HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-Council Office
-
'~.
;""
~
.(~. ;~. f\f."'-"~'M,gt...-. ,','.~ I -~~~ ',,"~~'~'.;"'>.'.''''.'::;''''''',
,,\',..,.. "..,.~ ....""..<I'i-"'.O"'."
. " . . "'?;)~, :~-~:;-,~~~t:. ,-:.,:'t,.l1'E;;~~) J: ,. " .. '-.
, -",iJ.t~, : '
.,-~~:.
.~ttJ,~'! ..
o
0:
RECE~VD-.\\i \' CLER!\
;:j
............
. 1986 SEP 25 AI! IQ: 46
ARRot-lHEAD-HUFF COMPANY
803 EAST BROADWAY SUITE D
GLENDALE CA 91205
, (ilF) 0l~'l~/3'y'b
EttIJ.f1'1 brYIN~/OtO I lAIC..
'86 SEP 24 P 2 :33
:i:.'~;ji/~
, ~', ,,"'..;
Kayor and City Council.
City Hall
'San Bernardino CA
Sept., 23rd, 1986
RE: Parcel Mapp 9939
(.:,.,:. .
',........
,.>....
Honorable Mayor and Coucil Memberst this letter isa request for
consideration of a waiverofcertain-conditions~' attached.to the
approval of the subject Parcel Map #9939, which have been imposed
by the City Engineer.
The specific requirements include'aseciion of sidewalk' paving' ,
on Huff Street, a handicapped curb ramp at the corner of Huff Street,
street lighting and the undergrounding of existing Edison Company
power service along the property street frontages. '
No development of the property is presently contemplated. The
purpose of the Parcel Map, is' to enable the tenants now' leasing the
existing plant on Parcel" ~,1 to purchas'e::"the property and the owner
of the adjacent property at Esperanza and Arrowhead to purchase :~:.
Parcel 2. .
In 1982 we consolidated the same parcels by Parcel Map {.7452 and
off-site improvemen~swere waived at that time pending development of
the property. ' .' , , .
Although the percise improvements have not yet been'!iefined, .~_
the City, Engineer has' estimated the cost of.:the required off-site
improvements to be in excess' of $170,000 for Parcell. This is more
than the appraised value of ,th~ eIltire p~rcel .of landl ' .
The waiver ~'f the abo';"e'mentioned conditions is' requested be~ause
we. cannot otherwise record the Parcel Map on account of t:he prohibitive
costs. Also we feel that any further development of th~ .property '.. ,:,':'
should properly bear the cost. The cost of the undergrounding
electrical service should also be ,borne by all surrounding properties,
not by just one owner~' imdshould be done by means of an assessment
district. .'
We would further appreciate you hearing our request at your
regularly scheduled meeting.on October 6th, 1986. .
Sincerely yours,
J:f;J!!
~