $66,000 would be collected in
this manner towards the estimated $300,000 cost of the box culvert.
Mr. Hardgrave stated that it was hard to say exactly when improvements
would be put in, because it was dependent upon the rate of development.
Commissioner Shaw noted the concerns of area residents and asked when
certain flood, road and traffic signal improvements would be put in
place and if the City had defined a program which could explain to the
public when certain improvements would be put in place to accommodate
the development that the Verdemont Area Plan allows.
Mr. Hardgrave stated that the City looked at the area and estimated the
number of lots that could be developed and came up with a unit/lot cost
and until development comes in, there is no money. In response to a
question from Commissioner Lopez, Mr. Hardgrave stated that he did not
expect improvements to be in before people move into the homes and that
it could take up to five years before enough money is raised for the
traffic signal and bridge improvements. Mr. Hardgrave felt that there
were viable alternatives to the method of assessing fees as development
comes in, currently used by the City, and suggested establishing
assessment districts to spread the cost over all the properties and
raise the money up front as a better way of providing improvements.
Mr. Hardgrave suggested that the Planning Commission and Mayor and
Council could place a hold on development until a mechanism was in
place to finance improvements.
Co~aissioner Watson noted that several cul-de-sacs a:e proposed in each
tract and asked if these pose any problems to public safety or circula-
tion. Mr. Running stated that the use of cul-de-sacs reduces speed and
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 5
the amount of traffic. Be stated that the Fire Department and the
Environmental Review Committee expressed no concerns. Mr. Anderson
stated that cul-de-sacs are typically sought after by residents because
of reduced traffic. He stated that they tried to balance the types of
streets to get variation in design.
Commissioner Flores had questions about wind damage, walls blowing down
and roofing materials.
Charles Dunham, Senior Plan Check Engineer of the Building and Safety
Department, was present and responded to questions. ~e stated that he
had seen the buildings and photographs of buildings wit~ wind,damage
and noted that winds were recorded up to 93 miles per hour ana a normal
roof is designed to withstand 60 miles per hour. Be said that roof
companies would not even certify a roof for that kind of wind. Mr.
Dunham stated that the area is noted throughout the United States for
this unique high wind situation. Mr. Dunham stated that builders are
required by the City to use a heavier shingle (300 pound), six nails
instead of four and to hand tab until summertime when you get the real
seal in your roof. Be also stated that the wind damaged roofs were
inspected and the six nail requirement had been met.
Mr. Dunham responded to Commissioner Nierman regarding block walls,
stating that most agencies have been lenient on block, walls because
they are low profile and normally do not experience a high wind area.
He stated that most walls are designed to withstand ten pounds per
square inch rather than 20 pounds, which is what the recent winds were.
He also noted that, presently, there is no building permit required for
fences (block walls) and this would be a new ordinance requirement, but
a retaining wall over two feet in height requires a permit. Mr. Dunham
also stated that there was a lot of wind damage to tile roofs. He
stated that, to avoid any real safety problems, heavier roofing mater-
ials and a greater number of nails or staples per shingle should be
required.
In response to a question from Commissioner Nierman, Mr. Dunham stated
that the present City Building Codes do not design for the type of wind
experienced recently in the area. Mr. Dunham stated that they require
the stability of the buildings to be designed for a larger wind load
and use the 30 percent exposure increase factor and require the struc-
tural engineers to use 20 pound wind instead of the normal 15 pound.
Commissioner Shaw asked if Mr. Dunham or other City staff would be able
to prepare recommendations for changes in the City's building standards
to address some of these problems that have been experienced. Mr.
Dunham stated that they require earthquake ties, which is not a
standard application, and require heavier tile (300 pound instead of
240 or 260) and a greater number of nails or staples per shi~gle.
Mr. Dunham also noted that they had required the builders to post cash
bonds to be sure that they made all repairs before the buildings were
finalized.
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 6
Ms. Barbara Sky, a resident of Palm Avenue, was present and felt that
all development should be stopped in the Verdemont Area until the
current problems are resolved. She submitted a copy of a letter from a
roofing company which told residents to turn their roofs in to their
insurance companies. She stated that she would like to see the build-
ing inspectors carry a ladder in their truck so that they could climb
onto the roofs to make inspections.
Mr. Allen Bairns, of 2385 Hyatt Road, was present and stated that the
shingles on his roof did not have more than two staples per shingle
and he had had the roofers out three times to fix the roof since he had
moved in January 10. He noted that the last wind was not more than 30
miles per hour and his roof came off. Mr. Bairns stated that the
cellophane strips on the shingles were still on them.
Mr. James Tissue, of 5945 Shepherd Drive, was present and stated that
his roof was blown off and one-third of the shingles still had the
cellophane strip on them which is supposed to be removed for proper
adhesion. Mr. Tissue stated that the house next door to him suffered
no damage and he felt . the roofing company was putting the shingles on
incorrectly. He felt that further development should be stopped or
building inspection procedures should be looked into.
Ms. Jo Silvas, of 6113 Shepherd, was present and stated that she had
had the same problems with her roof and it had been fixed three times.
Ms. Silvas felt that Code requirements should be maintained to address
the wind conditions. She stated that a building inspector inspected
the roof next door after it was fixed and indicated that it was still
not fixed properly and we should contact Forecast Development and have
them do it completely over. Mr. Silvas stated that she had contacted
Forecast Development and they said they would take care of it the same
way as they had done in the past.
Mr. Glen Gibson, a resident of the intersection of Belmont and Palm
Avenues (6495), was concerned about Tentative Tract No. 13505, directly
to the north of his property. Mr. Gibson was very concerned about the
construction of this tract to the north. Mr. Gibson was concerned
about wind and flooding problems and did not feel that the problems of
flooding had been adequately addressed by the developer. . He also
expressed concern about the problem with dust when the tract is built.
He noted the dust problems currently experienced by residents to the
south. Mr. Gibson was also concerned about the general traffic
situation, noting that they do not have stop signs and bridges where
they are currently needed, and the situation will only get worse if the
proposed tracts are built without any advance planning before people
move in. Mr. Gibson was in favor of holding down construction until
these things (improvements) are addressed.
Ms. Lily
the high
Price, of 2404 Hyatt Road, was present and stated that before
winds occurred there were a number of homes, including her
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 7
own, where shingles were already coming off and when the high winds did
strike, they lost their shingles down to the wood. Ms. Price stated
that she called manufacturers and West Coast distributors Qf the
shingles who suggested that, in our area of high winds, roofing nails
be used instead of staples. Ms. Price wanted to see Forecast
Development have their roofing company come out and nail everyone of
those shingles down so that the damage does not reoccur. Ms. Price
also noted that she had a big dip in her roof that was missed by
inspectors.
Ms. Connie Copp, of 2414 Hyatt Road, was present and stated that she
had had the same problems with shingles blowing off and in the latest
wind, which was not as high as previously experienced, they had lost
almost as many shingles as when the winds were 80 plus mil~s per hour.
She stated that her roof had been repaired twice previously and her
insurance man, after inspecting the roof each time, indicated that it
was not repaired properly and shingles were put in with staples or
nails with heads so small that they had already cut through the
shingle and it should be redone. Ms. Copp stated that a man from
Forecast Development came and said that their roofing company had not
been working out too well and they would repair the roof themselves
with larger headed nails, however, Ms. Copp was still concerned about
the rest of the shingles on the roof that still had staples.
