The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About20-City Administrator - -Ll-JI>. - _ tJ. -L ~If+ OF SAN BERNARD~ - REQU.Qr FOR COUNCIL AC'ilON Date: September 2, 1986 Subject: Requer,t to cOlltinue deVl'loper fee program in the City of San Bernardi no for comi n!l year to mitigate conditions of overcrowding in San Bernardino ~ified School District. From: Rdymond U. 5chweitZl'r Acting City Administrator Dept: " Synopsis of Previous COuncil ection: August 21, 1985 -- Council approved Resolution #85-337 establishing a requirement for payment of fees by developers of new residential development to mitigate impacts of such development on local schools, and prescribing a procedure for such payment. Recommended motion: That the request of the San Bernardino City Unified School District to continue the developer fee program in the City of San Bernardino for the coming year to mitigate conditions of overcrowding in the San Bernardino City Unified SChool District be referred to the Legislative Review Committee. COntact person: John Wilson , Deputv Citv Attornev III Supporting data attached: yes Phone: 5162 Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Source: Finance: Council Notes: A___"'_ .___ ..~(). ,~~ Bernardino City Unified s9oo1 District 0 E. Neal Roberts, Ed.D" Superintendent Harold L. Boring. Ed.D. Assistant Superintendent, Administrative Services T_~~__."" There'. No Better Place To Learn August 20, 1986 The Honorable Evlyn Wilcox, Mayor Members of the Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Dear Mayor Wilcox and Council Members: Pursuant to the requirements of City Resolution #85-337, the attached report, 'documentation of a public hearing, and Board of Education resolutions are submitted for your review. The Board of Education requests that the developer fee program in the City of San Bernardino continue during the coming year in order to mitigate the conditions of overcrowding in the school district. The District is seeking a flat fee of $1748 per single family home and $1373 per multiple family unit in the City and County areas of the San Bernardino City Unified School District. Any questions regarding the attached documents may be directed to this office at 381-1179. Please notify this office when the report is scheduled to be heard before a Council Committee and/or the Common Council. {;5:3~dJL R. Scott Shira Manager, Planning and Development <"'i L'. =::] ."" ,-, .. ~ 1 ..'.:0 '-) N 111 RSS :ej ~:=t co (,j ~ " Enclosures e ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION 777 North F Street. San Bernardino. CA 92410 . (714) 381-1179 o o o o Condition of Continued Overcrowding in the San Bernardino City Unified School District (Prepared by Administrative Services Division) At the meeting of the Board of Education on August 5, 1986, the Board adopted a Notice of Public Hearing on the Condition of Overcrowding in the San Bernardino City Unified School District. This report to the Board of Education shall be submitted to the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino as required by City Resolution No. 85-337 and County Ordinance #2409. . CURRENT CONDITIONS Conditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School District which will impair the normal functioning of the edu~ational program. The reason for this overcrowding is the construction and habitation of new residential housing which generates increased student enrollment. Functional* Projected Maximum 4-86 Enrollment 10-86 Enrollment Capacity (FMC) El ementa ry 19,644 20,703 19,383-21,830 Intermediate 4,417 4,670 6,162 High School 7,058 7,767 8,170 Special Schools 212 466 500 District Totals 31,331 33,606 34,215-36,662 *See Attachment 1 for definition of Functional Maximum Capacity (FMC) and a listing of District Schools. PUPIL YIELD FACTORS In 1985, the District employed a consultant to determine student population yield factors. Ms. Gloria Burbank Okuda and the ED-FAC Partnership conducted a detailed study to determine the number of preschool and school-age children residing in the typical single-family and multiply-family home. Within the District, the consultant contacted 1,754 dwelling units by telephone and a door-to-door canvas. The residences were located in the following study areas or "grids": 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 60, 61, 62, 65, 82, 191, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196, 203, 207, 208, 212, 216, 235, 236, 240, 243, 245, 250, 251, 252, 253, 255, 256, 257, 258, 259, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 277, 278, 302, 303, 304, 306, 307, 308, 331, 332, 333, 349, 350, and 351. -1- 0': o o o , , ' In addition to this survey, the consultant contacted realtors, bankers, escrow officers, and mortgage lenders to determine the family size of those purchasing and renting homes within the San Bernardino City Unified School District. The results of the study revealed the following pupil ,yield factors on a District-wide bas is: Single-Family Multiply-Family PRESCHOOL .cAges 3 & 4) .142 .121 ELEMENTARY .468 .397 SECONDARY .231 .169 ADULT EDUCATION .272 .314 The pupil-yield factor for all residences surveyed for K-12 students (including · three and four year old children) was as follows: Single-Family .841 Multiple-Family .687 After additional study and discussions with City and County officials, the pupil-yield factor was adjusted as follows: Single-Family .70 Multiple-Family .55 During the Fall of 1986, the District intends to conduct another study to update this data. , Until that survey is completed and analyzed, the pupil-yield factors, , as previously submitted to the City and County,shall be deemed the current and accurate District-wide, pupil-yield factors. BIRTH RATES There is evidence to suggest