The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About41-Planning c/;V OF SAN _RNARDA r- R~QUD\FOR COUNCIL ~T~ From: Brad K. Kilger Director of Planning Dept: Planning Date: June 21, 1989 l\RRf:Jl.l!f~ PLANNING COMMISSION'S ~:- t>.'ii!N!AL OF CONDITIONAL USE - u .' ," l-fIVAiI!rS 219:- 16 ~~S~: J';.:-.... ~. '- Mayor and Common Council Meeting July 13, 1989, 2:00 p.m. Synopsis of Previous Council action: No previous Council action. , Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed; and that the Mayor and Council deny the appeal and deny Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16. (Supports the Planning Commission's action.) OR , ~ That the hearing be closed; that the Mayor and Council uphold the appeal and approve Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16 with parking variance subject to revised Findings of Fact and Conditions of Approval; and, adopt the Finding of General Plan Consistency contained in Attachment "0". /L :'i= J!;,J ~~i3 tJ.L ~ Brad L. ilg Sjlhature ~ Contact person: Brad L. Kilger Phone: (714) 384-5057 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: 1 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Descriotionl Finance: Council Notes: . 75-0262 Agenda Item NO.5! CIT~OF SAN BERNARDINO. REQUESi:lFOR COUNCIL ACTIGO STAFF REPORT .' SUBJECT: APPEAL OF' PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-16 KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN ADDITION AT 477 SOUTH "E" STREET REOUEST The applicant, Carlson Design and Construction Company representing Collins Food International, requests-that the Mayor and Council reconsider and approve the application for the construction of an addition to an existing drive-through restaurant (Kentucky Fired Chicken) with a variance regarding the required parking. BACKGROUND Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16 is an application to con- struct a 418 square foot addition to an existing 1,500 square foot drive-through restaurant and approval of a variance from Code sections 19.56.020 regarding required parking. The restaurant is located on the east side of "E" Street north of Mill Street at 477 South "E" Street. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan adopted on June 2, 1989, in that the use of a drive-through restaurant is allowed in the CG-1, General commercial-One Land Use Designation. The proposed addition is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) . . The site is located on "E" Street about 100 feet north of Mill Street. These are both well traveled streets with "E" Street having over 18,000 trips per day and Mill Street having over 21,000 trips per day. There is nothing ex- ceptional about the size, shape, topography or circumstances of the site which is not applicable to other parcels in the vicinity. At the Development Review Committee meeting of May 4, 1989, there was discussion of the potential for on-sight traffic congestion resulting from inadequate parking. The proposal provides the 29 spaces which is three short of the required minimum. The applicant is basing their City's parking requirements for too high. Their evidence is appeal on the fact that the drive-through restaurants is a sampling of other cities 75-0264 ,0. o o o APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF CONDITOINAL USE PERMIT 89-16 - KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN ADDITION AT 477 SOUTH "E" STREET MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEETING - July 3, 1989 PAGE 2 City's parking requirements for drive-through restaurants is too high. Their evidence is a sampling of other cities requirements in Southern California, which generally have a requirement of one parking space for every 100 square feet of gross floor area. The City of San Bernardino's requirement is one space for every 60 square feet of gross floor area. In addition, they have provided evidence that the peak parking needs of the Kentucky Fried Chicken with the new addition would only be around seven spaces. The general policy behind parking standard requirements is to provide a sufficient number of parking spaces to accommodate the number of vehicles that ordinarily are likely to be attracted to the development in question. It is not desired to have a development with inadequate parking area or parking area far in excess of its needs. The former situation may lead to traffic congestion or parking violations on adjacent streets. The latter situation wastes money as well as space that could more desirably be used for valuable development or landscaping. In this case evidence has been presented to indicate that the City's standard is erroneous, and that the intent of the standard has been achieved. This evidence was not available to the Planning commission on June 6, 1989, when they voted 5 to 0 to deny the Conditional Use Permit and variance request. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OPTIONS: The Mayor and Council may deny the appeal and deny Conditional Use Permit 89-16 with variance as per Planning commission's recommendation; or uphold the appeal and approve Conditional Use Permit 89-16 with variance, subject to the appropriate revisions of Findings of Fact, Conditional Use Permit findings and variance findings. Prepared by: John Montgomery, AICP Principal Planner for Brad L. Kilger, Director of Planning Attachments:. A B Letter of Appeal to the Mayor and Council Statement of Official Planning commission Action Public Hearing Notice General Plan Consistency Finding C D PCAGENDA:CUPB9-16APPEAL @ CRRLSON OQSICiN & ~NSTRUCTION ccf;) p.o.box 819.onohelm.co 92815-0819 state license no.261205 a-I 2301 e.winston rd..onoheim co 92806-5542 phone(714) 776-3104 June 8, 1989 ..,~^~., ,-_.... i1.t\../"'. . - . . ...., -- :C: \1'.:'-: i 3 F ~ :=:.~ City Clerk City of San Bernardino 300 N. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Gentlemen: Conditional Use Permit 89-16 Kentucky Fried Chicken 477 S. "E" Street We hereby appeal the decision of the Planning Commission rendered on 6/6/89 for the above-referenced project. Our check for the amount of $75 is enclosed. Our appeal is based upon the following: 1. Parking requirements for the project are 1 space per 60 sq.ft. of gross floor area (1882 T 60 = 31.36 or 32 spaces). This code has been in place prior to the pro- liferation of drive-thru restaurants. The code was originally created for drive- in restaurants where customers park and are served food in their cars for con- sumption on the premises. Cars could be on the premises from 30-60 minutes or longer and, as such, parking requirements were high. Drive-thru restaurants are a different type of business. They are a convenience for customers who do not wish or are unable to leave their cars to purchase food for consumption off premises. We have enclosed a random sampling of parking requirements for other cities located in Southern California. This sampling suggests that many other cities have updated their requirements for drive-thru restaurants to reflect the fact that . restaurants with drive-thru facilities derive approximately 50% of their total sales from the drive-thru, and, as such, their onsite parking needs are far less than that of a conventional restaurant without a drive-thru. 2. We have enclosed a letter from Collins Foods International who is the operator of this store and three other KFC units in the city of San Bernardino. This letter provides information on this store and the KFC operation in general. The exhibits at the end of the letter indicate current sales per day, projected sales per day, and the incremental increase per day. Sales are indicated on an hourly basis and the type of sale. The sales charts clearly indicate that with the anticipated 16% increase in revenue, a total of 123 cars per day would park onsite over a 10- hour period--assuming that all customers arrive in an automobile. During the busiest single hour of the day (5-6 pm), the maximum number of cars on the lot at anyone time would be 7. . 