Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-Police Department CI'19 OF SAN BERNARDI~ - REQUEQ FOR COUNCIL AC~N Dept: Police nEe'o. - AOMIN. OFFsubject: 1387 APR 27 /.l'! :8: 24 Resolution of the Bernardino Urging Assembly Bill 36, Mandatory Helmets Motorcyclists City of San Support of Relating to for From: Donald J. Burnett Chief of Police Date: April 24, 1987 ~ f Synopsis of Previous Council action: None known. Recommended motion: Adopt attached Reso 1 ut i on . /-- " , ) /! ' ~'_IA~{'(! ,lZ~-' ~!'J ( ~}iJnature Contact person: Donald ,1 RlIrnptt, r.hipf nf Pnlirp Phone: 384-5607 Supporting data attached: Yes - Rf'sollltinn Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Sou rce: Finance: Council Netes: J~( . . CI-r9 OF SAN BERNARDI~ - REQUE~ FOR COUNCIL AC-hbN STAFF REPORT I In California motorcycles account for only 3 percent of all passenger carrying vehicles but are involved in 12 percent of the accidents. The chances for injury or death in a motorcycle accident are up to 17 times higher than in an automobile accident. Under existing law, it is an infraction for a person under 15 years and 6 months of age to ride as a passenger on a motorcycle or motorized bicycle without wearing a safety helmet. AB 36 will impose a State mandated program making it an infraction for any driver or passenger to operate or ride upon a motorcycle or motorized bicycle without wearing a safety helmet. The provisions of AB 36 can be expected to reduce serious head injuries or fatalities associated with motorCYC1.ZCC- nts on the highway. . (' ~ ---- / 4/?YJ~J<; ,~.'b Donald J. rnett Chief of ' lice .....Ln....::... .f \./ _8 w? C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -.."'" .,.....\ .-/ :) P-EcOLUTIO;: NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO UP,GING SUPPORT Of' i\SSEHELY r.ILL 36, PELATING TO 111\j~DATORY HELHETS FOR 110TORCYCLI S'J'S , BE T.T RESOLVED BY THE 1-1AYOR AND COI~IOI< COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNAP.DINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTIOll 1. Recitals. A. In California, Qotorcycles account for only three percent of all passenger-carrying vehicles but are involveG in 12 percent of accidents. B. The chances for injury or death in a l.1otorcycle accident are up to 17 times hic:rher than in all au'cor.'obile accident. C. In 1984, California Hi?hway Pa.t:':ol statistics shmJ that 26,511 Qotorcyclists were injured, anG of those ~njure~ 3,766 had severe injuries. " ~. The avera~e hospital bill of an injured rotorcyclist is conservatively estimated at more than $17,000 per in~ividual, and "indirect costs" such as lost wages and physical rehabil- itation usually are double the direct costs. E. I,lc:.torcycle injuries cost the taxpayers more than $65 nillion a year for hospital bills alone, based on the nur;tber of injuries in l'JC'l. F. Studies sho\-l .t:~;flt California taxpayers arc paying more than 80 rcrcent of tile cocts incurred by injured m01;or'- cyclists. G. The Mayor LinG. CUl.:lUon Council of the City of San Bernarclino arc concerned about the enormous financial cost: to the taxpayers an~ the unmeasurable el~,otional cost to victims 4/20/r7 -1-' C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ,.." V .