Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout30-City Manager c c , ! , ! ! I I I I I I I i o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Manager Subject: Resolution establishing certain fees for services furnished by the City of San Bernardino, and ordinances regarding unauthorized signs and yard sales, Dept: City Manager's Office Date: March 24, 2009 Meeting Date: April 6, 2009 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: March 16, 2009 - Mayor and Common Council set a public hearing for April 6, 2009. March 4 & March II, 2009 - Reviewed by Ways and Means Committee and recommended for approval Recommended motion: Adopt_Iutioo "'" I,y_ ov~........ _00/ Ii- ~ Signature Contact person: Lori Sassoon Phone: 384-5122 Supporting data attached: Staff report, worksheets, resolution and ordinances Ward: All FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Net additional revenue of approx. $770,000 in FY 09-10 Source: (Acct. No.) Various (Acct. Description) General Fund Finance: Council Notes: Agenda Item No. ~ t( r (r C'1 - c c o STAFF REPORT Subiect: Resolution establishing certain fees for services furnished by the City of San Bernardino, and ordinances regarding unauthorized signs and yard sales. Backl!round: Fees for service, otherwise called user f~, are calculated by determining the actual cost of the services being provided. Since the late 1990's, the Mayor and Common Council has approved numerous comprehensive user fee updates, usually in the spring of each year. The last of such updates were approved in May and June of2008, As part of the City's budget reduction measures to close the projected budget deficit, each department was asked to re-evaluate fees and look into the possibility of new fees. The result of the department's analysis is approximately $770,000 in additional revenue for FY 09-10. The majority of the proposed fees were included as part of the budget discussions during the budget meetings on February 2 and February 17, 2009. Departments submitting new and increased fees include Animal Control, City Clerk, Code Enforcement, Development Services, Facilities, Fire, Public Services, and Police. Attachment A contains a summary of fees to be considered for establishment and/or revision at this time. For each new and revised fee included in Attachment A, departments have completed cost , analysis worksheets with information regarding each service for which a fee is charged, including the job titles of any employees involved, the amount of staff time involved in providing the service, and other related costs for materials, supplies, equipment, utilities, etc, Information regarding hourly salary and benefit rates is also included in the worksheets. Generally, each department's recommended fees are based on this service cost; certain charges, such as fines, are not required to be based on the cost of service, Staff has also gathered information concerning comparable fees in neighboring jurisdictions, and that information is included on the worksheets. Key changes to the fee schedule include the following: . Animal Control is proposing to increase fees related to the boarding and apprehension of animals. Many of these fees have not been updated for several years. The proposed fees would eliminate the two tier apprehension fee for altered and unaltered pets. The new fees would set a single fee of $100 for the first apprehension, $200 for the second apprehension, and $350 for the third and subsequent apprehensions. . Fee Adjustments for Animal Control would also eliminate a two tiered adoption fee for dogs and cats ($25) versus puppies and kittens ($40) by establishing a single fee of $30. The change in fee structure will not result in the loss of money for Animal Control. . Code Enforcement is proposing two fee increases related to weed abatement. One fee is for staff time for inspection of the vacant lots, notices, billing and coordination of the contractors for the actual abatement. The other fee is for staff time involved in the lien process, when applicable, and includes the hearing with the Hearing Officer and the BBC, Neither of these fees has been increased since 1996, Not only has the volume of work increased since that time, 3/24/2009 1 o r- '-' o but staff costs have also increased. Total estimated revenue from the fee changes is approximately $196,000, . Code Enforcement has also proposed to update administrative fees for costs incurred on abatements of private property, buildings, abandoned vehicles and weeds. The seven fees on the resolution were consolidated into four fees, With an estimated revenue increase of approximately $180,000, The majority of the proposed increase is attributed to the consolidation of the administrative fees associated With the creation of a demand letters and for each line item on the demand letter. Updating these fees would bring the combined fee to $65 for the creation of a demand letter, . Development Services has proposed a number of new fees to recoup personnel costs for multiple plan re-checks, revisions to approved plans, and citizen requested stop signs and red curbs, The proposed fees include the creation of a combo permit, which combines the excavation ($45) and lane closure ($45) permits that contractors typically request at the same time; the cost of the combined permit would be $55. The new combo permit would allow the contractors to pull one permit, creating efficiencies for both the City and the contractor, Development Services staff estimates there is a proposed revenue loss of $10,900, which Will be offset by gains in efficiency. . . Development Services is requesting the addition of a NPDES inspection fee to offset the costs of the City's NPDES inspection program. Once an inspection is completed, the costs of the inspection Will be added to the following year's business registration renewal. This process Will ensure the City Will only collect fees on inspections that are actually completed, and Will reduce the General Fund's net cost for these federally-mandated reviews. . The Facilities Department is proposing to increase all parking fees by $5 to comply With sa 1407, which has increased the State Courthouse Construction Penalty from $1.50 to $4.50 per citation. Increasing the parking penalty covers the state penalty increase and collection costs as allowed by CVC Section 40200.4(t). Estimated total revenue increase, net of the Courthouse Construction Penalty increase which benefits the state, is $30,000, . The Facilities Department is proposing to increase the commercial parking fee from $65 to $260. An associated ordinance amending Chapter 10.16 of the City's Municipal Code is being considered on this same Council Agenda. The fee Will not become effective until the effective date of the ordinance repealing and replacing Section 10.16.120, . The Police Department is proposing to increase the fees charged for non-permitted false robberylburglary alanns. Also included are increases to the tow release fee and various photo, tape and video reproduction fees. . The Fire Department proposes to reduce its apartment inspection fees by 5% for compliant property owners that have met two criteria: 1) All fire code violations noted during the initial inspection must be corrected when the first re-inspection is conducted; and 2) payment of the first invoice that is sent to the property owner must be postmarked by the due date indicated on the invoice. Several Councilmembers had previously expressed an interest in establishing such an incentive program. Estimated revenue loss for a 5% reduction Will equal $28,840. However, Fire expects to generate revenue in excess of FY 08-09 budgeted amounts to offset this reduction. 3/24/2009 2 !!cr.''".' c c o At the March 6th Mayor and Common Council meeting, Councilmember McCammack states that owners of problem rental properties should be penalized for their lack of compliance with the City's ordinances. Staff notes that non-compliant apartment owners are cited and subject to fines, through the issuance administrative citations, pursuant to Chapter 9.82 of the City's Municipal Code. In FY 08-09 the Fire Department projects that $100,000 in citations will be issued. Proposed new and amended ordinances are typically reviewed by the Legislative Review Committee before being recommended to the Mayor and Council for approval. However, two new fees brought before the Committee will require enabling ordinances, so those ordinances were presented to the Ways and Means Committee: . Code Enforcement is proposing a new fee for the removal of unauthorized signs, The fee will require an ordinance adding Section 16.18, Unauthorized Signs, to the City's Municipal Code. The new ordinance will define the responsible party as the owner or lessee of property used for the illegally advertised activity or event. The ordinance will also provide a definition for an unauthorized sign and will designate the Code Enforcement Department as the responsible party for the enforcement of the unauthorized signs. Most importantly, the new ordinance would allow for the infraction amount to be set at $100 by the Master Fee Resolution, based on the cost to the City for administering the program. This fee for service is in addition to any administrative citations that may be issued pursuant to Chapter 9.82 of the City's Municipal Code. Code Enforcement does not suggest repealing Section 8.15,130, Posting Notices Prohibited. This is essentially an anti-littering ordinance which can be used if someone is actually caught in the act of placing illegal signs. . Code Enforcement and the City Clerk's Office have worked together to propose a new yard sale permit fee that will provide better regulation of yard sales. Currently, the City allows for two yard sales each year, but does not have a system to track the number held each year at a given property, An ordinance amendment would allow for the yard sales to be tracked by the City Clerk's Office through a permit process, and enforced by Code Enforcement through the issuance of administrative citations pursuant to Chapter 9;92 of the City's Municipal Code. The yard sale permit fee would take affect 90 days from the effective date of the ordinance, Most of the adjusted and new fees, with the exception of the unauthorized sign fee, yard sale permit fee, and commercial parking fee, will be effective immediately upon the adoption of the resolution, The Government Code requires that all development related fees take effect no sooner than 60 days after their adoption, which would make those fees effective on June 6, 2009. The proposed master fee resolution incorporates the proposed and revised fees discussed in this staff report. For the last several years, staff has been attempting to identify and repeal outdated fee resolutions, and incorporate those fees into this master fee resolution as fees are modified, so that over time most fees can be consolidated into a single document. For that reason, the master fee resolution includes many other fees that remain unchanged. In order to help readily identify the fees that are being modified or added, the changes are identified in strikethrough/italics. All other fees rem.un unchanged. 