HomeMy WebLinkAboutNB01-Animal Control
" .
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
COPIES:
l i I Y
o F S~N B ERN A R D TN 0
INTERO.E MEMORANDUM .
"'\~
. \<
r.
[
"
~i
HONORABLE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
Paul E. Turner, Director of Animal Control
.
...'......, J:',.."
...,. I
'-' 1/'
Animal Control Fund Hid-Year Review
v: 7[
Vc
January 31, 1986
Fil e
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The approved 85/86 Animal Control Fund is as follows:
Beginning Fund Balance July 1, 1985
Approved Expenditures
Estimated Revenue
(Current Years Deficit $123,995)
Ending Fund Balance June 30, 1986
U105,087)
587,695
463,700
($229,082)
This budget was a "worst case" scenerio based upon the County cancelling its
shelter services contract effective July 1, 1985 and an anticipated decline in
other revenues across-the-board. The County did not pullout until the end of
September 1985, therefore, the total budget picture is not as grim as was
approved.
We have revised budget estimates based upon actual experience during the first
six months of the fiscal year as follows:
Beginning Fund Balance July 1, 1985
(Revised) Estimated Expenditures
(Revised) Estimated Revenues
(Revised) (Current years deficit $43,400)
Ending Fund Balance June 30, 1986
($105,087)
$579,900
536,500
($148,487)
In order to bring the Animal Control Operation to a self-supportin9 status, a
number of alternatives must be researched, i.e., increasing fees and charges;
reducing expenditures; contracting some or all animal control services.
I have requested County Animal Control submit a written proposal to provide
shelter services and field services for the City, to include all costs. This
information has not yet been developed, but County has assured me it will be
made available for consideration during our 86/87 budget preparation.
Attachment A is a proposal to increase certain fees and charges. If approved
immediately, total revenue would increase an additional $37,600 this F/Y.
Attachment B shows revised revenue estimates $527,500 and revenue estimates if
the increases are approved $565,100. The bottom portion of attachment B proposes
cutting (previously approved) expenditures $16,100.
/tJ/5dO . !5och1
By increasing revenues $37,600 A .' clu€i-ng expenditures $16,100, the fiscal
year end balance would have a' 1,300 s rplus to be applied to the beginnin9
fund deficit $105,087, reduci ,787.
l?tJ?17
NBO\
, ,
.,
aNIMAL CUNTRUL FUND MID-YEAR RE~W
.GE - 2 .
.
.
Attachment C is "ballpark" estimates of expenditures and revenues for next fiscal
year 86/87. Revenues are shown with and without the aforementioned proposed in-
creases. Attachment C also has proposed cuts which would be necessary to make the
Animal Control operation self-supporting. Cuts required to offset a $88,500 deficit
and cuts required to offset a $40,450 deficit.
Attachment D is a projection ahead to fiscal year 87/88. Made with the assumption
no cuts or reductions were made during 86/87. Again, the revenues are estimated
with and without the proposed increases in effect. Again, required reductions are
shown to bring the Animal Control Fund into a self-supporting status.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. Eight questionnaires were mailed to eight different animal control agencies in
Southern California: Los Angeles County; San Bernardino County; Orange County-
The Cities of Santa Monica, Burbank, Long Beach, Palm Springs and Los Angeles.
These questionnaires are designed to gather operational cost and revenues gen-
erated in order to evaluate how the City of San Bernardino "matches up." As of
January 31, only three of these questionnaires have been returned.
Attachment E contains the comparative net per capita costs for animal control
operations in Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County and the Cities of
Palm Springs and San Bernardino. Those other agencies yet to respond will
be added as the questionnaires are received.
B. In the performance of their duties, Animal Control Officers issue citations (no-
tices to appear in court) for violations of our Municipal Code. Those defendants
found guilty and subsequently fined are a source of revenue which is not credited
to the Animal Control Fund. These fines are combined with other miscellaneous
fines from other city departments; i.e., some police citations, code enforcement
violations, etc. The courts do not itemize this information for us. However,
we do know that Animal Control issued 1,200 citations during fiscal year B4/85.
More than likely, not all were found guilty and/or fined. But, only if 50% of '
those cited were fined, ~ $10.00 each, that would represent $6,000 in addition-
al revenue. We are confl~t the percentage is greater'and the individual fines
are more than $10.00 each. ---
.
TYPE OF FEE
DOG LICENSE FEE
&EVENUE
ATTACHMENT - A
.
