HomeMy WebLinkAbout44-Planning
From:
CITe OF SAN BERNARDItJ() - REQUE~T FOR COUNCIL AC"'.ON
/ rt ~r
R. Ann Siracusa r:EC'D.~AOHIHS'tWect: Finding of consistenc;:ith
Director of Planning . I" General Plan for Public Works 87~13
Planning [~? C:T 22 F:-: J: ~. _~'
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
November 2, 1987
October 22, 1987
Dept:
Date:
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Findings of Health and Safety adopted by Council on July 20, 1987.
Recommended motion:
Adopt a finding of consistency with the General Plan, Adopt a
Negative Declaration,
I
o~~
~~o~
~Signature R, Ann Siracusa
Contact person:
R. Ann Siracusa
Phone:
384-5057
Supporting data attached:
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Sou rce:
Finance:
Council Notes:
75-0262
~
Agenda Item No /f I
. CI"':' OF SAN BERNARDI"'~1) - REQUr""T FOR COUNCIL ACr'1ON
STAFF REPORT
DESCRIPTION
This is a proposal to widen and realign 40th Street for a distance
of .09 mile between Mountain View Avenue and Electric Avenue
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map).
The plan will increase the drive path to a four lane 72-foot wide
street to better facilitate the current traffic flow of 13,000
cars per day, The right-of-way has been purchased, The work will
be done in phases, the south half first, to keep two lanes of
traffic open during the approximately three months of construction.
The hours of construction will be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
to avoid disturbing the nearby residential areas. The plan includes
new curbs, gutter and sidewalk. Stop signs will be relocated at
Mountain View Avenue and Palm Drive and the traffic signal at'
Electric Avenue will be relocated.
GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY
The General Plan aesignates 40th Street as a collector street and
this project will bring this section up to those standards,
ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE
An initial study was prepared by staff, reviewed by the Environmental
Review Committee, and made available for public review, No comment
has been received. The Environmental Review Committee recommended
at their October 21, 1987, meeting that a Negative Declaration be
adopted, (See Exhibit "B" - Initial Study'.)
PREVIOUS ACTION
Due to the Office of Planning and Research and court restrictions
on public works projects, the City Attorney has suggested that
all such projects be viewed by the Environmental Review Committee
prior to the City Council's review and action, Action on the
required Health and Safety findings was taken in July 1987,
75-0264
('-
.".~'
r
....."
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
INITIAL STUDY
FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING OF
40TH STREET
BETWEEN ELECTRIC AVENUE AND MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NUMBER 87-13
Prepared by
Vivian Stevens Leach
Planning Department
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
(714) 384-5057
Prepared for
Public Works Department
City of San Bernardino
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
September 23, 1987
.
,
,
,
Section
1.0
2.0
2.1
2.2
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.2.1
3.2.2
4.0
4.1
4.2
5.0
6.0
/
'-,
'~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Executive Summary
Proposed Project
Project Impacts
Project Description
Location
Site and Project Character-
istics
Existing Conditions
Project Characteristics
Environmental Assessments
Environmental Setting
Environmental Effects
References
Appendices
Appendix A - Environmental
Inpact Checklist
Appendix B - Locations Maps
Paqe
1-1
2-1
2-1
2-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
3-1
4-1
4-1
4-1,4-2
5-1
6-1
6-2,6-3
,
,
,
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report is provided by the City of San Bernardino as an
Initial Study for the proposed realignment and widening of
40th Street between Electric Avenue and Mountain View Avenue.
As stated in Section 15063 of the State of California Envi-
ronmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the purposes of an
Initial Study are to:
1. Provide the Lead Agency with information to use as
the basis for deciding whether to prepare an EIR or
a Negative Declaration.
2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a
project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR
is prepared, thereby, enabling the project to
qualify for a Negative Declaration.
3. Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is re-
quired by:
a. Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to
be significant.
b.Identifying the effects determined not to be
significant.
c.
Explaining the reasons
potentially significant
significant.
for determining that
effects would not be
4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the
design of a project.
5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the
finding in a Negative Declaration that a project
will not have a significant effect on the environ-
ment.
6. Eliminate unnecessary EIR's.
7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could
be used with the project.
