Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout40-Planning and Building .CITY OF SAN BE.oARDINO - REQUES100R COUNCIL ACTION From: Al Boughey, Director General Plan Amendment No. 91-15, t Su~~:change the land use designation fro CN to CG-l on the southeast corner Del Rosa Avenue and Eureka Street. Mayor and Common Council Meeting December 2, 1991 Dept: Planning & Building Services Dau: November 14, 1991 Synopsis of Previous Council action: The site was designated CN, Commercial Neighborhood upon the adoption of the General Plan on June 2, 1989. Recommendad motion: That the hearing be closed and the resolution be adopted. ,tt E. ~ itA 'Itif I Signature Al Boughey, Director Contact person: Al Boughey Supporting dau atUched: Staff Report Phone: 384-5357 4 Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $25.00 Source: (Acct. No.) 001-171-53150 IAcct. Descriotion) Professional & Contractural Services I;~'r\ Finance: ~"'-J JJ"--- Council Notas: 7.....n?62 Agenda Item No 7LO ~ITV: OF SAN BERroRDINO - REQUEST ~R COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJBC'l' : General Plan Amendment No. 91-15 Mayor and Common Council Meeting of December 2, 1991. RBODBST This City-initiated application is to change the General Plan land use designation from CN, commercial Neighborhood to CG-1, Commercial General on a 0.6 acre site (see Exhibit A of the Initial Study). The site is located on the southeast corner of Del Rosa Avenue and Eureka Street. BACKGROUND During the hearing process for the adoption of the General Plan on June 2, 1991, a designation of CN was assigned to the site. ANALYSIS The site lies adjacent to an established residential neighborhood and is located at the intersection of a major arterial (Del Rosa Avenue) and a secondary arterial (Eureka street). The CG-1 designation could slightly increase the traffic at the site but it would be within the capabilities of the circulation system. The site is developed with a 6-unit commercial center. It is the intent of the General Plan to locate general commercial types of operations along transportation corridors and at major intersections. The site fits this condition and it will allow for more uses that are slightly more intense than the CN designation but will be limited by site size and by the present development as long as it remains. Future development will also be limited by site size and configuration. The surrounding land use designations are residential, both multi- family and single-family. The property at the northwest corner of the intersection is designated CN. The CG-1 designation is consistent with the intent of the General Plan and is compatible with the surrounding land uses. BNVIRONMENTAL The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the applicant's proposal and the Initial Study on October 3, 1991 and proposed a Negative Declaration. 75-0264 o o General Plan Amendment No. 91-15 Mayor and Common council Meeting December 2, 1991 Page 2 COMMENTS No comments have been received. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning commission unanimously recommended adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 91- 15 at a noticed public hearing on November 6, 1991. MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OPTIONS 1. The Mayor and Common Council may adopt the Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment No. 91- 15 based on the Findings in the resolution. 2. The Mayor and Common Council may deny General Plan Amendment No. 91-15. RECOMMENDATIONS staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the resolution which adopts the Negative Declaration and approves General Plan Amendment No. 91-15. Prepared by: John R. Burke, Assistant Planner for Al Boughey, Director Department of planning and Building services Attachment 1: staff Report to the Planning Attachment A: Initial study Exhibit A: commission Location & Land Use Designations Map. Attachment 2: Resolution Attachment A: Attachment B: Location Map Legal Description CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD 2 11-6-91 4 ^ .... , APPUCANT: City of San Bernardino W ~ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-15 OWNER: Del Rosa Partners CJ 14964 Ventura Blvd. \........- "" Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 ,.... Hi To change the land use designation from CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-1, Commercial General on a 0.6 acre site on the southeast corner of Del Rosa Avenue and Eureka Street. = 0 W II: - C W II: C "" EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION Subj ect Commercial CN Commercial Neighborhood North Residential RS Residential Suburban South Vacant RM Residential Medium East Apartments RM Residential Medium West Church/Schoo 1 RM Residential Medium "" ,- ( ) GEOlOGIC I SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD 0 YES 0 ZONE A SEWERS: DYES HAZARD ZONE: JIll NO "" ZONE: Kl< NO o ZONE B j{j(NO ( HIGH FIRE XX YES )1 AIRPORT NOISE! o YES I REDEVELOPMENT DYES HAZARD ZONE: D NO CRASH ZONE: PROJECT AREA: ~)(NO 0Cl< NO ,.