.
CURRENT PROPOSED
RATE/FEE INCREASE TO
PERCENTAGE
OF INCREASE
$15.00 UNALTERED $16.00 UNALTERED
5.00 ALTERED 6.00 ALTERED
LICENSE PENALTIES $10.00
RESEARCH SALES
ANIMAL ADOPTIONS
CONTRACTEE FEES
$50.00 DOG
30.00 CAT
'" 15.00
~ 10.00
'-
17.50 DOG
10.00 CAT
LIVESTOCK FEES
(BOARD) $ 4.00 PER DAY
(LARGE)
3.00 PER DAY
(MED)
2.00 PER DAY
( SMALL>
APPREHENSION FEES $15.00 1ST
30.00 2ND
45.00 3RD
BOARD FEES
(DOGS 8, CATS)
FIELD SERVICE FEES
VET PICK-UP CHRGS
OWNER RELEASE
CHARGES:
ADOPTION SERVICE
DISPOSAL CHARGE
VACCINATION FEE
MISCELLANEOUS
RECEIPTS
RETURNED CHECK
CHARGES
3.00 PER DAY
6.00 PICK-UP
5.00 PER CALL
1.00 PER ANIMAL
12.00 ADULT DOG
6.00 CAT/KIT/PUP
5.00 ADULT DOG
2.00 CAT/KIT/PUP
5.00 DOG/CAT
6.25:';
16.6i:
NO INCREASE
PROPOSED
$75.00 DOG
50.00 CAT
33i:
40%
$20.00 DOG
15.00 CAT
25i:
33%
NO INCREASE PROPOSED
UNTIL NEXT FISCAL YEAR
CONTRACT
$ 6.00 PER DAY
(LARGE)
4.50 PER DAY
(MED)
3.00 PER DAY
(SMALL>
33%
33%
33%
20.00 1ST
40.00 2ND
60.00 3RD
25i.:
25Y.
2F.'.
'.)1.
5.00 PER DAY
40%
10.00 PICK-UP
40%
7.00 PER CALL
2.00 PER ANIMAL
29%
100%
15.00
8,00
25%
25%
6.00
3.00
1 7/~
3""'
~/.
6.00 'DOG/CAT
17%
NOT REGULATED BY ORDINANCE
6.00
NO INCREASE
PROPOSED
.
AllkAL CONTROL FUND.
.
ATTACHMENT - B
RESEARCH SALES
ANIMAL ADOPTIONS
CONTRACTEE FEES
LIVESTOCK FEES
APPREHENSION FEES
BOARD FEES
FIELD SERVICE FEE
VET PICK-UP CHARGES
OWNER RELEASE CHARGES
VACCINATION FEES
MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS
RETURNED CHECK CHARGES
REVISED
85/86
$200,000
50,000
$250,000
$ 50,000
35,000
110,000
4,000
9,000
9,000
2,200
2,100
30,000
20,000
15,000
100
ESTIMATED REVENUE
IF PROPOSED INCREASES
ARE APPROVED
$217,500
50,000
$267,500
$ 54,200
37,300
11 0 , 000 *
4,200
10,000
10,000
2,400
2,100
31,500
20,800
15,000 **
100
REVENUE
SOURCE
DOG LICENSE FEES
LICENSE PENALTIES
TOTAL LICENSES
TOTAL CHARGES FOR
CURRENT SERVICES
TOTAL REVENUE
$277,500
$527,500
$297,600
$565,100
*NO FEE INCREASE POSSIBLE BEFORE END OF FISCAL YEAR.