3. The primary purpose of the proposed remodel is to upgrade a facili ty which has operated for 11 years since its last facelift. The intent is to upgrade the exterior of the building with a new color theme, add a considerable amount of landscaping, and renew the customer areas of the interior including the addition of new rest rooms which meet all handicap requirements. GENERAL. ELECTRI CAL. MEC HAN I GAL AND REF'RIGERATION CONTRACTORS ,0. o o o City of San Bernardino June 8, 1989 Page 2 Referencing to the random sampling of various cities' parking requirements, we feel that the city of San Bernardino's code is too stringent--especially as applies to a KFC. Based upon actual studies conducted by CFI and KFC of more than 200 KFC's in Southern California, we submit that we have a minimum of twice the number of parking spaces that will be utilized for the projected increase in business.. We would ask that the Mayor and City Council give this project and analysis consid- era tion. Sincerely, CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. RWM:jm enclosures Check #44882 $75 Parking Codes (per city) Collins Foods letter dated 6/5/89 o. June 8, 1989 CITY ORANGE COUNTY Buena Park Anaheim Orange Tustin Fullerton Costa Mesa Irvine LOS ANGELES COUNTY Artesia Carson Commerce Culver City Los Angeles Santa Fe Springs Santa Monica Long Beach San Fernando Torrance Manhattan Beach Long Beach Temple City Whittier Duarte DESERT CITIES Cathedral City Coachella Desert Hot Springs SAN DIEGO COUNTY Escondida . National City Oceanside poway Santee OTHER COUNTIES Slmi Valley Chino Hemet Lama Linda Ojal Victorville Napa Upland o 0 PA~!ill!Q.SQDEl5 (Per City) o CODES :EQUIRED SPACES ( ased Upon 2200 sq.ft.) 10 Per 1000 sq.ft. oC gross floor area 10 Per 1000 sq. ft. . 10 Minimum or 1 per 100 sq.ft. gross 1 For every 3 seats 1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross area 1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross area 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross area 22 22 22 18 22 22 22 1 Per 3~ fixed seats or 1 every 35 sq.ft. of seating area, plus 1 per employee on peak shift 10 Minimum, 1 per 100 sq.ft. gross 1 Per 4 fixed sea ts 13 Per thousand 1 Per 500 sq.ft. gross area 1 Per 35 sq.ft. of public area, 1 Per 75 sq.ft. gross 5 Plus 1 Cor each 3 seats 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross floor area 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross floor area 1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross floor area 20 22 14 29 5 restrooms excluded, 10 minimum 18 30 23 22 22 22 22 22 22 22 1 Per every 45 sq.Ct. of serving area or every 5 seats, whichever is greatest 1 For each 5 fixed seats, plus 1 per each 35 sq.ft. non- fixed seating plus 1 per each 2 employees at peak For each 5 seats or 1 per 35sq.Ct. seating area 15 21 19 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross area 10 Minimum or 1 per 100 sq.ft. gross area 15 Minimum, 1 for each 3 seats or 1 for each 45 sq.ft dining, whichever is greatest 1 Per 7 seats, plus 1 per employee 1 Per 100 sq.ft. of gross floor area 22 22 18 12 22 , 1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross 22 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. of gross floor area, plus 1 per each 2 employees 22 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. oC gross floor area 22 25 Spaces 25 1 Per 100 sq.Ct. gross 22 1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross 22 1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross 22 1 Per 100 sq.ft. gross 15 - . c. rUN 06 '89 12:47 o o P.2/5 o c::p COLLINa ~oooa INT.PlN....TION....... INC. June 5, 1989 Mr. Bob Merriam Carlson Desiin , Construction Co. 2301 E. Winston Road Anaheim, CA 92806-5542 Subject. Parking Needs and Traffic Circulation Study KFC ,236 - Mill' 'E' Street Dear Mr. Merriam: I - This letter is provided to share some of the knowledge which has been accumulated by Collins Foods International, Inc. (CFI) concerning the parking circulation impact for its Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) restaurant concept. CPI is the largest international franchisee for the Kentucky Fried ~~icken concept with 207 KFC restaurants. With over twenty years of experience, CPI has gathered a significant amount of data on all aspects of its restaurant concepts. This information specifically pertains to the parking issu.s you appear concerned with as voiced to our construction department. We expect the information contained herein will allow you to more properly understand the on-site circulation and parking issues for the proposed re- build of our KFC restaurant at the property located at 477 S. 'E' Street in So. San Bernardino, California. KFC, monitoring the sales statistics of its restaurants through the use of computers, is able to assemble data establishing actual parking require- ments, number of carson the property, and average time spent on site by each customer. Each sale is recorded at the time of the transaction, indicating when the customer ate at the restaurant, used the drive-thru facility, or carried the product out. This data indicates that the average service time to receive an order, either going into the restaurant or through the drive-thru, is approxi- mately 2.5 minutes. In servicing a drive-thru customer the time spent looking at the menu and deciding on their order averages closer to 3.5 minutes, thiS indicates that 17.14 drive-thru custOMers can be processed per hour with no more than one or two car stackinq occurinq at any time, and the maxiMum amount of time a drive-thru customer will be on the site should be nO more,than 6 minutes. Customers who walk in and carry meals out should not spend more than 10 minutes On our site. Our experience shows that the typical dine in customer consists ot a party of 2 or more patrons and the average time spent on site as a sit-down customer is 24 minutes. _.~_Jl:" , e8se w.....