HomeMy WebLinkAbout53-Planning
CITl DF SAN BERNARDI,...., - REQUEr--,. FOR COUNCIL ACT.~N
Frank A. Schuma
From: Planning Director
Dept: Planning
Date: November 18, 1986
Subject:
Appeal of Denial of Appeal on
Review of Plans No. 86-43
Mayor and Council Meeting of
December 8, 1986, 2:00 p.m.
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Previous Planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on November 5, 1986, the
following action was taken:
The appeal of Review of Plans No. 86-43 was reviewed and it was the
determination of the Commission that the appeal was not filed in a
timely and appropriate manner, and, therefore, no further action
could be taken by the Planning Commission.
Vote: 5-2, 2 absent.
Recommended motion:
That the hearing on the appeal be closed and the decision of the
Planning Commission be affirmed, modified or rejected.
QJ
~
--
Signature Frank A. Schuma
Frank A. Schuma
383-5057
Contact person:
Phone:
Supporting data attached:
Staff Report
3
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
75-0262
Agenda Item NO.S...::5
't;ITY OF SAN BERn-ARDINO
"'~
MEMORANDUN. .
To Shauna Clark, City Clerk
Subject Appeal/project 86-43
From Council Office
Date November 13, 1986
Approved
Date
I herewi th appeal the decision
Ccommission to not hear my appeal of
opinion is that my appeal was filed in a
manner and that the Planning Commission
the authority to review the Developmental
recommendations.
of the Planning
Project 86-43. My
timely and correct
and Council have
Review Committee's
ft.4-
RALPH HERNANDEZ
Councilman, Third Ward
RH:sr
cc: Planning Department
Apr'EAL
1 SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF PLANS NO. 86-43
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
p~ope~ty lo~at~on; ~ubje~t p~ope~ty ~~ 1.3 a~~e~ hav~ng app~o .
498' on the South ~~de 06 Mill and be~ng lo~ated app~ox.
200' we~t 06 the ~ente~l~ne 06 Ran~ho Avenue
TO. CITY CLERK
CITY 06 SAN BERNARVINO
CITY f{ALL
SAN BERNARVINO, CA.
c-\
P-l
-,
I
Al! unde~~~gned paAt~e~ do heAeby appeal the above ~
ment~oned plan b 'o~e the Plann~ng COmm~~~~on at th~~ ~me.
. 'J ~
The ~ea~on~ 60A the appeal (p~ote.tl aAe l~~ted a~ 60l~~~:.
. ~.
,
I. Ven~ity 06 the aAea----- theAe aAe ~eveAal ~omplexe~
~n the aAea at th~~ time. ......-.
one complex ha~ 184 unit~
the next one ha~ 156 unit~
rii1 nut, 204 unt~~ (w~th a vacancy 60A th~" one
~alone 06 62%1, anothe~, ha~ 10 un~t~...theAe
aAe two mobile home paA~~-------one w~th
103, anotheA 93.... .th~~ ~~ ~n the ~mmed~ate
CITY rLANNil\!~ l,;:J'AillMENT a~ea... .lu~ than a blo~fl d~~tan~e 6~om the
SAN BERNARDINO. CA
pAopo~ed ~~te. ....... .theAe aAe oheA paA~~
and complexe~, al~o. ~n the ~uAAo~d~ng aAea.
oo~@m~w~
NOV 07 1986
2. CA~me a~t~v~ty-----theAe ~~ a h~gh ~~~me aAea......
d~ug~, bu~gla~y, petty the6t... .all w~th~n thi~
~mmed~ate aAea.. ... .one ~hopp~ng cente~ ha~
become a "wa~tland" 06 empty bu~~neHu....
due to the cA~me ~n the a~ea. .....~t ~~
adjacent to Colton, and theAe6oAe, ~u66eA~
the oveA6low 6Aom theiA ~Aime ~tati~t~C6.
3. School~.. :.the p~opeAty ~~ w~th~n the R~alto School
V~~~A~~t;. ...thi6 6~hool ~6 alAeady at ~ max-
~mum pea~ load 60A the~~ populat~on l~m~t.
(I)
'<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAN 16-43 eont.
