Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout37-Development Services CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Michael E. Hays Subject: General Plan Amendment No. 99-05 - To amend the General Plan designations from CG-1, and RS, to IH and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12 to allow for an expansion of the salvaging wrecking (dismantling) yard. Dept: Development Services ORIGINAL Date: January 31, 2000 MCC Date: February 22, 2000 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None Recommended Motion: That the Mayor and Common Council close the public hearing, adopt the resolution; and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12, based on the Finding of Fact, subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements. ~ Michael E. ays Contact person: Michael E. Hays Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report and Resolution Ward(s): 2 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Source: (Acet. No.) (Acet. Description) Finance: Council Notes: Agenda Item No.: :J 7 ,2.,/:1..40D CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT No. 99-05 CONDmONAL USE PERMIT No. 99-12 MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL MEETING OF FEBURARY 22, 2000 Owner: Jerry Jaeckels Pick-A-Part 407 E. 9th Street San Bernardino CA 92410 909-884-5308 Applicant: Jennifer Misumi Hogle-Ireland, Inc. 4200 Latham Street, Suite B Riverside CA 92501 909-787-9222 BACKGROUND The applicant requests amendment of the General Plan Land Use Map from CG-I, Commercial General and RS, Residential Suburban land use designations to the IH, Industrial Heavy land use designation. The existing business (10.7 acres) is in the CG-I, Commercial General land use district and the expansion area (10.96 acres) is in RS, Residential Suburban land use district. Also requested is a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of the salvaging and wrecking (dismantling) yard and a 337-space parking lot. The 21. 66-acre site is composed of the existing Pick -A-Part business located on the south side of 9th Street, approximately 370 feet east of Waterman Avenue, at 407 E. 9th Street. The expansion area abuts the existing business and is located on the north side of 6th Street, approximately 735 feet east of Waterman Avenue, at 343 E. 6th Street. The total project site is shown on Exhibit 1, Location Map and Exhibit 2, Site Plan. The applicant requested a General Plan Amendment to change in the land use designation from RS, Residential Suburban to IL, Industrial Light for 10.96 acres and a Conditional Use Permit to establish a salvage and wrecking facility and parking lot to support the existing business located at 407 E. 9th Street. Staff is recommending a General Plan Amendment to IH, Industrial Heavy for the entire site, including the existing business and the proposed expansion because aspects of the project are not permitted in the IL, Industrial Light. The existing business is non-conforming in the CG-I, Commercial General land use district. A vehicle storage yard is proposed on 6.05 acres on the west portion of the property fronting along 6th Street for the receipt and storage of vehicles. A 337 space-paved parking lot is proposed on the remainder of the 1O.96-acre site. The parking lot is for Pick-A-Part customers and auto glass installation and repair operations. The main entrance will be relocated from 9th Street to 6th Street. GPA No.99-05, & CUP No. 99-12 Mayor and Common Council Meeting of February 22, 2000 Page 2 of3 The existing operations employ a total of about thirty people. A maximum of twenty employees are on site at any time. An additional thirty employees are anticipated to be hired as a part of the expansion. The existing business accepts about 650 vehicles a month for salvage. This is expected to increase to about 1,000 vehicles per month. Most vehicles are towed to the site, with only a couple of vehicles per day driven to the site. The existing business has 250 to 300 customers per day on weekdays and about 400 to 450 customers per day on weekends. They anticipate this will approximately double to about 600 customers per day on weekdays and 900 customers per day on weekends. Detail background and project information is contained in the Planning Commission Staff Report (Exhibit 3). An Initial Study was prepared and presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on December 2, 1999. The Initial Study was distributed for a 21-day public review period from December 9, 1999, through December 29, 1999. No comments were received regarding the proposed Negative Declaration. Based on the Initial Study prepared for the project, the ERC determined that the project would not result in any significant environmental impacts. At the January 6, 2000 meeting, the ERC recommended adoption of the Negative Declaration for the project. On January 25, 2000 the Planning Commission lInanimonsly recommended that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment No. 99- 05, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12, based on the Findings of Fact, subject to the Conditions of Approval as amended and Standard Requirements. The Planning Commissioners present were; Adams, Durr, Garcia, Lockett, Ramirez, Thrasher and Welch. The Planning Commissioner Absent, Enciso FINANCIAL No impact, the applicant paid the application processing fees. GPA No.99-05, & CUP No. 99-12 Mayor and Common Council Meeting of February 22, 2000 Page 3 of3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration; and approve General Plan Amendment No. 99-05, to change the land use designation from CO-I, Commercial General and RS, Residential Suburban to IH, Industrial Heavy on 21.66 acres located on the south side of 9th Street, approximately 370 feet east of Waterman Avenue, and on the north side of 6th Street, approximately 735 feet east of Waterman A venue; 2. Approve Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12, based upon the Findings of Fact contained in the Planning Commission Staff Report subject to the Conditions of Approval as amended and Standard Requirements (Exhibit 3). Prepared by: Joe Bellandi, Associate Planner For: Michael E. Hays, Director D~cl~m~tS~viresDepartrnem EXHIBITS: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan 3. Planning Commission Staff Report, January 25,2000 Attachment A Location Map (included as Exhibit 1) Attachment B Site Plan (included as Exhibit 2) Attachment C Conditions of Approval Attachment D Standard Requirements Attachment E Initial Study 4. Resolution Exlol181T 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: GPA 99-05 PLANNING DIVISION CUP 99-12 HEARING DATE: 02/22/00 LOCATION MAP GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT MAP u NORTH I. PROPOSED G. P. AMENDMENT FROM CG-l TO IH 8IIIIIIIIIIIIII PROPOSED G. P. AMENDMENT FROM RS TO JH ,. ""I L-....J I I I ......... ..... ____ __. .0"IIl. - . I I I - f'f "_,...""..-._......,,,__'_,_... _""'">ll'''''. _.........". ! i . 'I' I: i' EXHIBIT 2 , I -----,. //' .,-:.' ? ~' ,I' 'J ,~.,' i!l <'I . ~~I'I ~,II" ','blil ." ','. I, j I! I'll: 'l ill... '.' II "'~"'I II, , · ,I"'" U :l ,n t ~_: . : ~..:--' ~, ".._. -- !I ~; " ,p: pI ." 'I . III III / if I I: Ii ,,), 1 ~ . J +~ ~ I ~ ! P , i , ...!} o~~ fl"',," r ~ I ..", '''m ; 1, 1/ ~ /"~ I!m ,';1 ~ ,I l~"'l !i1 !I ~ :;! ~ ,---~- I I C ." " ""-" ... :il W ~ ~ II . m l;J ~ ~ :1; ,'.." ,~ ~ ' " ~ i~1 ::!~ n~ I; ~ !i ill i ,I '" I'll I'll Ii ~ i! 'ii, "~ .1 'Ill ~ hI. I! ! m I I, ~ :i i! I 8 I S, I ~ . 'jill 'Ill i z Illi!! ! ~ . s o Z :;! '" ,. .. I .~':II -j--:~" I ~ ~i III ill "I!!! II IiI !' II ;g 11'1 ',Ijll III II ll!! Ii !Il ! II!! !j!! ! 1I111~Hil: Ill! Iii I IIi II illl ! Ii! i Ilil hi! III !! :~::~:, l'l i! Iii! I Ill! I ~ jlj:ll!i I III ill, i Pill i! Ijlli!l', II J !t .. I~; .! ii, tal. ! 1I111~!!11111 ~~! ~ I P I 11111'. g ~'j,1I1 I ., Iii "i!111i!1!! I II;: II' II! I ~ ',',:: "I I "I II ' " II ! !i " I! 'I I N I ., . I!llll' .1- i < i I ~B> I \ '3 I I IIi II i I H q'\ ;Q HI !. 11'111 I ~ II ! P: ~ I ' I I I ~ ii I .1 i'I'I!1 EXHIBIT 3 SUMMARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION CASE: AGENDA ITEM: HEARING DATE: WARD: General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12 3 January 25, 2000 2 OWNER: Jerry Jaeckels Pick-A-Part 407 E. 9th Street San Bernardino, CA 92410 APPLICANT: Jennifer Misumi Hogle-Ireland, Inc. 4200 Latham Street, Suite B Riverside CA 92501 REQUESTILOCA TION: A request for a General Plan Amendment to change in the land use designation from CG-l, Commercial General and RS, Residential Suburban to IL, Industrial Light for 21.66 acres located on the north side of 6th Street, approximately 735 feet east of Waterman Avenue, and a Conditional Use Permit under authority of Development Code Section 19.08.020 Table 08.01 (32) to establish a salvage and wrecking facility and parking lot. The proposal is a request to expand the existing Pick-A-Part business located at 407 E. 9th Street. The existing business (10.7 acres) is in the CG-l, Commercial General land use district and the expansion area is in RS, Residential Suburban. The total project site will encompass the area between 6th Street and 9th Street, approximately 21.66 acres (Attachment A, Location Map) and (Attachment B, Site Plan) in the CG-I, Commercial General, and RS, Residential Suburban land use districts. CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS: Subsidence/Liquefaction ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: o Not Applicable o Exempt, Section 15301, Existing Facilities . No Significant Effects, Negative Declaration o Potential Effects, Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan STAFF RECOMMENDATION: . Approval . Conditions o Denial o Continuance to: General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit. 99-12 Hearing Date: January 25, 2000 Page 2 REOUEST AND LOCATION Pick-A-Part requested a General Plan Amendment to change in the land use designation from RS, Residential Suburban to IL, Industrial Light for 10.96 acres located on the north side of 6th Street, approximately 735 feet east of Waterman Avenue, and a Conditional Use Permit to establish a salvage and wrecking facility and parking lot to support the existing business located at 407 E. 9th Street. Staff is recommending a General Plan Amendment to ill, Industrial Heavy for this site, and the existing business located at 407 E 9th Street, because aspects of the project are not permitted in the IL, Industrial Light. The existing business (10.7 acres) is non- conforming in the CG-l, Commercial General land use district. The total project site will encompass the area between 6th Street and 9th Street, approximately 21.66 acres (Attachment A, Location Map and Site Plan). A vehicle storage yard is proposed on 6.05 acres on the west portion of the property fronting along 6th Street for the receipt and storage of vehicles. Except for an 80' x 275' (22,000 square feet) area under and in front of a designated fluid drainage area and fire access lane, the storage area will be decomposed granite. A 6' x 8' modular building (Structure 4 on the Site Plan) for a security guard is proposed at the entrance to the vehicle storage area from 6th Street. A 30' x 80' canopy (Structure 3 on the Site Plan) is also proposed in this area for the removal of batteries from vehicles. A 337 space paved parking lot, cashier's trailer and customer staging, employee parking and auto glass installation and repair facility are proposed on the remainder of the 10.96 acres. The parking lot is for Pick-A-Part customers and auto glass installation and repair operations. The main entrance for this portion of the operation will be relocated from 9th Street to 6th Street. A 24' x 60' cashier's trailer (Structure 5 on the Site Plan) is proposed adjacent to the north end of the parking lot with a 30' x 60' canopy (Structure 6 on the Site Plan) for customer staging and waiting. An 8' x 20' modular building (Structure 1 on the Site Plan) will be an office for the auto glass and windshield repair. A 30' x 120' canopy (Structure 2 on the Site Plan) is adjacent to this office for storage and work area for the windshield repair. Improvements on 6th Street along the property frontage will include a 6' sidewalk with a 6" curb and gutter, 25' landscaped setback area, and a 6' split face block wall. These improvements will fully screen the operation, parking, and loading areas of the site. On-Site ODerations The existing business at 407 E. 9th Street removes parts from vehicles for direct sales, and allows customers to enter the yard and remove the parts they want, and take orders and have employees retrieve parts from a salvaged vehicle for customers. The operation is open to the public from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., seven days a week. Employees use equipment to move vehicles and work between 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., before customers are allowed on site. The proposed project provides a new parking lot on the north side of 6th Street for customers who remove their own parts. Customers will access the existing salvage yard from the parking lot and pay for parts at the new cashier's structure. Other General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit. 99-12 Hearing Date: January 25, 2000 Page 3 operations, including parts sales and removal of parts by employees for customers would remain on 9th Street. In addition to the new parking lot, the 1O.96-acre site would allow for the receipt of vehicles and storage until they obtain Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) clearances. The vehicle storage operation is for used and abandoned vehicles that are delivered to the site. The vehicles are stored in a contaimnent area where the battery and fluids are removed. The license plates and vehicle identification numbers (VIN) are removed and sent to the DMV for final clearances for salvage. This containment area is located on the western portion of the property on which a 2,400 square foot concrete pad is proposed. When stored, the vehicles are not stacked on top of each other in the storage area. All fluids will be stored in metal enclosed barrels and picked up by KCB Recycling once a week. KCB uses a government approved modified manifest which lists all locations they service. No more than 500 gallons of fluid will be stored on the property, which makes the operation exempt from hazardous material permits. Batteries are taken out and resold on the Pick-A-Part lot. Once the vehicles have the DMV clearance they will be transferred from the vehicle storage area to the Pick-A-Part salvage yard for the sale of parts. The equipment used to move the vehicles is a 1999 Caterpillar Series 80 forklift and a 1980 John Deere loader/forklift. Additional similar equipment may be added for the proposed facility. The site design proposes a gate at the north end of the storage area to allow for the movement of stored vehicles to the sales area. This will prevent potential circulation congestion that would result if the vehicles were towed around the block to the Pick-A-Part main entrance on 9th Street. The cashier's booth is a modular trailer of approximately 1,440 square feet to be located near the north