3/25/2009 3 .",. c c o Wavs and Means Committee Review: On March 4th and 11th, the Ways and Means Committee reviewed the proposed fee adjustments and new fees. Based on the Committee's feedback, the following modifications have been made to staff's original proposal: . Investigation fees for requested stop signs, no parking signs and permit parking signs have been removed. . The new yard sale permit fee will take effect ninety (90) days after the enactment of the enabling ordinance, , . New Development Services fees for more than 3 plan checks and more than 3 WQMP reviews will only be assessed upon the authorization of the Director or Deputy Director of Development Services. Next Steos Staff recommends the following timeline for implementation of the new fee schedule. It is recommended that the Mayor and Council act quickly so as to maximize the additional revenue to be realized as a result of these changes: April 6 - Public Hearing and first reading of two (2) new enabling ordinances. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Mayor and Common Council may adopt the fee resolution, Most fees become effective upon adoption of the resolution. June 6 - Development fees will become effective Financial Imoact: The new and adjusted fees are projected to provide $770,000 in estimated additional annual revenue in FY 2009-10. Recommendation: Adopt resolution and lay ordinances over for fina1 adoption. 3/25/2009 4 .~ - = Ci .. ~ c i "l:I ~ .. r:: .. .. '" i:l 01 =- CI .. =- -< J! e ~ M 0 '" .. c ~ e ..... ... ,51 J! -s~..: .s ._ _ fio4 '" at ~ '=' 0 c c .; .... " 0 .... " ~ S Oc ... ] .= o.~ "" g l!l e: 'ail": .. a Cl. '" " e oo l!! - go 11 = o '" o a 0 . ~ ~ ... ... ~ a () .- "0 .~ " .c..c .~ ~ " .= oS 'Ii ,,""" '" ~ ~ ~ ... c 1l.811 a u ... ~ 'C "'_..c..c .. ~ ~ o " .s~~~ " ,,- , ;>,. s~a J!.!! is .$ N ~ '" '" lfJ,!!l i " J !l "" ~ ~ 8 ! 1:) 8 0'- e € Ii ....J!e ""- :~ :~ ~~ .!!j..!!E3 Iii Iii " 0 > ~ 0 e !-o !-o ~ 0 8 ] 0 ] 0 , 0 8 , , 0 , & g g 8 8. 11illl g. 0 & 0 0 o. 0 0 N M ~ 0 c - c'" '" - "., '" N ~ M r-- El ;: :: II - 's 's N M M N ;::;;i.:!> , - ." ~ ... ... ... ... 1iIl-< ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... xi 0 6 0 g g 0 0 0 g g g 18 g g g 0 0 g g g 0 0 0 '" 0 0 '" 0 vi vi vi M ci ..: ci ci M vi vi ci vi M vi ci ci ci -0 -0 ! !: !::! 0 '" N N I::: N 00 a- - 00 00 .5~ - ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .... - M M '" '" N 00 00 0 M '" '" 0 .... 00 00 .... 0 0 r-- , a- "l 0 .... M M - r-- N N - , ": r-- r-- M M M ill-a ci ci - ~ ..: -0 -0 .. M -0 -0 ~ - M g ci ..: ..: ~"Ei: N N - N '" '" N '" .... .... N 0 M a- a- - - - - - - - - Jl II u ... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... ... .... ... ... .... .... .... ~ II g 8 g g g g g 0 0 g g g g g g 0 g g g g 0 0 0 ci ci ci vi ci ci ci g ci ci ci ci vi M ci g g ci ci ci '"roo N ~ N '" N 0 - '" M M - - N M 00 00 ~ - - - , - - - - - ... ... .... .... ... .... .... .... ... .... ... .... ... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... . g = g g g g 0 g g g 8 g 8 g g g 0 g 8 8 g !: II '" '" vi vi vi ..; ci M ~ ci 00 vi vi .:; ci ci vi 0( ci ci .. ~ :lroo - !::! - '" - 00 N N .... - - a- - - N a- U .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .1-;:: 8 8 - - M M 8 8 8 '" ~ 8 - '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .. .. .. a- a- 0 g g a- g a- a- a- a- a- s: ~~~ a- a- 0 a- a- a- a- a- a- N N - - N N N N N N N - N - - - - - - ~ ~ Ij i: "" J! J! .$ , ] .!ltle "" ~ ;>, J 5 I~ J! l -::: ~ . .. Ii Cl. II " ~ ~ .!l .. J > .. ~ ~~ ~ " ] u "" '6, ~ II 11 ] ;3 ~ = ; ] c -! ,51 1 "" j ~ ~ -< ~ ; ... ~.- 1= II ~ !~ J~ , , 0 .s SI. j;:l .... .... .... ~ ~ c .. 0 0 o~ ~ 5 l%l II II 0 0 J! ~ Ii 8:; 8 !t II ~ I eg ... ~ ~ J! " e ~ '= u u'iS ~ roo ~ i~'C' !'" i " '-" 'OJ .~ u'-'- " " '" .= .- .=~ c is '~ J! II Q > "'- .li "" ,~ E J! ~ !l ~ 8 0 1 ~ ._:: a:I e " !-o 0 ...j i ] ~ l! E ::I C i~ E", 'is !:l 'is] ;:l ;:l I ~ dlj'- > ~ C C ..0 ,- ~ ~ 'il ~!-o ;:l 0 0 J "'i:oo .. , .Ii ] l ~ .- C ]J 'S l~ ll'- .~ I ~ ~ 2 'i '~ rl C ,_ 's i " ,$ .Il ~l ~ ~e~ ~ ;( '0 'OJ " ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ -< Q ...lO... ...lC -< Q ;;:: -< Cl. e << Q ~ J J J J 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. i l! 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 u u u u u u u u u ] ] 1 ] ] ] ] ] ] i i i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. - N M .... '" '" r-- 00 a- 0 - N M :! '" '" r-- - - - - - - - 8 s t! .., --'''",'' -< - c! .. ~ c :l .. ~ Cl. >;;l .. r: .. .. '" >;;l 01 e- llo o 1;;..;; ,,8 - ". it = f?i .....<~ 101< ... -~ 1!"il,..: c~s::. !-o " .. '" c U ...!'i:1.O .! i~ ~ ,~ .. - .. ~ c U l'i~ . . on ~ t: ~ .!~64 . 8 ; a:"; C ,._ t- al'" '" II: .. - .. 0 ta:C! ~ '" 2 u ;;; ~.~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ,""OV"l_._ Q\M 14"')-:::.01 N 88 '" '" "'....: u ~ ~ it J ~ ! :;;: 8888888888888 ll'iV'ivi.n.n.n"'; vi vi lI'ilt'i"';"'; iI4~,^MflAM~~"'61964i14i14 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8888888888888 0000000";00";00 .........."'" '''It................... ~iI4i14.,.,MMMMMMMililtM 8888888888888 ..n",,,,lt"ill'i,,,lI'ici"';"';o"';"'; f"l"'lf"l"'lf'l"'lf'l"'lf"l"'lf"l"'l"""'f"l"'l""''''f''l'''l'''' MMMMMMMMMMMMM OOOOOOOOOCOOOCOOOOOOOCOOOO 8888888888888 NNNNNNNNNNNNN '. N , 88 vi vi .. .. ~~ 88 ~~ .. .. 88 .,.;.,.; '" '" .. .. oc oc 88 "'''' 'g :e <Il ~ 0 _" I~ ~ 1 J ~""B ~ b ~ !; 1 g ~~8i _ ~ljj~.. ~ ~ t ~ ~~ I~ ~ ,,~.s~~ - ~ 0 0.. ....." IJ~ _. m!HUhUn,~ it Hi ~ii~l iN !~ ~0~28J "''''~~go~. ul ~..~. ~ ~ ~ i1~ .1 1 ~ i i ~! ~ ~ : ~ g ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o. 9!u 2 .1 ~ ,$1 ~ I .$ i; ]~~J~1122~!1~~~Jlal~~j tJu~j1tju]1Ijl ...~u il,Q_OO~~uIl5i!'u::1l >00_ illooj>lu.e <<> >u~~~~~=U~_~~!-o O~Z~ ~~z"'~~>~ ~~ "" i. = .. MM....MMMMMMMMM .. .. 8888S\S\8S\S\S\88S\ ";8"vivi\CioCa\oO"':M"':"';"': N _V"lr-ooO\"'\O"'ltO-.:l"\C - - -- 00 oon N"'; "'.... on MMMMMMMMft4MMM" .. .. _C\C)Q\oo"'lt_r-NO.Q\N f"l"'l0l0 O\"'r-N......I.OO\t"'I\O \0 Nr..:\Civi\CioOa\oC"':N"';vi"': ... O_V"lr-OOQ\....1.O "It 0.. 1.0 N- - -- c;;;:; M"': "'.... on .. MMMMMMMMMMMMM .. .. 8888S\S\8S\S\S\88S\ 080"';"';\CioOa\oO"':r-i"':.n"': . _\I")r--ooO"l.I,O.O.1,O N- - -- 8S\ r-i"': '" .... on MMMMMMMMMM6IIItM~ .. .. g I I I I I I I I I I I I I I .,; - '" ~"""MMM"~M~MM MM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ , u "8 u ~ u 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 .~'-.- .~.~.~.~.-.- '_.~ ~jj",,)l,)l,,,jj,L,, u u u . . . . . . . . ." . 888~~~~~~~~~~ 8 8 'r~ "'''' ~~ 00 ~O_N~.\I")I,Or--oo~o_ N~ _ _NNNNNNNNNN~~ ~~ D D n n n n n n n n n n n :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: :i: ~ :i: :5 :e ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .-::::=::: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ n II .", .'" == ~~ 8 ~ Is ~~ u", _."'"','W__," - 01 Ci ! c ~ . 'l:I Clo ;;;l il r. .. .. ;;s 01 f ll. -< 1._Q,l - II . II . 0 II II E ~ 01 .. ~:a=t --a < ""'" [;01< ... ~ -Q,l= :1"$ ~El!l "'u~ . 8 ~ II g ll~ N =c: .... ~]'i:'0Cl . . .0 .:!~~:::l . ~ .. ~ .. u 11"'8 .. . .. .. '" .. .... '" .." - " .. .!le..... ~ e II ~ ~ ~ :a u .... 888888888888888 .n"';"';"';"';"';"";"';"';"';"';"';"';"';"'; ~~~~MMM~MfolI!tiAiAMMiA ~ .... '" ....0 -5 ~ .8 'ii S e - ~ a I is '3 "~ SS ,,~ 1l5.8,g ...] ,,," '> Ii "'1 ~ .i; 1l e ~ l~ 11 -= .~ E II Jl al ~"(; ~ E! o ' 8 6 '" .... 8888888 ",lI"i vi"';"'; vi '" f14MMMf:I4f1A{,IIlt ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ 888888888888888 00000000000000"; ...........r--........"'lt"lt'.......'" - ' li4MMMMMMMMMMM6464M 888888888888888 "';"';"';"';"';"';"';"';vivi",,,,II'i,,,d """"""f'I"lIf'I"lIrr'lIl.O('f"jf'l"llMf'I"lI"""f'I"lIf'I"lIC'I"lV'l - MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM 000000000000000000000000000000 888888888888888 MNNNNNNNNNNNNNN . ~ - ~ I 8 1 ~ ~ ~~ 1 I-~ i JJ~li IJ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ;~~",!j2!; ~u u ~ u~~ ...=R ~_u ll:.a ,I I ",il.sqllll;~ii, 8'~ ~ ~~ '~'~~'t.~e"ie~~gi,~~'~~ ~&i - ~ ;~~e ]=)>0'" e ill!! ~"'l!,!'i::5l~'- ozo ~1~~;~.]j~Q=]i~li'i e eeeii.s .;e....s'e~:8:: A l;l;l;~_~BuO~~o~ ~.. ~"'''''''''''''...l....... ..._~.........~ 'It P.- .. III "' .. :E "g ~ rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl :-3 :E :-5 :-3 :<8 :E :i! :.e :E :E :.e :E :.e :-3 :-5 =:;:=:::;:=====::::;:=::= ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8888888 . . . . . . . !!i ~~~~~~~o '" '" 'Iii MMMMMMM> 8888888!!i "';",vicidvi.,.;.g Mf'P'Iff"lOOOOOOOOil MMM~~MM> 0000000000000000 88888888 NNNNNNNN 1!! ,j i '5 of = "' _"'eil. &~ "'.~ s -~ os. 'C) e c: s ~5.g~] ~~ :Z:':Oog'i ~ ~~j]i3If ~ ~ ! l~ .~ ~ ~ ........._lll~~f-o rl rl rl rl rl rl i'l rl ".:: '';: "';: "+3 "';: ".:: '+1 ".::I ::::.:::=:.::.=== .~ .~ "~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ ~~~~~~~~ .... ~ '" o N '" - ~ .... 8 o '" ... '" o N - N .... ~ I -5 0 'ii .~ j } "' 0 0;; u C . .. 8l!l.9 .8.g g ij"g 11j " rl "ill Il;; 0 ~c... o ~ 8 '" aO N ~ ..., .... .... ~ '" o N '" - ~ "' .. "Iii > .... 8 o '" g 'Iii > !!i o 'Iii > .... '" o N - N .... 0Cl o o N 0Cl o o N ~ .. o '" :!: ~ o,:!!' u ~ '~ 1 .. u,~ " .~ >....l ; 0 tU_ 0 = c:l.~ III >. ~]-=> 0 1 ~ j-g) ~ ~_1l._l;'3 jt5j:~~! 8 ~ . u h e~ .~ .1l.1l ~ ~ ~ ... '" '" '" "~<F -< ... c:l Cl II ~ c :l .. "l:I l:l. ;;;l .. .. r;.. .. .. '" ;;;l 01 l:l. ~ .. Cl. 1._~ .... = " = e ~ i Ii :c:ac:lt ."a<"""'~ roil..: ... - _Cl.J"ii s.S! $ ~ t !l "'u _1-;:;00 .. .. .. 0 ~!~~ .!:! S '" oS "i 'C .e ! = "- .. ~ ~ 8 = o 1l "S UgJii " ]~ 0"" e =" " ~ '" Il.!! '" 2 ~...~ iO .. '" .....:; Q,J e ~ ~ ..- ~Q,J- "'8... Ill' 8'" Ill: ... - = 00 tll: ="'''' U ;;; ~~~ ~~ - ~:3'C ""~~~ i! " "-:351" ._-5j .~cf! ~ ~J.g i~~~ =1 01) rI.J I r.f.l "0 o~~ s]~=; = ..i3" "" .;; .c_.;; 'f:!;E~=~ S;E Ii =.- ~~ tS.-L....~~~-S ..t2 ~["""'"..... ..c-__ ~;;:;:s;;;~8~8 "'~ =.....O'I_=NU~ e~...,_e64r:/)~ riit~i~~] ~tO"ij";j~C;~tO;e 0- ---0 :q .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ ~. . ~ .s .5i .$ ._ .5 ~ e e e e e ... 88~~888 ";"':oof"i"';"'; N N """""M6o"tM6464 lI'l"lt'f"'lVlitnQN .....N.f""'IOO_OOV'l _r--:o('f'li.Ovii.O "'It'Nr'l"lr<"l\OOOO\ N M644i1l'tMMMM 888~888 c::ir-:of"'ii.O"';"'; ..,.NI'l')('f'l\C)OOI"-- N MMMMM64M 88~8888 vi\Oa\"",,,Moci _NNf'f'\\OOOY") N MMMMMMM 8888888 NNNNNNN . 88 -0 _ NN ... 8 o o - 888 000 NO'" '" ... ......... ......-0 00 '" 00 N""':vi N- N 00 _ o '" o N N ... MMM o o g N 888 ~gg 00 _ ... ......... o . C! 8 - ... .88 g~ '" ......... 8 N ~-o-o ~88 ;ZNN ~ " ... ~u Il ~ _ '" 0 I "=' ~ c ".c ..iugil .gg ~ ~fi;:! 1.2-11-1 f l~ Il a !l ! ~ ~I ~ ,lj =: ..: "']!!~jj~~!i ~c 12:~~=~.r:.::s ~ ;_== .9= ";g.~ 8'~~-;;~.Ij! gO:::;J.s....~~;>i:Srf .. i Q !! ii: . .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ 0000000 ~~=-=-=-a.a. \0.....000\0_("'1 f'lf""lf""lf"'l..,."'lt"'::l' rJ ~Il] ="'- 9~j ~.~ ~ = a" o '" "j] 'S ~ ~ 1-; ....j!~ ~ :;;: e;. :8 ~ ~ OJ '" il il ]] " .S! ~ " u u ~:E:E .,c:.e.e "''''-0 ......... '" ... v = III ~ ... ... ;g " = " " II .. = " ~ .. .. t " .. ~ 8 IE o t~ ~~ u~ _'._."0'" c c o User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtmentIDlvIslon Animal Control User Fee scrl on Altered License Fee Date 212012009 DescrlotJon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments: The fee to license an attered dog for 1 year will be increased from $15 to $20. Licenses for 2 years ($25) and 3 years ($35) will stay the same. Pe..onnel Costs T.... Coot 6.50 6.33 0.00 0.00 - Depl or D1v. Hou'S by LIbor Cost Overhead Labor CostIHr. PoeIlIon 1* U 8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.2 0.50 11.50 1.15 12.65 0.5 o 0,00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o Q.OO Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 12.82 Position Animal License Su isor License Checker 20.79 11 Material & Rental Coats Coot Ead1 .....Coot License Tac 0,35 1 0.35 Door Hana9r 0.1 1 0.1 Cash ReceiDt 0.1 1 0.1 Postalle 0.42 2 0.84 Citation 0.5 1 0.5 TolIIl Other costs per Unit of Servbe: 1.89 Other Costs IEauloment. feclllt rental. oart-tlme labor wlo beneftts\ ~ Coot Ead1 au.diIy- .....Coot ComDuter eouioment & SoIIware 4.00 1 . 4.00 , Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 4.00 Comoarlsons to Pro_ Fee . More ILen than SIB. DoIla.. Percentsae 5,00 -33.33% /10.00 -100,0% /12.00 -150.0% 18.71 Total SeMce DlIect Cost C~WIde Gen. & AdrrWI. RnI0 10.790 TOWl SeMce CoA'UnIl Jurisdiction San Bemardlno County Moreno Vallev Riverside Countv Fee ....r Unit 15.00 10,00 8.00 2.01 20.73 Recommended Fee R-.