**NO FEE INCREASE PROPOSED.
PROPOSED REDUCTION IN EXPENDITRES:
$ 8,000 EUTHANASIA ROOM REMODELING
4,500 RADIO DISPATCH CONSOLE
3,600 HANDY TALKIE RADIOS
$ 16,100
TOTAL REDUCTIONS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVISED 85/86 EXPENDITURES AFTER CUTS: $563,800
REVISED 85/86 REVENUE (with increases) $565,100
SURPLUS TO BE APPLIED TOWARD DEFICIT
$ 1,300
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT - C
Fiscal Year 86/87
E X PEN D I T U RES REVENUE
Without With
Personnel Services $400,000 Increases Increases
M.S & S. 158,650 License
Penalties $250,000 $270,000
Equipment 25,000
Charges Current
Capital -0- Services 245,100 273,200
TOTAL $583,650 TOTAL $495,100 $543,200
Fiscal Year-End
Balance ($ 88,500) ($ 40,450)
Cuts required to offset $88,500 Deficit:
PERSONNEL:
SAVINGS
$23,600
23,600
10,000
1 - Animal Control Officer (from 5 to 4)
1 - Animal Health Technician (from 2 to 1)
2 - Part-time Licnese Checkers (from 4 to 2)
EQUIPMENT:
2 - Replacement Animal Control Vehicles 25,000
Materials, Services & Supplies 6,ODO
TOTAL REDUCTION $88,200
Fiscal Year-End Balance ($350)
Cuts required to offset $40,450 Deficit:
1 - Animal Control Officer
SAVINGS
$23,600
PERSONNEL:
EQUIPMENT:
2 - Replacement Animal Control Vehicles
25,000
Fiscal Year-End Balance
TOTAL REDUCTION $48,600
$ 8,150 (surplus)
.
.,'.
4ItTTACHMENT - D .
Projections
Fiscal Year 87/88
.
E X PEN D I T U RES REV E N U E
Personne 1 Services $420,000 Without With
Increases Increases
M.S & S. 166,582 Licenses &
Penalties $270,000 $290,000
Equipment 15,000
Charges Current
Capital -0- Services 245,100 273,200
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $601,582 TOTAL REVENUE $515,100 $563,200
Fiscal Year-End
Balance ($ 86,482) ($ 38,382)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cuts required to offset $86,482 Deficit:
PERSONNEL:
SAVINGS
$24,500
- Animal Control Officer (from 5 to 4)
1 - Animal Health Technician (from 2 to 1)
4 - Part-time License Checkers (Eliminate the Program)
24,500
20,000
EQUIPMENT:
2 - Replacement Sedans
TOTAL REDUCTION
15,000
5,000
$89,000
$ 2,518 (Surplus)
Materials, Services, & Supplies
Fiscal Year-End Balance
Cuts requried to offset $38,382 Deficit:
PERSONNEL:
1 - Animal Control Officer (from 5 to 4)
$24,500
EQUIPMENT:
2 - Replacement Sedans
TOTAL REDUCTION
15,000
$39,500
$ 1,118 (Surplus)
Fiscal Year End Balance
.
.
.
.
.
.
---'- ---~--
0 VI VI
:z:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
COPIES:
L J 1 Y 0 F S ^ N B ERN A R DIN 0
INTERO~CE MEMORANDUM ~
HONORABLE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
tJ
r..,.,. \
["f ...,
Ui .' . :~ ,.
/re... ". : ,~'''r,
'"'..'..; "r-" ....."."
f(/.) 11 ""/1';>,
P"
"1 J:
.
Paul E. Turner, Director of Animal Control
Animal Control Fund Mid-Year Review
January 31, 1986
File
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------~----
The approved 85/86 Animal Control Fund is as follows:
Beginning Fund Balance July 1, 1985
Approved Expenditures
Estimated Revenue
(Current Years Deficit $123,995)
Ending Fund Balance June 30, 1986
1$105,087)
587,695
463,700
($229,082)
This budget was a "worst case" scenerio based upon the County cancelling its
shelter services contract effective July 1, 1985 and an anticipated decline in
other revenues across-the-board. The County did not pullout until the end of
September 1985, therefore, the total budget picture is not as grim as was
approved. '
We have revised budget estimates based upon actual experience during the first
six months of the fiscal ,year as follows:
Beginning Fund Balance July 1, 1985
(Revisedl Estimated Expenditures
(Revised Estimated Revenues
(Revised) (Current years deficit $43,400)
Ending Fund Balance June 30, 1986
($105,087)
$579,900
536,500
($148,487)
In order to bring the Animal Control Operation to a self-supporting status, a
number of alternatives must be researched, i.e., increasing fees and charges;
reducing expenditures; contracting some or all animal control services.
I have requested County Animal Control submit a written proposal to provide
shelter services and field services for the City, to include all costs. This
information has not yet been developed, but County has assured me it will be
made available for consideration during our 86/87 budget preparation.
Attachment A is a proposal to increase certain fees and charges. If approved
inmlediately, total revenue would increase an additional $37,600 this FlY.
Attachment B shows revised revenue estimates $527,500 and revenue estimates if
the increases are approved $565,100. The bottom portion of attachment B proposes
cutting (previously approved) expenditures $16,100.
