HomeMy WebLinkAbout27-Police Department
~1,9 OF SAN BI!RNARDltCb - RI!QUeOr FOR cOUNcl&~N
From: Dona 1d J. Burnett, Ch i ef of Pol i ce
Subject:
Resolution to Support State ot the Art
Career Criminal Apprehension Program
Grant
Dept: Pol i ce
Date: October 23, 1986
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
The past actions of the Council have included the passage of Resolutions that
have resulted in the award of a Career Criminal Apprehension Grant and a
Community Crime Resistance Grant to the Police Department from the Office
of Criminal Justice Planning. Such acts are consistent with the directives
given to the Police Department; to reduce crime, and in particular, crime
resulting from drug abuse and trafficking.
Recommen(jed motion:
Adopt Resolution
"
./
/ / I '. , J
/~tij :7-<. ~~ rLJ-
. Signature
Contact person:
nnn.lrl ,1 Burnf'tt
Phone: 383-5034
Supporting data attached:
Yes
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: $19.548
Source:
Cash m.trh p'pprtprl to be shared with Parole and
Probation.
Council Notes:
iFinance:'Yr~t--
^n.....nrl"" 1+.......... f\1..... c:=::; 7
II!I
--
-
-
-
CITC10F SAN BERNARDIr() - REQUEC7 FOR COUNCIL AC'O)N
STAFF REPORT
The proposed Career Criminal Apprehension Program State of the Art Grant
will materially enhance the ability of the Police Department to impact crime.
The total amount of the grant is $97,941; the Police Department will receive
578,192 and will be required to provide a cash match of 519,548. This grant
will establish a network wherein parolees, probationers, and narcotics
offenders residing in the CitYl/ill be monitored 'for criminal acts.
We have an excellent opportunity to impact the crime frequency in the City
of San Bernardino by identifying and focusing on career criminals. Research
has recognized that "police organizations can focu~ their often scarce resources
on predators who, crime for crime, day in and day out, are taking the greatest
criminal toll on a community. To apprehend the offender who averages five
or more serious crimes a week is, obviously, more productive for the criminal
justice system--the more beneficial to the community-~than apprehending
the occasional thief or burg1a~" '
The computerized ability to identify the persons who are committing the
most crime in the City of San Bernardino will allow us to focus on these
persons to neutralize their activity and show the greatest reduction in
crime. By neutralizing, I mean arrest, prosecution and incarceration or
providing intense interest overtly to career criminals by the police to
make it uncomfortable enough for them to move elsewhere.
This grant compliments our Crime Analysis Program that we received with
a grant a couple of years ago. It is an innovative approach in that it
provides a communication link through the compute~ with Parole and Probation
for a quicker match of criminal to crime.
Your support in pursuit of this grant wi 11 mean a great deal to our effort
to reduce the frequency of crime in the community and to stop the prolific
activity of the career criminal. A report from the Police Foundation on
this su~ject is attached.
. If -). .
D~~(~~Ah':'(Y' L)
Ch i ef of Po lice
-
JaIt1
1
-
III
Jj
.
o
o
o
o
I" - ---=]-
~ '~'~~~~i _~_~ ~~ -: ~
COMPLIMENTS OF
POLICE MANAGtMENT ASSOCIATION
IJL 1- R ib<~_
! I'D 1 ~i 'cj'f' Jl~r] YC rr I .: r ofnl
w~~~~'...J
For Release 6:00 pm, Sunday, July 20, 1986
'Contact: Tom Brady
..'
/. J ~ -.'" ':"-
;::. :'~'-:-
CAREER CRIMINAL REPORT RELEASED
WASHINGTON--A Police Foundation study funded jointly by the National
Institute of Justice and the Foundation has found that a special police unit set
up to catch career criminals substantially increases the likelihood of the
arrest, prosecution, and conviction on felony charges of these chronic
offenders.
The study concludes that large police departments should consider setting up
units to apprehend repeat offenders, defined as persons who commit five or more
serious crimes a week. Few police departments have adopted a targeting approach
to catching repeat offenders.
