Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR09-Redevelopment Agency c :) MlNIR V ANIR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. P.o. Box 310, Vanir Tower, City Hall Plaza, San Bernardino, California 92402 Telephone (714) 884-9477 Commercial/Industrial Developers - Real Estate Brokers October 5, 1992 Mayor W. R. Holcomb THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO City Hall 300 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 . Dear Bob: Thank you for the opportunity of presenting our Offer to Purchase the 20 I Building in the City of San Bernardino. t . This offer was reviewed and revised on several occasions to allow the Economic Development Agency Staff sufficient time to provide a thorough analysis of our offer. We received their latest comments and have revised our offer accordingly. t Our offer is being made with the assumption that the City, as many other cities and governmental bodies throughout the country, is desirous offocusing its assets and attention to the operation and management of City affairs. We have, therefore, also included our comments to Staffs report to the Agency Committee. , We have tailored our offer to meet the needs of the City. As you must conclude, the Offer to Purchase is in the best interest of the City. t Thank you for your kind consideration. . Very truly yours, V ANIR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. DOMINGUEZ aIrman HFD:cb Enclosures: Offer to Purchase Comments to Staff Reports Summary LOS ANGELES . SAN BERNARDINO . i>1 cC kOc1---- SACRAMENTO .I!;;!c, ) . ,- .. :.".. ,..:..~ . ,:". o C) '. .. CONFIDENTIAL REVISED OFFER TO PURCHASE 1. SUBJECT PROPERTY: 201 North E Street, San Bernardino, California . . .. 2. PURCHASE PRICE: $5,000,000 3. BUYER: Vanir Development Company, Inc. or its nominee 4. SELLER: Redevelopment Agency for the City of San Bernardino 5. CLOSE OF ESCROW: 60 days from execution of escrow instructions 6. TITLE INSURANCE: First American Title Insur;mce provided by Seller 7. LEASE AGREEMENT: A mutually acceptable Lease Agreement from the City of San Bernardino (see attached terms). 8. ACCEPTANCE: This Offer to Purchase, unless accepted in writing, will expire on October 15, 1992. Richard .Dominguez, President Date: 5 0 tT ~~ v By: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO .. By: - Date: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO By: Date: ... . . ':...... . ~. o ,:) CONFIDENTIAL LEASE AGREEMENT TERMS ". 8. Lease Term: 24 year term. b. Net Lease: All utilities and expenses including real estate taxes, if any, are to be paid by the Lessee. c. Base Rental Rate: $.75 per square foot per month for the entire building. d. Rental Adjustment: 1. During the first five years of the lease term, the rental amount will be adjusted to include onlv that space which is occupied. 2. There shall be a 3% increase in rent computed and adjusted annually throughout the term of the lease beginning upon the 5th year of the lease term. e. Option to Purchase: At the expiration of the 20th year of the initial term, the City may repurchase the facility for the sum of $2,000,000, reducing thereafter by $500,000 per year to the end of the lease term with a payment of$10.00 at the expiration of the lease term. -- o .:> V ANIR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.'S COMMENTS REGARDING ECONONUCDEVELOPMENTAGEN~S THIRD AND FINAL STAFF REPORT 1. Vanir has raised its offer to $5,000,000.00 cash without requiring are-appraisal. The only reason Vanir conditioned the price upon an appraisal was to justify the price for the Economic Development Agency, as this was a concern of Staff at the prior Hearing. 2. According to Staff, borrowing money is cheaper. While it is true that interest rates are lower, the proposed bond financing requires the City to put its credit on the line. The proposed Bond financing requires the City to additionally secure its financing with a "Letter of Credit" to increase its bond rating to "A". While the "Letter of Credit" scheme may act to lower the interest rate, it further obligates the City and may impair future loans needed by the City. 3. Vanir agrees to allow the building to be offered for sale during the escrow period to an all cash buyer if so desired by the Agency. Staff is correct that this is a flat real estate market and is predicted to continue for several years. The important facts to consider regarding sale is that: (a) The Agency is selling at a profit. (b) The lease rates offered to the City are below today's market rates for comparable facilities. ( c) The Offer exceeds the appraised value according to the Agency's appraisal documents. (d) The City ends up owning the building, thereby, recapturing all of its lease payments and any appreciation. 4. The purchase price is based on the low interest rates available in today's market tied to a function of rent. If the City desires to pay more rent, we are willing to increase the Offer accordingly. Likewise, if the rent is lowered, the price would reduce. 5. It was understood from Staff that control of the building is important to the City. Therefore, Vanir will provide a mechanism to remain under the City's control throughout the term of the lease. o o SUMMARY: The Offer is in the best interest of the City for the following reasons: 1. The City may reinvest the funds for City business without the need to increase debt by borrowing more money and signing a Letter of Credit which could possibly impair the real needs of the City's financial future. 2. The City remains in control of the building able to raise rents if it so desires and collect the increases to the sole benefit of the City. 3. The City will make a profit upon sale of the building (approximately $1.6 Million). 4. The current status of the building according to Staff is that it provides a very poor return on the City's investment. 5. The City may purchase the building at the end of the lease term for $10.00 and is, therefore, the beneficiary of all the "upside" appreciation. The building will also be delivered "free and clear". o o COMMENTS REGARDING DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Re: Offer to Purchase 201 North E Street Building San Bernardino, California Vanir Development Company, Inc. has revised the Offer in order to meet the concerns and needs of the City as set forth in the above-referenced Staff Report. 1. Staff is concerned that their Letter of Opinion is not a comprehensive appraisal and that $4.75 miIlion is not "adequate" return for the EDA investment. Therefore, Vanir Development Company, Inc. has hereby increased its Offer to $5 million subject to the appraiser completing a comprehensive appraisal. 2. Additional borrowing by the City versus sale. Staff feels that a loan may be more beneficial. Most cities are attempting to borrow less money and not become involved in the real estate business. 