1-1
~
Initial Study - Public Works Project No. 87-13
Widening and Realignment of 40th Street
September 23, 1987
2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2.1 Proposed Project
The project under consideration is a public works proposal to
widen and realign 40th Street for a,distance of .09 mile
between Mountain View Avenue and Electric Avenue. The
General Plan designates 40th Street as a collector and this
project will bring this section up to those standards. The
street will be widened to a 72 foot drive path with a 100
foot right-of-way. The curb and gutter will be replaced and
sidewalks added. The right-of-way has been purchased by the
city. Utility companies have been notified of the con-
struction and in accordance with their agreement with the
city will move the utilities.
2.2 Project Impacts
Impacts identified in the attached checklist include:
2.
The possible increase in
construction.
noise levels during
6. The possibility that the construction will cause a
traffic hazard and congestion during construction.
10. The displacement of community residents.
19. The possibility of significant cumulative impacts
on the environment.
2-1
.....~
,
1"'-"
......... '0/
Initial Study - Public Works Project No. 87-13
Widening and Realignment of 40th Street
September 23, 1987
"J
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 Location
The proposed street widening is of 40th Street between
Mountain View Avenue and Electric Avenue. See Map Exhibit A.
3.2 Site and Project Characteristics
3.2.1 Existing Conditions
The existing roadway is approximately .09 mile long by 60
feet wide. 40th Street is four lanes from Waterman Avenue to
Mountain View Avenue and traffic has to merge into the
existing two lanes at Mountain View which they curve South as
40th Street crosses Electric Avenue.
3.2.2
Project Characteristics
This project will realign and widen 40th Street to four lanes
with additional turn lanes at Palm Drive and Electric Avenue.
It will include the relocation of the stop signs at both
Mountain View Avenue and Palm Drive. The traffic signal at
Electric Avenue will also be relocated. 40th Street will be
improved with curb and gutter and sidewalks.
3-1
\
,/
/
Initi~l study - Public Works Project No. 87-13
Widening and Realignment of 40th Street
September 23, 1987
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
4.1 Environmental Setting
The subject site is .09 mile of a Collector Street connecting
the commercial center on 40th Street between Waterman Avenue
and Mountain View Avenuel Wildwood Park at 40th and Waterman
ahd various other community services to the residential areas
to the north and west. The construction proposed is between
Mountain View Avenue on the East to Electric Avenue to the
West. The North side of 40th Street and the South side
between Palm Drive and Electric Avenue in this area are zoned
R-l. The South side of 40th Street between Mountain View and
Palm Drive is zoned C-3A. Fire Station No. 7 is located at
the Northeast corner of Electric Avenue and 40th Street.
4.2 Environmental Effects
The environmental Impact Checklist identifies four areas of
potential concern regarding the project. These concerns are:
Increased noise levels during construction
The possibility of hazardous traffic conditions and
congestion during construction.
Community residents will be displaced because of
this project.
The possibility that this project in conjunction
with other projects will cause a cumulative signif-
icant adverse impact on the environment.
The Environmental Impact Checklist is attached in Appendix A
of this report. Each item checked "maybe" or "yes" on the
checklist is identified below, followed by the recommended
mitigation measures.
2. Would significant increases in either noise levels,
dust odors, fumes, vibration or radiation be
generated from project area, either during con
struction or from completed project other than
those resulting from normal construction activity?
The hours of construction will be limited from 8:00
a.m. to 5:00 p.m. to reduce noise impacts to nearby
residential areas.
6. Could the project create a traffic hazard or
congestion?
4-1
/
r~
V ~
Currently the traffic count on 40th Street in the
project area is 13,000 per day. The proposal is to
phase the construction to allow the use of 40th
Street during construction which should take about
three months. The north half of the street will be
kept open as the major portion of the work is to be
done on the South side. Then the South side will
be opened for traffic while the North side is
completed so that two lanes of traffic can be
maintained. Warning signs and lights will be used
to warn motorists of the construction.
I
,
~
10. Could the project result in the displacement of
community residents?
The right-of-way has been purchased by the City.
Individual property owners have made their plans
for moving. The existing structures will either be
moved or demolished.
19. Will any effects of the subject project together or
in conjunction with effects of other projects cause
a cumulative significant adverse impact on the
environment?
