HomeMy WebLinkAbout01A-Land Use
,
()
- --
C I T Y 0 F SAN B ERN A R DIN 0
INTE~FICE MEMORAN~
VS90S-1312 ~.
o
TO: Bra4 Kilger
Director of Planning
FROM: Kenneth J. Henderson
Director of Community Development
-------------------------------------------------------------
Brad, attached please find a letter from one of our infill
developers to me regarding proposed land use designation
changes. Attached to this letter is information showinq the
location, parcel number, planning issues and proposed zoning.
Several months ago I and Maurice Oliva (my Housing Develop-
ment Specialist at the time) met with members of your staff
and Roger Hardgrave to discuss the planning issues noted in
the attachment and to ensure the proper zoning for the
affected parcels throuqh the General Plan Revision Work
proqram.
I would appreciate these parcels receiving the proper zoninq
so our intill housinq proqram can go forward. we have loaned
the developer up to $7,000 per lot to acquire these parcels
for infill development. Plans have already been submitted to
affected City departments and we anticipated construction
commencing by late summer.
I appreciate your prompt consideration of this matter.
~
KENNETH J. HENDERSON
Director of community Development
KJH/lab
attachment
'0
~
MCII'IC
U.
.....~.INTI
lie.
t.,
~A_UE
.,n
\.ClNG _
(..' '. FOI'INIA 10102
..\.-
-
-
o
o
,
\
..,1-
May 10, 1989
Kenneth J. Bender.on, Director ..
COIIIIIIUnity Development Department
300-Borth "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
~..
~~~.
RBI Rezoning of In-fill Housing Parce18
Dear Mr. Henderson I
It has come to our attention, after a meeting with Mr. John
Montgomery of the Planning Department, that several of the
lots, on which we had been planning to build duplexe., have
been rezoned by the City to allow only single-family unit..
One unit was rezoned to a commercial/industrial designation.
As you will remember, the purpose behind pursuing the
duplexes was that several of the locations were ill
questionable areas that would not support appraisal. for
single-f&JDily homes. All of - these lot. had either a R-2 or
R-3 designation. How, five of the duplexes have been zoned
RS and one with the commercial/industrial zone. Attached
please find a copy of all units and the lots that are in
question.
We would ask that you investigate this aatter to determine
what might be done to continue as planned. If I can answer
any questions, please give me a call.
Barry R. McDaniel
Vice-Pre ident
Attachment
"
o
....~.Il. ~. ..
':>
. '
au _11Cl IIII'IU ....Il1O _
IIIUU _110 D~ '" I.ca
----------------------------------
-----
-~
~ ..:t1
.-.
nn_1'
-
- ------------
-
~/~~'~~ 121-121-",35
~,- .,"'
" \
a{ IIMS IPJUCa ft; 121-121007
'~.....~-,.._._,.~,~,.--...
-
al .~u.. UIjlI1_
'\2..5
~S
J
-
'1"aR1JIg .~y
DI J.ol "aluge
J. nil __ II
121-113-11
.IJIGLI 'JlIlII,r al ....k1ag nqll1_
DI J.ol "aiuga
136 .~ 11'
al 11<10 rani oat Dlcka
\, I
/- ...lJiQt4~ '1~5m(
~ . t
12'-113-20
IJJIGLI 'JlIlII,r
~~:...::~ ,~
UI _ II
al ..._ or C1tJ lUOat u_
DI Ilotch1llg raton cull I gutter ~ \ L -)
vitll ..SOU.. 11lDotudud .... ~,' /2."1-2..
Ut-IIZ-12
~:
-
",,,..,,,
~: USI VIllI II Ut-llI-tO - al ....k1ag nq_ e..7
DI J.ol "aluge
1.. 1211 _ II 12'-111-01 - al ....u.. ~ ~5
" DI J.ol "aluge
I. 112' IlOVJDaaI II 1"-011-10 IJJIGLI 'JlIlII,r a) J.ol "ala... ill _jUDCU..
vitll ..".....t ,..pony
,. III' IlOVJDICII II 144-011-11 IJJIGLI 'JlIlII,r al J.ol "alaago ill _,lIIlCUca
vitll ""0_ pmpaRl
10. -J- ft IIDa laB 144-111-21 2 IJJIGLI rJlllIl,r 01 Illbd1vloiClll ~ ro< opUtUIIg
,.....s illy _ _
DI _"" .._ ,.. no< ~
~~:::A~'=::~':r.4-20I-ZZ - ., ruk1ag .~ V--:,
---------------------------------------
o
O~~7~
Re I New General Plan land use catagory QeSignation J ~
/1!'o s....M..- W...;
r am here today to call to your attention that wi thin the" S
General Plan land use catagories we have lumped together under one
catagory 2 quite different uses. The city has provided one zoning
00-1 which encompasses both medical uses and uses which are not
directly related at all to medical. Hospitals and medical offices
possess unique characteristics which clearly differentiate them
from administrative type offices. Hospitals and medical offices
handle infectious waste, pressurized gases. take x-ray~ and
handle radio active substances. Administrative offices do not.
Hospitals must be able to provide sleeping accomodations for
patients, administrative offices do not. Hours of operation vary
dramatically from administrative type offices. Private medical
offices compete with the emergency room services provided by acute
care hospitals. These private medical offices, like hospitals,
are open on weekends. For example. the'Highland Medical Center,
located in the Target shooping center at Highland and Sterling
Avenues, advertises in the Yellow Pages, "We're open ~hen you need
us every day of the vear." No administrative office~i have ever
been aware of, stays open )65 days a year.
In addition to the significant distinctions between the
characteristics of the two types, it is my understandinlZ and belief
that medical professionals do not want to be located at sites !way
from acute care hospitals. An acute care hospital serves as an
anchor to medical related uses just as a major department store
serves as an anchor in a city's shoppinlZ mall. Ac~ordinlZ to Dr. James
Mulvhill, Urban Planning professor at CA State University, San Bdno.,
it is by no coincidence that medical offices follow wherever an acute
care hospital exists. Doctors find it more difficult to successfully
operate at sites located away from acute care hospitals. For
example, our dentist Dr. Glen Davis told me he found it advantageous
to move from his prior medical office site on Gilbert Street to
2150 N. Waterman Ave., a site across the street from St. Bernardine's
Hospital. The site away from a hospital has not been found to be
desirable for medical office uses and because of this, after taking
more than a year to find a buyer, who is now in escrow, it is
expected that the medical office building will be demolished and the
site used for an alternate ouroose. Likewise, a oroblem of con-
sistent vacancies exists at"a major medical office building located
at 21)0 N. Arrowheaz{ Avenue. "Because of the convenience fa~tor,
doctors like to be clustered together in t he same area near the
medical center hospitals." said Dr. Davis.
Creating a zoning which would group together all medical
related uses would help to achieve greater uniformity in the cit~r.
It would recognize the unique characteristics of medical building
uses and it would help to prevent a developer from making "the
wrong" decision if he were contemplating buildine a medical office
building Away from a major anchor, that is an acute care hospital
site. Because of medical building's specialized suuulies and their
uses, their different hours of operation, and their'typical need to
be near a major anchor, they are distinctly different from adminis-
trative type building uses and should be given a seperate land use
designation in the General Plan to reflect this.
I / t ,
d ~-...d,_._,(; ~ <to &~~'-' ~~'2 ~'~
-<-- pIi' Z'f? D ""v-/~L, ~~-.L -4-,~>,X-.4 ,t><-tf. _~. / ".__,.
I V / ~~~~'C4~~v~~~
~dt i'-'--':J~~d~'~~'(;~~~, f-~;L,~'{..bm'
o
o
o
o
o
\t:.'"'A-D'NI:> .
C I T Y 0 F SAN B ERN A R DIN 0
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
James F. Penman, City Attorney
FROM:
Henry Empeao, Jr., Deputy City Attorney
May 18, 1989
GENERAL PLAN AND THE RU, RESIDENTIAL URBAN,
LAND USE DESIGNATION.
DATE:
HE:
Attached please find copies of the Planning Department's
recommendations for the General Plan in describing the RU,
Residential Urban, land use designation.
As I stated to the Mayor and Council yesterday, May 17,
1989, this document, pages 71 and 72, encompasses policy
decisions which are entirely within the legislative authority of
the Mayor and Council.
Within that legislative authority, the Mayor and Council may
designate RU for mUlti-family attached dwelling units and may set
minimum lot sizes. They may also outline requirements for
"granny units" and for complete second units. They may also
choose not to do any of the above.
State law does not require the City to adopt these
recommendations.
~~
HENRY EM ENO, JR., .
Deputy City Attorney
HE/dys
cc: Dennis A. Barlow, Asst. City Attorney
o
1
.
,
000
LANSING AND ASSOCIATES
REAL ESTATE elNVESTMENT e DEVELOPMENT
291 S La Cienega Blvd
Suite 307
Beverly Hills, CallfornlO 90211
(213) 657-5191
May 9, 1989
Planning Department
City Council
City of San Bernardino
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: GENERAL PLAN REVIEW: LAND USE
To Staff and Council:
We hereby respectfully request that our parcel
APt 143-190-059 containing 10.10 acres which
currently shows CG-l on the front and R-l on
the back be fully included into a CG-l catagory
on your general plan revision.
It is evident that this was previously planned
this way due to the proposed freeway 30 right
of way.
Being that this location has been abandoned we
feel that as 10 acres a more attractive commer-
cial development can occur.
We appreciate your consideration of this item.
GPL/vt
.
~
, i
. '
, .
.
\I
"
I
I
I
. ,
I
I
.
;
l .
I
"
"
!'
';
f '
, ; I
. "I u~"-t "'~ ilsTA-Qz ~ ~ 2300 2400 ~ 250<1 2)00 ""'00 ~ I
"Y,li ~r~t' ~ .J I' ~ ;"i ~ ,: ~BR~CH ~l~;~.
~~~ I%!'j~ i < L..J:- ;;; -
> . =~), Ar1IZ(..NA!~e '? ~CA;.IFORNIA ::u-r-- ~J ST
I VDE ST CL~~E,i.l~_~,l: . -'11 ~ 2~ o-v- ~ ';LENVIEV "'I~ ·
,,--' "'~ GLENVIEW~ ~"l'"1~~# I i ~1 ,-. SV' "ANIA ... ~ ~ tENNSVLVANi~ AV
""I "",,,,FIf,- iii..ST..,:;~..... ..... I.-EN ...., ,",v ~ -, ....1
~ .. N % ~"FLOijES Sf /
I ~ ~R 1S ~!:l Ul _9 i! ~"'Z~ r -
'_. ~~ Il~s~:'~N~~dJi 1--,.. I !! FLOFES SI WILS N ~~;l,;'~ ~
_ I'~~fl~ n-'-~: ~ :.cLORE5.T ,G RDENA ST _ ~ ~l.q~~ <OJ~~ ..,.
~T~~OI' t.r~'9. ~~i r z /:~ 0'0 . ,:I; , SON ST TR CY"'~'iA.~'~ -4 r,o ...:('.
':< . ~ ~ '~l~' I l-. i"\' en ~.... ~ ~ ~..~~~~ "~~~):
lit::. 'l~ I- . .,., "-I ~..i! 'N' .....~1j)~.......;.~:.A.;.;
.'M' USC<;"~~ ~ i::~~ANf~~i 1ST ~.. tn'~S .~~~}':::a~t:~~;:,
. XJW .. .... 1lroo' r_ A .........".c: .......
lD J, : ~...... ~:~,~ i ~ I ~ ;.: rM~:r ~~:~lN:;;
~ -l I .. l.''So \
~ rr1 a; ~ Pica I P.J l ~ ~\ ~Y<''\",~ ~
~ ~50 ~ -l ~ I . I ~~\''''P,c.o I4V'?v?
_ ._,...~ % ~ J:lEIlBIr.ibTON~AII (' =~ - , :::r=
..n _. Z 1;;1: ' I ::. ~ ;; HERRI~TO
1 . , i~ Il! ~ ' ~ ;;0 ~-(Q -- ,.......
(,0 MT. VERNON 1700 AV.'::'....-.... ~ MI AMO~TE 1'7n :i; ~ ~ i! I DR ~ ~
1600 ". - 2000QJON. ~ N N ~ ~ TT)> d l~ II 'i~ lin,
--r"i TURRILi'""t. ~ AVII L: ~ i ~ ~.;! ~ T\.JRRI L {Ill I!I iT ~G~R4'~
CARNER v ........ Q . .... I;:; J ~ I GARNFR ~, ~ en.
~Vl ~ ~ ~ "'GAfj&JUv7~ ~ ic'! "'.. '" avr:2AV i (6 AV"'1
,. DAVIDS ~N ~z- AV 8ERR-": 0 0 VIOSON ~ , vi ^' I
~ I JF _ <II.\L MILBS n Il!!I Ai:
.I.~ g ::j ..... SERRA >10 ....... I -~ ~.:2 RO I
MA SAOfUSETTS. ~ ... 'AV,1OC SERRANo ! I ~ AL -'a
I en K ST~:" .... MUSCUPIAB'E I i( DR/f
PER(/lRIS~" "._ ST .' I ~ Si J." I SHMJOI~J 'AL C5 .
_ , I ~ lS J LADERA " AD
J "-I .. ST ~ LINCOLN ... . .. ~ ~ Iii DR ~
_'- ~~~S.'_ _ __ ~ ~ _~_I~lgj '1 _~ N;D ~ .'- - k.! '
I s!"'.J~ fRWY I _ 1_ ( I ~ ST ~ U i I '!l :
J~ ~~ ~4. tn
, -, r. _ ~ AALTOov '" ':i--i' ~ I ~ I
I II':~ ~:g ~ ~ ~ n I! g . .-1!~ r- ~,S-I H I
I C~ESC:NT l; ~!: '" i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~~ I A\
_~ r.. ~ ~ " i " Iv! l ... . "",f.
e I 6V IJ 1 ~ If ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ..." -::t ST . I ,~ G
i ~ l , '.:~ ~h~ I F ~~t:'~~S~;T~S; F ~
~ (/l Z l/l~1 '" ...: . ACACIA
~ !!l ~ u: a ... "i )> ~ j,. ~ Ul!!l ~!\!!. ~
E '-1 ~, ~ r >r: "i" I
" ! 19"0 rl C5 .. l800
~ _ +O'r Is -101 L....". I~ I:~ ~ 2zgjl ~ . k<?- ~tl~ ~OO~IW 1
f- T...., 'J ,~ I :1~_ ~ ~~ ';12 n ~ ~ ~'...r~-b I !=iT '1
-
(')
v> !l
m
m
:-.
~~
~
>
~
JOOO
l>>
---
r u
o
~~ ~ 0 I~ l '-.- 0
~ " ~
, - ""-
, .. . "
~ III ,
AI
.~ i@
, '"
~ Q
j) fN' dJ
~ &:;
)~ ~
"I. .II... a'
'" .~ ~ ~ :J
. ~ '" C')
~ @ .~ l:@ ::r
1-. II ~ ~ ~o
~ ~
.
t.".......,.) ill(/)
S9
. .
", II.,. ... to
"- ~
)0 0
Vol ...
> Q,
~ -.
~ :J
0
.. II I, t., . .u
l./J
- II
, l\ ,. ~ ~ I
i"'l)
I -'-..
V f;: ~.. ~
"'~
d 1 l' .
@ ...."fl ~.
t ~ ,
f\ '" ~~
" . ~. ~ /
, ~
... 11\
~
"' ~..
~
~ T I
."
I ~
@ ~ ~.....~
.. 2iW
I@
"
@ I ~. o;af
D J :"a
C> -.
10 -
@w - ... ~ !!:
QP I' .a
~ Q
(!), . (i) C')
-
~ i ~
Ii . @ ,
~ e ..... ,~ @
0-
--
...
""- . 1f4 -
. 1 , AlUSGO'Fr .L lSTRaf.l ~
CIl
~ . I
I, I j I 1.1 , r
-
tr\'\ r5'\ . '- (J)
. . . . ~~ ~ 0 I~ "0 \. 0
~ " 'is.
- ~ 0 "-
. .. ,-
.. .
. II> ,
~
, !'I@ 1.0
~ ~
~ IN' ~
)0) ~ 0),
(0 (01
111.1'. .l1~. S'
w ~ ~ ~ ::J
;0 @~~ .. '" g.
~ , l:@
l. . , ~ ~o
~ ~
.
v... ...J ill(/)
~9
. .
'..,. ~. ,
~
0
'"
Q.
-.
::J
0
- . ..,
/.4
-
, I I
I
Y ~
.,
'\.!! <to :-
t @ i
"15 -
II ,
It
.,
~ 'T ....., I ~
I I ~
@ .. 2il
I~ I I
@ I ,,@ ~~f
D " J
~ -.
I, -
I @W ... - ...,~~
. I. .~
Q
(1) a
~i . lr -
A ~ .~ ~
; i . @ ,
~ e .... ! ~~ -~~
0-
- -
0.. I
'" .~ .. -
.1 , MUSOOTf. lSTREflft A
J. '"
~ . I
I. I I I I ' I I r
-
IR\ fR\ . -.... (I)
"
\;"
QUE SPEAKER
A -------------
,~JAMES WIRTH
~ DAVID
\J ML YNARSKI
, 8 COURTNEY BUSE
/~AVID
L/SCHULTZE
~
LOCATION
HIGHLAND TO
5TH, 1-215 TO
SIERRA WAY
CITYWIDE
CITYWIDE
OHN CITYWIDE
TUBBLEFIELD
e DON TOWSEND
P JAMES WIRTH
V BUD ROBERTS
A-IO JOHN EDWINS
A-II TED SIRKEN
RRY SHARP
o
o
5-1 ~-g?
()
MCC
ACTION
REQUEST
--------------------------------
.
'ADD POLICY TO GP TEXT FOR 5%
VAR.TO LOTS IN TARGET AREA (SEE
ATTACHMENT A)
(WARD2)
a) 'UNITS PER GR.ACRE'OR MIN.LOT
SIZE b)DELETE CUSTOM FROM RL IN
1.1. 3b.
VARIOUS
B
TOPICS - SEE ATTACHMENT ~
~l
a)AGREE WI POLICY 1.25.10
b)POLICY 1.30.10 ADD
RETAIL.SERVICE & OFFICE USES
c)CONCERN ABOUT CENTRAL CITY
SOUTH d)PROVIDE 'GRANNY FLATS'
INADEQUACIES OF GENERAL PLAN
(SEE ATTACHMENT C)
N/O ORANGE SHOW ADDITIONS TO TEXT:OBJECTIVE 1.18 (WARD 3)
RD. E/O 1-215 & POL.I.18.10 & 1.18.32 (SEE
ATTACIDIENT D)
a)MT.VERNON N/O
BASELINE
b)BASELINE W/O
1-215
CITYWIDE
CITYWIDE
VERDEMONT
Cr:fYWIDE
CITYWIDE
a) MU DESIGNATION TO ALLOW IL
USES & NO MULTI-FAMILY b)CG-I
SAME COMMENTS AS A-I.
4
CHANGE RL FROM 3du/ac TO 4du/ac
CHANGE RL DENSITY OR ADD
RS-l0,800
(WARD 5)
EXPAND LOCATIONS FOR CG-2
GENERAL COMMENTS (SEE ATTACHMENT
Z)
HIGHLAND HILLS INCORPORATE INTO GEN. PLAN
(WARD 4)
~~~.~
....'
QUE SPEAKER
LOCATION
o
o
MCC 0
ACTION
------------- --------------- -------------------------------- --------
A-14 JACK
VANDERWOUDE
REQUEST
FOOTHILL AREAS ~ISCUSSION OF OF HILLSIDE MGMT.
OVERLAY DISTRICT
A-1S GENE PENSARO NORTH 'E' ST.
A-16 STAFF
E}m
A-18 STAFF
8 STAFF
eSTAFF
A-21 STAFF
&-~&
CITYWfuE" <
CITYWIDE
CR-2
CITYWIDE
USED CAR LOTS AND AUTO RELATED
USES IN CG-1
~f3
CONSIDERATION OF OPEN SPACE TEXT
IN LAND USE ELEMENT
DELETE REFERENCE TO NET OR GROSS
UNITS PER ACRE
CONSIDERATION OF HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL USES IN CR-2
DISCUSSION OF MINIUM LOT SIZES
FOR RM,RMH AND RH
CITYWIDE CONSIDERATION OF TEXT/TABLE FOR
STATUS OF EXISTING PLANS
~~? ~/;?-
TRI-CITY CONSIDERATION OF POLICY 1.17.37
(WARD 2)
(WARD 1)
(WARD 3)
- -
Q
o
o
5-/ff- 5
Ob;ective 1.12. naae 69
strike out: "... mobile homes
Add: ". . . mobile home narks
.
"
"
policv 1.12.10. naae 69
Add:
"
mobile home narks
"
policv 1.12.12. naae 69 (New)
Add: "Permit the development of duplexes on lots having 6,200
square feet or greater within the area bounded by
Highland Avenue on the north, Rialto Avenue on the
south, Waterman Avenue on the east and 1-215 on the west
(Il.1) ."
policv 1.12.30. naae 69
strike out:
lIa.
lib.
duplex: 7,200 square feet;" and
complete second units (with a
family detached residence: 7,200
feet;"
single-
square
GP:OBJECTlVE1.12
IIrrMNMewT 14 A
MQ'VWOOD co.IOANY. Ou~or Advertising of Cali~~rnia
1948 North "E" Street; San Sernardino, California Phone (714) 886-5244
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2713, San Bernardino, California 92406
-
1.'~ <. .. ,:~ .
i{"~.. ': .1_' '"jb:;~
May 15, 1989
, ) )J....-.i. "!-"....
sr "~ (~l.:h~';.