Mr. Allan Walters, of 4933 North ftFft Street, owner of five acres
immediately to the west of Tentative Tract No. 13530, was present and
stated that his arguement would be eliminated if the developer agreed
to redraw the map and not vacate Meyers Road.
Mr. Anderson stated that a condition of approval is to be included for
Tentative Tract No. 13530 requiring modification to the design of the
tract to reflect a "Tn intersection to maintain access via Meyers Road
to Mr. Walers' property. Mr. Running noted the site plan on the
overhead map, showing how access would be maintained to Mr. Walters'
property via Meyers Road.
Mr. Chris Saldecke of 6464 Palm Avenue, noted a waiver of storm drain
fees which was requested by Forecast Development on November 3, 1986.
He asked what had happened on the request and was concerned about where
the money would come from if developers were getting waivers of fees.
Mr. Saldecke also wanted to know what was going to happen with the
General Plan.
Mr. Hardgrave noted that the request referred to by Mr. Selnecke was
denied by the Mayor and Council. Attorney Grace stated that the Mayor
and Council adopted a work program for revision to the City's General
Plan which should bring the City into conformance with State guidelines
and the City is free to do business as usual unless there is a
rescraining order or injunction placed upon the 'City.
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 8
.
~
,
,
Mrs. Barbara Roberts, of 3766 Belmont Avenue, was present and asked how
many people were present at the meeting who lived in the Verdemont
Area. (Approximately 25 persons raised their hands to indicate that
they were Verdemont Area residents and 9 persons indicated that they
resided in the Forecast Development tract.) Mrs. Roberts stated that
there is a continuing problem with roofs blowing off and flooding and
asked if there was any kind of figure as to how many houses they
started with and how many have been built since 1974 to 1983. She
stated that she had not seen any improvements in bridges or anything
since 1974 and wanted to know where the fees were that had been
collected.
.
Mr. Hardgrave stated that the ordinance requ1r1ng payment of storm
drainage fees was adopted in 1978-79 and since that time developers
have paid approximately $2,000 per acre which goes into the City-wide
storm drain line construction fund. He stated that those funds are
allocated on a yearly basis by the Mayor and Council in order of
priority as they see fit. Mr. Hardgrave also noted that the crossing
of Cable Creek would be a street improvement and those funds would not
be applicable to that project.
Mrs. Roberts stated that the Commission should look at the cumulative
effects of development in the area. She stated that she had checked
with her insurance company and they reported that 2,000 claims were
filed in the area during the January 20, 1987 winds, 55 of which were
Verdemont Area homes with damaged roofs, fences and windows. Mrs.
Roberts felt it would be a valuable survey to have figures on the types
of losses there were and when they occurred. She further ~oted that
another insurance office had indicated that premiums for homeowners
insurance in the Verdemont Area would probably be raised because of the
high losses occuring due to shoddy workmanship.
Mrs. Roberts also expressed concern that access to planned equestrian
trails be maintained. She noted a tract adjacent to her that was
approved with a condition requiring equestrian trails, but since it has
been completed it has been determined that the people who purchased the
homes were not advised that the trails were not exclusively for them
and feel that the trails belong only to them.
Ms. Liz Grogan, a resident of the area, was present and stated that she
owned several horses and did a great deal of riding. She stated that
several years ago a group of residents, with the help of Ron Running,
laid out an equestrian and hiking trail system for the Verdemont Area
before most of this development was in. She stated that it appeared
that all of their efforts were totally worthless, since the only so
called equestrian trail has a chain link fence across it and is only
for the use of the people who live in that development. She stated
that some of the trail is on the side of a hill and another portion has
a fence across it. Ms. Grogan stated that she had felt that the
Verdemont Area was one of the last opportunities the City had to
develop with some sort of class like other cities do, but obviously
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 9
the class is going out of the window and the equestrian and hiking
trails proved this point to her.
Mrs. Roberts stated that one of the tracts being considered (Tentative
Tract No. 13307) includes an equestrian trail. Mrs. Roberts commented
that she lived on and owned three acres adjacent to Tract No. 11118 on
which they have patented water rights (Julius Meyer Water Patent) that
were signed by President Howard Taft. She stated that those who put in
the subdivision were required to realign the water system. Mrs.
Roberts stated that Joseph Bonadiman had filed suit against her and 22
wJohn Doesw claiming that they do not have rights to the water. She
was concerned about approval of the proposed tracts without some
determination as to the private water line easements for domestic use
and felt that other people may become unwitting defendants as Mr.
Bonadiman tries to acquire the water rights. She stated that the
Julius Meyer water patent rights run all throughout the territory and
she wanted to see all of the water lines marked and recorded.
Mrs. Roberts also expressed concern about the equestrian trail system
and the tract where residents are totally convinced that they own the
equestrian trail which is shown on the City's maps.
Mrs. Roberts further commented that she did not feel anyone was paying
attention to details when the tracts go through. She wanted to know if
every house had been inspected. She expressed concern about the lack
of an adequate number of building inspectors and having to rely on the
builder. Mrs. Roberts felt that current standards were not adequate
and the Code should be strengthened and better enforced.
Mrs. Helen Kopczynski, of 8150 Cable Canyon Road, was present and was
concerned that the standards in the Verdemont Area Plan were deleted or
changed by the Council Legislative Review Committee, which consisted of
Councilmembers Quiel, Reilly and Strickler. She also asked how a site
designated for a school became a housing site and was concerned that
the Verdemont Area would not have adequate school facilities in the
future.
Mr. Anderson stated that the City had identified the site as a school
site and the San Bernardino Unified School District has advised the
City of their procedure. However, there is nothing the City can do to
hold a property vacant until the school district is ready to purchase
it, the school district must determine its priorities. Discussion
followed. Mr. Running stated that the school district is willing to
purchase the site but does not have the funds.
Mrs. Kopczynski expressed concern regarding the total number of units
proposed and density permitted. She also felt that there may have been
a conflict of interest, since the Deed of Trust for Tentative Tract No.
13307 was signed by an individual who was a member of the Verdemont
Area Plan Citizen Advisory Committee. She expressed concerns regarding
the need for a bridge at Cable Creek and whether the projects met the
requirements for 80 percent of the average unit size within 500 feet of
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 10
the sites. She commented that portions of Palm Avenue would be in a
landscape maintenance district and portions would not be and existing
homes would have block walls facing them. Mrs. Kopczynski was also
concerned about the numerous cul-de-sacs and block walls proposed,
noting that the site is in the High Fire Hazard Zone and fire trucks
will have to go all the long way around to get to some units.
Ms. Rita Harrison, of 6866 McClay, was present and stated that she had
lived in her home for four months and had yet to have a walk-through
inspection. Ms. Harrison stated that they had lost their roof three
times and their insurance adjuster indicated that they had a defective
roof. She stated that she had spoken with Don Hesterley, City Code
Compliance Officer, who indicated that it would not be a good practice
to leave the cellophane on the shingles and the shingles should have
six fasteners each and fasteners may be nails or staples. Ms. Harrison
stated that she appreciated the comments made in regard to correcting
the situation, but wanted to see something done about the existing
homes.
