Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout36-Planning and Building CITY OF SAN BERIQRDINO -REQUEST GbR COUNCIL ACTION General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 and From: Al Boughey, Director Subject: Development Code Amendment No. 91-05. - Text Amendments to permit existing single- Dept: Planning and Building Services family residences as permitted uses in the CG-2, Commercial General, land use Date: October 29, 1991 district. Mayor and Common Council meeting of Synopsis of Previous Council action: November 18, 1991, 2:00 p.m. The General Plan and Development Code address the development of new commercial and multiple family uses in the CG-2 land use designation/district. Existing single family uses are not addressed. Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed and the resolution and ordinance be adopted. Al g~ JSignature Director Contact person: Al Boughey Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: City-Wide FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $25.00 Source: (Acct. No.) 001-171-53150 (Acct. Descriotion) Professional & ,Cont}~rac_tu/al Services Finance: ~'u-^~'~"' - Council Notes: ]5-0262 AOP.nfIA Itom Nn ~V CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO -REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION M ~ STAFF REPORT $IIBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 and Development Code Amendment No. 91-05. Mayor and Common Council Meeting of November 18, 1991. REOIIEBT This City-initiated General Plan amendment and Development Code amendment are to allow existing single-family residences as permitted uses in the CG-2, Commercial General land use designated areas in the City. The CG-2 areas are generally located along Baseline Street to the east and west of the I-215 freeway, on Mt. Vernon and on "E" Street north of Baseline Street. SACICGROIIND During the hearing process for the adoption of the General Plan on June 2, 1989, the CG-2 designation (Community Commercial: Mixed Residential) was adopted to enhance the economic activity of the area and to allow for the development of multiple family residential. The criteria established for the residential was a minimum contiguous area of one acre and a medium density (14 units per acre) west of I-215 and medium-high density (24 units per acre) east of the freeway. " The standards established for the residential uses were aimed primarily at new development and were not directed towards single- family homes existing in locations that fall outside those parameters. Consequently, many existing single-family homes are considered non-conforming structures and this has caused difficulties for owners in the sale of their property and in the securing of insurance and loans. ENVIRONMENTAL The Environmental Review Committee reviewed both amendments and the Initial Study on August 22, 1991 and proposed a Negative Declaration. COMMENTS No comments have been received. 75.0264 © 4 General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 and Development Code Amendment No. 91-05 Mayor and Common Council Meeting of November 18, 1991 Page 2 PLRNNINO COMMIBBION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 and Development Code Amendment No. 91-05 at a noticed public hearing on October 8, 1991. MAYOR AND COMMON CODNCIL OPTIONS 1. The Mayor and Common Council may adopt the Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment No. 91- 14 and Development Code Amendment No. 91-05. 2. The Mayor and Common Council may deny General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 and Development Code Amendment No. 91-05. RECOMMEND7ITIONB Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the resolution which adopts the Negative Declaration and approves General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 and adopt the ordinance which approves Development Code Amendment No. 91-05. Prepared by: John R. Burke, Assistant Planner for Al Boughey, Director Department of Planning and Building Services Attachment 1: Staff Report to the Planning Commission Attachment A: Initial Study B: Text Change to the General Plan C, D and E: Text Changes to the Development Code Attachment 2: Resolution Attachment A: Text Change to the General Plan © o General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 and Development Code Amendment No. 91-05 Mayor and Common Council Meetinq of November 18, 1991 Paqe 3 Attachment 3: Ordinance Attachment A: Text Change to the Development Code, Section 19.06.010 Attachment B: Text Change to the Development Code, Section 19.06.020 Attachment C: Text Change to the Development Code, Section 19.06.030 /GPA/GPA91-14.MCC CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA 91-14/DCA 91-05 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 10-8-91 PAGE 2 REOIIEBT The City-initiated General Plan Amendment and Development Code Amendment are to permit existing single-family residences as legal conforming uses in the CG-2, Commercial General land use designation. See Attachments B through E showing proposed text changes. LOCATION The proposed amendments are applicable to all CG-2 designated areas in the City. These areas are generally located along Baseline Street, east and west of the I-215 freeway, on Mt. Vernon Avenue and on "E" Street north of Baseline. HAC1C(iROIIND The General Plan permits new residential development at a medium density west of I-215 and at a medium high density east of i-215 in the CG-2 designation with a contiguous area of one acre. Planning Commission Interpretation No. 90-5, dated October 23, 1990, established that existing single-family homes are a conforming use within the CG-2 district to the west of the freeway and are consistent with the General Plan providing they fall within the density range as stated in the previous paragraph. Single- family homes existing outside the parameters are legal non- conforming uses. