HomeMy WebLinkAbout44-Planning & Building
~~~~
CITY OF SAN BERttARDINO - REQUES"Q-OR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Al Boughey, Director Su~~: Conditional Use "Permit No. 90-32
(Extension of Time)
D~: Planning & Building Services
Mayor and CO;m:\on Council r!eeting
June 15, 1992
Date: June 4, 1992
Synopsis of Previous Council ~ion:
l1ay 19, 1992, Planning Commission adopted Findings to support denial.
On April 20, 1992, the Mayor and CommOI1 Council continued the appeal of
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 (Extension of Time) and referred the item
back to the Planning Commission for formal adoption of Findings of Fact
to support the Planning Commission decision of denial.
March 3, 1992, Planning Commission denied Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32
(Extension of Time).
Recommended motion:
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council deny the
appeal and deny the extension of time request for Conditional Use Permit
No. 90-32, (supports Planning Commission action); or
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Co~non Council uphold
the appeal and approve the extension of time for one-year, until JAnuary
8, 1993, for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 subject to the Findings of
Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirem s contained in the
Planning Commission Staff Rer>ort of r:arch 3, 1992 (upports staff
recommendation and appellant's request.)
nature
Contect person:
Al Boughey
Phone:
384-5357
3
Supporting dete attached: Staff Report
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.l
(Acct. DescriDtionl
Finance:
Council Notes:
~J./
CITY OF SAN BERNG'DINO - REQUEST IQR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Appeal of the Planning commission's denial of a request
. for a one-year Extension of Time for Conditional Use
Permit No. 90-32, an application to establish a vehicle
recycling yard on 9.5 acres located on the south side of
Walnut Street, approximately 380 feet east of Muscott
Street.
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
June 15, 1992
REOUEST
The applicant, John Lightburn, is
Commission's denial of a request for a
for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32.
appealing the Planning
one-year Extension of Time
BACKGROUND
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 is an application to establish an
automotive recycling yard on 9.5 acres in the IH, Industrial Heavy
land use desiqnation. The site is located on the south side of
Walnut street, approximately 380 feet east of the centerline of
Muscott Street.
On January 8, 1991, the Planning Commission approved Conditional
Use Permit No. 90-32. The findings of consistency were based on
conformance with the General Plan, Urgency Ordinance, and Title 19
of the Municipal Code.
On December 2, 1991, the City received a request for a one-year
time extension of Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, under the
authority of Development Code Section 19.36.90. The basis of the
request was to allow additional time for the project to comply with
the 1,500 gallon per minute Fire Flow requirement of the City Fire
Department.
On March 3, 1992, the Planning Commission denied the applicant's
request for a one-year extension of time. The Planning
Commission's denial was based upon the findings that the proposed
recycling yard would not be compatible with existing and future
. land uses in the general area, that the proposed use is not
compatible in scale, mass, coverage, density, and intensity with
the nearby residential land uses, and that the use will impose a
harmful effect upon desirable neighborhood characteristics. Staff
was directed by the Planning Commission to make Findings of Fact
for the denial based on the discussion by the Commission for
inclusion as part of the Official Planning Commission Action.
Based upon the direction of the Commission, the negative Findings
of Fact were prepared and included as part of the Official Planning
Commission Action (See Statement of Official Planning Commission
Action for March 3, 1992, Exhibit D.)
75.0264
o 0
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 (EOT)
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
June 15, 1992
Page 2
On March 16, 1992, the applicant appealed the decision of the
planning Commission to the Mayor and Council. On April 20, 1992,
the Mayor and Council heard the appeal and continued the hearing
because the Planning Commission had not formally adopted the
Findings of Fact for denial. The Mayor and Council directed staff
to take the Conditional Use Permit back to the Planning Commission
for formal adoption of Findings of Fact to support the Planning
Commissions decision for denial.
On May 19, 1992, the Planning Commission formally adopted Findings
of Fact for the denial of the extension of time request for
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 (See Statement of Official
Planning Commission Action for May 19, 1992, Exhibit A.)
Because the Mayor and Common Council referred the item back to
Planning Commission and did not take action on it, the appeal
request of March 16, still holds. However, it has been re-noticed
for public hearing.
ANALYSIS
Compatibility with the existing nearby residential neighborhood was
addressed in the original Planning Commission Staff Report for
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 (See Planning Commission Staff
Report, Exhibit E). Project Conditions of Approval were included
requiring the applicant to screen the perimeter of the yard on all
sides with a 6-foot fence, and to ensure that vehicles were not
stacked above the height of the 6-foot fence. Additional
Conditions of Approval were added requiring the applicant to screen
the proposed recycling yard from adjoining land uses with a TYpe A
landscape screening per Development Code Standards. TYpe A
landscape screening includes 6-foot high screening accomplished by
either a decorative masonry wall or screen shrubs planted 4 feet on
center, and taller trees planted 30 to 40 feet on center. All of
these conditions serve to soften the Industrial-Residential
boundary along Walnut Street to ensure compatibility regardless of
whether new residential development has occurred in the area.
At the Planning Commission meeting, concern was also expressed with
regard to the potential for the facility to generate noise, odors,
and for gasoline or oil seepage into the ground. Noise was not
identified as a concern during the original application process.
However, if noise is a concern, it can likely be handled with
additional Conditions of Approval restricting the hours of
operation of the facility and the use of a public address system in
the yard area. Any odors generated by the facility would likely be
a result from the presence of gasoline or oil in the cars.
Conditions of Approval Nos. 9 and 13 address this concern as well
o 0
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 (EOT)
Mayor and Common council Meeting
June 15, 1992
Page 3
as the potential for leakage of gasoline or oil from the wrecked
vehicles into the ground. Condition of Approval No. 9 restricts
the facility from dismantling any liquid containers at the site.
Condition of Approval No. 13 requires the applicant to drain all
fluids, including gasoline or oil from all vehicles prior to
storing/recycling them at the site.
CONCLUSION
The project development and operation would occur subject to the
project Conditions of Approval. Therefore the proposed facility
should be compatible with the surrounding land uses.
OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
The Mayor and Council may deny the appeal and deny the Extension of
Time request for conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, or the Mayor and
Council may uphold the appeal and approve a one-year Extension of
Time, until January 8, 1993 for conditional Use Permit No. 90-32.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mayor and Council uphold the appeal and
approve a one-year Extension of Time, until January 8, 1993, for
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, subject to the Findings of Fact,
Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the
Planning Commission Staff Report (Exhibit E).
Exhibits
Mike Finn,
Associate Planner
for Al Boughey
Director of Planning and Building Services
A - Statement of Official Planning Commission
Action for May 19, 1992
B - Request for Council Action of April 20, 1992
(not included)
C - Letter of Appeal dated March 16, 1992
D - statement of Official Planning commission
Action for March 3, 1992
Prepared by:
E - Staff Report to the Planning Commission for
March 3, 1992
F - June 5, 1992 Letter from George Glenn Realty
o
o
city of San Benar4ino .
Stat..ent of Official Planning c~..ion Action
.
PROJECT
Number:
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32A - Extension of
Time
Applicant:
John Lightburn
OWner:
Mr. and Mrs. Buddy Long
ACTION
Meeting Date: May 19, 1992
The Planning Commission adopted findings of fact (Attached, dated
5/19/92) to support their determination of denial.
ED
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
Clemensen, Lopez, ortega, stone, Valles
None
Traver
Cole, Jordan, Romero
I, hereby,
accurately
Commission
certify that this statement of
reflects the final determination
of the City of San Bernardino.
Official Action
of the Planning
d/~~
Siqnatur /' h ;//11.
Al Boughey, AICP
Director of Planning and
~~ .~f' I";
(.Date))
Building services
Attachments:
Findings of Fact
cc (w/attachments):
Project Applicant
Project Property OWner(s)
Plan Check Section
Engineering Division
Case File
PC/ACTION
Exhibit "A"
CUP 90-32 0
.Meeting date: 5/19/92
0,
.
ATTACHMENT "B"
FTHDI~GS OF FACT
1. The proposed vehicle recyclin, yard is a conditionally
peraitted use within the IH. Industrial Reavy. land use
desi,n.tion and coeplies with allot the applicable provisions
ot the Developeent Code.
2. The proposed recyclinll yard will not i.pair the inteerH,. and
character ot the land u.e district in which it is to be
located. in th.t the yard i. in coepliance with the Industri.l
Developaent Desiln Guidelines contained in the Developeent
Code and the Industrial District Specific Stand.rds tor
.utoeotive di.eantlinl yard.. The proposal will be buffered
froe the adjoininl land u.es with a Type I l.ndscape screenin~
per Developeent Code landscape standards.
3. The subject sHe is physically suitable for the type and
inten.ity of l.nd use beinll proposed. in that the site c..
accoe.odate the proposed vehicle recyclina y.rd ill co.for...ce
with all applic.ble Develop.ent Code stand.rds.
4. The propo.ed use is co.p.tible with the l.nd uses presently on
the subject property. in th.t the site is pri..rilY v.c.nt.
with the exi.tinl .inale-f..ily dwellina. sep.r.ted fro. the
propo.ed u.e throuah a lot line .djust.ent. 6 foot decor.tive
v.ll. ..d Type I land.c.pe screenina.
S. The proposed recyclina y.rd will not be ..co.p.tible with
exi.tina .nd tuture l.nd use. i. the aener.l irea in whiCh the
proposed use is loc.ted. in th.t the proposed f.cility could
cre.te noise and odors not consistent with the residenti.l
u.e. loc.ted .cro.. W.lnut on the north. or with the exi.tina
sinale-t.eily dwellinas .djoinina the project .ite.
6. The proposed use is not co.p.tible in scale. ..... cover.ae.
dell.ity. and intensity with .11 .dj.cent l.nd u.es. in th.t
.lthouah the vehicle recyclina y.rd confor.. to .11 Co..erci.l
Develop.ent De.ian Guideline. and applic.ble Develop.ent Code
.t.nd.rds. it i. not consi.tent with the sc.le ..... coveraae
.nd density of the ne.rby residenti.l land use..
7. There are adequ.te provi.ion. tor w.ter. s.nitation. .nd
public utilities and .ervices to ensure th.t the proposed use
would not be detrieent.l to public he.lth and s.fety. in th.t
the proposed project h.s been reviewed by the .aencie.
re.ponsible for providina these .ervices and none of the. h.s
indic.ted .n in.bility to provide services to the .ite.
\
'"'o;,~
__A
CUP 90-320
Meeting date: 5/19/92
0..
,
I
ATTACHMENT "B" (continued)
Conditional Us@ P@rmit Findin2~ (continu@d)
8. There vill be adequate provisions for public access to serve
the proposed vehicle recycliae yard. ia that tvo aain access
poiats are proposed alone the south side of Walaut iato the
proposed parkine area.
9. There vi 11 be a harllful effect upoa desirable aeiehborhood
characteristics. ia that the proposed facility preseats a
potential for future aeilhborhood blieht. and could have a
har.ful effect oa property values in the aearby residential
neiehborhoods.
10. The proposed use i.s .needed at the prescribed location. as
demonstrated in the sarket/feasibility study. if required. A
market/feasibility study is aot required for a project of thia
type.
11. The proposed uae is consistent vitb .the General Plan. in tbat
it is a per.itted use in tbe III. Industrial lIea"y lalld as.
district subject to tbe appro"al of a Conditional Use Perait.
(
12. Tbere vill not be aieniticant bar.tul etfects upoa
eaviroaseatal quality and aatural resources. ia tbat
developsent viII occur accordina to tb. coad:.tioa. at apprg"al
aad atandard require.eats contained iu tbi. staLf report.
-
13. The neeati"e ispact. of tile propoae4 use a~e aitieated. ia
that all required aitieation required by tbe pre"iou.ly
a40pte4 Mitieated !feeative Declaratioa vill be iapleseateel
tbroueb the previoualy approved project Mitieation ~onitorina
and Reportina proeraa contained in tbe orieinal approval.
14. The proposed location. aize. desien. and operatine
characteristics at tbe proposed use vould be detriaental to
the public iaterests. bealtb. safety. convenience. or veltare
at tbe City. in tbat the proposal poses a potential tbreat to
property value. and hence. tbe health safety. convenience an4
vel fare at tbe Citizens of the City at San Bernardino.
15. The circumstances have changed since the project was approved
and the proposed automobile recycling yard is no longer
compatible with the surrounding land uses. New residential
development has occurred in the surrounding neighborhood and
the proposed use is not compatible with that new development.
o
O~
::.:-~.~
'--"
Mayor and Common Counci I
JOO North D Street
Sancernardino. Ca ';240 I
;::r.-.........
,.......'l:..:~ 1._'" -"I" ,.., -.. "
_=.....c
~
.~ ..~...
7~ ':."1': 75 P3 :27
Maret: IE, 1992
Reference: E:onditional Use Permit 90-3'2,
Request for an Extension of Time
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
On March J, 1992, the San Bernardino PlaMing Commission, on a split
decision, denied Mr. Bud Long's request for an extension of time for
Conditional Use Permit -90-J2
Therefore, by way of this letter, we are appealing to the Mayor and
Common Council the PlaMing Commission's denial of COnditional Use
Permit -90-32 In order to allow Mr. Long's legal counsel sufficient time
to review the issues and law related to this matter, we are requesting
that the appeal heaMng be held at the regularly scheduled meeting of the
Common Council on April 20, 1992.
cc: I"'.r. Bud Long
/Jjy 'S
t'~ !~ r? !I ..
- ;... " Iv7.o:r
l'14j1 , - <1 ;:; !S/j)
. ] ro.,
~y ~ _ 'oJ;/2
~1tP..w'! .....\0;>>..
-4 " ''r.'J't- ... -.:Rfy
(J'LO" ...~.., ..,,0,....
'0 ~..~. ':,,,,,.;;.u
-....rs....,
...._., ::'.~; ;~t -~S1
~. -" .. ... -
..... -
1'- ...~..~..:..i:.~:~1
":.::;.; -;: ~~..t . -
Ilxhibit "en
..-
o
o
.....
City of San Bernardino .
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANN:ING COMM:ISSION ACTION
PROJECT
Number:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-32A
(EXTENSION OF T:IME)
owner:
John Lightburn
Mr. & Mrs. Buddy Long
Applicant:
ACTION
Meeting Date: March 3, 1992
X Denied based on Findings of Fact (Attachment A).
mn
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
Cole, ortega, Stone
Lopez, Romero
None
Clemensen, Valles, Jordan
I, hereby, certify that this Statement of
accurately reflects the final determination
commission of the city of San Bernardino.
'/
~-=1
Siqna~
Official Action
of the Planning
..-- /. ./
~ . ,;--~~/
/!,,~..!;:~.. '1.
q 1<:(<(;/
Date
L. E. Reed, Assistant Director
of Plannina & Bui1dina services
Name and Title
CC: . Project Applicant
-Project Property Owner
. Plan Check
Engineering Division
. Case File
PLANNINGCOMM/AXJ
Attachment: Appeal Rights
Exhibit "0"
o
o
~
Riaht o'f ADneal
According to the San ge~ardino MUnicipal Code, Sections 2.54.030
and 2.54.040, the !ollowinq would apply in reqard to appeals to ':he
Mayor and Common Council of Planninq Commission actions:
"Except as provided in Section 2.54.020, any person aqgrieved by,
dissa~isfied with, or exceptinq to any action, denial, order,
requirement, per.:it, decision or dete~ination :ade or issued by
an ac:inis~rative official or by an administrative board,
commission, body or other agency of t.'le City pursuant to the
provisions of any ordinance, code, rule or requlation of the City,
may appeal therefrom by filing a written notice of appeal wit.'l the
city Clerk, directed to the Common Council."
"Any such notice of appeal shall not be valid and shall not be
acted upon unless filed within fifteen days after the date of the
action or decision appealed from. If notice of such action has not
been provided in writinq, and the appellant had no notice of the
hearinq at which the action was to be considered, the appellant
may, within five days after first becominq aware of such action,
demand written notice thereof, and shall. have ten days foll.cwinq
such notice in wtlich to file the notice of appeal. A prospective
appell.ant who was present at the time the action or decision
rel.atinq thereto was made shall be presumed to have const..""I1ctive
notice thereof and shall. file a notice of appeal within fifteen
days after the date of the action or decision. II
Appeals on Planninq COmmission decisions on Tentative Tract or
Parcel. Maps must be filed. in writing with the City Cl.erk within
ten aays of ':he date of decision.
das: wp
riqhtofappeal.
12/12/91
-"""-"",--~-
~-_.,
..
b
AGENDA
ITEM #
CITY OF SAN BER DINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 90- 1?
LOCATION
9
~
HEARING DATE
1_~-Q'
IT
-
~
ATC...,..... TO~I&.&
/'
U&
"'"
'-
\
i 'y
t
.r
;I'
,
.... ".
...
vl:t ...1
I-!
-...-
.d
1It..IIrM.1' ~__Ia,r, I""'"
~1'3",'f'~~:-.
,~
CUP 90-32 0
Meeting date: 3/3/92
o
'-
ATTACHMENT "S"
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposed vehicle recyclinr yard is a conditionally
permitted use within the IH. Industrial Heavy land use
desirnation and cOllplies with all of the applicable provision3
of the Development Code.
2. The proposed recyclina yard will not impair the intearity and
character of the land use district in which it is to be
located. in that the yard is in compliance with the Industrial
Development Desian Guidelines contained ia the Developllent
Code and the Industrial District Specific Standards for
autollotive dismantlina yards. The proposal will be buttered
trom the adjoinina land uses with a Type I landscape screenina
per Development Code landscape standards.
3. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and
intensity of land use beina proposed. in that the site can
accommodate the proposed vehicle recycl ina yard in conformance
with all applicable Development Code standards.
4. The proposed use is compatible with the land uses presently on
the subject property. in that the site is primarily vacant.
with the existina sinale-family dwellinas separated from the
proposed use throuah a lot line adjustment. 6 foot decorative
wall. and Type I landscape screenina.
5. The proposed recycl ina yard will not be ,.co.patible with
existina and future land uses in the aeneral area in which the
proposed use is located. in that the proposed facility could
create noise and odors not consistent with the residential
uses located across Walnut on the north. or with the existina
sinale-family dwellinas adjoinina the project site.
6. The proposed use is not compatible in scale. mass. coveraae.
density. and intensity with all adjacent land uses. in that
althouah the vehicle recyclina yard confor.s to all Commercial
Development Desian Guidelines and applicable Development Code
standards. it is not consistent with the scale mass. coveraae
and density of the nearby residential land uses.
7. There are adequate provisions for water. sanitation. and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use
would not be detrimental to public health and safety. in that
the proposed project has been reviewed by the agencies
responsible for providina these services and none of them has
indicated an inability to provide services to the site.
m"ii#.'".;;:,"i,:'-"....;.c
.
CUP 90-32
Meeting date: 3/3/92
o
o
ATTACHMENT "B" (continued)
Conditional Use Permit Findin29 (continued)
8. There will be adequate provisions for public access to serve
the proposed vehicle recycling yard. in that two main access
points are proposed along the south side of Walnut into the
proposed parking area.
9. There will be a harmful effect upon desirable neighborhood
characteristics. in that the proposed facility presents a
potential for future neighborhood blight. and could have a
harmful effect on property values in the nearby residential
neighborhoods.
10. The proposed use is needed at the p rescri bed 1 ocati on. as
demonstrated in the market/feasibility study. if required. A
market/feasibility study is not required for a project of this
type.
11. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. in that
it is a permitted nse in the IH. Industrial Heavy land use
district subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
12. There will not be significant harmful effects upon
environmental quality and natural resources. in that
development will occur according to the conditions of approval
and standard requirements contained in this staff report.
13. The ne&ative impacts of the proposed use are mitigated. in
that all required mitigation required by the previously
adopted Miti&ated lfe&ative Declaration will be implemented
through the previonsly approved project Miti&ation Monitoring
and Reportin& program contained in the ori&inal approval.
14. The proposed location. size. design. and operating
characteristics of the proposed use would be detrimental to
the pUblic interests. health. safety, convenience. or welfare
ot the City, in that the proposal poses a potential threat to
property values and hence. the health safety, convenience and
welfare of the Citizens of the City of San Bernardino.
_,~"""'_"_ j!li".'"'_""~"';;::--
.t.
_":fl
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
4
3-3-92
3
SUMMARY
r",-..., r APPUCANT:John Ligh tburn
P.O. 30x 1622
W CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. San Bernardino, CA 92402
tn
< 90-32 (EXTENSION OF TI}!E) OWNER: ~1r. & Mrs. 3uddv Lona
(.) 1 435 l'lest Rial to Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92410
\.
,-., t'
A one-year extension of time, until January 8, 1993, for
I- Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, an application to
tn
W establish a vehicle recycling yard on 9.3 acres.
:)
0 Located on the south side of Walnut Street, approximately
W
a:: 3l!0 feet east of the centerline or Muscott Street.
-
<
W
a::
<
\.
r EXISTING GENERAl PLAN
PROPI=RTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION
Subject Vacant & Single-Family IH Industrial Heavy
=:orth nesidence & Mobile Homes RU-1 Reside~tial urban
South Vacant IH Industrial Eeavy
East Vacant/Towing Service IH Indust=ial lieavy
t'1est Vacant IH Industrial Heavy
.J .J
GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC XX YES : ( R.OOD HAZARD ~ YES :: ZONE A )( SEWERS: ~s )
HAZARD ZONE: ::J NO ZONE: lC(No :: ZONE 9 :: NO
( HIGH FIRE - YES )( AIRPORT NOISEI - YES I( ;U:DEVElCPMENT _ YES )
'- ~
HAZARD ZONE: :0: NO CRASH ZONE: AAOJECT AREA:
XXi NO ~
-
r
...I j"": NOT :a POTENnAL SIGNIFICANT Z :ec APPROVAl
~ .... APPUCABLE EFFECTS WITH 0
MmGAnNG MEASURES ~ :el
Ztn NOE.I.R. < CONDmONS
WCl 1.1.0
::EZ o EXEMPT o E.J.R. REOUIRED BUT NO L1.Z 0 DENIAL
Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS <W
00 WITH M1nGAnNG t)::E
a::3E MEASURES ::E 0 CONTlNUANCETO
-1.1. 0
> o NO SIGNIFICANT o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
Z (.)
W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. W
MINUTES ) a:: .
"" - ~
CII'" .,.. "-- .......,
GPIIrIIW..._- I ~
P\.MoI.GZ PAGE 1 OF I 141Cn
l:J;hibit nEn
",,,,
CITY OF SANO"~RNARDINO - Q..EMORANDUM
Subject
Conditional Use Permit No. 90 -32
(Extension of Time)
~romAl Boughey, Director
Planning & Building Svrs
Date pe bruary 14, 1992
To
Planning Commission
Approved
Item NO.4
Date March 3, 1992
APPLICA)/T:
John Liahcburn
Post Office Box 1622
San Bernardino. CA ~2~02
OIi~ER:
~r. and ~rs. Buddv Long
1~35 Iiest Rialto Avenue
San Bernardino. CA 92~10
REOlTEST
Under the
applicant
1993. for
establish
authority of Development Code Section 19.36.90. the
requests a one year extension of time. until January 8.
Conditional Use Permit ~o. 90-32. an application to
a vehicle recyclina vard on 9.5 acres.
SITE LOCATIO!f
The site is comprised of 9.5 acres located on the south side of
lialnut: Street. approximately 380 feet east of the centerline of
~uscott Street in the IH. Industrial Heavy land use district.
BACKGROlJ~D
The application was approved by the Plannina Commission on January
8. 1991. The findinas of consistency were bas~d upon conformance
with the General Plan. the Uraencv Ordinance. and Title 19 of the
~un~cipal Code (See Oriainal Staff Report. Attachment "E"'.
The applicant is requesting the extension to allow additional time
to for the project to comply with the 1.500 gallon per minute rire
rlow requirement of the City rire Department (See Letter of Request
for Extension of Time. Attachment "0"1.
A~ALYSIS
Development Code
Pursuant to Section 19.36.90 of the Development Code.
Extension:
rime
"The Commission mav. upon an application beina filed 30 days
prior to expiration and for aood caUSe. arant a time extension
(or 12 months. ~pon arantina of an extension. the Commission
;---r"'!t:: ,,f
- .
......,
".
. "
.::: :...::?
" .
;.~ -r _....tIll
'_'. . - .".-0
- .".,
--~--- ~ . ~-
,,,~,,,,,,e,';:"'~' " -
'-....J.........._ '-_...........,;;,0._ "",;)'WO .,; ;;;._...._ _ .'-. .......
,_.... -,
Planning Commissio' "~eting
March 3, 1992 c:>
Page 2
o
shall ensure that the Conditional Use permit coaplies with all
current Development Code provisions.
The request for extension was received by the City on December 2.
1991. 37 days prior to the expiration of Conditional Use Permit Yo.
90-32. The reasons for the request have been discussed above. The
vehicle recyclina yard proposed under Conditional Use Permit No.
90-32 has been reviewed by staff. The proposal is consistent with
the General Plan and meets all setback, landscapina, parkina,
development standards~and provisions specified by the Development
Code for automobile dismantl ina yards (See Development Code and
General Plan Conformance, Attachment "A").
California Environsental Quality Act (CEQA)
An Initial Study was prepared by staff and was presented to the
Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on Auaust 23. 1990. The ERC
proposed a Mitiaated Neaative Declaration. The Initial Study was
made available for public review and comment froa Auaust 13. 1990
to September 19. 1990. No comments were received. The Mitiaated
Neaative Declaration was adopted and the Mitiaatioa Monitorina aad
Reportina proaraa was approved by the Plannina Coaaission at the
time of project approval (See Oriainal Staff Report. Attachaeat
"E") .
Develop.ent Review Co..ittee
The Deve lopaent Review Coaai t tee (DRC) reviewed the request at
their January 30. 1992 meetina. At the (DRC) aeetina. the Buildina
and Safety. Police. Fire. Public lIorks/Enaineerina. and lIater
Departments reviewed the Standard Requirements previously provided
for the oriainal approval (See Oriainal Staff Report. Attachaent
"E"). The DRe cleared the Extension of Time request onto Plannina
Commission for hearina with the oriainal Standard Requireaents.
Co.sents
Concern has been expressed about the potential impact the proposed
use could have on the existina neiahborhood. This concern was
addressed in the oriainal staff report (Attacbaent "E"). To
reiterate the co.ments contained in that report vith reaard to that
concern. conditions of approval have been bave iacluded requirina
the applicant to screen the perimeter of the yard on all sides with
a 6 foot fence. and to ensure that vehicles are not stacked above
the heiaht of the six foot fence. Additional conditions of
approval have been added to this extension of time request
requirina the applicant to screen the proposed recyclina yard from
adjoinina land uses witb a Type A landscapiaa per Development Code
requirements. Type A landscapina includes 6 foot hiah screenina.
accomplished by either a decorative aasonry vall or screenina
shrubs planted 4 feet on center, and taller trees planced 30 to 40
feet on center.
""_."'1',,.,,...,.,....-
-......-----......-- -...- -....-...-- ...... ......
\_.... - I
Planning Commissi~ '~eting
March 3, 1992 W
Page 3
o
CONCLUSION
The proposed vehicle recyclini facility is consistent with the
General Plan and is in conforaance with all applicable Development
Code Standards for automobile dismantlini yards.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Plannini Commission approve the request
for an extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 for
a period of twelve months. from January 8. 1992 to January 8. 1993.
subject to the attached Findinis of Fact (Attachment "B") and
Conditions of Approval (Attachment "C").
and Buildini Services
<==?'i
Michael R. Finn
Associate Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
"A" - Mu~icipal Code and General Plan Conforaance
"B" - Findinas of Fact
"C" - Conditions ot Approval
"0" - Letter ot Request for Extension ot Time
"E" - Oriainal Statf Report
...",,,,o,c,'
Attac=ent "A"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP ~ - 32 !EOT l
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
4
3-3-92
.1
r'
~L~rcrPAL CODE ~~D GE~ERAL PLAN COSFOR~ANCE
Cate20rV
Proposal
Development
Code
General
Plan
Permi tted Use
~otor rehicle
Recycling Yard
Subject to
Cl:P
N/A
Setbacks
Front
10 feet
10 feet
NO,
Lot Coverage
.:.% Floor
Area Ratio
75% Floor
Area Ratio
N/A
Parkinll
51 spaces
,
..5 spaces'
N/A
Development Code requires I parkini s!)ace for each 301)
square feet of gross building area plus I space for each 10.000
square feet of gross yard area. The project proposes a 960 square
foot office and 720 square foot storage building with a grosS ~ard
area of 386.125 square feet. .....21 or..5 parkinl spaces are
required.
...01
r:"1'P<l"-~
Pl.ANoa.GI ;tAGIi I OF 1
,...."
"<f=.':'V.C."
Attachment "B"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
(EOT)
CASE m1> q() -12
FINDINGS OF FACT
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
4
1_1_'17
5
FI~DI~GS OF FACT
1.
2 .
3 .
...
5 .
6 .
....
The proposed ~ehicle recvcling yard is a conditionallv
permitted use within the IH. Industrial Hea\',' land use
desiination and complies with all I'lf the applicable provisil'lns
of the Development Code.
The proposed recyclini vard will not impair the integrity and
character of the land use district in which it is to bf!
located. in that the vard is in compliance with the Industrial
Development Design Guidelines contained in the Development
Code and the Industrial District Specific Standards for
automotive dismantling yards. The proposal will be buffered
from the adjoining land uses with a Tvpe I landscape screenini
per Development Code landscape standards.
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and
intensity of land use being proposed. in that the site can
accomllodate the proposed vehicle recycl ina y"rd in conformance
with all applicable Development Code st"ndards.
The proposed use is cOllpatible with the land uses presentlv on
the subject property. in that the site is prillaril", "acant.
with the existina single-fallil", dwellings separated from the
proposed use throulrh a lot line "djustment, 6 foot decorative
wall. and Type I landscape screening.
The proposed recycling yard will be compatible with "xisting
and future land uses in the general area in which the proposed
use is located. in that the existing legal non-confl'lrminlt
sinale-family dwellings adjoining the si~e will be buffere~
from the use throulth the wall and landscaping "nd in that the
use is sillilar to the towing facility and automobile wrecking
facility already located in the are," to the west.
The proposed IIse is compatible in scale. lIass. co\'er"ge,
densit,'. and intensity with "II adjacent land 'Jses. in that
the vehicle recvcling yard confl'lrllls to all Cl'lmmercial
Devell'lpment Design Guidelines and applicable Development Co~e
standards.
7.
There are adequate pro\'isions for liater. sanitation. an~
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed liS"
would not be detrillental to ~ublic health and safetv. in that
the proposed project has been reviewed bv the agencips
responsible for providing these services and none I')f them has
Jndicated an inabilitv to provide services to th'! site,
...I
PlANoI..OS PAGE 1 OF I
.4oOOl
""'" OIl' ".,. ....-.0
~ .L1 4.4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
FINDINGS OF FACT
CASE CUP !:X)-32 (EOT)
AGENDA'ITEM 4
HEARING DATE 3 - 3 - 92
PAGE 6
,...
ArTACH~ENT "a" Icontinued)
Conditional ~se Permit Findin2s (continuedl
8. There will be adequate pro~isions for public access to ser~e
the proposed vehicle recycling ~ard. in that two main access
points are proposed along the south side of Walnut into the
proposed parking area.
9. There wi 11 not be a harmful effect upon desirable neighborhood
characteristics. in that potential harmful effects have been
mitigated through project Conditions of Approval.
10. The proposed use is needed at the prescribed location. as
demonstrated in the market/feasibility study. if required. A
market/feasibility study is not required for a project of this
type.
11. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. in that
it is a permitted use in the rHo Industrial Heavy land uSe
district subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
12. There will not be aianificant harmful effects upon
en,.ironmental quality and natural reSQurces. in that
developllent will occur accordina to the conditions of approval
-,- and standard requirements contained in this staff report.
13. The neaative illpacts of the proposed use are lIitiaated. in
that all required lIitiaation required by the previously
adopted Mitiaated :'<eaative Declaration wi 11 be illplellented
through the previously approved project ~itiaation ~onitoring
and Reportina proaraa contained in the original approval.
1:'. The proposed location. size. design. and operating
characteristics of the proposed use would not be detrimental
to the public interests. health. safety. con"enience. or
welfare of the City. as addressed in the Initial Studv.
~ ~
=--:.~,~
~ pAG;lOFl
,.....
Ac-cac:unen1:.
"<,.;"
-
,,-.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
o
CASE CUP 90 -32 (EOT)
""I
rr
...
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
4 .
3-3-92
7
....
~
.....
1.
2.
~
-..-
-
d
Construction shall !)e in substantial conforlllance with the
planes) approved !)y the Director, Development Review
COlDlllittee, Planning COlDlllission or Mayor and COlDlllon
Council. Minor modification to the planes) shall !)e
subject to approval !)y the Director through a minor
modification permit process. Any modification which
exceeds 10% of the following allowable measurable
desiqn/site considerations shall require the refiling of
the original application and a subsequent hearing by the
appropriate hearing review authority if applicable.
1. On-site circulation and parking, loading and
landscaping;
2. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and
structures;
3. Reconfiquration of architectural features, including
colors, and/or modification of finished materials
that do not alter or cOlllpromise the previously
approved theme; and
4. A reduction in density or intensity. of a development
project.
Within one year of development approval, cOlDlllencement of
construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval
shall become null and void. In addition, if after
cOlDlllencement of construction, work is discontinued for
a periOd of one year, then the pe=it/approval shall
become null and void. Projects may be built in phases
if preapproved !)y the review authority. If a project is
buil t in preapproved phases, each subsequent phase shall
have one year from the previous phase'S date of
construction COIIIlIIencement to the next phase I s date of
construction commencement to have occurred or the
permit/approval shall become null and void.
Conditional Cae Permit No. 90 -32 (EOT)
Project:
Expiration Date: January 8, 1993
IIUfrM.aI p.. 1 OF 1 t"-IDI
?age 1 of 7
- \I ...- ..
""'" 0
r- CITY OF SAN BER~RDINO PLANNING ...
CASE CUP !:D-32 (EOT)
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 4
CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 3-3-92
PAGE 8
lo..
, ...
3.
4.
5.
...
The review authority may, upon application beinq filed
30 days prior to ~~e expiration date and for qood cause,
qrant one t~e extension not to exceed 12 months. The
review authority shall ensure that ~~e project complies
with all current Development Code provisions.
In the event, that this approval is leqally challenqed,
the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim
or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the
matter. Once notified, the applicant aqrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
aqents and employees from any claim, action orproceedinq
aqainst the City of San Bernardino. The applicant
further aqrees .to reimburse the City of any costs and
attorney's fees which the City may b. required by a court
to pay as a result of such action, but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his or her obliqation
under this condition.
No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter
erected structure shall be occupied or no chanqe of use
of land or structure(s) shall be inauqurated, or no new
business commenced as authorized by this permit until a
Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the
Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be
issued by the Department subject to the conditions
imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed with
the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of
the Certificate of Occupancy. The deposit or security
shall quarantee the faithful performance and completion
of all terms, conditions and performance standards
imposed on the intended use by this permit.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of OCcupancy, the
landowner shall file a maintenance aqreement or covenant
and easement to enter and maintain, subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The agreement or covenant
and easement to enter and maintain shall ensure that if
the landowner, or subsequent owner(s), fails to maintain
the required/installed site improvements, the City will
be able to file an appropriate lien(s) against the
property in order to accomplish the required maintenance.
IIl.MM.DI PAGE I OF , '.....
"'OI'.~ ~ J
?ac;re 2 0-: 7
CONDITIONS
o
CASE (uP 90 - 32 (EaT)
AGENDA,ITEM 4
HEARING DATE J -3'-!:f.l
PAGE Q
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
,.
....
6.
...
The developer is to submit a complete master landscape
and irriqation plan (5 copies) for the entire development
to the Public Works Department with the required fee for
review. The landscape plans will be forwarded to the
Parks, Rec::-eation, and Community Services and the
Planninq Division for review. (Note: The issuance of a
buildinq development permit by the Department of Planninq
and Buildinq Services does not waive this requirement.)
No qradinq permit(s) will be issued prior to approval of
landscape plans. The landscape and irriqation plans
shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape
and Irriqation" (available from the Parks Department),
and comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter
19.28 (Landscapinq Standards) of the Development Code
effective on the date of approval of this permit. Trees
are to be inspected by a representative of the Parks
Department prior t'O plantinq.
(The followinq provision is applicable t'O single family
hOllies. ) Trees, shrubs and qr'Ound c'Over 'Of a type and
quality qenerally c'Onsistent or c'Ompatible with that
characterizing single family h'Ollles shall be provided in
the front yard and that p'Ortion of the. side yards which
are visible frOlll the street. All landscaoed areas must
be provided with an automatic irriqation syst_ adequate
to insure their viability. The landscape and irriqation
plans shall be reviewed as outlined above.
....
rr all - -....,
PUIM.DI PC;: 1 os: 1 1&olDl
Page 3 of i
.-
..
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
A.ND. BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
J
CASE
!D -32 (EOT)
"'
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
...
J-J -92
10
,
7. This pe=it or approval is subje~ to all the applicable
provisions of the Development Code in et~e~ at ~~e time
of approval. This includes Chapter :'9.20 - ?ropert::z-
Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt:
control during cons~1J~ion and qrad':':'Ig ac~ivities~
emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other for.:s
of air pollution ~ glare control; exterior lighting desiqn
and cont=ol ~ noise conuol; odor control; screening ~
siq:'ls, off-street parking and off-street loading~ and,
viDration control. Screening and siqn regulations
compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior
st.'"'Uctural equipment, or utility t--ansfo=ers, I::loxes,
duc:-..s or meter caI::linets shalll::le architecturally screened
by wall or struc:tural el_ent, I::llending with the building
desiqn and include landscaping when on the ground. A
siqn proqrua for all n_ commercial, office and
indust--ial centers of three or lIlOre tenant spaces shall
be approved by the Department prior to the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy.
This requirement also includes any applical::lle Land Ose
District Development Standards for residential,
<;!..........rcial and industrial developments reqardinq minimum
lot area, 111;..;_ lot depth and width, minimum setbacks,
llIlO";1IItJJII height, "'"...;"""" lot coverage, etc.
8. This development shall be required to :aaintain a minimum
of 4 5 s~"n"'ard off-street parking spaces as
shown on the approved plans(s) on file.
I
....
~~ --..-.
-
~ PlGltQP:t I....
Page 5 of 7
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE
CUP 90 -32
!EOT)
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM 4
HEARING DATE 3-3-92
PAGE 11
,
"""'l
cO~DrTrONS OF APPROVAL
9. All of the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements of
the original approval of Conditional Use Permit ~o. 90-32
shall applY'. ;;herever conflict between the Conditions of this
Time Extension and the Conditions contained in the orizinal
approval arise. the condition or the Time Extension shall
apply.
10. The proposed facilitY' shall be screened from all adjoining
land uses through the planting and establishment of a Type A
landscaping screen. The Type A screening shall be included on
all required landscape plans and is subject to revie" and
approval bY' the Planning Division.
r."'~"'~
~ ~
fIUN.&aI ~MIi 1 OF ,
(....,
" ~//
/.
1
k Attachment "0"
...~ .:'.:J
'0)
~ 25, 1991
~ E.. REm
!)~t.A OF :?LriNNING ~ !Ill:I.DnXi SERVICE:S.
PL<\.lIlN!NG CEl'~
c::=:! OF Sl\N l3F.mooumlO
PRCJEX:T: Vehicle Rec'JClinlI (""..ro.. (ConditiODal. Use Pe=i.t N::l.90-32)
SCBJCX:r: Request f= addit:iorlal time f= Ccndi.tiODal. Use Permit N::l.
90-32 (J;:XPIRATIQI DA1E J1lN 8 1992)
"'!'-.
REF5:RANC:E: Page 17 pa:r-_~ 1 of ~""'''''"li P.el:r.i ,_.-nts of <;ht-t
of Ofi"l......l pl_~ ".."""......"" llct1aIs Catsd Jan 8, 1991
(A[',u I II dld. TDE MY . GRMrrED 0l'CIf ~~.~.a;_) .
'.