Mr. Jim Ballard, of 2739 North "F" Street, was present and stated that
he had been a resident for 33 years. He noted the poor drainage in the
tracts referred to by residents with roofing problems. He stated that
they would probably be looking at five to six years before there is a
school built. Mr. Ballard questioned whether the Verdemont Area Plan
was a stop-gap measure to continue growth and exploitation of the open
area land. Mr. Ballard also was concerned about potential conflict of
interest in regard to the voting that took place on the Verdemont Area
Plan. Mr. Ballard felt that the City should read the message that the
citizens of the Fifth Ward and throughout the City cast on Tuesday
night (March 3, 1987) and deny the proposed tracts or postpone action
on the tracts until sometime in May when there will people who can make
decisions on public policy who will answer to the people instead of
private interest.
Barbara Sky submitted photographs of Chestnut Avenue and of grading
that was approved in the Verdemont Area.
Mrs. Kopczynski asked if the applicant had satisfied the requirement
that adequate waste water treatment capacity was available to accommo-
date the proposed units.
Dr. Jim Mulvihill, of the University of California - San Bernardino,
was present and stated that there was concerned about many basic
things. Dr. Mulvihill noted that the Mayor and Council had initiated
procedures for a revised General Plan and he was concerned that there
would be a tremendous rush of development taking place by individuals
who want to propose projects prior to revised standards taking place.
Dr. Mulvihill requested that the Commission deny the requested Negative
De~larations until the Council establishes procedures to deal with
potential development that may take place between now and when the new
General Plan takes effect.
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 11
Dr. Mulvihill commented in support of Mr. Selnecke's concerns in regard
to the General Plan by reading a portion of a court case, CamD vs. the
~dQ~ip9_County Boar9_of SUDervisors, where a subdivision was approved
at a time there existed no adequate General plan for physical
development of the County. Dr. Mulvihill stated that the Mendocino
County Board of Supervisors could not legally find the subdivision to
be consistent with the requisite General Plan and such approval was,
therefore, unlawful and would be set aside.
In response to a question from Commissioner Shaw, Dr. Mulvihill stated
that he felt the Verdemont Area Plan did not have any real legal
significance. Dr. Mulvihill noted that in the Noise, Housing and
Scenic Highways Elements of the Verdemont Area Plan reference is made
to standards that exist that will be contained in the General Plan,
which, in fact, do not presently exist. Dr. Mulvihill repeated his
concerns in regard to the flood of development that is anticipated
during the two to three year period prior to new standards taking
effect. He noted the thousands of apartments, existing and proposed,
and the very high vacancy rate in the State College Area. Dr.
Mulvihill felt that the Mayor and Council needed to prepare interim
procedures or adopt a slowed growth policy. He stated that the City's
General Plan could never stand litigation and the City would be in an
extremely weak position if taken to court.
Mr. Tom Minor, of 5429 North nEn Street, was present and requested that
all of the subject tracts be denied.
Joy Kolstad, of 1542 Indian Trail, was present and stated that she had
purchased her home six years ago and it was a lemon. Ms. Kolstad
stated that the problems experienced by the homeowners are not new and
have been going on for years. She related the numerous problems she
had had with her home, including, poor grading which created a natural
swimming pool on the property, flames coming out of electrical outlets,
water coming out of the walls and the shower head pulling out because
plumbing was never hooked up, the siding on her house (and entire
tract) falling off, and the 400 foot block wall built for the
development falling down three times. Ms. Kolstad stated that one
fourth of her roof would blow off at a time and she finally did get her
ten-year warranty because she had gotten the manufacturer from Chicago
to come out and see if it had been installed correctly.
Ms. Kolstad related the problems that she and her neighbors had when
they got together to get the contractor to replace the siding on their
homes. She noted that her neighbors had similar problems with elec-
trical outlets and she was aware of bathroom walls falling down. in
homes on an adjacent street and of six tracts that have had roofs blown
off and shingles flying into windows. Ms. Kolstad stated that some-
thing is wrong here and she said residents are asking the City to do
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 12
something about the problems. Ms. Kolstad also noted the provisions of
the existing General Plan for schools and parks and other public
facilities which have not been fulfilled.
Mr. Joseph Bonadiman, of 606 East Mill Street, was present and stated
that problems mentioned should be brought up with the City Council. Be
noted that there is a wind problem throughout the County of San Bernar-
dino and just because people are having problems in this area does not
justify a moratorium on building in the entire Ve~de~on~ A~ea.
Mr. Bonadiman suggested a workshop to discuss alternatives regarding
engineering issues amongst staff. He stated that changes to the
Verdemont Area Plan were not significant and some revisions to the Plan
may still be needed. He noted that problems discussed were unrelated
to the proposed developments. Mr. Bonadiman responded to a question
from Commissioner Watson, stating that the Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Fire Code, plumbing standards and others are used, but the
things described this evening indicate shoddy workmanship.
Mr. David M1ynarski, representing a development company with a very
substantial interest in the area, was present and stated that a
moratorium could affect potential projects of his company and his
company desired to build quality homes and the City should not be
prejudiced against all builders because of the tr~cts having shoddy
workmanship. Mr. M1ynarski requested that the Commission allow the
proposed projects to proceed.
Dennis Stafford, representing the applicant for each of the subject
proposed tracts, was present and stated that the isssues of drainage
and traffic have been addressed and they have agreed to all conditions
and the special assessment district and have agreed to enter into
future assessment districts. Mr. Stafford stated that the projects
meet the letter of the Verdemont Plan and have been awaiting the
approval of that Plan.
In regard to Tentative Tract Nos. 13505 and 13572, Mr. Stafford stated
that they are in complete agreement with conditions and findings and
have no problem with staff's recommendation. In regard to Tentative
Tract No. 13307, Mr. Stafford asked for clarification of the condition
regarding the Chestnut Avenue drainage facilities
Mr. Running stated that staff is suggesting that the applicant install
flood control improvements on the westerly portion of the tract. .
Mr. Stafford stated that they would be opposed to such a condition,
since the natural drainage course does not flow alongside their
property but comes down Chestnut Avenue to the corner of their property
and curves off in a westerly direction and there would be no outlet for
water if there is construction of a portion of the channel. Be noted
that they would not be opposed to entering into an assessment district
for future construction of a storm drain.
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 13
In regard to Tentative Tract No. 13530, Mr. Stafford commented that the
property could be developed as shown on the overhead site plan, how-
ever, if the stub street (Meyers Road) was developed, it would be a
burden. Mr. Stafford noted that Mr. Walters' property has aCCeSS to
Belmont Drive and they would be opposed to providing Meyers Road as a
stub street in that location. Mr. Stafford requested that action be
taken on the proposed tracts.
Staff members responded to questions. Attorney Grace stated that staff
testified that there was an offer of dedication for Meyers Road and if
it has not been accepted by the City, it is not a dedicated road and
does not require vacation.
Discussion and comment followed amongst Commission members.
Commissioner Nierman stated that he was convinced that, at this time,
they were not prepared to handle development in the Verdemont .Area. Be
complimented the Planning Department for doing everying to bring
information to the Commission and the Building and Safety Department
for doing what they have done with a limited number of people, however,
the problem is the fault of the City. Commissioner Nierman felt that
in order to forestall insurance companies from collectively filing suit
against developers and the City, they needed new standards. He noted
that it appeared that standards in the Verdemont Area Plan were voted
out by the Legislative Review Committee. Commissioner Nierman was
concerned that the City had the lowest standards of any City in South-
ern California and that proposals meet the bare minimum.
Commissioner Nierman felt that, before there is any further development
in the area, they needed standards to cope with high wind and needed
the Building and Safety Department to present standards for new ordi-
nances for walls and roofing. Commissioner Nierman indicated that he
could not approve any of the four subject tracts.