~ ..J -...) in loss of human lives and suffering caused by motorcycle accidents. H. Implementation of the 1986 Seat Belt Law requiring mandatory seat belt usage in automobiles traveling in California established a precedent that declares when the state has a vested interest in paying costs it is entirely appropriate and prudent for the state to protect itself. SECTION 2. Implementation. A. The Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino do hereby urge the California Legislature to enact legislation that requires California motorcyclists to wear safety helmets. B. The City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to State Senators H. L. Richardson and Ruben Ayala, and to State Assemblymen William Leonard and Jerry Eaves. I HERERY CEKTH'Y that the foregoing resolution was ,July adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Rernardino at a meeting thereof, held ;)n -- - ~ --_.__.- -.---------..-.---.-.- the day of __________ _.___._' 1987, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Members ----_.._--_.._._~._._~-_._~---'_._-- -- ----- - ....- -----_._-- --,..- _._~_._---- -.--- - _._-- --..---.-..---..-------..- -- ..- - ---. NAYS: --- ---- ----_._---~~--- --_.. -.. _.- -_._- ---.--.- - - -.-. - - ......_- ABSENT: -.-------.---.- -- - -.- -- _.- -'-- - -- - ..- .... '. - - --_._.-. ..._-- - -.-.-- -.._..-. - ----------cIty -Clerk ------- - - -- . . . . - - . . -'>- c .............. ...... ---- -..J ..J 1 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this _,___ day 2 of 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 , 1987. 3 4 5 Approved as to form: /1 ') (/({:I fJ Ah~e;7 7 Clty orney 6 4/?O/R7 Mayor of-the -Ci ty of San Be-r:nard i no- -3- . c' o :) oral ifnrnia 11legislature ~ SACRAMENTOAOORESS STATE CAPITOL ... 9581.. 916-445'0'165 COMMITTEES: CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION P\JBLIC EMPLOYEES'" RETIREMENT REVENUE & TAXATION DISTRICT OFFICE 16921 S. WESTERN AvENUE. : SUITE 220 GAROEN"'. CA 90247 1213> 516-"037 CHAIRMAN LABOR 6: EMPLOYMENT JOINT COMMITTEES: FAIRS'" ALLOCATIONS PRISON CONSTRUCTION 6: OPERATIONS RICHARD E. FLOYD ASSEMBLYMAN. FIFTY-THIRD DISTRICT March 31, 1987 r Evlyn Wilcax, Mayor City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardina, CA 92418 Dear Mayor Wilcox: Per yaur request, I am forwarding a copy of AB 36 and dacuments which are germane ta the issue af mandatory helmets far motarcyclists. Thank you far your interest in this substantive traffic safety/saciaecanamic measure. ~;:t~ ~l J Richard E. Floyd ~ REF:dmc ~s ,<j "I ,r:' ~ \ ", L~J' \' , :l ..~ ,';) " c o CALIFORNIA QISLATt1IlE-llllI7__ RECULAR SESSION :) ASSEMBLY BILL No. 36 Introduced by Allembly Member Floyd December 1, 1986 An act to amend Section 27803 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles. LE.C1SLA11VE COUNSEL'S DICEST AB 36, as introduced, Floyd. Vehicles. (1) Under existing law, it is an infraction for a driver under 1.5 years and 6 months of age to operate a motorcycle or motorized bicycle on the highway, and for a person under 1.5 years and 6 months of age to ride as a passenger thereon, without wearing a safety helmet. