Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout56-Planning CI!~~ SAN BERNARDIO - REQUEG FOR COU~~N vincent A. Bautista ,Appeal of Conditional Use From: Acting Director of PlaftlttIL-AOMll@ufJlIF!: Permit NO. 87-3l Planning fj~1 ~1" -5 Nt. e at; Mayor and Council Meeting of June l5r 1987, 2:00 p.m. Dept: Date: June 4r 1987 Synopsis of Previous Council action: Previous planning Commission action: At the meeting of the Planning Commission on June 2, 1987, the following action was taken: The application for Conditional Use Permit No. 87-31 was denied without prejudice. Vote: 3-3, 1 absent. Racommended motion: That the hearing on the appeal be closed and the decision of the Planning Commission be affirmedr modified or rejected. ~~ Signature Vincent A. Bautista Contact person: Vincent A. Bautista Phone: 384-5057 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: 3 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Sou rce: Finance: Council Notes: ....::.n""" Agenda Item No, ~. .. c :) June 4,1987 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 300 North "D"Street San Bernardino, California 92408 Mayor Wilcox and Common Council Re: Appeal of City Planning Commision's decision on June 2,1987 CUP 87-31 "Unbias decision" To Whom It May Concern: Please find enclosed Request for Hearing with Appeal from Hannon,Park & Lennon Attorneys at Law dated June 3,1987. Further, enclosed a petition compiled upon short interest within the community for the approval. signatures will be gathered and presented. notice which represents Prior to the meeting further If I can be of further assistance to clarify questions please feel free to phone at 714-381-1809 or stop by the leasing Office situated at the Centre. Sincere ly, man leasing Office · Suite A20 738 SOUTH WATERMAN AVE. -= SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92408 -= (714) 381.1809 . ' c. c':] HANNON, PARK a LENNON ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3:1:10 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE BIIO LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 110010 (213) 3B4.oo7B ..... J June 3, 1987 ~ ::It m (") m !; <: m 0 J. I ::") - ;!! -< - ("') r- ~ m ;:c ~ MICHAEL HANNON HEE.OK ,.ARK GERALD E. LENNON City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, Ca. 92468 Attn: Mayor Wilcox and Common Council Re: Appeal of City Planning Commission's decision on June 2, 1987 CUP# 87-31 To Whom It May Concern: Please be advised that this office represents Mr. Steve Freeman in his application for a conditional permit use. We would like to appeal the City Planning Commission's decision on June 2, 1987 denying Mr, Freeman's application to sell beer and wine at his shopping center and would like to request a hearing for an approval at the next scheduled city council meeting. This appeal is made on the following grounds: 1. Both the police department and planning department have recommended approval of the application. Both departments feel strongly that the community needs a market selling beer and wine. 2. The market to be built shall have a public restroom. The maket hours will be from nine in the morning to nine in the evening, 3. The nearest liquor store is at least one mile away from the shopping center and is located at the corner of Mill and Waterman. The Planning Commission was under the impression that Mr. Freeman was applying for a liquor store and not a market selling just beer and wine. 4. ~aving a market with a license to beer and wine would enhance the image of the shopping center and attract tenants. 5. At the hearing only the representatives of the church across ," c o o The City of San Bernardino Page 2 June 3, 1987 the street from the shopping center appeared to oppose Mr, Freeman's application. Although the church is only one hundred feet away from the boundary of Mr. Freeman's property, the distance between the church and the market to be built is almost five hundred fifty feet. Sincerely, ~-~ --.......... era1d E. Lennon Attorney at Law :) c ~<.. ,.1 '.Il.'