Commissioner Brown made a motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 13307,
with the direction that the Planning Department staff prepare findings
of fact for adoption at their March 17, 1987 meeting. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Lightburn and carried with the following vote:
AYES: Brown, Lightburn, Nierman, Shaw, Watson
NAYS: Knowles, Lopez
ABSTAIN: Flores, Maudsley,
ABSENT: None
Prior to the vote being taken, some discussion ensued amongst staff and
Comluission members. Mr. Anderson suggested the alternative of sending
the items back to the Environmental Review Committee for a wind study
and preparation of a Capital Improvements Program.
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 14
Commissioner Lopez stated that he would like to see standards
strengthened and made more uniform in the area of high winds, but he
stated that, whenever you build in the canyons or foothills you are
accepting problems unique to the area and not encountered in the flat
lands. Commissioner Lopez stated that he was not in favor of a
moratorium, but was in favor of getting better standards.
Commissioner Shaw stated that he agreed that development should not
proceed until such time as improved development standards are adopted.
Commissioner Nierman wanted the word sent out that developers are going
to have to do better than the minimum.
Attorney Grace indicated that Commission members Flores and Maudsley
would be entitled to one vote, either as Planning Commission members or
in their near" future status as Council members. Commissioner Maudsley
withdrew his motion for denial of Tentative Tract No. 13530. Commis-
sioners Flores and Maudsley stepped down and did not participate in
action taken on the subject tracts.
Commissioner Knowles stated that he did not disagree with testimony
presented but concurred with Commissioner Lopez, stating that the State
Subdivision Map Act does not address quality control improvements. He
stated that he would be in favor of the staff report and would
recommend approval of the tracts based upon the fact that issues would
be treated separately.
Commissioner Watson was concerned about quality control and stated that
the developer was not concerned about the quality of work and he would
have liked to hear the developer give some testimony that the quality
of work would be improved in these proposed developments. Commissioner
Lightburn stated that he had not seen anything in this County quite as
serious as the situations in the photographs (submitted by resident,
Barbara Sky) and stated that he could not support approving any of the
tract maps.
Commissioner Nierman stated that storm drain needs have not been
adequately addressed and he repeated his comments regarding the need
for standards for block walls and roofing. Commissioner Nierman was in
favor of directing staff to come up with a Capital Improvements Program
so that a program can be implemented for major improvements and that an
ordinance be prepared providing new standards for flood control,
drainage and traffic circulation and that staff work with the Building
and Safety Department to develop the ordinance necessary for block
walls and fences and the ordinance addressing roofing requirements in
the high wind areas.
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/5/87
Page 15
ITEM NO.6, Ward 5
Tentative 1I~kt No. 13530 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres located at the
southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage
of approximately 707 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a
frontage of approximately 961 feet on the west side of Palm Avenue.
The applicant requests approval to establish a 45 lot subdivision in
the R-I-IO,800 Single-Family Residential zone.
Palm Avenue Investors, owner/applicant.
Staff's report, discussion and public comment on this item are noted
under Item No.5, Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were consid-
ered concurrently because of their location in close proximity to each
other.
Commissioner Nierman made a motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 13530,
with the direction that the Planning Department staff prepare findings
of fact for adoption at the March 17, 1987 meeting. The motion was
seconded by Commissioner Brown and carried with the following vote:
AYES: Brown, Lightburn, Nierman, Shaw, Watson
NAYS: Knowles, Lopez
ABSTAIN: Flores, Maudsley
ABSENT: None
ITEM NQ. 7, Ward 5
1entgtive Tract No. 13505 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.6 acres located at the
northeast corner of Belmont Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a.
frontage of approximately 715 feet on the north side of Belmont Avenue
and a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the east side of Palm!
Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 49 lot subdivision in
the R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential zone.
Richard Hobgood, owner; Mike Cole, applicant.
Staff's report, discussion and public comment on this item were noted
under Item No.5, Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were consid-
ered concurrently because of their location in close proximity to each
other .,
Commissioner Watson made
with the direction that
of fact for adoption at
se~~nded by Commissioner
a motion to deny Tentative Tract No. 13505,
the Planning Department staff prepare findings
their March 17, 1987 meeting. The motion was
Lightburn and carried with the following vote:
AYES:
Brown, Lightburn, Nierman, Shaw, Watson
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87
Page 7
Commissioner Brown stated that she was concerned because she was in
that parking lot twice weekly and there is a problem with parking in
the lot and she had to be very careful about leaving children in the
area. She noted that cars have been broken into in that parking lot.
There was no one present to speak to this item.
Mr. Anderson noted four letters of protest received by the Planning
Department from Glenn Skinner, of 380 West 23rd street, Myrna Lunsford,
of 372 West 23rd Street; Bernice L. Hirsema, of 372 West 23rd Street;
and Cherie Nielsen, of 379 West 23rd street. Concerns noted in the
letters included the current lack of parking, congestion in the area,
close proximity to a school, crime and drug dealing currently
experienced, late hours, noise, broken glass and trash, numerous police
calls and disturbance to the nearby residential area.
Deputy City Attorney Grace stated that there was concern about the
enforcement of parking agreements, since they are private agreements
and the City is not a party and they could be rescinded as soon as the
Conditional Use Permit is approved. She further con~ented that the
hours of operation of adjacent businesses conflict and there would be
no way of ascertaining whether the lease agreements were voided by both
parties and no way of notifying leasees of the adjacent, currently
vacant spaces. Attorney Grace recommended that leases be recorded and
be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney's office.
Commissioner Watson made a motion to deny Conditional Use Permit No.
87-6 based upon findings of fact contained in the staff report dated
March 17, 1987. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lopez and
carried with all but the opposition of Commissioner Lightburn.
ITEM NO. ~_~g_2
TiDt~Y~I~ct No. 13513 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.2 acres located at the
southeast corner of Ohio Avenue and Olive Avenue and having a frontage
of approximately 697 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a
frontage of approximately 559 feet on the east side of Olive Avenue.
The applicant requets approval to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the
R-I-7200 Single-Family Residential zone.
Donahue and Dorothy Wildman, owners; Robert Sessa and J. F. Davidson,
applicants.
This item was heard after Item Nos. 6, 7, 8, and 9, at which time the
applicant, Mr. Addison, stated that he had just received conditions of
approval and needed time to answer questions. Mr. Addison requested a
continuance of the item for an unspecified length of time.
Mr. Addison also agreed to waive the statutory time requirements for
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87
Page 8
processing of tentative tract maps according to the State Subdivision
Map Act.
Commissioner Knowles
13513 indefinitely.
carried unanimously.
made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No.
The motion was seconded by Co~issioner Lopez and
ITEM_NQ. 6. Ward 5
~AtiYJ_TII~t No. 13307 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 22.7 acres having a frontage
of approximately 702 feet on the north side of Irvington Avenue and
approximately 695 feet on the south side of Belmont Avenue and being
located approximately 720 feet west of the centerline of Palm Avenue.
The applicant requests to establish a 71 lot subdivision in two phases
in the R-l-10,800 Single-Family Residential zone.
Mirna-Overland Enterprises, Inc., owner/applicant.
Vice-Chairman Shaw indicated that Item Nos. 6, 7 (Tentative Tract No.
13530), 8 (Tentative Tract No. 13505), and 9 (Tentative Tract' No.
13572) would be reviewed and discussed at the same time, since all of
the tracts are in close proximity to each other.