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by making it an infraction for any driver regardless of age, to operate a motorcycle or motorized bicycle on the highway, and for any person, regardless of age, to ride as a passenger thereon, without wearing a safety helmet. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: yes. . 99 60 " -' o o o ,) SUPPORT OF ASSEMBLY BILL 36 (Floyd) Mandatary Helmets for Motorcyclists (3-19-87) American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons American Academy of Pediatrics American Academy of Physician Assistants American Association of University Women American Automabile Associatian American Public Health Assaciation American Trauma Saciety Bell Helmets California Associatian for Safety Education California Association of Safety Cauncils California Assaciatian of Women's Clubs California Medical Association California Matarcycle Dealers Associatian Baard af Directors California P.T.A. California Paralyzed Veterans Association California Peace Officers' Assaciatian California Pal ice Chiefs Association Califarnia State Automobile Assaciation California State Firemen's Associatian Califarnia State Sheriffs Association Califarnia Tax Payers Association Californians far Safe Matarcycling Developmental Disabilities Board, Area XI Emergency Nurses Assaciatian Family Survival Project League of California Cities Los Angeles Caunty Cammissian on Disabilities Las Angeles Palice Department Los Angeles Resource Center-Adults with Brain Impairment Las Angeles Unified Schaal District Motarcycle Industry Cauncil Natianal Association af Independent Insurers National Highway Traffic Safety Administration National Safety Council National Student Nurses Association National Traffic Safety Institute Orange County Injury Coalition Orange County Trauma Society Organization of Area Boards an Developmental Disabilities Peace Officers Association San Francisca Trauma Faundatian Southern Califarnia Automabile Assaciation Southern California Head Injury Foundation, Inc. Wamen Highway Safety Leaders World Institute an Disability c o ~ , , v :> Page 2 (SUPPORT OF AB 36) (CITY SUPPORT) City of Alturas City af Anaheim City of Belvedere City of Brentwood City of Briggs City of Brisbane City of Buena Park City of Burlingame City of Carmel-by-the-Sea City af Carpinteria City of Ceres City of Clay tan City of Coronado City of Cotati City of Cupertino City af Cypress City of Oaly City City of Duarte City af Dublin City of El Cerrita City af Fairfield City of Foster City City af Fremont City af Gridley City of Hercules City of Irvine City of La Palma City af Loomis City af Las Angeles City of Menlo Park City of Mt. Shasta City of Narwalk City afPacifica City of Pacific Grove City of Pico Rivera City of Piedmont City of Pismo Beach City of Placentia City of Portola City af Redwood City City of Rio Del City of Rohnert Park City af Ralling Hills Estates City of Raseville City of San Bruna City of San Fernanda City of San Pablo c (SUPPORT OF AB 36) (CIn SUPPORT) City of San Rafael City of San Ramon City of Santa Ana City of Santa Barbara City of Seal Beach City af Stacktan City of Unian City City of Villa Park City of Westminster City of Willows City of Waadland (COUNn SUPPORT) /''''''. V o :) County Supervisars Association of California County of Alpine Caunty af Amador County af Cantra Costa County af Del