property line. It will be used for the collection of money and organization of customer ingress and egress into the Pick-A-Part operation north of the vehicle storage lot. No customer access will be allowed from the cashier's trailer and adjacent customer staging and waiting area into the storage area to the west and will be fenced. Currently, the auto glass installation and repair shop is in operation on the northeast comer of the Pick-A-Part lot on 9th Street. The glass shop will be relocated to a 160 square foot modular trailer at the southeast comer of the site along 6th Street. In addition to the trailer, a 4,800 square foot concrete pad will be installed to provide repair bays and glass storage under a canopy. About 85 to 90 percent of the glass is salvaged from the Pick-A-Part yard. The existing operations employ a total of about thirty people. A maximum of twenty employees are on site at any time. An additional thirty employees are anticipated to be hired. The existing business accepts about 650 vehicles a month for salvage. This is expected to increase to about 1,000 vehicles per month. Most vehicles are towed to the site, with only a couple of vehicles per day driven to the site. The existing business has 250 to 300 customers per day on weekdays and about 400 to 450 customers per day on weekends. They anticipate this will approximately double to about 600 customers per day on weekdays and 900 customers per day on weekends. General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit. 99-12 Hearing Date: January 25, 2000 Page 4 SETTING! SITE CHARACTERISTICS The surrounding land uses include: Across 9th Street to the north is a vacant shopping center in the CH, Conunercial Heavy land Use District; to the west is a shopping center, 5 dismantling yards, 3 single-family residences and 2 tire shops in the CG-l, Conunercial Land Use district along Waterman Avenue; to the east is a steel manufacturing business in the IL, Industrial Light land use district. To the south are salvage and heavy equipment yards in the CG-l, Conunercial General and RS, Residential Suburban land use districts. BACKGROUND The Development Review Conunittee (DRC) initially reviewed the project on September 9, 1999. An Initial Study was prepared and presented to the Envirornnental Review Committee (ERC) on December 2, 1999. After the required 2l-day public review period, no conunents were received regarding the proposed Negative Declaration and at the January 6, 2000 ERCIDRC meeting, the project was cleared to the Planning Conunission. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 99-05 - A request to change the land use designation of approximately 21.66 acres from CG-l, Conunercial General and RS, Residential Suburban to IH, Industrial Heavy. 1. Is the proposed amendment internally consistent with the General Plan? Yes, General Plan Objective 1.33 is to "Provide for the continuation and development of heavy manufacturing industries in locations where they will be compatible with and not adversely impact adjacent land uses". The property is currently vacant and similar and supporting uses are adjacent to the site. 2. Is the proposed amendment detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City? No, the proposal would allow the property to be developed for industrial purposes. The development proposal meets all applicable provisions of the Development Code, and will be constructed and operated in conformance with all applicable City and State requirements, and will not pose any threat to the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino. 3. Does the proposed amendment maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City? Yes, the property is adjacent to other similar uses. The amendment will make the existing business conforming. The General Plan Amendment does not impact the balance of land uses General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit. 99-12 Hearing Date: January 25, 2000 Page 5 within the City. The property designated RS, Residential Suburban is not conducive for development as single-family residential. The site is not large enough and is surrounded by heavy commercial and industrial uses. 4. Is the subject parcel physically suitable (including, but not limited to, access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraints) for the requested land use designation and anticipated land use development? Yes, the site is suitable for IH in terms of access and surrounding uses and all agencies responsible for reviewing access, and providing water, sanitation and other public services have all had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none have indicated an inability to serve the project. The site meets the minimum requirements of the Development Code in regards to lot size, access, and circulation for the IH, Industrial Heavy land use designation. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 99-12 - A request to establish a salvaging wrecking (dismantling) yard. 1. Is the proposed use conditionally permitted within, and would not impair the integrity and character of the subject land use district and complies with all of the applicable provisions of this Development Code? No, the project site is located in the CG-I, Commercial General and RS, Residential Suburban land use districts that do not permit vehicle storage, salvaging and related uses. However, these uses are permitted in the IH land use designation subject to a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Development Code Sections 19.08.020 Table 08.01 (32). Approval of the associated General Plan Amendment will alleviate the project's inconsistency with the General Plan. The proposed project complies with all applicable provisions of the Development Code as shown in Table 'A' below. T ABLE 'A' --DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE CATEGORY PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT GENERAL PLAN CODE Salvaging, wrecking Permitted subject to Permitted Use (dismantling) yard and Conditional Use Permit N/A parkin~ lot Hei~ht 12 feet Maximum None Setbacks - Front 25 feet 10 feet - Side (east) 10 feet 10 feet - Side (west) 10 feet 10 feet - Rear 10 feet 10 feet LandscaDinl! 28 249 sa.ft. 15% 28 246 sa.ft 15% N/A Lot Covera~e 2 percent 75 percent N/A Parking 337 spaces 79 spaces - Standard 328 75 N/A - Handicap 9 4 General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit. 99-12 Hearing Date: January 25, 2000 Page 6 2. Is the proposed use consistent with the General Plan? Yes, General Plan Objective 1.33 states that it is the objective of the City of San Bernardino to: "Provide for the continuation and development of heavy manufacturing industries in locations where they will be compatible with and not adversely impact adjacent land uses". The property is currently vacant and similar and supporting uses are adjacent to the site. 3. Is the approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed use in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section 19.20.030(6) of the Development Code? Yes, a Negative Declaration is proposed for the Conditional Use Permit and General Plan Amendment. The current plans for expansion of the facility will not have a significant impact on the environment. Measures are identified to mitigate potentially significant adverse impacts for Water Quality (surface runoff), Transportation/Circulation (increased traffic) and Utilities (absorption rates and surface runoff) Aesthetics (visual impact). The mitigation's are incorporated in to the Public Works Standard Requirements (Attachment D). All other issues were determined to experience no impact or non-significant impact without any mitigation. 4. Are there potentially significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored? No, as noted on the Summary page and in Finding #3, a Negative Declaration is proposed for this proj ect. 5. Is the location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use compatible with the existing and future land uses within the general area in which the proposed use is to be located and will not create significant noise, traffic or other conditions or situations that may be objectionable or detrimental to other permitted uses in the vicinity or adverse to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City? Proposed Use The Conditional Use Permit will allow expansion of an existing auto dismantling and parking lot and this use is considered to be compatible with other surrounding uses. The project has been reviewed by the appropriate departments and agencies and is not anticipated to cause significant noise, traffic or other conditions that may be detrimental. Although ill permits outside uses and activities, they will be screened from view and no noise from the operation will go beyond the property lines. The applicant has proposed a split faced block wall across the front of the property and around the existing residence located in the southwest comer of the property. The applicant is proposing to use a solid 8' metal fence along the east and west boundaries of the site. General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit. 99- J 2 Hearing Date: January 25, 2000 Page 7 The Development Code allows for the metal fence, but Staff would recommend that the entire fence be split face block. Parkin\! and Circulation A parking area will be provided along the east portion of the site along 6th Street. A total of337 parking stalls will be provided of which 9 will be designated for handicapped parking. Two drive approaches are proposed on 6th Street to provide access onto the site. At the west side of the property a driveway will be provided strictly for the delivery of vehicles. The second driveway located on the east side of the property will be for the general public. This driveway will lead directly to the glass shop and the parking area. LandscaDing The Development Code requires that 15% of the parking area be landscaped. The project provides for a ten foot landscaped setback in the customer parking area and the 25' setback in front along 6th Street. Additional landscape planters will be provided adjacent to the customer parking areas. The total landscaped area is 28,249 square feet. The required amount of landscaping is 28,246 square feet. 6. Is the subject site physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being proposed? Yes, the site is physically suitable for the type and density/inteusity of the project being proposed as evidenced by project compliance with all applicable Development Code Standards as noted above. 7. Are there adequate provisions for public access, water, sanitation, and public utilities and services to ensure that the proposed use would not be detrimental to public health and safety? Yes, all agencies responsible for reviewing access, and providing water, sanitation and other public services have all had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none have indicated an inability to serve the project. The proposal will not be detrimental to the public health and safety in that all applicable Codes will apply to the construction and operation of this project. CONCLUSION The proposal meets all the necessary Findings of Fact for approval of the General Plan Amendment and Conditional Use Permit. General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit. 99-12 Hearing Date: January 25, 2000 Page 8 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration and; 2. Approve General Plan Amendment 99-05 and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12, based upon the Findings of Fact contained in this Staff Report and subject to the Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D). Respectfully Submitted, 'fmW;u.&t~1f Michael E. Hays Director of Planning and Building Services Attachment A Attachment B Attachment C Attachment D Attachment E Location Map Site Plan Conditions of Approval Standard Requirements Initial Study Gene..al Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Pef'mit. 99-12 Hearing Date: January 25, 2000 Page 11 ATTACHMENT C CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12 1. Within two years of development approval, commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a period of one year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. Phasing of project construction/development shall be as follows: PROJECT: EXPIRATION DATE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 99-12 TWO YEARS FOLLOWING MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL APPROVAL 2. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date and for good cause, grant a one-time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review authority shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code provisions. 3. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his or her obligation under this condition. 4. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plan(s) approved by the Director, Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Mayor and Common Council. Minor modification to the plan(s) shall be subject to approval by the Director through a minor modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the following allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the refiling of the original application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if applicable: a. On-site circulation and parking, loading and landscaping; b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures; c. Reconfiguration of architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of finished materials that do not alter or compromise the previously approved theme; and, d. A reduction in density or intensity of a development project. 5. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business commenced as authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued General Plan Amendment 99-05/ Conditional Use Permit 99-12 Hearing Date: January 25. 2000 Page 12 by the Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by the Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided that a deposit is filed with the Department of Public Works prior to the issuance of the Certificate, if necessary. The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion of all terms, conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this permit. 6. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development Code in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property Development Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and grading activities; emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air pollution; glare control;exterior lighting design and control; noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control. Screening and sign regulations compliance are important considerations to the developer because they will delay the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior structural equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally screened by wall or structural element, blending with the building design and include landscaping when on the ground. 7. Signs are not approved as a part of this permit. Prior to establishing any new signs, or replacing existing signs, the applicant shall submit an application, and receive approval, for a sign permit from the Planning Department. 