The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About14-Development Services . OR1G::JAL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: William Woolard, Interim Director Subject: Adopt Negative Declaration for State Street improvements from 16th Street to 5th Street. Dept: Development Services Date: October 25,2000 File No. 1.7060 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: MCC Date: 1/08/01 None Recommended Motion: That the Mayor and Common Council adopt the (Mitigated) Negative Declaration for State Street improvements from 16th Street to 5th Street ~;(JkJJ~d - William Woolard Contact person: T. larb Thaioeir. Senior Civil Engineer Phone: 5127 Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Map Ward: 6 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/ A Source: (Acct. No.) Acct. Description: Finance: Council Notes Agenda Item No. ~ Ilt/ol CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subiect: Adopt Negative Declaration for State Street improvements from 16th Street to 5th Street. Backl!round: The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines dictate that the construction of a new roadway, or substantial improvements to an existing street such as lane widening, etc., require an environmental approval by the authorizing agency. An Initial Study was prepared for the project and reviewed by the Development/Environmental Review Committee (D/ERC) on July 17, 1997. Based on its review of the Initial Study, the D/ERC recommended that a (Mitigated) Negative Declaration be prepared and adopted by the Mayor and Common Council, but no action was taken to the Council at that time. The Initial Study was made available for public review from July 19, 1997 to August 6, 1997. No comments were received from members of the public or responsible agencies. In addition, an updated field review performed by Tom Dodson and Associates on November 9, 2000 confirmed that there has been no change in the environmental condition since the last Initial Study. At its meeting of 12/21/00, the D/ERC again recommended that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the (Mitigated) Negative Declaration. Financial Imllact: There is no financial impact. Recommendation: That the Mayor and Common Council adopt the (Mitigated) Negative Declaration for State Street Improvements from 16th Street to 5th Street. ~:;:: .~ .9 ~.~ :-.: ...., ~ .:...,,:: l-.: ~~ U.~ - ~ a~ ::i 8:: ~~ .~ ~ '1j ...., ~~ ~V':l E~ ~~ cq~ ~ ~~ ~Q VJ~ ...... ~'~ O~ .~ ~ UQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N V:l ~ &S V:l ~ V) a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V:l ~ \0 ~ a ~~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;:. ~ a ~ \,,;) ~ ~ ~ ~ -" "" c.;:; lr)~ ::.Q. t).)~ ~:::: ~(,,) ~. ~~ -"" ..;: V)O r'\-..... ::::: .....~ ~ '" '" - "t ~'" c-" '" -,,- '" "Or) '::! f" ~ - -'" Vj~N ~~ ~ ;.:::L.~ ~ ~\O ~ <;l..., ~ ~.8 """-l '" ::- """, ~ "'''' ~ "':: ' ~.- ~ ~~ c., -S? ~ ~ ."'Cl:i ~ :5,9 ~ '" .5 CQ .9 ~ '-I - '" '" '''<is '" -s 0 ~ 0\ ~ a:: "" "" 00 - '" ~ .;; -SO') '" '" c '" - '::! ~ a:: ~ ~ . o ~ I t ,-~~~ ,I ~4.J1l.:lli- 1 1 -; I .... ; i ..- I II -'I ~ I I l l$l!.U ! ., j 'I-III 1"I'I~'., .'" . I' \ /' I \1 ~ ~. 'n" IflL ~'U .L c"j ,..., E-: ~~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ INITIAL STUDY v - f~ r') ~ tJ Public Works Project PWP97002 Project Description/Location: Construction of State Street from Rancho Avenue to 16th Street, including construction of bridges over the Lytle Creek Channel, construction of a bridge over the Lytle Creek overflow spillway, and acquisition of right-of-way. Date: June 2, 1997 Applicant: Department of Public Works/City Engineer City of San Bernardino San Bernardino, CA 92418 Prepared by: Michael W. Grubbs Senior Civil Engineer City of San Bernardino Department of Public Works/City Engineer 300 North "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Y(o. (f (If/ol INITIAL STUDY Public Works Project PWP97002 INTRODUCTION This Initial Study is provided by the City of San Bernardino for Public Works Project PWP97002. It contains an evaluation of potential adverse impacts that can occur if the proposed Public Works Project is approved. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from CEQA. The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from CEQA, qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be prepared. The following components constitute the Initial Study for PWP97002: . Project Description . Site and Area Characteristics . Environmental Setting . Environmental Impact Checklist . Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures . Conclusion/Environmental Determination Combined, these components constitute the complete Initial Study. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project consists of construction of a four lane arterial roadway beginning at the curve in Ranch Avenue just south of Foothill Boulevard, then bridging across Lytle Creek Channel and crossing Foothill Boulevard, then bridging across the Lytle Creek overflow spillway, thence northerly through the sand and gravel pits area to Base Line Street, thence northerly to join existing State Street near 16th Street. The work consists of roadway construction, including grading, paving, Curb & Gutter, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signals, bridges, signing and striping, and right-of-way acquisition. SITE AND AREA CHARACTERISTICS The site consist mainly of sand and gravel pits and flood control areas. Much of the sand and gravel mining at the site has been completed and the pits are being reclaimed under a mitigation plan prepared by Fourth Street Rock Crusher. Most of the area has been disturbed by the mining operation and surviving vegetation is sparse. City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact n...dr1iot PWP97002 Page 3 June 2, 1997 ENVIRONMENTAL SETIING The project site is located in a biological overlay area and the southern end of the site is traversed by the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone for the San Jacinto Fault. The project is located in the South Coast Air Basin. CITY CONTACT: Michael W. Grubbs, Senior Civil Engineer (909) 384-5179 City of San Bernardino Department of Public Works/City Engineer City of San Bernardino Environmentallmpact Checklist PWP97002 Page 4 . June 2, 1997 INITIAL STUDY for PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT PWP97002 ENVIRONMENT AL DETERMINATION ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY, o The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. . The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA Valerie Ross, Principal Planner Name and Title Signature Date City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist PWP97002 Page 5 June 2, 1997 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS Explain "Yes" and "Maybe" answers on a separate attached sheet. "No" answers are explained on !his checklist. The arrows between responses (for example, "Yes --> No") indicates that the identified impact will be reduced by mitigation measures to a level of insignificance. See Attachment "A" Preliminary Environmental Description Form, where necessary. 1. Earth Resources: Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) on slopes of 15 % or more based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. D.(3)? x b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15 % natural grade based on review of General Plan HMOD map, which designates areas of 15 % or greater slope in the Ci1y? _X_ c. Development within the Alquist- Priolo Special Studies Zone as defined in Section l2.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 47, of the City's General Plan? x ---> X d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature based on field review? _X_ e. Development within areas defined for high potential for water or wind erosion as identified in Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 53, of the City's General Plan? _X_ City of San Bcmardino Environmental Impact Checklist PWP97002 Page 6 June 2, 1997 f. Modification of a channel, creek Yes No Maybe or river based on review of USGS Topographic Map (Name) ? _X_ <--- _X_ g. Development within an area subject to landslides, mudslides, subsidence or other similar hazards as identified in Section l2.D-Geologic & Seismic, Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the City's General Plan? _X_ ---> X h. Development within an area subject to liquefaction as shown in Section l2.D-Geologic & Seismic, Figure 48, of the City's General Plan? X ---> _X_ i. Other? _X_ 2. Air Resources: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient air quality as defined by South Coast Air Quality Management District, based on meeting the threshold for significance in the District's, "CEQA Air Quality Handbook"? X <--- X b. The creation of objectionable odors based on information contained in Preliminary Description Form, No. G.