SIR: 'DIis ....quest is far id:ti.~......1 t1me '--"''7 tD CICIIIp1.y witl1 ,'~'
..~ tbe 1500 QlM TeI:.er F1re n- t'rotect:ial ~ far IIff project
by tbe C1ty ~ ~' .1 , I bave bes1 in ~ aad bav8
IIIIIde request fer tbe lIIItIIr DIpe., aDd or t"l........ity o.v-1 L --t
to ~hl ich c:ost, __ ilahil;ty, possi,hility to pI:OVide t:bis
. StKVice. 1!Iis ;"~H.... ......,1~ be .........."'g iD t:be t&Ir rat:uxe .
aad tb&t point tbe ~_.' 1:.... pEmits wauJd ba cir-oi"""" far CCIl-
st:I:Uct1a1 tJ:? begin.
.'
.'
.. .'.
"
;'!'::" t1" ~Ot
-_'. ':.1" ".",....
Gt
;'1/
~
'lSU<< ~
/,' .
,j;(,;.,l ~u y
BudIDnql
1435 W. RialtD Ava.
San Bel::r.ar"...iIlC. Calif.
Te 1.epbcne 888-0841
92410
-.
. - '
i ..ij
.,'
. ff i
W._
;j :~ :~ j ...; ]
=:-~ ~ :'~.:: ==~: "::~::
=Z'..~.~~T::P:--_. .:....'..:;:,
.,..-...--- ~.
_..........;.a..,~.I'\..........
--~...._- :;.;,;,--
Q.
Attachment "E"
Q,
.,
i
ci to.l ot! San Bernardino
ST~~ OF OFF:tCI.U. ~G COH!aSSION A.C!:oN
~o~~
Nu:::l:ler:
conditional. 17s. Per.:zit No. 90-32
App~!.cant:
owner:
Buc1dy Lonq
'Same
A~OM
Meet':;'"1q Date: January a, 1.991
x Adopted Mitigated 1'leqative Oec~aration.
Approved Mitigation Monitorinq/Repor:inq
Proqram (Attadment F), and Approved Request
based upon the Attached. Finc1inqs ot Fact
(Attac:h::1ent B) and Subject to the Canc1itions
ot! Approval (Ae-..at'"},"ent C) and S~""t'I,,~
Requirements (At'ta""-ent D).
CONDTTiONS
'l:'1Us project was lI.pp...""ecl ~ect to the Ct:;Jdi.tions o~
Approval. and S~,.....I..~ ~ cozrt:ained. in Ae..-....nt:s <:
and D wit:1 a lIIQI4; ~ication to Canc1ition ot Ap~...."..J. .0. 7 to
read:
7. Th. ot!tice and storaqe ba.i1ciiDq ..h..ll be ccmst::uc-
tad. with a decarative spUt-face or fiuted concreb
b~ock or ~~ exterior to be 1IIaiDtai.ned. in 11
servicea.b~e and aestheticall.y pleasinq -....er.
VU-J:~
Ay_:
Cl.em.....en. CaraDa., J"orc::!aJl, T ;,.."'eath.
Stone
Hone
Hone
Cal.
Lclpez. Sharp,
Hays:
AJ:1sta1n:
Absent:
:r. her--by , cart.i..~ that t:tis Statement ot
aCC".:--ateJ.y refiec--s t:le tinal. datar.:zinacon
CamI:l.ission ot! the Ci':y ot! San Ser::ardino.
~
Si.;na1:W:p'
ot!::icial. ~
ot! ~ Pl......;"'J
r-~
o~ <7 I /q~/
/ 0&1:8 .
La~ ~. Reed. Di~or o't P'lannina' " Bui1dine Se'P"rie@!I
Na:a anc1 TiU.
cc: Project Applicant
.r
:.'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM .9 .
HEARING DATE 1-8-91
WARD 3
... ,..-.... """l
/ r APPUCANT: Iluddy !.onq
W . 1435 .'lest Ri.alto l\.ver.ue
en COr.ditior.al lJse Pe:::lit ~. 90-32 San llel::'.ar'..:i.-:o, C\ 92410
0( OWNS!: saue as applicant
tJ
'-...../ \.
-.. r
I- To establish a vehicle recycli::q yard an 9.5 ac:a...s ur.Cer t.'1e aut.....ority
en of ~lmicipal CoCe Section 19.83.300.
W
= Ia:ated an the sal'=h si.d8 of Walnut Street apprcximate1y 380 feet east
0
W of the centerline of ~ Street.
a::
-
0(
W
a:
0(
'-"
" EXISTING GENERAL PlAN
PQOPC:RTV UNO USJ; ZONING O~~IGNAnON
S\.:l:)ject Vacant am Sinq1e Family m Industrial Heavy
North Ell!s;....-,:e am Z.....n,.. Ei:m!!s RO-1 ~ t1d:lan
SOUth Vacant m Industrial Heavy
East Vacant/'D:lwiJlq Service m IlWstrial Heavy
t'lest Vacant m IDdustr'...3l Heavy
\.
C GEOLOGIC I ~~I(' !llI YES ) ( FLCOD HAZARD CJ YES = ZONe A )( SEWERS: ~ YES )
HAZARD ZONE: ONO CNO
ZCNE: XI NO C ZCl\IE B
C HIGH FIRE - YES )( AlAPORT NOISE( DYES )( FlECEVELCPMENT CYES )
- HAZARD ZONE: :Q: NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA:
~NO ~NO
--- -
" r
... o ~CABU: i19 POTBf11AL SIGNIFICANT Z XX APPROVAL
0( EFFECTS WIlH 0
I- MlTlGA'11NG MEASURES j::: XX cONDmO:-4S
zen NO E.1A 0(
WCJ u.Q
2% o exatPT o EJJl AEC\JlAED sur NO 11..% 0 DENIAL
z- SIGNIFlC.\NT EFFEC'lS o(w
Oel WI11lIolTlGATlNG til
a::~ MEASUJIES 0 CONTINUANCE TO
-II.. 0
>
% o NO S1GNIFlCAHT o SIGHIFlCANT _ . :ClS tJ
W EFFeCTS see AlTACHED EAC. W
l.\.- \. MINIITB a:: \.
'--
:-r-~ - -.,
auHoI.a:I ;t1lQ& 1 CP' : ......
o.
Q.
. .
..
OBSERVATIONS'
CASE aJP 90-32
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE l-a~l
PAGE .,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
,.
R~OtJEg'l'
The applicant reque~t~ the approval of a Conditional U~e Per3it
under the authority of Municipal Code Section 19.83.300, to
establish a 30tor vehicle re~Jclinq yard on 9.5 acres and to vary
the amount of required parkinq by 78 ~paces.
SITE LOC~'l'ION
The subject property I~ located on the
street, approximately 380 feet east of the
Street in the IH, Industrial Heavy land use
south sIde of Walnut
centerline of Mu~cott
designatlon.
Mt1NTCra~H.. ~nDE ~ND r;~N;:RJH. Df...AN ~ONFnRMANC1!:
The project does not comply vith the Municlpal Code Parking
Standards. The proposed project otherv1~e 1s In conformance w1th
the Municlpal Code and is consistent vlth the General Plan as
shown 1n Attachment -A-.
C~LrFORNT. ~NVtRoNMRN~aL QU~Ir~ A~
An Initlal study was prepared by staff and was presented to the
3nvironmental Reviev Commlttee on Auqu~t 23, 1990. A Mltigated
~eqative Declaration wa~ proposed. The Initial study vas made
available for public reviev and co..ent from Au~t 13, 1990 to
September 19, 1990. No co-.ents were received. A Mltigatlon
Monitorlnq and Reportlng program ha~ been prepared for the
proposal (Attachment -V-).
9ACXGROUND
The rectanqular ~ite is prlmarl1y vacant wlth the exceptlon of
three sinqle family residences, a barn, and a tln shed located
alonq Walnut near the northern property line. All appear to have
been constructed between 1930 and 19.50. Several uture trees
~urround the re~idence~. 'DIe site sloces to the southeast
at approximately one-half to one percent. Elevations on tne
property range from 1,080 feet at the northvestern most corner to
1,065 at the southwestern most corner.
Several sinqle-family residences and a trailer
across Ifalnut on the north. Vacant industrial
border the ~ite on the east, ve~t and south.
Limits are located approximately 132 feet south
most property 11ne.
park are located
designated land
The Colton C1ty
of the southern
~
P\.NrIo&GI PlGlt ~, :......
-----
.~ -
~7,-:_
'.
,
-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE ~ 90-32
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING CATE
PAGE
9
1-8-91
3
..-
~
Similar land uses in the area include a vehicle recyclin~ yard.
located approximately 350 feet to the vest on the northeast
corner of Walnut and Muscott streets. and an automotive tovin~
service on the south side of Walnut Street approximately 143 feet
to the '''est.
ANA-r.vS! g
Permitted Use
The proposed vehicle recyclin9 yard is a permitted use in the IB.
Industrial Heavy General Plan land use district with a
Conditional Use Permit.
Existin~ Structures
Two of the existin~ sinqle-family residences located at the
northeastern and northwestern corners of the site are to remain.
OR tb. .ite-6~~ Lw ~~..in. The third residence is to be
demolished. The proposal has been conditioned to comply with the
City's Historic Preservation Ordinance and to obtain proper
demolition permits in reaovin9 this structure. The barn and the
tin shed are to remain. The barn will be used as an accessory
structure to the residence on the northeast corner of the site
and the tin shed will become a stora~e buildin~ for the recyelin~
facility.
Since the Municipal Code does not permit
industrial/residential land uses. the project
conditioned to file a lot line adjust3ent separatin~
residences from the vehicle recyclln~ yard.
combInation
has been
the exIstin~
Trees
There . are numerous mature trees surro~ndin~ the structures
developed on the site. The project has been conditioned to
preserve these trees in place vhenever feasible. Should the
removal of any tree be necessary, the applicant has been
conditioned to submit a tree removal per2it SUbject to :~e
approval of the Parks and Recreation Department and the Planninq
Depart3ent. The tree removal permit is to include an arborist
report on the condition of any trees to be removed and the
viability of relocatin~/transplant~n~ the trees elsewhere on
site.
eft'" .. _ .---
-..~
~ ;:t1Gl:1~'
.....
OBSERVATIONS
CASE COP 90-32
AGENCA ITEM ~
HEARING CATE 1-8-91
PAGE 4
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
"'l
"
Office and Storage 3uilding
The proposed el~vat~ons of t~e of:lce and the storage building
vere discussed at the Development Revlew Committee (DRC) on
November 15, 1990. At that ~eeting staf: expressed concern over
the proposed constructlon materlals. The applicant proposes a
stucc~ exterior for both of the buildings. Staf: belleves that
the stucco exteriors will be easily damaged by the vehicles and
equipment to be used at the facillty. Should damaged stucco go
unrepaired it would detract from the appearance of the building
to the detriment of the surrounding area. Staff recommended that
both buildings be constructed of a more durable decorative split-
face or fluted concrete block. The concrete block is not easily
damaged and would maintain its appearance longer. The DRC did
not share staff's concern and cleared the elevaticns onto
Planning COmmission with. stucco exteriors. However, staff's
concern remains. Staff therefore recommends that both buildings
be constructed vith a decorative split-face or fluted concrete
bLock exterior for greater durability and malntalned appearance.
A condition of approval has beeD included to this effect.
Fences and Screening
The applicant proposes to screeD the recycling yard area vith a 6
foot fence. Conditlons have also been included reqUiring the
applicant to screen the perimeter of the ~rd on all sides.
At the ORC meeting, the applic3nt vas requested to prOVide an 8
foot fence to screen the yard area. Hovever, the applicant is
opposed to erecting an 5 foot fence because of the monetary cost
involved. To ensure adequate screening, the applicant has been
conditioned not to stack vehicles or parts above the height of
the six foot fence.
Compatibility with Surroundlng Land Uses
The proposal will be compatible vith the vacant industrial
deslgnated land borC.er'..nq the site en the east, vest and south.. The
project vill also be compatible with t~e single-family
residences and trailer park located across Walnut on the north in
that the storage ~rd vill be screened by a decorative vall and
landscaping and development vill take place according to the
conditions of approval.
",...,.-...-
- -
....
~~ illGE' c,:. . :....
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTMENT
CASE CCP 90-32
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
9
l~-ql
"
r
.,
Traffic and Circulation
The proposal was ~eviewed by the City Traffic ~ngineer who has
indicated that the project-generated traffic would not
significantly impact the streets in the vicinity.
Internal Circulation
Allan-site vehicular paths are of adequate
two-way traffic in conformance with
requirement of a minimum of 24 feet.
Parklng
A total of Sl parking places are proposed; 47'standard stalls and
4 handlcapped stalls. The Municipal Code Section 19.56.070(C)
requires 1 parking space for each 3,000 square feet of gross yard
area for auto dismantling facilities, junk yards, and recycling
facilities. The gross yard area is equal to 38~,880 square feet;
parklng required by the code is therefore 129 parking places.
vidth to accommodate
the Municipal Code
The appllcant has indicated that the requireaent of 129 spaces
may be unreasonable given the large size of the site. Most other
vehicle recycllng yards in the City do not exceed 3 acres in
size. The applicant surveyed the parking requirements for
vehicle recycl1ng yards 1n surround1ng cit1es and supplled them
to staff. The applicant ~lso reviewed the existing p4rklng
cond1tions at other recycllng yards and compared them to the
standards of other cities in the local ar~a. The applicant
illustrated that ~ost of these yards had 20re spaces than were
actually used. Typically a similar facility compr~sing
approximately 3 acres had 10 spaces; apprOXimately 70 to 7S'
fewer than currently required by code. The City of Rialto parkinq
standards 'vere found to be the most representative of the number
of parking spaces found at other recycling yards. Rialto
standards requires 1 space for each 300 square feet of building
area plus one space for every 10,000 square feet of qross yard
area for vehicle re~Jcllnq yards. Based upon the reviev
conducted by the applicant, the Draft Development Code has b~en
revised to the Rialto parking standards for vehicle recycling
yards.
"'"
~ ...., ~, I....
::.;: ~- .--
OBSERVATIONS
CASE .COP 90-32
AGENOA ITEM 9
HEARING OATEl-a-91
PAGE 6
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
,
....
Under the Rialto standards, the proposed yard would be required
to provide 45 parking stalls. Given the large size of the size
of the site it is unlikely that 129 spaces would be needed and
that the 51 stalls proposed by the applicant are reasonable based
on the review of parking at similar facilities. Staff has some
concern that if the facility is underparked with 51 spaces, the
residences and mobile home park located across from the site
could be impacted by the overflow parking on Walnut. To mitigate
this concern, a conditton of approval has been added requiring
that the parking at the site be reviewed after one year of
business for adequacy. Should the survey prove the site to be
underparked, the applicant will be required to provide the
additional 78 spaces required by the current code.
Landscaping and Internal Planting
The proposed internal planting and landscaping for the proposal
meets the requirements of the Municipal Code. Bxcluding the
required landscaped setbacks, the project proposed landscaped
areas are equal to 13 percent of the total paved parking area.
Waste Gasoline, Oil, and Other Fluids from Wrecked Vehicles
The applicant has been conditioned to drain all fluids, including
gasolIne and oil from all motor vehicles to be stored/recycled at
the site. ~ocal regulation dictate that the applicant comply
with all requirements of the Uniform Flre Code and County
Environmental Health Services regulations regarding air quality
control, soil and ground water protection, and fire prevention
with respect to drainage, storage, and disposal of the waste
fluids, gasoline, and oil from the vehicles at the site.
Geologic and SeismiC
The San Jacinto Fault Zone passes through the southwest portion
of the slte. Methods for fault investigation Lncluded aerial
photography, field reconnaissance and trenching in the area of
proposed 3tructures.
Ko faulting was observed ~t the subject area within the limits of
the trenching. Based upon previous geologic work Ln the area and
aerial photo examination, it appears that the closest distance to
the San Jacinto Fault is plus or minus 300 feet to the southwest
of the proposed structures.
~
,..., ---
....... .M
~ ;aiGIila:1 :44Gt
,,--",~_.".
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE
alP 90-32
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA rre.A 9
HEARING DATE l-a-~l
PAGE 7
,.
Because the study revealed that no faulting was observed within
the area of the proposed structures the possibility ground
rupture resulting from an earthquake is con:3idered low. However,
several other potential secondary seismic hazards do exist at the
site. These potentiai hazards include liquefaction and
seismically induced settlement. Mitigation concerning structural
design standards, compiiance with MC-677 concerning liquefaction,
and observance of building placement in the area identified by
the study to be free of faulting have been included as conditions
of approval.
COMMENTS R~CEIVED
Development Review Committee
At the Development Review Com.ittee meeting, the Building and
Safety, Police, Fire, Public Works/Engineering, and Water
Departments provided Standard Requirements for the proposal (see
Standard Requirements, Attachment D).
City of Colton
The City of Colton has requested that the City ensure that the
applicant maintain the site in ~n orderly manner, that the yard
area be screened by an 8 foot decorative block vall, that no
liquid containers be disaantled on the site, and that all storage
be conducted vithin the fenced area. With the exception of the 8
foot vall, the requested items have been included as conditions
of approval. As stated before, the project viII ~e prOViding a 6
foot decorative wall, and the appiicant has been conditioned to
ensure the staCking/storage of vehicles and equIpment does not
exceed the height of the 6 foot vall.
county Department of snvironmental Health and safety
The San Bernardino county
has indicated that the
permi ts from DEHS for
materials and vaste.
The project has been conditioned
neces'sary.
Department of Health and safety (DEHS)
facility viII be required to obtain
storage, handling, etc. of hazardous
to obtain
these
permits as
=-: .... ........,
..Ii
iI\.MoUI ;a.IGI1 at' , ;....
<~.:;.,;.~
-
OBSERVATIONS
CASE ct:!' 90-32
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-8-91
PAGE 8
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
r
.'
CONC!..T1srCN
The proposal is a permitted use subject to the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit. The project Ls compatible with
surrounding vacant industrially designated land and vill be
compatible vith the residential uses located across Walnut In
that the storage yard vill be screened and development vill occur
accordlng to the conditions of approval. Traff~c generated by
the proposal vill not significantly impact the adjacent streets.
Internal circulation will be adequate and ~eet Municipal Code
Standards. The proposed parking does not meet Municipal Code
requirements, but a review of parking standards for other area
cities and similar uses indicate that the MuniCipal Code
Standards may be excessive. Given the large size of
the site it is anlikely that 129 spaces would be needed and that
the Sl stalls proposed by the applicant are reasonable based on
the review of parking at similar facilities. The project has
been conditioned to review the parking after one year of
operation. If tbe reviev reveals the facility to be underparked
vith the Sl parking spaces provided, the applicant vill be
required to provide the additional 78 spaces currently required
by code.
l
.....
.......,. ------
- ..
~ jtJGIICF'1
.....
. ..-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE alP 90-32
.
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA 1TEM:r-:S
HEARING DATE - -:1.1
PAGE 9.
,...
."
RRCOMM~nA'rTON
staff recommends that the ~lanning Commission:
1. Adopt the MLtigated Negative Declaration; and
2. Approve t~e Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program
(A~tachment F); and
3. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, subject to the
attached Findings of Fact (Attachment Bl, ConditLons of
Approval (Attachment Cl, and Standard Requirements
(Attachment Dl;
Respectfully submitted,
~ltt C.&d~O~
Larry E. Reed
Director, Planning and Building Services
, /'{Il. ...; L" ,1 .
f\A. ...., :..?~- r_. 7- "";...r/
Michael R. Finn ~~
Associate Planner
Attachment "A" - Municipal COde and General plan Conformance
Attachment "B" - Findings of Fact
Attachment "C" - Conditions of Approval
Attachment "D" - Standard Requir~ments
Attachment "E" - Initial study
Attachment "F" - MitLgation Monitoring Program
Attachment "G" - Site Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevations
Attachment "H" - Location Hap
W".,.-~
....
. ...,j
~ lIJQ& 1 OF I I....
ill
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPAR'T'MENT
CASE CCP 90-32
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
9
1-8-91
1D
~
A'l"1'ACHHEIfT -A-
MUNICIPAL CODR AND G2N~AL PLAN CONFORMANC~
~~@aorv ProDo!!lal Municipal
~nd@!
Permitted Use Motor Vehicle Subject to
Rec:ycl1DCj Yard CUP
Setbacks
Front 6 feet 6 feet
Lot Coverage . 4' Floor 7S' Floor
Area Ratio Area Ratio
parkinCJ Sl spaces 11' spaces
General
Pl~n
If/A
If/A
If/A
K/A
...
...
~ ....1",,1 (44CIt
~ -----
~:_;.;..,..
,.
o
0".
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE ~ q()-12
.
FINDINGS OF FACT
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
q
, --~-'l1
"
....
ATTACHMENT "B"
CONnr"YONAL USE p~RMr,. C'tYNDINGS
"
1. The proposed vehicle recycling yard conforms to the
Objectives of the City's General Plan, in that it is a
permitted use in the IH, Industrial Heavy land use district,
subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which it is proposed to be located. Conditions of Approval
and Standard Requirements ~hould mitigate any potential
negative impacts to the surrounding properties.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use
in a manner not ~trimental to the particular area nor to
the peace, health, safety and general welfare in that the
site can accommodate the proposed vehicle recyclinq yard
in conformance with all applicable standards reqardinq
setbacks, landscapinq, parkinq, and internal circulation.
4. The City Traffic Enqineer has reviewed the project and has
indicated that the traffic generated by the proposed use
vill not impose any undue burden upon the streets and
highways desiqned and improved to carry the trafflc in the
area. The parking provided is adequate in that it satisfies
MuniCipal Code Requirements.
. S. Based upon the above given Findinqs, the granting of this
Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed wLll
not be detrimental to the peace, health and safety and
qeneral welfare of the citi:ens of the City of San
Bernardino.
l..
=.z-~
~ PAG;;QFl 1.&oIIGt
-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE OJ? 90-32
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
9
t!!-91
FINDINGS OF FACT
~
...
VARTAN~~ ~TNnrNGS
,
.-
There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved, which do not
apply to other ~roperty in the same %oniog district and
neighborhood in that the site is larger than the other
similar facility located 380 feet to the east.
The granting of this variance Is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right
of the appllcant In that vlthout the variance, the applicant
viII have an excesslve amount of unused parking.
The granting of the variance viII not be materially
detrimental to the public velfare or injurious to property
and improvements in the zoning distrlct and neighborhood in
that after one year of operation the parking for the facility
viII be revieved for adequacy and if found to be lnadequate,
the applicant v:ll be required to provide the add1tional 78
parking spaces currently requ1red by the Municipal Code.
2.
3.
4.
The granting of such a variance viII not
object1ves of the General Plan 1n that
defers to the Municipal Code concerning
be contrary to the
the General Plan
parking standards.
~
.....
"......._~
---
iIl..Mo&OI aCE 1 OF ,
-
At""..ac:::zm.IIt .e.
()
cliY OF SAN BERNARDINO PlANNING
ANO BUlLOING SeRVICES DEPARTMENT
Ct? 90-32
~E
AGeNDA rra.t
HEARING OAr.:
PAGE
9
1-8-91
13
CONDITIONS
~
....
-
1.
S'!?JfnA-~ ~~~eNS
2.
""
---
-
.,4 "'0= :acti~ic::ltions ~~ ~. .,lan s~ l:e sul:lj act ~ approval
l:ly ~e Oi:SC-..=r at ?lar"'~:1q. An inc:=easa at :are ~ 10
percent at ~e square toouq. or a siqni~ic:ant =anqa in the
app~ve<1 concept shaJ.l :e subject ':0 (Pl..-,.,.i"'q C:m::zissioZ1 ana
Devalopment Revi_ Collllllit:.e) review ana approval.
Cons-:..-uction shall be in substantial contor::laZ1ce with the
Plans approved by the Developlllent Review C::Immitt.e, P1anninq
cam=ission or Director at P1anninq.
'rhe daveloO'er is to sul:lmit a cCllIIp1et:a ::laster l..."r1~pa and
i.=iqation ~lan (4 copies) tor the en",,4-a c1aveloplllant to the
ZZ1qi.:1..rinq :)ep&r.::leA't with the requi.-ec1 te. tor appraval.,
th. 1ands-::3?e p1aDS ~ b. tar.rarc1ed ~. the ParJcs,
1lac::'aa1:ion, aDd O"......~;ty Services and the &'l""";"q
Dep_-=en1: tor ravi_ and approval. (Bota: the issuance at a
!M.llc1inq per.:ti.t:, ~ ~ . Depart:len1: ot Builcli.nq and Sata'l:7 ot
th. City ot san~, <10_ mzJ: waiva ~e
requi..-=an1:.s/conc1itions.) Bo 9%""";""1 Jjler.:ti.ts ~ be issued
prior to app~ dt l""",cape plans.
'rha <1_i.;:1 "h.." 1nclucl., bat ZlO1: be 1.i.:litec1 to the
tollawi:1q:
x S-:.._.t t:" a.as ...It" 11 b. plantae! on 30 toot center
~acinq Imlass ot:ler"':ise inctic:a1:ec1 :y the Ceaar'::lent
ot ?arks. 1lec:::'8atioZ1, and COIIIIIIunity Sernc:aS. 'l'he
Par~.s Deaar':Mftt shall c1e1:er.:dne~. va=ietie. anc1
l=c=.-:i::lns - prior to p1antinq. All ;;re_ ch,,11 ::'. 24-
:OX s;l8C'i ......... Tra_ ara to be i:wpec:ac1 :y a !'ar.lc
Division =ep=ssentative crier to .,lantinq.
X ?lantars ..h..n :e encl.osec1 ."'i~ concrete <:Ur.:Iinq.
.......... ~"'ICltI
....
CrrY OF SAN Se.~INO PlANNING
AND aUILOING sa;vrca CEPARTMENT
o
CASE alP 90-32
.
CONDITIONS
AGalDA IT'SI
HEARING DATE
PAGE
q
'~-9'
14
r
.
~ s.caCis ='--:::11 ~. :JCI:-~ _ , sout:1 _ ,
e&S1: _ , .....s~ _ .,roper:/ lin. s"'" 1 i. ~. ]:).=ed
a'C a -.y.-...r :1:1. slop. aM ,,,,.,, o. plan'Ced wi-:: a
~ ~..=. '="jp. ~;ras..
A ~ .....~CC3pe ~u::ar :one shal.l oe i.~1:alled ~et"J.~
~aci1~~~.. an~ s~..e.
x ~e lanc!.scape u:e! i..-=:.qa1:iol! .,lans mall C=lllply wi~
~e -?:_c.cura ane! ?oli~/ to~ ~Aft~scapa and
I=iqa-cion- (available t=:m ~. l'arks ~par'::lan'C).
Subjec:': to the Condi':ioftS ot the Cepart:ent ot Parks and
Racrea1:ion (a'C':ad1eci).
Trees, sh.."'Ubs and CJ%'Clunc!c:over ot a t"lP. anc! qg.aJ.ity qenera.lly
ccnsis'Cen'C or c:ompa'C~le 'lith tha'C c:harac::ari:inq si."tqle-
tamily l1ClIl8S scall o. provided iD ~. t:Ol!~ yan and tha'C
por'Cion ot th side yar'_ :.ttU.= are n.~l. t:am th. S~'C.
U1. l:md.sapecl areas::ms1: ~. _.....lcled n~ &I! aU1:alllat!.c:
i::'iqa1:iOft ~ adeqaa'C. = ........., t:he~ v1UUity. 'Ct.
l~lK'tp. anci i::iqa'Cioft plans ..It." ~. approVacl lIy the &larks
aDd ilec:::'_'CiClll C.p&raan'C.
3. A1: all .....- th. Dusin__ wllJ. b. operated 1.:1 a :llaZmer llt1i=
=- l2C'C produce o!lftoxiaus nou.. v1b:a1::.CID. odor, cius'C.
-U. qlare. or o'Cl1ar nut"ance.
A siqn p........_ tor the :ml.1:i-t-...n: .>. _ercj.a1/1:lclus1:::ial
CCl'Car "".11 a a..!'......eci ~ -::e Pl......ft(j' Depar=am: prior ~
isauaftca ot car--i:ica'Ce ot Oc:c:upam:r.
4. J:A the ev8l!t ....1: this a;lProvaJ. is leqally "'!o.nenqed. -::e
~ty :.tUl pr:=p1:ly :o'Ci.:Y the appJ.iC3ft'C ot any cla.i::a or
ac:--iOI! anci 1Ii.ll. c=opera~e :uu.y in th. Jetanse ot the _Car.
aac. nc'Ci:iecl. the appJ.ic:an'C ac;:.- ~ 4atancl, i:Iclemni.:y, &::Ii
bale! a.a::less ~e Ci1:7, i-cs ot:ic:aJ:S. aq~ aM -t'loye_
=:em any c:l.aj:a. ac:--ioft. or p=_.......iooq .qa.i::as~ ~. C~'='.1 ot S4I.D
Ber.za.-...ims. ~e applic::m'C:ur-~ 64%-- = :a~. ~e
~1:7 ot ur.y C:OS'CS aZId a:--==ays' t_ :.tlUd1 '::1a ~'='.I _y !::Ie
raqa,i..-act ~ . c:=a=': eo ;:a.y ... ~t~~ ot suc:!l a.=--iOft. =~
-= ~-ic:i;laCOI! ..t..' 1. a~ =-11_ appl.ic::ur: ot lU.s
oallqa'Cioft QDl1e~ ~ c=ncUtiCID.
I.
-..-
,...... ~ I'" ;...
~;;.:;-~
0-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE alP 90-32
.
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
9
1-&-91
,
"'I
4.
The project 3hall comply with the
Hi3toric Preservation Ordinance
demolition peraits in removing of
the site.
prov~3ion3 of the CitY'3
and to obtain proper
any structures located on
5. The applicant/developer shall file a lot line adjust3ent with
the Planning Department to separate the existing residences
from the vehicle recycling yard. Said lot line adjustment
shall have been approved and recorded prior to the issuance
of any grading or building permit3 as evidenced by a
Certificate of Compl~ance.
6. The project shall preserve all trees in place wherever
feasible. Should the removal of any tree be neces3ary, the
applicant/developer shall file a tree resoval permit with the
Planning Department, subject to the approval of the Parks and
Recreation Department and the Planning Department. The tree
removal permit application shall include an arbori3t report
on the condition of any trees to be removed and the viability
of relocating/transplanting the trees elsewhere on site.
7. The office and storage building shall be constructed with of
a decorative split-face or fluted concrete block exterior for
greater durability.
_ 8.
HO vehicles, part3, or equipment are to
height of the six foot decorative
storage yard.
be stacked above the
vall surrounding the
9. Ho liqUid containers shall be dismantled on the site.
10. All storage shall be contained vithin the fenced area.
11. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of
51 standard off-street parking spaces. Rowever, after 12
months - of operation of the business, the recycling
yard owner, shall submit to the City two sets of mailing
labe13 of property owners and their addresses and/or tenant3
addresses of the property within 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the recycling yard site. A sap illustrating
the 500 foot radius boundary and all parce13 within that
boundary shall also be submitted. This information shall be
obtained from the latest San Bernardino County equalized
assessment roll and maps. After receipt of the mailing
labels and map, the City will send a parking questionnaire to
those neighboring property owners, Councllmembers and Police.
This questionnaire viiI ask questions about vhether or not
the parking from the recycling yard has overflowed and
impacted their property, the frequency of such occurrences,
l..
~"'---
- -
~..AN04Dt ;l1GE I ~ I t4411
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PlANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE ct:P 90-32
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
9
l-a-91
:!o6
,.
and the adequa~I of ~king for the facility. If a parking
inadequacy is identified and substantiated, the applicant
shall provide the additional 78 standard parking spaces
required by the current code.
12. ~he applicant shall obtain all necessary ~er~it3 from DEHS
for storage, handling, etc. of hazardous material~ and yaste.
13. All fluids, including oil and gasoline shall be drained from
all vehicles to be stored/recycled at the site.
14. Since no evidence of faulting yas observed
of the trenching, no restricted building
warranted where the proposed building is to
within the limits
use setback is
be located.
15.
A potential for settlement of the
exists at the site aDd shall be
grading by removal and recompaction,
if applicable.
fault trench backfill
mitigated during rough
or compaction in place
16. Koderate-severe g%oUDd shaking levels can be anticipated
during the life of the structure. The seismic accelerations
discussed in the text of the geologic report shal: be
incorporated into the structural design of the building in
addition to complying with the seismic code provision for
the City of San Bernardino and the latest edition of the
Unifor2 3uilding Code.
17. If any other areas at the site are proposed to be built on
in the future, appropriate investigation shall be perfor2ed
to evaluate the potential for faulting.
18. A copy of the geologic aad seismic investigation of the site
conducted by Terra Geotechnical shall be 2ade available to
property owners and tenants of the proposed project, present
and future, in an effort to make them aware of the potential
seismic risks associated vith the site.
1'. Should any conditions be encountered during developme~t that
appear in any vay to be different from those described in
the geologic and seismic report cQmpleted by Terra
Geotechnical, a qualified geoiogist shall be notified
concerning appropriate recommendations and mitigation.
20. The storage building shall not be used for office or any
_other human occupancy use unless the appropriate geological
studies have been conducted.
..
a~ ~-ac,o,:,
-
,..---
- ...
~-_..;;-
~-.!-
. -.. .
',.:..;,;.
"."-
~.
,.
~--=oc;=er::t; '"0'1
CITY OF SAN 8 CINO PLANNING
AND BUILCING SEMVICES CEPARTMENT
o
~E cr:? 90-32
""..~
STANDABD REQUIREMENTS
. .Jt!'rt-.
".-. .
AGENOA fl"CY
HEARING CATE
PAGE
9-
1~_~,
17
, ~
C~JMM~~~. ~~:IAL
1. c..~'ticnal Use ~t~. 90-32 s"-" '-e'- .. _ .
~_.. :.. e.._e..._ ...or a
carioel o~ l2 ::Ion~ t__... the data ot accroval. Rowever, it no
deve~opment has been i:ti..... :oteci at t:e. and ot t:e l2 ::lOne
pe.ri.od, t:1e app~ication s!1al.~ expire. Adctitiona.l tUe :!laY be
approved upon reqaest ot t:1e applicant prior ~ expi..."'"3.tion o:f
ee l2-111one p~iod. Expi...-ation- Date:. Jar'..:arJ a, 1992
2. P.ARl':DiG:
I
I
b. AU. parkinq and driving' aisles shal~ be ~acecl with 1:"JO
inches o:f AC aver a suitable base or eq1dval.ent as
aP}:o-'';)''ecl by t::e City Enqineer. parkiDr; spaces ""..11 be
s1::'ipecl aDd have wheel stops instal.lecl at least three
f_t fraIa allY bnildh.q, wall, :fence, property line, or
walkway.
c. 1IheDever an o:ff-..t.....-t parJd.nq area is acljacent to or
across an alley t:'oa property zonecl resic1eatial, a soliel
clecorative wall six t_t in heiqht s"..n be erectacl anel
maintainecl alone; the property line so as to separate t:1e
parkiDq area physically t:'oa the =es~y zonecl
proper<=z providecl sue: wall shaU l:Ie '::zree f_t in l1e.iqht
when locatecl within the requ.i...-.c1 ':~zrt: or :ol...=et side
yard setback. Where no ~nt or :o~....t side yard. is
reqw..:.sel, sudl wall ""..11 be thr_ f_t in heiqht when
l.ocatec1 wit:1.in ten :f_t o:f the st._at line.
el. Wh8never an o:f:f-..l.........t parkinq area is locatecl across the
st:re.t :frolIl proper=y zonecl for residential uses, a solic!
clecorati ve walJ. or eqa.i valent landscape ber.:l not less
than .....~. ':_t in l1a.iqht shaJ.l b. ersc--ecl and :IIa.i:1ta.i.necl
uonq t:1e st.-..1: side a:f the lot not cl.oser u:a '=1e streee
than the =eqai...-ed :epth at t:1e ya...~ in '=1e adjoini."'1q
residential area. No fence or wal.l located in '=1. t:"'Qne
s.t::lack .."..11 obscura the requi...-ed front s.t::lack
lanclscapinq.
..... ---
-
~ ~
~la .... t OJ: ,
.....
.~::.:;.:~~'~' .... . .
~'S;i:.. . __ .
. ~~~.:;.;;;.' . :-",,:' CIiY OF SAN B RDINO PlANNING
.'~-c':- . AND BUILDING SE.=lVICES DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
... ~...
~
c:::P 90-32
AGSNDA /Tal
HEARING DATE
PAGE
Q
. '-3-91
'I!
, ~
3. REroSZ ENc:.oStmES:
.
Whenever :'e~e bi.."US are located wi~"1 or adjacent to a
parkinq area used by 1::1e publj,c, 1::1ey sna.ll. be mcl.osed by a
decorative wall six teet in heiqht alonq ~ :ear and sides
and sc:eened qata(s) six taet in aeiqht alonq t:e t=ont. 'l'he
enclosure shall not be placeci ;.ri~ 1::1e =eqaired t=ont or
street side ~ se1:l::lac:k area. :::xa~ location and si::e o:f
refuse enclosUres are to b. deter.:ineci by t:e ?lanninq
Oepar':::lent and Division at ?uDlic SerTicas Super-'-Dtencient.
4. WAI.I.S:
a. six-foot high solid decorative walls shall. b. requireci' on
the nort:l:l. X, south -A-' east -L, anel vest x ~
~~~- Prot:er1:y lines. ~-=I"M"'~
5~ LAHOSCAPIlfG:
.
'.rhe intent and pu:pose at ~ sec:tiOL is to preYent t:'aes and
other landscapiDq !:om cSalIaqinq ~lic imprav-.ats.
a. street trees 1IIaSt be installed at a ...~...;_ ar 30 t_t on
c:enter. Varieties aD! exact location ."'a" lie c1a.,--h,eci
by the Director ot Parks aDd :aac:.ation.
b. lUJ. requi...-ecl se~"a..- ~i"q a ~llc riqht-ot-way
..to." 1)e , ."~__peci (except for walJcs anc:l driveways whi.c:h
bis~ or en=ach apon the requi...-aci I""~~Cllpe area).
c. Four (4) copies at a landsCllpe plan (inc:ln"h.'iJ plant
_terial sp~ic:at'icm"') ,,1:1.'1 be sa!mli~..ac:l to t:e
:!:::lq~ Divisicm tor ravi_ and appr=val.
d. lUJ. required land~inq ..h..l1 be pratec--eci !:om parkinq
arsas and ..h..11 be p......vided wit: aut=:latic sprinkler
faciJ.l.tias which ..hall be. lIIl!lintaineci in an Clpe:ative
co""~ tiOD.
e. Interior plant.inq ..ha 1 1 be requ;i:l2ci and :aaintaineci equal.
to at l~ five percent or '=en per-..-n'l: of t:e open
~3c:eci parki:1q area .xcl""'; "q the area of land,capinq
st=ip requireci by subsection "b" and ..hall inc:lw1e at
least one t=ee tar fI'ITV:Y five spaces or ::ajar traC-..ian
thereof. KeasuremeIrts ..ha'l b. c:omputed. t::aa the insici.
of peri:zeter waJ.J.s or _~ac:k l.ines.
-...-
-
~ ~
~. ~1GI1CF' '.....
..
,
CrN OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
.
o
...... ..:
: ;0:;: ..
.. ~..~~~
CASE ~ QO-32'
.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
, 'J':~..:
AGCNDA rre.t . 9
He.~ING DATE , -'1-91
PAGE 1Q
r'
...,
'nle=aqui--.c setl=ack(s) f:'olIl the DOr""....h X , south, I
east _, west: _ prapar.:y line "Shall be deiiSei"y
lanciscaped with :lIa~ t:'aes, shr~s, and. g:ounclcaver. A
3 -foot land,cal)ec1 ear"'~en b8-'"': "I"''''' be erec::ac! and.
~..f"ed within -:he setl=ack aJ.onq the above incticated
proper:'.l line.
5. ~ON:
~.
a. Al.~ liqhtinq fixt"~-es in the parkinq areas sh,," be
d.irec:'::ed away f::om ad.jacant proper:ies and. the public
riqht-of-way.
