The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About33-Mayor's Office '. 'crf1 OF SAN BERNARD.wO - REQUIt$T FOR COUNCIL ACT'ION From: 14ayor Evlyn \~ilcox Subject: More Attractive Cor.1I'1uni ty Code Enforcement Program Dept: Mayor's Office Date: November 23, 1987 ;r1td ( Synopsis of Previous Council action: 12-9-86 Resolution No. 86-496 provided additional staffing to the department of Building & Safety for code enforcement. 10-5-87 Mayor & Common Council approval of Resolution converting an inspector position to code compliance officer for additional code enforcement activiti es. Recommended motion: That the Mayor and Common Council approve the More Attractive Community code enforce- ment program, and authorize the staffing, operating expenses and equipment outlay as proposed. cc: Glenda Saul, Executive Director, RDA Manuel P. Moreno, Jr., Public 'Services Director Gerald Newcombe, Fire Chief D.,o ',g.l, 'oj'd'o, '0"."'00 S""""O'~~....-I ~~ gnature Contact person: James C. Ri chardson, Deputy City Admi n. - uevelopment ~erVlces Supporting dltl IUlched: Staff Report Phone: 384-5274 Ward: Ci ty-l~i de FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: A $157,750 mount: Source: (ACCT. (ACCT. NO.) 001-183-5-?020/5843 ;lnri <;lIpplip<;; ~nri Fqllipmpnt nllt~y Finance: Funds: General $45,200; Refuse $60,960; RDA $51,590 Council Notes: DESCRIPTION)Per<;onal Sprvir.es: / it/L2 Materials. Services r .I~::- :2, ';:'-~ c J" ..... BACKGROUND In identifying requirements for "Project Renaissance," Mayor wilcox asked that the relationship to the More Attractive Community (M.A.C.) team and routine code enforcement activities be addressed. The Mayor had stressed for the Renaissance Program to be successful without impacting existing code enforcement efforts, an expanded code enforcement program would be necessary. Additionally, Councilman Maudsleyhas asked about additional personnel for building inspection and code enforcement. Herein outlined is a proposal that has been reviewed by the Mayor with the various departments involved which will significantly expand code enforcement activities. For many years, there was only one code enforcement position but that has been increased to three positions in the past year. NEED During my acting directorship for the Building & Safety Department, it has become obvious that greater supervision is needed regardless of the number of code enforcement personnel. Currently, the Building Inspection Supervisor provides supervision of code enforcement as assisted by the Senior General Building Inspector. The backlog of complaints has been significant and no systematic code enforcement work is occurring. This backlog is dramatic when one tours the City of San Bernardino and sees a significant number of houses and structures that are deteriorating, vacant lots too numerous to count with junk and debris present, hundreds of abandoned/inoperative vehicles. These general conditions cannot effectively be dealt with by only three positions. The Mayor and Common Council want, and the people, deserve a more attractive community (MAC) that can occur with a concentrated effort and the increased staffing of a separately identified Code Enforcement Division. There have been general concerns raised about the need for increased code enforcement by the General Plan citizen Advisory Committee and the Board of Building commissioners. Finally, a previous staff study for combined code enforcement by Mr. Schweitzer makes obvious the need for greater interdepartmental coordination and centralization of staff efforts. PROPOSAL since there appears to be significant support and interest for expanding code enforcement, a comprehensive proposal has been developed accordingly. Financial support from other funds and sources is necessary due to limitations on the General Fund. While fines can support some additional staffing, it is not recommended to go beyond that which is herein outlined. This expanded enforcement proposal would call for the establishment of a separate "Code Enforcement November 23, 1987 .~.." ~.' v ~ Request for Council Action - Staff Report Expanded Code Enforcement Program November 5, 1987 Page 2 Division" within the Building and safety Department. The details of this proposal are outlined in the attached charts describing each program element, staffing, costs and the funding source. The following is a summary of the proposal for expanded code enforcement: Proqram Elements Staffinq 1987-88 Cost 1. 