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OIIALITY ACT (CEOAI BTATIIB The project is subject to CEQA. The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the proposed amendments and the Initial Study (Attachment A) on August 22, 1991 and determined that the proposed amendments would not have an adverse impact on the environment and recommended a Negative Declaration. There was a public review period from August 29, 1991 to September 18, 1991 for the Initial Study. ° PIMI•B~B PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-W) f CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA 91-14/DCA 91-OS AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT gGENDA ITEM OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE_ 10-8-91 PAGE 3 CO1lQiENTB RECEIOED No comments have been received. ANALYBIB The objective of the CG-2 designation is to enhance the economic activity in the area by infilling and intensifying existing development and allowing for the development of new commercial and medium and medium high residential uses (General Plan Objective 1.22). Policy 1.22.21 sets the density range for residential development to between 4.6 to 14.0 units per net acre west of the I-215 freeway and to 14.1 to 24.0 units east of the freeway. Policy 1.22.13 sets the minimum contiguous area at one acre. The General Plan does not provide specific policy guidance on how to address existing single-family residences in the CG-2 areas. However, Policy 1.7.9 of the General Plan states: "Permit the continuation of uses which existed at the time of the adoption of the Plan which do not conform to the land use intent of the zone; allowing for their minimal expansion." Both the General Plan and the Development Code define a non- conforming structure or use as one which conformed to the laws when it was constructed/established but does not conform to the provisions of the General Plan or the Development Code now. This is a problem if the building has been vacant for over 180 days as it is then required to comply with the commercial standards. The goals of the Housing Element of the General Plan are to provide for the preservation and improvement of existing housing and neighborhoods, to prevent the deterioration of housing stock, and to assist in the provision of affordable housing for the citizens of the City. The status of legal non-conforming precludes some property owners from obtaining loans and insurance coverage to adequately maintain their property. Some of the single-family homes existing in the CG-2 district are in excess of 50 years old and fn some instances could be lost despite the intent of General Plan Goal 3A which was established to protect, preserve, and restore structures which have historical significance. PUW!A9 PAGE t OF t µ.9p) CITY OF SAN BERNARDiNO PLANNING CASE GPA 91-14/DCA 91-05 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT • AGENDA ITEM OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE i n-R-gi PAGE 4 COWCLIIBIONB It has been previously concluded that existing single-family residences in the CG-2 designation west of the I-215 freeway are a permitted use providing density requirements are met. At present there is no way to directly address the retention of existing single-family homes and modifications to them. With the determination that existing single-family homes are a permitted use and not non-conforming, the difficulties encountered in obtaining financing and insurance coverage should be removed. ~ FINDZNGB Existing single-family homes located in the CG-2 land ~e designations as a permitted use is consistent with the intent ~bf ' the General Plan. The proposed amendment is not detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City, The proposed amendment does not affect the balance of land uses within the City. PWFBp9 PAGE t OF t (~-qry CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE GPA 91-14/DCA 91-05 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDAlTEM 6 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 10-5-91 PAGE 5 RECOI~LND7ITIONB Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council that: 1. A Negative Declaration be adopted in accordance with Section 21080.1 of the California Environmental Quality Act for General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 as per Attachment B to reflect that existing single-family residential structures remain a conforming permitted use. 2. A Negative Declaration be adopted in accordance with Section 21080.1 of the California Environmental Quality Act for Development Code Amendment No. 91-05 as per Attachments C, D and E to reflect that existing single- family residential structures remain a conforming permitted use. Respectively s/ub~mit~ted Lar E. Reed, Assistant Director Department of Planning and Building Services ~r~~~/~ John R. Burke Assistant Planner Attachment: A - Initial Study B - Proposed Text Change to General Plan, Page 1-83 C - Proposed Text Change to Development Code, Page II-60 D - Proposed Text Change to Development Code, Page II-79 E - Proposed Text Change to Development Code, Page II-90 PLAN•BAB PAGE t OF 1 (4gp1 CITY OF SAN BERN RDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 AD.