Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutF-Council Office COUNCIL ACTION CORRESPONDENCE To Councilman Jack Strickler Subject Policy on Providing an Legal Opinion Dab January 6, 1987 Meeting Date January 5, 1987 Agenda Item No. New Business Action The issue of obtaining a legal opinion from an outside source on the two most recent memos from the City Attorney concerning his policy on conflict of interest and examining the appropriate role of the City Attorney in representing members of the Council and the Council as a whole is to be placed on the January 19, 1987 Council Agenda as the first item (preceeding the consent calendar). SC:dc Mayor Wilcox cc: City Attorney City Administrator I , /rfY.MV SHAUNA CLARK City Clerk F JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP Attorney General Cni' ~f ( , _' "Mi' IF~} - - ~/I, I ""-,1 State of California 1'086 f1 . "1I,l'ru J DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE P. O. Box 944255 Sacramento 94244-2550 9 ISIS K STREET. SUITE .511 SACRAMENTO 9SIl14 (916) 4015-95.55 December 24, 1986 Mr. Jack Strickler Senior Council Member City of San Bernardino 300 North "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Dear Mr. Strickler: This is in reply to your December 17 request for "an oplnlon regarding the proper representation our City Attorney is to provide to the Common Council". The opinion function of the Attorney General is limited to providing opinions to state officials, district attorneys (and county counsels) and city prosecutors (limited) to criminal law questions). I have attached materials which explain the Attorney General's opinion functions. Since the Attorney General has no authority to provide opinions to city officials on civil law questions I must respectfully decline your request. It may be of some interest to know that this office is preparing an opinion on the question whether a county counsel has a duty to provide a legal opinion to an individual school trustee (Op. No. 86-404) requested by the County Counsel of Solano County. Sincerely, JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP ne P'JJL ACK WINKLER Assistant Attorney General Opinion Unit JW:lrh Attach. CIT ERN ARD IN 0 300 NORTH "0" STREET. SAN IERNAROINO. CALIFORNIA 92..1 i .. ~ :t:.; i ~ 1; . I ~ " " JACK STRICKLER Councilman, s.venth Ward (714) 383~ December 17, 1986 :~ t J 't l '~ { ~ Honorable John Van de Kamp Attorney General state of California 1515 wK- street, suite 511 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear Sir: Please peruse the attached information and furnish an opinion regarding the proper representation our city Attorney is to provide to the Common Council. several Council Members are of the opinion that the City Attorney is attempting to shirk his responsibilities. Thank you very much for any assistance you can provide in this matter. J K STRICKLER enior council Member JS: jv Attchs. cc: Mayor Evlyn wilcox Mr. Ralph prince, City Attorney Mr. Ray schweitzer, Acting City Administrator ~ GOVERNMENT CODE I 12519. OplDlOD8 The Attorney General shall give his opinion In writing to the Legislature or either house thereof, and to the Governor, the Secre- tary of State, Controller, Treasurer, State Lands Commission, Super- intendent of Public Instruction, any state agency prohIbited by law from employing legal counsel other than the Attorney General, and any district attorney when required, upon any question of law relat- inl to theIr respective offices. The Attorney General shall give his opinion In writing to a city prosecuting attorney when required, upon any question of law relat- ing to crmllnal matters. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OPINIONS [VOLUMB 64 FOREWORD State budget constraints have caused substantial reductions in the Opinion Unit staff. To better utili~e limited staff in the performance of our opinion responsibilities under Government Code section 12 S 19 the following practices (some of long standing and some new) have been implemented: (1) All requeits for opinions must be in writing and relate to the re- quester's official duties. r1" (2) Requests submitted by or on behalf of anyone not entitled to an opinion under section 12 S 19 will be declined. (3) The opinion request must be sufficiently specific to permit precise legal analysis and the questions maybe reframed to state more precisely the legal issues presented. Opinions will not be issued to resolve factual questions. ( 4) Requests will be declined when the questions: (a) are at issue in pending litigation; (b) call for interpretation of proposed constitutional amendments, statutes or regulations before their enactment; or (c) call for the interpretation of local charters, ordinances or regula- tions. (~) Requests submitted by local legal officers and by state officers having full time public legal counsel to advise them must be accompanied bya full legal analysis and conclusions on the questions presented. (6) The issues presented must have sufficient significance to justify the expense of preparing an opinion. Informal responses will be provided on opinion requests when appropriate. Pebruary I, 1982 GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN Attorney Ceneral oj tM State oj CaliJornia