HomeMy WebLinkAbout54-Planning
CITCOF SAN BERNARDI~ - REQUEO' FOR COUNCIL AC-hbN
~~
Change of Zone No. 87-10
Vincent A. Bautista
From: Acting Director of P~~DMIM. 8~!'Ct:
Dept: Planning 1931 nl" -5 AM !3 ac
DMe: June 4, 1987
Mayor and Council Meeting of
June 15, 1987, 2:00 p.m.
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Previous Planning Commission action:
At the meeting of the Planning Commission on June 2, 1987, the
following recommendation was made:
The application for Change of Zone No. 87-10 was unanimously
recommended for approval.
The Negative Declaration for environmental review was also
recommended for approval.
Recommended motion:
To approve, modify or reject the findings and the recommendation
of the Planning Commission and to direct the City Attorney to
prepare the necessary amendments to the Zoning Code.
To approve the responses to comments and to adopt the Negative
Declaration for environmental impact which has been reviewed and
considered.
--I~~ -
Signature Vincent A. Bautista
Contact person:
vincent A. Bautista
Phone:
384-4057
Supporting data attached: Staff Report
Ward:
3
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
75.0262
Agenda Item No
,
..sf
c
o
o
\
CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
8
6/2/87
3
lIJ
~
u
Change of Zone No. 87-10
APPLICANT: C.G. Engineering
2627 S. Waterman Ave.,
Suite "E"
San Bdno., CA 92408
The Club Business Park
225 W. Hospitality Lane,
OWNER:
92408
~ The applicant requests approval to change the land use zoning
lIJ district from M-l, Light Industrial to C-M, Commercial Manufac-
:) turing.
~
a:
....
4 Subject property is a rectangularly-shaped parcel of land
lIJ consisting of approximately l.39 acres located at the north-
~ east corner of Caroline Street and Hunts Lane.
PROPERTY
Subject
North
South
East
West
EXISTING
LAND USE
Vacant
Commercial
Mini-Storage
Vacant
Industrial/Commercial
ZONING
M-l
C-M
C-M
C-M
Colton
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION
Light Industrial
Light Industrial
Light Industrial
Light Industrial
Light Industrial
GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC OVES FLOOO HAZARD DYES OZONE A ( SEWERS 1[1 YES )
HAZARO ZONE lil NO ZONE ~NO OZONE B ONO
HIGH FIRE DYES AIRPORT NOISE / DYES REDEVELOPMENT IDYES
HAZARO ZONE IX! NO CRASH ZONE IX! NO PROJECT ARE^ ONO
....I o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z IX! APPROVAL
~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
WITH MITIGATING - 0
Z(I) MEASURES NO E,I.R. ti CONDITIONS
lIJe!) o EXEMPT o E,I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO 1&.0 0
2Z 1&.i5 DENIAL
Z- SIGN IFICANT EFFECTS
00 WITH MITIGATING ;!::E D CONTINUANCE TO
a:Z MEASURES en::E
>k: 0
Z 1[1 NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS U
lIJ SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E,R. C. lIJ
EFFECTS MINUTES a:
NOV, 1981 REVilED JU~V 1"2
..v
..
c
o
o
--..,
i
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE COZ NO. R7-10
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM R
HEARING DATE ~ /? /R7
PAGE . ..;
1. The applicant is proposing to change the zoning designation
from the existing M-l, Light Industrial to C-M, Commercial
Manufacturing. The site is located at the northeast corner of
Caroline Street and Hunts Lane.
2. The surrounding zoning to the north, east and south presently is
C-M. Thus, the change to C-M on this site would not be a
detrimental impact to the surrounding uses which are
predominantly retail-warehouse oriented businesses. In fact, if
the zoning were to continue as M-l, a potential industrial use
could be developed that may not be compatible to the present
uses surrounding the site.
3. The General Plan designates the site for Light Industrial land
uses. In the past, the C-M zone has been deemed consistent with
the Light Industrial land use designation.
4. As it is a corner lot, the site will have access to dedicated
street which will be appropriate for either commercial or
industrial land uses.
5.
At their regularly scheduled meeting
Environmental Review Committee
declaration be adopted for Change of
of May 7, 1987,
recommended a
Zone No. 87-10.
the City's
negative
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon the observations contained herein,
adoption of the negative declaration and approval
No. 87-l0 from M-l, Light Industrial to
Manufacturing.
Staff recommends
of Change of Zone
C-M, Commercial
Respectfully Submitted,
VINCENT A. BAUTISTA,
Acting Planning ~~~eftor
1 !"
I.
ED
- .
c'
o
..........
, I
-
..-..
,
J
~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT "'"
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
... ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ~
~ """IIi
A. BACKGROUND
1. Case Number (s) : Change of Zone No. 87-10 Date: 5/4/87
2. Project Descr iption: To change the zone from M-l to C-M on
1. 39 acres.
3. General Location: Located at the northeast corner of Caroline
and Hunts Lane.
- _._---
----.-.._---~--,-- ----..--.---
B. ~:NV [ RONM1,NT AL 1MI' ACTS
YES MAYBE NO
- -
1. Could project change proposed uses of land, as indi-
cated on the General Plan, either on project site or
within general area? --X.
-
2. I,ou Id significant increases in either noise levels,
dust odors, fumes, vibration or radiation be gener-
ated from project area, either during construction
or from completed project other than those result-
ing from normal construction activity? --X.