~ Development Code Amendment No. 91-05 Project Description: To permit existing single-family residences ae legal conforming uses in the CG-2, Commercial General land use designation. This project is a text amendment to the General Plan and the Development Code. Project Location: The proposed amendment area includes all CG-2 designated areas in the City. These areas are generally located along Baseline Street, east and west of the I-215 freeway. Date: August 13, 1991 Applicant: City of San Bernardino Owners: Various Prepared bv: John R. Burke Title: Assistant Planner City of San Bernardino Department of Planning and Building Services 300 N. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 ATTACHMENT~_ °M1nw°n~ PLAN-BA7 PAGE 1 OF 1 µ-00) _ p O 1.0 INTRODUCTION / This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for City-initiated General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 and Development Code Amendment No. 91-05 which propose to change the text of the General Plan and the Development Code to reflect that existing single-family residences be a legal and conforming use permitted in the CG-2, Commercial General land use designation. As stated in Section 15063 of the California Environmental Quality Act guidelines, the purposes of an Initial Study are to: 1. Provide the Lead Agency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an EIR or Negative Declaration; 2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a project, mitigating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared, thereby enabling the project to qualify for Negative Declaration; 3. Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is required, by; (A) Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant, (B) Identify the effects determined not to be significant, and (C) Explaining the reasons for determining that potentially significant effects would not be significant. 4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of a project; 5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative Declaration that a project will not have a significant effect on the environment; 6. Eliminate unnecessary EIRs; 7. Determine whether a previously prepared EIR could be used with the project. © C~? INITIAL STUDY for GPA91-14 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Residential development in the CG-2 designated areas is permitted at a medium density range of 4.6 to 14 dwelling units per acre to the west of I-215 and a medium high density range of 14.1 to 24 units per acre to the east of I-215. A contiguous area of one acre is required. Single-family homes existing outside these parameters are considered legal non-conforming uses. This project proposes to permit all existing single-family structures and uses to be legal and conforming. New single-family housing development is not covered by this amendment. The purpose of the CG-2 designation is to enhance the economic activity in the area by infillinq and intensifying existing development and allowing for the development of medium and medium high residential uses. 2.1 AMENDMENT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA CHARACTERISTICS The area designated as CG-2 generally consists of commercial activities with some residential properties interspersed throughout. Many of these properties consist of one or two single-family units on adjoining lots and combined are below the contiguous one acre required for conformance. The CG-2 areas are located primarily along Baseline Street but include some areas along "E" Street, north of Baseline Street and areas along Mount Vernon Avenue north and south of Baseline Street. The area extends from California Street east to the Del Rosa Avenue area. 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.1 Environmental Setting The CG-2 designated area is mostly developed with commercial and residential uses. This project proposes to permit existing single-family uses as legal and conforming. This constitutes text changes only to the General Plan and the Development Code. CITY OF SAN BERNA INO PLANNING,AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST a sAacoROUNn //~~ //// AppBcatbn Number. ~Fr?~~'/9L /zi+~? /iY~~OtOi~.?T /{li. 9~ ~4 Utct/,E10~.A',7da/T Coat E.,/D.~?r A6. 9/-OS Project Description: f/-.~9~iy nib location: /y~ 2 L.ay~ df6 ~ECY.~iri?lil'w/s• Environmental Constraints Areas: /L~ General Plan Designation: C-l- 2 Zonlnp Designatbn: N~/~ B. ENVIRONMENTAL II~ACTS ExpWn anawrs, when appropriate, on a separate attached shear. 