/
4. Involvement 06 the 601lmVl..... Bob Holeomb ex-
Mayo~, ha6 ta~en it upon him6et6 to beeome involved
....thi6 i6 totally out 06 line....hi6 u6ing hi6
in6luenee in 066iee6 whe~e he i6 no longe~ in
autho~ity, but ~ying to u6e what in6luenee he
ha6 ~emaining. ..to eneou~age mo~e e~ime aetivity
. -....mOlle ~aHie p~oblem6...mOlle p~oblem6 with an
al~eady bu~dened 6ehool 6y6tem.....we 6eel i6 a
dlAeet in6ult to the eu~~ent Mayo~....the Hono~able
Evlyn WUeox.
A petition h46 been elAeul~ed, and 6ignatu~e6 gathVled......
in a VVly &ho~t length 06 time.....lette~& we~e 6ubmitted
to the Planning COmmi&&ion, the Mayo~'& 066iee, the CouneU
oHiee... . all 601l uview 0' .hi& del.ieate 6ituation.
Thi6 planning i& &u~ely no~ in the be6t intVle6t 06 the eom~unity
.....it eould only elC.a6Vlb~e the a~eady exi6ting p~oblem6.
PATE:
t(lf2J.t,I91'~ '
,
ALICE STIn
~
Sl f'lKDl\ST ~oe.\LE. ~RK..
~'::I.So w. \'f\\LL S\'o ~~b
Co L"\ 0 N) c.. f\ '" ~ ~ ~ '-\
<6~~-~~'5\o \ <?,~'6-\.,'oS;
"~k-,Q
JEA HE STIE.L
. HUTCHINSON
Planning Department
San Bernardino City Hall
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
October 14, 1986
Stardust Mobile Home Park Owners, Henry and Alice Stie1, and
the following residents of Stardust Mobile Home Park at
2250 W. Mill Street in Colton, are against the approval of
construction of a 48 unit, 3 story apartment complex on 1.3 acree,
located on south side of Mill Street, west of Rancho Ave. in
San Bernardino. (Plans No. 86-43)
SPACE
4~
'-l~
!./7
'11
.'17
]u
3/
5/
51
f9b
3L.
3'7
~I
~3
1-/3
NAME
\\tN.~\{ S\\tL
.k.Ll~~\L, ~:XA~J
.e~ U<.% '--
1 ( J
(!.IH<. (" k.. ~
Afj t .~'-
1: ~vn~c~
W f. f/.
~~L'
C'~~ A
({~~~.3'
~, (, " ~p~~/ II i:nv
C /tU V ,j.<.....c, tyAJ
~--.-l2 'II / ~
~~
f(of'- &Gt..4l~
-.;
.-'
-:CJ
:-'\1
')
, I
--,
,
00 lli @ ~~ \Yl ~ {ill
NOV 10 1986
CITY PLANNING OEP Am MENT
SAN BERNARDINO. CA
...
Lf6
/16
2>~
52
~(,
1)5
<60'
f? t:l~
,()
13
'78
78
Io-~
~. ";t;.
34
7:>1.{
'(7
"7 ':J-
S,
6'(.,
b' b'-
0'4
ti II
~- Cf
=>3
sgO
~1t
SPACE
NAME
-
~H-f;
12k 7' ~ ~'L1: ~
~~-?Jf' '71~4)
C~~~1--td-l-lu ~
e'lI~"~ ~.,,~
~Ult2-IJ ~~-iJ
~') '. 0 .
.:-7 ~
.'j'"' ',.:..- ,_/,.,f_
,.! I ,,'~, (... _ ~\ :,
'''I .' :'\.... '--:1-+--'
j ( ',li . ,. v' 1,..: ~
. :)'
..' ,
'~j';' U'!' L',,-," .*..U->7J
4 'l.'IV'N",,:..-.IJ.:..J ,.' ,/./ ...,." - . ,
';/ J (. ,~L L .,. .j'.." ~~, i-'/" ~-, _...,....-
,V ~ t4-tt Cp (L /-tM~
:}vt'M-i/~ rf/, rD>>^"~
~ 6'
/ .., -'
~ A" C ( <C"-7Y;: (,.~.y:>.(
~ai2-~."t??J'(~c:(
11~ 'rl
&~~~
C' '- "
~~ ~':'}I{ (;f~~A-A~
(.~~r .K;k.,.~V" ",~'7
)J J J:) <.2 /J ~/-r-
j) Ii,~
E fct.,) tf;CVlA-:x4/J
..-, c!) , /
L?~. _, .... . ~ L,'--r!'ee-;~
~~~
.