~, ;..,. ":"~,., ;~t':"ftf'~~~:~}'7,~'~I~.'" ~T:.~I." ~~'~~'~:"f':.,,;."~~ t'" P 6-i. .) ~''1::.: ' .. . . ,'. " "..... . , C '. . ".... :;. J. 1=\ ,... ~ K. '\.... '.......,,.,.,. ..."," ,'_ .':' 'W' ..~......, -." .' ' - .J .,." -.-.' ... ...,. .... .... PETITION TO BE PRESENTED TO MAYORS OPPICE AND COIIlON COUNCIL POI IlEETING OP JUNE 15.1987 ot Cit, NaIl . SUBJECT: PROPERTY nditlonal Uoo Pondt No.87-31 ... TION: LINBAR BUSINESS CENTRE located at 738 South Wataraaa Avenue orner of Water..n 6 Cantral AVenue. . PROPOSAL: The .ppllcant request. approval of . conditional ua. p.~lt under uthorlty of Coda Section 19.26.020.815 to per.!t off-aita ..1.. f alcohol within a .hoppin. center .-11l ~th. C-M, Co_reiel to Liaht nufacturina aon. THE POL ING SIGNATURES REPRESENTS NEIGRBORNOOD RESIDENTS. REQUESTYNG THE. API!IlOVAL --OF CoDd! anal -U.. Par.!t 87-31.allowlft1 the ..1..of....r/Wln. at the-propo... GROCERY locatad within the CIITRE at tenant apace Al1/12 .b -.] - r ? 6- .j'-cf 7 t5-3-Fl. 6-;J-~7 {-of 6~ ~J ub - 3 -~ 7 . k-.--'?--Ji7 . tf-.?-.f'? _ ._.._........__.._.... . 0_.__----..-..--..---.--.,--.. U'_'__"'_.._ , '.. _.'_'___n__ .~___.._ . __.6: - .7.-: (7._ '1 6-,,7-[=7 . '/0:30 A'N.O;t..~. .s.-~P.9:~Q.6)- g 7 . 8Sy <; c/~ J<t!. ._~. . i::- J'-F '7 " /1 I' 6 - J- <1 7 :J.6q~1d:- . 6-3 -~7 ':J.~9</1 q~ 'S-1- . h- ,) - ~..., IfllA.ltu>rtU V.... <l3rf~() c; ?~V~$' /'V-.f'7 cJ7?e;; ;Iv...tjtJ-t,d),A, 44i~L ~, 'l;v</ OJ enS - ~?' I~f urJil ):)51 5 f*no.s { dU Lf A:'OX-,Y't:, (11 f.( yeW" f( ulHt.'; (J.d 5j~q J. ~ ~ '. I / , , ,I I~ -- '''DAT! -_.. 6-;'-8'.7 ff-J-'6?; t' II , ~'7 -~? 1-. I r- PAb-'i.. 7.. o<;::~ i"",ti ~ PETITION TO BE PUSENTEIl TO MAYORS OFFICE AIlD COItlOlI COUNCIL POR !lEETING or JURE 15,1987 at Clty N.ll SUBJECT. dlt~ U...P...lt No,87-31 PROPERTY ATtOR: LINBAR IUSINESS CENTRE located at 738 South Wateraan Avenue orner of Water..n , Central Avenu.. PROPOSAL: The applicant requests approval of . conditional ule pe~lt under uthorlty of Code Saction 19.26.020.115 to permit off-alte e.l.. , f alcohol within a shopping center in the C-H, Co.-ercial to Liaht . . nufacturinl zone ........ ,~ .. c ING SIGNATURES REPRESENTS NEIGNBORROOD RESIDENTS REQUESTING THE. APlIlOVAL anal U.. 'er.tt 87-31 allowing the ..le of Beer/Wine at the propo..d-- RKIT loeated within the CEKTR! at tenant .pace Al1'12 . ADDRESS }o.." ~ AYE . /t:f 6 P. s: ~",-c.~t..A/ <'V~ /d~ '1 Sj...~ ,4vc j07~ S..L./<<:.s:(J/ (:i. (.. 't.. 5' 5'l:lS. r,a&'fju,,, V '1l1ef W,::t:;~ . j//{C.~ /17'3. ~,A-.-L.~ 6-u l()f9:1~.;;t;1/ - I09~;J.~1'.~~/4J IMlf'oD J~41 ,..jt.1 t..uCl1.J liP!( jUt. ?;, 11-f sf. " c2'1J2'f .NCJIlfl1-4,v ~d, S,/8, .1,~7~~ .'.?_'-7 ~~~ DATE &..-.$ -~.'7_ ~ --:~_-Y7.. t:. - ~ -~ 0-i~~i.:'.: ... (p . 3 - g] t "0- 8'r t. - 3=F7,. -7 t-- '3 - fl. fe, -J~tf7 . o - .3~J'7 f.;7-o-~ tJ.~;~t; ~ /3/P7 C - LI- ~,'8'.7 ~-~? I. . ..."''''''...'''..~~ . . " !dlo+,.~IIJt~,~..JIhMr-l_,J,....",...,,', ," ',. .-".:....; ,"'.,.-./-... . .,I(~ ". ",'~"~t ....'.;--. ,''', . c o o ~ ERN ARDIN 0 30ll NORTH "0" STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92418 EVLYN WILCOX Meyor Memblirt of the Common Council Either Estrada. . . . . . . . . . . . . Fir.' Ward Jack Reilly............. .SecondW.rd Ralph Hernandez. . . . . . . . . . . Third W.rd Stave ~.rkl . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fourth Ward Gordon Qulal . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fifth Ward DIn Fr.,ler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sheth Ward Jack Strickler . . . . . . . . . . . .Sev,nth Ward June 4, 1987 Mr. 738 San Steve Freeman South Waterman Bernardino, CA Avenue 92408 Dear Mr. Freeman: At the meeting of the Planning Commission on June 2, 1987, the following action was taken: The application for Conditional Use Permit No. 87-3lr to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consump- tion withih a shopping center in the C-M Commercial-Manu- facturing zone on a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately 3.82 acres located at the north- west