that local pupil-yield factors may increase in future years. The following chart shows that the number of births nationwide has steadily increased since 1975. Prior to 1975, the number of births had been 4eclfning since 1957. The recent upturn in births has been termed the "baby boom echo." This terminology means that the current birth rate increase is directly connected to the post-World War II "baby boom" children who are now adults of child-bearing age. According to the U.S. Bureau of the, Census, the "baby boom echo. will peak in 1988. This phenomenon means that increased K-12 enrollments, on a nationwide basis, will continue through the year 2000. NUMBER OF U.S. BIRTHS , (1n ~li 11 ions )* YEAR 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1988(Projected) TOTAL 3,144 3,168 3,329 3,333 ' 3,494 3,598 3,646 3,704 3,741 3,787 3,825 3,879 -2- _ il:IU l&. - - - - o. o o o ,', , This national trend is likely to impact the San Bernardino area because of the growth Of the area. As new families move into the area, the increasing birth rates will cause an increased demand for public school classroom space. The growth, predicted at 19.9S between 1983-1987 by Chase Manhattan Bank, wilt result in San Bernardino being the fastest growing large county in California. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT . The largest amount of undeveloped land suitable for residential construction is located in the northwestern quadrant of the District. This area, known as Verdemont, is currently being transformed into a new residential community. Between September 1985 and July 1986, in excess of 1,800 building permits' have been issued. The City of San Bernardino Planning Department'estimates that the Verdemont area will represent 15S of the total city growth per year. The development of this area is expected to continue beyond the year 2000. The chart below represents the activity expected to occur in the Verdemont area from 1987 to 1991: VERDEMONT RESIDENTIAL GROWTH NEW DWELLING # OF NEW YEAR UNITS STUDENTS* ----, 1987 250 156 1988 250 156 1989 250 156 1990 250 156 1991 290 181 TOTAL 1,290 805 *Assumes an equal number of single family units and multiple family units. Consequently, the pupil-yield factor equals as follows: K-12 = .625 (.7 + .55 + 2) The City of San Bernardino, as a whole, is projected to grow from 55,242 qwel1ing units in 1986 to 63,762 dwelling units in 1991. This increase of 8,520 residences represents an increase of 15.4S in the total housing stock. With the exception of the Verdemont area, the new residences are expected to be located throughout the City where yacant and properly zoned land is located. The chart which follows reveals the impact of residential growth on the San Bernardino City Unified School District. -., ~ o o o o . , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO RESIDENTIAL GROWTH NEW DWELLING # OF NEW YEAR UNITS STUDENTS* 1987 1,650 1,031 1988 1,650 1,031 1989 1,650 1,031 1990 1,650 1,031 1991 1,920 1,200 .. TOTAL 8,520 5,323 *Assumes an equal number of single family units and multiple family units. Consequently, the pupil-yield factor equals as follows: K-12 = .625 (.7 + .55 t 2) In the County of San Bernardino, the major area of growth is expected to be in the Devore and Highland areas. Dwelling units in the County are expected to be built at a rate of 400 per year, with 100 units in the Devore area. The remainder of the units will be distributed throughout the unincorporated areas of the San Bernardino City Unified School District. The following chart indicates the impact , of this growth on the District: ' --" COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RESIDENTIAL GROWTH NEW DWELLING # OF NEW YEAR UNITS STUDENTS* 1987 400 250 1988 400 250 1989 400 250 1990 400 250 1991 400 250 TOTAL 2,000 1,250 *Approved by the County of San Bernardino -4- o ELEMENTARY ATTENDANCE AREA BARTON BELVEDERE .. BURBANK EItIERTON KENDALL ,J<IMBARK LANKERSHIM LYTLE CREEK o o o PROPOSED RESIDENTAL DEVELOPMENT withln the SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TRACT/CUP 83-28* Pumalo/Arden* NUMBER OF UNITS 20 328 53 19 113 71 15 , 108 68 135 247 152 516 254 60 32 45 24 222 44 162 116 9 258 , 318 48 5 120 46 56 452 224 12 TYPE (**) MF MF SF SF SF SF ' MF MF SF SF SF MF MF MF SF SF SF SF SF SF MHP SF SF MF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF MF SF 13329 12949 11857-60 11884 12626 LSH 85-0095* 10600 10648-50 12451 12220 12824 12896 10182 10183 10184-85 11038 11291-96 11391 11739 11843-45 11881 12146-48 12150-51 12629 12674 12756 13029 13036 13172 10772* 10296 *Approved by the County of San Bernardino **MF . MUltiple Family; SF. Single Family; MHp. Mobile Home Park -5- Q' o o o ELEMENTARY NUMBER ATTENDANCE AREA TRACT/CUP OF UNITS TYPE(**) MUSCOY 13274 289 SF NEWMARK 12759 6 SF 84-76* 24 MF 12955-58 312 MF NORTH PARK 11741-11757 362 MF 98 SF 11407 196 MF 11745 89 SF 11921 75 MF ' 12411 69 MF 12481 41 MF 12872 121 SF OEHL 86-51* 594 ~lF 12639 39 SF 11922 750 MF RIO VISTA 13296 18 SF THOMPSON 10358* 185 SF 12735* 188 SF --- 13237* 36 SF WARM SPRINGS 11308 108 SF 12813 135 SF WARM SPRINGS Base Line/Sterling* 168 MF (con't.) 12468* 104 MF 84-69* 168 MF 84-38* 160 MF E257-74/LSH* *Approved by the County of San Bernardino '. **MF = Multiple Family; SF = Single Family; MHP = Mobile Home Park -6- 0, o o o FIVE-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS (Regular and Special Education Students) 1986-87 1987-88 1988-89 1989-90 1990-91 FMC Elementary 20,703 22,448 23,802 25,035 26,289 19,383-21,830 Intennediate 4,670 4,892 5,201 5,793 6,213 6,162 High School 7,767 8,106 8,365 8,555 9,083 8,170 Special Schools 466 485 504 524 545 500 . Di strict Totals 33,606 35,931 37,872 39,907 42,130 34,215-36,662 -. -7- o o o () MITIGATION . All reasonable methods for mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated and implemented, as appropriate. No other feasible methods for reducing overcrowded conditions exist. Resolution No. 85-337 and Ordinance 12409 require the review of the following mitigating measures: 1. agreements between a developer and the affected school district whereby temporary use buildings will be leased to or for the benefit of the school district or, an agreement for the temporary use of buildings owned by the developer for the benefit of the district. As of August 15, 1986, no developer has agreed to such an arrangement. 