HomeMy WebLinkAbout35-City Manager CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUIog WA L
From: Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Subject: Resolution of the City of San
Manager Bernardino amending Resolution 96-188
and Resolution 2008-149 establishing
Dept: City Manager's Office certain fees for services furnished by the
City of San Bernardino.
Date: May 29, 2008
Meeting Date: June 2, 2008
a Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
May 19, 2008 - Mayor and Common Council set public hearing for June 2, 2008.
May 7, 2008 — Ways and Means Committee forwarded this item to the Mayor and
Common Council to set a public hearing.
May 5, 2008 —The Mayor and Common Council approved Resolution Number 2008-149,
Resolution establishing certain fees for services furnished by the City of San Bernardino,
amending Resolution Nos. 89-471 and 91-148, and repealing Resolution No. 2006-325.
Recommended motion:
That the public hearing be closed; that said resolution be adopted.
Signature
Contact person: Catherine Allison Phone: 384-5122
Supporting data attached: Reso, staff report, attachments Ward: All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Net additional revenue of appx. $184,200 in FY 08-09
Source: (Acct. No.) Various
(Acct. Description) General Fund
Finance:
Council Notes: �so 2008 -/77
f� P S
Agenda Item No. ✓�
STAFF REPORT
Subiect•
Resolution of the City of San Bernardino amending Resolution 96-188 and Resolution 2008-149
establishing certain fees for services furnished by the City of San Bernardino.
Background:
On April 21St, the Mayor and Common Council were presented an updated Master Fee Resolution. At
that time, the Council forwarded the entire item to the Ways and Means Committee. The Committee
removed certain items and referred the fee item back to the Council for consideration. On May 5t" the
Mayor and Council closed a public hearing and adopted Resolution 2008-147, adjusting many user
fees and establishing certain new fees.
On May 7t", staff provided the Ways and Means Committee with additional information on the
remaining items. Attachment A illustrates each of these with a side by side comparison of the current
fee amount, the originally proposed adjusted amount, and the new proposed amount. In addition, each
of these fees has a corresponding cost analysis worksheet justifying each fee increase (attached).
The Committee recommended that the following fees be forwarded for council approval:
• City Clerk's Office — Application Processing Fee for Business Registration: The
Committee has recommended lowering this fee from $12.00 to $10.00. The City Clerk's Office
has prepared an Ordinance allowing for the collection of this fee.
• City Clerk's Office - Operator Permit Background Investigation: The Committee
recommended charging a fee that would cover the entire cost of providing this service to any
business owner required to register under Municipal Code 5.82. This includes restaurants,
hotels/motels, and delicatessen. Originally, this fee was proposed for $100.00. At the
Committee's recommendation, this fee was raised to $293.00.
• City Clerk's Office — Massage Permit Application Fees for Massage Investigations: The
Committee requested that the City Clerk's Office consider an Ordinance establishing a two tier
system whereby massage technicians with tables in established beauty salons will be charged a
lower fee than owners and technicians in independent massage parlors. The City Clerk's
Office, working with the City Attorney's Office, has created an Ordinance that differentiates
between the two establishments. That Ordinance will be presented to the Mayor and Common
Council as a separate item. As a result, the Massage Permit Application fees and the Massage
Exam fees will not be effective until after the effective date of the new Ordinance.
Accordingly, the fee has been increased from $100 to $293 for owners and from $25 to $293
for technicians. For owners and technicians of established salons providing accessory services,
this fee will be increased to $60.00.
• City Clerk's Office—Massage Exam Fees: The Committee recommended charging a flat fee
that covers the entire cost of providing this service to owners and technicians working in
massage parlors. As a result, the fee has been increased from $60 to $152 for owners and from
5/29/2008
1
$25 to $152 for technicians. For owners and technicians in established salons providing
accessory services this fee will be increased to $60.00. This fee will also not be effective until
after the effective date of the new Ordinance.
• Development Services — Lot line adjustments: Initially, the recommended fee for all lot line
adjustments was $828.00. The Committee recommended establishing a two-tier fee to lessen
the burden on homeowners. The proposed fee for lot line adjustments for a single family/owner
occupied home is $414.00. The proposed fee for commercial and residential lot line
adjustments will remain at $828.00.
• Parks and Recreation — Fee increase for swim classes: The Committee requested a more
detailed analysis of this program to justify the fee increase. The attached worksheet takes into
consideration equipment and custodial costs that were not originally included in the fee
justification. The current fee amount is $35.00; the proposed fee amount is $40.00.
Most of the remaining adjusted and new fees would be effective immediately upon the adoption of the
resolution. The Government Code requires that all development related fees take effect no sooner than
60 days after their adoption, which would make the lot line adjustment fees effective August 1St, 2008.
Financial Impact:
This action will generate approximately $184,200 in additional net revenue to the General Fund in FY
08-09.
Recommendation:
That the public hearing be closed; that said resolution be adopted.
