HomeMy WebLinkAbout24-City Manager
c
c
,
!
,
!
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Lori Sassoon, Assistant City
Manager
Subject: Resolution establishing
certain fees for services furnished by
the City of San Bernardino, and
ordinances regarding unauthorized
signs and yard sales,
Dept: City Manager's Office
Date: March 24, 2009
Meeting Date:
April 6, 2009
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
March 16, 2009 - Mayor and Common Council set a public hearing for April 6, 2009.
March 4 & March II, 2009 - Reviewed by Ways and Means Committee and recommended for
approval
Recommended motion:
Adopt_Iutioo "'" I,y_ ov~........ _00/ Ii- ~
Signature
Contact person:
Lori Sassoon
Phone: 384-5122
Supporting data attached:
Staff report, worksheets,
resolution and ordinances
Ward: All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Net additional revenue of approx.
$770,000 in FY 09-10
Source: (Acct. No.) Various
(Acct. Description) General Fund
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. ~
t( r (r C'1
-
c
c
o
STAFF REPORT
Subiect:
Resolution establishing certain fees for services furnished by the City of San Bernardino, and
ordinances regarding unauthorized signs and yard sales.
Backl!round:
Fees for service, otherwise called user f~, are calculated by determining the actual cost of the
services being provided. Since the late 1990's, the Mayor and Common Council has approved
numerous comprehensive user fee updates, usually in the spring of each year. The last of such updates
were approved in May and June of2008,
As part of the City's budget reduction measures to close the projected budget deficit, each department
was asked to re-evaluate fees and look into the possibility of new fees. The result of the department's
analysis is approximately $770,000 in additional revenue for FY 09-10. The majority of the proposed
fees were included as part of the budget discussions during the budget meetings on February 2 and
February 17, 2009. Departments submitting new and increased fees include Animal Control, City
Clerk, Code Enforcement, Development Services, Facilities, Fire, Public Services, and Police.
Attachment A contains a summary of fees to be considered for establishment and/or revision at this
time. For each new and revised fee included in Attachment A, departments have completed cost ,
analysis worksheets with information regarding each service for which a fee is charged, including the
job titles of any employees involved, the amount of staff time involved in providing the service, and
other related costs for materials, supplies, equipment, utilities, etc, Information regarding hourly salary
and benefit rates is also included in the worksheets. Generally, each department's recommended fees
are based on this service cost; certain charges, such as fines, are not required to be based on the cost of
service, Staff has also gathered information concerning comparable fees in neighboring jurisdictions,
and that information is included on the worksheets.
Key changes to the fee schedule include the following:
. Animal Control is proposing to increase fees related to the boarding and apprehension of
animals. Many of these fees have not been updated for several years. The proposed fees would
eliminate the two tier apprehension fee for altered and unaltered pets. The new fees would set a
single fee of $100 for the first apprehension, $200 for the second apprehension, and $350 for
the third and subsequent apprehensions.
. Fee Adjustments for Animal Control would also eliminate a two tiered adoption fee for dogs
and cats ($25) versus puppies and kittens ($40) by establishing a single fee of $30. The change
in fee structure will not result in the loss of money for Animal Control.
. Code Enforcement is proposing two fee increases related to weed abatement. One fee is for
staff time for inspection of the vacant lots, notices, billing and coordination of the contractors
for the actual abatement. The other fee is for staff time involved in the lien process, when
applicable, and includes the hearing with the Hearing Officer and the BBC, Neither of these
fees has been increased since 1996, Not only has the volume of work increased since that time,
3/24/2009
1
o
r-
'-'
o
but staff costs have also increased. Total estimated revenue from the fee changes is
approximately $196,000,
. Code Enforcement has also proposed to update administrative fees for costs incurred on
abatements of private property, buildings, abandoned vehicles and weeds. The seven fees on
the resolution were consolidated into four fees, With an estimated revenue increase of
approximately $180,000, The majority of the proposed increase is attributed to the
consolidation of the administrative fees associated With the creation of a demand letters and for
each line item on the demand letter. Updating these fees would bring the combined fee to $65
for the creation of a demand letter,
. Development Services has proposed a number of new fees to recoup personnel costs for
multiple plan re-checks, revisions to approved plans, and citizen requested stop signs and red
curbs, The proposed fees include the creation of a combo permit, which combines the
excavation ($45) and lane closure ($45) permits that contractors typically request at the same
time; the cost of the combined permit would be $55. The new combo permit would allow the
contractors to pull one permit, creating efficiencies for both the City and the contractor,
Development Services staff estimates there is a proposed revenue loss of $10,900, which Will
be offset by gains in efficiency.
. . Development Services is requesting the addition of a NPDES inspection fee to offset the costs
of the City's NPDES inspection program. Once an inspection is completed, the costs of the
inspection Will be added to the following year's business registration renewal. This process
Will ensure the City Will only collect fees on inspections that are actually completed, and Will
reduce the General Fund's net cost for these federally-mandated reviews.
. The Facilities Department is proposing to increase all parking fees by $5 to comply With sa
1407, which has increased the State Courthouse Construction Penalty from $1.50 to $4.50 per
citation. Increasing the parking penalty covers the state penalty increase and collection costs as
allowed by CVC Section 40200.4(t). Estimated total revenue increase, net of the Courthouse
Construction Penalty increase which benefits the state, is $30,000,
. The Facilities Department is proposing to increase the commercial parking fee from $65 to
$260. An associated ordinance amending Chapter 10.16 of the City's Municipal Code is being
considered on this same Council Agenda. The fee Will not become effective until the effective
date of the ordinance repealing and replacing Section 10.16.120,
. The Police Department is proposing to increase the fees charged for non-permitted false
robberylburglary alanns. Also included are increases to the tow release fee and various photo,
tape and video reproduction fees.
. The Fire Department proposes to reduce its apartment inspection fees by 5% for compliant
property owners that have met two criteria: 1) All fire code violations noted during the initial
inspection must be corrected when the first re-inspection is conducted; and 2) payment of the
first invoice that is sent to the property owner must be postmarked by the due date indicated on
the invoice. Several Councilmembers had previously expressed an interest in establishing such
an incentive program. Estimated revenue loss for a 5% reduction Will equal $28,840. However,
Fire expects to generate revenue in excess of FY 08-09 budgeted amounts to offset this
reduction.
3/24/2009
2
!!cr.''".'
c
c
o
At the March 6th Mayor and Common Council meeting, Councilmember McCammack states
that owners of problem rental properties should be penalized for their lack of compliance with
the City's ordinances. Staff notes that non-compliant apartment owners are cited and subject to
fines, through the issuance administrative citations, pursuant to Chapter 9.82 of the City's
Municipal Code. In FY 08-09 the Fire Department projects that $100,000 in citations will be
issued.
Proposed new and amended ordinances are typically reviewed by the Legislative Review Committee
before being recommended to the Mayor and Council for approval. However, two new fees brought
before the Committee will require enabling ordinances, so those ordinances were presented to the
Ways and Means Committee:
. Code Enforcement is proposing a new fee for the removal of unauthorized signs, The fee will
require an ordinance adding Section 16.18, Unauthorized Signs, to the City's Municipal Code.
The new ordinance will define the responsible party as the owner or lessee of property used for
the illegally advertised activity or event. The ordinance will also provide a definition for an
unauthorized sign and will designate the Code Enforcement Department as the responsible
party for the enforcement of the unauthorized signs. Most importantly, the new ordinance
would allow for the infraction amount to be set at $100 by the Master Fee Resolution, based on
the cost to the City for administering the program. This fee for service is in addition to any
administrative citations that may be issued pursuant to Chapter 9.82 of the City's Municipal
Code.
Code Enforcement does not suggest repealing Section 8.15,130, Posting Notices Prohibited.
This is essentially an anti-littering ordinance which can be used if someone is actually caught in
the act of placing illegal signs.
. Code Enforcement and the City Clerk's Office have worked together to propose a new yard
sale permit fee that will provide better regulation of yard sales. Currently, the City allows for
two yard sales each year, but does not have a system to track the number held each year at a
given property, An ordinance amendment would allow for the yard sales to be tracked by the
City Clerk's Office through a permit process, and enforced by Code Enforcement through the
issuance of administrative citations pursuant to Chapter 9;92 of the City's Municipal Code.
The yard sale permit fee would take affect 90 days from the effective date of the ordinance,
Most of the adjusted and new fees, with the exception of the unauthorized sign fee, yard sale permit
fee, and commercial parking fee, will be effective immediately upon the adoption of the resolution,
The Government Code requires that all development related fees take effect no sooner than 60 days
after their adoption, which would make those fees effective on June 6, 2009.
The proposed master fee resolution incorporates the proposed and revised fees discussed in this staff
report. For the last several years, staff has been attempting to identify and repeal outdated fee
resolutions, and incorporate those fees into this master fee resolution as fees are modified, so that over
time most fees can be consolidated into a single document. For that reason, the master fee resolution
includes many other fees that remain unchanged. In order to help readily identify the fees that are
being modified or added, the changes are identified in strikethrough/italics. All other fees rem.un
unchanged.
3/25/2009
3
.",.
c
c
o
Wavs and Means Committee Review:
On March 4th and 11th, the Ways and Means Committee reviewed the proposed fee adjustments and
new fees. Based on the Committee's feedback, the following modifications have been made to staff's
original proposal:
. Investigation fees for requested stop signs, no parking signs and permit parking signs have been
removed.
. The new yard sale permit fee will take effect ninety (90) days after the enactment of the
enabling ordinance, ,
. New Development Services fees for more than 3 plan checks and more than 3 WQMP reviews
will only be assessed upon the authorization of the Director or Deputy Director of Development
Services.
Next Steos
Staff recommends the following timeline for implementation of the new fee schedule. It is
recommended that the Mayor and Council act quickly so as to maximize the additional revenue to be
realized as a result of these changes:
April 6 - Public Hearing and first reading of two (2) new enabling ordinances. At the conclusion of the
public hearing, the Mayor and Common Council may adopt the fee resolution, Most fees become
effective upon adoption of the resolution.
June 6 - Development fees will become effective
Financial Imoact:
The new and adjusted fees are projected to provide $770,000 in estimated additional annual revenue in
FY 2009-10.
Recommendation:
Adopt resolution and lay ordinances over for fina1 adoption.
3/25/2009
4
.~
-
=
Ci
..
~
c
i
"l:I
~
..
r::
..
..
'"
i:l
01
=-
CI
..
=-
-<
J! e ~
M 0 '"
.. c ~ e .....
... ,51 J! -s~..:
.s ._ _ fio4
'" at ~ '='
0 c c .;
.... " 0 .... " ~ S Oc
... ] .= o.~
"" g l!l e: 'ail":
.. a Cl. '" " e oo l!!
- go 11
= o '" o a 0 .
~ ~ ... ... ~ a () .- "0
.~ " .c..c .~ ~
" .= oS 'Ii ,,"""
'" ~ ~ ~ ... c 1l.811 a
u ... ~ 'C "'_..c..c
.. ~ ~ o " .s~~~
" ,,- ,
;>,. s~a J!.!! is .$
N ~ '" '" lfJ,!!l
i " J !l "" ~
~ 8 ! 1:) 8
0'- e € Ii ....J!e
""- :~ :~
~~ .!!j..!!E3
Iii Iii " 0 >
~ 0 e !-o !-o ~
0 8 ] 0 ] 0 , 0 8 , , 0 , & g g 8 8.
11illl g. 0 & 0 0
o. 0 0 N M
~ 0 c - c'" '" - "., '" N ~ M r--
El ;: :: II - 's 's N M M N
;::;;i.:!> , -
." ~ ... ... ... ...
1iIl-< ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
xi 0 6 0 g g 0 0 0 g g g 18 g g g 0 0 g g g
0 0 0 '" 0 0 '" 0
vi vi vi M ci ..: ci ci M vi vi ci vi M vi ci ci ci -0 -0
! !: !::! 0 '" N N I::: N 00 a- - 00 00
.5~ -
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ....
- M M '" '" N 00 00 0 M '" '" 0 .... 00 00 .... 0 0
r-- , a- "l 0 .... M M - r-- N N - , ": r-- r-- M M M
ill-a ci ci - ~ ..: -0 -0 .. M -0 -0 ~ - M g ci ..: ..:
~"Ei: N N - N '" '" N '" .... .... N 0 M a- a-
- - - - - - - -
Jl II
u
... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... ... .... ... ... .... .... ....
~ II g 8 g g g g g 0 0 g g g g g g 0 g g g g
0 0 0
ci ci ci vi ci ci ci g ci ci ci ci vi M ci g g ci ci ci
'"roo N ~ N '" N 0 - '" M M - - N M 00 00
~ - - - , - - - - -
... ... .... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... .... ... .... .... .... ....
. g
= g g g g 0 g g g 8 g 8 g g g 0 g 8 8 g
!: II '" '"
vi vi vi ..; ci M ~ ci 00 vi vi .:; ci ci vi 0( ci ci .. ~
:lroo - !::! - '" - 00 N N .... - - a- - - N a-
U .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
.1-;:: 8 8 - - M M 8 8 8 '" ~ 8 - '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
.. .. .. a- a- 0 g g a- g a- a- a- a- a- s:
~~~ a- a- 0 a- a- a- a- a- a-
N N - - N N N N N N N - N - - - - - -
~ ~ Ij i: "" J! J!
