Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout34-Planning and Building CITY' OF SAN BERN~QDINO -REQUEST F('~I COUNCIL ACTION From: Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director Subject: Appeal of Approval of Tentative Tract No. 14352 Dept: planning and Building Services Mayor and Common Council Meeting of Date: October 10, 1991 October 21, 1991 2:00 P.M. Synopsis of Previous Council action: On September 16, 1991, the Mayor and Common Council directed the applicant to prepare tract redesign options to satisfy the appellant's concern. At the same meeting, two additional issues were raised for further review: General Plan consistency and Monnig's request for reimbursement consideration for the oversizinq of a Verdemont Drive storm drain. Ma or and Common That the hearin be closed; and that the g Y Recommended motion: on No. 1 of 1 e a sal and a rove O ti Council upho d th pp pp p Tentative Tract No. 14352 with the addition of one Public Works/Engineering Standard Requirement identified as Alternative No. 2 which would require that the applicant pay a proportionate share of the cost of oversizinq the Verdemont Drive storm drain (not to exceed $16,211.00) and subject to the Amended Findings of Fact and the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained within the Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 6, 1991. (Supports appellant's request and staff recommendation) Larry Reed Signature Assistant Director Contact person: Larry E. Reed Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: 1Acct No ) 1Acct Descriation) Finance: Council Notes: Agenda Item No__~- _ _ CITY ~OF SAN BERN/IQDINO -REQUEST Fri COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject Appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract No. 14352, to subdivide 24.3 acres into sixty-nine (69) single-family lots in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. Mayor and Common Council Meeting of October 21, 1991 REQUEST The appellant, William T. Kruger, appealed the approval of Tentative Tract No. 14352 by the Planning Commission. The appellant requested that the Mayor and Common Council reevaluate the road alignment of the tentative tract to resolve a potential impact to their property. BACKGROUND The Planning Commission reviewed Tentative Tract No. 14352 which proposed to subdivide 24.3 acres into sixty-nine (69) single- family lots with a density of 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. The applicant proposed to utilize the alternative lot size provision of the Verdemont Area Plan to establish lot sizes less than 10,800 square feet. On August 6, 1991, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on Tentative Tract No. 14352. A motion was made for approval based on the discussion and in agreement with the staff recommendation. The motion for approval was seconded, and then was carried by unanimous vote of the six Commissioners in attendance. On August 15, 1991, Mr. William T. Kruger, submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision of approval (see Exhibit 4, Attachment "A"). The basis for his appeal is that with a minor road alignment future area-wide circulation could be enhanced and would not impact his property. Mr. Kruger has included a possible reconfiguration as part of his appeal request. The modification results in a net loss of one lot while potentially increasing the lot size of four other lots. '5.0264 _ r. ........-.~, Q Appeal of Tentative Tract No. 14352 Mayor and Common Council Meeting October 21, 1991 Page 2 On September 16, 1991, the Mayor and Common Council discussed the appeal and directed the applicant to prepare an alternate lot design to avoid the Kruger's property. At the same meeting, two additional issues were identified for further review. The first issue involved General Plan consistency in relation to the lot sizes proposed under the Alternate Lot Size provision of the Verdemont Area Plan. The other issued raised involved an inquiry from Monnig Development which asked for reimbursement consideration for its fair share of the cost of the Verdemont Storm Drain that was constructed in conjunction with Monnig Tract No. 14260 and No. 14261. ANALYSIS The applicant at the direction of the Mayor and Common Council has redesigned Tentative Tract No. 14352 to avoid the conflict with Mr. Kruger's property along Palm Avenue. The centerline of Huntington Drive has been aligned with the southerly property line of Mr. Kruger's parcel. The redesign maintains an overall density of 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre and results in a total of 68 lots which is minus one from the previous proposal and the recreational trail has been reduced from a total of 56,116 square feet to approximately 50,081 square feet (see Exhibit "1", Revised Map Option No. 1). In addition, the applicant has elected with the redesign to eliminate the use of the alternate lot size provision and with their proposed Option No. 1 has designed all 68 lots to be equal to or greater than the 10,800 square foot minimum lot size requirement of the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation. Therefore, the issue raised of consistency is no longer a concern. The Findings of Fact have been amended to apply to the revised tentative tract map (see Exhibit "2"). The last issue regarding Monnig's request for consideration of reimbursement was reviewed by Roger Hardgrave, Director of Public Works/Engineering. He has met with the representatives of Monnig and has arrived at three possible alternatives to their request. ~ rrr~f Q 7 Appeal of Tentative Tract No. 14352 Mayor and Common Council Meeting October 21, 1991 Page 3 The three alternatives outlined in an interoffice memorandum dated October 8, 1991 (see Exhibit "3" ) are as follows: 1. Disa>>ow any reimbursement to Monnia. 2. TT 14352 and other tracts in the benefit area Sdeveiopab~e portions of the drainace area to reimburse Monnia a proportionate share of the cost of oversizing the Storm Drain beyond that needed to protect Monnic's proiects (Alternative preferred by Public Works Department). 3. ~ a;*;^*~ TT14352 and other tracts in the benefit area (developable portions of the drainace area to share in the total cost of the storm drain (Alternative preferred by Monnig). The interoffice memorandum from the Public Works/Engineering Department discusses that the Subdivision Map Act (Section 66486) requires that a local agency must agree to reimburse a subdivider for oversizing of public improvements. The storm drain was constructed as a condition of approval to protect four Monnig tracts at the southeasterly corner of Verdemont Drive and Palm Avenue, consisting of about 35.8 acres of land. The total drainage area upstream of the storm drain is 114.4 acres of which only 69.5 acres are regarded as developable. The storm drain design assumed those 69.5 acres to be developed even though, except for a few single family houses, the area is vacant land. Therefore, the drain is oversized for Monnig's purposes. The representatives of Monnig Development contend that the storm drain is not needed to protect their development and they could have built mud walls to divert the flows past their property. The Public Works Department does not agree with their position since a block wall could not be constructed across the intersection of Huntington Drive with Verdemont Drive, which could allow flood waters to enter into the tract. The Public Works Department prefers Alternative No. 2 which would involve conditioning TT 14352 to pay their proportionate share of the cost for oversizing the storm drain in Verdemont Drive (estimated to be $16,211.00), with funds to be reimbursed to Monnig. This requirement to pay proportionate share of the cost will also need to be imposed on other tracts in the drainage area. Appeal of Tentative Tract No. 14352 Mayor and Common Council Meeting October 21, 1991 Page 4 1~rnvOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OPTIONS The Mayor and Common Council can uphold the appeal and approve Option No. 1 of Tentative Tract No. 14352 subject to the Amended Findings of Fact and the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained within the Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 6, 1991. OR The Mayor and Common Council can uphold the appeal and approve Option No. 1 of Tentative Tract No. 14352 with the addition of one Public Works/Engineering Standard Requirement condition which identified as Alternative No. 2 would require that the applicant pay a proportionate share (not to exceed $16,211.00) of the cost ' of ovsrsizing the Verdemont Drive storm drain and subject to the Amended Findings of Fact and the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained within the Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 6, 1991. OR The Mayor and Common Council deny the appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 14352 subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained within the Planning Commission Staff Report dated Auqust 6, 1991. OR The Mayor and Common Council may uphold the appeal and deny Tentative Tract No. 14352. © O Appeal of Tentative Tract No. 14352 Mayor and Common Council Meeting October 21, 1991 Page 5 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Mayor and Common Council uphold the appeal and approve Option No. 1 of Tentative Tract No. 14352 with the addition of one Public Works/Engineering Standard Requirement identified as Alternative No. 2 which would require that the applicant pay a proportionate share of the cost of oversizing the Verdemont Drive storm drain (not to exceed $16,211.00) and subject to the Amended subject to the Amended Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained within the Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 6, 1991. Prepared by: Patti Nahill, Associate Planner for Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director of Planning and Building Services Attachments: Exhibit 1 - Revised Map Option No. 1 for Tentative Tract No. 14352 Exhibit 2 - Amended Findings of Fact Exhibit 3 - Interoffice Memorandum dated October 8, 1991 Exhibit 4 - Request For Council Action dated September 16, 1991 Attachment A - Letter of Appeal to Mayor and Common Council Attachment B - Statement of Official Planning Commission Action Attachment C - Official Notice of Public Hearing before the Mayor and Common Council Attachment D - Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated August 6, 1991 i I A I_•._.~~Cr,~ T O V m IV ~S, . 31 PALM AVE _-gL:_._.{-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- --- I 0 a = w u i a w w • C Z ~ w I P i ~ ~ • V P Z I e a `~~I ~ w w j a w y I O w w u V Y t W I o°'`s~ V i O i P P 1 a~ ~ P I I O • ~ ~I ,q 1 w m~ ~ ~ O V ~ j w D - ~O w ~ m, ~ e ,~,~ / N 0 ZI +r/ a ~f e w w w c 3 T _vi~ ~ ,a~ o a 5 ~q Lq Z • ~ " s • ' / w V ~ ¢.4 v i /'~ N R /' = ~ a g i.,.i r -~ - _ Y \ ~ ~ ~a Z i o ^' € ~ ~ ~a+~ w ~ j j ~rn ,; V --i ~o ~ ~ ,a~ ; ~ ~ ,T ~'s i~ ~ W ~i^ ='~ ~ e~ - " N x~ - ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM FINDINGS OF FACT HEARING DATE October 21, 1991 PAGE 1. The requested subdivision is consistent with the minimum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation and is consistent with the General Plan in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that they and each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet (88 feet on corner lots) and a minimum depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that the development will occur according to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in this report. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the State Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed private streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works/ Engineering for street improvements. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. ~ PUN-BAB PAGE t OF 1 IN01 Exhibit 2 ® Q C I T Y O F S A N B E RNA R D I N O INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: PATTI NAHILL, Associate Planner FROM: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Director of Public Works/ City Engineer SUBJECT: TT 14352 - 68 SFR Lots on the Northeast Corner of Verdemont Drive and Palm Avenue DATE: October 8, 1991 COPIES: File TR 14352; Reading File --------------------------------------------------------------- At their meeting of September 16, 1991, the Mayor and Common Council heard an appeal of the subject tract by Monnig Development, Inc. requesting that they (Monnig) be reimbursed by the subdividers of TT 14352 for a proportionate share of the cost of a storm drain installed by Monnig in Verdemont Drive, between Palm Avenue and Olive Avenue (see attachment). The appeal was continued to October 21, 1991, so staff could resolve this issue, along with two others. We have met with representatives of Monnig regarding this matter and ki,:ve arrived at three possible alternatives to their request. These alternatives are: 1. Disallow anv Reimbursement to Monnig -- There are provisions for reimbursement for oversizing in the Subdivision Map Act; however, exclusive of this appeal, no application for reimbursement has been received from Monnig. Normally, such applications would be made prior to start of construction so the City could verify that the project was competitively bid. Since this storm drain is already con- structed, we have no way to make such a verification. 2. Condition TT 14352 and other tracts in the benefit area (developable ortions of the drainage area) to reimburse Monnig a pro ortionate share of the cost of oversizing the Storm Drain beyond that needed to protect Monnig's projects We estimate the cost of oversizing at $43,500.00. Tract No. 14352's proportionate share would be $16,211.00. This alternative is preferred by the Public Works Department. 3. Condition TT 14352 and other tracts in the benefit area (developable ortions of the drainage area) to share in the total cost of the storm drain -- Monnig Development has indicated their total cost to con- struct the storm drain was $225,000. Under this alternative, Tract No. 14352's share would be $55,342.00 Exhibit 3 . C~ PATTI NAHILL TT 14352 October 8, 1991 Page - 2 - (24.6 of the total cost). Monnig Development would absorb 34.0$ of the total cost, or $76,496.00, with the balance provided by other tracts in the drainage area. Monnig prefers this method. DISCUSSION The Subdivision Map Act (Section 66486) requires that a local agency must agree to reimburse a subdivider for oversizing of public improvements. The storm drain was constructed as a condition of approval to protect four Monnig tracts at the southeasterly corner of Verdemont Drive and Palm Avenue, consisting of about 35.8 acres of land. The total drainage area upstream of the storm drain is 114.4 acres of which only 69.5 acres are regarded as developable. The storm drain design assumed those 69.5 acres to be developed even though, except for a few single family houses, the area is vacant land. Therefore, the drain is oversized for Monnig's purposes. Representatives of Monnig Development contend that the storm drain is not needed to protect their development and they could have built mud walls to divert flows past their property. We are unable to agree with this position since the block wall could not be constructed across the intersection of Huntington Drive with Verdemont Avenue, which could allow flood waters to enter into the tract. Recommended Action: That Tentative Tract No. 14,352 be conditioned to pay their proportionate share of the cost for oversizing the storm drain in Verdemont Avenue by Monnig Development, Inc, (estimated at $16,211), with the funds to be reimbursed to Monnig. This re- quirement to pay proportionate share of the cost will also need to be imposed on other tracts in the drainage area. Please advise if you have any questions or would like any further information. ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Director of Public Works/City Engineer ~'~:J~~- MICHAEL W. GRUBBS Senior Civil Engineer MWG:rs Attach ice/ ~ •`'•`''`~i I ~;'-T ~~_l~i;./~ alt; ; `~,I ~- l ~- n p ~ '.f ~...~~)f h ;`mot, ~ ~~~/~. ~1 ~ ~ • ,,, ,.., .J° ~~X, MEAT " N A'1`f6~I AL ~ - ~ ~p 'l'f L'~352. /I ~ ~ . ~ t/ ~ 1~ II ~I ~--~ \ I ii 394 ' ~ ~ II ti !K ~ ~ q p's'`o-._. Mort '!R "~~a 1 7 / . ., ~ P Goo . Q 'e, /84 = ~ ` ~Ohly f ~ `t 0 1 c~+^ TENT 77~"A._., T L~."'s - - ~N J@9m v+es~"~ SToeM ~ O C? '91 JG 15 A 9 ,29 August 14, 1991 Honorable City Council City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 To Whom This May Concern: This letter is in appeal of a decision of the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission, August 6. 1991, regarding Tentative Tract 14~32.i4352. First let me state that I am not against development in the Verdemont area if it is done with careful planning and concern for the safety and well being of the existing residents. At this time the area's infrastructure is not adequate to insure the safety of new residents in an emergency situation as there are effectively only two exits from Verdemont; Pine and Palm Avenues. At the Planning Commission meeting of August 6, 1991, three residents spoke in opposition to the development. There were about twenty other people in the audience who voiced their concerns to me personally. The mayor concerns were the high density, the lack of adequate infrastructure and the need for an additional point of ingress and egress. I proposed an alternate road alignment that appeared to garner support from planning staff and the commission. Hover, due to the late hour, that discussion fell by the wayside. You are our last hope! As proposed, this tract provides for a high number of lots, small lot size, and large slopes (due to the relatively steep topography) which result in low net useable pad areas. The proposed alignment of Huntington Drive is not conducive to orderly development west of Palm Avenue. ATTACH~dEFlT A p Ca Honorable City Council August 14, 1991 Page two I have attached a copy of an alternate alignment of the proposed road system that would help meet the needs of future development west of Palm Avenue, providing better circulation. This, coupled with reduced density, results in amore acceptable development. The applicant's representative, of course, opposed this option because of the loss of lots and, therefore, the net profit yield. It would also cause the additional cost of reengineerinq which to me is small compared to the benefit for the area. Once again, please review the attached reconfiguration and in addition, please consider the feelings of the surrounding property owners who attended the Planning Commission meeting August 6, 1991, who are concerned about the density of this development. Thank you, William T. Kruger 6920 Palm Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92407 887-53 qs ii;e2i - - --' ~n v.eo+ 33 23.900 61 12.632 9 ; fl ~ -_-'-~ ~ it ~~~Q}~•746 34 10.292 62 13.646 T ~.A..: 2 ~ - g 1-26 17 7 ~ 36 9.902 63 11.407 6ldl9t ~ - - _-- _ :NIA 92769 16 471 76 9.162 64 10.676 ~{~1p ~~' _ _ 6277 • l6T •A• V1LL OE 09DlGTED T6 TIE OtTY OF tAM TID Fa : __' - EgE0TR1AN iMllJ. 0/EN rADE. 911YE6 AItD OMI/iMOE Y-__ _ REST _ ••' ~`'+l.i/Ii.LII/'l~ rl~~'I~I ~-_'-= ~ _ -~:_:_ CALIFORNIA 92106 ~/%`^~ ~~~'-r J', fit- /I I~~~\~\_._ - ~ i"' 2441 ~ - s i " p ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ \ .,~ - ,' CAl[FOIINIA 92410 ~ 'i' / ` i ~MT& \~~,,~.. . ~j-t'r'=_ _ 3761 ~ j ~ ~ ,. ~-`\ ~`•."S~~•~ C~ - ., ' _ S ..- :fTT VATER DISTRICT ~ - ~'1, `t"•~` ~ ~ \ `~~J_;, -- CALIFORNIA 92410 _ " ~IEUMtfg4S VNtsT'• ~ ~ 5361 ~ SIMP!p' 4LifaFIMItN. '. ~'fl\. -- j `~~.- -_ - iii 02BERS : - '_ ..'1%, ~' \~,~~ •t p ~ I`~~_ Y~ ~ ~ .'i 1!I VET . rCl , :-Yy~ ) \ i ~' 2~"' "/ _ -_~•: ~ ,.f ~ , ,. ice- - -~ ITS ACRE _•'~. L '^eY•. ` ~~+fw . // ~~-. ~~' 7 Via. ~.~~1;. ' ._~0 1 TILL RESULT IN ~~"~ ~ ~ ~, ~J ~ ~ ti~ IIPROVEMENT8 ~ --- W - \ _ r ~ . "i ~ / ~ . - - ^~W - •tL-tIH ~ -1.E.t1~, -•LE~L'`; ~'JIE.UH- ' : c c: ~ _ ~j'a IBTAt21E0 u91NS TA61Mf' ~ ~ -Y ~ ~':- t..s~-~ ~72-e91. ~ ~-, ~ ~ . t --_ r-• ,. _ _- ~"~/ ` \ INwtoAnoN. - _ - - a ~~~, 34,,if _ < 3ri s" 3t- - a, - - - ~ L2eco LFt1sr - ~ LE.2115.. LL a 31 ~/• - ~ -t11t 3! ,'^ . rRO,IECT. ~ -- ~ _ eE. _ ~ . ---r nr.~ 1123 ~ ~'-~- I9TRICT. ~ ~" ,: E 'P.E.t111 ,' . ~ !E$DEM1E `t, t~ ,~ _ ~LL4110 " " - - - _ 'f~ ~ - ~ R;y+, .tip -~ nT$ALONODv6TN ~ '- - P.E_.210D ITr aF sAN - ROINO. .E. 2 $ tE111i; _ y tEi' ~ _ .--_.~ -- n ~ _- _ ~ `B• fitll~ i ---4-{ a i0 4 --- '~~ - - LLll11 ?.E.tftl y '~ - -- 12 s. INC. ~ VACA1(. ; - E - _ ~" ;7 R.tl1~ ox so6z - R - _ - a P.E.t~13. • ~ ~ tE1l15 ~ ~ ~' ' -~iJ' 16 ~ Qity of San Bernardino STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT Number: Tentative Tract No. 14352 Applicant: Dr. and Mrs. Donald Huber Owner: Same $~IQt3 Meeting Date: August 6, 1991 X Adopted Negative Declaration and Approved Request Based Upon Findings of Fact (Attachment B) and Subject to Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D) CONDITIONS This project was approved subject to the Conditions of . Approval and Standard Requirements contained in Attachments C and D with the revision of Condition of Approval No. 19 to read: 19. Bailey Creek shall be protected in a natural condition. Building pads shall be elevated to provide at least 3 feet of freeboard above the high water elevation in a 100 year frequency storm. and the deletion of Condition of Approval Nos. 20, 21, and 22. VO Ayes: Cole, Jordan, Lopez, Ortega, Sharp, stone Nays: None Abstain: None Absent: Clemensen, Lindseth, Vallee i, hereby, certify that this Statement of Official Action - accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning Commission the City of/San Bernardino. ~iC 6'}UG YT~/ q/ Signatu Date Larry E. Reed. Assistant Director of Plannina & Buildina $grvices Name and Title ATTACHMENT 6 CITY OF SAN BERNA INO PLANNING AND BUILDING VICES DEPARTMENT OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL SUB.IECT: WARD # APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT N0. 14352 5 PROPERTY LOCATION: Subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of about 24.3 acres located at the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive. PROPOSAL: To establish a 69 unit single-family residential subdivision in the RL, Resi- j dential Low, General Plan land use designation. PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: SAN BEANARDINO CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ~ / 300 NORTH "D' STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418 HEARING DATE AND TIME: (Y Monday, September 16, 1991 2:00 p.m. '-+.~ ~ a appWaOepanaarrpav~r~me.n.rnw..q~asre.y sw.s e I D~pblrrierS~ICA1r Nell.Mt~dWMAMtisnile11tb01/!1{p00ArPbrb01~ M~~q. aleeee NlaealM e'Ien~9/W 91Wr9 S,IYCR ~elleleb9,I,en a q eebmq 17161 ]KEC67. Tlyiiw'>a10 Cpr~nOn CAAb OIgMO4'A~PYBCO~Yg1. pyW 1~ur,01~ lOalY/rO.,OV/dyMdM MaerltYMb114mbgaR nppppMpnb M9r99e•erb H. ,cbuN~lITl9 eleldll~'ra.9~NR/eap/~I~A..tiellMmrWbl.Mr lbe. ]OO NOIEr'O' ..?w.. $a11 ~erb. Cia01~ a2Al/. O.wcrsaeb w.,rrocamn.a..MYmK«r.va.lenomw+gs•cv. ' ~ aowlr ur vermb. IWbr a Pleru. r..s.. n.a wo. em venrm ueees aiJ aow,bObfr WgenOCmnbnt.aubl AOpe,lebObbryV e,pCpengnCaugl mwsm~O,nMMYq•t4a9MryWr0ealM qAl. e110 muelp,eWrMOetlbOb ` ~~/ car Cwn awglnn lnrr eebbpalb 1M bevel elbwr OWS a ebaewm Ilan Orye a vacr Sew rb rwlub+naa wpµ / t Grwel PYn AlnelvrMretiq AlneIglMlaf e1M MiMe0911 CaOe Ml aa9me? cwrwrw..a.ebn.bw«.bcm.mca.elbrmraoan. y / • ~Iy9uaWW¢1MweYtllOeISeY1aM?Yr>.bcan.mncww.lmucfw S' "yY9emrMeebrMY1a01+rmaMblYe/yOYOI eeIMabNYrelMOatabpp9Mwy ` ObpipeOnlMrpc•,pnw"IMpprrYyprbrpyY~pbMCAy YIeMgONYr x v9nw b. ubewmnw+q. ~ N moan .Ewnu .:.~.~a u"~K,'b, PtAw907 GAGE r GF r 3901 ATTACHMENT C CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 SUMMARY HEARING DATE 8-6-91 WARD 5 APPLICANT: Dr. & Mrs. Donald Huber W 4671 S9ebb Canyon Road Claremont, CA 91711 Q Tentative Tract No. 14352 owNER: gp~ V The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide 24.3 acres ~ into sixty-nine (69) single-family lots in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. W The subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land ~ located at the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Verdemont Q Drive in the Verdemont area. W Q EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY ~E ~11~ DESIGNATION Subject Vacant RL Residential Low tdorth Single-family Residential RL Residential Low and Vacant South Residential RL Residential Low East Vacant RL Residential Low West Single-family Residential RL Residential Low GEOLOGIC /SEISMIC ~ VES FLOOD HAZARD ~ VES 7~ 20NE A SEWERS: ~ YES HAZARD ZONE: ? NO ZONE: ? NO ? ZONE B ? NO HIGH FIRE ~ YES AIRPORT NOISE/ ? YES REDEVELOPMENT ? YES HAZARD ZONE: ? NO CRASH ZONE: ~ NO PROJECT AREA: ~ NO Q ? NOT ? POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z APPROVAL APPLICABLE EFFECTS WITH O ~ MITIGATING MEASURES F Z y NO E.I.R. Q ~ CONDITIONS ~ _ ? EXEMPT ? E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO W Z~Z ? DENIAL Z C SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS Q W ~ Z WITH MITIGATING N ~ ~ MEASURES O ? CONTINUANCE TO _ ~ NO SIGNIFICANT ? SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. W MINUTES ft a°M1Mw° n~"inroa PLAfY0.02 PARE 1 OF 1 (49D1 ATTACHMENT D CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 2 REQUEST • The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide 24.3 acres into sixty-nine (69) single-family lots in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. The General Plan land use designation permits a maximum density of 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre and requires a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. SITE LOCATION The subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land located at the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive in the Verdemont area (See Attachment "G", Location Map). MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Municipal Code and is in conformance with the General Plan as shown in Attachment "A". CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT STATUS The Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 25, 1991. The ERC found that no significant impacts would result from the project and recommended a Negative Declaration be adopted. The Negative Declaration was advertised and available for public review and comment from May 2, 1991 to May 22, 1991. To date, no comments on the initial study have been received. If comments are received referencing this project, they will be presented to the Planning Commission at the August 6, 1991, Planning Commission meeting lsee Attachment "E", Initial Study). ANALYSIS Site Characteristics The 24.3 acre site is currently vacant. The topography of the site consists of rolling terrain generally sloping five percent to the southeast. Minor drainage courses are located in the east and southern portions of the site. PL11NiDB P11GE 1 OF 1 (a-W~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM S OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 3 Lot Characteristics The tentative tract will create sixty-nine (69) single-family lots with a density of 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre. The applicant is proposing to utilize the alternative lot size provision of the Verdemont Area Plan to establish lot sizes less than 10,800 square feet. The Verdemont Area Plan states that lot sizes in single family subdivisions may vary in size due to unique or unusual topographic features. The Plan further explains that the subdivisions shall be in accordance with the following standards and shall meet the alternative lot size performance criteria. Alternative Lot Size Standards General Standard Minimum Average $ of Lots Plan Minimum Lot Size Lot Size Permitted Lot Size Below Average RL 10,800 8,700 10,800 25 square square square percent feet feet feet The Alternative Lot Size Performance Criteria includes the following: a. Proportional mix and placement of lots. b. Preserving of mature trees and natural features. c. Placement of dwelling unit on lot. d. Preserving the views. e. Provision of amenities. f. Treatment of drainage courses. q. Treatment of walls and fences. h. Other unique amenities. The applicant by design is proposing to create 11 lots or 16 percent of the lots below the average of 10,800 square feet. The smallest residential lot proposed is 9,152 and the largest residential lot is 20,940 square feet. The applicant mixed the placement of the alternative lots into the balance of the subdivision with the exception of five lots placed together at the northeasterly intersection of Palm Avenue and the proposed Steven Way. The block of alternative lot sizes in this location preserves the views of the lots to the north. The applicant has provided an equestrian trail as their amenity to satisfy the performance criteria. The trail will serve as a buffer between the Bailey Creek and the residential lots thus preserving the creek in its natural state (see discussion below). PLAl4BAB PAf~ 1 OF 1 (a->bl CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENt gGENDA ITEM OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE - - PAGE Lot "A' - Equestrian Trail and Staging Area The developer has agreed to provide a 12-foot wide equestrian trail along the back of Lots 52 through 65, Lots 68 and 69 which will provide a valuable link to the existing recreational trail system in the area. The trail will connect with the Chestnut Creek Trail and the proposed Muecupiabe-Rancho Line Trail. The trail is envisioned to enhance the proposed subdivision by establishing a focal recreational amenity for the homeowners and surrounding neighbors. Equestrian trail fencing will be provided to serve as a buffer between the residential lots and Bailey Creek. The 6-foot high fence will be constructed of a combination of wrought iron panels with decorative concrete block pilasters. The fencing will be compatible with the perimeter subdivision fencing proposed for the project. Lot "A" will encompass a total of 56,116 square feet and will include a staging area for horses at the northernmost tip of the subject property. Surrounding Area The properties to the south of the proposed tentative tract are occupied by single-family structures. The lands to the north and west are predominately vacant with a few scattered single-family residences. The property directly to the east is Bailey Creek. On the other side of the creek is vacant land a portion of which is to be used for the State of California Water Resources Second Afterbay Project. The surrounding properties are all designated RL, Residential Low (see Attachment "G", Location Map). Access and Circulation The site has frontage along the north side of Verdemont Drive of approximately 1,381 feet and has a frontage along the east side of Palm Avenue of approximately 1,148 feet. Tentative Tract No. 14352 proposes to utilize Palm Avenue as its primary access. Palm Avenue is classified as a secondary arterial from its function with Interstate 215 north to Ohio Avenue. it becomes a local continuous road north of Ohio Avenue to the site as identified in the Verdemont Area Plan, page 126. Secondary access will be from Verdemont Drive to Huntington Drive which is classified as a local continuous street. Although the rights-of way exist for the primary and secondary standard means of access, they have not been fully improved or paved. A Condition of Approval has been added requiring all standard means of access to be paved and improved per Public Works Department Standard Requirements prior to the issuance of building permits for construction of homes on the subdivision. The majority of the lots will be served by two curvilinear local continuous streets which will connect to Palm Avenue and to Verdemont Drive. The balance of the lots will access Verdemont Drive by way of an interior cul-de-sac. a w°¢""n"o~ PLAKBAB PAGE 1 OF 1 (4-801 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE T 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 5 Traffic The City Traffic Engineer reviewed the proposed subdivision and determined that the project did not meet the minimum criteria for a traffic impact study. The additional trips from the proposed project are not sufficient to cause a significant impact on the adjacent street system. Environmental Concerns The proposed subdivision is mapped in the General Plan as being within the boundaries of the High wind Hazard Area, the High Fire Hazard Zone and within Greenbelt Zone "B" of the Foothill Community Greenbelt Program and the Verdemont Area Plan. Conditions of Approval have been included requiring compliance with the Uniform Building Code for wind resistance and fire protection and compliance with the provisions of the Development Code. Biological Resources The site is located in the Biological Resources Management Overlay. A Biological Survey was prepared for the site by Joe Gorman. PhD Associates dated January 15, 1990. The report concluded that no threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of wildlife or vegetation were found and that none were thought to be present on the subject property. Archaeological Resources Tentative Tract No. 14352 ie located within an area identified by the General Plan as having potential archaeological resources. The San Bernardino County Museum Archaeological Information Censer evaluated the proposed project site and determined that no cultural resources are known to exist within or adjacent to the project area and that the potential for the presence of cultural resources within the project area is low. No further studies were recommended. Geological Resources The northeastern portion of Tentative Tract No. 14352 is located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. A geotechnical study prepared for the proposed project by Gary S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. in January, 1990. The report included the following recommendations: 1) The Alquist-Priolo Special Study restricted use zone shall be identified on the final grading plans and on a Composite Development Plan filed with the Final Map. Minimum setbacks for human occupation structures have been established in the geotechnical report. °~,,,~,°.