2. 3. 4. Code Enforcement Supervision Contract w/Redevelopment Agency Contract w/Refuse Fund Transfer/Expand Vehicle Abatement +1.0 +2.5 +2.5 +2.0 $ 16,720 51,590 60,960 28,480 Subtotal - MAC Program +8.0 $157,750 5. Current Code Enforcement section 3.0 126,180 TOTAL Code Enforcement Division 11.0 $283,930 The projected revenues from fines and fees for these code enforcement activities are outlined below: Proqram Elements 1987-88 1988-89 1. Code Enforcement supervision $ 23,820 $ 47,440 2. Contract with RDA 10,000 15,000 3. Contract with Refuse Fund 48,750 92,500 4. Transfer/Expand Vehicle Abatement MAC Program Revenues 32,630 $115,200 60,000 $214,940 A comparison of the new costs and revenues, as proposed, are outlined as follows by year: 1987-88 1988-89 MAC Program Costs $157,750 MAC Program Revenues $115,200 $237,170 $214,940 Revenues as % of Costs 73% 90.6% The combined second year (1988-89) cost would be $359,760 as compared with $283,930 in 1987-88 and would provide fUll-year costs for staffing while discontinuing certain equipment outlay expenses. The staffing additions would include six positions which are tied to contracts or funding levels and November 23, 1987 c Request for Council Act~ - staff Expanded Code Enforcement Program November 5, 1987 Page 3 """ Report could be discontinued if necessary. RECOMMENDATION I would recommend the endorsement of this proposal for expanded code enforcement as presented. The proposal, as presented, will help centralize code enforcement and demonstrate the commitment of the Common Council to a City that is proud and seeks to improve itself. This proposal is closely related to Project Renaissance and routine code compliance responsibilities and an expanded MAC Code Enforcement Program will eventually lead to a greatly enhanced image through stronger enforcement of community standards. / J ES C. RICH RDSON, eputy City Administrator - Development Services mtb Attachments (5) November 23, 1987 c ,r'..... v ....,,1 1. Code Enforcement supervision a. Proqram Descriotion: Reclassify position to Division." management controlling an existing General Building Inspector a superv1sor for the "Code Enforcement A fully staffed division will demand a mid- position for scheduling, monitoring and the workload. b. Staffinq: Convert an Inspector position to Code Enforcement supervisor +1.0 c. Costs: (Personal Services) Reclassify posi- tion from Range 1103 to Range 2141 with an increase of $807jmonth plus 30% fringes for 6 months (Materials, Services & Supplies) Postage, printing, copying, advertis- ing, office, training and special supplies at $150jmonth for 6 months Garage Charges $120jmonth for 6 months $ 6,300 900 720 (Equipment Outlay) Used mid-sized sedan Desk, chair and file cabinet First Year Costs Second Year Costs 8,000 800 $16,720 $18,490 d. Fundinq Source: Administration and overhead charges of 10% for supervision are estimated at $4,140 for RDA and $4,680 for Refuse Fund (first year $8,820; Second year $17,440). Additionally administrative charges for board-ups are estimated at $200 each with 75 to 150 per year. Program revenues projected at $23,830 for 6 months and $47,440 annually. November 23, 1987 I '-' 2. contract with Redev".:l,opment AgencylRDA) ,-/ Proqram Description: a. Establish a contract or memorandum of understanding (M.O.U.) between the RDA and the City for expanded code enforcement services. Field and support personnel (+2.5 FTE) , equipment and supplies would be added for sign abatement, zoning enforcement and general property maintenance in the 12 RDA project areas program to begin January 1, 1988, with staff on a year-to-year contract, rather than being "regular" City employees. b. Staffinq: Add Code Compliance Officer Add Abatement Technician Clerical Supportjhalf-time +1.0 +1.0 +0.5 c. Cost: (Personal Services) Code Compliance Officer, Range 1103 at $2,028jmonth plus 25% fringes for 6 months $15,210 General Abatement Technician, Range 1083 at $1584jmonth plus 25% fringes for 6 months 11,880 Typist Clerk I (half-time), Range 1049 at $1,041jmonth plus 25% fringes for 6 months 3,900 (Materials, Services & Supplies) Rental of 2 vehicles at $250jmonth and operating expense of $120jmonth for 6 months Postage, printing, copying, training, office and special supplies at $170jmonth for 6 months Emergency Abatement (signs, etc.) Program administrationjoverhead 10% (Equipment outlay) 2 desks, 2 chairs, 2 files, typewriter, 2 recorders and transcriber Radio Equipment 4,440 1,020 5,000 4,140 4,000 2,000 First Year Cost $51,590 $84,280 Second Year Cost d. Fundinq Source: M.O.U. between RDA and Building & Safety Department funded annually by RDA and charged back to project areas. Also, fees of sign abatements are estimated at $50 each for 200 signs and emergency abatements for program revenues $10,000 in 6 months adn $15,000 annually. November 23, 1987 1 j' ......... 