-".,...8f'll!!lo..tlevro.l.oe ~Caif'''''''''' eacee ca, 3,) 827.2300 MAlLAQQRliliiile: I=I.O'....:IOM. ~ ..........c.e~ 51000. T".X .?4Ue COL.uNS L.8" ..AX I;8:1:IJ pa.S'7ee - L . C). JUN 06 .89 12:48 o o P.:3/5 o June 5, 1989 Mr. Bob Me~~iaJII Carlson Design , Const~uction Co. Page 2 The restau~ant is located on South 'E' Street. As the typical traveller frequentinq KFC is on their way home, he or she. will enter the site off of South 'E' Street, either qo through the drive-thru, or into restau~ant and exit. To determine the potential traffic impact at this site it is important to consider the information on our existing restaurant prior to a rebuild. This current data establishes the existing t~affic impact. The existing KFC restaurant is a free-standing pad having 29 parking spaces, drive-thru and 22 seating. The existing store has a sales volume of a!most a half million dollars annually. Using the existing store as a base indicator and our twenty year plus experience with the Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant concept, we have projected an increase in weekly transactions of 220 or a 16\ increase in aales. We have projected aa shown in Exhibit I the amount of incremental t~affic to be generated when the new KFC restaurant is completed. The ratio of customer types are divided by the following properations: 45' for drive-thru, 26' for ca~ry-out, and 29' for dine-in customer. This equates to 99 drive-thru, 57 carry-out, and 64 dine-in customers daily. Exhibit I pertains to the rebuilt restaurant with respect to the increase in traffic ci~culation while on the site. What's significant is the total projected cars du~ing the peak hours of service occupying the site at any one time. Exhibit I shows a maximum of 7 cars frOD 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. What is important to keep in mind about KFC is that our customers are predominantly adults who frequent the drive-thru facility to purchase a feast for their family or acquaintances. Most transactions are purchased for groups of four or more, thus, ~he reason for less parking needs when compared ~o other fast food concepts due to our hiqhe~ ~icket per cus~omer averages. Additionally, the KFC concept itself does not cater to teenagers who are more inclined to linger on the site fraternizing with one another. Due to this, KFC enjoys a low ~equirement for parking and the. resulting traffic impact is light while generating a s~st.ntial sales volume. Con- sequently, ~he KPC concept is attractive for most developers and communities alike. We hope ~his information assists you in evaluating our submission. If there is any other info~a~ion that we can provide you in order to make your decision do not hesitate ~o let us know. Sincerely, ~~.~N~ Chris B. Planders Real Estate Manager CSP/pm cc : J. Henson W. Scarpino ----o~-. 0__.... - - . .... . .'_" __n . B " .1U"f 06 "89 12r49 '0 P.4~ o --..- .~. --0 -- . ... FOOTNOTE. _ The averaqe transaction for a drive-thru customer occurs every 3.5 minutes. _ The averaqe time spent on site for a carry-out customer is 10 minutes. _ The averaq. time spent on site as a dine-in customer is 24 minutes. o ., '0, lUN 06 '89 14'43 o o P.2/~-o-- CII/2.U#i S4c..dt.S P.!:.,iZ ~4Y EXHIBIT I KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN . 236 T:i... TTan.- 0:1. Day act.:i.on. Tot.al Dl':l.v. TbTU CaTTY Out. D:i.n. In ------------------------------------------------------ 193.0 4:S.0 " 26.0 X 29.0 " lIll." 1.0% 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.6 11.00 7.0% 13.5 6.1 3.5 3.9 12.00 14.e% 27.e 12.2 7.e 7.8 13.00 5.0X 9.7 4.3 2.5 2.8 14.00 5.0X 9.1 4.3 2.5 2.8 15.ee 6.0% 11.6 5.2 3.0 3.4 16.00 9.0% 11.4 7.8 4.:5 5.0 11.00 19.ex 36.7 16.5 9.S 10.6 18.0e 16.0% 30.9 13.9 8.0 9.0 19.00 11.0% 21.2 9.6 5.5 6.2 20.e0 6.e% 11.6 :S.2 3.0 3.4 21.00 1.0% 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.6 100.0% Tot.al 86.9 50.2 56.0 DT:i.V. CarTY D:i.n. Tot.al T:i... Thru Out. In PaTk:i.ng 01 nay Parking Parking Park1ng ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11.1/Hour 15/Hour 2.5/HoUT 10. ell e.0S 0.lI3 ..22 0 11.00 0.36 0.23 1.57 2 12.00 0.11 0.47 3.13 4 13.e0 0.25 e.l? 1.12 2 14.00 0.2:5 e.l? 1.12 2 15.1IUll lit. 30 0.2e 1.34 2 16." 0.46 0.30 2.01 3 17.00 lit. 9'1 e.64 4.2S 6 18. ell 0.81 0.:54 3.58 5 19.M 0.56 0.37 2.46 3 2e.lit0 e.30 0.20 1.34 2 21." 0.0:5 0.03 0.22 0 --------------------~--------------------------------------------------- Tot.al 5.1 3.3 22.4 31 AVERAGE 0.46 0.30 2.e4 3 '0. JUN 06 '89 14:44 o o fdDS"l!cr,&,'i) ~ .l!S /s.i2. i)JI/'Y EXHIBIT II KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN . 236 T111l. Traft8- o~ Day act.1ona Total. Dr:l.ve Tllru Carry Out. P.3/4 o ... Din.. In ------------------------------------------------------ 18.88 11.80 12.00 13.00 14. 88 1~.00 16.88 17.08 18.0e 19.80 20.88 21.." T1.. o~ Day 1.0X 7.8X 14.0X e.8X ~.0X 6.8X 9.0X 19.0X 16.8X 11.8X 6.IIlX 1.0X lee.0X 224.8 2.2 15.7 31.4 11.2 11.2 13.4 20.2 42.6 3S.8 24.6 13.4 2.2 Tot.al. 4~.0 X 1.lll 7.1 14.1 S.0 ~.lll 6.0 9.1 19.2 16.1 11.1 6.0 1.lll 100.8 Dr1ve ThTU Park1ng 26.lll " 8.6 4.1 8.2 2.9 2.9 3.S 5.2 11.1 9.3 6.4 3.S 8.6 ~.2 Carry Out. Parking 29.lll X lll.li 4.5 9.1 3.2 3.2 3.9 15.8 12.3 llll.4 7.1 3.9 8.6 65.0 Din. In PaTk1ng Tot.al. Parking -----------------------------------------------------------.------------ UI.08 11. 08 12.00 13.00 14.lIlla . lS.1Il0 16.00 17.00 18.8la 19.1lllll 211l.la0 21.1Il1ll 17.1/HoUT lS/Hour 2.5/Hour 0.0li 0.41 lll.83 0.29 0.29 0.35 IIl.S3 1.12 0.94 Ill. liS 0.35 111.06 0.04 0.27 0.~4 0.19 0.19 0.23 0.3S 0.74 0.62 0.43 0.23 0.04 0.26 1.82 3.64 1.3111 1.30 1.Sli 2.34 4.94 4.1li 2.86 1.156 0.26 (/I 3 ~ 2 2 2 3 7 6 4 2 o ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tot.al AVERAGE 15.9 lll.S4 3.9 Ill. 315 26.0 2.36 36 3 . O. JI../'i "'6 '8S 14:44 o o P.4/4 0 ~ 1~""'t!.'I/T'Zl'- IVc:.4,.e~S6. EXHIBIT III KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN . 236 ------------------------------------------------------ Till. Tran.- 01 Day act.ion. Tot.al Driv. Thrll Carry Ol.lt. Din. In 31.11 4~.0 " 26.0 X 29.0 " 10.00 1.0% 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 11. 011 ?0% 2.2 1.0 0.6 11.6 12.00 14.0% 4.3 2.0 1.1 1.3 13.00 5.0" 1.6 GI.7 0.4 0.4 14.00 5.0X 1.6 0.7 0.4 0.4 15.00 6.0% 1.9 0.8 0.5 0.5 16.00 9.0X 2.8 1.3 GI.? 0.8 17.00 19.0% 5.9 2.7 1.~ 1.7 18.00 16.0X ~.0 2.2 1.3 1.4 19.00 11. (/IX 3.4 1.5 (/1.9 1.0 2(/1.(/10 6.0" 1.9 (/1.8 (/1.:1 (/1.5 21.00 1.0% (/1.3 e.l 0.1 e.l lee. 0% Tot.al 14.0 8.1 9.0 Drive Carry Din. Tot.al Ti- Thrll Ol.lt. In Park:i.ng 01 Day Parking Parking Parking ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 17. 1 I HOl.lr l~/Hol.lr 2. 51 HOl.lr 10.00 e.01 0.01 0.1lI4 III 11.1lI0 0.06 0.04 0.25 0 12.e0 IlI.U 0.08 e.50 1 13.00 0.114 0.(/13 e.18 II 14." e.04 ..03 0.18 0 1:1." 0.05 ..03 0.22 . 16.00 0.(/17 0.(/15 0.32 0 17..0 0.16 11.10 (/1.68 1 18.011 0.13 ..09 0.S8 1 19.(/I1lI 0..9 ..06 0.40 1 20.0(/1 (/1..5 0.03 0.22 (/I 21.(/1. 0.(/11 0.01 0.04 . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tot.al 0.8 ..5 3.6 5 AVERAGE 0.(/11 0.05 ..33 0 '0. ATTAcONT "B" o o City of San Bernardino STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT Number: Conditional Use Permit 89-16 Applicant: Carlson Design ACTION Meeting Date: June 6, 1989 Approved Adoption of Negative Declaration and Request Subject to the Following Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements. x Denied. Other. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property involved which do not aPply to other property in the same district and neighborhood in that the 0.42 acre parcel is flat and rectangularly shaped rather than irregularly shaped. 2. The variance is not necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right of the applicant in that the property may still be used in a manner which is on a par with uses allowed to other property owners in the vicinity. 3. The granting of the requested variance could be detri- mental to the public welfare in that it could cause circulation problems and traffic hazards. 4. The granting of the variance would be contrary to the General Plan objective of ensuring that developments provide adequate parking, either on-site or in con- solidated parking facilities. ~ -0. o o o CITY OF SAN BERNA;. ":NO STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Conditional Use Permit 89-16 Page 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: 5. See Variance Finding No.4. 6. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located in that it is compatible with existing commercial uses in the vicinity 7. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare in that the site cannot accommodate the required number of parking spaces for the proposed amount of gross floor area. 8. The proposed site plan does not provide adequate parking in that it does not satisfy the Municipal Code parking requirement for drive-through restaurants. 9. The granting of this Conditional Use Permit would be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino in that the inadequate amount of parking could cause circulation problems and traffic hazards. YQn Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Absent: Brown, Lopez, Nierman, Sharp, Stone None None Cole, Corona, Lindseth I, hereby, accurately Colltlllission certify that reflects the of the City of this Statement of Official Action final determination of the Planning San Bernardino. Director of Planning Name cc: Project Property Owner Project Applicant Building and Safety Dept. Engineering Division ,0, L o o ATTACHMENT .Cn Public Hearing Notice A notice of the appeal hearing was sent to the applicant and property owners within 500 feet of the subject property at least 10 days prior to the hearing as per Municipal Code Section 19.81.020. A copy of this notice is attached. o .. i - ,0, o o o OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL APPEAL OF Conditional Use Permit 89-16 ; THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THE FOLLOWING ITEM HAS BEEN APPEALED TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL BY the applicant r (.",'" J SUBJECT. Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16 with Variance of Parking Standard. r PROPERTY LOCATION : 477 South .IE" Street PROPOSAL: To construct a 418 square foot addition to the Kentucky Fried Chicken drive-through restaurant and to construct a 29 space parking lot, 3 less than required 32 minimum spaces. PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 NORTH "0" STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92418 HEARING DATE AND TIME: Wednesday, July 5, 1989, 2:00 p.m. A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAl. IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT CITY HALL. IF YOU WOUl.D l.IKE FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN PERSON OR BY PHONING (714) 384-5057. THANK YOU. i., IM4 .., - - J '0- o 0 ATTACHMENT "D" o 'CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT "'l CASE FINDINGS of FACT AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE ~ PAGE -., General Plan Consistency Findinq The Planning Department has investigated Conditional Use Permit No. 89-16 and has determined that the proposed addition is consistent with the General Plan adopted,by the Mayor and Council on June 2, 1989. ~ NOY. . "'0 o. u - j J:l o OTACHMENT "En 0 , CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT" SUMMARY .... AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD 5 &-6-89 1 ..J l&I ~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 89-16 (J AP~I~NTCo11ins Foods International 1800 W. Kate11a Avenue Orange, CA 92667 OWNER, Carlson Design P.O. Box 819 Anaheim, CA 92805 t; lU ~ o lU a: ...... ct ILl a: ct The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit under the authority of Code Section 19.26.010(B9l to con- struct a 418 square foot addition to an existing drive through restaurant and a variance from Code Section 19.56.020 (f) regarding required parking. The 0.42 acre site is located at 477 South "E" Street. PROPERTY Subject North . East South t-lest EXISTING LAND USE Drive throuh rest. Corrunercial Corrunercial Corrunercial Corrunercial ZONING CM CM CM CM CM oJ ~ ZU) lU(!) ::IZ Z- OO a:Z >~ Z lU GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC HAZARD ZONE HIGH FIRE HAZARD ZONE o NOT APPLICABLE D EXEMPT ONO SIGNIFICANT . EFFE CTS NOV. 1911 RaVlllD .IuU I'" SKY DYES !UNo I.P.D. DESIGNATION CG CG CG CG CG C [3vES ) SEWERS 0 NO oVES QNO FLOOD HAZARD DVES OZONE A ZONE ~ NO OZONE B AIRPORT NOISE lOVES CRASH ZONE IiU NO o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS WITH MITIGATING MEASURES NO E.I.R. o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO SIGN IFICANT EFFECTS WITH MITIGATING MEASURES o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS SEE ATTACiiED E. R. C. MINUTES Z o fi ...0 ...Z lU ~::E U)::E o (J lU a: REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA iii YES oNO o APPROVAL o CONDITIONS !9 DENIAL o CONTINUANCE 'TO - '0. o o o .CITY OF SA~ BERNARDINO PLANNIN~ED~tW-T~ENT OBSERVATIONS AGENOA ITEM HEARING DATE ,AG ~ 6- 6-89 .2 1 . REOUEST The applicant requests approval under the authority of Code Section 19.26.020(8.9) to construct a 418 square foot addition to an existing 1,500 s~are foot drive through restaurant and approval of a var~ance from Code Section 19.56.020 (F) regarding required parking. The Municipal Code requires 32 parking spaces for the proposed total square footage. The site plan provides 29 spaces (See Attachment C) . 2. SITE LOCATION The 0.42 acre site is located on the east side north of Mill Street and is further described "E" Street (See Location Map, Attachment D). of "E" Street as 477 South 3. MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Except for the requested variance, the proposed project is consistent with the Municipal Code and in conformance with the General Plan as shown in Attachment A. The proposed addition does not meet the required setback of 20 feet from curb face of the Central City South Redevelopment Project Area, but it is a continuation of an existing building frontage. 4. CEOA STATUS The proposed .addition is exempt California Environmental Quality 1 (el. from Act per the provisions of the Section 15301 Class 5 . BACKGROUND Conditional Development Permit 879, an application for approval to enlarge the existing restaurant at .477 South "E" Street and to provide drive-through service, was approved by the Planning commission on August 15, 1978. The approved . J '0. o o o .CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT . CASE CUP89-l6 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DA1'! MGE 5 6-~-Rq r gross floor area was 1,464 square feet. and the required number of parking spaces was 25. The parking requirement for drive-through restaurants was the same at that time as it is now: 1 space per 60 square feet of gross floor area. On May 4, approval requested 1989, the Development Review Committee recommended of the site plan subject to approval of the variance by the Planning commission. 6. ANALYSIS Traffic Volumes on "E" street and Mill Street The existing traffic volume on the portion of "E" Street where the site is located is 18,000 trips per day. The traffic volume on the nearby portion of Mill Street is 21,000 trips per day. (Source: Technical Backqround Reoort: February, 1988.) At the Development Review Committee meeting of May 4, 1989, the Police Department expressed a concern that a tight parking situation at this site could cause on-site traffic congestion and traffic backing up at the entrance from "E" street. There are four (4) parallel parking spaces beside a one-way drive aisle 16 feet and 7 inches in width at the rear (east) side of the site. Cars pulling into these spaces could contribute to on-site traffic congestion. Traffic backing up on to a heavily traveled street 115 feet from a busy intersection has the potential to cause serious problems. size. Shaoe and Toooaraohv of the site The 0.42 acre site is a flat, rectangular parcel of land. There is nothing exceptional about size, shape, topography, or circumstances of the site which is not applicable to other parcels in the vicinity. Straiahteninq of the "E" Street Curb The "E" street curb in front of the site is not straight. Eventually, the street will be widened in order to provide a uniform distaQPe from the curb to the street centerline. The proposed site plan accounts for the eventual street widening. .i.