8. .All fencing materials shall conform to the Chapter 19.20 of the Development Code. Split face block wall as shown on the site plan fronting on 6th Street and around the single-family residence, metal fencing for the remainder of the site. 9. All vehicles associated with the business shall be parked or stored on-site and not on the adjoining street. 10. Noise from bells or loudspeakers shall not be audible beyond the property line at any time. 11. .This Conditional Use permit does not include auto repair. No vehicle service or repair work shall occur within the property boundaries, except for the auto glass shop. 12. .AII operations are limited to the hours of 6:30am to 6:30pm. 13. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the following City Departments or Divisions: a. Department of Development Services - Public Works Division b. Department of Development Services - Plan Check Division c. Fire Department d. Water Department e. Public Services Department d. Park, Recreation & Community Services Department *Amended per Planning Commission on 1/25/00. ATTACHMENT 0 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICESIPUBLlC WORKS DIVISION CASE NO: _ C.U.P. 99-12 DESCRIPTION: _CONSTRUCT PICK-A-PART APPLICANT: _TED SMITH LOCATION:_ 343 E. 6TH STREET . NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the applicant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. 1. Drainaae and Flood Control a) All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer, which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino County Flood District. The developer'S Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. b) All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. c) If site drainage is to be outletted into the public street, the drainage shall be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 400. Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway approaches will not be permitted. d) Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit Requirements. A "Notice of Intent (NOI)" shall be filed with the State Water Quality Control Board for construction disturbing 5 acres of more of land. Page 1 of 9 112012000 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION CASE NO: _ C.U.P. 99-12 DESCRIPTION: _CONSTRUCT P/CK-A-PART - APPLICANT: _TED SM/TH LOCATION:_ 343 E. 6TH STREET e) The City Engineer, prior to grading plan approval, shall approve an Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to water and wind, including blowing dust, during all phases of construction, including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built upon. 2. Gradina and Landscaplna a) If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's' "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. b) If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the Development Code shall be obtained from the Department of Development Services- Planning Division prior to issuance of any grading or site development permits. c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 7012(c) of the Uniform Building Code. d) If more than 1,000 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets then a special hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer. Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls, bonding, covering of loads, street cleaning, etc. may be required by the City Engineer. Page 20(9 112012000 STA.NDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION CASE NO:. C.U.P. 99-12 DESCRIPTION: .CONSTRUCT P/C~-PART APPLICANT: _TED SM/TH LOCATION:_ 343 E. 6TH STREET e) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). f) A refuse enclosure constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing No. 508. The minimum size of the refuse enclosure shall be 8 feet x 15 feet, unless the Public Services Department, Refuse Division, approves a smaller size, in writing. g) The Refuse Division shall approve the number and placement of refuse enclosures. h) Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and detailed on the On-site Improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the On-site Improvement permit issued by the City Engineer. i) The on-site improvement plan shall include details of on-site lighting, including light location, type of poles and fixtures, foundation design, conduit location and size, and the number and size of conductors. Photometry calculations shall be provided which show that the proposed on-site lighting design will provide 1 foot-candle of illumination uniformly distributed over the surface of the parking lot during hours of operation and 0.25 foot-candles security lighting during all other hours. j) The design of on-site improvements shall also comply with all requirements of The California Building Code, Title 24, relating to handicap parking and accessibility, including retrofitting of existing building access points for handicap accessibility, if applicable. Page 3 of 9 1/2012000 STANDARD REQUIREMEN.T~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION CASE NO: _ C.U.P. 99-12 DESCRIPTION: _CONSTRUCT P/CK-A-PART APPLICANT: _ TED SM/TH LOCATION:_ 343 E. 6TH STREET k) A handicap accessible path of travel shall be provided from the public way to the building entrance. All pathways shall be concrete paved and shall provide a minimum clear width of 4 feet. Where parking overhangs the pathway, the minimum paved width shall be 6 feet. I) Where the handicap accessible path of travel crosses drive aisles, it shall be delineated by striping or textured/colored concrete pavement. m) A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is proposed to cross lot lines, or a lot merger shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines. n) The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the Engineering Division for Checking. 3. Utilities a) Design and construct all pUblic utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV (Cable TV optional for commercial, industrial, or institutional uses). b) This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of San Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. c) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required. Page 4 of 9 112012000 STANDARD REQUIRENl~NT~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICESIPUBLlC WORKS DIVISION CASE NO: - C.U.P.99-12 DESCRIPTION: _CONSTRUCT PICK-A-PART APPLICANT: _TED SMITH LOCATION:_ 343 E. 6TH STREET d) A street cut permit, from the City Engineer, will be required for utility cuts into existing streets where the street is not being repaved as part of the required improvements. e) All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Section 19.20.030 (non-subdivisions) or Section 19.30.110 (subdivisions) of the Development Code. f) Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be undergrounded. See Development Code Section 19.20.030 (non- subdivisions) or Section 19.30.110 (subdivisions). g) As an alternative to undergrounding required by Section 19.20.030 (non- subdivision) or Section 19.30.110 (subdivisions).of the Development Code, the developer will provide a letter of agreement for participation in an assessment district, if one is formed, to fulfill the requirement for undergrounding utilities. Prior to recordation of a map or issuance of building permit subdivider/developer shall have the letter of agreement recorded with the deed. Page 5 of 9 1120/2000 ... STANDARD a.EQUIREMEN'(S DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES/PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION CASE NO: C.U.P.99-12 DESCRIPTION: _CONSTRUCT P/CK-A-PART - . APPLICANT: _TED SM/TH LOCATION:. 343 E. 6TH STREET 4. Street ImDrovement and Dedications a) All public streets within and adjacent to the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to traffic signals, traffic signal modifications, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. b) For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line(C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Riaht of Wav(ft.) Curb Linelft) 6TH Street 44' 32' c) Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200 adjacent to the site. Widen pavement adjacent to the site to match new curb and gutter. Construct approach and departure transitions for traffic safety and drainage as approved by the City Engineer. d) Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb). Page 60(9 1/20/2000 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICESIPUBLlC WORKS DIVISION CASE NO: _ C.U.P. 99-12 - DESCRIPTION: _CONSTRUCT PICK-A-PART - APPLICANT: _TED SMITH LOCATION:_ 343 E. 6TH STREET e) Construct Handicap Ramps in accordance with City Standard No. 205 at all curb retums within and adjacent to the project site. Dedicate sufficient right-ot-way at the corner to accommodate the ramp. f) Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 204, Type II, including Handicap by-pass. Remove existing driveway approaches that are not part of the approved plan and replace with full height curb & gutter and sidewalk. 5. Reauired Enaineerina Permits a) Grading permit (If applicable.). b) On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Development Services-Building Division), including landscaping. c) Off-site improvements construction permit. 6. Applicable Enaineerina Fees! a) Plan check and inspection tees tor off-site improvements - 4% and 4%, respectively, of the estimated construction cosf ot the off-site improvements. I All Fees are subject to change without notice. 'Estimated Construction Cost for Off-S/te Improvements Is based on a list of standard unit prices on file with the Public Works Division. Page 70f9 1/2012000 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVlCES/PUBLlC WORKS DIVISION CASE NO: _ C.U.P. 99-12 DESCRIPTION: _CONSTRUCT PICK-A-PART . APPLICANT: _TED SMITH LOCATION:_ 343 E. 6TH STREET b) Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Development Services-Building Division) - 2% and 3%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost3 of the on-site improvements, including landscaping. c) Plan check and inspection fees for grading (If permit required) - Fee Schedule available at the Engineering Division Counter. d) Drainage fee in the approximate amount as follows based on $0.419 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area (estimated as 85% of the net lot area), then $0.143 per square foot of remaining impervious lot area or fraction thereof: e) This project is greater than 5 acres and has been determined the City Engineer to be eligible to pay the drainage fee at the large parcel rate; therefore, a drainage fee in the approximate amount of _ Based on Square Feet @ $0.419 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of impervious lot area (estimated as 85% ofthe net lot area), then $0.143 per square foot for each square foot over 3,000 square feet but less than 5 acres, and $0.044 per square foot for each square foot of impervious area over 5 acres. f) Traffic system fee based on trip per day @ $16.689 per new trip generated by the project. The City Traffic Engineer shall determine exact amount at time of application for Building Permit. g) Sewer Connection fee in the approximate amount as follows based on $236.99 per 3,000 square feet or fraction thereof: 3 Estimallld Construction Cost for On-Site Improvements Is based on a list of standard unit prices on nIe with the Public Works Division. Page 80(9 1/20/2000 City of San Bernardino STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Development ServicesIPlan Check Division Date: December 2, 1999 Property address: 407 E 9th & 363 E 6th GPA 99-05 & CUP 99-12 For construction of structures or install of modular units, canopies, etc.: 1. Submit 4 sets of plans, minimum size 18" x 24", drawn to scale. If plan check is for expeditious review, submit 5 sets. The plans shall include (if applicable): a. site plan (include address & assessors parcel number) b. foundation plan c. Door plan Oabel use of all areas) d. elevations e. electrical, mechanical, & plumbing plans f. detail sheets (structural) g. cross section details h. show compliance with Title 24/Accessibility (disabled access) 2. The title sheet of the plans must specify the occupancy classification, type of construction, if the building has sprinklers, & the current applicable codes. 3. The person who prepares them must sign the plans. Also, provide the address & phone number of that person. Some types of occupancies require that the plans are prepared, stamped, and signed by an architect, engineer, or other person licensed by the State of California. 4. For structures that must include an engineers design, provide 2 sets of stamped/wet signed calculations prepared by a licensed architect/engineer. 5. Submit soils and/or liquefaction report. 6. Submit grading, site, and/or landscape plans to Public WorkslEngineering for plan check approval and permits. For more information, phone 909-384-5111. 7. Fire sprinkler plans, flJ'es suppression system plans, etc., shall be submitted to the Fire Department for plan check approval and permits. For information, phone 909-384-5388. 8. Signs require a separate submittal to the Planning Division for plan check approval and permits. For information, phone 909-384-5057. 9. Occupancies that include restaurants, car washes, automotive repair/auto body, dentist offices, food preparation facilities or processing plants, etc. may require approvals and permits from San Bernardino Water Reclamation. For information, phone 909-384-5141. 10. An air quality permit may be required. Contact South Coast Air Quality Management Division for information, phone 909-396-2000. 11. Provide receipt from San Bernardino School District. For information, phone 909-381- 1238. 