HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-Building and Safety
c
o
o
o
cou~aCRt. AC.TmO~J CORRE5f?O~.jD~MC~~
To
James Robbins, Sl'perintendent
Building and Safety
Subject
Date
August 2!:i, 1986
current city policy on Requiring
Garages on Rehabilitation project.;
...-------- .-
Agenda Item No, 28
August 18, 1986
Meeting O<Jtc
Action
-~--
.
The proposal to require garages on rehabilitation projects was
con ti!l.':.':.~_1..g.,.~e~1;~~::F 8, 1 J 86 .
sc:pn
~\,....
I,
/1?l>>(L,
" SHAUNA CLARK
City Clerk
cc:
/~
~I-e 0.. SAN BI:RNARU~U- KI;UU~ I P'UK \iUUN\iIL A\i~U"
From: JAMES ROBBINS, SUPERINTENrf~'O.-AOMIK. OM'6ject: CURRENT CITY POLICY ON REQUIRING
1986 AUG II ~M \I: 37 GARAGES ON REHABILITATION PROJECTS
Dept: 8UJLDI1lG AND SAFETY
Date: AUGUST 11, 1986
Synopsis of Previous Council ection:
Board of Building Commissioners Order of Abatement 638 "L" Street appealed at
meeting of June 2, 1986, carried over to August 4, 1986, then Council directed
a report regarding current city policy on requiring garages on rehabilitation
proje,Cts,.
......
\\)
Recommeno:led motion:
It is reqpectfully recommended that the Mayor and Common Council adopt alternatives
1 and 2.
1. Adopt a City Council policy that: the Building and Safety and Planning Departments
will require a double garage or carport in single family rehabilitation where there
is evidence of a garage or carport previously existing. Where estimated rehabilita-
tion costs exceed 50% of the value of the structure and access (min. 10 ft.) is
available, a carport or garage will be required.
2. Leaving Redevelopment Agency memo of understanding in place.
" /1/ I/~
(,' Y:
Vii.........).,\. f~:..J ~,.'---p- .'\~
(/ Signature
COntact person:
James Robbins
Phone:
5274
Supporting data attached: Yes
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
COuncil Notes:
75-0262
Agenda Item No,_
CIO OF SAN BERNARDQO - REQUQT FOR COUNCIL AC:lON
STAFF REPORT
This report reviews the background on the issue of adding garages or carports to single
family residential structures being rehabilitated. It then discusses the alternatives
and makes a recommendation.
A review of the background indicates there were three ways of dealing with the problem,
two of which are still in effect. Some time ago the direction was simply if an owner
came in to convert or add on, a new garage was required. This informal policy was
occasionally appealed.
With the implementation of the Redevelopment Agency Neighborhood Housing Rehabilitation
Program, a more specific guideline was desired. As a result, a two page memo of under-
standing was drafted and signed by Building and Safety, Planning and the Redevelopment
Agency. That understanding indicated, "if the ~roperty did not previously include a
covered garage, no off street coveredJarklng w1l1 be reQuired," "when the property in-
cludes a garage that has been convert ,the froperty owner shall apply for a variance."
In this case the owner is not required to rep ace the garage or carport. However, thlS
type of variance has not been requested.
The current informal policy in Planning is if there is a conversion, the converted garage
or carport must be replaced "in kind." If a building is going to be added on to or re-
habilitated over 50% of value, then a garage or carport will be required if not existing.
The zoning ordinance is clear on all single family dwellings, a double garage is required.
The informal policy in Building and Safety has been, if a unit was condemned then rehabil-
itated and the cost exceeded 50% therefor, the garage was necessary.
The most common problem with older units is the lot they are built on. Often it is 40-50
ft. wide with 5 ft. or less side yardS and no alley access. Thus access is not available
to a garage even if it is required.
Alternatives to consider include:
1. Adopt a City Council policy that: the Building and Safety and Planning Departments
will require a double garage or carport in single family rehabilitation where there
is evidence of a garage or carport previously existing. Where estimated rehabilita-
tion costs exceed 50% of the value of the structure and access (min. 10 ft.) is avail-
able, a carport or garage will be required.
2. Leaving RDA memo of understanding in place.
3. Adopt a City Council policy that unless lot and house configuration preclude, all
rehabilitation projects shall include a double garage or carport.