3. Contract with Refu~,Fund -...,.,; a. Proqram Description: '-" " Establish a contract or memorandum of understanding (M.O.U.) between the Public services Department for expanded code enforcement services. Field and support personnel (+2.5 FTE) , equipment and supplies would be added for Project Renaissance, litter control, property maintenance and general abatement activities. This program would begin January 1, 1988, with staff on a year-to-year contract rather than being "regular" city employees. b. Staffinq: Add Code Compliance Officer Add Abatement Technician Clerical Support/half-time +1.0 +1.0 +0.5 c. Cost: (Personal Services) Code Compliance Officer, Range 1103 at $2,028/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months General Abatement Technician, Range 1083 at $1584/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months Typist Clerk I (half-time), Range 1049 at $1,041/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months (Materials, Services and Supplies) Rental of 2 vehicles at $250/month and operating expenses of $120/month for 6 months Postage, printing, copying, advertising, training, office and special supplies at $225/month for 6 months Emergency Abatements (litter, nuisances) Special Projects (youth/community groups) Program administration/overhead 10% (Equipment Outlay) Desk, chair, file, 2-mini recorders and micro computer Radio Eqipment $15,210 11,880 3,900 4,440 1,350 5,000 5,000 4,680 . 7,500 2,000 $60,960 $90,110 First Year Cost Second Year Cost d. Fundinq Source: Fees from abatement charges to property owners. Also charges to refuse Fund for litter control (500 parcels at $50 each). Administrative fees for property and more involved Clean-ups for approximately 500 parcels annually at $125 each. Program revenues would be $48,750 in 6 months and $92,500 annually including emergency abatement charges. November 23, 1987 . 4. Transfer/Expand Ve~~~le Abatement L ',... a. Proqram Description: " Transfer the abatement of inoperative vehicles from the Fire Department to the Building & Safety Department and add a position to provide for expanded vehicle abatement activities. The additional position would be on a year-to-year contract rather than "regular" City employees. b. Staffinq Transfer Fire Prevention Inspector and reclassify as Code Compliance Officer Add Vehicle Abatement Technician +1.0 +1.0 c. Costs: (Personal Services) Reclassify "Fire" position from Range 1103 to "Code" position, Range 1111 with an increase of $211/month plus 15% fringes for 6 months Vehicle Abatement Technician, Range 1083 at $1,584/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months (Materials, Services & Supplies) Rental of 2 vehicle at $250/month and operating expenses of $120/month for 6 months Postage, printing, training, copying and office supplies $200/month for 6 months Emergency abatement (dismanteling cars) (Equipment Outlay) 2 desks, 2 chairs and 2 files Radio Equipment $ 1,460 11,880 4,440 1,200 5,000 2,500 2,000 First Year Costs $28,480 Second Year Costs $44,290 d. Fundinq Source: Administrative fees the pass-through based on abatement revenues would be annually including of $100 for removal of vehicles and fees of $25 for dismantlers of 220 vehicles in 6 months. Program $32,630 for 6 months and $60,000 emergency abatement charges. November 23, 1987 f" ~~ 5. Current Code Enforc'~ent section '-' a. Proqram Description: . ~ The Building and Safety Department currently utilizes three positions in general code enforcement activities throughout the city of San Bernardino. There is a backlog of routine complaints, while emergency abatement actions are quick in response. More difficult cases involving demolition are slowed by complexity and limitations of staff time and budget resources. Current functions include M.A.C., Mobile Home Parks and general/Council complaints. b. Staffinq: Currently there are three code compliance3.0 representatives assigned to code enforce- ment and general supervision by a Senior Building Inspector, the Building Inspector Supervisor and the Building & Safety