HomeMy WebLinkAboutR02-Redevelopment Agency
1,--..
",
',",
",
lilt
,.
.".
C
DBVBLOPMBBT DEPARTMEBT
OF THE CITY or SAIl BERlWIDlBO
,
-
REOUBST FOR COMMISSIOB/COUBCIL ACTIOB
From:
KENBBTH J. HENDERSON
Executive Director
Subject: BMERGBBCY SHELTER GRAlIT
PROGRAM (BSGP) rmmlllG
AWARD
Date:
July 29, 1992
SvnoDsis of Previous C~fssion/Counci1/C~ttee Action(s):
On July 28, 1992, the Housing Committee considered this matter and
recommended approval to the Mayor and Common Council.
RecommPnded Rotion(s):
(Mavor and CnMBnft Council)
MOTIOB
That the Mayor and Common Council approve funding from
the FY 1992/1993 Emergency Shelter Grant Program (ESGP)
to the Frazee Community Center in the amount of $25,000
and the Salvation Army in the amount of $18,000, pursuant
to an ESGP Request for Proposals previously approved for
issuance by the Mayor and Common Council.
~~
Executive Direc or
Administrator
Contact Person(s):
Ken Henderson/Emilv WOnK
Phone:
5081
Project Area(s):
Citv Wide
Ward(s) :
Supporting Data Attached:
Staff Reoort
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: $ 43.000
Source:
ESGP Loc
Budget Authority:
Reauested
Commission/Council Botes:
KJH:1ag:0934E
COIIIISSIOB IIDTIIIG AGBBDA
Meeting Date: 8/3/1992
Agenda Item Bumber:
,).
1-- ..
c
(,
,
"
D B ~ LOP M B B T D B PAR T ~B T
vcr THE CITY or SAIl BERlWIDllIO ......,.
STAFF REPORT
EIIer.enev Shelter Grant Pro.raa (BSGP) Fundina Award
On March 2, 1992, staff received notification from BUD regarding the
Emergency Shelter Grant Program. The notice indicated the City has
been allocated $43,000 to provide certain types of assistance to
address homelessness.
On June 15, 1992, the Mayor and Common Council approved a Request for
Proposals (RFP) for the City's FY1992/l993 Emergency Shelter Grant
Program ($43,000) and authorized staff to solicit proposals from
qualified non-profit entities. In addition, staff was directed to
utilize the Housing Committee to review eligible proposals and make
funding recommendations to the Mayor and Common Council.
On June 16, staff released the RFP through letter solicitation and
newspaper notification. Four (4) proposals were received by the July
8, 1992 deadline. The proposals were evaluated by three (3) staff
members of the Development Department (See Attachment A for example of
evaluation form.) Following are total scores for each proposal:
Salvation Army
Frazee Community Center
Good Shepard Ministries
Lutheran Social Services
343 points
391 points
213 points
299 points
Good Shepard Ministries failed to receive high ratings because its
proposal was incomplete and they could not demonstrate an ability to
match the federal funds.
Lutheran Social Services failed to receive high ratings because it
appeared that a portion of the requested funding might be utilized in
Riverside County and because they did not demonstrate a need for funds
for operations (a 35% requirement.) It should be noted that even if
the services proposed are provided in the City, the points assigned to
this category are not at a SUffiCiently high level to receive funding
consideration.
Based on these evaluations, it is appropriate that the funds be
allocated to the Salvation Army in the amount of $18,000 and the Frazee
Community Center in the amount of $25,000.
On July 28, 1992, the Housing Committee considered this matter and
recommended approval to the Mayor and Common Council.
Staff recommends adoption of the form motion.
~J~~BRSOB' Executive Director
Deve10paent Depar~ent
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
KJH:1ag:0934B
COIRISSIOB IIBBTIIIG AGDDA
Meeting Date: 8/3/1992
Agenda Itell Bullber: cZ
1--- .
,~ Attachment A ~
"" . _.-
CITY OF 5AI IrRIARDIIO
Dtvl101*nt Dtpan.nt
,. ESGPPIOPOSALEVALlMTII
" , ,
1. Is the Proposll wrlttln'tn such a ..nner as to allow dlflnltlvl .
undlrstandlng of Its ov.rlll Ob3lCtlvls' (Maxl.un 10 points)
.
2. Dots Proposll cl11rl1 dllOftstrltl how proposlr will "It tts
Ob3ectlv.s? (Maxt_ 10 points)
3. Dots prm:.r IllvI tll. nec.lllr1 resourc.s (peopll. .qulp-.nt.
and fact Itl.s to .It tts Ob3lctlVls' (Maxl_ 10 potnts)
4. Dots ~slr's Illstorl and background dlplct an ag.nCl that
Is .xpar .nc.d In optratlllf an ..rg.ncl slltlt.r pl'Ollr.'
(Maxt_ 15 points)
- .. .. .--- -.. --. .. . ...-.
s. Dots Proposll show tvldlnc. of propos.r's abl1ltjo.to.liv.rlg'.....
r.sourclS (ptOpl.. .qulp-.nt. and facUltlts) of oth.r
a,lncl.s? (Maxl_ 15 points)
I. Dots tIl. pl'Ollr. dlSllll allow for PrclllOttng of s.lf
sufflct.nc1l11Cl11g cH.nts? (Maxt_ 15 potnts)
7. Dots propos.r ~rovtde follow-up s.rvlc.s for cll.nts?
(Maxl_ 10 po nts)
I. Is the couns.lor to clt.nt ration:
, a) 10 or l.ss cll.nts to 1 couns.lor? (15 t:tnts)
" b) 11 to 20 cll.nts to 1 COUns.lor? (10 po nts)
c) 21 to 30 cl'.nts to 1 couns.lor? (5 points).
d) 31 to 50 cH.nts to 1 couns.lor? (3 potnts)
.. Is pl'OlIr. slrvlc.s .,. d.stgn.d to ..k. avallabl. an arr:r
of approprlat. S.rvtCIS to tach cH.nt? (Maxl_ 15 points
10. Dots ov.ran dlSlln of pl'Ollr. PI'OlIOt. the ...,_ us. of
funds? (..xl_ 1 points)
11. II the fOllowlnLPlrc.nta,. of totll fro3.ct costs derlv.d
frOll IOUrclS ot r tllln r.rrlnc1 She tlr Grant 'rogr.'
a) 10 11ss tllan 501 (5 potn s)
b) IItwe.n SOl and 7ft no r,nts)
c) Mor. than 7ft n5 points
d) Asst,n bonus points of 10 points for liard doHar
..tcll (not IWlnd)
,
~ "
12. Dots the proposal slrvlc. .1. refl.ct tilt 1ll,IItst "Iorltl
of slrvlc. to:
a) '.Ilt.s with chlldrln? (10 points)
b) rldlrl,l.ntal11 111 hoItl.ss (5 points)
c) 5Ingl'..n and WCllIIn (2 potnts)
13. Dots the porposal show .vtd.nc. that funcls wt11 be ben.flt:
a) Cltl of SIn IIrnardlno cltlltns (10 points)
b) County of SIn IIrnardlno cltlz.ns (5 points)
c) OUtsld. Count, of San IIrnardtno (0 potnts)
OUIL
;)