The recommendation is based on the results of a two-year, $216,000
Foundation study of the work of the Washington, D.C., Metropolitan Police
Department's innovative Repeat Offender Project (ROP) and recognition of the
ma9nitude of the repeat offender problem,
The study found that:
. The work of the Repeat Offender Project substantially increased the
likelihood of arrest of the persons it targeted.
. Those arrested by ROP officers had longer and more serious arrest
histories than a comparison sample.
- -
.
o
o
o
o
-2-
COMPLIMENTS OF
POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIA TION
. Persons arrested by the ROP unit wer~ more likely to be prosecuted and
convicted on felony charges and more likely to be incarcerated than comparison
arrestees.
The study also found that officers in the ROP unit made only half as many
total arrests as a group of comparison officers, but made slightly more arrests
for serious offenses.
The results "portray the ROP approach as an important new crime control
tool," according to Hubert Williams, the Foundation's president. "Specifically,
the results strongly indicate that ROP units can increase the apprehension,
conviction, and incarceration of repeat offenders. ROP units, thus, can playa
significant role in helping to rid the nation's streets and neighborhoods of
these offenders."
James K. Stewart, director of the National Institute of Justice, commented
that the report of the study "shows that police organizations can focus their
often scarce resources on predators who, crime for crime, day in and day out,
are taking the greatest criminal toll on a community. To apprehend the offender
who averages five or more serious crimes a week is, obviously, more productive
for the criminal justice system--and more beneficial to the community--than
apprehending the occasional thief or burglar."
The Washington department's Repeat Offender Project was formed in response
to Chief Maurice Turner's request for innovative proposals to reduce crime in
the nation's capital.
deyeloped a "perpetrator-oriented
unit" designed to identify and apprehend two types of active recidivists: those
already wanted on one or more warrants who could be arrested on sight, and those
believed to be criminally active but not wanted.
, L
.
o
o
,
o
o
COMPLIMENTS OF
-3. POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
The development of a ROP unit, eventually made up of 60 officers, gave
Foundation researchers the opportunity to assess the problems and effectiveness
of a proactive police approach to carrying out a selective apprehension
strategy.
The researchers found that offenders wanted on warrants accounted for 46
percent of the ROP arrests, and others believed to be actively committing
felonies accounted for 24 percent of the ROP arrests. Offenders encountered
serendipitously while officers pursued previously selected ROP targets accounted
for the remaining 30 percent of ROP arrests.
The authors of the report, Catching Career Criminals: The Washington, D.C.,
Reoeat Offender Project, are Susan E. Martin and Lawrence W. Sherman. They note
"that two facts stand out in modern crime control policy debates. First, a
small proportion of criminals commit~ a disproportionate number of crimes.
Second, most prisons are overcrowded, Together, these facts have generated
growing int~rest in selectively focusing criminal justice system resources on
the most active and dangerous chronic offenders."
"These reI atively few offenders impose an immense burden on the criminal
justice system," Stewart said. "To prevail in its mission the systen must work
'smarter, not necessarily harder,' by removing repeat offenders from the
commun i ty."
One result of the research on ROP is "to open to question traditional police
thinking about the standard gauge of pOlice productivity," Williams noted..
"Many police administrators measure the prOductivity of their officers by the
numbers of arrests they make. The findings in this report suggest that it is
more useful to weigh the net impact of each arr~st ,rather than just the total
number of arrests,"
. ,
-~
- -
h
Jll.
a.
.
o
o
o
o
-4-
COMPLIMENTS Of
POLICE MANAGEI.1ENT ASSOCIA TION
Officers assigned to the Repeat Offender Project used a variety of
investigative undercover tactics to catch high-rate offenders. To arrest
persons not wanted on warrants, they had to develop evidence about a specific
crime in which their targets had participated. This involved several
activities, including cultivating informants~ investigating tips from citizens,
placing targets under surveillance, tracing stolen property found in a target's
possession to the original owner, and using "buy-and-bust" techniques.
Williams said that "in forming and operating ROP units, the police must be
cautious. As in many other aspects of policing, ROP units carry wi:h them the
potential for abuse of civil 1iberties....Thus, police chiefs and administrators
have a responsibility to carefully safeguard civil liberties against potential
abuses as they supervise ROP activities."
