Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout49-City Administrator JL o o o L/SE:rvg Deci s ion 86 09 042 o r1rr " ", BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Application of General Telephone ) Company of California, a corporation, ) for authority to increase certain ) intrastate rates and charges for ) telephone service. ) ) ) Investigation on the Commission's ) own motion into the rates, tolls, ) rules, charges, operations, costs, ) separations, practices, contracts, ) service, and facilities of GENERAL ) TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, ) a California corporation; and of all ) the telephone corporations listed in ) Appendix A, attached hereto. ) ) Application 83-07-02 (Filed July 1, 1983) on 83-08-02 (Filed August 3, 1983) ORDER MODIFYING DECISION (D.) 86-04-020 AND DENYING REHEARING A petition for rehearing of D.86-04-020 has been filed by Toward Utility Rate Normalization (TURN). we.have carefully considered all the allegations raised in the petition and are of the opinion that rehearing should be denied but that the decision should be modified in several respects. We have further reviewed our policy regarding compensation for travel time and are of the opinion that TURN should be granted ~ compensation for travel time, which was reasonable and necessary to its participation. We have determined that a reasonable accounting for travel hours in this case is to include reasonable and necessary travel time at one-half the regular hourly rate approved. (See Ryan v. Raytheon Data -1fb o o o o A.83-07-02 L:SE:rvg ~ Systems Co., 601 F.Supp. 243, 256 (D.Mass. 1985); Maceira v. Pagan, 698 F.2d 38, 40-41 (1st Cir. 1983); Miles v. Sampson, 675 F.2d 5, 9 (lst Cir. 1981); Furtado v. Bishop, 635 F.2d 915, 918 (1st Cir. 1980). In addition, as provided below, the Commission will consider a request by TURN for compensation at the full hourly rate for travel time that was spent working on issues for which compensation has been granted. We also wish to articulate our general policy with respect to travel time, to be applied in the future. In formulating this policy, we consider the fact that travel time can be divided into two distinct categories, distinguished by whether the potential exists for the time spent traveling to be used simultaneously as productive working time. We recognize that, due to the realities of travel, some of the time spent traveling lacks the potential to be used as productive working time. We have determined that this time, which cannot be used as productive working time, is compensable at a maximum of one-half the normal hourly rate approved, upon a showing that the time claimed was reasonable and that this time could not have been used to work on any issues in the case. The efficiency of the mode of transportation used will be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the time claimed. We stress that compensation for this "purely" travel time is to be narrowly limited to time in which applicant is unable to work due to considerations related to the practicalities of traveling. We also emphasize that the burden is on applicants to provide the required showing. A second category of travel time is time which is potentially productive. We have determined that this time is compensable only if a detailed showing is provided by applicant to demonstrate that the time was reasonable and that it was used to work on issues for which compensation is ultimately granted by the Commission. Compensation may be granted for these hours, upon a 2 o o o o A.83-07-02 L:SE:rvg proper showing, at a rate up to 100% of the claimed hours, in a manner consistent with our general rules for intervenor fee awards. In presenting a Claim for such hours, applicants should include the requisite showing within the category of hours spent working on the specific issue for which a claim is made, rather than within the category of travel time. Applicants seeking compensation for time spent traveling must file their requests for compensation in accord with these guidelines or face a substantial risk that their claims will be disallowed. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Finding of Fact No.6 is modified by deleting the second sentence. 2. Finding of Fact No. 7 is added to state: "The following is adopted for the instant case: compensation shall be allowed for necessary and reasonable travel time at one-half the regular hourly rate approved, in addition to reimbursement for the actual costs of travel. The Commission shall consider any request by TURN for compensation at the full hourly rate for travel time that was spent working on the issues for which compensation is granted." 3. Conclusion of Law No.3 is modified to state: "TURN has made a substantial contribution under Article 18.6, Rule 76.26, on the issues listed in the above findings of fact and, absent a showing as to what proportion of the travel time was spent in working on issues for which compensation is granted, is entitled to compensation of $5,570.22 from General less compensation at one-half the attorney's regular hourly rate for reasonable travel time." ~ - o o o o A.83-07-02 L:SE:rvg 4. Conclusion of Law No.4 is added to state: "A reasonable accounting for travel hours for TURN in this case is to include necessary and reasonable travel time at one-half the regular hourly rate approved." 5. Ordering Paragraph No.1 is modified by revising the first and second sentences to state as follows: "I. Toward Utility Rate Normalization (TUR~) shall file a verification of the time spent traveling that was previously included within the 26.5 hours of "GENERAL HOURS" and a verification of the travel time that was spent working on the issues for which compensation is granted. The compensation award shall be reduced by the product of the reported travel time (not spent working on the issues for which compensation is granted) and one-half the hourly attorney's fee. The Commission shall consider any request by TURN for compensation at the full hourly rate for travel time that was spent working on the issues for which compensation is granted." 6. Ordering Paragraph No.2 is modified to state: "2. Within 30 days of the fina~ determination in this matter, General Telephone Company of California shall pay TURN $5,570.22 less the appropriate reduction for travel time, as provided herein, for TURN's participation in the 1986 attrition phase of these proceedings." 4 " o A.83-07-02 denied. ~ o o ALT:L:SE:rg IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: Rehearing of 0.86-04-020, as modified herein, is This order is effective today. Dated SEP 171986 , at San Francisco, California. ['ON';LD VIAL Preaident \~:ToR CAL.VO f'11I5C1lLA C. GREW FI~EDr:RICK R. OUDA ;;;'1 AI.:..EY W, HULEiT Commislloner. 