3. Most commercial buildings today are seIling under appraised value. The important thing to remember is the City has bought the building and is re-seIling it for a profit. To alleviate concerns regarding value, Vanir is allowing the City to appraise the property and accept cash offers during the first sixty days following acceptance by the City of this Offer. 4. Staffis concerned that this is a 14% return on investment which is not accurate as it fails to consider that the City ends up on full ownership and control of the facility. Furthermore, Staff fails to consider that if the property increases in value (which is one of the main concerns of the Staff) and assuming that the increase in value is approximately 5% per annum, the building at the end of the lease term will have a value of approximately $18 miIlion. 5. Vanir Development Company, Inc. agrees with Staffs conclusion. 6. Vanir Development Company, Inc..will provide a mechanism which will provide for ownership and operation of the building to remain under the City's control throughout the term of the lease. 7. In this paragraph, Staff assumes that the building, because it is owned by the City and paid for by tax funds, it is, therefore, free to the City. Most businesses and governmental agencies, as a matter of prudent business, allocate rent and expenses to its -- o c:) own facilities. If the City is not doing this, it should do so irrespective of the consequences of this proposal. 8. Staff indicated that EDA would lose any potential appreciation in value over time. The Offer provides that all appreciation of this building is provided to the City. ADVANTAGES: 1. Vanir Development Company, Inc. has increased its Offer of$4.5 million to $5 million. 2. The City could utilize the sale proceeds for full investment income for other projects needed by the city. As it is, the return on the investment is based upon the ability of the City to run and operate an office building. 3. No comment. . Sf::;:-23~92 WED 14: 53. DEVELOPMENT DEPT. ,""..,., '... ,r- I ~ ~;..;\. -:~- FAX NO. 7143845434 "'C. .....,..; P.02 .' " DBVBLOPMB.T DJ:PARTMENT or THE CITY or SAN llEIlBARDINO llBDEVELOPMBl'lT COtIUl'TEE AGElIDA IT:EM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- " FROM: lCENNEIH J. HENtJERSON Executive Director SUBJECT: OFFIll. TO PURCHASE - 201 BOIml "1:" STll.BB'r BUILDING DATE: September 23, 1992 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RecD1IIIIIended ActionCs): That the Redevelopment Committee reeo~end rejection of the offer to purchase from Vanir Development CompaDY, Inc. Administrator ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Committee Reeommendation(s): ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- KJH:JMW:lag:0066e REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Meeting Date: 9/24/1992 Agenda Item No. ,SEP~23-92 ~ED 14:53 . '. ~C"C'0n'l-NT Drn~ ;"I...I/...;......'r:.:.: t,:--:. FAX N~ 71433~~~34 P.C3 ."J-.':~ ( ';\...... ~.,) . ~'I'l(.' \ :) " '-...J ~.. , DEVELOPMElfr DEPARTMENT STAFF REPOR't OFFER TO PUIlCBASB - 201 North 'E' STIlJ:ET BUILDING On August 6, 1992, the Redevelopment Committee received and filed staff comments on an offer to purchase the 201 North "E" Street building ("the building") from Vanir Development Company, Inc., ("Vanir"). As staff had not had an adequate amount of time to analyze this $4.5 million offer, the Committee asked that further evaluation be performed. " On September 10, 1992, the Committee considered a detailed staff analysis and a recommendation to reject the $4.5 million offer. Representatives of Vanir were present and submitted an improved offer for $5 million (see attached copy). The Committee directed that said offer be thoroughly . evaluated and a recommendation be brought back to the September 24, 1992 Committee meeting. Staff, with the assistance of B.H. Wood and Associates and Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc" has analyzed the new offer and presents the following breakdown of ad.vantages and disadvantages: DisadvantaRes: 1. While Vanir has raised its offer to $5 million, it has stipulated that the Economic Development Agency (EDA) must perfopn an appraisal to justify this price. This could cost $4,000 to $5,000 and take a month or more to complete. The Committee might explore whether Vanir would waive this requirement. 2. If the desire is to raise cash from the building, tapping into the equity could probably be accomplished less expensively through a bond issue, Jim Iverson from Miller and Schroeder Financial, Inc., has advised the Mayor the Agency could accomplish the desired result more efficiently with bondinl than through acceptance of Vanir's offer. A more detailed discussion of this issue ean be found at the end of this report. 3. If the decision is made to sell the building, it should be advertised and other offers invited. EDA might receive a better offer than Vauir's, This is an appropriate course of action to enable the Agency to get a better offer and give potential buyers a fair chance to compete. While Vanir has offered to allow EDA to solicit other cash offers for a period. of sixty (60) days following acceptance of its offer, this places a considerable time constraint on any marketing efforts that-might be undertaken. It should be noted, however, that Staff can see no urgency or need to sell snd feels that this is a bad time, economically speaking, for anyone to be selling property. In other words, it is a buyer's market. -------------------------------------------~---------------------------~------ KJH;JMW:lag:0066g llEDBVELOPIIKIIT COMMITTEE Meeting Date: 9/24/1992 Agenda Itell No. . SEP-23-92 ;';~D 14: 54 DEVELOPMENT DEPT. "..../ ! k} "'.JI . FAX NO. 7143845434 "",e .. ,...i '.. P. 04 DEVELOPMEIlT DEPARl'MEftT STAFF REPORT " Offer to Purchase - 201 Borth WBW Street Building September 23, 1992 Page Bualber -2- --------------------------------------------~---------------------------------- 4. Vanir's offer involves a leaseback to EDA at $.75 per square foot NNN. While Vanir offers to charge this rate only on the space actually occupied during the first five (5) years of the lease term, the rent for the balance of the term would be based on the entire " building leasable square footage. It is debatable whether the City and/or EDA would grow into all of the approximately 70,000 square feet of space within five (5) years. Though Vanir assumes that the building is currently seventy percent (70X) occupied, staff estimatea that the figure would be closer to fifty percent (SOX), unless we include spsce on the second floor which is occasionaly used by Personnel/Civil Service for testing and for various other City functions such as Management Association meetings. It is unclear whether Vanir would consider this intermittently used space as "occupied". Moreover, while EDA would be paying $.75 per square foot, we are not receiving that much from Big Five or Isabella's Ristorante, nor is it clear that we will be able to realize this much from future rentals. Finally, staff feels that, for a "credit tenant" such as EDA, a more appropriate rental rate would be in the neighborhood of $.50 per square foot. 5. Under the proposal submitted by Vanir, the Agency would be responsible for all maintenance, janitorial, utilities, taxes, insurance and any and all miscellaneous costs, the same items it is currently responsible for as owner. Advantu.es: 1. The receipt of $5 .i11ion in cash, less sale expenses, would certainly be.beneficial to IDA's financial prOfile. It is a180 noteworthy that the proceeds would flow back into tax increment, as opposed to bond proceeds. In terms of funding new projects, tax increment is less restricted than bond proceeds. 