~._~ Fee &aIdy eun.m Fee ....... Feell'lCfMM (Dec:ruM) 20.00 0.73 15.00 5.00 ., 001 o User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet DellllrtmentIDlvlslon Fund Account! User fee DescrlDtlon Data Animal Control 124 43201 Altered License Fee Refund 212012009 Descrl n of service, dellllmd, subsl , and other comments: This increases the refund amount from 25 to $50 that an pet owner can be refunded for spaying or neutering their dog within 60 days of purchasing an unaltered pet license. Position Personnel Costs NA TolIl Burdened Personnel Costs per Unft of ServIce: o Matsrls' & Rentsl Costs Oooaiption Coot Eoch QuonIIIy RequiIod UnI CoIl NA . Other Costs /EauIDment, faclllb rantsl, DlIrt-tlme labor wlo benefltsl Del I...... CoIl Eoch QuonIIIy Unl CoIl TolIl Other co.ts per unft 01 Servioe: ComDllrlsons to Prooosad Fee Mora/Lass than SIB. Jurisdiction Fee par Unit Dollars Pen:antaae This Is not an additional faa but a reduction lJ . -- TotII SeM:le onctColl C/ly-Yt'Ide Gen. &Admh. R_010.7Mio ToI8IServlctColtlllnlt Recommended Fee R-..oo...,....d...clF..SUbIiCIy c........._ F_1nc:rMM (0eaMM) 002 o User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet DepartmentlDlvlalon Fund Account User F.. Description Date Animal Control Deoartment 124 4430 Delinauencv Penaltv (Licensinal 2/2012009 Description of service. demand, subsldv, and other comments: This increases the penalty added to the cost of the pet license for failure to license from $15 to $20 Personnel Costs OeIOlorDiv. olIIl_ Hours by LaborCost ~ COS1IHr, _perU 8.75 29.54 2.954 32.49 0.4 0.50 11.50 1,15 12.65 0.4 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Cos1s per UnR of ServIce: Position Animal License Su ervisor License Checker C Material & Rental Costs Desc:lIpIIon Cash Recei t Posta Citation Cost Eoch ~ 0.1 1 0.42 2 0.5 1 Total Olher costa per Unit of ServIce: Tolal Cost 13.00 5.06 0.00 0.00 18.06 Unit Cost 0.1 0.84 0.5 1.44 Other Costs IEaulDment. fac:1l1t rental. nart-time labor wlo benefits) Desc:r1p11on Cost Eoch 0;;;;;;;;;- ~ UnIt Cost Total Olher costs per Unit of S8fVice: Comoarisons to Pro F.. More ILeas) than SIB. Jurisdiction F.. Der Unit Dollars Percentaae San Bernardino County 15.00 (5.00 -33.33% Moreno Valley 18.00 12.00 -11.1% Riverside County 8.00 112.00 -150.0% c 00.1 T.............-Cool 18.90 CIty-wlde Gen. I A/:tnkI. _ .'0.""" 2.03 T...........CoItIUnlt '0 Q3 Recommended Fee ~\..l&.lded F.. Subsidy eun.nt F.. ArticUlI Fee IncrUH (DecruM) ?OOII 093 1500 5011 o User Fee Detennlnation Coet Analysis Worksheet rbnent/Dlvlalon Animal Control Aceou 4320 U.er Fee Deserl on Re lacement &Transfer Ta DeserlDlIon of ..lVIee, demand, eUbsldv, and other eommenta: Increases the "additional tag issued to replace a lost stolan misplaced or damaged tag" from $3 to $5 Increases the ''transfer of ownership of a licensed dog to a new owner in lieu of a fee for new license" from $3 to $5 Increases the ''transfer of a current license from another jurisdiction" from $3 to $5 Pe...onnel Coata 20.79 11 .......- La<<~. 2.954 32.49 1.15 12.65 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Costa per Unit of Service: -by _..u 0.2 0.2 T.... ColI 6.50 2.53 0.00 0.00 Position Animal License Su rvisor License Checker 9.03 Matarla' & Rental Coata o - ColI Eoch 0_- "",ColI License Taa 0.25 1 0.25 Door Hanller 0.1 1 0,1 Cash Receiot 0.1 1 0.1 Postalle 0.41 2 0.62 Citation 0.5 1 0.5 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.77 Other Coata /Eauloment, !aelllt / Nntal. oart-llme labor wlo beneflla - ColI Eoch 0.-_ "",ColI - Total other costs per Unit of $ervlce: C omoarlsons to Proooaed Fee MaN ILees than SIB. Jurladlcllon Fee oar Unit Dalla... Percentane San Bernardino County 5.00 - 0.00% Mareno Vallev 3.00 (2.00 ~.7% Riverside County 2.00 (3.00 -150.0% 10111l s.va DnctCOlt 10.80 CIy-WilIII Gen. & Admln. RUO 10.7n. 1.16 TIUl SeMel; COIIIUnIt 11 QR Recommended Fee f:;M "-nmendldF..SubIldy 8M CurNnt F.. AmounI 300 F..IncruM~ 700 o 004 o User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet o.partmentIDlvlalon Fund Accou Animal Control 124 4759 o.acrlDtlon of ..rvlce, demand, aUbaldv, and other commen.: This increases the livestock (over 5001bs) apprehension fee from $50 to $150 Personnel Coa. 26.32 18.95 17.17 .......- 0veI'tIMd l8bor CoIUHr. 3.597 39.57 2.621 28.83 2.402 26.42 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel COltS per Unit of Service: ........ -per 0.4 1 0.4 Poaltlon Animal Control Su rvisor Animal Control Officer Customer Service Re /Oi s 55.23 o Material & Rentel Coate """"- Colt..... 0_- UIlICoIt VehiclelFuellMaintenance 15 1 15.00 Radio EouiDmentlMaintenance 5 1 5.00 Scecializad Haulina Eauiament 100 1 100.00 Total Other ct*S per Unit of Service: 120.00 Other Coa. {EaulnmenL faclllt NntIIl ...rt-tlme labor wlo benefltal """"- Colt..... -- UIlICoIl Total other coltS per Unit of Service: ComDllrlaona to Proaoaed Fee MON (Las a than SIB. Jurladlctlon Fee -r Unit Dollars Pareen.oe San Bemardlno County 100.00 50.00 -50.00% Moreno Vallev 75.00 75.00 -100.0% Riverside Countv 90.00 60.00 -66.7% TDIaI8erYIcIDnclcost CIy.WIdeCJen.&AdmIn. RMII010.7Mlo Tct8l8erYlc:8C01UUn1t 175.23 18.84 1A4M Recommended Fee RIICGlftIMnded F.. SubaIdy Currenl....Amaunt F..IncrMM~) 1AAM 4408 5000 100M c 005 c User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet De rlnlsntlDlvlslon Animal Control User Fee Dsscrl on La e Livestock Board Dew 212012009 DsscrlDtlon of service, demIInd, subsldv, and othsr commentll: This increase.s the large livestock daily board fee from $12.50 to $20.00 Personnel Costs 21.47 16.25 pept.orDtv. Colt 0VerfIead L*3r COIb1ir. 30,39 3,039 33.43 22.89 2.289 25.18 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: ..... by _perU 0,2 0.4 T.... Cool 6.69 10.07 0.00 0.00 Position Animal Shetter Kennel Su rvise Animal Shetter Attendant 16.76 Material & Rentlll Costs o eaa-. Cool..... ~R_ Unl Cool Animal Care 8 1 8.00 8.00 Other Costs IEaulDlTlenL faclllt rentlll, Dart.tlmelabor w/o benefltsl eaa-. Cool ElICh ~- Unl Cool . Total Other costa per Unit of service: Comoarlsona to Pro_ Fee Jurisdiction San Bernardino Cou- Moreno Vallev Riverside County Fee 08r Unit 15.00 11.00 15.00 More ILeal than SIB. Dollars Percent8Ge 5.00 -33.33% 9.00 -81.8% 5.00 -33.3% Total SeMc:e 0irId: Colt Clly-WkM Gen. & Mrnin. Rate010.7ft TO!.lI5ervlcllCoatlUnIt 24.76 266 ,}74,} Recommended Fee ?n M Reco..~.04...4 F.. SuDIIdy 7 42 omwntFHAmount 1250 F.. IncruM (DKruM) 7 M o 006 c c c User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtmen Iv\slon Animal Control UHr F.. Deserl rehension Fee Date 212012009 DeserlDllon of Hrv\ce, demand, subsldv, snd othsr com....nta: This eliminates the two tier Apprehension Fee for altered and unatiered pets and establishes a single fee of $100 for the first apprehension, $200 for the second and $350 for the third Personnel Costa ......by -... 0.4 1 0.4 Position Animal Control Su ervisor Animal Control OffIcer Customer Service Re Oi *- bOI' CoeUHr. 3.597 39.57 2.621 28.83 2.402 26.42 o 0,00 o 0.00 o 0,00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel CoatI per Unit of SeJvIce: 55.23 26.32 18.95 17.17 M8larlal & Rental Costa - Cost..... UnIlCaol VehlclelFuellMalntenance 15 1 15.00 Radio EaulomentlMalntenance . 5 1 5.00 Animal CarelDisllOsal 75 1 75.00 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 95.00 Other Costa IEoulo....nt, faclllt rental, ....rt-t1.... IsbQr WiD beneflta' - Cost..... ~- . UnIlCaol Total Other costs per Unit of Service: ComDllrlsons to Pr-d F.. Jurisdiction San Bemardlno Countv. Moreno Vallev Riverside Countv F.. -r Unit 80.00 50.00 35.00 More (Len) than SIB. Dollars Percents... 20.00 -25.00% 50.00 -100.0% 65,00 -185.7% 150.23 ToW s.Mce; 0tNd eo.t Ctty.WiMoG.n. & Admin. ~010.7~ Toe.lS<<vkleec.llUnIt 16.15 166,38 Recommended Fee "-n1lMnded F_SWUly Cunnt Fw AmcuII F..,,-{o.:.-I 100.00 66.38 varies varies 00"; c User Fee Detennlnatlon . Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtmsntlDlYlslon Animal Control User Fse Dsscrl on Board Fee DsscrlDtlon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments: This increases the daily board fee from $8.00 to $10.00 . Personnel Costs 21.47 16.25 F_ ......... _ ......Coot 8.92 30.39 6.64 22.89 ... ......~. 3.039 33.43 2.289 25,18 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel C_ pet" Untt of service: 16.76 Position Animal She~er Kennel Su rviso Animal She~er Attendant Matsrlal & Rentsl Costs o ~ Coot .... ~_I LlnlCool Animal Care 5 1 5.00 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 5.00 Other Costs IEaul"",ent. fsclllt rentsl. aart-tlme labor wlo bsneflts' ~ Coot .... ~_I LlnlCoot Total Other costs per Unit of Service: Comaarlaons to Prooosed Fse More I~ than SIB. Jurisdiction Fse asr Unit Dolla.. Percentllae San Bernardino County 9.00 11.00 -11.11% Moreno ValleY 6.00 14.00 -66.7% Riverside County 15.00 5.00 33.3% Totals.MclOinlCtCOIt 21.76 Cily-~ Gen. & Acmin. Rni .10.75% 2.34 TobIlServaco.tlUnil '410 Recommended Fee in M Recanwn.ncledF..SuIlU:Jy 1410 CUfTnt.... Amount 8 00 F..1nerHH (OWN..) ., M c 008 c User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Ana~1a Workaheet De rtrnenllDlvlalon Animal Control User Fse Deserl on Pick-U Service Cha DescrlDtlon of aarYlce, demand, eubsldv, and olller comments: This increases the fee charged for pick-up services from $25.00 10 $50.00 Pe..onnel Costs Dept. or D1v. lAbotColt 0verhUcI laborCDIUHr. 9.65 35.97 3.597 39.57 7.26 26.21 2.621 28.83 6.85 24.02 2.402 26.42 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 TollIl Burdened Personnel COI1I pet Un~ of Service: 27.61 Position Animal Control Su rvisor Animal Control Officer Customer Service Re Oi 26.32 18.95 17.17 Material & Rental Costa ..... by P..-.... 0.2 0.5 0.2 T_ Cool 7.91 14.42 5.28 0.00 """"- Cool..... eu..tIv _ UnIt eo.tI Vehicle/FuellMaintenance 15 1 15.00 Radio EauicmentlMainlenance 5 1 5.00 Total Other costs per Unit of service: 20,00 c Other Costa IEoullllllent faclllt rental, oart-tlme labor w/o benefltal """"- Cool..... QuenIIIy- UnIt Cool Total Other costs per Unit of Service: Comoarlaona to ProD088d Fse More TLen than SIB. Jurladlctlon Fse oar Unit Dolla.. Percentall8 San Bernardino Countv varies varies varies Moreno Vallev varies varies varies . Riverside County varies varies varies c 008 TOIIlsatviceonctco.t Clly-\Mca o.n. & Admin. R....10.7S% TotIlhl"\lic1lCosUUnit Recommended Fee RKmWMnded F.. SlIblldy Cunnt F.. Amount F..IncNI... (DKrHH) 47.61 . 5.12 1;?7:<1 MOO 273 2500 ?1;OO c User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtmentlDlvlslon Animal Control U..r on Ado tion Fee Description of ..rYlee, dem8J1d, subsidy, and other comments: This creates a single adoption fee of $30,00 Adoption fees (to new owners) from $25 to $30 for each dog or cat Adoption fees (to new owners) from $40 to $30 for each puppy or kitten . Personnel Costs 21.47 16.25 FrtngI caI DRcI: ...- .-Coot 8.92 30.39 6.64 22.89 .... .-~. 3,039 33.43 2.289 25.18 o 0,00 o 0,00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 ToI8l Burdened Personnel Coats per Unit 01_: 16.76 Position Animal Sheller Kennel Su Animal Shelter Attendant MlIlsrlal & Rentsl Costs o Coot .... UnIt Coot Animal Care 5 5 25.00 . ToI8l Other _III per Unit 01 Service: 25.00 Other Costs (Equipment. facll"" rentsl. part.tlme labor wlo benefltsl ~ Coot .... .",..,..- UnIt Coot Total Other costs per Unit of SeNice: ComD8rlsons to ProllOMd F.. . Jurisdiction SlIn Bemsntlno Countv Moreno Valley Riverside Countv Fee Der Unit 20.00 30.00 75,00 More (Lessl than SIB. Dolle.. Perce- 110,00 -50.00% - 0.0% 45.00 60.0% ToIeIServlceDnc:tCost Clty-WIdeGen.