1. Earth Reaouroes UIIII tM proposal resuk in: Yss No Maybe a. Earth movement (art and/or tip) d 70,000 cubic yards or mon? b. Dwebpmem and/or grading on a sbpe gnabr than 15X natural grade? c. Dwebpment within the Alquist-Priob Special Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0 - Geobgb 8 Seismic, Fpure 47, of tM Cty's Gerwral Pkn? d. Moddicafion of arty unpue geobgic or physical feature? a. Dwebpment within areas defined for high potential for waur or wind erosion as identdied in Section 12.0 ~bgb & Seismic, Fpun 53, of the City's General X f. Modkicatbn of a channel, seek or riwrl g, pevebpment within an aroa subject to landslides, Yes No Maybe mudaYdea, Ngwfactiorr or other similar hazards as idamilied b Section 12.0 - Geologb a Seismic, ~ Fpuros 48, 52 and 53 ct the City's General Plan? h. Otlrer7 2 Alr Ibeouroa: Witl the Proposal result in: a. Substantial air emiasbns or an gifted upon ambient air quality as daCmed by AOMD? -~_ b. The croation d objectionable odors? X c. DevebPr11ed within a high wind hazard aroa as ident"died in Section 15.0 - Wind R Fire, Fgure 59, d the City's Generel Plan? ---~- 8. Water faeaourds: Will the proposal resuh in: a Changes in absorption ratan, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount d surface runoff dw b impermeable surfaces? b. Changes in the oourae or tbw d tbod waters? X e, pischsrge imo surface waters or eny aMeratbn of suAece water quality? ~- d. Change in the quantity d quality d ground water? X e. Exposuro d people or property to flood hazards as identified b tlw Federal Emergency Managemem Agenry's Fbod Insurance Rata Map, Community Panel Number 060281 and Sectbn 16.0 - Fboding, Fpuro fit, d the City's Generel Pkn7 X f. OtMr7 4. 6bbgbal fbaourcas: Could the proposal resufi in: a pevebpm.m within tl» Biobgbal Resources Managemem Overlay, as identified in Section 10.0 Natural Resources, Fguro 41, d tire City's General Pbn7 b. Change in the number d any unigw, raro or endarrgared apecles d plums or tiroir habitat indudirrg stands d trees? -K- e. Change in itw rwmber d any unique. raro or ondarrpered species d animals or their habitat? d. Removal d viable. mature trees? (6' or grouter) _,2L_ e. OlMr7 5. Nobs: Could the proposal rewh in: a Dewbpmem d lowing, haaRh taro SadBies, adrools, fibreries, relipiow taci6iu or otMr •rage' sensitive uses b arose wham exktirtg or tuturo raise levels exceed an Ldn d 85 dB(A) exbrior and an Ldn d 45 d8(A) interior as idemifad in Section 14.0 -Noise. Fpures 1~6~ arrd ~ k, 11116 d the City's General PIan7 f"`uiw°..1...oR."'°a3 ?tµ.ea rx~:oc_ moor b. pewbpmem of new or expansbn of existing industrial, Yes Nc Maybe oommerciel or otMr uses which generate noise Iwels on arose containing houshp, adrools, heahh taro facilhias or outer wneitiw uses above an Ldn of 85 d8(A) exterior or en Ldn of IS dB(A) imerion c. OtMn 6. Land Use: wq the proposal rosuk in: a. A change kt the land use as despnated on tlw General PIan7 b. Development within an AirpoR Datriet as ideMgied in ttw Air Irudagauon Compsllble.UN Zone (AICUZ) Report and tlw I.artd Uw Zonirp Dishhrct Map? e. Dewlopmem within Foothiq Fw Zones A 3 8, or C as Id.mni.d on the I.artd Use zonirrp District MapT ~ d. when TrrGe~1,?cE 70 CG-2 A~~w//.+7rp.? ~_t~ ~ a?•O~ 7. MaMAada Hazards: WiN the project: a. Use, atom, trampoR or dispose of hazsrdous or toxic mabriak (including but not gmRed to oil, pesticldes, cMmials or radiation}? b. Involve tta reNase of hazardous substanasT ~L. a Expwe people to ttn pdemial heaghrsafely hazardsT d. ah.n & Honahtp: WIq tlw proposal: a. Remove exMinp housirp w mate a demand for addgionel hotuingT b. alien p. Tranaporutlon / Ckouhtlort: Could 1M propossl, in comparaor+ with tM Cirwletion Plan as identified In Section 6.0 -Circulation of 1M City's General Plan. rewR in: a. An irrxeate in traftb tint fs greater than tM knd use designated on 1M Gerwral PIanT b, tlee of existing, or demand ~r new, perkirp tacilgiee/stnrtxureaT X c, hopes upon existing public trarrportation systemsT d. Alteration of preaem paberns of dreulation7 e. Impact to rail or air lrofiicT i. k~reaeed safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? ~L p. A disjoimed pattern of roadway improwmeMaT ,~(_ h. SgMligm inereaae in traffic volumes on the roadways or interoed'aneT ~ i. OtMr7 10. Publk Servlon: wU the proposal impact thra folbwing Yes No Maybe beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a Fire pmtectbn? b. PoUw protectbn? c. Schools (i.a., a0endance, boundaries, overbad, etc.)? d. Parks or other recroational facilities? X e. Medical aid? ,u// f. Solid Waste? ___d~_ g. Other? 11. tnnnl.s: win th. proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate Nvek of wrvice or require the corrstruelan of new faalities? 1. Natural gas? ~C-. 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. OtMr~ b. Result in a disjointed pattam of utiUly extensions? ,~_ e. Requiro the constnrction of new facilities? _ ~ 12. Msthetlcs: a. Could tM proposal resuh in 1M obmuGbn of any sanb Vlew? b. Will the visual impact of tM project be deMmarrtal to 1M surrounding aroa? c. Ottwr? 