12. State of California Business & Professions Code/Contractors License Law requires that permits can be issued to licensed contractors or owner-builders (that are doing the work). Contractors must provide their State license number, a city business registration, and workers compensation policy carrier & policy number. Owner-builders must provide proof 0 ership. i~d~/t-Jz GE SKE~LANSCHECKEWDEVELOPMENTSER~CES CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT "1*- '1p_oJ- STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: CUJ- S'9-/:1- Date: '9 - f - ?,j Reviewed By: ~/.A'J- GENERAL REQUIREMENTS: o Provide one additional set of construction plans to Building and Safety for Fire Department use at time of plan check. o Contact the City of San Bernardino Fire Department at (909) 384-5388 for specific detailed requirements. o The developer shall provide for adequate fire fktw as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Minimum fire flow requirements shall be based on square footage, construction feltures. and exposure information supplied by the developer and JmW: be available .m::im to placing combustible materials on site. \/YATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE PROTECTION: ;13 The fire protection water service for the area of this project is provided by: o San Bernardino Municipal W~ter Department. Engineering 19091 384.5391 D East Vallay Watar District - Enginaaring 1909) 888-8986 o Other Water Purveyor: Phone: ~BLlC FIRE PROTECTION FACILITIES: . Public fire hydrants are required along streets at intervals not to exceed 300 feet ~ comm~nd multi-residential areas and at intervals not to exceed 500 f.et for residential areas. ~ =:; )1f.. Rre hydrant minimum flow rates of 1.500 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual pressure are required for commercial and multi-residential ar88S. Minimum fire hydrant flow rate. of 1,000 gpm at a 20 psi minimum residual press'Ire are required for residential .reas. o Fire flow requirements may be met from the combined flow of two adjacent fire hydrants. Fire flow requirements may be adjusted. as deemed appropriate by the Fir. Department. based on individual site specific conditions and available mh:igations. o Fire hydrant type and specific location shaA be jointly determined by the City of.San Bernardino Fire Department in conjunction with the water purveyor. Fire hydra!1t materials and installation shall conform to the standards and specifications of the water purveyor. o Public fire hydrants. fire services. and public water facilities necessary to meet Fire Department requirements are the developer's financial responsibility and shall be installed by the water purveyor or by the developer at the water purveyor's discretion. Contact the water purveyor indicated above for additional information. ACCESS: o Provide two separate. dedicated routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall be paved. all weather. a Provide an access road to each building for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather driving surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width. o Extend roadway to within 150 feet of all portions of the exterior wall of all single story buildings.~. o Extend roadway to within 50 feet of the exterior wall of all multiple.story buildings. o Provide "NO PARKING" signs whenever parking of vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less than the required width. Signs ar. to raad "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING - M.C. See 16.1S". . o Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500 feet in length and shall have a minimum 40 foot radius turnaround. o The names of any new streets (public or private) shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. rE: All access roads and streets are to be constructed and usable prior to combustible construction. Private fire hydrants shall be installed to protect each building located more than 160 feet from the curb line. No fire hydrants should be within 40 feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shall be Wet Barrel type. with one 21/2 inch and 4 inch outlet. and approved by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants shall be designated as a "NO PARKING" zone by painting an 8 inch wide. red stripe for 15 feet in each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by parked vehicles. .BJ..lILDINGS: ~ Address numerals shall be installed on the building at the front or other approved location in such a manner as to be visible from the frontage street. C.ommercial and multi family address numerals shall be 6 inches tall. single family address numerals shall be 4 inches tall. The color of the numerals shall contrast with the color of the background." a Identify each gas and electric meter with the number of the unit it serves. 'a' Fire Extinguishers must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A lOB/C. Minimum /' distribution of fire extinguishers must be such that no interior part of the building is over 75 feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher. o Apartment houses with 16 or more units. hotels (motels) with 20 or more units, or apartmems or hotels (motels) three stories or more in height shall be equipped with automatic fire sprinklers designed to NFPA standards. o All buildings. other than residential. over 5.000 square feet,. shall be equipped with an automatic fire sprinkler system designed to NFPA standards. This includes existing buildings vacant over 365 days. o Submit plans for the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction of the system. o Tenant improvements in all sprinklered buildings are to be approved by the Fire Department prior to start of construction. o Provide fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department prior to stan of installation. o Fire Department connection to (sprinkler system/standpipe system) shall be required at Fire Department approved location. Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to Fire Department requirements. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: d ,cJrD"',.4.... ,...J,.t..;,~,,--<-- ..:TA-,(:"'~..~ L 0>...J-k"..J-..! r'{ v.-. r<-A.A.t...:..h .'?, AriJ'-'u ..1y - ~ I~..... .I. ,';;,. vJ,<.L<- f- ~<-<-J. r.....tw~~S". ~ ,c:i;.... +r ,<. c:k.J(..~J r '7.. k. -<_-J - (J,.J C!_"'-i'--4/,/W . ).) ~r C-FC - /';. V . <f;""~' .!J f} .~) ;t(~<-I P1J ~.....b ~ " ./".---1 v I~r.....f>;..... - FP817011,.941 APJ : -z'18 1>$ ~.-z-p - /(.,/ -07 {OS L_._. _".__ ..1__ CtJp. TJ IUI6J) ~l)GJ!:" 'f ;.,;- SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT STANDARD REQUIREMENTS tGe~L ~ AM6N[)~T t<Ic. q;-06' Review of Plans: COIDI1l~.o.t..- vIt;;;; ~rr ~. 'it:{ -I z... Date Compiled: Owner/Developer: .Jb !Z--Jl.:-(' .JA&c..."e,\...S . Compiled By: . CMA,~(;>~ ~Io1D I.f~ FIZCt-1ll& W ~ . Type of ProJect:\kof.IICAL. ~'" YAP'/:} it, t"AUnPfS 9., ~ s.c=Number ofUruts: , .I'::..'_~ Location:-'h? 15{fJr~ tf'Jt: G-. G>-r'l]U GJr oJ MaqH tzIl:6 WATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING: I Contact:!>'/"v ~ PbDne:3BJ,r5/~ Fax:31?r-- 5532-- Note: All Water Services are Subject to the Rules &: ReculatioDB of !be Water 0.-. XSize of Main Adjacent the Project: 2D I( 'b I P ~ximate Water Pressure: 41ft' .q.;; Elevation of Water Storage: \ ~~L Hydranl FIow@ 20 psi: /I bl:rtype, Size, Location, and Distance to Nearest Fire Hydranl: (, - ZWoAc'f Wf"Tl-l Iw.. .at:'n F'T OF 'f1zoJt5C7 .,;::;,-rE> ~ressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meier. o Off-site Water Facilities Required. o Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department. o Comments: WATER OlIALITY CONTROL: (" Contact: CO~ ~ AJCtF..l';:T4 Phone: 3e1"-6/i!> " Fax: 1M'I/- ~e; "B'Z-- )i.R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection~'nC_ pouble Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connectiond:-ruz-<.Qook7\o,J o Backflow Device to be Inspected Before Water Service can be Activated. o No Backflow Device Required at This Time. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLIINDUSTRIAL WASTE: Contact: DICJ C/.l6~ Phone: 3/0{- !f;j61 Fax:~-5'Z-~g *' ~~ripe ~~ w~r~U"m~,T~n1/~ing and Hauling is Provided for the Brine. ~ will" "ltoO (jailon Capacilywilh a Sample Box fuclud . Xludllstrial Waste Permit Required. o Grease Interceptor Required. 0 Sand/Oil Interceptor Required. >>0 Issues at this Time. o Pre-treatment Required. SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Contact: ,..JElL -rHOM~ Phone: 3/Y!-Sdi3 Fax: ~if- ~'Z-I!5 Note: Proof of Payment Must be Submitted to the Building &: Safety Depsrtment Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit. o No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. -10 \>L ck.~\~ )(Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the Water Department for *":- Gallons Per Day, Equivalent Dwelling Units: X Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. Breakdown of Estinlaled Gallons Per Day: All Interceptors S1l)REQll13.FRM (2197) . . CITY OP SAN BERNARDINO PARltS, RBCRBATION &: COMIItJNJ:TY SBRVICBS DBPARTIIBNT C tA- P -Ff::, crcr- I L Date: (2.- /"7, --rer Revi_d By: T c:'oJo \' STANDARD RBgUIRBMBNTS Case: _JUtAL RBQUIVmnnrl'S: ~!1 [ I H Commerci.l Indu.tri.l and MUlti-unit A......-nt Di.trict R..id_U.l Purpo.e, Guid.lin.. and .ubmitt.l procedure Irrig.tion and Landec.ping Plana. Cont.ct the City of San B.rn.rdino P.rk.,R.cr..tion and ('<>'l""'~l ty S.rvic.. D.par_t .t (909) 384-5217 or 384-S31t for ap.cific d.t.il.d r.quir...-nt.. SPBC:IP:IC RBQUTD-".rS: [)C) [ I [ I ~~ [ I Vi [ I PLAH'l' MATBRULS Kaint_anc. of land.c.pe .re.. Plant.r Ar... Int.rior Plant.r Ar... Irrig.tion ay.t... S.tb.ck Ar... Slop. Ar... Ground Cover and B.dding Kat.ri.l Bro.ion Control We.d COntrol [;--1 Pl.nt li.t and climatic condition. [~I Str..t Tr.e. ~l Plant Kat.ri.l Si". R.quir...-nt. and R.tio. IHSPBCT:IOH AND \T.l1:U5It RBQtJTIl'Bl'll!Wf'l'S [VI [Yl [ I Vl [ I [,.(1 Irrig.tion Sy.tam Landec.ping H.rdec.p. It... Stre.t tr.e Sp.cifio.tion. Arbori.t R.port Remov.l or de.truotion of tre.. Scr..ning Requirement (City, Dev.Cod.) to the Park., R.cr..tion and Note: The .pplicant mu.t reque.t, in writing, any chang.. Community S.rvic.. r.quir...-nt.. Additional information Sr44P4....) C'.tJ-v,trlo.v > ~/' J#~ b-1LN~ r==;;;,_ /l--S ~ p- C I !'-}/ /.. f ~N,"CY .-?-A/-I /r.....~TIu"'-J_ lIS:jj CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO pusuc SERVICES DEPARTMENT REFUSE & RECYCUNG DIVIS/ON 3()() Not1h 'd. _~ .f' Floor S8Il8emwllilo,CA 02418-()()()1 . (DOlI) 384-6335 STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Project Number (!t/P qq-,J.L (1 PA- -# o/q-Of( Meeting Dale / J-I J) 19"1 Property Address &fit (p >T. W' 7,,)..() fr ft.<<7 1 tI)~Jo...IM\~, :-~ ProjeclPlanner :]{Je /Je<vl/J{JI R~by lVM,J ".,,,ftZlll CONDmONS (Applicable if checkedl: Comm~ R_ & Racycllng ServI_ 4, 1.(d'APPllcant 10 esta~,commerclal refuse enclosure aCC!lrdlng 10 CRy Standard No. 508 with a length of /j 0" "';\Ji\ and a width of .L;L. ' ~2. 0~lcant shall p1aes convnerclal refuse enclosure in a IOC8\kln ~Iy accesslbla lor proper refuse truck pick-up "'fit and without obstruction 10 drive alslas, driveways, loading zones. partdng, etc. Location and ortentallon of enclosure and gatas shall be as shown on plans. ....K...3. Applicant shall establish Cay commercial refuse seMesat the lo1low1ng minimum level: ~ 4<, 'u/ Refu.. BIn SIze ..... . Bin 1 10 1 1.5 -- lS 2 2 20 3 3 30 . . 35 5 a Cl a 1IIn_ Bin 1 1.5 2 3 . a Ls. Applicant shall Install compactor(s) as shown on plans. Compactor configuretlon shall meet CRy Slandard No. 510, a copy of which Is atIached. Applicant Sheq complete a Servlca Application prtor to _anes 01 flnal Cer1lflcate of OCCUpancy. Application number if'::' '10 Is atIached and must be retumedlo the Public Servlcas Department. Applicant shall contact ~1 /(Ileu, Uqct:, with \he Public SeNIces Refuse and Recycling DlvIslcn at (809) 384-5549 ex\. J/'^ 10 establish a commercial recycling programprtorlo lssuanCB Of flnal Certiflcate of OCCUpancy. ResldenfMI Refluse & Recycling Services _4. ..:La. _1. Residential refuse and recycling SONless 10 be provided. by CRy of San Bemardlno. ConeAlon day Is . CRy shall provide one aat of . refuse and recycling carts to each single family residential unR QB one aat to avery two-unR mulllple family un. up to six 100aI unls. _2, Each ...sldentlallot shall have a 3'><9' concrete pad located out of view of public rtghl.of.way for storage of Ihree automated containers and shall have a concrete path of lravel from storage pad to curb. Minimum 9ate widIhs shall be 3 feet. _3. Applicant must provide edequate space for residential trash collecllon at curb by refuse trucks. A_., Conclflons: I litlrr=7D /l'1l/(1\01' :J/I1j,c he cW ;""1/1.......- t>.l01"_ Ie> rAid ~".t#' ,t'o<l 0>" ;,1,.", n1. (.-ul.~(' (};.r,:b,4l 1 AG;k!Il..JlIC. fOV'il::1 6W1.14'iliJ r..u Sll~, /0 vAeiJ ~ou. rrr A:!eT,. Ak(ot.Lt-/fJ 1M' m _ ltJcl{IIT r>t4"I)W. A;'A,(;W7' (,<p.e MINJ'O 77;"- Jolt> 71rJi'.J SI.I1LL M I},",I:)I.) 11./ jll.tL I'Tr. (I"q t'rrlfJ U~J'i~ //,~ 1 .s('IW),)'li~t. /p,VVU/, Sf21KI"! JJ'~ F~J,IJ,1Pi/,l1 kfri)Jr {iAYW..n,(/,= h()u,/fi} - 1I ('IF ;'" If:> "'(U) /I-J A2r_~ (lpit'i..i7( y ':,/Ii ,I,!i' A~ RtTiHf t~(llJ'/.I/t /J '~" ~/;;.,~ Signature I,; h h/ Date .6.&uzJ.iB.Id..WhitelfWuliu.Greell/QSB.VeUowl Bm:sIiD&.Pinklfill.Oolden Rod Venlou l.O(rev. 7199) (F'llename;FORl\C98mb.rev.) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY ATTACHMENT E - The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) musi1ie prepared. 1. Project Title: A request by Pick-A-Part, to establish a salvage and wrecking (dismantling) yard. 2. Lead Agency Name: City of San Bernardino Address: 300 North "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 3. Contact Person: Joe Bellandi Phone Number: 909-384-5057 4. Project Location (Address/Nearest cross-streets): 407 E. 9th Street and 343 E. 6th Street 5. Project Sponsor: Address: Pick-A-Part/Jerry Jaeckels 407 E. 9th Street San Bernardino CA 92410 6. General Plan Designation: The northern portion of the site (existing business) is CG-I, Commercial General and the southern portion of the site (proposed expansion) is RS, Residential Suburban. 7. Description of Project (Describe the whole action involved, including, but not limited to, later phases of the project and any secondary, support, or off-site feature necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary): Pick-A-Part is requesting a General Plan Amendment to change in the land use designation from RS, Residential Suburban to IL, Industrial Light for 10.96 acres located on the north side of Sixth Street, approximately 735 feet east of Waterman Avenue, and a Conditional Use Permit to establish a salvage and wrecking facility and parking lot. The proposal is a request to expand the existing Pick- A-Part business located at 407 E. Ninth Street. Staff is recommending a General Plan Amendment to IH, Industrial Heavy salvage and wrecking (dismantling) yard. Staff also recommends that the General Plan Amendment include the existing business located at 407 E 9th Street. The existing business (10.7 acres) is in the CG-I, Commercial General land use district. The total project site will encompass the area between 6th Street and 9th Street, approximately 21.66 acres (Attachment A, Location Map and Site Plan). A vehicle storage yard is proposed on 6.05 acres on the west portion of the property fronting along 6th Street for the receipt and storage of vehicles. Except for an 80' x 275' (22,000 square feet) area under and in front of a designated fluid drainage area and fire access lane, the storage area will be IS I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY decomposed granite. A 6' x 8' modular building (Structure 4 on tbe Site Plan) for a security guard is proposed at tbe entrance to tbe vehicle storage area from Sixtb Street. A 30' x 80' canopy (Structure 3 on tbe Site Plan) is also proposed in tbis area for tbe removal of batteries from vehicles. A 415 space paved parking lot, cashier's trailer and customer staging, employee parking (nortbwest comer of expansion area) and auto glass installation and repair facility are proposed on tbe remainder of tbe 10.96 acres. The parking lot is for Pick-A-Part customers and auto glass installation and repair operations. The main entrance for tbis portion of tbe operation would be relocated from Nintb Street to Sixth Street. A 24' x 60' cashier's trailer (Structure 5 on tbe Site Plan) is proposed adjacent to the nortb end of the parking lot witb a 30' x 60' canopy (Structure 6 on the Site Plan) for customer staging and waiting. An 8' x 20' modular building (Structure 1 on the Site Plan) will be an office for tbe auto glass and windshield