/ (J .. /<,/- ,t\(.
SPACE
~ f' fJ' '1 Lf
5 -/7 '1
~ tz~/
"'~
'..~
"~ ~-G
lrf
f (
r J
~;
/.1
II
'1
If
1/
/-.
'I
'^
If
01
'I
/-
1::./
(PO
L,o
\QU
60
t\-
~y
71
6S'
b7
/0
l~
\'t\
" II
~/ / I
tI
1-1
l~
\g
NAME
-
/ ii / c; - .f'1e
SPACE NAME
<$r' l~ ~~~/ e-"--<-l)--"
.0'\. \ ~ ~J~~ "
~ P/~ J4 4/ /U ~ (a'M to
~~. &~ d, . cfr t'~#
. I
,8f' '1- 'J- (d telA{,' t'/)/l t/ftfA-a~
f ~-::;:L. ~~,1IJ3-1(~~
,....
V\ /A.> UM-....x- Wtl.~L
~ Z -e~~.{J ~l ~'L
~ :U-d~4J1l~~
-7 0~ 3- ~-L;a:j
(Jkf tt./ ~ d'
s<~,
.~' /UI 'T-LL .~
dt '2>1~
It> / P fi~7' /7
~p Q ~
~' ~~ . ,'.~
re-", . b'
4 fl.P "'/72....-.,-; ~ ,'" C7.
'~Cl. .--~ ~
,Y,f'" ;:::;;../ d-- ,'/# c.-~
~I/'~~
I.( (,1'7
f7 t 0'--/ A
V( ~Jh<-L!It' . ~AA-"-
r? ~~ -7'- Ii /
,( .j' _ ?~C- ,.1/ ' t.--~~-t,...,d!
'f Y(,; ')~ 1?'h~
~~ ,.:/ .,,', (
. 7,'
, I -"\Je $') 1(",-".,-;, '). ~/A' ~ 4...:.--
( I I-I q. '?'77 ~ ';1-' W~ .
/1 .3 .;L
I ,L.u. ~;, . (~.l' (j <'< (-.; ,I
i, Y ']
~l ," l'l ~ .' .
I{ W7 -; 4 /) a_t&l.A--W' L
.'2( [citcA.- /3 (l t~~:
JD 1 f(-,'(,.
,
OCTOBER 14, 1916
TO. CITV.' SAN BERNAROINO
PLANNING OEPARTMENT
300 NORTH .0" STREET
SAN BERNAROINO, CA. 9241'
('''';
,;0.
,
"
,
,
~
c:
, ,
,
WE, THE UNOERSIGNEO, STRONGLV OBJECT TO THA APPROVAL
OF CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOS EO 4' UNIT, 3-STORV, APARTMENT
COMPLEX---PROPOSEO LOCATION TO BE ON THE SOUTH SlOE OF
MILL STREET, WE$T OF RANCHO AVE. WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN
BERNAROINO. THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO PlANISI NO.I6-H.
> .
NAME
AOORESS
t,
Jl;lQ...kr ('J..~A,d :tf~, ~.Il (). f,':>I/I>J
~ 2- W. e.H~.r.f,IV.... T -#- .:(03 SlJelo '}I2V~
<) '>,0 (1'0
~:r~i~#/~l)1 :w~~ ~ 9;;.'I^
I /(.J.t!' Zl2- '" &72-'I1~
~~a/~~~'9M~
f{W",,_~;~__u /. &.. 9~J/J
/D .;1( ,'hi
'~TOBER 14, 1916
TO: CITY 06 SAN BERNARIIINO
PLANNING IIEPARTMENT
300 NORTH "II" STREET
SAN BERNARIIINO, CA, 92418
WE, THE UNIIERSIGNEII, STRONGLY OBJECT TO THA APPROVAL
OF CONSTRUCTION OF A PROPOS EO 48 UNIT, 3-STORY, APARTMENT
COMPLEX---PROPOSEO LOCATION TO BE ON THE SOUTH SIIIE OF
MILL STREET, WEST OF RANCHO AVE. WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN
BERNAROINO. THIS IS IN REFERENCE TO PLANtS) NO.I6-H.