2. the use of relocatable structures and tempora~ use buildi~gs owned by the district. Students are currently housed at all grade levels with relocatable structures owned by the School District. 3. the use of available tax, bond, and other revenue procedures, to the extent authorized by law. With the exception of developer fees, no other local funds are available to provide classroom space. -. 4. the use of funds ~vailable from any other sources. The use of funds from the General Fund would impair the normal functioning of the educational program. 5. the use of other schools in the district not having overcrowded conditions; The District routinely assigns students to schools with available space when the neighborhood school no longer has the capacity to educate attendance-area residents. Additionall~, the court-ordered Desegregation/ Integration program of the District attempts to place the appropriate ethnic category of students in schools with available space wheneyer possible. 6. the use or sale of discontinued facilities; All District facilities, with the exception of Pacific High School. are in use and providing educational services to the community. The District intends to reopen Pacific high School in the near future. Extensive rehabilitation of the school will be required before the reopening. -8- 0" o o o 7. continuous school programs as authorized by Education Code Sections 37600 et. seq.; On July 1, 1986, a continuous school program at Lincoln Elementary School was initiated because of overcrowded conditions. The Year Round Program is, already in effect at Ramona-Alessandro Elementary and Hunt Elementary Schools. 8. the filing of appropriate notices of overcrowding with the City/County within attendance areas subject to overcrowding. " ~ The San Bernardino City Unified School District filed appropriate notices of overcrowding with the County of San Bernardino on May 8, 1985, and August 5, 1985. Subsequently, the County approved the collec- tion of developer fees by the School District in the unincorporated areas within the District subject to overcrowding. A similar notice of overcrowding was filed with the City of San Bernardino. The City adopted Resolution 85-337 on August 19, 1985, to mitigate conditions of overcrowding. In addition to these mitigating measures, the Board of Education approved numerous attendance boundary changes for the 1986-87 school year, reopened the Highland- Pacific Elementary School to ease overcrowding, employed an architect to develop plans for a new elementary school in the Verdemont area, and leased the following , number of relocatable classrooms: ---.... SCHOOL NO. OF RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS 7 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 4 Highland-Pacific Elementary Hunt Elementary Kendall Elementary Kimbark Elementary Monterey Elementary Mt. Vernon Elementary Muscoy 'Elementary Urbita Elementary Sierra High School Finally, the District applied for new school construction funds pursuant to the Leroy F. Greene Lease/Purchase Act of 1976. The District is not eligible for ~unding at this time. In addition, the District applied for funds to rehabilitate Pacific High School so that the facility may be made available to ease overcrowded conditions. The State approved this application and authorized a total estimated cost of $3,645,030. The District estimates the cost at in excess of $5,000,000. -9- Ci. o o o Despite this difference, significant reconstruction work with State funds will be accomplished. Local funds will be needed to complete the project. CLASSROOM COST 1. Five-Year Lease of Modular Classrooms (Actual low quote from Steelgard, Inc. as of May 29, 1986) ~ 1st Year Lease 2nd Year Lease 3rd Year Lease 4th Year Lease 5th Year Lease TOTAL $11,500 7,500 4,000 7,500 7,500 $38,000 2. Site Preparation and Utilities for Classrooms -. Plumbing Electrical: For electrical, Fire Alarm, Intercom--$25 per linear foot (minimum 150 ft.) plus, $125 for Breaker and Enclosure Site Preparation: Paving and Walkway, Leveling and Grading, Sprinkler Repair/removing and replacing fence $ 2,800 3,875 TOTAL 3,500 $10,175 3. Fees and Services for Classrooms Architect I S Fee (7S of the total cost) OSA Plan Check Inspection Tests TOTAL $ 3,652 1,000 1,500 1,500 $ 7,652 $ 6,500 4. Furniture and Equipment -10- o o o o 5. Five-Year Lease of Rest Rooms (Telephone quote from Steelgard, Inc.) TOTAL $12,285 12,285 12,285 12,838 13,415 $63,108 1st Year Lease 2nd Year Lease 3rd Year Lease 4th Year Lease 5th Year Lease . One rest room will be required for each nine (9) classrooms. 6. Site Preparation and Utilities for Rest Rooms Water, Sewer, Plumbing Electrical Grading and Paving $ 6,000 1.500 2,000 TOTAL $ 9,500 7. Fees and Services for Rest Rooms Architect's Fee (7~ of Total Cost) OSA Plan Check Inspection Tests TOTAL $ 5,293 1,000 1,000 1,000 $ 8,293 '....~. . 8. Summary of Classroom Costs Classrooms Site Preparation, Utilities, Fees Furniture and Equipment 1/9 Rest Room 1/9 Site Preparation, Utilities, Fees Contingencies $38,000 17 ,827 6,500 7,012 . 