- - r ... o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z n APPROVAL C APPUCABLE EFFECTS WITH 0 MITIGATING MEASURES - !Zen NOE.l.R. !C 0 CONDITIONS we I&.el ~Z o EXEMPT o E.l.R. REQUIRED BUT NO I&.Z 0 DENIAL Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS CW oel WITH MITIGATING ~I 1I:i: MEASURES 0 CONTINUANCE TO -I&. 0 > XXI NO SIGNIFICANT o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS Z fd W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. \. MINUTES II: ... -.... 1 ~&r~== ATTACHMENT ~ -... -... This is a City-initiated General Plan amendment to change the land use designation from CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-l, Commercial General on a parcel of land on the southeast corner of Del Rosa Avenue and Eureka street. AREA CHARACTERISTICS The amendment site consists of a developed parcel of land of approximately 0.6 acres. A 6-unit strip commercial development is presently on the site which includes parking and landscaping. There is an apartment complex to the east of the site, vacant land to the south, a flood control channel parallelling Del Rosa Avenue to the west, and Eureka street to the north. CALIFORNIA BWIRORMBIlTAL OOALITY ACT (CEOA) STATOS The General Plan amendment is subject to CEQA. The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the proposal and the Initial study (Attachment A) on October 3, 1991 and determined that the proposed amendment would not have an adverse impact on the environment and recommended a Negative Declaration. There was a public review period from October 10, 1991 through October 30, 1991 to review the Initial study. COMMEII'l'S ltBCBIVED No comments have been received. ARALys:rs General Plan Consistencv The Community-Serving Commercial uses, which includes both the CN and the CG-1 designations provide for community-serving retail and service uses along major transportation corridors and intersections to serve the needs of the residents (General Plan Objective 1.19). .... S<'JY_C!~_'!'!!!!!!!: Ell ..0.,...... ....""'" ,,.."', OBSERVATIONS CASE GPA 91-15 AGENDA ITEM 2 HEARING DATE 11-6-91 PAGE 'I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT """"Il The CN designation provides for the continued use, expansion, and new development of small scale, low-intensity commercial uses which serve and are in proximity to residential neighborhoods (General Plan Objective 1.26). It permits neighborhood-serving commercial uses such as small grocery stores, shoe repair, florists and similar uses (General Plan Policy 1.26.10). The CG-1 designation permits a diversity of community-serving retail and service uses, entertainment uses, and professional and financial offices (General Plan Policy 1.19.10). The Commercial General type of use is associated with transportation corridors and high-volume intersections. The intensity of use is normally greater in the CG-1 areas than in those designated for CN. The amendment site contains a small strip commercial center which is suited for the higher intensity use. The site's location on a major arterial and at a major intersection is suited for CG-1 uses. Land Use The land use designation adjoining the site to the east and south is RM, Residential Medium. The west side of Del Rosa Avenue is also designated RM and the property contains a church with sc~ool. The permitted density is 12 dwelling units per acre. The land on the northwest corner of Del Rosa Avenue and Eureka street is designated Commercial Neighborhood. The r_aining area within the general location of the site is designated RS, Residential Suburban which is single-family in character. This designation permits a density of 4.5 dwelling units per acre. The site lies within a long-established residential neighborhood and is at the intersection of a major arterial and a secondary arterial. General Plan Policy 1.26.30 requires that the CN areas be designed to reflect and be compatible with the character of a lOW-density residential neighborhood. However, Policy 1.19.30, which applies to the CG-1 area, is in place to ensure a community- oriented environment and it is augmented by other General Plan policies along with Development Code design guidelines to safeguard the integrity of the neighborhood. The site size and location is consistent with the intent of the General Plan for a CG-1 designation. The redesignation of 0.6 acres from CN to CG-1 will minimally impact the balance of land uses within the city. ~~~.:w.Nlfli .. PlAN-8.D8 PAGE 1 OF , 1.