&A<<r*l. R8 0 10.7", Tote! s.vIce eo.tI\JnIt 41.78 4.49 4R?~ Recommended Fee MOO R-..._lded Fee WIeldy 18 25 Currn.... Amour( vaf'iRA ....1naeeIe lDecruH) VAn- o DIU c User Fee DetenninatJon Cost Analysis Worksheet De artmantIDlvlalon Animal Control User F.. Deserl on Quarantine Dail Board Descrlptlon of aarvles, damand, aubaldv, and othar commanta: This increases the quarantine daily board fee from $10.00 to $15.00 Palllonnel Costa - Oepl or Otv. HoIn by L*Ir Colt 0vefhMd ~ u 8.92 30.39 3,039 0.2 6.64 22.89 2.289 0.4 o o o o o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Costa per Unit of 5ervice: Position Animal Shelter Kennel Su !Viso Animal Shelter Attendant 21.47 16.25 Matarlal & Rantal Costa T.... Coot 6.69 10.07 0.00 0.00 16.76 CootEocl1 0U0nIIIy- ....Coot Animal Care 5 1 5.00 . Total Other cos1s per Un~ 01_: 5.00 c Othar Costa IEaulDmant. flIclllt rental ""rt-tlma labor WiD banellta' ~ CootEocl1 0U0nIIIy- ....Coot Total Other costs per Unit of Service: Comoarlaons to ProDosad F.. Jurladlctlon San Bernardino Counlv Moreno Valley Riverside County F.. oar Unit 9.00 6.00 15.00 MorelLnaI than SIB. Dollalll Parcantaaa 1.00 11.11% 4.00 66.7% (5.00 -33.3% c 01i r_StrYic4Ionctcost 21.76 Clly-wtclIi Gen. a AdmIn, Rae 0 10.7R 2.34 TotIIls.rvlCtiCOlllUnIt 7.1 in Recommended Fee HiM Recornmendld F.. SuDIidy 910 ClIINtCF_AmoI.Inl 1000 ,..1nctMM (OKtUH) ~nn o User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtm.ntIDIvIslon Animal Control Us.r F.. Deecrl Rabies Vaccination De Description of ..rYlc., demand, sUbeldv, snd oth.r comments: . The rabies veccination will be inClllased by $2 to cover the cost the contracted veterinarians charge to the City. Position s_ HoIn by ToI8I PosItion per U Colt Pe..onn.1 Costs NA Mate...1 & R.ntel Costs o - Coot .... ....Coot Oth.r Costs IEaulpm.nt, "clllt ......1 nart.am. "bor wlo ben.fIts """"- Coot Eoch 0__ ....Coot Total Other colm per Unit of Service: Comosrlsons to ProDos.d F.. Jurisdiction THIS IS A DEPOSIT ONLY F.. ...r Unit Mo..ILessl thIln SIB. Do..... P.........D. TcMl5ertll:eDndCOll 0.00 CIly-WIde Gen. & Admin. R.aeG10.7", 0.00 TotIIlSltrYk>>COItAJnI nM Recommended Fee nm RtocommenOlG F.. Subeldy 000 CurNnlF..AmounII 000 F..lnctNM (DIcrMM) nM c 012 User Fee DetermInation Cost Analysis Worksheet o De artmentIDlvlslon Fund Code Enforcement 001 Date 2/2312009 Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments: This 1Ii95 adminIstrative fee IS added to amount u, u", "eanng costs when 1Illl88 costs have not been paid In the Ume given to the property owner and the hearing order Is processed. The total amount Is then placed as a lien agalnslthe property. The proposed fee modification is to reflect increases in salaries and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has not been uodaled In accordance with Increases In salaries and materials since 1996, Personnel Costs Labor Rates -....... F...... T....O..... Dept. CI' DiY, .....- ..... by ..... .... PoslUon Laor ...- Laor Coot ~ ..... Coot/IO". Poo_pwUnl Coot .. Administrative Assistant $24.09 $7.23 $31.32 $3.13 $34.45 3 $103.35 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: $103.35 c Material & Rental Costs 0.._........ Mallinos PrintinolcooleslreceiotslreDOrtl fax cover sheat/Countv Recorder} $0.42 $0.10 Cclot Each Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2 7 UrilCclII $0.84 $0.70 1.54 Other Costs IEaulDment. facll Iv rental. . rt-tlme labor wlo benefits} ~ Coot Each ~- UrilCclII Total Other co... porUnnofSefVice: 0.00 C rI P dF omaa. sons to ro....... ee More (Leas) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee ....r Unit Dollars Percentaae San Bernardino 120.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0,0% 0,00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0% Total SerW;e Dnct eo.t Clty-WldeGen. IAdtNn:. "'016.~ Tot8ISer'I/lceCoelllJnll. Recommended Fee -'"'''- Cunool Fee ....... ,"-1ncNMe~) o 013 104 8Q 16.86 1?1 7& 1?O no 174 11500 'I'iM User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet o De ntIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date Administrative fee for processing weed abatement Code Enforcement 001 4815 liens on vacant lots 31112009 Description of servlc:e, demand, subsldv, and other comments: Administrative fee for processing weed abatement liens against properties whose owners have failed to pay the abatement costs for vacant lots. There has been no fee Increase since 1996. Fee modification to refIecIlncreases In staff time, salaries, and other administrative costs associated with this nrocess. Personnel coats Labor Rates s..~.. T_ Fringe Ir....onct Oept.Dr[)W" T.... ...- . -;j T....... Poeitlon ""'" ...- Iuba..Ccot ... """""'. -per Ccot.. Weed Abatement Coordinator 32.45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 46.40 2 92.81 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 92.81 Material & Rental Costs o.cr-. Ccot Each . ~- UnlCclot Maillnos 0.42 3 1.26 Total Other costs per Unit of SeMce: 1.26 c Other Coets IEaulDmenl faelll v rental. Dart-time labor wlo beneflts\ o.cr-. CclotEach -- UnlCclot 0.00 Total Other costs per Un" 01_: 0.00 Comoarlsons to Pro- Fee Mont (Lass) than S.B. Jurlscllcllon F_ ""'r Unit Dollars Pe San Bernardino nla nla 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% o 014 TotIlSenllceDlMcteo.t 9281 Clty-Wlcleo.n.&Admk'I. RIIlIt011l.on. 9.96 TotIlSeMceColltUnlt 100 78 Recommended Fee 1l1/1l1/1 Rcoft"'....-aF-.~ 278 CumonlFee ....... 1950 F_m.::n..e(~) AIlM User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet o DeDartmenllDlvIslon . Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date Code Enforcement 001 4733 Request for demand letter 2/2312009 DescrIption of service, dem8nd, subsldv, and other comments: When Code enforcement places a lien on a property, they file a Notice of Pendency with the County Auditor-Conlroller Recorder (ACR). When an Individual or company tries to buy, sell, refinance, etc they may be noticed by the ACR's Ofllce the property mey show a lien. A demand letter is typically requested from an escrow company during the salellransfer/refinance of property, which details total amount owed to the City for liens, administrative cltations or other charges panding against a property. Currently, the City collects a $10 administrative fee for preparing a demand letter and $5 for each additional line item fee that includes abatement costs, existing citations and hearing orders that have not yet been liened and a calculation of any interest owed on each of the debts. Based on the averaga demand letter containing 5 additional line Rems ($5 for each item), for a total of approximately $35 per demand letter. Updating these fees for personnel costs would bring the combined fee to $100 for the creation of a demand letter (no charges for additional lines). Personnel Costs LllborRateS S1r8Ig"- F..... ....0_ jooot. '" DIv. "'....- --j T....~ Position ""'" ..- ~Ccl8t l.abo<CclotiHo". 1'00_.. U Ccl8t.. Administrative Assistant 24.09 7.23 31.32 3.13 34.45 2.5 86.13 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 86.13 C Material & Rental Costs Ccl8t..... CuonlIv _ UnlCcl8t Printina lcooiea/fax $0,10 7 $0.70 cover sheetl . Total Other COlts por Un~ of Service: 0.7 Other Costs IEaul_L facll "' rental. DArt-tlme labor wlo benefttsl Oeo .....' Ccl8t..... UnlCcl8t Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00 ComDarleons to ProDOSlld Fee Fee ....r Unit More (LIIss) than S.B. Jurisdiction . Dollars Percentaae Other luslsdlctlons do not ore )Bre delMlld letters. . ToteIServIoeDnc:tColl Clly-~Gen. &Adri't. Rete 0 16.07'% Total SeMce CoatIUnIl: 8683 13.95 1/1/17R "--""'......"-~ Cunrw. Fee Amount F..Inc:fMIe(~1 1/1/1/1/1 078 1000 ll/l/l/l Recommended Fee c 015 User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet o DeoartmentlDlvlslon Fund Account U.er Fee DescrlDllon Date Code Enforcement 001 4733" Duplicate Release of Lien fee 2/2312009 on se ee, em.n I au ay,an er commen : The $20 fee is an administrative fee for producing a Duplicate Release of Usn. This occurs when our department previously complied with a request for a demand letter, the lien was paid through escrow, and a release was Issued that was noll1lCOl'ded by the party receiving the original release. The request must also be researched for additional fees owing and Interest re-calculated. Personnel costs Labor _ s...... TIme F_ tr"""onct ~<<DN. t=~ HounI by T"""~ Position L.- - L.- Cast 0verNed CoIt/Hr. ...."""'_u.. Cast.. Administrative Assistant 24,09 7.23 31,32 3.1317 34.45 0.75 25.84 . Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of SefVice: 25.84 Descrlptl of rvi d d bsld ts doth Malerlal & Rental Costs o o.cr-. Cast Eoch """"""- UnO Cast Prinlinll/cooieslfax $0.10 3 $0.30 cover sheet) Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.3 Other Costs (Equipment, facll~ V ..ntlll. p If'l-tlme labor wlo benefits) o.cr-. Cast Eoch "'--- UnO Cast Total Other costs por Un" of Service: 0.00 ComDarlsons to Proooeed Fee More (Lass) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Pe San Bernardino 3O~00 0 0.00 0,00 0,0% 0,00 0,00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0,00 0,0% * Account No. 001-000-4733 is used for building abatement fees Account No. 001.()()().4411 is used for administrative citation fees c 016 Total SeMce DIrect eo.t 2614 cty.WkIe Gen. & Adn*I. R.-016.07"J' 4.20 TobII SeMc:e eo.tIUnIl: AA~ Recommended Fee AAnn RKaIo"'................., 034 CunwIt F.. Amount 7000 Fee 1ncIuIe~) 1nnn User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet o DeDartmentlDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date Code Enforcement 001 4735 Release of Notice of PendencY Fee 2/2312009 Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments: A Notice of Pendency is a document that is recorded with the County Rscorder's oIIice to notify any potential buyer and/or lender that there is some type of administrative action pending against the property and/or there is a lien against the property. This is an administrative fee for releasing a notice of pendency for costs incurred. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time, salaries, and other administrative costs associated with this process. The fee has not been updated in accordance with increases in salaries and materials since 1996. Personnel Costs Labor lbtiiS s...... .::I F..... T"", llncI Depl or Oiv. ""'...- ......:.1 T""'lAIM>r Position .- Lobar Coot ~ __ CootIH<. PoIItion PI" Coot.. Code ComDliance Officer II $34,15 $10.25 $44.40 $4.44 $48.83 2 $97.67 Code Comoliance Proc. Asst, $20.74 $6.22 $26.96 $2.70 $29.66 2 $59.32 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of SeMce: $156.99 Material & Rental Costs c ~ Coot Eoch 0u0nlIT _ .....CcoI Mailinas $0.42 2 $0.84 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.84 Other Costs IEaulDment. facility rental. D rt-tlme labor wlo benefits' ~ Coot Eoch a..uv_ .....CcoI County Recorder Fee $13.00 1 $13.00 Total Other COlts per Unit of Service: 13.00 ComDarlsons to Pro_ad Fee . More (Less) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee ...r Unit Dollars Percentage Not available 0.00 0.0% 0.00 0.0% Total Serva DlrKl Colt Clty-Wlde o.'l. & Adn*l. R-.O 16.onIo T0S8I5ervIce Co8UUnI 1811l1ll 27.32 107 AA R80amm..