1,977 1,000 TOTAL $72.316 2,169 $74.485 SUBTOTAL 32: Inflation This estimated cost is realistic and consistent with other local District costs. A memorandum from Hr. Robert Prosse, Associate Planner for the County of San Bernardino, dated July 28, 1986. states: -The average total relocatable classroom costs of all overcrowded school districts in the San Bernardino Valley taken from last -11- o . , o o o year's impaction reports was $72,726. Using the 3% index to adjust the cost, an average relocatable cost of $74,908 will be used to review the 1986-87 School Impaction Reports." In order to develop an equitable fee for residential units, the following formula was utilized: ' Cost of Classroom Pupil-Yield Factor X 30 Students per Classroom Single-Family Unit .70 X S743~08 = Multiple-Family Unit 55 X $74,908 . 30 $1,748 = $1,373 The amOunt of the fee requested will provide for leased modular classrooms and furniture. Auxiliary facilities, such as the multipurpose room, kitchen facilities, administration, and teachers work room area are not included in the fee. The cost of land for future school sites is not included in the calculation. FINANCIAL INFORMATION As of June 30, 1986 --. FUNDS RECEIVED Developers Fees - City Developers Fees - County Interest $1,809,522.00 83,548.00 6,727.15 TOTAL $1,899,827.15 FUNDS EXPENDED (City) Materials Contracts Leases Furniture & Equipment . (4590-88-710-100-0) (5610-88-710-100-0) (5620-88-710-100-0) (6490-88-710-100-0) TOTAL $ 9,850.31 77,560.00 204,060.00* 16,378.74 $ 230,289.05 *First year payment of a five-year lease for classrooms. -,,- 1 III o o o o FUNDS EXPENDED (County) Materials Contracts Leases Furniture & Equipment (4590-88-710-100-0) (5610-88-710-100-0) (5620-88-710-100-0) (6490-88-710-100-0) $ 14,755.84 262.00 69,000.00* -0-. ** TOTAL $ 84,017.84 *First year payment of a five-year lease for classrooms. **Furniture and Equipment had not been received by ~une 30, 1986. ; I " I I I ADDITIONAL ITEMS 1. The lease costs of classrooms reflect the actual first year lease costs. Lease payments for the next four years are not included as an expenditure as of June 30, 1986. 2. The Board of Education approved an agreement for architectural services on July 15, 1986, to develop plans and specifications for a new elementary school in the Verdemont area of San Bernardino. The preliminary estimate of costs for construction is $4,000,000. The architectural fees for the project are estimated at $250,000. This project will be funded with developer fees collected within the City of San Bernardino. '- CONCLUSION , The San Bernardino City Unified School District currently collects a unifonn District-wide fee within the City of San Bernardino ($1,725 single family/$I,353 multiple family) and a variable attendance area fee in the County of San Bernardino ($287-$1,725 single family/$173-$l,353 multiple family). In the interest of equity to the building industry, the School District requests that a uniform fee structure be established on a District-wide basis. This type of structure is in effect in the City of ,San Bernardino. The complexities of the School District allow for the same fee format in the County of San Bernardino. In the October 28, 1985, Minutes of the Board of Supervisors meeting, Mr. John Jaquess, Director of the EPWA Land Management Department, stated that, "County Ordinance requires a determination of impaction and fee calculation based on each separate school attendance area within the District." Essential to this interpretation is the concept of "attendance area" as defined by Section 813.0105 of the San Bernardino County Code. "Attendance area" means that portion of a school district with identifiable boundaries determined by the school board. from which children residing within these boundaries would normally be assigned to attend a specified school in the district" (emphasis added). -13- 0: o o o ~ The San Bernardino City Unified School District is currently under a court-ordered Desegregation/Integration Program. The definition of attendance area is not con- sistent with the implementation of this court-ordered program. Over 20 elementary schools offer magnet programs to attract students from outside the school attendance area. These programs are offered to ethnically balance the schools. At the inter- mediate school level, a "controlled open enrollment" program has been implemented to achieve ethnic balance. As with the elementary schools, youngsters may attend schools outside of their assigned attendance areas. Because of the significant num- ber of pupils transferred in and out of District Schools for ethnic balance reasons, the attendance area definition used in connection with County Ordinance #2409 should not be applied to the San Bernardino City Unified School District. A significant number of the actual attendance area population may not normally be assigned to a particular specified school. Additionally, students residing outside the identified attendance area may be assigned to the school. The county's attendance area definition and the development of an impaction fee schedule for new residential construction is appropriate when a school district implements a strict "neighborhood school" attendance area concept in whi ch students of a particular geographical area normally attend a designated school in the neighborhood. The Board of Education respectfully requests that the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino and the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino concur with the findings of this report: 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School District which will impair the functioning pf the educational program. The reasons for this overcrowding is the construction and habitation of new _. residential housing which generates increased student enrollment. 