Director. c. Cost: (Personal Services) Three (3) Code Compliance Representatives classified in Range 1111 plus 25% fringe benefits $105,250 (Materials, Services & Supplies) Garage Charges $1440/yr., for 3 cars 4,320 Postage, printing, copying, advertising, office and special supplies $200/mo. 2,400 Data Processing Charges - In House 1/3 of total Telephone charges 1/6 of total (Equipment Outlay) Pick-up (replacem 4,460 900 8,850 Estimated 1987-88 Budget $126,180 Projected 1988-89 "Base Budget"$122,590 d. Fundinq Source: General Fund solely, although some fines and fees help offset. expenses to a minor extent. November 23, 1987 - , ~ r ...... IMPACT OF MAC CODE ENFORCEMENT AND PROJECT RENAISSANCE UPON CITY DEPARTMENTS Animal Control: Minimal, i.e., no more impact than in Delmann Heights; complaints can serve a preventive purpose. Public Services: Financial support from Refuse Fund; weed abatement procedures would be impacted but can be helped; weed abatement could be reassigned as a second phase of consolidation; enforcement should reduce widespread litter. RDA: Contract administration; financial support; upgraded service level for II project areas; current code enforcement regarded as insufficient. Police: Minimal impact as significant coordination occurs for code enforcement now, i.e., uniformed police officers assist as required; long term benefit with improved image to help with crime prevention. Fire: Reassignment of Fire Inspector will impact inspection activities; reduce clerical workload; plan check procedures could benefit; "in-service" inspection would help mitigate inspector loss; lessen burden of vehicle abatement; public safety impact is regarded as an acceptable manageable risk. citv Clerk: Increased better coordination for license revenues. records and filings, i.e., liens; C of D's; could increase business Leqal: cases; Increased coordination of legal activity, i.e., BBC impact to be offset by new Investigator position. Planninq: Beneficial as zoning enforcement and follow-up on C.U.P. 's is limited due to other priorities. -r Communitv Development: Some rehab; Director to serve Renaissance. impact on CDBG such as housing as Project Manager for Project Mavor's Office: The MAC program would shift in emphasis to one of coordination; more concentration on community involvement and image enhancement; complaints should drop. Administration: Through Development, overall centralized; increased Renaissance. the Deputy operational activity City Administrator for management will be with MAC and Project Council Office: priority and The Project Renaissance identified as a high can now be implemented; MAC & Project -.--"- ""!<:> \ , -i_~ 1 . ,...... ... ........ ,/ Impact of MAC Code Enforcement and Project Renaissance upon City Departments December 4, 1987 Page 2 Renaissance will enhance image of community and should cut the number of complaints. Personnel: Recruitment of staff for code enforcement positions and new job descriptions; minimal impact. Parks & Recreation: Minimal impact. Water: None anticipated. Public Works/Enqineerinq: Construction specifications and capitol improvements, otherwise minimal impact. Buildinq & Safetv: The greatest impact will be on this department; the centralization of code enforcement activities will increase accountability through improved organization; a new CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION would be created with significant new resources to advance MAC and Project Renaissance; an implementation plan will need to be established with an emphasis on public relations effect of wide scale and intensified enforcement activities; an immediate and strong commitment to these programs will greatly enhance the long term benefit to the department, the City and the people. Prepared by James C. RiChardson, Deputy City A~~trator Development Services, December 4, 1987. ".. , ~If..t OF SAN BERNARDtWb - REQU~T FOR COUNCIL AC~ON From: r4ayor Evlyn Wil cox Subject: More Attractive COr.1l'1uni ty Code Enforcement Program Dept: ~1ayor' s Offi ce ;rfrd ( Date: November 23, 1937 Synopsis of Previous Council action: 12-9-36 Resolution No. 86-496 provided additional staffing to the department of Building & Safety for code enforcement. Mayor & Common Council approval of Resolution converting an inspector position to code compliance officer for additional code enforcement activiti es. 10- 5-87 Recommended motion: That the Mayor and Common Council approve the More Attractive Community code