2. Assuming the funds will be retained, EDA could receive investment income on the sale proceeds until they were used for another project. As it is, with the buildinl largely unoccupied, EDA receives little in the way of a current return on its investment. This situation could be reversed if the building is fully rented under EDA ownership. 3. Under the new offer, Vanir proposes a twenty-four (24) year lease term, siving EDA the option to repurchase the building in year twenty (20) for $2 million. Thereafter, the repurchase price drops by $500,000.00 per year until year twenty four (24), When EDA may repurchase the building for $10.00. This repurchase option is undoubtedlY attracti~e, as the building will slmost assuredly be worth tens of millions of dollars by the expiration of the lease term. -----------------~~------------------------------~----------------------------- KJH:JMW:lag:0066g REDRVELOPm:RT COMtfiTrEB Meeting Date: 9/24/1992 Agenda Item No. S~P-?;-:2 ~-_-D '.'~:~~ . :-"'0 '-)0< '" _ 't..J..J D'"','l:"' nC!-'l:"N.T n,c-'- ~ ~ ~_...... ..... . ""'...... .. d' (~:'r~1 r ' .,; Il ., ;, ~._I FAX N~ 7143845~34 !~\() \,..: ~ P.05 DEVKLOPMEBT DEPAIlTMEl'lT STAFF REPORT Offer to Purchase - 201 North "E" Street Buhdill& September 23, 1992 Page Number -3- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------~--- though there is no questign that Vanir's revised offer is ~ore attractive than the original, staff still recommends against acceptance of the offer. An analysis by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. (copy attached) demonstrates that EDA would be far better off by issuing bonds against the property than by selling to Vanir. '. the principal components of the analysiS can be found in the first tbree pages (numbered 002 through 004). the first page is an analysis of the costs and benefits to EDA if it accepts the current Vanir offer involving the $.75 per square foot rental figure. As can be seen at the lower right of the table, this scenario would result in a present value debit balance to the agency of $3,408,134.20, In other words, this is what it would cost EDA to agree to the current offer. The second page provides the same type of cost/benefit analysis, but this time looking at the same offer from Vanir except that the rental figure has been changed to $.50 per square foot. Again, the result can be seen in the lower right of the table. As one would expect if EDA's rent was lower, the present value debit balance is lower than in the above example, but still amounts to $605,423.44. The third page examines the costs and benefits to EDA of pursuing a bond issue instead of selling the building. Once again looking at the lower right of the table, it can be seen that the present value debit balance for this scenario is only $73,596.05, and is thua the least costly alternative of the three which have been examined. According to the analysis, the long term savings to EDA from bonding, as opposed to accepting Vanir's revised offer, amounts to $3,334,538.20. This figure 1s arrived at by subtracting the bonding cost of $73,596.05 from the cost of the current Vanir Offer, which is $3,408,134.20. For Vanir's offer to be the equivalent of a bond issue, the purchase price would have to be $8,334,538 with a rental of $.75 per square foot or $5,531,827 with a rental of $.50 per square foot (assuming all other deal points as enumerated in Vanir'u revised offer stay the same). Based upon the foregoing, Staff recommends adoption of the form motion. leE J. REND RSOK, b:ecutive Dtrector Development Department -------------~----------------------------------------------------------------- XJH:JMW:lag:0066g REDBVELOPKEIlT COMMITTEE Keeting Date: 9/24/1992 Agenda Itelll No. . .' '.- ... ~ ~-:...~~{., ';..... ;..:: SEP-23-92 ~~D 14:55 ....- . _~.,. ,:c. .' " . ." . .... ,.' DEV~t~T DEPT. FAX NO. 71~5434 . -'(~ P. 06 , VANIR DEVELOPMENt COMPANY,INC. P.O. 80x 310. vanirTower, Cily Hall PI..ll, S.n Bernardino, CaliComia 92402 Tc1tphOGO (714]) 8801-9471 Commcrcial/l4ldwuial Developers - Real Euate BtokeR September 10, 1992 .. Chairwoman Esther Estrada REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMIITEE 201 North "E" Street San Bemardino, CA 92401 Dear Esther: Thank you again for the opportunity of presenting our Offer to Purchase the 201 Building in the City of San Bernardino. As you know, this matter was postponed to allow Staff sufficient time to provide a thorough analysis of our offer. Having received that information from Staff today, We have revised our offer accordingly. Our offer is being made with the assumption that the City, as many other cities and governmental bodies throughout the country, is desirous of not being in the real estate business and, thereby, focusing its assets and attention to the operation and management of City affairs. We have revised our offer to meet the needs of the City and as you must conclude, the revised Offer to Purchase is in the best interest of the City. Thank you for your kind consideration. Very truly yours, VANlR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. HFD:cb Enclosures: Revised Offer to Purchase . SEe-2H2 ;':ED 14: 56 DEVELOPMENT DEPT. I-"~,(_.'-;- .) 1......._".-.- FAX NO. 7143845434 .,...,..~"lv)~ \a...~A.: P. 07 . " '. CONFIDENTIAL OFFER TO PURCHASE '. 1. SUBJECT PROPERTY: 201 North E Street, San Bernardino, California 2. PURCHASE PRICE: $5,000.000 or aopraised value. whichever ;s less 3. BUYER: Vnnir Development Company, Inc. or its nominee 4. SELLER: Redevelopment Agency for the City of San Bernardino 5. CLOSE OF ESCROW: 60 days from execution of escrow instructions 6. TITLE INSURANCE: First American Title Insurance provided by Owner 7. LEASE AGREEMENT: A mutually acceptable Lease Agreement from the City of San Bernardino (see attached tenns). 8. ACCEPTANCE: This Offer to Purchase. unless accepted in writing, will expire on September IS, 1992. ACCEPTED AND AGREED, VWeOPMENT COMPANY, INC. By:~1 .~ Richard Domingue?;, President Date: 10 ?tVt 92- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ By: Date: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO Dy: Dale: ,... .;..~~t.;,_......'....~~_. ""'" . SH'-23-92 t.r:D 14: 56 DEVELQPMENT DEPT. /""< '; "","'1" FAX NO. 714J~45434 .. l/. ,,,,,1.:. . P. 08 ~ - '. CONFIDENTIAL '. LEASE AGREEMENT TERMS 8. Lease Term: 24 year term. b. Net Lease: All utilities and expenses including real estate taxes, if any, are to be paid by the Lessee. t. Base Rental Rate: $.75 per square foot per month for the entire building. d. Rental AdJustment:* 1. During the first five years of the lease term, the rental amount will be adjusted to include only that soace which is occupied. 