5/29/2008
2
C C
v O O i0
27 W N � itl ti
U
U
w° a c po w° a o
u a
o v� v o w E E N
C U W N U C
v v 9 .E
E y O E y C
E a o s o
c � AN o � w 3 a>'i �' 3 ^ ❑ a
w 3 v w O D
` N v v
v T v O
U ° o Z L o A O E
E w a
o w w o o ° w o o ❑ 3
° I s ❑ c o
C v
.d .o oa O E a ai •o ❑ ai A � is E
E = X
Oa sv s U m n. A c s u ❑ s .o E a N
0.. v a1 Q W F O 0.l Q W F o Q
u o o O o O o
0 0 0°0 °0 0 0°0
� E ^
v �
z
= o o z o 0 0
vvo o � o
w
0 0 0 o O
0 0 0 0
d U 0 M 7 op v�
U R N _T
R
sv `^ vi In ss u
7
d 'C M GO 00 o0
9 �
W w p 0 O O O
y F O pM. V o0 O
eC N N V
G
v
z E
E
0
u
u
CG ds � sv a sv
u °o °o °o °o °O
y� y o0 00
C O
r O
L
p" vi V1 Hi Vi 69
Y O O O O
�w
d
L
_
U
vv sv ss vi sv
a
= z N N N
T N
° � E
E
� � 3
� a �
F a x 3 m
d 'y
A C Q c N
o � �
C C v Cp 'O U •p t�tl y
R O
m a o4 > a 3 a E E
s Qa O .E .p7° � � U vii
u
A
E
L U O v O v
U U N N Y
AUO UO Q V] Q (n a.
COPY
1 RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
96-188 AND RESOLUTION 2008-149 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES FOR
3 SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
6 SECTION 1. Resolution No. 96-188, Section 2, Numbers 51 and 52 are hereby
7 amended to read as follows:
8 "51. 5.20.040.13 (Permit-Application-Fee) $293.00 investigation fee for each
9 owner and massage technician in a
massage parlor. $60.00
10 investigation fee for each owner
and massage technician in a beauty
11 salon/accessory service.
12
52. 5.20.040.C. (Permit-Application-Fee) $152.00 examination fee for each
13 owner and massage technician in a
massage parlor. $60.00
14 examination fee for each owner and
15 massage technician in a beauty
salon/accessory service."
16
SECTION 2. Resolution No. 96-188, Section 2, Number 56 is hereby amended
17
to read as follows:
18
19 "56. 5.82.040 (Operator's Permit) $293.00 investigation fee for each
permit application."
20
SECTION 3. Resolution 2008-149, Part V is hereby amended to add Section 5
21
22 as follows:
23 "SECTION 5: A $10.00 fee is hereby established for the processing of business
24 registration applications."
25
26
27
28
1 Xo , 35
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
96-188 AND RESOLUTION 2008-149 ESTA13LISHING CERTAIN FEES FOR
1 SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
2 SECTION 4. Resolution 2008-149, Part VII. Section 32(E) is hereby amended
3
to read as follows:
4
5 "E. The review fee for Lot line Adjustments shall be:
6 1. Single Family/Owner Occupied Dwellings: $414.00
7 2. Commercial/Industrial: $828.00."
8 SECTION 5. Resolution 2008-149, Part X, Section 8(A)(6) is hereby amended
9 to read as follows:
10
"6. Swim Classes: $40.00."
11
SECTION 6. Effective date.
12
13 The fee established in Section 1 and Section 3 of this resolution shall become effective
14 September 151, 2008. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66017(a), the fees established
15 and/or modified in Section 4 of this resolution shall become effective 60 days from the
16 adoption date of this resolution. All other fees contained herein shall be effective upon adoption
17
of this resolution.
18
m 19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
96-188 AND RESOLUTION 2008-149 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES FOR
1 SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
2 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
3
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on
4
the day of , 2008, by the following vote, to wit:
5
6 Council Members AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
7 ESTRADA
8 BAXTER
9 BRINKER
10 DERRY
11
KELLEY
12
13 JOHNSON
14 MC CAMMACK
15
16
17 City Clerk
18 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 2008.
19
20
21 Patrick J. Morris, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
22
23 Approved as to form:
24 James F. Penman,
City Attorney D
25 By: r Gam.
26
27
28
3
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Accounti User Fee Description Date
City Clerk/Business Registration 1 11 43011 Application Processing Fee 4/24/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Proposed fee for processing a business registration application. This cost analysis represents the minimum amount
of staff time for processing a renewal application. The cost to process a new application is higher. For administrative
ease, a single lower fee is proposed.
Personnel Costs LaborRates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit Cost per
BR Representative 20.72 6.22 26.94 2.694 29.63 0.333 9.87
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 9.87
Material& Rental Costs
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Postage-Renewal Package 0.42 1 0.42
Posts a 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.26
Other Costs (Equipment,facilit rental, art-time labor w/o benefits
Description Cost Each tantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More(Less)than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 11.13
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen SAdmin.
