Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-Public Works QTV OF SAN BERCRDINOO- MEMORANDUO J!M ROBBINS, Acting City Administrator GENE R. KLATT, Acting Dir. From Publ i c Works/City Engineer To Subject R.P. 86-ll7: Retail Center at Southeast Corner of 40th Street and Mountain View Avenue - Appeal of Rsqwir9m9At ts YAd9r~r9wRa ixistiRg Qver~ead Utility Lines Date July 26. 1988 File No. 11.43 RP86-117 Approved Date .:J(Cf In response to your memo dated July 21, 1988, subject as above, we have reviewed the case history of this project and have the following observations: 1. Thi s project was approved by DRC on January 15, 1987, and the Building Permit was issued on June II, 1987. 2. Standard Condition No. 9 of the Conditions of Approval required that "All uti 1 i ty 1 i nes shall be i nsta 11 ed underground subject to exceptions approved by the Planning Department and the City Engineer." 3. Resolution No. 87-189, which was intended to clarify the Standard Undergrounding Condition, received final approval on June 16, 1988. This Resolution would have allowed this project to pay the equivalent cost of undergrounding to the City's undergrounding account because it has 1 ess than 300' of frontage; however, the Resolution contains a paragraph which states that it "shall apply to any project for which a building permit has not been issued. therefore, the Resolution 87-189 cannot be applied to this project. 4. Reso 1 uti on No. 88-65 was approved on March 8, 1988, and superseded Resol uti on No. 87-189. The new Resol uti on woul d have compl etel y exempted the subject project (less than one acre) from undergrounding existing overhead lines; however, it also contains the statement indicating that it applies only to projects for which a building permit has not been issued. Therefore, we conclude that Standard Requirement No. 9 of the original Conditi ons of Approval prevail s. Thi s condi tion requires undergroundi ng subject to exceptions approved by the Planning Department and the City Engineer. In all fairness to Developers who were subject to the same condition and either undergrounded or paid, it seems reasonable that this project should proceed to underground the overheads or pay the equivalent cost of undergrounding (as determined by the utility company) into the underground account. However, we understand the Developer's concern. :0 II ~ . ~ ~ N > cD c % ~ ~ ~ ~/8. . <:J JIM ROBBINS, Acting City Ad~strator c:> c:> Re: R.P. 86-117: Retail Center at SEC of 40th Street and Mountain View Avenue - Appeal of Requirement to Underground Existing Overhead Utility Lines July 26, 1988 File No. RP86-117 Simply, because he began the process before the change, he is asked to do work that is no longer required of similar developments. Therefore, we have no overriding objections to the deletion of this requirement at this time. If we can provide further information, please contact me at 384-5111. I , ' , ' " .( / " ',/ . GENE R. KLATT, Acting Director Public Works/City Engineer GRK:pa -2- . . o o 0 L&M DEVELOPMENT GROUP o R..-, -" ,~, '":0-1'/'1" " '..' , -', ,-..... July 13, 1988 II" 1,} ,..., to"~ I" The Honorable Mayor and Common Council City of San Bernardino c/o City Clerk's Office P. O. Box 1318 San Bernardino, CA 92402 Re: 40th Street and Mt. View Avenue To Whom it May Concern: This letter shall serve as our request to appeal the conditions imposed upon L&M Development Group to underground existing utility lines at the property located at the southeast corner of 40th Street and Mt. View Avenue, commonly known as Mt. View Shopping Center. Our justification for requesting the waiver is as follows: Under the guidelines of Resolution No. 88-65, as adopted by the Mayor and Common Council on March 8, 1988, any property of a single lot development of one acre or less is exempt from the undergrounding requirements. Please note the enclosed plat map that the property upon which the new development has been constructed consists of 25,103 sq.ft. prior to the 9.5 ft. dedication on the 40th Street frontage. Net after dedications, which was required as a condition of the development, the lot area is approximately .53 acres. In addition, the total building valuation per the enclosed building permits is $295,800. The undergrounding cost estimate from the utility company computed to two sides of our property is approximately 36,840, which would be in excess of the 10% of the valuation of the building costs pursuant to Section A, Paragraph 4, of Resolution No. 88-65. The necessity for L&M Development Group to place the utility lines underground or to deposit funds into a line item account for the undergrounding of the utilities would place a major hardship on this development and we respectfully request that the 1040 N. MANSFIELD AVE. LOS ANGELES' CA. 90038 (21:1) 463-940 I c o o necessity to underground the utilities or to deposit cash in-lieu funds be waived by the Mayor and Common Council. I i \ '. L&M PM:djh Enc. o