corner of Central Avenue and Waterman Avenue and further described as 738 South Waterman Avenue, was reviewed" A motion was made, and seconded, for approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 87-31, however, the motion did not carry and the item is considered to be denied without prejudice. According to the San Bernardino 19.78,,070., the following applies tional use permit: Municipal Code, Section to the filing of a condi- "The decision of the Commission shall be final unless appeal- ed in writing to the Mayor and Common Council. The written appeal shall be submitted to the office of the City Clerk within ten days from the date of the Commission's decision" The Common Councilr after receipt of the appeal, shall conduct a public hearing and may either approve, modify or reject the decision of the Planning Commission.n .. c o o ~ Mr. steve Freeman June 4, 1987 Page 2 If no appeal is filed pursuant to the previously mentioned provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Coder the action of the Commission shall be final. Respectfully, ~ VINCENT A. BAUTISTA Acting Director of Planning mkf cc: Building and Safety Dept. Engineering Division Linbar Investments 3175 Lorna Vista Palm Springs, CA 92264 ~ITY OF SAN BEIQJARDINOO- MEMORANDWI To Planning Commission From P1anni~g Department D~e June 2, 1987 Subje'ct Conditional Use Permit No. 87-3l Approved ITEM NO.3, WARD NO.' 3 Date OWNER: Linbar Investments 3175 Loma Visca Palm Springs, CA 92264 APPLICANT: Steve Freeman 738 South Waterman San Bdno., CA 92408 Regarding Conditional Use Permit No. 87-31, requesting approval of a permit to sell beer and wine for off-site consumption within a shopping center located at the southwest corner of Waterman Avenue and Central Avenue. New information has come to light since the staff report was written. Observation number five of the staff report is based on concerns expressed in an agency comment sheet from the police Department about recent burglaries and the lack of security measures, has been reviewed by staff" Staff found that security problems are being addressed by such measureS as bars to reinforce the ground level panels, steel plates to protect door jams from crowbars, the installation of security systems by the tenants, and a plan to install a closed circuit television camera trained on the driveway between Building 2 and Building 3. Furthermore, the driveway behind Building 1 contains no store fronts; the only entrances located on this driveway are doors with deadbolts and metal roll-up bay doors with double interior latches which will also be padlocked by tenants. Although the site plan did not indicate the location or method of lighting, adequate lighting is provided at each front entrance and near each bay door. Staff judges these measures to be adequate to address the concerns the police Department raised in its agency comment sheet. The police Department has submitted a memorandum, attached hereto, stating that the security measures cited above satisfy police concerns. Staff is, therefore, changing its recommendation for Conditional Use Permit No. &7-31 and recommending approval. Respectfuliy Submitted, ~ 5e~ kJ ' SCOTT WRIGHT, PI n~ng Aide VINCENT A. BAUTISTA, ..-' --Acting Planning Director '- ..; :.. ,," . t, ..,., . i . C CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE CUP NO. 87-3l .FINDINGS of FACT AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 1 fj /2/R 7 1 1. The zoning of the site is C-M, Commercial Manufacturing which allows General Commercial uses including the sale of alcoholic beverages. The General ~lan designation for the' site and the su~rounding area is General Industrial. In the. past the Planning Department has deemed the C-M zone to be. consistent with a General Industrial designation by the General Plan. On this basis the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan designation. 