-od""~ eun.nt Fee Amol.nl .... mcr..e (oecr..e) 1RnM 1730 11400 MOO Recommended Fee c 01, User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet o DepartJnentlDivislon Fund Account User Fee DescrlotIon Date Administrative fee for weed abatement on vacant Code Enforcement 001 4815 lots 3/112009 Descrtotlon Of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments: Administrative fee for weed abatement incurred costs and staff time for processing abatements, There has been no fee Increase since 1996. Fee modification to reflect increases in staff time salaries and other administrative costs associated with this Personna. "osts Labor!!!; s Stralgtc .:::I FringI Total Dnd Dept. or DIY. T...._ ..... by T~~ Position - ","",Coot ~ """" CostIHr. Pas_,..'" Code Comoiiance Officer II 34,15 10.25 44,40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67 Weed Abatement Coordinator 32,45 9.74 42.19 4.2185 48.40 2 92.81 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Servlce: 190.48 Material & Rantsl Costs ~ Coot Each 0u0nIy -.cI UrilCcoI Mailings . 0.42 5 2.1 Total Other costs per Unit of SeMce: 2.1 c Other Costs (Eaulament facllI Y rental. aart-tlme labor wlo banafttsl Dea_/tAL. Coot Each 0.-. -.cI UrilCcoI Vehicle ExPense 30 30,00 2.00 60.00 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 60.00 Comparisons to Proposed Fee More (Lan) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentaae San Bernardino nla nla 0,00 0.0% 0,00 0.0% TomlSeMceonc:teo.t C!ty-WIde Gen. & Admn. ReeeOUI.~ Total SeMce CoItIUnt 250 48 28.93 '77 40 R.cam...........~ Cl.II'8Ilt Fee Amount Feell'lCl'fNlM (Dec:rMIe) "7fiM 240 11000 1R~M Recommended Fee o 018 c c c User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet De..._entlDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DeecriDtlon Date Code Enforcement 001 4743 Vehicle Tow Release Fees 21912009 Descrl don of service, demend, aubel , and other comments: Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. This fee was first adopted by Code Enforcement in 2008 to mirror the fee chargad by the Police Department for the same service. eve 22850.5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as GTA are not ct.a ad and can obtain a release 7 d a week 8am-7 m, All other releases can be obtained M-F 7:30-5:30 . The current Personnel Coats .aDOI' RalIls StnIlghtl::l Fn.... lToI8lD1rect Dept. orDlv. ..........""" ..... by ToIal..- PoaItIon ...... LI....Coot ."..,... Labor cost/Hr. -"'-,.. Coot,. Code Comellanee Officer II 34.15 10,25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 2 97.67 Sr JSUD 0Ificer 57.03 17.11 74.14 7.4139 81,55 0.25 20,39 Code Enf, Processi"" Asst 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.66 1 29,66 Admin. Svcs. SUNlr. 34.15 10.245 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.25 $12,21 Total Burdened Personnel Coats per Unit of SeMce: 159.92 Materiel & Rental CllSts lloKri"'", . Coot..... ... Unit Coot Photos $2.00 4 $6.00 Reoular Mallinas 0.42 2 0.84 Total Other COItI per Unit of SeMce: 8.84 Other CllSts IEaulllllltlnL facll v rental. Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl lloKri- Coot..... ... Unit Coot Vehicle Ellllense 40 40,00 1.00 40.00 Total Other costa per Unit of Service: 40.00 Comoarlaons to ProDOtllld Fee Fee Der Unit More (Lese) than S.B. Jurl8dlctlon Dollars Percent-. San Bernardino nla nla 208 76 ToIIIlServloeDncteo.t CIty-WIde hi. .. MINn. 1WI016.(l'1% Tc*lS<<vloeeo.&lUnlt 3355 ?4?~1 Recommended Fee ?.4llM , ~1 21500 ?"M -..- c..n..o__ ....~to--l 018 User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet o DeDartmentlDivlsion Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date Code Enforcement 001 4411 Removal of Unauthorized Sians (New Feel 21912009 DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments: Direct costs incurred for removal of unauthorized signs. Recommended fee is for removal per sign. If an ordinance amendment Is approved to remove the certified mail requirement, costs would be reduced by $5.21, but the $100 fee per sign would s1111 be ustified. Personnel Costs Labor Rates s.."" Tme FrirOO Total Dna Oept.orOlv. T"'_ _,,:::J T'" '*" I Position La"'" ...- Labo< Coot c...- Labo< CcetIHr. Coot.. Code Comoliance Officer II 34.15 10.25 44.40 4.4395 48.83 0.4 19.53 Sr JSuo Officer 43.87 13.16 57,03 5.7031 82.73 0.2 12.55 Code Enf. Pf0C8ssina Ass! 20.74 6.22 26.96 2.6962 29.86 0.5 14.83 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 48.91 Material & Rental Costs c Oeo ....' Coot.... -;:;,,,;;;,,,- Ura Coot Certified Mailinas 5.21 1 5.21 Reoular Mailincs 0.42 2 0.84 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 6.05 Other Costs IEoulDment, facll v rental Dart.tlme labor wlo benefltsl o.c.-. Coot .... ."....,.- Ura Coot Vehicle Exoense 40 40.00 1.00 40.00 Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: 40.00 CDmDllrlaons to Fee More (Lass) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee ....r Unit Dollars . Perce_ San Bernardino nla nla RIverside 100.00 0.00 0.0% Corona 80.00 . (20.00 -20.0% ToIal SeMce DINcI Colt Clty-Wlde Gen. & Adrr*I. Rnt016.~ T01IIl ServIce CoA'UnIt 9296 14.94 in? an ~"'...,..'"-~ Current Fee Amount FMlIJlCfUIe(oea.M) inn nn 7M Recommended Fee inn nn o 020 User Fee Det8nnlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet o DeoartmentlDIYlslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Date City Clerk 001 4901 Yard Sale Permit Fee (N_ Feel 3/112009 Description Df service, demand, subsidY, and Dlher CDmrnents: Nominal fee for issuance of yard sale permit Personnel CDSts LabDr Rates Strlllglt.::! ....... T....lJlrect Oepl:.OtDIv. Ir....~ ..... by T....l.8bar PDSltlon - l.8barCoot l.8barCootiHo". ..._... UriI Coot ... Business Rea. Reoresenlatlve 20.72 6.22 26.94 2.6936 29.63 0.467 13.84 0.00 0.00 0 0,00 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Untt of Service: 13.84 d=......- I I I I I~- I ~-I ~1 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: Other CDSts /Eoulornent, facll hi rentsl, . rt-t1rne labor WID benefltsl ~ Coot Each au.dy- UrilCoot . 0.00 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00 Comparisons to Pr Fee Jurisdiction San Bernardino Redlands Ontario Fontana Yucaioa Permit fee More (Less) than S.B. TobII SeMctl Dncl COlt 1384 Dollars Percentage CIly-Wlde Gen. & AdrN'l. nla nla RMlt018.01"JI0 2.22 112.50 -83.3% Total5eMcl eo.tIUnII IBM /12.00 -80.0% 7.00 -46.7% Recommended Fee 1E;M 112.50 -83.3% ~lMIldIdr:..:w.idy 106 c..n.rt F.. Amount FeelnauM (Decreae) 11;00 2.50 3,00 8.00 2.50 o 021 o User Fee Detenninatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet artmentlDivlalon Develo ment Services Fun 184 Account 4351 Unr .. DescrI on Blanket/Combo Permit ate 2/23/2009 Description of service, demand, subsl ,and other comments: A combo permit would combine the excavation permit ($45) and lane closure perm~ ($45) that contractors typically pull together. The cost of the combined perm~ would be $55, The combo perm~ would allow the contractors to pull one perm~ saving the City and contractors time. Devel men! Services staff estimates there is a sed revenue loss of $10 900. Position Develo ment Services Tech, En ineerln Assistant 1 F ....Olnoc:l _ Labor Colt 7.22 31.28 7.97 34.55 Labor CoItIHr. 6.88118 38.16 7.60188 42.18 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total eur<lenod Peroonnel Com per Unij of Servlco: H.... by PoIllIonperU 1 15% TolllI Colt 38.16 6.32 0.00 0.00 Personnel Costs 44.48 0' Material & Rental Costa 1- r-I-l -1 ---~~.- , Other Costs /Eaulomant, facllU . rental, oart-tlme labor wlo banafltal OeocrIpIlOn Colt __ Quonllty - u,* Colt Total Other costs per Unit of Servtce: Comoarlsons to P_ed Faa Jurisdiction San Bernardino Corona Ontario Redlands TemecuJa Temecula Chino $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Mora ILHsI than S.B. Teal s.rvlce Dnct Coel $ 44.48 Fee l8/' Unit Dollars PercentaGe CltyoWIde Gen. I Mr*L 55.00 nla nla R.w Q zen. $ 11.50 60.00 $ 25.00 45% TcalServlceec.tlUril !I; !i.o; 1IQ 85.00 $ 30.00 55% 216.00 $ 161.00 293% Recommended Fee !I; !i.o;no 338.00 Annual $ 283.00 515% Recommended F.. SubaIdy S 099 39.00 MonthlY $ /16.00 -29% eurr.ntF..Amounl: S 177.00 $ 122.00 222% F..InCrMM(DecfuM) S !i.O;no c 022 User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet DapartmantJDivision Fund Account New 184 Account Usar Fee Description Devalo ment Services Blanket Ins ection Fee Data 2/23/2009 Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments: Fee charged to utility companies to inspect the work covered under the blanket permit, 16 square fee. The recommended fee is $76.50. This is based on one hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II and .18 hours of a Construction ISurvey Manager's time. Not all cities have adopted a separate fee, it is included in the permit. Pensonnel Costs otaIB..- labor CoItIHr. 8.82882 48.96 11.90904 66.04 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0,00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Pel$Onnel CoIls per Un~ of Service: Position Construction Ins or II Construction/Surve Mana er 30.87 41.64 <;i.terlal & Rental Costs Hours by PoaitIon per Un 1 0.18 Total Cool 48.96 11.89 0.00 0.00 60.85 Oesc:rlption Coot Eoch QuonlllyR_ Unit Cool Postaae Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: 0 Other Costs IEauiDment, faclllt1 rental. Dart-time labor w/o benefltsl Cat Each Quonllly R_irod Unit Cool Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: C rI edF omDa sona to ProDOBE ee More/Less than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee [ er Unit Dolla,. Percentage San Bernardino $ 76.50 N/A N/A Corona Full Cost N/A N/A Moreno Vallev $ 15.00 Per Location $ 161,50 -0.80392157 Ontario Included in ""rmit fee N1A N/A Temecula $ 194.00 I $ 117.50 154% ( ~no $ 177.00 I $ 100.50 131% ......) 023 TOUIlServlceOtrecl:Coll: $ 60,85 City-WIde Gen. & Admn. Rate 0 25.18'" $ 15.74 Toml Service C08tJUnIt S 7858 Recommended Fee S 7851) RecommencIed F.. SUbIIdy S 008 Current F.. Amount S F.. lnau.. (0ea'MN) S 78 51) User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet Account Various User Fee Description More than 3 Plan Checks Fund 183 Date 2/23/2009 Description of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments: Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing plan check comments, city standards, or public safety. The recommended fee is $88.50 per hour. This represents review time for an Engineering Assistant III, the Senior Civil Engineer, the City Engineer, and the Development Services Tech, The account will vary based on the type of plan being checked. Peraonnel Costs Depl crOiv. Labor Cost Overhead Labor CoItIHr. 31.28 6.88116 38,16 44,34 9.75546 54.10 62,87 13,83096 76.70 80.68 17,74916 98.43 o 0,00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unn of Servlc:e: ~'~" Str8tght TI Lobo 24.06 34.11 48.36 62.06 B 7,22 10,23 14.51 18.62 Hours by Posttkln per U 0.1 1 0,1 0.05 70:51 Oterlal & Rentsl Costs I5Oocription Cost Each QWlntity Required Unit Colt Postaae Total Other costs per Unn of Selvic:e: 0 Other Costs IEaulDment, faclllt rentsl, Dart.tlme labor wlo benefits) . 0eIatpIi0n Coot ElICh Quontlly R...- Unit Cost : , Total Other costs per Unn of Service: ! ComDari8ons to ProDOSed Fee Mora ILeas than S.B. Jurisdiction Fes oer Unit Oollara PercentsDe San Bernardino $ 88.50 Per Hour N/A N/A Temecula $ 93.00 Per Sheet $ 4.50 $ 0.05 Mareno Vallev ' MaDsl $ 190.00 Per Sheet $ 101.50 $ 1,15 Moreno Vallev ' ImDrovementsl $ 248.00 Per Sheet $ 159.50 $ 1.80 Moreno Vallev Gradinal $ 207,00 Per Sheet $ 118.50 $ 1.34 '" 02'1 Total Service Direct Colt $ 70.51 City-Wiele Gen. & AdmIn. Rate 0 25.88~ $ 18.23 T0t8IServiceCOItI\Jflit s 8874 Recommended Fee S 8850 Rec:ommellded Fee &IMIdy S 024 Currwnt F.. Amount F.. 11"ICfN" (Oeauee) S 8850 User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet Fund 188 Account 4780 User Fee Descrlptlon More than 3 WQMP Reviews Date 2/23/2009 Descrlptlon of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments: Fee charged to applicant when staff must check the plans more than 3 times due to the design engineer not addressing plan check comments, city standards, public safety, or adequate water quality best practices. The recommended fee is $99.00 per hour. This represents review time for the NPDES Coordinator, the City Engineer, and the NPDES Customer Service Rep. Personnel Costs StrllightTi La 17.84 37.68 62.06 B 5,35 11.30 18.62 0eI>l or Olv. Labor Coot Overheod ~ CoIlIHr. 