-80) o o r- .., CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 91-15 2 11-6-91 4 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE r- """" circulation The site is already developed and the issue of circulation impacts will only be a factor upon future redevelopment. Del Rosa Avenue is a major arterial handlinq a present level of 16,000 averaqe daily trips (ACTs) and Eureka street is a secondary arterial carryinq a current level of 7,000 ACTs. Presently inqressjeqress is from both streets. A CG-l desiqnation could potentially increase the ACTs by 1,000 on Del Rosa Avenue and 400 on Eureka street which is within the capabilities of the system as per the city Traffic Enqineer. CONCLUSIONS The site is developed commercially with a 6-unit strip center and the uses permitted under the CG-l desiqnation could be incorporated into the center without impacts to the surroundinq area. The amendment site is established in the neiqhborhood and the amendment proposal will not chanqe the status of the site other than allow uses that could make it more economically viable. I'INDINGS The proposed amendment is consistent with the qoals, objectives and policies of the General Plan in that a CG-1 desiqnation is appropriate due to its location on a major arterial and at a major intersection. The amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City as addressed in the Initial study. This amendment will minimally impact the balance of land uses within the city. The subject land is physically suitable for the CG-1, Commercial General land use desiqnation and any anticipated future development on it. .. ..... ".~~~".... o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 91-15 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM 2 HEARING DATE ll-b-H PAGE :J ""I RBCOIIMBRDA'1'IONS Staff recommends that the Planning commission make a recommendation to the Mayor and Common council: 1. That a Negative Declaration be adopted in accordance with Section 21080.1 of the california Environmental Quality Act for General Plan Amendment No. 91-15. 2. That the General Plan Amendment be approved. ~~:fr2/ted ~~E. Reed, Assistant Director Department of Planning and Building Services Department t1. I 7? L 1/;< It/~),/ /X':.!f:.0 John R. Burke Assistant Planner Attachment A: Initial Study OT'I'OfSillJll~ --- PLAN.8.D8 PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-90) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY r """'l Ganaral Plan Aa.Dda.n~ Ko. 91-15 Pro;ect DescriDtion: To chanqe the land use desiqnation on a 0.6 acre site from CN, Commercial Neiqhborhood to CG-1, Commercial General. Pro;ect Location: The amendment site is located at the southeast corner of Del Rosa Avenue and Eureka street. ~: September 16, 1991 ADDlicant: City of San Bernardino OWner: Del Rosa parteners 14964 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 PreDared bv: John R. Burke Assistant Planner city of SaD Bernardino Department of Planninq and Buildinq Service. 300 II. "D" Street SaD Bernardino, CA '2418 ATTACHMENT A ClTTCIF"'~ --- ... Pt.AN-I.07 PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-10) o o IBITIAL STUDY for GPA91-15 1.0 IBTRODUCTIOB This Initial study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for City-initiated General Plan Amendment No. 91-15 which proposes to change the land use designation from CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-1, Commercial General on a 0.6 acre site at the southeast corner of Del Rosa Avenue and Eureka Street. As stated in Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act quidelines, the purposes of an Initial Study are to: 1. Provide the Lead Agency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an EIR or Negative Declaration~ 2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared, tl~ enabling the project to qualify for Negative Declaration~ 3. Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is required, by~ (A) Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant, (B) Identify the effects determined not to be siqnificant, and (C) Explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant. 4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of a project~ 5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative Declaration that a project will not have a siqnificant effect on the environment~ 6. Eliminate unnecessary EIRs~ 7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project. o o IRITIAL STUDY for GPA'1-15 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed city-initiated amendment is to change the General Plan Land Use Plan designation from CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-l, Commercial General on a parcel consisting of approximately 0.6 acres at the southeast corner of Del Rosa Avenue and Eureka street (see Exhibit A). 2.1 AllBNDJIBJIT SITB AND SURROURDING ARBA CDRACTBRISTICS The site is rectangular in shape and developed with a six- unit commercial strip center with parking and landscaping. The land to the north is developed with single-family residential and to the east is a apartment project. The land to the south of the site is vacant. There is a church with a school across Del Rosa Ave. to the west. The northwest corner of the intersection is designated CN and consists of a variety of commercial activities. There is a flood control channel paralleling Del Rosa Ave. between it and the site. Access to the site is from Del Rosa Ave. across the channel and from Eureka street on the north side. Vehicle access to the apartments is along the south side of the site. 3 . 