2. All reasonable methods for mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated and implemented, as appropriate. No other feasible methods for reducing overcrowded conditions exist. 3. The fee to mitigate conditions of overcrowding on a District-wide basis shall be established as follows: Single-Family Unit Multiple-Family Unit $1,748 $1,373 _111_ o. o o ATTACHMENT ,0 SCHOOL CAPACITY The San Bernardino City Unified School District is aware that the Office of Local Assistance and the State Allocations Board have developed guidelines for determining a school 's capacity.in relation to the Leroy F. Greene State School Building Lease-Purchase Law. In an effort to meet the unique needs of this District and recognize the requirements of the Greene Act, the "Functional Maximum Capacity" concept was developed. 1. Functional Maximum Capacity: Elementary Level Guidelines and Room Assignments: . -- a. Kindergarten classroom utilizations will be back-to-back with the exception of all-day kindergarten classes (33 students). b; One classroom will be assigned for each 30 students in grades 1 through 6. c. Special Education - Special Day Classes can function with less than a full classroom, if modified for SDC needs. Resource Specialists will use less than one-half a room, if modified. If the Resource Specialist is in ~ school all day and has a maximum of 28 students, a full room will be allocated. Support Rooms - all D & I and ESAA programs will be allocated rooms as needed and as determined by the D & I Director and Administrative Services. Each school will have a library and a staff room (not necessarily a classroom). Each building will be given two support rooms (MU Room will count as one room). d. e. Categorical schools with more than 500 students and one or more resource teachers will be allocated one additional classroom. f. Other requests for classrooms will be given consideration only as available. 2. Secondary Schools The intermediate school and high school levels also have unique characteristics because of shop, physical education, categorical program, and special program needs. Subcommittee personnel from each level developed similar but unique formulas for calculating the Functional Maximum Capacities of each school. a. High Schools The guidelines were developed for assessing each school including per pupil allocation for each type of room but each was then adjusted according to special needs. It was decided that since special program room needs vary so much between schools, allocation adjustments would be based on existing programs only. These adjustments can be revised if programs change. o . -..... 1 - o o o Functional Maximum Capacity - Senior High Level Guidelines: (1) All regular classrooms will be filled to the teacher contract maximum of 40 students minus 10% adjustment for scheduling discrepancies (36 students). (2) Art and home economics rooms will be filled to the contract maximum of 32 students minus the 10% adjustment (30 students). (3) Typing rooms will be filled to the contract maximum of 45 students minus the 10% adjustment (40 students). (4) Labs will be filled based on the average number of stations (35) minus the 10% adjustment (31). (5) Shops will be filled to the contract maximum of 32 students minus a 25% adjustment for scheduling discrepancies/credentialing constraints (24 students). (6) Each senior high school will be allotted two student support classrooms with an estimated enrollment of 20 students each. (7) Each school will be allotted one additional room for the On Campus Supervision Program. (8) Each band room is estimated to serve an average of 24 students per period. Special Education Special Day Classrooms will be assumed to be filled to the contract maximum of 20 students and will use rooms which are smaller than regular classrooms whenever feasible. Special Education Resource Specialists will use less than one-half a room, if modified. All rooms allocated to Categorical pull-out programs (Comp. Ed., Bilingual, etc.), requiring a full room, will not be counted in the school 's room utilization allotment. (9) (10) (11) (12) Physical Education projections assume that current graduation requirements and enrollment patterns will continue as the schools approach maximum room utilization. The following formula was used to establish projected Maximum PE enrollment: maximum room utilization Current PE enrollment X current room utilization d , o o o b. Intermediate Schools Similar to the high school, the intermediate school formula provides a capacity for each type of program and makes adjustments for special programs: Functional Maximum Capacity - Intermediate Level Guidelines: , . (1) All regular classrooms will be filled to the teacher contract maximum of 36 students minus a 10% adjustment for scheduling discrepancies (32 students). (2) Art and home economics rooms will be filled to contract maximum of 32 students minus the 10% adjustment (29 students). (3) Typing rooms will be filled to the contract maximum of 40 students minus the 10% adjustment (36 students). (4) Shops will be filled to capacity by actual stations minus a 25% adjustment for scheduling discrepancies/credentialing constraints. (5) Each regular intermediate school will be allotted one additional room for Opportunity Class. (6) Special Education Resource Specialists will use less than one-half a room if modified. (7) Special Education Special Day Classrooms will be assumed to be filled to the contract maximum of 20 students and will use rooms which are smaller than regular classrooms whenever feasible. Each band Room is estimated to serve an average of 20 students per period. All rooms allocated to Categorical ,pull-out programs (Comp Ed, Bilingual, etc.), requiring a full room, will not be