~„~„~~ PLM4BAB PAGE 1 OF 1 (4A0) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 6 2) A Richter magnitude 7.5 earthquake is expected along the San Andreas fault, which is located approximately 400 feet northeast of the site; therefore, human occupancy structures should be designed accordingly. 3) Positive drainage of the site should be provided, and runoff should not be allowed to flow over natural, cut or fill slopes in such a way as to cause erosion. 4) The final grading plans for the site shall be reviewed and approved by an engineering geologist prior to any grading. State Department of Water Resources The Devil's Canyon second afterbay project is located to the east of the subject property and will utilize Verdemont Drive to access their site. The increase in truck traffic along Verdemont Drive during the construction of the second afterbay is expected to be short-term. The developer of this tract shall notify the purchaser at the time of purchase agreement and at the close of escrow of the afterbay project. Hydrology and Drainage The San Bernardino County Flood Control District has identified the eastern portion of the site to be adjacent to a natural drainage course outlettinq flows from Bailey Canyon. The natural drainage course is not adequate to contain the total flows from the canyon, and in the event of a major storm, overflow can be expected. The Flood Insurance Administration mapping for the area shows that a portion of the site lying within and adjacent to the natural drainage course as Zone "A", subject to 100 year overflow. Therefore, in their opinion, portions of the site are subject to infrequent flood hazards due to overflow, erosion, and debris deposition from Bailey Canyon in the event of a major storm. Portions of the site may be subject to excessive street flows and accumulated drainage from the north. Further studies of the project will be necessary prior to development with respect to local and on-site drainage conditions. COMMENTS RECEIVED City Departments All City Departments reviewed the proposal at the Development Review Committee meeting on June 20, 1991. The Public Works/ Engineering, Police, Building Services, Fire, Water and Parks and Recreation Departments have attached Standard Requirements (see Attachment "D"). pry ~, M" ~y~pp P{,ANJ.OB PK,E 1 OF 1 N~1 rz"n,rw"nwo~"+c[s ,... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE T 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE a-6-91 PAGE 7 San Bernardino City Unified School District Current developer fees collected by the district are inadequate to finance all costs associated with school construction. The District requests the establishment of supplemental fees to finance new school off-site improvements and a separate fee to generate revenues for purchasing school sites in the Verdemont/Devore area. The City is currently investigating the establishment of supplemental developer fees to fund these off-site improvements. Conditions of Approval requiring developer participation in any supplemental fee program established by the City to help finance new school off-site improvements will reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. San Bernardino County Flood Control District The District has made the following comments and recommendations for this property: First, if the District is to assume operation and maintenance responsibility of the Bailey Canyon Channel System, including debris basin, from the canyon to Devil Creek: 1) The natural drainage course outlettinq flows from Bailey Canyon shall be upgraded to a concrete lined channel facility ae shown on Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Number 7, Project Number 7-E1~, capable of handling 100-year storm flows plus freeboard with twenty foot patrol roads on both sides of the channel. 2) A hydrology and hydraulic anaylsis for the channel through the site shall be prepared by the developer's engineer and approved by the City and the Flood Control District. 3) Adequate right-of-way for the channel including patrol roads, cut and fill slopes, and access from the road crossings shall be dedicated to the City in fee title for future transfer to the District upon completion of the debris basins and channel from Devil Creek to the debris basin. 4) Chain link fencing or other approved barrier shall be provided along the channel right-of-way including gates at the road crossings. 5) Channel improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by both the City and District. 6) The District, in conjunction with the City, shall inspect the channel construction. wnue~ PLM4BD8 PAGE 1 OF 1 Ia~9o1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 8 Second, if the Bailey Canyon Debris Basin is not constructed prior ' to the development of the site, adequate provisions shall be made to protect the site from the debris Laden flows from Bailey Canyon. Next, adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the tributary flows from the north, including Bailey Canyon, around or through the site in a manner which does not adversely affect adjacent oz downstream properties. Finally, the developer should provide his fair share of the cost for the Bailey Canyon Debris Bas1n if there is not another means for financing the basin. CONCLUSION Tentative Tract No. 14352 meets all of the development standards of the Municipal Code and Verdemont Area Plan and is consistent with the General Plan and the Subdivision Map Act. Impacts associated with the development of the project will be mitigated and reduced to a level of insignificance. There is a proposed Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration; and, 2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 14352, subject to the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment "B"), Conditions of Approval (Attachment "C") and Standard Requirements (Attachment "D"). Res ectfu~ submi ted, Larry E. Reed Assistant Director of Planning and Building Services ~, Patti Nahill Associate Planner Attachments: A - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance B - Findings of Fact C - Conditions of Approval D - Standard Requirements E - Initial Study F - Tentative Tract Map G - Location Map ~~,~~~ PW4BD8 PAGE 1 OF 1 (e-W) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT gGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 5-6-91 PAGE 9 MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE CateaorY Proposal Municipal General Plan Code Permitted A 69 lot RL, RL, Use single Residential Residential family Low Low subdivision Density 2.8 dwelling 3.1 dwelling 3.1 dwelling units per units per units per gross acre gross acre gross acre Residential 9,152 to 10,800 10,800 Lot Size 20,940 square foot square foot square feet* minimum minimum Open Space 56,116 N/A N/A Lot Size square feet Lot Depth 100 feet or 100 foot N/A more minimum Lot Width 80 feet or 80 foot N/A more minimum Corner Lot 88 feet or 88 foot N/A Width more minimum Frontage All lots Required on N/A all lots Street 11.94 8 12 8 N/A Grades maximum maximum * Applicant is utilizing the Alternative Lot Size provision of the Verdemont Area Plan. reMw~ ~ngxs PUN-BLB P1KiE 1 OF 1 (490 H CLdCI11llC 1lL D CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 FINDINGS OF FACT HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 10 1. The requested subdivision is consistent with the minimum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation in the Verdemont Area Plan with alternative lot sizes and is consistent with the General Plan in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that they and each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet (88 feet on corner lots) and a minimum depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause aubetantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that the development will occur according to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in this report. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the State Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. A11 proposed private streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works/Engineering for street improvements. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. PIANiDb PAGE 1 OF t (a.qp( CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 8-(-91 PAGE 11 1. Minor modifications to the plan shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10 percent of the square footage or a significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission and Development Review Committee review and approval. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plane approved by the Planning Commission. 2. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (4 copies) for the entire development to the Engineering Department with the required fee for approval, the landscape plans will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation and Community Services and the Planning Department for review and approval. (Note: the issuance of a building permit, by the Building Services Division of the City of San Bernardino, does NOT waive these requirements/conditions.) No grading permits will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The desi n shall include, but not be limited to the g following: a. Street trees shall be' planted on 30 foot center spacing unless otherwise indicated by the Department of Parke, Recreation and Community Services. The Parks Department shall determine the varieties and locations prior to planting. All trees shall be 24" box specimens. Trees are to be inspected by a Park Division representative rD for to planting. b. The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parke Department). 3. Trees, shrubs and groundcover of a type and quality generally consistent or compatible with that characterizing single- family homes shall be provided in the front yard and that portion of the side yards which are visible from the street. All landscaped areas must be provided with an automatic irrigation system adequate to insure their viability. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Parke and Recreation Department. ~"" ~ PUIN~BDY PAGE / OF 7 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE - - PAGE 12 4. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay ae a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of hie obligation under this condition. 5. The developer shall participate in any supplemental fee program established by the City to help finance new off-site improvements or with the City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 995 School Fee 1~11tigation Agreement. 6. The developer shall identify specific locations for centralized mail delivery units to the satisfaction of the Postal Service and Public Works Department and shall delineate the easements or mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery unite on the final map. 7. Two standard means of access shall be provided and improved per Public Works/Engineering Department Standard Requirements prior to the issuance of building permits for construction of homes on the subdivision. 8. The construction of homes shall comply with the all applicable provisions of the Development Code. 9. All slopes shall be 2:1 finished grade. 10. A truck hauling route which includes a schedule of dates and times of export shall be filed with and approved by the City Public Services Department for import or export of earth materials. 11. The developer shall comply with all City Codes in regard to dust control and noise attenuation. 12. No combustible materials shall be on site until water is available to serve the subject property. 13. The development shall provide for fire flow qpm, duration and hydrant spacing according to minimum standards of the City. 14. All utilities are to be placed underground. °~inwnwna~re PLAN~BAi PAGE 1 OF, ~a-ao~ _ _ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT gGENDA ITEM 8 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 15. All recommendations of the geotechnical report shall be incorporated into the development of the property. 16. The Alquist-Priolo Special Study restricted use zone shall be identified on the final grading plans and on a Composite Development Plan filed with the Final Map. 17. The final grading plane for the site shall be reviewed and approved by an engineering geologist prior to any grading. 18. The developer of this tract shall notify the purchaser at the time of purchase agreement and at the close of escrow of the afterbay project. 19. if the San Bernardino County Flood Control District ie to assume operation and maintenance responsibility of the Bailey Canyon Channel System, including debris basin, from the canyon to Devil Creek, they will require the following: a) The natural drainage course outlettinq flows from Bailey Canyon shall be upgraded to a concrete lined channel facility as shown on Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Number 7, Project Number 7-E14, capable of handling 100- year storm flows plus freeboard with twenty foot patrol roads on both sides of the channel. b) A hydrology and hydraulic anaylsis for the channel through the site shall be prepared by the developer's engineer and approved by the City and the Flood Control District. c) Adequate right-of-way for the channel including patrol roads, cut and fill slopes, and access from the road crossings shall be dedicated to the City in fee title for future transfer to the District upon completion of the debris basins and channel from Devil Creek to the debris basin. d) Chain link fencing or other approved barrier shall be provided along the channel right-of-way including gates at the road crossings. e) Channel improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by both the City and District. f) The District, in conjunction with the City, shall inspect the channel construction. PUN~BAO PAGE t OF 1 Ir-ml CITY OF SAN BERNA DINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE - PAGE 20. If the Bailey Canyon Debris Basin is not constructed prior to the development of the site, adequate provisions shall be made to protect the site from the debris laden flows from Bailey Canyon. 21. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the tributary flows from the north, including Bailey Canyon, around or through the site in a manner which does not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 22. The developer should provide his fair share of the cost for the Bailey Canyon Debris Basin if there is not another means for financing the basin. 23. The developer shall coordinate the development of the site and its potential impacts to the Bailey Storm Drain Project with the Public Works/ Engineering Department. 24. The developer shall assume full responsibility for the repair of pavement within Verdemont Drive, within the limits of Palm Avenue on the northwest and Olive Avenue to the southeast, holding harmless the State of California. Beginning of said repair occurring within 120 days of written notice from the State to the City of San Bernardino and the developer of the termination of use of said streets for heavy vehicle usage. °M1wnu°ir~inw~ PU/iWi PAGEIOFI H->bl CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM S STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARINGP GE a_1591 S N A 1. Tentative Tract No. 14352 shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department. However, if the final map has not been filed with the County Recorder's Office at the end of the 24 month time period, the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planning Commission upon written request of the applicant if made 30 days prior to expiration of the ~,~ month time period. Expiration Date: Auvust 6. 199 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D. a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC & R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC & R's shall also include a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within the complex except for central antenna systems. b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC & R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC & R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. c. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot,~either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and facilities. PUIN~B,10 P~ 1 OF 1 µ-90~ CITY OF SAN BERN RDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING AGE a 1691 d. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC & R's. e. The CC & R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside of the specified common areas. PARKING: a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of 2 parking spaces, in an enclosed garage for each buildabl lot. b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway. c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned property, provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in height when located within ten feet of the street line. Said wall shall be located on the north , south , east , west or peripheral property lines. d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equivalent landscaped berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure the required front setback landscaping. Said wall shall be located on the north south east , west or peripheral property lines. All parking areas and vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours of darkness for security and protection. 3• Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least a six-foot high decorative wall with screened gates. ~,~ny~ PUW-8.10 PAGE i OF 1 (490) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARINGPA`T'E a-~- There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or other specifically designated area, a loft or other usable storage area with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition to standard utility storage. Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to the City Traffic Engineer's approval. A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on Standard Drawing No. 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to the development. Location and design shall be subject to approval of the Engineering Division. Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the Planning Department. All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall.. Location, size, type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent. 4• Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local requirements. 5. LANDSCAPING: a. Four (4) copies of a master landscape plan shall be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed. 2) Irrigation plan. 3) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may be proposed. 4) Erosion control plans. b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior to planting by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department or his/her designee. A minimum number of one 'n calf er 15 allon multi-branched trees shall b Pl,llll.t0 PILE 1 OF 1 (Kq CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARINGPAGE_ t8 planted within the parkway for each of the following types of lots, as per the City's specifications: i) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree; 2) Interior lot -- two trees; 3) Corner lot -- three trees. c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, surfaces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10$, 15 gallon; 40$ 5 gallon; 50$, 1 gallon. Shrubs 20$, 5 gallon; 80$, 1 gallon. Ground cover 100$ coverage. d. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an irrigation system approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership. f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, shall be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. 6. an average All lots shall have n minimum area of 10.e0psquare feet, a minimum depth of 100 feet, and a minimum width of ~,p_ feet, ( 88 feet on corner lots). in addition, each lot on a cul-de- sac or on a curved street where the side lot lines thereof are diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 60 feet measured at the right angle to the lot depth at the midway point between the front and rear lot lines, and a width of not less than 40 feet measured alon the front P MM II.MIOO PIAWB.10 PI16E t OF t (~-00) CITY OF SAN BERN RDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING PAGE a-1991 lot line as delineated on the tract map. Where lots occur on the bulb of the cul-de-sac, a minimum lot depth of 100 feet will be permitted. If the proposed depth is less than 100 feet, a plot plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible and to justify the lesser depth. Variable front building setback lines of at least feet and averaging feet, and side street building setback lines 15 feet shall be delineated on the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of 18 feet. 8. Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots shall be. designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or engineering design of the proposed wall. 9. When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the City Engineer. 10. Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation. lI, Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required (if applicable). 12. Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site plan. 13. During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control. PIAN~l.fO PNpE f OF 1 149% CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING AGE 82091 14. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. 15. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: a. All utility service boxes, connections and service lines shall be painted to match the building exterior on which they are located. b. All existing overhead utility services and wiring shall be relocated underground. c. No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building (except far solar collection panels). d. All utility systems including qas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and Cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, Cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residences. PLMLI.fO PAOE 1 OF 1 (Hq CITY OF SAN BERN DINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING PAGE 8-21 ' 16. COMPOSITE DEVEIAPMENT PLAN A Composite Development Plan (CDP) shall be filed with the Engineering, Planning, and Building & Safety Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processing by the City pursuant to Ordinance No. MC-592. The CDP shall provide additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building criteria (e.q. setbacks), flood control criteria, seismic and geological criteria, environmental criteria and easements of record. The CDP shall be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan", and contain a section entitled "Composite Development Plan Notes". The applicant shall have listed under the CDP Notes section the following conditions or mitigating measures required for the development of the subject property: Conditions No. 1 thru 24 and Standard Requirements No. 1 thru 17. 17. The property owner shall sign a covenant running with the land agreeing that if the required landscaping is not maintained, the City may enter on the the property and install and main- tain the required landscaping and may lien the property for the costs. The covenant shall be signed and recorded with the County of San Bernardino Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. In addition, land- scape maintenance easement shall be filed with the Recorder's Office, which gives the City the right to enter the property and perform maintenance to the required landscaping. 1at10/9/90 DOC:PCAGENDA DOCUMENTS.1 PWFB.10 PAGE 1 OF 1 IKq . qTY OF SAN S~tNARDINO PUBLICORKS/EMOR. E TR 14'5 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM _ 8 HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAG NOTE TO APPLICANT: Nhere separate Engineering plans are required, t e app scant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly ,to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainage and Flood Control _ A11 necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer; which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. 18 X A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. _ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. _ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. _ Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. ThlTdrain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclusively Show that the drain is not needed to protect your development or mitigate downstream impacts. 19 ~ A11 drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 20 X Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit requirements. 21 X Catch basins shall be installed upstream of each intersection along Verdemon± Drive with connector pipe to the existing storm drain. A catch basin shall also be installed on the Easterly side of Palm Avenue, Northerly of Yerdemont Drive. CITY OF SA ERNARDINO PUBL WORKS/EMOR, CASE TR 14352 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM B HEARING DATE ..-B~.L PAGE Grading 22 X If more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. 23 X If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shalt be supervised in accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall De approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is proposed to cross lot lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines. 24 X The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain landscaping within the following areas: 25 Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided for the Landscape Maintenance District. (Equestrian Trail). C1TY~ ~ ~MI'~1 ~ C1~1VA1't~ifNV 1'{~LI'~i ~1'V~l~l~ii/ (~E TR 14352 r.i STA~ARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 8 FIEARING DATE Utilities: 26 X Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TY. 27 ~_Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so it can De served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. 