repair. A 30' x 120' canopy (Structure 2 on tbe Site Plan) is adjacent to tbis office for storage and work area for tbe windshield repair. Improvements on 6111 Street along tbe property frontage will include a 6' sidewalk witb an 6" curb and gutter, 25' fully landscaped setback area, and a 6' split face block wall. These improvements will fully screen tbe operation, parking, and loading areas of tbe site. On-Site Ooerations The existing business at 407 E. 9tb Street removes parts from vehicles for direct sales, and allows customers to enter tbe yard and remove tbe parts tbey want, and take orders and have employees retrieve parts from a salvaged vehicle for customers. The operation is open to tbe public from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., seven days a week. Employees use equipment to move vehicles and do major work between 6:30 a.m. and 8:00 a.m., before customers are allowed on site. The proposed project provides a new parking lot on the nortb side of Sixtb Street for customers who remove their own parts. Customers will access tbe existing salvage yard from tbe parking lot and pay for parts at tbe new cashier's structure. Otber operations, including parts sales and removal of parts by employees for customers would remain on Nintb Street. In addition to tbe new parking lot, tbe 10.96-acre site would allow for tbe receipt of intake of vehicles and storage until tbey obtain Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) clearances. The vehicle storage operation is for used and abandoned vehicles tbat are delivered to tbe site. The vehicles are stored in a containment area where tbe battery and fluids are removed. The license plates and vehicle identification numbers (VIN) are removed and sent to tbe DMV for final clearances for salvage. This containment area is located on the western portion of tbe property on which a 2,400 square foot concrete pad is proposed. When stored, tbe vehicles are not stacked on top of each otber in tbe storage area. All fluids will be stored in metal enclosed barrels and picked up by KCB Recycling once a week. KCB uses a government approved modified manifest which lists all locations tbey service. No more tban 500 gallons of fluid will be stored on tbe property, which makes tbe operation exempt from hazardous material permits. Batteries are taken out and resold on tbe Pick-A-Part lot. IS 2 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Once the vehicles have the DMV clearance they will be transferred from the vehicle storage area to the Pick-A-Part salvage yard for the sale of parts. The equipment used to move the vehicles is a 1999 Caterpular Series 80 forklift and a 1980 John Deere loader/forklift. Additional similar equipment may be added for the proposed facility. The site design proposes a gate at the north end of the property to allow for the movement of stored~hicles to the sales area. This will prevent potential circulation congestion that would result if the vehicles were towed around the block to the Pick-A-Part main entrance on 9th Street. The cashier's booth is a modular trailer of approximately 1,440 square feet to be located near the north property line. It will be used for the collection of money and organization of customer ingress and egress into the Pick-A-Part operation north of the vehicle storage lot. No customer access will be allowed from the cashier's trailer and adjacent customer staging and waiting area into the storage area to the west and will be fenced. Currently, the auto glass installation and repair shop is in operation on the northeast corner of the Pick - A-Part lot on 9th Street. The glass shop will be relocate to a 160 square foot modular trailer at the southeast corner of the site along 6th Street. In addition to the trailer, a 4,800 square foot concrete pad will be installed to provide repair bays and glass storage under a canopy. About 85 to 90 percent of the glass is salvaged from the Pick-A-Part yard. The existing operations employ a total of about thirty people. A maximum of twenty employees is on site at any time. An additional thirty employees are anticipated to be hired. The existing business accepts about 650 vehicles a month for salvage. This is expected to increase to about 1,000 vehicles per month. Most vehicles are towed to the site, with only a couple vehicles per day driven to the site: The existing business has 250 to 300 customers per day on weekdays and about 400 to 450 customers per day on weekends. They anticipate this will approximately double to about 600 customers per day on weekdays and 900 customers per day on weekends. Parkin!! and Circulation A parking area will be provided along the east portion of the site along 6th. A total of 415 parking stalls will be provided of which 9 will be designated for handicapped parking. Two drive approaches are proposed to be installed on 6th Street to provide access onto the site. At the west end of the property a driveway will be provided strictly for the delivery of vehicles. The second driveway located on the east end of the property will be for the general public. This driveway will lead directly to the glass shop and the parking area. 8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The surrounding land uses include: To the north across 9th street is a shopping center in the CH, Commercial Heavy land Use District. To the west along Waterman Avenue is a shopping center, 5 dismantling yards, 3 single-family residences and 2 tire shops in the CG-l, Commercial Land Use district. To the east is a steel manufacturing business in the IL, Industrial Light land use district. To IS 3 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY the south are salvage and heavy equipment yards in the CG-I, Commercial General and RS, Residential Suburban land use districts. 9. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, fmance approval, or participation agreement): None - IS 4 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY ENVIRONMENT AL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. o Land Use and Planning o Population and Housing IZI Earth Resources IZI Water o Air Quality ~Transportation/Circulation o Biological Resources o Energy and Mineral Resources o Hazards o Noise o Mandatory Findings of Significance o Public Services ~ Utilities and Service Systems o Aesthetics ~ Cultural Resources o Recreation Determination. On the basis of this Initial Study, the City of San Bernardino, Environmental Review Committee [mds: That the proposed project COULD NOT have significant effect on the environment, D and a NEGATNE DECLARATION will be prepared. That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the J:8:I environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. That the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. That although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the D environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ErR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. .~ ~J'~Ll.'_ 81 ature :::J;;t" _ ~~ / IAN Dr Printed Name J;J.. /7 /Y'f Date / I IS 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant impact Incorporated impact No Impact I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Will the orooosal result in: a) A conflict with the land use as 0 0 1:8:1 0 designated based on the review of the General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Districts Map? b) Development within an Airport District 0 0 0 1:8:1 as identified in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AlCUZ) Report and the Land Use Zoning District Map? c) Development within Foothill Fire 0 0 0 1:8:1 Zones A & B, or C as identified on the Land Use Districts Zoning Map? d) Other? 0 0 0 0 II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Will the proposal: a) Remove existing housing (including 0 0 0 1:8:1 affordable housing) as verified by a site survey/evaluation? b) Create a significant demand for 0 0 0 1:8:1 additional housing based on the proposed use and evaluation of project size? c) Induce substantial growth in an area 0 0 0 1:8:1 either directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or an extension of major infrastructure)? d) Other? 0 0 0 0 IS 6 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less 1ban Significant Mitigation Significant Imoact Incorporated Impact - No Impact III. EARTH RESOURCES: WilI the proposal result in: a) Earth movement (cut and/or fill) on D D D [gJ slopes of 15% or more based on information contained in the Preliminary Project Description Form No.D? b) Development and/or grading on a slope D D D [gJ greater than 15% natural grade based on review of General Plan HMOD map? c) Erosion, dust or unstable soil D D [gJ D conditions from excavation, grading or fill? d) Development within the Alquist-Priolo D D D [gJ Special Studies Zone as defmed in Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic, Figure 47, of the City's General Plan? e) Modification of any unique geologic or D D D [gJ physical feature based on field review? f) Development within areas defined as D D D [gJ having high potential for water or wind erosion as identified in Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic, Figure 53, of the City's General Plan? g) Modification of a channel, creek or D D D [gJ river based on a field review or review of USGS Topographic Map Redlands Calif. h) Development within an area subject to D D D [gJ landslides, mudslides, subsidence or other similar hazards as identified in Section 12.0, Geologic & Seismic, Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the City's General Plan? IS 7 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant . Impact Incomorated Irnnact No Irnnact i) Development within an area subject to 0 0 ~ 0 liquefaction as shown in Section 12.0, . - Geologic & Seismic, Figure 48, of the City's General Plan? j) Other? 0 0 0 0 IV. WATER. Will the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage 0 0 0 ~ patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces that cannot be mitigated by Public Works Standard Requirements to contain and convey runoff to approved storm drain based on review of the proposed site plan? b) Significant alteration in the course or 0 0 0 ~ flow of flood waters based on consultation with Public Works staff? c) Discharge into surface waters or any 0 0 ~ 0 alteration of surface water quality based on requirements of Public Works to have runoff directed to approved storm drains? d) Changes in the quantity or quality of 0 0 0 ~ ground water? e) Exposure of people or property to 0 0 0 ~ flood hazards as identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 0607lC8682 F, and Section 16.0, Flooding, Figure 62, of the City's General Plan? t) Other? 0 0 0 0 IS 8 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant ImDact Incoroorated Imoact No ImDact V ~ AIR QUALITY. Will the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or D D t8J D contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation based on the thresholds in the SCAQMD's "CEQA Air Quality Handbook"? b) Expose sensitive receptors to D D D t8J pollutants? c) Alter air movement, moisture, or D D D t8J temperature, or cause any change in climate? d) Create objectionable odors based on D D D t8J information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form? VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. D D D D Could the proposal result in: a) A significant increase in traffic D D t8J D volumes on the roadways or intersections or an increase that is significantly greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b) Alteration of present patterns of D D D t8J circulation? c) A disjointed pattern of roadway D D D 0 improvements? d) Impact to rail or air traffic? D D D 0 e) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or D D D t8J off-site based on the requirements in Chapter 19.24 of the Development Code? f) Increased safety hazards to vehicles, D D D t8J bicyclists or pedestrians? IS 9 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Imnact Incomorated bnnact No Imnact g) Conflict with adopted policies 0 0 0 ~ supporting alternative transportation? h) Inadequate emergency access or access 0 0 0 ~ to nearby uses? i) Other? 0 0 0 0 VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Could the proposal result in: a) Development within the Biological 0 0 0 ~ Resources Management Overlay, as identified in Section 10.0, Natural Resources, Figure 41, of the City's General Plan? b) Impacts to endangered, threatened or 0 0 0 ~ rate species or their habitat (including, but not limited to, plants, mammals, fish, insects and birds)? c) Impacts to the wildlife disbursal or 0 0 0 ~ migration corridors? d) Impacts to wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, 0 0 0 ~ riparian and vernal pool)? e) Removal of viable, mature trees based 0 0 0 ~ on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form and verified by site survey/evaluation (6" or greater trunk diameter at 4' above the ground)? f) Other? 0 0 0 0 VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy 0 0 0 ~ conservation plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a 0 0 0 ~ wasteful and inefficient manner? IS 10 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than -. Significant Mitigation Significant - - Imoact Incorporated Imoact No Imoact c) Result in the loss of availability of a D D D ~ known mineral resource that would be of futJ!re value to the region and the residents of the State? IX. HAZARDS. Will the proposal: a) Use, store, transport or dispose of D D ~ D hazardous or toxic materials based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. G(l) and G(2) (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Involve the release of hazardous D D D ~ substances? c) Expose people to the potential D D D ~ health/safety hazards? d) Other? D D D D x. NOISE. Could the proposal result in: a) Development of housing, health care D D D ~ facilities, schools, libraries, religious facilities or other noise sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior as identified in Section 14.0, Noise, Figures 57 and 58, of the City's General Plan? IS 11 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant hnnact Incomorated hnnact No-hnnact b) Development of new or expansion of 0 0 0 ~ existing industrial, commercial or other uses which generate noise levels above an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior that may affect areas containing housing, schools, health care facilities or other sensitive uses based on information in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. G(l) and evaluation of surrounding land uses No. C, and verified by site survey/evaluation? - c) Other? 0 0 0 0 XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 ~ b) Medical aid? 0 0 0 ~ c) Police protection? 0 0 0 ~ d) Schools? 0 0 0 ~ e) Parks or other recreational facilities? 0 0 0 ~ f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 ~ g) Maintenance of public facilities, 0 0 0 ~ including roads? h) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 ~ XII. UTILITIES. Will the proposal, based on 0 0 0 ~ the responses of the responsible Agencies, Departments, or Utility Company, impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? a) Natural gas? 0 0 0 ~ IS 12 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than '- .