18. Cultural Resources: CouldtM propoaalresuhin: a. The alteralbn or destructbn or a prehistoric or h'storb archaeobgicat eke by dewbpmeM within an archaeobpieal wneitiw area as identified in Section 3.0 - Hiatorial, Fgure B, of the Cily'e Cwnerol Plan? _L b. Akeratbn or deshuction of a historical arts, structure or object as Ileted in tlw Ciry's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? ~ c. Ottwr? ~.~.'di~ ~ n~oDS n~~oo_ rn-oo1 14. Mandatory Flndlnps of Sipnfllanee (Sed'an 15065) The Calilomia Ernironmental Ouslily Ad states that B any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, tits project may haw a sign'rficant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Yes No Maybe a. Does the project have the potential ~ degrsde the qualNy of 1M environnwnt, subetantially reduce the habilet of a fish or wNdtlfe specas, cause a fish or wbdile populetion to drop bebw wM sustaining levels, throaten to eYmlrude a plea or animal community, roduce the number or roatrict the range of a raro or endarperod plats or animal or eliminate important examples of tM major periods d Califomle hisbry or pnhlebry? b. Does the project have the potential m echaw short- term, to 1M dkadvantape of bng-urm, environmental poab? (A short-tens impact on tfw environmem is one which r>carn in a nlatiwy brat, definitive period of time whin bng-term onpacts will ordure well into the finuro.) c. Does the projeG have impacts which aro individually limited, Ixrt cumuletively oonsideratta? {A project may impact on two or moro separate rosouroes whero the ' impact on eadt nsourw is relatively smeN, but whore the etleet of the total of those impacts on the ernironnwnt a signifirara.) d. Does the project haw ernaonmental allects which will cause substantlal adwrw effects on human beings, ehfwr directly or indirectly? C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MRIOATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as neaswry.) ~ RrPi9[,S~ED Si,~E~rS. ~O "~ ~ PlMfep PAGE 60F_ (1 tAq ® 4 INITIAL STUDY for GPA91-11 ' 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS The project will not have an effect on the environment. Existing uses and structures will be given conforming status and new development will not result from approval of this project. 3.2.14 Mandatory Findings of Significance The proposed General Plan and Development Code Amendments will not have any environmental impacts. The proposal is for a text change only which will result in allowing conforming status for existing single-family uses and structures. D. DETERMINATION On the basis of this initial study. The proposed project COULD NOT haw a sgnifiunt effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION will be prepared. The proposed project could haw • spnilinrd eflea on the environment, ahhouph tMre will not be a spntliunt eMect in this use bet:auw tM mNipstpn measures described ebow'haw bwn added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. TM proposed projeq MAY haw a spntlicant Nfect on tla env'sarment, and an ENVPONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT b required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CRY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA NrcH~lt. w. t5h~b3S~~eA+~att c.vlc FicR:+N~ Name and TiW Sgnatun Dau: ~ - ~ 2-q / T:,.,° rwraa rsoi;_oo_ n+aq ~ Q a. a minimum contiguous area of one aae is committed to residential use; b. walls, landscape, horizontal and vertical setbacks, and other elements are used to buffer the use from adjacent commercial uses; c. noise, traffic, and lighting impacts of adjacent commerdal uses, are mitigated; d. passive recreation open space is provided on-site; e. the project is adequately secured; f. its location will not impact the integrity and continuity of other commercial uses; and g. a development plan is approved by the Mayor and Common Coundl (Il.l, I1.4, I1.6, and I1.7). 1.2214 Permit senior citizen and sensor congregate care housing in locations between the commercial centers, provided that they are adequately buffered from these uses (sound walls, landscape, security, controlled access, etc) and in accordance with the provisions of Policy 1.1211 (Il.l and I1.6). 1.22.15 Pursue aggressive programs to stimulate the economic revitalization of the Mount Vernon Avenue and Base Line Street areas, which shall include marketing of development opportunities, attractions management, Redevelopment authorities, and other appropriate actions (Il.ll, 11.12, 11.14). 1.?2.16 Promote the development of specific plans for the Mount Vernon Corridor, including all pazcels flanking Mount Vernon Avenue designated as CG-2 between Base Line Street and Highland Avenue, which allow for the collaborative input of residents and business owners in the formula- tion of a comprehensive and phased plan which meets the business, resi- de~tial, and culxural need~of ~he ac~acent condtm~nit)j (Il.l Il.~). 1.22.17 Allow existing singe ami y rest en as sttuc ures to remain onforming permitted uses. Density/Intense and~eig~ht 1.2220 Permit a maximum floor area ratio of 0.7 and height of two stories (30 feet) for commercial uses (Il.l). 