Narte County of El Oarado County of Glenn County of Inyo County af Los Angeles County af Mendacino Caunty of Monterey Caunty of Napa County af Nevada Caunty of San Francisca County af Santa Cruz County of Sutter County of Yala County of Yuba , , c o o :) '. ERIEFING PAPER FOR f"ANDATORY HElfEr LEGISLATION LEGAL BASIS FOR HEADGEAR LEGISLATION o CoMPULSORY HELMET LEGISLATION IS AN EXERCISE OF A STATE'S POLICE POWER WHICH INCLUDES THE Pl)oIER TO ENACT LAWS--~IITHIN COf':STITUTIONAL L1MITS--TO PReY-mE TIlE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY OR WELFARE OF ITS RESIDE~ITS. THE BOUf':DS OF POLICE POI'l'ER ARE GENERALLY PEG/,RDED AS HAVING BEEN CC'MPLlED WITH ~IHP: THE FOLLOVIlNG TWO ponrrs APE MET: 1. THE PUELlC nITEPEST, NOT THE INTERESTS OF A PARTICULAR PERSr.N OR GROUP, REQUIRES IIfTERFERH'CE ~iITH INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS. ~N EX,w.PLE ~IOULD BE THE STATE'S PLENARY POI'IER OVER ITS HIGHWAYS. TO REGULATE FOR THE SAFETY Af\'D BEST INTERESTS OF THE PUELI C . 2. THE MEANS OF CARRYING OUT THE PUBLIC INTEREST ARE BOTH REASONABLY "ECESSARY TO ACCl1'1PLI SH IT, MOO ARE NOT UNDULY OPPRESS lYE UPON INDIVIDUALS. (U\WTON v. STEELE, 152 U.S. 133 (1894)). IN ENACTING MANDATnRY HELMET LEGISLATION IN OTHER STATES, LEGISLATURES HAVE , RELlFD UPON A '(PUBLIC PURPOSE" TO SUPPORT THEM. THE PUBLIC PURPOSE FURTHERED BY THIS LEGISLATIorl, AS DEFINED BY THE COURTS, HAS RANGED FRCIo\ THE INDIRECT PUELlC BENEFITS OF PROTECTING AN INDIVIDUAL MOTORCYCLIST FROM THE CONSEQUENCES OF HIS OWN DANGEROUS CONDUCT (THE "SELF PROTECTION" THEORY) TO THE DIRECT HARM TO ALL HIGHVIAY USERS \1HO SHARE THE PUBLIC ROADS WITH UNPROTECTED CYCLISTS (THE "DIRECT HJI,PM" THEORY). " c o o :) THE "SELF PROTECTION" THEORY OF PUBLIC EENEFIT FOCUSES ON lliE H:TEP.DEPENDENCE OF AN INDIVIDUAL'S ACTICNS rND lliE INTERESTS OF lliE STATE; lliAT IS, ~MEN A PEFSON NEGLECTS HIS Ow-.! HEALlli, SAFElY, OR WELFARE, ALL OF SOCIEIY SUFFERS. THE SOCIETAL COSTS TAKE lliE FOPJII OF LOST PRODUCTIVIIY, HIGHER WELFARE COSTS, INCREASED INSURAACE RATES, AND MUNICIPAL MEDICAL EXPENSES. A RECE!\'T S1UDY BY lliE UNIVERSIIY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS ~iEDICAL CENTER SHCfflS lliAT 82% OF /'OTORCYCLE VICTIMS' MEDICAL COSTS ~IERE PAID BY lliE STATE AND TAX-BASED ENTITIES. GIVE~: lliE LIMITED PUBLIC FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR ~1EDICAL CARE, lliE HEAVY PUBLIC COSTS OF /'OTORCYCLE RIDER TRAlNA Ca-1PRa-1ISES iHE QUALlIY OF HEALiH CARE IN OiHER AREAS. CHALLENGES TO iHE CONSTlTUTIONALIIY OF HEAIlGEAi:1 LEGISLATION HAVE BEEN RAISED IN lliE APPELLATE COURTS 0F 3~ STATES; COURTS OF L.A.sT RESORT IN '2J STATES, At\'D I!\'TEP}1EDIATE APPELLATE COURTS IN 6 OiHERS. THESE COURTS Ht,VE UPHELD SUCH LAWS AGAINST Cm:STITUTIONAL CHALLENGE IN EVERY INSTANCE. RESEARCH RE EFFICACY OF HELMET USAGE o HEAD INJURY IS THE LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH IN MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS. CoMPARED WITH RIDERS WEARING HELMETS, UNHEL~ETED RIDERS ARE THREE TIMES /'ORE LIKELY TO INCUR FATAL H!JURY M'D ThQ TIMES MORE LIKELY TO INCUR A HEAD INJURY OF LESSER SEVERIIY. THE UNIVERSIIY OF SOUlliERN CALIFORNIA IN DEPlli STUDY OF 900 r.cnORCYCLE ACCIDENTS CONCLUDED THAT SAFElY HELMET