Members of Council, City of San Bernardino
Honorable Mayor Evelyn Wilcox
Mr. Brad Kilger, Planning Director
RE: Proposed change of zone - parcel of land (now commercial),
1948 North "E" Street (APN 145-055-02), described as the
north 50 feet of the east 175 feet of lot 4, block "A",
Sibley and Allison's subdivision, as per plat recorded in
book 8 of maps, page 24, records of said County.
This letter is brought to you with much concern about deleting
our property to allow a commercial enterprise as it exists and
with long term plans to improve the property with an improved
building to better utilize all of the property and a commercial
activity thereon. This property at present houses the corporate
headquarters of our outdoor advertising company (Western Empire
Industries, Inc. dba Heywood Company Outdoor Advertising of
California), as well as maintaining a business office for
Heywood's Fancy Ice Cream and the office of John Dumas Real
Estate Broker. Our neighbor, Print Quick, is working on plans
for new buildings and it is anticipated that Heywood's Ice Cream
will become a tenant in the building complex (as well as Heywood
Company Outdoor Advertising of California) in the immediate
future.
I have authorization to speak for Mr. Robert A. Bakken, property
owner at 1932 North "E" Street, lots 5 and 6, APN 145-055-04. He
definitely wants the zone to remain heavy commercial. After
spending about $700,000 for property, building and building
improvements, Mr. Bakken does not want the zone down graded to
residential.
Mr. Sikes, Mr. Bakken, and Mr. Heywood own the entire block
westside of "E" Street between 19th Street and 20th Street. This
request is not inconsistent with the general up-grading of the
general plan because at present, all property from 20th Street to
Highland Avenue entire westside is designated commercial and
along the eastside of "E" Street from 18th Street to Highland
Avenue is designated commercial.
1
'\
KQYWOOD COMQANV. OuOoor Advertising of CalQrnia
1948 North "E" Street: San Bernardino, California Phone (7141886-5244
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 2713. San Bernardino, California 92406
In conclusion, kindly leave our property commercial.
Respectfully submitted,
~aJ~ \,\; t' \.
gal R. HeYWO~d, p~nt
WESTERN EMPIRE INDUSTRIES. INC.
dba Heywood Company
enc: plat map
cc: R. Bakken
W. Sikes
HRH/nm
2
-
..
"
A1TifCNMRVT ];B
o 0
FRANK TRACADAS a ASSOCIATES, INC.
- .
Struclurat eo.,.klQ, OM Er9>-~oQ. Unc1 PIl...... It o..v.
May 17, 1989
The Mayor and Council
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA. 92410
RE: 10 Acres + Parcel
South Side of Highland Ave.
600' ~ West of A.P.N. 143-19-33,47 , 59
Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council:
We represent the owners of the above-referenced parcels. (See
attached Assessor's Map).. The proposed General Plan is for
the northerly 200' + to be CG-l.1l the reu.inder to be RS
(Discussion Area '6).
We do NOT believe that the zoning should be different for the
same piece of property and would appreciate your c:c)nsideration
in zoning the entire piece "eG-l". This would be consistent with
the area located just to the East which is proposed CO-I.
(The area that once was proposed for the freeway is no longer
required and was sold in 1973. This uy have been what divided the
land into the two different zonings.)
Thank you for your consideration in this utter.
Very truly yours,
FRANK TRACADAS & ASSOCIATES INC.
/7 ")
cc: Gregory Lansing
..:.:';'.
463 N. Siemo Way. . San Bern.rdm. CeIIIamIIl92410 . (714) 114-1115
"
I..W , . , ~
'W l . L..O--J ~ "UOOsnll 1'-
...2i- ..... '- 0 ,., 'I
'(J) ..J . T ... (
- - e
'c'. ~33I1JST -
".,. ......
"-:; .. I . .
.. ~i i @ I 5G)
-
~l I e
f . ~ ~~ I .
b (1) I ~ (
- I
u. - " J (j)
Ie
;; ~... It @
J - ~ (III I
e-
ici @~ I .
! .&.
I -
!.!e ~ -~
II
. @ q
~.~~
.
.
I . .... ,
.
i
-
rn
I
,..
0 ~
C
'-
~ '{
i ('.""'-?
sS ~ S
I ; ~ @ t
(I)! ~
CI)~ ~ a... ~ ~
a
0 ..,.."
1i ., .., I"
5
a: ! CDJ co "
l U). @I .
.N I
..... . . !
0
... ... : "
-
l ~ " ~~
~.. I
. '\
. -,
I
Ol>,..-....
.5C' A. ~ ~ 0 ~ 0
.J I . , I , I . I
Ja .. JJ.~5n" . ,.
_:U~IJS, - . T
..
- ~ ,,, lo._.... '"
I ... I! (
~ - - E>
-0
.....
b
U ~
.. ~~
.-
=i ~... - ..,
J~~ ~ Q
It: .
I 0 @I
!!e
~ .. I
., I
,
.&.
-~
@ ~
.
I
i I
.
-
,., ~?
..
0 .
.5
I ... ---...
&~ · .l
(I); ~
0 ~I I - ~@
1i ~ ,
c ! a... =
a. ..~ 'III'
l I ~J Q) ~
".~ .. <Dr
.... .' '.
~ (JI
'"
.
~.. .. .. . I
"\ l ~ - ~ .: !
..
... I IiO'It
O'
o
o
;fTf1tllHNe7VT '5
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AGENDA
ITEM "#
LOCATION
CASE
HEARING DATE
I
.- L";\..-~
I ....... . -~....
. '. ...;.., Ad;
'." .~yl'
: ,s~'Ofd Ie
. . I
....
'.
.
~
/; fo~ .
..
,
~
~
~- ..... - '
'".
~,
\\\
- .- ---
0,61
".- \ ,
,.R'''~
..
_..
I/, -to
,.-u
0..
o
o
Am"" "" FNr 'l!P
,
I
,
LAW OFFICES OF
Reid .&Hellyer
WII..I.IA,M S. !-lEI-LYER
ENOS C. REID
..10"'''' O. eAeBAGE
ROl!ll!:RT J. 81ERSCl-tl!lACI-l
I-lORACE O. COIL
JOE SAX
OON"I-O F'. POWELL
DAVID G. MOORE
FRANI'; ..I. OE\..ANY
.JOI-lN K. MIRAU
,JAMES ..I. MANNING. JR.
.JANE W. CARNEY
RALPI-l e. PAI,.MER
DIANE $. l!IREWER
RICHARD O. ROT'"
CATHERINE E. S. IRWIN
DAN G. McKINNEY
MARK C, EOWARDS
ALEX"NORA S. WARD
WILLIAM J. WARD
CHARLES T. SCI-lUI-T%
ROBERT M. PAOIA
M ICI-lAEL O. WOLF
EDWARD ..I. NOWAKOSKI
MICHAEL..I. GILLIGAN
DEIIRA BARTLE GERVAIS
ROlSERT W. NAGIIY
KENNETH C. .JONl!:5
ROBl!:RT W. CANNON
,JAMES E. COFFIN
MICI-lAEL G. KERBS
J. CRAIG WllL.IAMS
JAY C. EGENES
STEVEN G. I..EE
MICHAEl- A. MARi'lEL
A pROl"ESSIONAL CORPORATION
3880 LEMON STREET, FIFTH FLOOR
FlIVERS1CE, CA. 92501
pOST OF"nCE "OX 1300
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92502.1300
TEl.EPHONE (714) 682*1771
TEl.ECOPIER 17(4) 686-2415
,",OWARO SURR (leee-IQ47l
GEO. W. HEl.l.YER lleee-IQe9)
JOl-lN e. SURR (leOe-197Il
JAMES R. EOWARDS (IQ20-19771
599 N. ARROWHEAD AVENUE
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92401
(7141 884*4704 . 824-5325
27710 .JEF"FE.RSON AVENUE
TI!:ME.CUl.A, CA 923itO
(714) 676-1"'1-2"'1-
May 17, 1989
695 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 800
COSTA MESA, CA 92020
(714) 754-5813
OUR F"ll.E NUMBER
R0549-001
NORMAN W. AC..E:N
OF COuNS~~
Common Council for the City of San Bernardino
City Hall
400 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA
Re: Highland Hills Specific Plan 82-1
Dear Council Members:
On behalf of Highland Hills Properties and Rancho San
Andreas Company, we would like to take this opportunity to
thank the members of the Common Council for the City of San
Bernardino, the Highland Hills Homeowners Association, the San
Bernardino City Attorney's office and the San Bernardino
planning Commission and Department for their efforts in
settling the litigation in San Bernardino County Superior Court
Case No. 241464.
The case concerning the Highland Hills Specific Plan 82-1,
previously adopted by the Common Council as part of the General
Plan and now upheld by Superior Court Judge Ben T. Kayashima in
his opinion of October 17, 1988, has now been concluded by
Settlement Agreement between all parties thanks to the
cooperation of everyone.
The Draft Environmental Impact Report for the 1989 General
Plan considers Highland Hills Specific Plan 82-1 in
Alternative B. Table lA in the General Plan would incorporate
the Highland Hills Specific Plan in the 1989 General Plan.
Therefore the General Plan and EIR will be consistent with the
details of Highland Hills Specific Plan 82-1 and allow the
development to go forward under the terms of the Settlement
Agreement.
.0
o
o
o
"
Common Council for the City of San Bernardino
May 17, 1989
Page 2
Thank you for your consideration and entering into the
Settlement Agreement. with the understanding of the Common
Council, this settlement became a reality. Councilman Michael
Mauds1ey was instrumental in bringing about this settlement,
conferring with the Homeowners Association and contributing his
input and support to cement the Settlement Agreement to
everyone's mutual benefit.
Thank you for your time.
Very truly yours,
REID & HELLYER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
--- ~-J..::: ~ a~~- ;
J. Craig Williams
4/R/R0549-001/2730z
--
-
, ~.it-()>\~
etrf~
o
o
11171IU'M~5~
.
..
May 17, 19l:l9
The ~ity ~ouncil ot San bernardino
~ity Hall
San ~ernardino, ~A ~2401
R~: General Plan Revision, Historic "Auto Row" area
We would liKe to request the maintenance ot tne longstanding
commercial zoning (now CHI on "E" Street between Sixth & baseline;
"u"Street between Sixtn & "H" Streets, Baseline between Waterman
and tne 1-l1b Freeway, ana tne adJolnlllg ClOCKS ot Eigtltn, Nintll,
and Tentn streets.
As an alternate, create an "Auto Row" oesi\jnation trlat would allow
tile continued existence of tllis traoe area witnout iJreJudicing
tne maintenance of viaole and nistorically interesting residences.
We would liKe to point out tnat we pertorm a valuable service to
the community in providing a range of services to those who
need aftordable transportation tor our mobile society. Our
Industry is the largest signle source of sales tax revenue for
the city, and we also contribute to the property tax base and
the community payroll. We appreciate the mention of our businesses
in ft 1.21.11, but we are concerned that the word "continuation"
could be (and has been) con trued by the Planning uepartment to
deny occupance to facilities built tor automotive use but that
have been vacant 0 temporarily out ot such use.
. ~ W · A ~, .. RI.-'-'" (_c "7 c"" ro
1;0/ J,/1~so.,,/1v;''J ;n{J c::',-L \....~ I " -::7~~ftJ~.;;:)
.. 4 _ ji"~ "C:"" ' , "__ - ,(c' "{c/./1'N! ///';/('/:5 '.7' / r7
,: { . . -r I!... I / ""1'" '-', <" , '
~.-')f".~r/'t"',!., ~S~' (~~~r"
__~ ,. ,j .J: ' ! , '.j.., /nt: /r....!U
17)or~~/ e~J~' ~~v.,~/ $I_":<'''~' -_ :~/'p~'s/~;'Q~~
-fiJ Jl"J ~~ ~Q!) A'j (; p
~ ... rU 1{)9~ 11/ E $/
.Y;~j.. # J ~ J --;:)nrJef/ $,:j/-t~s~
tI'(."" ~;L/~ p'
/)'\1- k ,c,..- -- -=:-
/,~~;;~#'~7~~~ /'
k'~/'J~/" Prt//c-'S>ff--:r->>_~-'
,'/ - f~e, ..;.~r G:."t- "/'Zl -?Y/ ()f-N~"J
/; '~ If)~h611j $47 /lJ!K-f-J
--' . /). _ 1~," 1 ,/'l;y'E, /Iv" 4/~~
t?d//~/Yl {aeu/ { tl ~IJ~ ?#"tf7Y
~ff~z;/.1Jk'~ /b 17' ~ ' I
::r:i.,,1J ~lt,i'1t'I' APA'~K.I nrJf~ ~ ~
-
dl
-
~.... s..../c"
~ "
o . 0
.r -. c.
o I Z
~ n
:> G . ;:
... .
oj
o 0
Automotive Service Council of California
o
~.
(Formerly Independent Garage Owners of California)
INLAND EMPIRE UNIT #14
May 16, 191)9
TO: The San Bernardino City Council
RE: General Plan Revision, Draft Proposal, Automotive Uses
We would like to support the requests and efforts of our members and collegues
who operate independant auto repair shops in San Bernardino to retain their
appropriate zonings. Locally owned shops are run by businessmen who not only
provide an important public service but contribute to the co~ity in many
other ways. It is important for those who need to keep theil1trnaintained in
a clean and safe condition to have repair facilities located in a variety
of neighborhoods that are convenient to where motorists live, work and shop.
.
.
~''h M c,At.-
Ess Jju.~o qbC-rrlC YJ. "Wl/{)"
~~ft;5 ~ ;~
~J
luZi-"httd~. - <>18\
~~~g4~~'
/) - .'
/p~.ii .r}
E:.o (Y/""'I2.:n,J ~...c.<=
fj) /71/iC2(i,..) C; II (!Act C
~ k
tl/.t ?R~ /~
/lIIL/..~ 1:",1',,1(;' I}..ro RJZPfH~
sL,s (U ~ti.v
c3 'f-/lH -7tr t"j- 0 ..-cs
jJ~"M~'- U2r+-L '7~k~~~'
~r.~)?~O
- ---,
c
o
o
~~
,41111"'Me1VT~
'.
14) Alternative "H" - Adopt Reaidenial Medium (RM) for the area
designated in the vicinity of Baseline snd Waterman.
15) Fortieth Street between "E" St. and "Mt. View" -
No demand for excessive amount of commercial.
Major of street should be Residential (RU & RM)
with some Commercial and Light Industrial (CH-?)
extending from the two major intersections.
16) State College area -
Provide for off-campus student housing (RM & RMH)
reflective of the original State College Area
General Plan.
17) Verdemont-
The addition of PUD requirements in the Residential
(RS) is no~ necessary to direct standard subdivision
development.
18) Mt. Vernon Corridor -
Limited demand for extensive Commercial as designated.
Include Residential (RU & RM) as an appropriate
housing type for that portion of the community.
19) Reinstate existing "T" designation as a parking option for
older linear commercial districts.
In the past additional parking has been useful for
the expansion of existing business.
'0.
o
o
(
I I
I I
, ,
,
. , 1
, !
: ,
. flgOI!;:
I
I
I I Ii: I
I I 1, '_...+
4~ -'~'~_99:.;.~
................l<o..,,~19_ ' ':ti
",9 ., ~~
..,
I I I I I III I IT
I I I -I III I ]' I
, 1 :' " ,,:'
I . Ii, -~__ . ---:-(N)'~ '
I I: W'i !'
'I lC1~!)1 I ~II' II'
I I I ~ I : !! 1 i
, ,,,,,1'-1" ,'" "1'1 1'-","
! I I ' i : i I
l-: i 1& I !(N!!!';''''' I: II-..",Y ,- -- -Sl6'"
~~
~~ :: ~~ :6;';;: 1 ~ ' ' . . I :''l..''''''-:-:N~
I i -1" '! I I : ~ I i I -..... .,.......:)
,i I : I, I . (1:;:1 I I f'YLL ,I ''-'';,,:~'-~''-~~
t' I] I " I!, i 1-', 1_ ' I ,I:"l~
... ,..... I ii" ' ,I] I . I~I ] , "'!L~___' __J..lJ~
.... I~ i I I -I i; ! ' I
s:) I I~ I;' :, Ilnll ii, "tl~ r ;.'\Q9-'r-j ~
~ , I Ii" "",,-' I' I] I !.
,I I 1Sl1 ,'ll<; ,: ' r ...., , "OB6'-~<;::'
: ': I: Cl~ : : ~ Ii: : I]' -&Z--_~ ~
Ii ' II I] I I~"'" "..,~
,] I!,!?'J ItEI"7I: II', "II .'100..",' "Il_: ~1l3
] -I --1 1 I I I I' , '!' l(
I~! "'", r:a:I:'] , ''''LI ] II, I 1 " ""{T"-',
I"; 1 I ,I'll 1"1 j;........-----:l~
'-M i i-Flii:-: t -j-~~ >;..',- :&0 ~1
~ : I] I,: 11 ' i,,: I ~_,k~:__:'iE)::_'JI JL.:~~
! I " :: ' ! ' , ~ ~'q9 -- ", ~: it' .1..
] ,~ ,-- - -..:.:"" -- \.::.J. ,~ ' ' , ';::s "b
I"" l--l _(~I~~~~ ~l'--';;;:"'~::~~
: ! ;~-::: I' I' 'l!P)~fl'" I 1.1..",,-...::-rc-~'}
1 I I~ ~, ,: -- --- . ---SO ~
:, "-:. ".yy, . ", i """ Oil
I' 'il117 +-::-r:::E J~~ '
I " ~ ~-"-=~__~.~--~~: 1_ '_I -~'f<C.: :-0 ~ '-H
I'll 1 ~ i i: i j , i
I~ I ~ I . ----- - 11'fl- - [II) '-~I
~_~ '~ :~6;; _: -- I I." ~~ ~- u~
''lj i I ~ ....
, ,- Zgl . -f 9'615!)
---+----___ _~--.' " .1 -,
. " 1 I '
-- -------: ~-c3b---.-1 I.."-"~ t" . .
.. I --,- I ., ----
"is,-r, ...."",,.......,.,.~'"
,: .. ~I. '
_ . II l~.-r Z'161:_
,
1_' ~: ,_i.O;::;.- -
. ~_' "II:). i co C)
-.---~---:--:-- I,~ni-'~--'-~ 1 .~ - --
~_._,___.,+_._..__.. __n_~'
. I ,! I
: I ,-1C."1 !'?2n::~ n'.Lar---. ". .-".-
II I I I T I 'i", ,----'-----'
I: II ] I I I 1 I 'i ' -,.-- -r,: ---rl
I, I I! I 11; I ! I I , 'J
I
!
!
I~ ,-
'''5 ''''
>t ' '
,
I I'
, 1 I
-t~: :
~I
, I I I
,2
<\.:,
, I I
o
,1
\--
.~ ~
l ~
h@-L~
o ::Ii \'.
~ .
l.)
~
~
If
9
-
,
on
~
~
i3
00
.: .
~.q
o
E!!
.0
IDr::_
""8
Jl~~
~
\t.
.m;".
@).
~
---\
,+
AmfCJ.fN RV't
;-''')
~..
'.
I L-'
" I
O'l3H~IJ'I- , - " -
r
: I
~ ____. -h_1CO\
..,,--.. ,. ~ \::::;I
ir
\
---~~O
"
,
@)O
3I1N.iA"
,
,
..
...
\oJ
Q:
..
r
.- .-' I - ,- I~.J'. . ..
~
\11J
.
J@ e 61
~ ~ ~
, ~~ ~ @ (l)~- .. WI
~~ (\i
,~ ..-, '1
. e
~(i) . .. e
~
@ .
~ ~ . o!) ~
'-'
~ @ .. E)
,
@ . ~
.
I ,. (!) @
@ '~~ ~ @ , .. ~
K
I
, 2 @
,
, ~ (!) I : @
i
~ @ ~
~- ;or - w
i33IJlS
.0.
I'
: ~ l.' ~
, .. I
.,... .. ,...
. I
\0; \ ---t-
~ \....:.. l",.
~ : ~ \- : -
, I
I I
I I
,
.~ ,"-
.-
,
I
I
0'
- I · I ·
, ..;::-.1
.. -~ .',n,1 r--
::! .. I ..
@
@
~ :;;
~
..
- .1-111
..
..
..
o
..
8
,
.0
-.. 1- 3I1N3/f1
~-
"'~
CllMXlO.L S - ..,
E
!!!
1
,
@ @ '(!) @ <!>
,
-CD" !:! ~ !!
- -
...
-.
0 . . ..: .
,~ e e ~ @ -~ (!l)
,
~ !!
.l-~
I
~ @ @
~ · 2
.. I .. I -
I I
I (i) I
I I
..
~ --,.- .~ - .L331JiS -
,
-
.
,
_ ,--3--,-
, . .
.r
..
\oJ
...
II:
..
III
~
".
s
l5
z
~
i
I
....
~
.0
-l.)
Q,.O
<> ca.,
~ 0-
..Q.,.~
. on 0
C)~ :
~_..
~-Q)
..0<0
"00
"lID'"
-
- .
3'tl
,"
",..,
... .5
iDi
.- j!
~III
~ ..
:: -
~'"
.. e
, ~
~Z
~
...
l!!
",!!
~Qj
,:II
III
:aN
i
Illi
:E ;"
XII:
.K
-
.! .S
...
:i-'
~l
-,"
o
1~ ,,4~ s~"
o
AT1PUf~r /IN
o '1It4IAt ""td~",~tWe ~
565 West 9th Street
San Bernardino, California 92410
Phon" 889-9505 - 889-9506
May 17, 1989
10: The Common Council, City of San Bernardino
RE: General Plan Draft Proposal
Ninth & ''E'' Streets
We would like to amend our zone change request of May 10, 1989 as follows:
ThE! blocks bounded by "D" Street, "F" Street, Eighth Street an:! Tenth Street, from
CG-1 an:! RM to CH, an:! Ninth Street from "F" Street to the 1-215 Freeway, to CC-2,
with a greater latitude of density on the R allowance than currently suggested.