.$ , ] .!ltle "" ~ ;>, J
5 I~ J! l -::: ~ . .. Ii Cl. II " ~
~ .!l .. J > .. ~ ~~ ~
" ] u "" '6, ~ II 11
] ;3 ~ = ; ] c
-! ,51 1 "" j ~ ~
-< ~ ; ... ~.-
1= II ~ !~ J~ , , 0 .s SI. j;:l .... .... ....
~ ~ c .. 0 0 o~
~ 5 l%l II II 0 0 J! ~ Ii 8:; 8 !t
II ~ I eg ... ~ ~ J! " e ~ '= u u'iS ~
roo ~ i~'C' !'" i " '-" 'OJ .~ u'-'- " " '" .= .- .=~
c is '~ J! II Q > "'- .li "" ,~ E J! ~ !l ~
8 0 1 ~ ._:: a:I e
" !-o 0 ...j i ] ~ l! E ::I C i~ E", 'is !:l 'is]
;:l ;:l I ~ dlj'- > ~ C C ..0 ,- ~
~ 'il ~!-o ;:l 0 0 J "'i:oo .. , .Ii
] l ~ .- C ]J 'S l~
ll'- .~ I ~ ~ 2 'i '~ rl C ,_ 's i "
,$ .Il ~l ~ ~e~ ~
;( '0 'OJ " ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~
-< Q ...lO... ...lC -< Q ;;:: -< Cl. e << Q
~
J J J J 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..
i
l! 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0
u u u u u u u u u
] ] 1 ] ] ] ] ] ] i i i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ -< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. - N M .... '" '" r-- 00 a- 0 - N M :! '" '" r--
- - - - - - -
8
s
t!
..,
--'''",''
-<
-
c!
..
~
c
:l
..
~
Cl.
>;;l
..
r:
..
..
'"
>;;l
01
e-
llo
o
1;;..;; ,,8
- ".
it = f?i
.....<~
101< ...
-~
1!"il,..:
c~s::.
!-o " ..
'" c
U
...!'i:1.O
.! i~ ~
,~
..
-
..
~
c
U
l'i~
. . on
~ t: ~
.!~64
. 8
; a:";
C ,._ t-
al'" '"
II: ..
-
.. 0
ta:C!
~ '" 2
u ;;;
~.~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~
,""OV"l_._ Q\M
14"')-:::.01 N
88
'" '"
"'....:
u
~
~
it
J
~
!
:;;:
8888888888888
ll'iV'ivi.n.n.n"'; vi vi lI'ilt'i"';"';
iI4~,^MflAM~~"'61964i14i14
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
8888888888888
0000000";00";00
.........."'" '''It...................
~iI4i14.,.,MMMMMMMililtM
8888888888888
..n",,,,lt"ill'i,,,lI'ici"';"';o"';"';
f"l"'lf"l"'lf'l"'lf'l"'lf"l"'lf"l"'l"""'f"l"'l""''''f''l'''l''''
MMMMMMMMMMMMM
OOOOOOOOOCOOOCOOOOOOOCOOOO
8888888888888
NNNNNNNNNNNNN
'.
N
,
88
vi vi
.. ..
~~
88
~~
.. ..
88
.,.;.,.;
'" '"
.. ..
oc oc
88
"''''
'g :e
<Il ~ 0 _" I~ ~
1 J ~""B ~ b ~ !; 1 g
~~8i _ ~ljj~.. ~ ~ t ~ ~~ I~ ~
,,~.s~~ - ~ 0 0.. ....." IJ~ _.
m!HUhUn,~ it Hi ~ii~l iN !~
~0~28J "''''~~go~. ul ~..~. ~ ~ ~ i1~
.1 1 ~ i i ~! ~ ~ : ~ g ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o. 9!u 2 .1 ~ ,$1 ~ I .$ i;
]~~J~1122~!1~~~Jlal~~j tJu~j1tju]1Ijl
...~u il,Q_OO~~uIl5i!'u::1l >00_ illooj>lu.e
<<> >u~~~~~=U~_~~!-o O~Z~ ~~z"'~~>~ ~~
""
i.
=
..
MM....MMMMMMMMM
.. ..
8888S\S\8S\S\S\88S\
";8"vivi\CioCa\oO"':M"':"';"':
N _V"lr-ooO\"'\O"'ltO-.:l"\C
- - --
00
oon
N"';
"'....
on
MMMMMMMMft4MMM"
.. ..
_C\C)Q\oo"'lt_r-NO.Q\N
f"l"'l0l0 O\"'r-N......I.OO\t"'I\O \0
Nr..:\Civi\CioOa\oC"':N"';vi"':
... O_V"lr-OOQ\....1.O "It 0.. 1.0
N- - --
c;;;:;
M"':
"'....
on
..
MMMMMMMMMMMMM
.. ..
8888S\S\8S\S\S\88S\
080"';"';\CioOa\oO"':r-i"':.n"':
. _\I")r--ooO"l.I,O.O.1,O
N- - --
8S\
r-i"':
'" ....
on
MMMMMMMMMM6IIItM~
.. ..
g I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
.,;
-
'"
~"""MMM"~M~MM MM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~
,
u
"8
u
~
u 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
.~'-.- .~.~.~.~.-.- '_.~
~jj",,)l,)l,,,jj,L,,
u u u . . . . . . . . ." .
888~~~~~~~~~~
8 8
'r~
"''''
~~
00 ~O_N~.\I")I,Or--oo~o_ N~
_ _NNNNNNNNNN~~ ~~
D D n n n n n n n n n n n
:i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: ~ :i: :5 :e
::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .-::::=:::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
n II
.", .'"
==
~~
8
~
Is
~~
u",
_."'"','W__,"
-
01
Ci
!
c
~
.
'l:I
Clo
;;;l
il
r.
..
..
;;s
01
f
ll.
-<
1._Q,l
- II . II
. 0 II II
E ~ 01 ..
~:a=t
--a < ""'"
[;01< ...
~
-Q,l=
:1"$
~El!l
"'u~
. 8
~ II g
ll~ N
=c: ....
~]'i:'0Cl
. . .0
.:!~~:::l
.
~
..
~
..
u
11"'8
.. .
.. .. '"
.. .... '"
.." -
" ..
.!le.....
~
e II ~
~ ~ :a
u ....
888888888888888
.n"';"';"';"';"';"";"';"';"';"';"';"';"';"';
~~~~MMM~MfolI!tiAiAMMiA
~
.... '"
....0 -5
~ .8 'ii
S e -
~ a I
is '3 "~
SS ,,~
1l5.8,g
...] ,,,"
'> Ii "'1
~ .i; 1l e
~ l~ 11
-= .~ E II Jl
al ~"(; ~ E!
o '
8
6
'"
....
8888888
",lI"i vi"';"'; vi '"
f14MMMf:I4f1A{,IIlt
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~
888888888888888
00000000000000";
...........r--........"'lt"lt'.......'"
- '
li4MMMMMMMMMMM6464M
888888888888888
"';"';"';"';"';"';"';"';vivi",,,,II'i,,,d
""""""f'I"lIf'I"lIrr'lIl.O('f"jf'l"llMf'I"lI"""f'I"lIf'I"lIC'I"lV'l
-
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
000000000000000000000000000000
888888888888888
MNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
.
~ - ~
I 8 1 ~ ~ ~~
1 I-~ i JJ~li IJ~
s~ ~ ~ ~ ;~~",!j2!;
~u u ~ u~~ ...=R ~_u
ll:.a ,I I ",il.sqllll;~ii, 8'~ ~
~~ '~'~~'t.~e"ie~~gi,~~'~~ ~&i
- ~ ;~~e ]=)>0'"
e ill!! ~"'l!,!'i::5l~'- ozo
~1~~;~.]j~Q=]i~li'i
e eeeii.s .;e....s'e~:8::
A l;l;l;~_~BuO~~o~ ~..
~"'''''''''''''...l....... ..._~.........~
'It
P.-
..
III "'
..
:E
"g
~
rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl
:-3 :E :-5 :-3 :<8 :E :i! :.e :E :E :.e :E :.e :-3 :-5
=:;:=:::;:=====::::;:=::=
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
8888888
. . . . . . . !!i
~~~~~~~o
'" '" 'Iii
MMMMMMM>
8888888!!i
"';",vicidvi.,.;.g
Mf'P'Iff"lOOOOOOOOil
MMM~~MM>
0000000000000000
88888888
NNNNNNNN
1!!
,j i
'5 of = "'
_"'eil. &~ "'.~
s -~
os. 'C) e c: s
~5.g~] ~~
:Z:':Oog'i ~
~~j]i3If
~ ~ ! l~ .~ ~ ~
........._lll~~f-o
rl rl rl rl rl rl i'l rl
".:: '';: "';: "+3 "';: ".:: '+1 ".::I
::::.:::=:.::.===
.~ .~ "~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~
~~~~~~~~
....
~
'"
o
N
'"
-
~
....
8
o
'"
...
'"
o
N
-
N
....
~ I
-5 0
'ii .~
j }
"' 0
0;; u
C . ..
8l!l.9
.8.g g
ij"g
11j
" rl "ill
Il;; 0
~c...
o ~
8
'"
aO
N
~
...,
....
....
~
'"
o
N
'"
-
~
"'
..
"Iii
>
....
8
o
'"
g
'Iii
>
!!i
o
'Iii
>
....
'"
o
N
-
N
....
0Cl
o
o
N
0Cl
o
o
N
~
..
o
'"
:!: ~
o,:!!' u
~ '~ 1 ..
u,~ " .~
>....l ; 0
tU_ 0 =
c:l.~ III >.
~]-=> 0 1
~ j-g) ~
~_1l._l;'3
jt5j:~~!
8
~
.
u
h
e~
.~ .1l.1l
~ ~ ~
... '"
'" '"
"~<F
-<
...
c:l
Cl
II
~
c
:l
..
"l:I
l:l.
;;;l
..
..
r;..
..
..
'"
;;;l
01
l:l.
~
..
Cl.
1._~
.... = " =
e ~ i Ii
:c:ac:lt
."a<"""'~
roil..: ...
-
_Cl.J"ii
s.S! $
~ t !l
"'u
_1-;:;00
.. .. .. 0
~!~~
.!:!
S
'"
oS
"i
'C
.e !
= "-
.. ~
~ 8 =
o 1l "S
UgJii
"
]~
0""
e ="
"
~ '"
Il.!!
'" 2
~...~
iO .. '"
.....:;
Q,J e ~
~ ..-
~Q,J-
"'8...
Ill'
8'"
Ill:
...
-
= 00
tll:
="''''
U ;;;
~~~ ~~ -
~:3'C ""~~~
i! " "-:351"
._-5j .~cf! ~
~J.g i~~~
=1 01) rI.J I r.f.l "0
o~~ s]~=;
= ..i3" "" .;;
.c_.;; 'f:!;E~=~
S;E Ii =.- ~~
tS.-L....~~~-S ..t2
~["""'"..... ..c-__
~;;:;:s;;;~8~8 "'~
=.....O'I_=NU~
e~...,_e64r:/)~
riit~i~~]
~tO"ij";j~C;~tO;e
0- ---0
:q .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ ~.
. ~ .s .5i .$ ._ .5 ~
e e e e e
...
88~~888
";"':oof"i"';"';
N N
"""""M6o"tM6464
lI'l"lt'f"'lVlitnQN
.....N.f""'IOO_OOV'l
_r--:o('f'li.Ovii.O
"'It'Nr'l"lr<"l\OOOO\
N
M644i1l'tMMMM
888~888
c::ir-:of"'ii.O"';"';
..,.NI'l')('f'l\C)OOI"--
N
MMMMM64M
88~8888
vi\Oa\"",,,Moci
_NNf'f'\\OOOY")
N
MMMMMMM
8888888
NNNNNNN
. 88
-0 _
NN
...
8
o
o
-
888
000
NO'"
'"
...
.........
......-0
00 '" 00
N""':vi
N- N
00 _
o
'"
o
N
N
...
MMM
o
o
g
N
888
~gg
00 _
...
.........
o
. C!
8
-
...
.88
g~
'"
.........
8
N
~-o-o
~88
;ZNN
~
"
... ~u Il ~
_ '" 0
I "=' ~ c ".c
..iugil .gg
~ ~fi;:! 1.2-11-1 f l~
Il a !l ! ~ ~I ~ ,lj =: ..:
"']!!~jj~~!i
~c 12:~~=~.r:.::s
~ ;_== .9=
";g.~ 8'~~-;;~.Ij!
gO:::;J.s....~~;>i:Srf
..
i
Q
!!
ii:
.
.~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~
0000000
~~=-=-=-a.a.
\0.....000\0_("'1
f'lf""lf""lf"'l..,."'lt"'::l'
rJ
~Il]
="'-
9~j
~.~ ~
= a"
o '"
"j] 'S
~ ~ 1-;
....j!~
~
:;;:
e;.
:8
~
~
OJ
'"
il il
]]
"
.S!
~
" u u
~:E:E
.,c:.e.e
"''''-0
.........
'"
...
v
=
III
~
...
...
;g
"
=
"
"
II
..
=
"
~
..
..
t
"
..
~
8
IE
o
t~
~~
u~
_'._."0'"
c
c
o
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentIDlvIslon
Animal Control
User Fee scrl on
Altered License Fee
Date
212012009
DescrlotJon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
The fee to license an attered dog for 1 year will be increased from $15 to $20. Licenses for 2 years ($25) and 3 years ($35) will
stay the same.
Pe..onnel Costs
T....