- Significant Mitigation Significant !mnact Incomorated !mnact No !mnact b) Electricity? 0 0 0 ~ c) Communications systems? 0 0 0 ~ d) Water distribution? 0 0 0 ~ e) Water treatment or sewer? 0 0 0 ~ t) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 ~ g) Result in a disjointed pattern of utility 0 0 0 ~ extensions based on review of existing patterns and proposed extensions? h) Other? 0 0 0 0 XIII. AESTIIETICS. a) Could the proposal result in the 0 0 0 ~ obstruction of any significant or important scenic view based on evaluation of the view shed verified by site survey/evaluation? b) Will the visual impact of the project 0 0 ~ 0 create aesthetically offensive changes in the existing visual setting based on a site survey and evaluation of the proposed elevations? c) Create significant light or glare that 0 0 0 ~ could impact sensitive receptors? d) Other? 0 0 0 ~ XN. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Could the proposal result in: a) Development in a sensitive 0 0 0 ~ archaeological area as identified in Section 3.0, Historical, Figure 8, of the City's General Plan? IS 13 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Inco['JlOrated Impact No Impact b) The alteration or destruction of a 0 0 0 rgj prehistoric or historic archaeological site by development within an archaeological sensitive area as identified in Section 3.0, Historical, Figure 8, of the City's General Plan? c) Alteration or destruction of a historical 0 0 0 rgj site, structure or object as listed in the City's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? d) Other? 0 0 0 0 XV. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand for neighborhood 0 0 0 rgj or regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Mfect existing recreational 0 0 0 rgj opportunities? XVI. MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 rgj degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 rgj achieve short-term, to the disadvantage oflong-term, environmental goals? IS 14 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Potentially Potentially Significant Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 ~ indi0dually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) . d) Does the project have environmental 0 0 0 ~ effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? IS 15 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY DISCUSSION OF SPECIFIED CHECKLIST RESPONSES L LAND USE AND PLANNING La. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment to change the land use designations from CG-l, Commercial General for the existing site and RS, Residential Suburban for the proposed site to IH, Industrial Heavy and a Conditional Use Permit to establish a salvage and wrecking (dismantling) yard and parking lot. This General Plan Amendment would reduce the potential residential development by 10.96 acres or .0005% and commercial development by 10.70 acres, or .0035% and increase industrial development by 21.66 acres or .0074%. Neither are considered significant In general, residential uses are distributed throughout the western, central and northern portions of the City. The southeast and south-central portions contain the least housing due to the predominance and impacts of the former Norton Air Force Base and industrial uses and industrial land use designations. The EIR also identifies the fact that development has resulted in fragmented and inconsistent patterns and quality of uses. Some areas have developed as islands unrelated to adjacent land uses or the character of the existing development. There are five existing auto-dismantling yards which front on Waterman Avenue and are along the western boundary of the project. One of these, All GM Recycling also has significant frontage along Sixth Street. Another auto dismantling use is located on Fifth Street, between Waterman Avenue and Cooley Street, just south of the subject property. There is also a vehicle storage yard on the south side of Fifth Street. There are also numerous vehicle and auto service uses to the west of the project site along Waterman Avenue, east of the project site along Ninth Street, and south along Cooley Street. Opposite the project site, on Sixth Street is Ray Kelly Heavy Equipment Service and McCray Truck Repair is located along Cooley Street, at the northeast corner of Cooley and Fifth Streets. To the east of the existing Pick-A-Part is a steel fabrication facility which fronts on Preston Street. There are several existing single-family residences in the vicinity of the property, some of which are vacant or have been converted to offices or commercial uses. On the east-side along Sixth Street are two properties with single- family residences, which are densely overgrown, with a considerable accnrnulation of trash and debris on-site. The well-maintained residence on Sixth Street at the southwest comer of the site is to be buffered with an eight-foot split faced block wall. This residence already abuts commercial and heavy industrial type uses. The existing and proposed project is consistent with the character of the neighborhood and the uses in the immediate area. The existing Pick-A-Part is in a CG-l Commercial General land use district. The proposed expansion is in an RS, Residential Suburban land IS 16 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY use district. Both the CG-l and the RS land use districts are inconsistent with the existing and surrounding land uses. This General Plan Amendment will allow the area to eliminate some of the islands of inconsistent land uses and allow for progressive and consistent development. -....... Lb. The project site is not located within an Airport District. The nearest general avi~ion airport is San Bernardino International Airport, approximately two miles to the southeast. No adverse impact from airport conflicts is anticipated and no airport land use or conflict mitigation is required. I.e. The project site is not located within a High Fire Hazard Area, as identified on Figure 4 of the General Plan and is several miles southwest of these zones. No mitigation is required. II. POPULATION AND HOUSING II.a. The project site has an existing business on the northern 10.7 acres and the southern 10.96 acres are vacant. No mitigation is required. II. b. A maximum total of 55 employees are anticipated at full development, many of whom are already employed at the existing facility. It is expected that the proposed project would provide jobs for existing residents of the City. A housing demand is not anticipated and no mitigation is required. II.c. The proposed project extends the existing pattern and character of existing development and is considered infill development. No expansion or extension of infrastructure is required and no mitigation is required. III. EARTH RESOURCES lILa-c. The site is relatively flat with less than five percent slope. No significant alteration of the topography is proposed. The site will be graded in compliance with Public Works Standard Requirements and paved or covered with decomposed granite as required by the Development Code to control dust. No additional mitigation is required. III.d. The project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone as shown on Figure 47 of the City's General Plan. No mitigation is required. IILe. The site is partially developed and southern 10.96 acres is a vacant, flat parcel with no unique geological or physical features. No mitigation is required. III.f. The project site is not located within an area defmed as having high potential of water or wind erosion as identified on Figure 53 of the City's General Plan. No mitigation is required. IS 17 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY III.g. The project site is located approximately 500 feet west of a San Bernardino County Flood Control channel improved with a concrete box channel. The proposed project is a flat site and does not involve any alteration of a channel or watercourse. No' mitigation is required. '. .- III.h. The project site is located within an area of potential ground subsidence as identified on Figure 51 of the City's General Plan. All foundations and structures will be constructed in compliance with the Uniform Building Code. No additional mitigation is required. III. i. The project site is located within an area of High Liquefaction Susceptibility as identified on Figure 54 of the City's General Plan. All foundations and structures will be constructed in compliance with the Uniform Building Code. No additional mitigation is required. IV. WATER IV.a. The proposed development of the 10.96 acres will alter absorption rates and surface runoff to a minor extent, which will be mitigated by Public Works Standard requirements. Specific measures are include in the standard requirements to control surface runoff and related onsite and offsite drainage. No additional mitigation is required. IV.b. No significant alteration of flood waters will occur as a result of the proposed project. No mitigation is required. IV.c-d.No significant changes in surface or ground water quality water quality is anticipated to result which will be mitigated by Public Works Standard requirements. Vehicle fluids and hazardous materials are extracted and removed from vehicles for recycling in a specially designated containment area and are removed weekly. The proposed project will be required to comply with the National Pollutant Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. No additional mitigation is required. Inv. The project site is not located within an area of flood hazard as identified on Figure 62 of the City's General Plan and is identified as Zone X unshaded. No mitigation is required. V. AIR QUALITY V.a. The proposed project is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The South Coast Air Quality (SCAQMD) has jurisdiction over air quality issues and regulations within the SCAB. The SCAQMD has published a "CEQA Air Quality Handbook" (CEQA Handbook) that identifies thresholds values for emissions to assist local agencies in determining if a project emissions could pose a significant adverse impact to air quality and air quality standards. IS 18 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY The thresholds are: Reactive Organic Compounds (ROC) Nitrogen Oxides (Nox) Carbon M~noxide (CO) Particulate Matter (PMIO) Sulfur Oxides (SOX) 75lbs/day 100 lbs/day 550 lbs/day 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day The existing facility generates approximately 400 to 450 customers per day on a heavy day and 250 customers on a light day. It is anticipated that development of the southern 10.96 acres will double or perhaps triple the number of customers on a peak day for the combined uses. The CEQA Handbook discourages the assumption that emissions from a project will be offset by reduced emissions within the SCAB. However, in this case, the expansion of this project will be offsetting emissions from the same activities at another location. By locating in this area where a concentration of similar businesses are located, reduced emissions will be achieved by less vehicle trips to different areas. Therefore, this amount of increase will not generate emissions that exceed the threshold values for emissions. No mitigation is required. V.b. Air emissions do not exceed thresholds and removal and storage of hazardous materials are in amounts less than threshold levels for SCAQMD permits. No additional mitigation is required. V.c. The proposed project is not anticipated to alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, or cause any change in climate. No mitigation is required. V.d. The proposed project is not anticipated to create any significant objectionable odors. No mitigation is required. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION VI.a. Overall trip generation for the combined uses is anticipated to approximately double with development of the 10.96 acres. This would result in an increase of approximately 800 additional trips on a heavy day. However, except for pass-by trips, these trips would typically not occur at peak hours, other than increases in employee trips, estimated at only 30 additional peak hour trips split between a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The cumulative increase in traffic will require a signal at the intersection of 6rh Street and Waterman Avenue. The applicant will be required to fund one-half of the cost of a signal. The Public Works Division will monitor the traffic increase and install the signal as the traffic increases warrant. VI.b. The proposed project will shift primary access and parking from Ninth Street to Sixth Street. The additional trips are within the capacity and adequate levels of service for a IS 19 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY secondary arterial street, such as Sixth Street. No significant impacts are anticipated and no additional mitigation is required. VLc. The roadway system already exists and no major extensions or modifications are proposed. The project will widen the street and install curb and gutter across the property frontage on Sixth Street as required by the Public Works Division. No additional mitigation is required. VLd. The proposed project will not utilize or affect rail or air traffic and no mitigation is required. VLe. The existing dismantling and sales facility currently has a parking lot with access to Ninth Street. A total of 415 parking spaces are proposed on the 10.96 acres, including nine handicapped parking spaces. Based upon one space per 300 square feet of building area, six spaces would be required (l,648 square feet of buildings/330). Based upon one space per 10,000 square feet of gross yard area, an additional 48 spaces would be required (10.96 acres = 477,235 square feet/l0,OOO). Total required parking would be 54 spaces, with three handicapped. Parking provided is 415 spaces with nine handicapped. Substantially more than the required spaces are provided onsite. No mitigation is required. VLf. No safety hazards are anticipated to result to vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians. No mitigation is required. VLg. The proposed use is focused on vehicle uses and does not conflict with adopted policies supporting alternative transportation. No mitigation is required. VLh. The proposed project does not block or change any emergency access or access to nearby uses. No mitigation is required. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES VILa-d. The project site is not within any Biological Resources Management Overlay, or any Riparian Corridor, as identified on figure 41 of the City's General Plan. There are no anticipated impacts to endangered, threatened, or rare species or impacts to wildlife disbursal or migration corridors or to wetlands habitats. No mitigation is required. VILe. Three trees, located in the southwest portion of the site will be removed. This will be offset by planting of trees in the landscaped area along Sixth Street and in the proposed parking lot. No mitigation is required. IS 20 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES VIlLa-b. The proposed project will not conflict with any adopted energy conservation plans or use of nonrenewable resources, rather it contributes to recycling of materials and petrochemicals which are consistent with energy conservation programs. No mitigation is required. VIII.c. The project site is not located within an area of known or identified mineral resources as identified in City's General Plan. No mitigation is required. IX. HAZARDS IX.a-c. Vehicles are initially stored in a containment area where the vehicle fluids are extracted and batteries are removed. This containment area is located along the west side of the property where a 2,400 square foot canopy is proposed. All fluids will be stored in metal enclosed barrels and picked up by KCB Recycling once a week. KCB uses a govermnent approved modified manifest which lists all locations they service. No more than 500 gallons of fluid will be stored on the property, which makes the operation exempt from hazardous material permits. Batteries are taken out and resold on the Pick-A-Part lot. No mitigation is required. X. NOISE X.a. The proposed project involves development of a vehicle salvage and storage lot and glass shop and does not a proposed development near any sensitive uses. No mitigation is required. X.b. The proposed project involves the establishment of a vehicle storage lot and glass shop. Noise will not exceed allowed noise levels at the property line. No further mitigation is required. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES XLa. The City Fire Department maintains 11 fire stations spread strategically throughout the City. The closest fire station to the site is located on Third Street, just west of Waterman Avenue, approximately one-half mile from the site. No mitigation is required. XLb. Emergency medical services are provided by City Fire Department trained personnel through the EMT-Paramedic program. The closest hospitals are the San Bernardino Community Hospital, St. Bernardine's Hospital, and Loma Linda University Hospital. All hospitals are within a five to ten minute drive from the project site. No mitigation is required. IS 21 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY XI.c. The City's General Plan ties future demand for police services to growth in population. The proposed project is not forecast to cause any growth in population. No mitigation is required. XI.d. The project is not forecast to cause any increase in population and therefore no impact on schools. No mitigation is required. XI.e. The project is not forecast to cause any increase in population and employees are anticipated to be local residents, therefore no impact on parks or other recreational services is anticipated. No mitigation is required. XU. The operation is dedicated to recycling of vehicles, thereby mitigating impacts on the solid waste system. Hazardous materials are also removed and recycled. No adverse impacts are anticipated on the solid waste system. No mitigation is required. XI.g. The proposed project is an infill project with all public facilities existing. No significant impacts are anticipated. No mitigation is required. XII. UTILITIES XII.a-c. The proposed project is an infill project with all utilities existing. No significant impacts are anticipated. No mitigation is required. XII.d. The City General Plan determined that adequate water resources are available for full development of the City. Although this project does involve a change in land use, anticipated water usage would be less from the proposed project, than residential and commercial development consistent with present designations. No mitigation is required. XII.e. The proposed use anticipates a maximum of 55 employees and limited public usage of restroom facilities. No adverse impacts are anticipated on waste water or treatment systems. No mitigation is required. XII.f. The proposed development of the 10.96 acres will alter absorption rates and surface runoff to a minor extent, which will be mitigated by Public Works Standard Requirements. Specific measures are include in the standard requirements to control surface runoff and related onsite and offsite drainage. No additional mitigation is required. XII.g. The proposed project is an infill project with all utilities existing. No significant impacts are anticipated. No mitigation is required. IS 22 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY XIII. AESTHETICS XIII.a. The proposed project site is flat, and vacant with no significant features. Construction involves only single-story structures, which will not obstruct any view sheds of surrounding properties. The vehicles that are stored on site are not stacked. - No mitigation is required. XIII.b. The proposed project will be completely surrounded by a six foot split face block wall along the Sixth Street Frontage and the neighboring residential use, and an eight foot block wall, solid fence, or a landscaped wrought iron fence will surround the rest of the property. No additional mitigation is required. XIII.c. Lighting is proposed for the parking lot and will use fixtures that direct light downward and away from adjacent properties. The proposed lighting will be a minimum of one foot candle maintained across the surface of the parking lot, in compliance with Development Code ~ 19.24.060 (7). No additional mitigation is required. XIV. CULTURAL RESOURCES XIV.a-c. The project site is not located within a sensitive archaeological area as identified on Figure 8 of the City's General Plan and no historical resources are shown as identified in the City's Historical Resources Reconnaissance Survey. A records check was completed by the Archaeological Information Center of the San Bernardino County Museum, who recommended a field survey. A Phase I Study was completed by Tetra Tech, Inc. Tetra Tech, Inc. concluded that no archaeological sites of prehistoric or historic character were identified and no further work is recommended. No mitigation is required. XV. RECREATION XV.a-b. The project is not forecast to cause any increase in population and employees are anticipated to be local residents, therefore no impact on parks or other recreational services is anticipated. No mitigation is required. XVI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNFICANCE XVI. a-d. The proposed project is a General Plan Amendment, to change the land use designation from CG-l, Commercial General for the existing Pick-Apart operation and from RS, Residential Suburban for the proposed project, to IH, Industrial Heavy and a Conditional Use Permit for vehicle salvage and wrecking (dismantling) yard, glass repair, and parking lot on the 10.96 acres fronting on Sixth Street. Measures are identified to mitigate potentially significant adverse impacts for Water Quality (surface. runoff), Transportation/Circulation (increased traffic) and Utilities (absorption rates and surface runoff) Aesthetics (visual impact). All other issues were determined to experience no impact or non-significant impact without any mitigation. Based on the data and findings in this IS 23 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES INITIAL STUDY Initial Study, the City can approve this project and it can be implemented without causing any significant adverse environmental impacts. Since this project does not involve any activities and physical changes to the environment that may be significant without mitigation, a mitigated Negative Declaration is recommended for adoption by the City as the appropriate CEQA environmental determination. REFERENCES. The following references cited in the Initial Study are on file in the Development Services Department. 1. City of San Bernardino General Plan. 2. City of San Bernardino General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Districts Map. 3. City of San Bernardino Development Code (Title 19 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code). 4. City of San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey. 5. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones Map. 6. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook. 7. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 8. Public Works Standard Requirements-water. 9. Public Works Standard Requirements-grading. , IS 24 1 o o o . ~@~)f RESOLUTION NO. 1 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING GENERAL 3 PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 99-05 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, TO AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 4 FROM CG-l, COMMERCIAL GENERAL, AND RS, RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN, TO m, INDUSTRIAL HEAVY, FOR 21.66 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN ()I'll AND 9111 5 STREETS. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals (a) WHEREAS, the General Plan for the City of San Bernardino was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-159 on June 2, 1989. (b) WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 99-05 to the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning Commission on January 25, 2000, after a noticed public hearing, and the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval has been considered by the Mayor and Common Council. (c) WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared on December 2, 1999 and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee and the Planning Commission who both determined that General Plan Amendment No. 99-05 would not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore, recommend that a Negative Declaration be adopted. (d) WHEREAS, the proposed Negative Declaration received a 21-day public review period from December 9, 1999 through December 29, 1999 and all comments relative thereto have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the Mayor and Common Council in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local regulations. (e) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed public hearing on January 25, 2000 in order to receive public testimony and written and oral comments on 1 l-37 JIZZ /20 1 c o Staff Report on February 22, 2000. (g) WHEREAS, the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 99-05 is deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the existing General Plan. SECTION 2. NelZative Declaration NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the c 2 " o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 C. 10 11 12 13 D. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 o A. o manufacturing industries in locations where they will be compatible with and not adversely impact adjacent land uses.. B. , The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that any development proposed for the site in the future will be required to meet the extensive development standards that are in place to buffer nearby sensitive uses and that enable industrial projects to blend with adjacent neighborhoods. The proposed amendment would not impact the balance of land uses within the City in that the addition of industrial designated land will provide additional opportunities for economic development that has been lost during the recession of the last several years. In the case of an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map, the subject parcel(s) is physically suitable (including, but not limited to access, provision of utilities, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and absence of physical constraintS) for the requested land use designation(s) and the anticipated land use development(s) in that the amendment area is bounded on both sides by developed, dedicated streets, and existing infrastructure suitable for urban development. SECTION 4. Amendment BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino is amended by changing the land use designation from CG-I, Commercial General, and RS, Residential Suburban, to IH, Industrial Heavy, for 21.66 acres located between 6rh and 9'" Streets. This amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 99-05 and its location is outlined on the map entitled Attachment A, and further described in 3 , c o o 1 2 B. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Attachment B, copies of which are attached and incorporated herein for reference. General Plan Amendment No. 99-05 shall become effective immediately upon adoption , of this resolution. SECTION 5. Map Notation This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as having been previously adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 6. Notice of DetenJlination The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's compliance with California Environmental Quality Act in preparing the Negative Declaration. " c o o 1 RESOLlmON. . . ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 99-05 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, TO AMEND THE .2 GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATIONS FROM. CG-l, COMMERCIAL 3 GENERAL, AND RS, RESIDENTIAL SUBURBAN, TO m, INDUSTRIAL BEA VY, FO~ 21.66 ACRES LOCATED BETWEEN ()I'B AND 9TH STREETS. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the day of , 2000. by the following vote, to wit: Council Members AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT . ESTRADA LIEN MCGINNIS SCHNETZ SUAREZ ANDERSON MILLER City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of 2000. JUDITH V ALLES, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PENMAN City Attorney #-7'P~ 5 ... ATIACHMENT "A" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION PROJECT: GPA 99-05 CUP 99-12 HEARING DATE: 02122100 u LEGAL DESCRIPTION APN: NORTH 0278-161-03 & 07 0278-141-36 & 37 0140-301-18, 19 & 20 . - _1_.1 -1 9:l1 Stre~t ~, r -,."oS.;' .. - 1.. ... -; -- -1- . -~ II IE!.. ~~. .......-- <: :. -c:: ~. . . ~- --~t . 1-<. _Q,)8'. . ....... ~ctt! . :s: ::.:~ ........ .:~:'. .....~. :.' #>', . . .,,~ ! . ~ . . ";:,,'. . ~'..c.-': . ..: t '.: '. . :; · !-.I. I' .......,;,t-l. . . .!t --..... " ~ .-. @ 10 ~ L4'AC. l i !Z.:. . , ~ ~. @) . ....~ :'.. 6) (if Ci) . . ., ~:f!!3~:.::",:. 6th Street -=~::~ .. ,I ...,---- .. .. .~ . . ., . .- I :. ...- <<81"> ~ -~. . . . - . t ! . . . . ...!&!P.!'t___ . . . . i- . I .. . . . . . . ". .. . :- ; ! . .. .-- . . . . .... --~- . .r. _..., Li.3 R . . ..---' ~~7.- ',i!) . . . " ..Ne ,. n.. "'C' ._~ u..