counted in the school's room utilization allotment. (8) (9) (10) Physical Education enrollment must be limited by the total number of students which can be housed in all other rooms since each student is required to take one period of PE. The resulting formula: 90% of the maximum room enrollment _ projected maximum per 6 - period PE enrollment o o o o SCHOOLS IN THE SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: --~. INTERMEDIATE SCHOOLS: HIGH SCHOOLS: ALESSANDRO ARROWHEAD BARTON BELVEDERE BRADLEY BURBANK CALIFORNIA COLE CYPRESS DAVIDSON DEL ROSA EMf~ERTON HIGHLAND HUNT KENDALL KIMBARK KING LANKERSHIM LINCOLN LYTLE CREEK IoIARSHALL MONTEREY MT. VERNON MUScOY NEWMARK NORTH PARK OEHL PARKSIDE RILEY RIO VISTA ROOSEVELT THOMPSON URBITA VERMONT WARM SPRINGS WILSON ARROWVIEW CURTI S GOLDEN VALLEY MIDDLE RICHARDSON PREP HI SERRANO SHANDIN HILLS CAJON SAN ANDREAS SAN BERNARDINO SAN GORGONIO SIERRA G: o o o Public Hearing It is in order at this time to call upon the public for comments about the conditions of continued overcrowding and the collection of fees from housing builders and developers, as reported above. HOLD PUBLIC HEARING , Resolution . Following the Public Hearing, if the Board of Education concurs with the report, then a Resolution of Condition of Continued Overcrowding is in order by adoption of the following resolutions: WHEREAS WHEREAS --- WHEREAS WHEREAS SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT CONDITIONS OF CONTINUED OVERCROWDING student enrollment is increasing within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City Unified School District, located in the City of San Bernardino and certain unincorporated areas of the County of San Bernardino; and a substantial portion of the increased student enrollment is a result of the construction, sale, and habitation of new residential dwelling units; and the projected student enrollment growth will tax the capacity of the District's normal housing ability on a District-wide basis; and in the absence of assistance in the form of financial contributions or dedications of land from the developers of such new residential developments, this District would not have the financial resources available to provide adequate housing; and .. Chapter 4.7 (commencing with Section 65970; added to Statutes of 1977, Chapter 955) Division 1, Title VII of the Government Code, makes provision for financial or other assistance by developers to a school district if the governing board of the school district has made a finding that conditions of overcrowding exist in one or more attendance areas of the district and if such finding includes the additional information specified in Government Code Section 65971. THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to Government Code Section 65971 and related ordinances of jurisdiction in which the District is located, this Governing Board makes the following findings: , WHEREAS 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School District which will impair the normal functioning of the ,.:1 4 tl _ 4. . ~ ~ ..... o o o o educational program. The reason for this overcrowding is the construction, sale, and habitation of new residential housing units. 2. All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcrowding have been evaluated and no feasible method of reducing such conditions exists. 3. The fee to mitigate conditions of overcrowding on a District-wide basis shall be established as follows: Si ngl e-Fami ly Multiple-Family $1,748 $1,373 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of this Board deliver certified copies of this resolution to the City of San Bernardino and the County of San Berna rdi no. -~-. o. ~ - - I. - - J. - - ... o o o SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICl' CQ."mITIONS OF CClm'Th1lID OVE:RCroVDING RESOLUTIo..'<;/ \'mEREllS, student enroll.rnent is increasing within the boundaries of the San Bo-mardino City Unified School District, located in the City of San &1rnardino and certain unincorporated areas of the County of San Bernardino; and W1IEP.ElIS, a substantial portion of the in-::reased student enrollment is a result of the construction, sale, and habitation of new residential dtvelling units; and h1lERBl\3, the projected student enrollment gro.rJ1 will tax the capadty of the District's normal housing ability on a district-\tide basis; an:1 WdEREIIS, in the absence of assistance in the fonn of financJ.al contributions or dedications of land fran the de-.relcpers of such :o...."W residential develOj;llents, this District \OOUJ.d nOt have financial resources available to provide adequate musing; and 1~'HEREIIS, Chapter 4.7 (ccm:rencing with Section 65970, added to Statutes of 1977, Chapter 955) Division 1, Title VII to the Goverl'llrent Cexie, makes provision for financial or oth~r assistance by develcpers to a scho:>l district if the governing board ot the scho:>l district has made a finding that conditions of overcro...'t:ling exist in one or nore attendance areas of the district, and if such finding includes the additional infmma.tion specified in Govel.'11"161t Code Section 65971; THEr<EFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to Covernmant Coda Section 65971 nnd related ordinances of jurisdiction in which the District is located, this Governing Board makes the following findings: ' 1. Conditions of overcI'Olmng exist in the San Bemardino City Unified SChool District which will inpair the normal functioning of the educational prcxJralll. The reason for this overcro..'ding is the construction, sale, and habitation of ne\'1 residential housing units. - ~ III - - III lIIl _ - ,0. o o o / / 2. All reasonable rnzthods of mitigating conditions of overcrOl\'ding have been evaluated, and no feasible n13thod of reducing such conditions exists. 