1.22.21 Permit a residential density of 4.6 to 14 units per net aQe and height of two stories (30 feet) for residential uses along Mount Vernon Avenue and 1-83 ATTACHMENT~_ C CIAL DISTRICTS • 19.06 B. co-1(coMMERCIAL oFFICE) DISTRICT • This district is intended to pmvide for the continued use, expansion, and new development of administrative and professional offices, hospitals, and supporting retail uses in proximity to major transportation corridors and ensure their compatibility with adjacent residential and commerdal uses. Additionally, this district permits a maximum density of 47 units per gross aae for senior dozen and senior congregate care housing. C Co,Z (COMMERCIAL OFFICE-CONVERSION DISTRICT This district is intended to promote the conversion, rather than the demoli- tion of existing residential structures where feasible, in designated areas for low-intensity administrative and professional offices. Additionally, this district permits a maximum density of 47 units per gross aae for senior dozen and senior congregate care housing. D. CG-1(COMMERCIAL GENERAL) DISTRICT This disirict is intended to provide for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of n~ta1~, personal service, entertainment, office and related commerdal uses along major transportation corridors and intersect lions to serve the needs of the residents; reinfordng existing commerdal corridors and centers and establishing new locations as residential growth occurs. E CG-2 (COMMERCIAL GENERAL-BASELINFIMT. VERNON DISTRICT This district is intended to enhance the economic activity of the Baseline Street and Mount Vernon Avenue, and other appropriate malalerdal oa- ridors; infilling and intensifying existing development, establishing new _ key activity centers and nodes, allowing for the development of medium and medium high residential density as alternative uses. The residential development shall have a minimum contiguous area of 1 gross aa+e with a maximum density of 12 units per gross aae along Mount Vernon Avenue and Baseline Street and other designated locations west of I-215 and a maximum density of 21 units per gross aa+e along Baseline Street and other designated locations east of I-215. Additionally, a bonus density of 5096 for the development of senior dozen and senior congregate care housing shall be permitted, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use 1'eratit. Allow existing single family residential structures to remain as conforming permitted uses. ATTAGHMENT~_ II~0 5191 ~.19~ ~~j, pt5'~ C r r r r r r r r r ~ r r ~ ~ o E r ~, c r ~ r V a r ~ ~ d ar ~ U ~r o i .%'. r ~ ~ o V Q mo ~r ~ ~O N r tlf ~ ~ C d. ~ ~ C ~ 7" r i ri N ~' ~ .r~ to ~ A7Y G ~ V U ~ ~$, ab o. ~ ~ E ~ =°o~~~N~ ~ ATT ACHM NT ~ r rj, O O ~ II~ fit, pIS'IR1C~'.---~' + + ~' + + '~' + + ~ + + } i~ + + t ~, ,~. t + + + } {, + + '} cJ1 + + + + '~ ~' + } + • + { + d { t t } + + ,~. } t t '~' to } {' ~, tH ~ p + ~, } t O, 7 ~ + + ~, } ~- { + + 0 F + ~, } ,~~!] ~, } + 4 t ~ ~ V } F 4 V + + } + + + + + + J w + + + } 4 G + V N } + + + w } + } ~' !~' + ; t 's + a+ nO" ~ V " r. N p1 ~ .W O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ". ~ C ~ O mE--~~~ ~~~'wcw a ~~m$~o~ c~ m~ r m$~~ ~~U o~~=~~N~DtJN to ~~~~~=VpO~'l~tL ~ w T am ~°~"'~i-~xj~AT ACHMENT~- O Resolution No. 1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING TAE NEGATIVE 2 DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-14 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN ~ BERNARDINO. 4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: b SECTION 1. Recitals 6 (a) The General Plan for the City of San Bernardino was ~ adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-159 S on June 2, 1989. 9 (b) General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 to the General Plan of 10 the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning Commis- 11 sion on October 8, 1991, after a noticed public hearing, and the 12 Plannin Commission's recommendation of a g pproval has been 13 considered by the Mayor and Common Council. 14 (c) An Initial Study was prepared on August 13, 1991 and re- 15 viewed by the Environmental Review Committee and the Planning 16 Commission who both determined that General Plan Amendment No. 91- 17 14 would not have a significant effect on the environment and 18 therefore, recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted. 19 (d) The proposed Negative Declaration received a 21 day 20 public review period from August 29, 1991 through September 18, 21 1991 and all comments relative thereto have been reviewed by the ~ Planning Commission and the Mayor and Common Council in compliance ~ with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local 24 regulations. 25 //// 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 4 1 (e) The Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public 2 hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General Plan ~ Amendment No. 91-14 and the Planning Division Staff Report on 4 November 18, 1991. 5 (f) The adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 is 6 deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City and 7 is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the 8 existing General Plan. 9 SECTION 2. ~gative Declaration 10 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the 11 Mayor and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General 12 Plan of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect 13 on the environment, and the Negative Declaration heretofore 14 prepared by the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of 15 this proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. 