These changes would bring these areas into consistency with the existing uses, the
requests of the "E" Street businesspeople, an:! the existing zonings.
As an alternate, we would recommen:! that the developed areas between Highlan:! Avenue
an:! the downtown area be excluded from the plan revision at this time. In spite of
some superficial inconsistencies, due primarily to the fact that this part of town
is up to a century old (in contrast to many other cities in Southern California)
an:! the transition from residential to commercial use has been gradual. In spite
of the comment of Ralph Waldo Emerson of the 19th Century that "a foolish consistency
is the hobgoblin of little min:!s", I would suggest that a consistency on the time
axis is more important to facilitate long-range planning an:! investment than an
apparent consistency on a map. A General Plan which covers a long-developed area,
an:! which was good enough for an All-American City a decade ago, should not need
more than fine-tuning; it should change evolutionarily, not revolutionarily.
It ought not be inevitable that a mixed-use area be blighted; with adequate
thought being given both to the encouragement of business an:! commercial development
an:! to the preservation of viable residential properties, we could develop a
central city area with a unique character. It is, after all, the people who
wild a city, not plans on paper.
.)~/; . /, {cJ:~ /'/J" /;..-
.1'! ... '.Cllt"!... ;Jr::tl1kt ~I
D~~
JZes Roe 1(,)4.
Qsessor's MoP 0
Book /43 Page 08
San Bernardino County
.0
,
Note- Assessors Blk. a Lot
Numbers Shown in Circles.
o
J ".. !,~
~-- t-
· 1
., I
~o
LL
=>
~
1>-04
@
o
J1
.ar
REVISED
5" - ,s-- ~ 7
-
.......-.-
.....~...............
. "q~
.
Por. Tract 289/ MB. 40//
Por. Tract 2850 MS. 39/26
Por. Tract 2780 M.S. 38/71
X
6/.8/ 61.6' I
96 97 98 99 /00 /0/ /02
c.c -\
t<)
~ '10 'e;J @ @ @ @) @
III
12-- S
61.t::l1 e.[R
\
f--~-TRENTON
\
55.6/ SS
~@ @ @ @ @> @ @) ~
95 94 93 92 9/ 90 89 81
19 /8 17 16 /5 14 13 /1
~@ @ @ @) @> @ @ @
"
55&1 55
~
~
(J)
~
I
GO
I
-j--~-/6th
I
. .
\
o
o
o
o
~
SUGGESTED REVISIONS TO
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL PLAN
May 10, 1989
from CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Since the time of the Citizens Advisory Committee hearings the
San Bernardino Area Chamber of Commerce has actively participated in
the General Plan process. Representative of the Chamber have
repeatedly conveyed the attitudes and concerns of the business
community at C.A.C., Planning Commission and City Council meetings.
We are pleased to acknowledge that some of our suggestions have
been incorporated into the Draft General Plan. We are equally
concerned that there are parts of the proposed plan which continue
to create problems for our
members.
We have prepared a list of further recommendations for change
to the Draft General Plan now being reviewed for adoption. We hope
the City Council will give careful consid~ration to each of our
suggestions. Our members, the independent business people of this
City, believe the Plan needs to be modified as recommended to
provide a healthy environment for local business and improve the
quality of life for all residents of our community.
Issue 1
page 69 - 1.13.13 Provide 100 percent density bonus for
senior citizen housing.
Provides a greater incentive to build senior housing
for our ageing population. Density bonus should be
consistent throughout the City. Senior units are smaller
and therefore little increase in building size will be
distinguishable.
(
page 69 - 1.13.30 Delete reference to minimum lot size for
RM District density.
There is a need for small-scale rental housing and v
single lot projects should enjoy the same density
of development as large projects.
page 69 - 1.13.31 Delete reference to minimum lot size for
RMH District density.
Incentives must be created for individual property
owners to rebuild older neighborhoods throughout the
city by providing the opportunity through zoning to
create small-scale income producing property.
o
o
o
o
Issue #2
page 71 - 1.14.10 Change slope/density formula to read;
Slope (%) Units Per Acre
0-15 * 3.0
15-25 * 1.5
25-30 0.5
30+ 0.1
/
To create densities that will result in financially
practical upscale housing developments in the foothills.
page 72 - 1.14.13 Increase allowable density transfer by a maximum
of 100 percent from 50 percent.
A greater transfer of units will lessen development of
the steeper hillsides and retain them in a more natural
state.
page 72 - 1.14.14 Permit attached units throughout the Hillside
Management Overlay Distric~.
The option of attached homes will provide for greater
flexibility in the design of unusual or difficult parcels-
of land. An additional housing type broadens the
potential housing market and offers another response to
future homebuyers.
Issue #3
page 82 - 1.17.10 Add to permitted uses; "region-serving
retail centers"."
If the two existing regional centers are unsuccessful
in attracting new upscale retailers to the marketplace,
Tri City with the improvement of freeway access may have
the opportunity to succeed and maintain major commercial
along the 1-10 corridor within the city of San Bernardino.
~
,
o
Issue #4
o
o
o
page 85 - 1.19.10 Add to permitted uses; "self-storage facilities".
Self-storage was previously permitted in the General
Commercial zone. Self-storage should be convenient to
the places where people live and to where they operate
offices and businesses rather than limited to industrial
areas. Proper design criterion can insure a good blending
with other commercial uses.
Issue #5
page 110 - 1.36.10 Eliminate as a permitted use; "hotels".
\
Hotels are private enterprise businesses differing from "
the public-assembly function of convention centers and
should pay property and T.O.T taxes. Hotel business ~
draws from customers other than those attending
conventions.
- 112.4 Reinstate language of Public Hearing Draft,
General Plan. Do not include single - family homes
as "sensitive facilities" subject to a 100 ft. fault
set-back.
The 50 ft. set-back has been the standard in the /
State of California since the creation of the
State Law. No geologist has provided a convincing
argument for a greater set-back on all structures.
Special site-specific conditions have always been
addressed by individual engineering recommendations
and should remain so.
-
~
-
o
o
~
o
o
.
December 8, 1988
Mr. John Traver
Chairman, citizens Advisory committee
c/o Planning Department
300 North D street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
BE: THE VERDEMOHT DXSTRXCT PARCBL NO. AP26604101 , AP26603114
Dear Mr. Traver:
As recommended by Mr. Vince Bautista, Senior Planner for the
City of San Bernardino, we are writing to you concerning the
subject parcel. Our purpose is to request a change in use
from designation U.R. (Urban Residential) to C.G. (Commercial
General).
As a preface to our proposal, we would like to note that we
contacted councilman Tom Minor in an effort to collaborate in
a proposal which we hoped would be in the best interest of all
parties concerned. With respect to a commercial use,
Councilman Minor made it clear that the Verdemont District was
opposed to multi-family residential projects and to commercial
uses which consisted of gas stations, mini-marts, and fast
food.
Based upon this information, we would like to propose the
following project and present our justification for its
consideration as an acceptable proposal to the citizens
Advisory committee for their recommendation in favor of its
incorporation into the General Plan for San Bernardino. The
Owner of the property, Cove Development Corporation is
interested in developing an upscale commercial use consisting
of service oriented retail and office space. possible tenants
for this project would include a supermarket, barber shop or
hairdresser, florist, and other specialty retail uses such as
clothing or home product boutiques. In addition, we would
like to propose a full service restaurant such as a Coco's or
similar facility.
There are a number of factors which we would like to offer in
support of such a use. Our initial conversation with
Councilman Minor indicated that such a use would be very
PROJ EGr CONTROL COMP.'.'J\"
Douglas Plaza
2192 Martin Strt'('r
Suite 270
Irvine. Calif(lrnia 9271';
:14'H'iI.IOI'i
F:L'C: '"11'lK~I0409
PhlX:'nix
1...0$ Ail~dt:s
S~1I1 Francisco
Flag.'ilJ.ff
'IlI~.Si III
o
o
~
o
o
Verdemont District
December 8, 1988
Page 2
desirable for the Verdemont District in as much as it would
provide necessary services for the community. Due to the
adjacency of the site to the 215 Freeway, it enjoys good
visibility and easy access by way of Palm and Kendall Drive.
The site does not appear to be appropriate for residential use
because of its proximity to the freeway noise and because of
its irregular shape. It would appear that the use which we
are proposing would create a buffer between the freeway and
the adj acent proposed residential use on the east side of
Kendall.
In our discussions with the Planning Department, it was
indicated that a commercial use is currently being considered
for the northeast intersection of Kendall and Palm Drive. It
would appear that this would be comparatively a better
residential use than the subject parcel. It was also
indicated that the city was not in opposition to our proposal
and suggested that it be presented to the citizens Advisory
Committee for their consideration during the January meeting.
It is Cove Development Corporation's foremost desire to
include the local agencies and citizen's group as part of the
proj ect development team in order to provide an improvement
which is beneficial to all parties. On behalf of our client,
we will be in contact with you in the near future and look
forward to your comments and invite your participation in
enabling the success of this project.
Sincerely,
PROJECT CONTROL COMPANY
/YUivtdt3. ~
Michael B. Schneider, A.I.A.
Project Director
MBS: kgm
cc: Councilman Tom Minor, City of S. B.
Mr. Vince Bautista, Planning Department, City of S. B.
Dr. Stanley Ho, Cove Development Corporation
Mr. Henry Chan, Cove Development corporation
Mr. Richard Wong, Cove Development Corporation
Enclosure
o
o
o
o
VERDEMONT PROJECT
San Bernardino, CA
Additional considerations supporting a commercial vs. a
residential use:
Environmental Issues:
A. Noise Pollu tion: Inabili ty to meet allowable decibel levels
for residential on a portion of the site especially along the
215.
B. Air Pollution: Since the site is below the adjacent freeway,
there will-be a tendency to collect smog.
C. Crime: The frequency of crimes especially breaking and
entering increases dramatically along freeways and major
arterials. Since the site is lower than the 215, any suspicious
activity would be difficult to see by passing traffic.
~ Issues Related m .the. Ils.e. 2f. .the. s..i..n
A. Residential tax base does not typically pay for the cost of
services.
B. Commercial taxes are higher than residential; retail uses also
generate sales tax revenues.
Practical And Planning Considerations
A. The site will never be as desirable a location for residential
as nearby sites on the other side of Kendall or on sites with
more manageable dimensional condi tions. Ou r site is long and
narrow forcing a high pe rcentage of total residential product
along the least desirable boundaries, especially the 215.
B. Ease of access from the freeway and general visibility of the
site supports a wpublicw use (commercial/retail) vs. a wprivate"
use (residential).
Ils.e. Consistent ~ In[Q fLam Staff/Council/Community
A. Proposed commercial use at the northeast corner of Kendall and
Palm would permit automobile service station use. It is our
understanding that the Verdemont District opposes such a use and,
as stated in our letter to Mr. Traver, our client is interested
in honoring this concern and will develop uses compatible with
the residents' program for commercial services.
,
o
o
o
o
~ Frame
A. The development of any commercial or retail use on the subject
parcel will be contingent upon demographic considerations.
Consequently, actual development may not occur until the
surrounding community had grown to an appropriate size to warrant
the provision of such services.
Final Ar9uments
A. There is considerably more commercial use designation on the
preferred land use alternative than will apparently be needed
based on the demographic projections (50 million SF designated
for a projected need of 15 million SF during the next 20 years).
However, this should not justify the exclusion of the subject
site by default.
B. We would contest that there are undoubtedly many sites
designated for commercial use in the preferred land use
alternative which are more suited for a residential use than our
site.
C. We are not requesting more commercial use designation per se~
we are requesting a commercial designation for our site because:
* it makes good planning sense in both the short and long term
* it does not increase commercial use designation overall if
another parcel better suited for residential is redesignated.
11;'--<': """"""'~~'-:"",:.-._.,.,-
o
NUM
~PEAiER
B-42 Ernest
Riffenburg
B-43 Hal Heywood
B-44 Mary Montrenec
B-45 Dana Pankey
B-46 Frank Tracadas
B-47
B-48
B-49
B-50
B-51
B-52
B-53
B-54
B-55
B-56
Edward Locke
Michael
Schneider
John Edwins
Charles Garner
Mel Harrison
Richard Bristow
Jerry Lair
Ernest Ramirez
Albert Cohen
Charles Schultz
r9ATION
o
a) 1215 Freeway
at University Pkwy
b) NW of Stater Bros
1900 block of "E" st.
West Side of Macy
North of Highland Ave.
East side of "Oil st.
from 15th to 16th
South side of Highland
west of Medical Center
Drive
Southeast corner of
Blood Bank ~d & "E" st.
Kendall Dr. southerly
of Palm Avenue
North of Ostrems Way
adjacent to 1215 Fwy
South side 5th st.
Southeast corner of
Ohio and Palm
741 E. Baseline
(entire block)
loth & "E" st.
Laurelwood, west of
Tippecanoe
Northeast corner of
6th & sterling
a) 60 acres at Cable
Lakes westerly of Palm
b) 5 acres westerly of
Little Leaque next
to pet cemetary
c) Concur with 25 feet
setback in Verdemont area
REOUEST
o
MCC ACTION
RL to CG
RU to RMH
RMH to CG-1
RS to CG
RM to CO-1
RS to CG-1
CG-1 to IL
RU to CG-1
To allow hotel
uses in CG-1
and increase
Ht. limit
CR-2 to CG-1
RL to RS
CG-1 & RM to
CG-1
Used car sales
and auto-related
on N. "E" st.
Auto repair
uses in CR-3
Retain RMH-15
RL to RM
RL to CN
... ..
o
mm
B-57
B-58
B-59
~
I
B-60
B-61
B-62
B-63
B-64
B-65
B-66
B-67
B-68
B-69
B-70
B-71
SPEAKER
Mary Ann
Caldwell
will Sturn
Kevin Mitchell
Ernest Fisher
Jay Gordon
Harold Anderson
a) Ernest
Riffenburg
b) James wirth
Joyce Jacobs
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
Letter-Resident
Petition
o
o
LOCATION
2078 N. Waterman
Foothill areas,east
of Hemlock,west of
willow Dr.
a) Northwest corner
Belmont & Little
League Dr.
b) Baseline st.
at Lassen
1500 N. Stoddard
East of California
north of 19th st.
Northwest corner
Kendall & Mountain
2730 N. "E" st.
2730 N. "E" st.
Northwest corner
Western & Trenton
Tippecanoe south of
Central
California of SR-30
sierra Way at 27th
South side of 40th
east of Kendall
Waterman Ave. north
of Highland
city Creek north
Highland
1490 Lynwood
o
REOUEST
MCC ACTION
Small rest.
or office
in converted
residence
RE designation
RL
Concur with IL
RMH to CG-1
RS to RM
Concur with PC
CG-1
Retain proposed
use
CG-1 to CO or
or CHC
RS to CO-1
PF to IL
RS to RM
CO-1 to RS
RM to CG-1 on
2000 scale map
RS to CG-1 on
1000 scale map
PFC to RL
(HMOD)
RM to RS
~~"".'-"
o
mm
SPEAKER
B-72
Letter-
Bill Nessel
B-73
Letter-
Daniel Salter
B-74
Letter-
Harvey Olsan
B-75
Letter-
Jim Brickly
B-76
Letter-
Ronald A.
Brandt
B-77
Letter-
Martin Rohr
B-78
Letter-
Russell Merwin
B-79
Letter-
Ludwig Eng.
B-80 Letter-
Cal Trans
B-81 Councilman
Reilly
B-82 Councilman
Reilly
B-83 Councilman
Reilly
B-84 Councilman
Reilly
B-85 councilman
Reilly
B-86 Councilman
Reilly
o
o
LOCATION
North "E" st.
Central city south
overlay area near
Inland Center
Central city south
overlay area near
Inland Center
North side of Baseline
on I2l5 Fwy
North of Walnut
Btwn Muscott & Artesian
400 S. Allen
888 Medical Center Dr.
North side of Bryant,
east of Lugo
Highland at Rt.330
1300 N. "0" st.
1200 Block of Stoddard
Baseline,east of
Tippecanoe
South side of 9th
st. near Del Rosa
1300 block of
N. "0" st.
21st Street @
Crestview
o
REOUEST
MCC ACTION
RMH to CG-1
IL to CG-1
IL to CG-1
CM-type
designation
Remain IL
CH to allow
steel fabri-
cation
RM to CG-1
CO-1 or T for
rear parcel to
allow parking
Concerned with
RS to CG-l
designation
See B-1
See Audit Trail
II - 107 Area 3
See B-38
48 Area 7
See Audit Trail
II
See B-33
See B-28, B-40
,,,,,,,-'~7.~ ..:",:",,::0'0'.-"-
o
. . . .
NUM
SPEAKER
B-87 Councilwoman
pope-Ludlam
B-88 Councilwoman
Pope-Ludlam
B-89 Councilwoman
Pope-Ludlam
B-90 Councilwoman
Pope-Ludlam
B-91 Councilwoman
Pope-Ludlam
B-92 Councilwoman
Pope-Ludlan
o
LOCATION
1076 spruce
1045 Spruce
948 8th st.
1258 Vine st.
1261 8th st.
o
1240 Massachusetts
REOUEST
RS to RU
RS to RU
RS to RU
RS to RU
RS to RU
RS to RU
o
MCC ACTION
~
o
C I T Y
OF SON BERNAQ,INO
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8905-2309
=11/
o
"
o
TO: Mayor and Common Council
FROM: Brad L. Kilger, Director of Planning
SUBJECT: Open Space
DATE: May 16, 1989
COPIES:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Attached is Staff's recommendation pertaining to open space
for inclusion in the General Plan. It includes text and two
tables that replace page 41 (from the last paragraph on) and
page 48 of the text. It also replaces the proposed revision
distributed on May 10, 1989 by the consultant. The
attachment should be inserted on page 48 of the text under
the heading of "RelationshiD to ODen SDace ."
Staff took information pertaining to open space from all
sections of the General Plan and compiled it under the
heading of "RelationshiD to ODen SDace II in response to input
received at the public hearings. No new data is included.
o
c
.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
RELATIONSHIP TO OPEN SPACE
As discussed in the Introduction section, the General Plan is
organized around four major topics: Community Development,
Infrastructure and Community services, Environmental Resourc-
es and Hazards. open space is not a separate element
(chapter or section) of the Plan but is addressed throughout.
The City's General Plan addresses open space through maps,
text and goals, objectives, policies and implementation
measures. The text includes background and an assessment for
each topic. From this, the goals, objectives, policies and
implementation measures were formulated. Table 4A shows the
sections of the Plan and the various maps that address open
space. Table 4B lists the Open Space Resources and summari-
zes the actions that constitute the Open Space Program. Both
tables list the Open Space Resources which are divided into
four major headings: Preservation of Natural Resources,
Managed Production of Resources, Outdoor Recreation and
Public Health and Safety.
These tables represent information from all sections of
General Plan pertaining to open space compiled into
place. The various chapters and sections of the General
have the detail that may not be shown here.
the
one
Plan
."_"n_'.""
o
.
o
o
o
I
o
Table 4A Open Space Resource and General Plan Relationship
General Plan section
Related MaDS
Chap. 1, Community Development
1. 0 Land Use and
Urban Design
3.0 Historical
and Archaeo-
logical Re-
sources
Chap. 2, Infrastructure
and Community Services
7.0 utilities
o
9.0 Parks and
Recreation
Chap. 3, Environmental
Resources
Fig.6,Generalized
Land Use
Fig. 8, Environmental
Management OVerlay
(Biological, Wind,
Fire)
Fig. 9, Environmental
Hazards OVerlay
(Geological Hazards)
Fig. 10, Archaeo-
logical Sensitivities
Fig. 13, Potential
Historic Districts
Fig. 34, Geothermal
Resources
Fig. 41 Parks and
Recreation Facil-
ities
Fig. 42 Conceptual
Equestrian Trail
System
10.0 Natural Resources
ODen SDace Resource
All
Public Health and
Safety
Public Health and
Safety
Outdoor Recreation
outdoor Recreation
Public Health
Safety,
Production of
Resources
and
Managed
Outdoor Recreation
Outdoor Recreation
A. Biological Re- Fig. 43 Known Sensi- Preservation of Plant
sources tive Elements and Animal Life
Fig. 44 Biological Preservation of Plant
Resource Manage- and Animal Life
ment Overlay
B. Mineral Fig. 45 Regionally Managed Production
Resources Significant Agg- of Resources
regate Sectors
0 11.0 Energy and N/A Managed Production of
Water Conservation Resources
.._....".~.......-.._.....-
-
o t'"\
SPACE RESOURCES AND GENERAL P~ RELATIONSHIP
stBLE ~B OPEN
. MAY 16, 1989
PAGE 2
o
Chap. 4 Hazards
12.0 Geologic and
Seismic
15.0 Wind and Fire
16.0 Flooding
GP:TABLE4A
o
o.
o
Fig. 50 Major Fault . Public Health and
Locations Safety
Fig. 51 Lique- Public Health and
faction Suscepti- Safety
bility
Fig. 54 Potential Public Health and
Subsidence Areas safety
Fig. 55 Slope Sta- Public Health and
bility and Major Safety
Landslides
Fig. 65 Fire Hazard Public Health and
Areas Safety
Fig. 66 One Hundred Public Health and
Year Floodplain Safety
'-~-~'O'_'--'
o
o
o
o
f
\
,
!
o
Table 4B Open Space Resources and Programs
Open Space Resource
Manaaed Production of
Resources.
-Areas containing mineral
Deposits
o
-Geothermal Resources
o
-Areas for recharge of ground-
water basins
Open Space Programs
-Figure 6 designates areas
where extractive uses are
permitted.
-Implementation
provides for the
tion of areas for
tive purposes.
provides for
uses, buffers
uses.