~ (i) @ . o (Ii · " ......p.E: RIVi..... ". .' ~ " FUe No. 72271.02 ATTACHMENT liB" o The land referred to In this report Is situated in the City of SAN BERNARDINO, County of SAN BERNARDINO, State of California and described as follows: , Legal Description: PARCEL NO.1: THE NORTH 186 FEET OF THE EAST 50 FEET OF THE WEST 425.35 FEET OF LOT 11, BLOCK 43: RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGE 2 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, o PARCEL NO.2: THE WESTERLY 200.92 FEET. MORE OR LESS, OF THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 11 AND 12, IN BLOCK 43 OF RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7, PAGE 2 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 11, 425.35 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE EAST 429.92 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 11 AND 12 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 14, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF BEAM SUBDIVISION, TRACT NO. 2078, PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 30, PAGE 15 OF MAPS; THENCE SOUTH ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 976.20 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 91N SAID BEAM SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12 AND LOT 11, 429.92 FEET TO A POINT 425.35 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE NORTH 976.70 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL NO.3: c THE EASTERLY 229.00 FEET OF THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 11 AND 12 IN BLOCK 43 OF THE RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, AS PER PLAT RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS. PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 11, 425.35 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE EAST 429.92 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 11 AND 12 TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 14, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP OF BEAN SUBDIVISION, TRACT 2078, PER PLAT RECORDED IN'BOOK 30 OF MAPS. PAGE 15: THENCE SOUTH ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 976.20 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 91N SAID BEAM SUBDIVISION; THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 12 AND LOT 11, 429.92 FEET TO A POINT 425.35 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 11; THENCE NORTH 976.70 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING FROM THE ABOVE-OESCRIBED LAND A CERTAIN 3 INCH WELL LOCATED NEAR THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE OF SAID PROPERTY, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO TAKE THE WATER FLOWING AND TO FLOW FROM SAID WELL AND TO CONVEY THE SAME BY MEANS OF PIPE LINES OR OTHERWISE FROM SAID WELL TO THE PROPERTY LYING IMMEDIATELY EAST THEREOF AND CONVEYED TO LEE BEAM UNDER DATE OF MARCH 24,1914. February 22, 2000 City Council City of San Bernardino 300 N. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92408 Honorable Council Members: ... . HOGLE-IRElAND -#- :s 7 . ~Hered IIIIU AeGord at I I Cc ALandJ'lanning&Dm:"'e1m',\fMe'Ifi\l'tf~'iltms Mtg: 2.. L 2. () (j D\ _____... re i\~",;Jii Item.... .3 7 4-~t.L Ctwv12- GilY ClerklGOC Secy City .At Sail tl"lfldrdino Attached are letters received from various agencies expressing their appreciation for the assistance received from existing Pick.A-Part facilities operated by Ted Smith and Jerry Jaeckels. A summary of each letter is listed below. . Tri City Towing, Inc . San Bernardino County Fire Department . Lake Elsinore Unified School District . Riverside County Fire Department . City of Riverside . Riverside County Fire . Adlerhorst International Police Dog Training RE: 9" Street Facility Facility on 9'" street has reduced drive times for disposal in the Riverside facility. RE: Riverside Facility Pick-A-Part donated vehicles for the Simulated Live Action Melodrama (S.L.A.M) at A.B. Miller High School in Fontana. Vehicles used to simulate an accident resulting from drunk driving. RE: Riverside Facility S.L.A.M demonstration at Temescal Canyon High School. RE: Riverside Faciltiy Fire department to training at the Riverside Pick-A-Part location. Vehicle extraction training: Jaws of Life, hydraulic shears, air bags and many other rescue equipment. RE: Riverside Facility Donation of vehicles for advanced Improvised explosive devices (lED) or "bomb" training. RE: Riverside Facility Auto Extraction Class held at the Clark Training Center. Training for many southern California Fire Departments RE: Riverside Facility Continued use of the Riverside Pick-A-Part facility for the training of narcotics officers and their dogs. We appreciate the time taken to review the attached letters. We hope the letters are helpful in identifying the community benefits provided by the Pick-A-Part facilities. 'iCereIY, ~ . .'v;~[jV frY f(jInr,V Je fer MrJ~i I A iate Project anager __ J___L_J::L -... ?u t!-Cttf TOWING, INC. P.O.eox 5250 SAN BiRNARDlNO. CA 92412.5250 (Oog) 884.9211 JANUARY 19, 20UO PLAl'.'NlNG COMMISSION 300ND ST. SAN BERNARDINO, CA 924U8 DEAR I'.ONORABLE COMMISION MEMBERS: MR. TED SMITH 01' PICK. A .PART HAS PROVIDED EXCEPTIONAL SERVICE TO Ot.:R COMPANY FOR THE PAST 10 YEARS. THEY GUARANTEE A BID ON ANY VEHICLE THAT WE HA'IE A V AILABl.J;: fOR LlF.N SALl! NO MA 1"I'F.R MIA T THE CONDITIONS OF THl:i VEHICLE. ONE OF THE IMPORTANT FUCTIONS WE PROVIDE FOR THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO IS THE DISPOSAL OF ABANDONED OR DUELICT VEHICLES fROM nU:i CITY STREEtS. THE ONLY WAY WE ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE nus SERVICE IS TO HAVE A DEPENDAllLE LOCAL SOUll.CE TO DISPOSE OF THE VEKlCLES.. SINCE PICK.A.PART HAS OPEl';"ED UP THEIR SAN BERNARDINO LOCATION IT HAS HELPED OUR BUSINESS BY REDUCING THE DRIVE TIME WI'I.EN WE TAKE TRESE JUNK CARS TO nmIR FACILITY. IT IS VERY IMPORT ANT THAT WE CAN RaYON A SALVAGE llUS1NES UKE PICK.A.PART TO BE WELL MANAGED AND ACCURATE IN THEIR PAPER WORK WHEN DISPOSING OF JUNK CARS. PICK-A.PART HAS AI.W A YS HANDLJ:o:O OUR BUSINESS IN A VERY PROFESSIONAL W ^ Y AND WE HA VF. NEVER HAD A VEHICLF. COME BACK ON US FOR IMPROPER DOCUMENTATION. I BELIEVE '!HE EXPANSION AND REMODEL OF THE EXISTING RECYCLE FACILITY WILL ONLY IMPROVE TIlE AREA AN'D WILL CONTINUE THE PATTERN OF MODERNIZATION OF RECYCLE F AClL1TIES IN THE Crll'. I POIN1' TO THE EXAMPLE SET BY S4N BERNARDJlI;O meCK DiSMANiUNG, AS THE FIRST IN THIS AREA TO ADO A STATE OF THE ART DISMANTLING FACILITY IN SA~ BER."IARDINO. I K:\OW YOU Wll.l. FJJ\'D THE PICK.A.PART LOCATION TO COMPLEMENT THE EFFORTS ALltEADY APPROVED BY THE CITY. SINCERELY, ~__~~-I'd--'''~ STEVEN L JOHN~E~ TRl-ClTY TOWING, INC. COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT .- ---''':-=~~-,-~'';r.....;. 7" - ,.,."..,..,... .~.__.... COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO '1L~;:,-,,\"=,.-;2~.'.,,;:~ .;c!Jj~1!f."~::".;' P. O. Box 1953 . Wrightwood. CA 92397 . 16191 249.3206 Fax 16191 249.632B RICHARD W. SEWEll Fire Chief County Fire Warden April 10, 1997 Mr. Ted Smith Hillside Auto Salvage 376 Pyrite St. Riverside, CA 92509 Sl'B]ECT: H-80....THANKS FOR THE ASSIST....AB Miller High School S.L.A.M. Dear Mr. Smith, I wanted to take a moment and thank you for your assistance in putting helping us put together the Simulated Live Action Melodrama held today at AB. Miller High School in Fontana. The Simulated Live Action Melodrama or S.L.AM. is a program designed to give students intelligent choices about drinking and driving without preaching or thumping of chests. We simulate a borrible traffic accident that occurs because someone drank and drove. Everytbing today seemed to really come together all at once. We had superb weather...excellent cooperation from all agencies....the kids seemed receptive and everything worked as it should. I really appreciate the fact that you folks are willing to commit valuable resources to such a program. The feedback that I got from the school was extremely positive....we really seemed to make an impact. The atmosphere of the audience changed from happy-go-lucky to serious and intent. A large part of our audience was in tears at the end of the program. There has been a great deal of discussion amongst the students and teachers about what they saw and the message. Tbe next program I will be doing is at Bloomington High School on May 8, 1997. Ted, thanks again for your help and support. I really appreciate your sense of community support! Yours in Service, please feel to call upon me if I can ever be of assistance. (00-- ~ ~ S ~ ~"" . \~...~ ~~ .. . LAKE ELSINORE UNIRED SCHOOL DISTRICT 54S Chaney SlrMl, l.ak8 Elsinore. CA 92530 9091674-7731. FAX: 909J874-1716 Dear Agency, On behalf of the associated student body at Temescal Canyon High School and myself, I would like 10 thank you Ill/" pm1icipating in our Operation S.L.A.M. We led that the asscmbly had a positive and elfective influence on the students al T.C./-I.S. on prom night. We could nol have done it with out you. Thanks again!!! h~ OGWlaJ?iuIJ Kelley De~artmo Commissioner of Special Projects GOVERNING BOARD: JeMie Corral . Richard Jenkins, J.D. .1Iidl Knight, Ed.D. . Jellmine Menineeu . Sonje Wilson SUPERINTENDENT: Dellid L Long, Ph.D. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT J. M. HARRIS FIRE CHIEF 210 WEST SAN JACINTO AVENUE. PERRIS, CAUFORNIA 92570. (909) 940-6900 Brain Jossart Hillside Auto Salvage 3760 Pyrite St. Riverside, CA 92509 February 2, 1996 Dear Brian, Just a short note to thank you for supporting your fire department by allowing us to train at your place of business. Vehicle extrication training is a technical facet of our occupation in which we seldom get to practice for the real thing. Through your generous donation, we will be able to provide a higher level of service to the citizens we serve. The training included use of the Jaws of Life, hydraulic shears, hydraulic rams, air bags and a multitude of other rescue equipment. The training benefitted fire fighters from the West Riverside, Pedley, and Highgrove Fire Stations. WE ALL THANK YOU! -- \l.~L~~v. ~ <-. Timothy Walsh Fire Captain West Riverside Forest Fire Station (909)685-5260 Thr-Sat prlnrN on r<<}'Cltd fJdpn @ ;"...~.,:*~...... ,l....:IOP " . <11~~J '. : If)J" I ",.: .~,.1~i>1~ ...........-......-..: CITY OF RIVERSIDE "People Serving PeoP1'fuly 20, 1999 Hillside Auto Wreckers Attention: Ted Dear Ted, Operation Riverside '99 is a unique eight day advanced training and technology transfer exercise which is typica1ly held every two years. During this exercise, scientific staff of Sandia National Laboratories present technology, tools, and techniques, which they have developed to deal with rendering safe sophisticated types of improvised explosive devices (lED) or "bombs". The audience and participants for this exercise are members ofbomb squads or explosive ordinance disposal (EOD) units from local, state, and federaliaw enforcement agencies. Representatives from the U.S. military EOD units and other federal agencies will attend. In addition, select foreign government officials, either from EOD units or from the scientific community, have been invited. Sandia National Labs and Riverside Police Department co-sponsor Operation Riverside. The Riverside Police Department's Technical Services Unit is currently a subcontractor for Sandia Labs in the area of research and development concerning lED's. This program will be held in Riverside from August 10 through August 18, 1999. In order to maximize the impact of this advanced training, challenges will be presented that align with current events or predicted trends. . Realism is key to our success. Past targets of terrorist bombings range from buildings to devices for transportation. Scenarios will be set around these potential targets during the course of the training. We feel that vehicles continue to be potential targets. For this reason, we respectfully request your assistance and hope that you can provide us with 10 vehicles for destruction for our training program. On the first day of Operation Riverside a number of important guests will be invited for lectures and field demonstrations involving some of the technology developed. Among the many invited guests is all U.S. Senators and Congressmen. Certain high governmental officials will be key note speakers during the first days events. Again, I would like to thank you for your help and consideration in this matter. 1 >, /. -./ vUI'- ../,:<,.-",/1 -?~" ~. d."-. Dave Reeves, Sergeant Riverside Police Department Technical Services Unit POLICE DEPARTMENT 41020RANGESTREET . Rlv1>R!lm1l.CAL1FoRNJA92501 . (909) 782.5700 TO: Mr. Ted Smith Hillside Auto Salvage August 4th, 1997. FROM: Capt. Jim Hollingsworth Ben Clark Public Safety Training Center SUBJECT: Vehicle donation. Mr. Smith, I would like to thank you for your kind donation of the eight (8) cars for our Auto Extrication Class held here at Clark Training Center. By using the cars you provided we were able to teach the most current methods of auto extrication to members of numerous Fire Departments from all over Southern California. We are deeply appreciative ofall your continued help in this field. Respectfully, o //;f? .c Hollingsworth Fire Captain Riverside County Fire Department April 22, 1991 Ted Smith Hillside Auto Salvage 3760 Pyrite Street Riverside, CA 92509 Dear !'.r. Smith, At a time when everyone seems to want saneone else to solve the drug problem, you have generously provided a training area for narcotics officers and their dogs. We at Adlerhorst are always trying to use areas for training that will mirror, as closely as possible, what the officers will find on the job. Since vehicles are a major concern, your facility is ideal for our purposes. It is exceptional in that it is convenient and that you have always made it available to us at little or no notice. Over the years. you have enabled Adlerhorst to put hundreds of narcotics detection dogs to work for agencies here in southern California as well as the federal government and other western states. I would like to thank you on . their behalf for your contribution to this very valuable law enforcement tool. rely, David ver Adlerhorst Intarnational, Inc. DR/ny ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAl. INC. 3951 Vernon Avenue. Riverside. Ca 92509 . 714-685-2430 LARGEST PRIVATE POUCE DOG SCHOOL IN THE WORLD. IMPORTING. TRAINING. BREEDING. TRAINING EQUIPMENT ST. L1C, WOOOO02 . OEA: PA0232568. PAIl232520 . ~ .J 1 . I ~ ~. \ l r \ E- ~ ~ c::: E- rr; .j .... \C C-' Z o ..:l < ~ C-' < E- Z o c::: I~ IZ If: rr; - ~ ~ 'I I l'- tv] 9f I I I I ~ (,I' Ilf.t~ II "0 = :I o il E;D ~ = .- s I l. rr; :I E-.o . J Z.:i~ I j ~ ~ ~ , ,Ji ~ ,g OJ) I .. ~Qj:B , ,: ..... '" ~ . 0 ~ '" , c:::.... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~"O~ _ = ... E- ~ 'i: ~-;:"O ~~"O c:::=== E- .5 ~ rFJrI'l= '" ~ - ... ~ ... \C .- .:( ~ Q. ~ O ~ 0 "0- ~o.o ..:lO~ ~.:= ~ c..'i: ~ ~ ~ ",.:'" rr;E-8 I c ~-~.'-~'10 ::I-'J7 ERNARDINO 300 NORTH "D"STREET, SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 82418 R AC H E L C L ARK CITY CLERK February 23, 2000 Jennifer Misumi Hogle-Ireland, Inc. 4200 Latham Street, Suite B Riverside, CA 92501 Dear Ms. Misumi: At the meeting of the Mayor and Common Council held on Tuesday, February 22, 2000, the following action was taken regarding General Plan Amendment No. 99-05, to amend the General Plan designation from CG-l, Commercial General, and RS, Residential Suburban, to IH, Industrial Heavy, and Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12 to allow for an expansion of the salvaging wrecking (dismantling) yard: The Mayor and Common Council closed the public hearing, adopted Resolution No. 2000-39 amending the General Plan land use <lesignations, and approved Conditional Use Permit No. 99-12 based on the Findings of Fact and subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, Rachel G. Clark, CMC City Clerk cc: Michael Hays, Director of Development Services Jerry Jaeckels, Pick-A-Part P. O. 101 131'. SAN IERNARDINO. CA '2402 300 NORTH . D' STREET. SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92418.0001 ('01)1'4-1001 ("')314-1102 FAI-(I.t)3'4.111' TDD/TTY -{'OI}II.-IS.'