AOORESS
u- k-i)
;a tzy <;)- ..diu, '"
_ t/ <-
'-lIl'~t"", '~.Jj,:a
~ I' ,,/i.),I,:,,~
;4.-/,/ c'
......
r.ncuzL..,. ~~(!!l.L.
9.1:01"("
...~... .5-1414-A.CI'~ {:.""
i /].. ,-.2 ,// c
,A/.. ~'rt"..^('~
~ Ro' j,' f';."'/<'
, ( AJ.,Jlli <</11<1 .
~~ ~'j'~ ~~~: :-'''''
"~-"- " ~~M-'- .-< ;,- ~::: 0,7:. i~,~
~;-,;:t~~ :;~J ;~f;a:~;.~~;d~$~~~~~:;~:~~
iJ"''}.,i'l 'ii,~" 1y.'~"L- ;: :)'j,. 'oj 1'1.,.4 ,,,,; A{. ,-7, ~.-n ..:\:;."..,.....1.~~
~. . .
(]-V}'11'h1....l 4/ ,,67;'20 J) n /1..' ('A~......,i,,~U? St"- {, 7/.,.-t-~ -~,/-. ..-
L 7L~ .ti:>~.t~ ....L...... ;7 ~;"]; L,J (i~o4'../d<0 c./
. I (. , .
U. I ~ T
l'
t'..{.~LiJ ~ .3
It'. d~..1:'/U.r:#_'j
-<. J ~- ,. Iii rj,,,p';.:f t+ 11
,J..2,r/ I.V E..!?,'T..bJ *,,'
..........
II
-~ ,~~ __ ~-~" ;. ..'J ~).;~ "'\0 "
4~:J J 1a.,w'Kutc
~~.A~r~
t(l--t"U'. c, 5. u~(J~;_. ,-~'. II'. (f}1( ( .;:;:trl;l.
~::A...... '~.vd..(', ('c (
Ji'
/1/"
. I
/l.
I
Planning Department
San Bernardino City Hall
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Octo~-~ 14, 1986
-.;
"
,
~
,
"
.,>
-'
We, the undersigned, strongly object against the approval of .
construction of a 48 unit, 3 story apartment complex on 1.3 acres,
loc&ted on south side of Mill Street, west of Rancho Ave. in
San Bernardino. (Plans No. 86-43)
!!!m!
'f~~+~
. .;:---;~..,~.u.JC
, ~ "l..
:,' . i/
.1IJ;~~
()/ / / "
, /"
:~'''~,.(... ,.~., ~.:~( /.';!'
:')~~/ /J;1~
(at<rva.. ,1J' ~ ~
,~ j7
'~abl4 7?l-t .
~ ,L/ r.
*'r....:/A;{-; JI,/;f
(;lI;1 ~fir~
#......4c....;,l /J"-<u~..
, .J){j '\-);
.'\ .i6U' (-~ ,-' cJL--
p'::->
~i;JL~~~~
~~/t;JJ
t;;~ M~\)tflllU
.~~~r
Address
'd.~s'O W. C~~\~\\'\ :h,.~~.
.:).~'"'" L '''::, c.~\.,...i.~ V\..~, ~ ~(; 'b....J\t\.,C,
:}:l.1 5 t\ o.,.J.vl--# 8'2 5. f) I
j. , ). S ,,)/ i+:-i'/4" tfy.;z s, 'B .
..;LI.;J...:;Z t</, CI(..e4....".( . ~r:? 5.,$,
.f'/:S ~.J' //1/ 1.~.(.'4.,,~;,o.- I.::nr~ ,-;',;;./. .6~.