16 SECTION 3. Findings 17 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the 18 City of San Bernardino that: 19 A. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the 20 General Plan in that goals, objectives and policies contained 21 in the land use element of the General Plan support the text ~ amendment which will further those goals, objectives and ~ policies. 24 //// 25 !11! 26 J/I1 27 //// 28 //// 2 © 4 1 B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public 2 interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City ~ in that adding the residential use of existing single family 4 residential structures as a permitted use allows the 5 structures to be a conforming use and gives the property 6 owners the ability to properly maintain the structures, which ~ is in the public interest. 8 C. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance ' 9 of land uses within the City in that permitting an existing 10 land use does not affect the balance of land uses. 11 SECTION 4. Amendment 12 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: 1g A. The text of the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino is 14 amended by adding Policy 1.22.17 to page 1-83, (Attachment A) 15 and is more specifically described as allowing existing single 16 family structures to remain as conforming, permitted uses in 17 the CG-2, Commercial General, land use designation. This 1g amendment is designated General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 a 19 copy of which is attached and incorporated herein by 20 reference. 21 B. General Plan Amendment No. 91-14 shall be effective ~ immediately upon adoption of this resolution. ~ SECTION 5. Text Notation 24 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be ~ noted on such appropriate General Plan page as has been previously 26 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are 27 on file in the office of the City Clerk. 28 //// 3 1 SECTION 6. Notice of Determination 2 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of 3 Determination with the County Clerk of the county of San Bernardino 4 certif in the Cit ~s com liance with CEQA in y g y p preparing the 5 Negative Declaration. 6 //// 7 //// 8 //// 9 //// 10 //// it //// 12 //// 13 //// 14 //// 15 //// 16 //// 17 //// 18 //// 19 //// 20 //// 21 //// ~ //// ~ //// 24 //// ~ //// 26 //// 27 //// ~ //// 4 RESOLUTION...]lDOPTING THE NEGATIVE DEC7~CATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL • IMPACT AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 91-14 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 1 2 9 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by 4 the Mayor and Common Council of the City of•San Bernardino at a 5 meeting therefore, held on the day of 6 , 1991, by the following vote, to wit: 7 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN 8 ESTRADA 9 REILLY 10 HERNANDEZ 11 MAUDSLEY 12 MINOR i~ POPE-LUDLAM 14 MILLER 15 16 City Clerk 17 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day 18 of , 1991. 19 20 21 W.R. Holcomb, Mayor City of San Bernardino ~ Approved as to ~ form and legal content: 24 JAMES F. PENMAN, City Attorney-S ~ ~ ~- ~ Byr,l `~/%~~ ~/ 26 27 28 5 i o ~ a. a minimum contiguous area of one acre is committed to residential use; b. walls, landscape, horizontal and vertical setbacks, and other elements are used to buffer the use from adjacent commercial uses; c. noise, traffic, and lighting impacts of adjacent commercial uses, are mitigated; d. passive recreation open space is provided on-sib; e. the project is adequately secured; f. its location will not impact the integrity and continuity of other commercial uses; and g. a development plan is approved by the ivtayor and Common Council (Il.l, I1.4, I1.6, and I1.7). 1.2214 Permit senior dtizen and senior congregate care housing in locations between the commerdal centers, provided that they are adequately buffered rrom these uses (sound walls, landscape, security, controlled access, etc) and in accordance with the provisions of Policy 1.1211 (Il.l and I1.6). 1.?2.15 Pursue aggressive programs to stimulate the economic revitalization of the vlount Vernon Avenue and Base Line Street areas, which shall include marketing of development opportunities, attractions management, Redevelopment authorities, and other appropriate actions Q1.lI, I1.12, I1.14). 1.~? 16 Promote the development of spedfic plans for the vlount Vernon Corridor, including all parcels flanking vlount Vernon Avenue designated as CG2 between Base Line Street and Highland Avenue, ~vhich allow for the collaborative input of residents and business owners in the formula- tion of a comprehensive and phased plan which meets the business, resi- de~ltial, and cultural n~ed~of ~he ac~acent cotdnmunit}~ (I1.1 Il.~). 1.22.17 Allow existing singe ami y rest entia stfuc ores to remain onforming permitted uses. Density/Intense and f~eig~t 1.?220 Permit a maximum floor area ratio of 0.7 and height of two stories (30 feet) for commercial uses (Il.l). 