-Implementation 10.13
requires that all proposals
for mineral extraction
contain reclamation plans
and both be prepared
pursuant to the Surface
Mining and Reclamation Act.
-Implementation 1.1 requires
the inclusion of permitted
uses and standards in the
Development Code.
-Policies 1.4.1, 1.34.10,
1.34.11 address Implementa-
tion 1. 1
-Policies 10.7.7 - 10.7.9,
10.8.1, 10.8.2, 10.8.6, and
10.9.1 address Implementa-
tion 10.11 and 10.13
10.11
designa-
extrac-
It also
compatible
and interim
-Figure 34 shows the
location of geothermal
resources.
-Implementation 7.39
requires an education
program pertaining to
geothermal resources.
-Implementation 7.39a
requires the City to
perform a geothermal
feasibility review on
certain buildings.
-policies 7.18.1-7.18.3
address these measures.
-Implementation 11.15
prohibits the discharge
_,~>,,>,c~.
o
o
o
o
.0
TABLE 4B OPEN SPACE RESOURCES AND PROGRAMS
MAY 16, 1989
'PAGE 2
-Agriculture
of hazardous materials into
the 9roundwater and pro-
hibits the location of
septic systems in areas
with high soil
permeability. It also
provides for slop stability
measures and storm runoff
improvements.
-policies 11.2.1-11.2.6 and
11.3.1 and 11.3.2 address
Implementation 11.15.
-Implementation 1.1 provides
for standards in the
Development Code to permit
agriculture as an interim
use.
-Policy 1.4.2 addresses this
measure.
Outdoor Recreation
o
-Areas of scenic, historic
and cultural value
-Figure
area of
cultural
ties.
-Implementation 3.1 requires
the survey and inventory of
all historic, cultural,
architectural and archaeo-
logical resources.
-Implementation 3.3 requires
adoption of a Historic
Preservation Ordinance.
-Implementation 3.6 requires
preparation of a Historic
Preservation overlay Zone
to protect and enhance the
environment of significant
sites, structures and
districts.
-policies 3.1.1 3.1.6,
3.1.10, 3.1.14, 3.2.6,
3.2.7, 3.3.2, 3.3.3 address
these implementation
measures.
10 designates an
arcaeological and
value sensitivi-
o
-Areas for park and
recreation purposes
-Figure 6 designates
existing parks
existing schools (PF)
public/quasi-public
(PCR).
-Implementation 9.1 and 9.2
(PP),
and
uses
~
o
o
TABLE 4B OPEN SPACE RESOURCES
MAY 16, 1989
PAGE 3
.
o
o
-Links between major recreation
and open space areas (trails)
o
o
AND PROGRAMS
o
require preparation of a
Parks Master Plan to
inclu4e siting of new
facilities, improvements of
existing facilities, timing
and funding.
-Implementation 9.3 requires
5 acres of. parkland p~r
1000 population.
-Implementation 9.4 requires
dedication of parkland or
in-lieu fees.
-Implementation 9.12, 9.14,
9.15 and 9.16 provide for
interagency coordination in
the provision of parks and
recreation facilities.
-Policies 9.1.1, 9.1.2,
9.1.3, 9,1.6, 9.1.7,
9.1.11, 9.1.12, 9.1.13,
9.1.14, 9.2.1-9.2.7, 9.3.1-
9.3.4 address these
measures.
-Figure 42 designates a
conceptual equestrian trail
system.
-Implementation 9.1 requires
provisions for trails as
part of the Parks Master
Plan.
-Implementation 9.16
provides for interagency
coordination in the pro-
vision of trails on and to
public lands.
-Policies 9.1.8 and 9.1.9
address these measures.
-Implementation 10.6
requires the formulation of
recommendations for the
acquisition of property to
establish a corridor to the
National Forest Service via
Cable Creek and/or Devil
Canyon.
-policies 10.3.2 and 10.4.1
address this measure.
.
o
o
o
-~
o
o
TABLE 4B OPEN SPACE RESElURCES AND
MAY 16, 1989
PAGE 4
Preservation of Natural Resources
-Areas for preservation of
plant and animal life and
areas for ecological/
scientific study
-Banks of rivers, streams and
watersheds
Protection of Health and Safety
-Geologic Hazards
o
PROGRAMS
o
-Figure 8 designates areas
where potential biological
resources are located.
-Implementation 10.1 re-
quires establishment and
maintenance of a biological
resources data base.
-Implementation 10.2 re-
quires standards and
restrictions to be incorpo-
rated in the Development
Code. .
-Policies 10.2.1 10.2.4,
10.2.6, 10.3.1 10.3.3,
10.4.1 10.4.3, 10.5.1
address these measures.
-Figure 8 designates areas
where potential biological
resources are located,
including riparian areas.
-Implementation 10.2
requires restrictions and
standards to be included in
the Development Code
pertaining to the develop-
ment in or adjacent to
riparian corridors.
-Policies 10.3.1 10.3.4
address this measure.
-Implementation 11.15
requires standards and
regulations in the De-
velopment Code pertaining
to slope stabilization.
-Policies 11.3.1 and 11.3.2
address this measure.
-Figure 9 shows areas locat-
ed in the Alquist Priolo
Special Studies Zones.
-Figure 51 shows areas
susceptible to liquefaction
-Implementation 12.2
requires site specific
studies for all critical,
Sensitive and High-Occu-
-.
.-
o
o
o
o
.
o
TABLE 4B OPEN SPACE RESOURCES AND PROGRAMS
MAY 16, 1989
PAGE 5
pancy facilities.
-Imple~entation 12.3 pro-
hibits critical facilities
from locating in an
Alquist-Priolo Special
Studies Zone.
-Implementation 12.3
requires a 100 foot setback
from an active fault.
-policies 12.1.1, 12.1.2,
12.2.1, 12.3.1-12.3.4,
12.4.1-12.4.8, 12.5.1,
12.5.2, 12.6.1-12.6.3,
12.7.1 and 12,7.2 address
these measures.
-Fire Hazards
-Figure 65 designates areas
susceptible to wildland
fires.
-Implementation 15.1
requires incorporation in
the Development Code of the
provisions of the Foothill
Communities Protective
"Greenbelt" Program per-
taining to siting, access,
water supply, vegetation,
erosion control, etc.
-Policies 15.2.1-15.2.9
address this measure.
o
-Flooding
-Figure 6 designates areas
for flood control uses.
-Figure 66 designates areas
within the 100 year flood
plain.
-Implementation 16.1 re-
quires projects within the
100 year flood plain to be
consistent with require-
ments in the Municipal
Code. It also requ~res
review of projects by the
County Flood Control
District.
-policies 16.1.1 16.1.4
address this measure.
o.
-Hillside Management
-The Draft Land Use Plan
designates areas included
in the Hillside Management
overlay.
-Implementation 1.1 requires
inclusion in the Develop-
o
.
o
o
c
o
o
o
TABLE 4B OPEN SPACE RESOURCES AND PROGRAMS
MAY 16, 1989
PAGE 6
ment Code of standards and
restrictions.
-Implementation 1.2 requires
inclusion of subdivision
development and design
standards in the Develop-
ment Code.
-Implementation 1.6 and 1.7
include provisions for
project review _ from the
developmental and environ-
mental standpoint.
-Policies 1.14.10 ~
and 1.14.30
address tl1es~,
1: 14.1,5
1.14.41
measures.
GP:TABLE4B
.,~--~ " .
.I.. _II
~ -
.J:P
o
o
o
o
"
.
~~~~~~~ _
.' i/~._ _ _
. ~.
- . ...7--
-4-__.__.__ . 'm"_.~__'______'__'_'~_"_'_'___'~_~_~
o
- ____d:_ --- .. . _. _ ~~-tk~~--~1-~
_.__._~ ______ _ H'_ _ ~d-tf~~.(~
__._~ fa-ll'5__I,?_~j~-:-n'~l?)_ ----
<l~~~tWd;tL~ ef~~
~14 ka"'f.-~,..:Sn.~/982 9~ ~~oI.
9r:tf:~c1 ~t/v. ~;~~.
_~ %d.~ Iq92..t;-~4t,J..zJ4!
~ fna I-fU D ~4~A:lM~~M~
'1 ~ ~I ~~ Jwzu a.I1UI>~
hd-k~J-~at~~~~dM
~.J~ . 9~U~~~
~ ~ 4.N<.a . J;t/4.~, lu:t
~~~~ .~~,~
. __ _ 01 JJ:. T:Ae..~ c/ L:4., :l.av.at.k::.k~
_ __._ .__ .._._ .~.~~~~~d~~ ..-
______ot.'d~_~~~d:-4Vt..~
-. -~.._..._.._-_.._---_._-_.__....
______.___..Y-:~1it~dd~~
_.._m._~di'cl~-~-~~ {2~aI
1k~~~ilvd.hdot:v.; -a flU D~
o ~ ~p a.v..~~oI~aZ-'t~
l-aoCVlcl. ~ ~ ~ ~A~dC/'P<J.O yr
Ohao4>~~~ g~ ~~~
. '_'F~.'._'..'_ 1
*.
o
o
o
()
.~~d~~...n~~4
. f~~~R3-L2..6J:L~~'~~~
Alp. J-,.. ~~. /tAIl
l; ~
dMf-r Aalp._. .-.....-....-. . ~... -- ._-
N fnArLJ..L~J J _A:-:V J.~".t.~ .atJ&Jj,!.<V>.._{
~~,J{-1~ ~.9~"~ 9M.JJ2(Jk~ ~
.~, fl~~I2~.~~~ ~~
.~ ~~~;ioa~~J!A~.-u
/l'l.U~;':L ~ ~(J~ ~ 41l ~ /oWvtr
CU~a..
__um' ..tk ~ ~~~.zIu~/3.A'..I..1./h .
() .AA~;4~Hl1J)~~d.ztv~~
..... .~.-2ad~ d~d ~~d~ ;I:;.,th
. ../Ua)L ~aAdP-aJ.t)lddCi.!:. . n
_ . ~/-iuO~~L~dO'\-O~..JltM
..4n~~/~~~~/~J
---t;;::ty;l:~'!t~~;:~~v
-..... :;;:?~~7~'k;.;;y~
o _n _Ik. CA(~ dol'~~ :tk~/JJ4.rJ.d ~~~~l~
.. .~.~k..-cw..drii4~~O'il'lH~r <UIU.
... -.. inn.Wrav..ltk CAC ~.rtI~f}aI/fA/
-
1
o
o
o
~
5-20-89
San Bernardino City Council
300 N. D Street
San Bernardino, CA
Dear Mrs. Mayor and Common Council:
As a Project Area Committee member and more importantly a resident of
the 6th ward, a grave disservice has been done to me by the City of
San Bernardino which resulted in denying me the opportunity and the
time to organize the residents directly affected by zone changes in
the 6th ward to come and express their opposition at these meetings.
circulate a petition opposing multi-family residential units on
Baseline and on Mt Vernon and make arrangements with my employer which
would allow me to be present at these final meetings concerning the
adoption and approval of the General Plan.
Contrary to what many believe, the project area committee has met re-
gularly to discuss the General Plan, Redevelopment Plan, the problems
pertaining to the proposed supermarket. land use and zone changes as
well as other issues affecting our project area. In fact, we have had
at least five special meetings besides our regular meetings in the
last 6 months. I attended two special meetings in April in which we
discussed land use and zone changes. These meetings were very infor-
mative and productive. Unfortunately when Mr. Kilger attended our May
8th meeting it became apparent to us that the map he was showing us
was different than what Mr. James, the liaison appointed by RDA and
approved by the City Council had provided us. The main difference
was that the General Plan and Redevelopment Plan maps that we were
provided with were color coded to show that Mt. Vernon and Baseline
were zoned commercial and specifically excluded multi-family residen-
tial units.
During the latter part of last year when Mr. James first presented
maps that had been completed that very day I recalled that I had
recently read that the Planning Commission had agreed to the CAC
recommendation for multi-family units along these two corridors. When
I mentioned this, he advised that as far as he knew, the map that was
drawn up for him was accurate and he had not been advised of any change.
Because my job required that I commute extensively throughout Orange
County and L.A. County I thought perhaps I had missed something and
relied on the information provided by our appointed liaison.
I can only conclude that Mr. James was either, intentionally kept in
the dark or there is a lack of communication between or within the
departments at City Hall. The result being that the PAC gets misin-
formed and our community pays the price.
Tal_ing the above into consideration, I would like to request that the
Council read the attached statement and re-vote the multi-family unit
issue along the Baseline and Mt. Vernon corridors.
Respectfully submitted,
-==Bv7",- yv'-><il.cj"Z:;c,-
()
o
o
o
Dear Mrs. Mayor and Common Council:
Thank you for taking the time to read the statement that I would have
read aloud had I been given the opportunity. I would have liked to
attend these last meetings but I too have some major deadlines to meet
before the end of this month.
Two years ago I was a candidate for the Project Area Committee. I
walked door to door soliciting support and votes from the residents
in our neighborhood which is bordered by Baseline street and Mt. Vernon
street.
After speaking with many resident homeowners in this area, it was clear
to me that the majority overwhelmingly opposed a plan which called for
multi-family residential units along these two corridors. A group of
us attended a planning commission meeting and expressed our opposition
and our concerns about this plan, The Planning Commission voted that
evening to recommend that the plan be amended to exclude mUlti-family
residential units along Mt. Vernon and along Baseline.
Subsequent to this meeting, someone formed a CAC which convinced the
planning Commission to reverse its recommendation. It is obvious that
this CAC did not walk door to door requesting input from the residents
and homeowners who would be directly affected by this decision.
The idea that this area cannot support commercial zoning without these
multi-family units 1S nonsense. The success of Amapolas on Baseline
and Mr. Lee's establishment on 8th and Mt. Vernon disproves that theory.
In fact, Mr. Lee has so much business that sometimes the traffic lines
up on Mt. Vernon to get into the parking lot and his security guards
direct the traffic and p~~ng in and out of the lot. AS you know,
Mr. Lee is opening another business less than two miles away on 5th
street, one block west of Mt. Vernon. I doubt that he would consider
this were he not making a nice profit.
We can also make reference to the problems associated with multi-family
units on 14th and Mt. Vernon. Like the Highland and Arden apartments,
years ago they were very nice. The question we must consider about
multi-family units along Baseline and along Mt. Vernon, is what will
they look like in ten years? What will they be like in twenty years?
I believe it is a mistake, and frankly, irresponsible to take that
chance with the main corridors of our sixth ward.
I would like to request that the Council reconsider and for the sixth
ward, exclude multi-family residential units along Baseline and along
Mt. Vernon. These main corridors of the sixth ward would be best
suited as commercial general and single family homes, or commercial
neighborhood.
Thank you,
~, u.. )1A~6Z..{..J...-
J 'J
-" ,,'"
'-0--
I N 0
Gr
I :~:..~ i_'~
i l; i
......:. ':~~
0__
C I T Y
o F Q AN B ERN 9R 0
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8905-805
f.,
.
:'-_-j
MAY 1 . 1989
(
TO:
Brad Kilger, Director, Planning Department
C'-'" >. ,.
II' .t..- .
,:.:/
(-.': .- --..." , .:
....,...,<~ ...' ~ ".-'\..~
."
~:i.
FROM:
Council Office, Ward Two
SUBJECT: General Plan Designation - "0" Street, from Wabash
to 14th Street
DATE:
May 12, 1989
COPIES:
Councilman Tom Minor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please find attached letter from Mr. Adolf Miller
regarding "0" Street, from Wabash to 14th Street.
I would appreciate your review of Mr. Miller's request.
The existing land use is primarily multiple family.
Second Ward
JR:sr
attch.
- . - ,...,..
--. '-'"'
o
o
'2f~
:)>. ,
- i'-'>-
"
1859 Random Drive
Anaheim, California
Hay 9, 1989
PAl
~
/
V
r:; C""" ._,
< ,
f-~
~
Mr. Jack Reilly
Council Offices
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino
California 92418
Dear Mr. Jack Reilly:
l' -.,.
.....,...'...
~-
'-'
:-~
,. ..I.al~
~:;> ..
'-".-~
a.:...",
co
The east side of "D" Street from Wabash north to within
145.12 feet of 14th Street should be zoned for multiple
family residential instead of single family residential.
At the present time parcels 145-2l2-9,-5,-43,-3,-1,and -8,
are occupied by multiple family residences.
For ~any years parcels 145-212-12,-13,and-34, have been
zoned for multiple family residences.
I own the 63,079.50 square feet area in parcels 145-212
-10,-11,-34. My land is 447 feet deep and most of my
land is in the center of the block. The frontage of my
land on "D" Street is surrounded by land developed or
zoned for multiple family residences on both sides and
across the street.
I hope that you will consider changing the proposed zone
of 145-21.2-10, -11, -34, from single family residential
to multiple family residential.
Yours truly,
\j~~
l' vo-- ",:A
/v-. jA / U
~A.:
- r I C-t
'~~J"
.I
0-J~ i\
(Q.
';-. '~
(. - ._[;
L-. JI. &A ~ ,
r
["\ -
TLQ
~_ ,L{ t
f...;c. C"'. ~.'\. G .~- ~"; \\.--
':'t~_.,.;...._.. -
>~. cc ~
QITY OF SAN BERaARDINO Q.. MEMORANDUPtP
To Brad Kilger, Director of Planning
From
Jack Reilly
Councilman,
May 5, 1989
Second Ward
..;ubject Land Use Plan
Date
Approved
Date
I hereby reiterate my desire that the land use designation
along 21st Street to Crestview Avenue be extended. Please
prepare the necessary recommendation or motion to be presented
before the full Council during the nd Use aring.
JACK REILLY
Councilman, Second Ward
JR:fw
:"'-"--
-n_~___
w
l:I
o
o
o
o
Maudsley: I am going to move that on Table lA, the document entitled
"Relationship to other plans and documents"; that the item designated
as Highland Hills Specific Plan be incorporated by reference and changed
from "superceded" and the remainder of the plan as recommended by the
Planning Commission be incorporated into the General Plan. I am doing
so in the belief that this is the correct course of action and will resolve
a long standing problem in the east end and will incorporate the wishes
of the Citizens' Committee that has worked long and hard with a number of
entities to resolve this problem and I believe they have done so in good
faith. I believe the plan they have bought into and that if for the project
succeeds and will become an assst for San Bernardino. ~'
yYVL - ~
".
10.
o
o
5'~/g-'i$l
J
~f\u' ~ :
~~:
6~ 4ft...Wo :
s(n\ gq
~1~ (~~~
0.) r-2.ls@~ C~l-~c.G)
Q) IoJlw 1 ~ en..s, (Rt..I- Rom\-\)
. w........ S'du.s: AON.. 24.... ~2.4k:> 0'V\."~.s;t\.u:t:.
. 16-45. ~t\~: (~m,.,.""c.G-i) \&lOO ~('E.~
'C:>~. ~1~ M~: Uz-s ~ CG)
'0-45. ~ p~: ~~ 1-"D's,;tud, ISt:!J. 10 /(P""!!:J (~rr'I ~ CC1)
5-\q l.a.o- ~:
.B--'t0 f(C\ooI\l<..-C.....u#s: ~ 'tJlo ~c..;:1i;....tvl. C_12S...,Gb-l)
&-41 C~ k.ks-', US f'~ ~!J'" So,"i'. (
B-"'Ta rA~ S~: ~ ~o f'~ C ~u -} ac.G-0
A-\:,_ C~ l-1)A)tvi ," : ~~~~l%.-
B-4q ~"'A1 t?~: ~ 8,vk-o- @ I-2.I$
B-5D c~,j,:a-C~: *'5:Di ~~f'~G' ~l2--2..~CS-\)
&-5\ '()'\.d' +V-~ ~ (12.\..--)o \2.5) Gfi..c- @.p~ se:c..
1)-52.. ~13Y;sto..,: '14\ €.~ CCG-l.......,(~yY\-'tC6-!I~u..~
.J.--'A- ~P>-0~w~ " j-Wl.:A ~1'O~ ~
f} _ u _ ... . I: '" .., "-~ 4- "'\
A->-.5' Il'II!II ~ ~1.(l: gq ~ N., ~ i \.,V'i~ wuI CJ/'I.... .kt; "'" 100, {Z ~ ~ a:.-V
A-'1..1
5-4-2.
A-\0
B-53
~-51
B-55
A-::>
~\.'\,.. La-~1..:
.-1
,
Sr"";1- IR~: ~~~ (r,J~ ~~~ C12.-:)
51h-<-~ :~"b.@~ \2J\ ('N~il;/,,~~---'.;,
. ,&f~~)
I?~ ~@~ Nee @.s~l2-m)
{J1t<<;t~ " 61h4 ~ (w...z.~~Rm'rt-\s)
~~: (}u-~)
"-'"~-, """"
c
o~
o
o
Bo-s-c" ~s~ : ~Lv/u-;
0.) be ,,"c, (IZL-'>R.m)
b) ~ 5 p..c. (~L"" C!\J)
9 Z5'~~V~
Yh~ ~: v\;t1--fr~ @ ZITI (c..o-\
Vv;)j S--:te'\-. : rC1f1':t..;l( CV'~ ; (~(2..E)
~ rr\'~J.Jli :<>;)~t: ~f2.L.)
b) ~yt, (\L. 01<-)
E",....::f F;..v4-v: Qz.lY\ rt --7 e.G -\) \ $DC ';; ~
~ 6~: ~ .. [q3- f-S7gr0
3-"'"2- ~(J ~~: (1<.0'\ ~ e.G.-I)
5-"'3 t:...;v_::t.R;.fr-~J: 2,;;'0 No.' E."" C<-\? ~3-S~
5-5"7
6-58
'i>--sJ
bO
B-.
E)-bJ
6-""" ~~
(t<.Sa"7Co-I) W~4V~V- N'Z'C.