San Bernardino $ 15.00 Rate @16.22% 2.31
Cathedral City(9/07) $ 20.00 $ 5.00 33.0% Total Service Cost/unit 13.44
Colton $ 25.00 $ 10.00 66.0%
Corona $ 40.00 $ 25.00 166.0%
Fontana $ 35.00 $ 20.00 133.0% Recommended Fee 100
Ontario None Recommended Fee Subsidy 3.44
2ancho Cucamonga None Current Fee Amount 0.00
Redlands $ 50.00 $ 35.00 233.0%
Riverside None I Fee Increase(Decrease) 100
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Accountl User Fee Description Date
City Clerk/I 1 4750 Operator Permit Investigation Fee 4/24/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Revise current administrative fee for processing Operator Permit Investigations. An Operator Permit is required for
certain types of businesses per SBMC 5.85. This involves personnel from Business Registration and the
Police Department.
Personnel Costs .LaboriRatn
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit Cost per
Sr. Business Registration Rep 21.77 6.53 28.30 2.83 31.13 1.25 38.91
PD CSO II 29.12 8.74 37.86 3.786 41.65 2.35 97.87
Police Sergeant 70.34 21.10 91.44 9.144 100.581 0.45 45.26
Lieutenant 86.51 25.95 112.46 11.246 123.71 0.45 55.67
(See attached for PD) 0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:1 237.71
Material &Rental Costs
Description Cost Each jantity Required Unit Cost
Photocopies 0.15 33 4.95
Postage 0.42 1 0.42
Postage- Certified (PD) 9.31 1 9.31
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 14.68
Other Costs (Equipment,facility rental, art-time labor w/o benefits
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More Less than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 252.39
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-VVlde Gen 8 Admin
SBPD Rate @ 16.22% 40.94
Riverside
Total Service CosUUrrt _29 �
Pomona
New ort Beach Recommended Fee 2930 0
Irvine Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.33
Ontario Current Fee Amount 59.00
Huntin ton Beach Fee Increase(Decrease) 2310 0
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Accountl User Fee Description Date
City Clerk/I 1 1 331 Massage Permit Application Fee 1 4124/2008
Description of service, demand,subsidy, and other comments:
This fee is part of Reso 96-188. Revise the current investigation fee of$25 (technician) $100 (owner) to more
accurately reflect the investigation costs fo both the City Clerk and the Police Department
5.20.040B - Investigation fee for each owner and massage technician
Personnel Costs Lobar Res .
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit Cost pe
Sr. Business Registration Rep 21.77 6.53 28.30 2.83 31.13 1.25 38.91
PD CSO II 29.12 8.74 37.86 3.786 41.65 2.35 97.87
Police Sergeant 70.34 21.10 91.44 9.144 100.58 0.45 45.26
Lieutenant 86.51 25.95 112.46 11.246 123.71 0.45 55.67
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 237.71
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each oantity Required U nil Cost
Photocopies 0.15 33 4.95
Postage 0.42 1 0.42
Postage-Certified (PD) 9.31 1 9.31
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 14.68
Other Costs (Equipment,facility rental, art-time labor w/o benefits
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less)than S.B. Total Service Direct cost 252.39
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars IlPercentage City-Wide Gen BAdmin
SBPD Rate(g,6.22% 40.94
Riverside Total Service Cost/Unit 293 .43
Pomona
Newport Beach Recommended Fee 2930
Irvine Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.33
Ontario Current Fee Amount 25.00
Huntin ton Beach Fee Increase(Decrease) varies
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Accountl User Fee Description Date
City Clerk/I 1 331 Massage Examination Fee 1 4/24/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This fee is part of Reso 96-188. Revise the current examination fee of$25(technician) $60 (owner) to more
accurately reflect the costs to proctor and grade the examination.
5.20.040C - Examination fee for each owner and each massage technician
Personnel Costs Labor: -6 .s
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit Cost per
HR Anal s 35.85 10.75 46.60 4.66 51.26 2.5 128.15
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service:L 128.15
Material &Rental Costs
Description Cost Each pantity Required UnflCost
Photocopies 0.15 15 2.25
Postage 0.42 1 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2.67
Other Costs (Equipment,facility rental, art-time labor w/o benefits
Description Cost Each itantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More Less than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 130.82
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.&Admin.
SBPD Rate @ 16.22% 21.22
Riverside Total Service CosUUMI
Pomona
Mew port Beach Recommended Fee 1.
Irvine Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.04
Ontario Current Fee Amount 25.00
Huntington Beach Fee Increase(Decrease) Varies
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Services 001 4786 Single Family/Owner Occupied 2/21/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee to check and verify a lot line adjustment. The current fee is $230.00 (last updated in 2006). The recommended
change is $830.00 This represents 8 hours of review time for an Engineering Associate, 2 hours of review time for a Senior
Civil Engineer and 0.5 hours of time to process the application for a Development Services Technician.
This fee is for single family residential, owner occupied.
Personnel Costs
,ta.,•".R
��yy,
Gr`�� c :k:s+ +.n+m gYjxaA a *wisrsn„�� �FY; ,1en,c:
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Engineering Associate 39.62 11.89 51.51 11.33132 62.84 8 502.70
Senior Civil Engineer 48.36 14.51 62.87 6.2868 69.15 2 138.31
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 3.1278 34.41 0.5 17.20
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.001 1
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 658.21
Material 8r Rental Costs
Description Cost Each uant ty Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, art-time labor w/o benefits
Description Cost Each uantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More Less than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 658.21
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.BAdmin.