0 DlVIROIlIlEllTAL ASSBSSJlENT 3.1 BnviroDmental Setting The site is adjacent to a San Bernardino County Flood Control District channel. It lies within the 500 year floodplain as determined. by the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA). Del Rosa Ave. is a secondary arterial route and Eureka st. is a local street. The area is within the city's high wind hazard area. ~ ~ - """"l CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING. AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ~ ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ,... """"l A. BACKGROUND Application Number: <fbt~.tA'- JlNtI /I",htIJ:,h.LWT M. 91-/6'" PIojecl Description: ~<'~Je I'AtltA<f'.4I9.1'H 2. t> l.llcIIIion: .v", ~,A~'~~~"# :;,~ Environllltlntal ConahinlS.NUS: -PoAlI - General Plan De.ignation: eN , Zoning Designation: NbJ . B. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPAC1S ExlAin _II, wherelpplOllriate, on a separate attached .heel 1. Earth ReeO\lrcn WlH the proposaIrasull in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movellltlnt (CUI andIor fll) 0110,000 cubic yards or more? X b. Development and/or grading on a .Iope greeter than 15% natural grade? X c. Development within the A1quist-PrIoIo Special Studie. Zone as defined in SecIion 12.0 - Geologic X & Sei.mic, FIllID 47, of the ClIy'. Genaral Plan? d. ModKicalion of any unique geologic or physical feature? X e. Development within areas defiled for high potentiaJ for wawr or wind erosion as identified In SecIion 12.0 - Geologic & Seismic, Figure 53, of the CIIy'. General Plan? )( f. ModKication of a channal, creek or river? X ... ..I ::.l:.I:.IIIIIIl PlAN-I.DI PNlE' 00 _ 111.10) ... ::.l:.tl.-.ll _ -olII PLAH-I.D6 PAGE. OF "1-10) n ~ ,... 14. Mancllltary FlncIlnga of Slgnlflc8llC1 (Section 15065) The c.JlIomia EnviRlnmentaJ Quality Ad slates that H any 01 the following can be answered yes or maybe, the projac:l may have a signHic:ant e1fecl on the enviRlnment and an EnviRlnmental Impact Report shall be preparad. Ves No Maybe L Does the pRIject have the polentiallll degrade the quality 01 the environmant, substantially raduce the habllat 01 a fish or wlldlifa spacin, callH a fish or wiId.e popuIaIion III dRIp below ... sustaining levels, threalen III eliminale a plant or animal community, raduce tha number or rastrict the range 01 a rere or endangerad plant or animal or eHminate important examples 01 the major pariods 01 c.JiIornia hislDry X or prehislDry? b. Does the pRIject have the polentiallll achieve short- tarm, III the disadvantage oIlong-tarm, enviRlnmantal goals? (A short-tarm impact on the environmant is one which occurs In a relatively briel, definitive pariod 01 time whlle long-term impacts will endure well into >( the futura.) Co Does the pRIject have impacts which are individually Hmftad. but cumulatively considerable? (A PRIject may impact on two or more ..parala resources where the impact on each reeourea is relatively small, but where the aIfect 01 the llllaI 01 those impacts on the >< envi_mant is signlic:anL) d. Does the pRIject have enviRlnmantal e1fects which will cause subetantial adverse e1fects on human beings, X efther directly or indirectly? C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUAnON AND MITlGAnON MEASURES (Attach sheets as nec:essary.) SL=~ /}7rnC#~)) ..sll,{~"~ m:t-=:..:r== PlM.IIM D&n.1C' &f\e o o INITIAL STUDY for GPA91-15 3.2 BBVIROBKBBTAL BrrBCTS 3.2.1. Earth Resources 1. a thru q. The site is commercial use. unlikely. The site is not located in an Alquist-Priolo Special studies Zone and contains no unique qeoloqic or physical features. The flood control channel adjoininq the site is concrete lined. The site is not subject to wind or water erosion. qenerally flat and developed with a Since the site is built, qradinq is very 3.2.2 Air Resources 2. a, b. The site is commercially developed and land use redesiqnation will not have an effect on air quality. Future reuse of the site will not lead to an increase in emissions that are siqnificant. The CG-1 desiqnation does not permit uses that create objectionable odors. 2. c. The site is developed and impacts from hiqh wind are not an issue. 3.2.3 Water Resources 3. a thru d. since the site is developed, it already contains impermeable surfaces. Future improvements to or reconstruction of the sitejbuildinq could lead to chanqes in aDsorption rates, drainaqe patterns and the amount of runoff. This chanqe would not be siqnificant because improvementsj reconstruction would not be substantially different from that now existinq. 