By increasing revenues $37,600 and reducing expenditures $16,100, the fiscal
year end balance would have a $19300 surplus to be applied to the beginning
fund deficit $105,087, reducing it to~193~
1Y; 7<07
ANIMAL CONTROL
tl'GE - 2
FUND MID-YEAR REVIEW
.
.
.
Attachment C is "ballpark" estimates of expenditures and revenues for next fiscal
year 86/87. Revenues are shown with and without the aforementioned proposed in-
creases. Attachment C also has proposed cuts which would be necessary to make the
Animal Control operation self-supporting, Cuts required to offset a $88,500 deficit
and cuts required to offset a $40,450 deficit.
Attachment 0 is a projection ahead to fiscal year 87/88. Made with the assumption
no cuts or reductions were made during 86/87. Again, the revenues are estimated
with and without the proposed increases in effect. Again, required reductions are
shown to bring the Animal Control Fund into a self-supporting status.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
A. Eight questionnaires were mailed to eight different animal control agencies in
Southern California: Los Angeles County; San Bernardino County; Orange County-
The Cities of Santa Monica, Burbank, Long Beach, Palm Springs and Los Angeles. '
These questionnaires are designed to gather operational cost and revenues gen-
erated in order to evaluate how the City of San Bernardino "matches up." As of
January 31, only three of these questionnaires have been returned.
Attachment E contains the comparative net per capita costs for animal control
operations in Los Angeles County, San Bernardino County and the Cities of
Palm Springs and San Bernardino. Those other agencies yet to respond will
be added as the questionnaires are received.
B. In the performance of their duties, Animal Control Officers issue citations (no-
tices to appear in court) for violations of our Municipal Code. Those defendants
found guilty and subsequently fined are a source of revenue which is not credited
to the Animal Control Fund. These fines are combined with other miscellaneous
fines from other city departments; i.e., some police citations, code enforcement
violations, etc. The courts do not itemize this information for us. However,
we do know that Animal Control issued 1,200 citations during fiscal year 84/85.
More than likely, not all were found guilty and/or fined. But, only if 50% of '
those cited were fined, ?~lY $10.00 each, that would represent $6,000 in addition-
al revenue. We are confl ent the percentage is greater'and the individual fines
are more than $10.00 each. ----
.
.
TYPE OF FEE
DOG LICENSE FEE
,,!::::~E _ A Y 1p ,.
CURRENT PROPOSED
RATE/FEE INCREASE TO
PERCENTAGE
OF INCREASE
S15.00 UNALTERED S16.00 UNALTERED
5.00 ALTERED 6.00 ALTERED
6.251.
16.61.
LICENSE PENALTIES S10.00 NO INCREASE
PROPOSED
RESEARCH SALES S50.00 DOG $15.00 DOG 331.
30.00 CAT 50.00 CAT 401.
ANIMAL ADOPTIONS S15.00 DOG S20.00 DOG 251.
10.00 CAT 15.00 CAT 331.
CONTRACTEE FEES 17.50 DOG NO INCREASE PROPOSED
10.00 CAT UNTIL NEXT FISCAL YEAR
CONTRACT
LIVESTOCK FEES
(BOARD) S 4.00 PER DAY S 6.00 PER DAY 331.
(LARGE) (LARGE)
3.00 PER DAY 4.50 PER DAY 331.
(MEDl (MED)
2.00 PER DAY 3.00 PER DAY 331.
( SMALLl (SMALLl
APPREHENSION FEES S15.00 1ST 20.00 1ST 251.
30.00 2ND 40.00 2ND 251.
45.00 3RD 60.00 3RD 251.
BOARD FEES
(DOGS & CATS) 3.00 PER DAY 5.00 PER DAY 401.
FIELD SERVICE FEES 6.00 PICK-UP 10.00 PICK-UP 401.
VET PICK-UP CHRGS 5.00 PER CALL 7.00 PER CALL 291.
1. 00 PER ANIMAL 2.00 PER ANIMAL 1001.
