Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutR04-Redevelopment Agency o c o lJ I H REDEVELOPMEJT>AGENCY - REQUEST FOR COMMIS~~O~NCIL ACTION ~: MARCH 8. 1989 SUBJECT: RIALTO Il< "I" - PHILLIPS PROPOSAL SvnoDsls of Previous Commission/Council/Committee Action: 08-15-88 Authorized the expenditure of up to $5.000 for security and clean up and to give an exclusive listing to a local broker for the appraised value ($455.000). 02-24-89 Committee reviewed the Phillips proposal. (COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION) Recommended Motion: That the Commission reject Mr. Darrell A. Phillips' acquisition proposal for the Agency-owned property at 101 North "I" Street. Contact Person: Steven H. Dukett Phone: 384-5081 SUDDortlnq data attached: Yes Hard: 3rd FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Project: UT Date: MARCH 13. 1989 Council Notes: SHD:GH:sm:4889G Agenda Item No. o 3) 3/f? \\ o o o . o o S T A F F R E P 0 R T The purpose of this report Is to present a third proposal by Mr. Darrell A. Phillips to purchase the Agency-owned property at 101 North "I" Street (Mental Heath Bulldlng) . The proposal should be rejected because it is less than the appraised value, It overencumbers the property, It would put the Agency Into a long escrow while the buyer tries to work out his concepts with the City departments and It would prevent the Agency from considering a reuse of the property that would conform to the new General Plan. BACKGROUND The Agency-owned property at 101 North "I" Street, consists of two parcel s - a 12,648 square foot parking lot and a 36,061 square foot parcel Improved with a structure containing 10,000 square feet on the main floor and a 3,000 square foot basement. The property Is a former elementary school building which has been rehabilitated and converted to office use. The structure Is 61 years old, and In overall poor condition. In January 1985, the Redevelopment Agency purchased this property for $600,000 (based upon a contemporaneous appraisal of $590,000). The property was purchased to facilitate the relocation of the Mental Health Association of San Bernardino County (Mental Health) who were then located on property which was to be developed for low-cost housing. The Agency entered Into a 5-year lease with Mental Health In January 1985. Mental Health made only one lease payment and, after extended negotiations, they vacated the premises on July 8, 1988. On July 7, 1988, appraiser Edward G. Hill, Jr. appraised the property at $455,000. This Is approximately $210,000 less than the Agency has Invested In the building (see the attached expense analysis). On August 15, 1988 the Commission authorized the Agency to list the property with a real estate broker for the $455,000 fair market value. This was done and (separate from the listing) two offers were received from Mr. Darrell Phillips. These offers were unacceptable as they were substantially below fair market value and would have resulted In a net cash outflow from the Agency. Staff has concluded that the possibility of receiving an all cash offer seems remote. Moreover, the present building does not conform with the adopted Interim Plan Document. As an alternative, staff Is exploring the possibility of securing a master developer to master plan the entire block between Rlalto and Second Street. In an effort to determine the feasibility of such development and the level of Agency assistance, we have requested Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. to do an economic analysis. However, In recognition of Mr. Phillips' past Interests, and In keeping with the concept of a whole-block development, he was offered an opportunity to simultaneously submit a proposal to develop the entire block. SHD:GW: sm:4889G 2 o o o JL I JU o o Based upon Mr. Phillips' January 12, 1989 letter In response to this offer, It was apparent that he misunderstood the parameters of the proposed transaction. As a follow-up, on January 27, 1989 a letter was forwarded to Mr. Phillips to cl~rlfy the matter. On February 9, 1989, Mr. Phillips and a representative of his broker, Ms. PeggyAnn Morley, appeared before the