/ f5?? 0. J#.dI/ J.6 '
.2/ (/ c, W ;f(/// .j 6'
cJ/;V W '17lf.ll 5/3--
1/ // J '.~
..1 /,"-.(./.0, ,{)/"=,
00 ". '7 i',' /-( / / <;7 S.;<:
) (:,1 lL . J)!t.!! ~ - ~'. J?,
.L" 3 5 (J., C-.(".r.t",(:YI .s. 8,
].1 ;...~:-., w \~J'LJ:Jj)cl .0) /?,
~) \.) l.<.1. C' ~ ~~~
'., \..JU~,~A.
. 14 'I (J.) c1u..,J:,J /&!; ;;, /3
1\lt,-' u). CJ~4~\ S~
,?,\ IP1 \A), Q.,t~~tST :J.~ ~
"U,S'~ w. rl1/LL snt Q..OLT'DN
/
/l'It('/'"
Name
'1)7/l~3 B .fYz~r1ft.
" . 4 ~ (vI'-' <'oj ('-.....~,
._ '--l ' - ~
~<<,-lv (i)k~,
c/. d1~1(Lt) ~e6.'~tr:.
f<.(J, f.Ic'f-
~A .
Address
/', '
/' /
- . I"?/' l/~'I f.~'. r
~) ) .:;~' Jl. (hi., t:;((, , ~
:/' r ~ .....,
'I. '1- y 3 ()./ \:...,' /-J-'1' ('11.<..,,:f "" ~<, I >.. '7/"-"-'.l.,,,,, l<.:
fJ-J-.3( U--'";' f!/u.:i"","',/.J/ /1N,,,./kt,,tI~ ~"
b( /q"; tv!. 1J'Zd.t. .x:/L, ~~1( 4v~ 6 ,
_?/ ,;. '" f-t-'. ,~/;:/ ,<;I: ,513 {Vt?\. .
.' /. - . /( ,
_;.- _ 'i # r
, ,/-L" ( 1/Z"..) "/'-t,/, ---// (// . .
-" , c." ~() '\
h.~ 5' 0 l,-l ^' t'J\ \ \ \ S ''(''l C o? :J?\.
@,;)SO W )11' LL S'f'l\0e.;J. 0
, ./1/: r
/"
b~ /f0l6~h,,~1?~O)'
/J / ;'C/ iJ 1'0.s C,q AJ () 1</:2 ~ Iv' ch e,5/f/ (J t t7 '6 o() I
l~~.~ ~/Q;;l.()~estn\..LT 'ff ~e03
~cJ. . ~:</~2 au. cAes.;J7,b3bCJ3
J4 .,' c#,/&,~~,-
,-y~ Jj~ Oli~~W ~0 ~ILi~
~~ ~~ _d-ldd W. cV'.....~~~.'f~/<;./O/
i,h ,g,~~ c9/oM~. d..--...?:-' /#:~~
~~ ~. --- ~ ~
~ I
i
I
,
11
'I
\1
;\
!!
,
I
II
'I
I!
"
I
I
I
Ii
II
!i
'I
I:
I
I
il
, 'i' ,"?-
;/.'
!
~ITY OF SAN --dEpa IARDINO
- ,yIEMORANDUI\'"
To The Planning Commission
Subject Appeal of Review of Plans No. 86-43,
Ward 3
From
Frank A. Schuma
Planning Director
November 5, 1986
Date
Approved
Agenda Item No. II
Date
Owne r :
Mr. Darwin Reinglass
1901 East Fourth Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Applicant:
Mr. Frank Del'Andrae
5560 Mission Boulevard
Riverside, CA 92509
Review of plans No. ,,86-43 is a proposal to construct a 48
unit, three-story apartment complex on approximately 1.3
acres on land located on the south side of Mill Street, west
of Rancho Avenue and in the R-3-1200 Multiple Family Residen-
tial zone. This item was originally presented to the Devel-
opment Review Committee for the review and approval at their
meeting of May 16, 1986. At the request of the Planning
Department staff, the development proposal, which was ulti-
mately approved by the Development Review Committee at their
August 7, 1986 meeting, was altered several times to insure
compatibility with the surrounding area.