7. MECHANJ:CAL EQtn:PMEN'I':
a. Air conc!itioninq and vent ducts ~~ be directac! any
from any ad.j acent resic!en~ us_, and aJ.~ sic!es o~ the
l:lui1.c!inq .,,,,,,, , be !:8e o~ any extar.1a1. vents and
'-""nfcaJ. eqaipllUlJlt incln";~1 but not liaited to,
conci1ti.ts and c1uc:ts.
l:t. All. l:lui1.c!inq-supportecl R,~.n;c:al. equiplll8llt CiJ1C:.1ntfinq
roo~ ..quiplll8llt, lil-~ iIDc1 air coDCtiticminq and vent
c1ucts) ch,," l:te eaclosecl within the bullc!iDq's pr'-mary
archi tacturaJ. el8lll8llt.s: iDdepenc1ent sc:reeninq c1evices
.""" not be per.lli.t1:ed.
c. All. "...",lmc1-supporbld equipIIeDt: such _ t:aDS~ar:ers and
air conc!itioners ""..11 be located within the buil.c!inq, in
UDCla...,_......d. vaul.ts, and/ar D_h;,." appravec1 l.anciscapinq
~ :DaSOD-.-.r walls.
d. Al.~ u1:ll.i~.! ~ca boxes, ccmn8C""'..iOftS and service lines
shal.~ ba painted to -.tell the bullc!inq exterior on which
~y are located.
a. Ail. exiStinq av.....--' I1tiJ.ity services and. wi--i.:1q ..J;,,, I 1
be rel.ocatec1 "n"...."......-..1.
~. All. u1:ll.i:y ~ inclndi"'J qas, elec::ric, tel.ephcne,
water, sewer ;u::1 cai:lle TV ""''''1 be provid.ec1 for
und.er;rcund, with .ac'Ul8Dts provid.ed ~ raqui--ed, and
d.esiqned and. ~-ec1 in accordance with Cit-r C;1des
and the . utility pruvic!er. Telephona, Catll.e TV ancl/or
security syS'tUIS "h,,11 l:Ie pre-wiracl in the st:uc:t:ures.
8. c:cmpl. i "nee with aJ.1. re< ..."atiODS o~ the Gaol.oqy Report
",t...,:\, be raquireci C if appllcahle).
....
#IUNo&.ta IIIG1I CP' I ;.....
-,-
-
.
.~t'~_.{15: ..
..._-~
oL'- .
CrrY OF SAN a ROINO PlANNING.
AND BUILDING SERVICES OEPARnENT
STANDABD REQUIREMENTS
~-..r"_~
o
CASe
."
._~. .
'~-.
... ...-
........-
c::::P 90-32"
,
,
AGENDA rre.t
HEARING DATe
PAGE
_ 9
1-'3-91
20
,.
",
9. Gradinq and reveqetatian ..,...11 ~e staqed. as re~ed. by tl:le
C::i:t:y Enqi11eer in oNar t:a reduce tl:le amount e~ bare soU
ex;lased. to prec:ipitatian.
."
ourinq const::uc-..ian, tl:le Cit-I :::nqinear :nay requi-_ a :ence
a..-=und al.l or a por=ion o~ t:1e pe=i.,her.l a~ tl:le site to
...i";"';ze 'rinci and debris damaqe to adjacent prcper-..ies. 'n1e
t"jpe e~ fencinq .,h"ll ~e approved. l:ly tl:le City :::nqineer to
assu----e adequate project site :nai11tenance, Clean-up and. dust
cancal.
u.
witl:lin 75 feet ot any single-family residential. district, the
m",..; "'1J:l heiqht at any buildinq shall not exceed ene story or
20 teet unless t:1e Commissian dete=ines that due to unusual.
topcqrap~cal. or ether features, such restrictive heiqht -tis
not prac-..J.cal.. t "
No Cart'; 1"icate o~ Occupancy ch", l' ]:)e issued. prior "to
COIIlpliance with th_ s-..,,"'~ 1lequ.i.rements as -U as all
p_""...isions ot the San ~ KunicipaJ. COde.
12.
SIGNS:
All. siqns .h",P ]:)a in" ~arw""c. with San BeJ:Dard.ino
K1m.icipal. COcle sect:iou 19.50. Four (4) copies o~ a plot plan
mul elevation o~ t!Ia sip drawn to scaJ.e ~h"l1 ]:)e subIIlittad.
to the P1"'....;..'\1 Depart:lleDt tor revi_ and. app~ prior to
issuance o~ the siqn peait f:'aIa. tl:le Bui.J.c1inq and. Sa~ety
Depart:lleDt.
-...-
....
.........aa ....I~' t.....
..
CITY OF SA~: BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DE?ARTMENT
.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASe
c::? 90-32
AGCNDA rre.t
HEARING DATE
PAGE
q
l-a-n
71
,.
-....
COMPOS~:.::.::. DEVELOPMENT PUN
'"
,..----
-
-"""
~la ;I.IG&I:JP' :...
CITY OF SAN c:nNAROINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SEFlVlC5 OE?ARTMENT
cR
Cl!? 90-32
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGCNCA .. .:.'101
HEARING DATE
PAGE
'j
1;.a-91
7?
'u'n"""~
"'"
14. . sumu. ': ~lans pnpa:ed by 4 Rec;istared. 3UilcUnq Oesic;ner.
Ardti.':ac:: or c=,-.ril or s~~ ZZ1q:i:1ear.
15.
Hi
17
18.
Sul::::d': a c:o:zplata latan.l ami s1:..-':C":~-a1. analysis prep_-.d by a
:aaqis'Cered C::.r:U or s~_l :::nq:i:1aar or Ar-..hi ':ec:t.
Sul::::d': State o~ cali:o=ia ':.'itle 24 :::nar;y calc:uJ.atioZl :or.::s
:ar ~,",- ~, :ton-residential bui!.c:U...~CjS
inc~uc:i:1q a sic;nec1 =plianc:a stat_ent.
SUbmit calc::alatio1'1S and r_~ctu.._l. c1ravinqs. prepared by a
1leqistered civil. . st::uc'l:UraJ. Engineer or Architec:t, ~
~
Subcdt ~l.o~r plan ot existinq st..-uc:tura.
exis'C:i:1q :za'Cer:.als ot CClnst:::uc-..icn.
t.lI.DeJ. all. uses and
'Ii' sw=i.t ~aur (4) COIIplete se~ o~ eoast:uc-..ion plans incl....."...'J:
.
e. c:=py 01: .........ti'"".......
1:1. Soils and/or lique~act1on report.
c.
!:zlerc;y caJ.=zl.a"" ......,
4. . S1::"~-a1. c:alc:zlaticm..
SUblait e ,rel. ;...".....,.,. (soils) "'7-" 1
~.-N--""""""'~l report Pi';.p"iria by
cia so.
7' SUI:Il:li': a si::ql._ line c!nvi.nq ot 1::1_ al.-==ic:al. sarnc:a. Show
al.l. eqlUpIIlan1:. co~~ and "Ii.._ sues anc! tzPes. Shaw l::1e
serTica g:"CIUDd. s1:a u:ci ~_"""TA';9'I'J e1~_.....1e.
20.
e ~ llc-"-" 1:0
22. sumd.': ~eJ. sc:edule(s) and al.__':c:al. pl.aDs.
7' ~t recsUi---.d :or c1IIIIalltic:1 ot .xis1:inc; bu:U.cUnq(s) on s;i.ta.
24. SWlmi': a ;lan ot t:1e ~-:i:l;, vem::i!.ati.::c; or air c:oncU-:='oninc;
sys:am. (c::.early i::!.m:i.."'7 =- location anc! :a1:i:1q ot 1::1e
.quiplllClt and ~. ,.~_ am _~-al 01: all c!ac:-..3, req~ and
1::sa loc:ation o~ all. :ire ....."qMrlI). ShCIv 2--". ot ~......lcUnq
1lIl--....... c:al. vem:U&tiCD _ ~ by t:la 1.982 ~ar.a ~cUnq
c:ac!a.
...
-----
~ "..' =-, I....
.
.
CITY OF SAN . INARCINO PUNNING
AND BUILDING Se.=MCeS CE?ARTMENT
~ c:? 90-32
AGCNOA ITCNI
HEARING 0An:
. PAGE
q
1-8-91
23
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
,..
""""I
~t qas .,.1;:e loads, si::inq calc:--lat=.ans and. uanet..-ics.
!':OVid.e a. .,lel'l: .,lan shavinq t:1e lac::a~an at t:1e proposec! seve:-
systUl.
Su=:u': a lee.:- e1.ea:1:r ind.j,c:at~q t:1e i::':ar.d.e<1 use at all.
areas ot t:1e 1:)ailcti:1q. I.is1: t:1. ::IatariaJ.s ":::1 1:). use<1 and t:1e
projee""..s .,=d.ucad qiviJ1q ~e amount at ea.c: kept 1;1 ~e
build.i."1q. It~. bailcti:1q is use<1 :or ::ore ~ one ~a_,
lj,st all o~er us.s.
28.
SuJ:mi t isalllet=ic plans ot ~e cold and hot vater and . c!rain
waste and vent systems.
29.
Shov cQlllpllance vi~
m
~e physical.l.y handicapped
~
Title :Z4 tar
1iIl<<
SWmdt plans approveci by the Caun1:"l' lIeaJ.t:l Dapart::lent.
~ca1:a :Ile~:'-is ot ~liance
(exterior, 1n1:arl..ar party valls,
call.i::q) as per S1:lZC1y, a.s.c., locaJ.
tor saanc1 ae-..enu.atian
C.oor/cellinq ass-alr,
or S1:ata Law.
30.
Show COllIplianca vi1:h raqai..-.ments ot lU.qh tl.._ areas.
For S't:UC':::L.-as loc::atac1 vit:li.:1 hiqJ1 vim! areas:
&. Desiqn st:::uc=ra, incl,,"4.-q root caver..nq, as:i:lq :ZO
p.s.:. vi.nd load.
~ty ot san ~ ".....- as ~~ "'icaU hclder tor
WcrJcarI s <:=:ap-.asaCOll T1llI-<:l1.. ant:a.
31.
Assessor's l'ar"-el lIlDIber.
274-031-2,3,4,_ 5
32. C::ln1:ae""..::Ir's <::.ty license.
33. C::lnt..-ae""..::l%" s State Uc:--.
34. S_er c:apacit"l' ric;h1::l ::=a iia1:8%' Ce~1:, Ja~-5093, SeU
.....~eD.
"'"
~
........... .... .e>>1 l....
.,..._-
-
.
CITY OF SAN BetNARCINO ~NING
_ ANC BUILDING SeMCa DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
0-
CASE .COP 90-32
AGCNDA rre.t . q
HeARING CAn: .1-<3-91
PAGE 24
,.
""
35.
Sc:hCla~ ~_ ::=a 11Di.ti.ec! Sd1cal DuCic, J81.-U79.
~er:
"0:;
QZl'Osr.t':
$350.00
.
~
....--
......... ~ I ~, I.....
,
- -
1
o.
o.
- -
-
CXTY OF S~~ BERNABDZNO
DRC/ERC
DATE ~-~3 -~
CASE (' .1 P c;()- ~
.::
STANDARD REQUXREMENTS
POLZCE DEPT
pOR CCMHERCIAL/INDUSTRLU. DEVELOPMENTS
. .
SECURITY LIGaTING:
37.~
38 _ '-....
39. "-
40. -......
,
G. "-.,
42. ""
43. ..........
44. '-...
4S. '--
DOORS .
46.~
Lighting levels on the exterior of the building are to pro-
vide a 2ini~um of one ~oot candle of ~ini~um saint.ined il-
lumination, evenly distributed, on the ground level tro.
dusk until the ter=ination of business each operating day.
All exterior doors to buildings shall be equipped with an
illumination device capable ot providing a ~ini~um of one
foot candle of maintained illuminated at ground level during
hours of darkness.
Aisles. passageways, and recesses related to and within the
project complex shall be illuminated with an intensity of at
least .25 toot candles at the ground level during the hours
at darkness.
Open parking lots and carports shall be provided vi th a
.iDilllW8 _intained ODe foot candle at licht e"euy distrib-
uted on the parking sur!"e durina the hours of darkness.
All exterior lightin, de"ices are to be inaccessible to
co_on reach or cli.bine SlId shall be protected by weather
and vandalism resistant covers. AJ.l exterior lightin, shall
be projected so _ to _t cast lillht onto adJoiDin, prop-
erties.
Interior night li,htina shall be aaintained in those areas
that are visible trom the street (ground floor only).
There shall be a miniaua of 20 foot candles of illumination
per square foot of surface &rea adjacent to g- pumps.
Parking lot poles will be shake proof so ~hat lichts cannot
be damaged by shaking the pole..
Light fi.'ttures shall be positioned in sucll a lII&nner so that
-stray" licht does not affect adjoining property owners.
Interior night lighting shall b. aaintained in those Areas
that are visible from the street (ground floor only I.
I.OCD. AND WDf1)01IS:
Swinging exterior glass doors, wood 0:' lIIetal doors with
glass panels, solid wood or _tal doors shall be constl:'Ucted
or protected as follows:
Al Wood doors shall be of solid core constl:'Uction with a
mini:um thickness of 1 3/4-.
~'__'C~.o;;'..,"~,..,.~.~:
-
;...0_
_0_
STANDARD REQUXREMENTS
:ORC/ERC
DATE
CASE
POLICE DEPT
C:I:TY OF S.A.N BERNARDINO
-:-
.. Bl
Hollow iIIetal doors shall he constructed a iIIinimUIII
equivalent to sixteen U.S. gauge steel and have sut-
ticient reinforce.ent to aaintain the designed thick-
ness of the door when anT lock~~g device is installed
such as reintorcement heine able to rest~ict collapsing
at the door around the locking device.
C)
The above doors shall contain a 190 degree view angle
door viewer.
47. """
Except when double cTlinder desdbolts are utilized. any
glass utilized within 40. at anT door locking iIIechanislII
shall consist at laminated glass. tempered glass. wired
glass or plastics.
All swingine exterior wood and steel doors shall be equipped
_ tallows:
48. '-...
A) A sinele or double door sball be equipped with a double
or sinCle deadbolt. The bolt shall have & miniawa pro-
Jectioll at 1- iuuI be COIl.tructed _ .. to repel cutting
tool attAck. No double cylinder deadbol t locks. shall.
be installed all the tront door.
B) The desdholt shall bave _ eabedaent at at le_t 1-
into the strike receivin. the projected bolt. The
cylinder shall have a cyli:2der zuard. a :ainilaUlll at tlve
pin blablers. &ad sbal.l be connected to the inner por-
tion ot the lock by connectine screws :It at le_t 1/4-
in diaaeter. The reco...ndatioft does not apply when
~&aic hardware is required or an equivalent device is
approved by the BuildiDc Code.
49..............
I
C) The strike plate shall be a ainlaw. at 3- in heicht &ad
sball be secured to the j..u. with a ,.iniJlawa at tour
Z-l/Z~ screws.
~ouble doors shall he equipped as tallows:
Al The active leat at double doors shall be equipped with
m.tal tlush Dolts havine a minimUlD elllbedlllent at 5/8"
into the head &ad threshold ot the door tr.... Double
doors shall have _ astracal constructed at st..l. a
m!:law. at .1%5- thick. which will cover the openinc
betw_n the doors. This _tragal shall be a ldniaua
at Z. wide &lid eztended a minilllulII at 1- be70lld the edge
at to"e door to vhic:z it i. attached. The as;ragal
.hall b. attached to the outside at the active door by
means at welding or with nOllrelllovable bolts spaced
apar~ all not more ~han 10" ~ellters~
-
-
_ 0.-
-
_0
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
:CRC/ERC
:CATE"
CASE ""} ~ c:r0-3"2-
POL::t:CE :CEPT
CITY OF SAN BER.~ARDINO
30. ...........
51. --....
..All exterior hin~ed doors are to o~en/swing out~ard.
Hin~es ror"out-swin~in~ doors shall be equipped with non-
removeable hinge pins or & ~echanical inner lock to preclude
removal or the door r~om the exterior by removi~ the hinge
pins.
32. ............,
Windows
A) All moveable windows shall be equip~ed with a locking
device and shall be constructed in a fashion to ~
strict them from bei~g lifted out or their tracks when
in the closed position.
B) All moveable windows shall also be equipped with an
auxiliary locking device which prevents the window
froa being slid open (either vertically or horizon-
tally) open while in the closed position.
5J.~
Garace type doors: (rollinc overhead, solid overhead.
_incinC. slidiDC. or accordion s1:71eJ
A) The above described doors shall contors to the tollov-
in. .tanct.rds:
1. Wood doors shall have paDels a 81111_ of 5/1S-
iJa thickness wi en the locJdJag hardware beiac at-
t--"ed to the suppor1: f:r_inC.
%. Aluainua doors shall be a mi:i=wa thickness of
.0215- and rivet to.ether a ainimaa of 18- on cen-
ter alone the outside se.... There shall 'be a
full width horizontal be_ at~ed to the _in
door structure which shall aeet the pilot or
pedestrian access door fraainc within 3- ot the
strike area ot the pilot or pedestrian access
door.
3. Fiberslass doors shall have panels & ain1_ den-
sity or 6 ounces per square toot rroa the bottom
ot the door to a height at l' and pan~ls in
residential s~ruct~res shall have a density ot not
less than 5 ounces per squa:e toot.
B)
Where slidue or accordion doors are utili:ed. the,.
shall be equipped with auide 1::r&cu which shall be de-
signed so that the door cannot be reaoved trom the
track when in the closed and locked position.
Doors that exceed 16' in width shall have % lock
receivinc ~oints; or, it the door does not exceed 19',
C)
- -
o
\0
STANDARD REQUXREHENTS
DRC/ERC:::
DATE'
CASE
POLXCE DEPT
CXTY OF S~~ BE~~ARDXNO
.
a single bolt sa7 be used if ~l&Ced in the center at
the door with the locking ~oint located either in the
floor or in the door f:aae header.
OJ Overhead doors shall be equi~ped with slide bolts which
shall be capaole of utilizing padlocks with & =ini~um
9/32" shackle.
1.
Slide bolt assemblies shall have a frame a minimum
of .120" in thickness, a bolt diameter a minimum
at 1/2". ,and protrude at least 1 1/2" into the re-
ceiving guide. A bolt diameter at 3/8" maT be
used in a residential building.
Slide bolt assemblies shall be-attached to the
door with bolts which are nonremovable Crom the
exterior. Rivets shall not be used to attach
such assemblies.
2.
E) Padlocks used with exterior mounted slide bolts shall
have a hardened steel shackle a aini2ua of 9/32- in
di_eter with h_l and toe lockinc and a ainiaum 5 pin
tumbler operation. The k.,. shall be nonremoyable wheD
in an unlocked operation.
F) Doors utilizing a c,.linder lock shall have a sinimua ot
five ~in tumbler operatioD vith the bolt or locking
bar extending iDto the receivinc SUi de a miDiawa of 1-.
Common walls shall be as sound proof as ~ossible.
54.--""""
All roof openings ,iviDC acce_ to the buil-diAg shal.l be
secured with either iron bars, _tal. gates. se-ped metal or
shall be alarmed and _t vi th the approv~ of the police
departllaent. .
ADDRESS NtlHBERS
55. ............
Roof top address nUlIabers shall be proYided. The,. shall be a
minimum ot 3' in length and 2' in width ,usd ot :ont:astin"
color to the background. lfWllOers shall be placed paral:'.l
to the st::-eet address as assiped.
56. ,.
The project shall display street address Ilumbers placed
in a prominent position as Dear the street as practical.
Numbers shall be a minimum ot .. in height and of ~
cODtr_ting color to the background.
All indivi~ual units shall be clearl,. identitied b7 numbers.
letters, or a combination thereot. These numbers and
..
-
o.
0-
DRe/ERe
DATE'
CASE /J \.4 - ~e -~z..
CITY OF SAN BE~~ARDXNO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
POLICE DEPT
.'
let~e:s shall be a 3ini~um of 5" in hei&ht and of a contras-
ting colo~.to the background.
All numbe~ing at units shall be in a sequential. logical
o~der.
ACCESS CONTROLS:
57 _ "-
An access control override device shall be p~ovided tor use
by police depart:ent pe~sonnel t~ gain immediate access.
Perimete~ tencing or c~oss tencing shall be installed to
prevent criminal movement or activity.
The exterior business walls shall be posted with Municipal
Code Section 9.52.010 relative to trespassing.
The place.ent ot outside public telephones shall be re-
stricted to &II area Uaaediate17 adjacent to the !ront of the
store.
RETAIIJCONVENIEKCX STORES
Lockable cold beyerace (beer) cases shall be locked at
2:00 a.a.
No alcoholic be".races shall be displayed or stored in the
tront 2/3 ot the custa_r area.
Ice :D&Chines ab-11 not be installed in tront ot store win-
dows.
The interior cashier/sales counter shall be located so it
is visible trom the building exterior. The floor area
inside the counter shall b. elevated a ",ini:llUs ot 6" above
the (loor o.t the QusiDess.
Windows and counter/cash register area will not contain dis-
plays/advertisements that block the visibility ot the
cashier from the outside a! the store.
A photo-electric be_ across the entry door shall be
installed to audibly notity or ring when customers enter the
store.
Utilization at outside iDtereom speakers is prohibited.
-
_0
-0
- -
- -
"
STANDARD REQUXREMENTS
DRC/ERC
DATE -
CASE
POLJ:CE DEPT
CXTY OF SAN BERNARDXNO
ALA&'f SY::i1'2S
sa.
............
It the units are alar2ed o~ wired tor an alar2 system, the
buyer is to be notified to contact :he Police Depart2ent tor
an alarm per.ait.
04n~K REQUlREKEHTS
The placement ot machinerT (compressor equipment) shall be
away trom residential areas to abate the_intensity ot noise.
-
-0..
- -
-
-0
.'
ST~~DARD RE~UXREMENTS
DRe/ERC
DATE
CASE
POLICE DEPT
CXTY OF SAN BER.N.AR.DXNO
- -
ADDITIONAL REQUIKEHENTS:
59.
'-.J
(G.:'.Z:.r.:r~ t.....-;;.;;..
;.:. ;),~,ill~j: I-...-d .
~ ,
'.
QTY OF SA
~~ilCINO PUSUC9.ORKS/~
~ C':lT!> 00-"
..-
~
5T ANDARD REClIREMENT5
'AGENDA ITat 9
HEARING CATE 1-<l-91
,
~OTE TO APPL!CANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required.
~ne appllcant lS responsible for submitting the Engineering plans
directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior
to submittal of 3uilding Plans.
Drainaae and ~lood Control
_All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be
sub j ect to requ i rements of the City Engi neer~ whi ch may be based
in part on the recommendations of the San aernardino Flood
Control District. The. dneloper's Engineer shall furnish all
necessary data relating to drainage and flood control.
A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any
drainage improvements. structures or storm drains needed to
mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be
desi gned and constructed at the developer' s expense. and
right-of-way dedicated as necessary.
_ The development is located within Zone A on tile Federal Insurance
Rate Maps; therefore. a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued
by the City Engineer shall be required.
_ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance
Rate Maps; therefore. all building pads shall be raised above tile
sur:ounding area as approved by tile City Engineer.
_ Comprehensi ve storm' draiD Project !Co. is master pl anned in
the vicinity of your development. ThlS drain sllall be designed
and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can
concl usively .show tllat tile drain is not neejed to protect your
development or mitigate downstream impacts.
60.
~ All drainage from the development
approved pUblic drainage facility.
drainage facilities and easements
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
51. .....!.. Dr:o;n"'~~ f::om tbe parking lot aDd hrilrling5 shall be taken to !:be f=t~ st:eet
slla 11 be
If not
sha 11 be
directed
feasible.
provided
to an
proper
to tile
o
CfTY OF S"N sERHAROINO PUBLJC tiORKS/ENQR.
. - CASE CUP ~32 -
STANDARD .REQUlREMENTS =~l~
:/i:~
9
l-tj-,}l
~"
Grading
62. X If ilIore ~llan I' of fili or 2' of cut is ;lroposed, ~he site/p1ot/
grading and drainage plan shall be signed oy a hgistered Civil
Engineer and a gracing per::!it win be reauired. ihe grading plan
shail be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading
Policies and Procedures. and the City's .Standard Drawings.,
unless otherwi~e approved by the City Engineer in advance.
63. X If more than 5,000 cubi c yards of earthwork is proposed. a gr"adi ng
bond will be required. and the grading shall be supervised in
accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code.
A liquefaction repor~ is required for the site. ihis report must
be submi tted and approved pri or to issuance of a gradi ng permi t.
Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction
repor~ shall be incorporated in the grading plan.
:t An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where
feasible. this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan
and sha 11 conform to all requi rements of Secti on 15.04-167 of the
Municipal Code (See -Grading Policies and Procedures-). The
on-si te Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
64.
65.
66.
67.
:t A reei proca 1 easement slla 11 be recorded pri or to gradi ng pl an
approval if reciprocal drainage. :lccess. sewer. and/or parking is
proposed ~o cross lot lines. or a lot line adjustment shall be
recorded to remove the interior lot lines.
:t The j:lroject Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Engineer prior ~ issuance of a grading perllit. Submit 4
copies to the Engineering Division for checking.
:t An on-site-Li;hting Plan for the projec~ shall be reviewed and
approved by the C:~y Engineer. ihis plan can be incorporated with
the grading plan~ or on-site improvement plan, if practical.
~-"~'
I:sf:RHAJIOINO ~ 1V~~~2~
~
STANDARD REQUREMENTS =~~I~
......,
OTY OF S.l
9
l-il-91
~
Utilities:
6S. ~Ces i gn and cons truct a 11 pub 1 i c util i ti es to serve the si te in
accordance \:Ii tl'l :; ty Code. City Standards and requ i rements of the
serving utility. including gas. electric. telephone. water, sewer
and cab 1 e TV.
Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer
----facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing
such services in the area.
72.
Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be
----constructed at the Ceve10per's expense. Sewer systems shall be
designe:! and constructed in accordance with the City's .Sewer
Policy and Procedures. and City Standard Drawings.
69. X Uti 1 i ty servi ces sha 11 be pl aced underground and easements
provided as required.
70. X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site
on either side of the street Shall be undergrounded in accordance
with Ordinance NoJ. Me-50! (Subdivisionsl or Resolution No. 88-65
(Non-subdivisions).
71. X Existing utilities wilich interfere with new construction shall be
----relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City
Engineer.
Sewers within private streets or private parleing lots will not be
maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to
eity Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction
Permit. ~ private :.ewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer
and appr~ved by the :ity Engineer will be required. This plan can
~e incor,orated in the grading plan. wilere practical.
X ~ "CQIlIIIunication Conduit" shall be installed in all stre~rts witllin and
adjacen1: 'tl:I :''1is project. The ClXIl1uit shall be dedica1:ed to to'le City
and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by 1:.'1e Cable
TV Company under per::rit n-..lII tile City of San Bernardino.
~
CTY OF S
DeRNARD'NO PUBLJ9WCMS/EtGR. -~ -
~ CUP 90-32 -
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-'3-91
~
Street Imorovement and Dedications:
73. ~ All public streets within and adjacent to .the development shall be
.. improved to include combination cur!:! and gut'te:-, paving, handicap
ramps, s'treet 1 i ghts, si dewalles and appur":enances, i ncl udi ng, but
not limite-;\ to, t:-affic signals, traffic si;:1al modifieation,
I"'eloca<;ion of public or private faci1i":ies wll;c:! in-;erfere with
new construction, striping, signing, pavement marlting and marleers,
and street name signing. All design and construction shall be
accomplished in accordance with the City of San 3ernardino .Street
Improvement Policy. and tity 'Standard Drawings., unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, wilen required,
shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's
.Street Lighting Policies and Procedures., Street lighting shall
be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise
approved by the City Engineer, .
For tile streets 1 is'ted below, dedication of adequate s'treet
righ't-of-way (R.W.) to proyide the dis'tance from street centerline
to property line and place.at of tile curb line (C.L.) in relatior.
to the street centerl i ne sllall be as foll ows:
S'tree't Name
Right-at-Way (Ft.)
Curb Line (Ft.)
All ~ights of verticular ingress/egress shal~ be dedicated from
tile fol~owing streets:
74, X Const::".:t sidewalk alOng f.bolnn~ Stmet f::catage per Std. 202. Case "",".
75.
:t Remove exis~ drive approac!1eS Wicb are cot to be used by this project acd
- re-ccnst::lJC.t full h~t ~, gutter and c;"-..alk
~ Canstr.:t stteet ~ts alo~ cr..lnl1~ Street per c:.ity S'""""'''''"l1s.
~ Construct new driveway approach per Std. No. 204. Type II with !'m..ni""p by-pass.
76.
77.
CTY OF SA BZRNARDINO
WORKS/ENGA.
c:.se: CUP 90-32 -
STANDARDRE~REMENTS
AGENDA ITat
HEARING DATE
~
~
1-<1-91
~
78.
~ecui~ed ~ncinee~ing ~e~~its:
79.
80.
:{
X
Grading pff~T.lit (if allplicabie).
On-site imp~oveT.lents construction pe~~it (except buildfn~s - see
5ufldin~ and Safety).
:{
Off-site 1wproveoe~ts construction per~it.
'\oolicable ~nqinee~inc; Feu:it(Subject to :::r.ange without Notice)
Plan check fee fo~ Final/Parcel Map.
81. X Plan c!teck and i nspecti on feu for off-site i mproveSlents.
-
82. X Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements ( ucept
buildings; see Building and Safety).
-
83. X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if perlli t requirell).
84.
SS.
86.
Bridge improveDent fee in amount of S
.
x
Drainage fee. E.uct amount of fe't s:tall be deterllined by
Oellart:lent of SuildiDg and Safety at tille of application far
!)uilding perait.
Lanc1scape Plan Rnie'll Fee S 100.00 .
Traffic Systelll Fee of S 12.92 per vehicle trip for City-wide
traffic mitigation. The total 4C1ount of tile T,..ffic Systell ;:e.
sllall be deterained by tile City T,.affic ~nsine.r at tiT.le of
application for building per.it.
x
X
Street Light ~nergy
periOd of 4 years.
~ecor<Sing.
A Landscape "a i ntenance Distri ct slla 11 be hIp 1 ellented to
T.laintain landscaping within the fallowing areas:
Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a
Exact amount to ~e deter~ined prior to IIIp
._....."....... 'T.-=t-~_~~_.._
;';;:';:'-"
a,~"
0Lt" ",J?'" !Q
/J.(..~
SAN BERNARDINO tJ
CASE 90 3'~
HEARING'DATE /lbs"/9;
// ,.
REVIEWEO BY..'
n~
,
,-
~
C,. ?
..,
"
-
.
CITY
OF
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
"
l'IRE: ::JEP."JlT:IlE!'T UQUlKEJllE....TS
Ct.'lE:t."J.. ~!~t::R.E:.tE..'1TS:
[] ?roYice "ne ~ :set ,,( eonst..-Jctian ;nans :0 3uildin( 3I1a" ....r:: ~or Fire DeMl't:llertt '.:M at time at ~ c:ftedC.
[1 ;:crfttact F::"~ OllOut:nent :or !;JecifIc or c:etailed requiremt!nu .. IMPORT.-\HT..
87 . V'~e clVeiC:)er .:.;:.&&.l ;:rovIce~:r 'lCequ.ate ::re ?low ,as '::mOUleG ~y :.,e lire ?!-wencon 3ureau.. :ire 110w stIaU be band
)II sau~ :OOt3i~, .:onstro.:ct:on :eatures md '!~ ::tto:~.rion as ncp1iea ::Iy ::1:e o:eveloper 'lftC may ~ t:UCert from two
~cr.nts.
88.
890
90.
n.
.-\CCESS:
[) Pr"OViQ two ci!!e~t routes o! ::o.;resaI~ to the p~" eluanc... '!be rouees snail be ;Javed,. .aU-w.adter..
r) ~c. ~ accSl road...." :0 udt ,uilC:!r!Z' :or fire ~pal'2t""S. .-\ceess roedWay snall ~Ye 3ft ..u-...Uler driYinr surface
a! not !as ::tan ;:~..t ot unoD.st.."'UcteG ""ICt.."," .
[} Extend ro&dwa,., to within lSo-!..t at all portions at Ute exterior .,aiIs at aU sinct...tory buildinp.
[] Eztend roadway to wit."tin 5~tftt 01 the exterior walls at aU mul.;.ipIPStOty buiIdbIp..
[} Provide "~o P _"RXL.~C~ sips ...,hen.ever ~tkinr or venic!es would paaibly reduce to". c!nruce 01 accwa ruadways to less
Ulan the required width. Sims ore t. ....d"FlltE LAIIE -110 ?,UKIlfGo (All ~ ~I.c. Sec. 15.16".
[] D..~d strseu ilIaU not ezceed 500-Ceet in lencth anc15haU to.... . minimum u.coot :oadius tumarauncL
[) na. names oC any new streets (r;auolic or privar.e) snau. be suomitted to the r.... Deputment Cor approvaL
SITE:
[] ~.ccess roads And 5tr'fttI &re to cae constructed and USADle prior to CDIIlDusCible CCIIIStnICtiOL
~~?riv.t. fire hydrMu shaAl ~ inftaUed to iJrDtect UdI ~1AIdinr loc:aItId ..... taM lSG-Ceew: flOlft tile carD IiaL Yo nr. ",*,-t
sDotdC _ '..itDilll .;o..c..t 01 III"! ateriar-."aIL TIle nyaraaa: SlId be Wet s.nt tJpe.. willi ana :!-inca MIl .. .....ac:a audac:.
.... aapralllecl ~ tile :1re Depwt!IMIIL 1tre hydnaa: ... to be pI'IMKtM r.- duIap 7'! ,..__. . .. saiUDle tNUIc buI'hIrs.
The..... __ _ CUe.,........ _bedesiCDOUd... -::0 PAIUm,G"_lOrpaildJnlr.. _.... _.... Car IW_
~. . dincU_ in frollt of tile hydraal ill aICII a m...... tIIa& it wiD. naI. _ bIoaced b! prMked ,...---- Suitallle ""0
,'.IlKU.G" Ii.... .... .........
[' l'uDLIe CUe "-to _ be ~ aklnr __ at :ao-r_ _ rar =-......w _ _II. '. tIal _ _ at
300-fftt int....... tor ,......tial...... lIIstaUadaa shaD cant... to CIty J- '''-Dana Ud be __.0_ ,ncr tal IhI_
_...-... ar~
BI:1UllltGl
[ )
[ )
[ )
nw iIddI"eD of :he structIII"e. ill siz illdt IIIIIM'I'aII. shall :. inIIaIIed _ tile IIIIiIdiIIIr or ia .... -..- _ .ad loataa. is .... .
:nanner as :0 " visiDI. (ronr :he (taaracw street.. n. ca!or 01 tile __ ...... caauat ....iUl caler of the - . pVIGIL
~ufy eKft IU ... etecuic =... wiUl Ute munoer at tile unit wtIidI it ~ .'
Fi,. ~ maR :Je i_tailed priar :0 die tIaildiIIc ~ ---.-" s ". --- .....__ tar ~ fire '="~ . ~ is
%A 10 SIc.. ~Ini..._ dianDua_ of :ire ~ IftUIt :>>e SIIC8 dial no ___ pu'! of 1M......... is... :'$-I.. tawW
distance rrom . r.... -...-_
_-\11 . oJUI:.. to.... nsaa_tial ewer 5.300 ..... teet. iMllbe ___ "ded willi. autoaaadc a... sprinkler syu.-.. -"Ved
IIFl'''' ..-
SuDm.t ;tians Cor t!t. tlreCWOtection system to the rll'e Deoanm_iWiW tob-'Io . --.. ..__tt...tL.;n '2l thesysteIL
7'eftaftt improvements ia .u.iOrUlldwed ~ .,.. to _ ~ b!r tale rare Deipu't...eftC prior ~;a ~oa..
?nwide 3ft ~ut~Q.uc ~ aiarm (required:..~ 11'.- .~UK be __ ___d by die rU"e O.....tlDllllE.;mw to inaadaac...
rIA Depart::Ilent eonnection :0 isprintder svaenan.. . i1M sysr..) -.u. be ,....,.. al curD liD&.
[ )
! .
. .
. .
. )
i'J
-
:fOT!; The :ulpiic:mt ~ust request. in writinCt' Uf1 ~ in L"lese or allier ......
lIlFOR~.l.-\nOIl.
~7 -I I
./L.~
.
a..c:=>- .,f';( I ~./
-:-~ ~
:/
"-'
k
?';OS ~7J 7:;9
o ~n aemanllno City W_ Depa"o.1
S'TANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Review of Plans: '* "-.//.r=' &:? /:) - ~
. I 4-
Location:~ J""':::- W~L.t!I'J1t.~ ~G;;!" i-tI'!JllC/-rr-sr
Type of Cons-J'Uction: V~I'" ,.::. ~9" J '~ if'--
OwnertCevelope;- ~---y l ~ 1~1
Date:
Approved:
Denied:
Continued:
97.
ENGINEERING: Name: t:/ J J~ Wl1l.J.ok~'ts. Date: .8bl ;'~/y
- , ,
92. 5Z. P.S.I. ~-~L,/...~ _J- .~....loili2!l!o'- --12,1-= (~~ ~I ~.
= SizeofMainAcjac{nttotlle?roject C';~ "".;::>,.i..l"'!::> Wi" .::z;.-::\J''>'':'::'' J:J.....-__ y~....~j
Pressure i'legulatOr Required on Customer's SiCa on the Meter.
Off-site Water Facilities Required to Meet Peale Row Demand.
93. ')Z Comments: V'."'~ ~tl~~ u~:r. 0. ;~~Z:~::. ~~/;.JAl d/~74u
^ . ,~ +-\t~ _1___- ~ ~_ _ __ A~_~~_~~..:=---
Subject to the Rules & Regulations oftlle Water Department in effect atthe time of Application for Water Service.
This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees/Conditions will be Determined by their
Engineering Department.
WATER QUAUTY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Nule:~ Oate:~\Zz.~J"?
\. .
94. it R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at ServiceCOMdCtiOn. ;W/S ' - "t~ ~ .72
= Double Checlt Baclcflow Device Required at s.Mca ConnecDon~.se ..-s.702 .., ~!>. ~9 "1" .-Q
= Air Gap Required at Service Conneclion. = /""; r ~:::~ ~2!11<<-~ ~
- N Sa-.... D' R '--0 ' <i'.c..s .
'-' 0 ....."ow &VIce eqw......
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFlcat: Name: ~ r;:.c.. ~ Date: g~~ZJ
95. ~ndustrial Waste ~it Required by Envinll"-' ConaaI Officer.
= Grease Trap Required by Environmental ComraI Officer.
= Pre-treatment ~equired by :nv;ronmental ConlrDI Officer..
96. .x.. No Regenerative Water Softeners May be InszaJled WIthClUl Prior Approval
= Approved by E,,,,,ironmental Control Officer.
SEWERc;.PACJTYINFORMAnON: Name:~~ T~",,~~ Date: ~\n4::w
No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This r......
..& Sewer Capacity i!!!! Must Be P3id to the ell'( Water Depanmem for the ~moum of Gallons Per
Day. Equivalent Dwelling UnilS:
Subj~ to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance ot Building Pennit.
~ Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building &SatelyDepanment Priorto Issuanceofme Building Permit.
98.
Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day:
.z~, J....
NA",.10&
-......-
;...--...-...........
__._. _..; _. .~:._..,:",;c-';;'
n.....;_..;:~~.:.1.;. ;:.
G- Y OF SAN SE:iNAO NO
PlANNING DE? ARThlENT
INITIAL STUDY
1
.'
ApplicantCs)
Address
City, State
Zip
msC:
ZSPREPARAnOH
Jce/~-1.-89
Ini.~aJ. St::ciy for :::Wiro=en'ta1. I::lpac--s
For t.ol'tDmc.lAl.. us.e. ;:o;l!M1-:'" \lr ao_'l2.,
Project lIU:Iber
Proj e= 4esc:iption;Lac:atj,on co ..sr~ ,.I.1/~ctL
--.-...,f*L.1I'J"*- vA0:J ~ttJ Q.~ ~~ f-Oc:Aoo~ ~ ~ ,,<:;~T\J
c:t~~ ~~W~_MUT StQ~ ~1M~'" ~)Q.~ ..:~\
~~ OC MI15Cott" '5,",,-~
Date
,l.Uc,..us.T I~ , "q!')
J
Prepared far:
Mil. Mok~ ~ 1Ilo.N'III . NII'lr
,....~~ UJecr";2\A\.TD Avt:dtle
~ '"'CUI'Dl~NO ,...... ~2,",' n
I
'-.