(3)? _X_ c. Development within a high wind hazard area as identified in Section l5.D-Wind & Fire, Figure 59, of the City's General Plan? _X_ City of San Bemardino Environmental Impact Checklist PWP97002 Page 7 . June 2, 1997 3. Water Resources: Will the proposal Yes No Maybe result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces that cannot be mitigated by Public Works Standard Requirements to contain and convey runoff to approved storm drain based on review of the proposed site plan? _X_ <--- X b. Significant alteration in the course or flow of flood waters based on consultation with Public Works staff? X c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality based on requirements of Public Works to have runoff directed to approved storm drains? X d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground water? _X_ e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards as identified in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel Number 06071C8677 F, and Section 16.0-Flooding, Figure 62, of the City's General Plan? X <--- X f. Other? X City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist PWP97002 Page 8 June 2. 1997 4. Biological Resources: Could the proposal result in: Yes No a. Development within the Biological Resources Management Overlay, as identified in Section 10.0- Natural Resources, Figure 41, of the City's General Plan? x ---> X 1. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants or their habitat including stands of trees based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. B.(1) and verified by on-site survey/evaluation? X 2. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals or their habitat based on information contained in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. E.(2) and verified by site survey/evaluation? _X_ 3. Impacts to the wildlife disbursal or migration corridors? x b. Removal of viable, mature trees based on site survey/evaluation and review of the proposed site plan? (6" or greater trunk diameter at 4' above the ground) x c. Other? x Maybe ._-.... City of San Bernardino Enviromnentallmpact Checklist PWP97002 Page 9 June 2, 1997 s. Noise: Could the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Development of housing, health care facilities, schools, libraries, religious facilities or other noise sensitive uses in areas where existing or future noise levels exceed an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior and an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior as identified in Section 14.O-Noise, Figures 57 and 58 of the City's General Plan? X b. Development of new or expansion of existing industrial, commercial or other uses which generate noise levels above an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior that may affect areas containing housing, schools, health care facilities or other sensitive uses based on information in the Preliminary Environmental Description Form No. G.(l) and evaluation of surrounding land uses No. C., and verified by site survey/evaluation? X ---> X c. Other? X 6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in: a. A change in the land use as designated based on the review of the General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Districts Map? _X_ City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist PWP97002 Page 10 June 2, 1997 b. Development within an Airport District as identified in the Air Installation Compatible Use Yes No Maybe Zone (AICUZ) Report and the Land Use Zoning District Map? _X_ c. Development within Foothill Fire Zones A & B, or C as identified on the Development Code Overlay Districts Map? X d. Other? X 7. Ma~MadeHwmr~:~on information contained in Preliminary Environmental Description Form, No. 0.