enforce- ment program, and authorize the staffing, operating expenses and equipment outlay as proposed. cc: Glenda Saul, Executive Director, RDA Manuel P. Moreno, Jr., Public Services Director GeraldNewcombe, Fire Chief D", P'9,1, '"i1di'9 I"p"t'" S"P"'i"'~~--,.1 ~'~~ gnalure Contact person: James C. Ri chardson, Deputy City Admi n. - uevelopment ~erv'ces Supporting dlta luached: Staff Report FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $157,750 Source: (ACCT. NO.) 001-183-5-?020/5843 (ACCT. DESCRIPTION)Per~nn~l Sprvices: Materials. Services "nli <;IIDDlip~' ~nli Fqllipmpnt nllt"J' Finance: r{/;., /:' /:...J~ Funds: General $45,200; Refuse $60,960; RDA $51,590 Council Notes: Phone: 384-5274 Ward: Ci ty-l1i de .Ananrl... h......... ...1.... 33 , '''--,..... BACKGROUND In identifying requirements for "Project Renaissance," Mayor Wilcox asked that the relationship to the More Attractive Community eM.A.C.) team and routine code enforcement activities be addressed. The Mayor had stressed for the Renaissance Program to be successful without impacting existing code enforcement efforts, an expanded code enforcement program would be necessary. Additionally, Councilman Maudsley has asked about additional personnel for building inspection and code enforcement. Herein outlined is a proposal that has been reviewed by the Mayor with the various departments involved which will significantly expand code enforcement activities. For many years, there was only one code enforcement position but that has been increased to three positions in the past year. NEED During my acting directorship for the Building & Safety Department, it has become obvious that greater supervision is needed regardless of the number of code enforcement personnel. Currently, the Building Inspection Supervisor provides supervision of code enforcement as assisted by the Senior General Building Inspector. The backlog of complaints has been significant and no systematic code enforcement work is occurring. This backlog is dramatic when one tours the City of San Bernardino and sees a significant number of houses and structures that are deteriorating, vacant lots too numerous to count with junk and debris present, hundreds of abandoned/inoperative vehicles. These general conditions cannot effectively be dealt with by only three positions. The Mayor and Common Council want, and the people, deserve a more attractive community (MAC) that can occur with a concentrated effort and the increased staffing of a separately identified Code Enforcement Division. There have been general concerns raised about the need for increased code enforcement by the General Plan Citizen Advisory Committee and the Board of Building commissioners. Finally, a previous staff study for combined code enforcement by Mr. Schweitzer makes obvious the need for greater interdepartmental coordination and centralization of staff efforts. PROPOSAL Since there appears to be significant support and interest for expanding code enforcement, a comprehensive proposal has been developed accordingly. Financial support from other funds and sources is necessary due to limitations on the General Fund. While fines can support some additional staffing, it is not recommended to go beyond that which is herein outlined. This expanded enforcement proposal would call for the establishment of a separate "Code Enforcement NnVAmnAr?~ lqR7 .,'. '.... \ v '-.../ , j Request for Council Action - Staff Report Expanded Code Enforcement Program November 5, 1987 Page 2 Division" within the Building and Safety Department. The details of this proposal are outlined in the attached charts describing each program element, staffing, costs and the funding source. The following is a summary of the proposal for expanded code enforcement: Proqram Elements Staffinq 1987-88 Cost 1. 2. 3. 4. Code Enforcement Supervision Contract w/Redevelopment Agency Contract w/Refuse Fund Transfer/Expand Vehicle Abatement +1.0 +2.5 +2.5 +2.0 $ 16,720 51,590 60,960 28,480 $157,750 Subtotal - MAC Program +8.0 5. Current Code Enforcement Section 3.0 126,180 TOTAL Code Enforcement Division 11.0 $283,930 The projected revenues from fines and fees for these code enforcement activities are outlined below: Proqram Elements 1987-88 1988-89 1. Code Enforcement Supervision $ 23,820 $ 47,440 2. Contract with RDA 10,000 15,000 3. Contract with Refuse Fund 48,750 92,500 4. Transfer/Expand Vehicle Abatement 32,630 60,000 MAC Program Revenues $115,200 $214,940 A comparison of the new costs and revenues, as proposed, are outlined as follows by year: 1987-88 1988-89 MAC Program Costs $157,750 $115,200 $237,170 $214,940 MAC Program Revenues Revenues as % of Costs 73% 90.6% The combined second year (1988-89) cost would be $359,760 as compared with $283,930 in 1987-88 and would provide fUll-year costs for staffing while discontinuing certain equipment outlay expenses. The staffing additions would include six positions which are tied to contracts or funding levels and kI_..