San Bernardino $ 830.00 Rate @ 25.86% 170.21
Riverside 414.00 -100.0% Total Service Cosvunit x.42
r `o $ 580.00 166.00 40.1%
-)na $2,090.00 Two lots 1676.00 404.8% Recommended Fee 414.00
L a Linda $1,645.00 1231.00 297.3% Recommended Fee Subsidy 414.42
N no Valle $ 908.00 494.00 119.3% Current Fee Amount 23 .00
Ontario $ 805.00 + $50/parcel 391.00 94.4% Fee Increase(Decrease) 11B .00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Services 001 4786 Commercial/Industrial 2/21/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee to check and verify a lot line adjustment. The current fee is $230.00(last updated in 2006). The recommended
change is $830.00 This represents 8 hours of review time for an Engineering Associate, 2 hours of review time for a Senior
Civil Engineer and 0.5 hours of time to process the application for a Development Services Technician.
Personnel Costs Labor fWes
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Engineering Associate 39.62 11.89 51.51 11.33132 62.84 8 502.70
Senior Civil Engineer 48.36 14.51 62.87 6.2868 69.15 2 138.31
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 3.1278 34.41 0.5 17.20
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 658.21
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facilitf rental, p art-time labor w/o benefits
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More Less than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 658.21
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percenta a City-Wide Gen.B Admin
San Bernardino $ 830.00 Rate @25.86% 170.21
Riverside (828.00) -100.0% Total ServiceCost/Unit 8?8.42
Ilto $ 580.00 (248.00) -30.0%
rona ## ### Two lots 1262.00 152.4% Recommended Fee 82 .00
a Linda ## ### 817.00 98.7% Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.42
Ivtureno Valley $ 908.00 80.00 9.7% Current Fee Amount 230.00
Ontario $ 805.00 + $50/parcel, (23.00) -2.8% Fee Increase(Decrease) 598.00
tD
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
DepartmentlDivision Fundl Account User Fee Description Date
Parks, Rec & Comm Svcs 1 3891772-381-23161 Swim Classes @ Jerry Lewis Swim Ctr.
Description of service,demand,subsidy,and other comments.
Begin 4th week in June-4 sessions -2 weeks per session-M-Th,45 min. classes.
Fee currently$35.00 per session.
Personnel Costs Labor.
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. losition per Unit Cost pa
6 Lifeguards 9.50 0.00 9.50 0.95 10.45 48 501.60
2 Sr. Lifeguards 11.5 11.50 1.15 12.65 16.00 202.40
1 Pool Manager II 11.2 11.20 1.12 12.32 8.00 98.56
1 Aquatic Rec. Spec. 29.37 29,371 2.9371 32.30 25.00 807.50
0 - -
0 - -
0 - -
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 1610.06
Material 8r Rental Costs
.)escriplion Cost Each oantity Required Unit Cost
'Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs(Equipment,facili rental,pa rt-time labor w/o benefits
Description I I Cost Each ianfity Required Unit Cosl
Additional pool related costs are difficult to determine because pools are also open
to the eneral publi 1C.
Advertising 0.1 50 5
Custodial supplies 1 50 50
Acid and Chlorine Supplies $31,000.00 0.63% 195.3
Sr. Office Asst. $15.02 12.5 187.75
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 438.05
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More Less than S.B. Total Service Direct cost 2048.11
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.b Adrrdn.
San Bdo Proposed: 40.00 2 wkSess Rate Q 17.78% 364.15
Riverside PARTICIPANTS 50
Pomona 35.00 2 wk sess Total Service CosVUnit 48 9.,ri
Newport Beach
Irvine 56.00 8 wk sess Recommended Fee 4000
Ontario Recommended Fee Subsidy 8.25
Riverside 45 2 wk sess 35.00
Current Fee Amount
Fee Increase(Decrease) .xn nn
City Manager
LAID OVER FROM MAY 5, 2008
10. An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino adding Chapter 8.02 to the San
Bernardino Municipal Code and adopting, by reference, San Bernardino County
Code Chapter 14 of Division 3 of Title 3, relating to the inspection grading of
food establishments. FINAL READING (Backup material was distributed
on April 7, 2008, Item No. 40; item continued to May 5, 2008, Item No. 23.)
All Wards
Approved
MOTION: That said ordinance be adopted.
Adopted MC-1271
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
11. Set public hearing for Monday, June 2, 2008, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall
Council Chambers to discuss the adjustment of various user fees and the
establishment of new user fees. (See Attached)
Approved
MOTION: That a public hearing be set for Monday, June 2, 2008, at 4:00
p.m., to discuss the adjustment of various user fees and the
establishment of new user fees.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Development Services
12. Adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring/
Reporting Program for the demolition of an existing bridge on Old Waterman
Canyon Road and replacement with a new bridge, including relocation of
utilities (SS 07-14). (See Attached) (No Cost to City) Ward 4
Approved
MOTION: That the Mayor and Common Council independently review,
analyze, and exercise independent judgment in reviewing the
Initial Study and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program for the demolition
of an existing bridge on Old Waterman Canyon Road and
replacement with a new bridge, including relocation of utilities
(SS 07-14).