OWNER RELEASE
CHARGES:
ADOPTION SERVICE
DISPOSAL CHARGE
VACCINATION FEE
MISCELLANEOUS
RECEIPTS
RETURNED CHECK
CHARGES
12.00 ADULT DOG 15.00 251.
6.00 CAT/KIT/PUP 8.00 251.
5.00 ADULT DOG 6.00 171.
2.00 CAT/KIT/PUP 3.00 331.
5.00 DOG/CAT 6.00 'DOG/CAT 171.
-
NOT REGULATED BY ORDINANCE
6.00 NO INCREASE
PROPOSED
**NO FEE INCREASE PROPOSED.
PROPOSED REDUCTION IN EXPENDITRES:
$ 8,000 EUTHANASIA ROOM REMODELING
4,500 RADIO DISPATCH CONSOLE
3,600 HANDY TALKIE RADIOS
$ 16,100
TOTAL REDUCTIONS:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVISED 85/86 EXPENDITURES AFTER CUTS: $563.800
REVISED 85/86 REVENUE (with increases) $565,100
SURPLUS TO BE APPLIED TOWARD DEFICIT
$ 1,300
.
.
. .
ATTACHMENT - C
Fiscal Year 86/87
.
E X PEN D I T U RES REVENUE
Without With
Personne 1 Services $400,000 Increases Increases
M.S &S. 158,650 License
Pena 1t i es $250,000 $270,000
Equipment 25,000
Charges Current
Capital -0- Services 245,100 273,200
TOTAL $583,650 TOTAL $495,100 $543,200
Fiscal Year-End
Balance ($ 88,500) ($ 40,450)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cuts required to offset $88,500 Deficit:
PERSONNEL:
1 - Animal Control Officer (from 5 to 4)
1 - Animal Health Technician (from 2 to 1)
2 - Part-time Licnese Checkers (from 4 to 2)
SAVINGS
$23,600
23,600
10,000
EQUIPMENT:
2 - Replacement Animal Control Vehicles
Materials, Services & Supplies
TOTAL REDUCTI ON
25,000
6,000
$88,200
($350)
Fiscal Year-End Balance
Cuts required to offset $40,450 Deficit:
1 - Animal Control Officer
SAVINGS
$23,600
PERSONNEL:
EQUIPMENT:
2 - Replacement Animal Control Vehicles 25,000
TOTAL REDUCTION $48,600
Fiscal Year-End Balance $ 8,150 (surplus)
.
.'
.
ATTACHMENT - D
. Projections .
Fiscal Year 87/88
.
E X PEN D I T U RES REV E N U E
Personne 1 Services $420,000 Without With
Increases I ncrea ses
M.S & S. 166,582 Licenses &
Pen a lt i es $270,000 $290,000
Equipment 15,000
Charges Current
Capi ta 1 -0- Services 245,100 273,200
TOTAL EXPENDITURES $601,582 TOTAL REVENUE $515,100 $563,200
Fiscal Year-End
Balance ($ 86,482) ($ 38,382)
Cuts required to offset $86,482 Deficit:
PERSONNEL:
SAVINGS
$24,500
1 - Animal Control Officer (from 5 to 4)
1 - Animal Health Technician (from 2 to 1)
4 - Part-time License Checkers (Eliminate the Program)
24,500
20,000
EgUIPMENT:
2 - Replacement Sedans
15,000
5,000
Materials, Services, & Supplies
TOTAL REDUCTION
$89,000
$ 2,518 (Surplus)
Fiscal Year-End Balance
Cuts requried to offset $38,382 Deficit:
PERSONNEL:
1 - Animal Control Officer (from 5 to 4)
EQUIPMENT:
2 - Replacement Sedans
$24,500
15,000
TOTAL REDUCTION
$39,500
$ 1,118 (Surplus)
Fiscal Year End Balance
-
,.
.
.
.
.
-- ----
0 VI VI
z: 0>.....
- 0. "' 0 0 Of'
Cl 0 0 0<"> 0 0 ,..,
z: C<: 0 0 LO 0 0> eo , , eo LO
<1: c( 0 \D ..... eo 00 . .
VI z: . . 00 0> \D
n: LO LO eoN ..... M
W "I ~ . . LO LO
CO ~ ... \D .... ....,
~
_'_h_ --.,.- -
VI VI
"" 0 ..... 0>.....
Z 0 ... 0. .. 0 0
c( 0 ..... \D ... 0<"> 0 0 .....
<n . ~ 0 , , 0 0 \D
C<: ~ . M Mr-<
LO "I . . ,
::> eo 0> 0> 0 M
m ~ eo ... M .....
. . M "I
~~ .... ....,
0 0 VI VI LO "I
0 0>..... LO \D
VI 0 0 0. '", "I eo
W 0 0<"> .