'''~''~"'''','
Q
~
.
on
!:
\
....w~~o
.'
,
@)O
~
u
0..
.: .
~.Il
o
E!!
_0
cot::_
c:..o
~.l!g
~
1--'
:11N3^"
.
. OJ,
"
'~o
r
,
L-r.
" I
O"3H~II"- , - ,.-
,- ,...... - - I-.J"~ , .~
'<:>
I J@ e "
6l
@ ~ @
~ , (f;) ~ Q)<t- "' ...
~(1l) (I)
" r_" 'I
.. 0
~@ ~ .. 0
@ ;;; .
~ t; . €) ~
~ @ I ... e
I
,
, . E"
@ I .
I
i, ,~ (!) @ ~ .. ~
. ~ '~..~ @
I 2 @
,
,
, ~ @ I :: €)
I !! @ '.
- ~; ., -- ,- --
...
u
'"
0::
....
r
.~
....
'"
'"
a:
....
V!
'"a!-
<P~
wir
~
5
,,"0
-u
a._o
o Doc:
::E 0'-
...Q.~
- It) 0
t"Q>~
M__
:;.CD
"8"
M 0
"lllllll
s
c5
z
'"
..
a
I
..
- ..
,311
'..
lIIU
... .5
iDi
." 11
~V!
...
:: -
....
.. E
. ~
~z
~
I
/ij"
i
il
i~ @-l--i
~ :E I
~
.L 3311 lS
: . I
O ~ ---,~- tS\
. N ...,,-~... ~.~ \::::;)
ir
I'
.~ ."-
-..l-::no""
. : "l"
, I
@ :@ ~
, .. I
~.~ ..,'" ..
I . I
~ I ~ ~ -\';-; ! !
~;c:'> 10f;e
I I'
I I
,
, ..
".i..-
~d>:t.
@
, I
...
~ 0 I .. .
- I I
, -@ ~--
. ."
,
:: I "' I ~
,
OIMXXllS-'':'
, -
I
I
@
..
"'
8
.r
@ @ (!) @ @ (!) @ @
,
-(1)"' = ~ ~ ! !! 2
- -
...
_.
. . .. I .. 1-
0 .. . h.
I I
E ,~ e e @ @ ,f!} ~ I @I " ~
!! . .j.!!
I I
" I
~ -''-- .~. l3311.LS ~ ..
r
"
,.-3--'-
. . .
'"
l!?
e!!!
il\ai
,:I
II>
:aN
~
I~
:ii
~It
.i\.
.. c
-"
..-
~~
~l
~~,~.~-~' ,
..,c
o
o
5'-/3"1{"
~~
(;-17-"6'7
:!,"S POS'1-
.~..
~ \:
. ~
:> .
. .
.......
;~.;~ r :,?89
~i.. ~ ;. t.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
FICiIilies SeMce Center
San Btuno. CA 94091),(1330
, >.~', , ".
May 12, 1989
Mr. Brad Kilger
Director of PlaIU'!in3
City of San Beznardino
300 North "0" SL......ot
San Bernardin:>, CA 92418-0001
Re: San Bernardin:>, CA - Old General Mail Facility
General Plan Ian:i Use Zonin;J
Dear Mr. Kilger:
At the April 13, 1989 PlaIU'!in3 Camnission Public Heari.n;J, - requested
the General Plan - Ian:i Use portion - be modified to designate IL (Light
In:lustria1) zonin;J for our old General Mail Facility (GMF) property
located at 1331 South "E" street. '!he General Plan calls for a 0:;.-1
(General Ccmnercial) zonin;J. As the PlaIU'lin3 t"'rwmIkClion denied our
<lRllication, _ hereby officially seek an cq:peal of their clec:ision.
'!he subject facility was clec:lared exoeES property by the Postal Service
and is onrel1tly bei.n;J used for dead storage. ()Jr desire is to lease it
to a private finn, I::ut recetl't attempts to lease attracted only
irdustrial and distril::ution-type prospective tenants. No inquires were
received frail CY"JImlR1"Cial users.
'!he 00ildi.n;J was designed and constructed as a ptocessi.n;J and
distril::ution facility, ~ it, for all intents and pw:pcsoo,
fun:::ti.onal obsolete for other type users. '!he 00ildi.n;J is primarily an
qJeJl warehalse configuration with lilnited office space in the front.
Al~ the Postal Service is a tenant in the buildi.n;J, _ expect to
exercise our option to pm::hase the property. At which time, and if -
are still usi.n;J the property for Postal p.up:ses, the property will be
taken off the tax roles and will remain a zerv-=~loyment facility. If
however, we can lease the facility to a private finn, neither INOUld be
the case.
..0
(
{
.."....~ .
o
o
We respectfully request your office reconsider em' rezaUnq request am
rezalB to II.. (or OIP), which Wl:W.d give us a better d1aJxle of leasm;
than the }U.' p:ISEld a;-l zarln;J.
sincerely,
L-~~#~
R. W. C11apDan
General Manager
Real Estate Division
oc: Camcilman Jess Flores
File 060lA C/R
o
~~JJ~,
~~~~~~
" JIO':i;""'..."~ "'" ."
("'C('''''I~)I~,,8
r ~~. --."""~"" ;,
'. '~""'~""
" ' -~-~.. N
,:f~I~*"~..,.~
. <l~iI\$:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
~
AUDIT TRAIL
..,
~-:/; ~I g ')
Name f'oiJElt.1 0. /)'/6RNIN($T,FIC-
Mailing AddressOl'/7 //lltZP.s=r ;:57;,., BPNV
PleBse press down
Date
Phone 3$.& -~'/I..3
Zip tz::,'-'d..:L
Request/Comments g/'IttE~.EN'7Y /IIG (lA L 7i2.~,.JS
CO/U~~G:O WnH AI/arGO ;z."'6. ClMNCc
Q,mftll!:lloHl. / AJ PA#"t>S,a~ ~~'r~ :3 =3 0
,{JJ tJ~,q- Crt 'I C~U<~L A A ~
Location of Property or Area of Concern /?I'. /J 99 - :1// -03
i2.!HT fir 11114,/
;Ct2.01'tJ 12'5 70
FklEw'Y {7d~mu,
STAFF ONL Y BELOW THIS UNE
Existing IPD Designation
Proposed General Plan Designation
Existing Land Use
Existing Zoning
By
Comments
Date of Action
PC
MCC
Action
Comments
\.... 17 1 -003 13-191
~.=n:== ~
(
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
GENERAL PLAN REVISION PROGRAM
r
AUDIT TRAIL
"'l
Please press down
Date 9 - ~6 - fJ''j
Name E.p"",,~ A. tC,.-,..~ Phone 71'/- 8"77-/.R~a-
. . AVoL
Mailing Address/50/ ~. '2"'--<::~.D"'_ f??AL7';; Zip <j.:l.:37~
Request/Comments r.c- ill rl?r~*!-r ~N,;'# #,AC" ,~'N R~./--"-'"' J'io......
-g;;;. C;r;; of ~.v'~"'U"'RD'~" 3"'r~ v:--v;- ",.uN"~, J't..1"""'",';. t:."7"/./ej-
S-NI~Ro......AJ'-- ....y OUA~~; (J:';t:.,.LIr:;;;:- ..::i:)~~;&A/M-r:=..~"l: ~- Vh,.$-
~ ,
"'b ~ r-
,?le4~ y h.. r /" /oS
~"*,,,".J~...- _..../__
-
~ I ~~~, AA.j~..-
~eLdI^,G.~~~
r -..v7"Ar>> L ",VC-
,e;"s, .':
Location of Property or Area of Concern
~
~
v.
~~~(
v
'11,.IL."'l1r
STAFF ONL Y BELOW THIS UNE
Existing IPD Designation
Proposed General Plan Designation
Existing Land Use
Existing Zoning
By
Comments
Date of Action
PC
MCC
Action
"
Comments
""-- 171-G03 13-891
cnv 01' !WI IEIINoW*O J
CIfrmIal.-"SfIMCl!S ...I
o
C I T Y
o p()s A N B ERN CJk 0 I N 0
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8905-801
~-,
Ii' J
.J
.. ~
I j: I
(;:J
-'---iii~
i "J~ ~: !I ~ !S llli
ViAY fj ~ 1989
f
Brad L. Kilger, Director of Planning
Council Office, Ward Two
TO:
FROM:
.....i: !
. : -jl~~H::JT
.i"-~, CA
.).:,
SUBJECT: 1300 block of "0" Street - General Plan Designation
DATE: May 4, 1989
COPIES: Councilman Tom Minor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Please find the attached letter from Mr. and Mrs. Robert
willis. I would appreciate your review of their request and
bringing the matter to the attention of the Mayor and Common
Council at the forthcoming land use hearings.
Planning hearings
The new master zoning plan pro-
poses to rezone the 1300 block of 0
Street from administrative-profession_
al office uses to residential.
This is not appropriate because I
th~re are 13 businesses operating in
~hls one block whose owners all have
mVl!sted time .and money in keeping I
their properties neat and updated.
Also, at least one of the residential
property owners purchased his prop.
~rty recently with the intention of raz-
mg the old residence and constructing
a new medical office building.
We understood that one of the goals
of the new master plan was to eliminate
spot zoning, not create more. The rest
of north D Street, from Highland Ave-
nue to downtown is to be zoned for
C?mmerclat'Office use, which is very
slmtlar to what it has all been for years
If they change this one block to resi~
dential. it will soon become a blighted
block on an otherwise beautiful street.
We urge all concerned citizens to
attend the public hearings scheduled in
the Council Chambers to discuss the
proposed changes. They are scheduled
to be held on May 10 at 1 p.m., May 13
at9am. and May 17 at 1 p.m.
80eand LOIS WIWS
San e_<dIno
"
.
.;.0
CGMJ.lDII L~~~Q^"Fj^-
CITY Gf WI fE:~lillaDIN~
13S9 NAY -/ tJI/Q: 46
o
o
(
Mr". ~" Nt"s. RODin'+; WIllis
3155 N. 5ep~lveoa ~~e.,
San Bernardino. Ca. ~2404
Ap,"il :::7, 198';
Coun~llman Reilly
C it / Ha 11
San Bernardlno, Ca.
Dear Councilman Reilly,
We ~re p,"operty owne,"s 1n your district and we need ~our help
regat~dln9 the proposed zoneln master plan. Our property IS on D
Street in tne 130!) block. ~hen we pu,~chaseo it :~~c year's ago it
wa~ for the expt~ess purposE of llwlns tnere ~no cpet"atln9 a fIre
e;~tin~Ulsher' compan~ tnen ~na later' 30ding a ta~ prep~ration
OUSlness 1n the secona o+flce. We got the permlt to 11~e there
..anQ t~ op-:~':ar.e tile -rt,'s e;,tingui:ne," comF~n~. \-"'ewer'.: .:;iannln~ I~n
openln9 ~rie tax preFaratlon o+flce thIS coming ~ln~et-.
The ~r-QPoseo =one cnan3e 13 to make ~ll o~ 0 Str~at ~rom well
belo~ &asellne to ~i~hlana ~ve. Commercial/Office wlth the one
~~ceptlon o~ the 1301) block. Why thiS one oloc~ ~h~Gld De
d.f+erent we 00 not unoer~t.na. Currentl) th.~ 13~) blo~k of D
Street cont~ln~ 13 OUSlneS5 prcp~t.tle5 and 15 resldantial
FI-.C'j:'Et..tles:.. It 15 not .co 8000 to.esldeiitlal at"eao. a.na sEvet"'Co.l of tile
~'e~lj~~ce~ ~r'~ ala and not well kepc. One of the re~ldentlal
~t~C~er-tle3 has t~ecently been sold and we unaer~t~nd he noped ~o
oUlla a new medical of~ic2 bUilding wnich he cowid net jo unae,'
~ne Pt~oposed zone change to Residentlal.Units. Our unde!.~tandlns
o~ cne new =ones ~ifects would be tnat an) pt~opet'tj Cwt.t"~ntl~
belng useo for busIness WIll Immedla~el) revert to ~!U upon 5ale
0": the pt'operty Ot~ If tne OUSlne5s 15 nct~cti......= fat"' 51;:. lnonths.
This would substantially reou~e our property ~alues ana ma~~e it
esp~clally di-Tflcult to iind a buyet" witnout takIng ~ lar~e.
unn?-Tfordable loss and most of our neIghbors wowld also have the
$.ame p r"oo 1 em.
we at.e aSking if you can get the City Council to reconSIder"
~har":!ln9 the zon.ng on thlS one blo~k and make lt ~ln.+o'"m
Commer~lal/affl~e for all of D Street from below Baseline up to
H.ghland A,e. We are not requestlng spot zonlng. We are
requesting you eliminate spot zoning.
We have spoken to several property owners on thlS blo~k and all
are in agreement wlth this request.
F 1 ease respond and 1 et us know wha t you ~an do fo," us. If the"e
is anything more we ~an do, please let us know.
~~& wJiv,
7/C/- ?,f313P6
Q
o
o
o
( ;IT
ERN ARD IN 0 300 NORTH "0" STREET. SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 9241B
May 4, 1989
:---" ~~ " l-:! ..~ :-;-~ ".
! .~ ., ~~ i':' ., ~-~. ,
:..' ~:> . '0'; ~:':
, I
, ::1
: . -, k ~
.'
~ 0- i' " r; 1989
, t' -,
.
JACK REILLY
Councllm8n. Second W.rd
17141 384-5222
Mr. and Mrs. Robert Willis
3155 N. Sepulveda Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92404
,. --,
L.;
"~~f-rr
-.....,
::" t.
. ,-
.- '.',".
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Willis:
Thank you for your letter of April 27, 1989 regarding
the proposed land use designation in the 1300 block of "0"
Street. Your letter has been forwarded to Mr. Brad Kilger,
Planning Director for the city, as well as a copy to Council-
man Tom Minor.
I would strongly suggest that you and your neighbors
plan on attending the public hearings now being conducted by
the Mayor and Common Council. The land use hearings will
begin shortly. The Planning Department will be able to give
you the dates of the council hearings on land use.
The reason I have sent a copy of your letter to Council-
man Minor is the fact that I have undergone surgery and the
doctor doubts that I can return to work for several more
weeks. I have asked Councilman Minor to help out in situa-
tions like yours so you may wish to contact him by phone or
by appointment at City Hall.
I am always reluctant to create nonconforming types of
uses that result from changing commercially zoned areas
for commercial purposes to a residential use. I would
the Planning Staff and Mayor and Common council will
thoughtful consideration to your request.
land
used
hope
give
sincerely,
JACK REILLY
Councilman, Second Ward
JR:jv
Director
/
o
(
,
/)
/'
/
';
C I T Y
o ~ A N B ERN CJh DIN 0
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8904-806
o
TO: Brad L. Kilger, Director of planning
FROM: Council Office, Ward Two
SUBJECT: General Plan Draft
DATE: April 17, 1989
COPIES: Mayor Evlyn wilcox
"
i;: )
!., !
~"
lH<I. ~-~8:j
"';'0.','
;"~'i'~ i"'\...'~,~;. ;;~-:...~, ,
~Ad-t'!::~-f~\;,\;"{;:~':2. -;~:
-------------------------------------------------------------
In all likelihood I will not be able to attend the Mayor
and Common Council hearings on the General Plan scheduled for
the month of May.
I have noted my areas of concern to you and Vince
Bautista on an overlay of the proposed land use designations
in the Second Ward. In addition, I have recently received a
copy of a petition addressed to you from residents in the
1200 block of Stoddard Avenue who are desirous of retaining a
residential classification instead of a commercial designa-
tion. A field review would show that the dwellings in this
area are older: however, the majority are well maintained and
there is community pride in this small residential cluster.
I would appreciate the staff presenting my areas of
concern to the Planning Commission for their consideration
and to the Mayor and Common Council for their ultimate
decision.
"
"'.I
~ /)
~/ /.;>,
.. / --. "
, .' ~~ -' -,-\
'"./// '/ / ,////(
, . G,."-:;"'/;;', :.- x:.-,-,_t~
/ / '::rACK "REILLY .
j./../ councilman, S~c'ond
Ward
Ii
/}
/ '. 'f
V; /
)""'
('/'
/,j
'it,,- -
~ / ",,/'
, { ,
'/ JR:JV,
./
, / i
/ >.i/
\,
I
li_
~, ~
/
...~'
,"1'-./
I
I
j
'c
.,
o
o
o
C I T Y 0 F SAN B ERN A R DIN 0
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
8904-809
t.
FROM:
Brad Kilger, Director, Planning Department._
Council Office, Ward Two
~"'~ -j'?
~
I:) ;
i;: !
TO:
-'
SUBJECT: General Plan Land Use Designation
f;.).".... :989
DATE:
April 24, 1989
COPIES:
Mayor Wilcox, Councilman Tom Minor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Mark Walek who represents Moran Meat Company called
me concerning the proposed expansion plans of the meat
company at 1375 - 1411 E. Baseline - Desert Service Center.
Plans have been submitted to the Planning Department and he
has been told that the proposed land use designation for the
new general plan will not allow the expansion. I suggested
he set up an appointment with you to go over the company's
expansion plans and also to acquaint you with the total
property on which the plant is located. I would guess the
total site comprises of 20 acres, more or less. The property
contains the following uses:
- Moran Meats Company
- Peppertree Industries (Restaurant Supplies)
- Delbert Miller Heating & Air Conditioning
- Mountain View Heating & Refrigeration
- Bell Industries (HVAC)
- Car Parts Store
\
The property is bordered on the east by a new mini-
warehouse facility, on the south by a flood control channel.
An Edison substation is located to the west. West of the
substation is the "House of Plywood". There are commercial
uses on the north side of Baseline, opposite the site.
Several of the uses on the site are major distributors
of products to the Southern California area. Mr. Walek
estimates that perhaps as many as 300 people are employed in
the cluster of uses listed above. He also indicated that
there are approximately 4 acres of undeveloped land on which
future expansion can occur.
The land use map shows a CG2 designation which, if
approved, would make all but the car parts store nonconform-
ing. The extent of light industrial uses is not too evident
from Baseline. However, an on site visit of the property
reveals a substantial development of light industrial uses.
.c
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM~ 8904-809
General Plan Land Use Designation
April 24, 1989
Page 2
o
Prior to any final determination by the Planning Commis-
sion and Mayor & Council, I would appreciate you or your
staff taking another look at this site.
J CK REILLY
Councilman, Second Ward
JR:sr
o
'../" ~ n
II
~..,.
'-
,
"..
'. ~
"
,
"'..
....
'\
'\
"
"
'.
,
\.
,
,
"
"
'\
'.
"
'\,
'"
"
"
",
"
,
'\,
"
"
'.
.\
\'" \'"
.,\._~
'~
~o
...
.
o
, "
\ ",
,
,
,
\.., \\
" ,\, '\, \
! Existing single-family residences
'\ 4 - 5 units per acre
" "
'. \,
,
,
,
\
'\
'..
.
, ,
'. '"
" ' "
'\ , .
... \. ",
" \ \ .
....
"\ "
'--..;:
~."n
Ct1....
00..,.
"J s:: '1:"<
....0
Do III 0
CD HI
III Do
.... t/l
~ o ::I
CDolJl
....CDCD
....1IIt1
....::1
S::\lllll
::I
.
..,...,.....
III ....::1
'-00
111::1
0
t1
CD
-
"
..
..
'.
~,,:'-,. ~;-"'"....
1lI~."n
OCt1....
t100..,.
CD s:: 't"<
-....0
Do III 0
III Do
.... t/l
~~~
CDolJl
....CDCD
....1IIt1
....::1
s:: IQ III
::I::It1
""111 Do
..,...,.....
III ....::1
'-00
::I
--,-Ga.-.--fte&A-,
-' I
-'
-' ,
.~ I $,8, CITY LIMITS LINE_
.
n
....
rt
'<
o
HI
=
....
\ll
~
....
=
Do
\~ ~\.
.~~I.A \
\,
'l..
,
'--.-.--
o
. -:"'-:-.,r
.I
.. I
..
e .
'\,
"
II
,.
"
.
,
'-<. ~,
\ ."
,~
~
.
o.
o
o
o
TO: City of San Bernardino
Planninq Commission
Mayor and Common Council
TO: City of Highland
Planning Commission
Mayor and CODlllOn Council
We. the undersigned property owners and residents of the City of
Iliqhland in the surrounding area. hereby. protest the City of
San Bernardino's proposed General Plan designatioD of 11M Medium
Residential (which allows 14 dwellinq units per acre and would
permit apartments) for the area located south of Ninth Street,
west of Del Rosa Avenue, north of CUrtis Junior High School and
east of Fairfax Lane.
The designation of RM may be appropriate for the area north of
Ninth Street, since there is existing apartment development,
however, the area south of Ninth Street is developed with single-
family dwellings. A designation of 11M for the a~ea would be an
invasion of the single-family neighborhoods. The impacts of
apartment development would destroy any semblance of neighborhood
character which the residents have struggled to achieve.
We request that a designation of RS Residential Suburban be
placed on the subject area. This designation would be compatible
with existing development and would enhance the single-family
nature of the area in the future.
,
.
Address
<j' :1.. l.J /"
./. ',.
. .---.1./ ' 7 . ~. ;' iJ
--- - . / '--." '7. ,7', '~,) 1/ /''- I
/'~4;"'; ~'- ~ ... .,~~ _tf:...~..L / .~.,...:. ........,......
; /7., -'/';,--,. .... .. ~ . ~ , -'
.r... .... . ... c.-. . / 'f >~. ~ ..:........'~...., ..'"
_ .. L _ )'"
tr;t:~t" ;:i3t ~. 7'~ ~ (; ~-~~~ - i
." .:{ ./I. .' - . ~5 '7~ '1..' 5v.i.~_";
lI..'T-~ d.SC>~~ €.. U,N., ~C\U:k
;
'//,2rJl [J
,
,...