ROP officers varied in age, race, sex, appearance, and police experience.
They were organized into seven-member squads, each including a female and a
detective. _ A sergeant led each squad which became the basic work group to
which ROP targets were assigned and credits for arrest were given.
I
Copies of the report are available from the Communications Department of the
Police Foundation, 1001 22nd Street, N.W., Sbite 200, Washin9ton, D.C. 20037. A
full technical report in manuscript form is available from the Police Foundation
at the cost of reproduction.
,
The Police Foundation is an independent, non-profit organization established
by the Ford Foundation in 1970 and is dedicated to supporting innovation and
improvement in policing.
#/J/J
. 0
1
2
3
.4
5
6
7
o
o
o
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE
SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE OFFICE OF CRIMINAL
JUSTICE PLANNING FOR A CAREER CRIMINAL APPREHENSION PROGRAM
State of Art Grant.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recital.
A. The City of San Bernardino desires to undertake a
8 certain project designated Career Criminal Apprehension Program
9 State of Art. Grant to be funded in part from funds made
10 available through Chapter 477, 1985 Statutes, Career Criminal
11 Apprehension Program as amended, and administered by the Office
12 of Criminal Justice Planning (hereafter referred to as OCJPl.
13 SECTION 2. Implementation.
'14 A. The Chief of Police of the City of San Bernardino is
15 hereby authorized, on behalf of the City of San Bernardino, to
16 submit the attached application for grant funds for law
17 enforcement purposes to OCJP and is authorized to execute the
18 attached Grant Award for law enforcement purposes, including any
19 extensions or amendments thereof.
20 B. The City of San Bernardino agrees to provide all
21 matching funds required for said project (including any
~ extensions or amendments thereof), and that cash will be
23 appropriated as required thereby.
24 C. The City of San Bernardino agrees that grant funds
25 received hereunder shall not be used to supplant expenditures
26 controlled by the City.
27 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
28 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
-
.
.
o
o
o
o
1 Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held on
2 the
day of
, 1986, by the following vote,
3 to wi t:
4
AYES:
Council Members
5
6 NAYS:
7 ABSENT:
8
9
10
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day
11 of
, 1986.
12
13
Mayor of the City of San Bernardino
14 Approved as to form:
~~~/
16 City A torney
15
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
~
.
.
()
o
1'\ " Attachment 1
lFFMl' OHMIrw.. Ju:;nC~ING
GW{!" JlO.IAAO . .
The Office of Criminal Justice Plaming. hereinafter designated "OC~P", hen~oy JT\1kes a grant award of funds to
1) The City of San Bernardi no nereinafter designated "Subyrantee", in
the ilI1DUt1t and for the purpose and duration set fortn in this grartt akrd, under the provisions of:
{tlot~: ,If ~ubg~ant~ ~iI1I! ,exc~, 30 ,cha~act~ :rdi,cat~ be~~ ~~ abb~i~ted. n~ f~ w~rra~ts.,
2)D Juvenile Justice ard Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974 (~ ~-145)
3)0
ij
4. Project Title 7. ~rd No. 1
I
C-CAP State-of-the-Art .' I
!
~. Project Oi rector (Nalre, M1ress, Tel epmne) 8. Grant Period I
Chief Donald J. Burnett 9. F edera I IlmJunt 10. State ProJnt
466 W. 4th St.
San Bernardino, CA 92401 -0- $78,192.80
(714) 383-5011
6. Financial 01 ficer (Nalre, Address, Telepmne) 11: AWl icant Hard Match, $19,548.00 ,
Warren Knudson 12; Total Pi'oject Cost
400 N. D St.
San Bernardino, CA 92401 $97,941.00
(714) 383-5242
This grant award consists of this title page, the a~lication for the grant \OI1ich is attached hereto as Attach!Slt
A and JT\1de a part hereof. and the Standard Grant award Conditions which are attached hereto as Attacl1reit B and
r:ede a part of hereof.
The Subyrantee hereby si91ifies its acceptance of this grant award ard agrees to adninister the grant project in
accordance with the tel1T5 and conditions set fortn in or incorporated by reference in this grant award ard the
applicable provisions of the Crifll;! Centrol Act, or other authority, identified above.