Prepare4 by:
M,e\olo~t _ Q... F.~
Kama
~\PrTE~~K~
'ritle
d.1:y o~ Saa aer.saz:d.ino
1'1""";"'1 Oepart=ent
JOO ~. .0. street
San 3-=ar.:lino, 0. 9241.8
.-.
~
,7. IMn I.... HaIIda: WillIIe praj<<:
L u.._m_ r ltor~olhaDldDusor
1lIIi:: __ (indIIllinv build IimiI8d la oil.
~... .cne.... , arl~)?
b. IIMll\M lIIe ...... af h8Zllldous ~'':lV- ..:IM?
Co ExpaA peD;)le to lIIe pcI.mi8I hedhlslll8ly hcards?
ci. CIIler1
L HoU8lng: WiII:lIepll., ~
L R_ uisIing housing or CUI8 a d.mand
for .ddiIiol1al houSing?
b. CIIler1
t. TransportaUan I CIrculation: Could the prapasal r....1t in:
L hi incnaa in lnIIflC that is ;rHIer lIIen Ill. land
use d8li!;naled on Ill. G...... Pl8n?
b. Use af uisling. or demand for new. padcing
~7
c:. /mpC upon aiIIing public b_. Wi-. st-?
d. All '. ol ~ pIIIIemS ol
.. lmpeclla ... or unf11c7
. . .f
L ~_
p .
....,I_.:lslD..... ........... -
. _7 .
or
51- A r : . &4 pd8m aI.~, :...,.._-.....,
II. Siloo-0-4 ~oCI - in nIfiI:.... OIIl11e.
ar ;a... . _,
. _4,r'S
l 0lher7
10.. PublIc So... \MIllie.... ';",p.sllla IaII -L-a
be).a.odll1e . "l\ylDJII'D'Iide . . -_ol-*-7
a. FiN,.... 'I' "
II. PaiaI...u~ ti "
c:. ScI-*s r..... lIII ~_ baundaries. ""...~-.)?
ci. Pados or _.-uDonaI faciliMs?
.. Medic:lII aid?
f. Said w...?
~ 0lher7
.
o
-..,
'!-
No
x
)(
X
X-
X
x
x
)(
y
'X.
x
X
~
x.
x
X
X
)(
X
X
X
Maybe
x
...
... ., - ....-,
-
~ .tGI:~~. 1104IlI
0 ...
2- A/l'A WillIt. ,..opaul ~ in: Ya No MayDe
L ~.. air _. ..... or an elfecr upon ambient
., qud.y? )('
b. llIe cruIion of cDj~1e adars1 X
c. o-lapmenl within a higll wind hazard ....1 )(
3. ~ IleeDutaE WiD lite prcpasaI ~ in:
L QlMges in .i ..lion..... dnIin8g. p8Il8lllS, or lite
... and amount of SUIt_ IlJnCIif due ID
imp8nn8aDle slll1ar:8s1 ,..
b. CIlanga in the course Of flew of Ilaad _1S1 )(..
C. DiscIlaIge inID su/face _813 or at'I'f aJllIr.IIion
of sumce water qua&ily1. X
do Cllange in the quamily. of quality of gnlund _r? X
.. Exposure of peapIe or pr0p8r1y lD ftood hazanls1 X
l Other? X
4- ~1c:IIl R--= Could lite ........-. ~ in:
L C1_..... in lite lIUlIIIMr at ..., unique.,.. Of
_....Q..... rp- at pIanIS or III8ir haDil8I ~ c' #4 X
__at_1
b. a.tge in lite lIUlIIIMr aI ..., unique. ,.. or
_"'~4lMd 4- at......or1ll8ir l~ X
c:. ~no...at..... man _1 (6" OfgN60l X
do Other? \[
~ Malee: CauId lite ~ r . ,.... in:
L ~_ U'IS it aisring noise 1....1 )(
b. e ... at peapIe 1D __ noise ...... ~
&5 dB ar_ _I..........~ dB? X
c. Other? )(
I. Land u.: WillIt8... r -' rwsuI in:
L A change in lite land 11M'" ~.-d...lIte
~ !'Ian1 X
b. O-'opmenl wiIIIin an AiIpIft Oisllicr1 )(
c. O-'opmenl within "Gt8enb8r Zane A. B. ar ~ X
do D_lapmenlwilllin a higIl flte '-d_1 'X.
.. Other? X
~.,.---
~ JllGal'.
,w
-"'~'''''-'.
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
r
A. 'UCXGROUND
AppIicalionNuma.r. CONt>\i'"\ololAl- \..I.~~ERMI\ q,,-~2-
PlOjec:Oescri!llion: '"i""O ~~.l,.\:lL\$;~ A v'E~\c..t.e. ,:(:cc:.'ic:wt.lG- '4ARb ON
q.S" A.("..Qs::., UNn~Q ~o;::. .A.uN~~'",! !".-r: MI..\.NIC.tj:)AL ceu.e.
~CI~ t"l.e?'. ~CO.
l..ocaIion: ~N~":: ~()\A~ :";Ibt":: ~~ ,^/A-L!\1UT" SlRE,=.:r
A-~)('I'M"M'"SL-.i ."Ro PeGI ~\ CJF MUSco"tT STQ.~-=-r:-
Environm.malConslnlinlSAreu: A-'_Do..I\~-~\CI r"">; i::loTE.!\1T\AL SU~<;,LDF.l\ICfj
H-\(,-l-l- G:.1:! ol.lrJb W~Q..
Gen.-PlanDql8lion. \!-\ I I N.PtH:'''t'''Q\,A,L ~--AV'I
Zonin9 Desig'\Ao.I: \ \-+, \ N.~ 'T'R\A<- \~'/
L ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS &p.in _ wner. .pplllpli8le. an a ~ aacned sIIeeC.
1. e.rt/l R._ WilIIle prapasaI_ in: Yes No Maybe
a. EatIIl_1Il'Il (CUI andIlIrfil) at 10.000 cuIIic
ranis or.......? )(,
b. DeveloQment andIlIr gnIIing an a slape g..._
1tIan 15'Jo......~? . ~.,. ~ I. S"J. )(.
Co D....Iopm_ wilIlin rII. AIquisI.fIriaID Special
Studies Zon.? X.
do ModirJCalion 01 any unique 9 . J' ... p/lysical
taanua? X.
.. Sod 8IOSion on or aff th. pIOjeclsil8? X
I. ModiIic:lIIion 01 a cIIannal. creek ....rivw? X
9- O....ioprn... wilhin an .... subjaclllI ~... )(.,
mudSlides. &qu.Iacliol. arorllersimW hazada?
h. OllIe.? ~".\.OPM.Etl'l'" "'\~,~ At4 A-."" X
of ;>OTa..""""" :'U.55'~"" ",..t)
1+\&4 GllO\l"l:) wAoT&R.
.... ~
"... ., - ....... ~ 2GiIC':' '.....
~ -
II t!-
o
""
v_
No
Maybe
.
Co eo. lIIe pnIjecl II-. i~ wIIich ... individually
Imad. bul ClIIIIUlGwIy ..00.1. dll'llDle? (A pnlject may
impel an_ or _ n~ . __ whe,.the
impel on MCh __ is ........., SIll'" but wh_
lIIe <<Iec:l a1l11e .... at 1hoM inlpKls on the
emril'onmenl is signdicant.)
d. Does the project II-. ~ ""_ which wiI
__ sullllatlUl __liIecIS on Inunan beings.
eil/let direcIly or indiremly?
X'
x
C. DlSClJSSlCH OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUAllON AND MlTlGAll0N MEASURES
(AlIacil sllMD.. n~.)
Se:;i A\\A~'D.
C!'9'" _...-
-
~ P.tG&SC" (Ma
".4"".,
e
o
.....
r
11. Utllltla: Willth. prapasaI:
a. Impct th. Iallawing beyand lIIe L""y lD
pIaVid. adequ.l. 1""... 01 ....... or r.quire th.
CDftSUUClicn 01 new facilities?
y-
1. NalUral ;as?
. 2. E1..al icay?
3. Wat..r?
4. S_.r?
5. Oth.r?
b. R.sul! in a disjointllG Pa1.lem 01 UIiIiIy _ions?
Co Requir. th. canslruc::ion 01 n_ taciIitia?
12. AnUl.llca:
a. Could th. proposal fesua in the abslnx:Iian 01 any
scenic view?
b. Win th. visual impacl of lh. pIllject be delrim.maJ
lD th. surrounding ar..?
Co Other?
13. CuIlurlII R._ Could th. p.. ....... in:
a. The allllnllicn or deauc:tian 01 a..... . ~ or
hislDric aralUOlc;iclII sile?
b. Adverse physi:aI or -.cic inpcs ID a
prehislaric or llislDric sile, __ or cIIjecl1
Co Other?
No
x
X
)(
X
X
)(
X
x
)(
X
x
x
)(
Mayo.
14. Mandalary Flndlnp of Slgnl~ (ScIian 15065)
Th. CaliIcmia EnvitanmemaJ QuUIy Aa_1haI if any oI:h.lallawing can 0. _-.d ,. or maybe.
:h. P/OflIC may have a si;ndical,l-<<- an lIIe emrin:lnm_ and an etlvlfClllllemaJlmpacr Report shall be
pr8pared.
y-
a. eo.. th. P/Oiecl have the pct8lllialID .........lhe
~ 01 tile emrircnmem. ~.liooII, .....lhe
haDiIaI 01 a fish or WIIdliI. IIJ :' J. _ a IisIl or
wiIcIfif. pcpulalian lllI dIap ~ selI- . ...........
:hrMI... to eliminate a p&am or ..... _. GiI,.
_.- m. numcer or _:h. range 01 a ... or
endang.red plant or animal or ~ ;.lljlO/IIlo.1
examples oI:he m8JCll' penccs 01 caIDmia hisIary
or prellistary?
b. Co_me project havelhe pclenri;d ID .... shcIt-
term. ZD the disadvantage at long....... ....;._........
;aaIs? (A shcn-t.rm impct on !he 8lI.~o.~_ is ane
which cccurs in a relaIiv.iy briel, 4oII"..d!.. ...
oIlim. whil. long-term impac:lS wi. .......... inID
:he fuNre.)
.....
l.
~~.._~
No
x
x
Maybe
lII~-,- ".IG&.=~.;
e
o
Cond1t10nal Use Perm1t NO. 90-32
Auqust 13, 1990
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SVALUATION AND
KB~SURBS (contlnued).
MITIGATION
l.a" and l.e.
Development of the property will result 1n ainor qra41nq.
Potential impacts resultinq from project qrad1nq will include
1mpacts on the community (dust, noise, etc.) and impacts on the
physical environment (erosion, drainaqe, etc.). Enqineerlnq
Department Standard Requ1rements and Condltlons of Approval
concernlng project compllance wlth Sectlon 7012 (c) of the
Unlform sul1dlnq Code will reduce these potential Impacts to a
level of non-siqnlflcance.
l.c.
The proposal will result 1n development within an Alqul~t-Pr1010
special study area. A qeoloqlc and selsmlc study was conducted
for the site by Terra Geotechn1cal, and was review by the City
Geoloqlst, Dr. Floyd Wl111aas.
Faultlnq and Methods of Investlqat10n
The San Jaclnto Fault Zone passes throuqh the southwest portion
of the site. Methods for fault lnvestlqatlon lncluded aerial
photoqraphy, fleld reconnaissance and trenchlnq In the area of
proposed structures.
Results
Ho faultinq vas observed at the subject area wlthln the 11mits of
the trenchlnq. Based upon previous geoloqlc work ln the area and
aerlal photo examination, lt appears that the closest d1stance to
the San Jaclnto Fault Is plus or mlnus 300 feet to the southwest
of the proposed structures.
Potentlal Impacts to Developaent
Because the study revealed that no faultlnq was observed wlthln
the area of the proposed structures the posslbillty ground
rupture resultlnq fro. an earthquake 15 considered low. However,
several other potentlal secondary selsmlchazards do exist at the
site. These potentlal hazards include:
1. Ll~u~~a~~lon - The slte historically has had a ground water
depth shallower than 30 feet. Given the fine qralned loose
sediments present in the salls at the site, there is a
moderate-moderately hlqh potentlal for 11quefactlon at the
site; and,
6
o
~xtension of Time) .
Condition~l Use Pe~mit No. 90-32
Auqust 13, 1990
C. DISCUSSION OF SNVIRONHENTAL EVALUATION AND
MEASURES (continued).
l.c. (continued)
HITIGATION
2. S@!~mieal1v ?nduc~d S@t~l@m@nt - Settlement generally occurs
within areas of loose unsaturated granular soils with
relatively low density. Since unconsolidated sediments vere
found to be present at the site, seismic secclement is a
potential hazard.
Hitigations
The followinq mitigations apply to the proposal to reduce
potential seismic hazards:
1. Since no evidence of faulting was observed within the limits
of the trenching, no restricted building use setback is
warrented where the proposed building is to be located;
2. A potential for settlement of the fault trench backfill
exists at the site and shall be mitigated during rough
grading by removal and reco.paction, or compation in place
if applicable;
3. Hoderate-severe ground shaking levels can be anticipated
during the life of the structure. The seismic accelerations
discussed in the text of the geologic report shall be
incorporated into the structural desiqn Of the ~uilding in
addition to complying with the seismic code provision for
the City of San Bernardino and the latest edition of the
Uniform BUilding Code;
4. If any other areas at the site are proposed to be built on
in the future, appropriate investigation shall be performed
to evaluate the potential for faulting.
5. A copy of the geologic and seismic investigation of the site
conducted by Terra Geotechnical shall be made available to
property owners and tenants of the proposed project, present
and future, in an effort to make thea.avare of the potenCial
seisaic risks associated with the site.
6. Should any conditions be encountered during development that
appear in any way to be different from those described in
the geologic and seismic report completed by Terra
Geotechnical, a qualified geologist shall be notifled
concerninq appropriate recommendations and mitiqations.
t)
O'
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32
Auqust 13, 1990
C. DISCUSSION OF EHVIRONHENTAL EVALUATION AND
MEASURES (continued).
MITIGATION
l.q.
Althouqh the ~ite is not located within an area identified by the
General Plan as havinq a potential for liquefaction, the qeoloqic
and sei~mic ~tudy conducted for the ~ite by Terra Geotechnical
has indicated a moderate-moderately hiqh potential for
liquefaction at ~ite. Enqineerinq Standard Requirements
concerninq project compliance with MC-676 will ensure potential
impacts are reduced to a level of non-~iqniflcance.
l.h.
The project ~lte lie~ within an area of potential ground
subsidence and hiqh qround vater. A soils report shall be
prepared and ~ub.ltted to both the Buildlnq and Safety Departaent
and the Enqineerinq Department. The project shall comply with
all recommendatIons concerninq foundation desiqn contained in the
~oils study and ~ubject to the approval of the Buildinq and
Safety and Enqineerinq Departments to r~uce potential iapacts to
a level of non-siqnificance.
2.a, 3.c., 7.a.
~e project ..y involve the storaqe/disposal of hazardous
..terials or vaste, includinq oil. Storaqe/disposal of hazardous
..terials, waste, or oil must comply with the requirements of
the Uniform Fire Code and County Environmental. Health Services
requlations reqardinq air quality control, ~oil and qround
vater protection, and fire prevention. Potential impacts vill be
insiqnificant.
3.a
Development of the ~ite could result in increased ~urface runoff
due to a reduction in the aaount of permeable topsoil.
Enqineerinq Depart2e~t Standard Requirements and Conditions of
Approval concernin~ conveyance of drainaqe runoff to an approved
public drainaqe facility will reduce;;lotential iapacts to a
level of insiqnificance.
9.a.
The proposal has been reviewed by the
has deterained that the additional
project are not ~uffi;ient to cause a
existinq adjacent ~treet systea.
City Traffic Enqineer who
trips from the proposed
~iqnificant iapact on the
-
o
~
r
D. DI!TERMlNAnON
On t/ta baia a1lhi1 inial study,
O The jljllllllled praject COULD NOT.... ~,jllcallt effecl on t/ta environment and . NEGATIVE OECLARA-
TION will be prepared.
p Thelo.c.p~Jed project could have. ~ eIIc on die enYiranment. although th... wiD not be . signifICant
!.O.I .11_ in dlis cue _use 111. ,,~ .......... described above have Deen added to 111. pmjec:l. A
. NEGATIVE OECLARATION wiD be ~
o Th. praoosed prajc MAY have a significMl effecl on th. .mriranm.ru. and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is ~uired.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMI1iEE
crTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CAUFORNIA
~ /(~~4" .4~....~ .If.r~~
Nam. and Till.
{.:: r ~
5 r.
?-).3 -7,
DalII:
..
,...,-~
_.
~ ;J1GIi_0F'_ .S4Il
6
CJ
MT.T~a~TON ~WPOR~TMG/MONT~RtMG P~~N
for ~ftft
~ondl~lonRl Use P.r~l~ Mo. 90-12
Mt~lc~~~d N@aA~iv@ D@el~r~eion
tM"'~ODu~taM
In compliance with ~ublic Resource Code Section 21081.6 (enacted
~y passage of AS3180 (Cortise)), pu~lic agencies approving
projects which may cause significant environmental impacts must
.onitor the aitigation of those impacts. This Mitigation
Reporting/Monitoring ~lan, prepared for Buddy Long, ensures
lmplementatlon of the mitigation measures adopted by the ~lanning
Commission in approvlng the project and the Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
Mi~iCA~10ft M~A~UY.~ And R@nnY~1"a/Mont~nytnq &~~1v1~1~~
~rior to beginning construct lon, the applicant shall furnish the
city ~lanning Department with a checklist chart to use in
tracking the mitigatlon monitoring and reporting activities. The
chart shall list each mitigation measure, monitoring or reporting
action and be ruled lnto columns that are designed to record
responsible agency, dates of completion, inspector or other
certifying person and the person recording the information.
Barth Resources Mitigation Measures
1.c.
1. Since no evidence of faulting was observed within the limits
of the trenching, no restricted building use setback is
warrented where the proposed building is ..to be located;
2. A potential for settlement of the fault trench backfill
exists at the site and shall be mitigated during rough
grading by removal and recompaction, or compation in place
lf applicable;
3. ~oderate-severe ground shaking levels can be anticipated
during the life of the structure. The seismic accelerations
discussed in the text of the geologic report shall be
incorporated lnto the structural design of the building in
addition to coaplylng with the seis.ic code provision for
the City of San Bernardino and the latest edition of the
Uniform BUilding Code;
4. If any other areas at the site are proposed to be built on
in the future, appropriate investigation shall be performed
to evaluate the potential for faulting.
S. A copy of the geologic and seisaic investigation of the site
conducted by Terra Geotechnical shall be made available to
property owners and tenants of the proposed project, present
_.,.r'_~~,_~
6
o
and future, In an effort to make them avare of ~he potentlal
seisaic risks associated vith the slte.
6. Should any condltions be encountered durlng development that
appear in any yay to be different from those described In
the geologlc and selsmic report coapleted by Terra
.Geotechnical, a qualified geologist shall be notified
concernlng appropriate recommendations and ~itigations.
Barth Resources Reporting/Monitoring Action
l.c.
1. Any changes in the proposed location of the office building
viII be restricted to the area vithin the limits of the
trenChing by Terra. Geotechnical in the course of the Geologic
study of the site. Proposed changes vill be revieved by the
Planning Department under the Kinor Kodification application
process and compliance verified at that time. Copies
approved changes shall be placed in the project file in the
Planning Department.
2. Removal, recompaction/compaction in place shall be documented
by the contracter at the tlae of gradlng. Copies of the
documentatlon shall be subaitted to the Plannlng Department.
The Plannlng Department vill place the copies of the
documentation in the project flle located In the Planning
Department.
3. The seismic accelerations dlscussed In the text of the
geOlogic report shall be incorporated Int~ the structural
deSign of the building. Veriflcation of this and compliance
vlth the selsalc code provislon for the City of San
Bernardlno and the latest edltion of the Uniform Bulldlng
Code vill be accomplished by buildlng and safety durlng plan
check by Planning and Buildlng Services. The buildlng permit
viII serve as docuaentation of compllance. Copies of
building permits are kept on flle in the Planning and
BUilding Services Department.
.. Addltional buildlngs or expansion of the site viII require
the fillng of another Conditional Use Permit. The additions
and expansions would be SUbject to the provisions of the
california Environmental Quaiity Act and appropriate
investigations vould be performed at that time to evaluate
the potential for faulting.
S. A copy of the geologic and seismic investigation of the site
conducted by Terra Geotechnical shall be made available to
property ovners and tenants of t~e proposed project, present
and future, in an effort to make them avare of the potential
selsmic risks associated vith the site. A disclosure
statement verifying that a copy of the investigation has
L
~, -
o
D
been ~eceived, aust be signed by potential p~ope~ty ovne~s
and/or tenants at least thirty days prio~ to their custody
and/or occupancy of the site. Copies of the signed
disclosure shall be subaitted to the Planninq Department
and vill be placed in the project file.
6. . Should any conditions be encountered durinq developaent that
appear in any way to be different from those described in
the geoloqic and seisaic report completed by Terra
Geotechnical, a qualified geologist shall be notified
concerninq appropriate recommendations and aitiqatlons.
The Planning Departaent and city Geologist shall be notified
and the fl1e documented. Coples of any supplemental Geoloqic
Studies generated as a consequence shall be reviewed by the
city Geologist copies placed ln the project file in the
Planning Department.
Conclusion
This Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program shall be retained by
the City in the Planning Department project file for Conditional
Use Permit No. 90-32. 15 Various mitigatlon measures are fully
impleaented, their coapletion should be documented by appropriate
notation on the checklist provided specifically for this project.
When all measures have been confir.aed as coapleted on the
checklist, this Reportin9/Monlto~ln9 Plan Is coaplete.
, ,
-
I
" .
f .t1;d-fi -jl!t !. C
i '!~:J!!.\ .: !!f 1"1,rl ~ ~
. - ~J,-:: -
~ ,.. If tit. .,
, 'j!!-: I '"'1
iIr'. I' 1'~2
'. Atlf. oJ. I! !~
.~I!ta ;J I~I. · i
~~k, .!! !!!U. ;~
1~IJu:: I_I !.I... ; ~
. :Is.;il'~ i. 'Ii :!I!I ~ 3
Ii. ~":'fi t . 1-' ilJ'J .. .
'I ;:1~L1 m I~:i' ~ ~I
. "- _. ----'"
.
~ =t'llff, !i J!i
:2'0,-01 -lil' '1 I..
.fl':.~!1-.:.:' !a :ja
>~..IL..... -I. -Ii
.~..~ "";1;' i!I
'.I~~~!' I!i Jt
':irr1;.-....1' l~ 'ijf
i ilfil~f if; ~ii
M!'I1=:!I!: - 11 !h.
~liiJlU' "Iii .-1' 'I"
:_l::i ,I \I 'I I iI
oJU !iil"l" bJ "..
jiiii~ii!i : !!" ilil
t ,.:: "'lli: I: !ill'ri'
, Hili iri ,.,Ii 'U
-~ ---
"'.": 1"
3. 1 -~
si ~:-. -
: .~ "b.~ ' - :
-;" . ...",-t-.~.'
.. --.j~' "
__ _w,...~
;:;..4t........t ~~
~~,"",' 1~.1I
",.=n;:-i " " ~~ :\
!~", 11
-~~_.f:ot'J. -
.n.:, _..;:l , iir.
....-:~ .~. ---~
.~ to...1 ..
if:' ~ ~.' ~l ;~u.1.. ;,'
; -::::';;' ..... ~: rr',rr-!..
. ~- "4.io I ' .--.1>.
'::"l~r . ~.-.
~I.I. !
_~~a. ,
':'_~ -, 11-;
:;;; _ :t-
:: .~.=:.
..=-:.:' -:o:..'a '
... "_=-' I .
... ....&. 'I
;. ~."i~': :~ .
. . .~ f ;'_ i: j '..t-I :4~
,:';',:,.i,. ihi ...
,'j;-:O. ':! !:::l~:n: F' .....
. -" ". .1,' f '
'=~:;i r:r:l. ;.
._....~".ll. -;'
. '1'1...,' (, .
. !;;.a1 I '
'~I~UI' - . .,
_ '~'I . ',,-, " .J
~- -:':C~. ,"-~ ;
~:j..~: 'ff">~ c
.. .. ~ ,oil' .........;
~..,.~' I .:a.. .. I
"'~ . Ii. .... ~ '.
.... . .., I
" .
~. ;~.~I. ::,..__~~_:'.
.... ., ',4 "I '---
:-:... . '::f 6.--.-
'"F., ;:-; :~~. ~ \
. ....
b
:' '..iI':
'.
~I . .
!J~1 1
i!C~
h-'~
~:-.;:
.J~.. -
!ts~HI
~il!lta
.' -. ..;~~-
P' '
.----.
---'-'~-"::1-
,. -
-. _. .
, eo. .~.
- ':1111
.'.: ~~"~~~" \~ ~
. ::=\1. '"';. .
...~ I II t .' .. .;.
. . t" ! I :.:
, ..
..- .- .> ..-
-- \:. ut~~~
~_..
-.,
..I
;'
.
.~..lO"
.~,'
/'
. -:-f4-~~k
.._~..-.
I......
.:..--
-0.
~ .!
.~
1-,,1-
ir
~ .!
,;
if
.i'. t
" ....'
.. .:if.l
it ;:!
. . -
!f-'
!! ...:a
ii'
it
it
-
I
1.
h
t
:.~;._.. ':1
. . . .. J"
i ...fl." f .. i
I" .. ...
.:!'i:'I~
1'",1 t,
l!I It 0 Ji j
{]1{010.1
I JJIH
.
.ail .t}: :, .
~. f. I. : i: J'
11. ! . 1 !
!;J. ! ., i ...
iI'
· J 1 ·
I il
.. ..... J'
1 In I j
J ill d
rJ
c. I
1:3) .:
r -'1 i :
. --:
!" 1Ioi: '
. !' (: ~
I~" :.,
..~':. .'
!,-,
.. .,..
f l
d~
'"~ ,:.
..'~ !)o
. .
.J ~
;i ;..
,
'f
~-
f'
"
r
; ".
I
i
I
J
.r
l
"
A1:""...ac.:~ "Ii"
"
AGENOA
ITEM .
CITY OF SAN BERNA DINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE COP QO_1?
LOCATION
9
HEARING OA TE , -R-'11
..
-
--
AT C...,..... TQIIC.A
./'
14'
'.. .. I
J~ __.
ffr. ~ _I
. T [j
f ':.. \T r
I
A ..
.,.. .,. _ ...-...a
~I' ;lAGC I OJ:' t ~....
",
~
GEORGE GLENN REAL TV
EXHIBIT "F"
o
'Q.... ,\ ft "',u.,'
C~, ~C' "........
CO~~.. ~
I
'-..J
1920 MENTONE BLVD.
MENTONE. CA 92359
...i..,
I
PH. 714-794 9991
FAX 714-794-4598
June 5, 1992
00 ,..,@ ,"-;: ~.I ,- ': lID' -
.~ I -, '.
Ole: ,)'1 ,2, ii ',j ~ . i.'
,- '.- - ,. I J
JUH 0 9 '~::ll
City of San Bernardino
Planning & Building Services
300 N. "0" St.
San Bernardino CA 92418
":ITY OF SAN BERNARCII\IO
)EPAP.TMENT OF PLA,',"'....... &.
BUILO!NG SERVICES
Planning Director:
With reference to the appeal of the denial for the Extension
of Time as to the Conditional Use Permit application n 90-32:
I am generally familiar with the area under consideration. I
recall there is already an automobile towing storage lot and an
automobile dismantling yard in close proximity to the subject
property. In addition, there is an older mobile home park
directly across the street.
As I understand it:
1. the current zoning, as recently affirmed by the
General Plan adoption, is in conformance with the
intended use,
2. there are two rail road lines in the immediate area,
3. there is a flood control channel in the immediate
area,
4. much of the surrounding land is zoned either light
industrial or heavy industrial,
and 5. the planning staff has previously placed restrictive
development standards on any proposed development.
I do have nine years experience in Real Estate; with the primary
emphasis on commercial and industrial properties and development.
In my opinion. to contemplate either additional mobile home,
apartment or single family residential development in that area
would inevitably and rapidly lead to blighted living conditions.
I had thought that the whole purpose of zoning was to provide
a blueprint to users of real property. They could make fairly
firm decisions on the intended usage of properties in an area
based on the zone. Now, no matter what the zone, the "not-in-
my-backyard"ers protest almost any new development. And if that'
attitude is followed everywhere, where will the animal care clinics,
wrecking yards, recycling yards, parking and storage lots, any
less than idyllic usage be allowed?
Thank you
Sincere y;
George Glenn
.
t2J
~
CITY
OF
SAN BERNARDINO
CASE 90 ' 3"L.
HEAR'NG OATE~
REVIEWED BY .,L.
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
PIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
f J Provide one extra set oC construction plans to Building Blld < '~,ot~, for Fire Department use at time of plan check.
[ ] .9di1tact Fire Department for specific or detailed requiremenc, - IMPORTANT.
\.Y'The developer shall provide for adequate Fire Flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Fire Flow shall be based
on square footage, construction features and exposure information 8S supplied by the developer and may be taken from two
hydrants. /FOO C/'# /""..('?'# :2. //"htJ/#'-e/rf
ACCESS: ~
(J Provide two different routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved, all-weather.
{J Provide 8n access roadway to each building- for fire apparat"". Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface
of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width.
Extend roadway to within ISO-feet of all portions of the f!xtNior 'Hills of all singh~-story buildings.
Extend roadway to within 50-feet of the exterior walls of all mllJ;.iple-story buildings.
Provide "No PARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less
than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" (All caps). "M.C. Sec. 15.16".
(J Dead:-end streets shall not exceed SOo-feet in length and shall have a minimum 3S-foot radius turnaround.
(] The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval.
'access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction.
Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than ISO-feet from the curb line. No fire hydrant
should be within 40-Ceet of any extez:.i..or wall./the hydrants shaH be Wet Barrel type, with one 2t-inch and one 4-inch outlet,
and approved by the Fire Departmel]Jl Fire hYm-ants are to be protected from damage by providing suitable traffic barriers.
The area around the fire hydrant shall be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by painting an 8-inch wide, red stripe for IS-feet
h'n ach direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked v~hicles. Suitable "NO
AHKINO" signs are required.
(, Public fire hydrants shall be provided along streets at 300-feet intervals for commercial and multi-residential areas and at
500-feet intervals for residential areas. Installation sh~onform to City specifications and be installed prior to combustible
construction or storage.
87.
I
I,
I
I
I
88.
89.
BUILDING:
[J The address of the structure, in six inch numerals, shall be installed on the building or in other approved location in such a
manner as to be visible from the frontage street. The color of the numbers shall contrast with color of the background.
Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit which it services.
Fire extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is
2A 10 B/C. Minimum distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 7S-feet travel
distance from a fire extinguisher.
I~AIl uildings, other than residential over 5,000 square feet, shall be JM'ovided with an automatic fire sprinkler system, designed
NFPA standards.
( Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction on the system.
[J Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be a~proved by the Fire Department prior to construction.
(J Provide an automatic fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department, prior to installation.
[J Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shall be required at curb line.
90.
=====================================================================================================================
NOTE: The applicant must request, in writing, any change in these or other requirements.
91.
~
~ -tie
/ i ~/-
~~-,. '
H# ~j)~A://'J
-
~
FPB 170 7/89
~
'. -~'<'/ t
.r r},) f'
r
, ,
p"r 4?~(///CP
,
~
~~~~
~ /-l-1-f}
& 1/5/12 # '11
-eC"""..,,,,,=
--L
-A1I1
..
O'ATER DEPARTMEr(J
. CITY HAll
300 N. "0" STREET 92418' P.O. 80X 710 92402
SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
PHONE: (714) 384-5141 FAX: (714) 384.5475
BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS
_M~
MARGARET H. CHANDLER
C~(IItlln
ROBERT liVENS
EMILIA GARCIA
JAMES H. URA'"
HAROLD W. WILLIS
Oil". ..~+~..
~A.. ~
_ z
.... e
. .
.. ,.
_'f~,U 'O~~
BERNARD C. KERSEY
c._.........
CHERYL A. FLOWElS
AsIISU,..,Cl..fUl,M.\,..4GII
IOSEPH F. STEJSkAl
o.IKTOI. fHQoIallN(;-
COHfftUCYI(lOo-.M.uom:..4IoICf
DUANE .. NORTON
DIlKTOI.W41l1
IKlAJoU,ll(11tl
,
May 7, 1992
11M E. GRISSOM
o.lK101 Of fwAHcl
,
Mr. Robert Lavin
Water utilities Manager
city of Colton
Public utilities Department
650 North LaCadena Drive
Colton, California 92324
Dear Mr. Lavin:
There has been a request for this Department to authorize the City
of Colton to provide water service to Assessor's Parcel Numbers
274-031-02, 274-031-03, 274-031-04, and 274-031-05.
These parcels are located within the exclusive service area of theJ
City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department. Authorization
is hereby given for the City of Colton to provide water service to
these parcels in accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement between
the City of San Bernardino and the City of Colton dated June 10,
1971. This authorization is contingent upon the City of San
Bernardino's approval of a Conditional Use Permit to develop these
parcels. If such approval is not obtained by the property owner
within one vear, this authorization is rescinded and/or subject to
renewal.
If you have any questions, please call me at (714) 384-5091.
Sincerely ~ L
Bernard C. Kers~
General Manager
BCK:mka
cc: Mayor W.R. Holcomb
Bud Long
Joe Stejskal
Cheryl Flowers
~
-_.,-
~ . . 0
"QltQp,
o
Department: PUBLIC Y.ORKS
'Phone No.: 370-5065
"
Decaroer ")~., 1 991
.'1
Bud Long
1435 W. Rialto Ave.
San Bernardino, CA 92410
Re: Water Service for Temporary Fire Protection at Vehicle Recycling
Center on West Walnut Street, San Bernardino
In reference to your inquiry about the City of Colton providing water
services for temporary fire protection at the above location, and if
the City's fire flow will meet the 1500 GAM required by the City of
San Bernardino's Fire Department, the City of Colton would be able
to provide the temporary service.
You will have to hire a registered engineer to calculate the size of
piping. Also, he wouid need to have a new fire flow test done and
submitted to the City of San Bernardino's Fire Department. The City
of Colton will require you to pay for all of the connection fees,
inspections, and the installations would have to be per City of
Coiton standards.
RT A. LAVIN
Water Utilities Manager
RAl/lj
"llr
CITY OF COLTON CIVIC CENTER . 850 N. LA CADENA DRIVE . COLTON, CALIFORNIA 92324
..--
~'
,
"
"
~
!
-
"
"
- ,
o
.
o
t2 ,{)
pv ,,,'"
(\,f \
To:
'rh,", MHyur uf nUll I\Ullldl.d.luu
'l'he Ci ty Counci 1 of San Ilernardino
From:
The Residents, Tenants, and owners_of Real Estate
on West Walnut Avenue, San Bernardino
Re:
~roposed Vehicle Recycling Center on West Walnut Ave.
ion San Bernardino
Date:
October 18, 1991
We, the undersigned residents, tenants, and owners of real
"property on West Walnut Avenue in San Bernardino, California
hereby notify you that we do not oppose the Vehicle Recycling
Center proposed by Bud Long on West Walnut Avenue. As a
matter of reference we believe this would be an asset to our
area and create needed jobs, income, and improvements for
the community.
<-""--~.,,-
t
o
o
~
" '
I /
"
"
,',
tv
.'
'.
"
,"
"
"
o
o
T
,
--"' -.
.. .:
o
o
>t
.
.-- ~ ~.J; ~/Pfl
/tJo. ..; If ~.J~ ~I .
~ Wa;t~;;, ~~/Jt? ~;1
L/C/~F/oO ~~
I!~;' ~~~~~&>~~~d
~:d~~t:g,~~,
. # ~ eE~~4/~~
~~-~
.:Jim s..n,,,,,,,,,, fh, Ow"," .~ 7heC fl"m~ fl",( "7
/~()o/P. Wf"tt..{)VT-, I!> NOT ()ppoup TtJ fh(!.. vehide- Re"'ld.",y
Cet<.fel? p~o~) Oq+ WOu-LcI Rl"rTlk'a "'4~"b'7I;o Htt.Ut rS RfI'V.i1l.lf
he.. J.ef-k1Z fh/1.T is (l/I2~Jlt7hif, ,'lIe tJ~ f"'c!7hl'''''' iT /1.101" l,e
C-i(1a. /"':'tec{ ~ 7th;"" 7 h )'mrfs 0 p th~ Pt?I2lr bec&f,L.JF,lfF I!JyJ
/
the ~1en ftvt;.t- hn.. Thr- "fr;n-~ rmrcl ~e::s /lId- ~ If;lJ
Mdr/'olQ &st- ?M-ceO "-j70"'" /"'[$. Ik f?t?t7tJfr ?~ /lpPIU)m~
-d1 JS] '~f'€'n ~.dA fI7l1IP( Pe~J., 'Ih ;~. &sf- tvDIAW tRlJ r -Iv
:If '3()r) t!: 0(1. m-oRe pC:>1'Q ~~th I F ~ ;,!entl/llthw4 Fua(J,rJk./
jhe h/I'1'fen.. ~ ef'lvi"a-
.~
~
"
JOBADDR
GENERALL
OWNER:
lWUNG AD
CITY:
CONTllACTOR:
ADDRESS:
Walnut
w Mt
onst
Verno
owner
DESCRIPTION OF PRO.JECT:
OWLS & GAR
"'
NO. ROOMS:
so. FT.:
~
-
, BUILDING CODE REVIEW
"~~;;;;;;;;;~~ "YN
Occupancy Group RJ
F100d Plain
V88_ No_ Zone_
High WInd
Yes No.!.-- Zone_
HighAro X
Ves No_ Zone
.
plANNINCl<,REVIEW
Zone' RU1 By' PN
Rem.: 25' front sb. S' sIde Sb.
20. raar ~bA 151 dwlq. s8aarat1on
WORKMAN'S COMPENSATION
V.. X
ISSUED BY:
No
~&J" Jl1~
.',
~"
<,;,
CODE ENF. FILE'
-~
EXPIRATION
ve
Z1P:9174~
PLUMBING
8 fIx. s/s~ 1 w/h.
HEATlNG&AIC
fau. a/c. 1 ex/f.
PERMIT
Plan Ck. Dop.
Plan Ck. Bat
Building
Mechanical
Strong IAoIion
Storm Drain
Parl<s&Roc.
Sewe,'Conn.
Sewe, Cap.
Signs
Cuhural D.C.
Traffic
Plan Check Review
Building Permit Review
Schools
Investigation F...
TOTAL
API: 137'10109-~',
TRACTILOT:
OWNERlBLDR. YES X NO ~
,'-' -,.'''..': :6
TEL: 818/855-1056 ' ,',f;;"
TEL'" \.
STATE uC. t:' "f'
CITY UCENSE: ,*'
,..,'
'.0",,:",' _^~.
IteIIID
Permit F..
TotaIF...
g/s. W/S -
Permit Fee
Total F..
1 hood
Permit F..
TotalF..
ACCT.'
41731
41731
41330
41331
24591
41818
41732
41822
6024
41332
41335
41803
41no
41766
41330
Thil permit shall be void and of no further force or effeCt If work hereunder II not CX)mmt.nced by
or' work it IUapended or abandon1ld for . period of 180 day. .or more ...... work. com~.nced.
III 1.426/467 NO. STORIES: 1
BUILDING Pol'Ch 13.5 "
Dwlo. 1.426'
~ 4f7'
+...
EST. VALUATION
ELECTRICAL
wIrInG. 1 unel.
oower DOle
.~ ,~(:
,i!>"f
",";''', ~ :f~'t
,",J':' ,,~,~'.
, '178.88 <''-;,lI;(
.92"90.00;~"
"~~W:'('"
..~,"1' _ - .' _:' _ _ _, ~
I~' > :':'.,, 0 - . - -';;.~;:..:",
"'''~~lL;~i" "
15.00 '
;"98.41'
.,r,' _,
:, ,,~~" --~ '~~
76.50
15.00
; 91.50
31.50
15.00
46.50
APPLICANT I PROJECT OWNER RESPONSIBILITY
1. The plOject addre" must be vis" from stree" Check
1Idd,." y;aibillty prior to calfing for inspections (UBe
Sodlon"513).