- '0, o o o .CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE CUP89-16 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA I1D HfARlNG DATE HGE 5 0-6-89 4. No parking spaces are located within the setback from the ultimate curb face. CONCLUSION The site is located on south "E" street approximately 100 feet north of the intersection of "E" and Mill streets, a very busy intersection of two well traveled streets. Approval of the proposed site plan and the requested parking variance could cause on-site traffic congestion during peak use hours, leading to traffic backing up onto "E" street and, thereby, constituting a traffic hazard. There is nothing exceptional about the size, shape, topography or circumstances of the property in question to support approving the requested variance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends tional Use Permit Fact. that the Planning Commission deny Condi- 89-16 subject to the following Findings of . S ~<1A W/l-v-fJl Scott Wright Planner II ATTACHMENT A. - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance ATTACHMENT B - Findings of Fact ATTACHMENT C - Site Plan ATTACHMENT D - Location Map PCAGENDA:CUP89-160 . o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE CUP 89-16 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM 5 HEARING DATE 6-~-B9 PAGE 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL If Building Permits for the project described by this approval have not been issued prior to adoption of the General Plan, and the project described by this approval is. inconsistent with the adopted General Plan, then the approval of this project shall be null and void. Minor amendments to the plan shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10 percent of the square footage or a signi- ficant change in the approved concept shall be subject to (Planning Commission) (Development Review Committee) review and approval. Construction shall be in sub- stantial conformance with the plans approved by the Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Director of Planning. Four sets of Landscape Plans, along with the appropriate fee, shall be submitted to the Enaineerina Decartment for processing. No grading permits will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. At all times the business will be operated in a manner which does not produce obnoxious noise, vibration, odor, dust, smoke, glare, or other nuisance. Subject to the Conditions of the Department of Parks and Recreation (attached). In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition. PCAGENDA CUP89-l6C . o. AAHMENT "B" o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE ,.,nl>RQl ~ FINDINGS of FACT AGENDA ITEM 5 HEARING DATE 6-6-89 PAGE _ b "' VARIANCE FINDINGS: 1. There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumstances applicable to the property involved which do not apply to other property in the same district and neighborhood in that the 0.42 acre parcel is flat and rectangularly shaped rather than irregularly shaped. 2. The variance is not necessary for the preservation of a substantial property right of the applicant in that the property may still be used in a manner which is on a par with uses allowed to other property owners in the vicinity. 3. The granting of the requested variance could be detri- mental to the public welfare in that it could cause circulation problems and traffic hazards. 4. The granting of the variance would be contrary to the General Plan objective of ensuring. that developments provide adequate parking, either on-site or in con- solidated parking facilities. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS: 1. See Variance Finding No.4. 2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it ~s proposed to be located in that it is compatible with existing commercial uses in the vicinity 3. The size and shape of the site proposed fOr the use is not adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare in that the site cannot accommodate the required number of parking spaces for the proposed amount of gross floor area. Q. CITY OF SAN BERNRDINO PLA NING DEPARTMENT CASE CUP 89-16 . FINDINGS of FACT ~~~~~G I~~~E 6-6-:q PAGE 7 " 4. The proposed site plan does not provide adequate parking in that it does not satisfy the Municipal Code parking requirement for drive-through restaurants. 5. The granting of this Conditional Use Permit would be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of San Bernardino in that the inadequate amount of parking could cause circulation problems and traffic hazards. PCAGENDA:CUP89-16F "" ~ NOV, 1980 OF SAN BE ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS ARDINO CASE CUP 89-16 5 b-b-89 8 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE --C ""Il COMMERCIAL. INDUSTRIAL 1 x Conditional Use Permit 89-16 shall be in effect for a period of 12 months from the date of approval. However, if no development has been initiated at the end of the 12 month I period, the application shall expire. Additional time may be approved upon request of the applicant prior to expiration of the 12-month period. Expiration Date: June 6, 1990. 2 x PARKING: a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of 29 standard off-street parking spaces. b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the city Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway. . c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned property provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located within the required front or street side yard . setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in height when located within ten feet of the street line. . d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equivalent landscape berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential area. No fence or wall located in the .front setback shall obscure the required front setback landscaping. 