Coot
6.50
6.33
0.00
0.00
-
Depl or D1v. Hou'S by
LIbor Cost Overhead Labor CostIHr. PoeIlIon 1* U
8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.2
0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.5
o 0,00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o Q.OO
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
12.82
Position
Animal License Su isor
License Checker
20.79
11
Material & Rental Coats
Coot Ead1 .....Coot
License Tac 0,35 1 0.35
Door Hana9r 0.1 1 0.1
Cash ReceiDt 0.1 1 0.1
Postalle 0.42 2 0.84
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
TolIIl Other costs per Unit of Servbe: 1.89
Other Costs IEauloment. feclllt rental. oart-tlme labor wlo beneftts\
~ Coot Ead1 au.diIy- .....Coot
ComDuter eouioment & SoIIware 4.00 1 . 4.00
, Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 4.00
Comoarlsons to Pro_ Fee
.
More ILen than SIB.
DoIla.. Percentsae
5,00 -33.33%
/10.00 -100,0%
/12.00 -150.0%
18.71
Total SeMce DlIect Cost
C~WIde Gen. & AdrrWI.
RnI0 10.790
TOWl SeMce CoA'UnIl
Jurisdiction
San Bemardlno County
Moreno Vallev
Riverside Countv
Fee ....r Unit
15.00
10,00
8.00
2.01
20.73
Recommended Fee
R-.~._~ Fee &aIdy
eun.m Fee .......
Feell'lCfMM (Dec:ruM)
20.00
0.73
15.00
5.00
.,
001
o
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DellllrtmentIDlvlslon Fund Account! User fee DescrlDtlon Data
Animal Control 124 43201 Altered License Fee Refund 212012009
Descrl n of service, dellllmd, subsl , and other comments:
This increases the refund amount from 25 to $50 that an pet owner can be refunded for spaying or neutering their
dog within 60 days of purchasing an unaltered pet license.
Position
Personnel Costs
NA
TolIl Burdened Personnel Costs per Unft of ServIce:
o Matsrls' & Rentsl Costs
Oooaiption Coot Eoch QuonIIIy RequiIod UnI CoIl
NA
.
Other Costs /EauIDment, faclllb rantsl, DlIrt-tlme labor wlo benefltsl
Del I...... CoIl Eoch QuonIIIy Unl CoIl
TolIl Other co.ts per unft 01 Servioe:
ComDllrlsons to Prooosad Fee
Mora/Lass than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fee par Unit Dollars Pen:antaae
This Is not an additional faa but a reduction
lJ .
--
TotII SeM:le onctColl
C/ly-Yt'Ide Gen. &Admh.
R_010.7Mio
ToI8IServlctColtlllnlt
Recommended Fee
R-..oo...,....d...clF..SUbIiCIy
c........._
F_1nc:rMM (0eaMM)
002
o
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentlDlvlalon Fund Account User F.. Description Date
Animal Control Deoartment 124 4430 Delinauencv Penaltv (Licensinal 2/2012009
Description of service. demand, subsldv, and other comments:
This increases the penalty added to the cost of the pet license for failure to license from $15 to $20
Personnel Costs
OeIOlorDiv. olIIl_ Hours by
LaborCost ~ COS1IHr, _perU
8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.4
0.50 11.50 1,15 12.65 0.4
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Cos1s per UnR of ServIce:
Position
Animal License Su ervisor
License Checker
C
Material & Rental Costs
Desc:lIpIIon
Cash Recei t
Posta
Citation
Cost Eoch ~
0.1 1
0.42 2
0.5 1
Total Olher costa per Unit of ServIce:
Tolal
Cost
13.00
5.06
0.00
0.00
18.06
Unit Cost
0.1
0.84
0.5
1.44
Other Costs IEaulDment. fac:1l1t rental. nart-time labor wlo benefits)
Desc:r1p11on Cost Eoch 0;;;;;;;;;- ~ UnIt Cost
Total Olher costs per Unit of S8fVice:
Comoarisons to Pro F..
More ILeas) than SIB.
Jurisdiction F.. Der Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino County 15.00 (5.00 -33.33%
Moreno Valley 18.00 12.00 -11.1%
Riverside County 8.00 112.00 -150.0%
c
00.1
T.............-Cool 18.90
CIty-wlde Gen. I A/:tnkI.
_ .'0.""" 2.03
T...........CoItIUnlt '0 Q3
Recommended Fee
~\..l&.lded F.. Subsidy
eun.nt F.. ArticUlI
Fee IncrUH (DecruM)
?OOII
093
1500
5011
o
User Fee Detennlnation
Coet Analysis Worksheet
rbnent/Dlvlalon
Animal Control
Aceou
4320
U.er Fee Deserl on
Re lacement &Transfer Ta
DeserlDlIon of ..lVIee, demand, eUbsldv, and other eommenta:
Increases the "additional tag issued to replace a lost stolan misplaced or damaged tag" from $3 to $5
Increases the ''transfer of ownership of a licensed dog to a new owner in lieu of a fee for new license" from $3 to $5
Increases the ''transfer of a current license from another jurisdiction" from $3 to $5
Pe...onnel Coata
20.79
11
.......-
La<<~.
2.954 32.49
1.15 12.65
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costa per Unit of Service:
-by
_..u
0.2
0.2
T....
ColI
6.50
2.53
0.00
0.00
Position
Animal License Su rvisor
License Checker
9.03
Matarla' & Rental Coata
o
- ColI Eoch 0_- "",ColI
License Taa 0.25 1 0.25
Door Hanller 0.1 1 0,1
Cash Receiot 0.1 1 0.1
Postalle 0.41 2 0.62
Citation 0.5 1 0.5
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.77
Other Coata /Eauloment, !aelllt / Nntal. oart-llme labor wlo beneflla
- ColI Eoch 0.-_ "",ColI
-
Total other costs per Unit of $ervlce:
C
omoarlsons to Proooaed Fee
MaN ILees than SIB.
Jurladlcllon Fee oar Unit Dalla... Percentane
San Bernardino County 5.00 - 0.00%
Mareno Vallev 3.00 (2.00 ~.7%
Riverside County 2.00 (3.00 -150.0%
10111l s.va DnctCOlt 10.80
CIy-WilIII Gen. & Admln.
RUO 10.7n. 1.16
TIUl SeMel; COIIIUnIt 11 QR
Recommended Fee f:;M
"-nmendldF..SubIldy 8M
CurNnt F.. AmounI 300
F..IncruM~ 700
o
004
o
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o.partmentIDlvlalon
Fund
Accou
Animal Control
124
4759
o.acrlDtlon of ..rvlce, demand, aUbaldv, and other commen.:
This increases the livestock (over 5001bs) apprehension fee from $50 to $150
Personnel Coa.
26.32
18.95
17.17
.......-
0veI'tIMd l8bor CoIUHr.
3.597 39.57
2.621 28.83
2.402 26.42
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel COltS per Unit of Service:
........
-per
0.4
1
0.4
Poaltlon
Animal Control Su rvisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re /Oi s
55.23
o Material & Rentel Coate
""""- Colt..... 0_- UIlICoIt
VehiclelFuellMaintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EouiDmentlMaintenance 5 1 5.00
Scecializad Haulina Eauiament 100 1 100.00
Total Other ct*S per Unit of Service: 120.00
Other Coa. {EaulnmenL faclllt NntIIl ...rt-tlme labor wlo benefltal
""""- Colt..... -- UIlICoIl
Total other coltS per Unit of Service:
ComDllrlaona to Proaoaed Fee
MON (Las a than SIB.
Jurladlctlon Fee -r Unit Dollars Pareen.oe
San Bemardlno County 100.00 50.00 -50.00%
Moreno Vallev 75.00 75.00 -100.0%
Riverside Countv 90.00 60.00 -66.7%
TDIaI8erYIcIDnclcost
CIy.WIdeCJen.&AdmIn.
RMII010.7Mlo
Tct8l8erYlc:8C01UUn1t
175.23
18.84
1A4M
Recommended Fee
RIICGlftIMnded F.. SubaIdy
Currenl....Amaunt
F..IncrMM~)
1AAM
4408
5000
100M
c
005
c
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rlnlsntlDlvlslon
Animal Control
User Fee Dsscrl on
La e Livestock Board
Dew
212012009
DsscrlDtlon of service, demIInd, subsldv, and othsr commentll:
This increase.s the large livestock daily board fee from $12.50 to $20.00
Personnel Costs
21.47
16.25
pept.orDtv.
Colt 0VerfIead L*3r COIb1ir.
30,39 3,039 33.43
22.89 2.289 25.18
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:
..... by
_perU
0,2
0.4
T....
Cool
6.69
10.07
0.00
0.00
Position
Animal Shetter Kennel Su rvise
Animal Shetter Attendant
16.76
Material & Rentlll Costs
o
eaa-. Cool..... ~R_ Unl Cool
Animal Care 8 1 8.00
8.00
Other Costs IEaulDlTlenL faclllt rentlll, Dart.tlmelabor w/o benefltsl
eaa-. Cool ElICh ~- Unl Cool
.
Total Other costa per Unit of service:
Comoarlsona to Pro_ Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino Cou-
Moreno Vallev
Riverside County
Fee 08r Unit
15.00
11.00
15.00
More ILeal than SIB.
Dollars Percent8Ge
5.00 -33.33%
9.00 -81.8%
5.00 -33.3%
Total SeMc:e 0irId: Colt
Clly-WkM Gen. & Mrnin.
Rate010.7ft
TO!.lI5ervlcllCoatlUnIt
24.76
266
,}74,}
Recommended Fee ?n M
Reco..~.04...4 F.. SuDIIdy 7 42
omwntFHAmount 1250
F.. IncruM (DKruM) 7 M
o
006
c
c
c
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmen Iv\slon
Animal Control
UHr F.. Deserl
rehension Fee
Date
212012009
DeserlDllon of Hrv\ce, demand, subsldv, snd othsr com....nta:
This eliminates the two tier Apprehension Fee for altered and unatiered pets and establishes a single fee of $100 for the first
apprehension, $200 for the second and $350 for the third
Personnel Costa
......by
-...
0.4
1
0.4
Position
Animal Control Su ervisor
Animal Control OffIcer
Customer Service Re Oi
*-
bOI' CoeUHr.
3.597 39.57
2.621 28.83
2.402 26.42
o 0,00
o 0.00
o 0,00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel CoatI per Unit of SeJvIce:
55.23
26.32
18.95
17.17
M8larlal & Rental Costa
- Cost..... UnIlCaol
VehlclelFuellMalntenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EaulomentlMalntenance . 5 1 5.00
Animal CarelDisllOsal 75 1 75.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 95.00
Other Costa IEoulo....nt, faclllt rental, ....rt-t1.... IsbQr WiD beneflta'
- Cost..... ~- . UnIlCaol
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDllrlsons to Pr-d F..
Jurisdiction
San Bemardlno Countv.
Moreno Vallev
Riverside Countv
F.. -r Unit
80.00
50.00
35.00
More (Len) than SIB.
Dollars Percents...
20.00 -25.00%
50.00 -100.0%
65,00 -185.7%
150.23
ToW s.Mce; 0tNd eo.t
Ctty.WiMoG.n. & Admin.
~010.7~
Toe.lS<<vkleec.llUnIt
16.15
166,38
Recommended Fee
"-n1lMnded F_SWUly
Cunnt Fw AmcuII
F..,,-{o.:.-I
100.00
66.38
varies
varies
00";
c
User Fee Detennlnatlon
. Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmsntlDlYlslon
Animal Control
User Fse Dsscrl on
Board Fee
DsscrlDtlon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
This increases the daily board fee from $8.00 to $10.00
.
Personnel Costs
21.47
16.25
F_ .........
_ ......Coot
8.92 30.39
6.64 22.89
...
......~.
3.039 33.43
2.289 25,18
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel C_ pet" Untt of service:
16.76
Position
Animal She~er Kennel Su rviso
Animal She~er Attendant
Matsrlal & Rentsl Costs
o
~ Coot .... ~_I LlnlCool
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.00
Other Costs IEaul"",ent. fsclllt rentsl. aart-tlme labor wlo bsneflts'
~ Coot .... ~_I LlnlCoot
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comaarlaons to Prooosed Fse
More I~ than SIB.
Jurisdiction Fse asr Unit Dolla.. Percentllae
San Bernardino County 9.00 11.00 -11.11%
Moreno ValleY 6.00 14.00 -66.7%
Riverside County 15.00 5.00 33.3%
Totals.MclOinlCtCOIt 21.76
Cily-~ Gen. & Acmin.
Rni .10.75% 2.34
TobIlServaco.tlUnil '410
Recommended Fee in M
Recanwn.ncledF..SuIlU:Jy 1410
CUfTnt.... Amount 8 00
F..1nerHH (OWN..) ., M
c
008
c
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Ana~1a Workaheet
De rtrnenllDlvlalon
Animal Control
User Fse Deserl on
Pick-U Service Cha
DescrlDtlon of aarYlce, demand, eubsldv, and olller comments:
This increases the fee charged for pick-up services from $25.00 10 $50.00
Pe..onnel Costs
Dept. or D1v.
lAbotColt 0verhUcI laborCDIUHr.
9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57
7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83
6.85 24.02 2.402 26.42
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
TollIl Burdened Personnel COI1I pet Un~ of Service: 27.61
Position
Animal Control Su rvisor
Animal Control Officer
Customer Service Re Oi
26.32
18.95
17.17
Material & Rental Costa
..... by
P..-....