13. Resolution of the City of San Bernardino establishing fair market value and
minimum sale price for a portion of certain City Water Department owned
parcel of real property generally located northerly of Sepulveda Avenue, north
of 54`'' Street, and setting a public hearing to consider said sale. (See Attached)
(No Cost to City) (Resolution not available at time of printing.) Ward 4
6 05/19/2008
r
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Lori Sassoon, Assistant City Subject: Set a public hearing for
Manager Monday, June 2, 2008, at 4:00 p.m. in
the City Hall Council Chambers to
Dept: City Manager's Office discuss the adjustment of various user
fees and the establishment of new user
Date: May 13, 2008 fees.
Meeting Date: May 19, 2008
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
May 7, 2008 — Ways and Means Committee forwarded this item to the Mayor and
Common Council to set a public hearing.
May 5, 2008 —The Mayor and Common Council approved Resolution Number 2008-149,
Resolution establishing certain fees for services furnished by the City of San Bernardino,
amending Resolution Nos. 89-471 and 91-148, and repealing Resolution No. 2006-325.
Recommended motion:
That a public hearing be set for Monday, June 2, 2008 at 4:00 pm in the City Hall
Council Chambers to discuss the adjustment and establishmen f various user fees.
Signature
Con' ,nine Allison Phone: 384-5122
Su 7 leso, staff report, attachments Ward: All
F
Net additional revenue of appx. $184,000 in FY 08-09
Source: (Acct. No.) Various
(Acct. Description) General Fund
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No.
1
STAFF REPORT
Subject:
Set a public hearing for Monday, June 2, 2008, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers to
discuss the adjustment of various user fees and the establishment of new user fees.
Background:
On April 21St, the Mayor and Common Council were presented an updated Master Fee Resolution. At
that time, the Council forwarded the entire item to the Ways and Means Committee. The Committee
removed certain items and referred the fee item back to the Council for consideration. On May 5t" the
Mayor and Council closed a public hearing and adopted Resolution 2008-147, adjusting many user
fees and establishing certain new fees.
On May 7t", staff provided the Ways and Means Committee with additional information on the
remaining items. Attachment A illustrates each of these with a side by side comparison of the current
fee amount, the originally proposed adjusted amount, and the new proposed amount. In addition, each
of these fees has a corresponding cost analysis worksheet justifying each fee increase (attached).
The Committee recommended that the following fees be forwarded for council approval:
• City Clerk's Office — Application Processing Fee for Business Registration: The
Committee has recommended lowering this fee from $12.00 to $10.00. The City Clerk's Office
has prepared an Ordinance allowing for the collection of this fee.
• City Clerk's Office - Operator Permit Background Investigation: The Committee
recommended charging a fee that would cover the entire cost of providing this service to any
business owner required to register under Municipal Code 5.82. This includes restaurants,
hotels/motels, and delis. Originally this fee was proposed for $100.00. At the Committee's
recommendation, this fee was raised to $293.00.
i
■ City Clerk's Office — Massage Permit Application Fees for Massage Investigations:. The
Committee requested that the City Clerk's office consider an Ordinance establishing a two tier
system whereby massage technicians with tables in established beauty salons will be charged a
lower fee than owners and technicians in independent massage parlors. The City Clerk's
Office, working with the City Attorney's Office, has created an Ordinance that differentiates
between the two establishments. That Ordinance will be presented to the Mayor and Common
Council as a separate item. As a result, the Massage Permit Application fees and the Massage
Exam fees will not be effective until after the effective date of the new Ordinance.
Accordingly, the fee has been increased from $100 to $293 for owners and from $25 to $293
for technicians. For owners and technicians of established salons providing accessory services,
this fee will be increased to $100.00.
• City Clerk's Office— Massage Exam Fees: The Committee recommended charging a fee that
covers the entire cost of providing this service to owners and technicians working in massage
5/14/2008
1
parlors. As a result, the fee has been increased from $60 to $152 for owners and from $25 to
$152 for technicians. For owners and technicians in established salons providing accessory
services this fee will be increased to $140.00. This fee will not be effective until after the
effective date of the new Ordinance.
• Development Services — Lot line adjustments: Initially, the recommended fee for all lot line
adjustments was $828.00. The Committee recommended establishing a two-tier fee to lessen
the burden on homeowners. The proposed fee for lot line adjustments for a single family/owner
occupied home is $414.00. The proposed fee for commercial and residential lot line
adjustments will remain at $828.00.
• Parks and Recreation — Fee increase for swim classes: The Committee requested a more
detailed analysis of this program to justify the fee increase. The attached worksheet takes into
consideration equipment and custodial costs that were not originally included in the fee
justification. The current fee amount is $35.00; the proposed fee amount is $40.00.
Most of the remaining adjusted and new fees would be effective immediately upon the adoption of the
resolution. The Government Code requires that all development related fees take effect no sooner than
60 days after their adoption, which would make the lot line adjustment fees effective August 1St, 2008.
Next Steps
The next step in this process is to set a public hearing for June 2nd at which the Mayor and Common
Council will consider the proposed amendments to the master fee resolution which will incorporate all
new and revised fees. Upon the closing of the public hearing, the Mayor and Common Council may
adopt the fee resolution.