One of the issues concerning staff was the issue of
story structures in an area where the predominance of
opment is single story with some two-story development
immediate area.
three-
devel-
in the
The letter advising the applicant that the application had
been approved was dated August 25, 1986. The letter con-
tained the approval along with the appropriate standard
requirements and conditions applicable to the project. The
letter further stated that the approval of Review of Plans
No. 86-43 was final unless appealed within 10 days of the
date of the approval letter.
..
Councilman Hernandez, at a meeting of the Mayor and Council
on August 18, 1986, indicated to me his desire to appeal
Review of Plans No. 86-43 on the basis of incompatibility
because of the three-story structures. This was a verbal
request made a the Council meeting, however, it was not
included in the minutes of the Mayor and Council nor was it
picked up on the recording of the meeting. Councilman
Hernandez, at the Council meeting of september 8, 1986,
reaffirmed his appeal of Review of Plans No. 86-43 because of
the three-story aspect of the project. Staff then, on
September 25, 1986, informed Mr. Frank Del'Andrae, architect
for the applicant, Mr. Darwin Reinglass, that the item had
been appealed and the date on which the appeal hearing would
e."y Oil "HI:::M~
~.
'-
,
,
,
Memorandum to the Planning Commission
November 5, 1986
Page 2
be held. No appeal was ever submitted in writing by myself
or Councilman Hernandez.
Before the Planning Commission can act on this appeal, it
must determine that the appeal that was requested by Council-
man Hernandez was acted on in a timely manner and in a manner
consistent with the purpose and intent of the appeal process.
If the Commission can make such a determination, it then can
proceed with the appeal of the application to determine its
compatibility with the surrounding properties.
Recommended Motions:
That the appeal of Councilman Hernandez was filed in a timely
manner and that the Planning Commission can act upon the
appeal.
or
That the appeal of Councilman Hernandez was not filed in a
timely manner and, therefore, no further action can be taken
by the Planning Commission.
Respectfully submitted,
FRANK A. SeRUKA
planning Director
,
mkf
~ITY OF SAN "lERNARDINO
-
L'EMORANUU.M _
~
To Planning Cornrnission
Subiect Review of Plans No. 86-43
From Planning Department
Due October 2l, 19B6
Approved ITEM NO. 11 WARD NO, 3
Date
.
Owner: Darwin Reinglass
1901 East 4th Street
Santa Ana, CA 92705
Applicant: Frank Del Andre
5560 Mission Blvd.,
Riverside, CA 92509
Review of Plans No. 86-43 is a proposal to construct a 48
unit apartment complex on 1.3 acres ,of land located on Mill
Street, approximately 200 feet west of Rancho in the R-3,
MuJtiple-Family Residential zone.
This item initially was presented to the Development Review
Committee on May 15, 1986. The applicant requested maximum
dens ity at the site. Comments at that point in time we re
that three stories, maximum density and the commercial
appeatance of the elevations would be incompatible to the
area. The developer resubmitted the proposal on three
subsequent dates, each time mak j ng smalJ conce~'6 ions bu t
still maintaining three stories and ~aximum density in his
ptoposal. At the Development Review Committee meeting of
Augus t 7, 1986, it was determined . that eve ry mini IIIUln
requirement of the San Bernardino Municipal Code had been met
and that the project was still thtee stories and maximum
density, but was passed through the committee for further
action. A letter of approval was sent to the developer on
August 25, 1986.
At the City CounciJ meeting of September 8, 1986, Councilman
Ralph Hernandez appealed the decision of the Development
Review Committee. A letter inuicating such was sent to the
owner on September 25, 1986. The appeal was based on the
thtee stories which requites a massive structure on the
parcel and the incompatibility of the structure and resulting
density with the surtounding uses. Density at the site is
proposed at 36 units per acre. Surrounding land uses
include: a single family tract to the north, directly across
~liJ1 Streetl two story apartments to the southl and
commelcial uses to the east.
Respectfully Submitted,
FRAi,,z A. SCIIUNA,
P1"~ ~'Q L_
S~PAU~;'-;'o"
Asso~iate Planner
rHI=-~..