2. The proposed use is permitted in the C-M zone subject to a conditional use permit. The applicant is implementing security measures which address potential crime problems to the satisfaction of the Police Department. Staff, therefore, finds that the proposed use will not adversely affect adjoining land uses or the development of the area. 3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use to allow the development of the use in a manner not to the area. Security measures are adequate burglaries on the site. is adequate det rimen tal to prevent 4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets designed to carry traffic in the area. Adequate parking is provided. 5. Given the security measures being implemented, the granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 87-31 will not be detrimenta: to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino. RECOMMENDATION Based on the observations and findings of fact contained herein, Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 87-31. Respectfully Submitted, VINCENT A. BAUTISTA, Acting Planning Director - r ~ I -2-~I,,{ 6v1/)~......vr::_ --- SCOTT WRIGHT, Pl ning Aide . . \.. . ._ . _ J.,;I ! Y . VI"" ;:)"'1'1 Dt:.~~,",nUII"v/_~ ,~ ' ..-' .........~ IYI~IY."". ,ru "_"-II,tr,1 ) To Scott Wright, Planning CUP Request, Central and Waterman From Sherrie Moore, Police Subject Date 6-1-87. . Approved Date A few months back I, along with another crime prevention specialist, conducted a security inspection at the location of Central and Waterman at Chief Burnett's request. A r.1E!eting with the Chief, myself, Deb! Shuker, and It. l'layne Smith was held and these recommendations were given to the applicant. It was my impression at that time that he was not interested in pursuing any improvements to the security of his business or those on the premises. Approximately one month ago when the application for a CUP came through my office, I discussed the design of the building and the security weaknesses I was aware of with Sgt. Earnie Tull of the Vice Unit. He at that time sub- mitted some con.cerns arising from the sale of alcohol at that location. Today, 6-1-87, I have spoken with the applicant. He informed me that he has since--or is in the process of--taking steps to improve the overall security of the business: 1. Installing bars to prevent the ground level kick panels from being kicked out. 2. Install steel strike plate covers to protect the soft aluminum jambs. 3. Install a closed cir.cuit camera system for the added protection of the businesses. 4. 16 of the 25 businesses have--or have contracted for--a1arm systems (either with Sonitrol or National). Provided the above security measures have (or will be in the near future) been completed, my concerns have been satisfied. I believe these improvements are in the best intersest of not only the applicant but also all future businesses who will occupy the now 12-14 vacant spaces. Based on the 'above information, I, therefore, recommend ~pprova1 of this ap- plication, barring, of course, any comments from Sgt. Earnie Tul1. 'J1 l. t;.:).:- D . \.. ......-::::: .-X.~l( . Ch. /7, . r\l~ U~~M. '.::. . AS. f€.~ ~-~1\J6 ~,~u.. .s&7.o lH'i C "l) Jl(.,fL C'Y:\:{\,L ~y~ ,. " MI:". Ud::. ~ ~ o o o :) r CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT""" SUMMARY \. AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD " k/?/Q7 " ~ l&.I :l o Conditional Use Permit No., 87-3l APPLICANT' Steve Freeman 738 S. Waterman Ave., San Bdno'r CA 92408 Linbar Investments 3175 Lorna vista Palm Springsr CA 92264 OWNER: t; Applicant requests approval of a Conditional usa Permit for ~ the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption within o the C-M, Commercial Manufacturing district. l&.I II: ..... cr l&.I II: cr Subject property is located within a shopping center on a 3.82 acre site on the northwest corner of Central Avenue and Waterman Avenue. PROPERTY Subject North East South West EXISTING LAND USE Shopping Center Commercial Commercial Commercial Vacant GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION General Industrial General Industrial General Industrial General