Financial Impact:
None by this action. Adoption of the fee resolution will generate approximately $184,000 in net
revenue to the General Fund in FY 08-09.
Recommendation:
Set a public hearing for Monday, June 2nd, 2008, at 4:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers to
discuss the adjustment of various user fees and the establishment of new user fees.
5/14/2008
2
ti w v o ,0
°o 5 a E J
U O C
.0 T C p 0 0 0 C
o o a�i c aci p c � �•° w0 .° "
V) y k„ W cn y ° y y
°o o $
o o a a
U O V1 w
U � E .yF... y O U E U 1p C a'pn+
o s w o c 0 0 o c o Y 3 d 4 3 y w a
U W w°va c " °'
w ° v ° °' m v v ° a> 0000 w` 0 0 7 o w o o a 3 °
N r c a o
q
w o ° •° 0 0 a v m o o c m 7 0 o
w ❑ �$ � °� abi 'o � � abi •o � `� �oo N � ` Q � N � � ° �
d o bh o E e4 ao °q °' ao c ai v C ai E
° .� a°�i a3i = ° .tl
to
01 0
v
C U e� C
a AU m w � . U aw a� - U aoa ¢ w 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N C,0 O Cl
d aU h 7 N r
C3i W
z
d O O O O O O ¢ O O O
e o o O o 0 o z o 0 0
o
d U p h N
ae
^ W
r 60.)
°o 'o °p• .� w w o °o °o
p M � � •C W .�. F p 7 op
N Vi fA d O fA.`.,,4"
U �J
r-, W � 0 C7 O
C 69 fA O „U„fA O Vi 69 .U+Vi fA 6A
d
V y -It Nl O O 7 V N >m 06 06 06
G C M Cl Ol vryi N N 7 ~
C N
� N W 00
00 Q o V
� O
NQ. F 4i 69 69 69 69 of Vi fA H
w O q O o O O O O
O
N O OM+ V VNi � N a
w 7 .•r N V 00
L
0
v
� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H
C O
r O
L
�" ds fA FA cv fA fA vi fA cA
C N �' N w N •.U.w N •E N N M
pfA.0 W 'U O64 L O6s.0
O U O U
"0:
fA 69 69 30 Y `A Y 6°9 O ,o s�OS ,o sv FA sv
G C C
L 3 0 3 3
a8 °' z 1. r a N o N
6
w w v U m d Vn
Q C p C O. H m
LL C O w E ,y
5
y ° O 0' O O h
�+ • �°e a � a °' � a a �'
v
p
o.0 0. a. Q .� a `o w w ¢ ° ¢ U a
a m o oOU 0 u o°n 0 w m m 0 0 � U
_ ¢w" O C � Sa
u
:?
v
S
t
Q U U U U ° U ° U U V
UO u UO u u UO M Ml n a
f
x
1 RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
96-188 AND RESOLUTION 2008-149 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES FOR
3 SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
6 SECTION 1. Resolution No. 96-188, Section 2, Numbers 51 and 52 are hereby
7 amended to read as follows:
8 "51. 5.20.040.13. (Permit-Application-Fee) $293.00 investigation fee for each
9 owner and Massage Technician in a
massage parlor. $100.00
10 investigation fee for each owner
11 and massage technician in a beauty
salon/accessory service.
12 52. 5.20.040.C. (Permit-Application-Fee)' ; $152.00 examination fee for each
13 owner and massage technician in a
massage parlor. $140.00
14 examination fee for each owner and
15 massage technician in a beauty
salon/accessory service."
16
17 SECTION 2. Resolution No. 96-188, Section 2, Number 56 is hereby amended
18 to read as follows:
19 "56. 5.82.040 (Operator's Permit) $293.00 investigation fee for each
20 permit application."
21 SECTION 3. Resolution 2008-149, Part V is hereby amended to add Section 5
22 as follows:
23 "SECTION 5: A $10.00 fee is hereby established for the processing of business
24
registration applications."
25
26 SECTION 4. Resolution 2008-149, Part VII, Section 32. Part E is hereby
27 amended to read as follows:
28
1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
96-188 AND RESOLUTION 2008-149 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES FOR
1 SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
2 "E. The review fee for Lot line Adjustments shall be:
3
1. Single Family/Owner Occupied Dwellings: $414.00
4
5 2. Commercial/Industrial: $828.00."
6 SECTION 5. Resolution 2008-149 Part X, Section 8, Part A is hereby amended
7 to add number 6 as follows:
8 "6. Swim Classes: $40.00."
9 SECTION 6. Effective date.
10
The fees established in Section 1 and Section 3 of this resolution shall become effective
11
12 September 1St, 2008. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66017(a), the fees established
13 and/or modified in Section 4 of this resolution shall become effective 60 days from the
14 effective date of this resolution. All other fees contained herein shall be effective upon adoption
15 of this resolution.