__L_._ 1"1'" 1,..,...., ,.,.", ......, '1 j Request for Council Action - Staff Report Expanded Code Enforcement Program November 5, 1987 Page 3 could be discontinued if necessary. RECOMMENDATION I would recommend the endorsement of this proposal for expanded code enforcement as presented. The proposal, as presented, will help centralize code enforcement and demonstrate the commitment of the Common Council to a city that is proud and seeks to improve itself. This proposal is closely related to Project Renaissance and routine code compliance responsibilities and an expanded MAC Code Enforcement Program will eventually lead to a greatly enhanced image through stronger enforcement of community standards. ,~~ J ES C. RIC DSON, eputy City Administrator - Development Services mtb Attachments (5) November 23. lqR7 ^, :... - --' 1. Code Enforcement Supervision a. Proaram Descriotion: Reclassify position to Division." management controlling an existing General Building Inspector a supervl.sor for the "Code Enforcement A fully staffed division will demand a mid- position for scheduling, monitoring and the workload. b. Staffina: Convert an Inspector position to Code Enforcement Supervisor +1.0 c. Costs: (Personal Services) Reclassify posi- tion from Range 1103 to Range 2141 with an increase of $807jmonth plus 30% fringes for 6 months (Materials, Services & Supplies) Postage, printing, copying, advertis- ing, office, training and special supplies at $150jmonth for 6 months Garage Charges $120jmonth for 6 months $ 6,300 900 720 (Equipment Outlay) Used mid-sized sedan Desk, chair and file cabinet First Year Costs Second Year Costs 8,000 800 $16,720 $18,490 d. Fundina Source: Administration and overhead charges of 10% for supervision are estimated at $4,140 for RDA and $4,680 for Refuse Fund (first year $8,820; Second year $17,440). Additionally administrative charges for board-ups are estimated at $200 each with 75 to 150 per year. Program revenues projected at $23,830 for 6 months and $47,440 annually. November 23, 1987 r "-- 2 . ,""'-""' F', V '-' Contract with Redevelopment Agency (ROA) a. Proqram Description: Establish a contract or memorandum of understanding (M.O.U.) between the RDA and the City for expanded code enforcement services. Field and support personnel (+2.5 FTE) , equipment and supplies would be added for sign abatement, zoning enforcement and general property maintenance in the 12 RDA project areas program to begin January 1, 1988, with staff on a year-to-year contract, rather than being "regular" City employees. b. Staffinq: Add Code Compliance Officer Add Abatement Technician Clerical Support/half-time +1.0 +1.0 +0.5 c. Cost: (Personal Services) Code Compliance Officer, Range 1103 at $2,028/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months $15,210 General Abatement Technician, Range 1083 at $1584/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months 11,880 Typist Clerk I (half-time), Range 1049 at $1,041/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months 3,900 (Materials, Services & Supplies) Rental of 2 vehicles at $250/month and operating expense of $120/month for 6 months Postage, printing, copying, training, office and special supplies at $170/month for 6 months Emergency Abatement (signs, etc.) Program administration/overhead 10% (Equipment Outlay) 2 desks, 2 chairs, 2 files, typewriter, 2 recorders and transcriber Radio Equipment 4,440 1,020 5,000 4,140 4,000 2,000 First Year Cost $51,590 Second Year Cost $84,280 d. Fundinq Source: M.O.U. between ROA and Building & Safety Department funded annually by RDA and charged back to project areas. Also, fees of sign abatements are estimated at $50 each for 200 signs and emergency abatements for program revenues $10,000 in 6 months adn $15,000 annually. ...." 