This project is designed to bring 40th Street up to
Collector Street standards to alleviate the traffic
problems in the area brought about by increased
construction and growth rather than to encourage
new development in the area.
4-2
,
'- '-"
Initjal Study - Public Works Project No. 87-13
widerling and Realignment of 40th Street
September 23, 1987
5.0 REFERENCES
Persons contacted:
Michael Grubbs, Sr. Civil Engineer,
City Public Works Department
csj
9/23/87
DOCUMENT: MISCELLANEOUS
INITSTUDY 40THST
5-1
r~
" ,
, ,
...)
DEPARTMENT)
~
CITY OF
SAN
..)
BERNARDINO PLANNING
\-'
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
"" ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT CHECKLIST ~
,..
A. BACKGROUND
,
l. Case Number (s) : PW 87-13 Date: 8/20/87
2. Project Description: Realignment and widening of 40th Street
between Electric Avenue and Mountain View Avenue.
3. General Location: 40th Street between Electric Avenue and
Mountain View Avenue.
.------- -----.
B. r:NV [RONMENT AL IMP ACTS
YES MAYBE ~O
- -
l. Could project change proposed uses of land, as indi-
cated on the General Plan, either on project site or
wi thin general area? ..x
-
2. \Jould signif ican t increases in either noise levels,
dust odors, fumes, vibration or radiation be gener-
ated from project area, either during. construction
or from completed project other than those result-
ing from normal construction activity? X
- -
3. Will project involve application, use or disposal
of hazardous or toxic materials? X
- -
4. \.Jill any deviation f rom any established environ-
mental standards (air, water, noise, 1 i~h t , etc. )
and/or adopted plans be requested in connection
with project? X
- -
5. Will the project require the use of significant
amounts of energy which could be reduced by the
use of appropriate mitigation measures? X
- -
6. Could the project create a traffic hazard or
congestion? X
- -
7. Could project result in any substantial change in
quality, quantity, or accessibility of any portion
of region's air or surface and ground water re-
sources? X
... ~
6-1
E.R-C. 'OttM A
PAGE .1 OF 3
MAY '81
'-
~
...
MAY'.
,.,~
v
c )
':)
YES
8. Will project involve construction of facilities in
an area which could be flooded during an inter-
mediate regional or localized flood?
'9. Will project involve construction of facilities or
services beyond those presently available or pro-
posed in near future?
lO. Could the project result in the displacement of
community residents? --1L
11. Are there any natural or man-made features in pro-
ject area unique or rare (i.e. not normally
found in other parts of country or regions)?
12. Are there any known historical or archaelogical
sites in vicinity of project area which could be
affected by project?
13. Could the project affect the use of a recrea-
tional area or area of important aesthetic value
or reduce or restrict access to public lands or
parks?
14. Are there any known rare or endangered plant
species in the project area?
15. Does project area serve as habitat, food source,
nesting place, source of water, migratory path,
etc., for any rare or endangered wildlife or fish
species?
16. Will project be located in immediate area of any
adverse geulogic nature such as slide prone areas,
highly erosible soils, earthquake faults, etc.?
17. Could project substantially affect potential use
or conservation of a non-renewable natural
resource?
18. Will any grading or excavation be required in
connection with project which could alter any
existing prominent surface land form, i.e., hill-
side, canyons, drainage courses, ete?
19. Will any effects of the subject project together
or in conjunction with effects of other projects
cause a cumulative significant adverse impact on
the environment?
PW 87-13. )
....
MAYBE
--
NO
-Z
..x
..x
-Z
~
x
x
x
x
"I..
s
/~
EAC. FOltM A
PAGE 2 OF 3
.
f
, PW 87-13 ..J
'-' ........, '--"
'J
C, SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND C~roLATIVE EFFECTS
If any of the findings of fact have been answered YES or l'.AYBE, then a brief
clarification of potential impact shall be included as well as a discussion
of any cumulative effects (attach additional sheets if needed).
D. MITIGATION MEASURES
Describe type and anticipated effect of any measures proposed to mitigate or
eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts:
-----
E. DETERHlNATION
On the basis of tllis initial evaluation,
0 We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 \,e find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREP~~ED,
0 \,e find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL It~ACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRO~IENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALlFORIHA
(Secretary)
DATE:
... '~
MAY '81
ERe. FORM A
PAGE 3 OF S
,
~
.