0.2
0.5
0.2
T_
Cool
7.91
14.42
5.28
0.00
""""- Cool..... eu..tIv _ UnIt eo.tI
Vehicle/FuellMaintenance 15 1 15.00
Radio EauicmentlMainlenance 5 1 5.00
Total Other costs per Unit of service: 20,00
c
Other Costa IEoullllllent faclllt rental, oart-tlme labor w/o benefltal
""""- Cool..... QuenIIIy- UnIt Cool
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comoarlaona to ProD088d Fse
More TLen than SIB.
Jurladlctlon Fse oar Unit Dolla.. Percentall8
San Bernardino Countv varies varies varies
Moreno Vallev varies varies varies .
Riverside County varies varies varies
c
008
TOIIlsatviceonctco.t
Clly-\Mca o.n. & Admin.
R....10.7S%
TotIlhl"\lic1lCosUUnit
Recommended Fee
RKmWMnded F.. SlIblldy
Cunnt F.. Amount
F..IncNI... (DKrHH)
47.61 .
5.12
1;?7:<1
MOO
273
2500
?1;OO
c
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentlDlvlslon
Animal Control
U..r on
Ado tion Fee
Description of ..rYlee, dem8J1d, subsidy, and other comments:
This creates a single adoption fee of $30,00
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $25 to $30 for each dog or cat
Adoption fees (to new owners) from $40 to $30 for each puppy or kitten
.
Personnel Costs
21.47
16.25
FrtngI caI DRcI:
...- .-Coot
8.92 30.39
6.64 22.89
....
.-~.
3,039 33.43
2.289 25.18
o 0,00
o 0,00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
ToI8l Burdened Personnel Coats per Unit 01_:
16.76
Position
Animal Sheller Kennel Su
Animal Shelter Attendant
MlIlsrlal & Rentsl Costs
o
Coot .... UnIt Coot
Animal Care 5 5 25.00
.
ToI8l Other _III per Unit 01 Service: 25.00
Other Costs (Equipment. facll"" rentsl. part.tlme labor wlo benefltsl
~ Coot .... .",..,..- UnIt Coot
Total Other costs per Unit of SeNice:
ComD8rlsons to ProllOMd F..
.
Jurisdiction
SlIn Bemsntlno Countv
Moreno Valley
Riverside Countv
Fee Der Unit
20.00
30.00
75,00
More (Lessl than SIB.
Dolle.. Perce-
110,00 -50.00%
- 0.0%
45.00 60.0%
ToIeIServlceDnc:tCost
Clty-WIdeGen.&A<<r*l.
R8 0 10.7",
Tote! s.vIce eo.tI\JnIt
41.78
4.49
4R?~
Recommended Fee MOO
R-..._lded Fee WIeldy 18 25
Currn.... Amour( vaf'iRA
....1naeeIe lDecruH) VAn-
o
DIU
c
User Fee DetenninatJon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De artmantIDlvlalon
Animal Control
User F.. Deserl on
Quarantine Dail Board
Descrlptlon of aarvles, damand, aubaldv, and othar commanta:
This increases the quarantine daily board fee from $10.00 to $15.00
Palllonnel Costa
-
Oepl or Otv. HoIn by
L*Ir Colt 0vefhMd ~ u
8.92 30.39 3,039 0.2
6.64 22.89 2.289 0.4
o
o
o
o
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costa per Unit of 5ervice:
Position
Animal Shelter Kennel Su !Viso
Animal Shelter Attendant
21.47
16.25
Matarlal & Rantal Costa
T....
Coot
6.69
10.07
0.00
0.00
16.76
CootEocl1 0U0nIIIy- ....Coot
Animal Care 5 1 5.00
.
Total Other cos1s per Un~ 01_: 5.00
c
Othar Costa IEaulDmant. flIclllt rental ""rt-tlma labor WiD banellta'
~ CootEocl1 0U0nIIIy- ....Coot
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comoarlaons to ProDosad F..
Jurladlctlon
San Bernardino Counlv
Moreno Valley
Riverside County
F.. oar Unit
9.00
6.00
15.00
MorelLnaI than SIB.
Dollalll Parcantaaa
1.00 11.11%
4.00 66.7%
(5.00 -33.3%
c
01i
r_StrYic4Ionctcost 21.76
Clly-wtclIi Gen. a AdmIn,
Rae 0 10.7R 2.34
TotIIls.rvlCtiCOlllUnIt 7.1 in
Recommended Fee HiM
Recornmendld F.. SuDIidy 910
ClIINtCF_AmoI.Inl 1000
,..1nctMM (OKtUH) ~nn
o
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtm.ntIDIvIslon
Animal Control
Us.r F.. Deecrl
Rabies Vaccination De
Description of ..rYlc., demand, sUbeldv, snd oth.r comments: .
The rabies veccination will be inClllased by $2 to cover the cost the contracted veterinarians charge to the City.
Position
s_
HoIn by ToI8I
PosItion per U Colt
Pe..onn.1 Costs
NA
Mate...1 & R.ntel Costs
o
-
Coot ....
....Coot
Oth.r Costs IEaulpm.nt, "clllt ......1 nart.am. "bor wlo ben.fIts
""""- Coot Eoch 0__ ....Coot
Total Other colm per Unit of Service:
Comosrlsons to ProDos.d F..
Jurisdiction
THIS IS A DEPOSIT ONLY
F.. ...r Unit
Mo..ILessl thIln SIB.
Do..... P.........D.
TcMl5ertll:eDndCOll 0.00
CIly-WIde Gen. & Admin.
R.aeG10.7", 0.00
TotIIlSltrYk>>COItAJnI nM
Recommended Fee nm
RtocommenOlG F.. Subeldy 000
CurNnlF..AmounII 000
F..lnctNM (DIcrMM) nM
c
012
User Fee DetermInation
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o
De artmentIDlvlslon
Fund
Code Enforcement
001
Date
2/2312009
Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
This 1Ii95 adminIstrative fee IS added to amount u, u", "eanng costs when 1Illl88 costs have not been paid In the Ume given
to the property owner and the hearing order Is processed. The total amount Is then placed as a lien agalnslthe property. The
proposed fee modification is to reflect increases in salaries and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has
not been uodaled In accordance with Increases In salaries and materials since 1996,
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
-....... F...... T....O..... Dept. CI' DiY, .....- ..... by ..... ....
PoslUon Laor ...- Laor Coot ~ ..... Coot/IO". Poo_pwUnl Coot ..
Administrative Assistant $24.09 $7.23 $31.32 $3.13 $34.45 3 $103.35
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $103.35
c
Material & Rental Costs
0.._........
Mallinos
PrintinolcooleslreceiotslreDOrtl
fax cover sheat/Countv Recorder}
$0.42
$0.10
Cclot Each
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
2
7
UrilCclII
$0.84
$0.70
1.54
Other Costs IEaulDment. facll Iv rental. . rt-tlme labor wlo benefits}
~ Coot Each ~- UrilCclII
Total Other co... porUnnofSefVice: 0.00
C
rI
P
dF
omaa. sons to ro....... ee
More (Leas) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ....r Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 120.00
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0,0%
0,00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
Total SerW;e Dnct eo.t
Clty-WldeGen. IAdtNn:.
"'016.~
Tot8ISer'I/lceCoelllJnll.
Recommended Fee
-'"'''-
Cunool Fee .......
,"-1ncNMe~)
o
013
104 8Q
16.86
1?1 7&
1?O no
174
11500
'I'iM
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o
De ntIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement
Code Enforcement 001 4815 liens on vacant lots 31112009
Description of servlc:e, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
Administrative fee for processing weed abatement liens against properties whose owners have failed to pay the abatement costs for
vacant lots. There has been no fee Increase since 1996. Fee modification to refIecIlncreases In staff time, salaries, and other
administrative costs associated with this nrocess.
Personnel coats Labor Rates
s..~.. T_ Fringe Ir....onct Oept.Dr[)W" T.... ...- . -;j T.......
Poeitlon ""'" ...- Iuba..Ccot ... """""'. -per Ccot..
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 92.81
Material & Rental Costs
o.cr-. Ccot Each . ~- UnlCclot
Maillnos 0.42 3 1.26
Total Other costs per Unit of SeMce: 1.26
c
Other Coets IEaulDmenl faelll v rental. Dart-time labor wlo beneflts\
o.cr-. CclotEach -- UnlCclot
0.00
Total Other costs per Un" 01_: 0.00
Comoarlsons to Pro- Fee
Mont (Lass) than S.B.
Jurlscllcllon F_ ""'r Unit Dollars Pe
San Bernardino nla nla
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
o
014
TotIlSenllceDlMcteo.t 9281
Clty-Wlcleo.n.&Admk'I.
RIIlIt011l.on. 9.96
TotIlSeMceColltUnlt 100 78
Recommended Fee 1l1/1l1/1
Rcoft"'....-aF-.~ 278
CumonlFee ....... 1950
F_m.::n..e(~) AIlM
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o
DeDartmenllDlvIslon . Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733 Request for demand letter 2/2312009
DescrIption of service, dem8nd, subsldv, and other comments:
When Code enforcement places a lien on a property, they file a Notice of Pendency with the County Auditor-Conlroller Recorder
(ACR). When an Individual or company tries to buy, sell, refinance, etc they may be noticed by the ACR's Ofllce the property mey
show a lien. A demand letter is typically requested from an escrow company during the salellransfer/refinance of property, which
details total amount owed to the City for liens, administrative cltations or other charges panding against a property. Currently, the
City collects a $10 administrative fee for preparing a demand letter and $5 for each additional line item fee that includes abatement
costs, existing citations and hearing orders that have not yet been liened and a calculation of any interest owed on each of the debts.
Based on the averaga demand letter containing 5 additional line Rems ($5 for each item), for a total of approximately $35 per
demand letter. Updating these fees for personnel costs would bring the combined fee to $100 for the creation of a demand letter (no
charges for additional lines).
Personnel Costs LllborRateS
S1r8Ig"- F..... ....0_ jooot. '" DIv. "'....- --j T....~
Position ""'" ..- ~Ccl8t l.abo<CclotiHo". 1'00_.. U Ccl8t..
Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.13 34.45 2.5 86.13
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 86.13
C
Material & Rental Costs
Ccl8t..... CuonlIv _ UnlCcl8t
Printina lcooiea/fax $0,10 7 $0.70
cover sheetl .
Total Other COlts por Un~ of Service: 0.7
Other Costs IEaul_L facll "' rental. DArt-tlme labor wlo benefttsl
Oeo .....' Ccl8t..... UnlCcl8t
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
ComDarleons to ProDOSlld Fee
Fee ....r Unit More (LIIss) than S.B.
Jurisdiction . Dollars Percentaae
Other luslsdlctlons do not ore )Bre delMlld letters.
.
ToteIServIoeDnc:tColl
Clly-~Gen. &Adri't.
Rete 0 16.07'%
Total SeMce CoatIUnIl:
8683
13.95
1/1/17R
"--""'......"-~
Cunrw. Fee Amount
F..Inc:fMIe(~1
1/1/1/1/1
078
1000
ll/l/l/l
Recommended Fee
c
015
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o
DeoartmentlDlvlslon Fund Account U.er Fee DescrlDllon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4733" Duplicate Release of Lien fee 2/2312009
on se ee, em.n I au ay,an er commen :
The $20 fee is an administrative fee for producing a Duplicate Release of Usn. This occurs when our department previously
complied with a request for a demand letter, the lien was paid through escrow, and a release was Issued that was noll1lCOl'ded by
the party receiving the original release. The request must also be researched for additional fees owing and Interest re-calculated.
Personnel costs Labor _
s...... TIme F_ tr"""onct ~<<DN. t=~ HounI by T"""~
Position L.- - L.- Cast 0verNed CoIt/Hr. ...."""'_u.. Cast..
Administrative Assistant 24,09 7.23 31,32 3.1317 34.45 0.75 25.84
.
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of SefVice: 25.84
Descrlptl of rvi d
d bsld
ts
doth
Malerlal & Rental Costs
o
o.cr-. Cast Eoch """"""- UnO Cast
Prinlinll/cooieslfax $0.10 3 $0.30
cover sheet)
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.3
Other Costs (Equipment, facll~ V ..ntlll. p If'l-tlme labor wlo benefits)
o.cr-. Cast Eoch "'--- UnO Cast
Total Other costs por Un" of Service: 0.00
ComDarlsons to Proooeed Fee
More (Lass) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Pe
San Bernardino 3O~00 0
0.00 0,00 0,0%
0,00 0,00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.00 0.0%
0.00 0,00 0,0%
* Account No. 001-000-4733 is used for building abatement fees
Account No. 001.()()().4411 is used for administrative citation fees
c
016
Total SeMce DIrect eo.t 2614
cty.WkIe Gen. & Adn*I.
R.-016.07"J' 4.20
TobII SeMc:e eo.tIUnIl: AA~
Recommended Fee AAnn
RKaIo"'................., 034
CunwIt F.. Amount 7000
Fee 1ncIuIe~) 1nnn
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o
DeDartmentlDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4735 Release of Notice of PendencY Fee 2/2312009
Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
A Notice of Pendency is a document that is recorded with the County Rscorder's oIIice to notify any potential buyer and/or lender
that there is some type of administrative action pending against the property and/or there is a lien against the property. This is an
administrative fee for releasing a notice of pendency for costs incurred. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries,
and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has not been updated in accordance with increases in salaries
and materials since 1996.
Personnel Costs Labor lbtiiS
s...... .::I F..... T"", llncI Depl or Oiv. ""'...- ......:.1 T""'lAIM>r
Position .- Lobar Coot ~ __ CootIH<. PoIItion PI" Coot..