3. e. The site is within the 500 year floodplain as determined by FEMA. o o INITIAL STUDY for GPA91-15 3.2.4 3.2.5 3.2.6 3.2.7 Bioloqical Resources 4. a thru d. All natural veqetation that may have existed on this site was removed when development occurred. The site is not located in the Bioloqical Resource Manaqement OVerlay and no unique, rare or endanqered plant or animal species are known to exist in the area. Noise 5. a, b. The noise associated with the site is that qenerated on Del Rosa Ave. The proposed CG-l desiqnation does permit uses that are somewhat more intense than that permitted in the CN desiqnation, however, the present development is not anticipated to qenerate noise of siqnificance. The church/school on the west side of Del Rosa Ave. will not be impacted by the land use desiqnation chanqe. Any future reuse will be reviewed for noise impacts at the time of project review. Land Use 6. a. The project is to chanqe the City's General Plan Land Use Plan. 6. b, c. The site is not within an Airport District nor within the Foothill Fire Zones. Man-Made Hazards The existinq development does not use, store, transport or dispose of materials. Future uses and/or reuse of the site for other commercial uses could involve the use of hazardous materials. A proposal would be evaluated to determine if there were project specific impacts. o o IBITIAL STUDY for GPA91-15 3.2.8 Housing 8. a thru c. The proposed amendment will have no impact on existing housing nor create a demand for additional housing. 3.2.9 Transportation/Circulation 9. a thru h. The City Traffic Engineer indicates that the proposed land use designation change will not impact the circulation in the area and that a traffic impact study is not required. 3.2.10, 11, 12 and 13. Public Services, Utilities, Aesthetics and CUltural Resources. These sections are not impacted by the proposed General Plan amendment. 3.2.14 Mandatory Findings 'of Significance The site is developed with a commercial use and redesignation from eN to CG-1 will not create any significant impacts from a continuation of the current use or from future reuse with other commercial uses. D. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial study. ~e proposed projecl COULD NOT have a sign.ieant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION will be prepared. D The proposed projecl could have a significant effect on the environment, a.hough there will not be a sign.icanl effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DEClARATION will be prepared. D The proposed project MAY have a sign.icant effect on the environment. and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY Of SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director Name and TdIa Depar ent of Planning and Building Services r~ Dme: October 3, 1991 ro::.:t.=..::== P\.M-I.DI PAGE_OF _ (1'-10) ell OF SAN SER ~RDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-15 TIT L E LOCATION and LANQ USE QESIGNATIQN$ . ( i (l.t111 i EXHIBIT A ._,-,,~"', o 0 1 Resolution No. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO 91-15 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recitals (a) The General Plan for the City of San Bernardino was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-159 on June 2, 1989. (b) General Plan Amendment No 91-15 to the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning Commission on November 6, 1991, after a noticed public hearing, Planning Commission's and the recommendation of approval has been considered by the Mayor and Common Council. (c) An Initial Study was prepared on September 16, 1991, and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee and the Planning Commission who both determined that General Plan Amendment No. 91-15 would not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore, recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted. (d) The proposed Negative Declaration received a 21 day public review period from October 10, 1991 through October 30, 1991 and all comments relative thereto have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the Mayor and Common Council in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local regulations. IIII 1 o o 1 2 (e) The Mayor and Common Council held a noticed 3 public hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed 4 General Plan Amendment No. 91-15 and the Planning 5 Division Staff Report on December 2, 1991. 6 (f) The adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 91- 7 15 is deemed in the interest of the orderly development 8 of the City and is consistent with the goals, objectives 9 and policies of the existing General Plan. 10 SECTION 2. Neaative Declaration 11 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED 12 by the Mayor and Common Council that the proposed 13 amendment to the General Plan of the city of San 14 Bernardino will have no significant effect on the 15 environment, and the Negative Declaration heretofore 16 prepared by the Environmental Review Committee as to the 17 effect of this proposed amendment is hereby ratified, 18 affirmed and adopted. 