"-"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
A...-.......
')
LOCATION
CASE PW 87-13
~
AGENDA
ITEM #
HEARING DATE
.'. B!'~ .-.
.. ..~ GOlD .'. .-,.. ~ ... ~ :' ~. : .',
. ~. . ~.,. li;E:l R.'
lUTE 30 Q k 7 -. ~- -' -
("\ R-, R .'. T:1 .'. 1!iI' ~ <:R"....v_
" 0 ""R. . -.........= -.-. "" _;;-:
---~-
"
11-
ft.]- ~
')
0"
c
",.
w)-
.-,
.
...-
.
....
R..
.... .... ....
.'.
.',
.
.
.. ....... ..,
.
... ...
..,
6BBB :.
....:
.'.
.',
.'.
II-I ==..~
6-3
"-
.',
)-QQ~
..,....0 .....
.0" "L
/
.-
.-
...,
~
. ~ ...
~
~ ...
~
~ ..,
~
~ ...
~
I
c.
0-
.",0 IS-
.. GoO Co
...,
R-,
,
~ '
,
'-'
.~..~!! 5":,i'~::'1~-'lk
I"""".).. .. =1, a '. I ... ..
! liT' n"~.,_f::l---,':__';' , i i ~i ~' ,:
f :;'.~";/".:.!--= -iff;'f-'.. i~~tt:!-f @~ ~:;;~ ~
- : ~W~f""'Iq,,-~"':..w~' ~.~ " ~, ~ ;. ~S:.
~.nj J t. .. . . vw_ .J . m '......~
t,.':::.' I.....pnr '.u_.., .,":~'nc:..." Q .tnw;:
"-!,--.,-. ~~ ., i'.!.:~:(~.,::::w" ...~ ~~..;
m. I .-:- -ot -~. l-w .a~:
. '. 1...._.;:. '" J JI.:f: ~ ""( t: .. ~
. .Ii:~,<.;;._~u!m.;.... . . ...~~w.:" 0- ~~..f:ld L I l!s"g' ~ ~t
. .. /"" ': ~, --'It . ~.=:-':; _ 0
.._'!t.~K" ""~~; ':~, ./-.... n. ,'J..., . j ,.;i
.... 'ln~;cs 1. ~ ..~.; .,... "f"_~' -~1;"~ ..,-1 >--_.. .
1 00' ~i-t~,:'~ I. ," ~. t'~;}~;;'~..: - ~~ t:~ ~ ~
o..,r1, 111'1':'-' .... ~ ;-; -.. _.~-r-r......jrl-1"''lj c<.)
"""1\::'/,:", 11:~! :; I ~'.. _ -'-'1i~'l~ I' "
,ri':~;!!:U"':' :' I I ',rJ," F! f' I i 1;
,~'" '..' "_~"for:I~ I :~
.~" ~E: : ~r-l 1- {nr;fI II ~! L_ a~ ~l r.'-
~' '~::~~~:\'~'I~[F-'n~:~LJ..?t,~- ~~!~1i:;. ,,'~~ilm
4D_'~"u1 ..;. ....11 r,. j..~,,~u..:-:_ .~'1irY0 I. ~. -: ~ t
...........r\1' ,; ~ ,: i "l~';)""~-""'''''''' '9 ~.: .
........... "':~-l J,J' 'I'" ~ r. t,r.-:: ="'-1' ..,; ~
_1.",~. fjl) , . ,-\'c if!! ~ ~ 1:D - I ,...
..16....~ . :,;Hl~i : 1\!..~i~,'~~ ~',..'\'!~;~;;...I' ;} I)~~ l
:......~. a:!~!" : ~'JI::"1' E-~;1 ~4;t~I-....~. .r~ 1:.;i:J r~
""''7" :\ -.,' :\. . .. ""<...1 Ii..... 6 Aii r.;p.... f
.... : ~:,:t 77" ,~L__J: o<.:.,t... 1 ,~<;;~ ~.. k: "~~1 ..