1 "'LQ/,...
""i' ~~.
'- ,
9"~f..!
,*'~A/~17q7
.:2.'110
<=12.,11(0
If ,1) .1'-\4 /e
IV
. ~
..0:.
o
o
o
(
TO: City of San Bernardino
Planning Commission
Mayor and Common Council
TO: City of Highland
Planning Commission
Mayor and CommoD Council
we, the undersigned property owners and residents of the City of
Bighland in the surrounding area, hereby, protest the City of
SaD Bernardino's proposed General Plan designation of RM Medium
Residential (which allows 14 dwelling units per acre and would
permit apartments) for the area located south of Ninth Street,
west of Del Rosa Avenue, north of curtis Junior Biqh School and
east of Fairfax Lane.
The designation of RM may be appropriate for the area north of
Ninth Street, since there is existing apartment development,
however, the area south of Ninth Street is developed with single-
family dwellings. A desiqnation of aM for the a~ea would be an
invasion of the single-family neighborhoods. The impacts of
apartment development would destroy any semblance of neighborhood
character which the residents have struggled to achieve. .
We request that a designation of as Residential Suburban be
placed on the subject area. This designation would be compatible
with existing development and would enhance the single-family
nature of the area in the future.
Address
I II, .,.
j!,/4~JJ
u ; ~) : "5'1
o.
o
o
TO: City of BighlaDd
Planning Commission
Mayor aDd COIII\DC)n council
o
'l'O: City of San Bernardino
Planning cOmmission
Mayor aDd COIIlDIOn Council
we, the undersiqned property owners aDd residents of the City of
Highland in the surrounding area, hereby, protest the City of
San Bernardino's proposed General Plan designation of RM Medium
Msidential (which allows 14 dwellinq units per acre and would
permit apartments) for the area located south of Ninth Street,
west of Del Rosa Avenue, north of curtis Junior Bigh School and
east of Fairfax Lane.
The designation of RM may be appropriate for the area north of
Ninth Street, since there is existinq apartment development,
however, the area south of Ninth Street is developed with single-
family dwellings. A designation of 1M for the a~ea would be an
invasion of the single-family neighborhoods. The impacts of
apartment development would destroy any semblance of neighborhood
character which the residents have struggled to achieve.
We request that a designation of as Residential Suburban be
placed on the subject area. This designation would be compatible
with existing development and would enhance the single-family
nature of the area in the future
Name
Mdress
11M....r:::!j",.,u..,D..~fd .
......
~'"
o
."
o
o
o
.
TO: City of San Bernardin~!
Planning Commission J
Mayor and Common Council
TO: City of Bighland
Planning Commission
Mayor aDd Common Council
We, the undersiqned property owners and residents of the City of
Bighland in the surrounding area, hereby, protest the City of
San Bernardino's proposed General Plan desigDation of RM Medium
Residential (which allows 14 dwelling units Per acre and would
permit aPArt;!l}lD~s) for the area located south 'of Ninth Street,
west of Dir~~ Avenue, north of curtis Junior Bigh School and
east of Fairfax Lane.
The designation of RM may be appropriate for the area north of
Ninth Street, since there is existing apartment development,
however, the area south of Ninth Street is developed with single-
family dwellings. A designation of RM for the a~ea would be an
invasion of the single-family neighborhoods. The impacts of
apartment development would destroy any semblance of neighborhood
character which the residents have struggled to achieve.
We request that a designation of RS Residential Suburban be
placed on the subject area. This designation would be compatible
with existing development and would enhance the single-family
nature of the area in the future.
9~
~
J.:r '?~ ~ ~
~:;;~qZ~.~' -.-~.',
r{"q.tf'.?- 9'7~ ~'"' k~Cl
z...,-o::>") thif.,.-r-- S d3
oC/f'?+ s+ s.s
c.
."
o
o
;z.. /U
o
W M~
(:;:J ::4 C~
~ -c.:::
May 3, 1989
C.
o.
c.,
I
-
,-: ":.
City of Highland
City Council
27215 East Baeline Street, Suite A
Highland, CA 92346
Members of the City Council:
Attached is a petition from property owners protesting the City of
San Bernardino's proposed General Plan designation for the undevel-
oped land (approximately 80 acres) located south of Ninth Street,
North of Sixth Street and between Fairfax Lane and Elmwood Drive.
~
--
t.::>
~ ::
u'
~.
-
We respectfully request your support in our efforts to preserve
our single-family residential neighborhoods. The proposed designa-
tion of RM Residential Medium would permit 14 units per acre and
would allow for the intrusion of apartments into our neighborhoods.
Apartment complexes, with their related additional traffic, noise
and, unfortunately, crime would be a detriment to our area and
would lower the values of our properties as well a~ our quality of
life.
The property owners who signed the attached petition are all resi-
dents of the City of Highland and are greatly concerned about the
possibilities of further apartment development in our area. We have
submitted our petition and appeared at the City of San Bernardino's
public hearing on April 13., 1989 to voice our concern and request
that the area be designated as RS Residential Suburban which is in
keeping with existing development. We were happy to learn that the
Planning Commission, on April 17, 1989, unanimously voted to
recommend a designation of RS for the area.
The Draft General Plan is now before the San Bernardino City Council
for their review and approval and it is our hope that they will
adopt the RS designation for the area of our concern. It is also
our hope that the City Council and staff of our new City of Highland
will support us in whatever manner is appropriate in our attempts to
assure a future for our neighborhoods.
Very sincerely,
'~\"" ~ ~\ .r~.- . ,zJ.......;...~ 1..}2 '\"4"'" J \ 'c;'.zt (o"":t
Mr. and Mrs. Kurt W. Freiberg
25038 East yine Street
cc: Jack Reilly, City of San Bernardino
Second Ward Councilman
Steve Walker, Planning Department
City of Highland
Attachments
0 9A N~ P -. , ;Q
." C I T Y 0 F N B E R D I N
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM ,
, ,) ;
8905-802 ..
,. ,. '/', 1,qro'9
'T;,-\, v. "J
,.
. '.r:: ~:;';T
.~'::;JJ C,;\
TO:
Brad L. Kilger, Director of Planning
FROM:
Council Office, Ward Two
SUBJECT: Petition Regarding Land Use Designation South of
9th Street, between Fairfax and Elmwood Drive
DATE:
May 8, 1989
COPIES:
Councilman Tom Minor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Attached is a copy of a petition from property owners
residing in proximity to the above described property.
The petition is addressed to
with a copy to me. Please make
Common Council receive a copy at
hearings.
the Highland City Council
certain that our Mayor and
the time of the land use
JR:jv
Attch.
\ ':
V
0.,
o
o
~.
" ;-~. I
'-....,. .... - .
1859 Random Drive
Anaheim, California
Nay 9, 1989
PAl
~
,J
(/
G :;._.
c';.l
<..C>
1-'
,
Mr. Jack Reilly
Council Offices
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino
California 92418
I) ,1',
,....l;,.;'..
c'
:-?
- .;. ....~.I~;.
;:,>
o ;;;....:~,
co
Dear Mr. Jack Reilly:
The east side of "D" Street from Wabash north to within
145.12 feet of 14th Street should be zoned for multiple
family residential instead of single family residential.
At the present time parcels 145-2l2-9,-5,-43,-3,-l,and -8,
are occupied by multiple family residences.
For ~any years parcels 145-212-12,-13,and-34, have been
zoned for multiple family residences.
I own the 63,079.50 square feet area in parcels 145-212
-10,-11,-34. My land is 447 feet deep and most of my
land is in the center of the block. The frontage of my
land on "D" Street is surrounded by land developed or
zoned for multiple family residences on both sides and
across the street.
I hope that you will consider changing the proposed zone
of 145-212-10, -11, -34, from single family residential
to multiple family residential.
Yours truly,
\j~ ~ ;\ ~.: ~j\ 2~J-<. ': pe~. t~,,'>, ~..'f-{,..:..
.>., '>IV- "'.., ,[ I
r t J. . r t C-t ('j \ .J'~ -.,,',.;......., -
/1/.> }V I ~ '~-1- <-;<1.. .
R-o
"0"
f!lJao/lfkutC~
5 -/2' -'iTer
/~~~
5-/7- 'ilj'
(
, ~ ,;~~\-f
: l ~or:;c
_, ''JI.,-.
~Iay 9, 1989
;. ,L. ,;
5:~:',: t~.:
San Bernardino County Planning Dept.
Mr. Vincent Bautista
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Dear Mr. Bautista:
As per our telephone conversation of yesterday, I just want
to reiterate that you were in agreement with me that my
parcel's present zoning of RM is the best use for this
particular property. Because of its location, just South
of Highland Ave. and on the East side of California St.,
you agreed that the possible change to RS would not be
best and you further stated that this recommended zone
change was an error.
I am asking for your assistance in helping me to keep its
present zoning of RM and appreciate very much your time
and e~fort in this matter.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
~sh:1 /lkc..d
Basher Ahmad
BA/kmD
\Y
I ~.~.
encl. assessor map
(.
#76"& q;~ fflt.d., !/U44,nJ, tff~ ~a-. !JIo4.16",(818 ).981-&0404&
~
1
0'
/~~'
~FD;
-
I~
. ~"'H'lIM"A
.
o
'I Ll .
I
oQ
~rm LJ : L
~ I
STREET ~ I
,': if
. ;"...
-g
:a,
-;11
:..!i
.1
.=.J
~t"
!)
':<,.
...
-
..
;@ I
It
~,
~
I..,.....
: .., ~i,
k ~'~
c
...
~ ~ .-.I.... I
~
l
~
\0
~
'li.
""
'"
"-
'-
~
~
'~
.. en I
III 111/
.
:~
~
*
-
III i
-
.. :
io . k~ J
~ '~ ~
I
1
,.
~ ~, ,..
.
-
....
1I
II
It
'"
,
~'
.,..
T
.
.
i\l)
II
fl.
~
... .
'. ..,
-"" \$/
"
@
.
i@
~
~
; ..'
...,
~
II
I
I
~
1
.!~
,'_1-=": : -r-
. ,
-
~:Jr
~I
i
I
g.
o
It
;1
I
f
i,;
'~
~~
"'-
~
.-;
1-;
-
11-;
a-;
-
~-;
$-
~i'
?irl
..-
-- ;
:;! t ~
D. I ~
~ i:
loW
0: J.W. APPLE~~~~~ ~.;T. ~~ ENGINEER :~
SllN 1ER."JlIlOIlO. aIlFORIIA 92401
(
,,",;~"
, - ,
~,.. ....
. ,
~ ~ f
. ,
.J _"
May 5, 1989
,,~ ,,:
",.. 1C0Q
.~ ' ....{..!~
_,I
"
vince Bautista
City of San Bernardino
Planning Oe?artment
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92401
Re: Zoning for APN 280-250-52 at The South East corner
of Tippecanoe and Central
Dear Vince;
Per our discussion earlier today, please find the current
assessor's map and roll showing the above referenced parcel still
in private ownership. Brion Corporation has owned the property
for at least 10 years and is in the process of negotiating a sale.
The owner and buyer were both shocked and dismayed to find the
property zoned PF.
Please take the appropriate steps to change the zone
designation back to MIA (or the equivalent new terminology)
as it once was. The sale is in jeopardy and time is of the
essence.
We will be glad to assist in any way to get the record
amended in this matter.
Sincerely,
\.
,(~~..l.-1..0 &jLjdl.Sct-
J.W. Appleget, P.E.
Engineer for the Brion Corporation
0: O. ----- - -----~, ~-
I ,
, , , . ~\ ~
~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~, ~, ~ . N :~
,,. ~ ,,. , ~ , ~ ' ~, ~ ,
c- o 0 , 0 , C> , 0' C> . ~ ~ .
, , , , ,
~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ , ~. ~ . ~I
0- ~ ~ , 0- , '. . ~, ~ . .-r'
- , - . - . - , - .
. , , , . , - .
- . - - . . ~ , ~ , ~. ~\ N"':l
0- ~ r , ~ . r . ~ , ~,
. . . . .
'" n
~ -
. 0
@ VI 0 0 ~@
.... ~
~,"ll '" ~ (.oj
,- '"
.JjI I~ .. -AVENUE'"
---,.. !-
I
1ft I
I
.~ I ,....::,
--I
, ,
I -
~ ..
I ~@
1> . -
f; I ,
I
.. -+ ,.-
_""!;~~~_ _s:
@) \ I ." 'II
. ---- @
" -="'''''r
.
." I
@- ,I \
. ~ i~ \
' ,
.! ~
"'.J'W ' . ."
-~-:--.--- - Ii-
,;. ~
I '!'
I ; @ r .. '"
.
I ... ~ ~ , 1\ \ .\ ~
. a a ~
.. . . I
J n 1
~ ~g-
i N .a I
.. , ~@~~
j.oO .. +"
~
~ =$-
I;@"J ~ ~
- ....
i\I ~ -.. t@' .~ Ii
, ~ I e/\
~ , ~ 111,' l i~ '"
."> " ::!
~ @ ~ Q
~ \~ ~ a.
, - 5'
,. ~ 0
~ , 1-
f~ -,
\ I
(~ I ---
.-
. ~~
r~ I -I.
,,- I '"
sat
ii' I ::u
~1II <
ir- \ I ::u @
.a \ I
t
\1 E
~ ~
. ....-If
r i 00
f ,\ ,;. ~~I
-
~ .. ~~
<
'" ll;'" a'
!1 ~ . 1>
", .......
'\ I ~ 0'" 0 ,
.c.a _.
I \ " Ul ~ I
I ~
~ ~ ....
.....
. ~;
:.
a~
-
,,- II>
.. Ql
.;.
'1 9
l!'!' . . I\)
NIO~ . t ),
. 01
~i-
I: ~- -
..
o:ro:
NOR'lfE
)'-19LLl/~
o
\. f\ / \-,.-1,.... .
\ \" ~ . i ; I L (.J C~L, i') I ( . Ct' J I -) E: Ii' i ~ '- c,- r C1
t~";, c n i IlC) +c. "r; l~: t'-lc '-!( r (, ! ('lll()('!: (( ,\d
:J I . j - , I I r " r ' j r. S
t i(I,tV\II'ICj U"t';X_'-! (llfr)-t (r 1nc _it" cr" -ell
,
be'll(\(C';,\( . hiE '.)0 i\CT ;\,I-\;\,"I Me k:f
\ ~" ("r' · I ~ ' '.. "-. . , ' (' I ' f' I),~' ;:. ! I ) \ " .; ) \ "
,L\!"l-~i\ ,',_Iv;) j/\: \j' ,-\.'L,"'. I ne... Ic....'-cI'-
. ',l-iC\C. ' ,
CC./\C'''....llf'C'; I"~ (fl l i,..,,/n,.\.,,~ccd LJ'--,
I~'; 'il)I~." ':"')f)'Jt:. Cl<.(" ('JeC'\. is o,\t't.'C\.(~C"l:.( ruo
~~.Ii;) Or-cul/ll'ftdS S\"~.rt.. llifsc Ctp:d''''mfr1'<..>')t:ilt
(\IE:..
r. }
'-I' \'
f'('
c.r
: JlC'E:.
I~:)l ~
-i t....... -t i ,"
,.,en ,n....-.I
.
,
bt'C'c::n)E,
( L, ,\. cl t.I.....I.-.:',.......
c- i \c~
bO'ln(,
J
C' r' 0 r D ,l -'.r. 'S' C ,(, ,. c
I,ll"' -r,Ci:\" I "l.~~' ~,~n<~1 ""\0 -r"\~j'"
rn(,'~\ r(n('hl\ (",1 in,:, J,I)\E...
--'1'-,
In!':) is
t c ::3 -tc.p
c" ,
Cl- (
C " C E..
[1' C't
i' :t" , I ,
nC\. nCiS OCt'I) orC'l\~iYi
r1f ; :.;(', he (' ci -!"nh'€...' ~
. !) ~
Ole
-'; (it:.trCi:"I)
c.....
0'C' "'
i l . \.t- , .
:\C
~\!e
1~~1) \
~ I.~ 'I t' , \
C d \' C'c L ,-11 C ~ I ;
':1, I'")
I='c I 'f It E'
l'iee711.q ~'~(+\",,'"(lCt,/ ~l~\\.:
.J ,;
,\SSuE.. l_~i\l b<:kiE.
Genera..!
'"
'...'- I ~ \
!J.~
-'1""\ t. € . '.:' "')h....,y\ "1'
reI Ct.,)
. __ I (. t ~I-' l ..L. 1 .1
,:'.,\,:" .c ,'(ei"(, '';l.Y rlC,)\€";.. I\~
,
, ~ ' \ I
l\,llb'fl1vE.nt.:>l-E. ~Y\CU C,.)<\;r.I"'€' L"':ClLl~ \,,((t)',
GpClo-!J)ltt\~S en -;/")1'::, let Tilu"t: L-cL,ld ~L (./\\)'
Cll{ '.0Cl'-,.' !;" C,. el.i 0,',(: "!hc. 1rc,fHc. c/\
~"I' II l~ Cc d nc l..... 1.5 ':.c,:" r",\'. c h'
---
0:
o
o
o
@
(ll'\C I\" I.=. ::t:l
(0 i--'-(;) )
) /' <00
(i; =i\CVv..",-, ,,,--,I i :'<.../ de'\.- .3: / e :i, cI n({,( ,,--' I .s.') 553j? f:5
<b \-'~ /LvL 311 E fl,(!d:c [, SL-:~ SS=<,9H6
,'1 J_
o ",.L-d'Zt..- /J/, I&-MV1~~ .3 i 3>' //.-!..;;j: A.?~. 5,,4. .g8'.:'3-4r17;;2.
~.', 4i~~' f'. ~C?t.v~3/7c; U~~:J-~0r;J8 !~~~'~2-
8 zn (?6 \ ~ )1 /7 ~ ,//> ":"'.iY:-e:, b <:7 ,/
~, .1f:. (j r1 ~ .3ls~ jl, d:a If (; S8 ~y~-' / .5-1'~
~.. ~lLL 1V19Y d/~ IIrdcUJD ~ ,Jl%7~
cE ~~~ /'9'~r / j' /',. < / ;,
6 t&\~'{'\)\,,-,~ .~'0&;\.Cl-- \L\~"S VG...~\\\.C:\-\.~D 8<d~ -1--\;).C\3
~ fG~ &" ~ (97~- f. VA-L ;1/4'" fJ73-3/03
Ci fY';1~ f1l']hM(I!(1 , I.fZU Vi~iyY1(1"1 if.d 'JJ0^'I~Oi
~ ~~ ~ ~" 1"(1))- i./ /11tilf( tlcC?3-/.:t1
Q~ .J:it~ Ma2/JZi:4- /~?~ ::~( '1~:a,L I f
\0 llueA_\rU,,,,,,,.,:::':;c'-\fjN-L':"'>:-- 31 (O~ ^J i-'t;..>J._( . I.' /~ '-:.
~. tc<lU:! ~ . f)"""-c "31 ,,:, 1'0 \hM't" 50 S YCc -: ~ ~ 2-
~,~/>1~~7rP~~ 3/~,~ l\l. th~~1cr~r:-f'.~t;?,YC L-
iD~,~ b~31G3 10, ~.=>6.<to~71-t2-
~\ r'cr#/~/(l-59~-YC0;?~~/P ~1 ?~-~~~ ~_'
\ '1/ ,~S'/i~~>---~2.~ H-t..:itl!.6CU)/L ..) i~ SS7.) 'J-b 7 J '-=..'
<?~,~~:: Clo.-(..<-~ "\...{./~..~ I '-I 'jSf J.. ':r'.-I.Vi.:.,~<<-I ~),~ ~ '0 - )'-'7)
~,.. ~ '. ".' '. '/ _ ..', '.. J .. ..
c"., . 1 I ~ ".-_'-'1,.,1 'Ii :",1"-- . -"';- ~)-<",=..,:"'L-' 1\ (..,'c.(..'U \.-- JJ . .~~ :._\....(.
I ..;--.." ... v - "or . I I I -
/' \. ".,
~2 --. , ,. ':... " 3..' ", ", '.. ,'. t1", - '7" -.' /
.i, C'I.-( """"..:.A _ ~_ ....-, V:...C. ,;.""\ 'I"(.::':"'~ tvL......p\....1'.\ .- ~__ ,~. :"c..,~. a~:........ I".
'?;2.:.;' . '.' ",' . .. ~.. '.
:--::J . ~.r-".":' ..l.......;.~:. -:-...-:..-~!, ,'t-+'l.;.- \I" :..-~>~
[-J,n. , ' . ., .,.. . . ..
,'t..... \ ?(.L..c...l..' /-.&..-.v~'t... 0,(~,"", . .a...a.-"-"':-r' ~"';""',-_~.(..I ..........-x...c.:d.'1l."
0~ ," "
.-J - .~ '".;-, - .....~.'"l..........,.. ..5.:..3 ...,".. :,4.w ,A'
~~_......~.--. -'" -, _ "...... "2 ",../
N A i-tl:..
AbDk'ESS
, I
-3<:
,..) '_....~__ , I 1-~-,":,",,""
, .
-3(. _ /- ',~ ::1/t....tf ....,v'..#.~
,
2',' j / i ,,..., '7 , J I . A r 1?
J /.::,V('J/'Vu.. ?,:-t-..J-., ~ /) i ,...,..,'v(O~ /,0 . J. 1>,
3'2 %:~ ~ J~..kd;1 3/.51 I1f~ ~ Ic~ 5: f3.
~C! lt1tv~ ~ ~J J/-~-'f li!eld ~ .t ~. 5; 6,.
-~C ~1t1.~ 3/57' Jllt"-!' ft1-u1 hu-L{...S,13.