3 x REFUSE ENCLOSURES: Whenever refuse bins are located within or adjacent to a parking area used by the public, they shall be enclosed by a decorative wall six feet in height along the rear and sides and screened gate(s) six feet in height along the front. The enclosure shall not be placed within the required front or street side yard "'" ~ I." Illy '. ARDINO CITY OF SAN BE CASE CUP 89-16 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 5 6-6-89 ~ setback area. Exact location and to be determined by the Planning Public Services Superintendent. size of refuse enclosures Department and Division .., are of , WALLS : a. six-foot high solid decorative walls shall be the north . south , east . and peripheral ==== property lines. (Only those "X" or check mark apply). required on west or markedWith 4 x LANDSCAPING: . The intent and purpose of this section is to prevent trees and other landscaping from damaging public improvements. a. Street trees must be installed at a minimum of 3C feet on center. varieties and exact location shall be determined by the Director of Parks and Recreation. b. d. ..... All required setbacks abutting a public right-of-way shall be landscaped (except for walks and driveways which bisect or encroach upon the required landscape area). , c. Four (4) copies of a landscape material specifications) shall Engineering Division for review and plan (including be submitted to approval. plant the All required landscaping shall be protected from parking areas and shall be provided with automatic sprinkler facilities which shall be maintained. in an operative condition. e. Interior planting shall be required and maintained equal to at least five percent or ten percent of the open surfaced parking area excluding the area of landscaping strip required by subsection "b" and shall include at least one tre~ for every five spaces or major fraction thereof. Measurements shall be computed from the inside of perimeter walls or setback lines. f. The required setback(s) from the north , south, , east ____I west -X-- property line shall be densely landscaped with mature trees, shrubs, and groundcover. A ____ -foot landscaped earthen berm shall be erected and maintained within the setback along the above indicated property line. .-J I'" .., -0. 0 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUIREMENTS o CASE CUP 89-16 5 fi-~-Rq lfl STANDARD AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ~ a. ILLUMINATION: All lighting directed away right-of-way. fixtures in from adjacent the parking properties areas shall be and the public 5 x 6 x MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT: a. Air conditioning and vent ducts shall be directed away from any adjacent residential uses, and all sides of the building shall be free of any external vents' and mechanical equipment including, but not limited to, conduits and ducts. b. All building-supported mechanical equipment (including roof equipment, ladders and air conditioning and vent ducts) shall be enclosed within the building's primary architectural elements; independent screening devices shall not be permitted. c. All ground-supported equipment such as transformers and air conditioners shall be located within the building and/or in underground vaults. All utility service shall be painted to they are located. e. All existing overhead utility services and wiring shall be relocated underground. d. boxes, connections and service lines match the building exterior on which f. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and Cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, Cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the structures. Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required (if applicable). 7 x Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil precipitation. During construction, the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of by the City exposed to 8 x " ,.., ..., o. o o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO STANDARD REQUIREMENTS , '" CASE 89-16 ~ AGENDA ITEM 5 HEARING DATE 6-6-"1 Q PAGE II ~ 9. ~o. .1. .2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. r BUr~DrNG AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT x x x x ". x x x x '" Submit plans prepared by a Registered Architect or civil or Structural Engineer. Submit a complete lateral and structural analysis prepared by a Registered civil or Structural Engineer or Architect. Submit State of California Title 24 Energy Calculation Forms for non-residential buildings including a signed compliance statement. Submit calculations and structural Registered civil Structural Engineer following items: TRUSSF.S drawings, prepared or Architect, for by a the x Submit floor plan of existing structure. Label all uses and existing materials of construction. Submit four complete sets of construction plans including: a. Copy of conditions. b. Soils and liquefaction report. c. Energy Calculations. d. Structural calculation. Submit a preliminary liquefaction do so. (soils and geology with report) prepared by a person licensed to Submit a single line drawing of all equipment, conduit and wire service ground size and grounding the electrical service. sizes and types. Show electrode. She-... the Submit panel schedule(s) and electrical plans. Permit required for demolition of existing building(s) on site. Submit a system. equipment plan of the heating, ventilating or air conditioning (Clearly identify the location and rating of the and the sizes and material of all ducts, registers and I..S ...,. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22" 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. '0- - o o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ., CASE CUP 89-16 AGENDA ITEM 5 HEARING DATE 6-6-89 PAGE 12 .J STANDARD REQUIREMENTS " ~ x x x x x . v x x x x x " the ~ocation of all fire dampers). Show means of providing mechanical ventilation as required by the 1982 Uniform Building Code. ., Submit gas pipe loads, sizing calculations and isometrics. Provide a plot plan showing the location of the proposed sewer system. Submit a letter clearly indicating the intended use of all areas of the building. List the materials to be used and the projects produced giving the amount of each kept in the building. If the building is used for more than one purpose, list all other uses. Submit isometric plans of the cold and hot water and drain-waste and vent systems. Show compliance with Title 24 for the physically handicapped in the following: REST ROOMS, EXIT RAMPS Submit plans approved by the County Health Department. Indicate methods of compliance for sound attenuation (exterior, interior party walls, floor/ceiling assembly, ceiling) as per study,U.B.C., local or State Law. Show compliance with requirements of high fire areas. For structures located within high wind areas: a. Design structure, including roof covering, using 20 p.s.f. wind load. City of San Bernardino named as certificate holder for Worker's Compensation Insurance. Assessor's Parcel Number. 136-191-04,24 Contractor's City license. Contractor's State license. Sewer capacity rights from Water Department, 384-5093, Neil Thomsen. School fees from Unified School District, 381-1179. . I.'S .., . o. o o o , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CASE CUP 89-16 .sTANDARD \. REQUIREMENTS 5 b-tJ-ts~ 13 ~ " AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE , other: 29. x . DEPOSIT: $160 PLAN CHECK csj/8~3-88 . DOC : PCAGENDA DOCUMENTS. 