, ...-.... :1;',i:(.~WJ ';k~29'1-=\l;;..o\\3;,' J;,.e:..:;ijo......... I''-~: ·
, r." ~ S,;I'\',;II *" ~, :i: '/j' "., ,,~.. ~,~.... : ~c.
"..., :'.r~~. /,,1'I.l,tKJj "\ ~~",""1~"+. (, ~ 4::
....> .. . t '/ J 'x ":J ,.(,~ ~h-7.':"- _.-.......-~ 1'-: t) .,
.>.--~~:<6'!.1I'!jWg~~1J~"I}lft~~: '~:JrI~~; I..,.~:> ...
.pol).do :~':r~';{'\~,~~ ~f,A A-'~ 1:~~~.' ::':~~I;.I~;ri%- W
<il ,,,~,,,,"."!~\\', "-'k,q+'i.'1.0/// .~{Z-1- '?i;.~!'..._.; ~
@~ir ...... ~'vlffi' .....~~""\' ._
~~'~? ";cJ4i}~~~~ ':, ~"~-......~ ...
~{~.IJ~ t~.Li.((/-\1;.i4r- .,:'.~i""" --..;.r. 0 CI)
~;""'''''Ir(! . 1~,~".;r.(::.0)!ti, "'~'''",<::' _ ';':j
~":': i!'~~ 't~. 'ij:"{<;~",,-, ''<~'''''''-''.;''';::;,;,-:-'''N1-''':ilD~:,:,-.~,
~., '''': '~" :\( ;l'}',\f~,,' }".[1<?"i;'.:,-;",-,!?~ ;.:l....l':'~,"-' .,..
,I:: ". ,''''''': ," T '{::l?r:':':';:o:'7~~~'::\...,,,,!:,:~.t-~~"'-" 1
~-~ I"~':;.~{f-;.:' ~~',',\"// "--;~r:~~.'~~4"-;;. .~t::.J(,'~\":>:'~~"
:.... -- ..... I .',' .., ~""f
..-........, 'rirJ' -, ,- ::?"':~._.
:.. ...~::.e ~.;. {' \ ,'. 'j't . .1-I'}..ff-~ll:~i"?-5t!-~~ll'~ ';
@o"""{........ ',i "':,., {'/~;.,' ~ _.' ~\ "1......::.:\~...~r",:): -,:,'JIB :
- .~~ ;\' ~,'i;\,'17 !,~ ' , i~~"I" ,~, ','.!~:<"'~, ,
~~~.x.... ~ '/\\ \\~r:..'4 ~ (':J...=~l-! ~.:.___- l~.. .,.....~
I~::! &"i;0,~~l h\l\ ~\ ~;r-"\t"\'~2:f;~' ~ ;
~':1.t,,". I',~\'~ .' -:.~...... \\ +.., ,~: ol. ;'::: \'" 'J:
G. .-- ~;\'L:. " '.t '(.'. ~ ~'"O::'.:l:''''' q;;---'~--",
"...:.;~. '%.. ""'\~" /.<t;\\}:'/I;;.:,~ I ~cL,_ --,.h.;~"
fro _ Yn-:;:":i"":>~u' ~~', \'.,:~ '// // ',-/:' '~"'--=-'--4- _1... --.,~:),
-">'l:"~"'~/b..'."_' ,., //;;t;. '"..I !i(_..1 ~..r.."".....-O'
.... ..... .... . "z'.l"~..... .... ~- \ . '/1'// .' "_.. ...:7" -- ~,.--__~_.
,. '._J'''~:'' ! / , ~~' ./.::.~ '/ -.I't]t/ ~. _ ,.:.~ - . ':-~D
,. -",. ., l:%'.':'\(, "1'(" b.-r"''):2.:~ ,00' U ",,,-,-_,-,
.~;; ~:~~/~..: -~:tt!lr.'\lry017:r:.. ~ 0:-0..:' ....." " .. J)
.~---rN"1 : ~ ~\;~....;.Wl'/,/.I"if:i' ~ ; It ~~
- , '" ..\d",,,d,,{,. ;.#~'~'....-;.-< .,.,.<;)
. i"'.j ...:....~. "iJti,'t'...t.: ~:i)1'" . "',- j~~ .~~
'II :1.: :", ~":P-";t'!l'~'//~~''''.t\io.-- ~~..",.