19 SECTION 3. Findinas 20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common 21 Council of the city of San Bernardino that: 22 A. The change of designation from CN, commercial 23 Neighborhood to CG-l, commercial General on 0.60 24 acres located on the southeast corner of Del Rosa 25 Avenue and Eureka Street for the proposed amendment 26 will change the land use map only and is not in 27 conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of 28 IIII 2 o o 1 2 the General Plan. 3 B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to 4 the public interest, health, safety, convenience, 5 or welfare of the city. 6 C. All public services are available to the study area. 7 Any development permissible under the CG-1, 8 Commercial General designation proposed by this 9 amendment would not impact on such services. 10 D. The proposed amendment is to redesignate 0.60 acres 11 to CG-1, Commercial General. No housing stock will 12 be affected. 13 E. The amendment site is physically suitable for the 14 requested land use designation. Anticipated future 15 land use has been analyzed in the Initial study and 16 it has been determined that project specific 17 mitigation measures will be sufficient to eliminate 18 any environmental impacts. 19 SECTION 4. Amendment 20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor ilnd Common 21 Council that: 22 A. The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City 23 of San Bernardino is amended by changing 24 approximately 0.60 acres from CN, Commercial 25 Neighborhood to CG-1, commercial General. This 26 amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment 27 No. 91-15 and its location is outlined on the maps 28 IIII 3 - 1 2 3 4, 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 o o entitled Attachment A, and is more specifically described in the legal description entitled Attachment B, copies of which are attached and incorporated herein by reference. B. General Plan Amendment No. 91-15 shall be effective immediately upon adoption of this resolution. SECTION 5. Man Notation This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common council and which are on file in the office of the city Clerk. SECTION 6. Notice of Determination The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the county Clerk of the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's compliance with CEQA in preparing the Negative Declaration. II/I IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII IIII 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 o o RESOLUTION. . . ADOPl'ING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-15 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting therefore, held on the day of , 1991, by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: ~ ABSTAIN ~l'RI'N1' ~ ESTRADA REILLY HERNANDEZ MAUDSLEY MINOR POPE-LUDLAM MILLER City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 1991. w. R. Holcomb, Mayor city of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PENMAN, city~Attorney By: ~/'''''''Q 7- ,J/M~_ o 5 " - ? ,.. ~ ~ UI i ~ z CD CII ~ .~ '. , ,1> 1: . .. !~ ..' m "~ "~ "Ql b - ll:l1> 8:: .... .. ~~ UI~ ~h: CIa .'Q o ... ..WIQ ~~'d~ J ' 1i @], ]1... 1 r... ~ @ o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GPA 91-15 ~MOUNTA'N e @ S~ @ FAIRFAX ORIVE -; 'l1l I ~ I: ", 7'" .. - .. - e.. ..... ~ e ~ ,,~.~, ,,*/1 I. @ ~ II T...". ,.' @ ~ N . i ~ @ ~ . (j) ~ ;:. I ..... 1- - @i@ .r _.!.-- t DEL "'-ROSA I ~ - .. G .. n ~~ - .. E>~ I\) \0 @ "'TT"'("I-l"JI~NT A o i AVENUE', .,- .. 10 .. !l~ J !" . ~@ ~ .. e~ @ @ ~J o G) , .... w, ~ ill ~ 1- -i ~ ~ ~ CID 7fU -t ~ r - ~ ~ III ... ~ ... , " \ --:~- 1 ~ :0. ~ ~ !JlCll - SC) .c."" o < Cll ~ Q ~ - ....0'&1 8" :0 <D:tI' . a ll:l ....-. (]CD3 CXl1>!:l '''Q. ~l! ~. () - '"' Ul \1l o 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-15 TITLE Legal Description Parcels 155-102-12 Descrintion THE WEST 100 FEET OF THAT PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 22, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OF THE ORANGE GROVE TRACT, WEST HIGHLANDS, IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 11 OF MAPS, PAGE 14, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT IN THE CENTER LINE OF MOUNTAIN AVENUE (NOW DEL ROSA AVENUE) 695 2/10TH FEET NORTH ALONG SAID CENTER LINE OF SAID MOUNTAIN AVENUE FROM THE CENTER LINE OF LEMON STREET I THENCE EAST 440 FEET OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 11 THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 1 TO THE CENTER LINE OF EUREKA STREET I THENCE WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID EUREKA STREET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CENTER LINE OF SAID MOUNTAIN AVENUE I THENCE SOUTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE EAST 165 FEET THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE SOUTH 15 FEET THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DEEDED TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 2, 1951 IN BOOK 2712, PAGE 267, OFFICIAL RECORDS. FURTHER EXCEPTING THEREFROM THOSE PORTIONS OF SAID PREMISES LYING WITHIN STREETS OR HIGHWAYS. NOTE: MOUNTAIN AVENUE AS MENTIONED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS NOW KNOWN AS DEL ROSA AVENUE. LEMON STREET IS NOW KNOWN AS MARSHALL BOULEVARD. ATTACHMENT B