2. lot comerslJ)roperty IIn.. must be properly staked In
order to do . setback Inspection. If neighboring strue.
tur.. appear not to have the proper setbacks . liekt
survey by . Ilcenud land surveyor shall be required
(UBe Sodlon 3OS{a]).
3. CIty -approved- plana and job Inspedlon card must be on
project sit., ..ailable for Buikting Inspector's examina.
lion (UBC Sodlon 303(b]).
4. Tho DopartmantQfBulldlng and Saloty mUllbe callodto make
""",r...lnspoctfons lUBe Sec1Ion 305[a]).
5. An wall< Is 10 be IOspocIocI prior to c:ovoring; wall< covarod
without City Inspection must be uncovered at owner'II
contracto(s OXponH lUBe Sactlon 3OS{aJ).
6. Tho proJocIls 10 be buill In accordance with City __
plans. _Oevlatlons from lIppIOVed p!ans must be approved in
wrhlng from tho City (UBC Sactlon 303{a]).
7. The owner must obIain a Certiflcat. of Occupancy from CiIy
prior to occupving the building or using the projld (UBe
Sodlon 307(a]).
:..:.~ 11I"""01' ....~ v...kct_Oll ""*.F.. c.-...~__ ~'''''''Ccir ....................... flL.lH.ll.oe PAGEIOFa 11411
HE.l1lNG&AlC
- fau, a/c. 1 ex/f. 1 hood
Permit Fee
TOl8IF..
ACCT.. .
41731
41731
..41330
41331
24591
41818
41732
"822
6024
. '41332
.1335
41803
',.-_41710"':'~
".,788
I
JOB ADD
GENERAL
. OWNER:
IlAJUNG A
CITY: us r
CONlRACT
ADDRESS:
DESCRIP'llON OF PROJECT:
DWLG & GAR
'y
NO. ROOMS:
So. FT.:
e~LDlNG CODE REVIEW .
............. ~.. ;,-..- .,-, ,., '. .....
Cons'ructIon Type VN
Occupancy Group D't
Flood PIaln.
Yes No~ Zone
High Wind
Yes_ No-L- Zone
High Fir.
Yes NO-L Zone _
,~,
EST. VALUAnON
ELECmlCAL
wfrfna. 1 DaneE
'.powr DOl.
PLANNIIIG REVIEW
Zone: RUl By: GG
Remarks:
PLUIIBING
a ftx. Yo'. ~
q!', ",I.
WORKMAN'S COMPENSAnON
PERMIT
Plln Ck. Dop.
Plan Ck. Bal.
Building
MechanlcaJ
S''''ng Motion
Storm Drain
. Parks'& Roc.
Sew.rConn.
S_Cap.
Signs
CuhuraJ D.C.
Traffic
Plan Check Review
Building Permit Review '
Schools
Investigation F...
TOTAL
.-
Ves lI'
No
SG!Ml!sk
,{/
',p.:.
ISSUED BY:
CODE ENF. FILE.
PLANNING CAS
-~
EXPIRATION
~.
,,~-----"'.o;':r
,:-:.;-
" API/:
TRACTIlOT:
OVfNER!8LOf( Y1'$ I
~'~::. "~./'_::-" . ~,~c:> ~t::::"
'NO,:.l:;:
...,...,.,~ ......,.
ZIP,"'
, lEL.t
m..f~'" ,... "
STATEuc.~~:." "
. Cl'TYUC.e.. '. .
~', '""
{ f .
, \~,
/ .t.,
';.
'i".~. :'J
.
'..'-. ..~:.
",,"...f.1!;
If;,:.'"" '.,"
. ~. ,,\ ~';"
"j,:,C~A'/:':4.'~;
:"':~~:i:
, .~~
1 w/h,
...
II 76.50
-15;00 "
'91.50 .'
Permit Fee
TOla/.........
'''';
.1330
",.
off
This permilshall be void and of no fUnher force o~ effec:l if work hereUnder II not c:iorn",~ by
or if WOfk Is suspended or ~ed for a period of 180 clara or more after WO~J. ~~.
.
APPLICANT I PROJECT OWNER RESPONSIBILITY
,. Tho PI1ljoc1 odd.... must bo v1siblo f",m _st. Chock.
odd....-viaJbiiity prior to calling lor Inspoc:tions (UBC
SocIlon 513).
2, Lot comorolpropony Ii_ must bo properly .'lIkod In
order to do a sotback Inspoction. H noighboring SUlK>
lur.. appear not to have the pl'Cf)8r letbacka . field
IUrvey by . rcensed land lurveyOf' shaJl be requlrtd
(UBe SocIlon 305[a]~
3, Chy "_od'p1anund jobln'poc:lion card must bo on
project she. available for Building Inspector's examina-
lion (UBC Section 303(b)),
".:'", '. :1,
.. Tho Doparimonlo/lluildlng and Saloty mustbocaliod'o mllko
_r_ inspec:tIoris/Uec_n305[a]).
S, All work Is to bo Inspoc:tod prior 10 covering; work coverod
wlhOUl Chy IIIopoc:llon must bo uncovorod at owno(s/
conr_s ox_ (UBC Soctlon 305(a]).
6. .Tho p"'jocI Is to bobuillln acoonlanco with Chy _
pIIm. Dovlatlono ,... _ pions must bo approved In
writing f",m tho Chy (UBC Section 303(s)).
7. The own., musl obtain a Cenincale of Occupancy from City
prior 10 occupying Ihe building or using the project (USe
Section 307(0)).
:..::.....=.... lJI"""'OI ........... .,........QIll ".F.. 1>..0.-_ ~--.._~__ _.
Ill.......... IU....,...,..
~
lOOA...'t...." :.1..,',83.41""
'PormkF...,:,', ,1$.00,'"
ToIoIF~o;'" 911.41',
PLUMBING " " ',',
8 fh. s/s. 1 w/h. a/s.wts "'~765..50
Ponnk Foo I 00
ToIoI Foo 91.50
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT:
IWLG a GAR
"
i.or
NO. ROOMS:
1.426/1467
BUILDING Ilwl g.
Gar 4lIl
,
so. FT.:
"..-",",
BUILDING CODE REVIEW
;~..;.,...-,; '...:;....,~,...,,;.; .
. ec;nsUucuon Typo VN
:'Occuponcy Gfoup R3 "
. ,Fk>od Plein" ,
". ',VOI_ No-.!..- Zono_
Hig~ Wind "
',' V......:...- No--1- Zono_
High Aro
VOI_ No.c...L.- Zono_
PLANNING REVIEW '
EST. VALUAllON
ELECTRICAL"
wfpi'nQ.llpan.l.
power polo (I)'
"'1.:
zDno:RII! By~
, ~m~r ~g: rk'f'clwt~: h :~~:r:~ton
WORKMAN'S CQMPENSAllON
HEAllNG&AIC
fau. a/c. 1 ex/f.
VOl
x
No
SG/sk
PERMIT
Pion Ck. Dap.
Plan Ck, Bal.
Building
Mechanical
Strong Mallon
StormOraln
Parks & Roc.
sewer Conn.
Sewer Cap.
Signs
Cultural D.C.
Traffle
Plan ChltdcReview' .
Building Permit RevIeW
SchocIa
InVllstigatlon Feea
TOTAL
ISSUED BV:
..
~~
CODE ENF. FILE'
SENO
(
'1 q (ft..$.-
j
EXPIRATION
....... 137110108 ,e,
TRAcrrILOT:
OwNERiBLDR. YES 'A ' NO ~
ZIP: 917 5 ,'TEL:
TEL:
STATE L1C.1:
CITY LICENSE: '
/:~
.'..
,~I;;:;'
.
.~.:-;.: ;;i"':;.,.,:~.:: __
,~',,':'o'i!"." "; ".,,~,'
"~"}
1 bood
PlN'mll F..
ToIoIFN
ACCT. .
41731
41731
41330
41331
24591
41818
41732
41822
8024
41332
41335
41803
.1770
41788
,
31.50
15.00 '
46 50
41330
"'Z'
I) .-
'J)
'3~'
This permit shall be void and of no further force or effect if work hereunder Is not ClOtQ.menoad by'
or If work 118Uspended or IIbandonad for a period of 180 day. 0I11'lCn after work ~.~nced.::
APPLICANT I PROJECT OWNER RESPONSIBILITY
1. The project Ilddreu must be vlaible from Itreet. Check
address visibility prior to calling for inspections (USC
Soelion 513).
2. lot corners/property lin.. mUlt be properly staked in
order to do . setback Inspedion. If neighboring struc-
tures appear not to have the proper setbacks a field
SUlV-r by a licensed land surveyor shall be required
(UBC Soctlon 305{af). '
3. City 'approvod'p1anund PbIi\oPection cord muSl boon
project site, availabf, for Building Inspector', examina-
tion (UBC Soetion 303[bf).
4. ThoDoponmlntofBuilding and Safoty moot bo coilod tomoko
ptOgrosolnopoetiona (UBe Soctlon, 305{af). ,
5. All work io to Ilo Inspoctod prior 10 covoring; work covlrod
without City Inspection mUlt be uncovered at owner'"
controclor'a oxponso (UBC SocIion 305{af).
8. Tha projoet io to bo bui_ in occonfanca with Clty opprovocI
plans. o.viatlonl from approved plans must be approved i1
,writing lrom tho City (UBe SocIion 303(af).
7. The owner must obtain a Certificate of Occupancy from CIly
prior to occupying the building or Uling the protect (USC
Soctlon aG7(af).
.. -_.~
......Clt__ .. ' "t Pl.AN-l1,(1I PAOE1OF2 I"
--....... TA8lIDt ...... .,....AGaQi fW;.fill Gt...~..... GIIlIIIwIll'~""'''CIpJ ...."........-..
..
~~:..' W'_Y'....~,"':lV:.,~~NT ..~:P'~~_"IIi.
.- ,..-,:~~~. ,'-, ...... "",\:'.,., . . '.,":.', ,~-', ";;:,':;~I~:.,,,~':"j;;f~~'::;'~!":-;;\:~,;:::i~'~.)':.'::'~ ^,
IV" ;p<f'~1i
. I,,{,;?::/:' ,;1
_BUILDING DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
. ~ . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
'. "-;i~,,.: 300 North-O.StrHt-San Bemardino, CA 92418
"ilEPARTl.4ENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES
Infonnation -7141384-5071 Inspections -7141 384-L1NK
"
-,
DLWG & GAR
DESCRIPTION OF PR
NO. ROOMS:
SO. FT.:
..!IUIl-DING CODE REVIEW
Construction Typo VH
Occupancy Group R3
Flood Plain
Yes No ZOn8_
High Wind
Yes No-L Zone_
High Are
Yes No-L Zone _
"
PLANNING REVIEW
Zon.: RS By:
A.m~: 25' front
20' rear sb.
OM
sb. 5' side sb.
WORKMAN'S COMPENSAnON
v..
x
No
ISSUED BV:
SG/ML/sk
CODE ENF. RLE'
.~
o ' (/ff? &:!{tL/
EXPIRATION
,- '",' ,'.-,
( -;".1I;';'~;.;13
PUHCJ<.NO. 91-31ll
DAll 1/9/92
Aft: 14228310
TRACTILOT:
OWNERlBLDR. VES.2- NO_
ZIP: 745 TEL: 818/8bb-1Ubb
TEL:
STATELIC.t:
CITY LICENSE:
# 1
1.223/451 NO. STORIES:
BUILDING
Dwlq, 1,223
Gar 451~ ','
F/P
EST. VALUAnON
ELECTRICAL
wlrlnq. 1 Dane'
PLUMBING
'8 fiX. s/s, q/s. wIs.
1 temD Dower Dole
HEAnNG&A1C
IXIlUXl fau.
1 hood
PERMIT
Plan ek. Dep.
Plan Ck. Bal.
Building
Mechanical
Strong Motion
Sto(mDrain
Porks & Roc.
Sewer Conn.
Sewer Cap.
Signs
Cuhural D.C.
TraffIC
Plan Check R.view
Building Permit Review
Schools
Investigation F...
TOTAL
Permit F..
Total F..
1 w/h
PermitFH
TotalFe8
a/c. 3 exlf ,
Permit Fee
Total Fe.
ACCT. .
41731
41731
41330
41331
24591
41818
41732
41822
6024
41332
41335
41803
41no
41788 .
41330
.
...
19.49!)~;
-~:~~l,.
88,752.20
61.31 II
15.00
76.31
91.50
15.00
106.50
Pd
This permit shall be void and of no further force or e"ect if work hereunder is nol commenced by
or if work Is suspended or abandoned for a period of 180 day. or more aftarwork Is.commenced. . ,
APPLICANT I PROJECT OWNER RESPONSIBILITY
1. The pro}ed address must be visible from str..1. Check
addre.. visibility prior to calling tor inspections (USe
SocIIon 513).
2. Lot comers/property lines must be properly staked in
order to do . slttback Inspection. If neighboring struc-
tur.. appear noI to have the pmper setbacks a field
survey by a licensed land surveyor shall b. required
(UBC SocIlon ""Sla]).
3. City -approved- plans and job inspection card must be on
project sit., avallabl. for Building Inspecto,', examina-
tion (U8e Section 303[b}).
,
4. The Olpartmentof Building and Safety mustbecalled to make
prog'''' inspoctlon. lUBe SocIIon 305(.]).
5. All wort< 10 10 be Inspoclod pilar to covoring; wort< __
without City Inspection must be uncov.red at owner's!
contractor'. expens. (UBC Section 305(a]). ":.. ;,~.,t.
6.. Th. project 1a to be builln accordal'lCl whh City ~;.
plans. Oeviatlons from IppJOved plans must be approved in
writing from the City (UBC Section 303[a)).
7. Th. owner must obtain a Cenificale of Oo::upancy from c~.
prior to ocoupying the building or using th. projec:l (UBC
SocIlon 30710]).
..pr.:
-<
'?t
J;kl
. J2g
-
o
o
i~
. SAX BElUIARDIlfO MUJlICIPAL VAt'ER DEPAR'fH!fDT i
IlfTEROPl'ICB KEMOlWIDOK
'l'O :
00
::I r: ~"~ "'-,:-' -:
1'- ..j ,~ ,I ".1 .1
jr" !~1 :.. ;' ',1, '_
:: '. -",'~ .~ .-
m
~
MAY 0 4 1992
nON:
James F. Penman, City Attorney
Bernard C. Kersey
SOBJECt': RESIDBlfTIAL FIRE SPRIJIltLDS
DATE:
COPIES:
April 30, 1992
Hayor Holcomb, Councilman Hernandez, Shauna Clark, Will'
Wright, Al Boughey
In response to Councilman Hernandez's April 21, 1992 memo to you
concerning the requ1rement for res1cential sprinklers in new
residential construction where inadequate fire protection exists,
I submit the following:
I do not believe that there was a lack of communication
between the Fire Department, Planning and BUilding Services,
and the Water Department regarding the requirement for
residential fire sprinklers in areas of the City having
substandard fire protection. There was, however, a difference
in opinion as to when the new requirement should take effect.
According to Hr. Stejskal, who met with representatives from
the Fire Department, Planning and BUilding Services, and
~uncil representative earlier this month concerning this
matter, it was the consensus of the grou~, with the exception
of the Fire Department, that th1s requ1rement become .
~. or new app 1can sor U1 1ng pe as of the date of
that ~t~ng) to avoid any r_~~~tive enforcement.
The m~6Iity (95 or more percent) of the City's water system
'meeti or exceeds current fire protection requirements. There
are, however, a number of areas (5 percent or less) in our
water system that, due to small diameter pipelines and/or
hydrant spacing, do not meet this requirement. These areas~
identified as having substandard fire protection, are' not
wl1que to Councllman. Hernandez' sward. . ,
~
~
,
!
1-
c/
The estimated cost to replace substandard (undersized and/or
beyond useful life expectancy) water mains identified in the
Haster Plan exceeds '100 million at today's cost. We are
currently completing the first phase ('9.5 million) of a '65
million major water facility (wells, boosters, reservoirs, and
transmission mains) to assure an adequate water supply
~hroughout the City. ~on complet1~n of this projec~ (approx-
1mately 7 YAars), the ater Department will, through the sale
or-revenue bonds, initiate a systematic schedule of water main
replacement which will eliminate this problem.
'--
-
III
.'
o
o
James F. Penman
April 30, 1992
Page 2
RE: ~SIDDT;rAL FIRE SPRINltLERS
r
The water pressure in the area of 1600. West Congress Street
is 75 psi which is more than adequate to operate residential
fire sprinkling systems. The reason that this area failed to
meet the City's fire flow requirement (1,000 gpm from two
hydrants) was not a lack of static water pressure but rather
hydraUlic head loss through the 4" diameter water main serving
the street. Throughout the years, the City's residential fire
flow requirements have increased from less than 500 9PIII to
1,000 gpm. The Water Department installs water mains that
have a 50 year useful life expectancy; therefore, it is
possible that the City's increasingly stringent fire require-
ments may cause us to replace/upsize water mains on a more
frequent schedule.
It is. my understanding that there are probably. ;l.ess than six
'current in-fi 1 building permits-IS$ued by the City that may-5i
a ected ~ the S1 en 1a fire protection system regula n.
Department s conductJ.ng e owes s s se J.ndividual
addresses are given to us by the Planning and Building Services.
All new building permits for in-fill construction are being routed
to the Water Department for fire flow confirmation and then
forwarded to the Fire Department for final fire requirement
determination.
.
If you should need any additional information, please feel free to
contact me.
~e;L~, ,
/'Bernard C. KerSey2f
G.eneral Manager
BCK:eg
/
-,
CWT"- OF SAN BERaRDINO - REQUEST 90R COUNCIL ACTION
( .'
~: Al Boughey, Director
Su~~:Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32
(Extension of Time)
~ept: Planning and Building Services
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
April 20, 1992
Date: April 8, 1992
Synopsis of Previous Council ~ion:
No previous action by the Mayor and Common Council.
Recommended motion:
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council deny
.he appeal and deny the Extension of Time request for Conditional Use
Permit No. 90-32, (supports Planning Commission action); or
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council uphold
the appeal and approve the Extension of Time for one-year, until January
8, 1993, for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 subject to the Findings of
Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the
Planning commission Staff Report, (supports staff reco dation and
appellant's request.)
Al Boug ey
Contect person:
Al Boughey
Phone: 384-5357
Supporting date attached: Staff Report
Ward:
3
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: N / A
Source: IAcct. No.)
IAcct. DescriDtionl
Finance:
.1CU Notes:
~I'."'T "'-~ iJ,.'7
~f
CIT~ OF SAN BERtAMDINO - REQUEST Q)R COUNCIL ACTION
.
-
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of a request
for a one-year Extension of Time for Conditional Use
Permit No. 90-32, an application to establish a vehicle
recycling yard on 9.5 acres located on the south side of
Walnut Street, approximately 380 feet east of Muscott
Street.
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
April 20, 1992
REOUEST
The applicant, John Lightburn, is
commission's denial of a request for a
for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32.
appealing the Planning
one-year Extension of Time
BACKGROUND
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 is an application to establish an
automotive recycling yard on 9.5 acres in the IH, Industrial Heavy
land use designation. The site is located on the south side of
Walnut Street, approximately 380 feet east of the centerline of
Muscott Street.
On January 8, 1991, the Planning Commission approved Conditional
Use Permit No. 90-32. The findings of consistency were based on
conformance with the General Plan, Urgency Ordinance, and Title 19
of the Municipal Code.
On December 2, 1991, the City received a request for a one-year
time extension of Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, under the
authority of Development Code Section 19.36.90. The basis of the
request was to allow additional time for the project to comply with
the 1,500 gallon per minute Fire Flow requirement of the City Fire
Department.
On March 3, 1992, the Planning Commission denied the applicant's
request for a one-year extension of time. The Planning
commission's denial was based upon the findings that the proposed
recycling yard would not be compatible with existing and future
land uses in the general area, that the proposed use is not
compatible in scale, mass, coverage, density, and intensity with
the nearby residential land uses, and that the use will impose a
harmful effect upon desirable neighborhood characteristics (See
Statement of Official Planning Commission Action, Exhibit B).
,
o
o
#
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 (EOT)
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
April 20, 1992
Page 2
ANALYSIS
compatibility with the existing nearby residential neighborhood was
addressed in the original Planning commission Staff Report for
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 (See Planning commission staff
Report, Exhibit C). project Conditions of Approval were included
requiring the applicant to screen the perimeter of the yard on all
sides with a 6-foot fence, and to ensure that vehicles were not
stacked above the height of the 6-foot fence. Additional
Conditions of Approval were added requiring the applicant to screen
the proposed recycling yard from adjoining land uses with a Type A
landscape screening per Development Code Standards. Type A
landscape screening includes 6-foot high screening accomplished by
either a decorative masonry wall or screen shrubs planted 4 feet on
center, and taller trees planted 30 to 40 feet on center. All of
these conditions serve to soften the Industrial-Residential
boundary along Walnut Street to ensure compatibility.
At the Planning commission meeting, concern was also expressed with
regard to the potential for the facility to generate noise, odors,
and for gasoline or oil seepage into the ground. Noise was not
identified as a concern during the original application process.
However,' if noise is a concern, it can likely be handled with
additional \ Conditions of Approval restricting the hours of
operation of the facility and the use of a public address system in
the yard area. Any odors generated by the facility would likely be
a result from the presence of gaSOline or oil in the cars.
Conditions of Approval Nos. ~and 13 address this concern as well
as the potential for leakage of gasoline or oil from the wrecked
vehicles into the ground. Condition of Approval No. 9 restricts
the facility from dismantling any liquid containers at the site.
Condition of Approval No. 13 requires the applicant to drain all
fluids, including gasoline or oil from all vehicles prior to
storing/recycling them at the site.
CONCWSION
The project development and operation would occur subject to the
project Conditions of Approval. Therefore the proposed facility
should be compatible with the surrounding land uses.
OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
The Mayor and Council may deny the appeal and deny the Extension of
Time request for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, or the Mayor and
Council may uphold the appeal and approve a one-year Extension of
Time, until January 8, 1993 for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32.
o
o
.
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32 (EDT)
Mayor and Common Council Meetinq
April 20, 1992
Paqe 3
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mayor and Council uphold the appeal and
approve a one-year Extension of Time, until January 8, 1993, for
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, subject to the Findinqs of Fact,
Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the
Planninq Commission Staff Report (Exhibit C).
Prepared by:
Mike Finn,
Associate Planner
for Al Bouqhey
Director of Planning and Building Services
A - Letter of Appeal
B - Statement of Official Planninq Commission
Action
Exhibits
C - Staff Report to the Planning Commission
o - Official Notice of Public Hearinq Before
the Mayor and Common Council
---
o
~ .
,~.~.~""'"
, .
O'~""i
,', .
.'
Mayor and Common Council
300 North D Street
San Bernardino, Ca 9240 I
:;rr,.....
,\~..,~..:c, ... ....
- -' .. .. .'. -,..
. . .t.",(
.~
,~ "R~
~ liMn 16 P3 :27
March 16, 1992
Reference: Conditional Use Permit 90-32,
Request for an Extension of Time
Dear Mayor and Counci I Members,
On March 3, 1992, the San Bernardino Planning Commission, on a split
decision, denied Mr. Bud long's request for an extension of time for
Conditional Use Permit "90-32.
Therefore, by way of this letter, we are appealing to the Mayor and
Common Council the Planning Commission's denial of Conditional Use
Permit "90-32. In order to allow Mr, long's legal counsel sufficient time
to review the issues and law related to this matter, we are requesting
that the appeal hearing be held at the regularly scheduled meeting of the
Common Council on April 20, 1992.
/jJ is (jJ
t~ ~ ;? n n
1'1~1i /"= if tf !l
o en,..;,,, 9 1992 /jJ
EpA~ . 3.1",
'4i.4r/;,v.,. elf/t"L
. 1LO/1/(J:" ~ "VIo,^'o
"1i!/t\h,.~~/NG
-.~s f
cc: Mr. Bud long
",'"
.... ,.., ~ '~;:ll
~~'I'- .'. lilli .."~
~.,. _ .t. ,J
,_v -
.. ... ,,"'J
. I"'" ...~., ~ _ - 1J..J:\ 1.1
~;J, t..: : ~ I t ~ oJ .
.'
o
o
,
city of San Bernardino
STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
PROJECT
Number:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 90-32A
(EXTENSION OF TIME)
John Lightburn
Mr. & Mrs. Buddy Long
Applicant:
owner:
ACTION
Meeting Date: March 3, 1992
X Denied based on Findings of Fact (Attachment A).
mn
Ayes:
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
Cole, Ortega, Stone
Lopez, Romero
None
Clemensen, Valles, Jordan
I, hereby, certify that this Statement of
accurately reflects the final determination
Commission of the City of San Bernardino.
.Z;~~ ?
signatupe
Official Action
of the Planning
--./ /
! . ~C~~/
pL,,;. 'J
,/ ~/ /:'( (,,-
";/', I 'f't' ;(
.'
Date
L. E. Reed, Assistant Director
of Plannina , Buildina Sarvices
Name and Title
cc: Project Applicant
.project Property owner
. Plan Check
Engineering Division
Case File
PLANNINGCOMM/AKJ
Attachment: Appeal Rights
Exhibit "B"
o
o
Riaht of ADDeal
According to the San Bernardino Municipal Code, Sections 2.64.030
and 2.64.040, the following would apply in regard to appeals to the
Mayor and Common Council of planning Commission actions:
"Except as provided in section 2.64.020, any person aggrieved by,
dissatisfied with, or excepting to any action, denial, order,
requirement, permit, decision or determination made or issued by
an administrative official or by an administrative board,
commission, body or other agency of the City pursuant to the
provisions of any ordinance, code, rule or requlation of the City,
may appeal therefrom by filing a written notice of appeal with the
city Clerk, directed to the Common council."
"Any such notice of appeal shall not be valid and shall not be
acted upon unless filed within fifteen days after the date of the
action or decision appealed from. If notice of such action has not
been provided in writing, and the appellant had no notice of the
hearing at which the action was to be considered, the appellant
may, within five days after first becoming aware of such action,
demand written notice thereof, and shall have ten days following
such notice in which to file the notice of appeal. A prospective
appellant who was present at the time the action or decision
relating thereto was made shall be presumed to have constructive
notice thereof and shall file a notice of appeal within fifteen
days after the date of the action or decision."
Appeals on Planning Commissi~n decisions on Tentative Tract or
Parcel Maps must be filed in writing with the City Clerk within
ten days of the date of decision.
das : wp
rightofappeal
12/12/91
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
. CASE CUP 90-"
LOCA liON
b
r AGENDA ......
ITEM .
9
HEARING DATE
l_A_Q'
....
161
~- J
--." _'ClI" t_
CUP 90-32
Meeting date: 3/3/92
o
o
ATTACHMENT "Bu
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The proposed vehicle recycline yard is a conditionally
peraitted use within the IH. Industrial Heavy land use
desienation and coaplies with all of the applicable provisions
of the Development Code.
2. The proposed recycline yard will not iapair the inteerity and
character of the land use district in which it is to be
located. in that the yard is in compliance with the Industrial
Developaent Desilln Guidelines contained in the Developaent
Code and the Industrial District Specific Standards for
automotive dismantline yards. The proposal will be buffered
from the adjoining land uses with a Type I landscape screeninll
per Developaent Code landscape standards.
3. The subject site is physically suitable for the type and
intensity of land use beinll proposed. in that the site can
accoamodate the proposed vehicle recyclinl yard in conforaance
with all applicable Development Code standards.
4. The proposed use is coapatible with the land uses presently on
the subject property. in that the site is primarily vacant.
with the existinll sinllle-family dwellinls separated from the
proposed use throullh a lot line adjustment. 6 foot decorative
wall. and Type I landscape screeninl.
5. The proposed recyclinll yard will not be ,compatible with
existinl and future land uses in the leneral area in which the
proposed use is located. in that the proposed facility could
create noise and odors not consistent with the residential
uses located across Walnut on the north. or with the existinl
sinllle-family dwellinlls adjoininl the project site.
6. The proposed use is not compatible in scale. mass. coveralle.
density. and intensity with all adjacent land uses. in that
althoullh the vehicle recyclinll yard conforas to all Commercial
Development Desilln Guidelines and applicable Developaent Code
standards. it is not consistent with the scale mass. coveralle
and density of the nearby residential land uses.
7. There are adequate provisions for water. sanitation. and
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use
would not be detrimental to public health and safety. in that
the proposed project has been reviewed by the allencies
responsible for providinll these services and none of the. has
indicated an inability to provide services to the site.
o
o
CUP 90-32
Meeting date: 3/3/92
ATTACHMENT "B" (c~ntinued)
Conditional Use Perait FindinRs (continued)
8. There will be adequate provisions for public access to serve
the proposed vehicle recyclinl yard. in that two aain access
points are proposed alonl the south side of Walnut into the
proposed parkinl area.
9. There will be a haraful effect upon desirable neilhborhood
characteristics. in that the proposed facility presenta a
potential for future neilhborhood blilht. and could have a
har.ful effect on property values in the nearby residential
neilhborhoods.
10. The proposed use is needed at the prescribed location. as
deaonstrated in the .arket/feasibility study. if required. A
.arket/feasibility study is not required for a project of this
type.
11. The proposed uae is consistent with the General Plan. in that
it is a per.itted use in the IH. Industrial Heavy land use
district subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Per.it.
12. There will not be silnificant har.ful effects upon
environ.ental quality and natural resources. in that
develop.ent will occur accordinl to the conditions of approval
and standard require.ents contained in this staff report.
13. The nelative i.pacts of the proposed use are .itilated. in
that all required .itilation required by the previously
adopted Mitilated Neaative Declaration wi 11 be i.ple.ented
throulh the previously approved project Mitilation Monitorinl
and Reportinl prOlraa contained in the orilinal approval.
14. The proposed location. size. desian. and operatinl
characteristics of the proposed use would be detriaental to
the public interests. health. safety. convenience. or welfare
of the City. in that the proposal poses a potential threat to
property values and hence. the health safety. convenience and
welfare of the Citizens of the City of San Bernardino.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
4
3-3-92
3
~--. APPLICANT:John Lightburn
P.O. Box 16~2
III CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. San BernardJ.no, CA 92402
~ 90-32 (EXTENSION OF TIME) OWNER: Ur. & Mrs. ~uddy Long
(J 1435 West RJ.alto Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92410
'--" ~
--.
A one-year extension of time, until January 8, 1993, for
... Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, an application to
ffi establish a vehicle recycling yard on 9.5 acres.
:)
0 Located on the south side of Walnut Street, approximately
III
a: 380 feet east of the centerline of Muscott Street.
-
<
III
a:
<
\.....,..I\..
,- EXISTING GENERAl PLAN
PROPERTY \ LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION
Subject Vacant & Single-Family IH Industrial Heavy
North nesidence & Mobile Homes RU-1 Resider.tial Urban
South Vacant IH Industrial Heavy
East Vacant/Towing Service IH Industrial Heavy
liest Vacant IH Industrial Heavy
( GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC IX YES ) I FLOOD HAZARD DYES D ZONE A ( SEWERS: OlKYEs )
HAZARD ZONE: D NO ZONE: XKNO D ZONE B wNO
( HIGH FIRE DYES ) I: AIRPORT NOISEI D YES I REDEVELOPMENT [] YES
HAZARD ZONE: Xl NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA:
Xm NO ~O
- -
,-
-' o NOT :EX POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z :a APPROVAL
< APPUCABLE EFFECTS WITH . 0
!Z(I) MmGATlNG MEASURES ~ XX
NOE.I.R. CONDITIONS
IIlCl u"Q
~Z o EXEMPT o HR. REQUIRED BUT NO ~ifi 0 DENIAL
Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
OQ WITH MITIGATING lii~
a:~ MEASURES ! 0 CONTINUANCE TO
-u"
> o NO SIGNIFICANT o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
Z fd
III EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C.
\ MINUTES a: \..
\.
II. - -
~'=I~
PL.AN4D2 PaGE 1 OF 1 (~
CITY OF SANQJERNARDINO - o'lEMORANDUM
To
Planning Commission
COnditional Use Permit No. 90-32
(Extension of Time)
FromAl Boughey, Director
Planning & Building SvrE
Date February 14, 1992
,bject
Approved
Item NO.4
Date March 3, 1992
APPLICANT:
John Lightburn
Post Office Box 1622
San Bernardino. CA 92~02
OWNER:
Mr. and Mrs. Buddv Long
1~35 West Rialto Avenue
San Bernardino. CA 92410
REOUEST
Under the
applicant
1993. for
establish
authority of Development Code Section 19.36.90. the
requests a one year extension of time. until January 8.
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32. an application to
a vehicle recycling yard on 9.5 acres.
SITE LOCATION
The site is COllprised of 9.5 acres located on the south side of
Walnut. Street. approximately 380 feet east of the centerline of
Muscott Street in the IH. Industrial Heavv land use district.
BACKGROUND
The application was approved by the Planning Commission on Januarv
8. 1991. The findings of consistency were based upon conformance
with the General Plan. the Urgencv Ordinance. and Title 19 of the
Mun~cipal Code (See Original Staff Report. Attachment "E"l.
The applicant is requesting the extension to allow additional time
to for the project to comply with the 1.500 gallon per minute Fire
Flow requirement of the City Fire Department (See Letter of Request
for Extension of Time. Attachment "D").
ANALYSIS
De."elop.ent Code
Pursuant to Section 19.36.90 of the Development Code. Time
Extension;
"The Commission mav. upon an application being filed 30 days
prior to expiration and for good cause. grant a time extension
for 12 months. rpon granting of an extension. the Commission
,....m: ./
.;~~ '. ...... :;--';.:-t::-:
~~ .~"
;._._~.::,,~
"..;"":.
Cona~t~ona~ use ~erm~c ~u. ~u-J~ l~V~)
Planning comrnissi9C)~eeting
, March 3, 1992
page 2
o
.
shall ensure that the Conditional Use permit complies with all
current Development Code provisions.
The request for extension was received by the City on December 2.
1991. 37 daya prior to the expiration of Conditional Use Permit No.
90-32. The reasons for the request have been discussed above. The
vehicle recyclinl yard proposed under Conditional Use Permit No.
90-32 has been reviewed by staff. The proposal is consistent with
the General Plan and meets all setback. landscapinl. parkinl.
development standards and provisions specified by the Development
Code for automobile dismantlinl yards (See Development Code and
General Plan Conformance. Attachment "A").
California Environ.ental Quality Act (CEQA)
An Initial Study was prepared by staff and was presented to the
Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on AUlust 23. 1990. The ERC
proposed a Mitilated Nelative Declaration. The Initial Study was
made available for public review and comment from AUlust 13. 1990
to September 19. 1990. No comments were received. The Mitilated
Nelative Declaration was adopted and the Mitilation Monitorinl and
Reportinl prOlram was approved by the Planninl Commi.sion at the
tille of project approval (See Orilinal Staff Report. Attachment
"E") .
Develop.ent Revie~ Co..ittee
The Development Review Committee (DRC) reviewed the request at
their January 30. 1992 meetinl. At the (DRC) meetinl. the Buildinl
and Safety. Police. Fire. Public Works/Enlineerinl. and Water
Departments reviewed the Standard Requirements previously provided
for the orilinal approval (See Orilinal Staff Report. Attachment
"E"). The DRC cleared the Extension of Time request onto Planninl
COllllission for hearinl with the orilinal Standard Requirements.
Co..ents
Concern has been expressed about the potential impact the proposed
use could have on the existinl neilhborhood. This concern was
addressed in the orilinal staff report (Attachment "E"). To
reiterate the comments contained in that report with relard to that
concern. conditions of approval have been have included requirinl
the applicant to screen the perimeter of the yard on all sides with
a 6 foot fence. and to ensure that vehicles are not stacked above
the heilht of the six foot fence. Additional conditions of
approval have been added to this extension of time request
requirinl the applicant to screen the proposed recyclinl yard froll
adjoiniol land uses with a Type A landscapinl per Development Code
requirements. Type A landscapinl includes 6 foot hilh screeninl.
accomplished by either a decorative masonry wall or screeninl
shrubs planted 4 feet on center. and taller trees planced 30 to 40
feet on center.
Conditional Use P~it No. 90-32
Planning commissi~Meeting
March 3, 1992
Page 3
(EOT)
o
CONCLUSION
The proposed vehicle recyclina facility is consistent with the
General Plan and is in conforaance with all applicable Developaent
Code Standards for automobile dismantlina yards.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recomaends that the Plannina Comaission approve the request
for an extension of time for Conditional Use Perait No. 90-32 for
a period of twelve aonths. from January 8. 1992 to January 8. 1993.
subject to the attached Findinas of Fact (Attachaent "B") and
Conditions of Approval (Attachment "C").
and Buildina Services
Michael R. Finn
Associate Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
"A" - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance
"B" - Findinas of Fact
"c" - Conditions of Approval
"0" - Letter of Request for Extension of Tiae
"E" - Oriainal Staff Report
o
Attachment "A"
CITY 'OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP ~ - 32 (EOT)
4
3-3-92
<1
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
,
MUNICIPAL CODE ~~D GESERAL PLAN CONFOR~ANCE
Cate20rv
Proposal
Development
Code
General
Plan
Permitted Use
Motor Vehicle
Recycling Yard
Subject to
CUP
N/A
Setbacks
Front
10 feet
10 feet
N/A
Lot Coverage
...% Floor
Area Ratio
75% Floor
Area Ratio
N/A
Parking
51 spaces
..S spacesl
N/A
\
"
Development Code requires 1 parking space for each 300
square feet of gross building area plus 1 space for each 10.000
square feet of gross yard area. The project proposes a 960 square
foot office and 720 square foot storage building ~ith a gross yard
area of 386.125 squl.lre feet. .....21 or ..5 parking spaces are
required.
....
~..~
PlANoa.DI PAGE 1 OF , (A-ID)
o
Attachment "B"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE em> qO -32
(EDT)
FINDINGS OF FACT
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
4
1-1-Q'
5
""""I
r
FINDI~GS OF HCT
1. The proposed vehicle recycling yard is a conditionallv
permitted use within the rH. Industrial Heavy land use
designation and complies with all of the applicable provisions
of the Development Code.
2. The proposed recycling yard will not impair the integrity an~
character of the land use district in which it is to be
located. in that the vard is in compliance with the Industrial
Development Design Guidelines contained in the Development
Code and the Industrial District Specific Standards for
automotive dismantling yards. The proposal will be buffered
from the adjoining land uses with a Type I landscape screening
per Development Code landscape standards.
3.
The subject site is physically suitable for the type and
intensity of land use being proposed. in that the site can
accommodate the proposed vehicle recycling yard in conformance
with all applicable Development Code standards.
... The proposed use is compatible with the land uses presenth' on
the subject property. in that the site is primarily vacant.
with the existing single-family dwellings separated from the
proposed use through a lot line adjustment, 6 foot decorative
wall. and Type I landscape screening.
5. The proposed recycling yard will be compatible with existing
and future land uses in the general area in which the proposed
use iR located. in that the existing legal non-conforming
sinllle-familY dwellings adjoininll the site will be buffered
from the use throullh the wall and landscaping and in that the
use is similar to the towing facility and automobile wrecking
facility alreadY located in the area to the west.
6. The proposed URe is compatible in scale. mass. co"erage.
density. and intensity with all adjacent land uses. in that
the vehicle recycling yard conforms to all Commercial
Development Desilln Guidelines and applicable Development Code
standards.
7. There are adequate provisions for water. .sanitation. an~
public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use
would not be detrimental to public health and safety. in that
the proposed project has been reviewed by the agencies
responsible for providing these services and none of them has
indicated an inabilitv to provide services to the site.
to..
C1"c>>....~
PUH-I.OI PAGE' OF 1
('.00)
~
o
o
FINDINGS OF FACT
CASE CUP !Xl-32 (EOT)
AGENDA ITEM 4
HEARING DATE 3-3-92
PAGE 6
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
..
~
ATTACHMENT "8" (contin~ed)
Conditional Use Permit Findin2s (continue~!
8. There will be adequate provisions for public access to serve
the proposed vehicle recycling yard. in that two main access
points are proposed along the south side of Walnut into the
proposed parking area.
9. There wi 11 not be a harmful effect upon desirable neighborhood
characteristics. in that potential harmful effects have been
mitigated through project Conditions of Approval.
10. The proposed use is needed at the prescribed location. as
demonstrated in the market/feasibility study, if required. A
market/feasibility study is not required for a project of this
type.
11. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. in that
it is a permitted use in the IH. Industrial Hean' land use
district subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
12. There will not be significant harmful effects upon
environmental quality and natural resQ1,1rces. in that
development will occur according to the conditions of approval
and standard requirements contained in this staff report.
13. The negative impacts of the proposed use are mitigated. in
that all required mitigation required by the previously
adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration will be implemented
through the previously approved project Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting program contained in the original approval.
1... The proposed location. size. design. and operating
characteristics of the proposed use would not be detrimental
to the public interests. health. safety. con\'enience. or
welfare of the City. as addressed in the Initial Study.
Pl.AN-I.OI PIQi 10F ,
(A"'"
c..:~.'- -=
...............'-.....<.:,........
w
o
CASE CUP 90 -32 (EOT)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
4
3-3- 92
7
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
~
1. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the
plan(s) approved by the Director, Development Review
Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and Common
Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be
subj ect to approval by the Director through a minor
modification permit process. Any modification which
exceeds lot of the following allowable measurable
design/site considerations shall require the refiling of
the original application and a subsequent hearing by the
appropriate hearing review authority if applicable.
1. On-site circulation and parking, loading and
landscaping:
2. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and
structures:
3. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including
colors, and/or modification of finished materials
that do not alter or compromise the previously
approved theme: and
4. A reduction in density or intensity. of a development
project.
2 .
Within one year of development approval, commencement of
construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval
shall become null and void. In addition, if after
commencement of construction, work is discontinued for
a period of one year, then the permit/approval shall
become null and void. Projects may be built in phases
if preapproved by the review authority. If a project is
built in preapproved phases, each subsequent phase shall
have one year from the previous phase's date of
construction commencement to the next phase's date of
construction commencement to have occurred or the
permit/approval shall become null and void.
Condi tional Use Pe rmit No. 90 -32 (E:OT)
Project:
Expiration Date: January 8, 1993
1
~
m.:. ~ 1.
PlMoUI PAGE' OF , (..
Paqe 1 of 7
r'
~
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
o
CASE CUP ~ -32 (EOT)
AGENDA ITEM 4
HEARING DATE 3-3-92
PAGE 8
.....
CONDITIONS
....
r'
3. The review authority may, upon application being filed
30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause,
grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months. The
review authority shall ensure that the project complies
with all current Development Code provisions.
4. In the event, that this approval is legally challenged,
the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim
or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the
matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding
against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant
further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and
attorney's fees which the City may be required by a court
to pay as a result of such action, but such participation
shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation
under this condition.
5. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter
erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use
of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new
business commenced as authorized by this permit until a
Certificate of OCcupancy has been issued by the
Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be
issued by the Department subject to the conditions
imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed with
the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of
the Certificate of Occupancy. The deposit or security
shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion
of all terms, conditions and performance standards
imposed on the intended use by this permit.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the
landowner shall file a maintenance agreement or covenant
and easement to enter and maintain, subject to the
approval of the City Attorney. The agreement or covenant
and easement to enter and maintain shall ensure that if
the landowner, or subsequent owner(s), fails to maintain
the required/installed site improvements, the city will
be able to file an appropriate lien(s) against the
property in order to accomplish the required maintenance.
..
r.::.lt.: r.i j
IIUN-IJII P_ 1 OF 1 l..oll)
CONDITIONS
o
CASE CUP 90 - 32 /EaT)
AGENDA ITEM 4
HEARING DATE 3 -3-!Jl
PAGE q
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
,.
6.
...
r;:.:.=: II n
The developer is to submit a complete master landscape
and irrigation plan (5 copies) for the entire development
to the Public Works Department with the required fee for
review. The landscape plans will be forwarded to the
Parks, Recreation, and Community Services and the
Planning Division for review. (Note: The issuance of a
building development permit by the Department of Planning
and Building Services does not waive this requirement.)
No grading permit(s) will be issued prior to approval of
landscape plans. The landscape and irrigation plans
shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape
and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department),
and comply with all applicable provisions of Chapter
19.28 (Landscaping Standards) of the Development Code
effective on the date of approval of this permit. Trees
are to be inspected by a representative of the Parks
Department prior to planting.
(The following provision is applicable to single family
homes. ) Trees, shrubs and ground cover of a type and
quality generally consistent or compatible with that
characterizing single family homes shall be provided in
the front yard and that portion of the-side yards which
are visible from the street. All landscaped areas must
be provided with an automatic irrigation system adequate
to insure their viability. The landscape and irrigation
plans shall be reviewed as outlined above.
.....
PL.AN-UI PMIE 1 OF 1 (.._
~,
... . -""
o
CASE COP
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
5() -32 (EOT)
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
- J
...
CONDITIONS
"
3-3-92
10
~
,...
8.
7. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable
provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time
of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property
Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt
control during construction and grading activities;
emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms
of air pollution: glare control; exterior lighting design
and control: noise control: odor control: screening;
signs, off-street parking and off-street loading: and,
vibration control. Screening and sign regulations
compliance are important considerations to the developer
because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior
structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes,
ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened
by wall or structural element, blending with the building
design and include landscaping when on the ground. A
sign program for all new commercial, office and
industrial centers of three or more tenant spaces shall
be approved by the Department prior to the issuance of
a Certificate of Occupancy.
This requirement also includes any applicable Land Use
District Development Standards for residential,
commercial and industrial developments regarding minimum
lot area, minimum lot depth and width, minimum setbacks,
maximum height, maximum lot coverage, etc.
This development shall be required to maintain a minimum
of 4 5 standard off-street parking spaces as
shown on the approved plansCs) on file.
..,.,--
"'-
~
PUHoUI PAGE 10F 1 (..."
Paqe 5 of 7
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUilDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE
CUP 90 - 32
(EOT)
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM 4
HEARING DATE 3-3-92
PAGE 11
,..
.....
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
9. All of the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements of
the orilioal approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32
shall apply. Wherever conflict between the Conditions of this
Time Extension and the Conditions contained in the orilinal
approval arise. the condition or the Tille Extension shall
apply.
10. The proposed facility shall be screened from all adjoininl
land uses throulh the plantinl and establishment of a Type A
landscapinl screen. The Type A screeoinl shall be included on
all required landscape plans and is subject to review and
approval by the Planniol Division.
=-=..~ 1I -~
PUNoI.ClI PMIE 1 OF 1
(....,
r
'(
:
t
I
O=' Attachment "D"
.. ~.:.:U
0'
- ,)
-
~
t<<:l\molBER 2S, 1991
LARRY E. REm
"
D.Ltu:I.,a"-K Of' ~ AND mIIDIH; SERVICES"
PlANttIOO lEP~
CI'lY OF Sl\N l3F.moomnD
PROJEX:T: Vehicle Recycli.nq Center (Ccnti.tiaJlll Use Pemi.t No.90-32)
SUBJ1'rl': Request for additiaJlll time for Ccnti.tia1al Use Pemi.t No.
90-32 (~MTE.mf 8 1992)
", .
REFERANCE: Pa98 17 paracp:aph 1 of standard ~ts of statement
of Official Planning Q:mIIi.ssia1 Actions Dated Jan 8, 1991
(ADDrl'IalN:. TIME Ml'oY BE GWmD tJl'QI RIQIEST.) , , ,
SIR: ',,' '1his nlqUllSt is for additicnal time ~"'''Y to ccmply with
the 1500 Gl'M water F1J:e Flew Prot:ectial required for 'IItJ ptOject
"~ by the City F1J:e Depart:IDInt. I have bem in cont:act aDd bave
IIlBde ~ for the Water Dept., and or n-..uty oe-l",..-.~
, to establish c:cst, lIV"ilahiHty, posciltility to provide this
service. 'D1is izI~tia1 shculd be ""-"9 in the near fubD:e
and that point the ~~.l.ate permits would be obtained for OCD-
structia1 to begin.
"
"
1 -; "1 ~.~ ;; ~ ~7 :; :fiil
I J) :. '. ,:..' '.,- 1'1'
,.-----.
'nl !!J1
u.... ~'::"., 2 ~!lt 6
.._'~ 'oJ ~
'DmNlt mJ
/,' "
Jd,j ..JJl 'Y
axiJ.ortq!7
1435 W. Rialto Ave.
San Bemardino, calif. 92410
Te1..:.~ 888-6841
::,:",;":r: :.~.:: ::::::': :-::.~.~~
:~"~~~!T:=F :"-_. .~".I ".~ ;:..
!U:U;:;.G ~'......~
~"",-~.~...,
1
j
-
Q.
Attachment "E"
~,
City ot San Bernardino
STATEHENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMKISSION Ac.rION
PROJEC'l'
Numller:
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32
Applicant:
Buddy Lonq
. Same
owner:
ACTYON
Meetinq Oate:
January I, 1991
Adopted Mitigated Neqative Declaration,
Approved Mitigation Monitorinq/Reporting
Proqram (AttacblDent F), and Approved Requ_t
based upon the Attached Findings ot Fact
(Attachment B) and SUbject to the Conditions
ot Approval (Atta..lo".nt C) and Standard
Requir_ents (Atta~l1-Dt D).
x
CONlUTYONS
This project was approved subject to the c"."lditions ot
Approval and Standard Requir~ts coDtained in Attachments C
and 0 with a lIIOditication to condition ot Approval No.7 to
read:
7. The ottice and storage buildinq shall be construc-
ted with a cSecorative split-tace or tluted concrete
block or stucco exterior to be _intained in a
serviceable and aesthetically pleasinq manner.
VOTE
Ay_:
cl_ensen, corona, Jordan, T.h,tt"ath,
Stone
None
None
COle
Lopez, Sharp,
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
I, hereby, certity that this Stat~t ot otticial Action
accurately reflects the tinal cSetermination ot the Planninq
cOllllllission ot the city ot San Bernardino.
Y;A,~ r-/k,d
Si~
o~ 9, /'?$>/
/ Date .
I..a~ E. R.4!d. Dir't!!et:or o't Plannina , suildinc services
Na:118 and 'title
cc: Project Applicant
1-
t.'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
9
1-8-91
3
,. ,.-..,. r r Buddy I.onq
APPUCANT:
W . 1435 t~ Rialto Aver:ue
en COnditional Use Pe:clIit No. 90-32 San BeJ:naJ:diJxJ, CA 92410
C OWNER: sane as applicant
CJ
'-../ \.
,.-..,. r
... To establish a vehicle mcyclinq yard an 9.5 acres under the authority
en of amicipal Cede Section 19.83.300.
W
~ I.I:x:ated on the scu-..h si.d8 of Walnut Street ~tely 380 feet east
0
W of the centerline of !lJscott street.
a:
-
c
W
a:
c
\.J \. ~
r EXISl1NG GENERAL PlAN
pQOPI;RiY I ANn l!sf; ZONING Of;SIGNATlON
SUbject vacant and Sinq1e Family m Indust:rial Heavy
North 1esidence and JHnl. JbIIes RD-l Residential oman
South Vacant m Indust:rial Heavy
East Vacant!'l1::Iwinq Service m Indust:rial Heavy
West Vacant m I:dustria.l Heavy
( GEOLOGIC I !lU:1et.-tt' caYES ) ( FLOOD HAZARD 0 YES :: ZCNE A )( SEWERS: II YES )
HAZARD ZONE: ONO CNO
ZCNE: XI NO C ZONE B
( HIGH FIRE - YES .)( AIRPORT NOlSEI o YES )( REDEVELOPMENT DYES )
....
HAZARD ZONE: :g: NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA:
zeNO ~NO
- -
r Z
~ o NOT 119 POTBI11A1. SIGNIFICANT IKX APPROVAl
C APPUCASLJ: EFFECTS wmt 0
IotI11GA11NG MEASURES -
... ~ IKX CONDmO:'llS
zen NO EJA
wCl II.Q
2z o EXEMPT o EJA AECUlAED BUT NO ~ffi 0 DENIAL
z- SlGNIFICANT Emcrs
OQ WI1H II1lGATlNG ;2
a:~ MEASUAES 2 0 CONTINUANCE TO
-II. 0
\ > o NO SIGNIFICANT o SIGNIFICANT EfFeCTS
, z fd
W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C.
M11lUT'ES a:
-./ "-..-I ..4
:..: - ~
-uN-t.DZ PAGE 10Ft t""'"
9 9"
,. CCP 90-32
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEU 9
OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE l-ll-!ll
PAGE , ....
r --c
REt1tmS'l'
The applicant requests the approval of a Conditional Use Permit
under the authority of Municipal Code Section 19.83.300, to
establish a motor vehicle recycling yard on 9.5 acres and to vary
the amount of required parking by 78 spaces.
SlifE LOC1'rIOH
The subject property is located on the
Street, approximately 3"80 feet east of the
Street ln the IH, Industrlal Heavy land use
south side of Walnut
centerline of Huscott
designation.
MUNTCTPAL ~nOR ANn n~NRRAr.. PT...AN ~nNvnRMANCE
The project does not comply vlth the Hunicipal Code parking
Standards. The proposed project othervlse ls In conformance vith
the Hunicipal Code and is consistent vith the General Plan as
shovn in Attachment -A-.
CALIFORNIA RNVIRONMRN~AL ou.rI~ A~
An Initial Study vas prepared by staff and vas presented to the
Environmental Reviev COmmittee on August 23, 1990. A Hitlgated
Negative Declaration vas proposed. The Inltial study vas ..de
avallable for pUblic revlev and comment from Auqust 13, 1990 to
September 19, 1990. No comaents vere received. A Hitigation
Monitoring and aeporting program has been prepared for the
proposal (Attach..nt -P-).
RACXGROUND
The rectangular site Is primarily vacant vith the exception of
three single family residences, a barn, and a tln shed located
along Walnut near the northern property line. All appear to have
been constructed betveen 1930 and 1950. Several mature trees
surround the residences. 'Dle site "''1?'"'' to the southeast
at approximately one-half to one percent. Blevatlons on the
property range from 1,080 feet at the northvestern most corner to
1,065 at the southvestern aost corner.
Several slngle-faaily residences and a trailer
across Walnut on the north. Vacant industrial
border the site on the east, vest and south.
Limits are located approximately 132 feet south
most property line.
park are located
designated land
The Colton Clty
of the southern
...~-
-
~ ItMllIm:, ~.....
,"
OBSERVATIONS
CASE COP 90-32
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-8-91
PAGE 3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
,
...
"
Similar land uses in the area include a vehicle recyclinq yard,
located approximately 350 feet to the vest on the northeast
corner of Walnut and Huscott Streets, and an automotive towinq
service on the south side of Walnut Street approximately 143 feet
to the vest.
ANALYStS
Permitted Use
The proposed vehicle recyclinq yard
Industrial Heavy General Plan
Conditional Use Permit.
Existinq Structures
Two of the existinq sinqle-family residences located at the
northeastern and northwestern corners of the site are to reaain.
^~ tb. .ite-6~~ Lv .~aain. The third residence is to be
demolLshed. The proposal has been conditioned to comply vith the
City's ~istoric Preservation Ordinance and to obtain proper
demolLtLon permits Ln removinq this structure. The barn and the
tin shed are to remain. The barn vill be used as an accessory
structure to the residence on the northeast corner of the sLte
and the tin shed will beco~e a storaqe buildinq for the recyclinq
facility. '
is a permitted use in the IH,
land use district vith a
Since the Hunicipal Code does not permit
industrial/residential land uses, the project
condltioned to file a lot line adjustment separatlnq
residences from the vehlcle recyclLnq yard.
coabination
has been
the existinq
Trees
There are numerous mature trees surroundinq the structures
developed on the site. The project has been conditioned to
preserve these trees in place vhenever feasible. Should the
removal of any tree be necessary, the applLcant has been
conditioned to submit a tree removal permit SUbject to ene
approval of the Parks and RecreatLon Department and the Planninq
Department. The tree removal permit is to include an arborist
report on the condition of any trees to be removed and the
viability of relocatinq/transplant~nq the trees elsewhere on
si te .
)
....
aw.",____
~.~
........... ~AGlIOP" (.....,
The proposed elevations of the office and the storage building
were discussed at the Development Review Committee (DRC) on
November 15, 1990. At that meeting staff expressed concern over
the proposed construction materials. The applicant proposes a
stucco exterior for both of the buildings. Staff believes that
the stucco exteriors will be easily damaged by the vehicles and
equipment to be used at the facility. Should damaged stucco go
unrepaired it would detract from the appearance of the building
to the detriment of the surrounding area. Staff recoaaended that
both buildings be constructed of a aore durable decorative split-
face or fluted concrete block. The concrete block is not easily
damaged and would maintain its appearance longer. The DRC did
not share staff's concern and cleared the elevaticns onto
Planning Coa.ission with stucco exteriors. Hovever, staff's
concern remains. staff therefore recoaaends that both buildings
be constructed with a decorative split-face or fluted concrete
block exterior for greater durability and maintained appearance.
A condition of approval has been included to this effect.
Fences and Screening
The applicant proposes to screen the recycling yard area with a 6
foot fence. Conditions have also been included requiring the
applicant to screen the perimeter of the yard on all sides.
At the DRC meeting, the applic3nt vas requested to provide an 8
foot fence to screen the yard area. Hovever, the applicant is
opposed to erecting an 8 foot fence because of the monetary cost
involved. To ensure adequate screening, the applicant has been
conditioned not to stack vehicles or parts above the height of
the six foot fence.
compatibility vith surrounding Land Uses
The proposal viii be compatible vith the vacant industrial
designated land I:x%derinI1 the site on the east, vest and south. The
project vill also be compatible vith t~e single-faml1y
residences and trailer park located across Walnut on the north In
that the storage yard vill be screened by a decorative vall and
landscaping and development viii take place according to the
condltions of approval.
~.,-~
to.
...,j
~ ""'CF' t.....
o
.Q.
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE COP 90-32
9
1-8-91
C;
...
"'"
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
r'
Traffic and Clrculation
The proposal was revlewed by the Clty Traffic Engineer who has
indicated that the project-generated traffic would not
signlficantly impact the streets in the vicinity.
Internal Circulation
All on-site vehicular paths are of adequate
two-way trafflc In conformance wIth
requirement of a minimum of 24 feet.
Parking
A total of 51 parking places are proposed; 47 standard stalls and
4 handicapped stalls. The MunIcipal Code Section 19.56.070(C)
requires 1 parking space for each 3,000 square feet of gross yard
area for auto dismantling facllities, junk yards, and recycl1ng
faci11ties. !be gross yard area 1s equal to 384,880 square feet;
parking requ1red by the code 1s therefore 129 parking places.
width to accommodate
the Munlcipal Code
The applicant has 1nd1cated that the requirement of 12' spaces
may be unreasonable given the large slze of the slte. Most other
veh1c1e recycl1ng yards 1n the C1ty do not exceed 3 acres In
slze. The appllcant surveyed the park1ng requIrements for
vehlcle recycling yards in surrounding cit1es and supplied them
to staff. !be appllcant 31so revIewed the existlng parking
conditlons at other recyc11ng yards and compared them to the
standards of other cities In the local ar..a. The appllcant
illustrated that most of these yards had more spaces than were
actually used. Typlcally a slml1ar faclllty comprtslng
approximately 3 acres had 10 spaces; approxlaately 70 to 75'
fever than currently requlred by code. The Clty of alalto parklng
standards 'were found to be the most representative of the number
of parklng spaces found at other recycllng yards. alalto
standards requires 1 space for each 300 square feet of building
area plus one space for every 10,000 square feet of gross yard
area for vehicle recycllng yards. Based upon the revlew
conducted by the applicant, the Oraft Development Code has b~en
revised to the alalto parking standards for vehicle recycling
yards.
...
...
~~,..~
,..,.... 11_ 1 OF , t.....
~
0..
a..
OBSERVATIONS
CASE .COP 90-32
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATEl-8-9l
PAGE 6
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
...
Under the Rialto standards, the proposed yard would be required
to provide 45 parkinq stalls. Given the large size of the size
of the site it is unlikely that 129 spaces would be needed and
that the 51 stalls proposed by the applicant are reasonable based
on the review of parkinq at similar facilities. staff has some
concern that if the facility is underparked with 51 spaces, the
residences and mobile home park located across from the site
could be Impacted by the overflow parklnq on Walnut. To mitiqate
this concern, a condition of approval has been added requirinq
that the parklnq at the site be revlewed after one year of
business for adequacy. Should the survey prove the site to be
underparked. the appllcant wlll be required to provlde the
additional 78 spaces required by the current code.
Landscaplnq and Internal Plantlnq
Tbe proposed Internal plantinq and laDdscapinq for the proposal
aeets the requlrements of the Municipal Code. BxcludinC) the
required landscaped setbacks, the project proposed landscaped
areas are equal to 13 percent of the total paved parklnC) area.
Waste Gasoline, all, and Other Flulds fro. Wrecked Vehlcles
The applicant has been condltloned to draln all flulds, includlnq
qasoline and oil fro. all aotor vehicles to be stored/recycled at
the slte. Local requlation dlctate that the appllcant coaply
with all requlre.ents of the Unlfor. Flre Code and county
Envlronmental Health Servlces requlatlons reqardlnq alr quality
control, soil and qround water protectlon, and flre prevention
wlth respect to drainaqe, storaqe, and disposal of the waste
fluids, gasoline, and 011 from the vehicles at the site.
Geoloqic a~d Selsmlc
The San Jacinto Fault Zone passes throuqh the southwest portion
of the slte. Methods for fault investiqatlon included aerial
photoqraphy, field reconnalssance and trenching in the area of
proposed structures.
No faulting was observed at the SUbject area wlthln the limits of
the trenchlnq. Based upon previous qeoloqlc work in the area and
aerlal photo examination, it appears that the closest dlstance to
the San Jaclnto Fault Is plus or ainus 300 feet to the southwest
of the proposed structures.
)
..
...,j
.,.. .,. - ...-....
-
iI\.MoUI ,... 1011 t :....
o
o
r
OBSERVATIONS
CASE alP 90-32
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-8-91
PAGE 7
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
Because the study revealed that no faulting vas observed vithin
the area of the proposed structures the possibility ground
rupture resulting from an earthquake is considered love Hovever,
several other potential secondary seismic hazards do exist at the
site. These potential hazards include liquefaction and
seismically induced settlement. Hitigation concerning structural
design standards, compliance vith HC-677 concerning liquefaction,
and observance of building placement in the area identified by
the study to be free of faulting have been included as conditions
of approval.
COHMEN~9 R~CErVRD
Development Review Committee
At the Development Review Committee meeting, the Building and
safety, police, Fire, Public Works/Engineering, and water
Departments provided Standard Requirements for the proposal (see
Standard Requirements, Attachment D).
City of' Colton
\
The City of Colton has requested that the city ensure that the
applicant aaintain the site in an orderly aanner, that the yard
area be screened by an 8 foot decorative block vall, that no
liquid containers be dismantled on the site, and that all storage
be conducted vithin the fenced area. With the exception of the 8
foot vall, the requested iteas have been included as conditions
of approval. As stated before, the project vill be providing a 6
foot decorative vall, and the applicant has been conditioned to
ensure the stacking/storage of vehicles and equipment does not
exceed the height of the 6 foot vall.
county Department of Bnvlronaental Health and safety
The San Bernardino county Department of Health and safety (DBHS)
has indicated that the facility viII be required to obtain
permits from DEHS for storage, handling, etc. of hazardous
aaterials and waste.
The project has been conditioned to obtain these permits as
necessary.
....,.-
-
...
~
~
PUNoUI ~JG& lOF , :.....
o
o.
.
....
.....
OBSERVATIONS
~E COP 90-32
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-8-91
PAGE 8
CITY OF SAN BERNAROINO PLANNING
ANO BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTMENT
.'
CONCLUSYON
The proposal is a permitted use subject to the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit. The project is co.patible vith
surrounding vacant industrially designated land and vill be
co.patible vith the residential uses located across walnut in
that the storage yard viII be screened and develop.ent vill occur
according to the conditions of approval. Traffic generated by
the proposal viII not significantly impact the adjacent streets.
Internal circulation viII be adequate and aeet Municipal Code
standards. The proposed parking does not meet Municipal Code
requirements, but a reviev of parking standards for other area
cities and similar uses indicate that the Municipal Code
Standards may be excessive. Given the large size of
the site it is unlikely that 129 spaces vould be needed and that
the 51 stalls proposed by the applicant are reasonable based on
the reviev of parking at similar facilities. The project has
been conditioned to reviev the parking after one year of
operation. If the reviev reveals the facility to be underparked
vith the 51 parking spaces provided, the applicant viII be
required to provide the additional 78 spaces currently required
by code.
...
~
...... -
-
~ PAGlt OF t :....
o
Q
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE alP 90-32
II.
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM =--r-=D
HEARING DATE - ~.L
PAGE q.
r-
."
RECOMMENDATION
staff recommends that the Planning Co..ission:
1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
2. Approve the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program
(Aetachment Fl; and
3. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 90-32, subject to the
attached Findings of Fact (Attachment Bl, Conditions of
Approval (Attachment Cl, and Standard Requirements
(Attachment DJ;
Respectfully submitted,
~ltf ~ iZud <!O~
Larry E. Reed
Director, Planning and Building Services
jJ. 1. . ~ '" .
1 " ., -/ "
: f..,.,'...?.:v_ -' 7~ ..;...1"......
Michael R. Finn ~~
Associate Planner
Attachment w1w - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance
Attachment wBw - F1ndlngs of Fact
Attachment wcw - Cond1tions of Approval
Attachment wDw - standard Requir~ments
Attachment wEw - Inlt1al study
Attachment wFw - Mitigation Monitor1ng prograa
Attachment wGw - S1te Plan, Floor Plans, and Elevat10ns
Attachment wSw - Location Hap
II.
~
~"-~
P\.MoII.aI ~JG& 1 CF I t6otOt
l'1"l'''CHKENT -,,-
MUNICIPAL CODE lND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCZ
~~~aorv Municipal
Pyonosal ~odf!!!
Permitted Use Motor Vehicle Sub::lect to
Recyclln9 Yard CUP
Setbacks
Front 6 feet 6 feet
Lot Coverage ..., Floor 75\ Floor
Area Ratio Area Ratio
Parkin9 51 spaces 119 spaces
...
:::..: - ~
General
Pl~n
II/A
II/A
II/A
II/A
...
PUIIoIa PAGE, OF t c....
0 Q.,
~ CITY OF SAN BERNAROINO PLANNING CASE
nn:> QO-32
AND BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 9
FINDINGS OF FACT - HEARING DATE 1-!l-'l1
PAGE "
... ....
,. .....
.,
ATTACHMENT -B-
CONDYT'YONAL USE PERM!'!' FTNDINGS
1. The proposed vehicle recyclinq yard conforms to the
objectives of the city's General plan, in that it is a
permitted use in the IH, Industrial Heavy land use district,
subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit.
2. The proposed use vill not adversely affect the adjoininq
land uses and the qrovth and development of the area in
vhich it is proposed to be located. Conditions of Approval
and Standard Requireaents should aitiqate any potential
neqative impacts to the surroundinq properties.
,
3. The ~ize and shape of the site proposed for the use is
adequate to allov the full development of the proposed use
in a aanner not ~t%i.ental to the particular area nor to
the peace, health, safety and qeneral velfare in that the
site can accommodate ~he proposed vehicle recyclinq yard
in conformance with all'applicable standards reqardinq
setbacks, landscapinq, parkinq, and internal circulation.
4. The city Traffic Bnqineer has revieved the project and has
indicated that the traffic qenerated by the proposed use
vill not impose any undue burden upon the streets and
hiqhvays desiqned and improved to carry the traffic in the
area. The parkinq provided is adequate in that it satisfies
Municipal Code Requirements.
S. Based upon the above qiven Findinqs, the qrantinq of this
Conditional Use Permit under the conditions imposed vill
not be detrimental to the peace, health and safety and
qeneral velfare of the citi=ens of the City of San
Bernardino.
\
)
...
.....
~ PAGl1 D' I (...at
~ - ........
o
o
r-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE CCP 90-32
9
~8-91
FINDINGS OF FACT
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
~
.....
VARIAN~g FTNotNGS
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved, vhich do not
apply to other property in the same zoning district and
neighborhood in that the site is larger than the other
similar facility located 380 feet to the east.
2. The granting of this variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right
of the applicant in that vithout the variance, the applicant
vill have an excessive amount of unused parking.
3. The granting of the variance vill not be aaterially
detrimental to the public velfare or injurious to property
and improvements in the zoning district and neighborhood in
that after one year 'of operatioD the parkiDg for the facility
vill be revieved for adequacy and if found to be inadequate,
the applicant vtll be required to provide the additional 78
parking spaces currently required by the Municipal Code.
4.
The granting of such a variance vill not
objectives of the General Plan in that
defers to the Municipal Code concerning
be contrary to the
the General Plan
parking standards.
~,... ====
....
....
Pl"ANo&GI alGi 1 ~ ,
....
Q.
..
Attac:llrent 'C'
Q
~
COP 90-32
CONDITIONS
CASE
AGSNDA IT&I
HEARING DATE
PAGE
..
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PlANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
...
9
1-8-91
13
...
~
1.
~Alm eoND~OKS
2.
.....
----
-
~or :llClCii~ic:ations ~o the plan shal~ 1:1. suI:lj~ to approval.
~ the D1=ec:tor ot Pl......inq. AD inc=.... ot 30:'8 than 1.0
percent ot ~. square tootaq. or. siqni.ticant chaDq. in the .
.pproved concept shall l:Ie suI:lj ec:: to (Planni.nq Cammis.ion and
I)ev.loplll.nt lteVi_ Comaitt..) revi.w and approval..
Constructioft .ball b. in substantial contor.aanc. with th.
Plans approved by the Developlllent bvi.w co_11:t.e, Planninq
Commission or Direc1:or ot Planninq.
'l'h. deve:loper is to sumu1: a CCllIIpl.t. :l&st.r landsc:ape and
ir::iqation ;:Ilan (4 copies) tor th. entire developlllllDt to th.
znqin..rinq:)epart:ReD1: with the required t_ tor .pproval.,
the landsc:&.,. plans will be tonarded ~. the Parks,
~..tion. aDd eu....-.......;ty services and the Pl."ftiPl9'
Deparbent tor r8Viev and approval. (1'ote: the ~ ot a
bulldinq per.ait, ~ =- . Depart::aent ot BlUlctinq and Sat.ty ot
the City ot ~ BerDardiDo, does lfSZ: waive these
requir-.n1:s/concU.tions.) 110 g:otdirtq per.ai1:s will l:Ie issued
prior to app~ ot l"""-cape plans.
'l'he desic;:1 sball includ., bat not l:Ie IJ,mited to the
tOllowinq:
X S1:=e.t: t:'... shall be planted Oft 30 toot center
.pacine; unles. o1:he%wise inclic:ated by the Dep&r.::llent
ot ?a:Jcs. llec:reatiOIl, &Dc! Comaunity Services. The
Parles Depart::lent shall deter:ain. th. vari.ti.. ana
10c~..':iClns prior to plantinq. All tr.es shall l:Ie 24-
box speci:lens. orr- are to 1:1. inspected by a Park
Division rep=..entativ. Drier to plantinq.
X Plantars shal~ b. enclosed with COfte=et. curl:linq.
~~"IQ11t
-
o
CASE alP 90-32
...
CITY OF SAN aeRNARCINO PLANNING
ANC BUILCING SEiMC~S OEPARTMENT
CONDITIONS
AGiNDA ITEM
HEAIIlING DATE
PAGe
q
, -8-91
14
r-
.'
':he seeaCls !:ca ':he 11Or-~ _ , south _ ,
_st _ , w_t _ iU:oP~1 line s~ I)e :ber:ed
at a ~.."i........ J: 1 slape &n4 sball:be plantaci wiU a
1:&11 !_c:ze ~JPe ~~.
A t.anclscape bu~!er zane shall :be installaci :be~Jeen
~acili~i.. an~ s~..t.
.,
I
.
3.
X The landscape and L.-:-ili41:iaD plans shall comply 'll'iU
Ue "~ocaciu-_ and Polic:y tor I.anciscape a:c1
I=iqatiCln" (availallle t:oa the Parks :lep&r=eat).
SUbject tCl the CClnditiClns C1t the Depart:llent ot Parks anel
Recreation (attached).
Trees, sbrul:ls and qrounc!cClVer ot a type &n4 qaality qeaerally
consistent or c:ampat~le wiU that charac:terizinq sinqle-
~uaily hClIUS shall :be prCIVielaci in the t:ont yarci and that
portioD ot th siele yarcls wbic:!1 are Tisillle t:aa the S1::'eet.
All. 1 :md,capaci areas:ms1: :be p%a9idecl wi t!a an autClllatic
izriqatioD syst_ adequate 1:.0 to....., their viUil.1.~. The
l---ape and 1=iqatiaD plans shall :be app:riacl :by 1:he Parks
aDd Rec:reatlaD Ceparr=eat.
At all ~~,... the :basin... will :be operated 1A a -.zmer vtUc:!1
daea not proc11Zce obnoxiOlZS noise, villrauoa, odor, ciast,
-a, qlare, or ~ ZJDi"anc:e.
A siqn p~._ tar the 1IIIl1:i-1:eaant ......~ial/incmst:rial
c:entar shall :be app..",..raci:by the Pl-....h'q Dep~eat prior ~
.1..sa1zanc:e ot c:ar--i.:icate ot 0Cc:upaac:r.
4. In the eveat that this approval is leqa11y c:hallenqaci. the
Cj,~ will promptly notity the applicant ot any claill or
ac:--i.on and 'll'ill c:oaperate :ully in the at_. ot 1:he _=ar.
0Dce noti~ied. 1:he applicant ~_ ~ c1etel2d, f~-ity, and
bald har.al... the Ci~/, its otficers, aqeats Ulci _ploye_
::=- any c:laa. ac--i.an. or prClC."..afftCJ aqainst the C:l~1 ot San
~. ':~e applicant :a:-~-= ~ 1:0 rei:lll:nzrse the
Cj,ty ot any COS1:S and ae-..o:neys' t_ vQj,= =- City _y lie
~-.cI :by a c:aart: to ';lay .. a ~1: ot 51:= ac--i.on. bu't
.a= par--i.c:ipa'tioa shal.l not re.1i-. applic:aat ot ~
a!lliqat1aD WIlier t:U.s condition.
...
-,-
JIt.-... '_tGlft ....
!II
.
~
o
O'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE alP 90-32
""'I
...
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
9
11\-91
,..
""'I
4.
The project shall comply vith the
Hlstorlc Preservatlon Ordlnance
demolition permits 1n remov1nq of
the site.
provisions of the Clty's
and to obtaln proper
any structures located on
5. The applicant/developer shall file a lot line adjustment with
the Planninq Department to separate the existinq residences
from the vehlcle rec7clinq yard. Said lot line adjustment
shall have been approved and recorded prior to the issuance
of any qradinq or buildinq permits as evidenced by a
Certificate of Compl~ance.
6. The project shall preserve all trees in place wherever
feasible. Should the removal of any tree be necessary, the
appllcant/developer shall file a tree removal permit with the
Planninq Department, subject to the approval of the Parks and
Recreation Department and the Planninq Department. The tree
removal permit application shall include an arborist report
on the condition of any trees to be removed and the viability
of relocatinq/transplantinq the trees elsewhere on site.
7. The office and storaqe buildlnq shall be constructed wlth of
a decoratlve spllt-face or fluted concrete block exterior for
qreater durabillty.
. 8.
80 vehicles, parts, or equipment are to
heiqht of the six foot decoratlve
storaqe yard. "
9. 80 liquid containers shall be dlsmantled on the site.
be stacked above the
vall surroundinq the
10. All storaqe shall be contained within the fenced area.
11. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of
51 standard off-street parkinq spaces. However, after 12
months. of operation of the business, the recyclinq
yard owner, shall submit to the City tvo sets of ..ilinq
labels of property owners and their addresses and/or tenants
addresses of the property vithin 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the recycllnq yard slte. A map illustratinq
the 500 foot radius boundary and all parcels vithin that
boundary shall also be submitted. This information shall be
obtained from the latest San Bernardino County equalized
assessment roll and maps. After receipt of the ..ilinq
labels and ..p, the City vill send a parkinq questionnaire to
those neiqhborlnq property owners, Council.embers and Police.
This questionnaire vill ask questions about vhether or not
the parkinq from the recycllnq yard has overflowed and
impacted their property, the frequency of such occurrences,
-.,----
- ,
~DI PJGE 10,:, t40lUt
o
o
r
CITY' OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE alP 90-32
9
1-8-91
16
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
...
r
and the adequacy of parking for the facility. If a parking
inadequacy is identified and substantiated, the applicant
shall provide the additional 78 standard parking spaces
required by the current code.
12. The applicant shall obtain all necessary permits from DEHS
for storage, handling, etc. of hazardous materials and waste.
13. All fluids, including oil and gasoline shall be drained from
all vehicles to be stored/recycled at the site.
14. Since no evidence of faulting was observed
of the trenching, no restricted building
warranted where the proposed building is to
within the limits
use setback is
be located.
15. A potential for settlement of the
exists at the site and shall be
grading by removal and recompaction,
if applicable.
16. Hoderate-severe ground shaking levels can be anticipated
during the life of the structure. The seismic accelerations
discussed in the text of the geologic report shall be
incorporated into the structural design of the building in
addition to complying with the seismic code provision for
the City of San Bernardino and the latest edition of the
Uniform Building Code.
fault trench backfill
mitigated during rough
or compaction in place
17. If
in
to
any other areas at the site are proposed to be built on
the future, appropriate investigation shall be performed
evaluate the potential for faulting.
18. A copy of the geologic and seismic investigation of the site
conducted by Terra Geotechnical shall be made available to
property owners and tenants of the proposed project, present
and future, in an effort to make them aware of the potential
seismic risks associated with the site.
19. Should any conditions be encountered during development that
appear in any way to be different from those described in
the geologic and seismic report completed by Terra
Geotechnical, a qualified geologist shall be notified
concerning appropriate recommendations and mitigation.
20. The storage building shall not be used for office or any
.other human occupancy use unless the appropriate geological
studies have been conducted.
... .,. - .-..
- -
IIUHo&GI .a~ lOF ,
...
~
..
~',-.-~.
.~-!-
"..-..
>.-;.;.:.
.'V;
AttacimEnt -on
o
erN OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING'
AND BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTMENT
CASE a;p 90-32
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-8-CI1
PAGE 17
STANDAQP REQUIREMENTS
r
.
"""'I
COMMERCIAL. nmoSTRIAL
1. a:nai.ticnal t1se Pemit No. 90-32 shall be in ettect tor a
period ot 12 months from the elat. ot approval. However, it no
development has been initiated at the end ot the 12 month
period, the application shall expire. Additional time _y be
approved upon request ot the applicant prior to expiration of
the 12-month period. Expiration- Date:. Janua%y 8, 1992
2. PARlaNG:
,
I
i
b. All parkinq and drivinq aisl_ shall be surtaced with two
inch_ of AC' over a suitable b_e or equivalent as
approved by the City Inq1.neer. parkinq spac_ shall be
striped and have wheel stops installed at least three
t_t trom any buildinq, wall, fence, ilroperty line, or
walkway.
c. Whenever an off_treat parJdnq area is adjacent to or
across an alley troa property zoned r_idential, a solid
decorative wall siz teet in heiqht shall be erected and
_intained alonq the property line so as to separate the
parkinq area physically from the residentially zoned
property provided such wall shall be three teet in heiqht
when located within the required tront or street siele
yard setback. Where no front or street siele yare! is
required, such wall shall be three feet in heiqht when
10catecl within ten teet ot the street line.
d. Wbenever an ott_treet parkinq area is located across the
street trom property zoned tor resielential uses, a soliel
decorative wall or equivalent landscape berm not less
than three feet in heiqht shall be erecteel and _intained
alonq the street side at the lot not closer to the street
than the required ::lepth at the yare! in the aeljoininq
residential area. Ko tence or wall locateel in the front
setback shall obscure the required front setback
landscapinq.
~
-~-
-
"""""'1D -MIll ~ 1 ~...
.~:~~~...... .
~~..... .
-;t~.-.<~. ':.;.'.: CIlY OF SAN B NAROINO PlANNING
~'_.-:- . AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
o
CASE
alP 90-32
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
.... ;!IL.,.
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
q
1-8-91
lR
....