Industrial General Industrial ZONING C-M C-M C-M C-M M-l GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A ( !iUVES ) HAZARO ZONE !Xl NO ZONE Gll NO OZONE B SEWERS oNO HIGH FIRE DVES AIRPORT NOISE I o YES REDEVELOPMENT DYES HAZARD ZONE lXI NO CRASH ZONE DNO PROJECT AREA ~NO .J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z 0 APPROVAL ~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0 WITH MITIGATING - 0 Z(I) MEASURES NO E,I,R, tit CONDITIONS IIJ(!) [] EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO 11.0 0 2z II.ffi DENIAL Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 00 ~2 Q::Z WITH MITIGATING 0 CONTINUANCE TO >ii: MEASURES (1)2 DNo 0 Z o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 0 IIJ SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E,R C, l&.I EFFE CTS MINUTES It: NOY. ..81 IIEYISED JULY 1..2 8KY ~ c o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE CUP NO. 87-31 o :) OBSERVATIONS 1 6/2 /R 7 ? AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 1. Conditional Use Permit Reauired: The applicant has filed this conditional use permit application in response to Municipal Code Section 19.26.020<Bl15 which requires a conditional use permit to establish a new business selling alcoholic beverages. 2. Location: The store is a part of an existing commercial center on a 3.82 acre site located on the northwest corner of Waterman Avenue and Central Avenue in the C-M, Commercial-Manufacturing zone. 3. Airport Land Use District: The site is within Airport District II, part of the Norton Air Force Base flight path. Municipal Code Section 19.64.080<Cll permits all C-M, commercial uses within Airport District II. 4. Parkina: The shopping center provides a total of 208 parking spaces based on the square footage of gross floor area contained in the three buildings on the site and the applicable ratios of parking spaces required per square footi a total of 188 spaces are required for the total site. The total area of suites 10 and 11 is 2,582 square feet. Applying the standard ratio of one space per 250 square feet of gross floor area of retail space yields a requirement of II parking spaces for these two suites. 5. Police Comments: The Police Department finds no problem with the crime rate in the reporting district in which the site is located nor with the number of ABC licenses in the vicinity. However, the Department is concerned that a number of burglaries have already occurred in this center. They report that the ground level panels beneath the front windows of the buildings can be easily kicked in. They have met with the property manager and suggested a number of crime prevention measures including braCing the panels, installing alarm systems, and hiring a private security service. The manager allegedly has been unwilling to follow any of these suggestions and requested increased police protection. The Police Department is also concerned that the sale of alcoholic beverages at this site might lead to loitering at the center, and that anyone loitering behind Building One would not be visible from Waterman Avenue or Central Avenue. ~ c o o C) r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE CUP NO. 87-3l OBSERVATIONS 3 6/2/87 < .. AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6. Liahtina: The site plan does lighting. Adequate reduce the potential not indicate the location lighting should be provided for crime in the center. or method of in order to 7. Applicant's Intent: The applicant has submitted a letter indicating that he has a prospective tenant interested in selling beer and wine in spaces 10 and 11 of the center. However, the applicant requests flexibility regarding the location of the conditional use permit in the event that the prospective tenant withdraws from the lease agreement. 