Attorney Grace stated that at the last meeting the Commission took no
action on the Negative Declarations for the subject tracts and the
Commission should make a motion as to their decision to approve or not
to approve them.
Mr. Anderson presented comments, stating that staff has a request from
the applicant representing the four tracts for a continuance to allow
the applicant to present to the Planning Commission a full summary of
improvements which the developer intends to provide for that area and
speaking to the issues of drainage, bridge crossings and issues of high
wind relative to roofing and fencing materials.
Attorney Grace stated that in order to take the items off calendar for
an indefinite period of time, the applicants would have to waive their
rights in regard to the statutory time limits for processing and
approval of tract maps as contained in the Subdivision Map Act,
California Environmental Quality Act and Permit Streamlining.Act.
Commissioner Lopez was in favor of allowing a continuance for 30 days,
with the stipulation as specified by Attorney Grace.
Commissioner Lopez made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13307
for an indefinite period of time to allow the applicant to prepare a
Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont Area for review and
consideration by the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by
Commissioner Lightburn and carried with all but the opposition of
Commissioner Brown.
city of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87
Page 9
Prior to the vote being taken, discussion ensued amongst Commission
members and staff. In response to comments from Commissioner Nierman,
Mr. Anderson stated that the applicant had met with staff and the
Councilman of the Ward and the developers indicated that they would
provide a bridge crossing and channelization for Cable Creek and would
address roofing issues through an actual ordinance amendment and adhere
to certain requirements for construction permits for any walls and
fences. He noted that the wall issue could be addressed through
adoption of standards for all block walls. The issue of roofing
materials such as tile roofs and heavier materials and addressing tie
downs for tile components would also be reviewed. Mr. Anderson stated
that the applicants wish to cooperate in each of the areas.
Commissioner Shaw stated that the Commission had asked staff to return
'with a Capital Improvements Program and had specific questions
regarding building standards and answers were not satisfactory. He
stated that now the applicant has met with staff and agreed to come up
with a more detailed set of programs for evaluation by the Commission
and he hoped that the applicant would meet with residents of the area
so that they would be aware of the new proposals.
Commissioner Nierman noted that the Commission voted to deny the
subject projects and had directed staff to prepare findings of fact and
he saw no reason for the items to come back before the Commission.
Attorney Grace stated that she had advised the Commission that their
decision would not be final until adoption of findings of fact and a
move to continue the items would mean that the action was not final.
Attorney Grace concurred that, in essence, what had been presented was
a request for reconsideration.
Commissioner Lopez stated that most of the damage noted previously by
residents was to new buildings and he was in favor of allowing for a
reconsideration of the projects to see if the applicants could show
improved quality in the buildings.
Commissioner Nierman stated that it sounded like there are definite
problems in the area and action was needed by the City to overcome
problems. He felt that allowing one developer to come in and say he
would do things for his project was putting a band-aid on something
that needs a turniquet or major surgery. Commissioner Nierman felt
that a continuance, rehearing or reconsideration of the four subject
tracts may solve the problems for these tracts, but not for the entire
Verdemont Area.
Mr. Anderson stated that the intent is to provide a means by which
improvements could be made up front and the applicant would like to
propose a method by which improvements could be made for the entire
area so that they have a coordinated effort.
Commissioner Shaw felt that it was productive to have City
property owners work together to come up with comprehensive
staff and
solutions
City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87
Page 10
to development problems in that region of the City and if the
Commission feels that the soluti9ns are not adequate, the Commission
has the discretion to say so. Commissioner Nierman felt a continuance
would be productive, if they were going to attempt to resolve
improvement problems for the entire area.
Mr. Dennis Stafford, applicant representing the four subject tracts,
agreed to waive the statutory time limits for processing and approval
of tract maps, (as contained in the Subdivision Map Act, CEQA, and
Permit Streamlining Act) and stated that they hope to have a reasonable
proposal within the next 30 days.
Commissioner Shaw stated that the proposal should be well thought out
and should include the participation of residents. He did not think 30
days was sufficient time to accomplish that. Commissioner Shaw again
stated that he felt it would be productive that residents< of the area
have an opportunity to review the proposed plan and participate prior
to the next hearing on these items. He stated that, when the program
is ready, the Commission would ask that staff notify residents of a
workshop prior to consideration of the plan by the Planning Commission.
lT~M NO.7. Ward 5
Ten~Ye_~IA~t No. 13530 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 15.1 acres located at the
southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a frontage
of approximately 707 feet on the south side of Ohio Avenue and a
frontage of approximately 961 feet on the west side of Palm Avenue.
The applicant requests to establish a 45 lot subdivision in the R-l-
10,800 Single-Family Residential zone.
Palm Avenue Investors, owner/applicant.
Discussion and comment on this item are noted under Item No.6,
Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were considered concurrently
because of their location in close proximity to each other.
Commissioner Lopez made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13530
indefinitely until such time as the applicant is prepared to present a
Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont Area for review ~nd
consideration by the Planning Commission.
city of San Bernardino
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of 3/17/87
Page 11
ITEM NO.8, Ward 5
T.ntative Trl~t No. 13505 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.6 acres located at the
northeast corner of Belmont Avenue and Palm Avenue and having a
frontage of approximately 715 feet on the north side of Belmont Avenue
and a frontage of approximately 707 feet on the east side of Palm
Avenue. The applicant requests to establish a 49 lot subdivision in
the R-1-7200 Single-Family Residential zone.
Richard Hobgood, owner, Mike Cole, applicant.
Discussion and comment on this item are noted under Item No.6,
Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were considered concurrently
because of their location in close proximity to each other.
Commissioner Lopez made a motion to continue Tentative ~~act No. 13505
indefinitely until such time as the applicant is prepared to present a
Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont Area for review and
consideration by the Planning Commission.
IT~M_NO. 9. Ward 5
Tjnt~tiy~~~t No. 13572 -- Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped
parcel of land consisting of approximately 11.4 acres located at the
southeast corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue. The request is to
establish a 48 lot subdivision in the R-1-7200 Single-Family
Residential zone.
Melvin Harrison, owner/applicant.
Discussion and comment on this item are noted under Item No.6,
Tentative Tract No. 13307, as the items were considered concurrently
because of their location in close proximity to each other.
Commissioner Lopez made a motion to continue Tentative Tract No. 13572
indefinitely until such time as the applicant is prepared to present a
Capital Improvements Program for the Verdemont Area for review and
consideration by the Planning Commission.
* * *
Commission members discussed Engineering Division
approval for projects.
Commissioner Shaw stated that the conditions are vague and do not
address solutions to engineering issues. He stated that conditions do
not nail down solutions to problems that members of the public raise as
concerns. Commissioner Shaw also requested that standard requirements
be included in Planning Commissioner's packets.
conditions of
ATTACHMENT "Fl'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Initial Study
for
Environmental Review
Tentative Tract No. 13530
Southwest Corner of Ohio and Palm Avenue
May 5, 1988
Prepared by:
Vivian Stevens
Planning Department
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
(714)384-5057
Prepared for:
Palm Avenue Investors
1438 Dorothea Road
La Habra, CA
and
Me Keever Engineering
647 North Main St. t 2-A
Riverside, CA 92501
Section
1.0
2.0
2.1
2.2
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
4.0
4.1
4.2
5.0
6.0
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . ·
Proposed Project . . . . . . . . . . . . ·
Project Impacts .............