(1) and 0.(2) will the project: a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? X b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? _X_ c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? X d. Other? X 8. Housing: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing as verified by a site survey/evaluation? X b. Create a significant demand for additional housing based on the proposed use and evaluation of project size? X City of San Bernardino Environmentailmpact Checklist PWP97002 Page 11 . June 2, 1997 c. Other? X 9. Transportation/Circulation: Could Yes No Maybe the proposal, in comparison with the Circulation Plan as identified in Section 6.O-Circulation of the City's General Plan and based on the conclusions of the City Traffic Engineer and review of the Traffic Study if one was prepared, result in: a. A significant increase in traffic volumes on the roadways or intersections or an increase that is significantly greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? X b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities! structures? X c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? X d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? X ---> X e. Impact to rail or air traffic? X f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X g. A disjointed pattern of roadway improvements? X h. Other? X City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact C'h....klist PWP97002 Page 12 June 2, 1997 10. Public Services: Based on the responses of the responsible agencies or departments, will the proposal impact the following Yes No Maybe beyond the capacity to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? X b. Police protection? _X_ c. Schools (Le., attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? X d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X e. Medical aid? X f. Solid Waste? X g. Other? X 11. Utilities: Will the proposal: a. Based on the responses of the responsible Agencies, Departments, or Utility Company, impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? X 2. Electricity? X 3. Water? _X_ 4. Sewer? _X_ City of San Bcmardino Environmental Impact C"h.......list PWP97002 Page 13 June 2; 1997 5. Other? X b. Result in a disjointed pattern of utility extensions based on Yes No Maybe review of existing patterns and proposed extensions. X 12. Aesthetics: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any significant or important scenic view based on evaluation of the view shed verified by site surveyl evaluation? X b. Will the visual impact of the project create aesthetically offensive changes in the existing visual setting based on a site survey and evaluation of the proposed elevations? X c. Other? X 13. Cultural Resources: Could the proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site by development within an archaeological sensitive area as identified in Section 3.0- Historical, Figure 8, of the City's General Plan? X -...... City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact C1><dlist PWP97002 Page 14 June 2, 1997 b. Alteration or destruction of a historical site, structure or object as listed in the City's Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey? x c. Other? x 14. Mandatory Fmdings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Based on this Initial Study: a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Yes No Maybe x b. Does the project have the to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist PWP97002 Page IS June 2, 1997 c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) Yes No Maybe _x_ d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x B. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (The following responses are numbered to correspond to checklist items in the pz:evious section) 1. Earth Resources h. A portion of the site is located within an area designated as the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone of the San Jacinto Fault. The fault appears to cross the alignment approximately 1,500 feet north of Foothill Boulevard. Normally, a geologic investigation is required to locate faults in order to establish setback distances for habitable structures. A bridge structure is proposed in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, but no habitable structures are proposed. The site is covered by a thick layer of alluvial deposits, therefore, attempts to determine where faults cross the alignment would not be productive. A soils and geologic investigation will be require for the design of the bridge structure. A structuraI engineer will be retained to design the bridge and a requirement of the consultant agreement will be that the structural engineer obtain a soils and geologic study from a professional soils and geologic engineering and incorporate the results of the study in the design of the bridge structure. This mitigation will reduce potential seismic impact to a level of insignificance. . City of San Bernardino Environmental Impact Checklist PWP97002 Page 16 June 2, 1997 f. Lytle Creek Channel and the Lytle Creek overflow structure and spillway were constructed by the Corps of Engineers in phases of a period of years between the early 50's and 70's. After completion of construction these channels were turned over to the San Bernardino County Department of Transportation and Flood Control for operation and maintenance. This proposed bridge crossings over Lytle Creek Channel and Lytle Creek overflow spillway. This bridge construction will result in some modification of these concrete lined channels, however, the City will obtain all necessary permits from the San Bernardino County Department of Transportation and Flood Control and the Corps of Engineers for the channel modification and bridge construction. This mitigation measure will reduce potential impacts due to modification of these channels to a level of insignificance. g. The site is located in an area identified in the General Plan as susceptible to subsidence. A soils investigation will be conducted for the alignment prior to start of design. All recommendations of the soils investigation will be incorporated in the final design of the roadway and bridges. This mitigation measure will reduce potential impacts due to subsidence to a level of insignificance. h. The site is located in an area identified in the General Plan as susceptible to liquefaction. A soils investigation will be conducted for the alignment prior to start of design and will include an evaluation of the potential for liquefaction with recommended mitigation measures, if appropriate. All recommendations of the soils investigation will be incorporated in the fmal design of the roadway and bridges. This mitigation measure will reduce potential impacts due to liquefaction to a level of insignificance. 2. Air Resources a. The project could result in substantial air emissions or an effect upon ambient air quality as defmed by South Coast Air Quality Management District. An Air Quality Impact Forecast, dated May 1997, was conducted by Tom Dodson & Associates for the project. The forecast concluded that the proposed project will not result in generation of addition vehicle emissions due to an increase in the number of vehicle trips on the area roadways. . The forecast further concludes that the project will generally improve the circulation system thereby resulting in an unquantifiable overall reduction in pollutant emissions. To further reduce potential emissions, the City will implement the following measures: 1. Identify and construct the roadway and/or intersection improvements needed to improve the City of San Bernardino EnvironmentaIlmpact CheckJist PWP97002 Page 17 June 2, 1997 operation of those roads affected by this project. It is anticipated that improvements could include additional traffic lanes, additional turn lanes, and intersection controls (signals). 2. Monitor land development in the project area to ensure that further development does not impact roadways and intersections. Where necessary, adequate conditions of project approval shall be applied to minimize potential circulation system impacts. 3. Continue to monitor roadways and intersections in the project area to verify that adequate levels of service and operation are maintained. If levels of service and/or intersection operation declines the City shall identify the roadway and intersection improvements needed to improve traffic circulation. The City shall construct or require private parties to construct the needed improvements. Implementation of the above mitigation measures will reduce potential impacts of this project on Air Quality to a level of insignificance. 