.iJ,1 tf;u~ j'J7L...:4fJh 3/s''3 fJ'U,. {l~ dt~ s,/3
'-12 --"~/c'~". J / .;~'7 $Q-; ~./.v~ ~)t.
;: 9("; < 9~ 0, 3 /~ ~ Mr.; A,,: /-: Sl- '7'
,~~ .~J21~j? ~CZr1~ ~J~~ :/ILl-~ C0~,}~~ ~JbL't~
:'5 J) btl":t'/ fi=.,'(U-t) '..>II J:f lJ 1:tk-;l Ow.....' ,'. - " :\L.'l-
Y~j+:t~J1J;cck~,-i; 55}3 Q,f)~J2d,. - '5 1!J"'-1
Lj I ~Uf /lIc!l'4j0::/ 2.' 7'1>,J .."0:1-(;/1-<'/:'0' /ttf_v ;(/..
'-16 k::(4dtJ/~~~ 30t C~?)~1 {(;,~!.! i.22 J./~
Lfcf .1tff./,tf/'!e.ilufoftck ~?t;o ,)>f]CC IJ ,ej) ;; . B
5::J ~-u:;f ~ //-/3 '(!J 4r'VJ.~ ~~
0:
2k
~7
;L€
24
~,C
''31
3Z
~3
-'u
~,
o
o
.0
. "" r' ./
.~ ; . '. J --..-
- ,
{)'LI)((
''. .
. ~
....... t
F
\-, ..:- . ?-.,-, ,
'd _ /i -~,-:J _-'"'-; r.."" ,"
/-;C.i<..:;,y<&~~J' L~C 0;-
'J ~., -,' .
"-:" ~ # .) :.:~ L,i ..-
. _ .:: _ t...-'l,,,u/A- "" ~'J .~
~, '7AY'~,-<,"" '-.\,;;A.J1.P
,,) .~
, '" .
-.J.. /
'~- ../ ;(.1(: 'u.., ~(>u'-v-)~
__ ,fl] u' .".
,~,{;
f ,/
, '(..1
., , .- I<
. .""
.J l,~.J J
" 'L.' r=_ _/.:,
. ". - ;",'"
, .
\"_-_~:- \:;~'.li... ~..J"i.,(~~u:.t
- ~ - .':'-- ~
, (
, (
! '
J (
, .
., .2.{ e. ,-.L/:. \,..."'( '- 0__ ::...c.~>'
~ ~;.' .,/
,
. '. -. ...:..( ~.
,
,"
~e
. _ _' " C
"
: .. .." ~
- .,
'- '-",
1-' ,--- ^' (' '. ( ,1 c/ (it __,
-" <'" \,.
~L~'~/
'. c e:..,.... .t _ J -' ""'{-" ---~
. ..{. . ....' . e'. #
. ..' :-
.3/;:J j' ft. ;~,~,. ({:- .:~ ':.,'7-
v
3n~ IV. i.t~ lu.
~
'/"/ V< [. ) i '_~... (,,'-, ".-;
,," J~/._ ~.~..
v ,
.- '.
. " '1....
. ~ .
~- ,
"'. .
-::"t../6
.~~ I
"J " ,,'../ ",jJ' 'A'
/' 7,-/ ,'1/V/v' -"IV,
(
0: 0 0
#Q~
~ INSTANT PRINTING ~
INCORPORATED
1956 N. "E" STREET . SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92405 .
!J 1-. .:
,., ~
o
L.
'~~y 16 1989
:1T'~;;/~iE~:~j~2LD~i:O, ci=:-
(714) 886-0623
City Planning Commission
300 North "D" Street 3RD FLOOR
San Bernardino, California 92418
May 15, 1989
RE: Rezoning of "E" Street
Gentlemen,
It has been brought to my attention that the properties alon9
North "E" street, where my business is located, are to be rezoned from
commercial to residential. I feel that this change would be detrimental
to my business and respectfully ask that you reconsider your decision, for
the following reasons.
Print Quick Instant Printing, Inc..has been in the same location
since "1972", seventeen years. The location of a "Quick Print""shop is a
primary consideration to its sucess or failure. Moving an established
shop would be risky,at.best ,and could result ,in a loss of 'business.
Print Quick Instant Printing Inc. has shown steady growth over the
years. We have known for some time that we would out grow our present
facility. During the past several years Mr. Bill Sikes, Hr. Hal Heywood and
myself have discussed the possibility of building a new facility, utilizing
the three lots north of the old R.T.I. building. A zoning change would of
course kill the possibility of that happening.
I have made a commitment to sell our Rialto business, to gain the
seed money to build a new facility at the San Bernardino site, with Mr.
Sikes and Mr. Heywood. As I write this letter, I am awaiting a call from
my broker, informing me as to whether my Rialto store is in fact sold!
Needless to say, I would be quite disappointed to have my expansion plans
for Print Quick at its present site dashed.
I have been managing and or owner of Print Quick for fifteen years
now. I feel we try our best to be a good influence in our city, and an
asset to San Bernardino as well. I would like that opportunity to continue
to be available to me at our present location. Please Reconsider.
\
<:&::~
Bill Nessel
President
!
0:
D. SALQR AND CcQPANY
DEVELOPMENT - INVESTMENTS
10780 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD, SUITE 210
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90025
ffl
01
(
-"
~..:
~~
~..I
~'. ~:
t--' ~
\ ~.>:\
~...:
.-:. ".
r;3
c:"l
'-"
(213)475-4464
\
(.J"I
,-.;
:.-
.~
r->
-
~..-:. .-:--....
:""-'. "
: _..0;
t.. ,--
~ ~ .-:-J
~\.....,
May 2, 1989
Councilman Jess Flores
City of San Bernardino
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Re: General Plan - Land Use Alternative
Inland Center Drive - Zoning Designation.
Dear Mr. Flores:
At the April 17, 1989 Planning Commission meeting it was brought to
my attention that the zoning on the north side of Inland Center Drive,
east of the 215 freeway, to "E" Street is proposed as "IL",
Industrial Light. The current commercial uses, Levitz Furniture,
Federated Electronics, Radio Shack, Olson's Furniture, Sears as
well as other concerned retailers are currently under the "CM"
Commercial-Manufacturing zoning and use. "IL" zoning is not suitable for
these existing businesses.
The new zoning should be consistent with the other retail uses on "E"
Street and the Inland Center Mall area. That zoning would most likely be
"CG_l", General Commercial.
I urge you to consider the zoning of this area, directly on Inland
Center Drive being changed to "CG-l". Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
~<<-<<-,f17 ~
Daniel J. Salter
DJS/kr
cc: Valerie Ross
City of San Bernardino Planning Department
\.
,\0)c 0:
.,6- .
v
o 0
D. SALTER AND COMPANY
o
(
DEVELOPMENT - INVESTMENTS
10780 SANTA MONICA BOULEVARD, SUITE 210
LOS ANGELES, CAUFORNIA 90025
r;:"\ -r:; "
L~~ ..,
J~j
I"' .....
..-, ......"'11
11
(213) 4".4464
....,1'
MfiY 0 5 1989
Ctri ;1..:~;.'-": . '-.' ;'.<~'ir
S,~I-': cE~'~;~~~l.;::'i._~:J. j~;1
May 2, 1989
Councilman Jess Flores
City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Re: General Plan - Land Use Alternative
Inland Center Drive - Zoning Designation.
Dear Mr. Flores:
At the April 17, 1989 Planning Commission meeting it was brought to
my attention that the zoning on the north side of Inland Center Drive,
east of the 215 freeway, to "E" Street is proposed as "IL",
Industrial Light. The current commercial uses, Levitz Furniture,
Federated Electronics, Radio Shack, Olson's Furniture, Sears as
well as other concerned retailers are currently under the "CM"
Commercial-Manufacturing zoning and use. "IL" zoning is not suitable for
these existing businesses.
The new zoning should be consistent with the other retail uses on "E"
Street and the Inland Center Mall area. That zoning would most likely be
"CG-l", General Commercial.
I urge you to consider the zoning of this area, directly on Inland
Center Drive being changed to "CG-l". Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
( _Of \
\ - -j
-.\..;..-
Daniel J. Salter
DJS/kr
cc: Valerie Ross
City of San Bernardino Planning Department
0,
o
o
,.
, .
"-.en
-:] .:;
ExecutiIIe 0IIce
3069 Fourth Slnlet
RiwIside. CA 92507
(714) 684-6014
FINE FURMl'URl! SlN(;E ,...
Cfit .:L-~"
~:~..;~_. ~
"
"
May 4, 1989
Councilman Jess Flores
City of San Bernardino
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Dear Mr. Flores:
As a business owner on Inland Center Drive, it has come to
my attention that a new zoning of nIL", Industrial Light, is
being proposed east of the 215 freeway to "E" Street. I do not
feel that the proposed "IL" zoning is suitable to the business
I own.
Currently, I am operating under a "CM", Commercial Manufac-
turing, zoning code. Since a new zoning code is being proposed,
I would like to urge you to consider a "CG-l", General Commercial,
zoning for this area. I feel this zoning would be more suitable
for my business and more consistent with the other retail busi-
nesses in my area, such as Levitz Furniture, Radio Shack, Sears
and Federated' Electronics.
I would like to thank you for the time you spend on consider-
ing this "CG-l" zoning for the above mentioned area.
"
cc: Valerie Ross
City of San Bernardino
Planning Department
o
o
o
o
.... l,
TOM
SHANE
Uc. No. 424698
BRICKLEY CONSTRUCTION CO.
( (714) 888-2010
117 W. A&CE ST.
IAN IINIIII)IHQ. CA 1241 t
FAX 71....1-3433
AU ....__
.; -.'
BRiCKLEY CONSTRUCTION CO.
MEMO FROM: JIM BRICKLEY
DATE: 5-5-89
(
\ .
"'Lad KJ.lger;
If I need to or should furnish additional
information for this request, please let
me know.
em ..,., r-. ,-, ~ '11 -:> lID
,... r:,:; , -' ~",. ,~
,. l I' .~ .... ;/. \1
::-,; ~;:a v -- ' - ~ I U
III
-'.",
MAY 0 8 1989
S;.i'l :.~ ," . :
.~',' !~~:i ;t.'F\T
on
CIT';' ::',;..'" .
\
'.
,
~~~
'1r~~- -o~r;)>i ~
~i.t{~
:q)~,~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
c
GENERAL PLAN REVISIO~ .~~OGRAM
\.".' ','
~.' :-..
~.p-. -
~" ~
i i
, 1
,
AUDIT TRAIL
~:.h; J
.;...;...
"""II
""-", " ",j -0'- _,'
- ; ~:.....
.Il!
Please press down
Date MAY 3, L989
C'
"" , .~ .
(
Name
JAMES BRICKLEY
Phone 714_RRR_?n1n
MailingAddress 957 W. R...",.. !':t . !':an J:l..rnarninn Zip 92411
Request/Comments My orogerty front", on R...."'.. !':t
h::II..1rc:i! 11[' 't-n ~hQ
Baseline (Railroad Freeway) oyer ramo on the west side of fr....way
No acc~~~ ~n R~Q~l;n~
Location of Property or Area of Concern q c; ~ q c; c; q c; 7 W
11'::U::'il""A ~r
.
( Parcel # 014423214/15/16 There is no way this location. due to its
location and access should be commercial-r..ta;l
as it is- commercial- light manufacturing.
STAFF ONL Y BELOW THIS LINE
Tt: ~hn1l1n rpm::llin
Existing IPD Designation
Proposed General Plan Designation
Existing Land Use
l
Existing Zoning
By
Comments
Date of Action
PC
MCC
Action
~ Comments
.... 171-003 (3.891
~A:r..~ ~
0'
o
o
,.......
o
, ,.-,'i
~-. -~~
(
q [ , ",., ~'-'."" ~
:'; \\' ;., .; I,::Q~
Ronald A. Brandt
Brandt Properties
PO Box 541
Garden Grove. Ca.
92640
714 - 247-7702
619 - 251-9259
en--; ;', ;,:\,,'
S;'.,j'~ ...;~.
Mr. Brad Kilger
Dept. of Planning
300 North D. Street
third floor
San Bernadino. Ca. 92418
May 1. 1989
Dear Mr. Kilger;
I have just spoken with a Mr. Cannady of your department who has
informed me that there will be a possible zoning change on some
lots I own in San 8ernadino. These lots are north of Walnut St.
between Muscot and Artesian. and are currently zoned M-I. [was
informed that the new zoning would be changed to R-l or R-l
Agricu 1 tura 1 .
1 feel the zoning should remain M-l for these reasons:
1. The area is very conducive to M-I. with auto wrecking yards.
auto towing companies with storage lots. flood control channel
and railroad lines bordering the area. This hard look
environment would be absolutely wrong for R-I. This area is
perfect for M-I zoning.
2. I purchased these lots specifically because they were zoned
M-I. and was willing to wait until the area was ready for devel-
opment. It is unfair to make such a drastic zoning downgrade.
3. [f R-l Agricultural
rendering useless because
many different owners.
zoning is instituted.
of the small size of
the land will
the lots. with
Please review the rezoning in light of these factors. and I am
hoping that your decision will be the only realistic one: retain
M-l~9_ning.
Thank YOU for
your consideration:
l
l /'":
-,',I' L
".c-
u'
j iL~,_~i~
:/ c.. '
Ronald A. Brandt
.-''"'<'/~.''.,'''' ....."' ." ,,::,''','' . . . . . "."....~Yr:e1'4J:;.'i>O...~~~~~/C'i .
-f~t....~~.~:',.~.:.;'.!,...,~ \;"..'-: '>~'. .'~.;.\..":: ':',~"::nJ:'~"jo~":.&';lJl~.;~W~~"
':. ~.~~~ -,;-,:,,:~ ~ ',' ,4.H ",. . ... ~ -,"'" ;.::''';, ~:-...:t.~';""''''':f,t;~+.I$'.I.)~I~,iiIt.... I....
( '..f'~r.'J''''''''l.':' .:.....:.~.:~...tt .~ I' .~. -~..J;';il,oo~~~.~~~.. ';::""t'~.~ltIli~
4.~. <r..... .,.r ':,>~ '.~ . ,. :..... . ""'1f'-'.~'" ~,., . ~"".. ...-r~
. '. _" "_.".- '~'.'<,. .~...~,...../'"... :J:-;". ~ :'i~l'~.$, Q.rli
I-~ ,,,,,~\,,,,,,~,,.>""'-;''''.~(Ir;,..14'1...:';.oo.:.', '..>1;A~:t"...... ,'" ~ ~ _~.. ~ '\:ik-~~~ 4i
~ ~~." .. ". _.V"f''' .., ,...-;,0: .. .. - ~ ,.... ' ....-:~ I
;,;;fW' '4.-~"'t--;'., ~;,:,;t;~<;~~,'ri~';"<\ ',";'<:~';E:'~'..1.1~~~'~1~~1' .'
:ty ~>:~t':"'~"",,~-:V-::'J~!1~~~:!~~~ ~;",._(.l . ~:,.~~',:~" ....~f..~':"''';...t1...s;:.~:f~~~~~. .. ....; . .
iI'.. _ " ,..."~~,,,.j J..j1'~~ '~"l~...,..;,.........._oft'l""'''Y$l''~' ...\, ~..:I' J ,~.~.,..~.. ~. .~u...~~ r;..i:~ ~,~
'.........-" .~.,,~ ~ . ".~ < -,.... - -. -;.:-..,..=r...., ,,,,,. ~_.,,, '.rJ "'"
:....!f!'~~'!.<I. .....:.;.:.:;. -: ~.;.~<;~,:]'''-':".')'''.;,.1...'':'...\-:. . '.~' .:." 41......"::1:;.;:..:'.,.~,~~~ .~;,.../.'=~f.~~....:::-~:).". ....~_.. .....~ r.
;-"..
-----
~~
~
en , (.1"1 ,-,-.. SE' E' ------ MAP (,#II ,
....... -= __l. ~fiJj'l '-" ~ :,ttk~ .. ',- 'T --"
o ;o!,/', .. r '"' ., .~"t 1+. T~o~ -= _.1_ -- ____.L O'l
~~i ;'"~ i. '" -.y i:1; ~" : yi- ~lu:"""~~y I I:: -.: -- ~ - ,S';l'J11U111 I - -~ ..... ~T~
,'''t:...E '~-' rli.r' 'om." .... 'I ~ ~ . .. .., ".. I
... . .'1IIf ....,~ ...-&s,...... av1fJ;' II ~ u_ ~V r ?, '\'\1\\1') I I I,~" "A" ~L,
t;'?;;"""::''''!'-'-''''''L ,~~CHO',q" .'i """~ -:",;'~''ii' [. I '_."~. t-
:to P"- t"t"l"'-!~,. ~1! ~'F.5~ 5:':= . ". "- " , r-,~" t ' , ~ .'
~ _!IT "'..'.I ~ I ~.. ~ . U-.cJ t:l ~--~J'l1.t:,lI ~. ": _.1 ....~... -;
"," .~" ~ ~~ I L, IJ." 11~'r1 'I':' .'f~ f.: './ ,~~ 'CAU""'''' '.l :to
I~ I ~';;-~':'. 'l"'.Ji -t?~ ,0. 3t~t w -_..:...iJ::;. :,~;:. .....,; / ~~/" ...: ST. 'II" ',;
I '~; _:~ 'ENN","~.~~r; '~1> ~ ~t_ ,_~~"/ ~/ ,..:~l,,~;.!LL.., '.. ;;' .
,....,,,IB "",j ~~ ~I,~ .fl'f:~.,~'ti~ J~' ~~-/- - ;;;- - '~.1ii~.;\~ ~- ~:. -
I :----.. h ~j ::; ~ 10. ~ &V ~. ~I'.... ~ , f .;. - B I ~
-f-';;-i.. ~'2:" <1' =/"':., -- ;--- I'" I~ 3>' d -;;J!'''~ .",' '- . . z ;,,~....
I ,~__ ~~ -. ,;. ~,/ -< ? '. -~ ':~'~I Ilr.# - .
, LA "'If: 'H':~ ..~ $ ~~~~I ,..."'.:............. .~.].'''...b.o_!O ... ~ d MFDICN 1"" .i; I ~6!r ;.'".>o;\~ I
lII" i ~'(! ""LL M /" ../ C J.' '" -.,. U:N.I~!:~H,o.:I . :0.... I
'If.. '(..,\~ ~"'I/- '" 11"....':: ."..~ I!: II..
J' " ~ "'~';;"'<,_. < ::J! ~ ...:/ tv. .. ., -. 'OJ.:. ' i>- i"l/DR" I 1II
1 I 10TH Y'V 4 &/ ,~~ I c; ;;=-~,. yr .).< !. \ .... ~ ~_. "'" ~~.. ~ - ,',' ":: I
8OJI~~ .. 0:" All" , - \ 0." A :L::~: I
~,jf';J 0. I . !" er..;. .AH'[~'''.V \ . . V I -..-~~
.. ...... '''l~''''. - .. . '''j~ 19:~ IL' '- \ . e\ ... ~ ..
~ _ or. _"" ~.., .J I~ ~ ~:~ I~ ~~r,-....l.I' '\ i.~ ~~ afl: ~.<; I~ I: 10'" ~',_-';'
I ~..;a \; ~""I """'l !!!!!:!!!-ft-- ;"F4f -,:~!!,,~""'" _ -! _... ..m...... k ,. .):: r: I'l :JiB'-~W
lilA' j_-" .'''-: .' ~ '~"'"t-f.iC L, l- :.ri ~"':I ---
I MT ~ ~ '''.' VERNO j ,~I 1_ ",~ .' J ;\ i 1 ~ '" -I. ..L'. '~
:l<~'~\' '::'OLL< '~! I~~^"~~ ~ '1. "_~ . L F. 1" ~M ..._ "h I: ~I AV: I: - ~T.. _ NON ; ". ,'AV
., F"o\fRVI(W ~ '::11J<~JI...~' Inl; r: : " ". - !~OUI.,..... "j'- 1'5: ~ 1..~ I~ .....~ 05- ; I!.1d
(l ~" ",,"wm,. v:- '4~~~J: ~t -:':',.... ""let'; ,"'" ;..~._;"c. I ", - :.:::.,.' ri~: "1IIi..U
...... 0. ". .~~ , .' ..- .~~.;.. ,r "'L Tf' .,. .~; , .:,.....,l~ ~ _'Woo': ()
" "9J,~~' ~. ~I' :.~;.I' ~~ - :'F. r I,' n ~ j ~t- '''_. j, I I. ~; .... ~. .,-----';'-r.',
;; "'''f'-(>.~~",>,:",f,. ';~",;.'~s..;rrr-~:: 'IL!il...ie~::'/~:;-~':,1 C~l>i~I'1 ;:( '} 1. ,.. _~,:..,"I""'~~
on ~<t'.::>~'" .,' <.0, _'i',v"... ". :'l!!,_, ,..f'- ''i ()" ~- - - , I li) I ('l";' ""
~ '" ". "',) '~8 r ''''V, ,- .. "..~, 1 - . r.... ow
.' ~ ,". i . --,. '. .. ~ ~." .,. .. ""- - .. J ~ II
r. .,~~., ro' ~;" . D.:i."-.-;.,.....".~.J_;_.t:..f.-...,; ."~;' . ~ T "1
~":'..--:-7---', .' .- -1'"":::- .",,~.,-... --.<:-"';,..-'~ i-..... ~;;:;+--~ ... .L ...' .
I (. f.lf I'~' r ':" ~ I; I -,;; ~ . I ty.1Or""-"'~" ,,:"'j -..-,~ of' -
~ 1../ I." ( .! .. ,I ,.: Sf .: I'~' 'Sf' "I i"',~ ~. ~_ ~!" I" ,.;
> .,.- . '6 "'1t:~ . 'I' ." 'J' l.... -I" . . I'j; 'r.:" j" '. ....