2. There shall be a 3% increase in rent computed and adjusted annually throughout the term of the lease beginning upon the 5th year of the lease term. e. Option to Purchase: At the expiration of the 20th year of the initial term, the City may repurchase the facility for the sum of $2,000,000. reducing thereafter by $500,000 per year 10 the end of the lease term with a payment of $10.00 at the expiration ohhe lease term. *Note: The bllilding is approximately 70~. occupied with City offices and other tenants. City offices occupy approximately 50% of the total building space and additional tenants occupy approximately 20%. It is estimated thilllhe City orSan Bernardino will utilize the balance space within the next 3 years. -........, -" .......-.:...." ..... ..~..... .... ' ~..:..:......~::;;..'~:. . . . SEP-2'3-92 WED 14: 59 .. . DEV~.QW"t:.NT DEPT. "".....,...' . 09/18/92 12'32 FAX NO. 7~(::~34 /11~ & ~ FItR<<:IA.. P.15 . . 0'U '. Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. 505 Lo.... S."t. F. Drln - au... 100 - P.o. 80>( 848 .. Sol.... _uoh, C.lIforal. 0.0"'0'1' H..dquart.", Mlnn"pO"a, Mllln..ot. Toll Free (800) 542-0288 Fax (019) 481-8017 ~ . f , . .{,' . I - . -.. .. .. .. .. . .'.- . . .' ":;~.' . i... TO: -.-JDbo LJ~ FIRM: SAp.] &r~r~ iA,M NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING OOVER PAGE: fa SPECIAL INSTRUCTION, .. ~l AJ~r~ E Sn-...~.L ~~L ~ VO.1i~...l>.w.~~..., ~ ~ .iI.~ I ft.;. (:!) ll""r _~ ~ .. t:,Q,/ff:l _ W~l~_f)g~... ~.L&~-Is~ (~ LOG) FAX #: 3~ . ~.q4'3 __ FROM: KID CAYAIWJGIl SENT: ~ .....' , .....~.. 'SEP~23-92 WED 14:56 DEVE~QPMENT DEPT. r'\ . eg,,1~,1 '12133 FAX NO. 714JB45434 ..... P.Og .,.",", .. 1'11L.J...ER & ~ FI~IFl.. 002 Mr ke; IIdW~V)JJ\V C}OO) 5~;2.. - € ~W . '. '. ftkYtLClrII!MT AGbIc;y Dr 'HI olty 0' .... .......,1110 ZOI _no I STUn _ VAlli' O~ll"'lEIIr _'111I1 II 711.006 $II n 1U1L.11ll: I) as.o~(ooa _c_ PIli" 51 .1'5$/_T. I'IEI m 11 41 100l( ocaJPAIICT IV 'th T~ " RAle lRc;IllAa!' o. D tlAATln II S ,~ 0' "'. _ex ""LDI'. II ~ _. AT .,0 11 "!IIIIT ,." ,." _Ill '.'In _ _11. ....ft .!"n_ ._......._-~.._................~....-............-_...-.............-..--.--....... "." -.......................................... IU.LDIIlO kluCKl ,.... e.n III 1M IV VM.. 'cw~n alllT _,000 ~,.. ." ..'15I1Mnth 121 "n 10._ .....1_ 111 ,,\>.5 ~.OOI 00...'.... 1Z1' I,No 7O.00l _,.... 121 ,m lO.em ~i"'" 1Z1 1191 90.011I ~lIlIl!f' If: :~ 1= =:::: I~ l~ 1= :::1:: 121 IIVI 100ll ..cs.,'", 12/ 1/02 ,OOl( oecs.,lllcl 12/ ,m 100ll "cup'''' 1211~ 00ll occupl.., '2/ I/OS 'DOll ocCUP' '" III 1IG6 loox oocup'''' 1Z/1I0r 1001 ~i'" 21 1/DB lOOl .......,ed 12/ 1/09 100l _,,,, lV 11'0 lOOl .....," '21' 1111 100l ......,... 121 1112 lDOll .....;" 121 11\3 1001 f':Cl.IPled UI 1/'4 '001 OcCl.lP;ed '21 1/.5 lOOll .....1 ed III "'6 00ll 0<"'4110<1 '21 ','6 IU.LIIIIG _T UU --....-...... . --- 1.000,000 Itl._ SPl,OOO "',000 SOl,_ 567,_ t:'m 611:'" m'm J$Z'ln 774:82' M,W au.OOT lWI.l56l' 1I7lI.061 .... m ,7& fSl' 911 .,:," 1.010,. I,OlI,'" , on m "'04.7OP ,'gr'", t , 1D VT.._ --- ',OOll,OQI ".M'.19O . ""... As_IClW Cln v.u Cl(:QA'T '00 ~.Cl5Ir /II' IUIUI. I. ,.". TIM' ~ TD.OV& _r lAC" nAIl rllR TNI '1.". flVI! __ - "NT lIlCI_. AT ~, PU ,.... .rAlt1111 II TIllE STI I'IAR Of lie ~ I" POR ,." IIZlWtra II 12.903251 , . .911701624 .m1tllnJ .113_ ,~116 ._,orol .6&X'71* .611551$23 .J77UJOft .SJ9tSIli!II .SlI54Q5US ..~n .0071SrU ~pt .Mln_ ."rt?1SU ,5SS4ZI91'P .J\\SUI19 .2906I29f' .Z1l411" .~OII .itJ6571421 ._TlI' .ZIlN42'" .1925'2921 . 19Z5:J29Z7 I.CIOO,DDG SI5.008 3sa,9J' J&4 46J 41O:Z56 GO 851 '6O'~t 6U:m W,N' 4llt."1 iI9J.764 mea :se.' ,. JIlO;,,, :D6,m 32S .711 1":'71 ~.496 _.029 ur ,DOl ZI66 395 256:'~ _,340 ZJ6 909 227'$ 2":07' 2 .--.-.._.._..~=-~~ ',000,000 ',408, ,,. a""oa.'54.IO --_. --;:..&...:....'.....-:."--".'..r..;... . 'k: ..__........_.. .SEP-23-92 ~ED 14:57 DEV~~Q~~NT DEPT. "'" 1~~1. <:J 2 ~J/ !;;V ~.....'~-"~- 1 :33 . . utIl!VfL-.. AOo!MCY 01 ''''' Gin Of IAII __ lO' _f. ( SlUE! PI"'I'OlA" VAIIIRO~IIT AlkWH.... U 711.000 .,,, ..IUlIIll 21 ~L'?~ NRCIIASC ""e.! 'I ._. "" .. FT ., tom; IXXIlPAIICT IT ,tlI '1M '1 Un ..CIlUto, O' III .ru".. .. , rua f) ...., IACIC 1111I.1... '" z. nA" At ." OAl?: DIU.ft FAX NO. 71~45434 " I1ILUR & ~..4K:II'L . MIl". P,10 00J 7S _T - ,., CUDn. ,., ...." _..........-............~._-._---_.-.........~-.__....-.......................__._-~._--....-_._.-.....& ..&.....~........__.-... " 121 1m 12{ '1ft III 1In 21 ",. 121 1m ~~l~ '11 I'" 111 ",., 121 1/fIO 12/ 1101 121 IJIll: 121 I/OJ 121 1/0. '21 1105 '21 1105 121 11111 tZl 1/111S 121 ,m 1"""0 121 1/11 121 IJIZ III IIa '21 I'" 12, IllS IZI 1116 III 1115 alllblllG _, """ c,lt IT V..IR OEWL_T ',000,000 ab' 7O,1lGO ~.. ft '.501/_'" 'O.OOll .....'M" 6O.00ll _..I..,. 70.001. acc....",. 10._ ~'JdO "',em _..I.... 10011 ......,.1__ ,- .....,... '1lO:l ouuplod IIlO:l .....1... I. .....led IIlO:l "...Ied 00ll .....,... 1_ .....Iod TOlllt oe...lecl ,o~ ......1... ,_ ouupfed 'DOlt ~'od 1 DOl .....1.., 1001I o<cup'CIl 1_ 00...1.., IDOl "'CUP'''' 10CIiII .....'.., I aalC 0CC\4> f.., 1_ .....lelI laalC occupIed IUIL.laG IOUGltf ....~ -.-.. -..,,-.------...,. ~ 11',000 1$1,_ IK,OOO At 000 ''''000 631'_ 44"_ .,.:", 11'1,11' "".1fS m:m SR,1M3 541.... !l64 IoU "I'm ",'NO "';114 W.llllII m-m O"':1t6 "'.1l2I n6.4n 158.507 I. I,OOO,M 13,*"" . IIIIMI _IICIN CITV I/.u. OCC\lI'y 100 N'..u lIP IUIlDlllI 1M rM! __ CII\ '0.001 ~ _ TIM fCll\ TIlC f111T rlW _ .. UNT 1_.. At II fIR YIAIt ITMTr.. II TMJ sn _ Of fill LWe IU Ial flits 1t_'O .8 I.IS75. DI ffDlll" . 5,000,000 , 210.001 .ftS1O,iIN ass II!J .tnn117ZS 256.= .113_ m; .'11-- to',ee .7OPSlm, '116,"'" .16147.- 291, lIS .""MlIS us., .,"- 272:,., .mIS0211 162,51. .'OSI"''' 252,4" .'7DOUr! 242.m ._"'742 as,," -,. Zti .,,, ..m'~9 2n :019 ."Pln,,, 2D7.~Z .S33428P?9 '''llM .111m,." 1";0" .rPG'..2ft8 164,W .m4111S 1" ", .iI5SUMOO 70:7'1 .DU714!O 144,121' .l!2DII7'127 '",9''' .2D6l'21M9 151.~ .192SSZ027 146,~' .19253292' t .. , - ___11__- '.000,000 ,,-.qs "IOJ,4Z3.44 ~, '... ~,,~ . SEP-2'3-92 liED 14: 57 DEVW.V1~NT DEPT. 09/181\../ 12:34 __'In_lIT AteNer 01 'lilt CITY rw... _1110 281 IlOltlW f STlln _ ~LL&a & .eNIOEDE. 1C!~1110 ".~,- _'<'....L _ 1__ (Lon.. CII' _IT) UIE ClPns IIlln FAX NO. 71;1~45434 I'IILlER & SOR:Eb.,..)( ..f'IC1R... " 11 -., - py _no py _IT$ P.11 ll04 .........-.......................-----..............--.......................................................--...-........ D"'C~.~ 121 1M III 1M Ill''''' 121 IJ95 'a, 1/'11I IV 1m 121 IJ1III III I,., 121 11111I 121 1101 IV 11\12 III I/lIS 121 '/00 UI '/lIS 121 1106 12/ IIW 121 I/CIII 121 118 121 litO 12/ l/n 1~1~ '2, 1114 121 illS 121 "W --.- -.