HomeMy WebLinkAbout51-City Administrator
.
.
CITlIOF SAN BERNARDI..g - REQUEe;> FOR COUNCIL ACTart
From:
Raymond D. Schweitzer
Subject:
Amendment to OMNITRANS JPA
Dept: Administrative
Da~: June 4, 1985
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Resolution No. 84~436 authorizing execution of an amendment
to JPA providing that the General Manager of OMNITRANS shall
be the Treasurer and that the Director of Accounting of
OMNITRANS shal be the Controller in lieu of the City's Treasurer
and Director of Finance, respectively was adopted at the
regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council held October
15, 1984.
Recommended motion:
Adopt resolution.
Contact person:
R~ymnnn n. ~~hW~;~7.~r
Phone:
<;1"
Supporting data attached:
Yp.s
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Sou rce:
Finance:
Council Notes:
I
Agenda Item No~7.
.
.
CIT~ OF SAN BERNARDI a - REQU.9 FOR COUNCIL ACT~N
STAFF REPORT
When OMNITRANS was initially formed, each jurisdiction was given a
vote .weighted. by the amount of capital assets committed (1 vote for
each $5,888) to the regional transportation system (and in no case
less than one (1\) vote). Normally, each Board member had one vote
unless a call was made on any issue for a .weighted vote..
In FY 1984, the SB 325 funds were split among the joint powers
agreement participants, (prior to funding transit needs). Then each
entity was .charged. back the amount of funds needed to keep the
transportation routes in its boundaries functioning. The City of San
Bernardino was required to put more funds than it received under SB
325 into the routes inside its boundaries because: (1) it, naturallY
has more routes, (2) more routes did not meet the twenty (28~)
percent .fare box. ratio required for receiving State
funds, and (3) State funds allocated to San Bernardino were
inadequate to fund all the services requested by the Council.
Because of this deficit, the Mayor and Council (San Bernardino)
agreed that if SB 325 funds were taken first .off the top. to fund
All transportation needs in the region before the split, that they
were willing to relinquish the old .weighted vote. in favor of a new
system. The new system would be based upon population. (Please see
news article dated June 7,1983, attached).
Assets \ City Population \
26 3.8 (3) Chino 5.9 (6)
33 3.8 (4) Montclair 3.2 (3)
57 6.6 (6) Ontario 3.4 (13)
34 3.9 (4) Upland 6.7 (7)
15 1.7 (2) Rancho Cucamonga 7.9 (8)
356 41.8 (41) County 22.3 (22)
28 3.2 (3) Colton 3.f/J (3)
16 1.8 (2) Fontana 5.9 (6)
8 .9 (1) Loma Linda 1.4 (1)
48 4.6 (4) Redlands 6.3 (6)
25 2.9 (3) Rialto 5.7 (6)
6 .7 (1) Grand Terrace 1.2 (1)
225 25.9 (26) SAN BERNARDINO 16.9 (17)
869 188 l8f/J
Finally, it should be noted that Lf the funding of OMNITRANS ceases
from .off the top. funding, the old assets weighted vote is
reinstated.
Only the City and County of San Bernardino are left to agree to sign
in order to place the JPA into operation.
. .
bD U11!ll ~ltl'
a J!~I I hi
e ill It l\nl
~ lltil!h unl,
~ 1 hlhl U!'\J.I
~ ~JtI. ...11Ii rlilj~
.,.J 4I1::.'1J . I 11
~\ :>IIIII~ IJJ sil..U
d. ,. ltlll;UU
O..I~i~l 11 Ur,i
- ~ Itj!,i!\id1Iitl
cu al.t J.u .Ilfll
.~ :U(II !~rUU
8 }illl...'~lit ~1!~~1
a I -..IU--,- AI""
o illl1l~llilliU
. 1-11 ~I-i~ I-~I
.J:: I~dllltl ;Ilii~l
.+J UUI ~I~b id1
~ !J \Hiirir --
{1! It il
;_~Ii_ J!iMJ-'~!P
..;~o ::.1 Ilj-1l!lhn11
L e.> 11 '1 b~!li -II
: :~ : t l-j1td1aU 1
I .~ ...1' t lill.5-11.i
I .'00.' .i~1 !S li-r! 111'_
! .::Q)':~.~ h~~i~U ~
1 ~~: 1!~ln leu.)1
I ~:cu' fllhl idiui
Q) Itlilsl ll1-hl
~ ~ !11!l~iii tl;ij1i
. I . pq : . 11" till i ih
~ {f)... ~hlhl~lll.ll-1
o
o
o
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITIES OF CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA,
GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO AND UPLAND CREATING A COUNTYWIDE
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO BE KNOWN AS "OMNITRANS" WHICH
CHANGES THE CALCULATION OF WEIGHTED VOTE ENTITLEMENTS OF MEMBER
AGENCIES.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Mayor of the City of San Bernardino is hereby
authorized and directed to execute on behalf of said City an
Amendment to Joint Powers Agreement between the County of San
Bernardino and the Cities of Chino, Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace
Loma Linda, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands, Rialto
San Bernardino and Upland creating a countywide transportation
authority to be known as "Omnitrans" which changes the
calculation of weighted vote entitlements of member agencies, a
copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by reference as fully as though set forth at
length.