The Subgrantee certifies that state and/or federal funds received Will not be used to replace local fun,lS :nat
woul<1, in the abS'!llce of such state and/or federal aid, be made available for the activity being suppo"~ under
thi s agreefll;!nt.
(HlCE OF CRIMI~L JUSTICE PLAN'lING
STATE a= CALIFCRNIA
13. Date
,Official Authorized to sigl for Subgr6c'.~
Narre:
Title:
Teleplone:
A<t1ress:
Executi ve Oi rector, OCJP
Date
OCJP CFFlCE USE Ot..Y
I
i
I
i
I
i
,
I
,
i
I
I
,
I
, .
,
I
I
I
I
I hereny certify upon ITY 0<IIl personal krn~ledge
that bu<1geted funds are available for the period
and purpose of thi s expenditure stilte above.
Item:
State/Loca I:
Year:
OCJP Fiscal Officer
Date
Fund:
P rcigrcrn:
OC.lP rom 502 ReviSed 10/1/84
ReQioo:
.
J
~
-.
4
.
()
o
o
o
.
Attachment 2
CERTIFICATION OF,
FORMULATION AND AVAILABILITY OF
EQUAL. EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNlry 'ROGRAM
I,
Donaid J. Burnett
(Project Director or
other authorized official) certify that the .SanBernardino Pblice Department
(name of agency) has formulated an equal employment
opportunity program in accordance with 28 CFR 42,301, et seq., subpart E, and
that it is on file in the office of:
for review or audit by officials of the California Office of Criminal Justice
Planning, as required by relevant laws and regulations.
~
-
Ji.
- -
1&
-
-
.
.
()
o
0'
o
Attachment 4
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
NEGATIVE OECLARATION
In accordance with the procedures for the preparation of environmental impact
statements, an environmental assessment has been performed on the project
I fsted below: . , .
C-CAP .State-of~the-Art .
(Title of Project)
The assessment process di~ not indicate a significant environmental impact from
the proposed action, and the project will not i~volve any of the following:
-,
. ,
a. New construction projects;
b. The renovation or modification of a faci lity which leads to an
increased occupancy of more than 25 persons;
c. The implementation of programs involvqng'the use of pesticides and
other harmful chemicals;
d. The implementation of programs involving microwaves or radiation; or
e, Research and technology, the anticipated or intended future
application of which could be expected to have a potential effect on
the environment.
Consequently, an environmental impact statement will not be prepared.
An environmental impact appraisal, which summarizes the assessment and the
reasons why a statement is not required, is on file at the above office and
will be available for public scrutiny upon request.
Si ncerely,
(Signature of project director or
other authorized official)
-
-
-
-
-
.
.
o
o
o
Attachment 0
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING
,
PROJECT BUDGET
BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE ITEM DETAIL COST
A. Personnel Services - Salaries
i -O-
j
;
,
,
. ,
.
, I
,
,
-,
TOTAL -0- I
,
.
-
-
o
o 0
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING
PROJECT BUDGET
o
Attachment 5
BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE ITEM DETAIL COST
B. Peraonnel Services - Benefits
,
-0-
.
,
,
.
,
j
TOTAL -O- j
. ,
'1 IllIl
JIll
-
~
--
.
.
e
o
o
Attachment 5
o
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING
,.
PROJECT BUDGET .
BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE ITEM DETAIL
COST
C. Travel
1. 3 C-CAP Quarterly Training Conferences to be attended by
5 persons: I
1a. Meals for 3i days @ $35 per day = $125.00
$125.00 x 15 persons
1b. Lodging for 3 nights @ $45 per Aight = $135.00
$135.00 x 15 persons
1c. Travel, 1000 miles @ .25 per mile = $250.00
$250.00 x 15 persons
1,875.00
2,025.00
3,750.00
Please note that the above rates are set by the
Travel/Training Policy of the Police Department.
2. 3 persons to attend Department of Justice Training
courses. The expense for salaries, travel, lodging
and tuition are reimbursed under POST Plan IV and
do not constitute a grant expense.