3. Water Resources a. This project could result in changes in absorption rate, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces; however, these effects can be mitigated by the standard Public Works requirement to contain and convey run-off to an approved storm drain. Incorporation of this mitigation measure in the design of the project will reduce potential impacts due to change of absorption rates, drainage patterns, and rate and amount of surface run-off to a level of insignificance. e. Portions of the project site are located in Flood Zone A as shown on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) dated 3-18-96. The remainder is in Zone X (unshaded) which designates areas of minimal flood hazard. The portions of the site in Zone A are the bridges and the Zone A is contained within concrete lined channels. The City will obtain all required permits from the San Bernardino County Department of Transportation and Flood Control and the Corps of Engineers for construction within Zone A. Inclusion of this mitigation measure in the design and construction of this project will reduce potential impacts from construction within Zone A to a level of insignificance. ' City of San Bemardioo Environmental Impact Cbecklist PWP97002 Page 18 June 2, 1997 4. Biological Resources a. This project proposes construction within an area of the City designated by the General Plan as Biological Resources Management Overlay. A Biological Assessment, dated May 6, 1997, was conducted by Tom Dodson & Associates. The report concludes that no listed species or sensitive biological resources will be affected by the project. Approximately 0.37 acres of highly degraded riparian habitat will be impacted by the proposed project. A U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 404 Permit, a State Water Quality Control Board 401 Certification, and a California Department of Fish and Game 1601 Agreement will be required for the project. Inclusion of the above mitigation measures in the design of the project will reduce potential impacts of the project on biological resources to a level of insignificance. 5. Noise b. The project will result in construction that may generate noise levels above an Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior or and Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior. There are no schools, housing, health care facilities or other sensitive uses adjacent to the project. Based on the above discussion, there will be no significant impacts from noise generated by the project, therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 9. Transportation/Circulation d. The project will alter present patterns of circulation. State Street is a shown as a major arterial highway on the City's General Plan and is intended to carry large volumes of traffic through the area. The result will be that less traffic will use local streets as thoroughfares which, in most cases, is a favorable effect. However, a study prepared by the City Traffic Engineer using data from the Southern California Associated Governments (SCAG) Regional Model for the year 2015, indicates that the level of service on some adjacent streets will degrade to LOS "F" if improvements are not made after State Street goes into service. These impacts and the proposed mitigation measures are discussed in Section 2.a. "Air Resources" . The mitigation measures proposed under" Air Resources" will reduce the impacts due to alteration of present patterns of circulation to a level of insignificance and, therefore, no additional mitigation are required. . City of San Bemardino Environmentallmpllcl Checklist PWP97002 Page 19 June 2, 1997 14. Mandatory Fmdings oC Significance a-d The responses to the checklist questions above indicate the proposed roadway project, including the proposed mitigation measures, will not have any significant impact on the environment. , v/~~.. ':;'.r. ~":'::. :~.:.; n-"'~ m~4rl' if: -. \';;~'>" V' ~I}::;:4I._,.. ....:(~ !"-r""::'Y', __~ os,~:" f../I. ..' 