Code ComDliance Officer II $34,15 $10.25 $44.40 $4.44 $48.83 2 $97.67
Code Comoliance Proc. Asst, $20.74 $6.22 $26.96 $2.70 $29.66 2 $59.32
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of SeMce: $156.99
Material & Rental Costs
c
~ Coot Eoch 0u0nlIT _ .....CcoI
Mailinas $0.42 2 $0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.84
Other Costs IEaulDment. facility rental. D rt-tlme labor wlo benefits'
~ Coot Eoch a..uv_ .....CcoI
County Recorder Fee $13.00 1 $13.00
Total Other COlts per Unit of Service: 13.00
ComDarlsons to Pro_ad Fee .
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ...r Unit Dollars Percentage
Not available
0.00 0.0%
0.00 0.0%
Total Serva DlrKl Colt
Clty-Wlde o.'l. & Adn*l.
R-.O 16.onIo
T0S8I5ervIce Co8UUnI
1811l1ll
27.32
107 AA
R80amm..-od""~
eun.nt Fee Amol.nl
.... mcr..e (oecr..e)
1RnM
1730
11400
MOO
Recommended Fee
c
01,
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o
DepartJnentlDivislon Fund Account User Fee DescrlotIon Date
Administrative fee for weed abatement on vacant
Code Enforcement 001 4815 lots 3/112009
Descrtotlon Of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
Administrative fee for weed abatement incurred costs and staff time for processing abatements, There has been no fee Increase
since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time salaries and other administrative costs associated with this
Personna. "osts Labor!!!; s
Stralgtc .:::I FringI Total Dnd Dept. or DIY. T...._ ..... by T~~
Position - ","",Coot ~ """" CostIHr. Pas_,..'"
Code Comoiiance Officer II 34,15 10.25 44,40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Weed Abatement Coordinator 32,45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 48.40 2 92.81
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Servlce: 190.48
Material & Rantsl Costs
~ Coot Each 0u0nIy -.cI UrilCcoI
Mailings . 0.42 5 2.1
Total Other costs per Unit of SeMce: 2.1
c
Other Costs (Eaulament facllI Y rental. aart-tlme labor wlo banafttsl
Dea_/tAL. Coot Each 0.-. -.cI UrilCcoI
Vehicle ExPense 30 30,00 2.00 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 60.00
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Lan) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino nla nla
0,00 0.0%
0,00 0.0%
TomlSeMceonc:teo.t
C!ty-WIde Gen. & Admn.
ReeeOUI.~
Total SeMce CoItIUnt
250 48
28.93
'77 40
R.cam...........~
Cl.II'8Ilt Fee Amount
Feell'lCl'fNlM (Dec:rMIe)
"7fiM
240
11000
1R~M
Recommended Fee
o
018
c
c
c
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De..._entlDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DeecriDtlon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4743 Vehicle Tow Release Fees 21912009
Descrl don of service, demend, aubel , and other comments:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. This fee was first adopted by Code Enforcement in 2008 to mirror the fee chargad by
the Police Department for the same service. eve 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as GTA are
not ct.a ad and can obtain a release 7 d a week 8am-7 m, All other releases can be obtained M-F 7:30-5:30 . The current
Personnel Coats .aDOI' RalIls
StnIlghtl::l Fn.... lToI8lD1rect Dept. orDlv. ..........""" ..... by ToIal..-
PoaItIon ...... LI....Coot ."..,... Labor cost/Hr. -"'-,.. Coot,.
Code Comellanee Officer II 34.15 10,25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67
Sr JSUD 0Ificer 57.03 17.11 74.14 7.4139 81,55 0.25 20,39
Code Enf, Processi"" Asst 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 1 29,66
Admin. Svcs. SUNlr. 34.15 10.245 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.25 $12,21
Total Burdened Personnel Coats per Unit of SeMce: 159.92
Materiel & Rental CllSts
lloKri"'", . Coot..... ... Unit Coot
Photos $2.00 4 $6.00
Reoular Mallinas 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other COItI per Unit of SeMce: 8.84
Other CllSts IEaulllllltlnL facll v rental. Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl
lloKri- Coot..... ... Unit Coot
Vehicle Ellllense 40 40,00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costa per Unit of Service: 40.00
Comoarlaons to ProDOtllld Fee
Fee Der Unit More (Lese) than S.B.
Jurl8dlctlon Dollars Percent-.
San Bernardino nla nla
208 76
ToIIIlServloeDncteo.t
CIty-WIde hi. .. MINn.
1WI016.(l'1%
Tc*lS<<vloeeo.&lUnlt
3355
?4?~1
Recommended Fee
?.4llM
, ~1
21500
?"M
-..-
c..n..o__
....~to--l
018
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o
DeDartmentlDivlsion Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
Code Enforcement 001 4411 Removal of Unauthorized Sians (New Feel 21912009
DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
Direct costs incurred for removal of unauthorized signs. Recommended fee is for removal per sign. If an ordinance amendment Is
approved to remove the certified mail requirement, costs would be reduced by $5.21, but the $100 fee per sign would s1111 be
ustified.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
s.."" Tme FrirOO Total Dna Oept.orOlv. T"'_ _,,:::J T'" '*" I
Position La"'" ...- Labo< Coot c...- Labo< CcetIHr. Coot..
Code Comoliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.4 19.53
Sr JSuo Officer 43.87 13.16 57,03 5.7031 82.73 0.2 12.55
Code Enf. Pf0C8ssina Ass! 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.86 0.5 14.83
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 48.91
Material & Rental Costs
c
Oeo ....' Coot.... -;:;,,,;;;,,,- Ura Coot
Certified Mailinas 5.21 1 5.21
Reoular Mailincs 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 6.05
Other Costs IEoulDment, facll v rental Dart.tlme labor wlo benefltsl
o.c.-. Coot .... ."....,.- Ura Coot
Vehicle Exoense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: 40.00
CDmDllrlaons to Fee
More (Lass) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ....r Unit Dollars . Perce_
San Bernardino nla nla
RIverside 100.00 0.00 0.0%
Corona 80.00 . (20.00 -20.0%
ToIal SeMce DINcI Colt
Clty-Wlde Gen. & Adrr*I.
Rnt016.~
T01IIl ServIce CoA'UnIt
9296
14.94
in? an
~"'...,..'"-~
Current Fee Amount
FMlIJlCfUIe(oea.M)
inn nn
7M
Recommended Fee
inn nn
o
020
User Fee Det8nnlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
o
DeoartmentlDIYlslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date
City Clerk 001 4901 Yard Sale Permit Fee (N_ Feel 3/112009
Description Df service, demand, subsidY, and Dlher CDmrnents:
Nominal fee for issuance of yard sale permit
Personnel CDSts LabDr Rates
Strlllglt.::! ....... T....lJlrect Oepl:.OtDIv. Ir....~ ..... by T....l.8bar
PDSltlon - l.8barCoot l.8barCootiHo". ..._... UriI Coot ...
Business Rea. Reoresenlatlve 20.72 6.22 26.94 2.6936 29.63 0.467 13.84
0.00 0.00 0 0,00 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Untt of Service: 13.84
d=......-
I I I I I~- I
~-I ~1
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Other CDSts /Eoulornent, facll hi rentsl, . rt-t1rne labor WID benefltsl
~ Coot Each au.dy- UrilCoot
. 0.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Comparisons to Pr Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Redlands
Ontario
Fontana
Yucaioa
Permit fee
More (Less) than S.B. TobII SeMctl Dncl COlt 1384
Dollars Percentage CIly-Wlde Gen. & AdrN'l.
nla nla RMlt018.01"JI0 2.22
112.50 -83.3% Total5eMcl eo.tIUnII IBM
/12.00 -80.0%
7.00 -46.7% Recommended Fee 1E;M
112.50 -83.3% ~lMIldIdr:..:w.idy 106
c..n.rt F.. Amount
FeelnauM (Decreae) 11;00
2.50
3,00
8.00
2.50
o
021
o
User Fee Detenninatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
artmentlDivlalon
Develo ment Services
Fun
184
Account
4351
Unr .. DescrI on
Blanket/Combo Permit
ate
2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsl ,and other comments:
A combo permit would combine the excavation permit ($45) and lane closure perm~ ($45) that contractors typically pull together.
The cost of the combined perm~ would be $55, The combo perm~ would allow the contractors to pull one perm~ saving the City
and contractors time. Devel men! Services staff estimates there is a sed revenue loss of $10 900.
Position
Develo ment Services Tech,
En ineerln Assistant 1
F ....Olnoc:l
_ Labor Colt
7.22 31.28
7.97 34.55
Labor CoItIHr.
6.88118 38.16
7.60188 42.18
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total eur<lenod Peroonnel Com per Unij of Servlco:
H.... by
PoIllIonperU
1
15%
TolllI
Colt
38.16
6.32
0.00
0.00
Personnel Costs
44.48
0' Material & Rental Costa
1-
r-I-l -1
---~~.- ,
Other Costs /Eaulomant, facllU . rental, oart-tlme labor wlo banafltal
OeocrIpIlOn Colt __ Quonllty - u,* Colt
Total Other costs per Unit of Servtce:
Comoarlsons to P_ed Faa
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Corona
Ontario
Redlands
TemecuJa
Temecula
Chino
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Mora ILHsI than S.B. Teal s.rvlce Dnct Coel $ 44.48
Fee l8/' Unit Dollars PercentaGe CltyoWIde Gen. I Mr*L
55.00 nla nla R.w Q zen. $ 11.50
60.00 $ 25.00 45% TcalServlceec.tlUril !I; !i.o; 1IQ
85.00 $ 30.00 55%
216.00 $ 161.00 293% Recommended Fee !I; !i.o;no
338.00 Annual $ 283.00 515% Recommended F.. SubaIdy S 099
39.00 MonthlY $ /16.00 -29% eurr.ntF..Amounl: S
177.00 $ 122.00 222% F..InCrMM(DecfuM) S !i.O;no
c
022
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DapartmantJDivision
Fund Account
New
184 Account
Usar Fee Description
Devalo ment Services
Blanket Ins ection Fee
Data
2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee charged to utility companies to inspect the work covered under the blanket permit, 16 square fee. The recommended
fee is $76.50. This is based on one hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II and .18 hours of a Construction
ISurvey Manager's time. Not all cities have adopted a separate fee, it is included in the permit.
Pensonnel Costs
otaIB..-
labor CoItIHr.
8.82882 48.96
11.90904 66.04
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0,00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Pel$Onnel CoIls per Un~ of Service:
Position
Construction Ins or II
Construction/Surve Mana er
30.87
41.64
<;i.terlal & Rental Costs
Hours by
PoaitIon per Un
1
0.18
Total
Cool
48.96
11.89
0.00
0.00
60.85
Oesc:rlption Coot Eoch QuonlllyR_ Unit Cool
Postaae
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: 0
Other Costs IEauiDment, faclllt1 rental. Dart-time labor w/o benefltsl
Cat Each Quonllly R_irod Unit Cool
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service:
C
rI
edF
omDa sona to ProDOBE ee
More/Less than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee [ er Unit Dolla,. Percentage
San Bernardino $ 76.50 N/A N/A
Corona Full Cost N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev $ 15.00 Per Location $ 161,50 -0.80392157
Ontario Included in ""rmit fee N1A N/A
Temecula $ 194.00 I $ 117.50 154%
( ~no $ 177.00 I $ 100.50 131%
......)
023
TOUIlServlceOtrecl:Coll: $ 60,85
City-WIde Gen. & Admn.
Rate 0 25.18'" $ 15.74
Toml Service C08tJUnIt S 7858
Recommended Fee S 7851)
RecommencIed F.. SUbIIdy S 008
Current F.. Amount S
F.. lnau.. (0ea'MN) S 78 51)
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Account
Various
User Fee Description
More than 3 Plan Checks
Fund
183
Date
2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, or public safety. The recommended fee is $88.50 per hour. This represents review
time for an Engineering Assistant III, the Senior Civil Engineer, the City Engineer, and the Development Services Tech,
The account will vary based on the type of plan being checked.
Peraonnel Costs
Depl crOiv.
Labor Cost Overhead Labor CoItIHr.
31.28 6.88116 38,16
44,34 9.75546 54.10
62,87 13,83096 76.70
80.68 17,74916 98.43
o 0,00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unn of Servlc:e:
~'~"
Str8tght TI
Lobo
24.06
34.11
48.36
62.06
B
7,22
10,23
14.51
18.62
Hours by
Posttkln per U
0.1
1
0,1
0.05
70:51
Oterlal & Rentsl Costs
I5Oocription Cost Each QWlntity Required Unit Colt
Postaae
Total Other costs per Unn of Selvic:e: 0
Other Costs IEaulDment, faclllt rentsl, Dart.tlme labor wlo benefits) .
0eIatpIi0n Coot ElICh Quontlly R...- Unit Cost
:
,
Total Other costs per Unn of Service: !
ComDari8ons to ProDOSed Fee
Mora ILeas than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fes oer Unit Oollara PercentsDe
San Bernardino $ 88.50 Per Hour N/A N/A
Temecula $ 93.00 Per Sheet $ 4.50 $ 0.05
Mareno Vallev ' MaDsl $ 190.00 Per Sheet $ 101.50 $ 1,15
Moreno Vallev ' ImDrovementsl $ 248.00 Per Sheet $ 159.50 $ 1.80
Moreno Vallev Gradinal $ 207,00 Per Sheet $ 118.50 $ 1.34
'"
02'1
Total Service Direct Colt $ 70.51
City-Wiele Gen. & AdmIn.