16
17
18
///
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
96-188 AND RESOLUTION 2008-149 ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FEES FOR
1 SERVICES FURNISHED BY THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
2 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
3
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on
4
5 the day of , 2008, by the following vote, to wit:
6 Council Members AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
7 ESTRADA
8 BAXTER
9 BRINKER
10 DERRY
11
KELLEY
12
13 JOHNSON
14 MC CAMMACK
15
16
17 City Clerk
18 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 2008.
19
20
21 Patrick J. Morris, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
22
Approved as to form:
23
24 James F. Penman,
City Attorney
25 By.
26
27
28
3
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Accountl User Fee Description I Date
City Clerk/Business Registration 1 11 43011 Application Processing Fee 1 4/24/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Proposed fee for processing a business registration application. This cost analysis represents the minimum amount
of staff time for processing a renewal application. The cost to process a new application is higher. For administrative
ease, a single lower fee is proposed.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit Cost per
BR Representative 20.72 6.22 26.94 2.694 29.63 0.333 9.87
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 9.87
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Postage- Renewal-Package 0.42 1 0.42
Postage 0.42 2 0.84
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 1.26
Other Costs (Equipment,facilit rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More(Less)than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 11.13
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.BAdmin.
San Bernardino $ 15.00 Rate @16.22% 2.31
Cathedral City(9/07) $ 20.00 $ 5.00 33.0% Total Service Cost/Unit 13.44
Colton $ 25.00 $ 10.00 66.0%
Corona $ 40.00 $ 25.00 166.0%
Fontana $ 35.00 $ 20.00 133.0% Recommended Fee 10.00
Ontario None Recommended Fee Subsidy 3.44
Rancho Cucamonga None Current Fee Amount 0.00
Redlands $ 50.00 1 $ 35.00 233.00/o
Riverside None Fee Increase(Decrease) 10 00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Accountl User Fee Description I Date
City Clerk/[ 1 1 47501 Operator Permit Investigation Fee 1 4/24/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Revise current administrative fee for processing Operator Permit Investigations, An Operator Permit is required for
certain types of businesses per SBMC 5.85. This involves personnel from Business Registration and the
Police Department.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit Cost per
Sr. Business Registration Rep 21.77 6.53 28.30 2.83 31.13 1.25 38.91
PD CSO II 29.12 8.74 37.86 3.786 41.65 2.35 97.87
Police Sergeant 70.34 21.10 91.44 9.144 100.58 0.45 45.26
Lieutenant 86.51 25.95 112.46 11.246 123.71 0.451 55.67
(See attached for PD) 0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 237.71
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Photocopies 0.15 33 4.95
Postage 0.42 1 0.42
Postage -Certified (PD) 9.31 1 9.31
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 14.68
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less)than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 252.39
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.&Admin.
SBPD Rate @ 16.22% 40.94
Riverside Total Service Cost/Unit 293 33
Pomona
Newport Beach Recommended Fee 293 00
Irvine Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.33
Ontario Current Fee Amount 51-00
Huntington Beach Fee Increase(Decrease) 234.00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Accountl User Fee Description Date
City Clerk/[ 1 11 331 Massage Permit Application Fee 1 4/24/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This fee is part of Reso 96-188. Revise the current investigation fee of$25 (technician) $100 (owner) to more
accurately reflect the investigation costs fo both the City Clerk and the Police Department
5.20.040B - Investigation fee for each owner and massage technician
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit Cost per
Sr. Business Registration Rep 21.77 6.53 28.30 2.83 31.13 1.25 38.91
PD CSO II 29.12 8.74 37.86 3.786 41.65 2.35 97.87
Police Sergeant 70.34 21.10 91.44 9.144 100.58 0.45 45.26
Lieutenant 86.51 25.95 112.46 11.246 123.71 0.45 55.67
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 237.71
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Photocopies 0.15 33 4.95
Postage 0.42 1 0.42
Postage -Certified (PD) 9.31 1 9.31
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 14.68
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 252.39
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.&Admin
SBPD Rate @16.22% 40.94
Riverside Total Service Cost/Unit 2933
Pomona
Newport Beach Recommended Fee 293.00
Irvine Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.33
Ontario Current Fee Amount 25.00
Huntington Beach Fee Increase(Decrease) varies
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Accountl User Fee Description I Date
City Clerk/I 1 11 331 Massage Examination Fee 1 4/24/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
This fee is part of Reso 96-188. Revise the current examination fee of$25(technician) $60 (owner) to more
accurately reflect the costs to proctor and grade the examination.
5.20.040C - Examination fee for each owner and each massage technician
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept or Div Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. osition per Unit Cost per
HR Anal s 35.85 10.75 46.60 4.66 51.26 2.5 128.15
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 128.15
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each jantity Required Unit Cost
Photocopies 0.15 15 2.25
Postage 0.42 1 0.42
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 2.67
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each iantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less)than S.B. Total Service Direct cost 130.82
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.&Admin.
SBPD Rate @ 1622% 21.22
Riverside Total service Cost/Unit 152.04
Pomona
Newport Beach Recommended Fee 152.00
Irvine Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.04
Ontario Current Fee Amount 25.00
Huntington Beach Fee Increase(Decrease) varee
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Services 001 4786 Single Family/Owner Occupied 2/21/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee to check and verify a lot line adjustment. The current fee is $230.00 (last updated in 2006). The recommended
change is $830.00 This represents 8 hours of review time for an Engineering Associate, 2 hours of review time for a Senior
Civil Engineer and 0.5 hours of time to process the application for a Development Services Technician.