28 ~_Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shalt be constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shalt be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. 29 _(LUtility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required. 30 X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-601 (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65 (Non-subdivisions). ''31 X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained by the City but shalt be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where practical. 32 A "Communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets within and adjacent to this project. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernardino. --rz ~ .,, ~ 11r V~' :iMr'~r ~ r+mr~+?r;nvrr~v i~,rxa?+Lr~.~ ~rr+r?i~i cr~,~. g TR 14352 STAI~ARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 8 HEARING GATE a-6-91 PAG Ma in ' 33 X A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. 34 X A11 street names shall be subject to approval of the City Enyineer prior td Map approval. 35 X Additional survey and map information includiny, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks, geoloyic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-592. Improvement Completion 36 X Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Finat/Parcel Map. 37 X If the required improvements are not completed prior to recordation of the Final/Parcel Map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer and the City will be required. If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Parcel Map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the Map stating that they dill be completed upon development. Applicable to parcel maps consisting of less than 5 lots only. 38 X Street tight energy fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. A11 rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from the following streets: 39 X Change street names Panaview Drive" to "Steven Way"; and "Northstar Court" to "Ventura Court". 40 X Acquisition of 50' wide strip on the North side of Verdemont Drive shall be completed prior to map recording. w ~ r v~r 1ww licKrilwr~~+~nV w~,LR..~vnr.~ri ew«, ~ ~'"~ TR 14352 STAi~ARD REQINREMENTS~?~_ Da ITEM $ HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAG Street Improvement and Dedications: 41 X All public streets within and adjacent to ,the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers. and street name signing. All design and construction shall be accompiished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, ~shail be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 42 X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W,) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.l.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-Nay (Ft.) Curb Line (Ft.) Yerdemont Drive 30' P0' Palm Avenue 30' 20' Ventura Court 25' lg' Others 30' 18' 43 X A minimum of 28' of paved width shall be provided on Palm Avenue consisting of 20' on the Easterly side of centerline and 8' on the Westerly side of centerline. W f r Vr ~M~I il?Lf7i'rM1'IYft11v w' VdL.1b vI V'Pf1~i1/ if'R~`I. `tr/!r TR 14352 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM g~ ~$~g1 NEARING GATE ~- qq X If the project is to be developed in phases, each individual phase shall be designed to provide maximum public safety, conven- fence for public service vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. In order to meet this requirement, the following will be required prior to the finalization of any phase: a. Completion of the improvement plans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond the phase boundary to verify the feasibility of the design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b. A Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Division, Fire, and Planning Departments indica- ting what improvements will be constructed with the given phase, subject to the following: (1) Dead-end streets shall be provided with a minimum 32-foot radius paved turnaround area, (2) Half width streets shall be provided with a minimum 28-foot paved width, (3) Street improvements beyond the phase boundaries, as necessary to provide secondary access, (4) Drainage facilities, such as storm drains, channels, earth berms, and block walls, as necessary, to protect the development from off-site flows, (5) A properly designed water system capable of providing required fire flow, perhaps looping or extending beyond the phase boundaries, (6) Easements for any of the above and the installation of necessary utilities, and (7) Phase boundaries shall correspond to the lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. c. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Provisions shall be included in the plan to control blowing dust and storm water erosion on areas which are graded but on which no building construction is immediately proposed. CITY OF SA ERNARDINO PURL WORKa/EMOIt. CASE TR 14352 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING GATE B-6-91 PAGE Required Engineering Permits: 45 X Grading permit (if applicable). On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), includes landscaping. 46 X Off-site improvements construction permit. Applicable Engineering Fees (fees subject to change without notice) 47 X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map - E1 ,000.00 plus 530.00 per lot or parcel. 4B X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 3% and 2.5%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of off-site improvements. Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 1% and 1%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of on-site improvements, including landscaping. 49 X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required) - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. 50 X Drainage fee. Exact amount of fee shall be determined by Department of Planning and Building Services at time of application for building permit - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. 51 X Traffic system fee in the approximate amount of Exact amount shall be determined by the City Tra ~c ngineer at time of application for building permit. *Estimated construction cost is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engineer. . •qTY OF 3AN ~RNARDINO PUBLIC(~IORKa/EMOR. ~E TR 14352 STAt~ARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 8 HEARING GATE 8-6-91 PAGE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 52 ~ A tandscape maintenance easement shall be dedicated over the setback areas of each lot adjacent to public streets and a tandscape maintenance district formed over these areas to maintain the landscaping in case of owner neglect. 53 This development will be required to pay Infrastructure Development Fees prior to issuance of building permits or participate in an alternate Infrastructure Financing Plan in the Verdemont area when approved by the Mayor and Common Council. This single family residential project lies within the proposed Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of SO.i3 per square foot shall be paid (not to exceed 52,000.00 per lot), if the District is not formed prior to approval of building permits. This commercial, industrial, or multiple residential project lies within the proposed Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of E0.135 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of building area, paving or other imperfious area, and 50.045 per square foot in excess of 3,000 square feet, shall be paid if the District is not formed prior to approval of building permits. '~ 54 X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Traffic Signal Assessment District; therefore, a fee of 50.04 per square foot of net project area shall be paid to the City of the District is not formed prior to the approval of building permits. 55 X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Improvement Assessment District, therefore, a fee of 50.27 per square foot of net project area shall be paid to the City of the district is not formed prior to the approval of building permits. 56 _7L The above fees for the Chestnut Storm Drain, Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Signal and the Palm Avenue Improvement Districts represent estimates of this project's share of the cost of the improvements. If the Districts are approved, the amount of the fees rill be considered payment in full. If any District is not approved, the fee rill be retained in a fund for construction of the improvements for rhich it ras paid. CITY OF SAtERNAaD~NO u~ wOR1ca~EMCiA. CASE TR 14352 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM $ HEARING DATE 8 PAGE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 57 X An easement for an equestrian trail 12' wide minimum shall be dedicated over the Northeasterly line of the tract. The equestrian trail shall be designed, constructed, and landscaped to Department of Parks and Recreation Standards. An easement for landscape purposes shall be dedicated over the lot slopes (except those which are downhill into the lot) adjacent to the trail, and over Lot A. A landscape maintenance district shall be formed to maintain the trail and landscaping within the easements. 58 X A 6' high decorative wall shall be constructed at the top of slope between the equestrian trail and the lots. The wall shall be solid where the trail is above the adjacent pad grade. Where the trail is below the adjacent pad grade, the wall shall consist of 2' high decorative block with 4' of wrought iron on top. CI'T'Y OF SAN t3ERNAHf~INO FLANNIIVIa ~;A.~t i•r 14s~L • AND BUILOtNG SEfI~ES DEPARTMENT atB:N~M ~- STANDARD REQUIREMENTS "~""" ~e_ 8-311 59• Submit plans prsparsd by a Registered Building Designer, ]lrchitect or Civil or Structural Engineer. 60 gubmit a complete latsral and structural analysis prepared by a Registered Civil or Structural Engineer or 1lrchftect. 61 Submit state o! Calilornia Title Z4 Energy Calculation Forms for residential, buildings nc it dui nq a signed compliancs statement. 62 Submit caieulations and structural drawin s Registered Civil Structural Engineer or 71rc{sitp~parsd by a Submit tloor plan of existing structure. Label all uses and existing materials of construction. Submit lour (4) complete sets of construction plans including: a. Copy o! conditions. b. Soils report. c. Energy Calculations. d. Structural calculation. 64 Submit a preliminary (soils) (geology) ~ report prepared by a person licensed to do so. 65 gubmit a single line drawing o! the electrical service. Show all equipment, conduit and wars sizes and types. Show the service ground size and grounding electrode. 66 Submit panel schedule(s) and electrical plans. 67 Permit required for demolition o! existing building(s) on site. 66 Submit a plan of the hsatinq, ventilating or air conditioning system. (Clearly identity the location and rating of the equipment and the sizes ~d Bstariai of ali ducts, registsrs and the location o! all lire dampers). Show means of providing mechanical ventilation as required by the 2982 Uniform Building Code. i". uRSi1~iL~ .~.Ma,o r.o[,a, po CIYY OF SAN 9EHNArtu~~w rurwvu~~ - - - - -- AND BUILDING SE~ICES D=PARTMENT RF.Jd 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS "E'"F'~P; ~E 69 submit gas pipe loads, sizing calculations and isometrics. Provide a plot plan showing the location of the proposed saver systaa. Submit a latter clearly indicating the intended use of all areas o! the building. List the materials to be used and the projects produced giving the amount of sack kept in the building. It the building is ussd !or more than one purpose, list all other uses. 71 Submit isometric plans of the cold and hot voter and drain waste and want systems. Show compliance vith Titls 24 !or the physically handicapped in the following: Submit plans approved by the County Health Department. Indicate methods of compliancs for sound attsnuation (exterior, interior party walls, !loot/caflinq assembly, ceiling) as per study, U.B.C., local or State Law. Show c liance with rsquiraments of high Lira arses. Per Deve opment Code. Por structures located within high wind areas: a. Dasian structurs, including root covering, using 110 P.M.H. wind load Cfty at San Bernardino Hamad as certificate holder !or worker's Companution Insurance. 73 1?sssssor's Parcel Number. 261-011-15 s 16 261-021-28 & 29 74 Contractor's City lieanss. 75 Contractor's state license. 76 Saver capacity rights from Watsr Department, 38~-5083, Nail Thomson. ' ® ODRC/ERC CITY OF SAN BERNARD=NO DATE 7 ~6.9i CABS i 3sy STANDARD REQiJ=REMENTS - POLICE DEPT' ADD/ITIONAL RSQUIREMAENTS: ~~j ~ // 77 I ~//G~I.C _~~7 /ifGO nJ f!~ir-~C Ir~~ SL /~~2 //rL _ ,~-,9,~ ~/Aa~ s ri?o~ Ewa E's ~?~.9 , i ~- 1i'~~~ A"5 S.~fi.? i./ cSU ~ioL is ~ // Vic?' p7~4/~ / 5 A'/'~~ i~ "%/S Cep b phi=.~' ~.,/ .s ~'/!/ r~ GCX l tea. /~ /$~~/~~~i- =~/ ~ i-~ ~~' 7 ,? r ~ 'wy-.. ,it, l., :Y Lf ~a.~. ' CITY OF ~AN BERNARDINO © casE ~ / s~- STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING DATE s REVIEWED 8 PIRE DEPARTMENT REQUDiEMENTS GENERAL REQCIRE~fENTS: ( ) rovide one extra set of construction plans to Building emi ~ ~`^tc [or Fire Department use at time of plan check. ,~ B i 1 Contact Fire Department for specific or detailed requirements -IMPORTANT. The developer shell provide for adequate Fire Flow as computed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Ftre Flow shell be based on square footage, construction features end exposure information es supplied by the developer and may be taken from two hydrants. access: j/p2: Gy f{f W ~yee,c f. (e Lk,c 3 Ti4T;,7!` r::eF Fio... 1 1 Provide two different routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shall De paved, ell-weather. ( I Provide an access roadway to each Duildinx for fire apperat'~s. Access roatlway shall have en all-weather driving surface of not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width. I J Extend roadway to within 150-feet o[ all portions of the exterior :ails o[ all single-story buildings. l 1 Extend roadway to within 50-Peet of the exterior walls o[ all mul.:ple-story buildings. 1 Provide "No PARKING" signs whenever perking of vehicles mould possibly reduce the clearance of access roadways to less then the required width. Signs ere to read "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" (All caps). "51.0. Sec. 15.16", ( 1 Dead-end streets shall not exceed 500-feet in length and shall have a minimum OS-Coot radius turnaround. 79 l~ The names oC any new streets IpuDlic or private) shall De submitted to the Fire Department for approval. S[TE• 8 ~ All access roads end streets ere to be constructed entl usable prior to combustible construction. ( ] Private fire hydrants shall be installed [o protect each building located more than 150-feet from the curb line. No fire hydrant should be within 40-feet of any exterior wall. The hydrants shaft De Wet Barrel type, with one 21-inch and one 4-inch outlet, aro~ approved by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants are to be protected from damage by providing suitable traffic barriers. The area around the fire hydrant shall De designated as a "NO PARKING" zone Dy painting an 8-inch wide, red snipe for 15-feet ip'each direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it will not be blocked by perked vehicles. Suitable "NO 81 4RKING" signs are required. [ Public Cire hydrants shall be provided along streets et :400-ieet intervals for commercial and multi-residential areas end et 500-feet intervals for residential areas. Installation shall conform to City specifications and be installed prior to combustible ''construction or storage. 82 B_L'y~DING: l The address of the structure, in six inch numerals, shell De installed on the building or in other approved location in such a manner es [o be visible from the frontage street. The color of the numbers shag contrast with color o[ the background. I 1 Identify each gas end electric meter with the number oC the unit which it services. I 1 Fire extinguishers must be installed prior to the building Deinq occupied. The minimum rating [or any [ire extinguisher is 2A 10 B/C. .Llinimum distriDUtion oC lire extinguishers must De such that no interior part of the building is over 75-feet travel distance from a fire extinguisher. [ 1 .411 buildings, other then residential over 5,000 square feet, shall be provided with an automatic Cire sprinkler system, designed to NFPA standards. [ 1 Submit plans Cor the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction on the system. 1 Tenant improvements in all sprinktered buildings are to be awroved be the Fire Department prior to construction. ( 1 Provide an automatic fire alarm (required throughout), Plan must be approved Dv the Fire Department, prior to installation. l I Fire Department connection to (sprinkler avstem/standpipe s~sleml ;pall be required a[ curb line. ==ace=====eec-.coec.ccevee eeeceev.veeezeveeeeeeccevvcc.cccccceccceece.vvec occ. .eeevo.e.eecceo veoeec.zaeeceee. NOTE: The applicant must request, in writing, any change in these •r other requirements. AD ITIO L INFOASIATION: ,J. -~~r?~ FP8 110 7/b9 efernara~na a.ny vruanr uupa. ~ANDARD REQUIREMEN'Q Review of Plans: # ~ ~ Date: Location: L~ i/EApproved: Type of Construction: ~ ! ~?~.'~C ~.?l1~ ~ osi~TLss~ (.rs~Denied: Owner/Developer:'h!ZT~~cd .`~J~y~y_~~ Continued: ENGINEERING: Name: ~LI,.IS ~..~L L.I..jA~yY~S Date: a`~' 71 ? P.S. I. 83 •y~Size of Main Adjacent to the Project ~ Zyi `7pj Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. 84 ~ Off-site Water Facilities Required to Meet Peak Flow Demand. 85 ~ Comments: Q(ISTU klA-r•G'~ ~?'11E ~D OtT 1{~-'f,~=~~_~ = 1!/.~ C~ ;I G Subject to the Rules&RegulationsoftheWaterDepartmentineffectatthetimeofApplicationforWaterService. This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees/Conditions will be Determined by their Engineering Department. " ~ ~ ~/~~ WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name: ~,(J~7/~f / 7CJ~E Date: "~ '~~/~~ R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. _ Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. Air Gap Required at Service Connection. _ No Backflow Device Required. , ` ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name: Date: T Industrial Waste Permit Required by Environmental Control Officer. _ Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer. Pre-treatment Required by Environmental Control Officer. No Regenerative Water Softeners May be Installed Without Prior Approval. _ Approved by Environmental Control Officer. SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: /t.r T~!'9~-~J-~ Date: No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the City Water Department for the Amount of Gallons Per Day. Equivalent Dwelling Units: Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. Proof of Payment Must be SubmittedtotheBuilding&SafetyDepartmentPriortolssuanceoftheBuildingPermit. Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: .21fi 13901 ~,r. ,. WATR-~.fi. cewmy eewnae'~'""" g4.Ea. F> • © O CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPARTMENTS OF PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE • ~ AND 1 POLICY FOR ~ LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION MULTI UNIT • COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL • January, 1986 a a Table of Contents 1. Purpoce II. Submittals A. Number of Plans and Submittal Procedures 8. Landscape Plans C. Irrigation Plane III. Landscape Areas A. Maintenance of Landscaped Areas B. Planter Areas C. Interior Planter Areas D, Irrigation E. Setback Areas F. Slope G. Ground Cover and Bedding Material N. Erosion Control I. Weed Control IV. Plant Materials ,~ A. Plant List and Climatic Conditions B. Street Trees C. Plant Material V. Inspection A. Irrigation System B. Landscaping VI. Other Requirements ' R1~j REHENTS FOR SUBMITTAL AND AP~AL OF LANDSCAPE AND IRR]GATION PLA I. PURPOSE The Intent and purpose of these guidelines 1s to provide: 1. Guidance in the required submittal of landscape end irrigation plans. Z. Guidance in meeting street tree requirements. 3. Guidance 1n selection of plant material. 4. Guidance in what the plans (landscape and irrigation) sha]1 show. II. SUBMITTALS A. 1:UMSER OF PLANS AND SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE copies each of landscape and Irrigation plans sha21 be sub- mitted to the Publle Works/Engineering Department along with payment of the appropriate Lendscepe Plan Review Fee. B. LANDSCAPE PLANS , i. Shall be drawn by one of the following: A. A registered landscape architect. B. A licensed landscape contractor who installs the actual landscape. C. A nursery. D. The owner. NOTE: The name. address, telephone number. along with signature of the person(s) who do the design chall be on the plans. Registered landscape architects and licensed landscape contractors shall include their registration numbers and/or license numbers. 2. Diana shall be legibly drawn to scale on paper no cmaller than 18" x 24" and no larger than 24" x 36". 3. Plans shall show location of the property by vicinity map and nearest cross streets and give the property address os assessor's parcel number. 4. Plans shall show location of existing and proposed utilities -above ground and underground. • S. Plans shall show type of zoning, the scale, and northerly directional arrow. 6. Plans shall contain plant legends for all existing and proposed plant material. The legend shall be as follows: • 7. Plana ahal now lXitln~ ~w ~., up recd p.wr '.i.;~, _ • scale at it mature size. 8. Plans sl~a contain lsndscape specificet~s snd details. g. Plena shall show ell required landscape areas protected from parking sreas with concrets curbing. 10. Plane shall show the name, address, end telephone number of property owner or developer. C. IRRIGATION' PLA>;S 1. AlI required landscaping shell be provided w7th an automatic irrigation system. Z. Plsne shall be submitted with, attached to, and the same size es landscape plena. 3. Plans shall address conservation of voter and energy. A. Components - low gallonage end low precipitation heads, drip systems and other sub-surface techniques, mini jet heads, moisture sensing devices, controllers with ability of variable programming. B. Efficiency - velocity shall be close as possible to 5 feet per second. Plant material with different water requirements shall be on separate valves. Slopes shall be on separate valves. System design shall eliminate costly. wasteful, overthrow aPd runoff. 4. Plans shall show: A. Static P.S.I. B. Service Hain - type, size and length. C. Hater Metes -location and size. D. Approved Sackflow Prevention Device - location and size. E. All locations of pipe, valves and heads. (includes emmitters, ate.) 5. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with efficient and eater conserving irrigation systems. NOTE: Actual eater application rates shall be applied. as soil absorption rates dictate. Over watering shall be avoided. 6. All sprinklers shall be installed with approved swing joints. 7. Ali above ground sprinklers shall be the pop up type. installed flushed with the soil. Exposed sprinklers on risers above ground ate acceptable in limited areas with "bubbles" type sprinklers and do not border sidewalks, walkways. or areas subject to pedestrian traffic. 8. Separate water meter for landscape irrigation is optional at owners request and expense. 1:OTE: O~.~ner must notify the b`ater Department. 9. Plans shall contain installation specifications and details. ]0. Plans she]] contain irrigation legends as follows: EQUI PMfr;7 I ymSol T'~anufacturcr 1:odc] 0 .scription t;oz:le Radius GFM FSI~ -~- . . • PIPE !ze Type Clsse Sche e Note: Pipe sizing, (size) shall also be shown at each section of pipe, (malne and laterals). VALVE CHART Valve Valve Slze GYM f 1 2?!" ~ 3 fy 1~" 27 ETC. ETC. ETC. Total f Valve: Total GPM note: A]1 valves shall be numbered. FR1CT101: {p51 LOSS) " Hater Meier PSI Backflow Deviee ^ PSI Elevation Changes ` PSI Pipe _ PSI Valves, Fittings, Miscellaneous _ PSI Total PSI Loss _ PSI Original PSI (static) _ PSI Less Totsi PSI Loas _ PS1 Equals • Minimum to Farthest HD PSI III. LANDSCAPE AREAS A. MAINTE~A~CE OF LANDSCAPED AREAS The maintenance of landscaped areas and graded slopes shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership. B. PLA'~TER AREAS All required landscaping shall be protected by an enclosed concrete curbing. Interior pIant~j shall be required end rraintgr"~c~d equal to at least l0 percent of the oven surfaced porking area a uding the area of landscaping strip required !n the front yard setback Brea and al~all include •t least one tree for every live spaces or ma,)or fraction thereof. Messurementc ehal] be computed from the inside or perimeter walls or setback lines. D. IRRIGATION All required landscaping shall be provided with eutonatic sprinkler facilities which shall be maintained in an operative condition. Utilize only reduced pressusa (rp) devises or double check valve assen.hly. ~o atmospheric vaccuur.. breaktrF are pcrt.itted. E. SETBACK AREAS All required setbacks abutting a public right-of-way shall be land- scaped (except for walks and driveways which bisect or encroacl~ opon the required landscape area). The required setbacks shall be land- scaped with trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Landscaped earth berms shall be erected and maintained within the setback along the above indicated property line. Bezmed areas shall have a maximum of 3:1 slope and be planted~vith a tall fescue type turf grass, or other approved landscaping.. F. GROUND COVER AND BEDDING 11ATERIAL Gravel and decorative rock are not appropriate materials to be used as ground cover or bedding material and will be considered hardscape. G. SLOPES 1. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, surfaces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by land- scaping. Slopes exceeding IS feet in vertical height shall also be landscaped with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed twenty (20) feet on earners; or a combination of shrubs and trees as coves plants. Plant material selected and planting method used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site. Public Works/Engineerlnp, will also approve these. 2. Plant sixes shall be as follows: A. Trees 20h - 24" box 60'~ - 15 gallon 20.! - S gallon B. Shrubs 202 - 5 gallon 86:. - 1 g:.] 1 nn C. Groundcoves 100:c - co~•erage whey. mature or ]2" o.c. • 3, Tht DainttnaUC! OI t;s rucv v, .., -.... ,....... ., • tT~e respon~illty of the developer until ,V1, transfer to individual OwTCT6hip. ~l11 4. A)) grading end drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, s}~all be done in accordance wtth s grading plan approved Dy the City Engineer. A grading petv~it shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. H. EROSION CONTROL All grading and drainage taci]7ties, including erosion control planting of graded slopes. shall be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any p,rading betnf done. I. M'EED COt:TROL Pre-emergence control, post-emergence control and cultural control of needs small be addressed in the landscape specifications. IV. PLAE:T Y.ATER1A15 A, CLIMATIC CONDITIONS AND PLATT LISTS Due to the hot and dry climate of San Bernardino, drought and heat tolerant material may be used upon prior approval. 8. STREET TREE5 Street trees shall be required. Tree varieties and exact location will be determined by the Director of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department or his/her designee. The Parke. Rec- reation and Community Services Department shall mark locations and inspect plant material on cite, prior to planting. 'Sidewalks, curb and gutter, must be clean of debris prior to marking. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. (see attached specifications for Stseet Tree planting and Stseet Tree list). The size of the Street Trees shall be: All 24 inch box specimens, '. ". The 24 inch Dox trees shall be planted as street trees within the public parkway or City property. C. PLANT HATERIAL Landscaped areas shall have plant material selected and planting methods . used which are suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site. Sizes of the plant materials shall conform to the following mix: 7re7=s 20;, Z4" box; 50i, 15 gallon; 30k, S gallon Shrubs 205, 5 gallon; 60;, 1 gal)or. Groundct+vc•r ]00~ coversge A. IRR7GATl0'~ 51'$TE'I'~ 1. Inspections shall be performed bye Perk and Recreation Department tepresentatlvc st the toll owing: A. Pressure test of irrigation main line (150 PSU for 2 hours) B. Coverage test and final acceptance. I. Do not allow or cause the above items to be covered up. until it has been inspected and approved bye Park Department representative. A ilj hour natlce shall be given prier to anticipated inspections. 8. LA'+PS~APlt:; 1. Inspections shall be performed by a Park and Recreation Department representative at the following: A. Upon corpletion of finished grade, soil preparation and final raise out. B. tifi en trees and shrubs are spotted for planting, with one example of planting hole for trees and one for shrubs. C. Final inspection when planting and all other specified work has been completed. 2. A yQ hour notice shall be giren pzior to anticipated inspections. i Vl. OTHER REQUIREf~NTS A. Notify Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department of commence- ment of landscaping. Cive anticipated time line (start to finish), 8. All landscaping, litigation and street trees shall be installed and maintained in accordance with City of San Bernardino Munieiyal Codes, ordinances sod standard requirements. C. Haterisl requirement for ell plant material shall be number one grade of the California Nursery Industry Certificate as issued by the Agricultural Commissioner of the County of origin. D. All landscape material. irrigation equipment. irrigation components and workmanship shall be guaranteed fot a period of not less than one (1) year from, date of fins] approval by the Director of Parks, Recreatior. and Com:.unity Services or his/her designee. The conditions of the guarantee will be to insure, but not limited to all plant material being in healthy condition and free from abnormal conditions which may have occurred during or after planting, such as defoliation c+r :.