5 o c o o o -, c-- c_ BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~--- L' L.. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY NOTICE TO CUSTOMERS OF FILING OF APPLICATION AND PUBLIC HEARING IN APPLICATION NO. 86-09-030 and APPLICATION NO. 86-09-029 The California Public Utilities commission (Commission) will hold public hearings on the request of Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas) to increase its rates effective January 1, 1987. The requested rate increase is made up of several elements. First, Application No. 86-09-030, filed September 19,' 1986, requests Commission approval to increase rates by $304.3 million in the November 1986 Consolidated Adjustment Mechanism (CAM). In addition, SoCalGas seeks recovery of $9.7 million it expects to be billed during the forecast period by El Paso Natural Gas Company. Application No. 86-09-030 reflects changes in the cost of gas to be purchased by SoCalGas and gas costs already incurred by SoCalGas, but not yet recovered in rates. Second, SoCalGas filed on September 19, 1986, Application,No. 86-09-029 requesting a reduction in rates of $53.4 million to be effective January 1, 1987. This is pursuant to the Commission authorized Conservation Cost Adjustment Mechanism and reflects lower costs associated with previously-authorized conservation programs. Third, SoCalGas filed Advice Letter No. 1653 on September 19, 1986, requesting an increase in rates of $27.9 million as an attrition allowance effective January 1, 1987. In turn, SoCalGas will reduce the balancing account in 1986 by $15.3 million to reflect reduction in return on equity for .1986. An attrition allowance adjustment is authorized by Commission Decision No. 85-12-076 to offset the effect of inflation and other economic factors on the utility's cost of doing business between general rate cases. SoCalGas is requesting that the CAM increase be made effective on January 1, 1987, rather than its normal revision date of November 1, 1986 in order to make all of these rate changes simultaneously to avoid multiple rate changes within a short time period. The combined effect of these rate changes would be a net increase in rates of $277.9 million. SoCalGas has under recovered revenues because some large customers capable of burning oil have switched from gas to oil due to low oil prices. In addition, dramatically lower oil prices have meant SoCalGas had to drastically lower gas prices to retain these customers. When oil prices (and corresponding gas rates) were higher, the revenue from these large customers could subsidize a larger portion of the costs of providing service to residential customers. Although gas prices are lower than they used to be, they are not low enough to allow us to sell gas at a price competitive with oil and still recover adequate revenue from large customers to subsidize residential customers to the same extent as before. c o o 2 o o SoCalGas is requesting the net rate increase be recovered by increasing the monthly residential customer charge to $6.30 from the current $3.10, to more nearly cover the cost of providing service to residential customers. SoCalGas has also requested a reduction in the residential baseline allowances in accordance with the baseline statute. The revised monthly baseline allowances would be: Summer-19 therms for all climate zones; Winter-Climate Zone 1: 55 therms; Climate Zone 2: 72 therms; Climate Zone 3: 95 therms. No change in residential commodity rates is proposed. The effect of the proposed rate adjustment would increase the annual monthly average single family residential customer's bill from $27.84 to $36.46. Pursuant to Commission-set rate design formula, SoCalGas has also proposed to reduce rates to wholesale customers by $4.1 million. This reduction of wholesale revenues means a corresponding increase in retail revenue requirements. If SoCalGas' request is approved by the Commission as proposed, the impact on various customer classes will be as follows: Class of Service M$ Increase (Decrease) % Increase (Decrease) Residential Commercial/Industrial Wholesale 282,688 (716) (4,058) 19.308 (0.062) (1. 308) Tota 1 277 ,914 7.868 The actual rates adopted by the Commission could differ significantly from those requested by SoCalGas and may result in an increase or decrease in your individual rates. The public hearing date listed below gives customers an opportunity to express their views to the commission. You may submit written comments or make a brief oral statement at these hearings. DATE AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING IN CAM APPLICATION NUMBER 86-09-030 AND CCA APPLICATION NUMBER 86-09-029 BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION Wednesday, October 22, 1986 at 10:30 a.m. State Office Building 107 South Broadway Los Angeles, California 90012 o o o o 3 The Commission welcomes your comments. If you cannot attend these hearings, you may submit written comments to the commission at one of the addresses listed below. Simply state that you are writing about Application Nos. 86-09-030 and 86-09-029 of Southern California Gas Company. Places of hearing are accessible to the handicapped. A copy of SoCalGas' application may be inspected in its local business offices or at its headquarters or at the Commission offices located at the addresses listed below. Additional hearings days will be devoted to analyzing the need for the required rate increase and ways of allocating any approved increases among residential, commercial/industrial, wholesale and utility electric generation customers. At these hearings the Commission will receive testimony of SoCalGas, and the testimony of other interested parties, and the Commission Staff. The Commission staff consists of engineers, accountants, economists and attorneys who independently evaluate the proposals of utilities and present their analyses and recommendations to the Commission at public hearings. If you would like to participate in these proceedings and need advice on how to do so write to the Public Advisor, California Public Utilities Commission, 505 Van Ness Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94102. Further information may be obtained from SoCalGas at its headquarters at 810 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90017, its local business offices, or from the Commission offices at: 505 Van Ness Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 or 107 South Broadway, Room 5109 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Any interested party in the above application and related exhibits will be furnished a copy upon written request to: Frederick E. John, Vice President Regulatory Affairs Southern California Gas Company P. O. Box 3249, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, CA 90051