Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-Mayor's Office . - - CITY' OF SAN BERtOlDI NO - REQUEST tOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: 2/16/89 REC'O.-AOMIM. OFk~bject: Resolution of the City of San Bernardino MIa FES 2\ I'l~ 3: 44 Authorizing the Execution of a Bill of Sale bll~ for the Sl ide Show Presentation "Why Herge l'lith San Bernardino?" ~f., J I""." "V I From: Mayor Evlyn Wilcox Dept: Mayor 's Offi CEl Synopsis of Previous Council action: December 5th Mayor Wilcox directed the Acting City Administrator to conduct a complete audit of the slide show presentation entitled "Why Merge With San Bernardino?" to determine total costs involved in producing the show. Recommended motion: Approve resolution. ~~,d,2J~ Contact person: Mayor Evlyn Wil cox Supporting data attached: Yes Phone: 384-5051 Ward: FUNDING REOUIREMENTS: Amount: Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. DescriPtion) Finance: Council Notes: 75-0262 Agenda Item No. /1" - . . - .dIL. - - o o 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF BILL OF SALE. 3 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNC~ OF THE CITY 4 OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 5 SECTION 1: The Mayor of the City of San Bernardino is 6 hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City 7 of San Bernardino a Bill of Sale, for all copies of a slide 8 presentation entitled "Why Merge with the City of San 10 Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference as fully as 9 Bernardino," a copy of which is attached hereto, and marked 11 though set forth at length. 12 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 14 13 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 15 Bernardino at a , 19 meeting thereof, held.on the day of , by the following vote, to 16 wit: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 AYES: Council Members NAYS: ABSENT: City Clerk 24 III 25 III 26 III 27 III 28 III DAB:mw February 15, 1989 '. 1 . . . 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 - o .1 o " 1 The foregoing Resolution is hereby approved this 2 day of 3 4 5 6 7 Approved as to form and legal content: 8 9 JAMES~PENMAN~ City Attorney BY:' t r~ C . 25 26 27 DAB:mw 28 February 15, 1989 , 19 Mayor, Pro Tempore rJ. , 2 .::.; . o o , BILL OF SALE Know All Men by these presents that the City of San Bernardino, California, in consideration of $4,594.20 paid and delivered by Evlyn E. Wilcox of San Bernardino, California, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby sell, assign, convey, transfer and deliver to the said Evlyn E. Wilcox the following goods: All exisiting copies of the slide presentation prepared during 1986 and entitled "Why Merge with the City of San Bernardino." To Have and To Hold the same unto the said Buyer and the heirs, executors, administrations, successors and assigns of the said buyer forever. Dated , 1989. Mayor, Pro Tempore EXHIBIT "A" \ Jt[ . - C I T J:)O F SAN B ERN A R Dc:? N 0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 8812-628 FROM: Mayor wilcox James E. Robbins, Acting city Administrator TO: SUBJECT: Financial Report regarding Highland Slide Presentation Annexation DATE: January 17, 1989 COPIES: Attached is the Finance Director's report on the Annexation Slide Presentation. Based upon his report, an additional $3,569.96 can be documented as incidental or indirect cost involved in the production. Approximately $530.10 in materials cost has been identified but is inadequately documented to include the overall costs. A question was raised as slides were from earlier approximately $8.00 could to staff time productions. be charged for in production. Most Mr. Green indicates current posing. The slide presentation should be seen by Council prior to making decisions regarding cost allocation. The production clearly indicates benefits and answers questions about being a part of the City of San Bernardino. It could be used for civic and school presentations. The general public and students would then better understand why we have cities and how we pay for services. , A position can be made that since the production was made prior to Highland being incorporated, that a particular annexation or incorporation was the reason and/or target. Equally, a position can be made that the production, in th~t it does not name any area, was made for general use ~n discussing with any group the benefits of being a part of the City of San Bernardino. Further, the production can be considered an educational tool that explains some City services and some of the methods of paying for City services. You have the cost remaining are, if the for the annexation of the additional costs, information requested. The questions production is a specific advocacy piece Highland; and, if the Mayor does.__-I1.?Y is the production hers? . . '0'" . 1(" -, ~ ";"-.,, '" '.'.' \'::.; \\ t~ e IdRf4~:..o JAMES E. ROBBINS Acting city Administrator . ~, .\ ,\ .. "; . - . - - , .. o. o. C I T Y 0 F SAN B ERN A R 0 I N 0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 8812-1703 TO: JIM ROBBINS, ACTING ADMINISTRATOR, ADMINISTRATION FROM: ANDREW M. GREEN, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE SUBJECT: ANNEXATION FILM DATE: December 19, 1988 COPIES: ------------------------------------------------------------- In septe~er 1986 a slide show presentation on the benefits of annex1ng into the City of San Bernardino was created. This slide show was produced by Latent Images in cooperation with various city personnel. I have talked to the City personnel involved with producing the slide show in an effort to ascertain the amount of city- personnel time and materials used on this project. It appears that there were primarily two areas that did extensive work on the slide show presentation. These areas were: the Mayor's office and the Redevelopment Agency. Greg Garcia of the mayor's office stated that all work that he performed in regards to the slide show was accomplished above and beyond his normal 40 hour work week. All other work was done by an intern who was not paid. Some Police and Fire Department's personnel were involved in posing for some of the slides. As far as I can ascertain per my discussions with these departments the Police Department cost was approx- imately $8.00. The Fire Department informed me that all pictures of Fire Department personnel were from a pre- existing slide presentation produced by the Fire Department. It was very difficult to audit City personnel time used in producing the slide show due to the fact that nothing was documented. The total amount billed to RDA originally was $2,241.25 (81.5 hours at $27.50 per hour). There was then an amended invoice sent to RDA for the slide presentation for the amount of $453.75 (16.5 hours at $27.50 per hour). This amended invoice reclassified 65 hours of the original 81.5 slide show presentation hours to other projects. RDA paid the amended invoice and invoiced the city for $1,024.24. The City never paid this bill. The RDA invoice of $1,024.24 was eventually paid by Mayor Wilcox. j i-, 'I j -. u ~,.,,' , . o. o. I . INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM: ANNEXATION FILM December 12, 1988 Page 2 8812-1703 A recap of the cost to RDA per my audit for the slide show presentation was as follows: Amount paid to Latent Images Amount reimbursed by Mayor wilcox Time spent by RDA personnel: $2,241.25 <1,024.24> Moe Estevene 95.5 hours at $24.51 (Art wor~). Barbara Lindseth (Audit) 2.352.96 Total RDA Costs 3.569.97 other City expense in connection with this slide the research time involved to produce this and other The only show was reports. If I can be of any further assistance please let me know. Ov~~ fJ~~ Andrew Green Director of Finance kp *This amount does not include materials. An approximate amount for materials of $530.10 was provided by Barbara Lindseth. It is impossible to accurately audit this amount due to lack of documentation.