3. 'lhe fee to mitigate conditions of overcro..uing on a Oistrict-l'lide basis shall be established as follows: Single-Family Nultiple-Farnily $1,748 $1,373 P.cad and adopted at San Bernardino, California, on this 19th day of August, 1986 .. 4/k Ifk~/Jb~ ',- President r-7"~.Ji, ;?2-;::;~~:..:> ~, / / /Vice-Pre1ident )) - 1-- 6 r-; . ,;--;--_.- ~. .!--rU. l ,..:'lA'.' J.t: ( . If _ ~ ~ ;' ~ -::>.L P ';",. l<l:3ther !-~r !-Jenber l>iIenber Menber 41 u - L.. 4 JII1 - 0, SAN BER"DIND CITY UNIFIED SCr"!L DISTRICT CER"'ICATION OF rJJTNuTEs o The Board met in regul ar session on the 19th meeting pl3ce thereat. The meeting was called to order at 5: 30 day of August o'clock p. m. .19 86 . al the usual Members pres.,"t: H. Brown, Chri s ti e, Di az, Obershal'/ Membersabsenl: M. Brown, Grossman, Neigc1 The adoption of the following resolution and order was moved by Member Obershaw . and seconded by Member H. Brown . and a vote being taken. the said resolution and ord&r was adopted by the following votes of members present at thaI time, AYES: Members H. Brown, Christie, Diaz, Obershaw NOES: Members None ABSTENTIONS: Members None THEREFORE CE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to Government Code Section 65971 and related ordinances of jurisdiction in which the District is located, this Governing Board makes the following findings: 1. Conditions of overcrowding exist in the San Bernardino City Unified School District which will impair the normal functioning of the educa- tional program. The reason for this overcrowding is the construction, sale, and habitation of new residential housing units. 2. ' All reasonable methods of mitigating conditions of overcro~/ding have been evaluated and no feasible method of reducing such conditions exists. 3, The fee to mitigate conditions of overcrowding on a District-wide basis shall be established as follows: Single-Family Multiple-Family $1,748 $1,373 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of this Board deliver certified copies of this resolution to the City of San Bernardino and the County of San , Bernardino. I. LORNE BARGt.1ANN, Ass i stant Secretary of the Governing Board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of a resolution duly made. adop:e~ end entered in the Board minutes of the GovernirJg Board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District on the 19th day of August .19 86. Dated: August 20, 1936 d~A~ ~CA.-;!-f..1.,v""~- ~" secrc~ Board of Education Agenda 'Iem J 1 SU.12 (Rt:v. 10/83) tl ~ o o o San Bernardino City Unified School District Resolution And Notice Of Public Hearing On School Impaction And The Continued Implementation Of Land Dedication Or Developers' Fees ~~EREAS. for some time past there has been a continuing and substantial increase in population within the boundaries of the San Bernardino City . Unified School District, located in the City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County, to the extent that the school facilities of this district have become overcrowded; and "~EREAS, that population growth has manifested itself in an increase in student population of the schools of the'San Bernardino City Unified School District; and WHEREAS, thousands of additional housing plans have been approved or are in the planning stages, which would also bring additional students into the school district, and WHEREAS, the San Bernardino City Unified School District has limited space available to house the increased numbers of students in a suitable educational environment. THEREFORE, the Board of Education of the Sa~ Bernardino City Unified School District of the County of San Bernardino, intends to 1. determine whether or not overcrowding, which will impair the normal functioning of educational programs, will continue to exist in one or more attendance areas within the district, and 2. assess reasonable methods of mitigating the conditions of over- crowding if overcrowding continues to exist. 0':', " o o o 2. ,}lssess rc...asonable rrethods of mitigating the conditions of overcrov.'ding, if overcrowding continues to exist. ,BE IT RESCLVID t.'Jat a public hearmg will be held on 'F.ugust 19, 1986, at 5:30 p.m. at ti"o.e Boaro. of Education Building Co:munity Roan, 777 North F Street, San BarnaIdino, California, to detennine whether or not overcrowding '. canditio."lS conti.-me to e:<ist or will continue to exist, evaluate whether . feasible ne""...bcds for reducing such conditions exist, and detennine whether or not fees or dedication of land shall be imposed on developers. BE IT FURIHER RESOLVED that Notice of this intent to continue the inplementation of land d.."'Ciication, or developer fees, 'shall be posted in three public places, not less than ten (10) days prior to the public hearbg, and shall be published not less than once a wee.lt for two successive weeks prior to the public hearing, in a newspapo..r of general circulation published within the County, and The SUn is hereby designated as the n...<>wspaper in which f>uch No'-dce shall be published as aforesaid. IN 'l'mNESS of the passage of the foregoing resolutions and order in the fODII , , and manner prescribed by law, we, ,the ~..rs of said Board, present and voting thereon, have hereunto set our hands this ,.5th day of August, 1986. . ".- ~..rs of the GcMmring Boaid San Berna:.--::lino City Unified School Dis'-..rict 777 North F Street San Berl'.ardLTIO, CA 92410 0: / SAN BER"DINO CITY U'fIFIED S~L DISTRlcr CER-rrFJCATJON OF lIMNUTES o regular 5th A t The Board met in session on th& day of ugus meeting ptac:etl1ereof, Th8'm.eting...~ called to ord81' at 5: 30 o'clock Pm. Membersp_~ H. Brown~ 11. Brown. Christie, Diaz, Grossman, Neiger. Obershaw Members abserrl= .19 8fj at tho usual The adoption of me fol~Qjution ~nd ord.... was moved by Membltt' H. Brown' . and ed ...a.