USE WAS iHE SINGLE MOST IMPORTA~'T FACTOR GOVERNING SURVIVAL IN /'OTORCYCLE ACCIDE~IS. o THE REPEAL OF THE I"ANDATORY LOUISIANA HELMET LAW AND ITS SUBSEQUENT RE-ENACiMENT PROVIDED THE BASIS FOR A SYSTEMATIC STUDY AND Ca-1PARISON OF INJURY TYPES, SFYERIIY, FATALITIES, AND COSTS ASSOCIATED I'lIlli HELMET USE. THERE WAS A z , c o 0 30% REDUCTION OF FATAL ACCIDENTS DURING nlE C("(>'PULSORY HELMET LAVl REINSTATEf'I,EtH COMPARISON PERIOD, EVEN THOUGH Tl-IEPE ~IAS A 5.9% H!CREASE IN REGISTERED I"OTORCYCLES. THE LENGTH OF STAY ltl MEDICAL FACILITIES DECREASED BY %.6% At-[) nlE AVERAGE COST PER !,CCIDENT DECREASED BY 48.6%. :) o DURING nlE LAST nlREE ACCIDENT DATA REPORTING YEAPS. CALIFORNIA HAD 2202 FATN.lTIES AND 77 .552 INJUPIES DUE TO I"OTORCYCLE CRASHES. THE U.C. t"fDIC/1L CENTER STUDY REPORTS nlE AVERAGE MEDICAL COST OF SEVERELY INJURED CYCLISTS TO BE $17 ,70~. THE SOCIETAL COST FOR A FATAL ITY APPROXIMATES $268,000. IT IS CLEAR Tl-IAT THE FISCAL MAGNITUDE OF Tl-IIS ISSUE HAS EXCEEDED ONE BILLION DOLLARS DURING T1-lE LAST nlREE YEARS. BY APPLYING 11-'E REDUCTION FACTOR ASSOCIATED WlnI HEL~\ET USAGE. EtlACTMENT OF A HEL!",ET LAVI WILL HAVE nlE EFFECT OF SAVING I"ONEY M'D LIVES, VtHICH IN TURt,: WILL PROVIDE nlE STATE WlnI MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO IMPROVE nlE OYrRALL QUALITY OF PUBLIC HEALnI CARE BY A SI~'PLE Af\'D ItJEXPENSIVE MEANS. o PER MILE, A I"OTORCYCLlST IS 10 TIMES I"ORE LIKELY TO DIE IN AN ACCIDENT nll'.N IS AN AUTOMOBILE PASSENGER. !"oRE nlAN 80'7. OF ALL MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS RESULT IN INJURY OR DEAnI TO nlE CYCLIST, PHYSICIANS CHARACTERIZE TRAUMA IN I"OTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS AS nlE WORST TRAlJto1A Tl-IEY TREAT OUTSIDE OF A wr,R Ca~BAT ZONE. o IN SPITE OF I"OTCRCYCLE CRASH DATA M'D ~fDICAL RESEARCH WHICH SUPPORTS LEGISLATIVE INTERVENTION, I"OST OFFICERS OF MOTORCYCLE CLUBS f'J:NOCATE nlE PLU, "LET THOSE WHO RIDE DECIDE." IN SOME INSTANCES WHERE MEMBERS AT LARGE ARE POLLED. nlE MAJORITY VOTE Itl SUPPORT OF A MANDATORY HELMET LAW. THIS POSlTlOtI REFLECTS A LESS WF.U KNOWN QUOTE: "ONE MI\N'S FREEDOM IS ANOnlEP rAN'S SHACKLES IN TAXES ",~'D INSUPANCE PR8~ll.flS." 3 . c o o :> SAMPLE r1EDICAL ~ HISTORIES OF rOTORCYCLE INJURY VICTIMS FRor~ TI-lE f'OMENT OF INJURY, SOCIffi PICKS lHE CYCLIST UP OFF lHE HIG!-MAYi DELIVERS lHE VICTIM TO A M~~ICIPAL HOSPITAL ~~ MUNICIPAL DOCTORS; PROVIDES UNEMPLOYMENT COI'1PEN~ATlON IF, AFTER RECOVERY, HE CANNOT REPLACE HIS LOST JOB. NID. IF lHE INJURY CAUSES PEFMANENT DISABILITY, roAY ASSLME lHE RESPONSIBILITY FOR HI~l AND HIS FAMILY'S CONTINUED SUBSISTENCE. THE FOLLOWING ARE BRIEF SYNOPSES OF SEVEPJ\L PATIENTS FRCJo\ A STUDY OF INDIVIDUALS TREATED BY lHE QRlHOPEDIC SERVICE AT U.C., DAVIS MEDICAL CEf'..'TER FOR TRALMA SUSTAINED IN A ~'CTORCYCLE ACCIDENT. THESE WERE EIlHER fo'OTORCYCLE DRIVERS OR PASSENGERS ON fo'OTORCYCLES. 1. A 19 YEAR OLD MALE, MUlTIPLE FRACTURES, HEfD INJURY, NEUROLOGIC INJURIES REQUIRING REPEATED OPERATIONS, ACUTE HOSPITALIZATION 74 DAYS, NO INSURANCE, ~EDICAL COST $62,481. 2. A 25 YEAR OLD MALE, BLOOD ALCOHOL ,119, HEAD INJURIES, MULTIPLE FRACTURES, ABro-1INAL TRALMA, AClTTE HOSPITAL IZATlON 63 DAYS, NO INSURANCE, ~1EDICAL COST $38,772. 