HomeMy WebLinkAbout19-Council Office
C'.". " . . I"
"'-,'ii'ir,,"i_
..
J1T-.oF SAN BERNARDI. - REQUE. FOR COUNCIL AC"FN
Subject:
From: Councilman Jack Strickler Legislative Review Committee Report
Dept: Council Office
Date: August 1, 1986
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Recommended motion:
"
! . That minutes of Legislative Review committee meeting held
July 31, 1986 be received and filed.
2. That Committee recommended actions be approved and appropriate
departments implement these actions as necessary and as soon as
possible.
~d s2:;.~ ~
,
Contact person: Phil Arvizo Phone: 383-5188
Supporting data attached: Yes Ward: N/A
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: N/A
Finance:
Council Notes:
75.0262 Agenda Item No "
r!,.j<~
; .'~
.
.
.
LEGISLATIVE REVIEW COMMITTEE
July 31, 1986
ATTENDEES: Councilman Jack Strickler - Chairman, Councilman
Gordon Quiel, Councilman Jack Reilly; Acting ,City Administra-
tor - Ray'Schweitzer, Deputy City Attorney - Loren McQueen;
Planning Director - Prank Schuma, Fire Chief - Gerald New-
combe, Public works Director Roger Bardgrave; Council
Executive Director - Phil Arvizo, Affirmative Action Officer
- Juanita Scott; Cal State Prevailing Wage Consulting Team:
Don Lindsey, Tom Pierce, Barbara Sirotnick, She 1 Bockman,
Emblem Development Corporation representatives: Phil walsh,
Mike Cole; The Sun - Steve Stern.
1. PREVAILING wAGE STUDY - The Committee, after exten-
sive discussion, recommended approval of a 45-day extension
to September 15, 1986, in order for the team to complete
their study.
2. EMBLEM CORPORATION - TRACT NOS. 10459 - 10460 - The
Committee reviewed the information provided by Planning and
Engineering staff and the Emblem Corporation representatives
and directed staff to take administrative action in
processing the resubmission of tract maps. No Council action
required.
3. PARK FEE SCBEDULE AND PRIORITY USE OF PARK FACILI-
TIES - The Committee recommended approval with minor changes.
The Council Executive Assistant was directed to contact Mr.
Keith Lowe and ask him to submit his request for assistance,
with backup material, direct to the Council through the City
Clerk.
4. ORDINANCE TO AUTHORIZE APPROVED VOLUNTEERS TO ISSUE
NOTICES OF PARKING VIOLATIONS TO VEHICLES ILLEGALLY PARKED IN
DISABLED OR PHYSICALLY HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACES - Item
continued awaiting ways & Means Committee decision on -Blue
Crew- implementation.
5. ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE - Item continued. Planning
staff will review the -land use- portion of this ordinance
with coordination of City Attorney and Animal Control and
bring back to the Committee.
.
.
.
6. OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND
LIABILITY CLAIMS - Item continued.
1. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY ADMINISTRATOR TO ACT AS
A REPRESENTATIVE OF TBE CITY TO APPLY FOR DISABILITY RETIRE-
MENTS - Item continued.
8. PARK CONSTRUCTION FEES wAIVER - SANDLEWOOD PARK
The committee recommended approval of the waiver.
9. MALL PARKING STRUCTURE - RENOVATION - The Committee
referred this item to the City Administrator for his recom-
mendation on where funds would come from for this most needed
renovation.
10. ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FOR FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION
TRI-CITY CORPORATE COMPLEX The Committee recommended
approval of the alternate site location on Gould Street and
asked Council Executive Assistant to send memo to RDA advis-
ing them of the decision and that the purchase would be made
with tax increment from the off-ramp funding.
Meeting adjourned.
, Respectfully submitted,'
~#~
lman Jack Strickler
man
slative Review Committee
JS:ej
'~-r-~C7-~~---,n_~..~ T
tclTY OF SAN BE~ARDINO __ MEMORANDU.
-
Subject
Approved
To
RAY SCHWE ITZER
Acting City Administrator REC'U.-AOMHt Off.
Log of Act ions -- P1 an Checlnbl1g JIfEl'2 6 ~"\-\ 1\:' 2 2
Sandalwood Apartments, RP 8~-~3
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Dir. of
From Pub1 ic Works/City Engineer
Date July 28, 1986
File No. 6.50
Date
Attached, in response to your request, is a copy of ,the log of actions
in respect to plan checking by the Engineering Division.
We have no record of an extension of time of the conditions for Review
of Plans 85-23. Apparently, the submittal prior to the expiration date
was sufficient to meet the deadline.
Please advise if you have any questions.
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
RGH:rs
Attach.
~~'il
. ~ -
~"'_'i,~.,."
I .
.~~~~#~,,:;~
elFY' Oil FH.~~
;q
tk:ITY OF SAN BEalARDINO..... MEMORANDU~tP
To RAYMOND D. SCHWEITZER, ACTING CITY ADMINISTRATOR
Subject SANDLEWDOD PARK
From JAMES E. ROBBINS, SUPT.
DEPT OF BLDG & SAFETY
Date JULY 29, 1986
Approved
Date
Here is the time the Building and Safety Department has spent on the project.
All dates are 1986.
February 20
Plans submitted for Plan Check.
March 21
Tentative a~prova1 with corrections given to architect.
Plans resubmitted with corrections, however the alignment
of 2 buildings was changed.
We requested clearances from Engineering, in preparation
for issuance of permits.