23.19 5.10224 28.29 48.98 10.77648 59.76 80.68 17.74916 98,43 Hours by P_ per Un 0.5 1 0.05 ToIlll La Colt 14.15 59.76 4.92 Position NPDES Customer Service Re . NPDES Coordinator Ci En ineer o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unft of Service: 78.83 r~erlal & Rentsl Costs . . Coot Each Quontily Required Unit COIl Postage Total Other costs per Unft of Service: 0 Other Costs IEaulament, faclllt1 rental, osrt-tlme labor wlo benefltsl DescrlpIlon COIl ElICh Quonllty Required Unit COIl Total Other costs per Unft of Service: Comparlsons to ProDOSed Fee Jurisdiction San Bernardino Moreno Vallev (Preliminarvl Moreno Valley I Basic Final) Moreno Valley I Standard Final) Moreno Vallev I ComDlex Final) More IL_I than S.B. Fee oer Unit Dollars Percentsae $ 99.00 Per Hour N/A N/A $ 321,00 3rd Review $ 221.79 224% $ 750.00 3rd Review $ 650.79 656% $1,440,00 3rd Review $1,340,79 1351% $1,824.00 3rd ReYiew $1,724.79 1739% I I Total SeMce Direct COlt $ 78,83 City-WIde Gen. & AdmIn. Rate02U8'Wt $ 20.39 TotaJServlceCostIUnIt S llllno Recommended Fee S gg'1 RtclOfI'INnded F.. But*dy $ 1021) Current F.. Amount Fee Il"ICrUM (o.creu.) ~ gg'1 c 025 User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet Develo ment Services Fund Account New 188 Account NPDES Business Ins Date 2/23/2009 Description of service, demand, subsidY, and other comments: As required by the City's Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (MS-4) staff is required inspect all businesses to insure they are in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). The recommended fee is $148.50. This represents ,40 hours of documentation time for the NPDES Customer Service Rep, 2 hours of inspection time for the NPDES Inspector and .15 hours of review time by the NPDES Coordinator. The permit is a federal requirement and regulated at the State and regional level. Position NPDES Customer Service Re . NPDES Ins or Construction Ins ector II NPDES Coordinator StrIIlghtTi 1.8 17.84 30.87 Personnel Costs 37.68 48.98 Labor CostIHr. 5.10224 28.29 8.82882 48.96 o 0.00 10.77648 59.76 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel COllI per Unn of Service: $ Hours bv PooiIion per U 0.4. $ 2 $ $ 0.15 $ TOlOI COIl 11.32 97.92 11.30 8.96 c 118,20 Material & Rentel Costs OeIcrtptlon Coot Eoch QuontiIy RoquiNd Unit COIl Postage Total Othercosts per Unn of ServIce: $ - other Coats /EaulDment, faclllt rental, Dart-time labor wlo benefltsl . 0e0crlplI0n COIl Eoch QUlIntity Required UnII COIl Total Other costs per Unn of Service: Comparisons to Pro Fee . More /L_ than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentaae San Bernardino $ 148.50 N/A N/A Ontario (Commercial) $ 171,00 Avel'lllle $ 22.50 15% Ontario /Industriall $ 263,66 Averaoe $ 115,16 78% Redlands $ 71,00 $ m.5O -52% Moreno Vallev I Industriall $ 451,00 $ 302.50 204% Qeno Valley I Commercial) $ 311.00 $ 162.50 109% reno Vallev I Restaurantl $ 271,00 $ 122,50 82% TotaI~DiNdColt $ 118.20 City-Wide Gen. & AdmIn. R.. 0 25.18" $ 30.57 ToWI SeNice ColItIUnIt S 1411 n Recommended Fee S 1AR ~O Recommended F.. SUbIIdy S 027 CuI'l*ltF..ArnounI: F.. Inct1NI.. (Dec:reue) S 14850 026 User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet Depertment/Dlvlslon Develo ment Services Fund 184 Account Various Date 2/23/2009 Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments: The current fee covers one inspection and there are many times when the inspector is called to a site by the contractor and the contractor is not there or the site is not ready for inspection and then is requested to revisit the site, The original inspection fee is based on a percentage of the cost estimate. The recommended fee is $61.50. This represents one hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II, Moreno Valley based their fee on a 4 hour minimum. Not all cities have established this fee. The account will vary based on the type of inspection being performed, Personnel Costs 30,87 Oept. or Div. Hours by __ lAbor CoItIHt. per Un~ 8.82882 48.96 1 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel COlltI per Un. of Service: Total Coot 48.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 Position Construction Ins ector II 48.96 Otsrlal & Rental Costs Desaiplion Coot Each Q_ Roquhd UnII Coot Postaoe Total Other costs per Un. of Service: 0 Other Costa IEaulDment, faclllt rental, oart-tlme labor wlo bsnefits Desaiplion Coot Eoch Q_ Roquinld unllCootI I , Total Other costs per Un. of Service: ComDarlaons to Prooosed Fee Jurisdiction San Bernardino Moreno Vallev Fee oer Unit $ 61.50 $ 432.00 More IL_1 than S.B. Dollars Percentage N/A N/A Each $ 370.50 602% Total ServIce 0I111C1 Coat $ 48.96 City-Wide Gen. & AdmIn. Rete a 25.86" $ 12.66 Total ServIce CostIUnlt S A162 Recommended Fee S A150 Recomrl'IltFlded F.. SuMidy S 0.12 Current F.. Amount F.. Increase (Dec:rHM) S A150 L 02"( User Fee Determination Coat Analysis Worksheet epartmentIDlvlslon Develo ment Services Fund 183 Account Various U..r Fee Deserl Ion Revisions to roved Plans Date 2/23/2009 D88crlptlon of aervlce, demand, aubsldv, and other comments: The fee would be charged to applicants who request changes to their plans after the plans have been through the plan check process'and have signed mylars. The recommended fee is $142.50 per sheet. This fee represents review time for a Se!1ior Civil Engineer, a Construction/Survey Manager and documentation time for a Development Services Tech. Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a consultant. Personnel Costs 48,36 24.06 41.64 ,*,101_ Be Labor CoIl 14.51 62.87 7.22 31.28 12.49 54.13 oIol Labor CoItIHr. 13,83096 76.70 6.88116 38.16 11.90904 66.04 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0,00 o 0.00 Total Burdened PallOnnel Costs per Un. of Service: H.... by P_porU 1 0.1 0.5 Coot 76.70 3.82 33.02 0.00 113,54 Gterlal & Rental Coats DoIcripIlon CoIlEoc:ll QuontiIyR~ Unit CoIl Postage Totel Other costs per Un. of Service: 0 Other Coats IEaulDment, faclllt rental, DBrt-tlme labor wlo bsneflta OeIaipllon CoIlEoc:ll QuonlilyR"'- Unit Colli I . i I Total Other costs per Un. of Service: Comparlaona to ProDOSed Fee More IL... than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentaae San Bernardino $ 142,50 Per Sheet N/A N/A Corona $ 625.00 Per Sheet $ 624,60 438% Temecula $ 241.00 Per Sheet $ 98.50 69% Chino $ 614.00 $ 471.50 331% Moreno Vallev IMinor) $ 261.00 Per Sheet $ 118.50 83% Moreno Vallev IMaior\ $ 269,00 Per Sheet $ 126,50 89% C'" TotaISWVIClDnctCOll $ City-Wide Gen. & AdmIn. Rme 0 25.85" S TotIlSeMceColtAJnit ! 113.54 29.36 14' !l() Recommended Fee S Recommended F.. SUbIIdy S Currwd F.. Amount F..1ncrHM (DeaHse) ~ 14' 50 040 14' 50 02b User Fee Detenninatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet , lpartmentIDlvlalon Fund Account Uaer Fee Description Date ,.... Development Services 183 4782 Certificate of Correction (New Fee) 2/23/2009 Description of service. demand, aubsldv, and other commenta: The fee would be charged to applicants who have non-substantive changes to their tract/parcel maps after the maps have been signed and recorded. The recommended fee is $101,00, minimum one hour, This represent 1 hour of review time for a Senior Civil Engineer. Corona and Moreno Valley based their fees on a survey study that was performed by a consultant. ::~~L:."'" Dept. or Diy. Labor Coot 0_ Labor COII/Hr. 62,87 13.83096 76.70 31.28 6.88116 38.16 o 0.00 o 0,00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unft of Service: 80,51 Personnel Costa H.....by Pooltion perU . 1 0.1 Position Senior Civil En ineer Develo ment Services Tech. 14.51 7.22 Material & Rental Costa ToIa'La Coot 76.70 3.82 0.00 0.00 ( ...,Jstage Coot Eoc:h o..ntIly RequRd Unit Coot Total Other costs per Unft of Service: 0 Other Coats (EauIDment. faclllt rental, Dart.tlme labor wlo benefits) Desalption Coot Eoch Ouontlly Roqulrod Unit Coot Total Other costs per Unft of Service: ComDarlaona to ProDOSed Fee Jurisdiction San Bernardino Corona Temecula Moreno Valley Ontario More ILesal than S.B. Fee ..r Unit Dollars Percentage $ 101.00 Per Hour N/A N/A $ 735.00 $ 634.00 628% $ 651.00 $ 550.00 545% $ 496.00 $ 395.00 391% $ 334,00 $ 233.00 231% Recommended Fee S Recommended F.. Sw.Idy S Total Service DirK!: COst $ City.WiCM Gen. & Admin. Rate G 25.88% S TotaIServiceCoatlUnIt !; Cumtnl F.. Amount 80.51 20.82 1n1 ::l4 101 no 034 ...,........(_> S 1n1 no c 02~J User Fee Determination C st Analysis Worksheet n 0 DepartmentIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DescriDtlon Date DeveloDment Services 183 4352 . Permit Extension (New Fee) 2/2312009 Description of service, demand, aubeldv, and other comments: There are circumstances when a contractor needs to extend the perm~ time frame; staff enters the extension request into Permit Plus and verifies with the Construction Manager that the extension is warranted. The recommended fee is $45.00. This is based on 0.2 hours of review time by the Construction Manager and documentation time by staff. Pensonnel Costs StroightTi Oepl orOiv. oloIS_ Holn by ToloI La Position La Labor coat OverhNd COltlHr. PoIition per Un' Cos. Develo ment Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 6.88116 36,16 0,55 20.99 En ineerin Assistant 1 26.58 7.97 34.55 7.60188 42.16 0,05 2,11 Construction/Surve Mana er 41.64 12.49 54.13 11.90904 66,04 0.2 13,21 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 Total Bunlened Pel1lonnel Costs per Unft of Selvice: 36.30 Q;:I & Rentsl Costs Cost Each Quontily RoquiMd Unit Cool Postage Total OtIler costs per Unft of Service: 0 Other Costs (Equipment, faclllt rentsl, nart-tlme labor wlo benefits\ 0eIclipli0n COlt ElICh Quantity RequiNd Unit COlt Total Other costs per Unft of SeNice: Comparisons to Proposed Fee More (L888 than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee ....r Unit Dollans Percentsae San Bernardino $ 45.00 . - \,; 03U Total SeMc::e Direct Colt $ 36.30 City-Wide Gen. & Admin. Rille. 25.80" $ 9,39 Towl SeMce CoItIlInIt S 4569 Recommended Fee S 4500 R~I....nded Fee sw.Idy $ 069 Current F.. Amount F.. Ina'HM (o.a.u.) S 4500 User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet Develo ment Services Fund Account New 183 Account Date 2/23/2009 Description of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments: This is an inspection fee charged to applicants who requested a Temporary Use Permit or a Conditional use Permit. The inspection is required before the applicant's cash bond can be returned. The recommended fee is $61,50. This represents 1 hour of inspection time for a Construction Inspector II. No other cities have established this fee as it is included in the application fee. Personnel Costs oIIIlB" Labor CoItIHr. 8.82882 48.96 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened Pe~onnel Colts per Unft of Service: Hours by POIition por U 1 Totallll Coot 48.96 0,00 0,00 0.00 Position Construction Ins ector II 48.96 Uterlal & Rental Costs ~ Coot Eoch OUllntlly RoquinId Unit COlt Total Other costs per Unft of ServIce: 0 Other Costs IEaulDment, faclllt rental, aart-tlme labor wlo beneflta Deocription Coot Eoch Ouonllly Roquirod Unit COlt Total Other costs per Unft of Service: Comparisons to ProDosed Fee More (Lees than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentaae San Bernardino 61.50 N/A N/A 0 T...'.......'"