PROJECT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . ·
Location . . . . . . . . . . .. .. ·
Site and Project Characteristics. . . . ·
Existing Conditions ...........
Project Characteristics .........
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS
Environmental Setting
Environmental Effects
. . . . . .
. .. ...
. . . . . . . .
REFERENCES .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
EXHIBITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . · .
Exhibit - A Environmental Impact
Checklist ................
Exhibit - B Site Plan . . . . . · . . . ·
Exhibit - C Location Map . . . ·
. .
Page
1-1
2-1
2-1
2-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
4-1
4-1
4-1,4-2,4-3,4-
5-1
6-1
6-2
6-10
6-11
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report is provided by the City of San
Bernardino as an Initial Study for Tentative Tract
13530 for a 45 lot subdivision of 15.1 acres in the
R-l-lO,800 Single Family Residential District at
the southwest corner of Ohio and Palm Avenues.
As stated
California
Guidelines,
to:
in Section 15063 of the State of
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
the purposes of an Initial Study are
1. Provide the Lead Agency with information to
use as the basis for deciding whether to
prepare an EIR or a Negative DeclarationJ
2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a
project, mitigating adverse impacts before an
EIR
is prepared, thereby, enabling the project to
qualify for a Negative DeclarationJ
3. Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is
required by:
a.
Focusing the EIR on the
determined to be significant,
effects
b. Identifying the effects determined not to
be significant,
c. Explaining the reasons for determining
that potentially significant effects
would not be significant.
4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in
the design of a projectJ
5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for
the finding in a Negative Declaration that a
project will not have a significant effect on
the environment;
6. Eliminate unnecessary
EIRS.
7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR
could be used with the project.
1-1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530
45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues
May 5, 1988
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1 Proposed Project
The applicant proposes to establish a 45 lot
subdivision in the R-l-IO,800, single-family
residential zone. The subject property is a 15.1
acre parcel located at the southwest corner of Ohio
and Palm Avenues.
2.2 Project Impacts
Impacts identified
include:
in the
attached checklist
l.a. The cut of 16,000 cubic yards and fill of
12,000 cubic yards.
2.c. The proposal will result in development
within a high wind hazard area.
3.a. The proposal could result in a change in the
absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff due to
impermeable surfaces.
3.e. The proposal may result in exposure of
people or property to flood hazards.
6.a. The proposal could result in a change in the
land use as designated on the General Plan
is different that that being proposed.
6.c. The proposal will result in development
within -Greenbelt Zone C.-
6.d. The proposal could result in development
within the high fire hazard zone.
11.5. The proposal could impact the capital
improvements program beyond the capability
to the city to provide adequate levels of
service and require the construction of new
facilities.
2-1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530
45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues
May 5, 1988
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 Location
The proposal is located on a 15.1 acre site at the
southwest corner of Ohio Avenue and Palm Avenue in
the Verdemont area.
3.2
3.2.1
Site and Project Characteristics
Existing Conditions
The site is vacant and the topography drops
approximately 45 feet from north to south at an
approximate gradient of five (5) percent. The
northernmost portion of the property is
approximately 2,000 feet south of the San Andreas
Fault Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
3.2.2
Project Characteristics
The proposal is to create a 45 lot single-family
subdivision in the R-l-lO,800 single-family
residential district. The lot sizes range from
10,800 square feet to 17,120 square feet. Five of
the lots are irregularly shaped but comply with the
San Bernardino Municipal Code requirements
regarding minimum dimensions of irregular lots. All
of the lots front on improved streets. Ohio and
Palm Avenues provide access to the project.
3-1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530
45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues
May 5, 1988
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
4.1 Environmental Setting
Ohio Avenue is the northern boundary of this 15.1
acre site and the Palm Avenue is the eastern
boundary. The area is relatively flat with about a
45 foot drop from north to south over the 900 foot
length of the parcel. The area has been disked.
4.2 Environmental Effects
The environmental checklist identifies several
areas of potential concern. Each item checked
"maybe" or "yes" on the checklist is identified
below and followed by a recommended mitigation
measure.
1.a.
Will the proposal
(cut and/or fill)
more?
result in earth movement
of 10,000 cubic yards or
The Preliminary Environmental Description
submitted by the applicant indicates 16,000
cubic yards of cut and 12,000 cubic yards of
fill. Slopes will be 2:1. The City
Engineering Department will require that a
grading bond be posted for any ~arthwork
over 5,000 cubic yards to insure that the
work is done in accordance with Section 7014
(c) of the Uniform Building Code.
2.c. Will the proposal result in development
within a high wind hazard area?
The City requires that new projects located
in the high wind area have tile roofs with
hurricane clips for wind protection.
3.a. Will the proposal result in a change in
absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the
rate and amount of surface runoff due to
impermeable surfaces?
The Tract is engineered to drain toward the
southeast into Palm Avenue. The City Senior
Civil Engineer, Mike Grubbs, reviewed the
preliminary plans and found the Tract meets
the City's preliminary requirements for
drainage.
4-1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530
45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues
May 5, 1988
3.e. Will the proposal result in exposure of
people or property to flood damage?
The property in question is sometimes
flooded and as a result a condition of
approval of the tract will be that the
debris basin in the foothills and the storm
drain along Chestnut be developed. The
improvements are to be designed and bonded
prior to recordation and constructed
prior to occupancy.
6.a. Will the proposal result in a change in t~e
land use as designated on the General Plan?
The June 11, 1986 letter from the State
Office of Planning and Research prevented
the City of San Bernardino from accepting or
processing any permits north of the Saldecke
Sky line. It further released the City from
maintaining a complete and adequate general
plan. The processing of applications north
of the Saldecke Sky line on Single Family
lots of 10,800 square feet and larger was
allowed by the February 5, 1988 letter from
the State vffice of Planning and Research.
6.c. Will the proposal result in development
within "Greenbelt Zone C."
The proposal is
Greenbelt Study.
enumerated below.
located in Zone C of
Mitigation measures
the
are
The project is required and does have two
publicly dedicated ingress and egress routes
in "that both Ohio and Palm are points of
entry or exit.
In addition the development will be required
to have non-combustible and reflective
street markers and 3 inch high house numbers
that are all visible for 100 feet.
The development will be required to provide
6 inch or larger circulating mains and
storage capacity sufficient to provide the
minimum fire flow duration and hydrant
spacing with a residual pressure of 20
4-2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530
45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues
May 5, 1988
pounds per inch.
Each hydrant shall be identified with
approved blue reflecting street markers.
Utilities are to be placed underground.
Open ends of tile roofs must be capped with
non-ignitable material to prevent bird nests
or other combustible material to be located
within the roof structure.
Vents are to be covered by 1/4 inch
corrosion resistant wire mesh, not to exceed
144 square inches.
UBC exterior I hour fire walls.
Chimney spark arrestor, 12 gage wire screen
1/2 inch opening mounted in vertical
position visible from ground.
Vegetation clearance and modification:
30 feet from structure (some ornamental
and ground cover exceptions).
No combustible materials on-site until the
water is on-site.
6.d. Will the proposal will result in development
within the high fire hazard zone?
The proposal is located within the high fire
hazard zone and the mitigation required for
the Greenbelt zone C are the same.
11.5. Will proposal impact the capital improve-
ments program beyond the capability of the
City to provide adequate levels of service
and require the construction of new
facilities.
The City Engineering Department will impose
fees, approved by the Common Council, based
on their estimate of the future needs of the
area. The fees will be for improvements
such as storm drainage, park fees and etc.