,
2a. 2 persons to attend "Basic EI~ments of
Intelligence," this course buil~s upon
the analytical skills taught in "Intro
to Crime Analysis," which all Crime
Analysis Unit personnel have attended.
2b. 1 person to attend "Instructor. Development,"
this course will be attended by the Crime
Analyst, whose duties include the training
of Police Department personnel in automation,
crime analysis techniques, an~ C-CAP
methodology. -0-
-0-
I.
TOTAL
$7,650.00
J_
- ~.
-
1
III
.
.
o
o
o
Attachment 5
o
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTI~E ~LA~NING
PROJECT BUDGET
BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE ITEM D~AIL COST
D. Consultant Services
,
-0-
.
,
,
.
TOTAL -0-
_U
-
-
,
.
o
o
o
o
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING
,
PROJECT BUDGET
Attachment 5
BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE ITEM DETAIL. COST
E. Operatfng Expenses
1. Installation of computer hardware 7,978.00
2. Maintenance contract for computer hardware
($700 per month x 12 months) 8,400.00
3. Lease of phone lines for remote site installations
($300.00 per line x 10 lines) 3,000.00
4. Audit (1% of total grant funds) 968.00
,
,
.
,
I
I
!
,
I
i
i
I
TOTAL $20,346.00 j
1-._ __
o
o
0,
o
Attachment 5
OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLAN~ING
PROJECT BUOGET
BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE , ,
ITEM DErAIL COST
F. Equipment
1. 10 VT220 Video Terminals (10 x $880.00) 6,800.00
-to be placed in State Parole (2), County Probation (2), and the Contact
Stations (6) maintained by the Pblice Department
2. 10 VT220 Keyboards (10 x $215.00) 2,150.00
3. 10 VT220 Terminal Cables (10 x $60.00) 600.00
4. 1 VAXMATE Networking Terminal (1 x $6,690.00) 6,690.00
-to be placed in Crime Analysis Unit, allows active intertace with all
users of Network
I .
5. 1 VAXMATE Keyboard (1 x $250.00) , 250.00
,
6. 10 LA50 Printers (10 x $695.00) 6,950.00
-to be used at remote sites, provides hardcopy capability
7. 10 LA50 Printer Cables (10 x $30.00) 300.00
6. 20 Modems (20 x $695.00) 17,900.00
- 2 modems per remote installation necessary
.
9. 1 Expansion Package [Computer Pbrts & Expansion Cabinet] (1 x $3,795.00) 3,795.00
- Expansion necessary to provide 11 computer ports in the Rolice Dept.'s
existing VAX 11/750
10. 1 "VANSCAN" Directional Audio/Visual Surveillance Package 12,000.00
(1 x $12,000.00)
-Directional video w/audio hook-up for installation in Vice/Narcotics'
surveillance van. This system will markedly increase surveillance
capabilities and enable Vice/Narcotics to effectively monitor the
activities of targeted Career Criminals
11. 2 Litton Modular Nightscopes w/Attachments (2 x $4,155.00) 6,310.00
-Necessary for surveillance of targeted Career Criminals in low light/
night conditions: camera adabtable
12. Computer Supplies, paper, printer ribbons 2,000.00
,
CATEGORY TOTAL $69,745.00
G. PROJECT TOTAL $97,741.00
H. FUND DISTRIBUTION FEDERAL STATE LOCAL
a. Amount of Funds (a) (b) , (c)
-0- $76,192.60 $19,546.20
b. Percentage of Funds
-0- 60S 20S
1IL
-
JL
C>
o
o
o
Attachment 6
PROBLEM STATEMENT
The City of San Bernardino is both the governmental and population center of San Bernardino County. Located
within the City are the offices of State Parole and County Probation. The County Jail is also located
within the City; a major medium security facility, Glen Helen, is located adjacent to the City. As a result
of this situation numerous parolees and probationers are drawn into the City. There are 1420 Adult
Probationers living within the City. Over 251 of these probationers were involved in narcotics offenses.
There are 1200 Adult Parolees living within, or edjacent to. the City. Within the parolee population two
significant thrends have emerged. 131 of the parolees will be rearrested within one year for the commission
of an additional felony; 44S of the parolee' population will be returned to some form of custody within two
years.