This fee is for single family residential, owner occupied.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Engineering Associate 39.62 11.89 51.51 11.33132 62.84 8 502.70
Senior Civil Engineer 48.36 14.51 62.87 6.2868 69.15 2 138.31
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 3.1278 34.41 0.5 17.20
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.001 1
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 658.21
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each uantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefits
Description Cost Each Duantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less) than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 658.21
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.&Admin.
San Bernardino $ 830.00 Rate @ 25.86% 170.21
Riverside 414.00 -100.0% Total Service Cost/Unit 828.42
Rialto $ 580.00 166.00 40.1%
Corona $2,090.00 Two lots 1676.00 404.8% Recommended Fee 414.00
Loma Linda $1,645.00 1231.00 297.3% Recommended Fee Subsidy 414.42
Moreno Valle $ 908.00 494.00 119.3% Current Fee Amount 230.00
Ontario $ 805.00 + $50/parcel 391.00 94.4% Fee Increase(Decrease) 18 4.00
i
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division Fund Account User Fee Description Date
Lot Line Adjustment
Development Services 001 4786 Commercial/Industrial 2/21/2008
Description of service, demand, subsidy, and other comments:
Fee to check and verify a lot line adjustment. The current fee is $230.00 (last updated in 2006). The recommended
change is $830.00 This represents 8 hours of review time for an Engineering Associate, 2 hours of review time for a Senior
Civil Engineer and 0.5 hours of time to process the application for a Development Services Technician.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. Position per Unit Cost per
Engineering Associate 39.62 11.89 51.51 11.33132 62.84 8 502.70
Senior Civil Engineer 48.36 14.51 62.87 6.2868 69.15 2 138.31
Development Services Tech. 24.06 7.22 31.28 3.1278 34.41 0.5 17.20
0 0.00 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
0 0.00
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 658.21
Material & Rental Costs
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs (Equipment, facility rental, part-time labor w/o benefits)
Description Cost Each Quantity Required Unit Cost
Total Other costs per Unit of Service:
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More (Less)than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 658.21
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.&Admin.
San Bernardino $ 830.00 Rate @25.86% 170.21
Riverside (828.00) -100.0% Total Service Cost/Unit 828.42
Rialto $ 580.00 (248.00) -30.0%
Corona ####### Two lots 1262.00 152.4% Recommended Fee 828.00
Loma Linda ####### 817.00 98.7% Recommended Fee Subsidy 0.42
Moreno Valley $ 908.00 80.00 9.7% Current Fee Amount 230.00
Ontario $ 805.00 + $50/parcel (23.00) -2.8% Fee Increase(Decrease) 59 8.00
User Fee Determination
Cost Analysis Worksheet
Department/Division I Fundl Account User Fee Description I Date
Parks, Rec& Comm Svcs 1 3891772-381-23161 Swim Classes @ Jerry Lewis Swim Ctr.
Description of service,demand,subsidy,and other comments:
Begin 4th week in June-4 sessions-2 weeks per session-M-Th,45 min. classes.
Fee currently$35.00 per session.
Personnel Costs Labor Rates
Straight Time Fringe Total Direct Dept.or Div. Total Burdened Hours by Total Labor
Position Labor Benefits Labor Cost Overhead Labor Cost/Hr. losition per Unit Cost per
6 Lifeguards 9.50 0.00 9.50 0.95 10.45 48 501.60
2 Sr. Lifeguards 11.5 11.50 1.15 12.65 16.00 202.40
1 Pool Manager II 11.2 11.20 1.12 12.32 8.00 98.56
1 Aquatic Rec. Spec. 29.37 29.37 2.937 32.30 25.00 807.50
0 - -
0 - -
0 -
Total Burdened Personnel Costs per Unit of Service: 1610.06
Material&Rental Costs
Description I Cost Each amity Required Unit Cost
Postage
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 0
Other Costs(Equipment,facility rental, art-time labor w/o benefits
Description I I I I Cost Each jantity Required Unit Cost
Additional pool related costs are difficult to determine because pools are also open
to the general public.
Advertising 0.1 50 5
Custodial supplies 1 50 50
Acid and Chlorine Supplies $31,000.00 0.63% 195.3
Sr. Office Asst. $15.02 12.5 187.75
Total Other costs per Unit of Service: 438.05
Comparisons to Proposed Fee
More Less than S.B. Total Service Direct Cost 2048.11
Jurisdiction Fee per Unit Dollars Percentage City-Wide Gen.&Admin.
San Bdo Proposed: 40.00 2 wkSess Rate @ 17.78% 364.15
Riverside PARTICIPANTS 50
Pomona 35.00 2 wk sess Total Service Cost/Unit 4825
Newport Beach
Irvine 56.00 8 wk sess Recommended Fee 4000
Ontario
Recommended Fee Subsidy 8.25
Riverside 45 2 wk sess current Fee Amount 35.00
Fee Increase(Decrease) 5 00