The developer will be required to connect to
the City Water and Sewer facilities. At
4-3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530
45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues
May 5, 1988
present the water and sewer rights are
available. A fee will be imposed to
complete the bridge across Palm Avenue. The
bridge will be constructed when all monies
have been collected.
4-4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPA~TMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530
45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues
May S, 1988
5.0 REFERENCES
Mr. Huston T. Carlyle, Jr.
Director
Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street
Sacramento, California 95814
(Letters of June 11, 1987 and February 5, 1988)
Persons contacted:
Michael Grubbs, Civil Engineering Association,
City Public Works
Charles Dunham, Plan Check Engineer,
Department of Building and Safety
5-1
-'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY - Tentative Tract No. 13530
45 Lot Subdivision at Ohio and Palm Avenues
May 5, 1988
6.0 EXHIBITS
Exhibit wAw - Environmental Impact Checklist
Exhibit wBw - Site Plan
Exhibit wCw - Location Map
csj/5-5-88
DOC:MISC
ISTT13530
6-1
EXH.LJ:H'l' - J\
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. BACKGROYND
Application Number: Tentative Tract 13530
Project Description: 45 lot subdivision on 15.1 acre site.
Location: Southwest corner of Ohio and Palm Avenues
Environmental Constraints Areas:
General Plan Designation: N/A
zoning Designation:
R-l-10,800
B. ~HVIEONM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1. EaI~h Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes No. Maybe
"
~\
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more? X
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15'
natural grade?
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies.
Zone?
X
x
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
REVISED 12/87
VS/csj 6-2
PAGE 1 OF 8
TT 13530
Yes
No
Maybe
e. Soil erosion on or off the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
x
x
g.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
x
X
h. Other?
2.
AIR RESOURCES: Will the proposal
reau 1 t . in -;--
a.
Substantial
an effect
quality?
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
x
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
x
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area? X
3.
WATER_RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
Will
the
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
b. Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
x
X
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
x
X
x
REVISED 12/87 PAGE 2 OF 8
TT 13530
Yes
No
Maybe
4.
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE,B:
proposal result in:
Could the
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
x
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
x
c. Other?
x
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
x
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
x
c. Other?
x
6.
LAND_ USE:
result in:
Will the
proposal
a. A change in the land use as
designated on the General
Plan? x
b. Development within an Airport
D~strict?
x
c. Development within nGreenbeltn
Zone A,B, or C?
x
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
x
e. Other?
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 3 OF 8
7.
MAN-MADE BAJ~N>~:
project:
Will
the
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
8. HOUSING: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
b. Other?
9. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan ?
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation .systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
. J
Yes
TT 13530
No
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
""'
Maybe
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 4 OF 8
TT 13530
Maybe
g.
h.
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
of
Other?
10. FUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
Fire protection?
police protection?
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
b.
c.
d.
Parks or other recreational
f'acilities?
e.
Medical aid?
f.
Solid waste?
g.
Other?
11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
b.
1 . Natural gas?
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
Yes
No
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
--
x
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 5 OF 8
" /
TT 13530
Yes
No
Maybe
12. AESTHET1~~:
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
x
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
x
c. Other?
x
13. ~Y~~U~~--F~Q9YRCES: Could the
proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site? X
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic
impacts to a prehistoric or
historic site, structure or X
object?
c. Other? X
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
REVISED 10/87 PAGE 60F8
TT 13530
~
Yes
No
Maybe
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future.)
x
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant.)
x
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
x
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
TT 13530
r ~
D. DETERMI~~~JQ~
On the basis of this initial study,
o
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
o
D
ENVIRONMENi'AL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
r;/t!K.{)f/HeNrn ~WlpV toHM/~
Name and Title
Y/J.uW t. RI4i"
Signature
Date:
Al, ~ riBS
.
~
~
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 8 OF 8
At ..Lchment "G"
\
June 20, 1988
ill ffi @. ~ r c"" ,
;-:-:,
I . ~ .
: '. !
J UN j.~ 1988
Guillermo Gallardo
2950 Ohio Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92407
CI1"Y Pl". . .:., .:.":'1
1*.. ~. .., ~ ._' I... - .
SAN B[:1Nf\hu~~;~, C,~
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13530
TO: Members of the Planning Commission
I am unable to attend the public hearing regarding tentative
tract No. 13530. I am a (14) year resident directly north
of the proposed project residing on the northwest corner of
Palm and Ohio Avenues.
There are several concerns I wish to express and would like
read into public record.
These are four items which need to be conveyed to the Planning
Commission:
1. Located adjacent to my home is a small creek approximately
475 feet from the corner of Palm and Ohio Avenues. During
a moderate rain this creek will quickly fill up. The path
this stream follows runs through the proposed development
site. At present, during the summer months, it appears
harmless, but when rains occur ic will surely flood the
homesites.
2. What precautions will be made regarding dust contral during
construction? Over the years my family and I have enjoyed
a cool northerly breeze in the afternoons. I would hope
that a condition be made for the developer to keep the
level of dust down during and until the completion of the
project.
3. The Santa Ana winds, as you know, can be fierce. Over the
years the hurricane force winds have done extensive damage
to my home and the surrounding area. These winds will
continue to do extensive damage and there needs to be a
consideration of this factor. The homes on Ohio should
maybe face away from the wind like the other housing
projects along Ohio.
June 20, 1988
Tentative Tract No. 13530 continued.
4. There is a final concern regarding the proposed lot
sizes of R-1 10,800 and my property that is zoned
R-1 14,400. The transition of a larger lot size
should not be between the street, as in this case,
along Ohio Avenue. The flow of homes should be in a
progressively larger lot size as the project goes
north. In this case there should be homes adjoining
Ohio on the south with larger lot sizes so as not to
have an obvious visual change of zones from one side
of the street to the other.
I hope that some cf these concerns can be addressed and
I look forward to hearing further discussion on the proposed
development.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
~~~;'/Q~~
Guillermo H. Gallardo
u_____....____ .- ~ .~, ~ 28.:> 1398
- /;;i ;r~ ~~##"eP/AJo ~#'p/,.j6 ~""/.5.s/(JJ1~
/2 :/j4::,#Ep 4~ #f/ ~41Af&~/5 ,,4A/';P
-....
~~~J5"/7/t!J~'70 /C~4-71i/~ ~ /3-530'''\
~.,
1"95 /r /$ ~A:,~7Z.Y ~/b5G~
. "
~:1Al t:aq~/2S
4~_~_~ ;::::- S)-
c.~AI &~/lap/~o ::> ~A
.9:2407
714 892. 195-1-
--'
,
. .-. ~-:' ,.-;, : '(J n '.... .
~ " '\,;j'.: Ii' .
. ,\ 't t',' "
1 .:," L; ".J. .'
t., .
, I'
'. j
....t ....
JI"1 :'\ (j ~:,:~',
J,I, 1"1," ,'.
