HomeMy WebLinkAboutR01-Redevelopment Agency
AOENCY.QQUEST FOR ~/COUNCIL A&ION
.
jilfm:
~t:
Glenda Saul, Executive Director
Subject: COURT OF APPEAL RELOCATION
Redevelopment Agency
D8bt: September 25, 1986
Synopsis of Previous (:ommilSion/CouncillCtion:
.
9/22/86 Council directed Btaff to prepare a reBolution of Bupport for the
retention of DiviBion Two of the Fourth DiBtrict Court of Appeal in the
City of San Bernardino.
Recommended motion: (MAyea & COMllON COOlfCIL)
o
MOVE TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPPORTING RETENTION OF
COURT OF APPEAL IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
~I->~~ .
Signature
Contact penon:
Glenda Saul/Sandy Lowder
Supporting data attlched:
YES
Phone: 383-5081
1
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: S
N/A
Ward:
N/A
Project:
D8bt: September 29,
No lIdvene Impact on City:
Ceil Notlls:
1986
1582G/JH
09/29/86
Agenda Item No. .::/I /
'CI'. OF SAN BERNARDII.> - REQUE. FOR COUNCIL AC,.,N
.
C>
c
75-0264
STAFF REPORT
Insufficient Bpace at 303 EaBt Third Street is causing the relocatiOn of the
Fourth DiBtrict Court of Appeal. Several months ago, RiverBide officia1B hOBted a
luncheon for the jUBtices and pitched various faci1itieB. The IBM building there
seemed particularly attractive and there haB been an indication space waB being
held for them. .
Meanwhile, efforts have been underway to retain the court in San Bernardino and
several building owners and developers are making proposa1B. A tour by tbe
jUBticeB and luncheon with the Mayor is planned for mid to late October. Senator
PreB1ey'B Bill, SB 440, waB amended through the effortB of ABsemb1yman Bill
Leonard to allow for the Court'B relocation in the .San Bernardino/RiverBide area.
(it was originally provided for relocation to Riverside). We understand the
Governor has or will soon sign the bill.
Our information is:
1. The Court is quite eager to relocate in more suitable quarters to
overcome numerouB deficiencieB in their existing Bpace.
2. The justices appear to be much more intereBted in the quality and
Buitability of the quarters than the question of location between here
and Riverside.
3. We believe that, with some 1imitationB impoBed by State procurement
practiceB, the jUBticeB' deBireB will be a key point in ultimately
determining the location.
The justices' requirementB are 'approximately 20,000 Bquare feet with a minimum of
15,000 on a single floor. We have heard that the IBM building no longer haB two
contiguous f100rB which would make it Bignificant1y lesB attractive for Becurity
and administrative reasonB. The State is looking for a lo-year lease. Although
the State I18Y be willing to pay aB IIUch aB *500,000 per year for rental and
amortization of tenant improvementB, there will be a competition in which price
will be a definite factor. Still, the jUBticeB are interested in a firBt-rate
facility. Any construction of new facilities would need to be imminent aB the
justiceB do not prefer to wait for an extended time. The Court has hopes of a new
State building at the end of the lo-year 1eaBe but, apparently, nothing iB on the
drawing board.
1582G/ JH ,
09/29/86
c
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
this vital service within the City limits of the City of San
Bernardino.
SECTION 2. Imolementation.
The City of San Bernardino urges the California Court of
.
Appeal, the Government of the State of California, and all state
officials interested in the welfare of the citizens of San
Bernardino County to support the relocation of the Fourth
District Court of Appeal to other facilities within the downtown
area of the City of San Bernardino. The City also urges State
Assemblymen Gerald Eaves and William Leonard and State Senator
Ruben Ayala to lend their support and encouragement to the
retention of this service in the downtown area of San Bernardino.
The City further commits its staff to providing all reasonable
assistance to court officials and staff and to other state
personnel in locating and arranging transfer of operations into
other suitable court facilities in the downtown San Bernardino
area.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the
day of , 1986, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES:
Council Members
NAYS:
ABSENT:
City Clerk
2
o
o
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
o 27
o
28
o
o
o
1
2
3
4
5
6
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
, 1986.
da
of
Mayor of the City of San Bernardino
Approved as to form:
.
7
~~~
City Attorney
3