Rate 0 25.88~ $ 18.23
T0t8IServiceCOItI\Jflit s 8874
Recommended Fee S 8850
Rec:ommellded Fee &IMIdy S 024
Currwnt F.. Amount
F.. 11"ICfN" (Oeauee) S 8850
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Fund
188
Account
4780
User Fee Descrlptlon
More than 3 WQMP Reviews
Date
2/23/2009
Descrlptlon of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing
plan check comments, city standards, public safety, or adequate water quality best practices. The recommended fee is
$99.00 per hour. This represents review time for the NPDES Coordinator, the City Engineer, and the NPDES Customer
Service Rep.
Personnel Costs
StrllightTi
La
17.84
37.68
62.06
B
5,35
11.30
18.62
0eI>l or Olv.
Labor Coot Overheod ~ CoIlIHr.
23.19 5.10224 28.29
48.98 10.77648 59.76
80.68 17.74916 98,43
Hours by
P_ per Un
0.5
1
0.05
ToIlll La
Colt
14.15
59.76
4.92
Position
NPDES Customer Service Re .
NPDES Coordinator
Ci En ineer
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unft of Service: 78.83
r~erlal & Rentsl Costs
. . Coot Each Quontily Required Unit COIl
Postage
Total Other costs per Unft of Service: 0
Other Costs IEaulament, faclllt1 rental, osrt-tlme labor wlo benefltsl
DescrlpIlon COIl ElICh Quonllty Required Unit COIl
Total Other costs per Unft of Service:
Comparlsons to ProDOSed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Moreno Vallev (Preliminarvl
Moreno Valley I Basic Final)
Moreno Valley I Standard Final)
Moreno Vallev I ComDlex Final)
More IL_I than S.B.
Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentsae
$ 99.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
$ 321,00 3rd Review $ 221.79 224%
$ 750.00 3rd Review $ 650.79 656%
$1,440,00 3rd Review $1,340,79 1351%
$1,824.00 3rd ReYiew $1,724.79 1739%
I
I
Total SeMce Direct COlt $ 78,83
City-WIde Gen. & AdmIn.
Rate02U8'Wt $ 20.39
TotaJServlceCostIUnIt S llllno
Recommended Fee S gg'1
RtclOfI'INnded F.. But*dy $ 1021)
Current F.. Amount
Fee Il"ICrUM (o.creu.) ~ gg'1
c
025
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Develo ment Services
Fund Account
New
188 Account NPDES Business Ins
Date
2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments:
As required by the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS-4) staff is required inspect all businesses to
insure they are in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The recommended fee is
$148.50. This represents ,40 hours of documentation time for the NPDES Customer Service Rep, 2 hours of inspection time for
the NPDES Inspector and .15 hours of review time by the NPDES Coordinator. The permit is a federal requirement and
regulated at the State and regional level.
Position
NPDES Customer Service Re .
NPDES Ins or Construction
Ins ector II
NPDES Coordinator
StrIIlghtTi
1.8
17.84
30.87
Personnel Costs
37.68
48.98
Labor CostIHr.
5.10224 28.29
8.82882 48.96
o 0.00
10.77648 59.76
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel COllI per Unn of Service: $
Hours bv
PooiIion per U
0.4. $
2 $
$
0.15 $
TOlOI
COIl
11.32
97.92
11.30
8.96
c
118,20
Material & Rentel Costs
OeIcrtptlon Coot Eoch QuontiIy RoquiNd Unit COIl
Postage
Total Othercosts per Unn of ServIce: $ -
other Coats /EaulDment, faclllt rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl .
0e0crlplI0n COIl Eoch QUlIntity Required UnII COIl
Total Other costs per Unn of Service:
Comparisons to Pro Fee
. More /L_ than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 148.50 N/A N/A
Ontario (Commercial) $ 171,00 Avel'lllle $ 22.50 15%
Ontario /Industriall $ 263,66 Averaoe $ 115,16 78%
Redlands $ 71,00 $ m.5O -52%
Moreno Vallev I Industriall $ 451,00 $ 302.50 204%
Qeno Valley I Commercial) $ 311.00 $ 162.50 109%
reno Vallev I Restaurantl $ 271,00 $ 122,50 82%
TotaI~DiNdColt $ 118.20
City-Wide Gen. & AdmIn.
R.. 0 25.18" $ 30.57
ToWI SeNice ColItIUnIt S 1411 n
Recommended Fee S 1AR ~O
Recommended F.. SUbIIdy S 027
CuI'l*ltF..ArnounI:
F.. Inct1NI.. (Dec:reue) S 14850
026
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Depertment/Dlvlslon
Develo ment Services
Fund
184
Account
Various
Date
2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
The current fee covers one inspection and there are many times when the inspector is called to a site by the contractor and
the contractor is not there or the site is not ready for inspection and then is requested to revisit the site, The original
inspection fee is based on a percentage of the cost estimate. The recommended fee is $61.50. This represents one hour of
inspection time for a Construction Inspector II, Moreno Valley based their fee on a 4 hour minimum. Not all cities have
established this fee. The account will vary based on the type of inspection being performed,
Personnel Costs
30,87
Oept. or Div. Hours by
__ lAbor CoItIHt. per Un~
8.82882 48.96 1
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel COlltI per Un. of Service:
Total
Coot
48.96
0.00
0.00
0.00
Position
Construction Ins ector II
48.96
Otsrlal & Rental Costs
Desaiplion Coot Each Q_ Roquhd UnII Coot
Postaoe
Total Other costs per Un. of Service: 0
Other Costa IEaulDment, faclllt rental, oart-tlme labor wlo bsnefits
Desaiplion Coot Eoch Q_ Roquinld unllCootI
I
,
Total Other costs per Un. of Service:
ComDarlaons to Prooosed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Moreno Vallev
Fee oer Unit
$ 61.50
$ 432.00
More IL_1 than S.B.
Dollars Percentage
N/A N/A
Each $ 370.50 602%
Total ServIce 0I111C1 Coat $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen. & AdmIn.
Rete a 25.86" $ 12.66
Total ServIce CostIUnlt S A162
Recommended Fee S A150
Recomrl'IltFlded F.. SuMidy S 0.12
Current F.. Amount
F.. Increase (Dec:rHM) S A150
L
02"(
User Fee Determination
Coat Analysis Worksheet
epartmentIDlvlslon
Develo ment Services
Fund
183
Account
Various
U..r Fee Deserl Ion
Revisions to roved Plans
Date
2/23/2009
D88crlptlon of aervlce, demand, aubsldv, and other comments:
The fee would be charged to applicants who request changes to their plans after the plans have been through the
plan check process'and have signed mylars. The recommended fee is $142.50 per sheet. This fee represents review time
for a Se!1ior Civil Engineer, a Construction/Survey Manager and documentation time for a Development Services Tech.
Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a consultant.
Personnel Costs
48,36
24.06
41.64
,*,101_
Be Labor CoIl
14.51 62.87
7.22 31.28
12.49 54.13
oIol
Labor CoItIHr.
13,83096 76.70
6.88116 38.16
11.90904 66.04
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0,00
o 0.00
Total Burdened PallOnnel Costs per Un. of Service:
H.... by
P_porU
1
0.1
0.5
Coot
76.70
3.82
33.02
0.00
113,54
Gterlal & Rental Coats
DoIcripIlon CoIlEoc:ll QuontiIyR~ Unit CoIl
Postage
Totel Other costs per Un. of Service: 0
Other Coats IEaulDment, faclllt rental, DBrt-tlme labor wlo bsneflta
OeIaipllon CoIlEoc:ll QuonlilyR"'- Unit Colli
I
. i
I
Total Other costs per Un. of Service:
Comparlaona to ProDOSed Fee
More IL... than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino $ 142,50 Per Sheet N/A N/A
Corona $ 625.00 Per Sheet $ 624,60 438%
Temecula $ 241.00 Per Sheet $ 98.50 69%
Chino $ 614.00 $ 471.50 331%
Moreno Vallev IMinor) $ 261.00 Per Sheet $ 118.50 83%
Moreno Vallev IMaior\ $ 269,00 Per Sheet $ 126,50 89%
C'"
TotaISWVIClDnctCOll $
City-Wide Gen. & AdmIn.
Rme 0 25.85" S
TotIlSeMceColtAJnit !
113.54
29.36
14' !l()
Recommended Fee S
Recommended F.. SUbIIdy S
Currwd F.. Amount
F..1ncrHM (DeaHse) ~
14' 50
040
14' 50
02b
User Fee Detenninatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
, lpartmentIDlvlalon Fund Account Uaer Fee Description Date
,.... Development Services 183 4782 Certificate of Correction (New Fee) 2/23/2009
Description of service. demand, aubsldv, and other commenta:
The fee would be charged to applicants who have non-substantive changes to their tract/parcel maps after the maps
have been signed and recorded. The recommended fee is $101,00, minimum one hour, This represent 1 hour of review
time for a Senior Civil Engineer. Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a
consultant.
::~~L:."'"
Dept. or Diy.
Labor Coot 0_ Labor COII/Hr.
62,87 13.83096 76.70
31.28 6.88116 38.16
o 0.00
o 0,00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unft of Service: 80,51
Personnel Costa
H.....by
Pooltion perU .
1
0.1
Position
Senior Civil En ineer
Develo ment Services Tech.
14.51
7.22
Material & Rental Costa
ToIa'La
Coot
76.70
3.82
0.00
0.00
( ...,Jstage Coot Eoc:h o..ntIly RequRd Unit Coot
Total Other costs per Unft of Service: 0
Other Coats (EauIDment. faclllt rental, Dart.tlme labor wlo benefits)
Desalption Coot Eoch Ouontlly Roqulrod Unit Coot
Total Other costs per Unft of Service:
ComDarlaona to ProDOSed Fee
Jurisdiction
San Bernardino
Corona
Temecula
Moreno Valley
Ontario
More ILesal than S.B.
Fee ..r Unit Dollars Percentage
$ 101.00 Per Hour N/A N/A
$ 735.00 $ 634.00 628%
$ 651.00 $ 550.00 545%
$ 496.00 $ 395.00 391%
$ 334,00 $ 233.00 231%
Recommended Fee S
Recommended F.. Sw.Idy S
Total Service DirK!: COst $
City.WiCM Gen. & Admin.
Rate G 25.88% S
TotaIServiceCoatlUnIt !;
Cumtnl F.. Amount
80.51
20.82
1n1 ::l4
101 no
034
...,........(_> S 1n1 no
c
02~J
User Fee Determination
C st Analysis Worksheet
n 0
DepartmentIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DescriDtlon Date
DeveloDment Services 183 4352 . Permit Extension (New Fee) 2/2312009
Description of service, demand, aubeldv, and other comments:
There are circumstances when a contractor needs to extend the perm~ time frame; staff enters the extension request into
Permit Plus and verifies with the Construction Manager that the extension is warranted. The recommended fee is $45.00.
This is based on 0.2 hours of review time by the Construction Manager and documentation time by staff.
Pensonnel Costs
StroightTi Oepl orOiv. oloIS_ Holn by ToloI La
Position La Labor coat OverhNd COltlHr. PoIition per Un' Cos.
Develo ment Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 36,16 0,55 20.99
En ineerin Assistant 1 26.58 7.97 34.55 7.60188 42.16 0,05 2,11
Construction/Surve Mana er 41.64 12.49 54.13 11.90904 66,04 0.2 13,21
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Bunlened Pel1lonnel Costs per Unft of Selvice: 36.30
Q;:I & Rentsl Costs Cost Each Quontily RoquiMd Unit Cool
Postage
Total OtIler costs per Unft of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, faclllt rentsl, nart-tlme labor wlo benefits\
0eIclipli0n COlt ElICh Quantity RequiNd Unit COlt
Total Other costs per Unft of SeNice:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (L888 than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ....r Unit Dollans Percentsae
San Bernardino $ 45.00
.
-
\,;
03U
Total SeMc::e Direct Colt $ 36.30
City-Wide Gen. & Admin.
Rille. 25.80" $ 9,39
Towl SeMce CoItIlInIt S 4569
Recommended Fee S 4500
R~I....nded Fee sw.Idy $ 069
Current F.. Amount
F.. Ina'HM (o.a.u.) S 4500
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Develo ment Services
Fund Account
New
183 Account
Date
2/23/2009
Description of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
This is an inspection fee charged to applicants who requested a Temporary Use Permit or a Conditional use Permit. The
inspection is required before the applicant's cash bond can be returned. The recommended fee is $61,50. This represents
1 hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II.
No other cities have established this fee as it is included in the application fee.
Personnel Costs
oIIIlB"
Labor CoItIHr.
8.82882 48.96
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened Pe~onnel Colts per Unft of Service:
Hours by
POIition por U
1
Totallll
Coot
48.96
0,00
0,00
0.00
Position
Construction Ins ector II
48.96
Uterlal & Rental Costs
~ Coot Eoch OUllntlly RoquinId Unit COlt
Total Other costs per Unft of ServIce: 0
Other Costs IEaulDment, faclllt rental, aart-tlme labor wlo beneflta
Deocription Coot Eoch Ouonllly Roquirod Unit COlt
Total Other costs per Unft of Service:
Comparisons to ProDosed Fee
More (Lees than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bernardino 61.50 N/A N/A
0
T...'.......'"-C... $ 48.96
City-Wide Gen. & AdmIn.