-1.IPAl. _ !JM III'" I.OC _U4I. PAYMlIP _U4I. PAY".' _L .A""1lT --.. PATIII.. NUlUAL PA_T NlIIUAI. PA1lWI' _ PATOlI.I NltlUAL .A_.T _AI. PAM.T NI"""~ PA'ltle.t MllUAL PAM.T NI.UAL .AllIIlIT ....UAl PA\'lWIT A1iNUAL 'AtlflillT A1iKUAL "YlPI NlIlUAL PlllEllr NI-.w. PATIENT A11Il1AL 'A_ ANIlIAL PAtIENT AIIllJA1. PAMIIT AllIIlAL PATllbT AllIllAI PA\'1lIIIT AIIIlJAL PATIlEIIT A11I1lAL "'_, ---................ '-_._-,.. '..5,000 4,045,000 WO, III." 440,".. " 44O,NS.1No UP,..., 4SI,Ull.JZ O6,&Of.'7 _,11&." US,Nt.1lI 41t,aN.lt 41.,....0 GI,m.., '2I,N7.tJ gl,M." 421,215." 4l1,IU.S' "'.IIM,IS W,U9.11 624.541;21 428,740.D Ul...51 UO,DU.9I S",N.S' 61'.*.21 41',211.54 ----- '0.500,412'" , 4,",000 ."''''''6 "O,PI&.92 ,m?M7ZJ -.JG5.N ..,- 158,761." .IS9I901N 1J4,at.9.42 ,7OPJI07O' 111.....51 ._n~ up.,oa.., ."1$'0511 161,3'7.31 ,571_ 251.487.60 .,."on. Dl!.1J2.6Z .sattr\IJ 1'7,190.5' .41OCQINn 201."..., .~ '.,356.311 ~J' ''',Ml.64 ., 165._." . nsn '53.164.65 .:D.'M1M19 IU,as.n .).~ 132.900." 1D.SI.I.76 .Z"""5 "'.'v.I.6f :23i;lm ~:=:~ ,2ZOllInZ' tz.164.40 .~l669 IB.,..JS ,'N5D92' ",11'2.92 J. ................___...___... .,..,.aao 4,91','''.05 '. --.... '1'J,5",~ .S~?-23-82 A~) 14:58 , ~'\!"'0PM"'T D'PT :.i...V..._"'.li....J\. '-I . ~, 09/1~.,.,C~:2134 '-I.' "'-..,' FAX NO. 7143845434 I'IILlER & SOftED('~".e,<<::!AL. \...1' -~ P,12 Bl!l5 '. 1IIa>~_ _er or lI. IlllY or _ _'''' 201 IIOI'lII I IrllET umu CIl' -m "'Q1, RIll 1IIli. ..beI 'lIOll1"Z Dollwry UIt",m rIP ~t .f ~...."."'....'.I'............. ".GOD.OOO.DO '_I ....... -..,...eo '. ,.'.L ~'t'rl. .'acownt ct.~............. C~t. .f .~......_.._..................__.., C8ftft"'~__............'.'._......'.....,....", ".-." 10,000.011 '...DOI_OO .,.,000,00 fotal U_ Nt u.. & kll....... "'-'.1 .....11. rtllAllc, .llI . Ia20t '''111m 11M M -,',-' "~:J-'~ '. . . SEP'-2"3-92 lIED 14: 58 . . ~~~;:";~,:PT. FAX NO. 71~~?A34 I'IILlER & ~!l.i<<::IA.. " ._~ _ICY " Till Cln rw _ _""'1110 211 _hi I Intlrr IIrt DIIT _lei .......... M~ __VIClI IOT._ _ OI:T '" t2JOl/1992 . . . TrIG",," _,_.50 10,912.'7 44O.'D.17 12/0111'" 410,547.50 ..m... _,'1'..~ . . ..'1/0"'17$ .111,.7."....~._ ....."....... WO,7G~94. ...... ".~~~!la'll,.,.-..._i9rz;~.__~X::.:...~-..:"'":,'. . 'ttOI,'997 410,1"." 11,'''.'' 4SI,4t1.S1 'l/Ol,'99lI _,D2Z.50 17,..07 416,4119.17 IttOlIl'" W,I9P.50 ",'N." 433,"4.19 ......:..".~~z:.,. ... '::!t':::.. .-.....",.=:~~,.'A. ....,..=~_..... 1I/0l/ZOGZ'" ..... 401',510:00-..... a,...Q.............O'.6,....IJ. ... Il/OI/IDCD _._.00 1'l,1&5," _,m.H U,PlIZ- 4OP,S'IS.OO It,.." ol2t,N7.1S '"M,.==",,",,~~=~,....-..\..,..~~1::\;,.. .~!= ... .......... ......,. '" .............. .... '.;......(:It. ..,...... Il/OlltOOl' 410,'''.00 ",SOl.,. ",ilia." '2J911ZDl11 411,445.00 16;919.14 411,"'.D TZ/P1/ZUW '11,6111.110 "._.ll _,"'.11 '\ '". ~MI~!': .,.... .m::;.'I".-.. "'~I;;:1t... ...._..~;~;i._....... ,.~'.'.:_'... 'OJ ::..~"7;" .:~;::~'':'':', ,,)":":'~:."::. - t -' ~....~.' IZ'O'/2DIZ 4'O,IZJ.OO 10."',,. 411,016," IZIOlnOl1 ''',IZJ.OO I,m." 4iO,oza.9a IIIO',lOI' 410.1ZJ.00 ',72'." 417,146." , .. '~;:nl: =,.~.~., '4"".a,.. tl',or.o.ZI ........'1 I \.. .. ,oeiao-...~ ....,'. "IN. ..... .'. U,".ll.Jlh..,'::", TvrA~ ',., Its... 4f9,_.~ '11,_,411.06 .1110. & ~...uo. 'fftOftOI.1 ".., ic. Pf......... . n.t' . e.2Ot "''''~ I"q ... P.13 EI06 '. '~''';::J..~~:::-~'.:.;.tio.:~~-'';'....~.~: :,';';:~'..k.;~~ ::-..~,.~ SEP-23-92 WE: 14:58 ".. .~.; ._-.-~~, ; ..:..... ....... . DEVEC~WT DEPT,. 1lY18/92 .. 12':55 FAX NO, 71~~~434 -". 1'I1l.J..ER & ~ FII'RiCIR... P,14 00'7 . lIUblL_n _ct .. T. CIty. IlAII _1110 101 a.. E II'IIEI!T _, _vIm ...... "'IE PIlI.elm ClIUPOII I_Sf wn _VU2 '. I2I~'''''2 _. _ . 12/01"", ,~.OOO.OO J._ .,&b.'O &4t,UZ.,. '2/0'1'''' 110,000.00 4,_ _,'"'7.50 "O,M7.M '2/01"", 11'.000.00 4.5OOOal 191,'47.,. 411,147.'D :~liU~;..~.:~I,:\"'.~.,:.~ ~-!~~~~'.~lf.:~',"l....:i1"iM!.,,:,:-.t1D+......ID.~~:. 12I01,'m lZS.000.00 ,.- .,m.'D 410,112.'0 '2/01(1'" 1",000.00 '.IIIOOGII "',".'0 &Off 011.'0 t~1I1," '",000.. ,._ Z12,I9P.ID _.1W.,O 'Z/III_ "',000.00 S.1SOeC aM,_.ID _,m.M ~::.11lD1taO:I::::~~: ~~J".'VIJrUR.~~" ~__"'~~""'~~~~"'~". '210111001 ''',000.00 ...... 147,,,..00 _,"0.00 lVOl1llOOS 1",000.. ""Ma iIS7...00 _,ao.OD 12/0l/l!OOol lOO,OOO.OO'.2IOOOK U7,S1'J.oo _,S1S.00 ,.!~If8m....., ...I"~~.,.9.!!..... '.'~""""'4I;lt!!.,............m.1P..c!p "~~5t""" aoN:~:::; :':=.;...,M.~'~::""'''' .. ..w.......~:.~.:.,.;~:: '2101/200' UO,llOO.OO ......... IlIll,IZS.CIO l10,$ZJ.OD 12/011_ m,ooo.oo .._ 1711,60.00 41l,...'.CIO 12101/_ 250.0ll0.0II '.4OCIOllll ''',~.oo "1.405.00 . 1210l/&OID ...,000.00..40000II I., "'.00 'IO,40S.00 ~~ZAI'R11Il':"~'::: :'IA;:ooo;:oD:::~'""f"'"Ilr' M"'':.;'~.~~'~H:!.:?'_jliI;h'l!ll.::' 12/01/&011 100,000,00 ..4000llll 110,tZJ.00 tlO,us.oo 12/01/aOlJ NO,GOo.oo .._ trt,JZt.oo 411,sas.. 12101/&0'. J4C1,ooo.oo '.5OOOllll JlI.JZJ,oo 410,'U.OD '..0'...." .... 000 00 .. 411 .as.oo .oe ~.oo ..,......j.~........ ..... ......''''"'''~''''.'...' , ........,_1;::....-_." ......!..-._ . ';";IClV 1-c>>A....;;.:::,:::......~W.M'~+.:~w..1:.~:.IIOr.;.w::r,,'1N:~";'~..e.::JlW,~~IIlI;":-: 'OT.~ ',_,000,,00 . 4.IDO,'as.00 p.... 'D.w "III.. . Soh...... '1....1.1 Publi~ 'I...... FILl' . ...1 "'111m 11157 AN TIILD "ATlITIC8 Ilc..- Jnt..-t f_ 12/0"'", tv lIIOI/Im... ~ l.'....................................... lend ~..re~................................._..... A..r... ~.................................... . 'S.ZD __, ",,,,.GO ....,- ..e Int....t ea.t c.te)..............,............ J.nd Y1'I. '.r A~tt~ Purl..................... f~ 1~~..t tott CllC).......................... IffectS.. Int~..t c..c celc>>.......,............. 4"__ .."4I8Z1. '.lI7I991I '.17""7:1 c: C~ ~ c: - - r-- ......, '-' ....) DBVBLOPIIB.r DBPARrIlB.r OF rill CIn OF SQ RD.' vnUIO RBOUBSr POR COIKrSSIOIl/COURCIL ACTIOIl From: ~nA~A J. HEftDERSOIl Bzecutive Director Subject: OFI'BR TO PlJRCIWIB-201 .... S1'b.u BUILDIlIG Date: September 25, 1992 SYnODS is of Preyious CNRafssianlCoancil/CNRafttee Action(s): 08/06/92 The Redevelopment Committee received and filed an item on an offer to purchase from Vanir Development for $4.5 million. 09/10/92 The Redevelopment Committee heard a recommendation to reject the $4.5 million offer; Vanir increased the offer to $5 million; the Committee directed a new analysis. 