3. A 33 YEI>,P OLD MALE, BLOOD ALCOHOL .143, SKULL INJURIES, MULTIPLE FRACTURES, AClTTE HOSPITALIZATION 49 DAYS, NO INSURANCE, MEDICAL COST $39,024. 4. p, 23 YEAR OLD MALE, BLOOD ALCOHOL .118, HEAD INJURIES. MULTIPLE FRACTURES, AClTTE HOSPITALIZATION 26 DAYS, NO INSURANCE, MEDICAL COST $41,699. 4 , c o o :> 5. A 28 YEAR OLD MALE, HEAD INJURIES AND MULTIPLE FRACTURES, ACUTE HOSPITALIZATION 36 DAYS, NO I NSlIPANCE, fl'fDICAL COST $34,256. THE DIRECT COSTS CITED IN THESE EXAt-'iPLES ARE OIlLY FOR ACUTE HOSPITALIZATION. THEY DO NOT INCLUDE COST OF EMERGENCY TRANSPORT, PRETREAMNT AT ANOlHER FACILITY, PHYSICIANS' FEES, SUBSEQUENT CARE AT ANOlHER FACILITY, READMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL SURGICAL PROCEDURES, REHABILITATION, PHYSICAL lHERAPY, LOST WAGES, OR DISABILITY PAYMENTS. IN GENERAL lHESE ADDITIONftL COSTS MAY BE EXPECTED TO RUN ABOUT 1WICE T1-IE COST OF T1-IE INITIAL HOSPITAL IZATlOI,! AND ARE TYPICALLY BORNE BY TAXPAYERS T1-IROUGH VARIOUS STATE At:D FEDERAL PROGRAMS. 5 CALIFORNIArfiFOR SAFE ~TORCYCLING 6931 Fifth Street Rio Linda, California 95673 (916) 991-5091 :) c Board or Directors Prf'l(ir/I'11f Mary Price T""II.""t"t'I' Lucie K. Whitne~' .James BOllllan. M.D. Susan ~. Cleek Ha~'d('n Dawson HEl\'erly HolqUin Richard Plum Robert :\. Szabo. M.D. Laura Timmerman (,.E. \"an ('on E,'f,,.,lfi"j lJin'l"flll' Robert L. Terry HELMET USAGE FACT SHEET a Compulsary helmet legislation is an exercise af a state's pal ice pawer which includes the power to enact laws -- within constitutional limits to promote the public health, safety ar welfare of its residents. o Head injury is the leading cause af death in matarcycle accidents. Unhelmeted riders are three times more likely to incur fatal injury and two times more likely ta incur a head injury of lesser severity than riders wearing helmets. A Calijorllia Non-Profit P"bliC' Bt,,,jit Corporation u'ho.t primary purpou i. dirtcted to promotiPlg saft moto1'f!lding thrtlllgh ,durot;ng th, pllblir rrgarding th, importo'Mt o!motorcyclingo,wratoTs a"d paBungtTs t~'taTing protecti,', he'adgear. (California Franchisf' Ta.r Board Organization Nu.mbn-li9!968). ~,. c ......., \."". o :> o A University of Southern California in-depth study of 900 motorcycle accidents concluded that safety helmet use was the single most important factor governing survival in motorcycle accidents. o During the last three accident data reporting years, Califarnia had 2,202 fatalities and 77,552 injuries due to motorcycle crashes. o The U.C. Medical Center study reparts the average medical cast of severely injured cyclists to be $17,704. The sacietal cost for a fatality approximates $268,000. o A motorcyclist is 10 times more likely to die in an accident than is an automa~ile passenger. More than 80% of all motorcycle accidents result in injury or death to the cyclist. Physicians characterize trauma in motorcycle accidents as the worst trauma they treat outside of a war combat zane. CALIFC. .'IAQS FOR SAFFOo1 _ .{CYCLI!\G 693] f,fth Slr~~\ R'Q Lind.. Californi.. ~5Ci3 (~)6199)-509) :> c Board of Dil"f'rLDn pr,~irl(I.' )br.