RIo. 0 ....... $ 12.66
ToIoI_C-... S 111112
Recommended Fee S II 1 50
Reco....llnded Fee Subsidy S 0 12
Current F.. Amount
F"_IOoaouol S 11150
031
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
epartmentIDlvislon
Fund Account
New
184 Account
User Fee Oncrl Ion
Oate
Develo ment Services
2/23/2009
Oncrlptlon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
Currently staff provide a service to the utility companies by billing them a monthly invoice for penn its as no charge, The
recommended fee is $62.04 per invoice. This represents 1.5 hours of review time for an Administrative Assistant.
No other cities have established this fee.
Dept. ot Div. HOUIS by
LaborClllll 0_ ' LoborCoolIHr, _perU'
6,22 26,94 5.92592 32,86 1.5
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0,00
Total Burdened Personnel Coots per Un. of SeIVice:
Pereonne. Costs
Position
Administrative Assistant
Qerlal & Rental Costs
ToIoI
Cool
49.29
0.00
0,00
0.00
49.29
Deoaiplion Cool Eoch O_R~ Unit Cool
Postaoe
Total Other coots per Un. of Service: 0
Other COlIt8 (Eoulament, 18clllt rental, Dart.tlme labor wlo beneflts\
Deoaiplion Cool Eoch QUMtily Required .UnltCool
.
Total Other costs per Un. of Service:
Comaarisons to Proaosed Fee
More I Lees than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ""r Unit Oollare Percenta"e
San Bernardino $ 62.04 NIA NIA
-
( J
-
032
Total 5ervIce Dil1lCl; Cost $ 49.29
CIty-w.de Gen. & Adrhn.
Rate 0 2&.85" $ 12.75
Total SeMI>> CoItIUnIt !: 8'04
Recommended Fee !: 8'00
R~,~.16.lOed F.. SubI6dy S 004
CUl'*ltF..Amol.rrt
F.. lnau.. (DeaHM) !: 8'llO
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
partm.ntIDlvl810n
Fund Account
New
183 Account
U8.r Fee Description
Date
Develo ment Services
212312009
Descri on of ..rvlce, d.mand, .ubsld ,and oth.r comm.nts:
F.echarged to an applicant who is requ.sting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant is required to post
a bond to insure all outstanding work is finished. The recommended fee amount is $541.50. This fee is based 2,5 hours
of field review time by the ConstructiOn/Survey Manager, 2.5 hours of review time by the City Engineer and 0,5 hours of
documentation time b the Director. No other Cnies have established this fee because n is not alwa standard ractica.
11.90904 66,04
17.74916 98.43
6.88116 38.16
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened PenIonnet Costs per Unit of ServIce:
P.raonn.1 Coats
Poaltlon
Construction/Surve Mana r
Ci En ineer
Develo ment Services Tech.
S"lght Tim
l.Il
41.64
62.06
24,06
Fringe otIll Direct
Benefttl ...bor Cost
12.49 54.13
18.62 80.68
7,22 31.28
Hours by
_perU
2.5
2,5
0.5
ToIaIl.Il
Coot
165,10
246,07
19.08
430.25
Ctsrlal & R.ntal Coata
DelcriDtion Cost Elich QUllntltyR8Cluil'ed Untteo.t
Postage
Total Other cas" per Unit of ServIce: 0
Oth.r Coata IEaulDm.nL faclllt rental ....rt-tlm. labor wlo ben.fital
Delcription Coot Eoch Q_ RoqulNd Unit Coat
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
C
edF
rI
P
om.Da 80n. to 1'OD081 ee
More IL... than S.B.
Jurl.dlctlon Fee Der Unit Oollara Perc.ntaa.
San Bernardino $ 541.50 NIA NIA
.......
L:
03(;
TOIIII s.va Dnct eo.t $ 430.25
CIly.Vllideo...&",*,*,-
R80 25.~ $ 111.26
TOUIIServlclCoetIIJnIt s 54151
Recommended Fee S 541 50
R.......u"..1decI F.. $lMidy S 001
CU'Nnt F.. AmounI
Fee InctMM (o.a-.) S 541 50
o
c
o
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeDartmentIDlvialon Fund Account Uaer Fee DeacriDllon Date
Large Family Day Care (9-14 Children) -Initial
Fire 001 4336 Licensina Pre-Insoeclian Fee. 3/112009
Deacriptlon of service, demand, aubald ,and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permn. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with Stale
ulations has ro ed to mod' ins Ion fees for care facllnies
Peraonnel Coats Labor Rates
. Straight Time Fri~ ot8lDirect -."Dlv. ot8l Burdened _..by T.....-
Position ....... ......",j .......Coot t.aor CoetlHr. _perUnll Coot _
Fire Prevention OffIcer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63,00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of service: 63.00
Material & Rentsl Coats
~ C<lotEOCll QuontIty- ""'Coot
Supplies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of service: 0.60
Other Coats IEaulomant. flIclllll rentsl, _rt-lIme labor wlo banefltal
~ CootEOCll 0U0nltIv_ ""'Coot
Vehicle 40,00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Servk:e:
Com_risons to Pro_ Fee
Fee oar Unit More (Lan) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Dollera Percentage
N/A
123 6lI
T,*,ServloeDll-=l:CaM
Clty-~G.n.'",*,*,-
R-.a'.......
TDIIIl s.m:.eo.MJnI
17.98
141 AA
Recommended Fee
~""""Fww.6dr
CUrNIltFeeAmclult
Fw~(o.cr-)
MOO
9158
21203
_ill? 11~
03'1
o
c
c
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeDartmentIDlvIslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDllon Date
Fire 001 4336 Residential - Board and Care 6 or fewer 3/112009
Description of service, demand, subsld ,and other comments:
Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permfi. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State
ulations has ro sed to mod' ins ection fees for care facilfiies
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
-:=I . F_ h-otaIOIrect Oept. or Div. I=~~ _..by T.....-
Position Coot CosIIHr. -...... Coot_
Fire Prevention OffIcer 29,37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00
Matsrlal & Rentsl Costs
Deocriptian Coot .... "'-- .....Coot
Suoolies 0.15 4 0.60
Total Other costs per Unit of service: 0.60
Other Coats IE"ul"menl- facll"' ...ntsl, DarMIme labor wlo b8nafltal
Deocriptian Coot Eoch 0;';"";';_ .....Coot
Vehicle 40,00 1.5 60.00
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarlsons to Proooaed Fee
Mo... (Lea) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee -r Unit Dollars Percentaoe
NIIi
12360
r.-ls.n,IceDncl:Co.t
CitY-W..-a.n. & Mnn
RIliIo01U6-.
TotIII s-loe CoettUnIl
17,98
1~1 AA
Recommended Fee
~F..SlMIdr
Cunwlt F.- AmoIn
F..__lo--)
AAM
9158
21203
..1R?n~
Or) ,
Lit}
c
c
c
User Fee Detenninatlon
Coat Analysis Worksheet
DeparlmentIDlvIslon Fund Account User F.. DescrlDtlon D....
Police 001 4743 Tow Release 11612009
DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subslcly, and other commenta:
Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. CVC 22850,5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as
GTA are not charged, and can obtain a release 7 days a week, Bam-7pm. All other release can be obtained M-F, Bam-4pm.
The current fee is $215,00.
Pel1lonnel Costs Labor Rat8s
StraIgtrtTime F_ ot8lDirect Dept.orOiv. ....- ......by T....LoI>o<
Position ""'" ........ LoI>o<Cost ,.... CootiHo". -pet'" Cost -
Police Records Technician 17,84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0,25 7.10
Dispatcher II 25,29 9.76 35,05 3.51 38.56 0.25 9.64
Police Officer 40,43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.33 88.29
Communitv Service Officer II 21.77 8.95 30.72 3.07 33,79 1.25 42.24
Ser!leant 51,16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82,40 0.5 41.20
Total.Burdened Personnel Cosls per Untt of Service: 188.47
M....rlal & Rental Costa
Doocription Cost .... Quantity- UnlICost
Police Reoort Fee 0.15 5 0.75
Certified Postage 3.94 2 7.88
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.88
Other Costa IEaulDment. facllltl rental, oart.t1me labor wlo benefltsl
_on Cool .... CluonItIy- UnlICool
.
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to ProllClHCl F..
More (Less) thsn S.B.
Jurisdiction F.. oar Unit Dolla.. Percentaae
San Bernardino 215.00 nla nla
Ontario PO 125,00 (115.00 -47.9%
Corona PO 155.00 185.00 -35.4%
Redlands PO 175,00 (65.00 -27.1%
Pomona PO 100.00 (140.00 -56.3%
Riverside 205.00 (10.00 -4.2%
209 35
ToIIII s.rm. DnoI eo.t
City-Wide G<<'l. &Mnln.
R-.016.4n.
TotaIs.mc.CaIlIlJnII:
32.41
7417"
Recommended Fee
~mendldF.-~
CunwtF. o\mOUnI
....__Io-j
'4000
175
21500
?~OO
03[,
c
c
o
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentlDlvlalon
Police
Uaer Fee Oescri on
Police Photo ra hs 3" x 5"
DeacriDtlon of service, demand, aubsldY, and other commenta:
Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, including the cost of film, film developing, printing
and staff time to process requests, Comparisons with other cities are difficutt because of the services provided
are different. There has not been a fee Increase since 2006.
Peraonnel Costa I Labor Rates
_TIme "- TDIaI~ 0epI:. orDlv. TotIIBun:Iened :;:.1 TDIaI.=!
Position ,- -- Labor Cost ~ labor CoIIIHr. P_ Cool
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Forensic Soeclalist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42,27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of seNice: 23.32
Matarial & Rental Costa
~ TCool..... lInICool
Film developing & DrintinD 0.27 1 0.27
.. =
Total Other COltS per Unn of_: 0.27
Other Costa (Eaulpment. facllltv rental -rt.time labor wlo bsneflts'
Cool Eoell -- lInICool
Totel Other costs per Unit of ServIce:
Compariaona to Prooosed Fee
More (Leas) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ner Unit Dolla... Percentaae
San Bernardino 28.00 I nla nla
San Bemardlno Sheriff 2,00 I 25.00 -92.6%
Riverside PO 9.00 CD no reDrints 18.00 -$,7%
Ontario PO 15.00 CD no reprints 12.00 -44.4%
Fontana PO 32,00 CD no reDrints 5.00 18.5%
Chino PO 35,00 CO + 25 cents Der 8.00 29.6%
I
T................Coot 23.59
~o.n.&AdIIWI.
Rm01Uft 3.65
TOUiI SeNicl CosWnil. '7 ,.
Recommended Fee '7 M
A---..r=..........., 024
CurrentF..Amounl: 2800
F..IncrMH (DrIcruM) 1 M
O~,.
u,
c
c
c
User Fee Detenninatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentlDlvlslon
Police
User Fee Deserl on
Police Phot raphs 5" x 7"
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other commenbl:
Fee for reproducing police crime seene photographs. including .the cost of film, film developing, printing
and staff time to process requests. City comparisons are difficuij because of different services provided
There has not been a fee increase since 2006.
Personnel Costs I Labor Ratss
-.::I ::r:.~ Deilt~orOlv ....- -;~ T:'~
Position _ Cool LEar CoolIHr. p- per
Police Records Technician 17.84 7,96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37
Forensic Soecialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42,27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32
Malarial & Rentsl Costs
ICoolEacll - UnI Cool
Film develODiIlll & Drintinc 2.95 1 2.95
Totol Other co.to per Un~ of_: 2.95
Other Costs IEcuIDlllAnt. facllltv renbll. ...rt.time labor wlo benelltsl
Desa1pIlon CoolEacll Q-- UnI Cool
Total Other coats per Unit of SeMce:
Com...rlsons to Prooosed Fee
More (Lan) than S.B.
Jurladlction Fee DBr Unit Dollars Percenbloe
San Bernardino I 29.50 nla nla
San Bemardino Sheriff 6.00 24.00 -80,0%
Riverside PO 9.00 CO 21.00 -70.0%
Ontario PO 15.00 CO 15.00 -50.0%
Fontana PO 32.00 CO 2.00 6.7%
Chino PO 35,00 CO 5.00 16.7%
Tn! s.mc. onct COlt 26.27
Clty-Wtde Gtin. I Admin.
~..15.4fi 4.07
TotIIIServiCeCostlUnll: ~~.~
Recommended Fee ~IVI
~F..~ 033
Cunwnt F.. Amount 2950
F.. 1ncrM.. (OR'NM) OM
03b
c
o
c'
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Coet Analysis Workahaet
DepartmentlDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Dllte
Police 001 4741 Police Photographs 8" x 10" 3/1712008
Description of service, demand, sUbsldv, and other commente:
Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, including the cost of film, film developing, printing
and staff time to process requests. There has not been a fee increase since 2006.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
_Time F_ Ir... 0hcI Dept. or DIY. alai ......... tan by T:'~
Position ..- - lAbor Coot ~ lAbor ~. PooltlonporlJnl
Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0,33 9.37
Forensic Specialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 0.33 13.95
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32
Material & Rental Costa
Oesa1p1ian ICoot Eoch 0_- IN Coot
Film develaDina & Drintlna 6.00 1 6.00
Total Other costs per Un~ of Sefvice: 6.00
Other Costa (Equipment, facility rentel part-time labor wlo bsnefltal
0eIerIpII0n Coot Eoch Qur4Ity - UnIlCoot
.