1....n.., 3. '-' Contract with Refuse Fund '---" a. Proqram Description: Establish a contract or memorandum of understanding (M.O.U.) between the Public Services Department for expanded code enforcement services. Field and support personnel (+2.5 FTE) , equipment and supplies would be added for Project Renaissance, litter control, property maintenance and general abatement activities. This program would begin January 1, 1988, with staff on a year-to-year contract rather than being "regular" City employees. b. Staffinq: Add Code Compliance Officer Add Abatement Technician Clerical Support/half-time +1.0 +1.0 +0.5 c. Cost: (Personal Services) Code Compliance Officer, Range 1103 at $2,028/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months General Abatement Technician, Range 1083 at $1584/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months Typist Clerk I (half-time), Range 1049 at $1,041/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months (Materials, Services and Supplies) Rental of 2 vehicles at $250/month and operating expenses of $120/month for 6 'months Postage, printing, copying, advertising, training, office and special supplies at $225/month for 6 months Emergency Abatements (litter, nuisances) Special Projects (youth/community groups) . Program administration/overhead 10% (Equipment Outlay) Desk, chair, file, 2-mini recorders and micro computer Radio Eqipment $15,210 11,880 3,900 4,440 1,350 5,000 5,000 4,680 7,500 2,000 First Year Cost $60,960 Second Year Cost $90,110 d. Fundinq Source: Fees from abatement charges to property owners. Also charg~s to refuse Fund for litter control (500 parcels at $50 each). Administrative fees for property and more involved clean-ups for approximately 500 parcels annually at $125 each. Program revenues would be $48,750 in 6 months and $92,500 annually including emergency abatement charges. , " "-,, " 4. Transfer/Expand Ve~le Abatement -~ a. Proaram Description: Transfer the abatement of inoperative vehicles from the Fire Department to the Building & Safety Department and add a position to provide for expanded vehicle abatement activities. The additional position would be on a year-to-year contract rather than "regular" City employees. b. Staffina Transfer Fire Prevention Inspector and reclassify as Code Compliance Officer Add Vehicle Abatement Technician +1.0 +1.0 c. Costs: (Personal Services) Reclassify "Fire" position from Range 1103 to "Code" position, Range 1111 with an increase of $211/month plus 15% fringes for 6 months Vehicle Abatement Technician, Range 1083 at $1,584/month plus 25% fringes for 6 months (Materials, Services & Supplies) Rental of 2 vehicle at $250/month and operating expenses of $120/month for 6 months Postage, printing, training, copying and office supplies $200/month for 6 months Emergency abatement (dismanteling cars) (Equipment Outlay) 2 desks, 2 chairs and 2 files Radio Equipment $ 1,460 11,880 4,440 1,200 5,000 2,500 2,000 First Year Costs $28,480 $44,290 Second Year Costs d. Fundina Source: Administrative fees the pass-through based on abatement revenues would be annually including of $100 for removal of vehicles and fees of $25 for dismantlers of 220 vehicles in 6 months. Program $32,630 for 6 months and $60,000 emergency abatement charges. Nnv~mh~~ ?1. lQR7 . , \ r"'- -"" v ,j Current Code Enforcement section 5. a. Proaram Description: The Building and Safety Department currently utilizes three positions in general code enforcement activities throughout the City of San Bernardino. There is a backlog of routine complaints, while emergency abatement actions are quick in response. More difficult cases involving demolition are slowed by complexity and limitations of staff time and budget resources. Current functions include M.A.C., Mobile Home Parks and general/Council complaints. b. Staffina: Currently there are three code compliance3.0 representatives assigned to code enforce- ment and general supervision by a Senior Building Inspector, the Building Inspector Supervisor and the Building & Safety Director. c. Cost: (Personal Services) Three (3) Code Compliance Representatives classified in Range 1111 plus 25% fringe benefits $105,250 (Materials, Services & Supplies) Garage Charges $1440/yr., for 3 cars 4,320 Postage, printing, copying, advertising, office and special supplies $200/mo. 2,400 Data Processing Charges - In House 1/3 of total Telephone charges 1/6 of total (Equipment Outlay) Pick-up (replacem 4,460 900 8,850 Estimated 1987-88 Budget $126,180 Projected 1988-89 "Base Budget"$122,590 d. Fundina Source: General Fund solely, although some fines and fees help offset expenses to a minor extent. November 23, 1987