""""I
3. REFOSE DCLOStmES:
.
Whenever reruse bins are located within or adjacent to a
parking area used by the public, they sDlUl be enclo.c by a
decorative wall six teet in heiqht alonq the rear and sides
and screened qate(s) six teet in heiqht alonq the tront. The
enclosure shall not be placed wi thin the required tront or
street side yard setback area. Exact locatioD and size of
refuse enclosures are to be determined by the Planninq
DepartDent and Division ot Public Services Superintendent.
4. WALLS:
a. six-toot high solid decorative walls shall be required. on
the north -1L, south....1L, east -L, and west x ~
aeriaberal property line.. ~ ~.-...-.,'lt-~
- ~
5; LANDSCAPING:
~.
The intent and purpo.e ot this HetioJ. is 1:0 prevent trees and
other landscapinq trom duaqinq public 1.m.provaen1:s.
a. Str_t trees lIWIt be installed at a lRinillml of 30 f_t on
canter. varieties and exact locatioD shall be determined
by the Director ot Parks and RecreatioD.
b. All required setbacks abuttinq a public right-ot-way
shall be landscaped (except tor walks and driveways which
bisect or encroach upon the required landscape area).
c. Pour (4) copies of a landscape plan (includinq plant
material specifications) shall be sWaitted 1:0 the
Enqin-.rinq Division tor review and approval.
d. All required. landscapinq. shall be protected from parkinq
arwa. and shall be provided with automatic sprinkler
facilities which shall be. maintained in an operative
conclitioD.
e. Interior plantinq shall be required. and maintained equal
to at least five percent or ~en percent of the open
~aced parkinq area excludinq the area of landseapinq
.trip required by aubsection -b- and shall include at
l__t one tr_ tor every tive spaces or major fraction
thereof. Heasurements shall be computed fraa the inside
of perimeter walls or setback line..
---
-
Ii...
I
""""'0 IIMII. 0# t ......
r
.
"
o
.,
I
-. ...--.:.....
.~:,.;.,;:
0\-
,
. .
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
ANO BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
. ~ ~Ji~~ .. -
CASE mI> 90-32
AGENDA ITEM 9
HE.~ING DATE 1-R-91
PAGE 19
,
r
The required set!lack(s) frail ~ north~, south, _,
east _, west _ proper:y line shall be densely
landscaped with mature er-, shrubs, and c;rounc!cover. A
3 -foot landscaped. earthen bU3 shall be erected and .
maintained within the se1:J)ack alonq the above indicated
property line.
6. I:I.I.tlKINATIOH:
;.
a. All liqhtinq fixtures iD the parkinq are.. shall be
directecl away ~rOll adjacent properti_ and the public
riqht-of-way.
7. MECBAHICAL EQUIPMEH'r:
a. Air concUtioninq and vent ciucts Gall be directecl avay
frOll any adj acent r_identia1 usas, and all sidas of the
buildinq shall be free of any external venu and
mechanical equipment inc1udinq, but not limited to,
conduits and ducts.
b. All builc:linq-supported .,-'-"nJ.cal equipment (1ncluclinq
roof equipment, ladders aDd air conditioninq and vent
\ducts) Gall be enclosed within the builc:linq's primary
architectural elements, lD4ependent scr_ninq devic_
shall not be permitted.
c. All qround-supported equipaent such as transformers and.
air conditioners shall be located within the builc:linq, in
underqround vaults, anci/or -hind approved landscapinq
ADSi mason--y walls.
d. All utility service boxe., connections and .ervice lin_
shall be painted to match the buildinq exterior on which
~ey are locatecl.
e. Ail exiStinq overhead. utility servic_ and wirinq shall
be relocated underqrounc1.
f. All utility systems iftclDllin'J qas, electric, telephone,
vater, sewer and cable TV' shall be providecl for
underqround, with easements provided. as required, and
d_iqned and const:ruct:ed in accordance with City C~e.
and the . utility provider. Telephone, cable TV' and/or
security systems shall be pre-wired in the struc:t:ures.
8. COIlpliance with all AC01IlIIIlt11d.tions of the Geoloqy Report
Gall be required (U applicable).
l..
-...-
-
-1
~1D _"lOP1 t60lllt
.r.t":..~~:;:
-.;'
o
CASE ctlP 90-32
.--.
. .~...
~.;_ '.. 1.~
..<~..~
.. CITY OF SAN B '. INO PLANNING'
AND BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTl.tENT
STANDABD REQUIREMENTS
.-: -..... ~:.;
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATe
PAGE
9
1-8-91
20
...
9.
Gradinq and raveqetation shall be staqed as required by the
City EDqineer in order to reduce the amount ot bare soil
exposed to precipitation.
Durinq construction, the city Enqineer lIUly require a tence
around all or a portion ot the periphery ot the site to
1IIi"i1lli:e wind and debris damaqe to adjacent properties. The
type ot fencinq shall be approved by the City EDqineer to
assure adequate project site _intenance, clean-up and dust
control.
1n
11.
Within 75 feet ot any sinqle-fuaily residential district, the
lP"xi1llUlll heiqht ot any builc:linq shall not exceed one story or
20 feet unless the Commission determines that due to unusual
topoqraphical or other f_tur_, such restrictive heiqht .tis
not practical. ,:. .
.
;.
Ho Certificate ot Oc::cupanc:y shall be issued prior i:o
COlIpliance with these Standard Requirements as well &5 all
provisions of the San Bernarc:lino Municipal Code.
S:IGRS:
All siqns shall be in. c:ontonance with San BerDarc:lino
Kunicipal COde Section 19.60. Pour ( 4) copies ot a plot plan
and elevation ot the sign drawn to scale shall be subai1:ted
to the Plann!nq Department tor review and approval prior to
issuance ot the sign permit frOll. the Buildinq and Satety
Departlllent.
12.
..t
-..-
......... _.011. 1_
..
o
0-
CCP 90-32
....
CITY OF SAil: BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM q
HEARING DATE 1-8-91
PAGE 21
....
Gc
COMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAH
A COlllposite Development Plan (COP) shall be filed with the
Engineerinq, Planninq, and Buildinq and Safety Departments
prior to Final or Parcel Hap processinq by the City pursuant
to Ordinance No. MC-592. The COP shall provide additional
survey and _p inforlllAtion includinq, but not limited to,
buildinq criteria (e.g. setbacks), flood control criteria,
seismic and geoloqical criteria, environmental criteria and
easements of recor::l. - The COP shall be labeled with the title
"Composite Development ?lan", and contain a section entitled
"Composite Development Plan Notes.. The applicant shall have
listed under the COP Notes section the followinq conditions or
mitigating measures required for the development of the
.subject property: .
:i.- The' property owner shall siqn a cOVenant running with the land
aqreeing that if the required landscaping is not maintained,
the City may enter on the the property and install and main-
tain t::1e required landscapinq and..y lien the property for
the costs. The covenant shall be siqned and recorded with the
County of San Bernardino Recorder's Office prior to the
issuance of any Certificate of OCCUpancy. In addition, a
landscape maintenance easement sh.n be filed with the Recor-
der's Office, which giv_ the City the rigbt to enter the
property and perform maintenance to the required landscapinq.
latlO/9/90
DOC:PCAGENDA
DO~u1'U:a'lTS
".." -..-.-
-
P\.Mo&.10 PAQ& lOP' , (.....
.
.
CITY OF SAN ~NAROINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES OEPARTMENT
~ COP 90-32
AGENCA I'T&l ~
HEARING CATE 1-8-91
PAGe 2'
""'
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
.. un .. ,
14.- sWlmit plans pnparad},y a Reqisterecl BuilcUnq Desi~er,
Architect or Civil or strUCtUral EDqineer.
15. sWlmit a COIIpleta lateral aDd st..-uctural aDaJ.ysis prepared!)y a
tteqisterecl Civil or st..-uc:tural EDqinear or Archi tac:1:.
lfL
SWlmit State of cali:ornia 'fitle 24 Energy C&lc:uJ.ation Forms
for D"-1/If.. Mtr.l, non-residentiaJ. wilcUnqs
includinq a siqnad cOlllplianC8 stat_ant.
SWlmit calc:uJ.ati~ns and structural c!ravinqs, prepared by a
Reqisterecl Civil Structural EDqineer or Architect, ~)...~
~'1:----r
17
18. Sw,lIlit floor plan of existinq structure. I.a!lel all. uses and
axistinq _tarials of const..-uction.
111 Sw,lIlit four (4) COIIIplete sa":s of construction plans incl~"h,CJ:
a. l::lpy of conditions.
b. Soils and/or liquefaction report.
c.
Energy CaJ.c:uJ.ations.
20.
d. _ Structural. calc:lll.atioD.
~~ (s~:~~ lJ!!pu.!t by
do so.
. parson l.ic:en.sed ~
,
. 1
SWlmit a sinqla liDa c!raviDq of tha electrical _rvice. n_
aJ.l. equipment, conduit and wire siz_ and typ_. Show the
service ground size az:d .,.:.....0''' I'lCJ al.actroda.
22. subIIlit panel schedulers) and al.actrlc:sl. plans.
''1 Par.ait reqUired for d_liticm of existinq !)uildinq(s) on site.
'1
24. SWlmit a plan of the h_ti::q, ventilatinq or air conditioninq
ayse_. (Clearly identity the location and ratinq of the
aqai.paant and the siz_ .. ..tarial of aJ.l ducta, reqis1:a:s and
the location of all fire ".1OlpU'a). Sbov ...--". ot pz'aY'idiDq
.r~".n.ical ventilation as ~ by the 1982 1Jnif~ BuJ.l.diDq
COda.
10..
---
....... NM'., ...
u.. CtJP 90-32 ....
. CITY OF SAN &... lNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM q
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING DATE 1-8-91
PAGE 23
r , . ....
. ..
I
25.
~t).
27.
28.
29.
SWmi~ ps pipe loads, .idnq .calcuJ.ations and isometrics.
Provide a plot plan shovincJ the loc:a~ion ot the proposac! .ewer
sys~_.
sW:llIli~ a l.~tar clearly iDc1ica~i..\q ':he in~anc1ed use ot all
areas ot the builc1incJ. LiR the lI&~erials ~o be used and the
projects producac1 qivincJ the amount ot each kap~ in the
~uildinq. It the buildincJ is used tor more than one purpo.e,
lis~ all othar us_.
Subllli~ isometric plans ot tha cold and ho~ wa~ar and . drain I
was~e and ven~ SyRUIS.
Show compliance with TiUe 24 tor the physically haDdlcappac1
m 1;M ~
SWmi~ plans approved ~ the county Realth De98rt:lent.
IDclicaa methods ot c:ompllance tor sound &1:1:anuadon
. (exterior, in~arior party walls, fioor/ceI1inq _.81IIbly,
ceilinq) _ per s1:W:ly, a.B.C., loc:al or Sta~a Law.
30. Show complianca with requir..-nu ot hiqh tire ar....
For struc:b:ra. loca~ within hiqh wind ara_:
a. Deslqn st:ucture, inclw!1nq root cover!nq, usinq 20
p.s.t. wind load.
dty ot San Becardino .......ad as ~tlcate held_= tor
Werker's COIIIpeIIS&dcm IDsuranc:e.
.
31.
Ass_sor's Parcel !lUllber.
274-031-2,3,4,& 5
32. Contractor's City license.
33. Contractor's Suta lIcense.
34. S_er capaci~y riqhU troa Water De~ent, 384-5093, SeU
'rtIe.aen.
...
-...-
-
.01
,.,...... ~. OF 1 ....
_-c~~"'.
-,..---~.~.~-"
.
CITY OF SAN SERNARDINO PlANNING
. AND SUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
o
CASE
.COP 90-32
.,
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
q
1-8-91
24
35.
School t... troa tJnitied Scbool Disu-ic:t, 38t-U79.
other:
':I':;
DEPOSIT:
$350.00
.
.
-..-
-
,."..... ...., flI.' ....
.'
- -
-OJ.
_o~ _
-
-
DRC/ERC
DATE ~-~3.l,HI
CASE (' ~ f' c;~=3~
POLICE DEPT
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
-i
...
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
-
lOR COHMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS
. .
SECURITY LIGHTING:
37. ~
38. '-....
39. ~
",. ..............
I
41. ~
42. ...........
43. ............
44. """""
45. "'-
DOORS .
~
Lichtin, levels on the exterior at the building are to pro-
vide a minimum at one toot candle at minimum maintained il-
lumination, evenly distributed, on the ,round level tram
dusk until the termination at business each operating day.
All exterior doors to buildings shall be equipped with an
illumination device capable at providing a minimum at one
toot candle at maintained illuminated at ground level during
hours at darkness.
Aisles, passageways, and recesses related to and within the
project complex shall be illuminated with an intensity at at
least .25 toot candles at the ground level durine the hours
ot darkness.
Open parking lots and carports shall be provided with a
.inimu. maintained one toot candle at li,ht evenly distrib-
uted on the parking surtace durin, the hours ot darkness.
All exterior li,htin, devices are to be inaccessible to
common reach or climbine and shall be protected by weather
and ~andalism resistaat covers. All exterior li,htin, shall
be projected so as to not cast licht onto adjoining prop-
erties.
Interior night lightinc shall be maintained in those area.
that are visible tro. the street (,round tloor only).
There shall be a minimum at 20 toot candles at illumination
per square toot at surface area adjacent to gas pumps.
Parkin, lot poles will be shake proot so that lichts cannot
be damaeed by shakin, the pole.
Licht tixtures shall be positioned in such a manner so that
"stray" lieht does not attect adjoining property owners.
Interior night li.htinc shall be maintained in those areas
that are visible tram the street (ground tloor only).
LOCO. AND WI1fDOWS:
Svin,in, exterior Class doors, wood o~ .etal doors with
,lass panel., solid wood or .etal doors shall be constructed
or protected a. tallows:
A) Wood doors shall be at solid core construction with a
minimum thickness of 1 3/4".
'-
o
- -
_0'
-
- -
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DRC/ERC
DATE
CASE
-;.
. .
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
POLICE DEPT
. B)
Hollow lIIetal doors shall be constructed a IIIfnilllulII
equivalent to sixteen U.S. gauge steel and have suf-
ticient reinforce.ent to lIIaintain the designed thick-
ness of the door when anT locking device is installed
such as reinforce.ent being able to restrict collapsin,
of the door around the locking device.
The above doors shall contain a 190 decree view an.le
door viewer.
C)
47. ""'-..
Except when double cTlinder desdbolta are utilized. any
.lass utilized within 40" of any door lockin, aechanislll
shall consist at laainated class. telllpered class. wired
,lass or plastics'.
48. ~
All swinCin. exterior wood and steel doors shall be equipped
.. follows:
A) A single or double door shall be equipped with a double
or sincle deadbolt. The bolt shall have a ainilllUa pro-
Jection of 1" and be constructed so _ to repel cut.t. ine
tool attack. No double cylinder deadbolt locks shall
be instaUed on tho front door. .
B) The deadbolt shall have an elllbedlllent of at le_t I"
into the strike receiving the proJected bolt. The
CTlinder shall have a cylinder ,uard. a ainiauIII of five
pin tu.blers. and shall be connected to the Inner por-
tion ot the lock by connect In, screws ~f at le..t. 1/4"
In dia.eter. The reco..endat.ion does not apply when
paniC hardware is required or an equivalent device i.
approved bT the Buildin, Code.
C) The strike plate shall.be a lIIinilllUIII of 3" in height and
. shall be secured ~o the ja.b with a ainiaua ot tour
2-1/Z~ screws.
49. .............)
Double doors shall be equipped as tallows:
A) The acti~e leat at double doors shall be equipped wit.h
aetal tlush bolts havin, a 1II1nillluIII elllbedaent of 5/8"
into the head and threshold of the door fr_e. Double
doors shall have an _t.racal construct.ed of steel, a
1II1aiaUIII of .125" thick. which will cover the opening
between the doors. This _tra,al shall be a ainilllulII
of Z" wide and extended a alnilllUIII of I" be7Qnd the edge
of the door to whic:t it 18 at.tached. The as;ra.al
shall be attached to the outside at the act.ive door by
aeana ot weldin. or with nonre.ovable bolta spaced
apart on not lIIor. ~han 10" ~enters:
,
- -
_0
_0
-
-
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
DRC/ERC
DATE
CASE/I}"'; "10-3"2..
POLICE DEPT
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
so. .............
51. --.....
.All exterior hineed doors are to open/swin, outward.
Hinees tor.out-swineine doors shall ~e equipped with non-
removeable hin,e pins or a .echanical inner lock to preclude
removal ot the door trom the exterior by removin. the hin,e
pins.
52. ...........,
Windows
A) All .oveable windows shall be equipped with a lockin,
device and shall be constructed in a tashion to ~
strict them trom bein, litted out ot their tracks when
in the closed position.
B) All moveable windows shall also be equipped with an
auxiliary lockin, device which prevents the window
trom bein' slid open (either v.rticallT or horizon-
tallT) open while in the clos.d position.
e'
~
Gara,e tTPe doors: (rollin, overhead, solid overhead,
~win,in" slidin., or accordion st,.l.)
A) \ The above described doors shall contora to the tollow-
'in, standards:
1. Wood doors shall have panels a ainiaua ot 5/1'-
in thickness with the lockin, hardware be in, at-
tached to the support tr..in,.
Z. Aluainum doors shall be a ainimua thickness of
.0215- and rivet to,eth.r a ainiau. ot 18- on cen-
ter alone the outside ...... Ther. shall be a
tull width horizontal be.. attached to the ..in
door structure which shall meet the pilot or
pede.trian access door traaine within 3- of the
strike area ot the pilot or pedestrian access
door.
3. Fiberslass doors shall have pan.l. a ainiaum den-
sitT ot 6 ounces per square toot troa the bottoa
ot the door to a hei,ht of l' and panels in
residential s~ructure. shall have a density of not
less than 5 ounce. per square toot.
B) Where alidin, or accordion d_rs ar. utilized, the,.
shall be equipp.d with auide tracks which shall be de-
si,ned so that the door cannot be resoved trom the
track when in the closed and l_ked position.
e) Doors that exceed lS' in width shall have 2 lock
receivinr points; or, it the door does not exceed 19',
~"";"Q;"o-=.;"",_,,..,--.-
.... -
_0.
_O~
CXTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DRC/ERC
DATE
CASE
-
STANDARD REQUXREHENTS
POLXCE DEPT
a sinsle bolt m.T be used it pl.ced in the center of
the door with the lockin. point located either in the
tloor or in the door tr....he.der.
D) Overhe.d doors shall be equipped with slide bolts which
shall be capable ot utilizins padlocks with a minimum
9/32- shackle.
1.
Slide bolt asse.blies shall have a tram. a .inimum
ot .120- in thicknes., a bolt diameter a .ini.um
ot 1/2-, .and protrude at lea.t 1 1/2- into the r.-
ceivins luide. A bolt dia.eter ot 3/8- maT be
used in a resid.ntial buildin..
2.
Slide bolt a.se.blies shall be attached to the
door with bolts which are nonremovabl. trom the
exterior. Rivets shall not be u.ed to attach
.uch a....bli...
E) Padlock. u.ed with exterior .ount.d .lide bolt. shall
have a hardened .t.el shackle a miniau. ot 9/32- in
dia.eter with he.l and toe locking and a .ini.u. 5 pia
tumbl.r operation. The teT shall be nonre.ovable whea
in an unlocked operation.
F) Doors utilizin, a cTlinder lock shall have a .inimum ot
tive pin tumbler operation with the bolt or locking
bar ext.ndin. into the receivins .uide a .iniau. ot 1-.
Coaaon walls shall be as sound proof as possible.
54 . --.........
All root openins. sivins .cce.. to the buildin. shall be
secured with either iron bars, ..tal ,ates. .taaped metal or
.hall be .larmed .nd aeet with the approval of the police
department. .
ADDRESS NUMBElIS
55. """.
Root top address numbers shall be provided. TheT shall be a
mini.um ot 3' in len.th and Z' ia width and ot cont~astinc
color to the back,round. Nuabers .hall be placed paral!.el
to the .treet addre.. as .ssilDed.
The proJect shall di.plaT street addre.s numbers placed
in a prominent po.ition as near the street as pr.ctical.
Numbers sball be a mini.u. ot .- in hei,ht and of .
contra.tin, color to the backlround.
All individual units shall be cle.rlT identified bT numbers,
l.tters, or a combin.tion thereof. Th.se numbers and
56. '-...
.'
....
Q.
_o~.
DRC/ERC
DATE
CASE 1':...\... ~ ~e -~z.
CXTY OF SAN BERNARDXNO
STANDARD REQUXREHENTS
POLXCE OEPT
.'
letters shall be a minimum ot 6" in hei,ht and ot a contras-
tin. color. to the back,round.
All nusherin, ot units shall be in a sequential, lo.ical
order.
~;
ACCESS CONTROLS:
57.""""'-
An access control override device shall be provided for use
by police department personnel to lain i..ediate access.
Perimeter tencing or cross fencing shall be installed to
prevent criminal movement or activity.
The exterior business walls shall be posted with Municipal
Code Section 9.52.070 relative to trespassing.
The placement ot outside public telephones shall be re-
stricted to an area i..ediately adJacent to the front of the
store.
RETAIL/CONVENIENCE STORES
Lockable cold bevera,e (beer) cases shall be locked at
2:00 a...
No alcoholic beverages shall be displayed or stored in the
tront 2/3 ot the custo.er area.
Ice aachines shall not be installed in front of store win-
dows.
The interior cashier/sales counter shall be located so it
is visible fro. the buildin. exterior. The tloor area
inside the counter shall be elevated a minimua of 6" above
the tloor ~t the business.
Windows and counter/cash register area will not contain dis-
plays/advertisem.nts that block the visibility ot the
cashier trom the outside ot the store.
A photo-electric be.. across the entry door shall be
installed to audibly notify or ring when custo.ers enter the
store.
Utilization ot outside intereo. speakers is prohibited.
"
_0
-
_0
-
-
-
...
STANDARD REQUXREHENTS
DR.C/ER.C
DATS
CASE
POLXCE DEPT
CXTY OF SAN BERNARDXNO
-
"
ALARM SYSTUS
58. '!
It the units are alaraed or wired tor an alara systea, the
buyer is to be notitied to contact the Police Departaent tar
an alara perait.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
The placeaent of aachinery (co.pressor equip.ent) shall b.
away tro. residential areas to abate the_intensity at noise.
lI.- --'C-_C.-:;"-.;07'-_'C'~C;
-
_0.
-
..JJ
- - -
-
"
STANDARD RE~UIREMENTS
DRC/ERC
DATH
CASH
POLICE DEPT
CITY OF sAN BERNARDINO
-
- -
ADDITIONA~ REQUIREKENTS:
"'" f2...'\Z;Or~ L.:; r....
;.; P,~,h ,',~: J..~-d .
.
59.
\
'.
aTY OF SAIAtERNARDINO PUBL.o tVORKS/ENGlfl
CASE C'IlP ClO-~2
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-B-91
NOTE TO APP~ICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required.
the appl1cant 1S responsible for submitting the Engineering plans
directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior
to submittal of Building Plans.
Drainage and Flood Control
All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be
- subject to requirements of the City Engineer; which may be based
in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood
Control District. Tha developer's Engineer shall furnish all
necessary data relating to drainage and flood control.
A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any
drainage improvements. structures or storm drains needed to
mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be
desi gned and cons tructed at the developer's expense. and
right-of-way dedicated as necessary.
_ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance
Rate Maps; therefore. a Special Flood Hazard Area Permi t issued
by the City Engineer shall be required.
_ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance
Rate Maps; therefore. all building pads shall be raised above the
surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer.
_ Comprehensive storm. drain Project No. is master planned in
the viCinity of your development. Thl$ drain shall be designed
and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can
concl usively ~how that the drain is not nee~ed to protect your
development or mitigate downstream impacts.
60.
-z.. All dra i nage from the development
approved pUblic drainage facility.
drainage facilities and easements
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
.-L Drainage from the parking lot and hJ.ildings shall be taken to the fronting street
sha 11 be
If not
shall be
directed
feasible.
provided
to an
proper
to the
61.
-
iJERNARDINO PUSLi .wORKS/ENGIl
CASE aJP 90-32 -
: /.
/-
STANDARD .REOlIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-8-91
64..
Grading
62. X If more than l' of fi li or 2' of cut is proposed. the si te/p1 otl
grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil
Eng i neer and a gradhg permi t wi 11 be requ ired. The gradi ng plan
shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading
Policies and Procedures. and the City's "Standard Drawings.,
unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance.
63. X If more than 5,000 cubi ~ yards of earthwork is proposed, a gr'adi ng
bond wi 11 be requi red and the gradi ng shall be supervi sed in
accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code.
A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must
be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction
report shall be incorporated in the grading plan.
X An on-site IlIprovement Plan is required for this project. Where
feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan
and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the
Municipal Code (See wGrading Policies and Proceduresw). The
on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer.
65.
X A reci proca 1 easement sha 11 be recorded pri or to gradi ng plan
approval if reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, andlor parking is
proposed to cross lot 1i nes, or a lot 1 i ne adjustment sha 11 be
recorded to remove the interior lot lines.
X The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4
copies to the Engineering Division for checking.
X An on-site'.'Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and
approved by the C~ty Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with
the grading plan~ or on-site improvellent plan, if practical.
66.
67.
l
~RNAROINO PUBJ..2 tVCW~"'"
CASE
STANDARD AEQUREMENTS
. CITY OF SA
AGENDA ITEM 9
HEARING DATE 1-8-91
Ut;1ities:
68. ..-L.Des i gn and cons truct all pub 1 i c util i ti es to serve the si te in
accordance wi th C; ty Code, Ci ty Standards and requi rements of the
serving utility. including gas, electric, telephone. water, sewer
and cable TV.
Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer
----facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing
such services in the area.
Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be
-constructed at the Dnel oper' s expense. Sewer systems shall be
designe~ and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer
Policy and Procedures. and City Standard Drawings.
69. X Uti 1 i ty servi ces shall be pl aced underground and easements
-provided as required.
X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site
on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance
with Ordinance N'J. MC-50l (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65
(Non-subdivisions).
71. X Existing utilities which interfere witll new construction sllall be
-relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City
Engineer.
~-
Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be
-maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to
City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction
Permit. A private :ewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer
and approved by the :ity Engineer will be required. This plan can
~e incorporated in the grading plan, where practical.
72. X A .CoaIIIunica~ion Conduit" shall be installed in all streets within and
sdjacent to this project. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City
and its prillllry use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable
TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernardino.
\.
-":, '4 ~"_\_'.'_"-'._~"_
73.
DEANMoINO PU8l.i tVORKI/1NGlIl
CASE CUP 90-32 -
STANDARD REQUREMENTS ~e:~~~ l-a~91
'>
r
Street Improvement and Dedications:
~All public streets within and adjacent to ~he development shall be
improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving. handicap
ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including. but
not limHed to, t:-affic signals, traffic signal Illodification.
relocation of public or private facilities whicl1 ino:erfere with
new construction, striping, signing, pavement Illarking and markers.
and street name si gn ing. All desi gn and constructi on shall be
accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino .Street
Improvement Policy. and City .Standard Drawings.. unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting. when required.
sha 11 be des i gned and constructed in accordance wi th the City' s
.Street Lighting Policies and Procedures., Street lighting shall
be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise
approved by the City Engineer.
For the streets listed below. dedication of adequate street
right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline
to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation
to the street centerline sblll be IS follows:
Street Nl'llle
Rigbt-of-Way (Ft.)
Curb Line (Ft.)
"
All rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from
the following streets:
74. X Const=t sidewalk along ~lnut Street frontage per Std. 202, Case "A".
75. X Remove existing drive approaches 1ihich are not to be used by this project and
- re-construct full height curb, gutter ~ sidewalk .
76. .-!... Consttu::t street lights along ~ Street per city SI".>mrbords.
77, .-!... Construct new driveway approach per Std. No. 204, Type II with handicap by-pass.
l
~.~.'/;'.'
. CITY OF SA BERNARDINO
WORKI/ENQR.
CASE alP 90-32 -
STANDARD REClIREMENTS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
q
1-8-91
r
Required Engineering Permits:
78.
79.
80.
x
X
Gradhg pe"rmH (if appUcable).
On-site improvements construction permH (except bu;1dings - see
Building and Safety).
X
Off-site improveDents construction permit.
Appl i cabl e Engi neering Fees :iC(Subjeet to change without Notice)
Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map.
81. X Plan check and inspection fees for off-sfte iGlproye.ents.
.
82. X Plan check and inspection fees for on-si te iGlproYeGlen~s (excep~
buildings; see Building and Safety).
83. X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if perGlft requfred).
84.
85.
86.
t
Bridge improvement fee fn aGlount of S
.
X
Dra f nage fee. Exact aGlount of fee shall be deur.f ned by
Department of Building and Safety at tiGle of application for
building permit.
Landscape Plan Review Fee S 100.00 .
Traffic System Fee of S 12.92 per vehicle trfp for City-wide
traffic mitigation. The total aGlount of the Traffic System Fee
shall be determined by the Cfty Traffic Engineer at tiGle of
application for building perGlit.
x
X
Street Light Energy
period of 4 years.
recording.
A Landscape "afntenance Oistrfct shall be impleGlented to
maintain landscaping within the following areas:
Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a
Exact amount to be determined prior to map
a;"..
n~ tv;u." h~}.(:e 1
SAN BERNARDINO /) CASE
CITY
OF
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
HEARING DATE
REVIEWED BY
PlRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMEHTS
GE..~ER.~L il~Qt:lllEllE.~TSc
I] P1'ovice one extn set ,,1 c:anstrJctfon plans to SuildlnJ ana r "'~t: Cor FIN OeplIrtment use at time at plan: cbec:k.
I I j;dli..et Fire Deportment Cor ,pmfie or detailed requirem....u -IIIPOItTAIlT.
87 . ~'!'he cevelc;Mt :inaJl ;lrowide !Ot' acaquate Fire Flow ~ ~~PU1~ :ay me fIN PNventian Bureau. Fire Flow sIIIU be baed
'XI !qUare [ootare, ':onslruelion !..tures md exposure Intl}rmauon u ~ed by the developer !lid may be taken from two
lly_ts.
ACCESS<
88.
~
90.
91.
I I
[ I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
Provide t..o diCCe....t rout. of iJ!;resII_ to tile property ent........ TIle rout. sIlaIlbe pevecl, .u-...._.
P'!"OVide an ace... roadway to ".ch buil~r... tOt fire ..rat."$. Accea r'C*Iway shaU have an .n-w..ther driYinr surface
01 not less tl1an 20-1..t of unoDsUUctecl width. .
Extencl r_ey to willlin I5lH..t oC all portions oC tile exterior 'aIlI of aIlli"ll"'tory I>ui1dinp.
ExtOtld roedwey to willlin 511-C..t oC tile exterior walls oC all multipl_orr lluiIdIJIp.
Proride -No PARKUlC" .ips ..henever perlcinr oC vehioles would -""y __ the ole_ of e.... _e,. to lesa
then the requind wklth. Si........ to reed '"FIRE LANE - NO PARKINC" (All ~ ~.c. See. 15.1'".
Dead-end strnts shall not exceed 5aG-Ceet in leftl1h and shaD haM. lIIinimum ~s-taot radius tvmarouncL
The names of any new streets (pUDlic or pri.ate) shaD be IUDmittad to the Fire Department for approvaL
SITEa
[] ~&Ceess roads aad streets.... to De eonsuuctecland usable prior to I'~ C'OIIItruetlan.
I ~ P..lv.ta fire lIydrena _ l>e installed to prot... eech buiIdInC ~ted .... _ ISlH..t Crom tile c:wI> U- No fiN hydnnt
-.. Ilo witllia ~o-C..t oC MY exterior wall. The hydnna _ be Wet _ type, with _ 21_ _ _ ~ outIe..
_ _ed by the Fire ~m..t. FI... hydnna .... to be _eeted C_ _... by ~ ...._ ___
TIle ..... __ tile fiN hydnnt sIlaIl be _....ted u a -NO P AIKIIlC" _ by paietinr en 1-1_ wide, rod IU'Ipo for IW_
~ d1reeti... in front of the hydnnt in IIICII a m........ thot It ..m _ be _ed by perleed _.. SaI_ "110
.>.&KIllC" 51.... .... nrqulred.
I I'1lIIIle fi... /ly1lnIltI _ be ~_ ~ ......a at 30lH_ Ia_ for _--=ial _ multi. !JIndal _ .. at
50lH_ intelftil for _tlaI....... IMta1Iation sIlaIl ....f_ to City ...mcatlons .. be _ prior to _
c:onsuvctl... or s,-
BUILDINC.
I I TIle __ of tile ItrUCtIlI'e, in six Inch numerals, sIlaIl be _ ... the ~ or Ia 0_ _..od location in IIICII e
m......... .. to GO _ from the Cron.... street. TIle _ of tile --.s _ eonuut with _ of the ~
I J Identify eaellps _ _c meter with tile num_ oC the unit which it _
(I FI... exti~ moat Ilo i..taIled prior to tile IIuiIclinC !lei", ~ TIle minimum ratinr for MY fi... ~ Is
ZA 10 B/C. :IllnimUlll dlstrilluti... of fiN exti",,- mUlt Ilo _ thot no Iaterior pert of tile ~ fa _ 7W_ travel
distance Crom e fiN ext1II(uIsher.
1~.\11 iIcIlnp, ot_ then _tial over 5.000 oquere C.... _ be __ with III automatic fiN sprInJder syn_. .....1l"Ied
lfFP.~ il_
I' SuDmit plans Cor the fire proteetiOlllyltem to tile Fire [)epertm..t prior to IIeIinninr c:onstructlllll OIl the system.
~] Tenant improvements in ail.sprinlclererd bui1cIinp are to be .IIoprovecl by tile '1,.. Department prior to construed...
. J Provide an automatic fI,.. uarm CrequiNcI throupout).. Plan :nUlt be ~_.....d'" the Fire Department. prior to instaIIatian.
i' I Fi... Deportm..t """"eetion to (sprinkler SYStem/standpipe IyIteml_ be required at c:wI> U-
~
--=..--
-
NOTE: The applicant MUll request.. in writine. any dlanp in Lttese or other ,....;-....ts.
.
;=?9 17~ 7n9
o ~n a.mardino City W... o.P-o"'.t
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
..~
Review of Plans: # /""/ ~.r=' 4/:/.. ~
Location:'!!. Jr'~ ~~ ~~~"1'~-T-fsr
Type of Construction: ~ ..., I t::. ~'j': "'-
OwnerlOevelop~;- ~':( l ~'4
ENGINEERING: Name: ~J JJ~ !jU' ~""""'S. Date: skI I.JJ
92. jZ P.S.I. 1'Ip~~/,,--~ '-~.~~~~ :~~ C -,' ~:
= Size of Main Adjac ntto the Project (I \~ -".1?.i..l:D WI" ;;~ J.~=- &:>. JJ.tr-~fA,r+~
Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter.
Off-site Water Facilities Required to Meet Peak Row Demand.
93. .z :o.~~ents-~~All~':~ ~~.~ Q.~~:,.,.r ~i1:~ ~~~ ~{T~
Subject to the Rules & Regulations ofthe Water Department in effectat the time of Application for Water Service.
This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All FeesIConditions will be Determined by their
Engineering Department.
Date:
,.
Approved:
Denied:
Continued:
WATER QUAUTY CONTROL OEPARTPo'iENT: Name:~ Date: ~\~z.. ~
r .g, R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. ;19/$ , - C ~ ~ ~ ;
o Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Conrtrt:.tiorf.t'.s8-,:s~ .." ..~ _9 ~T ~
:: Air Gap Required at Service Connection. ;:~iS"~-~ lII.i:1~~'J1I2JJ#.-'~ ...
......."'-, -......~I~
C No BacJcflow Device Required. .
Date:~
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name:
95. ~lndustrial Waste Permit Required by Environmental Control Officer.
= Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer.
= Pre-treatment Required by Environmental Control Officet.
96. x.. No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed Without Prior Approval
= Approved by Environmental Control Officer.
SEWER CAPACITY INFORMAnON: Name: ~\G~""~..J
Date: ~\~~
.
97.
No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This TIme.
.& Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the City Water Department for the Amount of Gallons Per
Day. Equivalent Dwelling Units:
Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit.
Ji:.. Proof of Payment Mustbe Submitted to the Building & Safety Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit.
98.
Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day:
WATII-3.CM
':"ft......__
~.............ca.
d:' .J.tot
.-.----.-.-..- ....
,;y OF SAN BEHNAO INO
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
..
Applicant(.)
Adclre..\
ei ty, state
Zip
.
lase:
ISP1U:PARA'nOH
kej9-1-19
Initial Study tor EDYiromaent:a1. Impacts
For t.ol'UlmColAl. I.I!oE F~- '",. ~ ~o-~~
Project lIlmbu
Project 4..criptioD/Loc:ation"To ~ A "~qL
-- 'llrl...1.Jt:r vM/1:J ,..,w q.~ ~ L..Oe4'TCt'\ ~ ~ ~~'N
C:t"~ ~ \AJA1..h.\.\lT :!JrO~ ~'M""I '" ^~ .:~r
~ o~ M~oTr 9fQ-~ .
Date A\l~T I~J ,'tqo
Prepared tor:
MQ. ~ ~~ lIl..lftI . """&
\&.&:~< \JJ~T t2\M..T'D ""edllf!
-~"N!5l~ND t'"Ar ~"2.~'n
J
.'.
"
Prepared by;
"",e\ol-Aof=:L Q... ~~
....
~A OC\Pr'T"E: ~Art-\MeIL
Title
Ci'ty of San BerllUdino
P1anninq Departllent
300 H. -0- Street
San Bernam1no, Q 92411
.-. .
'.
7. IMn U,' HuardC WIIlhe projecI:
L u.......- . rtor.H. ~ IlIMDn1auaor
.. __ (including bullll1llimi1ed lD lIiI.
11 ,.. c:n........ or radIaIian)1
b. InvIIM IIIe N.... aI huanlaus-...-1
c:. ExpaIe peapIe lD IIIe palemia1 h..nlllAl.., hcarda1
d. OIlIer?
L Hoc..r.. WIIlh.",,~P~ .1-
L ~ ui8ling Ilauaing or =- a delMllll
far -*IiIianlIlIDIUIg1
b. OIlIer?
,
L Tnn.p I ....., I Clrculetlon: Could lhe pnlIlOIIINIUI in:
L All ..a... in nlflC IMlIs ~ lhM lhe IMd
_ deIigMled on lh. G<<I.,. ~1
b. U.1lI.a.dng, or demMd for.... P8ddrv
~1
c:. 1nIJ*I.... aIslIng public .- If t.A..1.,-1
d. NIl.. . .a1praMlpdemsal=' .' 17
L InIJ*IIlI ... or _lrdla?
l .1Cl1I t..., haDnIs lD whir:lee, bio, . " or
pi ~ Q.._? .
g. A Jh; . 4Wi ~ at ...-dw., ~.............?
h. SO...... inc:re.- in trdlc ~ on Ihe ...-dlllayS
or... ~~..7
L OIlIer?
10. Public S.u': WlIIhe ""'~: ., impectlhe 1aII~lIIil!l
-,and Ihe . "..~, lD pnMde 'V- levelS aI uMce7
L . FiN ""........,
b. PoIiae ""o~11
c:. s.J . (L.~"'-'-' tllIunAriM. ovwIlIed. --1'
d. P.a,.aIher~ ,....,
L ........,
l SaId Wde1
g. OIlIer?
..,~.. ......
o.
v..
No
"X
'J(
X
~
Maybe
x
x.
X
x
x
X
'l(
X
-,(
x.
~
"X.
x.
x.
')(
)(
)(
X
X
~ ....30'. C...
-..-
-
2. A1rA -
WIIthe ...1) ) ..1 raullln:
L ~ air .., 0, ,0 IS 01'" .e.s upon MlbienI
air qudIy?
b. l1Ie ___n aI abjecliDNble odars7
c:. D~11apmenl within. hig/l wind hazanI_7
:L \YaW ~ WID lha pnlIlaUI raullln:
L CMQ 1111 in ~~ ,Alon r-. dIUIalle pall...... 01 the
.. n anDlIII allUIf_1UlllIlI due III
ilnpMnllllM ..m-7
b: Changes in the CDIIIU 01 flaw allIlIlId _7
c:. DiscIlaIga inllllUlf_ __ 01 ." daraIian
allUIfEe _r qualiIy7
do Changa in the quanlily.af quality af gmund -.r?