2 "'" ~ 1.., airy . o~ .,-- o o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ CASE CUP 89-16 AGENDA ITEM 5 HEARING DATE 6-6-89 PAGE t 4 ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS .... " ~ 30. -L 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. x 36. x \.. "'.V'B4 POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS SECURI TV Ll GHTl NG x x All exterior lighting devices are to be inaccessible to common reach or climbing shall be protected by weather and vandalism-resistant and be valdal resistant. All exterior lighting shall be projected so as not to cast light onto adjoining properties. All roof openings giving access to the building shall be secured with either iron bars, metal gates, stamped metal or shall be alarmed and meet with approval of the Police Department. Interior night lighting shall be maintained in those areas that are visible from the street (ground floor only). x x DOORS, LOCKS, AND WINDOWS Swinging exterior glass doors, wood or metal doors with glass panels, solid wood or metal doors shall be constructed or protected as follows: a. Wood doors shall be of solid core construction with a minimum thickness of 1 3/4 inches. b. Hollow metal doors shall be constructed of a minimum equivalent to six- teen U. S. guage steel and have sufficient reenforcement to maintain the designed thickness of the door when any locking device is installed such as reenforcement being able to restrict collapsing of the door around the locking device. c. Except when double cylinder dead bolts are utilized, any glazing uti- lized within 40' of any door locking mechanism shall be constructed or protected as follows: Fully tempered glass or rated burglary resistant glazing or iron or steel grills of at least 1/8" metal with the maximum 2" mesh secured" on the i nsi de of the glazi ng may be utili zed or the glazing shall be covered with iron or steel bars of at least 1/2" round or 1" x 1/4" flat metal, space not more than 5" apart and secured on the inside of the glazing. All swinging exterior wood and steel doors shall be equipped as follows: ~ SJt. FORM C . paor: I 0' l!l j j "'v o o o , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO "'" CASE CUP 89-16 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS \.. AGENDA ITEM 5 HEARING DATE 6-6-89 PAGE 15 , ~ "'" a. A single or double door shall be equipped ~th a double or single cylinder dead bolt. The bolt shall have a minimum projection of 1" and be constructed so as to repel cutting tool attack. . b. The dead bolt shall have an embedment of at least 3/4" into the strike receiving the projected bolt. The Cylinder shall have a cylinder guard, a minimum of five pin tumblers and shall be connected to the inner portion of the lock by connecting screws of at least 1/4" in diameter. The recommendation does not apply when panic hardware is required or an equivalent device is approved by the Building Code. 37. x Double doors shall be equipped as follows: a. The acti ve leaf of double doors shall be equipped wi th metal flush . bolts having a minimum embedment of 5/8" into the head and threshhold of the door frame. Double doors shall have an astragal constructed of steel, a minimum of .125" thick which ~ll cover the opening between the doors. Thi s astraga 1 sh all be a mi ni mum of 2" ~ de and extended a mi ni mum of 1" beyond the edge of the door to whi ch it is attached. The astraga I shall be attached to the outsi de of the acti ve door by means of welding or ~ th nonremovable bolts spaced apart on not more than 10" centers. Hinges for outswinging doors shall be equipped with nonremo- vable hinge pins or a mechanical inner lock to preclude removal of the door from the exterior by removing the hinge pins. Strike plates shall be a mi nimum of 3i" in length and secured to the jamb ~ th screws a minimum of 2t" in length. 38. -lL. Windows: a. All moveable windows shall be equipped with a locking device and shall be constructed in a fashion to restrict them from being lifted out of its track when in closed pOSition. Garage type doors; rolling overhead, solid overhead, s~nging. sliding or accmrdion style. a. The above-descri bed doors shall conform to the followi ng standards: (ll Wood doors shall have panels a minimum of five-sixteenths (5/16l inch in thickness with the locking hardware being attached to the support framing. (2 l A I umi num daors shall be a mi ni mum thi ckness of .0215 inches and riveted together a minimum of eighteen (18) inches on center along the outside seams. There shall be a full width horizontal beam attached to the main door structure which shall meet the pilot, or pedestrian access, door framing within three (3) inches of the strike area of the pilot or pedestrian access door. \.. ~ MAY '84 S.R. 'ORM Co PAGE Z OF 15, ..v o o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. CASE CUP 89-16 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM . 5 HEARING ~~ 61~-89 39. x Open parking lots and carports shall be provided with a maintained minimum of one (11 footcandle of light on the parking surface during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism resistant covers. . ..v CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. CASE CUP 89-16 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS o AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 5 6-6-89 17 Project Description: Cup,qq-/(p 7, Or.t6 hI! /Soo5F Date: 5-3-t3f Page L of ....5:- pages Prepared By: 1kIG- Revi ewed By: App1 icant: C/!1C~ON ~6N NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, . t e app lcant lsresponsib1e for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Draina e and Flood Control All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer; which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be desi gned and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. _ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by.the City Engineer shall be required. _ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. _ Comprehensive storm drai.n Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. ThlS drain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclusively show that the drain is not needed to protect your development or mitigate downstream impacts. 40. LA11 drainage from the development approved public drainage facility. drainage facilities and easements satisfaction of the City Engineer. shall be I f not shall be directed feasible, provided to an proper to the -c- o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/1NQIl CASE CUP 89:'16 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS o o AGENDA ITEM HEARING ~i. 5 6-6-89 I. 418 '7.E. ADD/1io;.l 7b /S-aJ 5'r p F- /'1/ /.L.. S r. , Project Description: {;;vf7 8q-/~ (f1hIn.~*Jod ()foI els 'e' Sr AloLrH Date: Page -z:=- or .:z.-~rge~ Prepared By: ~ Reviewed By: Grading 41. X--If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading -bond wi 11 be requi red and the grading shall be supervi sed in . accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. 42. )<_A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must . be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan; 43. X_An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. 44. ~A rt,ipl aeal '43emt"t ~~~pe.al if reeiprocal pr:-epased i~ ,"ass lot recorded to remove the Jha 11 he reee. d,el pr; nr tn 3radi Ag pl an. ~rai"a~'t l1GGess, ~t:wer. alld/at pa,king is liftB, QF' a lot line adjustment shall be interior lot lines. 45.. X_The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. 46. ~Anon-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. Utilities: 47. .x--Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV. \.. . -0. r 000 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. ~ CASE CUP 89-16 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 5 HEARING DATE 6-6-~'l PAGE 1 Project Description: CvP /19-/{, Date: ~_;~ Prepared 8y: fUUG-Reviewed By: Page ~ of pages Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer ----facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be ----constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's .Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. 48. A.-Uti 1 i ty serv ices sha 11 be p1 aced underground and easements provided as required. All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site' -on eithe'r side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-60l (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65 (Non-subdivisions). 49. 