-....;.-&....-._ i'....... ",wn " . second by ,......"..... ' , , . and a vote betng taken. the saId resolullon and order was adopted by the following votes 01 members p..-t at that time. , AYES:. Members' NOES=' Membltt"S . -None ABSTENTIONS: Members '. BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Education adopt a Resolution and Notice of Public Hearing on the Condition of Overcrowding in the San Bernal'dino City Unified School District as presented. The public hearing is scheduled for the next Board of Education meeting on August 19, 1986. --, E. ilEAL ROBERTS. 0 I. . Secretary of thit Governing Board of the San Bernardino City Unified School District hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true and correct copy of a resolution dull' made, adopt~llnd entered in tnn9\J?fd minutes of t~6 Governing Board of the San Bernardino City Unifiec! School District on the day of .19. D3ted: August 6, 1986 I" /1/1 jJ or-- , a~u,j /(c/..x Secretary. Board of Education Sll-12IRev,_ 101831 A___..a_ "._ "7' II ~ 11 III L : Q CONTROl COPY o 0 ). ..,.,0.. No. A 077792 THtS NUMSERJUlILAPPfNt ON ALL PAC'CAGES. INVOICES AND OOAAESI'ONDENCE. PURCHASE ORDER SEND ALL BILLING AND CORRESPONDENCE TO: PURCHASING OEF'T.. CITY SCHOOLS 771 F STREET . SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA 92410 TELEPHONE (714) SAN BERNARDINO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DATE. Ac: . ~p.~ DELivER ;U" . 1 N. J mea BEFORE 4:00 P.M. SAN BERNARDINO. 92.11 TO: :t6: OTHERWISE SHOWN 3111-11Z6 TO: r tHE Stm :i9-J -D8 Street LSaIl Bdno.. CA 92401 I DEUVERY PROMlSEO: TERMS -' F.O.B. 81D NO.: " QUANTITY UNIT ITEMS AND DESCRIPTION olI.'II:\ AMOUNT , Fublish the attached ttoU~ of Public Ileariny esttate l.egal Ad. , . $45.00 '. "-...-. To be publ1sbed: August 8. 19e1S First PubHcatiGfl August 15. 1985 -Sel:Ol:d PulbUu1 loti .. . . . . . : REO. NO. LOCATION ACCOUNT NUMBER WARRANT NO. TOTAl. BUl-ZG7Zii ESTIMATE ~.... ,... ~... .--c ^.,.~.... rt.."""'" ..~... r.;., "AA ~ ,... n,"' ';'~/- .....,,....... ...,10;' "....._... VENDOR MUST SEND WITH INVOICE MANUFACTURERS MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS, OSHA FORM 20 OR EOUIVALENT INDICATING THE PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER, APPROVED BY ...... ..__~_ ...._~_a.__ ~t - .. ~a ao: ::10 ..... ~g "':r :J U "'''' o z ...- .. ..... "'0( o(u gJ ..... ":J - 0: 0:0 "'0( !: a ...z :! ;( ",... :J" ",0: z o - .... - en - :J o '.u c -I <: - o w c.. en . C w en :;1 ...: ... w Q Cl Z ;;; 0( :I: o a: :;1 " ... ~ a: 0: 0 II. I '0 \ ~ '..... ~ ~ .. 0') (\J t- CD (\J .; z .., CD, _. "'I' -I CDI o a .:: en o u Q w I- 0( :;; t: ~ o :3 !j ~ o a: o :) ii 0 '" en .. II U ... l: II In - . ~- ... ... u ;; c o U g '" " ~ c . 15~ @& ii:~ .d- .. "... ..'" 00 ..U ,. '" ~- o .. .. o U .. l2 ~ ... "" .... 00 ..U . ~- o .. S U ... o Z .. " ,. '" .... ".. "0 ~u ,. '" o .. .. N en ...J ;( I- w Q oil w a: :;1 l- e{ Z W al a: a: "" o UlD en o~ w "" Q UlZ M M e " " 0( .;; a: f w a: a: o II. .; !II" o .. S u .. ~ ... " .. o ... .. .. o U ~ Z " z o ~ .. ir. u .. .. o .. z " ~ ~ i!J ... ~ o ! ... J! u .. .. .. .. " .a .. i1 ... ... ~ ... - i!J ., a = a ::1 ~ ... ~ lj ... ~ :zs Q ?01 o i!J ... !:.1 b ;;a w i:l e :il i!l ... lj ooQ tl - ... 8 o (J '" M ::I l&I a e Q ~ o is S u ~ l&I Q ~ ~ .lI>.a- . ... <0 Ch ... .. .. Q/ ... .. ... OIl " i ... ... " ... " .c .. . "'I .... .. co :> ... ..;! .. .., CD Ch ... . <0 ... co Co ~ 8 In E o \..' \ . !AJ "- l\ ". 8:. -"', ~ <C.... . ~ 3 9 a:~ w" ala: :;;0 :>0 zf !Z~ :>>= ou o~ 0.. e{ ... u w ~ lD o , ..' w > w .. o z " .. .. ., u ... ~ lit 1: " '" '" :> '" ~ .. o o '" .. ~. 0_ u.:J iii ci .: : 'e o 0: ~ . - .~ E .. ~ a... ! .:: .. .. GI ~ c; ;!! a z :J u. u. o w U 0: :J o .. o~ ~ a ~ ., , '" ~ ,'. . :::- ~ :- , '. .:~ ~ . >- ~ .. ~ ~ , ...... , .,J ,', .... ~ '-...~. . , ':\ ~. /:\ ~ r g, .~ I a ! ~ ti ' .. - '0 a E. u a. .5 .',8' ~ a:' J': .. .. .; -> '" .. g.. :i III ... . ~, ~""" o o o AFFIDAVIT OF PQST~ NCIl'ICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) oounty of san bernardino ) ss Pete Ramos , being duly S\\IOD'I, deposes and says: .. That he nt::M is, and was at all of the times ~in rrentioned, a cit- izen of the United States, over the age of 18 years, '-U1~tplt to be a witness here- , in, and a resident of San Bernardino, California 0:: San Bernardino County, in the above naned County and State; that on the 7th day of August , 1986 , he securely and conspicuously posted three notices of School Imoaction and the Continued Imolementation of land Dedication or Develooers' Fees , in three of 'thE! nest public places within said district, 'lb wit: 1. cne at the west entrance to the San Bernardino County Court House, San Bemardino, California, 2. One at the entrance to the City Hall, San Bernardino, California, 3. And one at the entrance to the l\dmi.ni.stration Building of the City Schools at 777 North 'F' Street, San Bemardino, California. -. That such notices were and ranained so posted for not less then 15 days before said HearinQ , to wit: The sane were posted franthe 7th day of AUQust , 1986 , to and including the date of said Public HearinQ , and were duly signed by Board of Education A full, true and correct copy of said Resolution and Notice is hereunto attached and made a part hereof. AQfi. -43. ~ Pete Ramos &lbscribed and swom to before ne this "J ~ day of _O~J;.~'u/ , /9J'~. /) , ?,t.-' '-2:J fl2L1~l; '.t? ~?/'A -,., , / Notary Public m for Sclld County and State. r#.......~............._. A.....A.__. i . _ ... .OFFICIAL suu . . ; tr::;;;; BEAT~ICE I,\. BOLTIUHOUSE It ! ~sL:?j NOtARY ~uaLIC. CALI, ;parllA 1t I ~ SAIl BtRll~ROINO courm ~ I ; My Commission Expires Aug. 19, 1937 t .~..... w y ~ Y. 9 I I