.. ~Ira 01 paapla 01 JlftII*IY ID Iload hazanls7
l 0Ihar7
4. lIIoIollJcal.........c Could the ... llll . raull in:
L Change in the numbar 01 ." unlqua. raN 01
...-.;... III I: 0, , af pIantI OIl11air hIIIIiIaI incIulIng
..... af u.s7
b. Change in the numbar af ." uniqua, raN 01
_.Illarad III I:i II af animaIa OIl11air habiIaI7
c:. AamovaI 01 viable. man u.s7 (I" 0Igr.-r)
do 0lIw7
So Not.: Could the ...WjlOM raull in:
L ._ Uft in aisling noiM ...,..7
b. &. .... 01 paapIe III ~ noiM ...... over
15 cIS 01 intariar noiM I..,.. over G cI87
c:. 0Ihar7
50 LInd 11M: WIIthe .....~ .. raull in:
L A changa in lhaland use _ d..o~, 11M an the
General Plan7
b. D_lapmanl within an AiIparI Ditlricl'1
c:. o.v.Iapmanl wilhin 'Gt_lber Zana A. B. or C7
do Denlapmanl within . high finI hazanlZDM7
.. 0Ihar7
1
o
v_
)Co
.
No
Maybe
x
x
x
)C.
x
'X
X
><-
x
x.
X
"
.
)(
x
X
x
)(
'}t.
'X
X
lII\.NMa "I'1GI20'a (50
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
.,
ENVIROMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. 'BACKGROUND
~~~':~'iQnNumber: CONb\I'C~~ \.,~'";>eR,^1\ qt':)-~2..
PrajectDacriplian: It:> t=_'"-T"A-;l.L\s:.~ It v'e~\c.L:e REe'iO-It.\G-"~ ~
q.s- ArQec., ur-lD~Q ~~ Au,",,"~QI"T"J ~-F M\A,!Jlc'\PAl.. c.o\:>e
ne:::nCN \~.g~. ~oo.
Lacatian: t"')N ~y Sl")\A~ Blbe O~ ,^rAL~ur St'Re.=..r
A~XI~L..i .~R(') ~G'- ~\ C':>F M.USc.~ s~~-r
EnvirllnmenwlConslrailllSArea: A-L.DU\Si"-~lr\I '""J ~oTENI\4L &l~~~
~\60-14 ~O\AJJ!) wA>reQ.
Gene" PlM Duignalian: ,1-\ J t N t:ll.l~ TQ \ AL ~ '/
Zoning DuigMlian: \ l..\- I \ 1,.11::>,,~Sl "T"R\A<- \~'1
.. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Exp.in ..._ where ~... an a uparale aIIIIChad ahML
1. ElIrth Ra-. WillIle prapoaaI rauI in: V.. No Maybe
L EMIl _am (CUI MdIor fiI) a/l0,OOO cubic
yanla or rnarw?
b. Oavalapm'" MdIor gmding an a slope llra-
lhan l~naIu"lIrMe? ,1.5". TO I.S'"1.
C. Da:elapmanl within lIle A1quial.priaID Spacial
SludiasZana?
d. Modifalicln al any unique llaolagic or p/IyIw'
featwe?
e. Soil _sian on or off the pIlljact _1
f. Modlication ala channel, crHk or.nv.r?
II. Oavalopme.. within ~ .,.uulljecllO IInd."dw,
muds.... Iiquefaclion or oIhar aim_ hazlnla1
h. Other? "be"li~OP""'E.rr- W\T'h~ "'" A-'~
of l"O~loIT\"l... ~u65Ite~& "'MD
~I~ GflO\ltoLl) .....T'li~.
~1: ~
PUH-UI PIGi 1 OF' (5-101
o
.
v..
No
Maybe
c:. DaeI" plajIc:l haw impKlI wlli:Il... indIvidualy
ImIIId, buI _....,.1Wy Clllllidnv'-? (A plajIc:l may
impecl an two or __ ..'- _ wh.....
impecl an" __ iI -......,.;y IIIIalI, bill wheN
.. ..,.. GI..... GIlhaM impels on lhe
IIWinln/IlInt illigniIicenL)
d. Daellhe prajecl haw -mnrnens.l eII_ which wi.
_ ........ .... eII_ on hUIIlM beingl,
.iIher direc:lly or indiNclly?
)(
x
C. IlIICUSSlON 01' ENYIRClI""Em'AL EVALUATION AND wnGATION MVSURES
(AbclllIlMlIa n--'Y.)
SEG: A 'tTAc.H-~ b.
\
"
::.~~
H
PUIM.OI ._ 5OF' (5
o
.,
11. UtIllllM: WI. the prllpOA/:
L ImpC the IaI~lIJing beyond the ~ III
pnwide ~e levels 01 HIVice or require the
lllIIlItrUc:tia 01 new f.:illlies?
1. NlII1nl ga?
. 2. e...1>Uf?
. 3. W8!er?
4. S_r?
5. Other?
b. Ae8u1 in a diIjointed pallem 01 uliIiIy ftlensillns?
c. Requn the collllrUClion of new fdIieI?
v..
12. Melfletlce:
L Could the pIIlpoaal r..ul in the abslIuclion 01 any
scenic view?
b. Wllthe visual inpacl of the p1Vject be delrlmeral
III the sUmlunding _?
c. Other?
13. CUlllnt Re_: Could the prapr" reeul in:
L The alleratian or deslrUCliln 01 a prehistoric or
hiItoric ~icaI site?
b. AdYWM physical or MStIlelic inpacla ilia
Jnhiatoric or hillDric site, structure or object?
c. Other?
No
x
X
)(
X
X
)(
)(.
x
x.
X
x
x
X
Maybe
14. MlncIU:Iry Flndlnp of Slgn~ (Section 15065)
The California Envinll""entaI Ouaity lid slIIes th8! if any of :he fallowing can be AI""'" yes or maybe.
the p1Vject may h_ a signlicant effect on the environme.. and an Environmemallmpact Report shall be
pNpared.
v_
L eo.. the pIaject "- the potenIiaIlll degrade the
quIity of the environm.... IUbIlanllaIIy ~ the
habitat 01 a 11M or wildlife Ifll : .'1. _ a fiIh or
wildlIa plIIIlAIion 10 drap below ... --.g IeveII.
thfHIen III eliminu . plant or animal community,
reduce the number or rulrict the range 01. ,.,. or
andanQared plant or animal or elinrinlla imporIanI
ax..,pIee of the major periods of California hiItary
or prahillory?
b. Does tha pIIlject haw the palanliallll achiaft short-
tann. III tha diladvanWga 0I1ong-tann. .mar.m.....
goals? (A shorl-tann inpct on the anvinlhmant is ona
which ocan in . rala1ivwly briaf, cIaflniliw pIriod
of lima whla long-term inpcts wi. endure ... inIo
the futura.)
IIUIM.CII "Mii" OF f (MG)
CII'r ." _ ....-,
- -
No
x;
x
Maybe
o
o
conditional Use perait Mo. 90-32
August 13, 1990
c. DISCUSS 10M OF INVIROMKBNTAL EVALUATION .lHD
KlASURBS (continued).
MITIGATIOM
1.a" and 1.e.
Developaent of the property vill result in a1nor grading.
Potential iapacts resulting froa project grading v1ll include
iapacts on the coaaun1ty (dust, noise, etc.) and 1apacts on the
physical environaent (erosion, drainage, etc.). Bngineering
Departaent Standard Requ1reaents and Conditions of Approval
concern1ng project co.pliance vith Section 7012 (c) of the
Un1fora Bu1lding Code vill reduce these potential iapacts to a
level of non-significance.
l.c.
The proposal vill result in developaent vithin an Alqu1.t-priolo
special study area. A geologic and seisaic study vas conducted
for the site by Terra Geotechnical, and vas reviev by the city
Geologist, Dr. Floyd Williaas.
Faulting and Methods of Investigation
The San Jacinto Fault Zone passes through the southvest portion
of the site. Methods for fault investigation included aerial
photography, field reconnaissance and trenching in the area of
proposed structures.
Results
Mo faulting vas observed at the subject area vithin the liaits of
the trenching. Based upon previous geologic vork in the area and
aerial photo exaaination, it appears that the closest distance to
the San Jacinto Fault is plus or alnus 300 feet to the southvest
of the proposed structures.
Potential Iapacts to Developaent
Because the study revealed that no faulting vas observed vithin
the. area of the proposed structures the possibility ground
rupture resulting froa an earthquake is considered love Rovever,
several other potential secondary selsaic hazards do exist at the
site. These potential hazards include:
1. Llauefac~lon - The site historically has had a ground vater
depth shallover than 30 feet. Given the fine grained loose
sediaents present in the soils at the site, there is a
aoderate-aoderately h1gh potential for liquefaction at the
site; and,
o
0,
mxtension of Time)
Condltlonal Use Peralt Ro. 90-32
Auqust 13, 1990
C. DISCUSSIOH or IHVIROHKlHTAL IVALUATIOH AND
KElSURBS (contlnued).
l.c. (contlnued)
MITIGATIOH
2. Selsalcallv Tnduced Se~~leaen~ - Settleaent qenerally occurs
wlthln areas of loose unsaturated granular solls wlth
relatlvely low denslty. Slnce unconsolldated sedlaents were
found to be present at the slte, selsalc settleaent Is a
potentlal hazard.
Mltlgatlons
The followlng altlgatlons apply to the proposal to reduce
potentlal selsalc hazards:
1. Slnce no evldence of faultlng was observed wlthln the llalts
of the trenchlng, no restrlcted bulldlng use setback Is
warrented where the proposed bulldlng Is to be located;
2. A potentlal for settleaent of the fault trench backflll
exlsts at the slte and shall be altlgated durlng rough
gradlng by reaoval and recoapactlon, or coapatlon In place
If appllcable;
3. Moderate-severe ground shaklng levels can be antlclpated
durlng the llfe of the structure. The selsalc acceleratlons
dlscussed In the text of the geologlc report shall be
Incorporated lnto the structural deslgn of the bulldlng ln
addltlon to coaplylng wlth the selsalc code provlslon for
the Clty of San Bernardlno and the latest edltlon of the
Unlfora BU11dlng Code;
4. If any other areas at the slte are proposed to be bullt on
In the future, approprlate lnvestlgatlon shall be perforaed
to evaluate the potentlal for faultlng.
5. A copy of the geologlc and selsalc lnvestlgatlon of the slte
conducted by Terra Geotechnlcal shall be aade aval1able to
property owners and tenants of the proposed project, present
and future, In an effort to aake thea aware of the potentlal
selsalc rlsks assoclated wlth the slte.
6. Should any condltlons be encountered durlng development that
appear In any way to be dlfferent froa those descrlbed In
the geologlc and selsalc report coapleted by Terra
Geotechnlcal, a quallfled geologlst shall be notlfled
concernlng approprlate recoaaendatlons and altlgatlons.
.
o
o
conditional Use Perait No. 90-32
Auqust 13, 1990
C. DISCUSSION or IHVIROHHlNTAL IVALUATION AND MITIGATION
HBlSURSS (contlnued).
1.g.
Although the slte is not located within an area identified by the
General Plan as havinq a potential for liquefaction, the geoloqlc
and selsalc study conducted for the site by Terra Geotechnical
has indicated a aoderate-aoderately high potential for
liquefaction at site. Bngineering standard Requinaents
concerning project coapliance with MC-676 will ensure potential
lapacts are reduced to a level of non-significance.
Lh.
The project site lies within an area of potential ground
subsidence and high ground water. A soils report shall be
prepared and subaitted to both the Building and Safety Departaent
and the Bngineering Depart.ent. The project shall coaply wlth
all recoaaendatlons concerning foundatlon deslgn contalned ln the
solls study and subject to the approval of the Buildlng and
Safety and Bnglneerlng Depart.ents to rsduce potentlal 1.pacts to
a level of non-Significance.
2.a, ,3.c., 7.a.
\
The project ..y lnvolve the storage/disposal of hazardous
aaterials or waste, Includinq 011. storage/dlsposal of hazardous
aaterials, waste, or oil .ust coaply wlth the requlre.ents of
the Unifor. Fire Code and County Environ.ental- Health Services
requlations regardlng alr)uallty control, soil and qround
water protection, and fire prevention. Potential iapacts will ~e
insiqnificant.
3.a
Develop.ent of the ~ite could result in increased surface runoff
due .to a reductlon in the aaount of peraeable topsoil.
Bnqineerlnq Depart..~t Standard Requireaents and Conditions of
Approval concerning conveyance of drainage runoff to an approved
public drainage facility will reduce potential i.pacts to a
level of insiqnificance.
9.a.
The proposal has been reviewed by the
has deter.ined that the additional
project are not suffIcient to cause a
existing adjacent street systea.
Clty Trafflc Bnqlneer who
trips froa the proposed
slgnificant iapact on the
o
"'l
.
D.. DETERMlNA110N
On ... buia GI ...., atudy,
o 11le... ): I d praject COULD NOT "- . signillcan! aIlacI on lhe ~.. and . NEGATIVE DECLARA-
TION ..be praparad.
lIV'I' 11le fJ' Ip 11.:1 praject CDuld "-. ~ alIC1 on'" emrinInment, "hough th_ wiI nat be . lignilicanl
161 alIC1 in un. cue bll.'.... ... miliglllon _ dlllrill.d abave "- bean IIddad 111 thl projacl. A
. NEGATIVE DECLARATION wiI be pi....
o 11le pi ~p 11.:1 praject MAY h_ .lignilll:anl aIlacI on IhI anvin:lllmllll, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is raquilld. . .
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CrTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
.:::r::w ;f~#~ 4~~ A.. u<<
Nama and TIIII
s~(~
tT-)oJ - r,
DII8:
~,...
..,j
~ .__~_ IMlll
,
o
o
MY~tft..to. ."O..t.dJNONt~RINR p~a.
for the
eoftdl~loft.l u.. P.r.l~ _06 'O-~2
Mt~ICl.~.d N.~..tlv. DAelar.~lftn..
tIft'RODUe!'tOIl
.
In co.pliance with Public Resource Code Section 21081.6 (enacted
by passage of AB3l80 (Cortise)), pUblic agencies approving
projects which ..y cause significant environ.enta1 i.pacts aust
aonitor the aitigation of those iapacts. This Mitigation
Reporting/Monitoring Plan, prepared for Buddy Long, ensures
iaple.entation of the aitigation .easures adopted by the Planning
Co..ission in approving the project and the Mitigated .egative
Declaration.
Ml~laa~lftft M..ADrA~ and ..ftftr~tft9/Mftnl~ftrlfta a~~lvl~t~~
Prior to beginning construction, the applicant shall furnish the
City Planning Depart.ent with a checklist chart to use in
tracking the aitigation aonitoring and reporting activities. tbe
chart shall list each aitigation aeasure, aonitoring or reporting
action and be ruled into coluans that are designed to record
responsible agency, dates of coapletion, inspector or other
certifying person and the person recording the inforaation.
aartb Resources Mitigation Measures
l.c.
1. Since no evidence of faulting was observed within the liaits
of the trenching, no restricted building use setback is
warrented where the proposed building is.to be located;
2. A potential for settleaent of the fault trench backfill
exists at the site and shall be aitigated during rough
grading by reaoval and recoapaction, or coapation in place
lf appllcable;
3. ~oderate-severe ground shaking levels can be anticipated
during the life of the structure. The seisaic accelerations
discussed in the text of the geologic report shall be
incorporated into the structural design of the building in
addition to coaplying with the selsalc code provision for
the City of San Bernardino and the latest edition of the
Unifor. Building Code;
4. If any other areas at the site are proposed to be built on
in the future, appropriate investigation shall be perfor.ed
to evaluate the potential for faulting.
5. A copy of the geologic and seisaic investigation of the slte
conducted by Terra Geotechnical shall be ..de available to
property owners and tenants of the proposed project, present
~;;:;;,.:;:;",-,,:.-",,,..._-
.
o
o
and futu~e, In an effo~t to aake thea ava~e of the potentlal
selsalc ~lsks assoclated vlth_the slte.
6. Should any condltlons be encounte~ed du~lng developaent that
appea~ in any way to be diffe~ent f~oa those descrlbed In
the geologlc and selsaic report coapleted by Terra
.Geotechnlcal, a qualified geologist shall be notified
concernlng appropriate reco..endatlons and aitlgations.
Barth Resources Reporting/Monitoring Action
i.c.
1. lny changes In the proposed location of the office building
vll1 be restrlcted to the area wlthln the lialts of the
trenching by Terra. Geotechnical in the course of the Geologic
study of the slte. Proposed changes vll1 be revieved by the
Planning Departaent under the Mlnor Modification application
process and co.pllance verlfled at that ti... Coples
approved changes shall be placed In the project file In tbe
Planning Departaent.
2. Reaoval, recoapaction/coapaction in place shall be docuaented
by the contracter at the ti.. of gradlng. Coples of the
docuaentation shall be subaltted to the Planning Departaent.
The Plannlng Departaent wll1 place the coples of the
docuaentation In the project file located in the P1annlng
Departaent.
3. The selsalc accelerations dlscussed In the text of the
geologlc report shall be Incorporated Int~ the structural
deslgn of the bul1dlng. Verificatlon of thls and co.pliance
vlth the selsalc code provlslon for the Clty of San
Bernardlno and the latest editIon of the Unlfora BuIlding
Code vlll be accoapllshed by building and safety during plan
check by Planning and Building Services. The building per.it
vlll serve as docuaentation of co.pllance. Coples of
building peraits are kept on file In the PlannIng and
Buildlng Servlces Departaent.
4. Additional buildings or expanslon of the site vi11 require
the filing of another Conditional Use Per.it. The additions
and expansions would be subject to the prOVisions of the
californla Environaental Quality Act and appropriate
Investigations vould be perfor.ed at th~t tiae to evaluate
the potential for faultlng.
5. 1 copy of the geologIc and seis.ic investIgation of the site
conducted by Terra Geotechnical shall be ..de available to
property ovners and tenants of the proposed project, present
and future, In an effort to aake thea avare of the potential
seis.ic rIsks associated vith the site. 1 disclosure
state.ent verifying that a copy of the Investigation has
.
o
o
been rece1ved, aust be s1gned by potent1al property owners
and/or tenants at least thlrty days prlor to thelr custody
and/or occupancy of the slte.- Copies of tbe slgned
dlsclosure shall be subaitted to tbe Planning Departaent
and viii be placed in tbe project file.
6. -Sbould any conditions be encountered during developaent tbat
appear in any way to be different froa tbose described in
tbe geologlc and seis.ic report coapleted by Terra
Geotecbnlcal, a qualified geologlst sball be notifled
concerning approprlate reco..endatlons and aitlgatlons.
The Plannlng Depart.ent and Clty Geologlst shall be notlfled
and tbe flle docuaented. Coples of any suppleaental Geologlc
Studles generated as a consequence sball be revieved by tbe
City Geologist coples placed 1n tbe project file ln tbe
Planning Departaent.
Concluslon
Tbis Mitigatlon Monitoring/Reporting progra. sball be retalned by
tbe City 1n tbe Planning Depart.ent project file for Condltlonal
Use Peralt No. 90-32. As Varlous altlgatlon .easures are fally
i.ple.ented, tbeir co.pletion sbould be docuaented by appropriate
notatlon on tbe cbeckllst prOVided speclflcally for thls pro'ect.
When all .easures have been conflraed as coapleted on the
cbeckllst, tbis Reporting/"onlto~lng Plan is coaplete.
\
,
-'. '~. \ 1
, ,
I
.
,
I
L
...---_._......... -.;I.
" . 0
.ftfl-ll~ 1ft
'" ''I jij ~.
,.....I..~9i J
'iI . jJ I!I'. .
.! . ....", ~'! ~D~: ~:
' "~II[~ r.1 !dg I i
i Slitflii iYii. U
. . ---.
. ..
fl. .€lnt, II I~
~ril~f' ':!fo
. '~,"~' -I, imt'd
~ . l!f
. ";':[1;1'1
! . , '1)1 iJ" m.
'. L~r~ " ~, ir~
?c '.i~ile ~,lIfl
1'-, :ilr.: 0' mi,dl
I..' liS f...1 ID
...... -
.. .-
- . .
i.: :
= ~:.
~=- .'
: ~~; .1. ".;
,." . .;..~
t .....,ftf --
. 1t~~~f.' B :1
-~ )i lilt.
not. . ,.,1'. ::J
....~ o.
. J,":~: ~ :
. ...... ,
~lriJ~. ll.
.;......~ "
. ~~"
'!:" J.
o
'-:;: 1
.~; iJ~
'.
jl 11 } .
n~J9 :."
~,!II! ~ .
fr-JJ: ~. .
!hoa . : L.Ji . '_::
. .,.,.~ .~
---~~-
..
" . !III1 ._..
. .
.
. .... :". ~-_.
.
,
I,
I
'i. B
..
g ~ J
U ;i ,
. . .
.
I
.
!I-
I!
i-:
",
Jl ..
n
-.
.
.
.
.
J1rJI-nlll '
,.l'f!!d) ~
iil;~iii '1
rl'II'; ;
. ... I J h .~
f m if H .,
-
<\1;l:aQmen1;"C1"
o
r' AGENDA ~
ITEM .
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE ClJP 90-1'
LOCATION
9
\
H~ING DATE
l_A_Q1
I"
If
-
=r'- j
..........., ...., OF.t t....
JIl
CITY OF SAN BEROARDINO - REQUES~OR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Al Boughey, Director
De~: Planning and Building Services
Su~~: Development Code Amendment No.
92-04
Date:
May 27, 1992
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
June 15. 1992
Synopsis of Previous Council ~ion:
On February 3, 1992, the Mayor and Common Council directed staff
to prepare a Development Code Amendment to permit certain City-
sponsored uses and activities in the downtown area through a
Temporary Use Permit.
Recommended motion:
That the hearing be closed and that further reading of the ordinance be
waived, and the ordinance be laid ver for final passage; or
That Development Code Amendment No. 92-04 be denied.
Al
Supporting date IIttached:
Al Boughey
Staff Report
Phone:
384-5357
Contact person:
Ward:
Ward 1
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.1
IAcct. DescriDtionl
Finance:
Council Notas:
Anpnrb. Itpm Nn J.j 5
CITY OF SAN BERNORDINO - REQUEST lOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
.
Subject: Develepment Cede Amendment No.. 92-04
Mayer and Cemmen Ceuncil Meeting
June 15, 1992
REOUEST
The request is fer an amendment to. Develepment Cede Sectiens
19.70.020 and 19.70.050(1), to. establish criteria to. allew certain
City-spensered uses and activities in the Dewntewn area subject to.
the issuance ef a Temperary Use Permit.
BACKGROUND
Sectien 19.70.050(1) ef the Develepment Cede permits, with the
issuance ef a Temperary Use Permit, certain shert-term uses and
activities net eccupying a structure fer a fixed peried ef time,
net to. exceed 90 days. Develepment Cede Sectien 19.06.020, Table
06.01, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS LIST OF PERMITTED USES,
allews certain miscellaneeus nen-temperary eutdeer uses in
cemmercial land use districts threugh the appreval ef a Cenditienal
Use Permit.
Main Street Inc. is endeavering to. establish a farmers market en a
ence-per-week basis in the dewntewn area. A' use fJf this type,
extending fer a peried beyend 90 days, altheugh -temperary in the
sense that it eccurs fer a few heurs ence. da week, is still
censidered a permanent eutdeer use under the Develepment Cede.
These peints were breught to. the attentio.n ef the Mayer and Cemmen
Ceuncil at their meeting ef February 3, 1992. As a result, the
Mayer and Cemmen Ceuncil directed staff to. prepare a Develepment
Cede Amendment to. allew such City-spensered uses and activities
subject to. the issuance ef a Temperary Use Permit.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOAl STATUS
Miner temperary uses ef land having negligible er no. permanent
effects en the envirenment are categerically exempt frem CEQA
pursuant to. Sectien 15304 ef the CEQA guidelines. This erdinance
addresses Temperary Use Permit standards fer enly miner City-
spensered temperary uses and activities in the dewntewn area.
ANALYSIS
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The prepesed amendment is censistent with the General Plan, in that
it will allew the city to. spenser uses and activities in the
dewnto.wn area to. further implement and meet the Geals and
Objectives o.f the General Plan.
75.0264
o
o
Development Code Amendment No. 92-04
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
June 15, 1992
Page 2
.
General Plan Goal 1A states that a goal of the City is to provide
for the continuation and development of commercial, educational,
cultural, recreational, and social needs of the existing residents
and population growth. The amendment establishes a means by which
the City can sponsor periodic events such as Main Street's Farmers
Market, art exhibits, crafts shows, and other similar events in the
downtown area in support of Goal lA.
The amendment is also consistent with the General Plan Policies
applicable to the CR-2, Commercial Regional General Plan land use
designation, in that it will assist those goals in meeting General
Plan Objective 1.16 in enhancing the downtown area as the
functional and sYmbolic center of the City. The ordinance will do
this by allowing the City to sponsor commercial, recreational,
educational, and social activities designed to draw people to the
downtown area improving its viability and vitality.
ESTABLISHMENT OF A HIGH ACTIVITY ZONE IN THE DOWNTOWN
The Economic Development Agency, at the direction of the Mayor and
Council, has contracted with Project for Public Spaces (PPS) to
develop a Downtown Urban Plan for San Bernardino for the block
between "E" and "D" Streets, and 4th and 5th Streets. The plan is
to include the establishment of a high activity zone which will
encourage outdoor pedestrian oriented activities with an emphasis
on arts, entertainment, dining, and unique retail uses. The plan
and its high activity zone is intended to implement the General
Plan Policies and Goals as discussed above.
This ordinance will complement the PPS Downtown Urban Plan. It
will create a means by which the City can sponsor the types of
activities encouraged before the PPS plan is completed. This
ordinance will also allow such City-sponsored uses to be
established over a broader area of the downtown than the PPS Plan
area.
AMENDMENT
The amendment adds City-sponsored temporary uses and activities,
not occupying a structure and occurring at reqular periodic
intervals (weekly, monthly, yearly, etc.) to the list of permitted
uses under Section 19.70.020 of the Development Code. The
amendment also adds an exclusionary statement to Section
19.70.050(1) for City-sponsored uses or activities, exempting them
from the time limitations established by that section for temporary
uses.
o
o
Development Code Amendment No. 92-04
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
June 15, 1992
Page 3
The ordinance will establish the means for the City to sponsor
temporary periodic events not occupying structures, such as the
Farmer's Market, designed to bring additional business to the
downtown area improving its vitality, for periods of time longer
than 90 days.
PLANNING COMMISSION
On May 5, 1992, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed
ordinance and recommended that the Mayor and Common Council approve
Development Code Amendment No. 92-04.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL OPTIONS
The Mayor and Common Council may approve Development Code Amendment
No. 92-04 as proposed by staff; or
The Mayor and Common Council may deny Development Code Amendment
No. 92-04.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Mayor and Common council adopt the
ordinance which amends Sections 19.70.020 and 19.70.050(1) of the
Development Code based on the Findings of Fact (Attachment "A" of
the Planning Commission Staff Report).
Prepared by:
Michael R. Finn, Associate Planner
for Al Boughey, Director
Planning and Building Services
Exhibits: I. Planning Commission Staff Report
A. Findings of Fact
B. Proposed wording for Section 19.70.020 and
proposed wording for Section 19.70.050(1)
II. Ordinance
o
o
City of San Bernardino
STATEMENT OF- OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
PROJECT
Number:
Development Code Amendment No. 92-04
Applicant:
city of San Bernardino
Owner:
Various
ACTION
Meeting Date: May 5, 1992
X Recommended approval of text change (attachment B)
based upon findings. of fact
(attachment A) as contained in .staff's report
dated May 5, 1992. This item will be scheduled on
the Mayor and Council agenda for final action.
YQ:n
Ayes:
Clemensen, Jordan, Lopez, Ortega, Romero, Stone,
Traver, Valles
None
None
Cole
Nays:
Abstain:
Absent:
I, hereby, certify that this statement of
accurately reflects the final determination
Commission of the city of San Bernardino.
?~.12
\
Official Action
of the Planning
Al Boughey,
ector of Planning and Building Services
cc: Case File
PCACTIONDCA9204
Exhibit I
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
WARD
8
5-5-92
Downtrlwn Area
" ",.-. ,- r APPUCANT: City of San Bernardino
W DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
en NO. 92-04 Various
C OWNER:
()
\.
.--..
t- An amendment to Development Code Chapter 19.70, ~o establish
ffi criteria for certain City sponsored uses/activities in the
:::I downtown area through a Temporary Use Permit.
(3
W
II:
-
C
W
II:
C
"-/
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
PROPI=RiV L AND USE 7QNING DESIGNATION
Downtown Mixed CR-l, CR-2, CG-l, CR-l, CR-2, CG-l,
CO-l, RM and PF CO-l, RM and PF
"'
( GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC DYES ) R..OOO HAZARD 0 YES 0 ZONE A ( SEWERS: DYES )
HAZARD ZONE: o NO ZCNE: o NO OZONE B o NO
( HIGH FIRE 0 YES )( AIRPORT NOISE! 0 YES )C REDEVELOPMENT eYES
HAZARD ZONE: 0 CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA:
NO 0 NO :J NO
,-
..I o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z e: APPROVAL
c APPUCABLE EFFECTS WITH 0
MmGAllNG MEASURES -
~en NO E.I.R ~ 0 CONDITIONS
WO u.Q
:2Z agKEXEMPT o E.I.R REQUIRED BUT NO ~ffi 0 DENIAL
Z- Section 15304 SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
OQ WITH MllGATlNG ~I
II:~ MEASURES 0 CONTINUANCE TO
-u. 0
> o NO SIGNIFICANT o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS
Z fd
W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.RC.
MINUTES II:
\. '--'"
....- ""
~...~
PUlN-U2 'lOGE' OF , I....
CITY OF SAf4).JERNARDINO -OAEMORANDUM
To
Planning Commission
Development Code Amendment No. 92-0~
. From
Subject
Date
A1Boughey, Director
Planning & Building SV
April 24, 1992
Approved
Date May 5, 1992
REOUEST
The request is for an amendment to Development Code Chapter 19.70
to establish criteria for City-sponsored uses/activities in the
downtown area through a Temporary Use Permit.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOAI STATUS
Pursuant to Section 15304 of the CEQA quidelines, minor temporary
uses of land having negligible or no permanent effects on the
environment are categorically exempt from CEQA. This proposed
ordinance addresses Temporary Use Permit standards for only minor
City-sponsored temporary uses and activities of this type in the
downtown area.
BACKGROUND
Development Code section 19.70.050(1) permits certain short-term
activities not occupying a structure under a Temporary Use Permit
for a fixed period of time not to exceed 90 days. Development Code
Section 19.06.020, Table 06.01, COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL DISTRICTS
LIST OF PERMITTED USES, permits certain miscellaneous non-temporary
outdoor uses in commercial land use designations through a
Conditional Use Permit.
Main Street Inc. is pursuing the establishment of a farmers market
on a once-per-week basis in the downtown area. A use of this type
running for a period longer than 90 days, although temporary in the
sense that it occurs for a short period of time once a week, is
still considered a non-temporary outdoor use under the Development
Code.
These points were brought to the attention of the Mayor and Common
Council at their meeting of February 3, 1992. As a result, the
Mayor and Common Council has directed staff to prepare a
Development Code Amendment to allow such City-sponsored uses in the
downtown area under a Temporary Use Permit.
;;~l'.'"'~ ,.
~ . .i.I_ .,
4~~' .,: ....?.~'v.,,~=~.:
~:;:Z~'.' ~---
~-;:WP7"
o 0
Development Code Amendment No. 92-04
Planning commission Meeting
May 5, J.992
Page 2
ANALYSIS
GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY
The Development Code Amendment is consistent with the General Plan
in that it will enable the City to sponsor activities in the
downtown area to further implement and meet the Goals and
Objectives of the General Plan.
General Plan Goal 1A states that a goal of the City is to provide
for the continuation and development of commercial, educational,
cultural, recreational, and social needs of the existing residents
and population growth. The amendment creates a means for the city
to sponsor short term periodic events such as Main Street's Farmers
Market, art exhibits, crafts shows, and other similar events in the
downtown area in support of this goal.
The amendment is consistent with General Plan policies applicable
to the CR-2, commercial Regional General Plan land use designation
in that it will assist them in meeting General Plan Objective 1.16
in enhancing the downtown area as the functional and symbolic
center of the City by allowing the City to sponsor commercial,
recreational and social activities designed to draw people to the
downtown area improving its viability and vitality.
ESTABLJ:SHMENT OF A HIGH ACTIVITY ZONE IN DOWNTOWN SAN BERNARDINO
At the direction of the Mayor and Council, the Economic Development
Agency has contracted with Project for Public Spaces (PPS) to
develop a Downtown Urban Plan for San Bernardino for the block
between "E" and "0" streets, and 4th and 5th Streets. The plan is
to include the establishment of a high activity zone which will
encourage outdoor pedestrian oriented activities with an emphasis
on arts, entertainment, dining and unique retail uses. The plan
and its high activity zone is intended to further implement the
General Plan policies and goals as discussed above.
This proposed ordinance will complement the PPS Downtown Urban
Plan. It will create a means by which the city can sponsor the
types of activities encouraged before the PPS Plan is completed.
The ordinance will also allow such City-sponsored uses to be
established over a broader area of the downtown than the PPS Plan
area.
11
o 0
Development Code Amendment No. 92-04
Planninq Commission Meetinq
May 5, 1992
paqe 3
AMENDMENT
The amendment adds City-sponsored uses and activities to the list
of permitted uses under section 19.70.020. The amendment adds an
exlusionary statement from the fixed 90 day period for outdoor uses
for City-sponsored activities that occur for short periods of time
on a weekly or monthly basis (See Attachment "B").
The amendment will provide the means for the City to sponsor
periodic events such as the Farmer's Market, which are desiqned to
brinq additional business to the downtown area improvinq its
vitality.
CONCLUSION
The proposed amendment to chapter 19.70 will permit City-sponsored
uses that occur for short periods on a weekly or monthly basis to
be reviewed and approved under a Temporary Use Permit. The
Findinqs necessary under a Temporary Use Permit application will
ensure that such uses are consistent with the General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planninq Commission recommend that the
Mayor and Council approve Development Code Amendment No. 92-02
subject to the attached Findinqs of Fact (Attachment "A").
Respectful~ Submitted,
@/f5~~..,~ :!-,.
. Bouq~ .
Dl.ree~'"t";~_~a~J..nq and
r!l~ ~~ .
Michael R. Finn
Associate Planner
Buildinq Services
Attachment "A"
Attachment "B"
Findinqs of Fact
Proposed wordinq for Section 19.70.020 and
Proposed wordinq for Section 19.70.050(1)
'.
,
Attachmen-r. "A"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
FINDINGS OF FACT
CASE DCA 92-04
AGENDA ITEM 8
HEARING DATE 5-5-92
PAGE 4
r-
""'II
FnmrNGS OF FACT
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan in
that any uses that may be proposed under the provisions of the
amendment require review under a Temporary Ose Permit
Application. The approval of a Temporary Ose Permit requires
that the Findinq be made that the use proposed is consistent
with the General Plan.
2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City,
in that the amendment should facilitate temporary uses which
would help brinq business and vitality to the downtown area.
....
:.::.:.=-
PI..MoUI PAGE 1 OF 1 1<&0lOI
-
o
o
,
ATTACHMENT "B"
.
PROPOSED WORDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 19.70.020
11. City-sponsored uses and activities, occurring at regular
weekly or monthly intervals (eg. farmers market).
PROPOSED WORDING FOR DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 19.70.050(1\
Add the following exclusionary statement following the word
Director:
(Periodic City-sponsored uses or activities as outlined in Section
19.70.020(11) are not subject to the fixed time limitations of this
condition);
.
o
o
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING .SECTIONS
1 19.70.020 AND 19.70.050(1) OF THE SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE
(TITLE 19 - DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO ESTABLISH CRITERIA TO ALLOW
2 CERTAIN CITY SPONSORED USES AND ACTIVITIES IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA
THROUGH A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DO
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
Page IV-77, Section 19.70.020, Permitted Uses, is
amended
to
add
the
Subsection
city-sponsored
11,
uses
and
activities as one of the temporary uses permitted subject to the
issuance of a Temporary Use Permit [See Exhibit 1, (Page IV-77 of
the Development Code) attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference], to read as follows:
"11. City-sponsored uses and activities, not occupying a structure
12 and occurring at regular periodic intervals (weekly, monthly,
13 yearly, etc.)."
14 Section 2. Page IV-77, Section 19.70.050(1), Conditions of
15 Approval, is amended, adding an exclusionary statement for periodic
16
17
18
19
20
City-sponsored uses or activities, exempting them from the time
limitations established by that section for temporary uses [See
Exhibit 1, (Page IV-77 of the Development Code) attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference], to read as follows:
"1.
provision for a fixed period not to exceed 90 days for a
21 temporary use not occupying a structure, including promotional
22 activities, or 1 year for all other uses or structures, or for a
23 shorter period of time as determined by the Director. Periodic
24 City-sponsored uses or activities outlined in Section 19.70.020 (11)
25 are not subject to the fixed time limitations of this condition, as
26 determined by the Director."
27 IIII
28 IIII
1
o
o
'"
1 ORDINANCE.. .AMENDING SECTION 19.70.020 AND 19.70.050(1) OF THE SAN
BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE (TITLE 19 - DEVELOPMENT CODE) TO
2 ESTABLISH CRITERIA TO ALLOW CERTAIN CITY SPONSORED USES AND
ACTIVITIE;S IN THE DOWNTOWN AREA THROUGH A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly adopted
by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
meeting, therefore, held on the
day of
, 1992, by the following vote to wit:
Council Members:
~
~
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
ESTRADA
REILLY
HERNANDEZ
11 MAUDSLEY
12
MINOR
13 POPE-WDLAM
14 MILLER
15
16
17
18 of
19
20
21
22
AMES F. PENMAN,
23 city/tttorney
24By:~ 7f~
25C
City Clerk
The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this
, 1992.
day
W. R. HolCOmb, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
as to
legal content:
26
27
28
2
!l
o
T9()KAllYUSE I'ERMlTS .19.70
.
9. Emergency public health and safety needs; and
.
10.
Similar temporary uses which, in the opinion of the Direc:tor are compatible
with the 1ancl use clistrict and surrounding Ianci uses, pursuant to Section
19.02.070 (3) (Similar Uses Permitted).
.
11. City-sponsored uses and acti vi ties, not occupyinq a structure
and occurrinq at reqular periodic intervals (weekly, lIIOnthly,
yearly, etc.).
19.70.030 APPUCATION
A Temporary Use Permit may be approved, mociifieci, conditioned, or denied by the
Director. The Director may refer such application to the Commission. Decisions of the
Director may be appealed to the Commission, pursuant to Chapter 19..52 <Hearings and
Appeals).
19.70.040 FINDINGS
The Direc:tor may approve, or conditionally approve a Temporary Use Permit ap-
plication, only when all the Bndings contained in Section 19.36.oso (CnI'Iditional Use
Permits) are made.
19.70.050 CONDmONS OF APPROVAL
In approving an application for a Temporary Use Permit, the Dh-h". may impose con-
ditions deemed necessary to ensure that the permit will be in acccrdance with the find-
ings required by Section 19.36.050. These conditions may involve any pertinent factors
aifeding the operation of such temporary event, or use, and may include but are not
limited to:
1. Provision tor a tixed period not to exceed 90 days tor a
t_porary use not occupyinq a structure, includinq prolllOtional
activities, or 1 year for all other uses or structures, or for
a shorter period ot time as determined by the Director.
PeriOdic City-sponsored uses or activities outlined in Section
19.70.020(11) are not subject to the fixed time limitations ot
this condition, as determined by the Director.
2. Provision for temporary parking fadlities, including vehic:uJar ingress and
egress;
3. Regulation of nuisance factors such as, but not limited to, prevention of giare
or direc:t illumination on adjacent fl.operlies, noise, vibration, smoke, dust, dirt,
odors, gases, and heat;
4. Regulation of temporary structures and fad1ilies, including placement,
height and size, location of equipment and open spaces, including buffer areas
and other yards;
rv.77
~