-C... $ 48.96 City-Wide Gen. & AdmIn. RIo. 0 ....... $ 12.66 ToIoI_C-... S 111112 Recommended Fee S II 1 50 Reco....llnded Fee Subsidy S 0 12 Current F.. Amount F"_IOoaouol S 11150 031 User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet epartmentIDlvislon Fund Account New 184 Account User Fee Oncrl Ion Oate Develo ment Services 2/23/2009 Oncrlptlon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments: Currently staff provide a service to the utility companies by billing them a monthly invoice for penn its as no charge, The recommended fee is $62.04 per invoice. This represents 1.5 hours of review time for an Administrative Assistant. No other cities have established this fee. Dept. ot Div. HOUIS by LaborClllll 0_ ' LoborCoolIHr, _perU' 6,22 26,94 5.92592 32,86 1.5 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0,00 Total Burdened Personnel Coots per Un. of SeIVice: Pereonne. Costs Position Administrative Assistant Qerlal & Rental Costs ToIoI Cool 49.29 0.00 0,00 0.00 49.29 Deoaiplion Cool Eoch O_R~ Unit Cool Postaoe Total Other coots per Un. of Service: 0 Other COlIt8 (Eoulament, 18clllt rental, Dart.tlme labor wlo beneflts\ Deoaiplion Cool Eoch QUMtily Required .UnltCool . Total Other costs per Un. of Service: Comaarisons to Proaosed Fee More I Lees than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee ""r Unit Oollare Percenta"e San Bernardino $ 62.04 NIA NIA - ( J - 032 Total 5ervIce Dil1lCl; Cost $ 49.29 CIty-w.de Gen. & Adrhn. Rate 0 2&.85" $ 12.75 Total SeMI>> CoItIUnIt !: 8'04 Recommended Fee !: 8'00 R~,~.16.lOed F.. SubI6dy S 004 CUl'*ltF..Amol.rrt F.. lnau.. (DeaHM) !: 8'llO User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet partm.ntIDlvl810n Fund Account New 183 Account U8.r Fee Description Date Develo ment Services 212312009 Descri on of ..rvlce, d.mand, .ubsld ,and oth.r comm.nts: F.echarged to an applicant who is requ.sting a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicant is required to post a bond to insure all outstanding work is finished. The recommended fee amount is $541.50. This fee is based 2,5 hours of field review time by the ConstructiOn/Survey Manager, 2.5 hours of review time by the City Engineer and 0,5 hours of documentation time b the Director. No other Cnies have established this fee because n is not alwa standard ractica. 11.90904 66,04 17.74916 98.43 6.88116 38.16 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened PenIonnet Costs per Unit of ServIce: P.raonn.1 Coats Poaltlon Construction/Surve Mana r Ci En ineer Develo ment Services Tech. S"lght Tim l.Il 41.64 62.06 24,06 Fringe otIll Direct Benefttl ...bor Cost 12.49 54.13 18.62 80.68 7,22 31.28 Hours by _perU 2.5 2,5 0.5 ToIaIl.Il Coot 165,10 246,07 19.08 430.25 Ctsrlal & R.ntal Coata DelcriDtion Cost Elich QUllntltyR8Cluil'ed Untteo.t Postage Total Other cas" per Unit of ServIce: 0 Oth.r Coata IEaulDm.nL faclllt rental ....rt-tlm. labor wlo ben.fital Delcription Coot Eoch Q_ RoqulNd Unit Coat Total Other costs per Unit of Service: C edF rI P om.Da 80n. to 1'OD081 ee More IL... than S.B. Jurl.dlctlon Fee Der Unit Oollara Perc.ntaa. San Bernardino $ 541.50 NIA NIA ....... L: 03(; TOIIII s.va Dnct eo.t $ 430.25 CIly.Vllideo...&",*,*,- R80 25.~ $ 111.26 TOUIIServlclCoetIIJnIt s 54151 Recommended Fee S 541 50 R.......u"..1decI F.. $lMidy S 001 CU'Nnt F.. AmounI Fee InctMM (o.a-.) S 541 50 o c o User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet DeDartmentIDlvialon Fund Account Uaer Fee DeacriDllon Date Large Family Day Care (9-14 Children) -Initial Fire 001 4336 Licensina Pre-Insoeclian Fee. 3/112009 Deacriptlon of service, demand, aubald ,and other comments: Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permn. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with Stale ulations has ro ed to mod' ins Ion fees for care facllnies Peraonnel Coats Labor Rates . Straight Time Fri~ ot8lDirect -."Dlv. ot8l Burdened _..by T.....- Position ....... ......",j .......Coot t.aor CoetlHr. _perUnll Coot _ Fire Prevention OffIcer 29.37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63,00 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of service: 63.00 Material & Rentsl Coats ~ C<lotEOCll QuontIty- ""'Coot Supplies 0.15 4 0.60 Total Other costs per Unit of service: 0.60 Other Coats IEaulomant. flIclllll rentsl, _rt-lIme labor wlo banefltal ~ CootEOCll 0U0nltIv_ ""'Coot Vehicle 40,00 1.5 60.00 Total Other costs per Unit of Servk:e: Com_risons to Pro_ Fee Fee oar Unit More (Lan) than S.B. Jurisdiction Dollera Percentage N/A 123 6lI T,*,ServloeDll-=l:CaM Clty-~G.n.'",*,*,- R-.a'....... TDIIIl s.m:.eo.MJnI 17.98 141 AA Recommended Fee ~""""Fww.6dr CUrNIltFeeAmclult Fw~(o.cr-) MOO 9158 21203 _ill? 11~ 03'1 o c c User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet DeDartmentIDlvIslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDllon Date Fire 001 4336 Residential - Board and Care 6 or fewer 3/112009 Description of service, demand, subsld ,and other comments: Annual fire inspection and follow-up, issuance of permfi. Fee was established in 2008. To remain compliant with State ulations has ro sed to mod' ins ection fees for care facilfiies Personnel Costs Labor Rates -:=I . F_ h-otaIOIrect Oept. or Div. I=~~ _..by T.....- Position Coot CosIIHr. -...... Coot_ Fire Prevention OffIcer 29,37 8.81 38.18 3.82 42.00 1.5 63.00 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 63.00 Matsrlal & Rentsl Costs Deocriptian Coot .... "'-- .....Coot Suoolies 0.15 4 0.60 Total Other costs per Unit of service: 0.60 Other Coats IE"ul"menl- facll"' ...ntsl, DarMIme labor wlo b8nafltal Deocriptian Coot Eoch 0;';"";';_ .....Coot Vehicle 40,00 1.5 60.00 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: ComDarlsons to Proooaed Fee Mo... (Lea) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee -r Unit Dollars Percentaoe NIIi 12360 r.-ls.n,IceDncl:Co.t CitY-W..-a.n. & Mnn RIliIo01U6-. TotIII s-loe CoettUnIl 17,98 1~1 AA Recommended Fee ~F..SlMIdr Cunwlt F.- AmoIn F..__lo--) AAM 9158 21203 ..1R?n~ Or) , Lit} c c c User Fee Detenninatlon Coat Analysis Worksheet DeparlmentIDlvIslon Fund Account User F.. DescrlDtlon D.... Police 001 4743 Tow Release 11612009 DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subslcly, and other commenta: Fee for release of impounded/stored vehicles. CVC 22850,5 allows for recovery of actual costs. Victims of crimes, such as GTA are not charged, and can obtain a release 7 days a week, Bam-7pm. All other release can be obtained M-F, Bam-4pm. The current fee is $215,00. Pel1lonnel Costs Labor Rat8s StraIgtrtTime F_ ot8lDirect Dept.orOiv. ....- ......by T....LoI>o< Position ""'" ........ LoI>o<Cost ,.... CootiHo". -pet'" Cost - Police Records Technician 17,84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0,25 7.10 Dispatcher II 25,29 9.76 35,05 3.51 38.56 0.25 9.64 Police Officer 40,43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.33 88.29 Communitv Service Officer II 21.77 8.95 30.72 3.07 33,79 1.25 42.24 Ser!leant 51,16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82,40 0.5 41.20 Total.Burdened Personnel Cosls per Untt of Service: 188.47 M....rlal & Rental Costa Doocription Cost .... Quantity- UnlICost Police Reoort Fee 0.15 5 0.75 Certified Postage 3.94 2 7.88 Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 20.88 Other Costa IEaulDment. facllltl rental, oart.t1me labor wlo benefltsl _on Cool .... CluonItIy- UnlICool . Total Other costs per Unit of Service: Comparisons to ProllClHCl F.. More (Less) thsn S.B. Jurisdiction F.. oar Unit Dolla.. Percentaae San Bernardino 215.00 nla nla Ontario PO 125,00 (115.00 -47.9% Corona PO 155.00 185.00 -35.4% Redlands PO 175,00 (65.00 -27.1% Pomona PO 100.00 (140.00 -56.3% Riverside 205.00 (10.00 -4.2% 209 35 ToIIII s.rm. DnoI eo.t City-Wide G<<'l. &Mnln. R-.016.4n. TotaIs.mc.CaIlIlJnII: 32.41 7417" Recommended Fee ~mendldF.-~ CunwtF. o\mOUnI ....__Io-j '4000 175 21500 ?~OO 03[, c c o User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtmentlDlvlalon Police Uaer Fee Oescri on Police Photo ra hs 3" x 5" DeacriDtlon of service, demand, aubsldY, and other commenta: Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, including the cost of film, film developing, printing and staff time to process requests, Comparisons with other cities are difficutt because of the services provided are different. There has not been a fee Increase since 2006. Peraonnel Costa I Labor Rates _TIme "- TDIaI~ 0epI:. orDlv. TotIIBun:Iened :;:.1 TDIaI.=! Position ,- -- Labor Cost ~ labor CoIIIHr. P_ Cool Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37 Forensic Soeclalist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42,27 0.33 13.95 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of seNice: 23.32 Matarial & Rental Costa ~ TCool..... lInICool Film developing & DrintinD 0.27 1 0.27 .. = Total Other COltS per Unn of_: 0.27 Other Costa (Eaulpment. facllltv rental -rt.time labor wlo bsneflts' Cool Eoell -- lInICool Totel Other costs per Unit of ServIce: Compariaona to Prooosed Fee More (Leas) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee ner Unit Dolla... Percentaae San Bernardino 28.00 I nla nla San Bemardlno Sheriff 2,00 I 25.00 -92.6% Riverside PO 9.00 CD no reDrints 18.00 -$,7% Ontario PO 15.00 CD no reprints 12.00 -44.4% Fontana PO 32,00 CD no reDrints 5.00 18.5% Chino PO 35,00 CO + 25 cents Der 8.00 29.6% I T................Coot 23.59 ~o.n.&AdIIWI. Rm01Uft 3.65 TOUiI SeNicl CosWnil. '7 ,. Recommended Fee '7 M A---..r=..........., 024 CurrentF..Amounl: 2800 F..IncrMH (DrIcruM) 1 M O~,. u, c c c User Fee Detenninatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtmentlDlvlslon Police User Fee Deserl on Police Phot raphs 5" x 7" Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other commenbl: Fee for reproducing police crime seene photographs. including .the cost of film, film developing, printing and staff time to process requests. City comparisons are difficuij because of different services provided There has not been a fee increase since 2006. Personnel Costs I Labor Ratss -.::I ::r:.~ Deilt~orOlv ....- -;~ T:'~ Position _ Cool LEar CoolIHr. p- per Police Records Technician 17.84 7,96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0.33 9.37 Forensic Soecialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42,27 0.33 13.95 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32 Malarial & Rentsl Costs ICoolEacll - UnI Cool Film develODiIlll & Drintinc 2.95 1 2.95 Totol Other co.to per Un~ of_: 2.95 Other Costs IEcuIDlllAnt. facllltv renbll. ...rt.time labor wlo benelltsl Desa1pIlon CoolEacll Q-- UnI Cool Total Other coats per Unit of SeMce: Com...rlsons to Prooosed Fee More (Lan) than S.B. Jurladlction Fee DBr Unit Dollars Percenbloe San Bernardino I 29.50 nla nla San Bemardino Sheriff 6.00 24.00 -80,0% Riverside PO 9.00 CO 21.00 -70.0% Ontario PO 15.00 CO 15.00 -50.0% Fontana PO 32.00 CO 2.00 6.7% Chino PO 35,00 CO 5.00 16.7% Tn! s.mc. onct COlt 26.27 Clty-Wtde Gtin. I Admin. ~..15.4fi 4.07 TotIIIServiCeCostlUnll: ~~.~ Recommended Fee ~IVI ~F..~ 033 Cunwnt F.. Amount 2950 F.. 1ncrM.. (OR'NM) OM 03b c o c' User Fee Detennlnatlon Coet Analysis Workahaet DepartmentlDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee DescrlDtlon Dllte Police 001 4741 Police Photographs 8" x 10" 3/1712008 Description of service, demand, sUbsldv, and other commente: Fee for reproducing police crime scene photographs, including the cost of film, film developing, printing and staff time to process requests. There has not been a fee increase since 2006. Personnel Costs Labor Rates _Time F_ Ir... 0hcI Dept. or DIY. alai ......... tan by T:'~ Position ..