. t':J ..'-
C;'T-)' j.:,ti~;-.;:.lthu ff~. . :- .~L:'. f
SAr~ E.tFHl.~f~Hr:1i\ L: # ;;/,
*SAgJ rJ-G(2.JJAf2.pJ/Jo f2IwAhJtr (;;M"uJf-5Jo,J :
Q~Af2PJJJ6+- P1"eJJ-rATi t.If3.TAA~-1 ~3~3D-
'I p,.,fv\ N6-r d)pp~~'P r 0 Nf;\!J )4.DvSI~)&:"
o~--rt-J~ C4~)ZArzy ~ I AM AI-i- ~a. IT,
+-b)6JS'r2 r A.M OP,?c::?-SG'D -tC".J o1'Je- ASf'6"c-)
.,
o i=" 'J H l S 'J12~G 1 . Il-l 1 ~ S "yapl,/l S '0 "J
(l:2oP0?6~ .-'-0 ~F3AND(-;N AAe<,JG'f2s rr<=OAD
w/o ~l-M AVG~)()~,
A. YS""-f2- ACTO.:> -n:.! l~ sA,Mr3 ~PIVJ SlOp.!
WA.S ~eSelJ-rED 'To ~\-\e; 'R~,.JJ~}c,..
c-~MM\$~)"~ 1=V12.. A.'PPr:<OvAL- J\..~p I
Yot Ct;T7 M Y QM PL-AJ.,J-r AT -r\-~AT TI ME AL.~
Me( Frv'e ~~(2'es f=>A.f2.J/AL-L-<( ~()i2DG;qz5
--rHIc;. -r~AI)V6 T~A~ 0)0..> 'THe--r~Ac-,..~
,~ ~C:"I€v:2...!_l) ~r'I, J.. I ~.~ ,.., t J ~,___ .... ) / -r-~~l""', '\.
/t--/e l_o~Jea Ft>t2-T/O~ ~F Tt1JS Tr2AcT IS A
PG'Of C--,A-rE'P s-r-~eeT ~ Met.{~;::Z> ~A:.P.
-rt4/S s-rf2.6"r:=-, c5ij\/ec? MG' Ac~-e-ss \ 0
?AL~, AVE:,Juf3;, I H"'JG: ~eetJ uSJ0t~
--rH;~ S'ljZt~t?I ~a.. ---rJ-!E"' p,As) 1 oY2.. C;;eA.g~"
r l0~uL-O 1 ~ V,.E" ..,-tiE '~\.fE;1-~(?-/
ovJ N G (2.. c>F --r14)$ -rf2.Ac..;l N-Jp Tr+E'
rc.~NtJ,,,J&~MM1~S10N -to GJ.J'5Vl-J -rtiG
q~(? 2iJ~ ,J6E: i2-/,J& ThpAa..T^~G'"I.JJ M'rP -r..1 E:
c-::)jl.)J A..,--rOf2->Jf51) ~ CJFFI CG'" ~,~ c:2,N'Fli2tV\
--rH~T -nt'S l"S i~iA3'ED A PevleA-reD
~.\Y2..6'2T A;N-p -rHAJ ~J,..JFOt2.kh.~ c::lV) l._
GYve; PoE:~ NO] kL-~W fs.I\.I..J1?o,JMENJ
ttJF ~'Plc-A:Tt3D -S--ra~TS tt4^c ~f2G"
. '. '-
-S,'L.L- 'N l)~c.
--rH-E P8JE:LOPt:(2. l-\N:; SL)G~iZ~TeD .HAT
r ~I\/S uP -THE ~'~ib at;= Mc:yr;;:~ ROAP
AND LJSe '6cL.MOJJT AVeNue W 14 I eH
-
'~01-JT~ MY Pi2c)?e't2TC!. -L cAtJ a'''-JL-f.(
J.AAk'8" A. $',Mf'L-~ cC:9MPAt2l ~o1J. 1;=>0 YQJd
oW}...) T\AJO
.. -
AVT~)MO(3il-es? WOuLD YOlo
-cUt >- t-l -ro ~,vt; j\A 6 o,.J 6" OF -St ~'EM '?
<:..fOL) COlYL-D STJl_L- u~8' --rHS" OIrl51< ONe
(
---rT4 AT s tt-otAJ ..L reeL "-Be U J -r-vJ 0
A..c-C-B~~ S'TY26E,S ~ M Y 'P(2oPbt<.-rV.
r SSE No 1<G'AC;;o~ -r~~AT r s ~.-totJL-P
~eL..J1J~u,s.~ Mec{t;f2s ~AD S'IMPJ-t(
~12 'THE: &+JeF7,
~F ~AcT t3!;;3L),
~a //L L. '
:achment II'!"
(~
ot".
fr." '\
~, '. '
~. ')
. .;J
, I,
~ ,I
.I .4
1111
~a If
. .
!IE
/1
~I .
i il !
I !I I I
III!i11i I
., lit ~! I B!
s I~. I. ~iiii
I- . '!II I ! i IIII fi .
i ;!. i i. :i1i il
I!~ I~: e ;; ;lillI
i II~ Iii i,ll"~
I !! ~;i ~i ~ ! .Iill
c
-.= ,
~ ~III i
~ i~111
d oi!1
Z !rsl
t- rs~ I
~ !ii~
~
\~~O~E' I~VlU ~Xlli.V.L.IaL\L'
'0" \
'.. "-
. ,-S::
~
\
'\
)
\
'-:,',1
I Ii
~ J..J
\.: .;J
C' _
''\
\
"\
o
;'.
\
\.
\
\ ;
Y',
\
"" \,
\
\" \
6-10
Attc> ".ment "J"
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ r AGENDA ~
ITEM #:
LOCATION
CASE TT 13530
7
""
HEARING DATE _ 10/4/.88 _
~ ...
....oIIl
R-1-14,400
R-I-20,OOO ~
,"= 800'
4
R-
....
6-11
'N
"-
1":"00'
." "'TACli!1ENT E
'g \ - \0,8co -S.l=-
L.Or c,
.
I 10
I ,,""
I ,'"
-..."- e:"'l
--1 ~ov fH
1
_.___.1
\
--. --\
\:<.
---~
.
196.""bo.l"T
A.vt
heST
b -"\\";'" A.v~
i
I
-.\
i I
'II ,I " , i
, . I I I
\--- --- t-----f --.t, -. J
, 'I
I ' . ,I,
w
.>
I~
11
j
I~
-r
.... ~"'e-.l~ It"
-.-..--
Me-yH&' e:.A-C CON~~O-.l
CD WALTa '5 :
,,) 10; lPT-,. tAT>lN. NOW II. ~T~
\,) ,~I Mollk ~ C! 1&.0Cl0~)
~) ~~ 'tlt.4""L/~ 0'" Plt.~~
SCEN..4~I''' () ~
1Je. tlEL(),P~cNT
'.
"
. .
.TTACHMENT F
\.
,".,-'
K'1 - lO,eco S.f='. L.o~
~A,- F'-'1\J~ 'Dev~~-=r
,
-_J
\.-
';'~IO =-~._-~~=:- n.
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I I
! I
71
t"""
I~ ~------
n ~ --- ~ ~~~. ~ --------
I ' 'I
r ~-- ---- l ---.--
i ,
1- .J . - - - -. _ _ __ _
I '
I
~, ..,'------
- . - - -=-
I
I I
/
/
-
t
/
/
/
/
--
~J
.~
"
"
l
\
\
\
"
,
,
,
...t''',
,
\
.
,
I
I'
(
,
/
,
-----
- - - - - -:- - - - - .
~€L-.N\ONT
J
SE CoA/LJ
S(!EA/~R'/() tJ~ lJEVELo~/"?EA//
~ ~/R(JV~O 6)""
&N'A/~ C:~,,?/J:.f t""d...v
/()-li'-8'r
.....
,~ ...,'
..
~