This population of known offenders plays a significant part in the overall crime rate experienced by the City.
The San Bernardino Police Department, through its involvement in C-CAP. has determined that this group of
parolees and probatiners has an elevated involvement in narcotics offenses. A corollary relationship has been
identified. wherein narcotics use can be seen to be the causal factors for the crimes of robbery and burglary.
During fiscal years 84-85 and 85-86. a total of 25.547 lodging ~rrests were made by the San Bernardino Police
Department. Of these arrests. 5454. 21S, were for natcotics offenses. 1875 arrests. 7S. were for the crimes
of robbery and burglary. In 102 arrests the crimes of rObbery and burglary were combined with narcotics
charges. This supports the inference that the crimes of rObbery and burglary are committed to support the
use of narcotics.
The Crime Analysis Unit has continually supported the departmental effort to suppress narcotics offenses.
Involvement with narcotics has been recognized as a key indicator in identifying Career Criminals. While
the San Bernardino Police Department enjoys an excellent rapport with both State Parole and County Probation.
the fact that neither of these agencies have automated files has served to restrict the flow of information
as would have lead to the timely identification and apprehension of Career Criminals.
The exchange of information between the San Bernardino Police Depar~ment. State Parole. and County Probation
would be markedly enhanced if a network were formed wherein two data entry/inquiry terminals were installed
in both the State Parole and County Probation offices. This would allow for the automation of these Known
Offender files and make them directly accessible to the Crime Analysis Unit. The placement of remote entry/
inquiry terminals in the Police Department's six Contact Stations would then allow for patrol officers in
the field to directly access this information, and to interface directly with the Crime Analysis Unit through
a VAXMATE networking terminal. An additional benefit to both State Parole and County Probat10n would be
direct access to the Police Department's records of contacts with, parolees and probationers. and the ability
to interface directly with the Crime Analysis Unit through the VAXMATE. to communicate information concerning
the suspected criminal activities of clients. revocation of release terms. and officer safety.
In addition to tracking parolees and probationers the Crime Analysis Unit will work in close coordination with
the Vice/Narcotics Unit. Based upon recomendations from the Crime Analysis Unit selectee parolees and
probationers will be placed under surveillance by the Vice/Narcotics Unit. The use of enhanced surveillance
techniques and State of the Art hardware will allow for the processing of "no dope" search warrants. in
which suspected dealers (a catagory of Career Criminal that is lar~ly immune to traditional enforcement
strategies) are targeted based upon a documented association with known narcotics users and peddlers. The
Crime Analysis Unit will further solicit and disseminate information from other area law enforcement agencies
in support of this function.
Continued on AttlllC_t 6A
.
o
o
o
PROBLEM STATMENT
ATTACHMENT 6A
The San Bernrdino Police department has already set in place 8 mechanism by which to process and
distribute information on parolees, probationers. and other known offenders. The Crime Analysis
Unit was the driving force behind the formation of the Regiona\ Analysis Task Force (RAT). RAT
meets biweekly and includes representatives from the Air Force, Reilroad Police, State Police.
State Parole, County Probation. as well as the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department and
adjacent police departments. RAT will be utilized as the means by which to disseminate the Known
Offender and Career Criminal information generated by the network, and to solicit information as
will enhance the analysis of trends. patterns, and series occurring on a regional basis.
o
'iS1 ._
.
C>
o
o
o
Attachmen: 7
PROJECT OBJECTIVES
7a. The City of San Bernardino will experience a 10% reduction in the crime of robbery,
from 1041 to 937, 12 months after the start of the program.
7b. The City of San Bernardino will experience a 10% reduction in the crime of burglary,
from 4494 to 4045, 12 months after the start of the program.
7c. Two data entry/inquiry terminals and two printers will be installed in the offices
of State Parole for the purpose of establishing a Career Criminal Identification/
TraCking Network.
7d. Two data entry/inquiry terminals and two printers will be installed. in the offices
of County Probation for the purpose of establishing a Career Criminal Identification/
Tracking Network.
7e. Six data entry/inquiry terminals will be installed, one each, in the six Contact
Stations maintained by the San Bernardino Police Department, to allow for the
direct access of patrol officers in the field to Career Criminal/Known Offender
files, and to provide direct access to the Crime Analysis Unit through a computer
interface.
