HomeMy WebLinkAboutRS06-Redevelopment Agency
000
AOBNCY'-REQUEST FOR co.IlSSION/COUNCIL ACTION
.
a:
Dept:
GLENDA SAUL
Subject:
SELECTION OF DEVELOPER FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF SUPERMARKET LOCATED
AT BASELINE AND MUSCOTT STREETS
Redevelopment Agency
Dste: JULY 18, 1986
Synopsis of Previous Commission/Council action:
On June 2, 1986, the Mayor and Common Council authorized the development and
issuance of a Request for Proposals for the development of a major chain
supermarket at Baseline and Muscott Streets.
Racommended motion:
(COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION)
o
RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
TENTATIVELY SELECTING AND GRANTING EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE TO ALEXANDER
HAAGAN DEVELOPMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SHOPPING CENTER AT BASELINE AND MUSCOTT
STREETS WITH AUTHORITY TO AGENCY STAFF TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHERS UNDER CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES.
~AUd ~/
Signature
Contact person:
GLENDA SAUL/KEN HENDERSON
Phone: 383-5081
Supporting dete ettached:
YES/STAFF REPORT
Ward:
6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: $ N/ A
Project:
Date:
NW
No adverse Impact on City:
(Oil Notes:
JulY 21, 1986
Agenda Item NO RS6
. CI~ OF SAN BERNARD-'b - REQU&9r FOR COUNCIL AC~N
o
o
o
7s..0264
STAFF REPORT
On tbnday. July 14, 1986, the Development Review Team met to review proposals
received in response to the UP issued for the proposed supermarket
development at !l1scott and Baseline Streets. Those attending included the
following: Carl Clemons, Northwest PAC; Harry Jaclts, Northwest PAC; Diclt
Botti. Consultant Real Estate Economist; Dan Frazier. Councilman, Sizth
Ward; Roger Hardgrave. Director, Public Works/City Engineer; Frank Schuma,
Director. Planning Department; and Agency staff persons, Ken Henderson. Sandy
Lowder. Jeanne Wayne. Lisa Dicltey and Ezell James.
Proposals were received from five (S) Development Corporations and sre as
follows:
a) Schurgin Development Corporation
b) Halferty Development Corporation
c) Aleunder Hasll8n Development Corporstion
d) Peppertree Shopping Center Corporation
e) Westcom Development, Incorporated
The proposed review and evaluation criteria were as follows:
1) Compliance with UP submission requirements.
2) Prior esperience in dealing with major tenants with respect to
developments of this type.
3) Prior ezperience in the development and preparation of Urban
Development Action Grant applications.
4) Prior ezperlence in working with Redevelopment Agencies and
participating in RDA-sponsored projects.
S) F1nancial strength. capability and ability of proponent to raise debt
f1nancing.
6) Strength (qua1ifications and espertise) and depth of developer's staff
(project management).
The Development Review Team conducted estensive discussion rell8rding the
completeness of proposals submitted. In view of the time constraints relating
to the submission of a UDAG application, the COlDDlittee detenoined no
sdditional information would be requested of the respondents. Utilizing the
review and evalustion criteria described above. the Committee is recolDDlending
the following to the Mayor snd Common Council:
A. That Aleunder Haall8n Development Corporation be granted an esclusive
right to negotiate for a period not to esceed ninty (90) days as
developer for the pro ject loca ted at !l1scott and Baseline Streets;
and. further, that,
B. Should an agreement not be successfully negotiated with Haall8n
Development Corporation. that Agency staff be authorized to negotiate
with Sclurgin Development and/or Ilalferty Development Corporation
without issuing a new RFP; and, further. that,
o
o
o
111
o
o
o
C. Inasmuch as a successful UDAG application 18 considered to be an
integral part of project financing. the Committee recommends that
should a UDAG not be awarded to the City, that Agency staff be
authorized to negotiate with the developer with the strongest
financial capability.
Adoption of the resolution would authorize staff to proceed with the
preparation of the UDAG application and afford staff and the developer the
mazimum amount of time possible to accomplish same.
l259L
o
o
0 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
o
o
o
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO TENTATIVELY SELECTING AND GRANTING
EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO NEGOTIATE TO ALEXANDER HAAGEN DEVELOPMENT FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF SHOPPING CENTER AT BASELINE AND MUSCOTT STREETS
WITH AUTHORITY TO AGENCY STAFF TO NEGOTIATE WITH OTHERS UNDER
CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The Community Development Commission has
reviewed the proposals submitted by five separate developers,
proposing various concepts for the development of a shopping
complex at the intersection of Baseline Street and Muscott Street
in the City of San Bernardino, and has determined that the,
12 proposal, in concept, submitted by Alexander Haagen Development
13 offers the most promise of successful development, although not
14 all aspects of the proposal are acceptable to the Commission.
15 Alexander Haagen Development shall be offered an opportunity to
16 negotiate with Agency staff towards a development agreement.
17 Such negotiations shall be intended to afford adequate time to
18 Agency staff and the developer to explore all reasonable
19 possibilities of developing the center, approaches to such
20 development, the kind and amount of Agency assistance to be
21 offered, and the financial viability of the project.
22 SECTION 2. Alexander Haagen Development is granted an
23 exclusive right to negotiate with the Agency for ninety (90)
24 days, subject only to the following: If Agency staff and
25 Alexander Haagen Development reach a point where the parties
26 agree that there is no further point in continuing discussions,
c:J 27 or if the Executive Director notifies Alexander Haagen
28 Development that continued negotiations are meaningless, and
o
o
0 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
\0
o
o
o
o
offer no potential for a successful agreement, Agency staff shall
be authorized to negotiate with other developers, in an attempt
to arrive at a viable development package. The priority for such
discussions, after negotiations with Alexander Haagen Development
are terminated, is established as follows:
1. Schurgin Development Corporation
2. Halferty Development Corporation
SECTION 3. The Commission recognizes that a successful
Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) application is considered
10 to be virtually essential to the successful development of this
11 project, and the obtaining of a UDAG should be pursued with
12
13
utmost vigor.
However, in the event that a ODAG is not
available, Agency staff shall continue negotiations with the
14 developers in the priority established, in an attempt to find a
15 developer with sufficiently strong financial capability to
16 develop a successful and viable shopping center complex at
17
Baseline and Muscott Streets, in accordance with the request for
18 proposals earlier submitted to developers by the Agency.
19 Dated:
20
21 Approved as to form:
22 AGENCY COUNSEL
23
24 By
25
26
27
28
.... '.. /-'1'"'
J' ,~'/ // /. "
"1/' '/ /'
;'1..'. ,/, ..,') '~'/.('.
// ~/ ,..,~ . (~ ,. ,--, ~'I 1:-
Arlen R. Briggs 1,//
The foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the following
vote, to wit:
2
0 0 0 0
1 AYES: Members
0 2
3 NAYS:
4
5 ABSENT or
ABSTAIN:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
0 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
0 27
28