. 0 eo . LO .
~-' : 0 , , \D LO eo
lU 0 \D LO LO M 0 00
0 ... ... ... M
-' <.!l "I ~ ~ M 0 0 ..... M .
Z . ~ 00 . . ~
c:C M : . . \D "I : ....
: : "IN .... ....
: ~ LOM
: : ; 0 :
.....
: c VI VI VI :
VI QJ \D I- .0l"fJ . \D \0
<.!l 0 0 E".:!' LO 0. .. \0 ..... "I
Z 0 0 : "I ... ~ QJo'- ~ 0<"> \0 M LO
::e: - 0 eo -: M ~ , , . . .
-' C<: . : : ; . 0.>. 00 ... \0 "I
~e; 0> : 0> 0..0 C- 0\0' : M M ....
M ::J E : 0..... ~ :
; VI"tlQJ . .... ....
;
_ ClJ+J ~ ;
; ,.
0 ...
VI VI 0 ~ :
0 ; 0 0>..... 0 \0
0 : : ... 0. ",. . . "I
:J: 0 0 ~ ..... ~ ... 0<"> 0 ... : ...
<.!lU . LO ~ . . ~ eo , ,. .0 0 ,
zc:C 0 : ..... : ,....., r-; M ... "I
OW ..... ~ M.... ; . ....
-'m M M LO ~
: . .. .... ....
......... :
; ; :
:
VI VI 0>
; 0>..... "I ..... M
0 0 0. "' 0> .. "I .
c:CtS 0 0 0<"> : 0> CO : ~
0 M 0 : I ,. . . ....
1-.... . : CO U> . N: M 00: 0 ~
Z ZI 0 : "I : 00' ~ .....
~~ 0 : \00 "I
~ : . .. .... ....
~~ : :
; ; :
:
: :
;
: ;
: :
:
: ;
: '.
: ;
: ..,.
:
i : :
;
: :
,
, ;
:
: ;
w :
.<.!l
.:z: i ;
~ :
:
0 :
:
; VI VI o. b
0 0> 0 : LO ..-:. 0>..... .,.,. 0' g .'
\0 CO "I VI 0. .. "f
Z M \0 ... \0. "I \0 I- 0<">
.... CO ~ M QJ . "I
0 . . .. ..... \0 '" \0
z: <X CO 0 , I eo N . .
0> .-
c:C c:C LO '" ..... QJ '" \D ~.." ..- .,Ji,
VI z: 0 ; .c ... eo .
<X . ~ ~.
W ~ VI CO 0 -. ....
. .
m '" "'M
~ ~
"
VI VI
" .' . 0>.....
.. 0. "'
VI 0 0 0> ..... ..... ~ 0<..> 0 M
..... 0 0 ..... 0 ~ 0 0 .....
VI..J 0 0 LO ~ \0 , I 0 ..... 0
o LU . . . . . ...
..J<.!l 0 M ~ \0 LO 0 M
Z 0 ~ ..... 0> 0 ..... ~
< M ~ eo~ ~ CO ....
. - . . .
'" M '" ..... M
LON ...., ....,
V)
. ..J
X 0 ~
0 0 Z ..J Z ::e:
W <X <X c( W .... - C<: c(
:> a. c( Z Z c( <X
<X a. W <X Z V) c( W <.!l c(
Z W c( >- WO ..J >- 0 . W '1-
~ V) V) 0 I- VI W LL 0: ::> -
OW ..J ..JO: ..J<X Z 00: a. Z a.
::> z: W..J W ..JW W W Z~ W W c(
:cO :>..... _..J c(o. :co. WV) a. <..> :>0 <..>
..... 0: ::e: LLW <..> VI :><:~ 0 ...... WW ,
. I- W Z 0 I- 0<: z: 0 c( 0<:1- ex
Xc( VlW LL.Z LLW LL 0<: LLW W -'~ llJ
0-' 0<: 00 0-' 00 01- -' -' -' a.
ex ::> c:Cc( VI 0 a. -' c( 0 c(1- c( W 1-
o. 0. w::> .", z . a. 'W I- Z I-V) I-Z l- V)
o. 0 0<:0' O....J oc( 0 ::> o :c o c( 00 DiLl 101 0
--r " c( VI Zo. z :c Z VI ZV) l- X I- U I- (!l Z U
W
I-
Z
W
::e:
:c
<..>
<
l-
I-
<