4. Continue existing informal policies.
75-0264
-
J1
L1
o
o
o
o
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERStANDING
Neighborhood Housing Rehabilitation Program
TO:
tha Undersigned
SUBJECT:
Memorandum of Understanding governing the Property !l.ehabilitation
Standards (P!l.S) and Off Street Covered Parking !l.equiruents as said
requirements relate to the !l.edeveloplD8Dt Aaency of the City of San
Bernardino Neighborhood Housing !l.ehabll1tation Program. (NHBP)
PU!l.POSE :
The purpoee and intent of this KeIIorandum is to develop an
understanding between the City of San Bernardino DepartllleDts of
Building and Safety, Plam11ng and !l.edeveloplllent, and a framework for
the efficient and cost-effective 1IIIplnentation of the !l.edevelopllleDt
Agency/Community Development Block Grant Neighborhood Housing
!l.ehabilitation Program.
!l.ehabllitation, for the purposes of this Agresent, is defined as
follows: !l.ehabllltation is the reconditioning of the existing
dwelling unit without increasing the size of the liveable area witlln
the unit. Enlarging the liveable area within a dwelling unit by
twenty-five percent (25%) or less will DOt be cODsidered an increase
in the size of the liveable area. ---
P!l.OPE!l.TY !l.EHABlLITATION STANDA!l.DS (P!l.S)
!l.ecognizing the need for III1xdmuDl etandards with respect to health, eafety and
welfare, the State of California adopted the Community !l.edeveloplllent Law,
California Health and Saf.ty Code SectiODs 33000 .!h. seq., and the California
EnvirOllll8ntal Quality Act, California Public !l.esources Code Section 21000,!,!;.. seq.
Historically, under the City's Neighborhood Housing !l.ehabllitation Program these
III1DiJ1w1 standards, called Property !l.ehabilitation Standards (P!l.S), have
supplell8Dted those standards established \ly the UDiform Building Code and various
City ordinances. Due to the age and condition of a III&jority of the houses ,that
are tarseted for rehabilitation by the !l.edeveloplllent Agency, significant
additiouaJ. costs are incurred and financial hardsllp placed upon the low and
lIIOderate income owners who would otherwise benefit frOll the City's NHRP.
As such, this Memorandum ehall effectuate an understanding between the
!l.edeveloplllent Agency and the Department of Building and Safety that adopts the
following changes in the !l.edevelopllent Agency Neighborhood Housing !l.ehabllitation
Program's Property !l.ehabilitation Standards.
- When the rehabilitation work is maintenence, alteration or repair
(modernization, upgrading, etc.) of an existing building, it need
only conform to the code under which the building was iDitially
constructed.
o
Page 2
MelllO of Understand1ng
o
o
o
- When the rehabilitation work includes ujor structural repairs or
substantial reconstruction of an ensting building, that portion of
the build1ug requiring said repairs or reconstruction will be brought
to current code.
- When the rehabilitation work includes the remodellng of the kitchen
area, the electrical eervice to the build1ng IDWIt be upgraded to
current build1ng code requirements, including the area being
serviced, i.e., the kitchen must have the proper number and type of
electrical outlets and separate circuits for appliances.
- When the rehab1l1tation work elso includes the construction of a
new roOll add1 tion on an eus ting build1ng, the new roOll add1 tion IIUS t
conform to current codes required for new construction.
OFF STREET COVERED PAllXING REQUIREMENTS
Section 19.56.030 of the City of San Bernardino ,Zoning Ord1nance entitled
"Required MiI1illlulll Naber of Park1ng Spaces - Residentiar states that in a single
fllllily (including Manufactured Housing Subd1visions) - two spaces shall be
provided in a garage. Since uny of the hOllIes being rehabilitated were built
prior to this ordinance being adopted, many properties were constructed without a
garage, had a prage or carport that is now delllolished, or the eusting
garage/carport was converted to add1tianal living space.
As such, this mellloranda shall effectuate an u:nderstanding between the
Redevelopment Agency and the Plazm1ng Department that adopts the following:
- When the property to be rehabilitated u:nder the Redevelopment
Agency Nei&hborhood Housing Rehabilitation Program d1d not previously
include a covered garage, no off street covered parking will be
required. Additionally, when the property to be rehabilitated
inc:l.udes a garage that has been converted to living space, and since
the requirement for a garage ie' not excused by "non conforming use"
retroactivity provisions, the property owner shall apply to the City
of San Bernardino Pla:n:n1ng COlllllU.ssion for a variance under the
provisions outlined in Chapter 19.74 of the San Bernardino Municipal
Code.
r&Dlt Schuma
Director
Plazm1ng Departlllen t
u ~
Glenda Saul ~
Executive Director
Redevelopmeut' Agency
Date Executed:
0463C