~ ~i9,~ ~-t~~~~.;~~:"i,:. ~:; w.~f.,~w'~.t~':I..:~~~ ':.. H ":t~'. H-:f - ~~~ H". ~ ~
c ,it<",'<."r'-.' .'. .... '..;. l: ~,-":?,,-..,,r;iT:: ~'!t"'-.0 . -..' ."..
l<j~ /f,b. "-.)... . .,..:-:.:.:h~:~.~~,~,....,.;;:- .~,,..../ .. .; ~ ':I"'" .. fi .-:':::;i~ i i....,..-... ~. 0./... 1-
W"* 5i'~:;:t,~:;:,:,:~f~~{~..,. . 1 ~li1i .';:,. ',;;:::,::;,}, "; M :'W!' ~f:; ~ ,,," ~I."'C
itL'; '~2 X':+:.:':.:.~";:~::-O:'.:->:':-'~". ;.,"~~~. , I',!:; .<~.:.:-:.:.:.:% :..~: '" -fa. t ~~ ... ~ i.... I
. .. ,+, ~. .~.~:::~~::Z:::;. O:~~~1'. . . '~l' .~_- :t.~~.:}~:;:~~~:~. :f'J'. ~ ..~.~ . ('!: If m
.7-0:; .:aL;:- . I r! r.;.. +~ ;.T __ _ ~ ~ _ _ ", _ .' ~ .. :::::::~::::~::: :~. ~ l~.~ S -4'!: AY'
., I.; "'IIi! g I; ,.... 0' ;..; :".'~ 3"".~'''- .., T' .,,- ,.:.. ,ii )1 -. '.. _.... '. · ST.
I J;:: ",;, ~ Ii' r. ..' =~;:~~I n....:;1;.. .:s.:.. I -.. .': ~ ,,:.j"-~. .. ~!_
- ~. i If.:: i- I'. ". ... C> . "I' ,......'n \: ! ;0-:; (,01 _,;. , ' 'I
I '.' I "MOWH'.O . _"W"" . 'jl -'''''~ -;",;,- "'l!'" r "1.. ~.. '.
r :::,~ } '.~ I:" ,.. . ~ AV I~, ... ~~.;: 0 .. UJ!n:::' L' --.. ..., I
I .. I! :- ~": '.'4.." '.,w a,' AHR WH
m , ; I~" ,~.~ ,,!; ::- ,""5'..,."--~,..:~ ,:Ii .1' ',I ,,;; ,___, .v... .
;' l~ S"MM ~ wwh . . 1.:. ~ ~"'''_Y'J:W '~ .... ''';':. iia _. ~ == I ---=z.:::.
~_. .!1.lJ()f)_rr;.'";"",. -l...... E.'~' -~ -~if';:-- - I.y ~.:r~ _,. ~ '_-:"f.'M9UIIIT^' it VI'....
.' . .' , >."' . S'ER~A Wr /f" ;"::' }~'. .;" '". on · I' ~
Rt .- _W.-'5.,_,,,~.._1 ,"y'- " I '; .... . . _. 'I"" SJeRRA f"
~"'. ,. ~. ,- -,,,............"" "'''l.r.. .."'....~. . ,I, ,.. .~:~,... ~. .
-, .--- --~--+-------,.J.~=~:t:'-"'tr. ":1': ~t... Ir.;::=~.;.'. "'1'-"... -~ .~..'>;~)-"' :.....
:-,'1'. ......__ ._' -...~ T""" ':'"' __>>_..1.... _ __ ::... c)r, "
.,;: ..""':>'I,.y~---"-l _..-,J"__';'_ I" LI~:.. ~ J . ..: :"""...~ ",...--
~~. /rt.~nt,.ti,__."'_.. ~ ft..... ~~. . .:. . !:t~"':::', :~..
.~~ /! <; ~j'''''.II''. '"T' '~"I~ . It/WWolnl )00 . ;'1Ift1 ~.,... '_._;_..::> -U
-'_. ~ WA'rERMAN ~..y. I ~ ~ -: . - !::- < . ~~ .. ~~~, ..;' . ,>',:::.. ~
I / '," ~J '1"_' ....'v-n ..... "'" ... ........... __ ' AU ,!-"-~' -
, l I' g,' r ~ ~ j \ '. , ~ 1,[1
\ [ ~~,,~,.-tf:-<'"'~ ", ~lL '_,,: ,~; L..~'::~:
.:..(~~/. I' fl.. :( ~ -, ~'H -1-. - "'''ON . ~i
_' fi. ....."'w.- ~-,~~ ,,<.' .. i . - .
~_ I _ y.,,~. _~_:.M - ~J!'l.!rru ~D_<;:,5 -+- .... '. :L..
, ....-;- . r - ",;-~- -~ - ~ ~_. :"~"'lj.+--- ".{'r'-"'"
01 .... Cool' ... If
SE'E' MAP N ~
I ~~.~
AV
.I!I!lI!..
YiV ....
m
!- !'
..
.0"
, .~ _'0' '0""
- .. ..,
.--~
. "- ~:I
.. ,. .r.'
Olm"YWtI';A";a
0..:=&:1-
~C;;
" fl
H
ft:
"
'rf
tr
fit
."
._- 2:~ ""W~"""1/. AS 1186~'!~.ni" ~
,r,l.,. ,n;. ,.. \~" .'
. .' .. ,. \1:fV " ,
,
i
t I ~
...
I ~
..
I .
~
, !II
r ~
I ". ~
.. ~
~
II ,
t
I
.
!
~~, I
.. I
~~' >
,
,
,
- i
~l I
,
I
,:::
~-=. I
.... j
-;- I
""'= r
;
l~ I
,-:;: ,
'-:::0
..::!
(~
-=
:;I
"
I
~
~'
,
,
,
,
;
)
'-
J
)
U
~
~
-
,
~,::)
'~r'"
I
'.... ~
". !.a) ~
'. '
@
~"
, ,
Ii' @ ~\.
" ~ ~
\ .
~
__.0 ~
,
(~)
~1
".r..!!' ___-'
......
,
~
~
@
/~ ...,
---I:""
J>> w' ~
u,&
~~
--'=- ,.. -a
~~
@~ i
~""l.
~ r
~
@),
~/I
i
~
,
@
~
~!f +...
8tl) "~ ~
;a- ~ .
",.. n
II> ~
'hI
~"
~
@
@
I ~, @ t
I ~"4') \ z.."
."."",,-- ~I
'~ l.71 A. NIL ,:1,
M' I -,,,.,,..,1 I.
--.>..-------T'!'-'i'-,."T-T->,-T-"-'T->,.--l'-.,,-
__" ....,.,.;,,,., . I
"" ... ...1 I .... 1 ... I ... I .... I ... I ...
. ~I .... 1 4ft I "" I .. : Wi....
I l -~~~~~~- ~, : : : : :
~ ~-.."J'....~...;_1~ ~ .~ '1- f r
-t ..4.~ I I@l I:
~ 0 II I I I I I
.........-: ...... J
STREET ~
..
"',"'
1,.
=t :c:. eo eo eo
.. .. ..
eo
..
eo
..
eo
'"
eo
eo
.:-
....1.
l
@GG8eeeeee
::1.
'"
n
;:1:
~i
! ..
5''''
C)[
~Ql
~b
SAN
""-
.
@ @ ,@
.',
@:'@
I> ~
{:
:: ::.=
!!
IS
.,'
..
'"
..
'"
..
..
.. .. ..
.. .. ..
"
..
l5
..
~ "8
..
(0 \i
~ C\ -
~Q ""
~__~~.-~o_
Wfi
Wr\)~
:; ~_..
Q
e,d'~
&'i-" !!l
~2 ~ e
~ y.. ~ ,
~
I
..' :"'t
A I';)
i:i
.,.
N hi
.. ..
;j
~
g
Ie
;:;
..
G ;;;
\ '...T-' \If
N
..
i
ARTESIAN
II
@
__u_ ._u.,
fa.............'" '
'./- ~~..;;..~dl
,.......... ......""
~~!!~a1....~1
~ ~..
~
~-
o
i
-e
1).,0
-io
'r
~
J>
F
-
z.
~
c
""
~~
-
~
eo
..
6l
:::l
o
::T
o
;;:(1)
lIlo
;::!:::l
i\iw
"'
:3
o
a.
s'
o
I
@~I/"
'"
...,
l>
.
o
I\)
0:
o
o
o
(
ROHR STEEL INC.
P.O. BOX 251
Baldwin Park, Ca. 91706
(B1B) 962-1269
April :>~. 1989
To the City of San Bernardino:
The property at approximately 400 5 Allen street in the city
of San Bernardino, parcel number 136-251-28,29,30,31,40, is
currently for sale. I have delivered to the seller of the above
mentioned property an offer for the purchase of this property
with soecific terms and conditions.
The leading condition is it must be possible to locate ROHR
STEEL INC., a reinforcing steel resaler, fabricator and placer.
of which I hold 24% ownership, on the above mentioned prooerty.
Reinforcing steel fabrication requires the use of a few different
machines all of which generate small amounts of noises. The
mater.al IS shipped in via truck and trailer, fabricated to
different specifications. and sh.pped out via Rohr Steel's
bobtail trucks. Throughout the fabrication process all the
materials are handled with the use of fork lift trucks, and all
wor~ is done outdoors. The only building will be a combined
office and maintenance shop located at the front of the property.
The purchase of the above mentioned property is contingent
upon final approval by the city of San Bernardino and its
planning department, to allow ROHR STEEL INC. to conduct business
on the mentioned property.
Please contact me at this office if more informatior. is required.
/ ;;~~~' A~f-
Mart.n H. Rohr
ROHR STEEL INC.
, -..........
'1'-'1:
,
.,":-..-
0:
o
o
o
QltOlll/lq'}d
&IIIII"I!' AII"frrll 11111 t It'IH,.,.I,,1 I 11,,'111"1"/'" r-t:1 ". ..I,"J.J .I,tsJJ:'J~ [#J'!~.J
.. C"'./j. -
..;t
~
-.II ~ <t
.2
4.J -
tIC ~
'-J c;( <:: Lu
<: 4.J ~
4; {.!) :J: ~ .Q
'-1 Q;;
< 2 G ~ .
~ - ~ <:I
t-- D b;
~ -J
- -
< =s -
~ ICl -J
ft I.1J
0.: ~
<I:
VI
+- VJ
~ ;:2
~ ~
0 8 ~ P
'-.J ~
z: - 9
l-.U ::s
I-! lil ~
.
0
V) - ~
~ ~ '---
~
'-' l..U -<
\.J . ~
- VJ l-"
u.. 0 ;;!
u.. -
-I ~
a to
~
~
-
::::r: ~ \J
'vr ~ ~
, ~ -
-' ..,
~
- ...
3: ~
0
'13~ V '9 !WIlI ~d
.
)
r
,oa-z
t
'IS" N311'v
.,
"
.\
.-;:::J
'J
)
j
0:
o
o
o
RUSSELL L. MERWIN
Post Office Box 1088
Fontana, California 92334-1088
--.------------------------------
May 05, 1989
'~yor and Cammo~ Co~nsil
City of San Bernardino
jOO JrIorth "DII St.re~t
San Bernardino. California 92418
.~lP~
;/." " '<,/:..
if:>! ",..0/", r:\
, 11 II; " .
': >' Iit'r '~.:" . .
'JI"~ ~. '1 ...
--.,~.f :..~;..; t.} ~ '.~
~ ~ ~.;4';; ~ ":". ':.
., ..",.....,
".10 . ,. .
'~'.
[~ar Ladies and Gentlemen:
'<
As you are ~resently scheduled to take up the land use port
"cneral plan update this coming Wednesday, May 10, 1969, that it is
~riate for me to ap?rise you of an inequitable decision of the Planning
Commission with reference to 888 Medical Center Drive, San Bernardino.
.
, \...-:
For your convenience I have enclosed a copy of the written remarks
which were submitted on behalf of the equitable pro~rty owner of the
property at the final land use public hearing of the Planning Commission,
whic~ arc incqrporated herein by this reference.
The decision of the Planning Commission prever"s the owner thereof
from legallY occupying his own property which is ","'sing him to default on
a condition hiG property insurance policy that he C~ occupy the property.
By forcing this property owner to dcfauJ.t on jis oroperty insurance
policy you are pla,:ing him at great risk of losing rroperty, as the terms
of the trust deed, wnich permitted him to acquire the property, will be
called, forr-ing hlm to pay Ii sum which he is not presently able to so do.
It is presently estimated that the tntal amount of damage the Planning
~=-nT.issicn'~ decision will create for thic property owner will be in exces~
of $115,000.--.
Unless the decision of t.he Planning (:ollllllision to zone the property
Rcr:idential Urban as opposed. to C'iMc~,-.i Jl (i~nC'ra:' : s o.~Tcr+:l.lrnp.d the
property owner will suffer grave consequences, as D~tlined above. ror which
-::cmpensation will be required. of YO!JT city's treasury.
It is ~herefore incumbent upon ea~h of you, in the best interests of
the Cj. ty Ci~ ~':3.n Bernardi no and its taxpayers. to overturn the Planning
Commission's rlecision and rezone the properties along Medical Center Drive
between Eighth and Binth Streets to Commercial General.
Very truly yours;
00 rn @ rn 0 \VI rn [ID
MAY - 9 1989
~J--~
Russel! L. Kerwin
CITY PLANNING DEPArtmENT
SAN BERNARDiNO. CA
~
o
o
o
109 EAST THIRD STREET. AREA 714 894-8217 . SAN BERNARDINO. CALIFORNIA 92410
FAX 714 889-0153
CIVIL ENGINEERING: SURVEYING
oom@~Jt1[[)
MAY 12 1989
May 11, 1989
CITV pi ., '- ."'" ''''''':NT
' ,L..,~. d, ~.... t~ ..: ,...11 IJ;.
S',."._'.. "-'''0 C'
,-~i\t ~::.l1hl-\ld.lll\l: , t\
The Honorable Esther Estrada
Councilwoman, First Ward
City Hall
300 N. "D" St.
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RE: GENERAL PLAN ISSUES - THIRD STREET BETWEEN WATERIfAN AVENUE
& WGO AVENUE
Dear Councilwoman Estrada:
Glen L. and Pearle A. Ludwig are owners of property between Third Street
and Bryant Street, westerly of Waterman Avenue. The Assessor's Parcel
Numbers are 135-251-05, 32, 54 and 56. A copy of the Assessor's Map is
enclosed.
The proposed General Plan of the City identifies the frontage lots on
Third Street as CO (Coamercial Office) and the lots on Bryant Street as
RMH (Residential Medium High).
The lots were purchased with the intent
Third Street frontage and utilizing the
parking with access to the parking lot from
vehicle access from Bryant Street).
of putting office uses on the
two lots on Bryant Street as
the Third Street frontage (no
We were recently advised that the transition designation in your City Code
which allowed for this type of design is no longer part of the Code and
that the proposed General Plan does not consider transitional uses between
zones.
We feel that the following items need consideration:
1. Present lot sizes of 50' x 135' are inadequate in width and area for
office/parking uses.
2. Combination of lots is desirable for better land utilization.
3.
Parking should be' allowed as a transitional use into adjacent lots
of multi-residential uses. Parking should be by site review of
staff or couaission to assure that walls, landscaping, etc. are
adequate to protect adjacent residences. Also, no access should be
permitted from the residential street.
-.... --,-----------_._._----........-,~._~--_......p.,.-,..,'.."
, ,
O'
c,
t
o
o
In our opinion, this type of transitional use into adjacent, more
restrictive zones will not adversely affect the residential street and
will benefit the overall uses of the coaaercially zoned properties.
Sincerely,
~
bg
cc: Brad Kilger, Director, Planning Dept.
Ene.
2/B/167
-__,'~",,"'.=o"""'''''''''' _._~..,. ~._.... '-", \ ~.....- ..-....~...':_.r_--:.:'""':'"'"=._.~~_':"'.. .....~_..,_---_...---- - --:,"'--. .-~....-, ,.,. .~
.,....: ..--.;-.------ ......- ..~..-..-._;-.-.-,._-,....-
o
.'
-.
~~: 'f!~~ - ..~ ~
, .' C\I
,
on
!!!
,','
~
C}!
I
I'
l..~
It!~
o
'Y:,r
", 'J1i'i~-.
; n'.;
. .':';~
...-;.;'.;
"-'"''
,,:
'''' ,'-~
..,~.
'.:;:~
......::
. '"
: ~~
. :r iii
It.:.j
I
@
.f
~ .~ a.
"
,
,
., -,
m
: i
..J ~
:':':-":1)
,~,.
~ .;~&.~ @
'~'~.M;~
.'. ;):/ill:\.....
: . .1! ~~/:?-' ~~-~
~ :;"~ ~~.";:-.
.~. ..:;.::":'::':~!:~..: .'
o
@
..J
~~.;'
~ ,
QIJIn .u.a 011.........
,ft. ..
,. t;
i -
-ID I :- At... - I ~
-
!!I I.. _ .. l!
.. . == I.. I.. =- I .. ..
I I I I
. I
:@ l! II ~
-
:'~ .. II ~
- -
..,. .. Il
~@ll! ..
.
..@ l! . e
..
" ,
@ "
s @:X
,
o
.
I
c 1 I
HWlll!irAl_
~ ~
I ,,. I ....
I I ! ..
~
~ @ I f) I
0 ;; . I .. I..
.. .. I .. I..
, ,
@l!
<I> ~
---- ~
,.....-; ,ll- "li>
1'(
~ .' I <J
.."(....
.'
li}! :@
@!I :: <J
@! ;; <I:
@ : :: <I
e> 2 .. @
..
@. .
..
----
'3 · e
..
_. <ID
0 -------
.. . ::
.
0
"'--.---r-."1--T--r-
. I I , I
. . , . I .. I.. 1-
oe
- I ~I , ,
I ~lll , , ~ 'I
I , I
I I -, I I ..
, I I , I
, ....
/QTW "
.I' ...
@ @ @ @ I-
<i @ ..
..
!! 0 ;; .. .. .. ::
.. .. .. ..
, ..
, <9 . II l!l 'q
e ~ e @
.. <ID
@,,,., t=.Sl_ .'"
.~
0 . I @
t:'I .. e r.:.
~~ n ~
lI.~:..: .t ".)
... ...~ ~": -
-.. ...~ ,..
. --
on~
t\I8
.
lif f:
""on! "
111).. l::
--. .....
hIS f"
""11I11I'1:'
I; . t'
i 'h
11 r.i
I., ~
!3a ~
_as.! ,~
II
. ~
R
~
r
tt
..
..
I.'
t
I.;
I'~
11
J: .
.i-:
l
.'
~-
r
l~~
f.
i
-~
"~
-.
.----. :
ae.! \
,I
K
.f
I'.
"
.
;.
j:
F:\'
~
.,
,.
I:
r
I'
0:'
o
o
.:)
c,.
APPLICATION OF AN PHAK
RE:
aaa Ked~cal Center Dr~ve
Page 1
1. Subject property is located at the South West corner of the
intersection of 9th Street and Medical Center Drive.
2. The subject property has an underlying zone of C-2, and the Plan-
ning Commission/Citizen's Advisory Committee made a final recomendation, on
February 06, 1989. that it be zoned gesidential Urban in the Draft General
Plan.
3. The subje~t property. though having attached single family resi-
dences to the North. detached single family residences to the Vest and East
except for the properties located on ledtcal Center Drive, is adjacent
to commercially imprcved properties of a very intense useage and is thus
thoroughly compatible with the surrounding environs.
4. Subject property consists of approximately 1080 square feet of
improved, enclosed space on a lot of approximately 7,293.875 square feet.
5. The construction of the subject property consists of 2" x 6" wood
framing. 16" on center with "." Plaster/Drywall interior finishes and a
Stucco/plywood exterior finish on the forth, East and South sides and
corrugated metal on the West [RearJ side.
6. The general facade and general exterior architectural treatment and
design more closely resembles that of a residen..ial as opposed to a
commersial character.
7. Subject property's present improvements were constructed pursuant
to building permit number 24981. which were completed on or about January
10, 1955; and continue to maintain its structural integrity.
8. T~e :nter1or layout and design of ~he subjec~ prapertylE 1~prove-
ments are solely suited to auto related uses.
9. The requested usage 0: the subject propertv Nill not create any
significant increase in. daily tr.3.f!ic .:ounts as at ?r~-3ent the intersection
of 9th and Xedic3~ Cen~er Dri7e is approximately one-half of the daily
traffic .,....ol.1InS 0: 9th and Mt:'unt Ve:-r~cn A.,enue.
10. The applicant has investment backed expectat.ions for the continue1
:cmme~ci31 use of the sub;~ct pro?erty, ~s the subject pro?erty.s improve-
mants were made pursuant to a valid and properly issued building permit,
\.....
\,/
0:
o 0
APPLICATION OF AN PHAX
RE:
888 Xed~cal Center Dr~ve
Page 2
o
the property is still within the building codes requirement for a newly
constructed stru~ture for similar purposes and was purchased with the
intent of usin~ it for the purpose of which the building was most clearly
suited.
11. The applicant cannot obtain a certificate of occupancy for nor may
the applicant upgrade the appearance of the subject property unless the
zoning of the property is restored to that of an appropriate commercial
nature.
12. This body and the Mayor and Common Council have previously approved
commercial zoning, of the like kind being requested, during the instant
revision of the City's General Plan and are thus estopped from denying the
appl:c3nt's request.
CONCLUSION
If this body continues to deny the applicant's request, it does so with
the knowledge that it is in contravention of the most recent decisions on
the taking of private property for public use [and the requirement that
just compensation be paid therfore, which includes the cost of acquiring
comparable replacement property,] of the federal courts and will subject
the City to such liability.
......~~:~.
,"
\:.