2L-Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be -maintained by the. City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan. where practical. ~c o 0 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKI/INQfI. CASE cUP 89-16 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS o AGENDA ITEM HEARING = b-I,-ij~ 20 Project Description: CuP 89-lb Date: 7"-3dfi Page ~ of 5" ;lages Prepared By: I1uf::,- Revi ewed By: _ Mapping A Fina,/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and ~ones, seismic lines and setbacks, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in accordance ~lith Ordinance No. MC-S92. Imprbvement Completion Street, se\~er, and drainage improvement plans for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. If the required improveQents are not completed recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. an improvement accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer City will be required. If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Parcel Map, an improvement certificate shall be placed upon the Map stating that they tlil, be completed upon development. Applicable to parcel maps consisting of less than 5 lots only. prior to security and the Required Engineering Permits: 50. . X 51. .X Grading pemit (if appl icable). On-site improvements ~onstruction permit (except buildings - see Suilding and Safety). Off-site improvements construction permit. ^C o o o r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKI/INQtl CASE CUP 89-16 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENOA ITEM . HEARING ~i 5 6-6-89 -." 52. Project Description: CUP 8'1-/" . Date; 5"- 3-fY1 Prepared By: f"tA.</v--Revie\'/ed By: Page -s:- of ~ pages Applicable Engineering Fees:it Plan check fee for Final/Parcel Map. Plan checl< and inspection fees for off-site improvements. X Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildinss; see Building and Safety). X Plan check. and inspection fees for grading (i f permit required). Bridge improvement fee in amount of $ . X Drainage fee. Exact amount of fee shall be determined by Department of Building and Safety at time of application for building permit. X Landscape Plan Revi e';; Fee $ 65.00 . X Traffic System Fee of $ 12.35 per vehicle trip for City-wi de tra ffi c mitigation. The total amount of the Traffic System Fee shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of application for building permit. Street Light Energy Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. A Landscape Maintenance Di strict shall be implemented to r.laintain landscaping with i n the fo 11 owi ng areas: )( t',t1y A- R::G TO iHG OTy /0 u,~ rvr<./lZe= COSt OP c..;/~"'IJ.{{,.- " II .5rl!E€/ 10 ?br/IDfE II- l?t5T/lNcE r.eom f: To CtJt8 == 43 ~ C. ~ 5I/1h...t- Be ~ ON. C/ry~ 5r/1llP/jI!J) f./NIT f?R.tcES. ~Pees /!'IlE :s </fJ,Jer:-r To CHNJ6l? WI ThY' ",r No1'/cE. .J 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. .~ SAN BERN~INO CITY WATER DEQTMENT'S STANDARD REQUIREMENTS o Review of Plans: # e..V P 8cIf -- L Cp Location: .4-'l" "e. F .. ""f Type of Construction: ~16 .... .!3'',:.,! "1"'":--t::::R.,,,.; ~.- . ~'"F\l"""J Owner/Developerc- J _I&l~ ~~ ~V" ENGINEERING: . Na~;;',? ;z::'.~~;'h~u- _1 58. ~.S.1. _\~&:' -:p~ I J .,.,. lu Il cl' 59.~Size of Main Adjacent to the Project "" _ t;..c: 60. .K. Pressure Regulator Suggested on Customer's Side on the Meter. o Comments: Date: Approved: Denied: Continued: Date: A\ 110\~ 4/11e!f{ I J ~g>.- -1 o Subject to the rules & regulations of the Water Department in effect at the time of application for water service. WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name: ~h:.L Mnr4.JfJ5 61. ){ o Date: 4 "'!o o o R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. Air Gap Required at Service Connection. No Backflow Device Required. Date: ~ Jt>~ I ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name:~~~ ~~,:t o Industrial Waste Permit May Be Required by Environmental Control Officer. o Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer. 62.A No Regenerative Water Softeners May Be Installed Without Prior Approval of the Environmental Control Officer. o Approved by Environmental Control Officer. SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: (...-lJdt:lc. (" 2~ Date: ../. J ~ I~ o No Sewer Capacity Charge Applicable at This Time. ~:t:!:.. ~~ 1 63~Sewer Capacity Right Must Be Purchased from the Redevelopment Agency or t_e Ma,o.". elli..1ll the Amount of Gallons Per Day. Sewer Capacity Rights Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: If. '11 1" '1 And/or: 64,;;;.Z!-. Proof of Purchase Must Be Submitted to the Water Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit. o This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water District and All Fees Will Be Determined by Their Department. #216 5/85 . AT'OH~lr;NT "(;"' 0- \."UlU7-.l."!O I iJU . II i!n II [',!ii ; , .. 'I.- II" .1 I- - . ! .. : , ," j: .: ~ II ~ I; :: .. n -. :It ~: = ! ;;:.. 0 ;; i z .- , ", .. ::; Oft 5z() :i !. j' i .~ . -.. rt...:....~...:_: -- - .J,.. I _---L.i~- · nc~ ~l li~ , __-._"~ 10..___.. ... " .;_~-:r.--' -r' ", ~;i~...",- =-=;'-:'-0-- t-r:t" ~\'- . (; 1~:O "ft.__..... -9;~,;;! -----1 :j - I -:-i '.1 I 2-:: ~ 0-11 ,.., " :1':.e~':"..Jt,:, .1.: _ 1- ....\ I r __. ,,- I) I ',',ft" . -",I -,;;.Iii~' ~ r 31!i~i 6 I l- .. :11 . '. "I, --~ I - -.. . I <;;. t- ~ I '. . . ,- I ~ c~' .! 1 I ' ,l:8 . J- I .,~ " I I I -J. iH HI!! 11- <lI- ;~ ~ ~!: 1 I .; ll.J"~ ~ +l'E): :~ ! ~ I !;: I I ~ .. :---:-. :1 ,.... ._.- :Ii : J r r......a;~ 'l_;- .JIf'''__~ !; I:;'''! _ r ~.e. ': : l --' .. ....; ~.:....~" L'-l -.....l . .Jf-.- t i I' 1: '19iL~fl-:: -~ " ri, - I ._-..~ _... Ell I ; . ----; v . e ' ,--;:, -jl .. ',' .J---l--' . :.... ~ :: .!" ~-- :! I! .~ , i5 r I : f- --- r , I I ----- ... ---_!-" , - , ! . It Go-'- 1\ ~': -' -:~ :t=~: \~.. tt ,_~e,. -6r:; i r;- (}. ~l:i ~ ~ ~. - j , ", I ~r-~-~::l "~pi . ,+-- = I f ~;... . :: r~ 5ii -@I' i i ~ LJ~'=---,<-I-:!a l i! 1 .. ii }';~-- I s s , :i ;~:- j i il I -E). '-. . I i--~- f s i Ii Ii H i= ;~ I ! : ! ~ I I j .-.. '". it! '" :i .. i! .:: l~ .r._' ~Ell r .~ r <; r- '0 1 i ~: -, , .~~ O'~ 0.' ,.. c n I ~ ~ . .. ~ z() _ '" "." S'''IIT I , " " j I , ! ; I , 1 I t I' . I ~ I 0'.;) .:e- o- J ~'I ,.. ! , - ,- - ~ I.. a' n' ~ '\ ~\:,!\T.\i~ -11 i \: . I ,,- ,. I ~ '. 1 i. i i, ; It tCDC\ c::~c:.~~s~~:,::,~~.==~.::'~D. 1.\ i~ ~ "---"- ......---.-.........-....- 'I' __..- _... _''''_0'__'''''' __.._ ..... t ,_.__n .-... -.. - ~~=~~_'!'..."_..~.~~~~_.........._.............. "."ce 0' ".....cs........,....'" -..-...-. ......- -...- --..- -... ..--.....--....-......-...-.-..... ~!~~~1;~~-::~~:-:.;'S:~:.:r;7;:k ....... -.-. .--.-.. ,_.,-,_.~ .......... ...... ..,_......... - - -..... ~,..- .~-, '.. ... ,.. .-..-.....-........ ---..,......., ....'... iEb-=;~f~;t~~~~~~EE::;~::;.~,~~ r. ~.":;':'~"!" ~!;.'.... ...... ....... . J 1 - -0- .oACHMENT "0" o o LOCATION CASE CUP89-16 AGENDA ITEM # 5 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PlANNNG DEPARTMENT 6-6-8q HEARING DATE M-' 0 M-2 I""" ,- I .. T III 11-2 ~ .. 31 :z: 11'2 '" M-/ M-2 % .... C-II C-II C-II CoM ... ~ .... ... . M-I .... <II ffiB '" M'2 ... ~ ... ! . M-I ~ CoM ~ . . M-I C'" . i . M-2 C-M 101-1 101-1 . ~ ~ . M-/ 101-1 C-M . .~ CoM 101-2 C.II -,' II,' M.I ~Q 11-1 C.M C.M M" 101., Ant .. OJ C-3 C-3 C-3 C.M 9 0"0" 11'2 11-2 11I- C.M N M.' 11'2 .0. "0" "0'. .0. C-~ CoM )<~ "0" 0 ... ... .0. :z: 101-1 ~ .... C'M 0 " '" .0. of' ,," !i II-I ,...... +l CoM 101-1