7f. A VAXMATE networking terminal will be installed in the Crime Analysis Unit to allow
for direct access between the Crime Analysis Unit and the offices of State Parole
and County Probation, Vice/Narcotics Unit, and the six Contact Station maintained
by the Police Department.
7h. Through the Parole/Probation/Police Department Network the Crime Analysis Unit
will monitor 2000 parolees and probationers to ensure the early identification
of these Known Offenders as Career Criminals.
7i. The Crime Analysis Unit will identify 200 Career Criminals whose narcotics
involvement makes them suitable for targeting and apprehension by the Vice/
Narcot i cs Unit.
7j. Through information obtained through the Parole/Probation/Police Department
Network, the Crime Analysis Unit will prepare and distribute twentysix
Known Offender Bulletins, to disseminate information on paroless and
probationer either suspected of, at at risk of, becoming involved in criminal
offenses.
L
4.
~
()
o
o
o
Attachment 8
METHODOLOGY/ACTIVIT1ES.
~he formation of 8 Parole/Probation/Police Network will provi~e the Crime Analysis Unit of the San Bernardino
Police Department with direct access to the files of all parolees 'and probatiners residing within, or adjacent
to, the City of San Bernardino. These Known Offenders will be monitpred by the Crime Analysis Unit, using
techniques developed under the C-CAP program, so that recidivists are identified as Career Criminals on a
timely basis. Once a parolee. or prObationer, has been identifi~ as a Career Criminal they will be closely
tracked by the Crime Analysis Unit. The Crime Analysis Unit will then disseminate its findings to the Vice/
Narcotics Unit, and Patrol Officers. Vice/Narcotics will then coordinate with the Crime Analysis Unit for
the purpose of developing an apprehension stragegy. Emphasis will be ~iven to Career Criminals involved in
narcotics offenses in that involvement innatcotics has been identified as the cause 1 factor in the crimes of
rObbery and burglary occurring within the City. The Vice/Narcotics Unit will then place s~lected Career
Criminals under surveillance for the purpose of identifying large scale narcotics distributors. The large
scale narcotics distributor represents a catagory of Career Criminal that has remained largely immune to .
traditional policing stategies. The large scale narcotics distributpr will be apprehended through the use
of "no dope" search warrants. This type of warrant is issued when a suspected narcotics distributor can ..
be documented as having a high level of contact with identified narcotics users and peddlers.
Through the use of a VAXMATE networking terminal the Crime Analysis Unit will have a direct access to all
other members of the Network. The Crime Analysis Unit will use the capability to coordinate the monitoring
of Known Offenders, the identification of Career Criminals. and to provide analysis support to Patrol
Officers in the field through a direct interface with the terminals 'placed in the six Contact Stations
maintained by the Police Department. The Crime Analysis Unit will in~erfece directly with State Parole
and County Probation. and so be able to offer the same support.
State Parole and County Probation will utilize the terminals installed in their offices to enter files on.
and track. parolees and probationers. Inquiries against the automated records management system of the
Police Department will enable State Parole and County Probation to verify contacts between clients and the
Aolice Department. When release status is revoked or modified. immediate notification will be made to the
Police Department so that parolees and probationers who are at increased risk of committing an offense can
be returned to custody in a timely fashion.
The Crime Analysis Unit will exchange Known Offender and Career Criminal information with other area law
enforcement agencies at the biweekly (every 2 weeks) meeting of the Regional Analysis Task Force (RAT).
The purpose of RAT is to identify Career Criminals who are operating regionally and to formulate appre-
hension strategies. This liaison will serve to include in the Network law enforcement agencies that are
not currently automated. A further enhancement is the ability of the Crime Analysis Unit to coordinate
the exchange of information on a mUltijurisdictional basis. thus ensuring the timeliness and efficiency
of the information exchange.
The Network will in all cases build upon the pre-existent analysis program as was established in the
San 8eranrdino Police Department through its participation in the C-CAP program. The personnel. hardware,
and software required to setup the Network have been operational for over two years. With the exception
of training for State Parole and County PrObation, the San Bernardino Pblice Department will be able to
implement the Network with a minimal start-up time.