•tructure diebaek. E. ASSESS.`:C!iT D157RICTS CO°::.'1 7si!. C2 T1' }'n}:}:~, RF.Ci:~+770': A\?+ COt::7!aTY SCnC]CEE OCT+:,F:T!:L!:7 FUA Pccr: ~~~, ••7 i•]9i F.}~7'C LA':i•f C'::~'] F:~.,'7 F:!''!i..";~. ALI.: O?!•:? ]7C':~ 0'; n«:'!~- . . S'. ., i~. . ~:~v_ww..._ -- cl~r aF sr~ sn~ DF.PARIT~N'PS ~ PAidCS, gpCRFATIQ`i AMID pC1~M1JITY $ERVIC~S plAIaIII~IG DF~AitII'gNr PROCE~7RE AMID pCII.ICSf F'OR ~lp6CA,PING AMID IRRIGATIQJ - ASSES3~STP DISl7tiC15 JAN[JARY, 1988 ~..~STRICTS - IRRIGM'ICN ,~l?E (XJolPCNENl'S \.. IRRIGM'ICN 1. Separate water meter for the irrigation shall be required. 2. Separate electric meter for the irrigation controllers shall be required. 3. ValconIII M.P.C. controllers, with water miser feature, shall be used. Said controllers shall be enclosed in a "Ia Max" enclosure fran the Valcon earpany. 4. "Rain QJard" w1i.ts fran the Hydro Visor Carpany shall be installed at each controller. 5. Valcon Hi-Flow series, reIlDte control valves, in angle pattern shall be used. 6. All irrigation sprinklers in planter areas and snall turf areas shall be Rain Bird 1800 series with M.P.R., B-12 nozzles IQ-H-F). 7. All irrigation sprinklers in medil.lll areas shall be Tore, 91per ')00 C. 8. All irrigation sprinklers in large turf areas shall be 'Dlatpson heads with rubber covers. 9. All sprinklers used shall be "pop-up" type. 10. All irrigation sprinklers shall be on triple swing joints. 11. All pipe 2" and larger shall be class 315 P.V.C., all pipe 1~" and smaller shall be P.V.C. sch. 40. 12. Rain Bird 3/4" quick coupler valves shall be installed every 100' in round plastic valve boxes. LANDS:APE 1. Specific infoIllBtion on street trees and plant material will depend on project locati.cn. Contact City Parks Division for further infoIllBtion. 2. Mi.ninun plant sizes shall be as follCMS: Trees: A. Open recreation areas - 24" box B. Street trees - All 24" box - - - -- Shrubs : I A. Even CCIllbination of 15 gallon and 5 gallon sizes 'l\1rfgrass: A. Setback areas shall be sod B. Open recreation areas shall be hydro~ G~a~mdcvver: . A. Intent sha].1-be total coverage at maturity NOTE: Intent and purpose of said plant sizes are to oa~lete a dense and mature appearing landscape. 3. A oaaplete soil test with reoampndations shall be required. Sample results and r+ecam~erdations shall be on the landscape plans and shall be adhered to. three (3) copies of said sample reports shall be provided with the final landscape plans. 4. Setback areas shall be beared not to exceed 3:1 slope. Said harming shall be oontinuws in shape and fo~an. 5. Planter areas shall be a mtnimm of four feet (4'j wide. 6. Cbrx:rete curbing shall enclose all planter areas. 7. 6" concrete maastrips shall separate all turf areas fmn shrub areas, 6. 6" concrete nowstrips shall separate assessment district from private lardscapi.tg. ORSiER 1. Zhe following information shall be listed in the sheet index and shall be referenced in the plans on a separate sheet. A, City of San Besnandino irrigation section for Assessment Districts. B. City of San Bernarditn Assessment Districts Maintenance Period. ASSE~4SMFSIT DIS`lRiIC!'S - M4IIJ'I9rlwtivtx, rru.,.. MP~IT~TII1t1NLE All areas landscaped by the contractor under this project shall be maintained by ham for a period of not less than one (1) year from the date of written aeoeptanee for start of maintenance, (365 days). A. Start of Maintenance Period 1. Maintenance period sha11 not start until all elements of the project are oti~leted in accordance with the contract docianents. Projects will rot be secpnented into phases. 2. Power to remote controllers shall be established prior to the beginnirng of the maintenance period. 3. Zhe maintenance period for the job shall not begin until after the first mowing of the turf area. New turf shall pat be mooed until attaining a mnninman height of 1~. inches. Mow at 1~ inch height using a rotazy mower equipped with a Properly sharpened blade. Notify the Parks Division representative 24 hours prior to this mowing, who will make an inspection. 4. Written acceptance of the landscape architect and the City must be obtained prior to the beginning of the maintenance period. Said letters shall be given to the Parks Division and shall be on file. 5. If the project maintenance fails to oontirnnously meet standards required for start of maintenance, the maintenance period wi11 be suspended and will not continue until eontrac6or has corrected all deficier~ies. 6. Contractor shall post a bond or cash in the amount agreed upon with the F7~gin>eerirng Division/Subdivisions. Said ironies are to guarantee the repair or replaoerprt of any deficiencies in the irrigation, landscape and hard surfaces at the end of the one (11 year (365 days) miantenance period. 7. Contractor shall sutmit oa~pleted as-built drawings which shall be in the form of one (1) mylar reproducible and two (2) blue line copies. Actual submittal shall be made to the City's representative. Said drawings shall enoongaass all irrigation, landscape and hard surfaces. 6. Pazks Division representative shall be the sole deciding party, regarding all acceptance items, for start of maintenance period, B. During Maintenance Period 1. Contractor and/or designee shall contact City's representative on the first Monday of each month during the one (i) year (365 days) maintenance period. Contact shall be by telephone or other means if pre-arranged. Rirpose of contact is to review the status of the . Proj~. ~(~~yyt_enanoe district portions onl It shall also be the responsllY[lity of the contractor and/or~ignee to leave a business address and teleptnne number with the City's representative. 2. During the maintenance period provide all watering. weeding. fertiliz- ing, cultivating and spraying necessary to keep the plants arri turf in a healthy growing condition a~ to keep the planted areas neat, edged and attractive. All trees and shrubs shall be pinched and pzuned as necessary to encourage new growl-h and to eliminate rank sur]cer growth. Old wilted flowers and dead foliage shall be imrecliately pinched or cut off. Dc no msjor tree pruning without proper approval of the City. 3. After planting and during the maintenance period, in the event that trees exhibit iron c3~].orosis synQtana, apply FE 138 G,eigy or equivalent at manufacturer's reoannended rates. q. During the maintenance period, should the appearance of any plant , indicate weakness, that plant shall be r~laoed immediately with a new healthy plant. At the end of the maintenance Period, all plant materials shall be in a healthy, growing condition and spaced as i.rdicated on the plans. 5. Iawns shall be rotary nn~aed at a 1~ inch cut, minivinan weekly. 7Yinming and edging shall be done in '4row" days. 6. Damage to planting azeas shall be repaired immediately and thr+ougkwut the maintenance period. 7. Any planting areas that do not show a prapt establishment of plant material shall be replanted at 10-day intervals until accepted by the City's representative. 8. Miscellaneous Maintenance Items: A. Depressions caused by vehicles, bicycles or foot traffic shall be filled and leveled. Replant damaged areas. B. Dcterntinate gophers, squirrels a:d moles, and repair damage as above. C. 'Ihe postplant fertilizing will consist primarily of a nitrogen only fertilizer program. Beginning approximately 30 days after planting, amronium sulfate shall be applied at the rate of 5 pounds per 1,000 square feet on a monthly basis. D. Irrigation shall oonsidere soil, exposure, day and night tempera- tures and sprinkler output. Conservation of water is a must. 9. Debris and trash shall be ramved from the site weekly at a minurnan. 10. throughout the maintenance period, all plants shall be maintained in a disease and pest free oonctition. A licensed pest control operator shall be reatined by the contractor to apply all pesticides. Pesticide reoamerdations shall be made by a licensed pest control advisor. C. F7~d of Maintenan 1. On oo~letion of the one (1) year (365 days)©intenanoe period the City's representative will inspect the project. Notify the City's representative 24 hours prior to said inspection, 12~e contractor and/or designee shall be present during inspection. 2. Confirnation that the City has received all submittals and turn- over items shall be made. 3. Deficiencies noted during the inspection shall extend the mainter~anc.~e period until alI are corrected. 4. City's representative shall be the sole deciding party regarding all end of maintenance items. 5. F7r3 of maintenance period sha12 occur only on written aooeptarxe by the City. Said letter shall be on file in the Parks, Recreation , and Catmmity Services Department. 6. The Parks Division shall ratify the F~ngineeri~ Department/Subdivision in writing of said acceptance of pzvject for bond/cash release. ..-.~~.. • ~ City of Snn Bernardino Q Parke, Recreation and Community Servic s Department Residential Requirements Front Yard Package l1. Irriaation System: (Per Front Yard) - 7lutomatic Irrigation Controller (unit must be able to have enough stations for future hook up of possible back yard irrigation). - Electric valves with anti-siphon devices - Pop-ilp Type Irrigation Heads (Turf and Shrub areas) B. Landscape s (Per Front Yard) - 1-15 gallon tree (double-staked - 4 cinch ties or 4 wonder ties). C. Turf (no more than 75t o! area) - drought tolerant type species. Sod or hydro-seeded. D. Shrub and Planter Urea (not less than 25t of area) - 70t - 1 gallon shrubs - 30t - 5 gallon shrubs Groundcover in planter area under shrubs - 1001 coverage when mature or 8" o.c. * NOTE: Shrubs not to exceed more than 5 test apart. E. Polyethylene Bed Divider or Concrete Mow Strip to separate all turf and planter areas. Type o! materials allowed: 6" concrete mowstrips, concrete curbmaker, Black Diamond (or equal)/polyethylene bed divider. CITY OF SAN BERNC"'~DINO PLANNING AND BUILDIN~ERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Initial Study for Environmental Impacts for TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14352 PROJECT DESCRIPTION and LOCATION To construct 69 single family residential lots on a 25.9 acre site which is located at the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive in the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation. April 15, 1991 Prepared for: Mr. & Mrs. Donald Huber 4671 Webb Canyon Road Claremont, CA 91711 Prepared by: Patti Nahill Associate Planner City of San Bernardino Planning and Building Services Department 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino. CA 92418 PUWBA7 PAGE 70F t (Hp( CITY OF SAN BERN~INO PLANNING.AND BUILDIN~RVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Application Number. T~A'f IVE TFSAGi' NO • I'~3 52 Project Deseriptbn: •TO ~1.413DtV I DE 25.9 A«`.R~ tMTJ ~rJi"a ~'( -~ E F ES Locatbn: NC~FSTNE,P6~ CORIJE:~ ot= AV'ENbI.E A>\1D ~~fiDEJ~1CN"f"' DRIUF EnvironmentalConstraiMSAreas:ALEQUIST-'P(=iG1.OfHlEtH WINDr ~t01-OGtICAI_ ~~, ` ''(' O1~E~•1f~1,~. f~P~N>?Et-~ Zc'I~,IE uB~~ HI(1t! FtREr AFy,:iiAEOt..OGrIt:.I11~ ~ R~- AREA General Plan Designation: f~l 1. RE51 DE~Iri,4 L i~lnl Zoning Designatbn: B. f]iVIpONMf?ITAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. Earth Resources Witl the proposal rosuh in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth mowmeM (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or moro? x b. DevebpmeM andbr grading on a sbpe groater than 15Y. natural grade? c. DewbpmeM within the Aquist•Prbb Spacial Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0 - Geobgb b Seismic, Fgure 47, of the City's General Plan? k d. Modification of any unpue geobgb or physical ~ feature? a. DevebpmoM within erase defined for high potential for wamr or wind erosion as identified in Section 12.0 Geobgic ii Seismic, Fpme 53, of the Cty's General v Plan? f. Modif icatbn of a channel, weak or river? X ~°w~""w~a~wR PLAN•OA! VAOEtOF_ ftt•Y01 g. DevebpmeM within an aroa subject to landslides, Yes No Maybe mudsldes, Nquetadfon or other similar hazards as identNied in Seetbn 12.0 - Geologb 8 Seismic, Figures 48.52 and 53 of the City's General Plan? X h. OtMr? x 2. Alr Reaourds: Will the proposal resuh in: , a. Substantial air emieabns or an effect upon ambient ~i air quality as defined by AOMD? b. The creation of objectbnable odors? c. DevebpmeM wthin a high wind hazard aroa as ideM'rfied in Sectbn 15.0 -Wind 6 Fire, Fgure 59, of the City's General Plan? X 9. Water Resources: Will the proposal resuh in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount d surfaa runoff due to impermeable surfaces? b. Changes in the course or f bw of ibod waters? c. Discharge into surface waters or any aheratbn ~/ of surtace water quality? /~ d. Change in the quantity of quality of ground water? a. Exposure of people or praperry to flood hazards as ideMifled in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's flood Insyfance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 060281 b - A, and Sectbn 16.0 - Fboding, Figure 62, of the City's General Plan? f. Other? 4. Bblogbal Reaourds: Could the proposal resuh in: a DevebpmeM wthin the Biological Resourws Management Overlay, as ideMdied in Saetion 10.0 - Natural Resources, Fguro 41, of the City's General Plan? b. Change in the number of any unique, raro or endangered species of plarns or their habitat inducting ~ stands of troes? c. Charge in the number of any unqua, raro or endangered species of animals or their habhat? ~v d. Removal of viable, mature trees? (6' or greater) ^v a. Other? 5. Nolan: Could the proposal resuh in: a DevebpmeM of housing, health care facilhles, schools, libraries, relgious facilhles or other'nolee' senshive uses in areas where existing or future noise Iwele exceed an Ldn of 85 dB(A) exterior and an Ldn of 46 d8(A) interbr as identNled in Sectbn 14.0 -Noise, Fgures 14~ and t 14-13 of the City's General PIan7 ~~" y~ PWI~OAa P1GE tOf_ f1t~901 . p 4 b. Devebpment of new or expansbn of existing industrial, Yes No Maybe commercial or other uses which generate noise levels on areas containing housing, achoob, health care facilities or other sensitive uses above an Ldn of 65 d8(A) exterior y or an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior? a OtMr? 6. Land Use: wll the proposal result in: a. A change in the land use as desgnated on the General Plan? b. DewbpmeM within an Airport District as identified in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Report and the Land Use Zoning District Map? X c. Devebpment within Foothill Fire Zones A & B, or C as identNied on the Land Use Zoning Distrid Map? d. Other? 7. Man-Made Hazards: wll the project: a. Use, storo, transport or dispose of hazaMous or toxic materiab (inducting but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b. InvoHe the release of hazardous substances? X a Expose people to the potential heafth/safety hazards? d. Other? ~EUIL(S C'M)IaOh1 6. Houeing: wll the proposal: a. Remove exsting housing or croate a demand for addkbnal housing? b. Other? 9. Transportatbn / Ctrculatlon: Could the proposal, in comparison with the Circulatbn Plan as identified in Sedan 6.0 - Ciroulatbn of the City's Generol Plan, result in: a. An increase in tragic that is groater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking fadlities/stnrcturesT c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? d. AReration of present patterns of droulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to whbbs, biryyclists or ~/ pedestrians? /~ g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? h. Significant increase in traffic volumes on the roadways or intersections? i. Other? anvrw PW49.o9 PAGE 30F_ (11901 10. Publle Services: ®he proposal impact the folbwing Yes No Maybe beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Rre protectbn? X b. Pollee proted'an? e. Schools (i.e., attendance, 6oundaras, overbad, etc.)? X d. Parks or other recreatbnal facilhies? a. Medical aid? f. Solid Waste? g. Other? ~STP,1>gN T(~Fllt-- 11. Utllltles: tMll the proposal: a. Impact the folbwing beyond the capability to provide adequate Iweb of service or requiro the construction of new faalities? ,/ 1. Natural gas? ^ 2. Ebctricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? s. Otlwr? ~- b. Resuh in a disjointed pattern of utility extensbns? c. Require the construction of rrow facilities? 12. Asslhetbs: a. Could the proposal resuR in the obstrudbn of any scenic view? b. Will the v~ual knpact of th. project b. detrimental ~ !b the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal resuh in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeobgieal site by dwebpmerrt within an archaeobgical sensitive area as iderdNied in Section 3.0 - Historical, Figure B, of the City's General Plan? b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site, structure or object as listed in the City's Historb Resources Reconnaissance Survey? X c. Other? PIAM•eD! PAGE •OF_ (tvsor . p 4 14. Mandatory Flndings of Slgnl}lana (Sectbn 15065) The California Environmental Quality Ad states that it any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant eNect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Yes No Maybe a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlfe populatbn to drop below sent sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number ar restrict the range of a rare or endangerod plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods ~ California history or prehistoryT b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short- term, to the disadvantage d bng-term, environmental goale? (A short-term impact on tfa environment is one which occurs in a rolativey brief, definkiw period of time while bng-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does the project have impacts which are individualy limited, but cumulatively considerable4 (A project may impact on two or more separate resouraa whero the impact on each resource le relatively small, but where - the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment le sign'rficant.) d. Does the project have environmental efrects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, ~/ edlwr directly or indirectly? ~l C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) ~,~~ PLArF0A6 VAGE SOF_ (tt•00( . p 4 C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES 1. EARTH RESOURCES a. Preliminary calculations for Tentative Tract No. 19352, indicate that approximately 88,552 cubic yards of cut and ~ approximately 73,183 cubic yards of fill will be necessary for this project. The applicant expects to import approximately 4,025 cubic yards to achieve a balance on site. If the excess fill material is imported to the site, the following measures shall be applicable: * All slopes shall be 2:1 finished grade * A truck hauling route shall be filed with and approved by the City Public Services Department. * Schedule of dates and times of export shall be approved by the City Public Services Department. * Compliance with City Codes in regards to dust control and noise attenuation shall be required. c. The northeastern portion of Tentative Tract No. 14352 is located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. A geotechnical study prepared for the proposed project by Gary S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. in January, 1990. The report included the following recommendations: * A minimum setback of 50 feet, plus a 5 degree variance for human occupancy structures from the northern end of the subsurface fault investigation trench as identified on their Enclosure 4 in said report shall be established. The Alquist-Priolo Special Study restricted use zone shall be shown on the final grading plane and on a Composite Development Plan filed with the Final Map. * A Richter magnitude 7.5 earthquake is expected along the San Andreas fault, which is located approximately 400 feet northeast of the site; therefore, human occupancy structures should be designed accordingly. * Positive drainage of the site should be provided, and runoff should not be allowed to flow over natural, cut or fill slopes in such a way as to cause erosion. * The final grading plane for the site should be reviewed and approved by an engineering geologist prior to any grading. f. The project site is adjacent to the Bailey Creek. Although, the developer's proposal dose not indicate that it will encroach within the limits of the Bailey Creek, the developer shall exercise caution during the grading of the home sites and the equestrian trail to avoid impacting the natural resources located within the creek's boundaries. The developer shall coordinate the development of the site and its potential impacts to the Bailey Storm Drain Project with Public Works. p C~ 2. AIR RESOURCHS c. The site is located in a high wind hazard area, Standard Requirements and Conditions of Approval from the Planning and Building Services Department pertaining to building exposure and orientation, and building roof construction using 110 MPH winds shall serve to reduce potential wind impacts to a level of insignificance. 3. iiATHR RHSOURCHS a. The nature of the project, i.e. grading, construction of homes, streets and driveways, may result in some environmental impacts relating to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff due to the loss of permeable surfaces. This surface runoff will be directed into appropriate public drainage facilities. Engineering Department Standard Requirements will reduce these potential impacts. e. The San Bernardino County Flood Control District has identified the eastern portion of the site to be adjacent to a natural drainage course outlettinq flows from Bailey Canyon. The natural drainage course is not adequate to contain the total flows from the canyon, and in the event of a major storm, overflow can be expected. .The Flood Insurance Administration mapping for the area shows that a portion of the site lying within and adjacent to the natural drainage course as Zone "A", subject to 100 year overflow. Therefore, in their opinion, portions of the site are subject to infrequent flood hazards due to overflow, erosion, and debris deposition from Bailey Canyon in the event of a major storm. Portions of the site may be subject to excessive street flows and accumulated drainage from the north. Further studies of the project will be necessary prior to development with respect to local and on-site drainage conditions. 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a. The site is located in the Biological Resources Management Overlay. A Biological Survey was prepared for the site by Joe Gorman PhD Associates dated January 15, 1990. The report concluded that no threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of wildlife or vegetation were found and that none were thought to be present on the subject property. 5. IfOI58 a. Construction of the proposed project will temporarily increase noise levels in the project area. In consideration of nearby residential development, construction shall be limited to weekdays between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. This shall serve to reduce potential noise impacts to a level of insignificance. -_ _ 6. LAND USS c. The project site is located within Greenbelt Zone "B" as identified in the Verdemont Area Plan, page 138 and as identified in the City's General Plan. Project layout and design along with Conditions of Approval shall ensure compliance wfth the Foothills Community Protective Greenbelt Program and the high fire hazard zone standards to reduce the potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 7. MAN !LADE HAZARDS d. The Devil's Canyon second afterbay project is located to the east of the subject property and will utilize Verdemont Drive to access their site. The Increase in truck traffic along Verdemont Drive during the construction of the second afterbay is expected to be short-term. The developer of this tract shall notify the purchaser at the time of purchase agreement and at the close of escrow of the afterbay project. 9. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION c. Tentative Tract No. 14352 proposes to utilize Palm Avenue as its primary access. Palm Avenue is classified as a secondary arterial from its junction with Interstate 215 north to Ohio Avenue. It becomes a local continuous road north of Ohio Avenue to the site as identified in the Verdemont Area Plan, page 126. Secondary access will be from Verdemont Drive which is classified as a local continuous street. The project as proposed will not alter the present pattern of circulation instead it will provide improvements to benefit the entire surrounding area. h. Upon review, the City's Traffic Engineer has determined that the project does not meet the minimum criteria for a traffic impact study. The additional tripe from the proposed project are not sufficient to cause a significant impact. 10. PUBLIC SERVICES g. The developer is proposing to establish a 12-foot equestrian trail lot along the boundary with the Bailey Creek. The trail will connect with the Chestnut Creek Trail and the proposed Muscupiabe-Rancho Line trail. Lot "A" will also include a staging area for horses at the northernmost tip of the subject property. 13. CULTURAL RESOUCRfiS a. The site lies within an archaeologically sensitive area. The San Bernardino County Museum Archaeological information Center evaluated the proposed project site and determined that no cultural resources are known to exist within or adjacent to the project area and that the potential for the presence of cultural resources within the project area is low. No further studies were recommended. Q " HAMILTON 8c ASSOCIATES CONSULTING hub2-11 11165 Mountain View Ave., Suite 143 Loma Linda, Cal'rfornia 92354 (714) 79&5688, 796-3750 FAX October 17, 1991 Mr. Tom Minor, Councilman, Fifth Ward City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Dear Councilman Minor: Thank you for your time to discuss with us the problem of the street realignment on our Tentative Tract #14352, on October 9. I hope that it is apparent to you that we have all along been sensitive to the local residents and any impact our project might bring. It is our desire to present a development plan that is orderly and beneficial to the City of San Bernardino. As a result of our meeting, the issue of Monnig Development being reimbursement for a "fair share" of the cost of storm drains is a real concern to us. This letter is intended to provide you our follow up on this matter. Bonadiman Engineering, under our request and expense, prepared an additional hydrology analyses encompassing Monniq's development and our tentative tract. The conclusion of this report showed that Monnig's storm drains were not effectivg~y oversized. Monnig was required by the development codes to install sufficient sizing on these storm drains for their own benefit. The storm drains as installed represent a "limited benefit" at best. A copy of this report is provided for your convenience. Our question is, "What fair share, if any, should be assessed"? We acknowledge that some benefit could be equated to the existing storm drain system, but on what basis. Based on our report there is no evidence to substantiate Monnig's claim. if, we agree to some form of reimbursement as an accommodation to the parties involved, on what basis are these amounts derived. in an inter-office City memorandum dated October S, Monnig stated they want $55,342, Mr. Hardgrave presented an option of 516,211. In order to avoid further delay and additional work, we would reluctantly be open to some form of settlement based on a range of $0.00 to $12,000. Res~tfu ly, ~' ~//~ ~ ~ Malrtin L. Hamel on Owner's Representative Page 2 Mr. Tom Minor Oct. 17, 1991 MLH:kd cc: vFtr. Roger Hardgrave, Director Public Works Ms. Patti Nahill, Planning Dr. Donald Huber Bonadiman Engineering ~.