1.2221 Permit a residential density of 4.6 to 14 units per net acre and height of two stories (30 feet) for residential uses along Vlount Vernon avenue and I-83 ATTACHMENT A~ ~ o 1 ORDINANCE N0. 2 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING SAN SERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 19.06.010(E), 19.06.020 AND $ 19.06.030 TO ALLOW EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES AS PERMITTED USES. 4 THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 5 DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: 6 SECTION 1. Section 19.06.010, paragraph E, is amended to 7 add the following (as shown on Attachment A): $ "Allow existing single-family residential structures to g remain as conforming permitted uses." 10 SECTION 2. Section 19.06.020, Table 06.01, is amended to 11 read as shown on Attachment B: 12 Item "100I. Temporary Uses" is renumbered as Item "100J". 1$ Add new Item "1001. Single-Family Residences (Existing)" 14 Permitted in the CG-2 Land Use District. 15 SECTION 3. Section 19.06.030, Table 06.03, is amended to 16 read as shown on Attachment C: 17 Add new Item "P. Single-Family (Existing)" permitted in the 1g CG-2 Land Use District. 19 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was duly 20 adopted by the Mayor and Common. Council of the City of 21 San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on '~ / / / / 23 / / / / 24 / / / / ~ //// 26 / / / / 27 / / / / 28 / / / / HE/dya/pexmituae.ord 1 November 12, 1991 o a 1 ORDINANCE AMENDING SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 19.06.010(E), 19.06.020 AND 19.06.030 TO ALLOW EXISTING SINGLE- '~ FAMILY RESIDENCES AS PERMITTED USES. 3 the day of 1991, by the following vote, to wit: 4 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT 5 ESTRADA s REILLY 7 HERNANDEZ 8 MAUDSLEY 9 MINOR 10 POPE-LUDLAM 11 MILLER 12 13 City Clerk 14 The foregoing ordinance is hereby approved this day 15 of 1991. 16 17 W. R. Holcomb, Mayor City of San Bernardino 1g Approved as to 19 form and legal content: e~ JAMES F. PENMAN, City Attorney 21 ~ By: 23 24 25 26 27 28 HE/dye/permituse.ord 2 November 12, 1991 C ~ CSAL DISTRICTS -19.06 B. co-z (coMMERCIAL OFFICE) DISTRICT This district is intended to provide for the continued use, expansion, and new development of administrative and professional offices, hospitals, and supporting retail asps in proximity to major transportation corridors and ensure their compatibility with adjacent residential and commercial uses. Additionally, this district permits a maximum density of 47 units per gross sae for senior dtizett and senior congregate care housing. C. C0~ (COMMERCIAL OFFICE~ONVERSION) DISTRICT This district is intended bo promote the conversion, rather than the demoli- tion of existing residential structures where feasible, in designated areas for low intensity administrative and professional offices. Additionally, this district permits a maximum density of 47 units per gross sae for senior dozen and senior congregate care housing. D. CG-1(COMMERCIAL GENERAL) DISTRICT This district is intended to provide for the continued use, enhancement, and new development of retail, personal service, entertainment, office and related commeraal uses along major transportation corridors and intersec- tions to serve the needs of the residents; reinfordng existing commerdal corridors and centers and establishing new locations as residential growth occurs. E CG-2 (COMMERCIAL GII~iERAL-BASELII~iFlMT. VERNON) DISTRICT This district is intended in enhance the economic acrivity of the baseline Street and Mount Vernon Avenue, and other appropriate coataterdal cor- ridors: infillin and in existin develo establishin new 8 Ong 8 Pman~ g key activity canters and nodes, allowing for the development of medium and medium high residential density as alternative uses. The residential development shall have a minimum contiguous area of 1 gross sae with a maximum density of 12 units per gross sae along Mount Vernon Avenue and Baseline Street and other designated locations west of I-215 and a maximum density of 21 units per gross sae along Baseline Sweet and other designated locations east of I-215. Additionally, a bonus density of 50% for the development of senior citizen and senior congregate care housing shall be permitted, subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permikk Allow existing single family residential structures to remain as conforming permitted uses. ATTACHMENT A II~60 ~ x/91 o a .r+r~ ~~r p29'~~ 19~' ~p~~ 0 r r r r r r r '~ Y r m U r as O r ~ r 'o r ~c ar ~ 3 p V ~ 3 ~ r c°~ ~ C~ %r C v (r] r ~ ~ O V r ~ m p yr ~ ~ a tlf r .,~ ~ ~ ~s m a r ,, '' ~ ~N 'Ti ~' ''.+ m E ~, ~ ~ ~~r c ~.t? ~ r ~ ~ Z~ v r s ~ C v ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ t6 ~' i~ N y N C crb -~ ~ r`D ~ ~ 3 ~ ~y ~ ~ o o°o~m N7 Y Z ATT AC'HMENT y9 r V r h a 0 II-~' QpT, C125TR1C'fS .19.06 ~ ~, } } } } } } ~ + + + + } } } + } } + + + 0~ + + } A + + + MFG ocn~ + } ° p EQ,,, + + } + + + 4pU + + + F 4U + .3w + + ~ C. + U cA + + + + '~ + i w + + '~ + + + ~ + o -~ v ~ w ~ c ~ c' ,n C7 ~ ~ .r+ G V ~m O$~~ ~OO c6 p m A '~ ~ rN df 3 A " O y 1. Nm N~~~~~tl1~~C=~~6~~.+ O m O mr~~O ~ ~" t~.~3>A i m ~ S C A ~" _ m ~ N ~ j.N ~ m ~ ~ m Oy O m Um~~ GV~a~l~~~NZQ~M N 4~~ara' °m c7s-~-'Y'~~ ENT ~-~- 4~ vpy~u: pTTgCHM II~