8. Environ~~n~_p~termination: At its regularly scheduled meeting on May 7, 1987r the Environmental Review Committee determined that the project is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act. I. , '-' o /""'\ ..,.; :) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ""'. CASE CUP NO. 87-31 FINDINGS of FACT < ~ /? fR i , A ' 'I.. AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE "'" 1. The zoning of the site is C-M, Commercial Manufacturing which allows General Commercial uses including the sale of alcoholic beverages. The General Plan designation for the site and the surrounding area is General Industrial. In the past the Planning Department has deemed the C-M zone to be consistent with a General Industrial designation by the General Plan. On this basis the proposed use is consistent with the General Plan designation. 2. The buildings in this commercial center provide little security from burglars. A number of burglaries have already occurred. The sale of alcoholic beverages is likely to attract people who will loiter on the site, thereby, increasing the chances of burglaries. An increase in the area's crime rate would adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area. 3. The layout of the buildings on the site is such that loiterers behind Building Number 1 cannot be seen from Waterman Avenue or Central Avenue. Given the fact that these buildings are easy to break into, to sell alcoholic beverages in this center without the provision of additional security measures would be tantamount to inviting burglaries. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed undue burden upon the streets designed area. Adequate parking is provided. 5. The granting of this conditional use permit is likely to increase the burglary rate in the commercial center for which it is proposed and will, therefore, be detrimental to the peace, safetYr and general welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino. use will not impose an to carry traffic in the RECOMMEND~:nON Based upon the observations and findings of fact contained herein, Staff recommends denial of Conditional Use Permit No. 87-3l. Respectfully Submitted, VINCENT A. BAUTISTA, Acting Planning Director ~c.-.ftr w ~ ---.----.. --- ---_.- SCOTT WRIGHT, P nner I ~. c c r"" -...J o r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT '" ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE "" ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ,.. .., A. BACKGROUND l. Case Number (s) : Conditional Use Permit No. 87-3lDate: 5/7/87 2. Project Description: Applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to sell alcoholic beverages for off-site consumptio [l within an existing shopping center. 3. General Location: The 3.82 acre site is located in the C-M zoning district on the northwest corner of Central and Waterma 1 Avenues. _..n.._._.___.___. -- ...-.--.. -. B. j':NV [ RONMENT AL lMPACTS YES MAYBE NO . - l. Could project change proposed uses of land, as indi- cated on the General Plan, either on project site or within general area? - ~ 2. Would significant increases in either noise levels, dust odors, f urnes, vibrat ion or radiation be gener- ated from project area, either during construction or from completed project other than those result- X ing from normal construction activity? - -- - 3. Will project involve application, use or disposal of hazardous or toxic materials? ~ - 4. Will any deviation from any established environ- mental standards (air, water, noise, light, etc, ) and/or adopted plans be requested in connection with project? ~ - 5. Will the project require the use of significant amounts of energy which could be reduced by the use of appropriate mitigation measures? -X - 6. Could the project create a traffic hazard or congestion? ~ - 7. Could project result in any substantial change in quality, quantity, or accessibility of any portion of region's air or surface and ground water re- sources? X - - , MAY 8' EAt, FORM A '~ -c () CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. ~-31 o ~ 8. Will project involve construction of facilities in an area which could be flooded during an inter- mediate regional or localized flood? 