-
3. Will project involve application, use or disposal
of hazardous or toxic materials? -X
-
4. Will any deviation from any established environ-
mental standards (air, water, noise, light, etc.)
and/or adopted plans be requested in connection
with project? -X
-
5. Will the project rC::!quire the use of signif icant
amounts of energy which could be reduced by the
use of appropriate mitigation measures? ..x
-
6. Could the project create a traffic hazard or
congestion? ..x
-
7. Could project result in any subs tan t ial change in
quality, quantity, or accessibility of any portion
of region's air or surface and ground water re-
sources? X
...
.
....av AI
E.Re. FORM A
."
c
o
""'
..".J
"
~
Chancre of Zone No. 87-10
YES
8. Will project involve construction of facilities in
an area which could be flooded during an inter-
mediate regional or localized flood?
9. Will project involve construction of facilities or
services beyond those presently available or pro-
posed in near future?
10. Could the project result in the displacement of
community residents?
11. Are there any natural or man-made features in pro-
ject area unique or rare (Le. not normally
found in other parts of country or regions)?
12. Are there any known historical or archaelogical
sites in vicinity of project area which could be
affected by project?
13. Could the project affect the use of a recrea-
tional area or area of important aesthetic value
or reduce or restrict access to public lands or
parks?
14. Are there any known rare or endangered plant
species in the project area?
15. Does project area serve as habitat, food source,
nesting place, source of water, migratory path,
etc., for any rare or endangered wildlife or fish
species?
16. Will project be located in immediate area of any
adverse geologic nature such as slide prone areas,
highly erosible soils, earthquake faults, etc.?
17. Could project substantially affect potential use
or conservation of a non-renewable natural
resource?
18. Will any grading or excavation be required in
connection with project which could alter any
existing prominent surface land form, i.e., hill-
side, canyons, drainage courses, ete?
19. Will any effects of the subject project together
or in conjunction with effects of other projects
cause a cumulative significant adverse impact on
the environment?
...
MAYBE
"""ll
NO
x
x
x
x
x
x
...x
...x
...x
...x
_x
..x
...
EAe. FORM A
.
--0
o
o
--..
,
Change of Zone No. 87-10
~ ~
C. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CUMULATIVE EFFECTS
If any of the findings of fact have been answered YES or MAYBE, then a brief
clarification of potential impact shall be included as well as a discussion
of any cumulative effects (attach additional sheets if needed).
D. MITIGATION MEASURES
Describe type and anticipated effect of any measures proposed to mitigate or
eliminate potentially significant adverse environmental impacts:
-_._-~
E. DETERMINATION
On the has is of this initial evaluation,
!Xl We find the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
0 We find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet
have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREP~~ED.
o We find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environ-
ment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
J:th 1'{~/ c. -l~~"
(Secretary) VALERIE C. ROSS, Assistant Planner
DATE: -11.201- ? /987
f
... ~
c
o
o
J
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM #
LOCATION
CASE COZ NO. 87-10
8
HEARING DATE f. n /R7
~ o-M C>M CoM I "
-
C-!A CoM C-M
CoM
CoM I
3 C-!A C-!A C-!A
y
C-!A C-!A
C-3A
o-!A INTERSTATE @
-- \ ~!A \ 'IT
V -!A /C-M[
C'\'Otl ~ CoM CoM CoM CoM CoM C
!
~
.. CoM
GO\.) ..
Ii
oi CoM C'M
.. M-I M-I
CoM
M-I
Mol
M-I
C'\'Otl MolA M-I
M-IA
GO\.) Mo!
PRO ~c;:
12u/Oc M-I
PRO M-IA
2411/OC
C'\'Otl
GO\.) ::>
~Rf]
"'C'
, .
'--'
o
o
:)
, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, PLANNING DEPARTMENT....
APPLICATION FOR
t. 'CHANGE OF ZONE NO. ~ ~
....
~~e Club BU3i~ess Park APPLICANT: C G Engineering
OWNER: '. u 't lit L
ADDRESS: 225 \'Iest ..osp.. Ii- y ane ADDRESS: 2627 S. Waterman Ave, Ste E
Suit/;' 10C San Bernardino, CA 92408
San :;erna~c..i.:'1o, CA 92408
"'0, 4~P'
TEL: j'-",- ~-- TEL: (714) 824-2420
\.
EXISTING ZONE: PROPOSED ZONE: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:
M-l Ligttlndustria1 C-M Commerical-Manufact. General Industrial
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (ATTACH AODITIONAL SHEETS IF NECESSARY)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 164-321-01
A portion of the North one-half of Lot 4, Block 65, Rancho San Bernardino, in the
City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per ~ap
recorded in Book 7 of Maps, page 2, in the Office of the County Recorder of sald
San Bernardino County.
REASON FOR CHANGE OF ZONE REOUEST:
To allow a more cohesive development throughout the area.
SUBMITTALS: I!I PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT OR '3RANT DEED
I!I APP~ICATION (3 COPIES) Iil 500 FT. PROPERTY OWNER'S MAP (EXHIBIT A)
lil MAP OF SUBJECT PROPERTY (10 COPIES, FOLOED lID ~ETTER OF CERTIFICATION (NOTARIZED)
TO B V2".u")
lID PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTA~ DESCRIPTION ~ ~ETTER OF AUTHORIZATION (NOTARIZED)
FORM
l!I GUMMED ~ABELS (2 SETS) l!J TRANSPARENCY OF MAP
( "\ OATE'
SIGNATURE OF ~ ) OATE ~1;;.'1
~EGAL OWNER (S) ~
DATE'
DATE APPLICATION RECEIVED:
DATE APP~ICATION ACCEPTED: E.R.c. MEETING
( ) p.c" MEETING
OAPPROVED ODENIEO M/C"C" MEETING
II. ~
~A"CH .84 ..y
c.z" ~0Il11 A