, Clearance was not provided, we could not issue.
Clearance issued by Engineering.
March 25
March 25
March 25
July 22
(
July 23 We were prepared to issue permits on
~' ,_~pp1icant refused to pay.
,,-/ I' ~)J 1
, \/",-<':"v<,,0 U J.~~ _
James Robbins, Superintendent
Department of Building and Safety
JR/ia
payment of all fees.
[F>OOlIDOOrnalIDaOO_~fO~:
M
f7
of
Telephoned 0 Retumild your call 0 Came in
o Will call again 0 Please return the catl 0 See me
Phone:
Dale;;...9 Time j 1'''' By IdL
elf'f' Oil f'H..G.-
~ITY OF SAN BE~ARDINO"" MEMORANDU.
To Ray Schweitzer, Acting City Administrator From
Review of Plans No. 85-23, Proposal to
Subject develop a 216 unit apt. proj ect 011 10.5 Date
acres at the NVJ corner of tiaseline & Victoria
w~ ~n zon~ng ~s r~ct.
Approved Date
Frank A.
Planning
July 29.
Schuma,
Director
1986
rr
The following is a chronological list of events regarding
Review of Plans No. 85-23:
1. ROP No. 85-23 was submitted March 18, 1985.
2. ROP No. 85-23 approved by DRC on April 11, 1985.
3. Letter to applicant with conditions of approval mailed
to applicant on April 15, 1985.
4.
~plican~'s Enqineer. Michael Bailey, appeals conditions
'Of aefroval.
Planning Commission
ROP No. 85-23 on May
denies the appeal.
6. Applicant's Engineer appeals Planning Commission's
denial. Applicant appeals Planning Commission's denial
on May 31, 1985.
5.
holds hearing on the
21, 1985. Planning
appeal for
Commission
7. City Council considers appeal of conditions of approval
for ROP No. 85-23 at their June 17, 1985 meeting, item
is continued to the Mayor and Common Council meeting of
July 1, 1985.
8.
July 1, 1985, BOP No. 85-23 was continued
time ~ the request of the applicant.
9. July 15, 1985, BOP No. 85-23 is heard by the Mayor and
Common Council, appeal was denied.
for a second
-
10. March 4, 1986, Michael Bailey, Engineer for the
applicant requests an extension of time for BOP No. 85-
23.
11.
DRC approves the request for a one year
time for BOP No. 85-23 at their meeting
1986.
extension of
of March 27,
Ray, I hope this addressed all of your questions. If you
~~: co.c.,.. '.0".'" Rev'ew of Plans Ro. 85-23, pl.as.
~
mtb elr.,. Oil rHI~""
I"
-,- -,~.-~~--..,. ,-
-".--- =---.,.----...."
~T-~
.
.
.
.
REPORT ON TIME ANALYSIS FOR SANDLEWOOD APARTMENT
PROJECT RP 85-23
A request has been made to review the time frame and data in our files on the
referenced review of plans. The following is a chronology of our records as
reflected by received stamp, transmittal letters and review plans.
4-15-85 DRC conditions were sent to applicant.
5-30-85 Applicants appeal of conditions denied by Planning Commission.
7-12-85 Soils report data (submittal date is unknown but assumed to be
5-2-86)
9-05-85 Flood Control letter with recommendations received by City.
2-20-86 First submittal by applicant. Submittal incomplete and so prelim-
inary in nature it was returned.
2-27-86 Letter of transmittal from City to engineer indicating plans were
inadequate to begin even the first check. Applicant also advised
conditions about to expire and advised to submit complete plans
and data.
v
-..c'. r' "!:,..
CONDITIONS EXPIRE. Applicant has not
~~~received for first plan check.
therein to begin check process.
F~r~t ,~~~7~L<c8~~1~~;~ :Itlf~~s returned to applicant with comments.
Letter from Flood Control relating information of meeting between
Flood Control and applicant on June 4 and June 23. Requirements
of previous letter changed.
submitted plans.
4-11-86
5-02-86
Sufficient data contained
5-16-86
6-27-86
7-03-86 Letter from Flood Control indicating another meeting held July 1,
1986, and again revised conditions for approval.
7-14-86 Revised plans submitted for final check.
7-18-86 Applicant advised omissions on plans regarding compliance with flood
control requirements. Applicant picked up plans to make revisions
concerning rock slope protection and flood control permits.
7-21-86 Revised plans submitted to City for final check.
V- 7-21-86 Plans approved.
7-21-86 Grading Permit'issued.
7-25-86 Sewer plans still .have not been completed nor submitted
with no time frame for their completion yet established.
..
.
.
.
A review of the attached indicates that the first acceptable plan submittal
was made one full year after approval of the conditions and our records do
not indicate the applicant requested a time extension. It further appears
that the applicant appealed the original conditions of the City and on three
occasions appealed directly to the Flood Control District to have the condi-
tions changed. Final conditions acceptable to Flood Control received July 3,
1986, with final plans submitted to City on July 21, 1986. Project plans are
still not complete and we are awaiting improvement drawings, but have issued
grading permits.
Hope fully, this infonnation will be useful in your analysis of the project
time frame. Our files are available to document the dates and times, if
required. In the event there are additional questions, please contact me.
Cordially,.
I
,/'/ ~'/".
, / ,.,. . 'if
/_ .A'-_ >< /; Z.
..
GENE R. KLATT
Assistant City Engineer
t> &. ,,"4 \ t
''t~h~
U'C,,~, ~