09/24/92 The Redevelopment Committee heard a recommendation to reject the $5 million offer; direction vas to forward the item to the Commission vith no recommendation. RecnMm~~ed IIotion(s): (C-itv Deyelo_ent CNRaission) IIlrIO. That the Community Development Commission reject the $5 million offer to purchase the 201 lIorth "E" Street buildina from Vanir Development CompBllY, Inc. ~ Administrator Contact Person(s): !Cen Henderson/John Wood Phone: 5081 Project Area(s): Central Citv Pro1ects Ward(s): One (1) Supportina Data Attached: Staff ReDort:Vanir Offer:Miller & Schroeder Analvsis FUNDIRG REQUIREMEl'ITS: Amount: $ RIA Source: RIA Budget Authority: RIA CommissianlConnril lIotes: ICJH:JMW:0071g COIBISSIO. IlEBrIBG AGDDA lleeting Date: 10/05/1992 Ageada Iteall1aber: ~ (.. ,;' c: c: - 1""". ....... v '-" DEVELOP.ERr DEPARr.ERr 01' rBB CI1T 01' SAIl R'RV.umIBO snn RBPORr 01'l'BR TO PURt:II4!l1l: - 201 Worth 'E' S'I'II1nf'r BUILDIBG On August 6, 1992, the Redevelopment Committee received and filed staff comments on an offer to purchase the 201 Worth "B" Street building ("the building") from Vanir Development Company, Inc., ("Vanir"). As staff had not had an adequate am01D1t of time to analyze this $4.5 million offer, the Committee asked that further evaluation be performed. On September 10, 1992, the Committee considered a detailed staff analysis and a recommendation to reject the $4.5 million offer. Representatives of Vanir were present and submitted an improved offer for $5 million (see attached copy). The Committee directed that said offer be thoroughly evaluated and a recommendation be brought back to the September 24, 1992 Committee meeting. At its September 24, 1992 meeting, representatives of Vanir were not present and althOUgh detailed discussion took place regarding the relative advantages and disadvantages of Vanir's improved offer, the Committee directed that the item be forwarded to the full Commission for consideration, without a recommendation. Staff, with the assistance of B.B. Wood and Associates and Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc., has analyzed the new offer and presents the following breakdown of advantages and disadvantages: Di..dvanta"U!8 : 1. While Vanir has raised its offer to $5 million, it has stipulated that the Economic Development Agency (BDA) must perform an appraisal to justify this price. This could cost $4,000 to $5,000 and take a month or more to complete. If the Commission were to accept the offer, staff would explore whether Vanir would waive this requirement. 2. If the desire is to raise cash from the bUilding, tapping into the equity could probably be accomplished less expensively through a bond issue. Jim Iverson from Miller and Schroeder FinanCial, Inc., hss advised the Mayor the Agency could accomplish the desired result more cost effectively with bonding than through acceptance of Vanir's offer. A more detailed discussion of this issue can be found at the end of this report. ICJB:JMW:0071g co.rSSlOW IID'fDG AGBBD.\ Meeting Date: 10/05/1992 Agenda It.. lflaber: ~ (,... ". (" ,,... (~ ". ~ - c ...... ,...; DEVELOPIIIIIr DBP.&n.u...l SUIT DPOIIr U: O!TEll TO PlmCIIASB 201 101m[ ..." SxIWU: BUILDIlIG Septeaber 25. 1992 Paae w-ber -2- 3. If the decision is made to sell the bUilding, it should be advertised and other offera invited. The Agency might receive a better offer than Vanir's. This is an appropriate course of action to enable the Agency to let a better offer and live potential buyersa fair chance to compete. While Vanir has offered to allow IDA to solicit other cash offers for a period of sixty (60) days following acceptance of its offer, this places a considerable time constraint on any marketing efforts that might be undertaken. It should be noted, however, that staff can see no urlency or need to sell and feels that this is a bad time, economically spe8king, for anyone to be selling property. In other words, it is a buyer's market. Vanir's offer involves a leaseback to.the Agency at $.75 per square foot IIIB. WhUe Vanir offers to charle this rate only on the space actually occupied during the first five (5) years of the lease term, the rent for the balance of the term would be based on the entire building leasable square footale. It is debatable whether the City and/or IDA would Irow into all of the approximately 70,000 square feet of space within five (5) years. 4. Though Vanir assumes that the building is currently seventy percent (70S) occupied, staff estimates that the filure would be closer to fifty percent (50S), unless we include space on the second floor which is occasionsly used by Personnel/Civil Service for testing and for various other City functions such as Manalement Association meetings. It is unclear whether Vanir would consider this intermi ttently used space as "occupied". Moreover, whUe the Agency would be paying $.75 per square foot, we are not receiVing that much frOll Bil Five or Isabella's Ristorante, nor is it clear that the Agency would be able to realize this much from future rentals. Finally, staff feels that, for a "credit tenant" such as the Agency, a more appropriate rental rate would be in the neighborhood of $.50 per square foot. 5. Under the proposal submitted by Vanir, the Agency would be responsible for all maintenance, janitorial, utilities, taxes, insurance and any and all miscellaneous costs, the s8lle items it is currently responsible for as owner. ICJH:JMW:00711 COfMISSIO. IIBBTIlIG AGBlUlA Reet1n& Date: 10/05/1992 Aaeada It_ lluUer: --9-- ('.... ," c: (~ - ..... c .- -' DBVELOPIIBIIr DBPh.uma.. STAn' RBPORT D: 01TBlt TO PllRCIWIE 2011101m1 ..." SDBBr BDILDIBG September 25. 1992 Pqe JI1aber -3- Advant..es: 1. The receipt of $5 million in cash. less sale expenses, would certainly be beneficial to EDA'a financial profile. It is also noteworthy that the proceeds would flow back into tax increment, as opposed to bond proceeds. In terms of funding new projects, tax increment is less restricted than bond proceeds. 2. Assuming the funds will be retained, the Agency could receive investment income on the ssle proceeds until they were used for another project. As it is, with the building largely unoccupied, the Agency receives little in the way of a current return on its inveatment. This situation could be reversed if the building is fully rented under ED! ownership. 3. Under the new offer, Vanir proposes a twenty-four (24) year lease term, aiving the Agency the option to repurchase the building in year twenty (20) for $2 million. Thereafter, the repurchase price drops by $500,000.00 per year until year twenty-four (24), when EDA may repurchase the building for $10.00. This repurchase option is undoubtedly attractive, as the building will almost assuredly be worth several millions of dollars by the expiration of the lease term. Thouah there is no question that Vanir's revised offer is more attractive than the oriaina1. staff still recommends against acceptance of the offer. An analysis by Miller & Schroeder Financial, Inc. (copy attached) demonstrates that the Agency would be far better off by isSUing bonds against the property than by selling to Vanir. The principal components of the analysis can be found in the first three paaes (numbered 002 throuah 004). The first pqe is an analysis of the costs and benefits to the Agency if it accepts the current Vanir offer involving the $.75 per square foot rental fiaure. As can be seen at the lower ri&ht of the table, this scenario would result in a present value debit balance to the aaency of $3,408,134.20. In other words, this is what it would cost the Agency to agree to the current offer. The second pqe provides the same type of cost/benefit analysis, but this time looking at the same offer from Vanir, except that the rental figure has been chan&ed to $.50 per square foot. Again. the result can be seen in the lower ri&ht of the table. As one would expect if the Agency's rent was lower, the present value debit balance is lower than in the above example, but ati1l amounts to $605,423.44. ICJlI:JMW:0071a COIIIISSIO. IIDTIK AGDDA Reetina Date: 10/05/1992 Aaea4a It_ lfwIber: -L -- ('" " (: c: c ...... ......,.I DBVBLOPMDr DBPAa'buwo.. SU!'I' IBPORr D: OFI'D TO PlmCIIASB 201 IIORrII ... SDDr BUILDIlIG Septeaber 25. 