Redevelopment Committee to discuss their previous offers. On February 15, 1989, Mr. Phillips' third proposal was received (see attached) from Ms. Morley. It Is Important to note that there Is a typographical error In the second line of the first paragraph under "TERMS". The First Trust Deed amount of $213,000 should read $273,000. Staff has analyzed Mr. Phillips proposal (see attached summary) and recommended rejection for the following reasons: 1. Sale Is not for all cash. 2. Broker/buyer has no equity Investment. The entire purchase price of $455,000 Is financed by First and Second Trust Deeds totaling $73,000 more than the sales prices and appraisal value. 3. The Agency has the potential of being liable for $105,300 more than cash actually received. 4. The contingencies (Including "approval of all city agencies") cannot be clearly Interpreted. Mr. Phillips' broker, Ms. Morley, appeared at the February 24, 1989 Committee meeting and represented that Mr. Phillips had a substantial net worth; that he would provide audited financial statements to the Agency; and that he would personally guarantee the first and second deeds of trusts. No financial statements have been received nor has Mr. Phillips confirmed that he would be willing to guarantee the two deeds of trust. Ms. Morley also passed out the attached, undated "PROPOSAL FOR MENTAL HEALTH BUILDING" at the February 24, 1989 meeting. It contains a number of errors, Including: a) "Cash to RDA" would only be $163,600 (not the $200,000 shown In the proposal) because the broker's commission and escrow costs would be deducted by the escrow company. b) The second trust deed Is at 101 Interest with Interest only payments made In arrears. Thus the loan earns $25,500 per year (not the $27,500 shown In the proposal). c) The present value of the total of all the payments on the second trust deed Is $255,000 at 101 (not $550,000 as Implied by the proposal). SHD:GH:sm:4889G 3 o o o o o d) The return to the Agency Is: $163,600 Sales proceeds $255,000 Value of second trust deed ~418 600 Total return Thus, the total return Is substantially less than the $750,000 Indicated In the proposal and Is even less than the sales price. Moreover, the building would be encumbered with $528,000 In liens leaving the Agency $110,600 short If It needed to redeem the property shortly after the close of escrow. Based upon all the above, it is recommended that the Commission reject Mr. Phillips' third purchase offer. SHD:GH:sm:4889G 4 o o o o o SUMMARY OF THIRD PHILLIPS OFFER Offer by Phillips to Purchase Mental Health Building Presented to RDA staff on February 15, 1989 Sales Price $455,000 FINANCING 1st Trust Deed (Buyer to obtain) 2nd Trust Deed to RDA at 101 for 10 yrs., Interest only with no payments for 1st yr. $273,000 255,000 $528,000 CASH FLOW TO RDA Cash from 1st Trust Deed* Broker Commission Closing Costs (estimated) Cash Flow Cash In $200,000 Cash Out Net Cash In $27,300 9,100 $36,400 $200,000 $163,600 *Balance of $73,000 to be held In reserve COMMENTS: 1. Actual offer Is at appraised Fair Market Value. 2. Building would be encumbered by $528,000 In loans which Is $73,000 above Fair Market Value and sales price. 3. RDA's net cash received would be approximately $163,600. 4. Buyer/Broker Is obtaining the building with no equity commitment and Is receiving $73,000 In proceeds from the 1st Trust Deed. 5. If buyer defaults on the 1st Trust Deed, RDA would have to cure any default on 1st Trust Deed and would remain liable on 1st Trust Deed If RDA foreclosed. Paying off the 1st Trust Deed could cost $110,600 more than RDA would have received. 6. Broker/buyer would receive $100,300 In proceeds ($27,300 commission plus $73,000 from 1st Trust Deed) with no obligation to make any payments to the RDA for one year. SHD:GW:sm:4889G ~ 0 0 101 N. "I" BUILDING EXPENSES 0 Through February 28, 1989 Acquisition of Building: Deed of Trust $600,000.00 Escrow Fees 598.00 Taxes (Escrow) 2.352.99 $602,950.99 Interest on Notes: Bunker/Swing 65,161.21 S.B.Clty Unified 6,075.00 71,236.21 Maintenance: Insurance 3,217 .00 Clyde Thompson Con. 176.00 Locks & Keys 274.57 Grounds Maintenance 2,357.29 6,024.86 Utili tl es: Hater 577 .91 Electric 1 ,537 .72 Trash 225.33 2,340.96 0 Legal: City 737.59 Sabo & Deitsch 3.470.50 4,208.09 Adml nl stratlve: Appraisal 2,500.00 Reconveyance Fee 80.00 Staff Tlme* 2.815.00 5,395.00 TOTAL EXPENSES $692 _ 156 _ 11 RENT RECEIVED: July 1985 $ 3,900.00 September 1987 10,000.00 March 1988 13,750.00 TOTAL RENT RECEIVED ~ 27.650.00 NET EXPENSES ~664 506. 