KEVI_.vJ OF~LA.NS. ~b-43
5 v (' r c> ").\ V\. d...i. fL a \ ~,^-ol 1-\ S es
---'----'--:i
'II
I
I
K./'{j{,-'I3 . IO-IJ-i"~
_ ;><dJeG-,T.- f<'.~ce.1 (417fT. mill"
6.",,t. . 11'3- reet d~~I') ;;Z 5r0f'':f ~
l5for'j &l-.f'K iA kt:,5rVII,<.....&'-
S\,6
-
L ._ ~ -'-.;..;.;.~_...:.. .~. ,. ~ _:.... ..:,:..::..:......:..-:J
R,.(' g~, --<j a 10 -/3- '1("
- ~. (tt;1-e -r; r>V. f.:t. /lO~l!S di ~cll'f
({(' U!'.S 5 {1Jor(d.} -11'-0 m. sVlc
N 0 f~:rrt
.J
F2f' ~c-- f( 3 '. (0 -,3 -if:, 1
- "Sll1..tJle -:Gnul, t:,d.c-{;.- e;sM-
~m.es direully (kcr".s-s-fn,.,\ [fcc' J
N O;::.-rl-(
~._-...-.
1
---T -___
~(? fi"(.. -tj3 . 10-/3-('(,
_ V,e.,J or: /1rU'1 -POll' 5';4'11 (~
-5im. k-PI1 f. YAJd. 1- 51''-1 a. :.S-
7d -fief! 5-"'< i-t-
SiTE { S~\A,T\-\
/<);;21- [lb
KE:.V1E.vJ- OF -P/....P--NS ,--<glo-4~
~(" r OtNY\"&"~',(\_(r /a..M 'lotses
~r '0/,-43
51 rl fltc.
jO-/3-tt:,
s:1or;j MT5' 7?J ~tJ,:-f(
5ou.+l
,": '..: ,.t;~r:ffl~!<<~~1::~:r~k!~~.':'~~~'~~~'- '\i '.:. ""V..
),;\.:t*lcif,,,~,'b:tii(~:~#.\~,;;;.~;i;\~~J.;: i!lt...
,_ ., "'~ ' ti~ft.it. .,ill'" ;~-,.'" I~ ~(,,"'';~F~' ...~ f~."rj- ;.*,Njf!,
:-':',:~',~:t1',..:t~!:.'tft;.~,':;~:'t}. ~.~:,! "':.;'ir.'~n; ~ .~l)\~\'?~':' ~.~~~';
" "'--~J _.~;':/~,~'_~-.'.i-'~" >.'1'.",.:-1::....8 ~ :i;l:\::'>, :,:..,~f..;_.:~'.i<"'); ~.,:l
"
,r'
."
\
q.~~
~,..(.').
,,~:
\L"., .,; \-., t
t.',:~i~~l
c. -.2 -u.-;e -fa -/4t.12 tr< s{
I2f f0-t/ 3
r::=. A<'/
((.p~{.,-tf3 jO-I3-8b
1J~(fC.ru1.ce. f,elweet<. :Z-s.Io"J 4.f-fj'
(.^ r/y.t)"",{ {,.sier,! "pH (611 feR)
Sou:rH
~
W~S1
r-tr (f/P,,-/3
:J -;1or'j MIS 71J
10-/3-fj
t.Je~:t
;~\ r;.~"\
/' :)1-(1'"
0'
'-
....^,...... ''''..,I
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION CASE REVIEW OF PLANS 36-43
11
HEARING DATE OCT, 2.1, i:mb
R-'
~!
M.I
~-l~ "-2 \
~]~
I ~'_~~~ '
W
R.I
C-3A
C-3A
R-'
R-2
R-2
R-I
C-3A
I
I
--
I
11I-,
I ....
1
R -f
.--
.IM1TS
---' ,
. '
'-~
,::..:..: I.......:::.., ~ fou..
. ill
JLI ..;2/-d I(J
... -
v lD;lD-tITY OF SAN ~EPNARDINO
-.-
..
...