_ r: '~~r .-.r-........ .....ii:y.~...~ V.,h..... \q-\i~.:-.c" ~,Q~...--
" :.' :""'~';g""O";':' ~.' "'-'.,~ :f.._...-t
. "):.'I!" ~.. "'~"r\""v'~~ .~~.a-,
!: ;(: ,1 .;....- (-:':-;;'J'VX'""'j:o..~ "~~l i:i.Cl( Q"
~:::~: :.:..i~:-$m~:L!.:1'"?fJ I"'~~':'!'~'" i!;~=
'" .. ""'. "/' h.___ -I'J: q' ," ." :>:~( I, ~. \1 . .:'" ..
I;) .,.;~;: - " OlT:m;f_~ . ~../. ./"n,. _~J;( '; ~.,q.~..:g. n .--~::.!f;:'f1.~~
L; : :. ~ 1"1:-. . ('I ~~~I '1"l:~'o:\~~-r."., ..:;~\.~=n~l~:t-G
.~; ..~~:...~~\J,~\.)\ ,.t!-?1~'~ ~.(... -n'~
-_U"iJ-'. ;:S=-!;1"{'j"~ ".....~~'l"I' -".,.".'
f/'';w:.''~.-''~'~~: t .y.... .J~:=: "r" .\~%,-, Of 'rJ4~ ,~\~~.- .:,,'iV
...~. ....'Jo 'E t.. .. t '~Jl \J'i":i~;t::-..,...," .
f''ii. --",.' ~' ;\" 'ijf'" , '~~ ,'....-, "
,., ".., "~;:', \J !. ,hrp '~\l6, ~\ ',~ .. ,;.._=:-"" ,;
J" 'r~lI-'~:, -'~. ':~::"_'~;~;'l"" .
, 6' \\' _"..~.: \...i.-:.;i........~'J,,-a'I,-. .1
,L"';~;;::~:.. "'l~ 'r' ~"::r-(,lis'
:,-. .,1'.. .... ~-1 t ~..,. _'~-;-:;J i6.,h;.,. .."
0,' ',---~' I "'"'JJ,''' c.
--:--"'Y'~ H'::., - '.: ~ .., ....,.
.~ ....,' ~.\"'" ~... ""'A~ . ,
,,~_".:._"-o;... .', ~~.{ I .
. I :;::;-....-.,., \",,,:._1 .' r;",f( /1. I'"
. . ...'... :. '~'~' "roo'
....~....~.Il f't';i" _.~~.:_~' 1..,--,
..".....! I: " ..tJ.... I' I
4.... = .'.' :, '. ;:: .1 1'1(
.. ~I :: .' 1h::. .: I II~
. ., I. I '''J~I ~.'- 'r
\ :. tlJir'~ S : 'I
..,. :' ~" ; y .~< .;..,1 1=
~ ~I , '.''1;1" .r,"!" 1 ... ,~
~; ': : '~:'::';' ~:' J
=n: ~ I :~'" ,-
",) -f!~ ~
,.;
h=14 i
5 ::! !.,
i:
~~
'"
-
I
....
00
I
:.:
""
.1;---/
.t.
,
i
!
!.
I
Appendix B -
)
i_.
..
)
Location
Maps
6-2
". .~ '*
J:.Ah.llH'l l\. LUCAT.lUN I"lAY
..., .",,",
\0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE PW 87-13
HEARING DATE
---- -
.',
.', ) ..00
. .,....01l+-
.'1 ! -0" ..~
.
.-, ~ /
~
C:-1& .
'0 .,
., .-
.-
.-
1
co"
.
!l-
R-3. ~ ~
w)<::
.
.,~
:~ I~'b
...1bL IH
-
I
I. R-I
.-,
I
,~
4"
~
'~ H
I
I "1
I
I '-1
I
~ .,
I
I
.',
c.
.'
..0 ,).
.. toO C
11-0
..t ..1
lUTE 30
",8" ,'" .'.
, 1
0016 .',
Q 6C~9Q ~~ c-- ~ l
~,;H., ., tJGJG:1l-":~
.',
.',
.-1 =;..04.
IN JI-l
..
I .-t
i
....-
.',
I "", ""I
,~ -"'''
<;( R-' R
6-3