11 0 *Staff time Is calculated for the period 7/87 through 12/88. SHD:GH:sm:4889G 6 ~- 1 r t I , , " . , 0 , ; . o o .--- LOMA LINDA FINANCIAL SERVICES JJ 306 Mountain View A ve., Suite D Loma Unda, California 92354 February 13. 1989 Redevelopment Aaency City of San Bernardino 300 Morth 'D' Street San Bernardino. CA 92418 t Attn: Steven Dultett Reference: Commercial property located on I Street. San Bernardino The enclosed offer is being presented by PeggyAnn Morley. President of Lama Linda Financial. Ma. Morley is acting as agent and representative for the Buyer. Mr. Darrell Phillips. o Offer to be at a total .alea price of................................$45S,OOO.OO TE1lMS : Buyer and property to qualify and secure a purchase money 1st Trust Deed in the aaount of $213.000.00 of which $200.000.00 shall be applied to the down payment. The remainder (approximately $73.000.00) shall be held in reserves for interest, design. architecture and closing costs. Buyer requests the Seller to carry a 2nd Trust Deed in the amount of spproximately $255~000.00 at 10% interest only for 10 years. First years payments shall be deferred for 12 aonths to allow redevelopment of subject property. This offer shall include commission to be paid to Loma Linda Financial in the amount of $27.300.00 or 6% of the total sales price. Offer shall be contingent on: 1. Approval of all city agencies involved in this property. 2. Interior inspection by Buyer. 3. Approval of preliminary title report. Buyer shall upon City approval open escrow with a good faith deposit of $5,000.00. o 1 I . r to I, ~ i t I ~ ~. o o o o Page 2 of 2 Offer 1 Street Buyer wishes to work with the City of San Bernardino to return this comaereial property baclt to the tax rolls as well as provide the City with . profitable cosmercial structure. aeapectfully OJ reggyAnD Morley President l1~ cc: AnD Harris Main Street Amended offer dated February 14. 1989 ~ :: . o o o o LOMA LINDA FINANCIAL SERVICES 11306 Mountain View Ave., Suite D Lorna Linda, California 92354 o PROPOSAL FOR MENTAL HEALTH BUILDING COMMERCIAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 101 NORTH "I" STREET SALE OF PROPERTY $455,000.00 200,000.00 DOWN PAYMENT CASH TO RDA 200,000.00 NEW 1ST T.D. 273,000.00 IN RESERVES TO LENDER 73,000.00 RDA TO CARRY 2ND MORTGAGE AT 10% FOR 10 YEARS 255,000.00 FINANCIAL BENEFITS TO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO IF OFFER IS-ACCEPTED: Property to be put back on tax rolls at the sales price of $455,000.00 which will bring revenue tQ the City at an estimated tax rate of 1% annual tax return of $4,550.00 (estimated tax return). Second Trust Deed to earn interest at a rate of 10% per annum for 10 years which should earn approximately $27,500.00 per year. Over the life of the loan should earn approximately $275,000.00 with a balloon payment of $275,000.00 at the end of its term. Total return to the City should be $750,000.00. Allowing for a 6% sales commis- sion of $27,300.00 plus an estimated closing cost of 2% or $9,100.00. Net return to the City wouild be $44,600.00 FINANCIAL EFFECT TO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO IF OFFER IS DECLINED: 1st Example: Allowing "the building to remain as is while studies are being accomplished ~il1 cost the City per day approximately $183.20 on funds extended previously at the legal rate of return of 10%, because the funds are extended and the property would not be increasing in value in its current condition. '. - " " o .' '0 o j . I. o o Page 2 of 2 Offer I Street 2nd Example: If building is demolished reducing value to land only. Normal value of industrial property is $2.75 to $3.00 per square foot, making the property worth $146,124.00 at best case. Causing a loss of $522,509.37. '. .r:'"r --~.., . "