I I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
I
adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held on
day of
, 1985, by the following vote,
the
I
'to
II
wit:
AYES:
Council Members
26
NAYS:
27 II
28 II
ABSENT:
City Clerk
..
.
o
o
o
o
day
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
1
, 1985.
2 of
3
Mayor of the City of San Bernardino
4
Approved as to form:
5
6
~~#~
City A torney
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
~
.
,:0
o
o
o
..
AMENDMENT TO JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITIES OF
CHINO, COLTON, FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA
LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO CUCAMONGA,
REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO AND UPLAND
CREATING A COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
TO BE KNOWN AS .OMNITRANS.
THIS AGREEMENT AMENDMENT, dated for convenience on the
1st day of october, 1984, is entered into by and between the
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO and the CITIES of CHINO, COLTON,
FONTANA, GRAND TERRACE, LOMA LINDA, MONTCLAIR, ONTARIO, RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, REDLANDS, RIALTO, SAN BERNARDINO and UPLAND, all of
which are bodies politic in the State of California.
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, the parties forming OMNITRANS, a joint powers
authority, desire to amend the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement
to provide for changes to the calculation of weighted vote
entitlements of member agencies of OMNITRANS1
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the OMNITRANS Joint
Powers Agreement agree as follows:
1. Section 3.B. of the OMNITRANS Joint Powers Agreement
dated March 8, 1976 is hereby amended, effective upon approval of
this Amendment by all member agencies of OMNITRANS, to read as
follows:
.Section 3.B.
Voting.
Each member of the Board of Directors shall
have one vote, provided, however, that upon the
call of any Board member, a weighted voting shall
be used with weighted votes calculated as follows:
Weighted vote entitlements shall be calculated
based upon population. Each member agency shall
receive one vote for each one percent (1') of the
total population of the OMNITRANS service area that
resides within the member agency's jurisdictional
EXlliull
A
Page 1 of 5
-
'C
o
o
o
area. If the population percentage computation of
a member agency results in a partial vote, the
weighted vote calculation shall be made by rounding
upward for population calculations of one-half
percent (1/2%> or more, and rounding downward for
population calculations of less than one-half
percent (1/2%> except that no member agency shall
have less than one vote when weighted voting
occurs. The controller shall compute the weighted
vote entitlement for each member agency as of the
preceding July 1st based on the most recent
Department of Finance population Statements. The
entitlement for the County of San Bernardino shall
be determined by utilizing the most recent County
Planning Department information indicating the
percentage of unincorporated population of the
County residing within the service area of
Omnitrans. In the event that the .off the top.
funding method first approved by the Omnitrans
Board of Directors for the 1983-84 fiscal year is
no longer used by Omnitrans, then weighted voting
entitlements shall thereafter be calculated in the
manner that existed prior to this Amendment to the
Omnitrans Joint Powers Agreement.
Weighted vote entitlements of each member
agency shall be computed by the Controller
designated in Section 3.D. of this agreement and
such computations will control in determining
weighted votes. The weighted votes to which the
County is entitled shall be divided equally among
those Supervisors present. The weighted votes of
any single representative shall not be split. The
weighted voting of any single member agency shall
not, of itself, constitute a majority vote. A
quorum shall consist of a majority of the
Page 2 of 5
. ,
o
o
o
o
membership of the Board of Directors, except that
all County representatives on the Board of
Directors shall be counted as one for the purpose
of establishing a quorum. Less than a quorum may
adjourn from time to time. All actions taken by
the Board shall require a majority vote of the
members present, with a quorum in attendance,
provided, however, that adoption of By-laws,
Amendment of By-laws, adoption of an annual budget
and such other matters as the Board may designate
shall require a majority vote of the entire
membership of the Board (majority of total weighted
votes of all parties if weighted voting is called
for). An abstention shall be considered neither an
affirmative nor a negative vote, but the presence
of the member abstaining shall be counted in
determining whether or not there is a quorum in
attendance.-
2. All other provisions of the omnitrans Joint Powers
Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement Amendment to be executed and attested by their proper
officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date and year first
above written.
Dated:
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ATTEST:
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Clerk of the Board
Dated:
CITY OF CHINO
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Page 3 of 5
-
'C
o
o
o
Dated: 1:1.-.5-11,,/
ATTJ;:ST: // .
Yti!:.-Jt:l. ~
City Clerk
CITY OF COLTON
a;-'~r
Dated:
Dated:
nrtnhpr ?Q, lQR4
~\~D~
M~r
"'
ATTEST: m ~
~'~. Vud{f
City Clerk
Dated: February 12, 1985
CITY OF LOMA LINDA
~L JJ/!~
Mayor
CITY OF MONTCLAIR
~./ ht .91'Y.'-
Mayor
A
Dated:
CITY OF ONTARIO
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Dated:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
Page 4 of 5
_.
1...0
o
o
o
Dated:
I... ~ -05'-1!'~
CITY OFREDLANDS
~& &~W
Mayor
CITY OF RIALTO
4..d~~- ~
Mayor
Dated:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Dated: Q,...:o \. \~
-
Page 5 of 5