.
C>
o
o
o
Attachment 9
ORGANIZATION CHART
Project Director
Donald J. Burnett, a.isf of Police
Will set policy and provide
direction as necessary for the
success of the Network.
Project Manager
Lt. Brad Hilder
Will supervise the operation
of the Crime Analysis Unit and
provide administrative support.
Project Coordinator
Joseph Kranyoc III. Crile Analyst
Supervisor of Crime Analysis Unit, will oversee the monitoring
of Known Offenders and identification of Career Criminals.
/ maintain necessary records and prepare reports, coordinate
apprehension ifforts against Career Criminals, provide analytic
and technical support.
/
State Parole
County Probation
Vice/Narcotics
Monitor Parolees,
Maintain Automated
Reocrds.
Monitor probationers.
Maintain Automated
Records.
Perform su~veillance of
targeted Career' Criminals
write and se~ve "no dope"
warrants.
Patrol Division
Police Contact Stations(6)
Perform enhanced initial
investigations, coordinate
apprehension efforts with
Crime Analysis Unit.
1 _
.
()
o
0.'
o
Attachment lU
WJ~KING RELATIUNSH~PS
Refer to Attached Letters of Support and Memorandum of Understanding in
Append i x I I.
'.
, ",
L _
.
()
o
o
o
Attdcnllcnt 11
Wi)/{K SCHEUULE
Month
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Activity
1. Install Remote Terminals x
2. Train Parole/Probation Personnel
in Program Methodology and Hardware
O~r"iM X
3. Develop Manual of Policy & Procedures XXXXXXX
4. Data Entry of Known Offenders,
Parolees and Probationers XXXXXXKXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
5. Identification of Career Criminals
for Targeting by Vice/Narcotics XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
6. Surveillance and Apprehension of
Identified Career Criminals by
Vice/Narcotics XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
7. Monthly Meetings between Parole,
Probation and. Police Department XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
8. Biweekly Dissemination of Known
Offender/Career Criminal Information
at Regional Analysis Task Force
Meetings XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
9. Audit of Program X
~ -
~
~
.
()
o
o
o
.
.
Attachment 12
EVALUATION CUMPLIANCE'ASSU~ANCE
Hdve the proJect director sign below indicating that the project will
participate in the u~JP/C-CAP proyram evaluation by camplying with the
reportiny requirem!nt of the evaluation. Minimally, this includes submitting
pro~ress reports and other data which may be designated as necessary by uCJP.
Indicate the name, title and phone number of the person who will be responsiole
for maintaining the records. .
DONALD J. BURNETT
Name
r.hipf of PnJirp
TItle
(714) 383-5011
(Area COde) Phone NU~ber
Comment if you are conducting an independent evaluation.
.
.
o
o
o
o
H. Assumption of Costs and Grant Fund Use
As a prerequisite to the formation of the Network the participating
entities have agreed to the following:
1. All computer hardware will become the property of the City of
San Bernardino, and will revert back to the Police Department
should any agency withdraw.
2. The cost of computer maintenance and related supplies, to
include a maintenance contract and lease of phone lines for
remote site installations, will become a regular budget item
for the agency in possession of the equipment.
3. Conditional to their continued participation in the Network,
the Police Department agrees to leave in place two data entry/
inquiry terminals and two printers, at the offices of State
Parole and County Probation. The Police Department further
agrees to allow an interface with .their. automated records
management system for the purpose of maintaing parolee and
probationer records.
4. The Police Department agrees to provid~ to State Parole and
County Probation hardcopies of files, and administrative
reports, as are reasonable and necessary.
These arrangements will ensure the continuation of the Network after grant
funding has expired. It is further noted that the hardware selected lS
compatable with the Police Department's existing records management system.
This factor is expected to mimimize complications arising from maintenance
and routine operation.
()
-
.
o
ATTACHMENT I
Iii
lli
4
o
The proposal includes no positions which are not standard in the general
personnel classification.
o
-
.
o
o
-
ATTACHMENT II
-
-
o
o
,
o
-L
1
""
o
o
o
ATTACHMENT III