1992 Peae lI1aber -4- The third paae examines the c:osts and benefits to the Alenc:y of pursuil1& a bond issue instead of se11il1& the buildil1&. Onc:e aaain 100kil1& at the lower riaht of the table, it c:an be seen that the present value debit balanc:e for this sc:enario is only $73,596.05, and is thus the least c:ost1y alternative of the three which have been examined. Ac:c:ordil1& to the ana1yais, the 1011& tem savil1&s to the Alenc:y from bondil1&. as opposed to sc:c:eptil1& Vanir's revised offer, amounts to $3,334,538.20. This fiaure is arrived at by subtrac:til1& the bondil1& c:ost of $73,596.05 from the c:ost of the c:urrent Vanir offer, which is $3,408,134.20. For Vanir's offer to be the equivalent of a bond issue, the purchase pric:e would have to be $8.334,538 with a rental of $.75 per square foot or $5.531,827 with a rental of .$.50 per,square foot (assumil1& all other deal points aa enumerated in Vanir's revised offer stay the same). Based upon the foreaoil1& and the fac:t that it is abundantly c:lear that the bondil1& sc:enario is in the Alenc:y's 1011&-tem best interests, staff rec:ommends adoption of the form motion. ~~BJlSO.. becutbe Direc:tor Deye1o~ent Departaent JC.JH:JMW:0071a CCRlISSIO. IIIBrIIIG AGKImA ReetiDa Date: 10/05/1992 A,eada It_lI1aber: ~ . . c ......." - (....., ,'; V ANIR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. P.O. Box 310. V.air T_. City HaD Plaza. SaIlIlemardiao. California 92402 T.leph_ (714) 884-9477 Coalmtr<iaIIIDdIlltrial Dtwlopers . RoaI Estole Broken September 10, 1992 Chairwoman Esther Estrada REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY COMMITrEE 201 North "E" Street San Bernardino, CA 92401 DcarEsther: Thank you again for the opportunity of presenting our Offer to PUrchase the 201 Building in the City of San Bernardino. AB you know, this matter was postponed to allow Staff sufficient time to provide a thorough analysis of our offer. Having received that information from Staff today, we have revised our offer accordingly. ( : Our offer is being made with the assumption that the City, as many other cities and governmental bodies throughout the country, is desirous of not being in the real estate business and, thereby, focusing its assets and attention to the operation and management of City affairs. We have revised our offer to meet the needs of the City and as you must conclude, the revised Offer to Purchase is in the best interest of the City. Thank you for your kind consideration. Very truly yours, VANIR DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. ~.,j!. H., DOMINGUEZ HFD:cb Enclosures: Revised Offer to Purchase c: LOS ANGELES . SAN BERNARDINO . SACRAMENTO q . . . r- V ,.-., - <: CONFIDENTIAL OFFER TO PURCHASE 1. SUBJEcr PROPERTY: 201 North E Street, San Bernardino, California 2. PURCHASE PRICE: 55,000,000 or .ppraised value. whichever is less 3. BUYER: Vanir Development Company, Inc. or its nominee 4. SELLER: Redevelopment Agency fpr the City of San Bernardino 5. CLOSE OF ESCROW: 60 days from execution of escrow instructions 6. TITLE INSURANCE: First American Title Insurance provided by Owner <: 7. LEASE AGREEMENT: A mutually acceptable Lease Agreement from the City of San Bernardino (see attached terms). 8. ACCEPTANCE: This OtTer to Purchase, unless accepted in writing, will expire on September IS, 1992. ACCEPTED AND AGREED: V~OPMENTCOMPANY, INC. By: '\1QV, Richard Dominguez, President Date: 1.D ?tyt q 2- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO By: Date: <: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO By: Date: q - .' ... I"""'- '-' r,""" '- <:' CONFIDENTIAL LEASE AGREEMENT TERMS L Lease Term: 24 year term. b. Net Lease: All utilities and expenses including real estate taxes, if any, are to be paid by the Lessee. . e. Base Rental Rate: S.75 per square foot per month for the entire building. d. Rental AdJustment:* I. During the first five years of the lease <: term, the rental amount will be adjusted to include only that ~ace which is oCCQpied. 2. There shall be a 3% increase in rent computed and adjusted annually throughout the term of the lease begiMing upon the 5th year of the lease term. e. Option to Purchase: At the expiration of the 20th year of the initial term, the City may repurchase the facility for the sum of S2,ooo,ooo, reducing thereafter by S5oo,ooO per year to the end of the lease term with a payment onto.oo at the expiration of the lease term. . *Note: The building is approximately 70o/I!. occupied with City offices and other tenants. City offices occupy approximately 50% of the total building space and additional tenants occupy approximately 20%. It is estimated that the City of San Bernardino will utilize the balance space within the next 3 years. <: q -- - - - - .. 0!Yl~(""" 12:33 - "ILJ.ER & SOfh -. E>. -.,toRlClA.. l!lB2 '... M: k~ 1la.vtVl4L~ "- (}oo) 5~:z.- ~WW (" _..-IIT _ or ,. .,".. ___ \lIt_I__ At ,,,_'Il~ .....IClII. 1) JU._ ." "'LII.. II -=":'.0.': -- ..,- J) . __" 41 t _IYSt~RM f) Uti ._. .. . "Mn. .1 S '11M 0) sur _ ........ .1 .. __ A' ." fII" _Ill _n 11 -... - PV _It. PV ..," 1'_- --.---......-.............................. ...........-----......................................---...........--.-----....... ........ _ _ C'TY 111 1M ., _'11 InelMMlll -........ , 1,-.- tll tlte ... 711._ ~ ft -.--.. IU.... , 115.GOO H.__'_ :~Im t:.= -,.... .... ._1Il a.m . -,.... ..,.... '10- 114_ l111m ".011I _,.... -:- .- 410:_ lZJ 1~ t:a.0III =-J!t' -.... .7Hl9G1. ...... tl/ ''''' =:m ._,1mn _~I 'II II,. ,_ ::;,.. ._n~ wm Itl~ 1__,. -... ....- .a'.I 1- "_'. =:11 .- -'''1 '21 IIlI1 ,_ -'" ..1511I11 -:- 121 l/lIr 1- -.1" m.m ._1ft'lB m._ '21 1M - .._I" m.1It .'JlIlDCK7Z 1M lIP 121 I~ ,- -'" "'.- .611715742 .,',.. 121 11115 ,- --'" m.: _N, lM'm lal "" 1._'" --,., m'm '~ 1/117 ,_ -'''' m:.., .D7ln54J ,':',. I Mil 1_ _'''' :r.m :mtim: m.,,. lZJ llGP 1__'" -.- III ,110 1_ _I. m:. .l":"lhJ' m.CIO'I 121 "" 1_ _'. "I.'" .Z11'11" 116._ '21 1112 ,_ _I'" I.eno._ .-NOt _,MS '21 lID ,- ....,pt... '."'.~ .1M57MZ1 ....JloO 121 "" ,- -'. lmm :=wI 1:56,9llP '21 "" ,- -'''' t:,,,'. 227 .. '~ 1116 1_ :=n 1.a;:.. .1t1532to:' 21"on (~ , 1116 ...LD.IO _ 10 .1RSJZ1l!7 . 2 _____11' ,,.. '.-.- "..,. ". ',.,... '._,1J4 ..'._.l34.zo . \I8'U _.. C'W V'LL _ ". ~ ,. "I"". IV PI. _ .. 10._ __ WI RlIIl .. ~ PI_ filii __ - IEIIT .__ AT ,. 'II _ If",,"" .. .. STII _ ,. .. _ IU .. 'III _. I' 12._ t- ~ ~3t.f.) !:3 <1- . ~4.....t_ Vc>\.r1.. ~ ~ Vl/e) j ~ A.~v(L ....(t) a~7 -feo e,v~ b6J 1.~ c: G1 --'..- .. " lI&'l~ -- 12:33 "ILLER & ~ FIIRlCIA.. '-" BBJ ('''' .i1",i _".-. _., - .In., ___ ~ _'I I ...IET _ _II _ ~.I ..-r.- U ?II.OOI ." "ILD.. I) ~,G - fU<< S) . ....." 4) ,.. ......-..,. IT I'" YUI 'J ItA,. ._. ., III ........ II J _ ~ GUY _ GUILD'" .1 .. __ AI ... JlI -. '" IIA1e _,,, _I" _ _." ..........................--......-...................................................---...--......-... ,., ..," .... GU'LDI" _ _ Ill" 'If 11ft IT _'I_~ 1.-,- , 1._.000 ....,. 70._ ~,.. ft ..lII.Iu6 ....- , It.,_ 'If '1ft Ill._ ........ Itl~ t:.- -.0..... -.- .tIIS1ll_ m._ .- ......- -.- .m_ It.m 'If .'" ..- =.... -.- ...- 'If '1'1 tII._ .... ".- .-.. -~ 'If '19' ._~- :<< .?lIPS.... s..tIK 'If .Ite ,- ....... Ml4naN -.'. 'If I,.. ,- ....... ..' "" .'_D ..... 'If '/lIII ,- ........ 171'"4 .S774DOlII m.., 'If ''''' ,- ........ in; ........ -.'" 'If I/III! 1_ -'" :m=m m.a' 'aI ,lilt - ........ N.m 'If '106 ,- =.. IIlI.DQ .4JI7ISN m4SJ 'V 11I15 ,- ,.. "'.- .~ m:'" 'If '~ ,- -'" 1M WI I.... 'If , ,- ....,.. .,~ .Im"'" lI!D7,81 'If I,. ,.. .....,.. m.m :m=m "'.- 'V 'lOP ,- ........ '01.0'1' 'If ,,,. '--'" -:- .atG1I_ ,...- 'V,,,, ,- ::;,.. m:= JIm:U: ,,, .- ,v "'z ,- ,.. '?II.'" 'V'JIlI ,- .....,.. -.- '--7MD '''.- ,U "" ,- ........ "I.. .-JI27 ti'... ,U "" 1_ ....,.. _.&71 *~JU' '.- 'If .", ,.. ....,.. 111._ .ttmzm t46... (~ 'V"" GU'LD'IIG _ _ ,. .IJlnMlJ 1 ,.-.- u..... tit '...- '._.411 --,41>>... ,,, . W'" _'III C'" "'U. -.,. ,.. ~ ., MLDIII .. rM _ CIIt 1.._ _ __ TIM fCIIt 'II rllm Pl1II lUll .. -, '1_' A' III ... _ "_'11 'I .. '"' _ ., .. .... ,.. - tIl" _'0 .1 ..,_ -.------..---------...-- f;. 5 53 ( ~;Z 7 - CA/(CA-f:. J ) +0 \u....x +k ~()J V <>'\A ~ l'- vVo .I cf 1~ ~vU -+0 ~c1\-,/ to ,... () --". - - .' llY1B;92 12:34 - '- I'IIUER & SOf>o-I~..(II'RCIFt.. Blil4 """",- .(..... '. ; ." __ - Dr _ .1'" Dr _ _lID 201 ...111 E annr I A.. .... ........ . IC_ _ID ~1~- _CINI. - ,- (u 1If _It) ?I - ", ", tAT! _,.. _.. ... _,... _,... p.,_ ....................................-...............---..........-.-......-----......-..--...................---...-....... _ICIPIlL _ 1_ It,tu,.. III 1M IIlfl1 L<< , III 11ft _PA_ _.'B.'" .......- IV I,. _ PA_IIT _.'''.'4 .m7W7ZJ '21 '191 _L ,a_lIT ....745.. ~ III ,,,. -. ra-.n 4If"..4I .-.. lVlm _PA_ 11.411.. .1WJ1"" III 1/18 _ ,a_r .&It.S1' ._nzM '11'_ _ ra_' 411."'." .,.... III IIGlI _ PA_r Sf:If:1f :mmm UI 1101 _PA_ I~I~ _L PA_r "',WI.IS ...tWt. -. ra_, UII.m... .1I1'D1rS1672 'II "116 _ra_ '2f..7.1S .4JINI7U It 1105 _PA_ Ul.M.. ...... 1 11Il6 _"''IIB' 21.m:l* .~' III 1107 _ PA_' . ns4J :tl= _L n_, 411.... -- -,.- w' =-= 'II 1/10 MlllAL n_ ...:If:ll III "11 _PA_ 4IO.7~.1J .m,,,,, III 1/12 ..lUll. "'lIB' U1....S7 =-= III lID "1IlMI. ,._, ea._.. III 1/14 "1IlMI. ...ne, .17....51' .1IlIII1U7 III IllS A1f1Ull."_' .'S.!MG.II .~Iftt III 1/16 A1f_ .._ '''.217.14 .1____.' - .- 6,_,_ 1..-..11.. .,Id.... .'D._.W _._.M _.767.1. -.-." I"....." _.''''1 ....lt7.. .1._." _,01.41 217,l".St -.."." _._.JG 1"."'-" -.-." _. "'.65 Ma.IIS.15 11I.900.51 18."'-" 114. Its." _...&6 ".SM." R; I".~ ..116." ".,n.fa ..".,..... -13."'.. ..Id#_ c: ( " ..... q -- 0' lB'1~ - 12:34 ''!ILLER & SOP- 'Cl.'P ~ltRClFL "I "-' l!e5 (: -- _.. _ el" or _ _l_ lit..,.. .- nm.. If _In --- _ I~"'" "It.,. VItV1". Per ~ .. ~............................... .,011O,011O.10 ..011O,-'10 ~_I-- T.cal ...... tgr'. .,_ (1.,.,............. c...a .. .~................................. cene,~...._...._......._..................... _.IOD.. 'ID._.. '."'.IGO._ ..100..... ~-- .mer ....~ J ~....I.1 Mile Pl_ ,,~ . _I ,,,.,,,,. 11M _ (.~ ." C..~ ,,, ~ -~. .' ( :' ('" ,r' (~ - - 5'1'L) 12.~ 1'l1L1.ER & ~yllRlCllI.. ......, ---..-""..--.. ., ..,. . ennr ., ..,. "'1:1 - - - __1m m.._ -_.,. ,ZJa1/t,. - . . 'I/lnll'" _._.10 ...... ....'..'7 '2/01'_ .,..Mf.H _.m... _,'''''. '1fO'''''' ." -.. .. "'46 "',N.M ;.,.;......:fItttI..fMo!-.......:...-.~ -~r ._...~..".U~..:.....~....... . ... '-",IfO""'" ..,m._ _.'." ~.. 411.... '-'" '2/01,1'" ",.._ Ill,.." _....SF '1fO'''''' -."'.. ...." _.114." 'I/O'~ .. na.. IS ft4.J1 _.W.. :_..:..~.:_~.,..".l.~....~.':lI.".~.....:.: .~~....~=-~,_._... '1fO'_""- _.s,...-'" _...11----...81.611.11. ... '1(G1/IIlD -..'" "MI." _.m... ,~ _.m.. 1t._.1I ..._.IS 'I/ll~ .11. 'a.. -.na.-.. ~t,flI!I.. ~~~~.:'UI01J ~~~-""'~:::*:::...~~ loftf:';..-.a..... r- ~.l 'I/ll~ .,..,.... ....... .......'7 'I/ll~ ."....... ,....oM "._.11 'l.III1I_ ."._." "....11 -._.E1 ~,. .,. _.. u -..a _ "".11 "',"" " .Q........~.-._.~..~_.._"-~_...- ..,. .. . ... -....... .....--. ..-.- . .... .. ........... ..... .. ..-. --.-...,...- '1It'/I011 .".".. ....,... "'...'" ,l/llt/lOtl .".IIS.. ...." ......." 'I/lll/lt,. .,...... "Toll." ." .N.". ... '~L1m =;:1;1... .~u... Jr'-'. ...~-:t , ~.. . ...~....:.. ....... t,a1lM"..'::::. _Ill. .._.,a.. 410..'" -.-,.'1." _fl.... & __ Pi_lei ....'5 .f.... ..... . .... .,,.,.,... 'hQ.. l!IB6 () '" ,.... c: (~ .' 8MSC I1ILLER & scm..coFllt'liClfI.. 12:JS --_..'In..._.. .. .....- ~ ....m .....-.. -.. ......... - 1- __III 111011'992 - . . - 11111111'" ,.,._.00 1._ -.... -..... '110"''" ',......00 6._ _.167._ C14I.5611' ... '1101,,,,, 11......00 6.- ....Mr.to '11.167.to :~IIARlII"'~';~:'~~',,,,,~,':'':. _=~.~':.'1lflf~J. '-'.iAj(.I:.'Y~~I.I. 11101,,,,, lD........_ _.m.to 'lO.m.. 11101/_ 111.....00..- ."....10 _,..... ,~,,,,, ,.........- _.1I'I'.to _. ,w... '1101_ ,",..... .._ 1M,m.1O _.m... ~1f'.IJtDl:~: ~d"~~ ~ -. -- .........~.::L.'II_.-.s~". 11101/101I '''._.00 I..fl. W..14I.. _.110.. 111011lIIlOS '''.....00 ..- -.".. -."'" 11101~ 1......00 ,,,". _.m.. _.In.oo -JtJI.'-"'-"JI.:I'~~-----UC!P .. , ~:::::-;: . . ':".... .....-... . -~. .:: 11101/11II7 _.010......... _,525.. CVI.58.. ,~- as..... .- 'PI.._'II. '''.'''.'' I.,.,,., 150...... f ...... 161'-.. &11._." . 1ftOlI." ..........._ 141._." ClO.~."" . C'1I011l1D1"-:::~-::: :"~_--'."lR'" '-'-"'';-iI!II'.;"*;,!-''iii'~'' ~:. '110111011 .........._ 11'.58." 610._.. '1101/.,1 DO....... .._ ..._.11I '''._.11I 11101/11I16 160."" ,._ ft.,.,.. 4to.525.. ~m" .. U W;; " at.. ... Uf... ::' .. illfi:.'...~'.':'..':.tii: J,.,,,. I..........r~_ ......__~ . -...... _# 'C:~_''::.-r' .::::::'::;';... . .. -... ',..._M . 6.".... .'-.ID.III 111I1......._ ''-1-' _Ic.'_ FiLl . .... ,11If1IR ,,."' M Y.IUI ftAn"... --.--. - WlII"", Ie 11101'''''... ~ LI........................................ ..... ,.-r8........................................ ~ ~................................... tt.m_ N.,..OO _,_ ... Int....t e..t C.1C)........................... .... YI...,.,. ArId,.... PUll.................... 'ru. 1neer..1 e.., CTI~.......................... IftectfYe Intereat c..t CI.C)..................... ..L- ~.. ..".... .....,.". 7.l16mft Il87 Of .", , , .~1 C'" ", c. . . BYl~ 12.32 l'lIUER & ~IIA'ICIFL 881 'Miller & Schroeder Financial Inc. aOI Lo.... S.nt. '0 Dr",o - 8ulte tOO - P.o. .... ~4. '.Ia/la ....b. Callforftla ..071.0'1' Hoadquarter., Mlftno.,oll.. Mlnn..Ola Toll Fr.. (000) 542-0200 ...x (811) 481-e077 ,~r' -., . . . . . . . . . . . . .,::-; . TO: FIRM: _._:JDhu LJt1t%A ~tJ &r~iI.J~ NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER PAGE: (D SPECIAL INSTRUCTION: .. ~ ~Ot'~ ~"'~oc~L C&---Uo.a.tit..I>~~~. "'" ~.p. ~ '-Pia (!) ..u...~..~ ~ .. ~'+2 W-Mi.l ~ r.-~ ~. ~ :t:s~ (..) FAX #: 3~ - fHj.q413 LOG) FROM: KID CAYA1W1G8 SENT: Q