-
-
- ~EMORANDU" ,
To MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
Subject Item 53, Agenda of December 8, 1986
Appeal of Review of Plans 86-43
From
RALPH H. PRINCE
City Attorney
December 5, 1986
Date
Approved
Date
Review of Plans 86-43 was approved by the Development Review
committee on August 7, 1986; a letter advising the applicant
that the application had been approved and enclosing copies
of the requirements and conditions was mailed to the
applicant on August 25, 1986.
At the Council meeting of August 18, 1986, Councilman
Hernandez orally indicated his desire to appeal Review of
Plans 86-43.
Planning Director, Frank SChum&, concurs that a verbal
request was made at the Council meeting, but it was not
included in the Minutes, nor w~s it located on the recording
of the meeting.
At the Council meeting of September 8, 1986, Councilman
Hernandez reaffirmed his desire to appeal Review of Plans 86-
43, and the architect was subsequently informed by letter on
September 25, 1986 that an appeal had been made. No appeal
was ever submitted in writing.
The Planning Commission heard the question of the timeliness
of the appeal on November 5, 1986. Resolution No. 86-361,
which set forth procedures for administrative appeals of
Development Review Commission decisions to the Planning
Commission, was adopted on Sept3mber 9, 1986, subsequent to
the events above described. At the time that Councilman
Hernandez' appeal was orally made, there was no time limit
and no requirement that an appeal be in writing.
Therefore, absent any specific appeal procedure in the Code,
or adopted policy, fundamental principles of due process
require that administrative app~als of staff decisio~s be
entertained by the Planning Co~ission. Absent a specific
time requirement, the time for appeal was a reasonable time.
The appeal of Review of Plans 86-43 should be referred to the
Planning Commission for a hearing on the merits. Interested
parties should be notified.
/~J~..,c;J!-"
RALPH H. PRINCE
City Attorney
Attachment: Resolution No. 86-361
53
*-Itr'
~ -~,
,
-~'4'IC
~=-g
~
-
RESOLUTION NO. i't- - 3 ,f. /
RBSOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 83-48 ENTITLED IN PART .RESOLUTION . .. ESTABLISHING A
PROCEDURB FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF PLANS., AND ADDING
PROVISIONS walCH ESTABLISH A PROCEDURE FOR THE APPEAL OF
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Resolution No. 83-48 Section 9 is amended to
read:
.Section 9. Appeal - Public Rearino.
A. The Planning Department shall approve or reject the
plans submitted for review, and the decision shall be final
unless an appeal to the Planning Commission i. filed, in wr~ing,
within ten days of the deCision.
B. Upon receipt of an appeal from the decision of tbe
Planning Department, tbe Planning Commission sball fix a time and
place of public hearing thereon not less than fifteen days nor
more than forty days thereafter. Notice of time and place of the
hearing, including a general description of the matter to be
considered and a general description of the property for which
the appeal is proposed, shall be given at least ten days before
the hearing in the following manner:
1. The notice shall be published at least once in a
newspaper of general circulation published and circulated in the
City.
2. The notice shall be mailed or delivered to all
persons, including businesses, corporations, or other public or
private entities, shown on the last equalized assessment roll as
owning real property within five hundred feet of the property
which is the subject of the proposed appeal.
9/9/86
23
24
25
26 Approved as to form:
/'. . .. .'./') .
27 '. . ' ....""
28 City Attorney
I
3. Forms and procedures for processing an appeal to the
Planning Co..is8ion shall be prescribed by the Director of
2
Planning. Tb, appellant shall pay a fee to cover administrative
3
costs as set forth by resolution.
4
c.
Failure of any person to receive the notice required by
5
this section shall not invalidate any action taken.
6
7
D. The Chairman of the Planning Commission, or the acting
8 Chairman, shall administer oaths and all witnesses shall be
9
10
11
12
13
sworn."
I HBRBBY CBRTIPY that the foregoing re.olution va. duly
adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, belel' OD
the
iM
4 ,., ?::.,~.~
,.
, 1986, by the following vote,
day of
14 to wit:
AYBS:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 t.,
... ~'
NAYS:
ABSENT:
City Clerk
c"'J- .
22 ft.. fOt~01n9 t..olution is hereby approved this
,""'
day of
, 1986.
Mayor of the City of San Bernardino
2
9/9/86