Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutS02-Council Office CJrY OF SAN BERNO:IDINO - REQUEST QR COUNCIL ACTION From: Council Member Tom Minor Subject: General Plan - Clarification of Council action taken May 23, 1988, regarding improvement plan for Verdemont area. Dept: Da~: June 15, 1988 Synopsis of Previous Council action: May 23, 1988 - Council adopted a motion for an improvement plan for the Verdemont area - See Council minutes attached. Recommended motion: See next page \0 ~--~ \-~-....~~ ~ . v>. Slgnatura ,. j Contlct pinon: Tom Minor, Councilman - ~;th Ward Phonl: 5188 SupportIng dati attached: Council Minutes of 5/23/88 Ward: 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Source: (ACCT. NO..l (ACCT. DESCRIPTION) Finance: Council Note.: This is an urqency item to correct the General Plan and clarifv the guidance given but not voted on at 5/23/88 Meeting. 15.0261 Agenda Item No. ~ - j,.,. OF SAN BER...ARDINO -REQUES1 -FOR COUNCIL ACTIO Councilman Tom Minor - 2 - Verdemont Area Improvement Plan Recommended Motion: That the Director of Community Development be instructed to coordinate the development and adoption by the Mayor and Common Council of a financing and implementation plan for the following improvements in the area bounded by Little League Drive on the west, the alignment of Cable Canyon Creek on the south, Devil's Canyon Creek on the east and the National Forest boundary on the north: I. Palm Avenue Box Culvert 2. Bailey Canyon Storm Drain and Debris Basin 3. Chestnut Street Storm Drain and Debris Basin 4. Traffic Signal at Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive 5. Installation of Curbs and Gutters, along with Full Street Improvements at the Following Locations: a. Palm Avenue - from Kendall Drive to Ohio Street b. Irvington Avenue - from Chestnut Street to Pine Avenue c. Belmont Street - from Chestnut to Pine Avenue d. Pine Avenue - from Belmont Avenue to Ohio Street; That all departments be instructed to give full cooperation to the Director of Community Development in the development of said plan, as a time frame of six months has been set by motion of the Mayor and Common Council; That the Planning Department be instructed to continue the pro- cessing of applications for single family developments on 10,800 square foot or larger lots within the area described above; and that approval of any application for development in the area be conditioned upon the participation of the developer and property owner, as appropriate, in the development of the financing plan for the improvements noted above, and their agreement to pay their proportionate share of said impr~~ements;' Except for minor additions and improvements on existing residential, that the Director of Building & Safety and the City Engineer be instructed not to issue building or gr~ding permits within the aforementioned area until further notice from the Mayor and Common Council, or until the adoption of the public improvement plan, whichever is first. C;Ty'OF SAN BERaRDINO - REQUEST~OR COUNCIL ACTION Councilman Tom Minor - 2 - Verdemont Area Improvement Plan Recommended Motion: , That the Director of Community Development be instruc d coordinate the development and ad ption by the Mayor and Council of a financing and imple ntation plan for the improvements in the area bounded y Little League Driv on the west, the alignment of Cable Canyon Cre k on the south, Dev. l's Canyon Creek on the east and the Nationa Forest boundary the north: I. Palm Avenue Box Culv 2. Bailey Canyon Storm 3. Chestnut Street Storm 4. Traffic Signal at Palm venue d Kendall Drive 5. Installation of Curbs a d Gut ers, along with Full Street Improvements at he Following Locations: a. Palm Avenue - from all Drive to Ohio et ~ b. Irvington Avenue Chestnut Street ne Avenue ~ Belmont Street estnut to Pine "- c. .~ '" d. Pine Avenue Avenue \, - t to ., , ~ .' ~ ~ ti l(: ~.l ~ ~ 1S "\ ~ ~' \\ ,,,j ~ That all departments be i the Director of Community Deve as a time frame of six months and Common Council; ive full cooperation to development of said plan, motion of the Mayor tructed to opment in the as been set b That the Planning Dep tment be instruct d to continue the pro- cessing of applications f single family dev lopments on 10,800 square foot or larger lo within the area des ribed above; and that approval of any applicat on for development in the area be conditioned upon the participation f the developer and pr perty owner, as appropriate, in the de lopment of the financin plan for the improvements noted ab e, and their agreement t pay their proportionate share of said improv. en.ts ;". . J ~ard ~dd./Z.4.. "ti:. ';3- "/ /U.t That Direc or ofJSuilding & Safety be i structed not to issue buildin ermits w' hin the aforementioned area u til further notice from the Mayor an Common Council, or until th a option of the public improvement plan, whichever is first. o o #4vks ~~ Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Miller and unanimously carried, that the Cable Lakes area, bounded on the south by 1-215; north by Cable Canyon Road1 east by Little League Drive, which is now designated RS, be changed to RL with a minimum lot size of lra,8IHJ. In a memorandum dated May 18, 1988, Council Member Minor provided recommended public improvements and development standards in the Verdemont Area. Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Reilly for discussion, that in the araa bounded by Little League Drive on the west, Devil's Can- yon Creek on the east, the alignment of Cable Canyon Creek (flood control channel) on the south and the National Forest to the north: 1. That no development be approved until a financ- ing plan for all developers and property owners to share in the costs of the following improvements totalling $3.6 to $3.9 million has been approved by the Council. The improvements are as follows: a. Palm Avenue box culvert b. Bailey Canyon storm drain and debris basin c. Chestnut Street storm drain and debris basin d. Traffic signal at Palm Avenue and Kendall Drive; 2. That a finding be made that the improvements benefit the entire area, and as such, require the par- ticipation of every developer and property owner; 3. That any new development in the Verdemont Area will not be supported until an infrastructure financing plan has been approved which addresses the projects listed above as a minimum, and also includes plans for the installation of curbs and gutters, along with full street improvements, at the following locations: a. Palm Avenue, from Kendall Drive to Ohio Street b. Irvington Avenue, from Chestnut Street to Pine Avenue c. Belmont Street, from Chestnut to Pine Avenue d. Pine Avenue, from Belmont Avenue to Ohio Street; 18 5/23/88 o o 4. That development standards in this motion in- clude more stringent than current standards. These standards should, however, be supplemented and contain more specificity. The development standards set forth in the Verdemont Area Plan be adopted by the Counc i 1, and that these development standards be supplemented by the following: a. All residential structures (houses, garages, barns) shall have clay tile or concrete tile roofs b. Minimum front set-back requirements are as follows: Lot Size 7,200 sq. ft. 10,800 sq. ft. 14,400 sq. ft. 18,000 sq. ft. 20,000+ sq. ft. Minimum Setback 25 feet 35 feet 45 feet 50 feet 60 feet Allowances May vary, provided that the average setback for all buildings is equal to the required minimum setback for the lot size in question. c. Landscaping shall be provided at the inter- sections of all arterial and collector streets and a maintenance district established prior to the release of improvement bonds. d. Landscaping shall be provided for all open space fronting parkways, arterials and collector thoroughfares prior to the release of improve- ment bonds. e. Every residential zoned property shall include front yard landscaping and front yard street trees as a requirement of bond release. f. All developments opening onto an arterial or collector street shall provide an entry treatment. g. All developments having perimeter fencing shall use slump stone, split face block, river rock or concrete block with stucco color coating only. Wood and/or chain link fencing shall not be allowed on the perimeter of or corner lots within any developments. h. CC&R's: All developments shall include restrictions covering satellite dishes, equestrian/hiking trails, screening of storage, recreational vehicle storage, repair of motor vehicles and other matters approved by Council; 19 5/23/88 , . . o o 5. And, that these development standards are effective immediately and include all projects in various phases of development, including tentative tract maps and projects going through final engineering as of this date, May 23, 1988; (See following text for amendment) And, that a six-month time frame for development of the infrastructure financing and implementation plan be imposed. Discussion ensued regarding the intent of the motion being that it would pass through the City Attorney's Office for rev iew and come back in legal form. Also, before development can take place, a financing and an implementation plan for the infrastructure will be developed. Ann Siracusa answered questions regarding the Speci- fic Plan process accomplishing the need for having the developer responsible for improvement costs. The motion Council Members Ludlam, Mi ller. None. carried by the following vote: Ayes: Reilly, Flores, Maudsley, Minor, Pope- Noes: Counc i I Member Estrada. Absent: Discussion ensued regarding reconsideration of the action taken on 19,899 square foot lots. Council Member Reilly made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada and unanimously carried, that Paragraph 5 of Council Member Minor's motion be amended to read: These development standards are effective immediately. Legal lots of record as of this date, May 23, 1988, are exempt from these development standards. Ann Siracusa defined the following as needing to be accomplished before the General Plan can be sent to the State of California: finalization of the map, action on hillside management densities, action on the interim implementation policies and adoption of a resolution forwarding the packet to the state with a request for exemption from the moratorium. RECESS MEETING The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Mayor and Com- mon Council of the City of San Bernardino recessed for a short break. 29 5/23/88