`I"*'Y,yOF SAN BERN~iDINO -REQUEST ~ COUNCIL ACTION Fr--~: Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director Subject: Appeal of Approval of Tentative Tract No. 14352 Dept: Planning and Building Services Mayor and Common Council Meeting of Date: September 5, 1991 September 16, 1991 2:00 p.m. Synopsis of Previous Council action: On August 6, 1991, the Planning Commission unanimously approved Tentative Tract No. 14352. ~' Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed; and that the Mayor and Common Council continua Tentative Tract No. 14352 and refer the tract back to stn!! !or a project redesign (Supports appellant's request and staff recommendation) OR i That the hearing be closed; and that the Mayor and Common Council deny the appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 14352 subject to the Findings oP Fact, Conditions o! Approval and Standard Requirements contained within the Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 6, 1991. ~ OR That the hearing ba closed; and that the Mayor and Common Council uphold the appeal and deny Tentative Tract No. 14352. (Mayor and Common Council alternate recommendation) Larry E Reed Signature Assistant Director Contact person: Larry E. Reed Phone: 384-5357 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward• 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.l (Acct. Descriotionl Finance: Coy I Notes: 75.0262 N~~~~G/~~/~l CITY OF SAN BERNQ;DINO -REQUEST FAR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject Appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract No. 14352, to subdivide 24.3 acres into sixty-nine (69) single-family lots in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. Mayor and Common Council Meeting of September 16, 1991 REQUEST The appellant, William T. Kruger, is appealing the approval of Tentative Tract No. 14352 by the Planning Commission. The appellant requests that the Mayor and Common Council reevaluate the road alignment of the tentative tract to resolve a potential impact with their property. BACKGROUND Tentative Tract No. 14352 is a proposal to subdivide 24.3 acres into sixty-nine (69) single-family lots with a density of 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre in an area designated by the General Plan as RL Residential Low. The applicant is proposing to utilize a Verdemont Area Plan to the alternative lot size rovision of th P establish lot sizes less than 10,800 square feet. The applicant by design would create it lots or 16 percent below the average of 10,800 square feet. The smallest residential lot proposed is 9,152 and the largest residential lot is 20,940 square feet. On August 6, 1991, the Planning Commission held a properly noticed public hearing on Tentative Tract No. 14352. During the public hearing, Joseph Mapalo, an engineer for Bonadiman & Associates spoke in support of the project. Three property owners in the area spoke in opposition of the tentative tract design. Mr. Howell Estes expressed concerns with the overall density of the subdivision and in particular the density proposed adjacent to the foothills. His concerns stemmed from the high wind and high fire hazard classification area-wide. He feels that based on the circulation system proposed there may be problems in the event of a major fire. He believes that the minimum lot size should be retained at 10,800 square feet. 75.0264 , , o 0 Appeal of Tentative Tract No. 14352 Mayor and Common Council Meeting September 16, 1991 Page 2 A second gentleman, Mr. Robert Reynolds also expressed his concern that the lot sizes not Pall below the 10,800 square foot minimum based on the numerous earthquake faults in the area. The last resident to speak was Mr. William Kruger. He resides on the property immediate to the west of the tentative tract's proposed Huntington Drive. He stated that he is not in opposition to the development of the site, however, he would appreciate consideration in the design of the subdivision so that it is not in conflict with adjacent properties. Mr. Kruger feels that with Huntington Drive as proposed, there will be headlights shining into his house and increased traffic that may be in conflict with his existing driveway. He feels that a more logical design would be to realign the roadway to the south to reduce the conflict. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Stone inquired of the applicant's representative whether or not they could realign the roadway to accommodate the issues raised during the public hearing. Mr. Mapalo said that they would prefer not to redesign, but that it could be done with an estimated loss of three lots. Commissioner Stone recommended a motion of continuance to resolve the issues, but a second was not made. Further discussion ensued and then a motion was made for approval based on the discussion and in agreement with the staff recommendation. The motion for approval was seconded, and then was carried by unanimous vote of the six Commissioners in attendance. On August 15, 1991, Mr. William T. Kruger, submitted an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision of approval (see Attachment "A"). The basis for his appeal is that with a minor road alignment future area-wide circulation could be enhanced and would not impact his property. Mr. Kruger has included a possible reconfiguration as part of his appeal request. The modification results in a net loss of one lot while potentially increasing the lot size of four other lots. MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OPTIONS The Mayor and Common Council can continue Tentative Tract No. 14352 and refer the tract back to staff for a redesign of the tract to eliminate the potential impacts with the adjacent property. OR ~,_ ,, ~ Q Appeal of Tentative Tract No. 14352 Mayor and Common Council Meeting September 16, 1991 Page 3 The Mayor and Common Council may uphold the appeal and deny Tentative Tract No. 14352. OR The Mayor and Common Council may deny the appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 14352 subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained within the Planning Commission Staff Report dated August 6, 1991. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Mayor and Common Council continue Tentative Tract No. 14352 and refer it back to staff for a project redesign. Prepared by: Patti Nahill, Associate Planner for Larry E. Reed, Assistant Director of Planning and Building Services Attachments: A - Letter of Appeal to Mayor and Common Council B - Statement of official Planning Commission Action C - Official Notice of Public Hearing before the Mayor and Common Council D - Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated August 6, 1991 © p '91 ;UG 1 S R 9 ,29 August 14, 1991 ~ Honorable City Council City of San Bernardino 300 North D Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 To Whom This May Concern: This letter is in appeal of a decision of the City of San Bernardino Planning' Commission, August 6, 1991, regarding Tentative Tract 19~32.i435Z First let IDe state that I am not against development in the Verdemont area if it is done with careful planning and concern for the safety and well being of the existing residents. At this time the area's infrastructure is not adequate to insure the safety of new residents in an emergency situation as there are effectively only two exits from Verdemont; Pine and Palm Avenues. At the Planning Commission meeting of August 6, 1991, three residents spoke in opposition to the development. There were abaft twenty other people in the audience who voiced their concerns to me personally. The major concerns were the high density, the lack of adequate infrastructure and the need for an additional point of ingress and egress. I proposed an alternate road alignment that appeared to garner support from planning staff and the commission. However, due to the late hour, that discussion fell by the wayside. You are our last hope! As proposed, this tract provides for a high number of lots, small lot size, and large slopes (due to the relatively steep topography) which result in low net useable pad areas. The proposed alignment of Huntington Drive is not conducive to orderly development west of Palm Avenue. ATTACHMENT A ., o a Honorable City Council August 14, 1991 Page two I have attached a copy of an alternate alignment of the proposed road system that would help meet the needs of future development west of Palm Avenue, providing better circulation. This, coupled with reduced density, results in a more acceptable development. The applicant's representative, of course, opposed this option because of the loss of lots and, therefore, the net profit yield. It would also cause the additional cost of reengineerinq which to me is small compared to the benefit for the area. Once again, please review the attached reconfiguration and in addition, please consider the feelings of the surrounding property owners who attended the Planning Commission meeting August 6, 1991, who are concerned about the density of this development. Thank you, William T. Kruger 6920 Palm Avenue San Bernardino, CA 92407 8~7-53 9.S' i S. 177 60 i~.uio ; 2~t24 ~ ~_.-_ It l;•HE 12 13.900 bl 12.M12 .6+.. '• } ~^~- - °' 16 IO.e6a ~ 10.292 b2 17.na6 - _ In '!!Jae 34 ILa6! 56.116 ~-: \ _ --- - rE 17 v/'!3T ~ 9.169 64 10.6]! f~-~ -" _ b 1-le Ie a.abl b - - --- :NIA 9zss9 ~ptw ?aR _ - _ . •, ~ e277 . Ipf •A• VlLL 6E 6LDIGTLD TC TIE CtTT Of 6AN ilAOf - ' ~1 ifU1L6. 0?EM fAC[. at~F1 /AIO CRAI ' r-_ _ . _ - 'REST to -_ ~/~...i ~~s.r JO,). '17'~ {,, =_r_ '- _ ~ CALIFORNIA 92ai0 I f ! , ~~'~ `-fi-~ J: ia'- :I1Y PATER OIaTRiCT .- -- ~- - • ' Y -- _ tEET _ YTtlCA ~A1R.J.~ }`w~ _ - -_- ~ tea CALIFORNIA 92a10 '~.!i!~!M>,}+~ t1r \K {" c:: -, ,,,.. 6]61 - nca..o•••r . Ss - , /. i~5 - - /':; '_, \',\`~ 9 ^-"•.:% .ter' i i rT 1.021-28 ~~`' ~, ~ i. ~ I' ~ ~ ~ '~ . iTn : ACRE '/~ • V ~ Y j/ `'. y~ \ ~S /' : ''-. 11MROYEMEMTS . ' ~ - ~-- ui+ • S1. ~ -'.~~' '•'i6~: '. ~4 I .' _ ;' ^., sTA1NEb uslNa .- . _ w 1 _ ~ w INYNOATION. '--" ..--' E11f0'- ~1.E'1HR tt41K . tt ~ 31 . "h _ a ' A 9E. ,.~ ~RaECT. ~ ~ - _ . %~ 2113 ~ ., S~j g 9Y ..RElAti- ? ..~..- .r 2013 - IbTRlCT. ~ -` .~.' _ -- ~tttOtO ~ •' . 1Ei~IkE •Lr `'i ~ _ ~.l,IL e.1y, ,t .e _ ~ IrY os 9AN ;, $ R101Ty LF:~ _ y tf: -- _-, - ~ n .Tl1N1~ - :- 1 ~ • s. INC. _- _ ~ _ a _ oR snot --- _ 't0 _ 92a12 I f :" _' : [l.g1Slg - Jg~ 1b~\~ S L . • City of San Bernardino ' STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT Number: Tentative Tract No. 13352 Applicant: Dr. and Mrs. Donald Huber Owner: Same gCTION Meeting Date: August 6, 1991 X Adopted Negative Declaration and Approved Request Based Upon Findings of Fact (Attachment 8) and Subject to Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D) CONDITIONS This project was approved subject to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in Attachments C and D with the revision of Condition of Approval No. 19 to read: 19. Bailey Creek shall ba protected in a natural condition. Building pads shall be elevated to provide at least 3 feet of freeboard above the high water elevation in a 100 year traquency storm. and the deletion of Condition of Approval Nos. 20, 21, and 22. VOTE Ayes: Cole, Jordan, Lopez, Ortega, Sharp, Stone Nays: NOrie Abstain: None Absent: Clamensen, Lindseth, Vallee i, hereby, certify that this Statement of official Action - accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning Commission the City of~San Bernardino. Signatu Date T-rrv F Reed Assistant Director of Plannina & Build~na Services Name and Title ATTACHMENT 6 ' ' ' ' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING RVICES DEPARTMENT OFFiClAL NOTICE OF PUBLlC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL SUBJECT: WARD A APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT N0. I4352 5 PROPERTY LOCATION: Subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of about 24.3 acres located at the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive. i PROPOSAL: To establish a 69 unit single-family residential subdivision in the RL, Resi- dential Low, General Plan land use designation. PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: SAID BEANAADINO CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ~ / 300 NORTH "D' STREET SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92418 HEARING DATE AND TIME: Monday, September 16, 1991 2:00 p.m. - ~.,` ,~ ~ < / ~eebb0eeygplrerpoP~IrrlynyMaygaq`,MrgBwvr t ~ 3 worenw~rC~rrrw.IlrrbrwOwr.+sniron Opysaaoarb+bb~ I 2 Mwelwnp.pPeeemras Meaa9elb irrq Swwab Oeprawery.ll :r ~ 'T woT Trnr0171a13ee.lOy7. I TIr Mb,rbYC011n101.CO~CIrbp1~14ArP0YYCOM~. MPai~brr~ beeab.punNYM.wb/ICO~wrlbnlrYtlOnCppp~pPbbp,pOblb yPlwwq Ole dlerM Bwneee Oaerwae.SrlBwrlplbCeP IbL 700 bab'D' , $ey. $al BwwWb. CiellrlY aae. OemimraerMNr9Cennlyrlwrlayralrl00lae~9leM~ge. CaF I ~ mow uee PwIMe. Ileww a Mar, Tarb Tmr WP. are vrlrsa r,ees NL abMebMMeryab CmwaaCYbl Aq,blebb YepabCalelrPCWKe 1\~/ rnWl rllllPee n,rlrlq, flyl0erprlll~aereeeer ablrY eea4llr,eby /~~/ r.WC.w aq9 nMyableillaeMwOn aarlelMaer Y,ysn ll,llee/eb , Pay rY are TrYbe TM MlPeF urlar Mal Nwrrrlb em MlaYIlN6by MPiOb CaOe~r aumr? o01'M blrreMber lYP>rb CYnlbn CaPYbI MYeL~ML f / • 'l Trl rlbageer leelYeepOeaM relerabCaorantana nmat,eil ma,a.nwbrwgarerwoorarwuarwlrararwrernaecny.q ` .w Orawen/lblab.OMlrl~eybiabFb)ibaeebpClTMaeagOhsOl x a.rvro.ymellwy ,J\ ~ N u~um. ,~wnu'. iw~"nnxMn PLNF9.07 PAGE i OF t 490 ATTACHMENT C . ~ 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM $ SUMMARY HEARING DATE 8-6-91 WARD 5 APPLICANT: Di . & Mrs . Donald Huber W 4671 Webb Canyon Road Claremont, CA 91711 a Tentative Tract No. 14352 OWNER: SAS V The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide 24.3 acres N into sixty-nine (69) single-family lots in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. W The subject property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land located at the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Verdemont Q Drive in the Verdemont area. W - Q EXISTING GENERAL PLAN PROPERTY I Anln I IcF DESIGNATION I~ Subject Vacant RL Residential Low I7orth Single-family Residential RL Residential Low and Vacant South Residential P.L Residential Low East Vacant RL Residential Low West Single-family Residential RL Residential Low GEOLOGIC /SEISMIC ~ VES FLOOD HAZARD XX VES 7~ ZONE A SEWERS: ~ VES HAZARD ZONE: ? NO ZONE: ? NO ? ZONE B ? NO HIAG~H FF RAE. Q N S AIRPORT NOISE/ ? YES REDEVELOPMENT ?VES CRASH ZONE. ~ NO PROJECT AREA: ~ NO J ? NOT ? POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z L~APPROVAL Q APPLICABLE EFFECTS WITH O ~ MITIGATING MEASURES ~ Z y NO E.I.R. < C~ CONDITIONS ~ Z ? EXEMPT ? E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO W Z~Z ? DENIAL Z ~ SIONIflCANT EFFECTS Q W WITH MITIGATING H ~ ~ MEASURES N ~ ? CONTINUANCE TO Z ~ NO SIGNIFICANT ? SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS (~j W EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E.R.C. W MINUTES ~ m PIIVFaL¢ PIOE t OF t (~N01 ATTACHMENT D CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 2 REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide 24.3 acres into sixty-nine (69) single-family lots in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low. The General Plan land use designation permits a maximum density of 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre and requires a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. SITE LOCATION The subtect property is an irregularly-shaped parcel of land Located at the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive in the Verdemont area (See Attachment "G", Location Map). MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Municipal Code and is in conformance with the General Plan as shown in Attachment "A". CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT STATUS The Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on April 25, 1991. The ERC found that no significant impacts would result from the project and recommended a Negative Declaration be adopted. The Negative Declaration was advertised and available for public review and comment from May 2, 1991 to May 22, 1991. To date, no comments on the initial study have been received. If comments are received i referencing this protect, they will be presented to the Planning Commission at the August 6, 1991, Planning Commission meeting (see Attachment "E", Initial Study). ANALYSIS Site Characteristics The 24.3 acre site is currently vacant. The topography of the site consists of rolling terrain generally sloping five percent to the southeast. Minor drainage courses are located in the east and southern portions of the site. N~°~ auw~n r~+a+ wm CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 3 Lot Chazacteristics The tentative tract will create sixty-nine l69) single-family lots with a density of 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre. The applicant is proposing to utilize the alternative lot size provision of the Verdemont Area Plan to establish lot sizes less than 10,800 square feet. The Verdemont Area Plan states that lot sizes in single family subdivisions maY vary in size due to unique or unusual topographic features. The Plan further explains that the subdivisions shall be in accordance with the following standards and shall meet the alternative lot size performance criteria. Alternative Lot Size Standards General Standard Minimum Average $ of Lots Plan Minimum Lot Size Lot Size Permitted Lot Size Below Average " RL 10,800 8,700 10,800 25 square square square percent feet feet feet The Alternative Lot Size Performance Criteria includes the following: a. Proportional mix and placement of lots. j b. Preserving of mature trees and natural features. c. Placement of dwelling unit on lot. d. Preserving the views. e. Provision of amenities. f. Treatment of drainage courses. q. Treatment of walla and fences. h. Other unique amenities. The applicant by design is proposing to create 11 lots or 16 percent of the lots below the average of 10,800 square feet. The smallest residential lot proposed is 9,152 and the largest residential lot is 20,90 square feet. The applicant mixed the placement of the alternative lots into the balance of the subdivision with the exception of five lots placed together at the northeasterly intersection of Palm Avenue and the proposed Steven way. The block of alternative lot sizes in this location preserves the views of the lots to the north. The applicant has provided an equestrian trail as their amenity to satisfy the performance criteria. The trail will serve ae a buffer between the Bailey Creek and the residential lots thus preserving the creek in its natural state (see discussion below). ~.~~'"'° nw~.w v~ ~ oc, µi01 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENt gGENDA ITEM OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE - - PAGE Lot 'A• - Equestrian Trail and Staging Area The developer has agreed to provide a 12-foot wide equestrian trail along the back of Lots 52 through 65, Lots 68 and 69 which will provide a valuable link to the existing recreational trail system in the area. The trail will connect with the Chestnut Creek Trail and the proposed Muscupiabe-Rancho Line Trail. The trail is envisioned to enhance the proposed subdivision by establishing a focal recreational amenity for the homeowners and surrounding neighbors. Equestrian trail fencing will be provided to serve as a buffer between the residential lots and Bailey Creek. The 6-foot high fence will be constructed of a combination of wrought iron panels with decorative concrete block pilasters. The fencing will be compatible with the perimeter subdivision fencing proposed for the project. Lot "A" will encompass a total of 56,116 square feet and will include a staging area for horses at the northernmost tip of the subject property. Surrounding Area The properties to the south of the proposed tentative tract are occupied by single-family structures. The lands to the north and west are predominately vacant with a few scattered single-family residences. The property directly to the east is Bailey Creek. On the other side of the creek is vacant land a portion of which ie to be used for the State of California Water Resources Second Afterbay l Project. The surrounding properties are all designated RL, Residential Low (see Attachment "C3", Location Map). ''~ Access and Circulation '~ The site has frontage along the north side of Verdemont Drive of i approximately 1,381 feet and has a frontage along the east side of Palm Avenue of approximately 1,148 feet. Tentative Tract No. 14352 proposes to utilize Palm Avenue as its primary access. Palm Avenue is classified as a secondary arterial from its junction with Interstate 215 north to Ohio Avenue. it becomes a local continuous road north of Ohio Avenue to the site as identified in the Verdemont Area Plan, page 126. Secondary access will be from Verdemont Drive to Huntington Drive which is classified as a local continuous street. Although the rights-of way exist for the primary and secondary standard means of access, they have not been fully improved or paved. A Condition of Approval has been added requiring all standard means of access to be paved and improved per Public works Department Standard Requirements prior to the issuance of building permits for construction of homes on the subdivision. The majority of the lots will be served by two curvilinear local continuous streets which will connect to Palm Avenue and to Verdemont Drive. The balance of the lots will access Verdemont Drive by way of an interior cul-de-sac. m•,S vur~w v~~oc, ~.aw "..A..r...,~_. _ _ _ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 5 Traffic The City Traffic Engineer reviewed the proposed subdivision and determined that the project did not meet the minimum criteria for a traffic impact study. The additional trips from the proposed project are not sufficient to cause a significant impact on the adjacent street system. Environsiental Concerns The proposed subdivision is mapped in the General Plan as being within the boundaries of the High Wind Hazard Area, the High Fire Hazard Zone and within Greenbelt Zone "B" of the Foothill Community Greenbelt Program and the Verdemont Area Plan. Conditions of Approval have been included requiring compliance with the Uniform Building Code for wind resistance and fire protection and compliance with the provisions of the Development Code. Biological Resources The site is located in the Biological Resources Management Overlay. A Biological Survey was prepared for the site by Joe Gorman PhD Associates dated January 15, 1990: The report concluded that no threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of wildlife or vegetation were found and that none were thought to be present on the subject property. Archaeological Resources Tentative Tract No. 14352 is located within an area identified by the General Plan ae having potential archaeological resources. The San Bernardino County Museum Archaeological Information Center evaluated the proposed project site and determined that no cultural resources are known to exist within or adjacent to the project area and that the potential for the presence of cultural resources within the project area is low. No further studies were recommended. Geological Resources The northeastern portion of Tentative Tract No. 14352 is located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. A geotechnical study prepared for the proposed project by Gary S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. in January, 1990. The report included the following recommendations: 1) The Alquist-Priolo Special Study restricted use zone shall be identified on the final grading plans and on a Composite Development Plan filed with the Final Map. Minimum setbacks for human occupation structures have been established in the geotechnical report. ~+p~ PW4YLB PAGE 1 OF 1 Ia.WI CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 6 2) A Richter magnitude 7.5 earthquake is expected along the San Andreas fault, .which is located approximately 400 feet northeast of the site; therefore, human occupancy structures should be designed accordingly. 3l Positive drainage of the site should be provided, and runoff should not be allowed to flow over natural, cut or fill slopes in such a way as to cause erosion. 41 The final grading plans for the site shall be reviewed and approved by an engineering geologist prior to any grading. State Department of Water Resources The Devil's Canyon second afterbay project is located to the east of the subject property and will utilize Verdemont Drive to access their site. The increase in truck traffic along Verdemont Drive during the construction of the second afterbay is expected to be short-term. The developer of this tract shall notify the purchaser at the time of purchase agreement and at the close of escrow of the afterbay project. Hydrology and Dratnape The San Bernardino County Flood Control District has identified the eastern portion of the site to be adjacent to a natural drainage course outlettinq flows from Bailey Canyon. The natural drainage course is not adequate to contaln the total flows from the canyon, and in the event of a major storm, overflow can be expected. The Flood Insurance Administration mapping for the area shows that a portion of the site lying within and adjacent to the natural drainage course as Zone "A", subject to 100 year overflow. Therefore, in their opinion, portions of the site are subject to infrequent flood hazards due to overflow, erosion, and debris deposition from Bailey Canyon in the event of a major storm. Portions of the site may be subject to excessive street flows and accumulated drainage from the north. Further studies of the project will be necessary prior to development with respect to local and on-site drainage conditions. COMMENTS RECEIVED Clty Departments All City Departments reviewed the proposal at the Development Review Committee meeting on June 20, 1991. The Public Works/ Engineering, Police, Building Services, Fire, Water and Parks and Recreation Departments have attached Standard Requirements (see Attachment "D"). ~,..:,,,~'~~ vwr.aa aws:,ov, pam CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 7 San Bernardino City UnSfied School District Current developer fees collected by the district are inadequate to finance all costs associated with school construction. The District requests the establishment of supplemental fees to finance new school off-site improvements and a separate fee to generate revenues for purchasing school sites in the Verdemont/Devore area. The City is currently investigating the establishment of supplemental developer fees to fund these off-site improvements. Conditions of Approval requiring developer participation in any supplemental fee program established by the City to help finance new school off-site improvements will reduce potential impacts to a level of insignificance. San Bernardino County Flood Control District The District has made the following comments and recommendations for this property: First, if the District is to assume operation and maintenance responsibility of the Bailey Canyon Channel System, including debris basin, from the canyon to Devil Creek: 1) The natural drainage course outletting flows from Bailey Canyon shall be upgraded to a concrete lined channel facility ae shown on Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Number 7, Project Number 7-E14, capable of handling 100-year storm flows plus freeboard with twenty foot patrol roads on both sides of the channel. 2) A hydrology and hydraulic anaylsis for the channel through the site shall be prepared by the developer's engineer and approved by the City and the Flood Control District. 3) Adequate right-of-way for the channel including patrol roads, cut and fill slopes, and access from the road crossings shall be dedicated to the City in fee title for future transfer to the District upon completion of the debris basins and channel from Devil Creek to the debris basin. 4) Chain link fencing or other approved barrier shall be provided along the channel right-of-way including gates at the road crossings. 5) Channel improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by both the City and District. 6) The District, in conjunction with the City, shall inspect the channel construction. a~inw '~ PLAN~p PAGE l OF 1 1~1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 19352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARINGDATE_ 8-6-91 PAGE 8 Second, if the Bailey Canyon Debris Basin is not constructed prior to the development of~the site, adequate provisions shall be made to protect the site from the debris Laden flows from Bailey Canyon. Next; adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the tributary flows from the north, including Bailey Canyon, around or through the site in a manner which does not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. Finally, the developer should provide his fair share of the cost for the Bailey Canyon Debris Basin if there is not another means for financing the basin. CONCLUSION Tentative Tract No. 14352 meets all of the development standards of the Municipal Code and Verdemont Area Plan and is consistent with the General Plan and the Subdivision Map Act. Impacts associated with the development of the project will be mitigated and reduced to a level of insignificance. There is a proposed Negative Declaration. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt the Negative Declaration; and, 2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 14352, subject to the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment "B"), Conditions of Approval (Attachment "C") and Standard Requirements (Attachment "D"). Res ectfully submi ted, Larry E. Reed Assistant Director of Planning and Building Services ~~, yJ~ Patti Nahill Associate Planner Attachments: A - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance B - Findings of Fact C - Conditions of Approval D - Standard Requirements E - Initlal Study F - Tentative Tract Map G - Location Map _ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 OBSERVATIONS HEARING DATE 5-6-91 PAGE 9 MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Cateoorv Proposal Municipal General Plan Code Permitted A 69 lot RL, RL, Use single Residential Residential family Low Low subdivision Density 2.8 dwelling 3.1 dwelling 3.1 dwelling units per units per units per gross acre gross acre gross acre Residential 9,152 to 10,800 10,800 Lot Size 20,940 square foot square foot square feet* minimum minimum Open Space 56,116 N/A N/A Lot Size square feet Lot Depth 100 feet or 100 foot N/A more minimum Lot Width 80 feet or 80 foot N/A more minimum Corner Lot 88 feet or 88 foot N/A Width more minimum Frontage All lots Required on N/A all lots Street 11.94 8 12 $ N/A Grades maximum maximum * Applicant is utilizing the Alternative Lot Size provision of the Verdemont Area Plan. vwaaae r~ ~ oc ~ pam Attachment "B" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING casE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 FINDINGS OF FACT HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE_ 10 1. The requested subdivision is consistent with the minimum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation in the Verdemont Area Plan with alternative lot sites and is consistent with the General Plan in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.8 dwe111nQ unite per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that they and each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet ( 88 feet on corner lots ) and a " minimum depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that the development will occur according to the Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in this report. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the State Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed private streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works/Engineering for street improvements. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. rurrace vw~ i a ~ ts.op Attachment "C" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE 8-(-91 PAGE tl 1. Minor modifications to the plan shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10 percent of the square footage or a significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to Planning Commission and Development Review Committee review and approval. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the plans approved by the Planning Commission. 2. The developer fs to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (4 copies) for the entire development to the Engineering Department with the required fee for approval, the landscape plane will be forwarded to the Parka, Recreation and Community Services and the Planning Department for review and approval. (Noter the issuance of a building permit, by the Building Services Division of the City of San Bernardino, does _ NOS waive these requirements/conditions.) No grading permits will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The design shall include, but not be limited to the following: a. Street trees shall be planted on 30 foot center spacing unless otherwise indlcnted by the Department of Parka, Recreation and Community Services. The Parka Department shall determine the varieties and locations prior to planting. All trees shall be 24' box specimens. Trees are to be inspected by a Park Division representative urior to planting. b. The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department). 3. Trees, shrubs and groundcover of a type and Quality generally consistent or compatible with that characterizing single- family homes shall be provided in the front yard and that portion of the side yards which are visible from the street. All landscaped areas must be provided with an automatic irrigation system adequate to insure their viability. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. ~.°,~. PW1./p PA[iElOF1 µgpl _ _ _ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE - - PAGE 12 4. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly•notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorney's fees which the City may be required by the court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve the applicant of hie obligation under this condition. 5. The developer shall participate in any supplemental fee program established by the City to help finance new off-site improvements or with the City of San Bernardino Community Facilities District No. 995 School Fee Mitigation Agreement. 6. The developer shall identify specific locations for centralized mail delivery units to the satisfaction of the Postal Service and Public Works Department and shall delineate the easements or mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units on the final map. 7. Two standard means of access shall be provided and improved per Public works/Engineering Department Standard Requirements prior to the issuance of building permits for construction of homes on the subdivision. 8. The construction of homes shall comply with the all applicable provisions of the Development Code. 9. All slopes shall be 2:1 finished grade. 10. A truck hauling route which includes a schedule of dates and times of export shall be filed with and approved by the City Public Services Department for import or export of earth materials. 11. The developer shall comply with all City Codes in regard to dust control and noise attenuation. 12. No combustible materials shall be on site until water is available to serve the subject property. 13. The development shall provide for fire flow gpm, duration and hydrant spacing according to minimum standards of the City. 14. All utilitie6 are to be placed underground. r" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 CONDITIONS HEAfiING DATE 8-6-91 PAGE 15. All recommendations of the geotechnical report shall be incorporated into the development of the property. 16. The Alquist-Priolo Special Study restricted use zone shall be identified on the final grading plans and on a Composite Development Plan filed with the Final Map. 17. The final grading plans for the site shall be reviewed and approved by an engineering geologist prior to any grading. 18. The developer of this tract shall notify the purchaser at the time of purchase agreement and at the close of escrow of the afterbay project. 19. if the San Bernardino County Flood Control District is to assume operation and maintenance responsibility of the Bailey Canyon Channel System, including debris basin, from the canyon to Devil Creek, they will require the following: a) The natural drainage course outlettinq flows from Bailey Canyon shall be upgraded to a concrete lined channel facility as shown on Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan Number 7, Project Number 7-E14, capable of handling 100- year storm flows plus freeboard with twenty foot patrol roads on both sides of the channel. b) A hydrology and hydraulic anaylsis for the channel through the site shall be prepared by the developer's engineer and approved by the City and the Flood Control District. c) Adequate right-of-way for the channel including patrol roads, cut and fill slopes, and access from the road crossings shall be dedicated to the City in fee title for future transfer to the District upon completion of the debris basins and channel from Devil Creek to the debris basin. d) Chain link fencing or other approved barrier shall be provided along the channel right-of-waY including gates at the road crossings. e) Channel improvement plans shall be reviewed and approved by both the City and District. f) The District, in conjunction with the City, shall inspect the channel construction. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 CONDITIONS HEARING DATE- -~~1 PAGE 20.. Zf the Bailey Canyon Debris Basin is not constructed prior to the development of the site, adequate provisions shall be made to protect the site from the debris laden flows from Bailey Canyon. 21. Adequate provisions shall be made to intercept and conduct the tributary flows from the north, including Bailey Canyon, around oz through the site in a manner which does not adversely affect adjacent or downstream properties. 22. The developer should provide his fair share of the cost for the Bailey Canyon Debris Basin if there is not another means for financing the basin. 23. The developer shall coordinate the development of the site and its potential impacts to the Bailey Storm Drain Project with the Public Works/ Engineering Department. 24. The developer shall assume full responsibility for the repair of pavement within Verdemont Drive, within the limits of Palm Avenue on the northwest and Olive Avenue to the southeast, holding harmless the State of California. Beginning of said repair occurring within 120 days of written notice from the State to the City of San Bernardino and the developer of the termination of use of said streets for heavy vehicle usage. PL11N.~p PIKE IOF 1 ~.yp) Attachment "D" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING ~E 8-1591 1. Tentative Tract No. 14352 shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department. However, if the final map has not been filed with the County Recorder's Office at the end of the month time period, the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planning Commission upon written request of the applicant if made 30 days prior to expiration of the month time period. Expiration Date: Au~~st 6. toga COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D. a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC i R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open agate, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC & R's shall also include a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within the complex except for central antenna systems. b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC & R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC ~ R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. c. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, 'either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association, owning the common areas and °acilities. ~.."..i"~" nuwa~o nKSE ~ w ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 ' AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDAfTEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING PAGE 8 1691 d. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC & R•s. e. The CC & R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside of the specified common areas. PARKING: a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of 2 parking spaces, in an enclosed garage for each~buildabl lot. b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway. c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned property, provided such wall shall be three lest in height when located within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet i.n height when located within ten feet of the street line. Said wall shall be located on the north , south , east , west or peripheral property lines. d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equivalent landscaped berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure the required front setback landscaping. Said wall shall be located on ffie north , south , east , west or peripheral property lines. All parking areas and vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours of darkness for security and protection. 3• Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least a six-foot high decorative wall with screened gates. :.' •lAK/.f0 PIICsE t OF 1 1~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 • AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARINGPA~TE - - There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or other specifically designated area, a loft ar other usable storage area with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition to standard utility storage. Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to the City Traffic Engineers approval. A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on Standard Drawing No. 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to the development. Location and design shall be subject to approval of the Engineering Division. Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the Planning Department. All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall. Location, size, type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent. 4• Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local requirements. 5. LANDSCAPING: a. Four (4) copies of a master landscape plan shah be submitted to the Engineering Division for review and approval. The plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following: 1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed. 2) Irrigation plan. 3) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may be proposed. 4) Erosion control plans. b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior to planting by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department or his/her designee. A minimum number of one n h calf er 15 allon multi-branched trees shall b 1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE T2 14352 ' AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARINGPA~E -,~ planted within the parkway for each of the following types of lots, as par the City's specifications: 1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree; 2) Interior lot -- two trees; 3) Corner lot -- three trees. c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, surfaces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding 25 feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10$, 15 gallon; 40$ 5 gallon; 503, 1 gallon. Shrubs 203, 5 gallon; 803, 1 gallon. Ground cover 1003 coverage. d. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an irrigation system approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership. f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, shall be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. 6. an average All lots shall have A ~~n-i~ area of lo_9opsquare feet, a minimum depth of 100 feet, and a minimum width of _gp_ feet, ( 88 feet on corner lots). In addition, each lot on a cul-de- sac or on a curved street where the side lot lines thereof are diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 60 feet measured at the right angle to the lot depth at the midway point between the front and rear lot lines, and a width of not less than 40 feet measured alon the front ~r ~ PWH./0 PI[iE 1 OF 1 IK0) ~ ~ . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 ' AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARINGPA~TE 9-1991 lot line as delineated on the tract map. Where lots occur on the bulb of the cul-de-sac, a minimum lot depth of 100 feet will be permitted. I! the proposed depth is less than 100 feet, a plot plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible and to justify the lesser depth. Variable front building setback lines of at least feet and averaging feet, and side street building setback lines 15 feet shall be delineated on the final tract map. AlI garage entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of 18 feet. 8' Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots shall be. designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall lace. The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or engineering design of the proposed wall. 9. When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the City Engineer. I0. Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation. 11. Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required (if applicable). 12. Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site plan. 13• During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. Thn type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control. nuwaaa novaioc, p.ao~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA REM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARINGPA~E 8-091 14. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Her*+a~;*+o Municipal Code, 15. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: a. All utility service boxes, connections and service lines shall be painted to match the building ex`erior on which they are located. b. All existing overhead utility services and wiring shall be relocated underground. c. No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building (except for solar collection panels). d. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and Cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, Cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residences. A.~°.~3""°° vuH.uo n~ ~ oc i r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNINZ; CASE TT 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARINGP~E 8_2191 16. COMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A Composite Development Plan (CDP) shall be filed with the Engineering, Planning, and Building & Safety Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processing by the City pursuant to Ordinance No. MC-592. The CDP shall provide additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building criteria (e.q. setbacks), flood control criteria, seismic and geological criteria, enviro~antal criteria and easements of record. The CDP shall be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan", and contain a section entitled "Composite Development Plan Notes". The applicant shall have listed under the CDP Notes section the following conditions or mitigating measures required !or the development of the subject property: Conditions No. 1 thru 24 and Standard Requirements No. 1 thru 17. 17. The property owner shall sign a covenant running with the land agreeing that if the required landscaping is not maintained, the City may enter on the the property and install and main- tain the required landscaping and may lien the property for the costs. The covenant shall be signed and recorded with the • County of San Bernardino Recorder's Office prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. Zn addition, land- scape maintenance easement shall be filed with the Recorder's Office, which gives the City the right to enter the property and perform maintenance to the required landscaping. 1at10/9/90 DOC:PCAGENDA DOCOMENTS.1 qTY OF SAN B~NARDINO PUBLIC ORKS/EtiOlt. CASE Ta tass~ STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM - R NEARING DATE a-6-91 NOTE TO APPLICANT: Hhere separate Engineering plans are required, t e app scant is responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainage and Flood Control _ A11 necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer; which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. -$ X A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. _ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. _ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shaft be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. i _ Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in ~ the vicinity of your development. T ttl^s drain shall be designed and constructed Dy your project unless your Engineer can conclusively show that the drain is not needed to protect your development or mitigate downstream impacts. 9 ~ All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 0 X Applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to maintain compliance with the City's NPDES Storm Hater Discharge Permit requirements. 1 X Catch basins shall be installed upstream of each intersection along Verdemont Drive with connector pipe to the existing storm drain. A catch basin shall also be installed on the Easterly side of Palm Avenue, Northerly of Verdemont Drive. ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENOR. CASE TR 14352 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM $ MEARIN6 DATE L Gradin 22 X If more than 1' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. 23 X If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement shall be recorded prior to grading plan approval if reciprocal drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is proposed to cross lot lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be recorded to remove the interior lot lines. 24 X The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Ptan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain landscaping within the following areas: 25 Separate sets of Landscape Plans shall be provided for the Landscape Maintenance District. (Equestrian Trail). .CIi TY OF SAN ~RRNARDINO PUBLIC G~ORKS14352 CASE STANDARQ REC~UIREMENTS AGENCA ITEM B NEARING GATE Utilities: '-6 X Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV. '-~ ~_Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. ~g _~Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. :9 _~Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as required. .0 X All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-601 (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65 (Non-subdivisions). .1 X Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer sill be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan. where practical. Z A "Communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets within and adjacent to this project. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernardino. CITY OF SAN ~RNARDINO PUBLICQ/ORKS/EMOlt. ~AgE TR 14352 STA~ARQ REQUIREMENTS AGENf~A ITEM $ NEARING GATE $-6-91 Mapping 33 X A r-inai/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. 34 X A11 street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. 35 X Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-592. Improvement Completion 36 X Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. 37 X If the required improvements are not completed prior to recordation of the Final/Parcel Map, an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer and the City will be required. If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Parcel Map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the Map stating that they will be completed upon development. Applicable to parcel maps consisting of less than 5 lots only. 38 X Street light energy fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. A11 rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from the following streets: 39 X Change street names "Panaview Drive" to "Steven Way"; and "Northstar Court" to "Ventura Court". 40 X Acquisition of 50' wide strip on the North side of Verdemont Drive shall be completed prior to map recording. CITY OF SAN ~RNARDlNO PUB~1C QIORKS/EN~11, GAgg TR 14352 STAt~ARD REQUIREMENTS aGENDA ITEM 8 HEARING GATE 8-6-91 Street Improvement and Dedications: 41 X q11 public streets within and adjacent to ,the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification. relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. A11 design and construction shall De accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, ~sha11 be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 42 X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street center]ine shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-Way (Ft.) Curb Line (Ft.) Verdemont Drive 30' 20' Palm Avenue 30' 20' Ventura Court 25' lg' Others 30' lg' 43 X A minimum of 28' of paved width shall be provided on Palm Avenue consisting of 20' on the Easterly side of centerline and 8' on the Westerly side of centerline. - CITY OF SAN ~RNARDINO PUBLIC QIOAKS/ENOIt. CAS TR 14352 STANDARD REQINREMENTS AciENDA ITEM $ HEARING DATE - -91 44 X If the project is to be developed in phases, each individual phase shalt be designed to provide maximum public safety, conven- fence for public service vehicles, and proper traffic circulation. In order to meet this requirement, the following wilt be required prior to the finalization of any phase: a. Completion of the improvement plans for the total project or sufficient plans beyond the phase boundary to verify the feasibility of the design to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. b. A Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the Engineering Division, Fire, and Planning Departments indica- ting what improvements will be constructed with the given phase, subject to the following: (1) Dead-end streets shall be provided with a minimum 32-foot radius paved turnaround area, (2) Half width streets shall be provided with a minimum 28-foot paved width, (3) Street improvements beyond the phase boundaries, as necessary to provide secondary access, (4) Drainage facilities, such as storm drains, channels, earth berms, and block walls, as necessary, to protect the development from off-site flows, (5) A properly designed water system capable of providing required fire flow, perhaps looping or extending beyond the phase boundaries, (6) Easements for any of the above and the installation of necessary utilities, and (7) Phase boundaries shall correspond to the lot lines shown on the approved tentative map. c. An erosion control plan shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of grading permits. Provisions shall be included in the plan to control blowing dust and storm water erosion on areas which are graded but on which no building construction is immediately proposed. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/EMOR. ~E TR 14352 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE B-6-91 PAG Required Engineering Permits: 45 X Grading permit (if applicable). On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see Planning and Building Services), includes Landscaping. 46 X Off-site improvements construction permit. Applicable Engineering Fees (Fees subject to change without notice) 47 X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map - E1,000.00 plus E30.00 per lot or parcel. 48 X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements - 3S and 2.5~, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of off-site improvements. Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings - See Planning and Building Services) - 1% and 1%, respectively, of the estimated construction cost* of on-site improvements, including landscaping. 49 X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required) - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. 50 X Drainage fee. Exact amount of fee shall be determined by ~ Department of Planning and Building Services at time of ~ application for building permit - Fee Schedule available from the Engineering Division. 51 , X Traffic system fee in the approximate amount of Exact amount shall be determined by the City Tra is ngineer at time of application for building permit. *Estimated construction cost is based on schedule of unit prices on file with the City Engineer. CITY OF 8AN RNARDINO PUBLIC ORKB/EMOA. CASE TR 14352 STANQARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 8 HEARING DATE 8-6-91 PAG ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 52 A landscape maintenance easement shall be dedicated over the setback areas of each lot adjacent to public streets and a landscape maintenance district formed over these areas to maintain the landscaping in case of owner neglect. 53 ~ This development will be required to pay Infrastructure Development Fees prior to issuance of building permits or participate in an alternate Infrastructure Financing Plan in the Verdemont area when approved by the Mayor and Common Council. This single family residential project lies within the proposed Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of f0 .i3 per square foot shall be paid (not to exceed 52,000.00 per lot), if the District is not formed prior to approval of building permits. This commercial, industrial, or multiple residential project lies within the proposed Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of 50.135 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of building area, paving or other imperfious area, and 50.045 per square foot in excess of 3,000 square feet, shall be paid if the District is not formed prior to approval of building permits. 54 X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Traffic Signal Assessment District; therefore, a fee of 50.04 per square foot of net project area shall be paid to the City of the District is not formed prior to the approval of building permits. 55 X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Improvement Assessment District, therefore, a fee of 50.27 per square foot of net project area shall be paid to the City of the district is not formed prior to the approval of building permits. 56 -_1L The above fees far the Chestnut Storo Drain. Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Signal and the Palm Avenue Improvement Districts represent estimates of this project's share of the cost of the improvements. If the Districts are approved, the amount of the fees rill be considered payment in full. If any District is not approved, the fee rill be retained in a fund for construction of the improvements for rhich it vas paid. .CITY OF SAP~ERNARDINO PUBL1~', WORKa/EN011. ' CASE TR 14352 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 8 HEARING DATE e PAGE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 57 X An easement for an equestrian trail 12' wide minimum shall be dedicated over the Northeasterly line of the tract. The equestrian trail shall be designed, constructed, and landscaped to Department of Parks and Recreation Standards. An easement for landscape purposes shall be dedicated over the lot slopes (except those which are downhill into the lot) adjacent to the trail, and over lot A. A landscape maintenance district shall be formed to maintain the trail and landscaping within the easements. 58 X A 6' high decorative wall shall be constructed at the top of slope between the equestrian trail and the lots. The wall shall be solid where the trail is above the adjacent pad grade. Where the trail is below the adjacent pad grade, the wall shall consist of 2' high decorative block with 4' of wrought iron on top. CITY OF SAN BERry~OINO PLANNING CASE ~../T 14352 AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT A3ENDA rtEM STANDARD REQUIREMENTS "E''R"''~P„",~E a-3191 59• Subait plans prepared by a Registered Building Designer, l?rchitect or Civil or Structural Engineer. 60 gubmit a complete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a Registered C1vi1 or Structural Engineer or 1?rchitect. 61 gubait State of Calilornia Title 2a Energy Calculation Forms for residential, buildings includ nq a signed compliance statement. 62 Submit calculations and structural drawings, prepared by a Registered Civil Structural Engineer or llrchitact, Submit floor plan of existing structure. Label all uses and existing aaterials o! construction. submit lour (a) complete sets o! construction plans including: a. Copy o! conditions. b. Soils report. c. Energy Calculations. d. Structural calculation. 64 Submit a preliminary (soils) (geology) ~ report prepared by a psrson licensed to do so. 65 Submit a sir?gla lines drawing o! the elsctrical service. Shov all aquipsent, conduit and wise sizes and types. Show the sasvice ground siz• and grounding alactrods. 66 gubmit panel schedule(s) and electrical plans. 67 Permit required !or demolition o! existing building(s) on sits. 68 submit a pion o! the hsatinq, ventilating or air conditioning system. (Clearly identity the location and rating o! the equipment and the sizes a~ Bstarial o! all ducts, registers and the location o! all lire dampers). Shcw weans o! providing mechanical ventilation as required by the 1982 IInilora Building Code. Sa~~~ w.r.w.