9. Will project involve construction of facilities or services beyond those presently available or pro- posed in near future? 10. Could the project result in the displacement of community residents? 11. Are there any natural or man-made features in pro- ject area unique or rare (i.e. not normally found in other parts of country or regions)? 12, Are there any known historical or archaelogical sites in vicinity of project area which could be affected by project? 13. Could the project affect the use of a recrea- tional area or area of important aesthetic value or reduce or restrict access to public lands or parks? 14. Are there any known rare or endangered plant species in the project area? 15. Does project area serve as habitat, food source, nesting place, source of water, migratory path, ctc" for any rare or endangered wildlife or fish species? 16. Will project be located in immediate area of any adverse geologic nature such as slide prone areas, highly erosible soils, earthquake faults, etc.? 17. Could project substantially affect potential use or conservation of a non-renewable natural resource? 18. Will any grading or excavation be required in connection with project which could alter any existing prominent surface land form, i.e., hill- side, canyons, drainage courses, etc? 19. Will any effects of the subject project together or in conjunction with effects of other projects cause a cumulative significant adverse impact on the environment? \..: YES MAYBE :; ""'I NO X- X- lL. x x X- x x ~ ~ x x ..... ERe. fORM A . - ... :c () CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.~7-3l o :) r ~ C. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS ANU CUMULATIVg gPF~CTS If any of the findings of fact have been answered YES or MAYBE, then a brief clarification of potential impact shall be included as well as a discussion of any cumulative effects (attach additional sheets if needed). D. MITIGATION MEASURES Describe type and anticipated effect of any measures proposed to mitigate or eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts: ------.-.,.------.---------- E. DETERMINATION On the has is of this initial eval uation, 0 We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a signif icant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o We find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added Lo the project, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREP~~ED, o We find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ- ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. X We find that the proposed project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Act. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA JI(/.I{'.vC~ C. ROSS, AssJ.stant Planner (Secretary) VAL E DATE: A1..1 ~ /187 \.. ~ , MAY II ERe. FOllIII A -c c o :) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENOA ITEM # LOCATION CASE CUP NO. 87-31 HEARING DATE 3 Fi /? /R 7 '--rm.r- st iW) JA ...! C-M .0. C-M M.l M-! M-I C.M COM ClR. COM C. CoM I 1--- C - CoM CoM L:J Church Locati ns l. St" Mark Missionary Bap- 1-' M.I tist Church - about 0.1 .-J mile from the site 2. New Canaan Temple - about 0.15 mile from the site Mol 3. Bethel Apostolic Faith Church - about 0.15 mile from the site I M-I J u C.M M-' I I Mol C"M C~_{f s...G~ " -c , "I """"'. " . l..! ,....... ,I, I . :.,1 ~'" I ~ II 1:1 , . . ...., .c. . _, c ,Ii fi -- . t I i -.-.-.. ,- ~ ~IU 'I , - -1 i ~ l i \. ~- I I _1 J ~, ~~ -, , It - - -.....-- '. I II I I o :) I ,.. I ,i , , :1 , J J ,J \ I It it 1 .. .' , ".i 1 '1 j JI '..',... ~: I ' > '. .c o o .:) ~PI Ill1 111 ~ I \~ (r r' I ~ -- I \ L- ~. ! . .-.-.. !1~:t .- ~ :=.-.-. - I .- 'I" ~- \'1..-.-. !::- . _: j' . ...,_ -I - - I 1. _ ! ,~--" . i '~~.-I: t li I J iit1\l -~ . . . 0 i1 , i I , , , , . \ . I i ,. '1 , ,- . ., . i I: J" ":, ',c,i . 'j ._. I '~I, ,.,.' j ~ i I I i 1 J .-...j'j .~ .. '1 10:.... '",' . . , _.J. ._.. .. ;,.~. . -" c c ," ~ J " /1 ~ tI T1,,-<:- I t. ~ -@ iI ~ -9 -@ ~ ~ ~ t J ~ .~ " '.~~ '1 : III 'I' ., . .. b."II.:'; II ,::11 , ,~ ..'I .', .'-..::..::......o.........J ....;,;