\ PrlC'f S,rrr,nr., T,.,n..",., r Lur~ 1\ W tillnf', Jam",. Bon~ar, ~~ D ~~~ir, ~ Clt't~ Hi' dt>r, [)iI\' ~Ol" Bf\trh Hc:c:;..nr, P.lcr.ird riiJrr. Rot.t-... ~ S::'ik. ,,~ Lo AN OVERVIEW OF COMPtJI.SORY BELMET OSAGE LEGISLATION C.,r"t." D...,,',. R,,~rt L Trrr:- A cursory review of literature dealing with helmet use as an effective countermeasure to head injury associated with motorcycle crashes indicates that most major health, medical and safety organizations endorse the use of helmets. Helmets usage is also endorsed anc promoted by many organizations representing the , motorcycle industry, as well as motorcycle riders. However, organizations within the motorcycle industry, as well as rider organizations have traditionally opposed legislation designed to require motorcycle operators and passengers to wear protective headgear. Motorcycle rider organizations, allegedly representing motorcycle riders as a class, have successfully defeated compulsory helmet legislation in California on numerous occasions. (It is estimated that membership in the largest motorcycle rider organization, American Motorcyclist Association, represents less than one percent of the 750,000 California licensed motorcycle operators.) .A Cn';.~II"t,;n ^'ut,.p,,~(,., PHM,," h~ HIli' ("or,.,,.,,,,,,,, HOJ,UIH pr,"",,'" ,."r,-"" ;If din.,.',rl',. ,,,,,,,,,,/i",1 .fll, IIIfI'''''' "d,,'fl tl '''fll,1 rri"rnl'''rJ'I" ",,1,1,,- ,...gnrtlj"f/ tI" IUII.,""H",' u,f HloIf'''f'~/'NI1 UIIf"rtr'ur"ntfd ,"'... Nfl' ,".. H'f n'"j"III"."" ,.",., I" nri,,. "'" ,ru/.(.""",,, F,-nlf,.'"" Tn. H.",,.,I O,.",'-f1;:n,im. """"",,"r 1.!".!"t~~J . o The central thp-~ ~as been based on the of Oposition to Ollt<"-" helmet legislation:) pre~ise t~at an individual's constitutional ri9~t to indiscretion is violated by such legislation. Opponents have argued that the state is exceeding the limits of police powers when it enacts such legislation. Constitutional challenaes to compulsory helmet leciflation have beer. raised in the appellate courts of at least 35 states with only one state (Illinois) striking do~n helmet-use statutes. Constitutional challenges to state compulsory helmet legislation poses the legal and philosophical question as to whether, and to ~hat extent, goverr~,ent ~ayact to protect people from their 0~T. indiscretions. The prep~nderance of judicial decisions directec to this issue appears to have concluded that motorcycle helu.et la~s have raised no constitutional issues; compulsory motorcycle hel~et statutes are ~ithin the scope of legislative power; and the opponent's argu~ents should be for the Legislature -- not the courts -- to consider. The efficacy--of helmet usage has been clearly established through e~pirical research. The death/injury reduction potential of cc~pulsory helmet legislation is in keeping with a state's police power to enact laws -- within constitutional li~its -- to promote the public health, safety, morals, or welfare. A viable case can be made for the prer.ise that a substantial percentage of deaths and major head trauma associated with motorcycle crashes could have been averted if California would have enacted compulsory helmet legislation at an earlier date. The people of California are in the main, law-abiding o citizens, and as 8uch it can be predicted that enac~ent of o ~ ~ helmet legislation will result in near total compliance directed to a safety measure designed for the best interests of the public.