'f' ':0:"", "!"'-1 ..." .' '0 ....rJ ...... I .- ." ",.; ~..... ...... .. ,"a" 3JY" ':~Li SCA&!ton_'''~ ~ . .,.. <' '~A.'_____.,. .t..:, ......... ! .' P".,,!, (,.. ~ . .....::.- . ~;-.. ..~~.~..~~ .....l.N1a__ 'J.. '_~/~. .... '" . ,. I~.,' J" ..' '-'..G'~."P'll..:.''':'''~", ~ ," . ..... -- ";:.. .--- ~::--1::::r ..- :: I!!j :4- . .I.~ "..V; ~ . ........ :r 'j ,.0 ..: '.. ~. ... _ .....~. -41\ - .-_.y' I . .. ,C. '.~ .:' . .... ~':~~.'" .' .{i~~ fr-(j" I.. . W..~aDINci ...., '. '\~ . ........... . \) .... ,,'.. ./ .' I ?\~~~?-~~.; '. ../:. '.:~. '. A ~ ?tJ:: 6 ':101 :U\ .2~~ft...~. ..:~~.~ . /. j!!~Sck/ I ~A~\M';~' :.'. -~'W;: \~:. 1V' \ ~ .. ". ~ ~. . I .. \ ";":;,~' . :~... \, .~~-- h 11 ...... J_.>-.J :"'~~"'~~: :"\~.~" I I " ..~ ~\.. .::>.'F'''' 1...:L l ~ _ · A , ." .: <J ,~:r · ,..". ~(...,.. I.. 'f~,..:;,. ~..:" " ...L-.J _..J..__ p,-.... 0 . ~ ~~~ ~ !.:S :1".. ~ T.;:: I~ ~-~:~t~tt1 ~r" :: -1~: il . ,.~. ~ 'u~\\) \ V-...~:~ltj gl!l-' /0 ./' .,. ~ \:'\ "'~.'b~~~ oL ~l ..v ~: .:~.~. "~~: \ FIbod Co"..a"(J',. " I :; 1 I. . . '.. . .- I - ~ '.' . I 1f:-,r _1.-.. ! I 1. O.nn I!o... I.~ ..I-=-/ ~ (: /' ,f'::-.. \ ',/'... i "':j .JIJY.,. 0" :.~"r' 11 ~I ,.-=..r--!l. ,. ~ /;'" '=\\~ ", I~"'A"..I.CV ~ ~ "'.sr _ ~ , I' ..' , ........ I 't'S"" . . '.' .' . .. .'[.:.:A" -" ,.,- .,,,.,,_.. . "_ao. '-"1 _LVO I..., I ...0.: .. ---:'1;~\... . 1.A.,j..... .':.:.:"; ..:~:;:-..: 1"'- '-.;.."-- .. g.:-...::.:. '.:: 1!1:::!~'- '.."; :;....;~..: ..~"'~. ".: I . r'_~~~ ii :~'i..-- :'m l-.--.:... "it>!'" ::t~,. .. -........:....: . .'~ I -:J. .. . ~_ _, ........ 1'. j,.,-....-...... a_ 10 !IT .do:" ~ GOlf cOut!f'"""'~-l';=:::::;-:' aeJ LIt;;;"-NT: I . I -!1M :./ - if; i::::::;;:~....../ . . Y:;-1L! <0 - , ....t;1_ ....-...... S<o ~'" i,;;;,;...:.lo!'<" _ ....r~'&r.y.s;r{{I .' . -f' ,-. - . .~r .......... ~.,:~/ f~ L~:,,:j~'/' ., ..j,~,,\:~~;b""~/~ ~ .~-. ici:.......,'...h........-i.' =e:. .'I~ . 1'1,1 _"'-.!'" 0' ......,--.. -," \\ .,~ I -t ~/"" ~----.-- .:J!. .., .. " T It' .' -. \\ ~ -' ... j _..- : : l:S6 T ..t.a....uc: i I i ..........~~ . \ ~.I I' ..... ~!0 - - '. :......"'~.;..... . - -.. I ":"~a.:tf 4 ,... _ _~'='_~__ - .. I. .., :-"':'i ~- \."', __ ....l~" ,..' ~l J . ;I ~ I' \ ..:!R'''l~( ...."":. "~I"Cf Iy,p..! . . .:,;'.I.~~Q;_- I ... . I .......... .,'. '. . .'). ... ..... .... ..::...:....- ~ _____....- hi.....:::... 'Ill- ~ . -..-" .~.:..w....."'--~ . _' ; I / t.- ~."" _:J """':.:"t""',."Io1 ;.. .~\. ;;-\.. ....;.....,.. Tl" --~--::::::=:-- V ..' '; _ ~. :..: . ':~...' :~).~ j~~'o' '.~ ;.;;";.:eJC;;.~. .S<O'7a~;2,-;;:~, c,.:~ - - . .~ ~ "- ~,.,., ~ '. .:0' . :-:~-~ -_.- Lytl. _~c:-..:._ .........: ~ ,. ~"''', _ .:. :.n '.'''''-'--':'..''__::~; /.,. .' ;';,."~~:~~i.::'::....: .:. .....~ . ~ - .~-:-- - ~.~.:__ r::': _ ' ,I~....-....-..-.,.-...-..-.-. ..... '~if : ! - I ~ .:.-=: L .' s;......;... ~. .:' .('. .: .~~'-'-:T;~'-' !T:'}~~~-)"-'::~:.".~;:l_!, '~1~':':~:'~' . ~: ~ .~+' :,..., 'J ~ -'':>-- ' "' '" . ...... ~u'I.." ~ 5,,10 ;-.... .-' ~~_... .._.. .# _ .:. :. .....: \ '_... ~ : r:.IJI.:c:-..a...~:\ e_,,- ._ - __' ~. ~....:.~~__~;:.. ~=...:;.j~1 ....:..i ";:-:!.l":Sc:-: L r....- - - .! I . -fl"C'- r -,,: ~ ... =--f ,i ,-- ... ~ ..' ,. ~ __ ":;' ;-- ., . '-:. . ';... _ - f-~ _ .~. tl..... c;. . ~~..~.4. "'!. ,!.;.:..- L: ~ - ._ _~_ .oV'" : ___ ~ -- ~ _'-;" 't:~'!'" .1. ~ t . ",. .-. .: ~ ~ .... -,-"R.-na "I - - ~ .p. ... ~ . 7". .-- ...:_ ',;: '__,_ .~.....s~-:::""'''' .-J', _.... ;.":: 3.~"t~~ino~' : .....-: ~ ,>- ~ ~.:-Ic:Kiftle,. ___ _' - t__:t'J' \,..2I.t'~t'. ~' .: _:.1.- ---..., I c.'::: =. Sc:!\ - 1;1- -~, ;_.~_..-: ':' t ... _ _~ ,.' t _ \ _ -=.-: ~ .; ::~....; '._':,;~,; ~~--==--~ ~--! .' :~, ;'.' r~~ ..--.' *.- =- ~.6:'" :t '~.." _-:;':1> _ ~ _____, . - --:,.$ ~. t. ' .. _ .... ... -~~,'_ ._ - ....:...::-~...- 'r _:. - ,:1. ... - 4' -----:--"":....~ ._~.--~" -- r-tl:._ _ -1 h .,;"~-.:.. "'~., .....~.~;'.;. .. '_,.- ! ~ -: .. .. tV rn .I ,V .,.; I /~ . ~ ~ .-' /. I II~,.:~ Y'hS' ,/1 Ir o u r~OP05fD All G N !v1EN T . ... . . . . . . . . .......- ~,..... - ~..ua. J s.~ ILi- tJl .. ,il.. ..- ..., ,llaM 1131 , ~:! . . ~~ I 'IM .32 . la ~ " to BASE LINE laa ~ l.---'" l " ~ ~rl~.~. _.... 1 '1' ...., . ~ T E ell to...:r._'.i'" ..~j)." " Ie . '" I~ ../ . /.~ /i . :W~ " i ~