Total Other costs per Un~ of Service:
Comparisons to ProllOS8Cl Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee aer Unit Dollars Percenteae
San Bernardino . 33.00 nla nla
San Bernardino Sheriff 6.00 27,50 -82.1%
Riverside PO 9.00 CD 24.50 -73.1%
Ontario PO 15.00 CO . 18,50 -55.2%
Fontana PO 32.00 CD (1.50 -4.5%
Chino PO 35.00 CD 1,50 4.5%
Total Service Dncleo.t 2932
CIly-WldlGen. & Admin.
_.16..... 4,54
Total Set\lIceCoaUUnll ~~ A~
Recommended Fee 33 !in
~._._..dWF..SubIIdy 035
eun.nt F.. Amount 33 00
F..1ncruH (o.cnu.) n fiin
03~1
c
c
c
User Fee Detennlnation
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtJnentIDivlslon
Police
Deacriotion of service, demand, subaldv, and other commentll:
For reproduction of video cassette tapes (VHS),
on
Personnel Costs ~Ra'"
-3 F_ ....0_ OoplorOiv. ...1- ......by T....Laa
Position ___ lAbor Colt lAbor CoIl/Hr. _perUnl Colt..
Police Detective 45.67 21.02 66.69 6,67 73.36 0.5 36.66
Police Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7,49 82.40 0.25 20.60
Tot81 Burdened Personnel Costa per Unit of Service: 57.28
Material & Rental Costs
1- I j I I _r:J.:-1 ~l
Other Costa IE..ul......nL facllltv rentlll ...rt-tlme labor wlo benefits) ....
Oooa1p1lon CoItEocll Q......., UNI Colt
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00
Com...risona to ProDOHC F..
F.. ....r Unit More (LHs) than S.I
Jurisdiction Dollars Pen:entllCH
San Bernardino 17.50 48.50 -73,5%
Riverside 50,00 110min $1.75 add'l 16.00 -24.2%
Ontario 25.00 41,00 -62.1%
Fontana 32.00 34,00 -51.5%
04(1
TOUiIServiclDnctColt 57.28
Cily-Wlde Geft. & AdmIn.
Rille 0 15.41'" 8.87
TotIIl8er'ta ColIWnil IIA 15
Recommended Fee llAno
~F_lIIIbIId)I 015
eu,.,.nt F.. Amount 6300
F.. Inern.. (Dean") ~no
c
c
o
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentlDlvlslon
Police
Fund
001
DeecrioUon of "Nice, demand, sUbsldv, and other comments:
Fee for reproducing Police Dispatch logs and CAD printouts
The fees have not been increased since 2006.
Personnel Costs Labor ...tes
5trajGhll::l F..... ot8IDirec:t oept.orDlv. IT_I Burdened Hauno by T....~
Position ....... lAbor Colt LaborColIIHr. POlition.....UnlI Coot...
Discatch Suce/Visor 30.87 12.27 43.14 4.31 47.45 1.25 59.32
Pclice Communications Mar 35.85 14.98 SO.83 5.08 55.91 0.25 13.98
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 73.30
Material & Rentel Costs
Ilotcri- Coot..... a~"" 0.;;0... un< Coot
Audio Tace 1.00 1 1.00
-c-
Total Other coats per Unit of ServiCe: 1.00
Other Costs IEnul......rd facllltv rentel. -rt-tlme labor wlo bsnefllal
DelCription c........ a...- ........ u... COlI
Total Other COItI per Unit of Service:
Com_ri...... to Pro.....ed Fee
More (Less) than S.B.
JuriedlcUon Fee -r Unit Dollars Percentaae
San Bemardlno 80.00 nla nla
Riverside PO 300.00 215.00 253%
TlUI5ervlceDil9Ctco.t 7430
ClIy-Wldt Get\. & MINn.
R.at01U"," 11SO
TotIls..vtceCOltAJnll R~AA
Recommended Fee A~M
--- 080
CurI'anl F.. AmounI 8000
F..11'\CfHM~) ~M
04J
c
c
c
User Fee Determination
Cost Analpls Worbheet
De rtmentlDlvlslon
Police
User Fee Descrl on
False Bu la Alarm Fines
DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false burglary alann calls. Unit cost for each false alann. No fines incurred for pennitted
locations until fifth false alann in alann pennlt calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1st to 4th non-pennitted
false alann. The fine for the 5th-9th false alann will be $90 and the 10th and subseauent fa"a alann '175.
Fees have not been Increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor RatatI
_TImo Fringe ot.IlDirect Oepl or DiY. IT.... HelIn by T:'~
Position ,- ...- Labor CoIl 0v0rMM Lobor CooIMr. __Unll
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.5 19.28
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 0,5 33.19
Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.25 20,60
Senior Office Assistant 19.84 7.96 27,80 2.78 30.58 0.33 10.09
Total Burdened Person"'" Costa per Unit 01_: 83.16
Material & Rental Costs
Oftalptian CoIlEac:h QuInIlIy ~ UnllCoIt
Postaae 0.42 1 0.42
Total 0tl1er c:cots per Un~ 01_: 0.42
Other Costs IEauloment. faclllt rental. DlIrt-llme labor wlo benefltsl
lJooc:rlotian CoIlEac:h QuInIlIy ~ UnllCoIt
Total Other costs per Unit 01 Service:
C
rI
P
edF
ompar sons to roDOtlO ee
More (Lass) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percenta~
SBPO 75,00 nla nla
Riverside PO Fine IS 75.00 0.00 0.0%
Pomona PO IS 220.00 145.00 193.3%
Newoort Beach PO . Fine IS 125.00 50,00 66.7%
Irvine PO IS 150.00 75,00 100.0%
Ontario IS 150.00 75.00 100.0%
Huntinaton Beach IS 200 125.00 166.7%
T<..........DndCool 83.58
CIly-WlcM Gen. & Admi'I.
.....,...... 12.94
Teal Servlce CcmIUriI AA Ft,
Recommended Fee 7'" nn
._..,~,......._ 2152
cu..no.......... 5000
F..IncrUM(DecruIe) .,~ nn
04~:
c
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeoartmentlDivlslon T Fund Account User Fee DeecrlDtlon Date
Police I 001 4747 False Robberv Alarm Fines 11612009
Description of service, demand, su~ldy, and other comments:
Fine for responding to false robbery alarm calls, Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines Incurred for permitted
locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1 st to 4th non-permitted
false alarm. The fine for the 5th-6th false alarm will be 5250. 7th-9th will be S300 and the 10th and
subsequent false alarm $350. Fees have not been Increased since 2004.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
I. Straight Time Frmv:t.~ 01r8cl 0ept.OI"0Iv. "olalB HounI by Total Laor
Position lobo Be ,.-.. ..... rCost Overhead l.abor CostIHr. _"",Un! Cost ...
Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 36.56 0.75 26.92
Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.67 110.66
Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20
Senior Office Assistant 17,84 7.96 25.80 2.56 28.36 0.33 9.37
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per UnR of ServIce: 190.35
C Msterlal & Rentsl Costs
c
Description CostEoc:h I..mitvRequlrod Unit Cost
Postage 0.42 0.42
Total 0Iher costs per UnR of SoMce: 0.42
Other Coats IEauloment. facllltv rentsl, oart-time labor wlo benefits)
0escrlpIl0n Cost Eoc:h ;;;tiiv~1rod Unk CaS
Total 0Iher costs per UnR of Service:
ComDarlsons to ProDOSed Fee
Mare (Less) than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Perc:entaQ
SBPD 175.00 nla nla
Riverside PO Fine #5 300.00 100.00 50.0%
Newoort PO #5 125.00 175.00 -37.5%
Irvine #5 150.00 150.00 -25.0%
Ontario #5 200.00 0.00 0.0%
Huntington Beach #5 200.00 0.00 0,0%
190.77
e
Total SeMce Direct Colt
Dty-WIde Gen. & Admin.
R8te015A8%
Total Service CostlUnlt
29.53
??n 30
Recommended Fee
?OIl 00
20.30
100 00
100 00
Recorrrnended F" Su'-ldy
CUrrent F.. Amou'lt
Fee IncrMM (DKruH)
043
c
c
o
User Fee Detennlnatlon
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DeDarlmentIDlvhllon Fund Account User F.. De8crtDtlon Da..
Police 001 4743 Traffic Citation Sion-off fees 313/2009
Dascrt tlon of service, demand, subsld ,and other commenta:
Police Officers issue traffic citations to the motoring public who operate vehicles with mechanical violations. These violations
must be corrected and signed off by police officers prior to the pUblic contacting the court. Currently the Police Department
does not cha e a fee for personnel to inspect vehicles. ve' corrections have been mede and s n off the citation.
Pe...onnel Costa Labor Re.
s...n"" F..... iT....onct Dept: or [)tv. iTomt BurdIned ~:J T~uj
Position ,..... - La<< Caol La<< CoItMr. p-..
Communilv Service Officer I 22.74 9.13 31.87 1.75 33.62 0.33 11.09
Lieutenant - Watch Commander 62.8673 27.68 90.55 4.75 95.30 0.1 9.53
0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Colts per Unit of Service: 20.62
Me..rlal . Ren"l Costa
I~
-l
I I I I I~~J_~=J
Other Cos.. (Eoulnmen*- faclllh Nntal, ...rt-tlme labor wlo bsnefll81
~ Caol.... ~- ....-
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
ComDarlsons to ProD08ed F..
MON (Lass) tIuln S.B.
Jurisdiction F.. ....r Unit Dolle... Percentaae
San Bernsrdlno nla nla
Ontario PO 0.0%
Corona PO 20.00 -100.0%
Redlands PO 20.00 -100.0%
Pomona PO 20.00 -100.0%
TataI s.rvIcI DlNd COIl: 2Q 62
C.,.WIdII Gen. & Admin.
Rate 0 10.7ft 2.22
TCUl8eMotCOlllUrlll ,? R4
Recommended Fee .,0 no
RecammMdldF.WIIIdy 2- 84
ClIf'Nfll F. AmounI 0 00
F..InInue(Dea8ll) '0 on
04';
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
De rtmentlDlYlsion
Public Services
Fund
132
Account
4820
User FH Deserl
Sewer Lateral Ca in
Date
2/25/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Currently, staff charges an applicant who is requesting sewer lateral capping services $500, the cost of the contractor who
performs the work. To recover the costs of City personnel and administrative overhead needed to inspect the sewer lateral
capping services performed by the contractor, Public Services is proposing to increase the fee by $300.
Personnel Costs
Position
Sewer Maintenance Su ervisor
IW Customer Service Re .
45.99
25.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hours by
Position per U
2
0.25
ToIllI
Cost po
91.98
6.31
98.29
..Material & Rental Costs .
{ lcrtplloh Cost Eoc:h ~ UnIt Cost
-
Total Other cools per Unit of Ser\Ilce:
Other Costa IEauilllllent facllltv rental -rt-tlme labor w/o bsnefltal
Cost Eoc:h ~ UnIt Cost
Contractor Cost 500.00 1 500
Fleet Charaes Vehicle 539 15.5 3 46.5
Total Other cosls per Unit of SONIce: . 546.50
Comparisons to ProPOSed FH
More ILess than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee ner Unit Dollars Percentsae
San Bernardino N1A N/A N/A
Riverside Insnection onlll $300 $148,50 N/A
Rialto Insoection onlll $157 $146.50 N1A
Redlands Insoection onlv $282 $146.50 N1A
Lorna Linda N/A N/A N/A
Moreno Vallev N1A N/A N/A
Ontario . N1A N/A N/A
c
045
Total ServIce IJIrKt Cost $ 644.79
City-Wide Gen.' Adrrin.
Rate 0 25.86% S 166.74
Total service CostlUnlt S 811 54
Recommended Fee S RMM
RecoI,~...nded Fee SubIldy S 11.54
CumtnI Fee Amount S 500.00
F..1ncruH (Oe<:ruse) S ~M
User Fee Determination
( -. Cost Analysis Worksheet
.)
DepartmentIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Dascrllltlon Date
Sewer Lateral Inspection Fee ( Private
Public Services 132 4820 Contractor) 2/24/2009
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and lither comments:
Currently, staff charges $50.00 for sewer lateral inspection services performed by a private contractor. Staff recommends
that the fee be increased by an additional $50.00, to recoup the $100 cost to the City for these services. Contractor
charges the City $100.00 per inspection.
Personnel Costs
llflII_
Lol>or CosI/Hr.
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
o 0.00
Total Burdened P"""",nel Cools per Unn of ServIce:
Position
Ins or Costs
C
Material & Rental Costs
100.00
Descrfption Cost Each L.n.ov Roqulrod UnIlCOll
Total Other costs per Unn of ServIce: 0
Other Costs IEaulDment, facilItY rantal, Dart-time labor w/o benefltsl
OescrtpUon Cost Each ..ntIly- unit Cost
Total Other oasis per Unit of Service:
ComDarlsons to ProDosecl Fee
Mora/Lass than S.B.
Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentage
San Bernardino NJA N/A N/A
Riverside N/A N/A N/A
Rialto N/A N/A NJA
Corona N/A NJA N/A
Loma Linda NJA N/A NJA
ueno Vallev NJA N/A N/A
tario N/A NJA N/A
04b
Total SeMce Direct Colt $ 100.00
Qty-WIde Gen. & Admin.
RMe.25.88% $ 25.86
ToWI $erotIce CoIWniI S 175 All
Recommended Fee S 100 00
R..........._llMdF..8LCleidV S 2586
Current Fee Amount S 5000
Fie Incr8aIe (0ecrNM) S MOO