~a[,as~ ,.o • CITY OF SAN 8E RDINO PLANNING CASE 11['T 14352 AND BUILDING SE CES DEPARTMENT AdENOA1TEM 8 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS "~t1NGP; QE 69 Suba+it gas pips loads, sisinq calculations and isometrics. gyp, Provide a plot plan showing the location of the proposed sewer system. Submit a latter clurly indicating the intended use of all areas o! the building. List the aatarials to ba used and the projects produced giving the amount of uch kept in the building. Z! the building is used for aora than one purpose, list ail other uses. 71 Submit isomstric plans of the cold and hot waLar and drain casts atu! vent systems. Show coapliancs with Title 24 for the physically handicapped in the following: Submit plans approved by the County Nealth Departmsnt. Indicate methods of compliance !or sound attenuation (sxtssior, interior party walls, floor/tailing assembly, ceiling) as per study, II.B.C., local or Stets Law. ~,Z Show compliance with requiruents of high lire areas. er Deve opment Code. !or structures located within high wind areas: a. DasiQn structurs, including root coveri~, using 110 P.M.H, wind load city of San Hsrnardino Hamad as certificate holder for ttorksr'a compensation Insurance. 73 1?ssessor's Parcel Number. 261-011-15 & 16 261-021-28 & 29 74 Contractor's City license. 75 Contractor's State license. 76 satyr capacity rights from Natss Department, 384-8099, Neil Thoasan. >C.S~ wNraw nai~os, ~ - - - - - ~- - - - - - C)- - - - - DRC / ERC CITY OF SAN BERNARD=NO CASE /~3Sy9/ STANDARD REQU=REMENTS - POL2CE DEPT ADDITIONAL REQUIRENENT3:,, ~ 77 ? /w r2ytr '~'F/> //Zo ~/ i'r'~C,.-. L St~/,sa2ia T...: ~ /Y/.4~ / S A'/'C~r_ ice'=i/S Gem b ~=.r' i~ ,vim /.~.,~'r = ±- i.~ -,~~) s Wit,.--r~~= .~- C tY/L'~c~/L ~dIGG U% ~ l~/Si/lf/'i7~ J ~, ..--, -. r, ~ i 1 ~ ~ 1' ', ~ ,-- ~ is ~~'~..: ~i. 1 ' ~ _ i---' ', ; ~ ~ i'., ~1 '~' i 1 ~ ~ _ b'•~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO casE %~ / s~- STANDARD REQUIREMENTS HEARING DATE S /: REVIEWED 6 r FIRE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENT8 ~' GENERAL REQI:IREDIENTS: [~rovide one extra set of construction plans to Building end ~ ~r••ty for Fire Department use at time of plan check. ,~ 8 I 1 Contact Fire Department for specific or detailed requirements -IMPORTANT. [ The developer shag provide for adequate Fire Flow ss computed by the ire Prevention Bureau. Fire Flow shall be bsaed on square footage, construction features and exposure information as supplied Dy the developer end may De taken from two hydrants. / ACCESS: ~~Q, ~t e% ffl /A).Z`Ee.t ~P -~. Le {lr,c 3 T~tTi'i7y F+R6 F/a.+ l 1 Provide two different routes of ingress/egress to the property entrance. The routes shag be paved, aB-weather. l 1 Provide an access roadway [o e9ch Duildinx [or fire apparat•s. Access roadway shall have en W-weather drivittg surface of not less then 20-leaf o[ unoDStructed width. [ I Extend roadway to within 150-feet of all portions of the exterior ~~alls of all single-story DuRdings. [ 1 Extend roadway to within 50-feet of the exterior walls of ell mW:tple-story buildings. I 1 Provide "No PARKING" signs whenever parking o[ vehicles would possibly reduce the clearance o[ access roadways to less than the required width. Signs are to read "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" (All caps). "M.C. Sec. 15.16". I 1 Deed-end streets shall not exceed 500.[eet in length and shell have a minimum 35-foot radius turnaround. ] 9 l~ The names of any new streets (public or private) shell be submitted to the Fire Department [or approval. SITE• 8 ~ All access roads end streets are to De constructed and usable prior to combustible construction. ( 7 Private fire hydrants shell be installed to protect each building located more than 160-feet from the curb line. No fire hydrant shoWd be within 40-feet oC any exterior waB. The hydrants shag be fvet Barrel type, with one 2i-ineD and one Finch outlet, end approved by the Fire Department. Fire hydrants are to be protected from damage by providing suitable trafDc barriers. The area around the fire hydrant shell be designated es a "NO PAR KING" zone by painting an 8-inch witle, red stripe for 15-feet i~eech direction in front of the hydrant in such a manner that it wiR not De blocked by parked vehicles SWteble "NO 81 P.RKINC" signs ere required. [ Public fire hydrants shall De provided along streets at 300-feet intervals for con martial end mWti-residential arces snd at 500-Peet intervals for residential areas. Installation shall conform to City specifies n[ions and lx installed prior to combustible construction or storage. $2 B~ING: ( The address of the structure, in six inch numerals, shall !te installed on the building or in other approved location in such e manner as to De visible from the frontage street. The color o[ the number shag contrast with color of the background. f 1 Identity each gas end electric meter with the number of the unit which tt services. [ I Fire extinguisher must be installed prior to the building being occupied. The minimum rating for any fire extinguisher is 2A 10 B/C. Minimum distribution o[ fire extinguishers must De such that no interior pert of the building is over 75-feet travel distance from a fire extittgufsher. 1 All buildings, other than residential over 5,000 square feet, shall De provided with an automatic [ire sprinkler system, designed to NFPA standards. I 1 Submit plans [or the fire protection system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction on the system. I 1 Tenant improvements in ell sprinkleretl buildings are to De approved by the Fire Department prior to construction. [ ] Provide en automatic fire alarm (required throughout). Plan must be approved by the Fire Department, prior [o installation. I 1 Fire Department connection to (sprinkler svatem/standpipe system) shall be required at curb line. ===_=eeees-eeeee.e e.ee-vxaeeeexzr__r_eeeseexevex==cvx==_nc=e===aa:e:--s____ _~_~_________voracce-xec = NOTE: The applicant must request, in writing, any change in thane .r other requirements. AD ITfO L INFORh1ATTON: ., ~~1.a.~t'- " J i FPB 170 7/59 ,I Q~ Bemsrdino City Water DspartmeO STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ,view of Plans: # o . Date: Location: ' I/EApproved: Type of Construction: r?~.-ILLS Fn.~~t1~ ,~ ~~,o~~.tTtsat_ C~~penied: Owner/Developer: "ham L1~ ~ . `i~t~1d i ;L"~~ Continued: ENGINEERING: Name: GLI...IS 1/~.'i l~i._.(LF~vnS Data: a`'3'' C P.S. I. g 3 ,Size of Main Adjacent to the Project ~ t Z.~~ ~ Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter. 6 4 ~ Off-site Water Facilities Req fired to Meet Peak Flow Demand. 1 85 ~ Comments:Q({„'(/i ~A•r~'~. Z~I'{Jr: ~D OeT 1/1T r/~~ SubjecttotheRules&RegulationsoftheWaterDepartmentineffectatthetimeofApplicationforWaterService. This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees/Conditions will be Determined by their Engineering Department. WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name: J,r?,~ / ~(Ji~IE Date: ~ ~f/~/ _' R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. - Air Gap Required at Service Connection. - No Backflow Device Required. , ` l ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name: Date: 7 ~~/ Industrial Waste Permit Required by Environmental Control Officer. Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer. Pre-treatment Required by Environmental Control Officer. No Aegenerative Water Softeners May be Installed Without Prior Approval. r' Approved by Environmental Control Officer. T `/ SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: /L.. / .>l1~7-/ Date: ~~7 No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable at This Time. Sewer Capacity Fee Must Be Paid to the City Water Department for the Amount of Gallons Per Day. Equivalent Dwelling Units: Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Permit. ProofofPaymentMustbeSubmittedtothe8uilding&SafetyDepartmentPriortolssuanceoftheBuildingPermit. Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: Gars Rlfi 13901 WATR3.9! ur. w ;w eeww.w CFFrMI AUNrW.YfrKfe o v 17~~ CITY OF SAN SERNARDINO DEPARTMENTS OF PARKS. RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PLANNING DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE AND POLICY FOR IANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION MULTI UNIT COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL • January. 1488 -' a Tebie of Contents I. Purpoce II. Submlttals A. Number of Plans and Submittal Procedures 8. Lsndscape Plans C. Irrigation Plans ill. Landscape Areas A. tSaintenance of Landscaped Areas 8. Planter Areas G. Interior Planter Areas D. Irrigation E. Setback Areas F. Slope G. Ground Cover and Bedding Material H. Erosion Control I. Weed Control IV. Plant Nsteriela A. Plant List and Climatic Conditions B. Street Trees C. Pleat llatezial V. Inspection A. Irrigation System 8. Landscaping VI. Other Requirements ,. © CITY OF SAN DERNARDINO REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF LANDSCAPE AND IAAICATION PLANS: 1. PURPOSE The intent and purpoce of these guidelines is to provide: 1. Cufdance in the required submittal of landscape end irrigation plans. 2. Cufdance in meeting street tree requlrements. 3. Cufdance in selection of plant material. 4. Guidance in what the plans (landscape end irrigation) shall show. II. SUBMIT?ALB A. NUMBER OF PLANS AND SUBMITTAL PROCEDURE ~'Z_ copies each of landscape and Irrigation plans shall be sub- mitted to the Public Works/Engineering Department along with payment of the appropriate Landscape Plan Revlew Fee. B. LANDSCAPE PLANS , 1. Shall be drawn by one of the following: A. A registered landscape architect. 8. A licensed landscape contractor who installs the actual landscape. C. A nursery. D. The owner. NOTE: The name. address, telephone number, along with signature of the person(s) who do the design chall be on the plans. Registered landscape architects and licensed landscape contractors shall include their registration numbers andJor license numbers. 2. Plans shall be legibly drawn to scale on paper no smaller than l8" x 24" and no larger than 24" x 36". 3. Plans shall show location of tha property by vicinity map and nearest crass streets and give the property address or assessor's parcel number. 4. Plans shall show location of existing and proposed utilities - above ground and underground. • 5. Plans shall show type of zoning, the scale. and northerly directional srrov. 6. Plans shall contain plant legends for all existing and proposed plant material. The legend shall be as fo]lo4s: 7. Plans ahs~ how exiting and proposed pla~ mterial drawn to - scale at !r mature size. 8• Plans shall contain landscape speci!lcatlona snd details. 9• Plane shell 6}104 all required landscape areas protected from parking areas with concrete curbing. 10. Plans shall show the name, address, and telephone number of property owner or developer. C. IRRIGATION PLA7tS 1. A1] required"lendsceping she]] be provided with an automatic irrigation cystem. 2. Plsns shall be submitted with. attached to. and the same size as ]andccape plans. 3. Plans shall address conservation of v.ter and energy. A. Components - low gallonage and low preeipltetion heads, drip systems and other sub-surface techniques, min! jet heads. moisture sensing devices. controllers with ability of variable programming. 8. Efficiency - velocity shall be close as possible to S feet per second. Plant material with different eater requirements shall be on separate valves. Slopes shall be on separate valves.. System design shall eliminate costly. wasteful, overthrow and runoff. 4. Plans shall show: A. Static P.S.I. 8. Service Main - type. size and length. C. Aster Meter -location and size. ' D. Approved Baekflow Prevention Device - location and size. E. All locations of pipe, valves and heads. (includes emmitteza, etc.) S. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with efficient and vstes conserving irrigation systems. NOTE: Actual eater application rates shall be applied. as soil absorption rates dictate. Over watering shall be avoided. 6. All sprinklers shall be installed with approved swing joints. 7. All above ground sprinklers shall be the pop up type, installed flushed with the soil. Exposed sprinklers on risers above ground are acceptable in limited areas with "bubbler" type sprirtkleza and do not border sidewalks. walkways. or areas subject to pedestrian traffic. 8. Separate eater meter for landscape irrigation !s optional at owners request and expense. NOTE: O~~ner must notify the Water Department. 4. Plans shall contain installation specifications and details. 10. Plans shall contain irrigation ]eAends as follows: EQOIPMEti7 ymSol Manufacturer 1:odc] P ascription Nozzle Radiu>< GPM PS7~ . ~ ~ 1 PIPE ~ , !ze Type Clase Schedule Note: Pipe sizing, (size) shall also be shovn at each section of pipe, (mains and laterals). VALVE CHART Valve Velve Sise GYM. /1 yy" 43 /Z lii" ZJ ETC. ETC. ETC. Total / Va]vef Total GPH A•ote: All valves shall be numbered. FRTCTIOK (PSI LOSS) " " hater Metes _ PSI Backflov Device PSI Elevation Changes ^ PSI Pipe PSI Valves. Fittings, Hiscelianeous _ PSI Totsl PSI Loss PSI Original PSI (static) PSI Less Totsl PSI Loss _ PSl Equals • MSn1aWm to Farthest ND PSI III. LAt`'DSCAPE AREAS A. HAIh•TEFAtaCE OF LANDSCAPED AREAS The vainttnance of landscaped areas and graded slopes shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer io individual o~~nership. B. PLA'~iER AREAS A71 required landscaping shall be protected by an enclosed concrete curbing. • C. INTERIOR 6ITE Pp TINC AREAS Interior planting shall be required and trainteln'cd equal to at Icast 10 percent of the open surfaced parking area exceuding the area of landscaping strip required in the front yard ertbaek Brea and shall include at least one tree for every five spaces or major fraction thereof. Measurements shall be computed from the inside or perimeter walls or setback lines. D. 1RRICATION All required landscaping shall De provided with automatic sprinkler facilities which shall be maintained in an operative condition. Utilize only reduced pressure (rp) devisee or double check valve asseably. i~o atmospheric va:cuur.. LrrakErc sre pcrr..ftted. E. SETBACK AREAS A21 required aetbseks abutting a public right-of-way shell be land- scaped (except for walks and driveways which bJsect or encroach opon the required landscape area). The required setbacks shall be land- scaped with trees, shrubs, and groundcover. Landscaped earth berms shall be erected and maintained within the setback along the above indicated property line. Bermed areas shall have a aiaxtmum of 3:1 slope and be planted with a tall fescue type turf grass, or other approved Iandscaping.. F. GROUND COVER AA'D BEDDING MATERIAL Gravel and decorative sock are not appropriate materials to be used as ground cover or bedding material and will be considered hardscape. G. SLOPES 1. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, surfaces of all cut alapes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by land- scaping. Slopes exceeding IS feet in vertical height shall also be landscaped with shrubs. spaced at not to exceed twenty (20) feet on cetners; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. Plant material selected and planting method used shall be suitable for the soil and climsiie conditions of the lice. Public Works/Engineerin}; will also approve these. 2. Plant sizes shall be as follows: A. Trees 20h - 24" box 60:c - IS gallon 20~G - S gallon B. Shrubs 202 - 5 gallon 80% - I F::limn C. Croundeover 100< - co~•erage when mature or IZ" o.c. ' 9. The teeinte~e of graded slopes •nd landc~:d srese shall be ' the reepons ilicy of the developer until transfer to lndividvsl o.~ncral,lp. 4. All gradlnp. and dralnaFe facilities, including erosion control planting of graded a]opes, stia]] be done fn accordance with e grading plan approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. H. EROSION CONTROL All grading and drainage faci]lties, including eroefon control planting of graded alopee, shall be done in accordance with • grading plan approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. 1. M`EED COI:TROL Pre-emergence control, post-emergence control and cultural cantsol of needs shall be addressed !n the landscape specifications. IV, PLANT YJ.TERIALS A. CLIHATJC CONDITIONS AND PLANT LISTS Due to the hot and dry climate of San Bernardino, drought and hest tolerant material rosy' be used upon prior approval. 8. STREET TREES Street trees shall be required. Tree varieties end exact locstion sill be dttermined by the Director of the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department or h1e/her designee. lfi a Parks. Rec- reation and Community Services Department she]1 mark locations and inspect plant material on cite, prior to planting. 'Sidewalks, curb and gutter, meet be clean of debris prior to marking. A 24 hour notice is required for inspection. (see attached specifications for Street Tree planting and Siseet Tree list). Ttte size of the Street frees shall be: All 24 inch box specimens. The 24 inch box trees shall be planted as street trees within the public parkway or City property. C. PLANT MATERIAL Landscaped areas shall have plant materia] se)ected and planting methods used which are suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site. Sizes of the plant materials shall conform to the fol]oxing mix: Trees 20;. T4" box; SOi, 15 ga]lon; 301, S gallon Shrubs 2(.i, 5 gallon; 60:. 1 @a]]or. Groundcovcr 100:, coversgE © V. INSPECTION O A. 1RRlCAT10t~ SYSTE?; 1. InepectlonF shall be yerformc•d by a Park and Recreation Department representative at the folloving: A. Pressure test of irrigation tnaln line (ISO PSU for 2 hours) 8. Coverage test and final acceptance. Z. Do not alloy or cause the above items to be covered up, until it has been inspected and approved by s Park Department representative. A ya hour notice shall be given prier to anticipated inspections. B. ].A':DSLAPIR.'• 1, Inspections shall be performed by a Park and Recreation Department representative at the folloving: A. Upon cor~letion o! finis},ed grade, soil preparation and final raF:e out. B. 6fien trees end shrubs are spotted for planting, with one example of planting hole for trees and one for shrubs. C. Final inspection when planting and all other specified work has been completed. 2. A y8 hour notice shall be given prior to anticipated inspections. VI. OTFIER REQUIRI?D:NTS A. Notify Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department of cotomence- ment of landscaping. Cive anticipated time line (start to finish). 8. All landscaping. irrigation and street trees shall be installed and maintained 1n accordance with City of San Bernardino Municipal Codes, ordinances end standard requirements. C. Ttaterial requirement for all plant material shall be number one (1) grade of the California Nursery Industry Certificate as issued by the Agricultural Commissioner of the County of origin. D. A11 landscape material, irrigation equipment, irrigation eomponente and workmanship shall be guaranteed for a period of not less than one (l) year from date of final approval by the Director of Parks. Recreatior. and Cam-unity Services or his/her designee. The conditions of the guarantee will be to insure, but not limited to all plant material being 1n hes]thy condition and free from abnormal conditions which may have occurred during or after planting, such as defoliation or structure dicback. E. ASSESSl:LS7 DISTRICTS CO:;::1'7 7idL CI T}' )•i.!;1;5, AICF:F_4T70:; A\;~ CO:~::i::77Y SL'nY1CE5 DET'i:ki?:L!:7 FOK eer:~••:..? a tr~r ,...e /,~ ,r. ,.• .r•••••-e P. 7] 7F.. S LA..:,. F. 7F. .i.•~.. ALl., O?}:.F 77L5:~ 0'; A«C'c- ~, pn~acs, ~Tlori nrID oorr~cr~rrx sERVIC~s ~ ~ pR~~ nac nrw zRRlc~zaa - AS~S9"ffSTT DISTRICTS J74N[A~Ia[, 1988 • AssFSS~xr ~sxxicrs - 1z~2c~Tiav ~ u~rmecr~ ocr~+aurns 1RRx~nTiari 1. Separate water meter for the irrigation shall be required. 2. Separate electric meter for the irrigation oontrollers shall be required. 3. Valoon~I M.P.C. controllers, with water miser feature, shall be used. Said oantrollers shall be enclosed in a "La Max" enclosure from the Valcon Ccnpany. 4. "Rain Gluard" units fmm the Hydro Vicar Ctst~any shall be installed at each oantroller. 5. Valeon Hi-Flow series, renote control valves, in angle pattern shall be used. ' 6. All irrigation sprinklers in planter areas and small turf areas shall be Rain Bird 1800 series with M.P.R., 8-12 rnzzles (Q-H-F). 7. All irrigation sprinklers in medium areas shall be Toro, Super 700 C. 8. All irrigation sprinklers in large turf areas shall be Thasq~son heads with rubber owers. 9. All sprinklers used shall be "pgrup" type. 10. All irrigation sprinklers shall be on triple swing joints. 12. All pipe 2" and larger shall be class 315 P.V.C., all pipe 1~" and smaller shall be P.V.C. ado. 40. 12. Rain Bird 3/4" quids ooup2er valves shall be installed every 100' in m~uXi plastic valve boxes. LANDSCAPE 1. Specific infornation ~ street trees and plant material will depend on project location. Contact City Parks Division for fzu-tYrs infogation. 2. Minino?n plant sizes shall be as follows: Trees: A. Open recreation areas - 24" boot H. Street trees -All 24" box Shrubs: A. Even oonbination of 15 gallon and 5 gallon sizes TUrfgrass: A. Setback areas shall be sod B. Open recreation areas shall be hydroseede3 1 ' • ~ : A. intent shall be total wverage at maturity NOME: Intent and purpose of said plant sizes are to ornQlete a dense and mature appearing landscape. 3. A complete soil test with reco:mierdations shall be required. Sample results and reonmie:dations shall be on the landscape plans and shall be adhered to. 1luyee (3) copies of said sample zeports shall be pzwided with the final la:dscape plans. 4. Setback areas shall be bern~ed :»t to exceed 3:I slope. Said beaming shall be oontituious in shape and fozm. 5. Planter areas shall be a minimm of four feet (4') wide. 6. Concrete curbing shall enclose all planter areas. ' 7. 6" wrxxete mowstrips shall separate all turf areas fran shrub areas. 8. 6" concrete m~wstrips shall separate assessment district fzrsn private latdscapi~. OiIFTER 1. Zttie follaving infcJanation shall be listed in the sheet index and shall be referenced in the plans on a separate sheet. A. City of San Hernardfm irrigation section for Assessment Districts. B. City of San Bernardino Assessment Districts Maintenance Period. ' _ DISTStICPS - l411r17QDiNl~ ~tI~ MAII~1SI111A1(Z; All areas landscaped by the oontracbor wider this project shall be maintained by him for a period of not less than one (1) year fran the date of written acceptance for start of maintenance, (365 days). A. Start of Maintenance~Period 1. Maintenance period shall not start until all elements of the project are completed in acoosdanoe with the contract docu~?ts. Projects will not be seg<mnted into phases. 2. Power to remote controllers shall be established priar to the beginning of the maintenance period. 3. Rhe maintenance period for the job shall not begin unrtil after the ~ first mowing of the turf area. New turf shall not be nriwed until attaininxJ a mi.niman height of lit inches. Mow at l~s inch height using a rotary mower equipped with a properly a~++'~~ blade. Notify the Parks Division representative 24 hours prior to this mewing, who will make an inspection. 4. Written aoceptatroe of the landscape architect and the City mast be ~ obtained prior to the beginning of the maintenance period. Sair] letters shall be given to the Parks Division and shall be on file. 5. If the project maintenanne fails to oontimrnnsly meet standards required for start of maintenance, the maintenance period will be suspended and will not oonrtirnue until contractor has corrected all deficiencies. 6. Contractor shall post a bond ar cash fn the amount agreed upon with the t?~gineering Division/Subdivisions. Said monies are to guarantee the repair ar replaaanent of any deficiencies in the irrigation, la~scape a~ hard surfaces at the end of the one (1) year (365 days) mianrtenanoe period. 7. Contractar shall sutsnit ou?gleted as-built drawings which shall be in the form of one (1) mylar reproducible and two (Z) blue Line copies. Actual sulanittal shall be made tv the City's representative. Said drawings shall enoaipass all irrigatice, landscape and hard surfaces. 8. Parks Division r~resentative shall be the sole deciding party, regarding all acceptance items, for start of maintenance period. B. During Maintenance Period 1. Contractor a~/or designee shall contact City's representative an the first Monday of each month during the one (1) year (365 days) maintenarae period. Contact shall be by telephone or other means if pre-arranged. Purpose of contact is to review the status of the , . project. (rnni~enanoe district portions only It shall also be the responsibility of the ootit~actor and/or designee tv leave a business address and telephone numiber with the City's representative. 2. During the maintenance period provide all weterfrg, ~9, fertiliz- ing, cultivating and spraying necessary to keep the plants and turf in a healthy qx'~'~J condition aid to keec the planted areas neat, edged and attractive. All trees and shrubs shall be pinched aid pruned as necessary to encourage new growth and to eliminate rank sucker givwth. "Old wilted flowers and dead foliage shall be immediately pinc3:ed or cut off. Du no majar tree pruning without Proper approval of the City. 3. After planting aryl during the ~ period, in the event that trees exhibit iron c3:lomsis synQtaas, apply FE 138 Geigy or equivalent at manufacturer's reoomnPlded rates. 4. During the maintenance period, should the appearance of any Plant ~ indicate weakness, that plant shall be replaced immediately with a new healthy plant. At the end of the maintenance period, all plant materials shall be in a healthYr 4~xJ oonditi~s and spaced as indicated ~ the plans. 5. Lawns shall be rotary mowed at a l~s inc3i cut, mininam weekly. ~imnirg and edging shall be done in 'Srow" days. 6. Damage to planting areas shall be repaired immediately and Uiroughout the maintenance period. 7. Arty planting areas that do not show a prompt establishment of plant material shall be replanted at 10-day intervals until accepted by the City's representative. 8. Miscellaneous Maintenance Items: A. Depressions caused by vehicles, birycles or foot traffic shall be filled and leveled. Replant detnaged areas. B. FScterniinate gophers, squirrels and moles, and repair damage as above. C. ~e postplant fertilizing will a~nsist primarily of a nitrogen wily fertilizer program. Beginning approximately 30 days after planting, amaornium sulfate shall be applied at the rate a~f 5 pounds per 1,000 square feet on a monthly basis, D. Irrigation shall wnsidere soil, exposure, day and night tempera- tures and sprinkler output. Cansecvation of water is a must. 9. Debris and trash shall be removed from the site weekly at a minirntsm. 10. 4hroughout the maintenance period, all plants shall be maintained in a disease and pest free condition. A licensed pest control operator shall be zeatined by the orntractvr to apply all pesticides. Pesticide reoommerdations shall be made by a licensed pest control advisor. .C. Hid of Nainterancir Q 1. On ornpletion of the one (1) year (365 days) maintenar?oe period the City's representative will inspect the project. Notify the City's representative 24 hours prior to said inspection. The contractor and/or designee shall be present during inspection. 2. Confitnatian that the City has received all submittals a~ turn- over itea shall be Wade. 3. Deficiencies noted during the inspection shall extend the maintenance period until all are corrected. 4. Cfty's representative shall be the sole deciding party regarding all erd of mainteranoe items. 5. Ehd of maintenac?oe period shall occur only an written aooeptanoe by the City. Said letter shall be on file in the Parks, Recreation , and Crnmulity Services Department. 6. ~e Parks Division sha12 notify the nngineerirg Department/Subdivision in writing of said acceptance of project for bow/cash release. • © City of San Bernardino Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department Residential Retuirements Front Yard Package 71. Irritation Svatem: (Per Front Yard) - 1~utomatic Irrigation Controller (unit must be able to have enough stations for future hook up of possible back yard irrigation). - Electric Valves with anti-siphon devices - Pop-Up Type Irrigation Heads (Turf and Shrub areas) B. Landscape s (Per Front Yazd) - 1-15 gallon tree (double-staked - 4 cinch ties or 4 wonder ties). C. Turf (no more than 75t of area) - drought tolerant type species. Sod or•hydro-seeded. D. Shrub and Planter l?rea (not leas than Z5t of area) - 70t - 1 gallon shrubs - 30t - 5 gallon shrubs • Groundcover in planter area under shrubs - 1001 coverage when mature or 8" o,c. • NOTE: Shrubs not to exceed more than 5 feet apart. E. PolvethYlene Bed Divider or Concrete flow Strip to separate aii turf and planter areas. Type of materials allowed: 6" concrete mowstrips, concrete curbmaker, Black Diamond (or equal)/polyethylene bed divider. Attachment "E" '~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Initial Study for Environmental Impacts for TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14352 PROJECT DESCRIPTION and LOCATION To construct 69 single family residential lots on a 25.9 acre site which is located at the northeast corner of Palm Avenue and Verdemont Drive in the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation. April 15, 1991 Prepared for: Mr. & Mrs. Donald Huber 4671 Webb Canyon Road Claremont, CA 91711 Prepared by: Patti Nahill Associate Planner City of San Bernardino Planning and Building Services Department 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 ap1Yim°w "' °O PlNHD7 PAGE t OF 1 (H0) CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING,AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND applieadonWumb.r T~A'f~IUE TPfAC.r NO• I~352 Project Descriptbn: ~ ~t.~DrV I DE 25 ~ 9 g~ rlVi'f~ ~ ~"a Location: NC)RTH~asT' CORIJ~ OF ~~M At/ENI,I.F r~bVD 11EFiDESAG'NT• DRIB/F_ EmritonmrnmtConatrairNSanas:Al.f3U1ST-'~>?1GLDf+ItCaH WIN17F~~OLOC~IC~I_. ' - OV - EtP~N~E~ zc~ ttBu HI(~{} fiP.tr, AW:~iAEOW~+icral_ i' iA~ AREA General Plan Dagnation: f~ I.._ Fir~l DEJ~IT1A L rat ~ 1 Zoning Desgnatbn: 8. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain ansarors, whero appropriate, on a separate attached sheet 1. Earth Retourees WIN the proposal rosuR in: Yes No Maybe a EaRh movement (cut andor tip) of 10,000 cubic yards or moro? b. Davalopmerp and/or gradhg cn a sbPe groaror ~ than 15% natural grade? c. Devebpment within the Alquip-Priob Special Studies Zone as defined in Section 12.0 - Geobgb 6 Seamb, Fguro 47, of the City's Gemral Plan? k d. Modification ar any unigw geobgb or physical ~ featuro? e. Dewbpment within area defined for high potential for water or wiW erosion as identHied in Section 12.0 - Geobgb a Seismb, Fguro 53, of the City's General Plan? Modifkrotion of a channel. creek or river? vraa~sa rrtaE,oF_ tn.rol -.rr rrrrrr~~rr _ g. powbpmoM within an aroa subjoet to bndslides, Yes No Maybe mudetldes, Iquefaclbn or othv aimNer hoards as iderttlfbd in Sodion 12.0 - Geobgb 6 Seismic, Fquros 48, 52 and 53 of the Cty's General Plan? x h. Other? X 2 Alr Ruourpa: WIII the proposal rosuh in: a. SubstaMW ah emissbns or an effect upon emblem air quality as defined by AOMD7 b. The croation of objectionable odors? a pevebpmeM within a hgh wind hazard aroa as identified in Sedbn 15.0 - Wbd 3 Fin, Fguro 59, of the City's X General Plan? 3. Wabr Reaouraa: wu the proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rote end amount d surface ronoN due to impormeabb surlacea? b. Changes b the course or lbw of f bed waUrs? c. Discharge into sudace watero or arty alteration of surface water quality? _ d. Champ in the quantity of quality of ground water? e. Exposuro of poopb or property to food hazards as identified in ttw Federal Emergency Management Agora~r's Food Insyranco • Map, Community Panel Number 060281 b • ~ and Soclbn 16.0 - Fboding, Figuro B2, of the City's Gernrol Plan? f. Otfwr7 4. Bbbglal posourees: Coda the proposal result in: a. f>ovebpmeM within the Bbbgbal Resources Managemera Overlay. as ideMM'rod b SeGbn 10.0 - Natural Reaouroes, Figuro 41, of the City's ~/ General Plan? /~ b. Change b the number of any unique, roro or endvgerod epedos of pbMS or their habitat indudirg startda of trees? o. Charge in tM number of any unigw, ran or endargerod species of animab or their habitat? d. Removal of viable, melon trees? (B' or groater) e. OtMr? 5. Nobs: Could the proposal rpuR in: a. DevebpmeM of howling. heakh eve facifdies, schools, Ibrories, rolgiow facNilia w otlter'nobe' wnekive uses b uses when existing or talon robe bwb exued vt Ldn of 85 d8(A) exbrbr and an Ldn d 45 d8(A) interior as identlfwd in See0on 14.0 - Nobe, Figuros /4~ and 14-13 of the City's General Pbn7 ,. ,7.7,E vuwan rsosxov_ a++A b. Devebpment of new or expansion of existing industrial, Yas No Maybe commensal or other uws which generate noise levels on areas oontedrirrg housirp, scltooM, hwkh taro facilkies or otMr sensitive uses above an Ldn of ti5 d8(A) exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interiori' c. OIIwr1 6. Land We: wk the proposal rosuk in: a. A change in the land uw as desgnated on the General Plan? b. DevalopnNnt within an Airport District as identkied in the Air Instakakort Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) Fiepon and the Land Ua Zoning District Map? X e. Development wkhin Foothik Fin Zones A R B, or C as identkied on tlro Land Use Zoning District Map? d. aher? ~ 7. Wn-Alade Harards: wll the project: a. Use, storo, trortsport or dispose d hazardous or toxic materials (indudirg but not limked to oil, pesticides, dwmicale or radiation)? b. MveNe the rolease of hazardous substances? k a Expose people to the potential heakhhafety hazards? ~' d. OtMr7 ~E111L1S CAAX/GN) ~/~ B. Housing: wll the proposal: a. Remove existhrg housing or croaU a demand ,/ for add'aional housing? b. OtMr7 g. Transportation / Ckwhtbrt: Could tlro proposal, in eomparieon with the Ciroulakon Plan as identiked in Section 6.0 - Ciroulatgn of the City's General Plan, resuk in: a. An Inaaase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the GenerN Plan? b. Uw of existing, or demand for new, parking fackkies/swduros? ~, c. bnpact upon exaaing public trartsportatgn systems? d. Akeration of present pakems of drouWan? a. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Inerewd safety hazards to vehicles, bigdiats or v pedestrians? /l g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? h. Signkicard increase in traNic volumes on the roadways or irderoeckons? i. ah.rr f:.&i~S~SR niw4.as awaFSaF_ n+.sq 10. Publk: Ssrvloss: tKli the proposal impact the folbwing Yas No Maybe beyond the capabilty to provide adequate levels d service? a. Fro protedan? X b. Police protection? a Schcols (i.e., attendance. boundaries, overbad, etc.)? x. d. Parks or other recroatbnsl tacilkies? a. Medical aid? f. Solid Waste? ~- g. Otter? ~1L~STFt (1rLN TRAI t-- ,,. Ut111tNs: wk the proposal: a. knpsct the tolbwing beyond the capability to provide adequate Iweb d wrvice or requiro the constnktion d newfadlkiea? 1. Natural gas? X 2. Ebctrieily? ~ 3. WaterT 4. Sewer? 5. OtMr7 b. R.suk in a disjointed patlem d utility extensions? ~ a Require the construction d new facilities? 12 Assthetlcs: a. Could the proposal nsuk in the obstructbn d any auenb VIeW? b. Wile the viwai impact d the propct be detrimental to the surroundirp area? c. Other? 13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal resuk in: a. The akeratbn or destruclbn d a prehistoric or historic arduswbgieal eke by dewbpmenl within an arohaeologieal aensitiw area ss identified in Section 3.0 -Historical. Figuro 8, d the Cky's General Plan? b. Akeration or destruction d a harorical site, strocturo or d>jeet as lisbd in the Cky's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? X a Other? P~.oF_ ,~,.«~ 14. AMndatory FNtdings of SlgnHband (Section 15065) The Calibmia Environmental quality Act states that A any of the folbwing can be answered yes or maybe, the project may haw a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Yes No Mayba a. Dds tM project haw the pdemiel to dprade the qualty d the emironmeM, substantiaNy reduce the habitat d a tbh or wNdlNe species, cause a fish or wildNfe popufkion u dmp bebw seN sustaining levels, threaten to eNminete a plant or animal mmmuniry, redtrd tM number or restda the renpe d a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminau important exampNs d tM major periods d CaBfomia history or prohistory4 b. Does the project haw the pdemW to achieve short- urm, >o the disadvantage d bng-urm, environmental goakT (A shorlurm impact on the emironmeM is one which azure in a reletiwy brief, definitive period d time whtle bng-term impacts will endure well into the future.) c. Does t1w project have impacts which are individualy IimRed, but cumulafiwy oonsiderable7 (A projeG may impact on two or more separate rosourds where the impact on each resound it relafiwly small, but where - the effect d the total d those hnpacts an the ernironmem is sgnifieant.) d. Does the project have ernironmenui effects which will quae substantial adwrw effects on human beings, v eitMr directly or indirectly? ~C C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUA71ON AND MIT1GA71tN1 MEASURES (Attach sheen as nedsaary.) n,~w.sm vwaEaoc, rnaoJ 0 0 C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES 1. SARTB BSSOURCS3 a. Preliminary calculations for Tentative Tract No. 14352, indicate that approximately 88,552 cubic yards of cut and approximately 73,183 cubic yards of fill will be necessary for this project. The applicant expects to import approximately 4,025 cubic yards to achieve a balance on site. If the excess fill material is imported to the site, the following measures shall be applicable: * All slopes shall be 2:1 finished grade * A truck hauling route shall be filed with and approved by the City Public Services Department. * Schedule of dates and times of export shall be approved by the City Public Services Department. * Compliance with City Codes in regards to dust control and noise attenuation shall be required. c. The northeastern portion of Tentative Tract No. 14352 is located within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. A geotechnical study prepared for the proposed project by Gary S. Rasmussen 8 Associates, Inc. in January, 1990. The report included the following recommendations: * A minimum setback of 50 feet, plus a 5 degree variance for human occupancy structures from the northern end of the subsurface fault investigation trench as identified on their Enclosure 4 in said report shall be established. The Alquist-Priolo Special Study restricted use zone shall be shown on the final grading plans and on a Composite Development Plan filed with the Final Map. * A Richter magnitude 7.5 earthquake is expected ~ along the San Andreas fault, which is located approximately 400 feet northeast of the site; therefore, human occupancy structures should be designed accordingly. * Positive drainage of the site should be provided, and runoff should not be allowed to flow over natural, cut or fill slopes in such a way as to cause erosion. * The final grading plane for the site should be reviewed and approved by an engineering geologist prior to any grading. f. The project site is adjacent to the Bailey Creek. Although, the developer's proposal does not indicate that it will encroach within the limits of the Bailey Creek, the developer shall exercise caution during the grading of the home sites and the equestrian trail to avoid impacting the natural resources located within the creek's boundaries. The developer shall coordinate the development of the site and its potential impacts to the Bailey Storm Drain Project with Public Works. . a 0 2. AIR RESOURCES c. The site is located in a high wind hazard area, Standard Requirements and Conditions of Approval from the Planning and Building Services Department pertaining to building exposure and orientation, and building roof construction using 110 MPH winds shall serve to reduce potential wind impacts to a level of insignificance. 3. RATER RESOURCES a. The nature of the project, i.e. grading, construction of homes, streets and driveways, may result in some environmental impacts relating to absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff due to the loss of permeable surfaces. This surface runoff will be directed into appropriate public drainage facilities. 8ngineerinq Department Standard Requirements will reduce these potential impacts. e. The San Bernardino County Flood Control District has identified the eastern portion of the site to be adjacent to a natural drainage course outlettinq flows from Bailey Canyon. The natural drainage course is not adequate to contain the total flows from the canyon, and in the event of a major storm, overflow can be expected. The Flood Insurance Administration mapping for the area shows that a portion of the site lying within and adjacent to the natural drainage course ae Zone "A", subject to 100 year overflow. Therefore, in their opinion, portions of the site are subject to infrequent flood hazards due to overflow, erosion, and debris deposition from Bailey Canyon in the event of a major storm. Portions of the site may be subject to excessive street flows and accumulated drainage from the north. Further studies of the project will be necessary prior to development with respect to local and on-site drainage conditions. 4. BIOLOGICAL BESOURCES a. The site is located in the Biological Resources Management Overlay. A Biological Survey was prepared for the site by Joe Gorman PhD Associates dated January 15, 1990. The report concluded that no threatened, endangered, or sensitive species of wildlife or vegetation were found and that none were thought to be present on the subject property. 5. 11OISE a. Construction of the proposed project will temporarily increase noise levels in the project area. In consideration of nearby residential development, construction shall be limited to weekdays between 7:00 AM and 10:00 PM. This shall serve to reduce potential noise impacts to a level of insignificance. © 4 . 6. LAND USE c. The project site is located within Greenbelt Zone "B" as identified in the Verdemont Area Plan, page 138 and as identified in the City's General Plan. Project layout and design along with Conditions of Approval shall ensure compliance with the Foothills Community Protective Greenbelt Program and the high fire hazard zone standards to reduce the potential impacts to a level of insignificance. 7. MAN MADE HAZARDS d. The Devil's Canyon Second afterbay project is located to the east of the subject property and will utilize Verdemont Drive to access their site. The increase in truck traffic along Verdemont Drive during the construction of the second afterbay is expected to be short-term. The developer of this tract shall notify the purchaser at the time of purchase agreement and at the close of escrow of the afterbay project. 9. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION c. Tentative Tract No. 14352 proposes to utilize Palm Avenue as its primary access. Palm Avenue is classified as a secondary arterial from its junction with Interstate 215 north to Ohio Avenue. It become6 a local continuous road north of Ohio Avenue to the site as identified in the Verdemont Area Plan, page 126. Secondary access will be from Verdemont Drive which is classified as a local continuous street. The project as proposed will not alter the present pattern of circulation instead it will provide improvements to benefit the entire surrounding area. h. Upon review, the City's Traffic Engineer has determined that the project does not meet the minimum criteria for a traffic impact study. The additional trips from the proposed project ~ are not sufficient to cause a significant impact. 10. PUBLIC SSRVICES q. The developer is proposing to establish a 12-foot equestrian trail lot along the boundary with the Bailey Creek. The trail will connect with the Chestnut Creek Trail and the proposed Muscupiabe-Rancho Line trail. Lot "A" will also include a staging area for horses at the northernmost tip of the subject property. 13. CULTURAL RHSOUCRSS a. The site lies within an archaeologically sensitive area. The San Bernardino County Museum Archaeological Information Center evaluated the proposed project Bite and determined that no cultural resources are known to exist within or adjacent to the project area and that the potential for the presence of cultural resources within the project area is low. No further studies were recommended. <i D. DETERMINA710N On the basis of this initial study, dThe proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARA- TION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a sgn'rfieant effect in this ease because the mltigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION•will be propared. The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Cft-~Y~OF SA/N/ BERNARDiNO, CALIFORNIA Name and Title S' Lure Date: _ '~" r5 - 9/ ~""°~" vuwaa vwaE_ov_ n+sot Attachment "F" l l;~i `ii ::iii s r iRi it . { \ ~_a~5~~ `.`i ~ .,, i ~ ! 1~ ~ ~ ';i t itn itt~ itts~ ±iti ~".~ !'i{ ,~. \~, 1.i iE~11 . i ~ ~ :1 ~ ~ ; t! :li( Lei c ~._/!' ~li.f . t,;s~~ ~ ~ i 1~ r"- ~ °~i~ !'~} iii iii ~i~i %~!~ +' p 1 i ~ 'E i 1 : Iii ~ t ~ i ; { . 4 -s?a?-? :Ny:y ss Stilil ilftN {tStii }a rt NeNf NNN ranra ,'• }I ss~s.? :asst- M?!!! a~ t r ~ , ~ ~C r iHlt! INSit IFNN 1r ii ~ ~ ~ i i ~ _ tYt~- ~ ~ ; runt Nwa uwr ys';~ f)/Nr t ~Y. '~ ¦i . ~ ~ t NN1t NNf! NNK {r ~ r -' - {r ~~s tlt ISlllj llUN ar - r _ ~ rr ~ r ! u ; •9 S . {r {.' ~' ' ~ s • m ~ r' a N S ~ i f 1 r ~ IS r {I_ S iY - { ;1 ~ I • ~ ~ d . • 1 1 r A 1~ !R -~ ?a _ : ~ ,._ q 4~ i d .4{ "" ',1 1! f--r;.q ~ ~ !(u~~ a0. i ; ~ { . -~ . / S ~ l~ i~ ~ a 1~ ! • / Y ! a-! n f ~- ° i i i t r ; fl ~, fi3 e ~ ! ~ ~4Q i Y' = ~ , / % ~ lee ~-~ . ~ y` ,/e ! has a i T. .,_- N ~ E• a Mh ~A . li , ; ,~,t e r - ~ ? ' J ! !fi !' j-' ~ ! r ~ Ar 1: -- ~t ~1 ~ . ..+=- Attachment "G" w ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM ~ CASE TT 14352 LOCATION HEARING DATE s-6-91 e 1 -- pFR RSV O,P C O SI :~:',::~•~: L' o -, r .~'~ ~ ~' . t ;, ~ 1 ~~, qV~ ~ ~ E~ s 1 C ~ ~ 3 Q / tti Ii it aw • ' ,• , . ? v PlA1FL77 PAfiE 1 OF 7 14Y01 o , ~- HYDROLOGY STUDY:' ( TENTATIVE TRACT 14352 IMPAGT UN VERDEMONT STORM-.DRAIN s F K. I Prepared by: I Bonadiman Engineers, Inc. 250 S. Lena Rd. P.O. Box 5852 San Bernardino, California 92412 (714) 885-3806 ' October 1991 I . ~ O O DISCUSSION ' s~' `s'-- I. PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to determine the impact that the '' construction of homes on Tentative Tract 14352 will have on the ' flow along the Verdemont Storm Drain in response to Monnig's request for reimbursement for storm drain oversize. II. BACKGROUND Sierra Engineering conducted studies to determine the size of the Verdemont Storm Drain assuming the tributary area would be developed wherever possible. Tract 14352 was included in this study. Sierra Engineering estimated the peak developed flow from Tentative Tract 14352 as 36.787 CFS and 51.746 CFS respectively for the two drainage sub-areas and, after confluence, the total run-off was 76.98 CFS. The study we accomplished was post-development and included in the Tentative Tract Map submittal. It identified a -, total flow of 90.4 CFS. III. FINDINGS '., To determine the impact of our development, we accomplished a baseline study of Tentative Tract 14352 prior to development. This nr~j. study was accomplished using the points, elevations and areas for . Tentative Tract 14352 that were included in Sierra Engineering's ',;, study. The only change that was made was to use "undeveloped, poor '°~ cover" rather than "residential 3-4 units/acre." This study _ identifies a pre-development flow of 82.898 CFS. Therefore, development of Tentative Tract 14352 increased the peak flow by 8$. _ This increased flow only raised the water surface level in the 54" pipe by .07 of a foot. Additional evaluations of the flow involved the hydraulics and _ water surface within the storm drain itself. Assuming that the development of the remaining tributary area increases the flow by 8$, the pre-developed flow is approximately 277 CFS. Based on the slope and normal pipe flow parameters, a minimum pipe of 50" would , have been required. It should also be noted that the maximum ;,_: capacity of a 42" pipe, as described in Sierra Engineering's report, is 184.3 CFS (40$ less than the developed flow). Additionally, Sierra Engineering did not provide any study to validate that a 42" pipe met the pre-development conditions. ID. CONCLUSION Development of Tentative Tract 14352 has an insignificant impact on the capacity of the Verdemont Storm Drain. In addition, a 54" pipe was required to support pre-development flows. No oversizinq was, in fact, provided since the 54" pipe also meets the post-develop- ment requirements. _ . A.f/~iibt~~.y are? I?w~yr~O P O N A D I M A N E N O I N F E R S, I N C. C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G C O N S U L T A N T S En4ineerine-Plannins-CIVILCADD Scftmare Support-Survevin4 250 SOUTH LFNA ROAD, SUITE A SAN PERNARDINO, CA 924018 '`~: :- «, PHONE (714) 885-38q~, - FAX (714? 3R1-1721 =~' Inside Diameter ( 54.00 in,? +r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ #_ - - .,..,...r,.. # Water ~ f e e e e ( 4(1.23 i n , ? , ( 3,353 ft.> ~ ~ ~ ~ ; #_ _ _ _ _ _ _ v_ Circular Channel Setticn s; ~ ~i _ s - F1 ewrate . . 303.000 CFS i'-~ ~ •~•'~~•'"• Velocity 23,P44 fps Diameter of Fipe,.......,.. 54.000 inches .Depth of Flow 40.231 inches Depth cf Flew 3.353 feet Y4' Critical J?epth ,,.....,.,.. 4,3g6 feet I~epthlDiameter (D/d) 0,745 Slope pf Pipe ,,,,,,,,,,,,, 2.900 X-Sectional Area ......,.,. 12.707 sa. ft. Wetted Perimeter ,,,,....,. 9,373 feet AR^(2/3) 15.566 Mannines 'n' 0,013 Min. Frio. Slope, 54 in. Pipe Flowine Full.,,.,.. 2,374 '1, pry ~,.,~ ~,~..,~~~•`.~;«~ ~ ~'~..,. ~.., ~~.., ~/f/ ~ X cry ~°'T7`"' / ~ 1 ~ ti CJ A O N A D I M A N F.. N O I N E E R S I N G. j ---------------^-----------°------------------ C I V I L. E N G I N E E R I N G C O N S U 1. T A N T S Fneineerine-Planning-CIVILCADD Software SuPPOrt-S~arvevinQ ?54 SO~tTH I.ENA ROAD, SUITE A SAN PERNARDINO, GA 9?448 ----------------------------------------------- PHONE (71.4) 885-3846 - FAX (714) 381-177.1 I Inside Diameter I ( 54.44 in.) ~ ~ I e # # #_ - .n.A 1. J.h h/.hhhhhhhl+hhhhhh n . +F Water # ; e I # # ( 39!44 in,) 3.233 ft.) I # # ~ ~ ; #._ _ _ _ - _ _ _ v_ I Cir•cul ar•-Gha.nnel-Section I Fl overate . . 195. 544 CFS f r~ ~v.~ji •,.s ~ Ve14G1tY 2'3.767 fps Diameter of PiPe,....,...,. 54.444 inches Depth of Flow 39.441 inches I 1"~ePth of Flow '3.2$3 feet Critical Depth .....,., 4,375 feet Depth/Diameter (D/d) 4.7'34 I 'Sl4Pe of Pipe :2.944 '; X-Gecti.onal Area 11.433 sq, ft. Wetted Perimeter ...,..,... 9,714 feet I AR"(1/3) 15.184 Mannines 'n' 4,413 Min. Fric. S1nPe, 54 •in. Pipe Ftowins Full..,..., 2.253 I yz t~ ~ • ~Q Cys.~a. ~Y , f t ~' S .~' .._- ,':~. ; B 0 N A D I M A N E N G I N E F R S I N C, C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G C O N E l~ L T A N T S ' En4ineerina-Plannine-CIVI~_CA.DD Software SuPPOrt-SurverinQ ~' 250 SOUTH LFNA ROAD, SU1TE A SAN PFRNARDINQ, CA .4,408 ~' ----------------------------------------------- _ PHONE (714) 8c5-3804 - FAX (714) 351-17:71 `-'' ,`-`r. :~r Inside Diameter ( 42,00 in,> . a ~ # # ~ #_ - - - # Water # i `.' i # '><' i e e ( 39.36 in.) ( 3.280 ft.l a s ~ a ~.------- v- Circular Channel Section Flowr•ate 184.302 CFS VelOC1tY 19,673 fPS Diameter of PiPe........,.. 42.000 inches `.- Depth of Flow 39.358 inches Depth of Flow 3.280 felt Critir,31 Depth 3.446 feet IP@Pth/Diam@ter• (D/d) ,,... (1.937 Slope of Pi Pe 2.900 X-Sectional Area 9,368 s9. ft. Wetted Perimeter 9.221 feet AR^(2/31 9.468 Mannines 'n' .,. 0.013 Min. Fric. SlePe, 42.~•in. P1Pe Flowing Full......, 3.356 '1, i• San Bernardina Caunty Ratianal Hvdralaev Prasram I (Hvdrolaey Manual hate - AuQ~.~st 1986) I CIVILCADDICIVILDESION EneineerinQ Software, (c) 1990 Version 2,3 ; --------Ratianal Hvdraloev Study -------Date: 14/]0/9]. ----------------- ------------------------------ HURBER TRACT14352 r_.ITY OF SAN BFRNARDINO PRE hEVEI.OPF..MENT STUDY FILE HUIJNDE 177,1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ~~~~#~### Hvdraiasv Stud•r Contral Information #**~a~aaw~ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _ Ratianal hrdrolaav st~idv storm event near is 144,0 Computed rainfall intensity: 'storm near = 144.44 ] hour rainfall P = 1,644(In.) $IOPe used far rainfall intensity curve b = 0.6440 Sail antecedent maistur•e candition (AMC) = 3 i ' Process Pram Paint/Station 11.440 to Point/Statian 12.444 #~#~ INITT.AL AREA EVALUATION #~## UNDEVFL4PE0 (Paar cover) subarea Decimal fractian soil 4rauP A = 0,044 Decimal fraction sail 4rauP B = 1.040 Decimal fractian sail erauP C = 4.444 Decimal fractian sail eravP D = 4,444 SCS curve number far• sail(AMC 2) = 7$.40 AdJusted SCS curve number far .AMC 3 = ?2,84 Perviaus ratio(AP> = 1.4440 Max lass rate(Fm)= 0..t40(In/Hr> Initial subarea data: Initial area flaw distance = 1140.440(Ft.) TaP (af initial area) elevatian = %'4R0,400(Ft,) k~attom (af initial area.) elevatian = 1935,444(Ft.) Difference in elevatian = 145.044(Ft,) SlaPe = 4.1318.? s{%)= 13.iR TC = 1:(4.53.5)#L(lenQth^3 )./(elevatian change))^4,2 Initial area. time of concentration = 12.963 min, Rainfall intensity = 4.4121In/Hr) far a 100,0 year storm Effective runoff coefficient used far area. l~?=K,CIA) is C = 0,869 Subarea runaff = 32,549(CFS) Tata.l initial stream area = 9.340(Ac.) Perviaus area fraction = 1.404 Initial area Fm value = 4,140<In/Hr) Pracpss from Paint/Statin_n 12.044 to Point/Sta.ti.an 15.000 •a•+~•+:•a IMPROVED CHANNEL TRAVEL TiMF #s#e Upstream Paint elevatian = 1:~95.00(Ft.) Downstream Paint elevatian = 0,04(Ft.) Channel len?th thru subarea = 740.04(Ft,) Channel base width = 14.004(Ft.) S1oPe ar 'Z' of left channel bank = 2,440 SiaPe ar '7' of r•i4ht channel bank = 2,444 Mannine's 'N' = 4,434 M~..__.._ J__il _r • _ ' Flaw(9) thru sub~a = 32.549(GFS) PePth of flow = 4,158(Ft.) ' Average Velpr_lty = 19„949(Ft/s) Channel flow top width = 14.633(Ft.> Flaw Velacity = 19.95(Ft/s) Travel time = 4.58 min. Time of cancentratian = 1?.55 min. Critical depth = 0.656(Ft,) Process Pram PaintlStatian 31,044 to PointlStatian 13.444 I ##~#-CONFLJ-IFNCE..OF-MINOR gTREAMg-+~#~#--°---°---•----------_.---._,_.__..--•--- Along Main Stream number: ] in normal stream number 1 Stream flaw area = 9,344(Ac.) Runoff from this stream = ,32.549(CFS> Time of canrentration = 13.SS min. Rainfall intensity = 3.947(In/Hr) Area averaged lass rate fFm> = 4.1444(In1Hr) Area averaged Per•viaus ratio (AP) = 1,4444 Process from Paint/Sta.tion 14.444 to Paint/Station 15.444 ~~## INITIAt_ AREA EVALUATION #### UNDEVELOPED (Poor saver) subarea -` Decimal fraction sail ProuP A = 4.444 Decimal fraction sail grauP I? = 1,444 Decimal fractian sail grauP C = 4,444 Decimal fractian soil grauP D 4,444 SCS curve number far soil(AMC = 75.44 AdJusted SCS curve number far AMC• 3 = 92.84 Pervious ratia(AP) = 1.4444 Ma.r lass ra.te(Fm)= 4.144(In/Hr> Initial subarea data.: Initial area flow distance = 1444.444(Ft.) ToP (of initial area) olevatian = 2444,444(Ft,) Bottom (af initial area.) olevatian = 2464,044(Ft,) Difference in elevation = 340,044(Ft,) Slope = 0.?2692 s(%)= 32,69 TG = k(0.525)#C(leneth^3)/(olevatian change)^4.2 Initial area t9.me of cunr_entratian = 14.574 min. Rainfall intensity = 4.535(Tn/Hr) far a 144.4 near storm Effective runoff coefficient used for area. (Gl=KCIA) is C = 0.87?. Subarea runoff = 15,074(CFS) ' Total initi.a.l stream area = 3.8.14(Ac.) Pervious area fractian = 1.444 Initial area Fm value = 4.14G(In/Hr) ' Pr'aCk55 from Paint/Station 15,444 to Paint/Station 16.444 #### IMPROVED CHANNF.t_ TRAVEL TIME #### Upstream Paint olevatian = 24F4,44(Ft.) ' Doo~nstroam Paint olevatian = - 7424.p0(Ft.) Channel length thru subarea 611.44(Ft.) Channel base width = 140.444(Ft.) ' Slope ar '7.' of left channel bank = 2.444 Slope or '7' of right channel bank = ?..444 ManninQ's 'N' = i~,4^a4 ' Flaw(q> thru subary = 15,070(GFS) Depth of flaw = 0.070(Ft.) Averase velacity = 2.150(Ft/s> Ghannel flaw tap width = 100.2R0(Ft.> Flaw Velacity = 2,15(Ft/s) Travel time = 4.74 min. Time of cancentration = 15.31 min, Critical depth = 0,0R4(Ft.> Process from Paint/Station 15.000 to PaintlStatian 1h.000 ##~# SUBAREA FLOW AD1?IT70N ~~## !INDEVELQPED (Paar cover) subarea Decimal fractian sail erauP A = 0.000 Decimal fractian soil erauP B = 1.000 Decimal fr•a.cti.an sail gr•a!~P C = 0.000 Aecimal fraction sail grauP D = 0.000 SCS curve number• far• sr.~i.l (AMC 2) = 70.00 AdJusted 8CS curve number far AMC ~ = 42,$0 Perviaus ra.ti.a(AP> = 1.0000 Max less rate(Fm>= 0.140(In/Hr) Time of cancentratian = .15.31 min, Rainfall intensity = '~.631(!n/Hr) far a 100.0 rear atarm Effective runaff caeffir_ient used far area,(tata) area roith madified rational methad)(t?=KCIA> is C = 0.865 Subarea runaff = 14.562(CFS) far 5.6201Ac,) Tatal runaff = 24.632(CFS) Tata1 area. = 4.43(Ac.) Area avera4ed Fm value = 0.140(Tn/Hr) Pracess Pram Paint/Statian 16,000 to Point/Statian 13,000 ##~~ IMPROVED CHANNEL. TRAVEL. TIME #### !1PStr•eam Paint elevatian = 2n?O,On(Ft.) Downstream Paint elevatian = 1430.0U(Ft,) Channel 1en4th thr•u subarea =948,00(Ft.) Channel pace iiiidth = 100.000(Ft,) filoPe ar 'Z' of left channel bank = 2,000 ~laPe ar 'Z' of rieht channel bank = 2.000 Mannine's •'N' = 0,034 Maximum depth of channel = 1.000(Ft,> F1aw(9> thru subarea. = 29.63?(CFS) Depth of flaw = 0,040(Ft,) Aver•ase velacity = 3.243(Ft/s> Ghannel flaw tap width = 100,35,9{Ft,) F1am Velacity = 3,24(Ft/s) Travel times = 5.05 min, Time of cancentra.tian = 20.36 mi.n. Critical depth = 0,134(Ft.> Pracess Pram Paint/Statian 16.000 to Point/Statian 13.000 #*## S!IBARFA FLOW ADDITION #~## UNDEVELOPED (Paar carer) subarea __.-----__._.- --__-- Decima.l fractian sail srauP A = 0,000 Decimal fractian sail erouP A = 1,000 J.?ccimal fractian sail er•euP C: = 0.000 Decimal fractian sail QrauP D 0,000 ' AdJusted SCS curv~umber for AMC 3 = 92.80 Pervious ratio(AP) = 1.0000 Max loss rate~m)= 0.140(7n/Hr) ' Time of tencentration = 20.34 min. Rainfall intensity = 3,060(In/Hr) for a 100.0 near storm Effective runoff coefficient used for area,(tetal area with modified rational method>(l?=KCIA) is C = 0.859 I Subarea runoff = 28.034(CFS) for 1?,510(Ac,) Total runoff = 57,666(CFS) Total area. _ ?.1.94(Ac.) Area avera4ed Fm value = 4.140(In/Hr) I I Process from PointlStation 1!.000 to PointlStation 13.000 #a~~ Ct1NFL.UENCE 4F MINQR STREAMS +~#~# Alone Main Stream number: 1 in normal stream number 2 I Stream flow area = 21.940(Ac.) Runoff from this stream = 57.666(CFS) Time of concentration = 24,36 min. I Rainfall intensity = 3,060(In/Hr) Area averaged loss rate (Fm) = 0.1440(In1Hr> Area avera.eed Pervious ratio (AP) = 1.0000 I Summary of stream data: Rtr•eart. Flow rate TC Rainfall Intensity No, (CFS) (min) (In/Hr) 1 32.549 13,55 3..947 I 2 57.666 24.36 3.Ob0 Omax(1) _ 1.000 # 7..000 # 32.549) + ' 1.290 # 0.666 a 57.666) + 82.057 ~lmax(2) _ 0.775 ~ 1.000 # 32.549) + 1.004 1.000 57.666) + = 82.898 ' Total of 2 streams to confluence: Flow rates before confluence Point: I 32.549 57.666 Maximum flow rates at confluence usins above data: 52.057 52.893 Area of streams before confluence: f 9.340 21.940 Effective area values after confluence: 23.942 31 . ?.80 ' Results of confluence: Total flow rate = 82.895(CFS) Time of concentration = 24.357 min. I Effective stream area after confluence = 31.280(Ac.) Study area avera4e Pervious fractienlAP) = 1,444 Stud•r area averase soil loss ra.te(Fm) = 4.140(In/Hr) Study area total (this main stream) = 31,25(Ac,) ' End of r_omPUtations, total study area = 37..?5 (Ac.> The followine fisures mar he used for• a unit hvdrosraPh study of the same area. ' Note: These fi4ures do not consider reduced effective area effects caused key confluences in the rational e9uatien. ' Area averaeed Pervious area fraction(AP) = 1,404 Area aver•a4ed SCS curve numher = 78.0