- - lAbor Coot ~ lAbor ~. PooltlonporlJnl Police Records Technician 17.84 7.96 25.80 2.58 28.38 0,33 9.37 Forensic Specialist II 27.94 10.49 38.43 3.84 42.27 0.33 13.95 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 23.32 Material & Rental Costa Oesa1p1ian ICoot Eoch 0_- IN Coot Film develaDina & Drintlna 6.00 1 6.00 Total Other costs per Un~ of Sefvice: 6.00 Other Costa (Equipment, facility rentel part-time labor wlo bsnefltal 0eIerIpII0n Coot Eoch Qur4Ity - UnIlCoot . Total Other costs per Un~ of Service: Comparisons to ProllOS8Cl Fee More (Less) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee aer Unit Dollars Percenteae San Bernardino . 33.00 nla nla San Bernardino Sheriff 6.00 27,50 -82.1% Riverside PO 9.00 CD 24.50 -73.1% Ontario PO 15.00 CO . 18,50 -55.2% Fontana PO 32.00 CD (1.50 -4.5% Chino PO 35.00 CD 1,50 4.5% Total Service Dncleo.t 2932 CIly-WldlGen. & Admin. _.16..... 4,54 Total Set\lIceCoaUUnll ~~ A~ Recommended Fee 33 !in ~._._..dWF..SubIIdy 035 eun.nt F.. Amount 33 00 F..1ncruH (o.cnu.) n fiin 03~1 c c c User Fee Detennlnation Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtJnentIDivlslon Police Deacriotion of service, demand, subaldv, and other commentll: For reproduction of video cassette tapes (VHS), on Personnel Costs ~Ra'" -3 F_ ....0_ OoplorOiv. ...1- ......by T....Laa Position ___ lAbor Colt lAbor CoIl/Hr. _perUnl Colt.. Police Detective 45.67 21.02 66.69 6,67 73.36 0.5 36.66 Police Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7,49 82.40 0.25 20.60 Tot81 Burdened Personnel Costa per Unit of Service: 57.28 Material & Rental Costs 1- I j I I _r:J.:-1 ~l Other Costa IE..ul......nL facllltv rentlll ...rt-tlme labor wlo benefits) .... Oooa1p1lon CoItEocll Q......., UNI Colt Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0.00 Com...risona to ProDOHC F.. F.. ....r Unit More (LHs) than S.I Jurisdiction Dollars Pen:entllCH San Bernardino 17.50 48.50 -73,5% Riverside 50,00 110min $1.75 add'l 16.00 -24.2% Ontario 25.00 41,00 -62.1% Fontana 32.00 34,00 -51.5% 04(1 TOUiIServiclDnctColt 57.28 Cily-Wlde Geft. & AdmIn. Rille 0 15.41'" 8.87 TotIIl8er'ta ColIWnil IIA 15 Recommended Fee llAno ~F_lIIIbIId)I 015 eu,.,.nt F.. Amount 6300 F.. Inern.. (Dean") ~no c c o User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtmentlDlvlslon Police Fund 001 DeecrioUon of "Nice, demand, sUbsldv, and other comments: Fee for reproducing Police Dispatch logs and CAD printouts The fees have not been increased since 2006. Personnel Costs Labor ...tes 5trajGhll::l F..... ot8IDirec:t oept.orDlv. IT_I Burdened Hauno by T....~ Position ....... lAbor Colt LaborColIIHr. POlition.....UnlI Coot... Discatch Suce/Visor 30.87 12.27 43.14 4.31 47.45 1.25 59.32 Pclice Communications Mar 35.85 14.98 SO.83 5.08 55.91 0.25 13.98 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 73.30 Material & Rentel Costs Ilotcri- Coot..... a~"" 0.;;0... un< Coot Audio Tace 1.00 1 1.00 -c- Total Other coats per Unit of ServiCe: 1.00 Other Costs IEnul......rd facllltv rentel. -rt-tlme labor wlo bsnefllal DelCription c........ a...- ........ u... COlI Total Other COItI per Unit of Service: Com_ri...... to Pro.....ed Fee More (Less) than S.B. JuriedlcUon Fee -r Unit Dollars Percentaae San Bemardlno 80.00 nla nla Riverside PO 300.00 215.00 253% TlUI5ervlceDil9Ctco.t 7430 ClIy-Wldt Get\. & MINn. R.at01U"," 11SO TotIls..vtceCOltAJnll R~AA Recommended Fee A~M --- 080 CurI'anl F.. AmounI 8000 F..11'\CfHM~) ~M 04J c c c User Fee Determination Cost Analpls Worbheet De rtmentlDlvlslon Police User Fee Descrl on False Bu la Alarm Fines DescrlDtlon of service, demand, subsldv, and other comments: Fine for responding to false burglary alann calls. Unit cost for each false alann. No fines incurred for pennitted locations until fifth false alann in alann pennlt calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1st to 4th non-pennitted false alann. The fine for the 5th-9th false alann will be $90 and the 10th and subseauent fa"a alann '175. Fees have not been Increased since 2004. Personnel Costs Labor RatatI _TImo Fringe ot.IlDirect Oepl or DiY. IT.... HelIn by T:'~ Position ,- ...- Labor CoIl 0v0rMM Lobor CooIMr. __Unll Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 38.56 0.5 19.28 Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 0,5 33.19 Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.25 20,60 Senior Office Assistant 19.84 7.96 27,80 2.78 30.58 0.33 10.09 Total Burdened Person"'" Costa per Unit 01_: 83.16 Material & Rental Costs Oftalptian CoIlEac:h QuInIlIy ~ UnllCoIt Postaae 0.42 1 0.42 Total 0tl1er c:cots per Un~ 01_: 0.42 Other Costs IEauloment. faclllt rental. DlIrt-llme labor wlo benefltsl lJooc:rlotian CoIlEac:h QuInIlIy ~ UnllCoIt Total Other costs per Unit 01 Service: C rI P edF ompar sons to roDOtlO ee More (Lass) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee Der Unit Dollars Percenta~ SBPO 75,00 nla nla Riverside PO Fine IS 75.00 0.00 0.0% Pomona PO IS 220.00 145.00 193.3% Newoort Beach PO . Fine IS 125.00 50,00 66.7% Irvine PO IS 150.00 75,00 100.0% Ontario IS 150.00 75.00 100.0% Huntinaton Beach IS 200 125.00 166.7% T<..........DndCool 83.58 CIly-WlcM Gen. & Admi'I. .....,...... 12.94 Teal Servlce CcmIUriI AA Ft, Recommended Fee 7'" nn ._..,~,......._ 2152 cu..no.......... 5000 F..IncrUM(DecruIe) .,~ nn 04~: c Cost Analysis Worksheet DeoartmentlDivlslon T Fund Account User Fee DeecrlDtlon Date Police I 001 4747 False Robberv Alarm Fines 11612009 Description of service, demand, su~ldy, and other comments: Fine for responding to false robbery alarm calls, Unit cost for each false alarm. No fines Incurred for permitted locations until fifth false alarm in alarm permit calendar year. Proposed fee is for the 1 st to 4th non-permitted false alarm. The fine for the 5th-6th false alarm will be 5250. 7th-9th will be S300 and the 10th and subsequent false alarm $350. Fees have not been Increased since 2004. Personnel Costs Labor Rates I. Straight Time Frmv:t.~ 01r8cl 0ept.OI"0Iv. "olalB HounI by Total Laor Position lobo Be ,.-.. ..... rCost Overhead l.abor CostIHr. _"",Un! Cost ... Dispatcher II 25.29 9.76 35.05 3.51 36.56 0.75 26.92 Police Officer 40.43 19.92 60.35 6.04 66.39 1.67 110.66 Seroeant 51.16 23.75 74.91 7.49 82.40 0.5 41.20 Senior Office Assistant 17,84 7.96 25.80 2.56 28.36 0.33 9.37 Total Burdened Personnel Costs per UnR of ServIce: 190.35 C Msterlal & Rentsl Costs c Description CostEoc:h I..mitvRequlrod Unit Cost Postage 0.42 0.42 Total 0Iher costs per UnR of SoMce: 0.42 Other Coats IEauloment. facllltv rentsl, oart-time labor wlo benefits) 0escrlpIl0n Cost Eoc:h ;;;tiiv~1rod Unk CaS Total 0Iher costs per UnR of Service: ComDarlsons to ProDOSed Fee Mare (Less) than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Perc:entaQ SBPD 175.00 nla nla Riverside PO Fine #5 300.00 100.00 50.0% Newoort PO #5 125.00 175.00 -37.5% Irvine #5 150.00 150.00 -25.0% Ontario #5 200.00 0.00 0.0% Huntington Beach #5 200.00 0.00 0,0% 190.77 e Total SeMce Direct Colt Dty-WIde Gen. & Admin. R8te015A8% Total Service CostlUnlt 29.53 ??n 30 Recommended Fee ?OIl 00 20.30 100 00 100 00 Recorrrnended F" Su'-ldy CUrrent F.. Amou'lt Fee IncrMM (DKruH) 043 c c o User Fee Detennlnatlon Cost Analysis Worksheet DeDarlmentIDlvhllon Fund Account User F.. De8crtDtlon Da.. Police 001 4743 Traffic Citation Sion-off fees 313/2009 Dascrt tlon of service, demand, subsld ,and other commenta: Police Officers issue traffic citations to the motoring public who operate vehicles with mechanical violations. These violations must be corrected and signed off by police officers prior to the pUblic contacting the court. Currently the Police Department does not cha e a fee for personnel to inspect vehicles. ve' corrections have been mede and s n off the citation. Pe...onnel Costa Labor Re. s...n"" F..... iT....onct Dept: or [)tv. iTomt BurdIned ~:J T~uj Position ,..... - La<< Caol La<< CoItMr. p-.. Communilv Service Officer I 22.74 9.13 31.87 1.75 33.62 0.33 11.09 Lieutenant - Watch Commander 62.8673 27.68 90.55 4.75 95.30 0.1 9.53 0.00 Total Burdened Personnel Colts per Unit of Service: 20.62 Me..rlal . Ren"l Costa I~ -l I I I I I~~J_~=J Other Cos.. (Eoulnmen*- faclllh Nntal, ...rt-tlme labor wlo bsnefll81 ~ Caol.... ~- ....- Total Other costs per Unit of Service: ComDarlsons to ProD08ed F.. MON (Lass) tIuln S.B. Jurisdiction F.. ....r Unit Dolle... Percentaae San Bernsrdlno nla nla Ontario PO 0.0% Corona PO 20.00 -100.0% Redlands PO 20.00 -100.0% Pomona PO 20.00 -100.0% TataI s.rvIcI DlNd COIl: 2Q 62 C.,.WIdII Gen. & Admin. Rate 0 10.7ft 2.22 TCUl8eMotCOlllUrlll ,? R4 Recommended Fee .,0 no RecammMdldF.WIIIdy 2- 84 ClIf'Nfll F. AmounI 0 00 F..InInue(Dea8ll) '0 on 04'; User Fee Determination Cost Analysis Worksheet De rtmentlDlYlsion Public Services Fund 132 Account 4820 User FH Deserl Sewer Lateral Ca in Date 2/25/2009 Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments: Currently, staff charges an applicant who is requesting sewer lateral capping services $500, the cost of the contractor who performs the work. To recover the costs of City personnel and administrative overhead needed to inspect the sewer lateral capping services performed by the contractor, Public Services is proposing to increase the fee by $300. Personnel Costs Position Sewer Maintenance Su ervisor IW Customer Service Re . 45.99 25.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hours by Position per U 2 0.25 ToIllI Cost po 91.98 6.31 98.29 ..Material & Rental Costs . { lcrtplloh Cost Eoc:h ~ UnIt Cost - Total Other cools per Unit of Ser\Ilce: Other Costa IEauilllllent facllltv rental -rt-tlme labor w/o bsnefltal Cost Eoc:h ~ UnIt Cost Contractor Cost 500.00 1 500 Fleet Charaes Vehicle 539 15.5 3 46.5 Total Other cosls per Unit of SONIce: . 546.50 Comparisons to ProPOSed FH More ILess than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee ner Unit Dollars Percentsae San Bernardino N1A N/A N/A Riverside Insnection onlll $300 $148,50 N/A Rialto Insoection onlll $157 $146.50 N1A Redlands Insoection onlv $282 $146.50 N1A Lorna Linda N/A N/A N/A Moreno Vallev N1A N/A N/A Ontario . N1A N/A N/A c 045 Total ServIce IJIrKt Cost $ 644.79 City-Wide Gen.' Adrrin. Rate 0 25.86% S 166.74 Total service CostlUnlt S 811 54 Recommended Fee S RMM RecoI,~...nded Fee SubIldy S 11.54 CumtnI Fee Amount S 500.00 F..1ncruH (Oe<:ruse) S ~M User Fee Determination ( -. Cost Analysis Worksheet .) DepartmentIDlvlslon Fund Account User Fee Dascrllltlon Date Sewer Lateral Inspection Fee ( Private Public Services 132 4820 Contractor) 2/24/2009 Description of service, demand, subsidy, and lither comments: Currently, staff charges $50.00 for sewer lateral inspection services performed by a private contractor. Staff recommends that the fee be increased by an additional $50.00, to recoup the $100 cost to the City for these services. Contractor charges the City $100.00 per inspection. Personnel Costs llflII_ Lol>or CosI/Hr. o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 o 0.00 Total Burdened P"""",nel Cools per Unn of ServIce: Position Ins or Costs C Material & Rental Costs 100.00 Descrfption Cost Each L.n.ov Roqulrod UnIlCOll Total Other costs per Unn of ServIce: 0 Other Costs IEaulDment, facilItY rantal, Dart-time labor w/o benefltsl OescrtpUon Cost Each ..ntIly- unit Cost Total Other oasis per Unit of Service: ComDarlsons to ProDosecl Fee Mora/Lass than S.B. Jurisdiction Fee oar Unit Dollars Percentage San Bernardino NJA N/A N/A Riverside N/A N/A N/A Rialto N/A N/A NJA Corona N/A NJA N/A Loma Linda NJA N/A NJA ueno Vallev NJA N/A N/A tario N/A NJA N/A 04b Total SeMce Direct Colt $ 100.00 Qty-WIde Gen. & Admin. RMe.25.88% $ 25.86 ToWI $erotIce CoIWniI S 175 All Recommended Fee S 100 00 R..........._llMdF..8LCleidV S 2586 Current Fee Amount S 5000 Fie Incr8aIe (0ecrNM) S MOO